499, Addition to existing SFR at so, ApplicationPROPERTY OWNER:
OWNERS ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO:
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
AGENT'S NAME:
AGENT'S ADDRESS:
REOUEST FOR HEARING
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW,
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS.
Donald A. & Barbara Kazarian
10 Southfield Road
(310) 544-0669
10 Southfield Road
LOT NO 36, R.S. 59/8-10
ASSESSORS BOOK N07567 PAGE 10 PARCEL 32
South Bay Engineering Corporation
304 Teion Place. Palos Verdes Estates.
CA 90274
TELEPHONE NO: (310) 375-2556
******** *************,k,**********************************************
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Describe in detail the nature of -the proposed project, including what
aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review:
An addition to the existing house at the southeast end and grading to allow for
a garden and a recreational area to be used by children.
SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make
an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance
with the criteria below:
A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning
Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the
sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses.
Yes. There has been no change in distance from streets and neighboring homes.
Existing house is similar in size to other homes in the area.
Site Plan Review
Application -9-
B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design,
to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic
features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature
trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and
knolls) ? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing
natural features.
Slopes move to allow for some garden planting and yard areas. No impact on
surrounding properties.
C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the
site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of
existing terrain tomaximize buildable area shall not be approved.
Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with
existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage
redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course.
Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed
minimization on lots.
Drainage to be picked up in pipes and directed to existing drainage course.
D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding
native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is
• compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community?
Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between
private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native
vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers.
Change in grades along public areas is minimal. New plantings will enhance
the site.
Site Plan Review
Application -10-
E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and
undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot
coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual
amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing
buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage proposed
compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on
neighboring lots.
The new addition has little effect on the area as it is at the back of the lot and
part of it replaces an existing patio. The square footage of house is similar to
other homes in the area.
F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the
site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks
shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall
be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness.
Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing
setbacks of neighboring properties.
The house is sited so as to flow with the contours and is approximately in the
middle of the high and low elevations. The existing garage at the front
is 50' back from the road easement. 80' from property line.
G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles?
Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway
location, design, trip data, landscaping and other on -site parking
' or storage areas.
The new addition will not affect pedestrian or vehicle circulation.
Landscaping will be enhanced due to new grading for garden and play area.
Site Plan Review
Application -11-
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
correct.
Executed at � n t— L--- ((�� G-. IA (L__ L 6 , California,
this 1- day of--h k l._. / / , 1991
1 0 oo Tl-(C- is--dn 2-CD
Q () L. 10(1 I -I (L L C On 714
(address)
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is
signed in California. If this application is signed outside of
California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of
the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of
that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it)
owns the property described herein, and that the information
accompanying this application is true to thebest. of his (its) knowledge
and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
APPLICANT: South Bay Engineering Corp.
REPRESENTATIVE: Douglas K. McHattie
COMPANY NAME:
South Bay Engineering
COMPANY ADDRESS: 304 Tejon Place
Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274
COMPANY PHONE NO. (310 ) 375-2556
PROJECT ADDRESS: 10 Southfield Road
Rolling Hills
Site Plan Review
Application -13-
DATE FILED 4/74l7
FEE: 19l 707) (,i-( Jaz p 1;1 � (ti ZO G )
RECEIPT NO: �� G�.-n�9'
r1
BY: t/ "�,�ti�,(,
ZONING CASE NO: L i i TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: 41d7
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of
the City of Rolling Hills ("City") and by private deed restrictions
enforced by the Rolling Hills Community Association ("RHCA").
The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are
completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and
approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in
Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean
or imply or ensure approval by the other.
The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City
approvals first.
I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has
been fully read and its admonition is completely understood.
Executed at Po (-7 // - 5
this /
, California
day of 4 /2/2 /�� / / , 19y-3
By: l"),�% /.� 7 (/ ��- i"lam y' i ii � ))��,-, oaf !1-- , //- ti , ,.—.cr._,
By:
Site Plan Review
Application -14-
f
/D .5_ /_i-� ( /)
Address
170 Z_ / /) �� /—// L G 5 �� 0 0 2 74
City
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in
the attached exhibits present the data and information required
for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and
that the facts, statements, and information presented are true
and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Signature of Legal Owner' Date.
zy/p
lSignture of Applicant
KA,L,ILd ,i,////cV.
9//93
/Date
DATE 4j4 3 ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS AG (..G 74A'6/
APPLICANT J). 4.
J
CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE
BUILDING AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
NET LOT AREA 42,692 sq.ft. sq.ft. 42,692 sq.ft.
BUILDING PAD(S) 21,080 sa.ft. 1,379 sa.ft. 22,459 sq.ft.
(2 pads)
RESIDENCE 3,302 sa.ft. 1,338 sa.ft. 4,640 sq.ft.
GARAGE 630 sq.ft. sq.ft. 630 sa.ft.
