469, Lot line adjustment between 13, Correspondence• •
City ovie0tit n,
CERTIFIED MAIL
April 30, 1992
Dr. and Mrs. Alfred C. Marrone
58 Cypress Way
Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 469, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
LOTS 10-SF. 11-A-SF, 11-B-SF, AND 12-SF
Dear Dr. and Mrs. Marrone:
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377-1521
FAX: (213) 377-7288
Because the procedures following approval for each of the zoning cases that you
proposed are different, we have prepared separate letters to address them.
This letter shall serve as official notification that a Lot Line Adjustment for the
subject Zoning Case was approved by the Planning Commission specifying certain
conditions as called out in attached RESOLUTION NO. 92-13, dated April 28, 1992.
The Planning Commission's decision will be reported to the City Council at their
regular meeting on May 11, 1992. You should also be aware that the decision of
the Planning Commission may be appealed within twenty days after you receive
the final Resolution (Sections 17.32.140 and 17.32.150 of the Rolling Hills Municipal
Code.
You will need to comply with the language of the Resolution which requires
preparation of legal descriptions that include easements and the removal of the
existing stable.
We have prepared a preliminary Certificate of Compliance form for the Lot Line
Adjustment that requires the Signature of the City Manager, once we receive the
legal descriptions of the proposed new lots and the existing stable is removed.
Then, for the Lot Line Adjustment to become effective, the following actions must
be taken by you:
(1) Record the notarized Affidavit of Acceptance Form, a copy of Resolution No.
92-13, approved map, and legal descriptions, with the County Recorder (Municipal
Code Section 17.32.087) County Recorder. Room 15. 227 North Broadway, Los
AnsTeles. CA 90012 [Tel. (213) 974-6611 with the proper fee. 05.00/first page,
$3.00/each additional page). [Government Code No. 66412 (d)].
(2) Record the Certificate of Compliance, the legal descriptions, and the approved
map with the County Recorder, Room 15, 227 North Broadway, Los Anlreles, CA.
90012 [Tel. (213) 974-6611 with the proper fee. ($5.00/first page, $3.00/each
additional page). [Government Code No. 66412 (d)J.
PAGE 2
(3) File a Miscellaneous Fee Application with the Lomita Office of the L.A. County
Building and Safety Division, 23420 S. Narbonne Avenue, Lomita CA 90717 [Tel.
(213) 534-3760).
The subject Lot Line Adjustment will become effective ONLY when you have
complied with all of the items above.
Feel free to call me at any time at (213) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
SINCERELY,
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
ENCLOSURES: RESOLUTION NO. 92-13
APPROVED MAP
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
cc: Mr. Criss Gunderson, Architect
Mr. Douglas McHattie, South Bay Engineering
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: Recorder's Use
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
JLLYIII -
Please record this form with the Registrar -Recorder's Office and
return to: City of Rolling Hills, 2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
(The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be
notarized before recordation).
ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss
ZONING CASE NO. 469
I (We) the undersigned state:
I am (We are)
follows:
This
I am
said
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT X
the owner(s) of the real property
described
LOTS 10-SF, 11-A-SF, 11-B-SF, AND 12-SF, ROLLING HILLS
property is the subject of the above numbered cases.
(We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions
ZONING CASE NO. 469
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT X
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury
foregoing is true and correct.
Print
Owner
Name
Signature
Address
City/State
Print
Owner
Name
Signature
Address
City/State
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
, „...e.,,,,e,...„...........„,.......„,...
re,
State of
SS.
