Loading...
771, Addition to existing SFR, and , Correspondence• C1t a ° Jh& October 13, 2009 Mr. and Mrs. Miller 12 Saddleback Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 771, Request for Variances Dear Mr. and Mrs. Miller: This is to inform you that the City Council at their October 12, 2009 meeting received and filed the Planning Commission's decision in your application. The approval is valid for two years, within which time construction must commence. The Planning Commission may approve additional time to start construction with a written request by the property owners. The request must be made in writing prior to the expiration of the approval. The approval becomes null and void if work has not commenced within the specified period of time. Enclosed is a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 2009-08, specifying the conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission. The approval will not become effective until you complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM, have the signature(s) notarized, and forward (or hand deliver) the completed form and a copy of the Resolution to: Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder Real Estate Records Section 12400 East Imperial Highway Norwalk, CA 90650 or LAX Courthouse 11701 S. La Cienega Blvd. 6th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90045 310-727-6142 Mon -Fri 8:30 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. Include a check in the amount of $10.00 for the first page and $3.00 for each additional page. Do not record the plan. Please make a couv of the Resolution for your files and for your contractor. The City now offers two agencies for plan review, issuance of building and grading permit, inspections and follow up; as in the past, the Los Angeles Printed on Recycled Paper • • County Building and Safety; and for additional fee for expedited process Willdan Engineering. The City will notify the Los Angeles County Building & Safety Division or Willdan to issue permits only after the Affidavit of Acceptance and the Resolution are recorded and received by us and any conditions of the Resolution required prior to issuance of building permits are met. As you go through the development process, please be aware of the conditions of the Resolution, as there are conditions that have to be met at different stages of the process. Please assure that your contractor follows the conditions and that they are printed on all of the plans. Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincer4y, ! n Yo1af Ica Schwartz Plai ung Director Enclosures: AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM RESOLUTION NO. 2009-08 PLAN FOR YOUR FILE cc: Doug McHattie, Bolton Engineering (Cover letter only) Anthony Inferrera, Architect (cover letter only) • RECORDING REQUESTED BY A MAIL TO: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2 PORTUGUESE BEND RD. ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX /17c2. • 0 L1.oy( d II RECORDER'S USE ONLY THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER'S OFFICE REQUIRES THAT THE FORM BE NOTARIZED BEFORE RECORDATION. AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ZONING CASE NO. 771 I (We) the undersigned state: ) §§ XX VARIANCES I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 12 SADDLEBACK ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, (LOT 17-1-RH) CA 90274 This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 771 VARIANCES XX I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature Name typed or printed Address City/State Signature Name typed or printed Address City/State Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. See Attached Exhibit "A", RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL • RESOLUTION NO. 2009-08 A RESOLUTION OF TI-IE PLANNING COMMISSION C OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE _ _ _ REQUIREMENT THAT A STABLE AND CORRAL BE CONSTRUCTED OR AN AREA FOR A FUTURE STABLE AND CORRAL BE SET ASIDE AND A VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED STRUCTURAL NET LOT COVERAGE IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 771, AT 12 • SADDLEBACK ROAD, (LOT 17-1-RH), (MILLER). PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Jeffrey Miller with respect to real property located at 12 Saddleback Road, Rolling Hills (Lot 17-1-RH) requesting a Variance from the requirement that astable and corral be constructed or an area for a future stable and corral be set aside and a variance to exceed the maximum permitted structural coverage in order to improve their property by adding 900 square foot addition to the existing residence, which includes a new 750 square foot garage. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application at a regular meeting on July 21, August 18, 2009 and at a field trip to the property on August 18, 2009. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants and their representatives were in attendance at the hearings. Section 3. The property is zoned RAS-1 and consists of 0.90 acres gross (39,200' sq. ft.) and 33,840 sq.ft. net lot area for development purposes. In 1968 the property was, subdivided into two lots. Building permits show that a 1,750 square foot residence with garage was constructed in 1952. In 1955 a 600 square foot garage was constructed; in 1956 a 400 square foot rumpus room was added; in 1957 a 120 square foot addition was made; in 1985 a 600 square foot covered patio was constructed; in 1987 a foyer, bedroom and a 2 car garage were constructed as well as swimming pool and a new driveway. None of these additions/improvements triggered the requirement for a set aside for a stable and corral. Section 4. The subdivision of the property in 1968 resulted in a lot that when calculated based on current requirements is less than one acre. The subdivision and subsequent changes to the way the City calculates NET lot area created a non- conforming situation on the lot. The approval of the swimming pool in the rear setback •exacerbated the non -conformity. Currently the property is developed with a 5,560 square foot residence, 600 square foot garage and 818 square foot swimming pool, pool equipment area and service yard. Currently the structural coverage on the lot is 21.0%, which exceeds the maximum permitted 20%. The addition would result in 23.6% ZC NO. 771 Reso. 2009-08 • Ca 61!2 Plin„ JII1} September 24, 2009 Mr. and Mrs. Miller 12 Saddleback Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 771, Request for Variances Dear Mr. and Mrs. Miller: NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission adopted a resolution on September 22, 2009, granting approval of your request. That action accompanied by the record of the proceedings before the Commission will be reported to the City Council on Monday, October 12, 2009. The meeting starts at 7:30 PM. You or your representative must be present to answer any questions the Council may have. The Planning Commission's decision in this matter shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the resolution by the Commission, unless an appeal has been filed or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty (30) day appeal period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). You, as an applicant, or anyone else may appeal the Planning Commission's decision. Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code. If no appeals are filed within the thirty (30) day period after adoption of the Planning Commission's Resolution, the Planning Commission's action will become final and you will be required to cause to be recorded an Affidavit of Acceptance Form together with the subject Resolution in the Office of the County Recorder before the Commission's action takes effect. Instructions for recordation will be forwarded to you after the Council's proceedings. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Singer ly, Ylanta Schwartz Planning Director /i cc: Doug McHattie, Bolton Engineering, (cover letter only) Anthony Inferrera, Architect, (cover letter only) Printed on Recycled Paper • • RESOLUTION NO. 2009-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIREMENT THAT A STABLE AND CORRAL BE CONSTRUCTED OR AN AREA FOR A FUTURE STABLE AND CORRAL BE SET ASIDE AND A VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED STRUCTURAL NET LOT COVERAGE IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 771, AT 12 SADDLEBACK ROAD, (LOT 17-1-RH), (MILLER). PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Jeffrey Miller with respect to real property located at 12 Saddleback Road, Rolling Hills (Lot 17-1-RH) requesting a Variance from the requirement that a stable and corral be constructed or an area for a future stable and corral be set aside and a variance to exceed the maximum permitted structural coverage in order to improve their property by adding 900 square foot addition to the existing residence, which includes a new 750 square foot garage. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application at a regular meeting on July 21, August 18, 2009 and at a field trip to the property on August 18, 2009. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants and their representatives were in attendance at the hearings. Section 3. The property is zoned RAS-1 and consists of 0.90 acres gross (39,200. sq. ft.) and 33,840 sq.ft. net lot area for development purposes. In 1968 the property was subdivided into two lots. Building permits show that a 1,750 square foot residence with garage was constructed in 1952. In 1955 a 600 square foot garage was constructed; in 1956 a 400 square foot rumpus room was added; in 1957 a 120 square foot addition was made; in 1985 a 600 square foot covered patio was constructed; in 1987 a foyer, bedroom and a 2 car garage were constructed as well as swimming pool and a new driveway. None of these additions/improvements triggered the requirement for a set aside for a stable and corral. Section 4. The subdivision of the property in 1968 resulted in a lot that when calculated based on current requirements is less than one acre. The subdivision and subsequent changes to the way the City calculates NET lot area created a non- conforming situation on the Iot. The approval of the swimming pool in the rear setback exacerbated the non -conformity. Currently the property is developed with a 5,560 