904, Construct a 4-stall stable wit, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsRECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
MAIL TO:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2 PORTUGUESE BEND RD.
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
(310) 377-7288 FAX
912^12016
*2(1161160444*
T RECORDER'S USE ONLY
THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER'S OFFICE REQUIRES THAT THE FORM BE NOTARIZED BEFORE
RECORDATION.
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
) §§
ZONING CASE NO. 904 (SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED)
XX SITE PLAN REIVEW XX VARIANCE XX CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I (We) the undersigned state
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows:
34 SADDLEBACK ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (LOT 13-RH)
This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 904
XX SITE PLAN REIVEW
I (Wi) certify or de
Signature
XX VARIANCE XX CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
re) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Name typed or printed
?4 vi// 'ck &ad
Address
/lin gill-
C R ga 271
p Code
City/State
Signature
Name typed or printed
Address
City/State, Zip Code
• •
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who
signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of
that document.
STATE OF Gi%/b/ ma }
COUNTY OF /co- ,%ge/ps' }
On F. /7. /6 , before me, E /VU/e2- ,%pnc/6ia , a
Notary Public, personally appeared
&I,7 be{ya %
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)
whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to
me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies),
and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity
upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California
that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature:
1
Name of Notary: A/ahe2- /9re /A%Q
Date Commission Expires sr. /e- 20/7-
Commission No. 203 ?S 2
E. NUNEZ-ARENCIBIA
Oommmission ( 20$7013
k3try CsItivirtc
lot Apia kook^ t
rstc_I-AL._:—.... - - - c c -
E. NUNEZ-ARENCIBIA
Commission # 2037513 •
Notery Public - Celitornie E
Los Angeles County
My Comm. Expires Aup 18, 20171,
----+-o -4,-..-., -,-. -w r ...r-»i-�v-V,-'i -ro
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-19
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE FOR GRADING AND
CONSTRUCTION OF A STABLE WITH COVERED PORCHES,
CORRAL, AND A RIDING RING, TO ENCROACH WITH THE RIDING
RING INTO THE FRONT SETBACK, AND TO EXCEED THE
PERMITTED DISTURBANCE OF THE LOT IN ZONING CASE NO. 904
AT 34 SADDLEBACK ROAD, (DELGADO).
THE PLANNING COMMISSION DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A revised application was duly filed by Ms. Eddy Delgado, to
request a Site Plan Review, a Conditional Use Permit and Variances for a 1,140 square
foot single story stable with 1,032 square feet of covered porches with 1,950 square foot
adjacent corral, and 5,500 square foot riding ring, 400 cubic yards of grading for the
ring, to encroach with the riding ring into the front setback by 2,150 square feet, and to
exceed the already non -conforming disturbance of the net lot area to 68.8% (max.
permitted disturbance is 40% and existing is at 63.3%).
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings
to consider the application at their regular meeting on May 17, 2016, in the field and at
their regular meeting on June 21, 2016, and again in the field and at their regular
meeting on July 19, 2016. Neighbors within 1,000-foot radius were notified of the public
hearings and a notice was published in the Peninsula News on May 5, 2016 and in the
Daily Breeze on July 8, 2016. The applicants and their agents were notified of the public
hearings in writing by first class mail and the applicants and their agents were in
attendance at the hearings. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons
interested in affecting said proposal, and from members of the City staff. Three
residents visited the site during the noticed field trip on June 21, 2016 and one resident
on July 19, 2016. One resident attended the public hearing during the evening of July
19, 2016 to express her support for the project as it supports equestrian uses in the City.
During the first field trip, Commissioners expressed concerns about the proposed stable
and it's proximity to the guesthouse. The applicant's responded with a revised plan to
relocate and reconfigure the stable and to request a 5,500 square foot riding ring that
partially encroaches into the front setback. The Planning Commission has reviewed,
analyzed and studied said proposal.
Section 3. The property is zoned RAS-1 and the gross lot area is 2.71 acres.
The net lot area is 2.32 acres or 101,040 square feet. The property is currently developed
with a 3,420 square foot residence, a 640 square foot garage, a 780 square foot
swimming pool/spa, 50 square foot pool equipment, 663 square foot guest house, 510
square feet of attached covered porches, 600 square feet of sheds (a 500 square foot
Reso. 2016-19 1
34 Saddleback Rd.
• •
storage shed and a 100 square foot shed), and a 350 square foot service yard. A 959
square foot addition to the residence and a 35 square foot barbecue were approved
administratively in October, 2015 and the addition is currently under construction.