County of
On this the day of
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
as
in
that the
19___, before me,
p personally known to me
O proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) subscribed to the
within instrument, and acknowledged that executed it.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary's Signature
See Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and made a part hereof
RESOLUTION NO. 92-13
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE
OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IN ZONING CASE
NO. 469
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY
FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Alfred C. Marrone
with, respect to real property located at 13 Southfield Drive (Lots 10-SF and 11B-
SF) and real property in the vicinity of Southfield Drive (Lots 11A-SF and 12-SF)
requesting a Certificate of Compliance for a Lot Line Adjustment to move the side
lot line dividing these two parcels so that the northeasterly portions of existing
Lots 10-SF, 11A-SF, 11B-SF, and 12-SF are placed into Parcel 1 and the
"southwesterly portions of existing Lots 10-SF, 11A-SF, 11B-SF, and 12-SF are
placed into Parcel 2.
Section 2. California Government Code Subsection 66412(d) authorizes minor
lot line adjustments without requiring a tentative map, parcel map or final map
if:
A. The lot line adjustment involves two or more existing adjacent parcels,
where land is proposed to be taken from one parcel and added to an adjacent
parcel;
B. A greater number of parcels than originally existed is not thereby
created;
C. The lot line adjustment will create parcels that conform to local zoning
and building ordinances; and
D. The lot line adjustment is approved by the City.
Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public
hearing to consider the application on January 21, 1992 and February 18, 1992,
and conducted a field site review on February 1, 1992.
Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project is categorically
exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act
pursuant to a Class 5 exemption provided by Section 15303 of' the State CEQA
Guidelines.
Section 5. The Planning Commission has considered the evidence, both
written and oral, presented to it in connection with this application and finds as
follows:
A. Section 16.16.010.B of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance requires
that each lot in any subdivision in the RAS-1 zone shall have a net area of not
less than forty-three thousand five hundred sixty square feet (1.0 acre). The
proposed lot line adjustment will result in Parcel 1 to• be one (1.0) net acre and
Parcel 2 to be 2.10 net acres after excluding easements.
RESOLUTION NO. 92-13
PAGE 2
B. Section 16.16.040 of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance requires
that the abutting footage along the street easement line shall be at least equal
to or greater than the depth of the lot divided by two and one-half; provided,
that in no event shall such abutting footage be less than one hundred fifty feet.
While the proposed adjustment does not comply with the provision that the
frontage of the lot be equal to or greater than the depth of the lot divided by
two and one-half, the adjustment will provide a 260-foot frontage for Parcel 1
along Southfield Drive and a 156-foot frontage for Parcel 2 along Southfield
Drive which will change the frontage for each parcel but, not be less than the
150 foot minimum frontage along a maintained roadway for each lot.
C. Section 16.16.020 of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance requires
that in all cases where practicable, the sidelines of lots shall be at approximate
right angles or radial to the street upon which such lot fronts. The proposed
adjustment will result in Parcel 1 to be at right angles to the roadway and
Parcel 2 to be at right angles to the roadway for 115.42 feet.
D. The City's Sanitary Sewer Feasability Study, prepared by ASL
Consulting Engineers on February 9, 1988, recommends the installation of future
sewer lines to service the immediate vicinity to be constructed along the
southeasterly property lines of Parcel 1 and Parcel 2. Based upon this Study
and the need to provide for the future installation of sewers to serve the
properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property, conditions have been
attached to require the applicant to record an easement to the Rolling Hills
Community Association for ingress and egress purposes to construct underground
utilities along the southeasterly property lines of Lot 1 and Lot 2, along the
northeasterly boundary lines of Lot 1 and 2, along the boundary line between Lot
1 and Lot 2, along the northwesterly boundary line of' Lot 2, and along the
southwesterly boundary line of Lot 2.
E. The proposed lot line adjustment will require the removal and relocation
of the existing stable for Parcel 1 which, if not removed, would be located on the
boundary line within the easement on proposed Parcel 2.
F. Conditions have also been attached to this approval which provide that
it will not impair or limit the City's application of' the Site Plan Review Ordinance
to any future development of Parcel 1 or Parcel 2.
