Loading...
896 w/MOD, Major modification to above (t, Application• • REQUEST FOR HEARING r� r FOR VARIANCE E[[ NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal usem structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or re(jye az'y @fa17tlforlfe f o pnzlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In additi n, ppursuant, to Resolution !Ala 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted wiiiiar ihe-acquisiition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher applicationfee. PROPERTY OWNER: Candice Warren OWNER'S ADDRESS: 109 Bear Creek Lane, Bellingham, WA 98229 TELEPHONE NO: 360-714-8386 EMAIL: warrenbroker@msn.com PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: 11 Saddleback Road LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 1 & 2 of Tract 31906 ASSESSORS BOOK NO. 7569 PAGE 004 PARCEL 022 AGENT'S NAME: Gary Wvnn, Wvnn Engineering, Inc AGENT'S ADDRESS: 27315 Valley Center Road. Valley Center, CA 92082 TELEPHONE NO: 310-306-9728 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT The State, County and City have mandated that residential construction projects comply with certain storm water management requirements. This project proposes to use two Bioretention basins to comply with the storm water management provisions. Based on final engineering for the grading and drainage plan, the two gravity basins disturb an additional 7,000 square feet above what was previously approved by the planning commission. A lot disturbance variance was previously required for disturbing 50.8% of the site for this redevelopment project. With the proposed bioretention basins, 58% of the 4 acres parcel will be disturbed. Per city planning staff, an additional variance application needs to reviewed by the city planning commission in order to approved the additional disturbance created by the bioretention swales. These drainage basins are designed to temporarily hold, clean and release the additional storm water runoff created by the increase in impermeable surfaces created by the new construction. These are vegetated basins that work with gravity to drain the site and clean the runoff. Alternatives to the bioretention basins that would require less site disturbance are systems that require holding tanks, filters and/ or other mechanical devices, that require routine maintenance for good performance. The biorientation basins will eventually become a part of the site landscaping and will perform long term, with minimal maintenance. -1 2- • • VARIANCE REVIEW CRITERIA A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone. Explain how. The extraordinary condition which does not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone is that the property is surrounded on three sides by private road easements for Saddleback Road. The owner has also recently tied the two lots together since the 2016 application was approved. This lot tie reduced the density of housing on Saddleback Road and removed a substandard lot from potential development. The disturbance has been increased 8% from the recently approved application in 2018. B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question. Explain how. Although the creation of the Bio-filtration Basins creates additional lot disturbance, the Basins are required to comply with the storm water management provisions. C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Explain how. The change would not be material detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property of improvements in the surrounding vicinity due to the proper building codes being followed during the construction process. The older dwelling/structure will be remodeled and improved. D. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. Explain how. Any and all hazardous materials, if encountered on the site will be properly disposed of as required by the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan. E. That the variance request is consistent with the general plan of the City of Rolling Hills. Explain how. The variance request is consistent with the general plan in as it provides for new equestrian amenities on the property which are encouraged by the general plan. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: Signature U For: l 6ir (, ' Applicant -13- • • FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. -14- 4416 REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR VARIANCE NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modi , or remove any unauthorized or unlawfUl use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher applicationfee. PROPERTY OWNER: Candice Warren OWNER'S ADDRESS: 109 Bear Creek Lane, Bellingham, WA 98229 TELEPHONE NO: 360-714-8386 EMAIL: warrenbrokera,msn.com PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: 11 Saddleback Road LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 1 & 2 of Tract 31906 ASSESSORS BOOK NO. 7569 PAGE 004 PARCEL 022 AGENT'S NAME: Gary Wynn, Wynn Engineering, Inc AGENT'S ADDRESS: 27315 Valley Center Road, Valley Center, CA 92082 TELEPHONE NO: 310-306-9728 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a variance: Disturbed Area. The proposed improvements and dressage arena will cause the disturbed area to be 51%, which is above the 40% maximum allowed. The 2016 project approved a variance for 75% lot coverage, so this project substantially