214, Construct a stable in front ya, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsBEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application
of
Mr. Joseph Lademan
Lot 9-2-RH
ZONING CASE NO. 21
FINDINGS AND REPORT
The application of Mr. Joseph Lademan, Lot 9-2-RH, Rolling
Hills Tract, for a conditional use permit under Article III, Section
3.06, Front Yard and Section 3.08, Rear Yard, Ordinance No. 33 came
on for hearing on the 22nd day of,August 1978 in the Council Chambers
of the Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills,
California, and the applicant, having submitted evidence in support
of the application, the Planning Commission, being advised, now
makes its Findings and Report as required by the Ordinances of the
City of Rolling Hills, California.
I.
The Commission finds that the applicant, Mr. Joseph Lademan,
is the owner of that certain real property described as Lot 9-2-RH,
located at 52 Saddleback Road in the City of Rolling Hills, and
that notice of the public hearing in connection with said appli-
cation was given as required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of Ordinance
No. 33 of the City of Rolling Hills, California. The Commission
finds further that Dr. Roberto Unguez, 48 Saddleback Road and Mrs.
Mya Hamburger, 58 Saddleback Road, attended the meeting and expressed
an interest in the proposed development of the property, and that no
communications, written or verbal, were received in favor of or in
opposition to the request.
II.
The Commission finds that Mr. Lademan has requested a
conditional use permit for construction of a stable in the front
yard and for construction of a residence with less than the required
rear yard. The Commission finds that conditional use permits should
be granted in order to preserve substantial property rights possessed
by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and that the granting
of such conditional use permits would not be materially detrimental
•
to the public welfare, nor injurious to property in the same vicinity
and zone.
III.
From the foregoing it is concluded that conditional use
permits should be granted to Mr. Joseph Lademan for the following:
1) A stable in the front yard, provided that it is re-
duced in size from that shown on the plan by the area
on the northerly extension, which is open and has no
walls. (A carport -like area,
2) That a rear yard setback of(30'be permitted, instead
l\ j'
of the required 50'; that the drainage be given partic-
ular attention by the City Engineer, taking into account
the natural drainage flow across the pie -shaped area to
the northerly portion of the land; that the drawing
labeled Exhibit "A" be duly signed and dated by a Civil
Engineer before the applicant is permitted to go for-
ward with the project;
3) That the modification of set back requirements for the
rear yard in no way indicates that the Commission ap-
proves the design or configuration of the house, and
addresses only the problems of the lot,
and it is, therefore, so ordered.
/s/ Forrest Riegel
Chairman, Planning Commission
cretary, Planning u ission