Loading...
84, Addition to SFR with encroachm, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsBEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Application of Dr. Richard McCall Lot 68 RH ZONING CASE NO. 84 FINDING AND FORMAL REPORT The application of Dr. Richard McCall, Lot 68 RH, Rolling Hills Tract, for a variance of front yard requirements under Article III, Section 3.06 of Ordinance No. 33 came on for hearing on the 21st of January, 1969 at the hour of 8:00 P.M. at the Administration Building of the City of Rolling Hills, California and the applicant, having submitted evidence in support of his application, the Planning Com- mission, being advised, now makes its Findings and Formal Report as required by the Ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills, California. I. The Commission finds that the applicant, Dr. Richard McCall, is the owner of that certain real property described as Lot 68RH, Rolling Hills Tract, located in the City of Rolling Hills, California, and that notice of the public hearing in connection with said application was given as required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of Ordinance No. 33 of the City of Rolling Hills, California. II. The Commission further finds that no person appeared at said public hearing in opposition to the application for a variance, and that no evidence was received by the Commission in opposition thereto. III. The Commission further finds that the addition to the residence would be 24'6" from the road easement line of Saddleback Road, instead of 30' as required, but would be well below road level and would not be visible from Saddleback Road, and further finds that by reason of the terrain of said Lot 68RH, Rolling Hills Tract, a variance of5'6" of front yard requirements should be granted to applicant in order to preserve sub- stantial property rights possessed by other property in the same vicinity • • and zone, and that the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to property in the same vicinity and zone. Iv. From the foregoing it is concluded that a variance should be granted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rolling Hills to Dr. Richard McCall, Lot 68RH, Rolling Hills Tract, in accordance with the plot plan marked Exhibit 1 on fiLe in these proceedings, and it is therefore, so ordered. February 14, 1969. ecretary, Planning CoLssion -2- Chairman, Planning Conuuission