Section 6. In accordance with the foregoing findings, the lot line
adjustment sought in Zoning Case No. 469 as indicated on the map attached
hereto as Exhibit "A" is hereby approved subject to the following conditions:
A. The applicant shall prepare and, upon approval and acceptance of the
City, record concurrent with the Certificate of Lot Line Adjustment and easement
in gross, in favor of the City of Rolling Hills (with the intention that the City
convey it immediately to the Rolling Hills Community Association) for ingress,
egress and the installation, maintenance, repair, replacement and removal of sewer
lines and other underground utilities over that certain real property described
as follows: (i) the southeasterly thirty (30) feet of Parcel 1 and 2 between the
northerly and southerly lot lines, (ii) the northeasterly ten (10) feet of' Parcel
1 and 2 between the easterly and westerly lot lines, (iii) ten (10) feet on either
RESOLUTION NO. 92-13
PAGE 4
The foregoing Resolution No. 92-13 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE
OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IN ZONING CASE
NO. 469
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
April 28, 1992 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners Frost, Hankins, Lay & Chairman
Roberts
None
None
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Raine
lyz_. DEPUTY CITY CLERK
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 92-13
PAGE 3
side of the boundary line between Parcel 1 and 2 between the northerly and
southerly lot lines, (iv) the northwesterly ten (10) feet of Parcel 2 between the
northerly and southerly lot lines, and (v) the southwesterly ten (10) feet of
Parcel 2 between the northerly and southerly lot lines. The easement deed shall
prohibit Grantor or successor to Grantor from constructing or erecting any
improvements or altering the contours of the surface of the easement area other
than installation of shallow rooted landscaping and necessary irrigation systems.
The map attached to the Certificate of Compliance, referred hereto as Exhibit "A"
shall delineate and note the easements specified in this paragraph.
B. The lot line adjustment shall not in any way constitute any
representation that Parcel No. 2 (Lot 2) is a buildable lot or that it is able to be
developed in compliance with zoning and building ordinance standards.
C. The lot line adjustment shall not in any respect limit or impair the
City's application of the Site Plan Review Ordinance (Ordinance No. 221, 1988)
to Parcels 1 and 2 (Lots 1 and 2) at such time as an application is made for
development.
D. The lot line adjustment shall not in any respect waive, release or be
construed to supercede any restriction, dedication or condition set forth on Final
Tract Map No. 30074, and all such matters are hereby reserved.
E. The Certificate of Lot Line Adjustment shall not be issued until a legal
description complying with the delineation of adjustment, and including, the
required easements as specified in Paragraph A of Section 6 are submitted to,
and approved by the City, attached hereto as Exhibit "A."
F. The Certificate of Lot Line Adjustment shall not be issued until the
existing stable structure located on the boundary line of proposed Parcel 2 is
removed. Removal of such structure shall occur within twelve (12) months of the
approval of this Resolution.
G. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions
or this Lot Line Adjustment shall not be effective.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 1992.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
DIANE SAWYER, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
OTHER:
DATE: -
BY• �r�CZC.
4
l
r'41x, Ggikea.;e117
/Y23'a% 3/"w
Az ..
+0 f'. -5
c.%9i / (1, 7 92 .�:.
rs.-r1r r.:: - :
SITE ADDRESS
LEGAL DESCRIP.
#17 SODUTHFIZLD DR.
ROLLING HILLS, CA.
s LOTS 10, 11 & 12
O_B. .15911-1O
so')
GOT 1
I.
J.00 AC.
/ A�`�
L sd.GG
1 N. 5e 5‘1,'h/
. kg ' FgV
5'F 1
3,1ri LOT L
ADJUSTMENT
DR. MD IrRs ALTRED 1IARRONE
58 CAS WAY
mum HILLS ESTATES, CA.
(213)341-9072
*OVTX SAT
raHGXNss*IWO
CORPORATION
304 TEJON PLACE
PALOS VERDES ESTATES, CA 9027/
(213) VS-2556 FROM L.A. 772.1555
622 HAMPSHIRE ROAD. SURE H
WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91361
(805) 194-1199
SCALE: ~is/DO.
