03-08-2021_CCAgendaPacket1.CALL TO ORDER
2.ROLL CALL
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX (310) 377-7288
AGENDA
Regular Council Meeting
CITY COUNCIL
Monday, March 08, 2021
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
7:00 PM
This meeting is held pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 issued by Gavin Newsom on March 17,
2020.
All Councilmembers will participate by teleconference. The meeting agenda is available on the City’s
website. A live audio of the City Council meeting will be available on the City’s website. Both the
agenda and the live audio can be found here: https://www.rolling-
hills.org/government/agenda/index.php.
Members of the public may observe and orally participate in the meeting via Zoom and or submit
written comments in real-time by emailing the City Clerk’s office at cityclerk@cityofrh.net. Your
comments will become part of the official meeting record. You must provide your full name, but please
do not provide any other personal information that you do not want to be published.
Zoom access: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87227175757?
pwd=VzNES3Q2NFprRk5BRmdUSktWb0hmUT09
Or dial (669) 900-9128
meeting ID: 872 2717 5757 passcode: 780609
Audio recordings to all the City Council meetings can be found here:
https://cms5.revize.com/revize/rollinghillsca/government/agenda/index.php
While on this page, locate the meeting date of interest then click on AUDIO. Another window will
appear. In the new window, you can select the agenda item of interest and listen to the audio by hitting
the play button. Written Action Minutes to the City Council meetings can be found in the AGENDA,
typically under Item 4A Minutes. Please contact the City Clerk at 310 377-1521 or email at
cityclerk@cityofrh.net for assistance.
Next Resolution No. 1273 Next Ordinance No. 370
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
1
3.OPEN AGENDA - PUBLIC COMMENT WELCOME
This is the appropriate time for members of the public to make comments regarding the items on
the consent calendar or items not listed on this agenda. Pursuant to the Brown Act, no action will
take place on any items not on the agenda.
4.MEETING MINUTES
4.A.FEBRUARY 22, 2021 MEETING MINUTES
RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented.
5.CONSENT CALENDAR
Matters which may be acted upon by the City Council in a single motion. Any Councilmember may
request removal of any item from the Consent Calendar causing it to be considered under Council
Actions.
5.A.PAYMENT OF BILLS
RECOMMENDATION: Approve as Presented
5.B.REPUBLIC SERVICES RECYCLING TONNAGE REPORT FOR JANUARY 2021.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented.
5.C.WAIVE SECOND FULL READING AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 369 OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA AMENDING
TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADDÂ
CHAPTER 17.19 (RANCHO DEL MAR HOUSING OPPORTUNITY OVERLAY ZONE)
ESTABLISHING AN OVERLAY ZONE TO ACCOMMODATE HOUSING AND TO
AMEND SECTION 17.08.010 (ZONES ESTABLISHED) OF CHAPTER 17.08
(ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONES AND BOUNDARIES) TO IDENTIFY THE OVERLAY
ON THE ZONING MAP; AND APPROVING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; AND
ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 1270 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2020-01,
AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT AND LAND USE POLICY MAP TO
ACCOMMODATE HOUSING; AND APPROVING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
RECOMMENDATION: Waive second full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 369, an
ordinance amending Title 17 (Zoning) of the City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code and
approving the Negative Declaration 2020-01 in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
Adopt Resolution No. 1270 of the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills, adopting
General Plan Amendment 2020-01 and approving Negative Declaration 2020-01 in
accordance with CEQA.
5.D.JOINT PENINSULA LETTERS FOR REOPENING OF BUSINESSES AND SB9 AND
2021-02-22_CCMinuteF.docx
Check Voucher Register - Council Report Expenditures from 3-8-2021.pdf
Tonnage Report Jan.2021.pdf
CEQA.pdf
CC_Resolution_1270.pdf
Ordinance_No._369_RDMO.pdf
2
CITY'S OPPOSITION LETTERS TO SB 9 AND 10.
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.
5.E.RESOLUTION NO. 1272 (PREVIOUSLY NO. 1268) OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN
CITY RECORDS AS PROVIDED BY SECTION 34090 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented.
