529, Lot line adjustment/Certificat, Correspondence•
•
��O� RO/L4fl,
r
r
c� s
CERTIFIED MAIL
November 28, 1995
Ms. Kelly Tsou and Mr. Ching Sung Tsou
4 Ringbit Road West
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
SUBJECT: APPEAL PERIOD AND AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
ZONING CASE NO. 529, 4 RINGBIT ROAD WEST & A VACANT LOT
AT 6 RINGBIT ROAD WEST (LOTS 8-A-SF & 8-A-2-SF, RESPECTIVELY)
RESOLUTION NO. 95-17
Dear Ms. and Mr. Tsou:
This letter shall serve as official notification that Zoning Case No. 529, a request for a
Certificate of Compliance for Lot Line Adjustment to determine compliance with
provisions of the Subdivision Map Act for property at 4 and 6 Ringbit Road West,
was APPROVED by the Planning Commission and the enclosed resolution was
approved on November 21, 1995 at a regular meeting. The Planning Commission's
decision was reported to the City Council at their regular meeting on November 27,
1995.
The approval will become effective:
(1) Thirty (30) days after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution if no
appeals are filed within that time period (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling
Hills Municipal Code attached), AND
(2) An Affidavit of Acceptance Form and the subject resolution must be filed by
you with the County Recorder.
We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 95-17, specifying the conditions of
approval set forth by the Planning Commission and the approved Exhibit A Lot
Line Adjustment Plan to keep for your files. Once you have reviewed the
Resolution, please complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM,
have the signature(s) notarized, and forward the completed form and a copy of the
Resolution to:
Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder
Real Estate Records Section
12400 East Imperial Highway
Norwalk, CA 90650
Include a check in the amount of $7.00 for the first page and $3.00 for each additional
page.
M
it
Printed on Recycled Paper.
•
• r
PAGE 2
Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
0-6, L
LOLA UNGA
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
ENC: RESOLUTION NO. 95-17
EXHIBIT A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAN
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
APPEAL SECTION OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE.
cc: Mr. Douglas McHattie
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO:
Recorder's Use
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
Please record this form with the Registrar -Recorder's Office and return to:
City of Rolling Hills, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274
(The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation).
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
§§
ZONING CASE NO.529 SITE PLAN REVIEW ❑
I (We) the undersigned state:
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT •
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows:
4 RINGBIT ROAD WEST & A VACANT LOT AT 6 RINGBIT ROAD WEST
(LOTS 8-A-SF & 8-A-2-SF, RESPECTIVELY)
This property is the subject of the above numbered case.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
ZONING CASE NO. 529 Si'1'h PLAN REVIEW ❑
VARIANCE ❑
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 0
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT ■
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Print Print
Owner Owner
Name Name
Signature Signature
Address Address
City/State City/State
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
State of
) On this the _day of , 19_,before me,
County of )§§
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
❑ personally known to me
❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s)
subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged that
executed it.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary's Signature
See Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and made a part hereof
• •
17.54.010
17.54 APPEALS
17.54.010 Time for Filing Appeals
A. All actions of the Planning Commission authorized by this
Title may be appealed to the City Council. All appeals shall
be filed in writing with the City Clerk.
B. All appeals must be filed on or before the 30th calendar day
after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution on
the project or application. Application fees shall be paid as
required by Section 17.30.030 of this Title.
C. Within 30 days after the Planning Commission adopts a
resolution which approves or denies a development
application, the City Clerk shall place the resolution as a
report item on the City Council's agenda. The City Council
may, by an affirmative vote of three members, take
jurisdiction over the application. In the event the City
Council takes jurisdiction over the application, the Planning
Commission's decision will be stayed until the City Council
completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions
of this Chapter.
17.54.020 Persons Authorized to File an Appeal
Any person, including the City Manager, may appeal a decision of
the Planning Commission to the City Council, in accordance with
the terms of this Chapter.
17.54.030 Form, Content, and Deficiencies in an Appeal Application
A. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk on a
form or forms provided by the City Clerk. No appeal shall
be considered filed until the required appeal fee has been
received by the City Clerk.