DATE /2 -31- 9/
J08 NO.
9I380-5
DRAWN G.✓.
CHECKED
SHEET OF
City
le am., tee,
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
April 28, 1993
Dr. and Mrs. Alfred C. Marrone
13 Southfield Drive
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: ZONING CASES NO. 469 AND 470
TERMINATION OF THE ASSIGNMENT OF FUNDS
Dear Dr. and Mrs. Marrone:
This letter allows the termination of the assignment of $3,000 to
the City of Rolling Hills for the removal of the stable between 13
and 17 Southfield Drive, Rolling Hills which has been completed.
We appreciate your patience and cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
CRAIG R. NEALI.S
CITY MANAGER
Printed on Recycled Paper.
• •
C1iyoMoff..a Jhi'/,
January 23, 1992
Dr. and Mrs. Alfred C. Marron_e
58 Cypress Way
Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NOS. 469 AND 470
13 AND 17 SOUTHFIELD DRIVE
Dear Dr. and Mrs. Marrone:
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377-1521
FAX: (213) 377-7288
We have arranged for the Planning Commission to conduct a field
inspection of your property to view the proposed lot line
adjustment and a silhouette of the proposed project on Saturday,
February 1, 1992.
The Planning Commission will meet at 7:00 AM at City Hall for a
time and then proceed to the scheduled project sites. Do not
expect the Commission at 7:00 AM, but be assured that the field
trip will take place before 11 AM.
The site must be prepared with stakes showing the proposed property
line and stakes showjnq the easements. as wel_l__as , a full -size
silhouette of the proposed pro-iect showing the roof rido•_e_ and_
bearing walls. We have enclosed Silhouette Construction
Guidelines.
The owner and/or representative should be present to answer any
questions regarding the proposal.
Feel free to call me at (213) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
LOLA M. UNGAR
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
cc: Mr. .Criss Gunderson
Mr. Douglas McHattie
• i
£'i(ff ol Rolling INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377-1521
FAX: (213) 377-7288
SILHOUETTE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES,
1. When required by the Planning Commission or City Council, a
silhouette of proposed construction should be erected for the
week preceding the designated Planning Commission or City
Council meeting. The Silhouette shall not remain erected for
a period longer than one week unless directed by the Planning
Commission or City Council.
2. Silhouettes should be constructed with 2" x 4" lumber.
Printed boards are not acceptable.
3. Bracing should be provided where possible.
4. Wire, twine or other suitable material should be used to
delineate roof ridges and eaves.
5. Small pieces of cloth or flags should be attached to the wire
or twine to aid in the visualization of the proposed
construction.
6. The application may be delayed if inaccurate or incomplete
silhouettes are constructed.
7. If you have any futher questions contact the Planning
Department Staff at (213) 377-1521.
•
:: i .i
1
i
41
i
i i
,iN
/ �\ PLAN
SECTION
•
•
KEITH V\T PHI PRT
Consulting Engineering Geologist
January 21, 1992 Project No. 2789-91
Fes.
Ms. Carol Marrone
58 Cypress Way
Rolling Hills, CA
J f--\ N 2 `i m2
Ciil' OF ROLLING HILL$.
SUBJECT: INFORMATION REGARDING MOST GEOLOGICALIiy_.SU1TABLR-BUITDT1G'
STTE
#13 AND #17 Southfield Road
Rolling Hills, CA
Dear Ms. Marrone:
Pursuant to your request, this letter regarding a proposed lot -line
adjustment proposed building site has been prepared. It is
understood that you propose to construct a single family dwelling
northwesterly of an existing house at #13 Southfield. The proposed
house will be located in the area of an existing stable behind the
house and will extend across the present boundary between 13 and 17
Southfield.