6.COMMISSION ITEMS
NONE.
7.PUBLIC HEARINGS
NONE.
8.OLD BUSINESS
NONE.
9.NEW BUSINESS
9.A.CONSIDER AND DISCUSS AN INCENTIVE PROGRAM FOR FIRE FUEL
MANAGEMENT IN THE CANYONS.
R E C O M M E N D AT I O N : Staff recommends that the City Council consider an
incentive program to eliminate fire fuel in the canyons, discuss elements of the
program, and provide direction to staff.
9.B.REPORT ON FINDINGS OF ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) SURVEY
ADMINISTERED TO ROLLING HILLS RESIDENTS IN THE LAST QUARTER OF
2020
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.
9.C.PROGRESS UPDATE ON THE ENGINEERING DESIGN OF ADA IMPROVEMENT
PLANS FOR ROLLING HILLS CITY HALL
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.
10.MATTERS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS
Final_PV Peninsula Cities_Vaccination Reopening Metric.pdf
Final SB 9 Atkins Increased Density in Single-Family Zones.pdf
RH SB 9 and 10 Letters.pdf
CCResolutionNo1272.pdf
030821-ADUSurveyRHCCStaffReport.pdf
20200509_rollinghills_costestimate10.pdf
20200612_Council_paritition_revised.pdf
20200704_rhada_OPTION_1_2.pdf
rolling_hills_city_hall__option1_202006008_Layout1__1_.pdf
rolling_hills_city_hall__option2_202006008d_Layout1__1_.pdf
Staff_Reports.pdf
3
NONE.
11.MATTERS FROM STAFF
11.A.CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION (CPUC) RULE 20A TARIFF
PROGRAM. (VERBAL REPORT)
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.
12.CLOSED SESSION
12.A.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54957.6   CITY’S DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE: MAYOR JEFF
PIEPER UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEE:Â CITY MANAGER ELAINE JENG
RECOMMENDATION: None.
12.B.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: INITIATION OFÂ LITIGATION
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(d)(4) Â Â THE CITY FINDS, BASED ON
THE ADVICE FROM LEGAL COUNSEL, THAT DISCUSSION IN OPEN SESSION
WILL PREJUDICE THE POSITION OF THE CITY IN THE LITIGATION. Â Â
NUMBER OF POTENTIAL CASES: 1
RECOMMENDATION: None.
13.ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting will be held on Monday, March 22, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. via Zoom. Zoom
access:
Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87227175757?pwd=VzNES3Q2NFprRk5BRmdUSktWb0hmUT09
Meeting ID: 872 2717 5757
Passcode: 780609
Notice:
Notice:
Public Comment is welcome on any item prior to City Council action on the item.
Documents pertaining to an agenda item received after the posting of the agenda are available for review in the City
Clerk's office or at the meeting at which the item will be considered.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting due to your disability, please contact the City Clerk at (310) 377-1521 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility and accommodation for your review of this
agenda and attendance at this meeting.
4
Agenda Item No.: 4.A
Mtg. Date: 03/08/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:DELIA ARANDA,
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:FEBRUARY 22, 2021 MEETING MINUTES
DATE:March 08, 2021
BACKGROUND:
None.
DISCUSSION:
None.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve as presented.
ATTACHMENTS:
2021-02-22_CCMinuteF.docx
5
MINUTES OF A
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2021
1.CALL TO ORDER
The City Council of the City of Rolling Hills met via Zoom Teleconference on the above date
at 7:00 p.m. via teleconference.
Mayor Pieper presiding.
2.ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, Wilson, and Black
Absent: None
Staff Present:Elaine Jeng, City Manager
Meredith T. Elguira, Planning & Community Services Director
Jane Abzug, Assistant City Attorney
3.OPEN AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENT WELCOME
Resident Jim Aichele requested to move the Open Agenda further into the Agenda to allow
people ample time to access the Zoom meeting.
Resident Alfred Visco asked if it is possible for the Block Captain or the City to approach Mr.