With the addition, the residence will be 4,379 square feet. All existing structures are
legal and permitted.
In 1989 a Conditional Use Permit was granted to convert the then existing stable
into a guest house (Resolution 89-30) and area was set aside for the stable at that time
adjacent to the 6,200 square foot riding ring that exists today. The existing 500 sq.ft.
storage shed was approved and permitted in 1969 as a detached garage.
Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project is exempt from the
California Environmental Quality Act, (CEQA) pursuant to section 15303 (new
construction of single family residence and accessory structures), and section
15061(b)(3) (common sense exemption) of the CEQA guidelines.
Section 5. Section 17.18.040E of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permits
approval of a stable over 200 square feet, a corral over 550 square feet, and a riding ring
with a Conditional Use Permit provided the uses are not located in the front yard or in
any setbacks. A portion of the riding ring is proposed to be located in the front yard
area of the lot. With respect to this request for a Conditional Use Permit, the Planning
Commission finds as follows:
A. Conditionally permitted uses are not outright permitted by the Rolling
Hills Municipal Code. The Commission must consider applications for conditional use
permit and may, with such conditions as are deemed necessary, approve a conditional
use which will not jeopardize, adversely affect, endanger or to otherwise constitute a
menace to the public health, safety or general welfare or be materially detrimental to the
property of other persons located in the vicinity of such use.
B. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for the stable, corral, and riding
ring would be consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and
General Plan because the uses are consistent with similar uses in the community, and
except for the location of the riding ring, meet all the applicable code development
standards for a stable, corral, and riding ring, and the proposed uses are located on
areas on the property that are adequately sized to accommodate such uses. The
proposed uses are appropriately located in that they will be sufficiently separated from
nearby structures used for habitation or containing sleeping quarters. The development
would be constructed in furtherance of the General Plan goal of promoting and
encouraging equestrian uses.
C. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent structures have been
considered, and the project will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to
these adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed stable/corral, and
riding ring orientation are not towards neighbors and their general location is of
Reso. 2016-19 2
34 Saddleback Rd.
• •
sufficient distance from nearby residences so as to not impact the view or privacy of
surrounding neighbors. The proposed stable is to be located next to the corral and a
path designated for equestrian uses runs from the stable/corral to the driveway. The
riding ring would be located in an area of the lot that is not in proximity to any
residents.
D. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural
terrain, and surrounding residences because the stable/corral, and riding ring complies
with the low profile residential development pattern of the community and will not
give the property an over -built look, and areas will remain open and unobstructed. The
lot is 2.32 acres net in size and is sufficiently large to accommodate the proposed uses.
E. The proposed conditional use, other than the riding ring being proposed
in the front yard area, complies with all applicable development standards of the zone
district and requires a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Sections 17.18.090 and
17.18.100 of the Zoning Ordinance.
F. The proposed conditional uses are consistent with the portions of the Los
Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting criteria for
hazardous waste facilities because the project site is not listed on the current State of
California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List.
Section 6. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for
Site Plan Review and approval before any grading requiring a grading permit or any
new building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or
repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an
increase to the size of the building or structure by not more than 999 square feet in any
thirty-six (36) month period.
With respect to the Site Plan grading and the proposed structures the Planning
Commission makes the following findings of fact:
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the
Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structures comply with
the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with
sufficient open space between surrounding structures and maintaining sufficient
setbacks to provide buffers between residential uses. Although the disturbed area
exceeds the maximum permitted amount of 40%, it was already legal non -conforming
at 63.3% and it will increase to 68.8%. The configuration of the lot is narrow and long
and a horse trail is located on the rear portion of the lot, accessible by the public with
the property owner's consent, making this portion of the lot unusable by the property
owner. The stable, corral, and riding ring promote the rural, equestrian aesthetic of
Rolling Hills. While 2,150 square feet of the riding ring is in the front setback, the
equestrian use is promoted in.the City.
Reso. 2016-19 3
34 Saddleback Rd.
• .
The project conforms with Zoning Code lot coverage requirements, except for
disturbance. The net lot area of the lot is 101,040 square feet. The structural net lot
coverage is proposed at 10.07%, which includes all of the structures, with allowance for
permitted deductions, (20% max. permitted); and the total lot coverage proposed,
including the stable would be 23.4%, (35% max. permitted). The disturbed area of the
lot is proposed to increase from 63.3% which already exceeds the maximum permitted
of 40% and is legal nonconforming, to 68.8% due to the 400 cubic yards of grading
required for the riding ring (200 cubic yards of cut and 200 cubic yards of fill).