reduces the area of disturbance. The new arena is creating the majority of the additional disturbance, however it will not be paved and still give the lot an open feel. Retaining Wall in the southerly side yard setback. The dressage ring has been redesigned to raise it up from a sunken condition and has eliminated all of the walls except for one wall averaging 2.5' to 5'. This is the only wall needed for this design of the dressage ring and it is located the in the side yard setback, which requires a variance. The wall has been minimized, but is necessary in this location to help minimize grading while eliminating the previously approved "depressed condition" with numerous retaining walls. -11- t— FE1 0 n 20f7 City of Rolling Hills By VARIANCE REVIEW CRITERIA A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone. Explain how. The extraordinary condition which does not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone is that the property is surrounded on three sides by private road easements for Saddleback Road. The owner has also recently tied the two lots together since the 2016 application was approved. This lot tie reduced the density of housing on Saddleback Road and removed a substandard lot from potential development. The disturbance has been reduced 24% from the recently approved application, creating a superior design. The bulk of the disturbance is creating an open arena, and with the removal of overgrown vegetation the "open in nature" feel will be enhanced and improved. B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question. Explain how. Although the creation of a dressage ring creates substantial lot disturbance, when the ring is finished, there is still a feeling of openness since it creates an unpaved arena area. A dressage ring requires substantial lot disturbance due to its required standard size. C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Explain how. The change would not be material detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property of improvements in the surrounding vicinity due to the proper building codes being followed during the construction process. Overgrown vegetation will be removed, additional equestrian amenities will be constructed and the older dwelling/structure will be remodeled and improved. D. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. Explain how. Any and all hazardous materials, if encountered on the site will be properly disposed of as required by the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan. -12- E. That the variance request is consistent with the general plan of the City of Rolling Hills. Explain how. The variance request is consistent with the general plan in as it provides for new equestrian amenities on the property which are encouraged by the general plan. The property has adequate acreage to accommodate the proposed project and in fact, substantially reduces disturbance and grading from the project approved in 2016. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: 2- - t "1 Signature For: Applicant FILING FEE bki A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS -13- REQUEST FOR HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2°16 It NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to mode or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher applicationfee. PROPERTY OWNER: Candice Warren OWNER'S ADDRESS: 109 Bear Creek Lane, Bellineham, WA 98229 TELEPHONE NO: 360-714-8386 EMAIL: warrenbroker(amsn.com PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: 11 Saddleback Road LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 1 & 2 of Tract 31906 ASSESSORS BOOK NO 7569 PAGE 004 PARCEL 022 AGENT'S NAME: Gary Wynn, Wynn Eneineerine, Inc. AGENT'S ADDRESS: 27315 Valley Center Road, Valley Center, CA 92082 TELEPHONE NO: 310-306-9728 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use and under what Section of the Zoning Ordinance the conditional use is permitted in the zone. A conditional use permit is required for the proposed dressage ring and new barn. The dressage ring is in the same location as the previously approved location in 2016, except the majority of the retaining walls have been designed out by raising the ring approximately 4.5 feet. A new barn structure with six stalls and paddocks, a 900 square foot tack room and a wash area. By relocating the barn next to the dressage ring grading for unnecessary circulation trail has been eliminated. A portion of the existing residence is being demolished to achieve a 35 foot separation between the habitable space and equestrian amenities. -11- FED 0 P 2017 City of Rolling Hills By Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage A new 1,056 square foot basement is proposed. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REVIEW CRITERIA Site Plan Review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the proposed conditional use consistent with the General Plan? Explain how. The project is consistent with the General plan as these proposed equestrian amenities for the property are one of the main features on which the city was founded. The current design places the equestrian features in one area of the lot and the residential portion in the remaining area. B. That the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures have been considered, and that the use will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, building or structures. Explain how. The dressage ring and barn are now clustered with this application and the dressage ring, which will create the feeling of open space in between the project and the adjoining uses. Saddleback Road surrounds the property on 3 sides. C. That the site for the proposed conditional use is of adequate size and shape to accommodate the use and buildings proposed. Explain how The 3.5 acre site is of adequate size to accommodate the proposed dressage ring and barn. The stable will be compatible with the uses in the surrounding area due to the fact that Rolling Hills is founded as an equestrian community where such improvements are generally encouraged. -12- D. That the proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development standards of the zone district. Explain how. The development standards for the district are complied with by not keeping the floor area of the dwelling fairly modest in comparison to new construction in Rolling Hills. The granting of the conditional use permit will be consistent with and in the furtherance of the public health, safety and welfare. The property had adequate acreage to support the proposed development. E. That the proposed use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. Explain how. Any and all hazardous materials, if encountered on the site will be properly disposed of as required by the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: 2'9- ti Signature For: dtv MeX`- Applicant FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS -13- REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modem or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher applicationfee. PROPERTY OWNER: Candice Warren OWNER'S ADDRESS: 109 Bear Creek Lane, Bellineham, WA 98229 TELEPHONE NO: 360-714-8386 EMAIL:warrenbroker(a msn.com PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: 11 Saddleback Road LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 1 & 2 of Tract 31906 ASSESSORS BOOK NO. 7569 PAGE 004 PARCEL 022 AGENT'S NAME: Gary Wynn, Wynn Engineering, Inc. AGENT'S ADDRESS: 27315 Valley Center Road, Valley Center, CA 92082 TELEPHONE NO: 310-306-9728 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: This project supersedes a recently approved 2016 project. The two lots are now legally tied together. The project is a remodel of the existing residence, a new swimming pool, a new barn and a regulation dressage riding ring. The house remodel will result in a 4,805 square foot dwelling including a new basement area. A new attached garage of 468 square feet will be added. The existing 1,163 square foot detached garage will be retained. The residential dwelling will be cut back to provide for the required 35 foot setback to the proposed new barn. The northerly side of the residential structure will be expanded and include a basement of 1,056 square feet. A new 425 square feet infinity edge pool will be constructed next to the house. The new 2,430 square foot barn is now located next to the proposed dressage riding ring, which consists of 6 stalls and 6 paddocks with tack areas and a wash rack. The dressage ring is proposed in the exact same location as the previously approved ring, only redesigned to minimize retaining walls and provide better access to the proposed new barn. The current elevation of the riding ring is elevation 882.5', raising the ring 5.5' higher than the previously approved riding ring. I.\..f If V 7.7 FEB 0 G 2017 City of Rolling Hills By SPR Rev. 2016 catty of Rolling Hills Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Site Plan Review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. This project redesigns the recently approved project and decreased the lot disturbance from 75 % to 50% by combining the equestrian to one site of the property by placing the proposed barn next the proposed dressage riding ring. The proposed remodel of the existing dwelling will result in a 4,805 square foot home, with remains compatible with adjoining homes. B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. The project better preserves and integrates into the site design the existing topographic features by placing the new pool adjacent to the house and subterranean basement. The barn and riding ring are clustered eliminating substantial grading of the property to connect these two features. C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. The site development plan follows the natural contours of the site by eliminating nearly one half of the previously approved grading and land disturbance of the site. By raising the dressage ring by 4 feet, the retaining walls are eliminated from around the riding ring. Only one 2.5 to 5 foot wall is required on the northwesterly side of the proposed dressage ring. No drainage courses are impacted. -12- SPR Rev. 2016 City of Rolling Hills D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. The project preserved the native vegetation by proposing the structures in an area that has already been disturbed. Overgrown vegetation is proposed to be cleaned up and properly managed. There is a named bridle trail on the south side of the lot which has trees on most sides to act as a buffer for the neighbor to the south. E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. The site development plan preserved