Schultz, property owner of 15 and 17 Johns Canyon Road, for possible access through his
property during an emergency. The property has a private gate near the intersection of Silver
Spur and Crenshaw.
4.CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
4A REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 08, 2021.
MOTION:Councilmember Wilson called for a motion to approve the minutes and the
motion was seconded by Councilmember Mirsch.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, and Wilson
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Black
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
5.CONSENT CALENDAR
5A PAYMENT OF BILLS
6
Minutes 2
City Council Regular Meeting
February 22, 2021
5B PROGRESS UPDATE ON THE ENFINEERING DESIGN OF THE 8” SEWER
MAIN LINE ALONG PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD AND ROLLING HILLS
ROAD.
5C PROGRESS UPDATE ON THE CAL-OES/FEMA HAZARD MITIGATION
GRANT PROJECTS.
MOTION:Councilmember Wilson called for a motion to approve 5A, 5B, and 5C and
the motion was seconded by Councilmember Black.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, Black, and
Wilson
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
5D ADOPT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE ROLLING
HILLS MUNICIPAL AMENDING TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF THE TOLLING
HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD CHAPTER 17.19 (RANCHO DEL MAR
HOUSING OPPURTUNITY OVERLAY ZONE) ESTABLISHING AN
OVERLAY ZONE TO ACCOMMODATE HOUSING AND TO AMEND
SECTION 17.08.010 (ZONES ESTABLISHED) OF CHAPTER 17.08
(ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONES MAP); AND APPROVING THE NEGATIVE
DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF
THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 2020-01, AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT AND
LAND USE POLICY MAP TO ACCOMMODATE HOUSING; AND
APPROVING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
Item 5D was pulled for discussion. There was a revision to the ordinance clarifying the
number of affordable housing units. Because of this revision, the Assistant City Attorney
Abzug modified staff’s recommendation to reintroduce the ordinance on first reading and
bring back the ordinance on March 8, 2021 for second reading. The Assistant City Attorney
Abzug also recommended to the City Council to approve the resolution at the March 8, 2021
meeting.
MOTION:Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer called for motion to approve Item 5D as
recommended by the Assistant City Attorney Abzug and the motion was seconded by
Councilmember Wilson.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, and Wilson
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Black
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
7
Minutes 3
City Council Regular Meeting
February 22, 2021
6. COMMISION ITEMS
NONE
7.PUBLIC HEARINGS
NONE
8.OLD BUSINESS
8A CONSIDER AND APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 1271 TO AMEND
RESOLUTION NO. 1263 THAT ACCEPTED STATE DEPARTMENT OF
PARKS AND RECREATION PER CAPITA PROGRAM GRANT
ALLOCATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $177,952 FROM THE OFFICE OF
GRANTS AND LOCAL SERVICES (OGALS) TO INCLUDE
MOTION:Councilmember Wilson called for a motion to approve Resolution No.
1271 and the motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, Black, and
Wilson
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
8B PENINSULA CITIES JOINT LETTERS TO STATE REPRESENTATIVE
OPPOSING SENATE BILLS 9 AND 10.
MOTION:Councilmember Mirsch called for a motion to approve a joint opposition
letter with the surrounding Peninsula cities and follow up with the City’s own SB 9 and 10
letters with stronger wording and specific City concerns. The motion also noted that Mayor
Pieper would sign the City’s SB 9 and SB 10 letters. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro
Tem Dieringer.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, Black and
Wilson
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
STAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
9.NEW BUSINESS
9A CONSIDER A REQUEST FROM ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION (RHCA) TO COST SHARE THE RESURFACING OF
TENNIS COURTS 2 AND 3 PER THE PROVISIONS OF THE LEASE
AGREEMENT.
MOTION:Mayor Pieper called a motion to approve the resurfacing of all three tennis
courts and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Mirsch.
8
Minutes 4
City Council Regular Meeting
February 22, 2021
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, Black and
Wilson
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
9B CONSIDER AND APPROVE A PROJECT BASED PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JIMENEZ CONSULTING SOLUTIONS,
LLC TO COMPLETE THREE ON-GOING TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS.
