Loading...
219, Additions to SFR with encroach, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsBEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Application of Mr. Joseph Hummel Lot 6-SF ZONING CASE NO. 219 FINDINGS AND REPORT The application of Mr. Joseph Hummel, Lot 6-SF, Southfield Tract, for a variance under ARTICLE III, Section 3.07, Side Yard Requirements, Ordinance No. 33, came on for hearing on the 16th day of January 1979 in the Council Chambers of the Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California, and the applicant, having submitted evidence in support of the application, the Planning Commission, being advised, now makes its Findings and Report as re- quired by the Ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills, California. I. The Commission finds that the applicant, Mr. Joseph Hummel, is the owner of that certain real property described as Lot 6-SF located at 3 Ringbit Road West in the City of Rolling Hills, and that notice of the public hearing in connection with said application was given as required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of Ordinance No. 33 of the City of Rolling Hills,California. The Commission finds, further, that no communication in opposition to the request was received, and Mr. Frank Jelsma, 14 Southfield Drive, called to inquire about the request, and said he had no objection. II. The Commission finds that the applicant has requested a variance of side yard requirements for a residence addition which would project six feet into the side yard on the west side of the property. The Commission finds further that a similar application was approved in April 1977, but the applicant failed to act on it within the one year time limit, and the approval expired. The Commission finds that a variance for a residence addition which would extend six feet into the side yard should be granted in order to preserve substantial property rights possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and • !. that the granting of such variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, nor injurious to property in the same vicinity and zone. III. From the foregoing it is concluded that a variance should be granted for construction of a residence addition which would encroach six feet into the side yard as shown on the approved plan marked Exhibit "A" in the file, to Mr. Joseph Hummel, Lot 6-SF, 3 Ringbit Road West, and it is, therefore, so ordered. This approval shall expire one year from the date of grant, if not acted on. ls/ Carol Hanscom Chairman, Planning Commission icretary, P annin "Commission