Loading...
14, Decrease side yard setback fro, Application• -4L4. ,1 t( la-t.n Gcr .1 July 12, 1961 The Secretary Planning Commission City of Rolling Hills Rolling Hills, California Subject: Application for variance from zoning ordinance Wei the undersigned , Wade E. and Helen M. Ballard, as the owners of that property situated at 3 Wideloop Road, Rolling Hills, designated as Lot 10B of a division of Eastfield, Rolling Hills, California, do hereby petition for a variance from zoning ordi- nance. Such change is warranted because a portion of the building on said property already is constructed and occupied, but is within 13'6" of the westerly property line. II. Such change is based upon the following exceptional and extraordinary circumstances that do not apply generally to other proper- ty or class of use in this vicinity and zone. Complete and detailed drawings of the pro- posed new construction, including a plot plan clearly showing the proposed location in respect to property lines, easements, etc. were submitted to the Planning Com- mission and to the County Engineers' Office. Both offices approved the final drawings and the construction proceeded accordingly. III. Such change is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in this same vicinity and zone because the Ordinance requiring a set -back of 10 feet from the (ID') easement was enacted after most existing construction and property use had already been established. IV. Such change will not be materially detri- mental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in this vicinity and zone where this property is located because of the reasons given in Paragraph III above and since the Majority of buildings in this vicinity are already • -2- July 12, 1961 Planning Commission City of Rolling Hills (con't) IV. in violation of the recently enacted ordinance. Therefore, inasmuch as the violation in question occurred through no fault of ours, and since any means of correcting the condition in order to comply with the now existing ordinance would be both completely impractical' and in- ordinately costly , we respectfully request a variance in this particular case. Sincerely yours, d?),053.11,,,LL PLANNING. COMMISSION CITY.:: OF ' 1OLLIJG ° HILLS Application .for 'a) CharrgensE' b) . Variance from Zoning Ordinance c) C asvr�rk.Pet The ..undersigned . wa. . . ...3..Wideloop. Road street address' de E . and Helen M. i41.ard Name Rolling .Hills .. a) Ware the owner(s) of b). s• �peeion•€-he-ower c) city.. telephone legal. description .of property situated .at ,. � 10-B lot 3 . Widelogp Road - Rp1..4ng Hills street .address Eastfield tract petitions. for.side vard setback variance from 10 f t . to 31 feet . I. :.Suchchange is warranted because (state reasons) see letter. attached ...dat.ed' July.,12, 1961 II ..!Such •change is based upon the .following described . exceptional ,or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that•'do not:'apply generally to,•ather.property '.or class of use in the: same vicinity and zone. (state 'circumtances)' III ._Such .change . is necessary for the .. prAser.va.tion and .enjoyment .of a subs.tautial;pr.operty, .right .posees'sed .b.y: other property in the same-, • vicinity:and zone because (state reasons) IV Such . change. will not b'i:,:materially detrimental . to the public welfare or .injurious .. to the property,or . improvements . in 'ouch vicinity and' 'zone where property is' located because. ,Plot • Plan MUST.,:accompany., the application .and must :chow: a) . the location .of the (proposed) building :on the property; ' and b) • the-. area for. which the .variance,. is ' requested;: and c) ... the outside boundaries showing.: dimensions and easements. • -Applicant or a•representative must -appear.:at the hearing, {Applications are considered at the regular.. -meetings of .the Planning CommissiA, ':which .are held .the, third Tuesday of each .month°. •Applications must: be • subnfitted ''..tie the Planning Commission Secretary no liter, than .the..first. Monday of the ...month in which .the hearing-, is to be held. • -A filing fee of $25.00 must 'accompany 'the .application; make,check payable 'to THE CITY.:OF'RQLLING;`HILLS. . (If ',,additional ,space. is: needed,. use . reverse side . of sheet.) Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts, swimming pools, service yards (enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or an area of not less than 200 square feet for the construction of a stable (with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover more than twenty (20%) percent of the net lot area; provided further that in addition to the above described improvements, the areas included within driveways, parking space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt or concrete paving of any kind excepting roads maintained by the Rolling Hills Community Association, shall not cover more than thirty-five (35%) percent of the net lot area. For the purposes of this Section 'net area' shall exclude all perimeter easements to a raximum of ten feet and that portion of the lot or parcel of land which is used for roadway purposes, and shall also exclude any private drive or driveway which pro- vides ingress and egress to any other lot.or parcel of land, and access strip portion of any flag lot. BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS NET LOT AREA &%f,O6, sq. ft. RESIDENCE 4, S2.0 sq. ft. GARAGE (p" ( sq. ft. SWIMMING POOL rj 141- • sq. ft. STABLE 2.0 O sq. ft. TENNIS COURT 5jb l Q sq. ft. . ' TOTAL SQUARE FEET I I ,1 16 L1 % COVERED (MAY NOT EXCEED 20% OF NET LOT AREA) 2.1.4 ro 33 'Z DRIVEWAY ;'f_ _, r sq. ft. PAVED'WALKS AND PATIO AREA 121 4 sq. ft. • POOL DECKING ©(osq. ft. 65 f Z. �.. TOTAL SQUARE FEET V TOTAL COVERAGE (MAY NOT EXCEED 35% OF NET LOT AREA) 3 3 .