Loading...
624, Addition to existing garage in, Staff Reports• C41 o/ leo Pf,.y _AA • al) INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com DATE: JANUARY 15, 2002 TO: HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PRINCIPAL PLANNER SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 624 Dr. Peter Spennato, 17 Wideloop Road, (Lot 3-A-EF) Request for a one-year extension of time BACKGROUND Attached is a request from Dr. Spennato requesting a one-year time extension for a previously approved Site Plan to construct additions to an existing single family residence in Zoning Case No. 624, that was approved by the Planning Commission on January 16, 2001 by Resolution No. 2002-01. The applicant states that due to his professional time constraint, he was unable to get the plans completed within the permitted time frame. If granted, the new expiration date will be January 16, 2003. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider the request and adopt Resolution No. 2002-03 granting the time extension. Printed on Recycled Paper. v / 0 • 7°C' /4,4P;r74. r )4,J-7 - /41 /4:90e,1 ,PN ‘'f /7 IA.) Z-e)c A-2c,/ /1e S es- r 44- (461-6,L, 4.4.>09-5 "71-4 ezr- L. 711, °1") 77) • • RESOLUTION NO. 2002-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2001-01 APPROVING AN EXTENSION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN REVIEW TO CONSTRUCT SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONS AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 17 WIDELOOP ROAD IN ZONING CASE NO. 624, (SPENNATO). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A request has been filed by Dr. Peter Spennato with respect to real property located at 17 Wideloop Road (Lot 3-A-EF), Rolling Hills, requesting a one year time extension for a previously approved Site Plan Review to permit the construction of additions at a single family residence that was approved by the Planning Commission by Resolution No. 2001-01 on January 16, 2001. Section 2. The Commission considered this item at a meeting on January 15, 2002, at which time information was presented indicating that the extension of time is necessary because the applicant's professional time constraints prevented him from obtaining the necessary plans and documents. Section 3. Based on information and evidence submitted, the Planning Commission does hereby amend Paragraph A, Section 6 of Resolution No. 2001- 01, adopted by the Planning Commission, dated January 16, 2001, to read as follows: "This Site Plan approval shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval, if construction pursuant to this approval has not commenced within that time period, as required by Section 17.46.080 (A), of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code". Section 4. Except as herein amended, the provisions of Resolution No. 2001-01 shall continue to be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15TH. DAY OF JANUARY 2002. ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK • • STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) §§ I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2002-03 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2001-01 APPROVING AN EXTENSION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN REVIEW TO CONSTRUCT SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONS AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 17 WIDELOOP ROAD IN ZONING CASE NO. 624, (SPENNATO). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on January 15, 2002 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. DEPUTY CITY CLERK • C40/R0/fi4 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Agenda Item No.: 5A Mtg. Date: 1/22/01 DATE: JANUARY 22, 2001 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ATTN: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER FROM: YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PRINCIPAL PLANNER SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2001-01: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A REQUEST FOR SHE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONS TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 17 WIDELOOP ROAD, IN ZONING CASE NO. 624. Dr. and Mrs. Peter Spennato, (Lot 3-A-EF) BACKGROUND 1. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2001-01, that is attached, on January 16, 2001 at their regular meeting granting a request for Site Plan Review for the construction of substantial additions to an existing single family residence. The vote was 5-0. 2. The Planning Commission viewed a silhouette of the proposed project at the site on Saturday, December 16, 2000, and held a public hearing on December 19, 2000. 3. The applicant originally requested a Variance to permit construction of a 240 square foot addition to the existing 480 square foot garage that will encroach 2.5 feet into the 20 foot west side yard setback. The new entrance to the garage would face Wideloop Road. There is a 61.75 square foot playhouse that is 10 feet from the property line southwest of the proposed garage and within the 20 foot side yard setback. A portion of the existing residence encroaches 4 feet into the east side yard setback. 