SWIMMING POOL/SPA 511 sq.ft. sa.ft. 511 sa.ft.
STABLE 450 sq.ft. sq.ft. 450 sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
( ) n/a sq.ft. sq.ft. n/a sq.ft.
SERVICE YARD 126 sq.ft. sq.ft. 126 sq.ft.
CTHER Play House 72 sq.ft. sq.ft. 72 sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES 5,091 sq.ft. sq.ft. 6,429 sq.ft.
% STRUCTURAL COVERAGE 11.93 % % 15.06 %
Total % PAD COVERAGE (2 pads) 24.15 % % 28.62 %
DRIVEWAY
PAVED WALKS
& PATIO AREAS
POOL DECKING
TOTAL FLATWORK
% TOTAL FLATWORK
COVERAGE
TOTAL STRUCTURAL
& FLATWORK COVERAGE
% TOTAL COVERAGE
1,050 sa.ft.
852 sq.ft.
4,832 sq.ft.
11.32
9,923 sq.ft.
23.24 %
2,930 sa.ft. sa.ft.
(remove)
345 sa.ft.
sq.ft.
2.930 sa.ft.
705 sa.ft.
852 sq.ft.
sq.ft. 4,487 sq.ft.
sq.ft.
10,916 sq.ft.
25.57 %
-7-
• •
DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS
APPLICANT
CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
PAD NO. 1
BUILDABLE PAD AREA
RESIDENCE
GARAGE
STABLE (BARN)
POOL
RECREATION COURT
OTHER
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
PAD NO. 2
BUILDABLE PAD AREA
RESIDENCE
GARAGE
STABLE (BARN)
POOL
17,936
4,640
630
511
n/a
5,781
32.23
4,523
450
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sa.ft.
sq.ft.
sa.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
( ) - sq.ft.
OTHER Play House
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2
BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
72
522
11.54
-8-
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
Date Filed
Cu• •
y ol Rolling JUL
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
(To Be Completed By Applicant)
w/s-/,3
NO.2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377.1521
FAX (213) 377.728E
Zoning Case No. //%
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Applicant, address and telephone no. South Bay Engineering Corp.
304 Tejon Place, Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 (310) 375-2556
2.. Legal Owner, address and _telephone no. (if different from
above) Donald A. & Barbara S. Kazarian, 10 Southfield Road (310) 544-0669
3. Address of project 10 Southfield Road
Assessor's Book, Page, Parcel No. 7567-10-32
Lot No. 36, R.S. 59/8-10
4. List and describe any other related permits and other public
approvals required for this project, including those required
by city, regional, state and federal agencies:
5. Existing zoning district RAS-1
6. Proposed use of site (project for which this form is filed):
Addition to existing residence
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
7. Site size. 60,676 sq.ft. 1.39 Ac.
8. Net lot area. 42,692 sq.ft.
9. Total square footage of structures. 6,429
10. Basement square footage. None
11. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage.
10,916 sq.ft.
12. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls?
adjoining
13. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls?
adjoining
14. Will the entire building structure require a new roof?
No
15. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 25%
added? No
16. Will cut and fill be balanced?
17. Attach plans.
18. Proposed scheduling.
Yes
Amount cut 683
Amount fill 683
19. If residential, include the unit size, approximate sale price
and household size expected. n/a
20. If commercial, indicate the type estimated employment per
shift and loading facilities. n/a
21. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated
employment per shifts, estimated occupancy, loading
facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the
project. n/a
22. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or
rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the
application is required. n/a
Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects?
Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as
necessary).
Yes +10
X 23. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands,
beaches, lakes or hills, or substantial alteration
of ground contours.
X 24. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing
residential areas or public lands or roads.
X 25. Change in pattern, scale or character of general
area of project.
X 26. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
X 27. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes, or odors in
vicinity.
X 28. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water
quality or quantity, or alteration of existing
draining patterns.
X 29. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration
levels in the vicinity.
X 30. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or
more.
X 31. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials,
such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives.
X 32. Substantial change in demand for municipal services
(police, fire, water, sewage, etc.).
X 33. Substantially increased fossil fuel consumption
(electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.).
X 34. Relationship to a larger project or series of
projects.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
35. Describe the project site as it exists before the project,
including information on topography, soil stability, plants
and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects.
Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of
the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots
or polaroid photos will be accepted.
Existing house is sited in approximately the middle of the lot.
Lot slopes down 46' from north to south. A stable is located on the
southerly pad. A pool is located at the rear.
36. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on
plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic
aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential,
commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest
house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height,
frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of
the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted.
There are existing one family homes on all the lots that surround this property.
Many of them have pools and./or stables.
• •
H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project
impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed
mitigation measures.
No impact.
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached
exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan
review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the
' facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct
to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date: % prf ( 79 3
r �
Site Plan Review
Application -12-
S igna'ture '
For: r? I2 P H 4 12! z I (3
Applicant