MOTION:Councilmember Mirsch called a motion to approve a professional service
agreement with Jimenez Consulting Solution as described in the staff report and the motion
was seconded by Councilmember Black.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, Black and
Wilson
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
9C CONSIDER AND APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH BARRY MILLER CONSULTING TO PROVIDE CONSULTANT
SERVICES TO PREPARE THE CITY’S 6TH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT
TO COMPLY WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT'S (HCD)
MOTION:CouncilmemberWilson called a motionto approve theprofessional service
agreement with Barry Miller Consulting to prepare the City’s 6
th cycle Housing Element and
Mayor Pro Tem Dieringerseconded with an amendment to the motion to include not to exceed
amount of $42,410.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, and Wilson
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Black
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
9D CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PERSONNEL COMMITTEE
FOR APPOINTMENTS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND TRAFFIC
COMMISSION.
MOTION:Councilmember Mirsch called for a motion to approve the re-appointment
of Charlie Raine to Traffic Commission for a four-year term; the re-appointment of Janet
Cooley to Planning Commission for a four-year term effective March 1, 2021; and the
appointment of Abby Douglas to Planning Commission to serve the remaining term vacated
by Commissioner Matt Seaburn ending on December 31, 2021. The motion was seconded by
Councilmember Wilson.
9
Minutes 5
City Council Regular Meeting
February 22, 2021
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, Black and
Wilson
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
10.MATTERS FROM THE CITY COUCIL AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS
10A UPDATE ON THE PALOS VERDES PENINSULA EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS COMMITTEE AND REGIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
COMMITTEE MEETINGS HELD ON NOVEMBER 12, 2020 AND
FEBRUARY 11, 2021 (VERBAL REPORT).
Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer reported on the November 12, 2020 meeting and updated the City
Council about an upcoming Peninsula-wide emergency preparedness tabletop exercise. Jesse
Villapando, RPV Emergency Services Coordinator, will host the exercise. Moving forward,
Palos Verdes Estates will be included in the PVP Emergency Preparedness and Regional Law
Enforcement Committees but will not be a voting member in regards to the contract with the
Sheriff’s Department. This change was formalized in the February meeting. Jesse Villapando
prepared a draft white paper on the utility companies’ response to a disaster and is available
for councilmembers to review. The cities will not be charged for the SRO services from March
2020 to the present time. The Peninsula Public Safety Committee was established in February.
Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer suggested scheduling a town hall with the Sheriff’s Department to
remind residents to be vigilant. Councilmember Wilson discussed that there was a case under
“Other Larcenies/Theft” that resulted from one mail being delivered to the wrong address.
Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer added that there were other mail incidents around the same time.
11.MATTERS FROM STAFF
NONE
12.CLOSED SESSION
12A CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54957.6 CITY'S DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE: MAYOR
JEFF PIEPER UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEE: CITY MANAGER ELAINE
JENG
The City Council recessed into Closed Session at 8:37 PM. Mayor Piper returned to
the open session at 9:44 and stated there was no reportable action from Closed Session.
13.ADJOURNAMENT
Hearing no further business before the City Council, the meeting was adjourned at 9:45 PM.
Next regular meeting: Monday, March 08, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. via City's website's link at:
https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/agenda/index.php.
10
Minutes 6
City Council Regular Meeting
February 22, 2021
Zoom access:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87227175757?pwd=VzNES3Q2NFprRk5BRmdUSktWb0hmT9
or dial (669) 900-9128, meeting ID: 872 2717 5757, passcode: 780609
Respectfully submitted,
____________________________________
Elaine Jeng, P.E.
Acting City Clerk
Approved,
______________________________________
Jeff Pieper
Mayor
11
Agenda Item No.: 5.A
Mtg. Date: 03/08/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:CONNIE VIRAMONTES , ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:PAYMENT OF BILLS
DATE:March 08, 2021
BACKGROUND:
NONE.
DISCUSSION:
NONE.
