Loading...
904, Construct a 4-stall stable wit, Correspondence•teavi September 13, 2016 Ms. Eddy Delgado 34 Saddleback Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 904-Stable and accessory amenities Dear Ms. Delgado: This letter shall serve to notify you that the City Council at their regular meeting on September 12, 2016 upheld Planning Commission decision to approve your project. Before this case takes effect you are required to record an Affidavit of Acceptance Form together with the subject Resolution in the Office of the County Recorder. Please read the conditions of approval, as some may have to be met prior to issuance of a grading and/or building permit. In addition, the conditions of approval must be printed onto the cover sheet of the plans. Please make a copy of the resolution for your files. I am enclosing a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 2016-19 specifying the conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission. Please complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM, have the signature(s) notarized, and forward, (or hand deliver), the completed form and the Resolution to: Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder Real Estate Records Section 12400 East Imperial Highway Norwalk, CA 90650 (562) 462-2125 OR LAX Courthouse 11701 S. La Cienega Blvd. 6th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90045 310-727-6142 Mon -Fri 8:30 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m Please confirm the cost of recordation with the County Clerks Office, as their fees change frequently. Printed on Recycled Paper • • Please keep a copy of the plans with the conditions printed on the plans at the construction site and assure that your architect, engineer, soils consultant and contractor adhere to the conditions in the Resolution during the construction process. Any deviation from the approved plans and conditions of approval must be brought to City's attention for review prior to it being implemented by your contractor. (Please note that the City has a View Protection Ordinance that protects the view one had at the time of acquisition of the property. If you believe you have a view from your property, please make sure to take photographic dated evidence from your viewing area as close to the time you acquired your property as possible. Chapter 17.26 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Please do not hesitate to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. rely, tY.�anta S wartz Panning Director Enclosures: AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM RESOLUTION NO. 2016-19 cc: Russ Barto, Architecture (cover letter only) • • RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2 PORTUGUESE BEND RD. ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX T RECORDER'S USE ONLY THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER'S OFFICE REQUIRES THAT THE FORM BE NOTARIZED BEFORE RECORDATION. AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) §§ ZONING CASE NO. 904 (SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED) XX SITE PLAN REIVEW XX VARIANCE XX CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, I (We) the undersigned state I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 34 SADDLEBACK ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (LOT 13-RH) This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval. I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 904 XX SITE PLAN REIVEW XX VARIANCE XX CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature Signature Name typed or printed Name typed or printed Address Address City/State, Zip Code City/State, Zip Code I • A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF COUNTY OF ) On , before me, Notary Public, personally appeared ,a who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: Name of Notary: Date Commission Expires Commission No. r RESOLUTION NO. 2016-19 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A STABLE WITH COVERED PORCHES, CORRAL, AND A RIDING RING, TO ENCROACH WITH THE RIDING RING INTO THE FRONT SETBACK, AND TO EXCEED THE PERMITTED DISTURBANCE OF THE LOT IN ZONING CASE NO. 904 AT 34 SADDLEBACK ROAD, (DELGADO). THE PLANNING COMMISSION DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A revised application was duly filed by Ms. Eddy Delgado, to request a Site Plan Review, a Conditional Use Permit and Variances for a 1,140 square foot single story stable with 1,032 square feet of covered porches with 1,950 square foot adjacent corral, and 5,500 square foot riding ring, 400 cubic yards of grading for the ring, to encroach with the riding ring into the front setback by 2,150 square feet, and to exceed the already non -conforming disturbance of the net lot area to 68.8% (max. permitted disturbance is 40% and existing is at 63.3%). Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application at their regular meeting on May 17, 2016, in the field and at their regular meeting on June 21, 2016, and again in the field and at their regular meeting on July 19, 2016. Neighbors within 1,000-foot radius were notified of the public hearings and a notice was published in the Peninsula News on May 5, 2016 and in the Daily Breeze on July 8, 2016. The applicants and their agents were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail and the applicants and their agents were in attendance at the hearings. