243, Construct a paddle tennis cour, Resolutions & Approval Conditions• •
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application )
)
of )
) ZONING CASE NO. 243
Dr. Chadwick Smith )
)
Lot 8-EF )
FINDINGS AND REPORT
The application of Dr. Chadwick Smith, Lot 8-EF, Eastfield Tract,
for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 3.01, Paragraph 3 (c) of
Ordinance No. 150 for construction of a paddle tennis court came on
for hearing on the 15th day of January, 1980 in the Council Chambers
of the Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills,
California, and the applicant, having submitted evidence in support
of the application, the Planning Commission, being advised, now
makes its Findings and Report as required by the Ordinances of
Rolling Hills, California.
I.
The Commission finds that the applicant, Dr. Chadwick Smith, is
the owner of that certain real property described as Lots 7B and 8-EF,
located at 7 Wide Loop Road in the City of Rolling Hills, and that
notice of the public hearing in connection with said application
was given as required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of Ordinance No. 33
of the City of Rolling Hills, California. The Commission finds that
no comment, written or verbal, was received in favor of or in oppo-
sition to the request.
II.
The Commission finds that Dr. Smith previously received approval
of a request for a Conditional Use Permit on October 17, 1978, and
that said approval has expired, and must be renewed. The Commission
finds that the request should be granted in order to preserve sub-
stantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same
vicinity and zone, and that the granting of such approval would not
be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to
property in the same vicinity and zone.
III.
From the foregoing it is concluded that a Conditional Use Permit
for construction of a paddle tennis court should be granted to Dr.
Chadwick Smith, Lot 7B - 8EF, located at 7 Wide Loop Road, subject
to the condition No. 1 imposed in October 17, 1978, as follows:
That the City staff be requested to take particular care to call to
the attention of the City Engineer the drainage problems in the area,
and subject further to conditions set forth in Conditions of Approval
Tennis Courts, as attached hereto, and it is, therefore, so ordered.
The Conditional Use Permit shall be void unless used within one
year of the date of the grant.. The applicant is further advised
which
that the time within/to seek judicial review of the action of the
Planning Commission is governed by Section 1094.6 of the Code of
Civil Proceedings of the State of California.
Plannin Commission/y10e.b
•
S retary, Planning Co��ission
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - TENNIS OMITS
While a complete list of conditions cannot be recommended until a
public hearing has been held and all testimony taken, the following
list of conditions pertaining to tennis courts is provided for the
Commission's consideration:
1. That this Conditional Use Permit shall not be effective for
any purpose until the owner of the property involved, or his
duly authorized representative, has filed with the City Clerk
of the City of Rolling Hills an affidavit stating that he is
aware of and accepts all the conditions of the Permit.
2. That it is declared to be the intent that if any provision of
the Permit is held or declared to be invalid, the permit shall
be void and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse.
3. That it is declared and made a condition of the Permit that if
any conditions thereof are violated, or if any law, statute or
ordinance is violated, the Permit shall be suspended and the
privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the
applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation
and has failed to do so for a period of thirty (30) days.
4. That all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and of the spe-
cific zoning of the subject property must be complied with
unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise
on an approved plan.
5. That the property shall be developed and maintained in
substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked
Exhibit
4"�� except as otherwise provided herein.
6. That thetennis court fence shall be a maximum of /0
feet in height above the surface level of the court.
7. That all slopes shall be landscaped with ground cover and
trees to screen the court area.
8. That a landscape plan and irrigation system shall be submit-
ted to the Planning Commission for review and approval.
9. That all proposed walls shall be a uniform earthern color.
The color and material shall be approved by the Planning
Commission.
10. That a bond be deposited with the City, to be held until
eighteen months after completion, to guarantee the satisfac-
tory growth and maintenance of the required landscaping.
11. That all landscaping and the irrigation system shall be
completed c'ncrrrent with completion of the tennis court.
This Conditional Use Permit shall expire unless used within
one year of the date of grant.
December 1979
RCA/JC
APPRO.VED0
DISAPPROVED.
OTHER:
Gr-