B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of
the lot by minimizing building coverage. The topography and the configuration of the
lot, have been considered, and it was determined that the proposed development will
not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, buildings, or
structures, because the proposed stable/corral will be constructed entirely on an
existing building pad of the currently developed lot where the corral currently is and
will be the least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped
with trees and shrubs, is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that it will not
impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will permit the owners to
enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding
property owners. The stable, corral, and riding ring will be developed on areas of the
lot that do not currently have structures.
C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and
mass with the site, and is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared
to other equestrian uses in the vicinity of said lot. The proposed stable is 1,140 square
feet and the average size of the last 15 stables approved since 2011 is 1,583 square feet.
D. The development plan will introduce additional landscaping, which is
compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community.
E. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the
convenience and safety of circulation. for pedestrians and vehicles because the
applicants will continue to utilize the existing driveway to the residence and the stable,
and the riding ring will be accessed from the main driveway for heavier vehicles
ingress/egress. The stable access from the driveway will be entirely decomposed
granite.
F. The project is exempt from the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act pursuant to section 15303 of the CEQA guidelines.
Section 7. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Code permit approval of
a variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when, due to
exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable
to other similar properties in the same zone, strict application of the Code would deny
the property owner substantial property rights enjoyed by other properties in the same
Reso. 2016-19 -4
34 Saddleback Rd.
vicinity and zone. The applicant seeks a variance from the requirement 17.18.100.3. that a
riding ring not be located in the front yard, and from 17.16.070B. that disturbance is
limited to 40% of the net lot area. The 5,500 square foot riding ring is being proposed in
the front yard, 2,150 square feet is in the front setback and the disturbance of the lot will
be 68.8%. With respect to this request for Variances, the Planning Commission finds as
follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other
property or class of use in the same zone because a horse trail used by the public crosses
the rear of property making a portion of the lot unusable by the property owner. The
disturbance of the lot already exceeds the maximum permitted and in order to locate the
riding ring it is necessary to slightly grade an area that is currently undulated. This will
cause the disturbed area to increase to 68.8%.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but
which is denied to the property in question because of the long and narrow lot, and
Saddleback Trail being located on the rear of the property. The residential building pad
is largely developed already, and there is no other option for locating the riding ring
other than the front yard area. There were no concerns voiced by neighbors about where
the proposed stable/corral and riding ring will be located. The exceedance of the
disturbance is due to the riding ring.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in
which the property is located because the proposed riding ring enhances the equestrian
aesthetic and therefore would not affect property values. The riding ring will remain as
open space, therefore not causing the lot to be overdeveloped.
D. The variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles
Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous
waste facilities.
E. The variance request is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed
project, together with the variance, will be compatible with the objectives, policies,
general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and will uphold the City's
goals to protect and promote construction that is rural in nature.
Section 8. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves Zoning Case No. 904 a Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permits and
Variances to construct a 1,140 square foot single story stable with 1,032 square feet of
covered porches with 1,950 square foot adjacent corral, and 5,500 square feet riding ring,
400 cubic yards of grading for the ring (200 cubic yards of cut and 200 cubic yards of fill),
to encroach with the riding ring into the front setback by 2,150 square feet, and to exceed
Reso. 2016-19 5
34 Saddleback Rd.
the already non -conforming disturbance of the net lot area to 68.8% (max. permitted
disturbance is 40% and existing is at 63.3%) subject to the following conditions:
A. The Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Variances approvals shall expire
within two years from the effective date of approval as defined in Sections 17.46.080,
17.42.070 and 17.38.070, unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of these
sections.
B. It is declared and made a condition of this approval that if any conditions
thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted
thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease
such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has
been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of
thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination.
C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning
Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied
with unless otherwise set forth in this permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with
the site plan on file dated July 13, 2016 except as otherwise provided in these conditions.
The working drawings submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan
check review shall conform to the approved development plan. All conditions of the
Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, and Variance approvals shall be incorporated
into the building permit working drawings, and where applicable complied with prior
to issuance of a grading or building permit from the building department.
The conditions of approval of this Resolution shall be printed onto building plans
submitted to the Building Department for review and shall be kept on site at all times.