4. During the December 19, 2000 public hearing the Commission expressed concerns pertaining to the proposed encroachment and the proximity of the addition to the adjacent residence. During the course of the meeting, the applicant withdrew the application for the Variance. The applicant reduced the addition to the garage from 240 square feet to 170 square feet for a total garage size of 650 square feet. ZONING CASE NO. 624 PAGE 1 Printed on Recycled Paper. • • 5. The applicant is requesting Site Plan Review to construct 1,318 square feet of residential additions to the existing 2,258 square foot residence for a total of 3,576 square feet. The applicant does not propose to construct a basement. Criteria for Site Plan Review is attached. 6. The existing residence was constructed in 1955. In 1967, the kitchen and family rooms were enlarged. 7. The existing driveway access off Wideloop Road will remain. 8. A 450 square foot barn with a 550 square foot corral is proposed at the rear of the lot to the southeast that is to be accessed from Crest Road East and has a slope of less than 25%. 9. No grading will be required for this project. 10. The structural lot coverage proposed is 4,772 square feet or 14.7% (20% permitted) and the total structural and flatwork lot coverage proposed is 8,389 square feet or 25.9% (35% permitted). 11. The 17,459 square foot residential and stable building pad beyond required setbacks will have proposed coverage of 4,772 square feet or 27.3%. The Planning Commission's guideline is 30%. 12. The disturbed area of the lot will be 10,144 square feet or 31.3% [40% maximum permitted; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist]. 13. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council receive and file Resolution No. 2001-01. ZONING CASE NO. 624 PAGE 2 SITE PLAN REVIEW RA-S-1 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 20 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line STRUCTURES Site Plan Review required for grading requiring a grading permit, any new structure or if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36-month period. STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) RESIDENTIAL & TOTAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE (Guideline maximum of 30%) GRADING Site Plan Review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof that is more than 3 feet in depth and covers more than 2,000 sq.ft. must be balanced on site. DISTURBED AREA 40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist. EXISTING Existing residence encroaches 4 feet into east side yard setback. Playhouse encroaches 10 feet into southwest side yard. Residence 2258 sq.ft. Garage 480 sq.ft. Service Yard 96 sq.ft. Stable 0 sq.ft. Total 2834 sq.ft. 'I8.7% 22.8% 16.2% N/A 22.8% STABLE (450 SQ.FT. N/A & 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL) STABLE ACCESS ROADWAY ACCESS VIEWS PLANTS AND ANIMALS ZONING CASE NO. 624 PAGE 3 N/A Existing from Wideloop Road N/A N/A PROPOSED No encroachment proposed Residence Garage Service Yard Stable Total 14.7% 25.9% 27.3% None 31.3% 450 sq.ft. stable 550 sq.ft. corral 3576 sq.ft. 650 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. 450 sa.ft. 4,772 sq.ft. Proposed from Crest Road East with a slope of less than 25%. No change Planning Commission review Planning Commission review • • RESOLUTION NO. 2001-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONS TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 17 WIDELOOP ROAD IN ZONING CASE NO. 624. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Dr. and Mrs. Peter Spennato with respect to real property located at 17 Wideloop Road (Lot 3-A-EF), Rolling Hills, requesting Site Plan Review for the, construction of substantial additions to an existing single family residence that requires no grading, and a Variance to permit construction that would encroach into the west side yard setback. Section 2. A. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application on November 21, 2000 and at a field trip visit on December 16, 2000. A continued public hearing by the Planning Commission was held on December 19, 2000. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants were notified of the hearing in writing by first class mail. The applicants' representative was in attendance at the hearings. B. At the same time, the Planning Commission also conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider a Variance to construct a 240 square foot addition to an existing 480 square foot garage that would encroach 2.5. feet into the required 20 foot west side yard setback. During the course of the public hearing, on December 19, 2000, the applicant withdrew the variance application. Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 1 Exemption (The State CA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 4. Section 17.46.020. requires a development plan to be submitted before any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings or structures, which involve changes to grading or an increase in the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building or structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six month period, may be permitted. With respect to the Site Plan Review application, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses. The proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development and maintains sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback, and lot coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 32,409 square feet The proposed residence (3,576 sq. ft.), garage (650 sq. ft.), future stable (450 sq.ft.) and service yard (96 sq.ft.) will have 4,772 square feet which constitutes 14.7% of the lot which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including paved areas and Resolution No. 2001-01 Page 1 of 5 driveway will be 8,389 quare feet which equals 25.9% ofte lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requirement. B. The proposed development preserves and integrates into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls). C. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to minimize grading. The natural drainage courses will be preserved and continue drainage to the canyons at the northern side of this lot. D. The development plan, as modified by the conditions of approval, substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structures will not cause the structural and total lot coverage to be exceeded. Further, the proposed project will have a residential buildable pad of 17,459 square feet with a coverage of 25.9%. E. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and other residences on Wideloop Road. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum will not be exceeded. The proposed project is also consistent with the scale of other homes in the immediate neighborhood. This project requires no grading. F. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians. The property is adequately served by the existing driveway access, and vehicles for the proposed project will continue to use the existing driveway. G. The project conforms with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental review. Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 624 for a proposed residential development as indicated on the development plan incorporated herein as Exhibit A, subject to the conditions contained in Section 6 of this Resolution. Section 6. The Site Plan Review approved in Section 5 of this Resolution is subject to the following conditions: A. This Site Plan approval shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to this approval has not 'commenced within that time period, as required by Section 17.46.080, or the Site Plan approval has been extended pursuant to the requirements of that section. B. It is declared and made a condition of this Site Plan approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of thirty (30) days. Resolution No. 2001-01 Page 2 of 5 C. All requiremSs of the Buildings and Construin Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance' with the site plan dated December 22, 2000 , and marked Exhibit A, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan approved with this application. F. Any grading shall preserve the existing topography, flora, and natural features to the greatest extent possible, (no grading is proposed). G. The structural lot coverage shall not exceed 14.7% and the total lot coverage shall not exceed 25.9%. H The maximum disturbed area shall not exceed 31.3% of the net lot area. I. Landscaping shall incorporate and preserve, to the maximum extent feasible, the existing mature trees and shrubs and the natural landscape screening surrounding the residential building pad. J. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum extent feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and . climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water efficient landscaping requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. K. Landscaping shall be designed using mature trees and shrubs so as not to obstruct the views of neighboring properties but, to obscure the residence. L. The property owner shall not plant any species of plant that are likely at mature height to impair the views of neighboring properties. Al. Landscaping shall be provided and maintained to obscure the residence and the building pad with native drought -resistant vegetation that is compatible with the surrounding vegetation of the community. N. At maturity, any new landscape plantings around the proposed residence shall not exceed the ridge height of the residence. O. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, and objectionable odors shall be required. P. During construction, the Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 1996 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to Resolution No. 2001-01 Page 3 of 5 minimize erosion ande protect slopes and channels toentrol stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles. Q. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if necessary, any overflow, parking shall take place within nearby roadway easements. R. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. S. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of septic tanks. T. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities. U. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste. V. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any building permit. X. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modifications to the project which would constitute additional structural development shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. Y. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of the Site Plan approval, or the approvals shall not be effective. Z. All conditions of the Site Plan approval that apply must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 16TH DA ATTEST: . MARILYN K RN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK Resolution No. 2001-01 Page 4 of 5 JANUARY, 2001 ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN STATE OF CALIFORNIA • ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2001-01 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONS TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 17 WIDELOOP ROAD IN ZONING CASE NO. 624. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on January 16, 2001 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer and Chairman Roberts. NOES: None . ABSENT: Commissioner Witte . • ABSTAIN: None . and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. r Resolution No. 2001-01 Page 5 of 5 DEPUTY CITY CLERK DATE: TO: FROM: • ()my o/ � Q�..p J✓.'�� DECEMBER 19, 2000 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. S11E LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: REOUEST ZONING CASE NO. 624 17 WIDELOOP ROAD (LOT 3-A-EF) RA-S-1, 1.08 ACRES DR. PETER SPENNATO MR. DOUGLAS MCHATTIE, BOLTON ENGINEERING CORPORATION NOVEMBER 11, 2000 Request for a Variance to permit construction of an addition that will encroach into the west side yard setback and a request for Site Plan Review to construct substantial residential additions at an existing single family residence. BACKGROUND 1. The Planning Commission viewed a silhouette of the proposed project at the site on Saturday, December 16, 2000. 2. The applicant is requesting a Variance to permit construction of a 240 square foot addition to the existing 480 square foot garage that will encroach 2.5 feet into the 20 foot west side yard setback. The new entrance to the garage will face Wideloop Road. There is a 61.75 square foot playhouse that is 10 feet from the property line southwest of the proposed garage and within the 20 foot side yard setback. A portion of the existing residence encroaches 4 feet into the east side yard setback. The proposed addition will be 17.5 feet from the property line and 30 feet from the adjacent residential structure to the west at 15 Wideloop Road. That adjacent structure is located 11 feet from the property line. Responding to the Criteria to be satisfied for grant of a Variance, the applicant states that, "The site is so encumbered by easements and rights -of -way, in order to continue the orientation of the structure, we must be in the sideyard setback." In response to whether the change will be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone where the property is located, the applicant says, "It is of such a minor nature." ZONING CASE NO. 624 PAGE 1 Printed on Recycled Paper. • • The applicant is also requesting Site Plan Review to construct 1,318 square feet of residential additions to the existing 2,258 square foot residence for a total of 3,576 square feet. The applicant does not propose to construct a basement. Criteria for Site Plan Review is attached. 2. The existing residence was constructed in 1955. In 1967, the kitchen and family rooms were enlarged. 3. The existing driveway access off Wideloop Road will remain. 4. A 450 square foot barn with a 550 square foot corral is proposed at the rear of the lot to the southeast that is to be accessed from Crest Road East and has a slope of less than 25%. 5. No grading will be required for this project. 6. The structural lot coverage proposed is 2,834 square feet or 8.7% (20% permitted) and the total lot coverage proposed is 7,391 square feet or 26.1% (35% permitted). 7. The 17,459 square foot residential and stable building pad beyond required setbacks will have proposed coverage of 4,842 square feet or 27.7%. The Planning Commission's guideline is 30%. 8. The disturbed area of the lot will be 10,144 square feet or 31.3% [40% maximum permitted; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist]. 9. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the plan and take public testimony. ZONING CASE NO. 624 PAGE 2 • • VARIANCE REQUIRED FINDINGS A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone; and B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question; and C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; and E. That the variance does not grant special privilege; F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills. ZONING CASE NO. 624 PAGE 3 • SITE PLAN REVIEW I EXISTING I PROPOSED RA-S-1 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 20 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line STRUCTURES Site Plan Review required for grading requiring a grading permit, any new structure or if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36-month period. STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) RESIDENTIAL & TOTAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE (Guideline maximum of 30%) GRADING Site Plan Review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof that is more than 3 feet in depth and covers more than 2,000 sq.ft. must be balanced on site. DISTURBED AREA 40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist. STABLE (450 SQ.FT. & 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL) STABLE ACCESS ROADWAY ACCESS VIEWS PLANTS AND ANIMALS Existing residence encroaches 4 feet into east side yard setback. Playhouse encroaches 10 feet into southwest side yard. Residence 2258 sq.ft. Garage 480 sq.ft. Service Yard 96 sq.ft. Stable 0 sq.ft. Total 2834 sq.ft. 8.7% 22.8% 18.2% N/A 22.8% N/A N/A Existing from Wideloop Road N/A N/A Residence to encroach 2.5 feet into west side yard setback. Residence Garage Service Yard Stable Total 14.9% 26.1% 27.7% None 31.3% 450 sq.ft. stable 550 sq.ft. corral 3576 sq.ft. 720 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. 