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal, and from members of the City staff. Three residents visited the site during the noticed field trip on June 21, 2016 and one resident on July 19, 2016. One resident attended the public hearing during the evening of July 19, 2016 to express her support for the project as it supports equestrian uses in the City. During the first field trip, Commissioners expressed concerns about the proposed stable and it's proximity to the guesthouse. The applicant's responded with a revised plan to relocate and reconfigure the stable and to request a 5,500 square foot riding ring that partially encroaches into the front setback. The Planning Commission has reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. Section 3. The property is zoned RAS-1 and the gross lot area is 2.71 acres. The net lot area is 2.32 acres or 101,040 square feet. The property is currently developed with a 3,420 square foot residence, a 640 square foot garage, a 780 square foot swimming pool/spa, 50 square foot pool equipment, 663 square foot guest house, 510 square feet of attached covered porches, 600 square feet of sheds (a 500 square foot Reso. 2016-19 1 34 Saddleback Rd. • • storage shed and a 100 square foot shed), and a 350 square foot service yard. A 959 square foot addition to the residence and a 35 square foot barbecue were approved administratively in October, 2015 and the addition is currently under construction. With the addition, the residence will be 4,379 square feet. All existing structures are legal and permitted. In 1989 a Conditional Use Permit was granted to convert the then existing stable into a guest house (Resolution 89-30) and area was set aside for the stable at that time adjacent to the 6,200 square foot riding ring that exists today. The existing 500 sq.ft. storage shed was approved and permitted in 1969 as a detached garage. Section 4. The PIanning Commission finds that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, (CEQA) pursuant to section 15303 (new construction of single family residence and accessory structures), and section 15061(b)(3) (common sense exemption) of the CEQA guidelines. Section 5. Section 17.18.040E of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permits approval of a stable over 200 square feet, a corral over 550 square feet, and a riding ring with a Conditional Use Permit provided the uses are not located in the front yard or in any setbacks. A portion of the riding ring is proposed to be located in the front yard area of the lot. With respect to this request for a Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. Conditionally permitted uses are not outright permitted by the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. The Commission must consider applications for conditional use permit and may, with such conditions as are deemed necessary, approve a conditional use which will not jeopardize, adversely affect, endanger or to otherwise constitute a menace to the public health, safety or general welfare or be materially detrimental to the property of other persons located in the vicinity of such use. B. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for the stable, corral, and riding ring would be consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan because the uses are consistent with similar uses in the community, and except for the location of the riding ring, meet all the applicable code development standards for a stable, corral, and riding ring, and the proposed uses are located on areas on the property that are adequately sized to accommodate such uses. The proposed uses are appropriately located in that they will be sufficiently separated from nearby structures used for habitation or containing sleeping quarters. The development would be constructed in furtherance of the General Plan goal of promoting and encouraging equestrian uses. C. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent structures have been considered, and the project will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed stable/corral, and riding ring orientation are not towards neighbors and their general location is of Reso. 2016-19 2 34 Saddleback Rd. sufficient distance from nearby residences so as to not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors. The proposed stable is to be located next to the corral and a path designated for equestrian uses runs from the stable/corral to the driveway. The riding ring would be located in an area of the lot that is not in proximity to any residents. D. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain, and surrounding residences because the stable/corral, and riding ring complies with the low profile residential development pattern of the community and will not give the property an over -built look, and areas will remain open and unobstructed. The lot is 2.32 acres net in size and is sufficiently large to accommodate the proposed uses. E. The proposed conditional use, other than the riding ring being proposed in the front yard area, complies with all applicable development standards of the zone district and requires a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Sections 17.18.090 and 17.18.100 of the Zoning Ordinance. F. The proposed conditional uses are consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities because the project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. Section 6. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for Site Plan Review and approval before any grading requiring a grading permit or any new building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by not more than 999 square feet in any thirty-six (36) month period. With respect to the Site Plan grading and the proposed structures the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures and maintaining sufficient setbacks to provide buffers between residential uses. Although the disturbed area exceeds the maximum permitted amount of 40%, it was already legal non -conforming at 63.3% and it will increase to 68.8%. The configuration of the lot is narrow and long and a horse trail is located on the rear portion of the lot, accessible by the public with the property owner's consent, making this portion of the lot unusable by the property owner. The stable, corral, and riding ring promote the rural, equestrian aesthetic of Rolling Hills. While 2,150 square feet of the riding ring is in the front setback, the equestrian use is promoted in the City. Reso. 2016-19 3 34 Saddleback Rd. The project conforms with Zoning Code lot coverage requirements, except for disturbance. The net lot area of the lot is 101,040 square feet. The structural net lot coverage is proposed at 10.07%, which includes all of the structures, with allowance for permitted deductions, (20% max. permitted); and the total lot coverage proposed, including the stable would be 23.4%, (35% max. permitted). The disturbed area of the lot is proposed to increase from 63.3% which already exceeds the maximum permitted of 40% and is legal nonconforming, to 68.8% due to the 400 cubic yards of grading required for the riding ring (200 cubic yards of cut and 200 cubic yards of fill). B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. The topography and the configuration of the lot, have been considered, and it was determined that the proposed development will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, buildings, or structures, because the proposed stable/corral will be constructed entirely on an existing building pad of the currently developed lot where the corral currently is and will be the least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with trees and shrubs, is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that it will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners. The stable, corral, and riding ring will be developed on areas of the lot that do not currently have structures. C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, and is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to other equestrian uses in the vicinity of said lot. The proposed stable is 1,140 square feet and the average size of the last 15 stables approved since 2011 is 1,583 square feet. D. The development plan will introduce additional landscaping, which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community. E. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation, for pedestrians and vehicles because the applicants will continue to utilize the existing driveway to the residence and the stable, and the riding ring will be accessed from the main driveway for heavier vehicles ingress/egress. The stable access from the driveway will be entirely decomposed granite. F. The project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to section 15303 of the CEQA guidelines. Section 7. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Code permit approval of a variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when, due to exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone, strict application of the Code would deny the property owner substantial property rights enjoyed by other properties in the same Reso. 2016-19 4 34 Saddleback Rd. vicinity and zone. The applicant seeks a variance from the requirement 17.18.100.3. that a riding ring not be located in the front yard, and from 17.16.070B. that disturbance is limited to 40% of the net lot area. The 5,500 square foot riding ring is being proposed in the front yard, 2,150 square feet is in the front setback and the disturbance of the lot will be 68.8%. With respect to this request for Variances, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone because a horse trail used by the public crosses the rear of property making a portion of the lot unusable by the property owner. The disturbance of the lot already exceeds the maximum permitted and in order to locate the riding ring it is necessary to slightly grade an area that is currently undulated. This will cause the disturbed area to increase to 68.8%. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question because of the long and narrow lot, and Saddleback Trail being located on the rear of the property. The residential building pad is largely developed already, and there is no other option for locating the riding ring other than the front yard area. There were no concerns voiced by neighbors about where the proposed stable/corral and riding ring will be located. The exceedance of the disturbance is due to the riding ring. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located because the proposed riding ring enhances the equestrian aesthetic and therefore would not affect property values. The riding ring will remain as open space, therefore not causing the lot to be overdeveloped. D. The variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. E. The variance request is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed project, together with the variance, will be compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and will uphold the City's goals to protect and promote construction that is rural in nature. Section 8. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves Zoning Case No. 904 a Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permits and Variances to construct a 1,140 square foot single story stable with 1,032 square feet of covered porches with 1,950 square foot adjacent corral, and 5,500 square feet riding ring, 400 cubic yards of grading for the ring (200 cubic yards of cut and 200 cubic yards of fill), to encroach with the riding ring into the front setback by 2,150 square feet, and to exceed Reso. 2016-19 5 34 Saddleback Rd. the already non -conforming disturbance of the net lot area to 68.8% (max. permitted disturbance is 40% and existing is at 63.3%) subject to the following conditions: A. The Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Variances approvals shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval as defined in Sections 17.46.080, 17.42.070 and 17.38.070, unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of these sections. B. It is declared and made a condition of this approval that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in this permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file dated July 13, 2016 except as otherwise provided in these conditions. The working drawings submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the approved development plan. All conditions of the Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, and Variance approvals shall be incorporated into the building permit working drawings, and where applicable complied with prior to issuance of a grading or building permit from the building department. The conditions of approval of this Resolution shall be printed onto building plans submitted to the Building Department for review and shall be kept on site at all times. E. Prior to submittal of final working drawings to the Building and Safety Department for issuance of building permits, the plans for the project shall be submitted to City staff for verification that the final plans are in compliance with the plans approved by the Planning Commission. F. A licensed professional preparing construction plans for this project for Building Department review shall execute a Certificate affirming that the plans conform in all respects to this Resolution approving this project and all of the conditions set forth therein and the City's Building Code and Zoning Ordinance. Further, the person obtaining a building and/or grading permit for this project shall execute a Certificate of Construction stating that the project will be constructed according to this Resolution and any plans approved therewith. Reso. 2016-19 6 34 Saddleback Rd. G. Structural lot coverage of the lot shall not exceed 10,179 square feet or 10.07% of the net lot area, in conformance with lot coverage limitations (20% maximum). The total lot coverage proposed, including structures and flatwork shall not exceed 23,599 square feet or 23.4%, of the net lot area, in conformance with lot coverage limitations (35% max). H. Grading for this project shall consist of 200 cubic yards of cut and 200 cubic yards of fill. The disturbed area of the lot, including the approved stable and corral shall not exceed 68.8%. I. The residential building pad shall remain 28,000 square feet and has coverage of 28.6%. The stable pad shall be 11,640 square feet and will have coverage of 18.7%. J. The riding may not have lights anywhere within it or around it. Should a mirror be installed in the future in the ring, and if reflection of the sun off the mirror causes glare on adjoining properties, it shall be the responsibility of the property owner or installer to mitigate this problem in a timely manner. K. A minimum of four -foot level path and/or walkway, which does not have to be paved, shall be provided around the entire perimeter of all of the proposed structures, or as is otherwise required by the Fire Department. L. At any time there are horses on the property, Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be applied for manure control, including but not be limited to removal of the manure on a daily basis or provision of a receptacle with a tight closing lid that is constructed of brick, stone, concrete, metal or wood lined with metal or other sound material and that is safeguarded against access by flies. The contents of said receptacles shall be removed once a week. It is prohibited to dispose of manure or any animal waste into the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4), into natural drainage course or spread on the property. M. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Lighting Ordinance of the City of Rolling Hills (RHMC 17.16.190 E), pertaining to lighting on said property, roofing and material requirements of properties in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. N. All utility lines to stable shall be placed underground, subject to all applicable standards and requirements. O. A drainage plan, as required by the Building Department shall be prepared and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of a construction permit. Such plan shall be subject to LA County Code requirements. Reso. 2016-19 7 34 Saddleback Rd. P. All graded slopes outside of the riding ring shall be landscaped. A landscaping plan shall be submitted to the City in conformance with Fire Department Fuel Modification requirements and graded slopes. Prior to finaling the project, trees and shrubs shall be planted to screen the project from the neighbors. The landscaping shall not form a hedge like screen but be offset. The height of the trees and shrubs shall not at any time exceed the ridgeline of the roof of the structure. The landscaping plan shall utilize to the maximum extent feasible, plants that are native to the area and are consistent with the rural character of the community. If landscaping of 5,000 square foot area or greater is introduced or redeveloped, the landscaping shall be subject to the requirements of the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Q. A three rail fence is required around the riding ring. R. The setback lines and roadway easement line in the vicinity of the construction for this project shall remain staked throughout the construction. A construction fence may be required. S. Perimeter easements, including roadway easements and trails, if any, shall remain free and clear of any improvements including, but not be limited to fences - including construction fences, any hardscape, driveways, landscaping, irrigation and - drainage devices, except as otherwise approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association. T. Minimum of 50% of any construction materials must be recycled and diverted from landfills. The hauler of the materials shall obtain City's Construction and Demolition permits for waste hauling prior to start of work and provide proper documentation to the City. U. