Loading...
682, Amendment of Zoning ordinance , Noticing• • Ceti: /f729c : At�1e INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityotrh@aol.com NOTICE OF A PROPOSED ZONING CODE AMENDMENT PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills will hold a Public Hearing at 7:30 PM on Monday, February 9, 2004 in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA for the purpose of receiving public input regarding the following: CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF A PROPOSED ORDINANCE AS FOLLOWS: AN ORDINANCE OF THE .CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AMENDING SECTION 17.16.040 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES ON SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY IN THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT AND AMENDING THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE. MUNICIPAL CODE APPLICATIONS: Section 17.16.040 - Conditionally Permitted Uses and Section 17.50.020(B) - Amendments to the Zoning Code. After reviewing the initial study for the proposed ordinance, staff has determined that the zoning code amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment. Accordingly, a Negative Declaration has been prepared. Any person is welcome to review the proposed ordinance prior to the public hearing at the City Hall Administration Building located at 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA. If you challenge the approval or denial of the proposed ordinance in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. Published in Palos Verdes Peninsula News January 24, 2004. Printed on Recycled Paper. i PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above -entitled matter. I am the principle clerk of the printer of the Palos Verdes Peninsula News a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published semi -weekly In the City of Rancho Palos Verdes County of Los Angeles, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, under the date of October 15,196 3 Case Number C 824957 that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to -wit: Tanuary 24 in the year 2004. , I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Rancho Palos Verdes California, this 24th day of January 2004. A, /7 Signature By ("Ffk(pR,1 : Oleetif ou\r►t j ., 1t: s Filing Stamp JAW 2 7 2004 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Proof of Publication PVPN # 7374 P.V.P, News No. 7374 NOTICE OF A PROPOSED ZONING CODE AMENDMENT PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE ' CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills will hold a Public Hearing at 7:30 PM on Monday, February 9, 2004 in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA for the purpose of receiving public input regarding the fol- lowing: CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF A PROPOSED ORDINANCE AS FOLLOWS: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AMENDING SECTION 17.16.040 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING CONDITIONALLY PERMIT- TED USES ON SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY IN THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT AND AMEND- ING THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE. MUNICIPAL CODE APPLICATIONS: Section 17.16.040 - Conditionally Permitted Uses and Section 17.50.020(B) - Amendments to the Zoning Code. After reviewing the initial study for the proposed ordi- ' nonce, staff has determined that the zoning code amend- ment will not have a significant effect on the environment. I Accordingly, a Negative Declaration has been prepared. Any person is welcome to review the proposed ordinance prior to the public hearing at the City Hall Administration Building located at 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA. , If you challenge the approval or denial of the proposed ordinance in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspon- dence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. Published in the Palos Verdes Peninsula News on ;fa qua ry 21,2004 By JAN2.1Lair CITY OF ROLLING HILLS • • ei al /e0,iL, Alto INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rolling Hills will hold a Public Hearing at 7:30 PM on Tuesday, January 20, 2004 in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA for the purpose of receiving public input regarding the following: ZONING CASE NO. 682 Consideration of a proposed ordinance of the City of Rolling Hills amending Section 17.16.040 of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code pertaining to certain conditionally permitted uses in the RAS-2 (Residential Suburban Agricultural, 2 acres minimum lots) zone, to be implemented by the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District. The request is briefly described as a proposed ordinance amendment of the City of Rolling Hills Zoning Code to include a conditionally permitted use, which would tillowental-nd.seryices in support of school district operations. LE P; _) tnmr, /ON itrGLSTMTI-R CORr)gr11> �t Ye- �n 1 PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY AND CRITERIA CONTAINED IN THE CALIFbR I) ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) AND THE CEQA GUIDELINES OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, THE LEAD AGENCY HAS PREPARED AN INITIAL STUDY, ANALYZED THE PROJECT AND DETERMINED THAT THE PROJECT WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. BASED ON THIS FINDING, THE LEAD AGENCY PREPARED THIS NEGATIVE DECLARATION. FINDINGS OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT:, A period of at least 20 days from the date of publication of the notice of this NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be provided to enable public review of the project specifications, the Initial Study and this document prior to the final adoption of the NEGATIVE DECLARATION by the Lead Agency. A copy of the proposed Zoning Code amendment is on file in the offices of The City of Rolling Hills, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274. Date: Decern - eer 26, 2003 /1.1::,c $ij( Yolanta Schwartz, Planning Director Published in the Palos Verdes Peninsula News on December 27, 2003. By: i Oa 0008208 I-1 Tr DEC 1f 2O0 CONNY B. thcCO RUNTY CLERK r�a� GEPUTY 6f5f'rn ri vrl on HOt,yr.Ind Rt{rr=, • • PROPOSED PROJECT: NAME & ADDRESS OF APPLICANTS: LOCATION OF PROJECT: ASSESSOR'S Book, Page & EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: LOT SIZE: LOCATION MAP: ZONING CASE NO. CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE Consideration of a proposed ordinance of the City of Rolling Hills amending Section 17.16.040 of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code pertaining to certain conditionally permitted uses in the RAS-2 (Residential Suburban Agricultural, 2 acres minimum lots) zone. The proposal is to be implemented by the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District. The request is briefly described as a proposed ordinance amendment of the City of Rolling Hills Zoning Code to include a conditionally permitted use in the RAS-2 zone, which would allow costume rental and services in support of school district operations. Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District 3801 Via La Selva Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 38 Crest Road West Rolling Hills, CA 90274 7569-22-900 Single Family Residential, low density. RA-S-2, Residential Agricultural -Suburban 2 acres minimum lot size. No change. (+) (-) 31.14 acres. Attached. Zoning Case No. 682 I. APPLICABILITY OF THE INITIAL STUDY A. Is the proposed action a "project" as defined by CEQA? (See Section I. of the City's CEQA Guidelines. If more than one application is filed on the same site, consider them together as one project). x Yes No 1. If the project qualifies for one of the Categorical Exemptions listed in Appendix E of the City's CEQA Guidelines, is there a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect due to special circumstances? Yes x No II. INITIAL STUDY REVIEW A. Does the project require a 30-day State Clearinghouse review for any of the following reasons? Yes X No 1. The lead agency is a state agency. I-1 • f 2. There is a State "responsible agency" (any public agency which has discretionary approval over the project). 3. There is a State "trustee agency" (California Department of Fish and Game, State Department of Parks and Recreation, University of California, and State Lands Commission). 4. The project is of Statewide or area wide significance including the following: (A) A proposed local general plan, element, or amendment thereof for which an EIR was prepared. (B) A project which would interfere with the attainment or maintenance of State or national air quality standards including: (1) A proposed residential development of more than 500 dwelling units. (2) A proposed shopping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or encompassing more than 500,000 square feet of floor space. (3) A proposed commercial office building employing more than 1,000 persons or encompassing more than 250,000 square feet of floor space. (4) A proposed hotel/motel development of more than 500 rooms. (5) A proposed industrial, manufacturing or processing plant, or industrial park planned to house more than 1,000 persons occupying more than 40 acres of land, or encompassing more than 650,000 square feet of floor area. (C) A project which would substantially affect sensitive wildlife habitats including but not limited to riparian for rare and endangered species as defined by Fish and Game Code Section 903. (D) A project, which would interfere with attainment of regional water quality standards as stated in the approved area wide wastewater management plan. III. PROJECT ASSESSMENT A. Project Description: Proposed ordinance amendment of the City of Rolling Hills Zoning Code to include a conditionally permitted use in the RAS-2 zone, which would allow costume rental and services in support of school district operations. B. Description of the Project Site: (Describe the project site as it exists at the present time, including information on topography, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and use of the structures.) The project site is a (+) (-) 31.14 acre parcel consisting of undulating hillsides and knolls covered by grasses and mature shrubs and trees, with some areas being somewhat wooded. There are approximately 14 one-story structures on the site. They consist of school buildings, maintenance building, warehouse building, office and administrative buildings, repair shop and parking areas for the school facility and the Palos Verdes Transit buses. A long tree lined driveway off of Crest Road West outside the Rolling Hills Crest Road gate, beginning at the westernmost portion of the I-2 lot serves as the accessway to the Palos Verdes School District property. This road is parallel to and is separated from Crest Road West by a sloped vegetated buffer. Only a very small portion of the school district's property is visible from Crest Road West. C. Surrounding Land Uses: North: Single family dwelling units within the City of Rolling Hills. East: Single family dwelling units within the City of Rolling Hills. South: Single family dwelling units within the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. West: St. John Fisher Church and private school affiliated with the church within the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. These areas also consist of undulating hillsides and knolls covered by grasses and mature shrubs and trees with some areas being heavily wooded. D. Is the proposed project consistent with: City of Rolling Hills General Plan Applicable Specific Plan City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance South Coast Air Quality Management Plan Congestion Management Plan Regional Comprehensive Plan Yes x x x x No x N/A x The specific use, as proposed, is not a permitted use in the City of Rolling Hills. Therefore, the school district is seeking zoning code amendment to allow rental of costumes at no charge for school related activities and for a minimal fee to the general public. E. Have any of the following studies been submitted? _ Geology Report _ Hydrology Report _ Soils Report _ Traffic Study _ Noise Study _ Biological Study Native Vegetation Preservation Plan _ Solid Waste Generation Report _ Public Services/ Infrastructure Report I-3 Historical Report Archaeological Report Paleontological Study Line of Sight Exhibits Visual Analysis Slope Map Fiscal Impact Analysis Air Quality Report Hazardous Materials/ Waste • • IV. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (Select one) X I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a potentially significant impact or potentially significant unless mitigated impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. This initial study was prepared by: Date: December 26, 2003 YOLKIA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR I-4 [Signaturef • • EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from Potentially Significant Impact to a Less Than Significant Impact. The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," above may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures Incorporated, describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project s environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. I-5 Issues: I. AESTHETICS — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? I-6 ' 0ss Than �jnificant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ a ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 III. AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? I-7 Less T n Sign' Potentially Witt' Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ I] ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ I] b) Have substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? Ajip Than jnificant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact El 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ IEI ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 I-8 c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on - or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1 B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life and property? I-9 Less Sign' Potentially Wit Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ E ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ E1 e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -- Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area/ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? I-10 ' ss Than jnificant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ EI ❑ ❑ ❑ L1 ❑ 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ o g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY --Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater able level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Less T. Signi Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact ' Incorporation Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 0 0 ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ L1 ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING -- Would the project a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? I-12 Elf Than ificant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ a ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ IE ❑ ❑ ❑ E1 ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ L1 ❑ ❑ 0 El ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ ID XI. NOISE — Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? I-13 Less Than Sign' t Potentially Wi Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact ❑ 0 ❑ l7 ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 17 ❑ ❑ ❑ 17 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment I-14 ss Than nificant Potentially ' With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact O ❑ 0 IE ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ a ❑ ❑ ❑ ID ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 0 0 El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 17 XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC — Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections? b) Exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., but turnouts, bicycle racks)? Item XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS -- Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? I-15 Less T Signifi Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 0 0 ID ❑ ❑ ❑ ID O 0 0 ID O 0 ❑ 0 O ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 F1 ❑ 0 E1 c) Require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? I-16 s Than (cant Potentially With " Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ CI ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ E1 ❑ ❑ ❑ E1 ❑ ❑ ❑ • b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? I-17 t Sign' Potentially Wi � Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact ❑ 0 0 a ❑ ❑ ❑ E1 i • The following analysis is a description of the findings contained in the Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Issues Checklist Form, which preceded this page. A detailed discussion of all potential environmental impacts checked Potentially Significant Impact, Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated, and Less Than Significant Impact is provided, along with appropriate mitigation measures. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Item I. AESTHETICS. a-c. No Impact. The proposed Zoning Code amendment will not affect the aesthetics, as no new provisions pertaining to density, type of vegetation or adjustments to views and vistas are proposed. The use, if permitted, will be operated out of a new one-story building located among the existing structures on the school district s property, and will not be visible from Crest Road. Item II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES No Impact. The City of Rolling Hills is not considered an agricultural City, and therefore, the impact of the proposed Zoning Code amendment does not apply. Item III. AIR QUALITY Less than significant impact. The proposed use will generate a slight increase in vehicle trips on the school district s property, which is located outside the gate to Rolling Hills. It is determined that there will be an increase of 5 cars per hour throughout the school year, with approximately 12 cars per hour three weeks before and one week after Halloween, and approximately 2 cars per hour from mid -June to mid -September The proposed Zoning Code amendment will have less than significant impact on the air quality in the City, as the amendment does not provide for additional development within the City. The change in the allowed use will be limited to the school district s property only and will have less than significant impact on air quality. Item IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES a-d. No Impact. The proposed Zoning Code amendment will have no impact on the biological resources in the City, as the amendment does not provide for additional development or changes in development standards within the City. The change in the allowed use will be limited to the school district s property only and will not affect any biological resources within the City. In addition, The General Plan and Zoning Code set forth policies, which