138, Construct a stable in front ya, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsBEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application
of
Mr. David Perrin
Lot 17-FT
ZONING CASE NO. 138
FINDINGS AND REPORT
The application of Mr. David Perrin, Lot 17-FT, Flying
Triangle Tract, for a conditional use permit under ARTICLE III,
Section 3.06,Front Yard Requirements, Ordinance No. 33 came on
for hearing on the 15th day of April, 1975 in the Council Chambers
of the Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills,
California, and the applicant, having submitted evidence in support
of the application, the Planning Commission, being advised, now makes
its Findings and Report as required by the Ordinances of the City of
Rolling Hills, California.
I.
The Commission finds that the applicant, Mr. David Perrin,
is the owner of that certain real property described as Lot 17-FT,
Flying Triangle Tract, located in the City of Rolling Hills, Cali-
fornia, and that notice of the public hearing in connection with
said application was given as required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of
Ordinance No. 33 of the City of Rolling Hills, California.
II.
The Commission further finds that no person appeared at said
public hearing in opposition to the application, and that no comment,
written ororal, had been received in favor of o'r oppositon to the
request.
III.
The Commission further finds that the applicant requests the
conditional use permit for construction of a stable in the side yard
which would project into the front yard between the front road line
and the nearest line of the main building. The applicant stated that
the stable must be located as shown on the site plan submitted to
avoid massive grading, because of the topography of the site, and
further, the exceedingly steep terrain of the site prevents normal
use of the property, and the view from adjacent properties would not
be blocked by the proposed stable. The Commission finds that use of
stables is enjoyed by other owners of property in the area, and a
conditional use permit should be granted in order to preserve sub-
stantial property rights possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zone.
IV.
From the foregoing it is concluded that a conditional use
permit should be granted under Article III, Section 3.06, Front Yard
Requirements, Ordinance No. 33 to Mr. David Perrin, Lot 17-FT for
construction of a stable projecting into the front yard subject to
the condition that a minimum side yard of 35 feet be reserved in
locating the proposed residence on the property, and that an existing
retaining wall in the side easement be removed, and it is, therefore,
so ordered.
/s/ William C. Field
Chairman, Planning Commission
(?',f�a.t..� /: Cam,
cretary, Planning Commission