450 sa.ft. 4842 sq.ft. Proposed from Crest Road East with a slope of less than 25%. No change Planning Commission review Planning Commission review ZONING CASE NO. 624 PAGE 4 •City ofiellin9. DATE: DECEMBER 16, 2000 TO: FROM: LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. SHE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: REOUEST ZONING CASE NO. 624 17 WIDELOOP ROAD (LOT 3-A-EF) RA-S-1, 1.08 ACRES DR. PETER SPENNATO MR. DOUGLAS MCHATTIE, BOLTON ENGINEERING CORPORATION NOVEMBER 11, 2000 Request for a Variance to permit construction of an addition that will encroach into the west side yard setback and a request for Site Plan Review to construct substantial residential additions at an existing single family residence. BACKGROUND 1. The Planning Commission will view a silhouette of the proposed project at the site on Saturday, December 16, 2000 following a visit to 37 Chuckwagon Road at 8:00 AM. 2. The applicant is requesting a Variance to permit construction of a 240 square foot addition to the existing 480 square foot garage that will encroach 2.5 feet into the 20 foot west side yard setback. The new entrance to the garage will face Wideloop Road. There is a 61.75 square foot playhouse that is 10 feet from the property line southwest of the proposed garage and within the 20 foot side yard setback. A portion of the existing residence encroaches 4 feet into the east side yard setback. The proposed addition will be 17.5 feet from the property line and 30 feet from the adjacent residential structure to the west at 15 Wideloop Road. That adjacent structure is located 11 feet from the property line. Responding to the Criteria to be satisfied for grant of a Variance, the applicant states that, "The site is so encumbered by easements and rights -of -way, in order to continue the orientation of the structure, we must be in the sideyard setback." In response to whether the change will be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone where the property is located, the applicant says, "It is of such a minor nature." ZONING CASE NO. 624 PAGE 1 Printed on Recycled Paper. • The applicant is also requesting Site Plan Review to construct 1,318 square feet of residential additions to the existing 2,258 square foot residence for a total of 3,576 square feet. The applicant does not propose to construct a basement. Criteria for Site Plan Review is attached. 2. The existing residence was constructed in 1955. In 1967, the kitchen and family rooms were enlarged. 3. The existing driveway access off Wideloop Road will remain. 4. A 450 square foot barn with a 550 square foot corral is proposed at the rear of the lot to the southeast that is to be accessed from Crest Road East and has a slope of less than 25%. 5. No grading will be required for this project. 6. The structural lot coverage proposed is 2,834 square feet or 8.7% (20% permitted) and the total lot coverage proposed is 7,391 square feet or 26.1% (35% permitted). 7. The 17,459 square foot residential and stable building pad beyond required setbacks will have proposed coverage of 4,842 square feet or 27.7%. The Planning Commission's guideline is 30%. 8: The disturbed area of the lot will be 10,144 square feet or 31.3% [40% maximum permitted; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist]. 9. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the plan and take public testimony. ZONING CASE NO. 624 PAGE 2 VARIANCE REQUIRED FINDINGS A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone; and B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question; and C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and ID. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; and 1E. That the variance does not grant special privilege; F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills. ZONING CASE NO. 624 PAGE 3 • • SITE PLAN REVIEW RA-S-1 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 20 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line STRUCTURES Site Plan Review required for grading requiring a grading permit, any new structure or if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36-month period. STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) RESIDENTIAL & TOTAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE (Guideline maximum of 30%) GRADING Site Plan Review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof that is more than 3 feet in depth and covers more than 2,000 sq.ft. must be balanced on site. DISTURBED AREA 40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist. STABLE (450 SQ.FT. & 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL) STABLE ACCESS ROADWAY ACCESS VIEWS PLANTS AND ANIMALS EXISTING I PROPOSED Existing residence encroaches 4 feet into east side yard setback. Playhouse encroaches 10 feet into southwest side yard. Residence 2258 sq.ft. Garage 480 sq.ft. Service Yard 96 sq.ft. Stable 0 sq.ft. Total 2834 sq.ft. 8.7% 22.8% 18.2% N/A 22.8% N/A N/A Existing from Wideloop Road N/A N/A Residence to encroach 2.5 feet into west side yard setback. Residence Garage Service Yard Stable Total 14.9% 26.1% 27.7% None 31.3% 450 sq.ft. stable 550 sq.ft. corral 3576 sq.ft. 720 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. 