encourage the retention and use of native drought tolerant vegetation in landscaping. Any known rare or endangered species of plants, which exist in the City, are required to be re -vegetated, when disturbed by a development. Item V. CULTURAL RESOURCES No Impact. The proposed Zoning Code amendment will not change the way the City addresses cultural resources, when found during construction. Item VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS a-e. No Impact. The proposed amendment does not change the density, or requirements for construction, and therefore, will not cause any additional removal of natural vegetative cover. There will not be any movement of soil necessary for the proposed ordinance and since existing development standards are not being affected, the proposed ordinance to amend the Zoning Code will have no impact on the geology or soils in the City. I-18 • • Item VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS No Impact. The proposed Zoning Code amendment will not cause any hazards or create any hazardous materials to be located in the City. The project does not change how the City handles such materials. Item VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY a. g-j No Impact. The City s Buildings & Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and the Rolling Hills Community Association s Construction Ordinance carefully regulate development construction activities and building materials. The existing development standards are not being amended. Therefore, the proposed ordinance will have no impact on the hydrology or water quality. No major floodplains exist in the City, and development is not permitted in the canyon areas most likely to be affected by flooding. No open bodies of water occur within the City; thus no such hazard exists. No water bodies are located in the project area. Future development within the City of Rolling Hills is not expected to result in change in the amount of any water bodies located in the vicinity. Item IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING. a-c. No Impact. The Zoning Ordinance establishes the maintenance of strict development standards to preserve the community s natural terrain and the Building & Construction Ordinance requires a balanced cut and fill ratio. The proposed ordinance will not make any changes to those requirements and will have no impact on the environment. Item X. MINERAL RESOURCES a-b No Impact. There are no known mineral resources that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state or delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or land use plan within the City of Rolling Hills. Item XI. NOISE a Less than significant impact. The proposed use will generate a slight increase in vehicle trips on the school district s property, which is located outside the gate to Rolling Hills. It is determined that there will be an increase of 5 cars per hour throughout the school year, with approximately 12 cars per hour three weeks before and one week after Halloween, and approximately 2 cars per hour from mid -June to mid -September The proposed Zoning Code amendment will have less than significant impact on noise in the City, as the amendment does not provide for additional development within the City. The change in the allowed use will be limited to the school district s property only and will have less than significant impact on noise. Item XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING No Impact. The proposed Zoning Code amendment will have no impact on population or housing in the City. The proposed project will not change the density; lot coverage or other development standards or type of uses permitted in the City, (except a use specifically limited to the school district s property), and therefore, will not have any impact on the natural growth and development of the City. Item XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES No Impact. The proposed project will not affect the current or future public services needed in the City, as no additional residential or commercial development will result from the proposed Zoning Code amendment. I-19 • • Item XIV. RECREATION No Impact. Goals of the Open Space and Conservation Element of the General Plan include continuing the City s program of acquisition and development of strategically located recreation centers, encouraging the maintenance and improvement of the system of hiking and equestrian trails in Rolling Hills through the Community Association, encouraging the continued upkeep of all City -owned recreation facilities within Rolling Hills, and providing expanded recreational opportunities for children. The proposed ordinance will have no impact on the recreation within the City. Item XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC Less than significant impact. The proposed use will generate a slight increase in vehicle trips on the school district s property, which is located outside the gate to Rolling Hills. It is determined that there will be an increase of 5 cars per hour throughout the school year, with approximately 12 cars per hour three weeks before and one week after Halloween, and approximately 2 cars per hour from mid -June to mid -September The proposed Zoning Code amendment will have less than significant impact on traffic in the City, as the amendment does not provide for additional development within the City. The change in the allowed use will be limited to the school district s property only and will have less than significant impact on traffic. Item XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS No Impact. The proposed Zoning Code amendment will have no impact on water supplies or wastewater treatment requirements for the City, since the proposed project will not change the density, lot coverage or other development standards permitted in the City, and therefore, will not have any impact on the natural growth and development of the City, which would affect utilities and service systems. Item XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a-c. No Impact. The proposed ordinance to amend certain provision of the City of Rolling Hills Zoning Code to conditionally allow a specific use, limited to the school district s property does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, does not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable, nor does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. I-20