221, Construct a tennis court at no, Resolutions & Approval Conditions• •
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application
of
Mr. Keith Slingsby
Lot 49-RH
ZONING CASE NO. 221
FINDINGS AND REPORT
The application of Mr. Keith Slingsby, Lot 49-RH, Rolling
Hills Tract, for a conditional use permit under Section 3.01 (D),
Paragraph 3 (a) of Ordinance No. 150 came on for hearing on the
20th day of March, 1979 in the Council Chambers of the Administration
Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California, and the
applicant, having submitted evidence in support of the application,
the Planning Commission, being advised, now makes its Findings and
Report as required by the Ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills,
California.
I.
The Commission finds that the applicant, Mr. Keith Slingsby,
is the owner of that certain real property described as Lot 49-RH,
located at 35 Saddleback Road in the City of Rolling Hills, and that
notice of the public hearing in connection with said application was
given as required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of Ordinance No. 33 of
the City of Rolling Hills, California. The Commission finds, further,
that no comment, written or verbal, was received in opposition to the
request.
II.
The commission finds that the applicant has requested a
conditional use permit for construction of a tennis court in a legal
location on his property in an area which would be at least 40 feet
from the proposed residence on the vacant parcel which adjoins his
property. The Commission finds that a conditional use permit should
be granted in order to preserve substantial property rights in the
same vicinity and zone, and that the granting of such conditional
use permit would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare,
nor injurious to property in the same vicinity and zone.
• •
III.
From the foregoing it is concluded that a conditional use
permit should be granted to Mr. Keith Slingsby, Lot 49-RH, 35 Saddle-
back Road under Section 3.01 (D), Paragraph 3 (a) of Ordinance No. 150
for construction of a tennis court subject to the following conditions:
1) That the tennis court fence not exceed eight feet in height;
2) That the landscape plan be approved by the Planning Commis-
sion after approval by the Landscape Committee;
3) That a bond in the amount of the estimate for landscaping
plus 15% for inflation be posted for not less than two years;
and it is, therefore, so ordered. This approval shall expire one year
from the date of grant, if not acted on.
/s/ Carol Hanscom
Chairman, Planning Commission
t_,Gvttizti
S-Gcretary, Planning/ ouunission