624, Addition to existing garage in, CorrespondenceINCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
January 17, 2002
Dr. and Mrs. Peter Spennato Jr.
17 Wideloop Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: SUBJECT: EXPIRATION OF APPROVALS
ZONING CASE NO. 624.
Dear Dr. and Mrs. Spennato:
This letter shall serve as official notification that a one year time extension was
APPROVED by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on January 15,
2002, for the subject case.
I have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 2002-03, specifying the conditions of
approval set forth by the Planning Commission.
Note that this approval will expire on JANUARY 16, 2003 and unless you acquire
permits before then, under Section 17.46.080(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code
you must re -file based upon the same criteria as for the issuance of a new permit.
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
lanta Schwartz!
rincipal Planner
Printed on Recycled Paper.
City
December 18, 2001
Dr. and Mrs. Peter Spennato Jr.
17 Wideloop Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
•
O� /o//i&g ..Jh//!gS INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
SUBJECT: SUBJECT: EXPIRATION OF APPROVALS
ZONING CASE NO. 624, Request for Site Plan Review to construct substantial
residential additions at an existing single family residence at 17 Wideloop Road (Lot 3-A-EF) Rolling
Hills, CA.
Dear Dr. and Mrs. Spennato:
We would like to remind you that your approvals in the subject zoning case will expire on JANUARY
16, 2002, unless work commences by that time. Please refer to condition "A" of Section 6 of the
Resolution regarding the expiration of your application.
You can extend approvals for one year only if you apply to the Planning Commission in writing to
request an extension prior to the expiration date. but no later than January 4. 2002. A reason for
the request must be indicated in your written statement. The filing fee for the time extension is $200,
to be paid to the City of Rolling Hills. The Planning Commission meeting at which this request will be
heard, if applied for, will be on January 15. 2002.
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Si erely,
1
lanta Schwartz
incipal Planner
Cc: Roger North, Architect
Printed on Recycled Paper
•City Wieling _AIL
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
January 23, 2001
Ms. Peggy Minor, Manager
Rolling Hills Community Association
1 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Dear Peggy:
RE: Site Plan Review application, Zone Case No. 624
17 Wideloop Road, Rolling Hills
This is to inform you that the Planning Commission at their January 16, 2001 public
hearing approved a substantial addition to an existing single family residence at the above
address. The City Council received and filed the Resolution of approval on January 22,
2001.
The Planning Commission's decision in this matter shall become effective on February
16, 2001, unless an appeal is filed with the City.
If you have any questions, please call me at (310) 377-1521.
Sin'erely,
Y
olanta Schwartz,
Principal Planner
cct c bl L- 01, Zorol--01
@Printed on Recycled Paper
Ci4I °Pe?f,.y Jij/j
CERTIFIED MAIL
January 18, 2001
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
Dr. Peter Spennato
17 Wideloop Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: APPEAL PERIOD AND AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM,
ZONING CASE NO. 624 (LOT 3-A-EF)
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-01
Dear Dr. Spennato:
This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission adopted a
resolution on January 16, 2001 granting a request for Site Plan Review for the
construction of substantial additions at 17 Wideloop Road, Rolling Hills, CA in Zoning
Case No. 624. That action, accompanied by the record of the proceedings before the
Commission will be reported to the City Council on January 22, 2001.
The Planning Commission's decision in this matter shall become effective thirty days
after the adoption of the resolution by the Commission, unless an appeal has been
filed or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty (30) day appeal
period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an
appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its
proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code.
If no appeals are filed within the thirty (30) day period after adoption of the Planning
Commission's resolution, the Planning Commission's action will become final and
you will be required to cause to be recorded an Affidavit of Acceptance Form together
with the subject resolution in the Office of the County Recorder before the
Commission's action takes effect.
We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 2001-01. specifying the conditions of
approval set forth by the Planning Commission and the approved Exhibit A
Development Plan to keep for your files. Once you have reviewed the Resolution,
please complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM, have the
signature(s) notarized, and 'forward the completed form and a copy of the Resolution
to:
Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder
Real Estate Records Section
12400 East Imperial Highway
Norwalk, CA 90650
Printed on Recycled Paper.
• •
Include a check in the amount of $9.00 for the first page and $3.00 for each additional
page.
The City will notify the Los Angeles County Building & Safety Division to issue permits.
only when the Affidavit of Acceptance is received by us and any conditions of the
Resolution required prior to issuance of building permits are met.
Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Si ce ely,
Y•lanta Schwartz
P 'ncipal Planner
Enclosures:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-01
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
APPEAL SECTION OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE
EXHIBIT "A" DEVELOPMENT PLAN
cc: Mr. Douglas McHattie
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
MAIL TO
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
(310) 377-7288 FAX
The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation.
