Loading...
611, Addition to existing SFR withi, ApplicationAGENT'S NAME: AGENTS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: • • City leo elinS JM6 PROPERTY OWNER: VARIANCE REOUEST FOR HEARING Mr. & Mrs. Edward Myers OWNER'S ADDRESS: 235 Paseo de las Delicias, TELEPHONE NO.: (310) 375-0362 PROPERTY ADDRESS: INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 Redondo Beach CA 90277 9 Wagon Lane, Rolling Hills LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 6, tract 30701 ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. 7569 PAGE 007 PARCEL 015 Russell E. Barto, AIA 3 Malaga Cove Plaza #202 Palos Verdes Est. CA 90274 (310) 378-1355 Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Variance. The proposed use is single family residential. The proposed 180 s.f. addition requires a variance because it is in the front setback. Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone. The existing buildings pre -date the current setback ordinance, and in fact the existing garage already encroaches into the front setback. The existing site topography precludes other design solutions to enlarge the garage. ®Pr led c^ raa"V''Q'i P'per. ..... •*'• ..... . ww ..):.,.,. ,,:ni::.IV• ..:.c ......••;a • • Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because The or000sed addition does not increase the existing encroachment (existing and new construction are both 30' from the property line), and the proposed addition will blend seamlessly with the existing Cliff Man architecture. FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. DATE titNINGCASENO. ADDRESS 9 WAGON LANE APPLICANT MR AND MRS EDWARD MYERS CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE BUILDING AREAS EXISTINQ PROPOSED TOTAL NET LOT AREA 78529 sq.ft. - sq.ft. 78529 sq.ft. BUILDING PAD(S) 1 T7On sq.ft. _ sq.ft. 13700 sq.ft. RESIDENCE 4889 sq.ft. - sq.ft. 4689 sq.ft. GARAGE 1020 sq.ft. 180 sq.ft. 1200 sq.ft. SWIMMING POOL/SPA 594 sq.ft. - sq.ft. - 594 sq.ft. STABLE - sq.ft. - sq.ft. - sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( ) - sq.ft. - sq.ft. - sq.ft. SERVICE YARD 176 sq.ft. - sq.ft. 176 sq.ft. covered porch OTHERand patio 825 sq.ft. - sq.ft. 825 sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES 7304 sq.ft. 180 sq.ft. 7484 sq.ft. % STRUCTURAL 9.3 % 0.2 % 9.5 % COVERAGE % TOTAL PAD COVERAGE 53.3 % 1.3 % 54.6 % DRIVEWAY 2116 sq.ft. - sq.ft. 2116. sq.ft. PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREAS 1550 sq.ft. - sq.ft. 1550 sq.ft. POOL DECKING 570 sq.ft. - sq.ft. 570 sq.ft. TOTAL FLATWORK 4236 sq.ft. - sq.ft. 4236 sq.ft. % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE 5.4 % - % 5.4 % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE 11540 sq.ft. 180 sq.ft. 11720 sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE 14.7 % 0.2 % 14.9 % • DATE 4ONING CASE NO. ADDS 9 WAGON LANE APPLICANT MR & MRS EDWARD MYERS ,CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAE .LAD NO. BUILDABLE PAD AREA 13300 sq.ft. RESIDENCE 4689 sq.ft. GARAGE 1200 sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) 0 sq.ft. POOL 594 sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( ) 0 sq.ft. OTHER covered porch and patio 1001 sq.ft. and service yard TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 7484 sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 56.3 PAD NO. 2 BUILDABLE PAD AREA 400 sq.ft. RESIDENCE 0 sq.ft. GARAGE 0 sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) 0 sq.ft. POOL 0 sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( ) 0 sq.ft. OTHER 0 sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 0 sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 0.0 OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at f,4/L1t 461 , California, this 25 2& day of k , 49--ad 4: . Y7//ot;" By: O, ilerY1/ Address NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: Mr & Mrs Ed Myers DATE FILED 2it 7 (Zero REPRESENTATIVE:Russ Barto FEE: COMPANY NAME: Russell E Barto, AIA RECEIPT NO: % I 0 S Architect ��Z� COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: r,� 3 Mal aga Cove P1 aza (#202 ZONING CASE NO: (D Palos Verdes Estates CA 90274 TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: COMPANY PHONE NO. ( 310)378-1355 312 / /zcD PROJECT ADDRESS: 9 Wagon Lane Rolling Hills OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS (''City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at this ,2 S A day of /%46 /1-4 . 49 0 ao By: ' By: r)LLL1\ atirryt/ , California Address Date Filed • • City 0/ Rotting _AIL ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To Be Completed By Applicant) INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 Zoning Case No. NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377.7288 E malt cityofrh@aol.com GENERAL INFORMATION 1 Applicant(s) MR & MRS EDWARD MYERS Tel. (310 )375-0362 Address 235 PASEO DE LAS DELICIAS, REDONDO BEACH, CA 90277 2. Legal Owner(s) SAME Tel. ( ) Address 3. Project Address 9 WAGON LANE, ROLLING HILLS Assessor's Book No. 7569 - 007 - 015 Lot No. 4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, LA COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT 5. Existing zoning district RA-S-2 6. Proposed project/use of site SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7. Site size 99553 8. Net lot area 78529 . "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of a lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot." 9. Total square footage of structures 180 10. Number of floors of construction ONE 11. Basement square footage N/A 12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 180 13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? GARAGE 14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? GARAGE 15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? YES 5-05-98 -1- s: Panted on Recycled Pane, • • 16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? NO 17. Grading quantites shall be balanced. Amount cut 0 . Amount fill 0 (Include any basement cut in grading quantities.) 