We have recently performed a geotechnical investigation which
included both 13 and 17 Southfield and found that, in our opinion,
geologic conditions in the area of the existing stable where the
proposed house will be located are favorable for the proposed
construction. Our investigation included the drilling of three
deep exploratory borings and excavating several test trenches. The
report of the investigation is presently being written. Based on
information obtained from the investigation it is further our
opinion that geologically the most suitable building site is the
area of the of existing stable. Firm bedrock suitable for
foundation support occurs near -surface in the area of the proposed
building site and as such, minimal grading will be required to
develop a building pad in this area. If the proposed house is
constructed anywhere else, it is likely much more extensive grading
will be required.
In summary, it is our opinion that, from a geological standpoint,
the most suitable building site for the proposed residential
structure is in the area of the stable located at #13 Southfield
Road.
316 Tejon Place c Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 c (310) 378-4146
• •
P.N. 2789-91
Page 2
If you have any questions regarding the information presented in
this letter, please call my office.
Respectfully subm4-tted, ,
MY(!/K__
eitW. Ehlert
C.E.G. 1242
• •
Cii of R//i,Z ij
December 5, 1991
Dr. and Mrs. Alfred C. Marrone
58 Cypress Way
Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90254
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377-1521
FAX (213) 377-7288
SUBJECT: Status of Application for Zoning Case No. 469, a request
for a Lot Line Adjustment for 15 and 17 Southfield Drive
(Parcels 10, 11A, 11B and 12-SF); and Status of Zoning
Case No. 470, a request for Site Plan Review for a
proposed new residence and attached garage at 17
Southfield Drive (portions of Parcels 10, 11A, 11B and
all of Parcel 12) received November 4', 1991.
Dear Dr. and Mrs. Marrone:
A preliminary review of the applications noted above have been
completed by the City's staff and pursuant to state law we find
that the information submitted is:
X Not Complete. The applications have been held in abeyance
because certain information is missing, you failed to
comply with certain requirements, or both. The
information needed to complete the applications is attached,
and must be supplied before the applications can be deemed
complete.
Additional Information/Requirements:
Attached are checklists for needed items for both cases that we
discussed on December 4, 1991 with Mr. Criss Gunderson, Architect.
Note that for the Site Plan Review you will be required to file a
$625.00 filing fee for a Variance because the future stable will be
located in the front yard.
Feel free to call me at (213) 377-1521 if you have any questions
about the application process.
Sincerely,
LOLA M. UNGA
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
•
jivy o ?idP-drb-cf'"4-/
Y�
%7„ i A% :
•�j7
4
CHECKLIST FOR PLAN SUBMITTAL
C(R,�L/ter
The following information must be included on any plan submitted
for checking to the Rolling Hills Planning Commission for:
A.
B.
C.
J
1
Conditional Use Permit (including grading requirements).
Variance (including grading requirements).
Site Plan Review (including grading requirements).
o/s-.! % )r L r
Show the following:
1. Name, address and telephone no. of applicant, and name
address and telephone no. of architect and civil
engineer.
2. Vicinity map drawn to scale.
Requested improvements should be dimensioned to property
line and residences of all contiguous properties.
3. North arrow and scale of plans.
4. Existing contours of the
entire lot.
Show setbacks, easements, orse trails on entire lot,:
6. Square footage of building pads in accordance with
Municipal Code Title 17 (form attached).
7. Computation of lot coverage in accordance with Municipal
Code Title 17 (form attached).
All slopes shall not be steeper in slope than two
horizontal to one vertical, or exceed a vertical height
of thirty feet (30'). All slopes shall be marked with
grade. (Municipal Code Title 15).
All cut and fill slopes must be shaded.
10. Show all retaining walls and sections
height and elevations. Show height for
11.
12.
(Title 15).
through walls,
all buildings.
Show proposed drainage pattern of graded areas.,
The defined area(s) for which the Variance, Conditional
Use Permit or site plan review is requested.
