92, Construct a tennis court with , Resolutions & Approval ConditionsBEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application
of
Dr. Donald Wright
Lot 14RH
ZONING CASE NO, 92
FINDING AND FORMAL REPORT
The application of Dr. Donald E. Wright, Lot 14RH, Rolling Hills
Tract, for a variance of front yard requirements under Article III,
Section 3.06 of Ordinance No. 33 came on for hearing on the 30th day of
September, 1969 at the hour of 8:00 P.M. at the Administration Building
of the City of Rolling Hills, California, and the applicant, having sub-
mitted evidence in support of his application, the Planning Commission,
being advised, now makes its Findings and Formal Report as required by
the Ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills, California.
Io
The Commission finds that the applicant, Dr. Donald E. Wright, is
the owner of that certain real property described as Lot 14RH, Rolling
Hills Tract, located in the City of Rolling Hills, California, and that
notice of the public hearing in connection with said application was
given as required by Sections 8.0 and 8.07 of Ordinance No. 33 of the
City of Rolling Hills, California.
IIo
The Commission further finds that no person appeared at said public
hearing in opposition to the application for a variance, and that no evi-
dence was received by the Commission in opposition thereto.
III.
The Commission further finds that in order to construct a tennis
court on his property it would be most desireable to located it in the
front yard. He stated that location in the rear yard was not feasible
because it would eliminate the parking area near the barn on his property,
and would require relocation of the seepage pit.
Dr. .Wright .submitted .plans -marked "A",-"B"-and Revised Plan "B" in support
of his request. The Planning Commission finds that Location "B", in the
front yard is more acceptable than Location "A" in the rear yard, and
after discussion, decided that the orientation in Revised Plan "B" was
considered most acceptable. The Commission finds, therefore, that a
variance to permit construction of a tennis court in the front yard should.
be granted to the applicant in order to preserve substantial property
rights possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and that
the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare nor injurious to property in the same vicinity and zone.
Iv
From the foregoing it is concluded that a variance of front yard
requirements should be granted by Planning Commission of the City of
Rolling Hills to Dr. Donald E. Wright, Lot 14RH, Rolling Hills Tract,
in accordance with the plot plan marked "Revised Plan B" on file in these
proceedings, and it is, therefore, so ordered.
Chairman, Planning Commission
Secretary, Planning Commission