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, and objectionable odors shall be required. V. During construction, all parking shall take place on the project site, on the driveway or motorcourt, and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within the unimproved roadway easements on the east side of Saddleback adjacent to project site only, and shall not obstruct neighboring driveways. During construction, to the maximum extent feasible, employees of the contractor shall car-pool into the City. W. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical Reso. 2016-19 8 34 Saddleback Rd. r • • equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. X. The contractor shall not use tools that could produce a spark, including for clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning conditions. Weather conditions can be found at: http:;/www.wrh.noaa.gov/iox(main.php?suite=safety&page=hazard_definitions#FIR E. It is the sole responsibility of the property owner and/ or his/her contractor to monitor the red flag warning conditions. Should a red flag warning be declared and if work is to be conducted on the property, the contractor shall have readily available fire distinguisher. Y. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) requirements related to solid waste, drainage and storm water drainage facilities management and to the City's Low Impact development Ordinance (LID), if applicable. Further the property owners shall be required to conform to the County Health Department requirements for a septic system. Z. Prior to finaling of the project an "as graded" and an "as constructed" plans and certifications, including certifications of ridgelines of the stable shall be provided to the Planning Department and the Building Department to ascertain that the completed project is in compliance with the approved plans. In addition, any modifications made to the project during construction, shall be depicted on the "as built/as graded" plan. AA. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this permit pursuant to Zoning Ordinance, or the approval shall not be effective. The affidavit shall be reco • together with the resolution. PASS ��'� P f� D A(D �G O i'ED THIS 16TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016. ELF, ATTEST:. Viu&L/a) HEIDI LUCE, CITY CLERK Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Reso. 2016-19 9 34 Saddleback Rd. • STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2016-19 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A STABLE WITH COVERED PORCHES, CORRAL, AND A RIDING RING, TO ENCROACH WITH THE RIDING RING INTO THE FRONT SETBACK, AND TO EXCEED THE PERMITTED DISTURBANCE OF THE LOT IN ZONING CASE NO. 904 AT 34 SADDLEBACK ROAD, (DELGADO). was approved and adopted at regular meeting of the Planning Commission on August 16, 2016 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Cardenas, Gray, Kirkpatrick and Chairman Chelf. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices HEIDI LUCE, CITY CLERK Reso. 2016-19 10 34 Saddleback Rd. Russell E. Marto • AlA • Architect 3 qtalaga Cove Plaza • Suite 202 • Palos Verdes Estates • California • 90274; • (310) 378-1355 MEMO TO: Yolanta Schwartz FROM: Russ Barth RE: Height Certification Delgado Stable 34 Saddleback Road DATE: November 20, 2017 This is to certify that the newly constructed stable at the Eddy Delgado residence at 34 Saddleback Road, Rolling Hills, complies with the requirement that the height of the building not exceed fifteen feet (15'). The maximum height of the completed structure is 14'- NOV 20 2017 City of Rolling Hills By r August 17, 2016 iC ` Ol (.ft114 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING BILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 Ms. Eddy Delgado 34 Saddleback Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 The Planning- Commission adopted a resolution at their regular meeting on August 16, 2016, granting approval of your request in Zoning Case No. 904. That action accompanied by the record of the proceedings before the Commission will be reported to the City Council on Monday, September 12, 2016, at their regular meeting beginning at 7:00 PM. You or your representative should be present to answer any questions the Council may have. Please submit 6 sets of plans for the City Council meeting by August 31, 2016. The Planning Commission's decision in this matter shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the resolution by the Commission, unless an appeal has been filed or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty (30) day appeal period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code. Please review the conditions in the resolution that was provided to you previously. Should you have any objections to any of the conditions, you may appeal them to the City Council. If no appeals are filed within the thirty (30) day period after adoption of the Planning Commission's Resolution, the Planning Commission's action will become final and you will be required to cause to be recorded an Affidavit of Acceptance Form together with the subject Resolution in' the Office of the County Recorder before the Commission's action takes effect. Instructions for recordation will be forwarded to you after the Council's proceedings. The staff report to the City Council with a copy of the signed Resolution will be forwarded to you prior to the Council's meeting. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincere 1y, Wendy Star,, AICP Associate r nner cc: Russ Barto, Architect G Printed on Recycled Paper Cty 0/'l2l'F,.9 Jdi!IZ Ms. Eddy Delgado 34 Saddleback Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 904. 34 Saddleback Road; Site Plan Review, CUP & Variance Dear Ms. Delgado, This is to notify you that the Planning Commission at their July 19, 2016 meeting directed staff to prepare a resolution to approve your request in Zoning Case No. 904, with conditions, which will be confirmed in the draft resolution that is being prepared. The Planning Commission will review and consider the draft resolution, together with conditions of approval, at an upcoming meeting on August 16, 2016 and make its final decision on your application at that meeting. The findings and conditions of approval of the draft resolution will be forwarded to you for your review before the Planning Commission's meeting. Please review the conditions and if you have any questions or concerns, you may bring them up at the meeting, or you could appeal them to the City Council. The Planning Commission decision will become effective thirty days after the adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution unless an appeal has been filed or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code. As stated above, the Planning Commission's meeting to consider the resolution of approval is scheduled for Tuesday, August 16, 2016, at 6:30 P.M. in the City Council Chambers. That action, accompanied by the record of the proceedings before the Commission, is tentatively scheduled to be placed as a report item on the City Council's agenda at the Council's regular meeting on Mondali, September 12, 2016 beginning at 7:00 P.M. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely Wendy Starr , AICP Associate P} nner cc: Russ Barto Architecture Printed on Recycled Paper .G HILisc� June 22, 2016 • • cry op2 Prry9 Ms. Eddy Delgado 34 Saddleback Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 904. 34 Saddleback Road; Site Plan Review & Variance Dear Ms. Delgado; This is to notify you that the Planning Commission at their June 21, 2016 field visit and at their evening meeting expressed concerns regarding the location of the proposed stable and in particular the need for a variance for the proximity of the stable (covered porch) to the guest house. After discussion, they recommended that you revise the project to eliminate the variance request and consider providing a more open area for the equestrian facilities. The Planning Commission's next meeting is on July 19, 2016, beginning at 6:30 PM. Any modifications to the project will need to be re -noticed in the newspaper and to residents within 1,000-foot radius of the site. Therefore, should you wish to be placed on the July 19, 2016 Planning Commission agenda, general information on the revised project (size, location, any variances, etc.) must be submitted to the Planning Department by no later than Wednesday, Tune 29 for timely submittal to the Newspaper for publication. New calculation sheets, application forms and revised plan must then be submitted for staff's review by no later than Tuesday, Tuly 5, 2016. You could also request a continuance of the project to the August 16th Planning Commission meeting. There will be no additional planning fee to consider the revised project. Additionally, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65957, the Planning Commission has certain time period by which to take action on any project, (either approve or deny), unless the applicant requests and agrees to continuance. Therefore, please sign the enclosed form allowing the City additional 90-days to take action. Otherwise, pursuant to the state law, if a decision is not made at the July 19th Planning Commission meeting to approve the project for adoption of a Resolution in August, staff would have to bring a Resolution of denial of the project for their consideration at the August meeting. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter. lanta Schwartz fanning Director cc: Russ Barto, AIA, Architecture Printed on Recycled Paper • • LETTER OF CONSENT TO EXTENSION OF TIME Government Code Section 65957 Date: 2016 Application: Zoning Case No. 904 Department of Planning City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, California 90274 Attn: Yolanta Schwartz Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65957, Ms. Eddy Delgado hereby requests and consents to a ninety (90) day extension to the time period specified in Government Code Sections 65950, 65950.1 and 65952 for the City of Rolling Hills Planning Commission to take action on the above referenced application at 34 Saddleback Road (Lot 102-RH) in the City of Rolling Hills, CA. Signature of Applicant (1) or Applicant's Representative Printed Name of Applicant (1) or Applicant's Representative Signature of Applicant (2) or Applicant's Representative Printed Name of Applicant (2) or Applicant's Representative Received by: • Russell E. Barto • AIA • Architect 3 Malaga Cove Plaza • Suite 202 • Palos Verdes Estates California • 90274 • (310) 378-1355 MEMO TO: Wend•. Starks Yolanta Schwartz FROM: Russ Barto RE: Delgado Stable Revisions City of Hol inp 34 Saddleback, Rolling Hills By.