Site Plan Review
Application
), j?„,r�.1�.��
-4-
7(1::
13. Show outline of residence and any additional structures.
All structures must be physically measured and square
footage of each structure must be shown on drawing. A
note must be on the drawing certifying to those
measurements.
14.E Show a graded area of not less than 450 square feet for
the construction of a stable, 550 square feet for a
S )?in�� corral, and a graded road of not more than 25% grade for
.'vehicular access to the stable site. (Title 17) . /
/tic) -v / )7 J.C�v✓ ('
nLLJ 15 Sections should be shown through highest slope and
through other areas where ground is steep, and as many
additional sections as necessary to clearly delineate
land contours with existing ground.
A current survey and grading plan, with related soils,
geology, hydrology/drainage reports, showing all
structures on the property, with their distance from
property lines delineated, will be required in
applications where the requested change is close to
easements, close to other properties, and/or where there
is to be significant grading on the property.
17. Note distances from the center line of all existing and
proposed streets adjacent to the subject property.
18. Show the xi-Sti,ng=buildable area.;which is that portion of
a lot that constitutes the existing building pad and any
contiguous portion of the lot within the area defined by
the required minimum setbacks that has an average slope
of ten percent (10%) or less. If there is not an
existing building pad, the buildable area shall mean that
portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an
average slope of ten percent (10%) or less.
16
06/- Site Plan Review
J�f•� Application r -5-
2 Gam;; �� , �, ���,� / . I (% - au
5/12;-7/1/- //IT 0.5:X.,--,76/J,I40crvi-afi-
it/
a:LAL.L•c.
Cc rL'
5/u6-24, ` /Z 6-7-6/_
'1
',; )
-7 7 7,/ - `L
le
r;
75r %�L' 7✓,,, //v2 i %'7' j'ue 4 _,./ (! /D!'✓' ��/fi' ivn, ee;dC' 71, GGG�tir1;i
U
• •
COMPUTATION OF LOT COVERAGE
LOT COVERAGE (TITLE 17)
Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts,
swimming pools, service yards (enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or
an area of not less than 1,000 square feet for the construction of
a stable and corral (with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover
more than twenty (20%) of the net lot area, provided further that
in addition to the above described improvements, the areas included
within driveways, parking space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt
or concrete paving of any kind excepting roads maintained by the
Rolling Hills Community Association, shall not cover more than
thirty-five (35%) percent of the net lot area.
For the purposes of this Section "net area" shall exclude all
perimeter easements for a maximum of ten feet (10') and that
portion of the lot or parcel of land which is used for roadway
purposes, and shall also exclude any private drive or driveway
which provides ingress and egress to any other lot or parcel of
land, and access strip portion of any flag lot.
BUILDING AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
NET LOT AREA sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
RESIDENCE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
GARAGE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
SWIMMING POOL sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
STABLE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
TENNIS COURT sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
SERVICE YARD sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
OTHER sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
TOTAL SQUARE FEET sq.ft.
% STRUCTURE COVERAGE
Site Plan Review
Application -6-
sq.ft. sq.ft.
• •
DRIVEWAY sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
PAVED WALKS AND
PATIO AREA sq.ft.
POOL DECKING
TOTAL FLATWORK
% TOTAL FLATWORK
COVERAGE
sq.ft.
sq. ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
TOTAL COVERAGE % % %
Site Plan Review
Application -7-
COMPUTATION OF BUILDABLE AREA AND COVERAGE THEREOF,
A policy of the City is to address coverage of an identified "EXISTING
BUILDABLE AREA". Coverage thereof is based upon the calculation of the
"footprint" square footage of the residence, garage, stable (barn), and
other accessory structures proposed and/or developed on said "buildable
area".
For purposes of this calculation, "buildable area" shall be defined as
stated in Section 17.08.135 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code which
declares existing "buildable area" as the portion of a lot that
constitutes the existing building pad and any other contiguous portion
of the lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten
percent (10%) or less. If there is no existing building pad, it shall
mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average
slope of ten percent (10%) or less.