the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by reducing the disturbance by 24% from the previously approved project. The main feature being proposed in the lot is a dressage arena which is not paved or considered flatwork or structural coverage and will increase the open space feel of the lot. F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. The plan is harmonious in scale and mass with the existing surrounding residences. The redesign of the 2016 project has decreased the number of retaining walls and substantially reduced the disturbance and grading. G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. The site plan is sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles as the equestrian and residential amenities have been separated into two distinct areas of the property. There will be no changes to the location of the driveway off of Saddleback and therefore will not impact any existing pedestrian or vehicular patterns. H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. The site plan is an improvement to the previously approved project requiring less grading, less site disturbance and provide for a better, overall layout of the site. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and will not have significant adverse impacts on the neighborhood. -13- SPR Rev. 2016 City of Rolling Hills I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are true and coact to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: z - e - c --/ Signature For: Applicant FILING FEE du./kov --. A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to:. CITY OF ROLLING HILLS -14- SPR Rev. 2016 City of Rolling Hills .Jr J<<i�, i • DATE: 05 ,02-2)19 ZONING CASE NO.: ADDRESS: 11 SADDLEBACK ROAD ALL MEASUREMENTS TO BE TAKEN FROM THE EXTERIOR FINISHED WALLS OF STRUCTURES. ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND LISTED HERE CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE AREA AND STRUCTURES EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL NET LOT AREA 98,358 sq.ft. 98,358 sq.ft. 98,358 sq.ft. RESIDENCE 3,069 sq.ft. 4,805 sq.ft. 4,805 sq.ft. GARAGE 475 sq.ft. 468 sq.ft. 468 sq.ft. SWIMMING POOL/SPA sq.ft. 425 sq.ft. 425 sq.ft. POOL EQUIPMENT sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. GUEST HOUSE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. CABANA sq.ft. sq.ft sq.ft. STABLE (dirt volume to be included in grading quantities) sq.ft. 2,430 sq.ft. 2,430 sq.ft. STABLE PORCH/WASH AREA sq.ft. 1,461 sq.ft. 1,461 sq.ft. ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES sq.ft. 168 sq.ft. 168 sq.ft. ENTRYWAY/ PORTE COCHERE, BREEZEWAYS sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ATTACHED TRELLISES sq.ft. 154 sq.ft. 154 sq.ft. *DETACHED STRUCTURES: (circle all that applies) SHEDS, TRELLISES, GARAGE, 1,163 sq.ft. 904 sq.ft. 904 sq.ft. BARBECUE, OUTDOOR KITCHEN, sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ROOFED PLAY EQUP.- over 15 ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. high and over 120 sq. ft. in area, WATER FEATURES, ETC. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. SERVICE YARD 98 sq.ft. 98 sq.ft. 98 sq.ft. OTHER sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. BASEMENT AREA sq.ft. 1,056 sq.ft. 1,056 sq.ft. (volume to be included in grading quantities) DEPTH OF BASEMENT TOTAL STRUCTURES % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE 9,692 sq.ft. 4.9 % 11,969 sq.ft. 12.1 % TOTAL STRUCTURES EXCLUDING up to 5 (legal) & up to 800 sq. ft. detached structures that are not higher than 12 ft. (no more 9,692 sq.ft. 11,969 sq.ft. than 120 sq.ft. per structure per deduction, except trellis) % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE 4.9 % 11,969 sq.ft. 12.1 % 11,969 sq.ft. 12.1 % 12.1 % • • DATE: 05-02-2019 ZONING CASE NO.: ADDRESS: 11 SADDLEBACK ROAD ALL FLATWORK MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL PRIMARY DRIVEWAY(S) 6,530 sq.ft. 7,008 sq.ft. 7,008 sq.ft. PAVED WALKS, PATIO AREAS, COURTYARDS POOL DECKING 245 sq.ft. 300 sq.ft. 300 sq.ft. sq.ft. 1,581 sq.ft. 1,581 sq.ft. OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS, ROAD EASEMENTS, PARKING PADS sq.ft. sq.ft. sq. ft. TOTAL FLATWORK 6,775 sq.ft. 8,889 sq.ft. 8,889 sq.ft. % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE 6.9 % 9.0 % 9.0 % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE 11,625 sq.ft. 18,098 sq.ft. 18,098 sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE 11.8 % 18.4 % 18.4 % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & structural 9,692 sq.ft 18,098 sq.ft 18,098 sq.ft FLATWORK COVERAGE flat work 6,775 sq.ft. 8,889 sq.ft. 8,889 sq.ft. Excl. the allowance of up to 5 — 800 sq. ft. structures from previous page. % TOTAL COVERAGE 11.8 % 18.4 % 18.4 TOTAL DISTURBED AREA * 36,000 sq.ft. 57,024 sq.ft. 57,024 sq.ft. % DISTURBED AREA 36.6 % 58.0 % 58.0 % GRADING QUANTITY (include future stable, corral and access way; basement and all other areas to be graded) All structures (attached and detached) must be listed. -0- cubic yards * Free standing legal, conforming accessory structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, fountains, barbecue, outdoor fire place, etc., are not counted towards coverages and disturbed area, unless their combined area exceeds 800 sq. ft., are over 120 sq.ft. in size (except for trellis) or if there are more than 5 such structures on the property. -16-