AFFIDAVID 0 F ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
ZONING CASE NO.624
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
I (We) the undersigned state:
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows:
17 WIDELOOP ROAD, (LOT 3A-EF), ROLLING HILLS, CA.
This property is the subject of the above numbered case.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
ZONING CASE NO. 624 SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
V
T Recorder's Use Only
Signature Signature
Name typed or printed Name typed or printed
Address Address
City/State City/State
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
State of California
County of Los Angeles )
On before me,
personally appeared
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
Witness by hand and official seal.
Signature of Notary
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
•
• .6x%i12i/-
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONS TO AN EXISTING SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 17 WIDELOOP ROAD IN ZONING CASE NO. 624.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY
FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Dr. and Mrs. Peter Spennato with respect
to real property located at 17 Wideloop Road (Lot 3-A-EF), Rolling Hills, requesting Site Plan
Review for the construction of substantial additions to an existing single family residence that
requires no grading, and a Variance to permit construction that would encroach into the west
side yard setback.
Section 2. A. The Planning Commission conducted a duly,noticed public hearing
to consider the application on November 21, 2000 and at a field trip visit on December 16,
2000. A continued public hearing by the Planning Commission was held on December 19,
2000. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal
and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed
and studied said proposal. The applicants were notified of the hearing in writing by first class
mail. The applicants' representative was in attendance at the hearings.
B. At the same time, the Planning Commission also conducted a duly noticed public
hearing to consider a Variance to construct a 240 square foot addition to an existing 480 square
foot garage that would encroach 2.5. feet into the required 20 foot west side yard setback.
During the course of the public hearing, on December 19, 2000, the applicant withdrew the
variance application.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 1
Exemption (The State CA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)) and is therefore categorically exempt
from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4. Section 17.46.020 requires a development plan to be submitted before any
building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to
existing buildings or structures, which involve changes to grading or an increase in the size of
the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of
the building or structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six month
period, may be permitted. With respect to the Site Plan Review application, the Planning
Commission makes the following findings of fact:
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning
Ordinance and surrounding uses. The proposed structure complies with the General Plan
requirement of low profile; low density residential development and maintains sufficient open
space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback, and lot
coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 32,409 square feet. The proposed
residence (3,576 sq. ft.), garage (650 sq. ft.), future stable (450 sq.ft.) and service yard (96 sq.ft.)
will have 4,772 square feet which constitutes 14.7% of the lot which is within the maximum
20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including paved areas and
Resolution No. 2001-01
Page 1 of 5
driveway will be 8,389 quare feet which equals 25.9% of a lot, which is within the 35%
maximum overall lot coverage requirement.
B. The proposed development preserves and integrates into the site design, to the
maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including
surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as
hillsides and knolls).
C. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to minimize grading.
The natural drainage courses will be preserved and continue drainage to the canyons at the
northern side of this lot.
D. The development plan, as modified by the conditions of approval, substantially
preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage
because the new structures will not cause the structural and total lot coverage to be exceeded.
Further, the proposed project will have a residential buildable pad of 17,459 square feet with a
coverage of 25.9%.
E. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval, is
harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and other residences on
Wideloop Road. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum will not be
exceeded. The proposed project is also consistent with the scale of other homes in the
immediate neighborhood. This project requires no grading.
F. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience
and safety of circulation for pedestrians. The property is adequately served by the existing
driveway access, and vehicles for the proposed project will continue to use the existing
driveway.
G: The project conforms with the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental review.
Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby
approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 624 for a proposed residential
development as indicated on the development plan incorporated herein as Exhibit A, subject
to the conditions contained in Section 6 of this Resolution.
Section 6. The Site Plan Review approved in Section 5 of this Resolution is subject to
the following conditions:
A. This Site Plan approval shall expire within one year from the effective date of
approval if construction pursuant to this approval has not commenced within that time
period, as required by Section 17.46.080, or the Site Plan approval has been extended pursuant
to the requirements of that section.
B. . It is declared and made a condition of this Site Plan approval, that if any
conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted
thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such
violation and has failed to do so for a period of thirty (30) days.
Resolution No. 2001-01
Page 2 of 5
C. All requireme'1TCs of the Buildings and Construcn Ordinance, the Zoning
Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with
unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the
site plan dated December 22, 2000 , and marked Exhibit A, except as otherwise provided in
these conditions.
E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and
Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan approved with this
application.
F. Any grading shall preserve the existing topography, flora, and natural features to
the greatest extent possible, (no grading is proposed).