B. The appeal application shall state, at a minimum, the name
and address of the appellant, the project and action being
appealed, and the reasons why the appellant believes that
the Planning Commission erred or abused its discretion, or
why the Planning Commission's decision is not support by
evidence in the record.
76
ROLLING HILLS ZONING
MAY 24, 1993
• •
17.54.030
C. If the appeal application is found to be deficient, the City
Clerk shall deliver or mail (by certified mail), to the
appellant a notice specifying the reasons why the appeal is
deficient. The appellant shall correct the deficiency with an
amendment to the appeal form within seven calendar days of
receiving the deficiency notice. Otherwise, the appeal
application will be deemed withdrawn, and the appeal fee
will be returned to the applicant.
17.54.040 Request for Information
Upon receipt of a written and complete appeal application and fee,
the City Clerk shall direct the Planning Commission Secretary to
transmit to the City Council the complete, record of the entire
proceeding before the Planning Commission.
17.54.050 Scheduling of Appeal Hearing
Upon receiving an appeal, the City Clerk shall set the appeal for a
hearing before the City Council to occur within 20 days of the filing
of the appeal. In the event that more than one appeal is filed for
the same project, the Clerk shall schedule all appeals to be heard
at the same time.
17.54.060 Proceedings
A. Noticing
The hearing shall be noticed as required by Section 17.30.030 of
this Title. In addition, the following parties shall be noticed:
1. The applicant of the proposal being appealed;
2. The appellant; and
3. Any person who provided oral testimony or written
comments to the Planning Commission during or as part of
the public hearing on the project.
B. Hearing
The City Council shall conduct a public hearing pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 17.34 of this Title. The Council shall
consider all information in the record, as well as additional
information presented at the appeal hearing, before taking action
on the appeal.
77
ROLLING HILLS ZONING
MAY 24, 1993
• •
1754.060
C. Action
The Council may act to uphold, overturn, or otherwise modify the
Planning Commission's original action on the proposal, or the
Council may remand the application back to the Planning
Commission for further review and direction. The Council shall
make findings to support its decision.
D. Finality of Decision
The action of the City Council to approve, conditionally approve, or
deny an application shall be. final and conclusive.
E. Record of Proceedings
The decision of the City Council shall be set forth in full in a
resolution or ordinance. A copy of the decision shall be sent to the
applicant or the appellant.
17.54.070 Statute of Limitations
Any action challenging a final administrative order or decision by
the City made as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing
is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and
discretion regarding a final and non -appealable determination of
facts is vested in the City of Rolling Hills, the City Council, or in
any of its Commissions, officers, or employees, must be filed within
the time limits set forth in the California Code of Civil Procedure,
Section 1094.6 •
78
ROLLING HILLS ZONING
MAY 24, 1993
e; SENDER:
y
m
to
a)
a)
4-
O
u)
CO
0)
CD
0
0
o
0
U)
a
P 852 865 l�7
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL •
NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED
NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL
(See Reverse)
Sent to M5 TSvGc
PAI)', 7750Lr i
Street and No
P.O ,Slate
and ZIP d i-A113,c 9621
Postage S
77
Certified Fee
II Special Delivery Fee
IRestricted Delivery Fee
Return Receipt showing
to whom and Date Delivered
Return,Receipt showing whom,
Date, and of Delivery
TOT& S3, 67
1- to
IJ.Jd
• Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services.
• Complete items 3, and 4a & b.
• Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can
return this card to you.
• Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space
does not permit.
• Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece below the article number.
• The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
delivered.
•o 3. Article Addressed to:
a)ll�e f1Y ' l scow
o jr. CJ 1 3 Se.eno 1
oz-c-)
1/,1 ,mo t)o
/14
is, wa7y
U
N
LU
CC
z
rc
cc 6. Signature (Agent
0
Vl
11
5. Sig)i t' i;e (Addressee)/
I also wish to receive the
following
fee):
1. ❑ Addressee's Address
services (for an extra
t1)
0.c)
0
w
cc
c
oc
y
0
Addressee's Address (Only if requested ,1
and fee is paid)
at
2. ❑ Restricted Delivery
Consult postmaster for fee.
