Loading...
706, Addition to SFR, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsRESOLUTION NO. 2007-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING MODIFICATION TO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2005-22 A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSTANTIAL ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 706 AT 17 CREST ROAD EAST, (LOT 9-FT), (JOHNSON). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. Anthony Inferrera, Architect, on behalf of the property owner, with respect to real property located at 17 Crest Road E., Rolling Hills, CA requesting a two-year time extension for a previously approved Site Plan Review, induding basement, in Zoning Case No. 706. Section 2. The Commission considered this item at a meeting on July 17, 2007 at which time information was presented indicating that additional time is needed to process the development application and to revise certain aspects of the proposed development. Section 3. Based upon information and evidence submitted, the Planning Commission does hereby amend Paragraph A, Section 6 of Resolution No. 2005-22, dated August 16, 2005, to read as follows: "A. The Site Plan Review approval shall expire within four years from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to this approval has not commenced within that time period, as required by Sections 17.46.080(A of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code". Section 4. Except as herein amended, the provisions and conditions of Resolution No. 2005-22 shall continue to be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17th DAY OF JULY 2007. ATTEST: 1//7/4 AIVEL WITTE, CHAIRMAN MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the RESOLUTION NO. 2007-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING MODIFICATION TO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2005-22 A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSTANTIAL ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 706 AT 17 CREST ROAD EAST, (LOT 9-FT), (JOHNSON). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on July 17, 2007 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Henke, Sommer and Chairman Witte. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: Commissioner DeRoy. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices M ) DEPUTY CI Y CLERK This page is part of your document - DO NOT DISCARD irrEim DEC 1 5 2005 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS By TITLE(S) : • FEE FEE $ 023- YY DAF$ a 1C-20 "7 CODE 20 CODE 19 05 2815901 RECORDED/FILED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS RECORDER'S OFFICE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CALIFORNIA 8:04 AM NOV 21 2005 LEAD S EET CODE 9 Assessor's Identification Number (AIN) To be completed by Examiner OR Title Company in black ink. D.T.T. Number of AIN's Shown A THIS FORM IS NOT TO BE DUPLICATED • • RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation. Use Only AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) ZONING CASE NO. 7 0 6 SITE PLAN REVIEW XX LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT VARIANCE I (We) the undersigned state: I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 17 CREST ROAD EAST, ROLLING HILLS, CA (LOT 9-FT) This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval. I am (We are) aware of, and accept, ZONING CASE NO.706 are Jl,%%-i c l��'✓ (We) all the stated conditions in said SITE PLAN REVIEW XX LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT VARIANCE rtify (or d •- under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. lt/N 7;t4Ms© Name)ed o_r pfin ed itp ___rtsr Addret? 14 I La . rM .10- City/State Signature Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.. State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) Onjrildn� Personally appeared_ Signature Name typed or printed Address City/State before me,BRUNO J. SARTINI JR. - NOTARY PUBLIC T T Reams (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s)1 whose name(a) istar6 subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that 1 /she(th y executed the same in hig/her/Weir authorized capacity(ies) and that by laistherZttleir signature(g) on the instrument the person(s`), or the entity upon behalf of which the personf) acted, executed the instrument. BRUNO J. SARTINI JR fitness by and and oi9al seal. COMM. #1341037 03 NOTARY PUBUC•CAUPORNTA LOS ANGELES COUNTY al + . �, MyCpmm. Expire* Feb. 21, tao6 I .., ,,?' ,' V M S .1 N MV' N V Y Signature of SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF • • RESOLUTION NO. 2005-22 N "A A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A SUBSTANTIAL ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 706, AT 17 CREST ROAD EAST (LOT 9-FT), UOHNSON). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mrs. Ann Johnson with respect to real property located at 17 Crest Road East (Lot 9-FT), Rolling Hills, requesting a Site Plan Review to construct a 3,381 square foot addition to the existing residence, 216 square foot addition to the garage, 4,160 square feet of covered porches at an existing single family residence for a total of 8,960 square foot residence and 1,008 square foot garage. A 7,350 square foot basement is also proposed. Section 2 The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application on June 14, 2005, July 19, 2005 and at a field trip visit on July 19, 2005. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants' representatives were in attendance at the hearings. Section 3. The property is currently developed with a 5,579 square foot residence, 792 square foot garage, 320 square foot swimming pool, 2,720 square foot stable and 7,200 square foot turnout area. Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 1 Exemption [State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)] and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 5. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any development requiring a grading permit or any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month period. With respect to the Site Plan Review application requesting grading (excavation for the basement) in the amount of 2,994 cubic yards of dirt for the 7,350 square foot basement, and the additions to the residence and covered porches, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: 05 2815901 Reso. 2005-22 Inhncnn • A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setbacks, lot coverage requirements, disturbed area requirements and all other development standards. The construction of the additions and covered porches on a 9.08 net acre lot would not created an overcrowded or overbuilt condition. B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot. The proposed additions will be constructed on an existing building pad and will utilize for most part already existing impervious surfaces. The project is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the additions will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners. C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site. The proposed project is located out of sight of any residences or the street and is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to properties in the vicinity. The site was previously disturbed and only a minimal additional disturbance (less than 2%) will result from the proposed project. D. The development plan incorporates existing vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot and the new additions will not cause the lot to look overdeveloped. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space. E. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will not change the existing circulation pattern and will utilize an existing driveway. The driveway will be improved and widened at some spots. The excavated material from the basement will be utilized for the driveway. F. The project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 6. Based upon the foregoing findings of this Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review in Zoning Case No. 706 to permit additions subject to the following conditions: A. The Site Plan approval shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval if work has not commenced as defined in Section 17.46.080 of the Zoning Ordinance, unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of this section. Reso. 2005-22 Tnhncnn 2 05 2815901 B. It is declared and made a condition of the approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Codes, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. This shall include, but not be limited to, the requirements of the Lighting Ordinance, Roof Covering Ordinance, Undergrounding of utilities Ordinance and others. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated June 8, 2005, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. The applicant shall submit for the case file cross sections of the proposed development including the driveway. E. The height of the residence shall conform to the height of the silhouette erected for the field trip, and shall not exceed 19 feet to the highest ridge line from finished floor. F. The second story shall be removed and may not be reconstructed. G. All utility lines serving the residence shall be placed underground. H. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 17,306 square feet or 4.4% in conformance with lot coverage limitations of the Zoning Ordinance. I. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 37,084 square feet or 9.4% in conformance with lot coverage limitations of the Zoning Ordinance. J. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 80,960 square feet or 20.4% in conformance with 40% maximum lot disturbance limitations. K. Residential building pad coverage on the 64,500 square foot building pad shall not exceed 16,944 square feet or 26.3%, which includes the covered porches. The coverage on the 11,940 square foot swimming pool building pad shall not exceed 3.0%. L. Grading for this project shall not exceed 2,994 cubic yards of excavation for the basement and shall be balanced on site and used as fill including for driveway improvements. M. Prior to issuance of a grading permit a landscaping plan for the project shall be submitted to staff for review and approval. Landscaping shall be Reso. 2005-22 It hncnn 3 05 2815901 5 designed using mature trees and shrubs so as not to impede views of neighboring properties but to screen the residence. Any new trees and shrubs planned to be planted in conjunction with this project shall, at maturity, not be higher than the ridge height of the residence. Landscaping along the front of the property shall preserve the open vistas of the property as currently seen from Crest Road East. N. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water efficient landscaping requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. O. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices. P. During construction, conformance with local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required. Q. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required. R. During and after construction, all soil preparation, drainage, and landscape sprinklers shall protect the building pad from erosion and surface water shall be directed to the rear of the lot and be dissipated on the property. S. During construction, the Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 2001 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater pollution, if required by the County of Los Angeles Public Works Department. T. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby roadway easements. U. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. 05 2815901 Reso. 2005-22 Tnhncnn 4 V. If an above ground drainage design is utilized, it shall be designed in such a manner as not to cross over any equestrian trails. Any drainage system shall not discharge water onto a trail, shall incorporate earth tone colors, including in the design of the dissipater and be screened from any trail and neighbors views to the maximum extent practicable, without impairing the function of the drain system. W. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities. X. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste. Y. The project shall be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any permit. Z. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the development plan described in Condition D. AA. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Site Plan approval, or the approval shall not be effective. AB. All conditions of this Site Plan approval, which apply, must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 16TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2005. ROGIER SOMMER, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: ){ -f h./1- ) MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK 05 2815901 Reso. 2005-22 Inhnc,.n 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2005-22 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A SUBSTANTIAL ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 706, AT 17 CREST ROAD EAST (LOT 9-FT), (JOHNSON). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on August 16, 2005 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners DeRoy, Hankins, Witte and Chairman Sommer. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: Commissioner Henke. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. ) < DEPUTY CITY CLERK 05 2815901 Reso. 2005-22 Johnson 6