G. The structural lot coverage shall not exceed 14.7% and the total lot coverage shall
not exceed 25.9%.
H. The maximum disturbed area shall not exceed 31.3% of the net lot area.
I. Landscaping shall incorporate and preserve, to the maximum extent feasible, the
existing mature trees and shrubs and the natural landscape screening surrounding the
residential building pad.
J. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum extent
feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers,
incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and . climate
conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and
overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water efficient landscaping requirements) of
the Rolling Hills Municipal Code.
K. Landscaping shall be designed using mature trees and shrubs so as not to
obstruct the views of neighboring properties but, to obscure the residence.
L. The property owner shall not plant any species of plant that are likely.at mature
height to impair the views of neighboring properties.
M.. Landscaping shall be provided and maintained to obscure the residence and the
building pad with native drought -resistant vegetation that is compatible with the surrounding
vegetation of the community.
N. • At maturity, any new landscape plantings around the proposed residence shall
not exceed the ridge height of the residence.
O. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district
requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and
engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise,
dust, and objectionable odors shall be required.
P. During construction, the Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in
Section 7010 of the 1996 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to
Resolution No. 2001-01
Page3of5
minimize erosion and protect slopes and channels to cahtrol stormwater pollution as
required by the County of Los Angeles.
Q. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if
necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby roadway easements.
R. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and
regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM
and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment
noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of
Rolling Hills.
S. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water
Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and
maintenance of septic tanks.
T. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water
Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and
maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities.
U. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water
Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices
(BMP's) related to solid waste.
V. , The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community
Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any building permit.
X. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal
Code, any modifications to the project which would constitute additional structural
development shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning
Commission.
Y. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of the
Site Plan approval, or the approvals shall not be effective.
Z. All conditions of the Site Plan approval that apply must be complied with prior
to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles.
PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 16TH DA -O JANUARY, 2001
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
rXVLA-J2-.-k L-t) ,,.--)
MARILYN KRN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 2001-01
Page 4 of 5
STATE OF CALIFORNIA • )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2001-01 entitled:
•
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONS TO AN EXISTING SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 17 WIDELOOP ROAD IN ZONING CASE NO. 624.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on January 16,
2001 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer and
Chairman Roberts.
None.
Commissioner Witte.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
Resolution No. 2001-01
Page 5 of 5
rndiAlak cP
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
•
17.54.010
17.54 APPEALS
17.54.010 Time for Filing Appeals
A. All actions of the Planning Commission authorized by this
Title may be appealed to the City Council. All appeals shall
be filed in writing with the City Clerk.
B. All appeals must be filed on or before the 30th calendar day
after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution on
the project or application. Application fees shall be paid as
required by Section 17.30.030 of this Title.
C. Within 30 days after the Planning Commission adopts a
resolution which approves or denies a development
application; the City Clerk shall place the resolution as a
report item on the City Council's agenda. The City Council
may, by an affirmative vote of three members, take •
jurisdiction over the application. In the event the City
Council takes jurisdiction over the application, the Planning
Commission's decision will be stayed until the City Council
completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions
of this Chapter.
17.54.020 Persons Authorized to File an Appeal
Any person, including the City Manager, may appeal a decision of
the Planning Commission to the City Council, in accordance with
the terms of this Chapter.,
17.54.030 Form, Content, and Deficiencies in an Appeal Application
A. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk on a
form or forms provided by the City Clerk. No appeal shall
be considered filed until the required appeal fee has been
received by the City Clerk.
B. The appeal application shall state, at a minimum, the name
and address of the appellant, the project and action being
appealed, and the reasons why the appellant believes that
the Planning Commission erred or abused its discretion, or
why the Planning Commission's decision is not support by
evidence in the record.
ROLLING HILLS ZONING
76 MAY 2A, 1993
17.54.030
C. If the appeal application is found to be deficient, the City
Clerk shall deliver or mail (by certified mail), to the
appellant a notice specifying the reasons why the appeal is
deficient. The appellant shall correct the deficiency with an
amendment to the appeal form within seven calendar days of
receiving the deficiency notice. Otherwise, the appeal
application will be deemed withdrawn, and the appeal fee
will be returned to the applicant.
17.54.040 Request for Information
Upon receipt of a written and complete appeal application and fee,
the City Clerk shall direct the Planning Commission Secretary to
transmit to the City Council the complete record of the entire
proceeding before the Planning Commission.