FISCAL IMPACT:
NONE.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve as presented
ATTACHMENTS:
Check Voucher Register - Council Report Expenditures from 3-8-2021.pdf
12
13
Agenda Item No.: 5.B
Mtg. Date: 03/08/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:CONNIE VIRAMONTES , ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:REPUBLIC SERVICES RECYCLING TONNAGE REPORT FOR
JANUARY 2021.
DATE:March 08, 2021
BACKGROUND:
None.
DISCUSSION:
None.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve as presented.
ATTACHMENTS:
Tonnage Report Jan.2021.pdf
14
15
Agenda Item No.: 5.C
Mtg. Date: 03/08/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:MEREDITH ELGUIRA, PLANNING DIRECTOR
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:WAIVE SECOND FULL READING AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 369
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS,
CALIFORNIA AMENDING TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF THE ROLLING
HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD CHAPTER 17.19 (RANCHO DEL
MAR HOUSING OPPORTUNITY OVERLAY ZONE) ESTABLISHING AN
OVERLAY ZONE TO ACCOMMODATE HOUSING AND TO AMEND
SECTION 17.08.010 (ZONES ESTABLISHED) OF CHAPTER 17.08
(ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONES AND BOUNDARIES) TO IDENTIFY THE
OVERLAY ON THE ZONING MAP; AND APPROVING THE NEGATIVE
DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.
1270 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2020-01, AMENDING
THE LAND USE ELEMENT AND LAND USE POLICY MAP TO
ACCOMMODATE HOUSING; AND APPROVING THE NEGATIVE
DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
DATE:March 08, 2021
BACKGROUND:
On February 22, 2021, the City Council directed staff to bring back Ordinance No. 369 and Resolution
No. 1270 for adoption at the next City Council meeting.
DISCUSSION:
The proposed revisions are required by HCD to meet the 5th Cycle Housing Element requirements. The
proposed changes ensure that the zoning code and zoning map are consistent with the general plan land
use policies and land use map.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost of preparing the ordinance, resolution and CEQA compliance is included in the adopted budget
for FY 2020-2021.
16
RECOMMENDATION:
Waive second full reading and adopt Ordinance No. 369, an ordinance amending Title 17 (Zoning) of
the City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code to add Chapter 17.19 (Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity
Zone) establishing an overlay zone to accommodate multiple housing, emergency shelter and single
room occupancy and amending Section 17.08.010 of Chapter 17.08 (Establishment of Zones and
Boundaries) to identify the overlay on the zoning map and approving the Negative Declaration 2020-01
in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
adopt Resolution No. 1270 of the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills, adopting General Plan
Amendment 2020-01 to the City of Rolling Hills General Plan, an amendment to the General Plan to
adopt the Land Use Element Amendment and Land Use Policy Map Amendment; and approving
Negative Declaration 2020-01 in accordance with CEQA.
ATTACHMENTS:
CEQA.pdf
CC_Resolution_1270.pdf
Ordinance_No._369_RDMO.pdf
17
Environmental – Planning – Engineering
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing
Overlay Zone
Initial Study –Negative Declaration
prepared for
City of Rolling Hiils
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, California 90274
November 2020
18
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. P a g e | 2 November 2020
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION 6
1.1. Background 7
1.2 Purpose and Legal Authority 7
1.3 Lead Agency 8
2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 9
2.1 Project Title 9
2.2 Lead Agency Name and Address 9
2.3 Contact Person Name and Phone Number 9
2.4 Project Location 9
2.5 General Plan Designation 9
2.6 Zoning 9
2.7 Project Description 9
2.8 Required Approvals 14
2.9 Tribal Consultation 14
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 15
3.1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected 16
3.2 Lead Agency Determination 17
4.0 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 17
4.1 Aesthetics 17
4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources 21
4.3 Air Quality 25
4.4 Biological Resources 30
4.5 Cultural Resources 35
4.6 Energy 37
4.7 Geology and Soils 39
4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 47
4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 51
4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality 60
4.11 Land Use and Planning 65
4.12 Mineral Resources 67
4.13 Noise 70
4.14 Population Housing 73
4.15 Public Services 75
4.16 Recreation 80
19
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. P a g e | 3 November 2020
4.17 Transportation and Traffic 82
