430, Addition & remodel to existing, Resolutions & Approval Conditions904140235
For Rdpr/ •'s Use
a
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS
RECORDER'S OFFICE
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
31 MIN. 8 A.M.DEC 311990
PAST.
Please record this form with the -Registrar -Recorder's Office and
return to:
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
(The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized
before recordation.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
Acceptance Form
Dr. Mathias Fobi
10 Saddleback Road
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO.
J_FEE $7 I -I
r A 2
VARIANCE CASE NO.
SITE PLAN REVIEW CASE NO.. 430
I (We) the undersigned state:
I am'(We are) the owner(s), of the real property described as follows:
/b Sa-h/4 t/ `2e/ /if Ms / /7
This property is the subject of the above numbered cases.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said •
Conditional Use Permit Case No.'
Variance Case No.
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty. of 'perjury that the
foregoing is true' and correct.' •
(Where the owner:and applicant. are not the same, both must sign.)
Type or print
Applicant Name . Mel 7/-///4- S g "L` f /
Address // ./ 9L) L 6L '/ -
d L1, / /7Cr /1/L!_._S w7 / 1
.vtkv-v-r-)
-
City, State
Signature
Owner Name
Address
City, State
Signature
This signature must
be acknowledged by a
notary public. Attach
appropriate acknowledgement.
)t)
,f" 30 1991
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
Bye..................................�....�.
(11--4--)
•
( GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of C/q//Fa2 /7//11
County of '-a5 4N6E LEv
I SS.
90=2140235
OFFICIAL SEAL
PEGGY R. MINOR
Notary Pubflc-Callfornla
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
My Commissfon Expires
August 23,1993
On this the 7"day of .7)(4-(-77%! -'.—
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
/11/5/7--i///i/. 5 4 . L. . A-0./
d— NO. 201
19_10 before me,
personally known to me
❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) / S _subscribed to the
within instrument, and acknowledged that /-lam ixecuted it.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Not srlgr7ture
k
O. •
a
A
7110 122
NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION • 23012 Ventura Blvd. • P.O. Box 4625 • Woodland Hills, CA 91364
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 90-16
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING SITE PLAN
REVIEW APPROVAL IN ZONING CASE NO. 430
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Dr. and Mrs.
Mathias Fobi with respect to real property located at 10 Saddleback
Road, Rolling Hills (Lot 17-1-RH) requesting site plan review approval
for proposed residential additions.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed
public hearing to consider the application on June 19, 1990 and July 17,
1990; and conducted a field site review on June 30, 1990.
Section 3. Section 17.34.010 requires a development plan to be
submitted for site plan review and approval before any building or
structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or
repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading
or an increase to the size of the building or structure by more than
twenty-five (25%) percent in any thirty-six (36) month period.
Section 4. The Commission makes the following findings of fact:
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General
Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the
proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of
low profile, low density residential development with sufficient
open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms
to Zoning Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The lot
has a net square foot area of 36,251 square feet. The proposed
residential structure, garage, swimming pool, future stable, and
service yard will have 6,822 square feet which constitutes 18.8%
of the lot, which is within the maximum 20% structural lot
coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including paved
areas and driveway will be 12,677 square feet which equals 34.9%
of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage
requirement. The proposed project is similar and compatible
with neighboring development patterns.
B. The proposed development preserves and integrates into the
site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural
topographic features of the lot including surrounding native
vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such
as hillsides and knolls) because the proposed development will
require no substantial grading and impact to existing vegetation
will be minimal.
C. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to
minimize grading because all drainage flow from the site will be
channeled into existing drainage courses to the rear of this
property that has double roadway frontage.
. •
D. The development plan preserves surrounding native vegetation
on the site and supplements it with landscaping that is
compatible with and enhances the rural character of the
community.
E. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and
undeveloped state of the lot be minimizing building coverage
because the construction will not exceed the structural lot
coverage maximum for the lot.
F. The proposed development is harmonious in scale and mass
with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences
because as indicated in paragraph A, the project will have
structural lot coverage that less than permitted.
G. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and
vehicles because the project will have the required setbacks
from the roadway and easements, and the present driveway access
to the site will be unchanged.
H. The project conforms with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from
environmental review.
Section 5. Based on the foregoing findings, the Commission
hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for a proposed
residential project to the property located at 10 Saddleback Road as
indicated on the development plan attached hereto as "Exhibit A" and
subject to the following conditions:
A. Any modifications to the project which would constitute a
modification to the Development Plan as approved by the Planning
Commission, shall require the filing of an application for
modification of the Development Plan pursuant to Section
17.34.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code.
B. A landscaping plan must be submitted to the City of Rolling
Hills Planning Department staff for approval. The plan
submitted must comply with the purpose and intent of the Site
Plan Review Ordinance. A bond in the amount of the cost
estimate for the landscaping plus 15% may be required to be
posted and retained with the City after the City Manager (or the
Landscape Committee of the Community Association, if appointed
to act for this purpose in place of the City Manager) determines
that the landscaping was installed pursuant to the landscaping
was installed pursuant to the landscaping as approved, and that
such landscaping is properly established and in good condition.
C. The proposed building plan must be approved by the Rolling
Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee
before any grading or building permit is issued.
• •
D. Prior to the submittal of a final grading plan, if
necessary, to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a
detailed grading and drainage plan with related geology, soils
and hydrology reports that conform to the Development Plan as
approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the
Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review. Cut
and fill slopes must conform to the City of Rolling Hills
standard of 2 to 1 slope ratio.
E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of
Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the
Development Plan approved with this Site Plan Review.
F. The access to the future stable must be clearly delineated
on the Development Plan. Any required approvals from the
Rolling Hills Community Association allowing access to the
stable through Association easements must be obtained by the
applicant prior to submitting any drawings for the proposed
residence to the County of Los Angeles for a building permit.
G. The applicant shall execute an affidavit of acceptance of
all conditions pursuant to 17.32.087 or this approval shall not
be effective.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this
1990.
ATTEST:
4th day of August
Chairman
• .
I hereby certify that the above Resolution No. 90-16 was adopted
at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rolling
Hills on the 4th day of August, 1990 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Frost and Hawkins; Chairman Roberts
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Raine
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Lay
DEPUTY CITY CLERK