BUILDABLE AREA CALCULATIONS,
TOTAL BUILDABLE PAD AREA sq.ft.
RESIDENCE sq.ft.
GARAGE sq.ft.
STABLE (BARN) sq.ft.
POOL sq.ft.
OTHER sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON BUILDING PAD
BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
Site Plan Review
Application -8-
sq. ft.
AT/Z�S,)
r
•
CHECKLIST FOR PLAN SUBMITTAL
l-Cli-7�-C_ LA
wLA
The following information must be included on any plan submitted
for checking to the Rolling Hills Planning Commission for:
A.
B.
C.
Conditional Use Permit (including grading requirements).
Variance (including grading requirements).
Site Plan Review (including grading requirements).
Show the following:
Name, address and telephone no. of applicant, and name
address and telephone no. of architect and civil
engineer.
Vicinity map drawn to scale.
Requested improvements should be dimensioned to property
line and residences of all contiguous properties.
3.
4.
North arrow and scale of plans.
Existing contours of the entire lot.
Show setbacks, easements, horse trails on entire lot.
Square footage of building pads in accordance with
Municipal Code Title 17 (form attached) . (/o ,-nU-/,,-l.:z.,-4/
Computation of lot coverage in accordance with Municipal
Code Title 17 (form attached) . /1/� 'cam 71s-w-S ,
All slopes shall not be steeper in slope than tso
horizontal to one vertical, or exceed a vertical height
of thirty feet (30'). All slopes shall be marked with
grade. (Municipal Code Title 15).
'All cut and fill slopes must be shaded. (Title 15).
Show all retaining walls and sections
height and elevations. Show height for
Show proposed drainage pattern of graded
through walls,
all buildings.
areas.
12. The defined area(s) for which the Variance, Conditional
Use Permit or site plan review is requested.
Site Plan Review
Application
_?-1(
--
-4- (1 !
Cl -c/C:ii ..C�(Lo�(/a �Gc 7 - C-C1! rvli ��614...„ C (;i.i
l
13. Show outline of
All structures
footage of each
note must be
measurements.
14
residence and any additional structures.
must be physically measured and square
structure must be shown on drawing. A
on the drawingcertifying to those
Show a graded area of not less than 450 square feet for
the construction of a stable, 550 square feet for a
corral, and a graded road of not more than 25% grade for
vehicular access to the stable site. (Title 17).
Sections should be shown through highest slope and
through other areas where ground is steep, and as many
additional sections as necessary to clearly delineate
land contours with existing ground.
16. A current survey and grading plan, with related soils,
geology, hydrology/drainage reports, showing all
structures on the property, with their distance from
property lines delineated, will be required in
applications where the requested change is close to
easements, close to other properties, and/or where there
is to be significant grading on the property.
17. Note distances from the center line of all existing and
proposed streets adjacent to the subject property.
18. Show the existing buildable area which is that portion of
a lot that constitutes the existing building pad and any
contiguous portion of the lot within the area defined by
the required minimum setbacks that has an average slope
of ten percent (10%) or less. If there is not an
existing building pad, the buildable area shall mean that
portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an
average slope of ten percent (10%) or less.
n .✓s2c�'�' / rCi v_ /u-L
CS/T/4 �L%„
T.^✓7141-- Gli�� cv t.cS c9 >.-!
°/1 (C1
Site Plan Review
Application
-5-
Ilk
KTTH V\1-<, 1HLEJ_T
Consulting Engineering Geologist
November 14, 1991 Project No. 2789-91
Ms. Carol Marrone
58 Cypress Way
Rolling Hills, CA
SUBJECT: INFORMATION REGARDING PROPOSED LOT -LINE ADJUSTMENT
#13 and #17 Southfield Road
Rolling Hills, CA
Dear Ms. Marrone:
Pursuant to your request, this letter regarding a proposed lot -line
adjustment has been prepared. It is understood that you propose to
construct a single family dwelling northwesterly of an existing
house at #13 Southfield. The proposed house will be located in the
area of an existing stable behind the house and will extend across
the present boundary between 13 and 17 Southfield.