18. Area of disturbance. 40% maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces will remain or are proposed to be added. Square feet 180 Percentage of Net Lot Area 0.2 . 19. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet 4689 EXISTING 20. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities. N/A 21. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. N/A 22. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. N/A 23. Attach plans. 24. Proposed scheduling. WORK TO COMMENCE UPON APPROVAL 25. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. VARIANCE REQUIRED TO PERMIT BUILDING STRUCTURE WITHIN THE 50 FT FRONT YARD SETBACK Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). 0 di 26. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes or hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours. 0 ® 27. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. 0 d 28. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. -2- • • 112 o m 29. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. ❑ © 30. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes, or odors in vicinity. O 0 31. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing draining patterns. ❑ IH 32. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. O ® 33. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more. ❑ 0 34. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. ❑ n 35. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.). ❑ LI 36. Substantially increased fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). m 0 37. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 38. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. THE PROJECT SITE IS PRESENT! Y OCCUPIED RY A SING! F FAMTI Y RESIDENCE, GARAGE, POOL AND PATIO. PLANS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED FOR REMODELING OF THE RESIDENCE. THE PROPERTY SLOPES DOWN FROM THE BUILDING PAD IN A SOUTH-EASTERLY DIRECTION. SOME MATURE TREES EXIST ON PORTIONS OF THE SITE. 39. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity .of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. THE PROJECT SITE IS SURROUNDED BY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES WHICH ARE SIMILAR IN SCALE OF DEVELOPMENT. -3- • • EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: VI. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact' answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A 'No Impact' answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A 'No Impact' answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). VII. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. VIII. 'Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. IX. 'Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact' to a "Less than Significant Impact.' The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section V, 'Earlier Analysis,' above may be cross-referenced). X. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEOA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier BR or negative declaration. See Section 15063(c)(3)(D) of the State CEDA Guidelines. Earlier analyses are discussed in Section V, above. XI. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): 0 Potentially Significant :... : Potentially Unless': := .: ._ . t.esThan Significant Mitigation- Significant . No impact t� ..r, .� i ,i' ..: hrpact impact I . LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? 0 0 0 ICI b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or 0 0 0 til polices adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the 0 0 ❑ i9 vicinity? d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. 0 0 0 QA impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an 0 0 0 gli established community (including a low-income or minority community)? II . POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local 0 0 0 population projections? -4- • • Potentially Significant Potentiaty Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact I..,,...r,,.d,..) Impact Impact b) Induce substantial growth in an area either 0 0 0 0 directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable 0 0 0 housing? III. GEOLOGICAL PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? 0 0 0 El b) Seismic ground shaking? 0 0 0 Ei c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? 0 0 0 0 d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? 0 0 0 PE e) Landslides or mudflows? 0 0 0 BO f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil 0 0 0 conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? 0 0 0 jg h) Expansive soils? 0 0 0 Ill i) Unique geologic or physical features? 0 0 0 1111 IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, 0 0 0 IV or the rate and amount of surface runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related , 0 0 0 0 hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration 0 0 0 It of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any 0 0 0 El water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of 0 0 0 El water movements? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either 0 0 0 through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? 0 0 0 0 h) Impacts to groundwater quality? 0 0 0 i) Substantial reduction in the amount of 0 0 0 El groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? V. AIR OUAUTY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to 0 0 0 0 an existing or projected air quality violation? -5- • • Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? 