17.54.050 Scheduling of Appeal Hearing
Upon receiving an appeal, the City Clerk shall set the appeal for a
hearing before the City Council to occur within 20 days of the filing
of the appeal. In the event that more than one appeal is filed for
the same project, the Clerk shall schedule all appeals to be heard
at the same time.
17.54.060 Proceedings
A. Noticing
The hearing shall be noticed as required by Section 17.30.030 of
this Title. In addition, the following parties shall be noticed:
1. The applicant of the proposal being appealed;
2. The appellant; and
3. Any person who provided oral testimony or written
comments to the Planning Commission during or as part of
the public hearing on the project.
B. Hearing
The City Council shall conduct a public hearing pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 17.34 of this Title. The Council shall
consider all information in the record, as well as additional
information presented at the appeal hearing, before taking action
on the appeal.
77
ROLLING HILLS ZONING
MAY 24, 1993
•
17.54,060
C. Action
The Council may act to uphold, overturn, or otherwise modify the
Planning Commission's original action on the proposal, or the
Council may remand the application back to the Planning
Commission for further review and direction. The Council shall
make findings to support its decision.
D. Finality of Decision
The action of the City Council to approve, conditionally approve, or
deny an application shall be final and conclusive.
E. Record of Proceedings
The decision of the City Council shall be set forth in full in a
resolution or ordinance. A copy of the decision shall be sent to the
applicant or the appellant.
17.54.070 Statute of Limitations
Any action challenging a final administrative order or decision by
the City made as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing
is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and
discretion regarding a final and non -appealable determination of
facts is vested in the City of Rolling Hills, the City Council, or in
any of its Commissions, officers, or employees, must be filed within
the time limits set forth in the California Code of Civil Procedure,
Section 1094.6
78
ROLLING HILLS ZONING
MAY 2/, 1993
• •
Z 138 110 590
US Postal Service
Receipt for Certified Mail
No Insurance Coverage Provided.
Do not use for International Mail (See reverse)
Sent to
Dr . pp .444 - (5&'i nc.
Street & Number
os It ice State, & �P` Code
Jdif„6 hi, /1) c:/, 227 yi
/.`D
Postage
Certified Fee
Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee
u)
rn Return Receipt Showing to
Whom & Date Delivered
. Return Receipt Showing to Whom,
< Date, & Addressee's Address
OCD TOTAL Postage & Fees
CO Postmark or Date
E
`o
U-
SENDER: COMP LTE _�i' S'
dt it, Itf5retwi
m Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
m Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
Tr, Pe I e=7- z�l7i�Jc k
lec
10,2-7'f
2. Article Number (Copy from service label)
,Z• 138. ,ir s'y0
/, 5Q
$1,5g
O'P
JAN 1 8 2001
CITY OF ROW.WNG KILS
+.
A. Received by (Please Print Clearly) B. Date of Delivery
0 Agent
_) ❑ Addressee
D. Is delivery-a•dress different from item 1? 0 Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
Certified Mail 0 Express Mail
Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
0 Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
PS Form 381 1, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt
'
102595-99-M-1789
Bolton Engineering Corporati
707 Silver Spur Road, Ste. 201
Rolling Hills Estates Ca. 90274
(310) 544-6010
January 04, 2001
Allan Roberts, Chairman
Rolling Hills Planning Commission
City of Rolling Hills
#2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, Ca. 90274
Re: Zoning Case No. 624
17 Wideloop Road
(Lot #3-A-EF)
Dear Mr. Roberts:
.]
JAN 0 2001
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
This letter is to inform you that we are withdrawing the request for a variance to
permit the construction within the west sideyard setback.
Sincerely,
/2, /
Douglas K. McHattie
Vice President
Bolton Engineering Corporation
December 21, 2000
Dr. Peter Spennato Jr.
17 Wideloop Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT:
40 0110
City 0/ Rolling
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1057
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
ZONING CASE NO. 624, Request for Site Plan Review to construct substantial
residential additions at an existing single family residence at 17 Wideloop Road (Lot
3-A-EF) Rolling Hills, CA.
Dear Dr. Spennato:
This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission voted at their regular meeting on
December 19, 2000 to direct staff to prepare a resolution to approve your request for Site Plan
Review to construct substantial residential additions at an existing single family residence at 17
Wideloop Road (Lot 3-A-EF), Rolling Hills, CA in Zoning Case No. 624 and shall be confirmed in the
draft resolution that is being prepared. The Planning Commission will review and consider the draft
resolution, together with conditions of approval, at an upcoming meeting and make its final decision
on your application at that subsequent meeting.
'Also, at the Commission meeting, you requested the withdrawal of a Variance to permit construction
of an addition that will encroach into the west side yard setback. We will need a letter to that effect
orior to the next meetina of the Plannina Commission.