We have recently performed a geotechnical investigation which
included both 13 and 17 Southfield and found that, in our opinion,
geologic conditions in the area of the existing stable where the
proposed house will be located are favorable for the proposed
construction. Our investigation included the drilling of three
deep exploratory borings and excavating several test trenches. The
report of the investigation is presently being written. Based on
information obtained from the investigation it is further our
opinion that if the proposed house is constructed in the area of
the stable, it will not have an adverse geologic impact on the
existing house located at 13 Southfield.
If you have any questions regarding the information presented in
this letter, please call my office.
Respectfully submitted,
tH W. Ehle
.G. 1242
1242
or ct i�tae/
D f C C \11
t_ll Nov v 1 4_ 199 i
City Of Rolling Hills
316 Tejon Place c' Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 (213) 37C-4146
0
• a.
KEITH W E LEa T
Consulting Engineering Geologist
NOV14: 1991
City Of Hills
by
November 14, 1991 Project No. 2789-91
Ms. Carol Marrone
58 Cypress Way
Rolling Hills, CA
SUBJECT: INFORMATION REGARDING MOST GEOLOGICALLY SUITABLE BUILDING
SITE
#13 AND #17 Southfield Road
Rolling Hills, CA
Dear Ms. Marrone:
Pursuant to your request, this letter regarding a proposed lot -line
adjustment proposed building site has been prepared. It is
understood that you propose to construct a single family dwelling
northwesterly of an existing house at #13 Southfield. The proposed
house will be located in the area of an existing stable behind the
house and will extend across the present boundary between 13 and 17
Southfield.
We have recently performed a geotechnical investigation which
included both 13 and 17 Southfield and found that, in our opinion,
geologic conditions in the area of the existing stable where the
proposed house will be located are favorable for the proposed
construction. Our investigation included the drilling of three
deep exploratory borings and excavating several test trenches. The
report of the investigation is presently being written. Based on
information obtained from the investigation it is further our
opinion that geologically the most suitable building site is the
area of the of existing stable. Firm bedrock suitable for
foundation support occurs near -surface in the area of the proposed
building site and as such, minimal grading will be required to
develop a building pad in this area. If the proposed house is
constructed anywhere else, it is likely much more extensive grading
will be required because of the "looser" materials that underlie
most of 17 Southfield. Information obtained during our
investigation indicates that most of 17 Southfield is underlain by
and estimated 30 to 50 feet of "breccia" (as opposed to bedrock).
As such, in order to prepare the earth for foundation support, more
316 Tejon Place c Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 c (213) 37C-414.6
extensive grading would likely be required if the house were
constructed at any location other than in the area of the existing
stable at 13 Southfield where near -surface bedrock is present.
If you have any questions regarding the information presented in
this letter, please call my office.
Respectf u .i eubmitted,
Kels�th W . 'Ehhlert
. 12` `2 �:
CRISS C GUNDERSON: ARCHITECT
253 5TH STREET
SEAL BEACH, CA 90740
TEL (213) 594-9157
FAX (213) 594-5553
November 4, 1991
Planning Commission
City of Rolling Hills
Regarding:
No. 15 and no. 17 Southfield Drive
Owners: Dr. and Mrs. Alfred Marrone
Dear commissioners,
Please review these two properties with regards to the lot line
attached drawings.
The purpose of this adjustment is to improve both properties.
have a greatly improve view of the ocean. No. 15 Southfield
front and side yards, resulting in an increase in useable land.
Tha `ou,
C ss Gunderso
adjustment as shown in the
No. 17 Southfield Drive will
Drive will have an enlarged
`"0