71, During construction of SFR, ho, Resolutions & Approval Conditions• •
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application
of
L. M. Simmons.
Lot 2A, Rolling Hills Tract
ZONING CASE #71
FINDINGS AND FORMAL REPORT
The application of L. M. Simmons, Lot 2A, Rolling Hills Tract,
for a side yard variance came on for hearing on the 20th day of June 1967
at the hour of 8:00 P.M. at the Administration Building of the City of
Rolling Hills, California, and the applicant having submitted evidence
in support of his application, the Planning Commission, being advised,
now makes its Findings and Formal Report as required by the Ordinances
of the City of Rolling Hills, California.
I.
The Commission finds that the applicant, Mr. L. M. Simmons,
is the owner of that certain real property described as Lot 2A, Rolling
Hills Tract, located in the City of Rolling Hills, California, and that
notice of the public hearing in connection with said application was
given as required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of Ordinance No. 33 of the
City of Rolling Hills, California.
II.
The Commission further finds that no person appeared at said
public hearing in opposition to the application for a variance, and that
no evidence was received by the Commission in opposition thereto.
III.
The Commission further finds that because the extension into
side yard requirements involves a twenty-five foot boundary easement,
and in no way affects the view, privacy and is in noway detrimental
to any other property owner, and further, the easement itself if of the
canyon variety, and is in fact unusable, the granting of such variance
under Ordinance No. 33, Section 3.07 will not be materially detrimental
to the public welfare, or injurious to property in the same vicinity
and zone.
IV.
From the foregoing it is concluded that a variance should be
granted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rolling Hills to
Mr. L. M. Simmons of Lot 2A, Rolling Hills Tract, in accordance with
the plot plan marked Exhibit I on file in these proceedings, and it
is therefore so ordered.
Dated dune 26, 1967.
Chairman, Planning Commission
Secretary, Planning Commission