The findings and conditions of approval of the draft resolution will be forwarded to you before being
signed by the Planning Commission Chairman and City Clerk.
The decision shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the Planning Commission's
resolution unless an appeal has been filed or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within that
thirty (30) day appeal period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should
there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its
proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code.
The Planning Commission's action taken by resolution approving the development application is
tentatively scheduled for Tuesday, January 16, 2000. That action, accompanied by the record of the
proceedings before the Commission, is tentatively scheduled to be placed as a report item on the
City Council's agenda at the Council's regular meeting on Monday, January 22, 2001.
Feel free to call me or Yolanta Schwartz, Principal Planner at (310) 377-1521 if you have any
questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
Lola M. Ungar
Planning Director
Cc: Mr. Douglas McHattie
Mr. Roger North
ii
Printed on Recycled Paper.
cE�
November 27, 2000
0/ INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
FIELD TRIP NOTIFICATION
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
Dr. Peter Spennato Jr.
17, Wideloop Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 624, Request for a Variance to permit construction of an addition
that will encroach into the west side yard setback and a request for Site Plan Review
to construct substantial residential additions at an existing single family residence at
17 Wideloop Road (Lot 3-A-EF) Rolling Hills, CA.
Dear Dr. Spennato:
We have arranged for the Planning Commission to conduct a field inspection of your property to view
a silhouette of the proposed project on Saturday, December 16, 2000.
The Planning Commission's timetable is to meet at 8:00 AM at 37 Chuckwagon Road and . then
proceed to 17 Wideloop Road. Do not expect the Commission at 8:00 AM but, be assured that the
Commission will be there before 9:30 AM.
The site shall be prepared according to the enclosed Silhouette Construction Guidelines and the
following requirements:
• A full-size silhouette in conformance with the attached guidelines must be prepared for ALL
STRUCTURES of the project showing the footprints, roof ridges and bearing walls;
• Stake the limits of the building pad;
• Stake the side property lines; and
• Stake the side yard setback lines.
After the field trip, the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission will take place on Tuesday,
December 19, 2000 at 7:30 PM at City Hall.
The owner and/or representative should be present to answer any questions regarding the proposal.
Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Lola M. Ungar
Planning Director
Enclosure: Silhouette Construction Guidelines
cc: Mr. Douglas McHattie, Bolton Engineering Corporation
Printed on Recycled Paper.
111
Ci41 °Mo«S.�u��
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
SILHOUETTE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES
When required by the Planning Commission or City Council, a silhouette of
proposed construction should be erected for the week preceding the
designated Planning Commission or City Council meeting.
Silhouettes should be constructed with 2" x 4" lumber. Printed boards are not
acceptable.
Bracing should be provided where possible.
Wire, twine or other suitable material should be used to delineate roof ridges
and eaves.
Small pieces of cloth or flags should be attached to the wire or twine to aid in
the visualization of the proposed construction.
The application may be delayed if inaccurate or incomplete silhouettes are
constructed.
If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department Staff at
(310) 377-1521.
SECTION
4,10*4411104.144,104
k
A
, 1 of.a n alfr.a.lsi.
PLAN
i
Printed on Recycled Paper
•
C'ity 0/ kiting _Afro
STATUS OF APPLICATION
& NOTIFICATION OF MEETING
November 9, 2000
Dr. Peter Spennato Jr.
17 Wideloop Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mall: cityofrh@aol.com
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 624, Request for a Variance to permit construction of an addition
that will encroach into the west side yard setback and a request for Site Plan Review
to construct substantial residential additions at an existing single family residence at
17 Wideloop Road (Lot 3-A-EF) Rolling Hills, CA.
Dear Dr. Spennato:
Pursuant to state law the City's staff has completed a preliminary review of the application noted
above and finds that the information submitted is:
X Sufficiently complete as of the date indicated above to allow the application to be processed.
Please note that the City may require further information in order to clarify, amplify, correct, or
otherwise supplement the application. If the City requires such additional information, it is strongly
suggested that you supply that information promptly to avoid any delay in the processing of the
application.
Your application for Zoning Case No. 624 has been set for public hearing consideration by the
Planning Commission at their meeting on Tuesday. November 21. 2000.
The meeting will begin at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills City Hall Administration
Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You or your designated representative must attend
to present your project and to answer questions.
The staff report for this project will be available at the City Hall after 3:00 PM on Friday, November 17,
2000. We will forward the report to you.
Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Lola M. Ungar
Planning Director
cc: Mr. Douglas McHattie, Bolton Engineering Corporation
Printed on Recycled Paper.