4,a Article Number _
141 $52 S%5 t —1
4b. Service Type
❑ Registered
Certified
❑ Express Mail
❑ Insured
El COD
❑ Return Receipt for
Merchandise
7. Date of Delivery /'
PS Form 3811, December 1991 *U.S.GPO: 1993-352714
h-
DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT '
I •
City ol
C
October 20,1995
Ms. Kelly Tsou
4 Ringbit Road West
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 529
Request for a Certificate of Compliance for Lot Line Adjustment to
determine compliance with provisions of the Subdivision Map Act for
property at 4 Ringbit Road West and a Vacant Lot at 6 Ringbit Road
West, Rolling Hills, CA; more precisely, Lots 8-A-SF & 8-A-2-SF,
respectively.
Dear Ms. Tsou:
This letter shall serve as official notification that Zoning Case No. 529 w a s
APPROVED by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on October 17,
1995.
The final Resolution and conditions of APPROVAL will be forwarded to you after
they are signed by the Planning Commission Chairman and City Clerk.
The Planning Commission's decision will be reported to the City Council at their
regular meeting on Monday, November 27, 1995. You should also be aware that
the decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed within thirty (30) days
after adoption of the Planning Commission's Resolution (Section 17.54.010(B) of the
Rolling Hills Municipal Code).
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter.
LOLA M. UNGA
PRINCIPAL PLA ER
R
cc: Mr. Douglas McHattie
h
it
Printed on Recycled Paper.
Boon Engineering poCor tion
707 Silver Spur Road, Suite 201
Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274
Phone (310) 544-6010
September 27, 2000
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Attn.:
Subject:
Craig Nealis
City Manager
Grading Sequence
#4 & #6 Ringbit, Rolling Hills, CA
BEC File No. 98206
Dear Mr. Nealis,
0
SEP 2 7 2000
CITY OF ROLLING .RILLS
In order to utilize best construction practices, it is necessary to move soil from the
driveway reconstruction at #4 Ringbit to the new pad at #6 Ringbit. When the
basement at #6 Ringbit is constructed, the excavated soil will be moved back to #4
Ringbit to properly construct the buttress fill for the driveway.
There will be a basement under the house at #6 Ringbit. The desirable way to prepare
for a basement within a fill pad is to compact the entire pad and then excavate the
basement. This procedure enables the pad area, which will in part support the house
above, to be adequately compacted throughout the pad. It is not good practice to
attempt to compact around a basement hole as it is not possible to obtain sufficient
compaction near the edges.
The soil generated from the basement excavation will then be taken to the area of the
driveway reconstruction to build the buttress fill as required by the soils engineer.
Buttress fills require removal of soil and then recompaction.
Our calculation of the quantity of soil being moved is a balance of 965 cubic yards of
cut and fill.
Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or require further information.
Sincerely,
Bolton Engineering Corpor
tion
Karina R. Bird, R.C.E. 48818
Vice President
RIofLS3oy-r�
7
\ CAVIL ,,
�oF cA\�.Fo�
NIL C48818
wegatty
City offie0ti4
FIELD TRIP NOTIFICATION
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
September 20, 1995
Ms. Kelly Tsou
4 Ringbit Road West
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 529
Request for a Certificate of Compliance for Lot Line Adjustment to determine compliance with
provisions of the Subdivision Map Act for property at 4 Ringbit Road West and a Vacant Lot at 6
Ringbit Road West, Rolling Hills, CA; more precisely, Lots 8-A-SF & 8-A-2-SF, respectively; request
for a Variance to permit a future stable to encroach into the front yard setback, and request for Site
Plan Review for the construction of a new single family residence and attached garage at 6 Ringbit
Road West.
Dear Ms. Tsou:
We have arranged for the Planning Commission to conduct a field inspection of your property
to view a staking of the Lot Line Adjustment portion of the proposed project on Saturday,
September 30, 1995.
The Planning Commission's timetable is to meet at 7:30 AM at 6 Meadowlark Lane and then
proceed to 20 Portuguese Bend Road, 3 Crest Road West, and finally, 6 Ringbit Road West. Do
not expect the Commission at 7:30 AM but, be assured that the field trip will take place before
9:30 AM.