square foot residence, 600 square foot garage and 818 square foot swimming pool, pool equipment area and service yard. Currently the structural coverage on the lot is 21.0%, which exceeds the maximum permitted 20%. The addition would result in 23.6% ZC NO. 771 Reso. 2009-08 ° PiLin2- Jh& August 24, 2009 Mr. and Mrs. Miller 12 Saddleback Road Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 771, Request for Variances Dear Mr. and Mrs. Miller: • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on August 18 directed staff to prepare a resolution, with conditions, to approve your request in Zoning Case No. 771. The Commission will consider this resolution at their September 22, 2009 meeting. One of the conditions that the Planning Commission imposed on this project is that any additional construction be brought back to the Commission and that you screen the pool equipment. The resolution with findings and conditions of approval will be forwarded to you and your agents the Friday prior to the next Planning Commission meeting. Please review the conditions of approval. The Planning Commission decision shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the resolution unless an appeal has been filed by you, any interested party or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty (30) day appeal period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code. The Planning Commission action, accompanied by the records of the proceedings will be presented to the City Council as a report item on their agenda, tentatively scheduled for October 12, 2009. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sinc rely, Sil(4 olanta Schwartz lanning Director cc: Doug McHattie, Bolton Engineering Anthony Inferrera, Architect Printed on Recycled Paper S. ! :1 Vol'f ;; iteir, 0 6<C .1l••1'2 @tt N INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 FIELD TRIP NOTIFICATION July 23, 2009 Mr. and Mrs. Miller 12 Saddleback Road .Rolling Hills, CA 90274 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 771, Request for Variances Dear Mr. and Mrs. Miller: The Planning Commission scheduled a field inspection of your property to view a silhouette of the proposed project on Tuesday, Auc ••t'l t3, 2009. at 0:00 PM. Your neighbors within 1,000-foot radius of your property will be notified of this field trip. The site is to be prepared according to the enclosed Silhouette Construction Guidelines and the following requirements. Please note that inadeq ate staking may result in postponement of the case to another month. • A full-size silhouette in conformance with the attached guidelines must be prepared for ALL STRUCTURES of the project showing the footprints and roof ridges; < Delineate the new driveway; <r Indicate on the pavement which portions of the existing hardscape will be replaced with "pervious" material Stake the property line, easement line and setback line in the vicinity of the proposed structures, side yards and rear yard per the attached instructions. This is to prove your case that a stable could not be constructed, because it would have to be either in the setback or too close to the structure. The silhouette shall be constructed a minimum of 5-7 days prior to the field trip, so that neighbors who may be away during the field trip visit would be able to view the silhouette and comment to the City prior to the meeting. The silhouette must remain on the property during the entire review process of this case. including City Council's review. It is. therefore. imperative that the construction of the silhouette be of a sturdy nature. including the stakes for the property, setback and easement lines. Printed on Recycled Paper After the field trip, the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission will take place the same evening, Tuesday August 18, 2009 at 6:30 PM at City Hall. The owner and/or representative must be present to answer any questions regarding the proposal. Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sin •er/ply, 1 cc: nta Schwartz nning Director Doug McHattie, Bolton Engineering Anthony Inferrera, Architect 50TH ANNIVERSARY 1957 — 2007 • • o //� nn..}}a. ire", NCOR POP rFD Ji". UAW( 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE 13END ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 SILHOUETTE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES A silhouette of proposed construction must be erected the week preceding the designated Planning Commission or City Council meeting/field trip. Silhouettes should be constructed with 2" x 4" lumber. Printed boards are not acceptable. Bracing should be provided. Lumber, wire or other suitable material should be used to delineate roof ridges and eaves. Flags in close proximity to each other must be attached to the wire or twine to aid in the visualization of the proposed construction. Property lines, setback lines and easement lines must be staked along the areas of construction. 