606, Addition to SFR and enlarge ga, Resolutions & Approval Conditions•
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL -
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
(310) 377-7288 FAX
00 C813480
U 1 E ,1 1�,
The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation.
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
ZONING CASE NO.606
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCES
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Pzy
I (We) the undersigned state:
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows:
1 WIDELOOP ROAD (LOT 11-B-EF), ROLLING HILLS, CA.
This property is the subject of the above numbered case.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
ZONING CASE NO.606
y (or declare » nder t
SI NGE�
g
nature
/
L i215 )1--7j6f — �.
Name typed or printed
f Gv/L oo /2P -
AddresOLL
4 /4J
City/State
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
State of California
Count _of Los Angeles )
On before me,
cg
90,275,/ City/State
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCES
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Signature
/2f,ci4 tf . i'/1%6
Name typed or printed
/ k /Db-c.--ooP
Address
J
JUN262OU
CITY OF ROLLING HI..LLS
T Recorder's Use Only
L
L
Dia Santrfro/i
hike 96oz7y
appea ed Ofiyi31-elitr � r i (l e,l Gut.fl, flaria.r Pf)i_L(iieil
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose
name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same
in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or
t. - i , _ .o_ • _,� . �.'c� �. • - son(s) acjed, executed the instrument.
{-DINA A. SAMMONS
'llt;,�. t-1" �1 COMMISSION #1189035 =
. ;fa=:*, Notary Public • California
`-'i...":"1"-", ,,i ' LOS ANGELES COUNTY Ci
lr;-� ✓ My Commission Expires
�-=- ,; JULY 4, 2002
Win
by hand and
is sea
6ndture of Notary
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
•
.)C/.//a/T 4,4 "
•
00 0813480
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-08
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING VARIANCES TO ENCROACH INTO THE
FRONT YARD SETBACK TO PERMIT ENLARGEMENTS OF KITCHEN,
NOOK, AND GARAGE AREAS; TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM
STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE PERMITTED; TO EXCEED THE
MAXIMUM TOTAL LOT COVERAGE PERMITTED; AND TO EXCEED
THE MAXIMUM DISTURBED AREA PERMITTED AT AN EXISTING
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1 WIDELOOP ROAD IN
ZONING CASE NO. 606.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Christopher Pingel
with respect to real property located at 1 Wideloop Road (Lot 11-B-EF), Rolling Hills,
requesting the following: (1) a Variance to encroach into the front yard setback to
permit enlargements of kitchen, nook, and garage areas; (2) a Variance to exceed the
maximum structural lot coverage permitted; (3) a Variance to exceed the maximum
total lot coverage permitted; and (4) a Variance to exceed the maximum disturbed
area permitted at an existing single family residence.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public
hearing to consider the applications on February 15, 2000 and March 21, 2000, and at a
field trip visit on March 11, 2000. The applicants were notified of the public hearing
in writing by first class mail and through the City's newsletter. Evidence was heard
and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from
members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed
and studied said proposal. The applicants were in attendance at the hearing.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a
Class 1 Exemption [State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)] and is therefore
categorically exempt from environmental review under the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of
property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity.
Section 17.16.110 requires a front yard of fifty feet (50') from the front easement line.
The applicant is requesting to add 345 square feet for the expansion of a kitchen and
nook that includes the conversion of a portion of the existing garage at the north
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-08
PAGE 1 OF 8
0
0
and the construction of 81 square feet for the expansion of th®e garag atttl e south
which will encroach a maximum of twenty-five feet (25') into the fifty foot (50')
front yard setback. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning
Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of
use in the same zone because the residence is located close to the street and adjacent
residences. The existing development pattern on the lot and the sloping rear portion
precludes continued expansion of the residence on the lot.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because
the development and use of the subject property in a similar manner consistent
with the shape of the lot and development of other property on this street justifies
this additional small incursion into the front yard setback. There will not be any
greater incursion into the front yard setback than already exists.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity
and zone in which the property is located. Development on the pad will allow a
substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped.
Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 606 to permit the proposed
project to encroach a maximum of twenty-five feet (25') into the fifty foot (50') front
yard setback, subject to the conditions specified in Section 12.
Section 6. Section 17.16.070(A)(1) states that coverage by structures shall not
be more than 20 percent of the net lot area. The applicant is requesting a Variance
because coverage by structures will cover 24.4% of the net lot area. With respect to
this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of
use in the same zone. The Variance for the structural lot coverage is necessary
because the lot is 0.79 acres and two bordering roadways exist at the southwestern
and southeastern sides of the property that reduce the size of the net lot area. The
lot size and configuration, together with the existing development on the lot creates
a difficulty in meeting this Code requirement.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because
the unusual size and configuration of the lot together with the City's development
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-08
PAGE 2 OF 8
•
•
00 0813480
standards result in more severe restrictions on the development of the subject
property than occurring on other lots in the vicinity.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity
and zone in which the property is located. All development will occur within
existing setbacks and will be adequately screened to prevent adverse visual impact to
surrounding properties. Development on the site will be 24.4% which will allow a
substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped.
Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 606 to permit lot coverage by
structures of 24.4%, subject to the conditions specified in Section 12.