The site must be prepared according to the following requirements:
• Stake the limits of the OLD & NEW property lines and easements, proposed building
pad(s) and stable and corral pads.
The owner and/or representative should be present to answer any questions regarding the
proposal.
Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
LOLA M. UNGAR
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
cc: Mr. Douglas McHattie
Printed on Recycled Paper
Ciiy opeo sans per
FIELD TRIP NOTIFICATION
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 529
Request for a Certificate of Compliance for Lot Line Adjustment to determine
compliance with provisions of the Subdivision Map Act for property at 4
Ringbit Road West and a Vacant Lot at 6 Ringbit Road West, Rolling Hills, CA;
more precisely, Lots 8-A-SF & 8-A-2-SF, respectively; request for a Variance to
permit a future stable to encroach into the front yard setback, and request for
Site Plan Review for the construction of a new single family residence and
attached garage at 6 Ringbit Road West.
We have arranged for the Planning Commission to conduct a field inspection of the subject
property to view a staking of the Lot Line Adjustment portion of the proposed project on
Saturday, September 30, 1995. The Commission will meet at the cul-de-sac accessway to 6
Ringbit Road West and then walk or car pool down to the lot line adjustment area.
The Planning Commission's timetable is to meet at 7:30 AM at 6 Meadowlark Lane and then
proceed to 20 Portuguese Bend Road, 3 Crest Road West, and finally, 6 Ringbit Road West. Do
not expect the Commission at 7:30 AM but, be assured that the field trip will take place before
9:30 AM.
The owner and/or representative will be present to answer any questions regarding the
proposal.
Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
LOLA M. UNGAR
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
cc: Mrs. Carol Marrone
Mrs. Leslie Dederer
Mrs. Sandra Heitzler
Mr. Charles Raine
Mr. Jonah Schnel
Printed on Recycled Paper.
•
City Rolling
GODFREY PERNELL, D.D.S.
Mayor
JODY MURDOCK
Mayor Pro Tem
THOMAS F. HEINSHEIMER
Councilmember
FRANK E. HILL
Councilmember
B. ALLEN LAY
Councilmember
September 8, 1995
Ms. Kelly Tsou
4 Ringbit Road West
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 529
Request for a Certificate of Compliance for Lot Line Adjustment to
determine compliance with provisions of the Subdivision Map Act for
property at 4 Ringbit Road West and a Vacant Lot at 6 Ringbit Road
West, Rolling Hills, CA; more precisely, Lots 8-A-SF & 8-A-2-SF,
respectively; request for a Variance to permit a future stable to encroach
into the front yard setback, and request for Site Plan Review for the
construction of a new single family residence and attached garage at 6
Ringbit Road West.
Dear Ms. Tsou:
We have received your application for residential development and the proposed
lot line adjustment involving #4 and #6 Ringbit Road West. We have determined
that your application requires a Variance for the proposed future stable and corral
area in the front yard area.
This has been communicated to your representatives at South Bay Engineering. We
have received the variance application. However, we have not received the
necessary fees to initiate this portion of your application process. Variance fees total
$1,250.
Therefore, presently, your application must be deemed incomplete. However, in
light of the circumstances that have been presented by your representative
indicating that you are out of the country and unable to provide the necessary fees,
we have scheduled your application to be considered by the Planning Commission
at their regular meeting to be held on Tuesday, September 19, 1995. If we do not
receive the fees prior to that meeting, we will have no choice but to report that your
41.
Printed on Recycled Paper.
Page 2 1,
Please understand, a future stable and corral are required to be demonstrated as
feasible in all residential developments that do not propose actual construction of
these equestrian facilities and, therefore, represent a major component of your
entire application.
Please contact this office at your earliest convenience so that we may clarify this
situation and move forward with your application review process. Thank you for
your cooperation.
Sincerely,
911.114
Craig R. Nealis
City Manager
CRN:mlk
cc: Lola Ungar, Principal Planner
Mr. Roger North
Mr. Doug McHattie