E. Prior to submittal of final working drawings to the Building and Safety
Department for issuance of building permits, the plans for the project shall be submitted
to City staff for verification that the final plans are in compliance with the plans
approved by the Planning Commission.
F. A licensed professional preparing construction plans for this project for
Building Department review shall execute a Certificate affirming that the plans conform
in all respects to this Resolution approving this project and all of the conditions set forth
therein and the City's Building Code and Zoning Ordinance.
Further, the person obtaining a building and/or grading permit for this project
shall execute a Certificate of Construction stating that the project will be constructed
according to this Resolution and any plans approved therewith.
Reso. 2016-19 6
34 Saddleback Rd.
G. Structural lot coverage of the lot shall not exceed 10,179 square feet or
10.07% of the net lot area, in conformance with lot coverage limitations (20%
maximum).
The total lot coverage proposed, including structures and flatwork shall not exceed
23,599 square feet or 23.4%, of the net lot area, in conformance with lot coverage
limitations (35% max).
H. Grading for this project shall consist of 200 cubic yards of cut and 200 cubic
yards of fill. The disturbed area of the lot, including the approved stable and corral shall
not exceed 68.8%.
I. The residential building pad shall remain 28,000 square feet and has
coverage of 28.6%. The stable pad shall be 11,640 square feet and will have coverage of
18.7%.
J. The riding may not have lights anywhere within it or around it. Should a
mirror be installed in the future in the ring, and if reflection of the sun off the mirror
causes glare on adjoining properties, it shall be the responsibility of the property owner
or installer to mitigate this problem in a timely manner.
K. A minimum of four -foot level path and/ or walkway, which does not have
to be paved, shall be provided around the entire perimeter of all of the proposed
structures, or as is otherwise required by the Fire Department.
L. At any time there are horses on the property, Best
Management Practices (BMPs) shall be applied for manure control, including but not be
limited to removal of the manure on a daily basis or provision of a receptacle with a
tight closing lid that is constructed of brick, stone, concrete, metal or wood lined with
metal or other sound material and that is safeguarded against access by flies. The
contents of said receptacles shall be removed once a week. It is prohibited to dispose of
manure or any animal waste into the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4),
into natural drainage course or spread on the property.
M. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Lighting
Ordinance of the City of Rolling Hills (RHMC 17.16.190 E), pertaining to lighting on
said property, roofing and material requirements of properties in the Very High Fire
Hazard Severity Zone.
N. All utility lines to stable shall be placed underground, subject to all
applicable standards and requirements.
O. A drainage plan, as required by the Building Department shall be
prepared and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of a construction permit. Such
plan shall be subject to LA County Code requirements.
Reso. 2016-19 7
34 Saddleback Rd.
P. All graded slopes outside of the riding ring shall be landscaped. A
landscaping plan shall be submitted to the City in conformance with Fire Department
Fuel Modification requirements and graded slopes. Prior to finaling the project, trees
and shrubs shall' be planted to screen the project from the neighbors. The landscaping
shall not form a hedge like screen but be offset. The height of the trees and shrubs shall
not at any time exceed the ridgeline of the roof of the structure. The landscaping plan
shall utilize to the maximum extent feasible, plants that are native to the area and are
consistent with the rural character of the community.
If landscaping of 5,000 square foot area or greater is introduced or redeveloped,
the landscaping shall be subject to the requirements of the City's Water Efficient
Landscape Ordinance.
Q. A three rail fence is required around the riding ring.
R. The setback lines and roadway easement line in the vicinity of the
construction for this project shall remain staked throughout the construction. A
construction fence may be required.
S. Perimeter easements, including roadway easements and trails, if any, shall
remain free and clear of any improvements including, but not be limited to fences -
including construction fences, any hardscape, driveways, landscaping, irrigation and
drainage devices, except as otherwise approved by the Rolling Hills Community
Association.
T. Minimum of 50% of any construction materials must be recycled and
diverted from landfills. The hauler of the materials shall obtain City's Construction and
Demolition permits for waste hauling prior to start of work and provide proper
documentation to the City.
U. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district
requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances
and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle
trips, noise, dust, and objectionable odors shall be required.
V. During construction, all parking shall take place on the project site, on the
driveway or motorcourt, and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within
the unimproved roadway easements on the east side of Saddleback adjacent to project
site only, and shall not obstruct neighboring driveways. During construction, to the
maximum extent feasible, employees of the contractor shall car-pool into the City.
W. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and
regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of
7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical
Reso. 2016-19 8
34 Saddleback Rd.
equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential
environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
X. The contractor shall not use tools that could produce a spark, including
for clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning conditions. Weather conditions can
be found at:
http//www.wrh.noaa.gov/lox/main.php?suite=safety&page=hazard_definitions#FIR
E. It is the sole responsibility of the property owner and/or his/her contractor to
monitor the red flag warning conditions. Should a red flag warning be declared and if
work is to be conducted on the property, the contractor shall have readily available fire
distinguisher.
Y. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional
Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management
Practices (BMP's) requirements related to solid waste, drainage and storm water
drainage facilities management and to the City's Low Impact development Ordinance
(LID), if applicable. Further the property owners shall be required to conform to the
County Health Department requirements for a septic system.
Z. Prior to finaling of the project an "as graded" and an "as constructed"
plans and certifications, including certifications of ridgelines of the stable shall be
provided to the Planning Department and the Building Department to ascertain that the
completed project is in compliance with the approved plans. In addition, any
modifications made to the project during construction, shall be depicted on the "as
built/as graded" plan.
AA. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of
this permit pursuant to Zoning Ordinance, or the approval shall not be effective. The
affidavit shall be reek together with the resolution.
PASS � Pl 5 ED D OP ED THIS 16TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016.
ELF,MA
ATTEST:.
*tit Wuw
HEIDI LUCE, CITY CLERK
Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public
hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section
17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section
1094.6.
-Reso. 2016-19 9
34 Saddleback Rd.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2016-19 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE FOR GRADING AND
CONSTRUCTION OF A STABLE WITH COVERED PORCHES,
CORRAL, AND A RIDING RING, TO ENCROACH WITH THE RIDING
RING INTO THE FRONT SETBACK, AND TO EXCEED THE
PERMITTED DISTURBANCE OF THE LOT IN ZONING CASE NO. 904
AT 34 SADDLEBACK ROAD, (DELGADO).
was approved and adopted at regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
August 16, 2016 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Coinmissioners Cardenas, Gray, Kirkpatrick and Chairman Chelf.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices
ilteuh dui)
HEIDI LUCE, CITY CLERK
Reso. 2016-19 10
34 Saddleback Rd.
• .
When recorded return to:
Eq w/d De/rob
Applicant's Name
.�� Sdd1 Qt/ 1 d
Applicant's Address
i&/h, 'o /j//Is C Q 902 7.0°
City, State, dip Code
*20161160443*
(Space above this line is reserved for Recorder's use)
FUEL MODIFICATION COVENANT AND AGREEMENT
THE UNDERSIGNED, £c%/x'/d . Jed , (print)
do hereby certify to be the owners of the hereinafte egally described property located in the County of Los
Angeles, State of California as Recorded in the Office of the County Recorder:
Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 7.�� 9° 00 2 DOS
Book Page Parcel(s)
Assessor's Parcel Number (APN)
Book Page Parcel(s)
We do Covenant and Agree with the County of Los Angeles Fire Department as a condition for occupation of
the above property that the requirements of the approved Fuel Modification Plan#6osoFFFM# gisand any
amendment to it, shall be met. The responsibility to implement and maintain those conditions shall be the
responsibility of the property owner. Any changes or amendments to the above plan must be approved by the
County of Los Angeles Fire Department, Fuel Modification Unit prior to implementation.
This Covenant and Agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the undersigned, all future
owners, encumbrances, and their successors, heirs or assignees.
q•/?,
Date
t/"
Ej///1),/v /12, be(9.04,
Owner's Signature Date
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual
who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or
validity of that document.
State of California //�� II
County of Las / 1)cTe/eS
J
On 7. / 7. /G before me, T ,1VaDP2- I- /7C,61 4 q /»�a/ri10d6/ia
(Insert Name of Notary Public and Title) !!
personally appeared gcl/in✓a /%%_ Y)e/aadn
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person() whose
name() is/.are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that
Jle/she/111.ey executed the same inJsr+s/her/th.eir authorized capacity(ies), and that by
1 /her/he+r signature(e) on the instrument the person(.$), or the entity upon behalf of
which the person(g) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
AIL t
E NUNEZ-ARENCIBIA''
Commission #" 2037513
Notery Public - Crlltornic
Los Angeles County
My Comm. E irer Aus IC 2017+