Section 8. Section 17.16.070 (A)(2) states that coverage by structures and all
other impervious surfaces, known as total lot coverage, shall not be more than 35
percent of the net lot area. The applicant is requesting a Variance because total lot
coverage will be 53.4% of the net lot area. With respect to this request for a
Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of
use in the same zone. The Variance for the total lot coverage is necessary because
the lot is 0.79 acres and there are two bordering roadways at the southwestern and
southeastern sides of the property that reduce the size of the net lot area. The lot
size and configuration, together with the existing development on the lot creates a
difficulty in meeting this Code requirement.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because of
the unusual size and configuration of the lot together with the City's development
standards result in more severe restrictions on the development of the subject
property than occurring on other lots in the vicinity.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity
and zone in which the property is located. All development will occur within
existing setbacks and will be adequately screened to prevent adverse visual impact to
surrounding properties. Total lot coverage on the site will be 53.4% which will
allow a substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped.
Section 9. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 606 to permit total lot coverage of
53.4%, subject to the conditions specified in Section 12.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-08
PAGE 3 OF 8
•
•
00 0813480.
Section 10. Section 17.16.070 (B) states that disturbance shall be limited to
40% of the net lot area. The applicant is requesting a Variance because total
disturbance will be 53.4% of the net lot area. With respect to this request for a
Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of
use in the same zone. The Variance for the total disturbance is necessary because
the lot is 0.79 acres and there are two bordering roadways at the southwestern and
southeastern sides of the property that reduce the size of the net lot area. The lot
size and configuration, together with the existing development on the lot creates a
difficulty in meeting this Code requirement.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because of
the unusual size and configuration of the lot together with the City's development
standards result in more severe restrictions on the development of the subject
property than occurring on other lots in the vicinity.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity
and zone in which the property is located. All development will occur within
existing setbacks and will be adequately screened to prevent adverse visual impact to
surrounding properties. Disturbed area on the site will be 53.4% which will allow a
substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped.
Section 11. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 606 to permit a disturbed area of
53.4%, subject to the conditions specified in Section 12.
Section 12. The Variances regarding encroachments approved in Section 5
and the Variances regarding lot coverages approved in Sections 7, 9, and 11, of this
Resolution are subject to the following conditions:
A. The Variance approvals shall expire within one year from the effective
date of approval as defined in Sections 17.38.O70(A) unless otherwise extended
pursuant to the requirements of that section.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Variance approvals, that if
any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the
privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been
given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been
provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct
the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's
determination.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-08
PAGE 4 OF 8
•
•
00 0813480
C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be
complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated February 9, 2000, except as
otherwise provided in these conditions.
E. The property on which the project is located shall contain an area of
sufficient size to also provide an area meeting all standards for a stable and corral
with vehicular access thereto in conformance with site plan review limitations.
F. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 4,652 square feet or 24.4% in
conformance with lot coverage limitations approved in Section 7.
G. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 10,183
square feet or 53.4% in conformance with lot coverage limitations approved in
Section 9.
H. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 10,183 square feet or 53.4%
in conformance with lot coverage limitations approved in Section 11.
I. Residential and total building pad coverage on the 8,133 square foot
building pad shall not exceed 4,652 square feet or 57.2%.
J. There shall be no grading for the project.
K. Landscaping shall be designed using mature trees and shrubs so as not
to obstruct views of neighboring properties but, to obscure the residence.
L. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum
extent feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes
automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones,"
considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to
reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section
17.27.020 (Water efficient landscaping requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal
Code.
M. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize
the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by
construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management
District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-08
PAGE 5 OF 8
•
•
00 0813480
N. During construction, conformance with local ordinances and
engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to landslides,
mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required.
O. During construction, conformance with the air quality management
district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local
ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to
undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion,
or land subsidence shall be required.
P. During and after construction, all soil preparation, drainage, and
landscape sprinklers shall protect the building pad from erosion and direct surface
water to the rear of the lot at the northeast.
Q. During construction, the Erosion Control Plan containing the elements
set forth in Section 7010 of the 1996 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code
shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control
stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles.
R. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the
project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby
roadway easements.
S. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule
and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the
hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and
mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet
residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
T. The drainage plan system shall be modified and approved by the
Planning Department and City Engineer, to include any water from any site
irrigation systems and that all drainage from the site shall be conveyed in an
approved manner to the rear or northeast of the lot.
U. An Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section
7010 of the 1996 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be prepared to
minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater
pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles.
V. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional
Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the.
installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities.
W . The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional
Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best
Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-08
PAGE 6 OF 8
•
00 0813480
X. A detailed drainage plan that conforms to the development plan as
approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills
Planning Department staff for their review.
Y. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of
any drainage, building or grading permit.
Z. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of
Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the development plan
described in Condition D.
AA. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code, any modifications to the project which would constitute additional
grading or structural development shall require the filing of a new application for
approval by the Planning Commission.
AB. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final building plan to the County
of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed drainage plan with related geology, soils
and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the
Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department
staff for their review.
AC. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all
conditions of these Variance approvals, pursuant to Section 17.38.060, or the
approval shall not be effective.
AD. All conditions of these Variance approvals must be complied with
prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los
Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 18TH DAOF A'1¢.IL,k 2000.
J -
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
MARILYN K RN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-08
PAGE 7 OF 8
• •
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2000-08 entitled:
00 0813480
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING VARIANCES TO ENCROACH INTO THE
FRONT YARD SETBACK TO PERMIT ENLARGEMENTS OF KITCHEN,
NOOK, AND GARAGE AREAS; TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM
STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE PERMITTED; TO EXCEED THE
MAXIMUM TOTAL LOT COVERAGE PERMITTED; AND TO EXCEED
THE MAXIMUM DISTURBED AREA PERMIIIwu AT AN EXISTING
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1 WIDELOOP ROAD IN
ZONING CASE NO. 606.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
April 18, 2000 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte and
Chairman Roberts.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None .
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-08
PAGE 8 OF 8