0 0 0 RI c) After air movement, moisture, or temperature, or 0 0 0 Id cause any change in climate? d) Create any objectionable odors? 0 0 0 LI VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? 0 0 0 b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., 0 0 0 0 sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to 0 0 0 Ifil nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on -site or off -site? 0 0 0 El e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? 0 0 0 SI f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting 0 0 0 pg alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? 0 0 0 NI VI I. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their 0 0 0 0 habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage 0 0 0 trees)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., 0 0 0 0 oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and vernal 0 0 ❑ IN pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? 0 0 0 p VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation 0 0 0 I plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and 0 0 0 III inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known 0 0 0 51 mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of 0 0 0 9 hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency 0 0 ❑ r1 response plan or emergency evacuation plan? -6- • • c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: Poteen�nbally Sigcan PotentialyUnless Less Than IS Incorporated S+Impact Impact ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ p a) Increases in existing noise levels? 0 0 0 b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 0 0 0 El Xl. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? 0 0 0 b) Police protection? 0 0 0 NI c) Schools? 0 0 0 Ell d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? 0 0 0 El e) Other governmental services? 0 0 0 0 XII. U1IUTIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? ❑ 0 0 OS b) Communications systems? 0 ❑ ❑ 113 c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution 0 0 0 VI facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? 0 0 0 US e) Storm water drainage? 0 0 0 f) Solid waste disposal? 0 0 0 0 g) Local or regional water supplies? 0 0 0 ry XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? 0 0 0 El b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? 0 0 0 ICI c) Create light or glare? 0 0 0 XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? 0 0 ❑ ig b) Disturb archaeological resources? 0 0 0 c) Affect historical resources? 0 0 0 El d) Have the potential to cause a physical change 0 0 0 m which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within 0 0 0 el the potential impact area? -7- • • Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or 0 0 0 411 regional parks or other recreations facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? 0 0 0 IS XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade 0 0 0 the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important example of the major period of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve 0 0 0 short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are 0 0 ❑ q individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Does the project have environmental effects 0 0 0 which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVI I. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier Analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See Section 15063(c)(3)(D) of the State CEQA Guidelines. In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses 0 0 0 and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which 0 0 0 effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less 0 0 0 than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site - specific conditions for the project. -8- • • NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the lists prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed statement indicating whether the project and any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list, and shall specify any list. HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENI The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is required to submit a signed statement which contains the following information: 1. Name of applicant: MR AND MRS EDWARD MYERS 2. Address: 235 PASEO DE LAS DELICIAS REDONDO BEACH CA 90277 3. Phone Number: 310-375-0362 4. Address of Site (street name and number if available, and ZIP code): 9 WAGON LANE ROLLING HILLS CA 90274 5. Local Agency (city/county): CITY OF ROLLING HILLS / COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: 7. Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE OF CALIFORNIA HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (available at City Hall), 8. Regulatory identification number: 9. Date of List: JULY 1992 Date 3.2 - 2000 For Applica t -9- • NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below. I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the development project and any alternatives prc osed in this application are not contained on these lists. Date ;•2- 2jn �►�111.�l19 Signa re For Applicant cant CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date S • 42? QCCO forms\environm. 1998app Ci);• II'��� _1ll�l Sig ature For d'f� Mn5 E-A 14 CA. 1\11/tr Aplicant -10- RECEIVED FROM THE SUM OF FOP �-1 ^ (1 DATE ARD N. MYERS ANN MYERS 235 PASEO DE LAS DELICIAS REDONDO BEACH, CA 90277-6439 249 SMITHBARNEY 46 SELEcT 1068 �7_02 -2°" FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT p� PNC National Bank E Wilmington. DE ':0 3 L L00 L 5 71: 7108 Atv: �,e�iGVu4.d ,F;2, L 2 L0648 249u' L068 OFFICIAL RECEIPT ty Of GRol'cin9 CAM CALIFORNIA ;FAc , 23.5' l',Qefl Lew n � T�QP//v0. , 2 // b 62-15/311 $ S-0,4tp la) iddezezdidzi7 OLLARS $ / FUND AMOUNT CITY CLERK