2 1/2 - 3' high wooden stakes must be used to delineate the lines. Such stakes must be flagged and marked on their sides: • Property line ( red or pink flag) • Setback line (green flag) e Easement line (yellow flag) and remain in the ground throughout the entire review and approval process as well as during the entire construction process, when required by the Commission. The application may be delayed if inaccurate or incomplete silhouettes are constructed. If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department Staff at (310) 377-1521. / \\ SECTION PLAN Printed on Recycled Paper 4 STATUS OF APPLICATION & NOTIFICATION OF MEETING June 23, 2009 Mr. and Mrs. Jeff Miller 12 Saddleback Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 771. Request for Variances Dear Mr. and Mrs. Miller: • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO, 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (3)0) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 Pursuant to state law the City staff has completed a preliminary review of the application noted above and finds that in order to deem the application complete and for the case to be scheduled at the July 21, 2009 Planning Commission meeting, additional information/corrections outlined below must be submitted to this office by Wednesday, July 8 2009. 1. Pictures of the entire property. 2. The checked off items on the enclosed Checklist. 3. Recheck the size of the existing residence and garage. The Assessor's records show the existing residence to be 5,920 square feet, whereas the application shows it as 5,470 square feet. Please have your representatives re -measure the outside walls of the residence and the garage. 4. The size of the proposed addition in the application forms and calculations therefore, do not match the size of the proposed addition shown on the plan. 5. Additional variance, possibly for Total Net Lot Coverage (Structures and Hardscape-over 35%) may be required if the calculations change. If that is the case, you may want to propose reduction in some of the hardscape and add landscaped areas. Additional fee would be required, if additional Variance is requested. 6. Label areas on the site plan that are landscaped or proposed to be landscaped and those that will remain impervious or proposed to be impervious. Assure that the calculations shown in the application match the plan. 7. Explain and label the area in front of the residence on the west side. The walls and concrete landings, as shown, are confusing. Printed on Recycled Paper • • 8. Recheck the size of the driveway; the site plan shows a new driveway, whereas the calculations in the application for the driveway are shown as being the same for existing and proposed. 9. Do you plan to substantially remodel the remaining of the house and/or demolish any part of the existing residence and rebuilt. Please explain. 10. Do you plan to raise the roof of the existing residence? By how much? 11. State somewhere on the plan that the utility lines to the residence will be placed underground. 12. State somewhere on the plan that the entire roof meets the City's and RHCA requirement for Class "A" construction and Class "A" assembly roof or that it will be replaced to comply with this requirement. 13. Submit 8 sets of completed plans as stated above. Please note that the City may require further information in order to clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the application. If the City requires such additional information, it is strongly suggested that you supply that information promptly to avoid any delay in the processing of the application. Should you be able to. provide the necessary information in a timely manner, your application for Zoning Case No. 771 will be set for public hearing consideration by the Planning Commission on Tuesday. July 21.2009. The meeting will begin at 6:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills City Hall Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You or your designated representative must attend to present your project and to answer questions. The staff report for this project will be available at the City Hall after 3:00 PM on Friday, July 17, 2009. We will forward the report to you and your representatives. Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sin e reI , Yanta Schwartz P . nning Director cc: Doug McHattie, Bolton Engineering Anthony Inferrera, Architect $ • CHECKLIST FOR PLAN SUBMITTAL The following information must be included on any plan submitted for checking to the Rolling Hills Planning Commission for: 1. Conditional Use Permit (► eluding grading requirements). (incliuLi; riding requirements). Site PIan Review (inclu—ding g oirfg requirements). 4. Subdivisions and Lot Line Adjustments Provide fifteen r5) sets of plans that show the following: ❑ Name, address and telephone number of applicant, and name, address and telephone number of architect and civil engineer. ❑ Currently surveyed plot plan showing the entire property. (More than one plan may be submitted). ❑ Plot plans must be stamped by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor. License number and expiration date must he clearly shown. Architectural elevation plans showing the height of proposed structures from finished grade and basement wells — all sides must be shown. t� \'IClnity 111Lip drawn to tale `.>,lll'I ;e qui.'`.