450 sa.ft. 4842 sq.ft. Proposed from Crest Road East with a slope of less than 25%. No change Planning Commission review Planning Commission review ZONING CASE NO. 624 PAGE 4 I DATE: TO: FROM: • City a`� NOVEMBER 21, 2000 • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SHE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: REOUEST ZONING CASE NO. 624 17 WIDELOOP ROAD (LOT 3-A-EF) RA-S-1, 1.08 ACRES DR. PETER SPENNATO MR. DOUGLAS MCHA'1"11E, BOLTON ENGINEERING CORPORATION NOVEMBER 11, 2000 Request for a Variance to permit construction of an addition that will encroach into the west side yard setback and a request for Site Plan Review to construct substantial residential additions at an existing single family residence. BACKGROUND 1. The applicant is requesting a Variance to permit construction of a 240 square foot addition to the existing 480 square foot garage that will encroach 2.5 feet into the 20 foot west side yard setback. The new entrance to the garage will face Wideloop Road. There is a 61.75 square foot playhouse that is 10 feet from the property line southwest of the proposed garage and within the 20 foot side yard setback. A portion of the existing residence encroaches 4 feet into the east side yard setback. The proposed addition will be 17.5 feet from the property line and 30 feet from the adjacent residential structure to the west at 15 Wideloop Road. That adjacent structure is located 11 feet from the property line. Responding to the Criteria to be satisfied for grant of a Variance, the applicant states that, "The site is so encumbered by easements and rights -of -way, in order to continue the orientation of the structure, we must be in the sideyard setback." In response to whether the change will be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone where the property is located, the applicant says, "It is of such a minor nature." The applicant is also requesting Site Plan Review to construct 1,318 square feet of residential additions to the existing 2,258 square foot residence for a total of 3,576 ZONING CASE NO. 624 PAGE 1 Printed on Recycled Paper. • • square feet. The applicant does not propose to construct a basement. Criteria for Site Plan Review is attached. 2. The existing residence was constructed in 1955. In 1967, the kitchen and family rooms were enlarged. 3. The existing driveway access off Wideloop Road will remain. 4. A 450 square foot barn with a 550 square foot corral is proposed at the rear of the lot to the southeast that is to be accessed from Crest Road East and has a slope of less than 25%. 5. No grading will be required for this project. 6. The structural lot coverage proposed is 2,834 square feet or 8.7% (20% permitted) and the total lot coverage proposed is 7,391 square feet or 26.1% (35% permitted). 7. The 15,564 square foot residential and stable building pad beyond required setbacks will have proposed coverage of 4,842 square feet or 31.1%. The Planning Commission's guideline is 30%. 8. The disturbed area of the lot will be 10,144 square feet or 31.3% [40% maximum permitted; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist]. 9. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the plan and take public testimony. ZONING CASE NO. 624 PAGE 2 VARIANCE REQUIRED FINDINGS, A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone; and B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question; and C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; and E. That the variance does not grant special privilege; F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills. ZONING CASE NO. 624 PAGE 3 SITE PLAN REVIEW RA-S-1 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 20 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line STRUCTURES Site Plan Review required for grading requiring a grading permit, any new structure or if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36-month period. STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) RESIDENTIAL & TOTAL BUILDING PAD COVERAGE (Guideline maximum of 30%) GRADING Site Plan Review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof that is more than 3 feet in depth and covers more than 2,000 sq.ft. must be balanced on site. DISTURBED AREA 40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist. STABLE (450 SQ.FT. & 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL) STABLE ACCESS ROADWAY ACCESS VIEWS PLANTS AND ANIMALS EXISTING Existing residence encroaches 4 feet into east side yard setback. Playhouse encroaches 10 feet into southwest side yard. Residence Garage Service Yard Stable Total 8.7% 22.8% 18.2% N/A 22.8% N/A PROPOSED Residence to encroach 2.5 feet into west side yard setback. 2258 sq.ft. Residence 480 sq.ft. Garage 96 sq.ft. Service Yard 0 sq.ft. Stable 2834 sq.ft. Total N/A Existing from Wideloop Road N/A N/A 14.9% 26.1% 31.1% None 31.3% 450 sq.ft. stable 550 sq.ft. corral 3576 sq.ft. 720 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. 450 sq.ft. 4842 sq.ft. Proposed from Crest Road East with a slope of less than 25%. No change Planning Commission review Planning Commission review ZONING CASE NO. 624 PAGE 4