__ DATE: June 10, 2016 Dear Wendy and Yolanta: Attached is one set of stable plans which have been revised per our meeting yesterday. The purpose of the revisions is to move the building nut of the riding ring while still respecting the 35 ft separation from the guesthouse. The revised plan maintains the four foot walkway around the building. By reducing the tack room and muck room the overall size of the stable is reduced by 153 sq. ft. • The silhouette will be revised on Monday next week. \NI (1 (s-c-c_iotai5) 767 5r poydiw •eitv May 18, 2016 Ms. Eddy Delgado 34 Saddleback Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 • 0'` e1 ti Jh& FIELD TRIP NOTIFICATION SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 904. 34 Saddleback Road Dear Ms. Delgado: INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 The Planning Commission at the May 17 meeting scheduled a field trip to your property to view a silhouette of the proposed project on TUESDAY, June 21, 2016 with time to be determined soon. Your neighbors will also be notified of this meeting. The Planning Commission will visit other properties beginning at 7:30 AM before coming to your site and we will advise you shortly of the time for your field trip visit. The owner and/or representative must be present to answer any questions the Commissioners may have regarding the proposal. The project shall be staked a minimum of a week prior to the meting pursuant to the enclosed guidelines and the following: A full-size silhouette in conformance with the attached guidelines must be prepared for ALL PROPOSED STRUCTURES of the project showing the footprint, roof ridges, breezeway and covered porches for the stable. Use different color flags for the footprint, center aisle, and porches. Show the stable access. • Stake the retaining wall. • Stake the side property line, setback line, and the easement line in the vicinity of the proposed project. After the field trip, the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission will take place on the same day, Tuesday, Tune 21, at 6:30 PM at City Hall, at which time the Commission will further discuss and deliberate your proposal. Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincere .ly, ,4 endy Starks AICP Associate Planer cc: Russ Barto, Architecture Printed on Recycled Paper 50TH ANNIVERSARY 1957 - 2007 0/1\00 iN�•OFFORATEG JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 SILHOUETTE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES A silhouette of proposed construction must be erected the week precedine the designated Planning Commission or City Council meeting/field trip. Silhouettes should be constructed with 2" x 4" lumber. Printed boards are not acceptable. Bracing should be provided. Lumber, wire or other suitable material should be used to delineate roof ridges and eaves. Flags in close proximity to each other must be attached to the wire or twine to aid in the visualization of the proposed construction. Property lines, setback lines and easement lines must be staked along the areas of construction. 21/2 - 3' high wooden stakes must be used to delineate the lines. Such stakes must be flagged and marked on their sides: • Property line ( red or pink flag) • Setback line (green flag) • Easement line (yellow flag) and remain in the ground throughout the entire review and approval process as well as during the entire construction process, when required by the Commission. The application may be delayed if inaccurate or incomplete silhouettes are constructed. If you have any further questions contact the Planning Department Staff at (310) 377-1521. >R SECTION PLAN © Printed on Recycled Paper • • Ccy op2 ff,.p STATUS OF APPLICATION & NOTIFICATION OF MEETING April 21, 2016 Ms. Eddy Delgado 34 Saddleback Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 904 Request for a SPR, CUP - stable. Dear Ms. Delgado: Pursuant to state law the City's staff has completed a preliminary review of the application noted above and finds that the information submitted is: X Sufficiently complete as of the date indicated above to allow the application to be processed. Please note that the City May require further information in order to clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the application. If the City requires such additional information, it is strongly suggested that you supply that information promptly to avoid any delay in the processing of the application. Your application for Zoning Case No. 904 has been set for public hearing consideration by the Planning Con -mission at their meeting on Tuesday, May 19, 2016. The meeting will begin at 6:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills City Hall Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You and/or your designated representative must attend to present your project and to answer questions. The staff report for this project will be available at the City Hall after 3:00 PM on Friday, May 13th. We will forward the report to you and your representative. Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerel endy Stark Associate P1'nner cc: Russ Barto, Architecture Printed on Recycled Paper • • Russell E. Barto • AIA • Architect 3 Malaga Cove Plaza • Suite 202 • Palos Verdes Estates • California • 90274 • (310) 378-1355 MEMO TO: Wendy Starks Yolanta Schwartz FROM: Russ Barto RE: Delgado Stable 34 Saddleback, Rolling Hills DATE: April 20, 2016 Dear Wendy and Yolanta: AR 2. 20IC City of Roiling Hills Attached are two sets of plans which have been revised in accordance with you review memo dated April 7, along with one set of calculations with the revisions highlighted. Please let me know if you need any additional information and/or additional sets of plans. Best