none, Addition to SFR, Correspondence• •
C1t °be /lin8 �ur�
50TH ANNIVERSARY
1957 — 2007
June 13, 2007
Mr. and Mrs. Don Martin
59 Crest Road East
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION PARKING ALONG CREST ROAD ROADWAY
EASEMENT
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Martin:
Thank you for speaking with me today concerning the letter we received from Mrs. Linda
Severy. You informed me that you received the letter as well. In the letter, Mrs. Severy,
who resides at 29 Crest Road East, states that the construction workers working on your
new residence at 22 Crest Road East are continually parking along the easement in such a
way that they block her sight distance as she exits from her driveway. Mrs. Severy has
spoken to me several times in the past with the same concern. Each time I contacted your
construction manager to inform him of the complaint and asked him to have the workers
move their vehicles. That seemed to work for few days or a week and then, according to
Mrs. Severy, they would resume parking their vehicles and heavy equipment close to her
driveway.
I understand that the construction will be completed within two or three weeks and that
this issue will be resolved. However, meantime, please inform your construction manager
to speak to the workers and ask them to either park on the property or on the north side of
the easement adjacent to your property.
The resolution of approval of your project states that "all parking shall take place on the
project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking may take place within nearby
roadway easements". Therefore, we'd appreciate your informing your construction
manager that the parking situation must meet the intent of this requirement.
Please do not hesitate to contact me shoudl you wish to discuss this matter. Thank you for
your cooperation.
Primed on Recycled Paper
Sing$rely
lanta Schwartz
anning'Director
cc: Anton Dahlerbruch, City Manager
Kristen Raig, RHCA Manager
Linda Severy, 29 Crest Road East
•
Ci1y o/ Ie0f/L4 �aP�
THOMAS F. HEINSHEIMER
Mayor
GODFREY PERNELL, D.D.S.
Mayor Pro Tem
DR. JAMES BLACK
Councilmember
FRANK E. HILL
Councilmember
B. ALLEN LAY
Councilmember
November 18, 2004
Mrs. Renee Martin
59 Crest Road East
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Dear Mrs. Martin:
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
,,,bk /to
eva* crto
tod' •
11'4' v,
Thank you for calling the other day regarding your property located at 22 Crest Road
East. For your reference, I have enclosed a copy of the Resolution of Approval for your
new home.
Should you have any questions regarding the language in this Resolution, please do not
hesitate let us know. Thank you for your cooperation and support.
Sincerely,
!0
C ig R. Nealis
City Manager
CRN:mlk
11-18-04martin.ltr
cc: Yolanta Schwartz, Planning Director
®Pro de. I,, R,., yr:loci ;r
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-08
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO
PERMIT GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE ON A VACANT PARCEL OF LAND IN ZONING CASE NO.
674 AT 22 CREST ROAD EAST (LOT 194-MS), (MARTIN).
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and -Mrs. Donald Martin with
respect to real property located at 22 Crest Road East, Lot 194-MS, Rolling Hills, CA
requesting a Site Plan Review to permit grading and construction of a new 10,367
square foot single family residence with 1,234 square foot garage and a 65 square foot
spa. A 1,600 square foot basement is also proposed. A 675 square foot stable exists on
the property and will remain.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings
to consider the application on November 18, 2003, December 16, 2003, January 20, 2004
and February 17, 2004, and at a field trip visit on December 13, 2003. The applicants
were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard
and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members
of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied
said proposal. The applicants and their representatives were in attendance at the
hearings.
Section 3. During the proceedings the Planning Commission expressed
concerns over the size of the originally proposed development, and as a result, the
applicants revised and scaled down their plans.
Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class
3 Exemption (The State of CA Guidelines, Section 15303) and is therefore categorically
exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 5. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for
site plan review and approval before any grading requiring a grading permit or any
building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or
repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an
increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the
effect of increasing the size of the building by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in
any thirty-six (36) month period. With respect to the Site Plan Review application
requesting construction of the new house, the Planning Commission makes the
following findings of fact:
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the
Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structures comply with
the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with
• •
sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning
Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The net lot area of the lot is 183,360 square
feet. The proposed residence (10,367 sq.ft.), garage (1,234 sq.ft.), service yard (96 sq.ft.),
spa (65 sq.ft.) and the existing 675 square foot stable will have 12,437 square feet of
structures, which constitutes 6.8% of the net lot which is within the maximum 20%
structural lot coverage requirement. A 1,600 square foot basement is proposed for this
development The total lot coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 26,277
square feet, which constitutes 14.4% of the net lot which is within the 35% maximum
overall net lot coverage requirement. The proposed project is located more than 100
from the roadway easement so as to reduce the visual impact of the development. The
disturbed area of the lot will be 35.4%, which is within the 40% maximum permitted,
and includes the stable pad.
B. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and
undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new
structure will not cause the lot to look overdeveloped. Significant portions of the lot will
be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space on the property. The existing native
vegetation and trees in the rear of the property will remain and will screen the
residence from the neighbors. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses,
buildings, and structures and the topography of the lot have been considered, and the
construction of the new house will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to
the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed structure will be
constructed on a portion of the lot which is the least intrusive to surrounding
properties, will be screened and landscaped with trees and shrubs which at maturity
will not exceed the ridge height of the structure, is a sufficient distance from nearby
residences so that the proposed structure will not impact the view or privacy of
surrounding neighbors, and will substantially utilize the existing building pad for the
new construction.
C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and
mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated in
Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum set forth in the Zoning Code will not be
exceeded and the proposed project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood.
D. The development plan incorporates existing trees and native vegetation to
the maximum extent feasible. Specifically, the development plan preserves dense brush
and shrubs and supplements it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances
the rural character of the community.
E. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to minimize
grading and retain the natural drainage courses. Grading for this project will involve
1,858 cubic yards of cut and 1,858 cubic yards of fill and will be balanced on site.
F. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed
project will utilize the existing driveway approach at Crest Road.
G. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act and is exempt.
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-08
PAGE 2
• •
Section 6. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby
approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 674 for grading and for
construction of a new residence as shown on the Development Plan dated February 10,
2004, and marked Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions:
A. The Site Plan Review approval shall expire within one year from the
effective date of approval if construction pursuant to this approval has not commenced
within that time period, as required by Section 17.46.080(A) of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code, or the approval granted is otherwise extended pursuant to the
requirements of that section.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Site Plan Review approval, that
if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the
privileges granted hereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been given
written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided,
and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation
within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination.
C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be
complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated February 10, 2004, except as
otherwise provided in these conditions.
E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building
and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan approved with
this application.
F. Grading shall not exceed 1,858 cubic yards of cut and 1,858 cubic yards of
fill and shall be balanced on site.
G. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 12,437 square feet or 6.8%.
H. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 26,277
square feet or 14.4% in conformance with lot coverage limitations.
I. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 64,909 square feet or 35.4% of
the net lot area in conformance with lot disturbance limitations.
J. Residential building pad coverage on the 57,088 square foot residential
building pad shall not exceed 11,762 square feet or 20.6%; coverage on the existing 3,040
square foot stable pad shall not exceed 675 square feet or 22.2 %.
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-08
PAGE 3
• •
K. The proposed basement shall not exceed 1,600 square feet and shall meet
all requirements of the Los Angeles County Building Code and City Zoning Ordinance
for basements.
L. Ridge heights of the dwelling unit shall vary between 12 feet and 23 feet
above finished grade, with only 4.11% of the structure at 23 feet in height, to be located
at the middle and front of the development. The average ridge height from finished
grade shall not exceed 18'2".
M. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum
extent feasible, that incorporates low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic
controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope
factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste
resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water
Efficient Landscaping Requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code.
N. A landscaping plan for the graded and disturbed areas must be submitted
for review by the Planning Department prior to issuing grading or building permits. To
the maximum extend practicable, native trees and other native plants shall be utilized.
If trees are to be used in the landscaping scheme for this project, they shall be mature
when planted and which at full maturity shall not exceed the ridge height of the
residence, and shrubs shall be planted so as not to obstruct views of neighboring
properties, but to obscure the residential structure on site.
A security deposit in the amount of the cost estimate of the implementation of
the landscaping plan plus 15% shall be required to be posted prior to issuance of a
drainage, grading and building permits and shall be retained with the City for not less
than two years after landscape installation. The retained security will be released by the
City Manager after the City Manager determines that the landscaping was installed
pursuant to the landscaping plan as approved, and that such landscaping is properly
established and in good condition.
O. The existing driveway apron shall serve the new residence.
P. Any proposed pilasters and gates shall be reviewed and approved by the
Rolling Hills Community Association.
Q. During construction, any soil disturbance shall preserve the existing
topography, flora, and natural features to the greatest extent possible.
R. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district
requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances
and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle
trips, noise, dust, and objectionable odors shall be required.
S. During construction, the Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set
forth in Section 7010 of the 1998 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be
followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater
pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles.
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-08
PAGE 4
T. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site
and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby roadway
easements.
U. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and
regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of
7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical
equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential
environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
V. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water
Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation
and maintenance of septic tanks.
W. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water
Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation
and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities.
X. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water
Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management
Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste.
Y. The property owners shall be required to conform to the City of Rolling
Hills Outdoor Lighting Standards Ordinance, roofing material requirements, basement
construction requirements and all other applicable provisions of the City and County
codes.
Z. A drainage plan shall be approved by the Planning Department and
County District Engineer, to include any water from any site irrigation systems and
shall ensure that all drainage from the site is conveyed in an approved manner.
AA. If an above ground drainage design is utilized, it shall be designed in such
a manner as to not cross over any equestrian trails. All drainage systems shall not
discharge water onto a trail, shall incorporate earth tone colors, including in the design
of the dissipater and be screened from any trail and neighbors views to the maximum
extent practicable, without impairing the function of the drain system.
AB. All utility lines shall be placed underground.
AC. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final building plan to the County of
Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed drainage plan with related geology, soils and
hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the Planning
Commission shall be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their
review and approval.
AD. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code, any modifications to the property, which would constitute
additional structural development, shall require the filing of a new application for
approval by the Planning Commission.
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-08
PAGE 5
AE. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review l'ommittee prior to the issuance of any
grading or building permit.
AF. The applicant shall pay all of the applicable Los Angeles County Building
and Safety and Public Works Department fees, including, but not be limited to school
fees and Parks and Recreation Fees for new a residence.
AG. Until the applicants execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of
this Site Plan Review approval, the approval shall not be effective.
AH. All conditions of the Site Plan approval, that apply, shall be complied with
prior to the issuance of a building permit from the County of Los Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADORED THIS 16th DAY OF MARCH 2004.
:(z7,
ARVEL 1.,CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
MARILYN KE1ZN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-08
PAGE 6
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2004-08 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO
PERMIT GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE ON A VACANT PARCEL OF LAND IN ZONING
CASE NO. 674 AT 22 CREST ROAD EAST (LOT 194-MS), (MARTIN).
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on March
16, 2004 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners DeRoy, Hankins, Margeta, Sommer
and Chairman Witte.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
11 �c '
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-08
PAGE 7