=led ,i1m11enti:Owed to pr'o. :rty line and to residences of all contiguous properties. ❑ North arrow and scale of plans. ❑ Existing contours of the entire lot, in maximum 5' intervals. ❑ Proposed contours, in maximum 5 intervals. ❑ Setbacks, easements, fences and horse trails on the entire lot. ❑ Note distances from the center line of all existing and proposed streets adjacent to the subject property. Outline and show square footsige of building pads' not in setbacks (existing and proposed) in accordance with Municipal Code Title 17. !Buildable area is that portion of a lot NOT IN SETBACKS that constitutes the existing building pad and any contiguous portion of the lot NOT IN SETBACKS that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less]. If there is not an existing building pad, the buildable area shall mean that portion of a lot not in setbacks which will be created through grading and which will have an average slopeof ten percent (10%) or less. A lot may have more than one buildable area. Outline and show distance from building footprint to any projections and architectural features Pincluarn poI( , entryways-orte cocheres, trellises, chimneys, eaves, and hay windows. XComputation of structural and total lot coverage, disturbed area and building pad coverage in accordance with Municipal Code Title 17 (form attached). cj,,s.uft -4- ❑ All slopes shall iic steeper in slope than two horizonta!►ne vertical, or exceed a vertical height of thirty feet (30') below or above the natural grade. Shallower slopes are strongly encouraged. All slopes shall be marked with grade. (Municipal Code Tide 15). Cut and fill must be balanced on site. Export of dirt is allowed from excavation activities, incl. basements. ❑ Show cut and fill slopes by separate shadings or patterns. Show shaded area square footage, cut and fill totals in cubic yards, and the percentage of lot to be disturbed. (Title 15). Show all existing and proposed retaining walls and sections through walls, including height and elevations. Show stairs, walkways and height of decks. \Show proposed drainage pattern and design and indicate whether the drainage design is above or below ground. ❑ Designate the area(s) for which the Variance, Conditional Use Permit or Site Plan Review is requested. ❑ Show outline of residence, any additional structures, and any basement areas. Indicate depth of basement. All structures must be physically measured and square footage of each structure must be shown on the drawing. Measurements are to be taken around the outside wails. • Show all other existing and proposed structures on the lot, including pool, spa, pool equipment, porches, shelters, entryways, trellises, barbecues, fire places, fire pits, sheds, gazebos, children play houses; forts and others. O Show width and length of basement wells and location of stairs. Show windows and doors in basement. ❑ Show an area of not less than 450 square feet for the construction of a stable. 550 square, feet for a corral (2.5' from any residence and 25' from rear properly line, and not in front yard or side setback), and access road of not more than 25% grade for vehicular access to the stable site on each lot. If grading would be required indicate the quantity. ❑ Show cross sections of slopes before and after grading. Show the variance of the existing slope and proposed slope. Sections should be through the highest cut and fill and through other areas where ground is steep, and as many additional sections as necessary to clearly delineate the proposed change in land contours from the existing terrain. Whenever possible, align the cross sections along the proposed development on the plot plan. O Soils, geology, hydrology/drainage reports, showing all structures on the properly, with their distance from property lines delineated, may be required in applications where the requested project is close to easements, close to other properties, and/or where there is to be significant grading on the property. ❑ Show location of utility pole(s) serving the property arid indicate the direction of the utility lines. Show the slope (in %) and square footage of the driveway and separately of any uncovered parking area or motor cout. Calculate the coverang (in %) of the driveway and motor court of the yard area in which they arc;Toc:ated. Motor court may not be closer than 30' to roadway easement. (Yard —Section .17.12.250). ❑ Show any other driveways/roads/easements and paved areas on the property that are existing, currently proposed or planned for the future. O Show trails within the property and adjacent thereto. ❑ If a stable is being constructed, delineate the loft area, if any. Show the size of the stable, the size -5- tI of porch and separa•the size of the. loft. Show paddock alei•l corral area. 0 If known, show the location of septic tank. 0 If a new driveway approach is proposed it must be reviewed by the Traffic Commission. Pictures of the entire property. Submit one copy of the plan delineating in different color mafers the following: ❑ Residential Building Pad (not in setbacks) • Additional Building Pads (not in setbacks) ❑ Disturbed Areas ❑ Net Lot boundary ❑ Setback lines ❑ Cut and fill areas for grading (shaded) -6-