4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources 85
4.19 Utilities and Service Systems 88
4.20 Wildfire 92
4.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance 97
5.0 REFERENCES 99
FIGURES
1.Regional Map 103
2.Project Location 104
3.Existing and Proposed Project Site 105
4.Landslide Hazard Zones 106
5.Fault Zones ______ 107
6.Clean Up Sites 108
7.Fire Hazard Zones 109
TABLES
Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning 110
20
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. P a g e | 4 November 2020
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
ALUC Airport Land Use Commission
AQMP Air Quality Management Plan
ARB Air Resources Board
AB Assembly Bill
CAL Fire California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
Action Plan California Energy Efficiency Action Plan
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CNDDB California Natural Diversity Database
Cal Water California Water Service Company
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
CAP Climate Action Plan
CWPP Community Wildfire Protection Plan
CC&Rs Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions
DOC Department of Conservation
DOF Department of Finance
DPH Department of Public Health
DDW Division of Drinking Water
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
FHSZ Fire Hazard Severity Zone
GWP Global Warming Potential
GHG Greenhouse Gases
HCP Habitat Conservation Plan
HCD Housing and Community Development
IS Initial Study
LU Land Use
LAMP Local Agency Management Program
LRA Local Resources Area
LAC Los Angeles County
LACFD Los Angeles County Fire Department
LACSD Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department
MOU Memorandum of Understanding
MRZ Mineral Resources Zone
MWD Municipal Water District
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NCCP Natural Community Conservation Plan
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
21
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. P a g e | 5 November 2020
NAHC Native American Heritage Commission
SB 18 Native American Heritage Commission Establishment
AB 52 Native American Historic Resource Protection Act
NCCP Natural Community Conservation Plan
ND Negative Declaration
NO2 Nitrogen Oxide
NOWTS Non-Conventional Onsite Wastewater Treatment
OWTS Onsite Wastewater Treatment System
OZD-1 Overlay Zone District 1
O2 Ozone
PVPTA Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority
PVUSD Palos Verdes Unified School District
PM-25 Particulate Matter
RTD Regional Transit District
RAS-1 Residential Agriculture Suburban 1+ Acres
RAS-2 Residential Agriculture Suburban 2+ Acres
RHCA Rolling Hills Community Association
RPV Runway Protection Zone
SB Senate Bill
SVP Society of Vertebrate Paleontology
SCAQMD Southern California Air Quality Management District
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SRA State Resources Area
SR State Route
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management Systems
USDA United States Department of Agriculture
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled
VHFSSZ Very High Fire Standard Severity Zone
22
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. P a g e | 6 November 2020
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This document constitutes an Initial Study (IS) that evaluates the potential environmental effects
of the City of Rolling Hills’ (City; Rolling Hills) proposed overlay zone at the property at 38 Crest
Road West (Project; proposed Project), also known as the Palos Verdes Unified School District
school site; the addition of a Mixed-Use Multi-Family Overlay Zone (Rancho Del Mar Affordable
Housing Overlay Zone); all associated General Plan Land Use Element updates; as well as all
related Zoning Ordinance and associated Map changes.
The proposed Project would establish a new mixed-use, multi-family overlay zone that would
accommodate the existing uses on the site, as well as allow for new multi-family units to be
developed at a future date. The proposed Project would include:
The creation of a new overlay designation – Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay
Zone;
Amendments to the City’s General Plan Land Element and Map;
Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance (Title 17 of the Municipal Code) and related zoning map
to add the new “Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone”. The City has one other
overlay zone that has been adopted and mapped for an area of smaller lots and steep terrain.
(See Rolling Hills Municipal Code Chapter 17.17 (Overlay Zoning District – 1 (OZD-1).)
The number of units allowed by the “base” General Plan designation on this site must be
clustered; in other words, the overlay allows 1 multi-family units on this site by
right.
Preparation of an Initial Study/Negative Declaration (IS/ND) for the Proposed Project.
The City is undertaking this Project as part of its Housing Element Update. The zone change and
new overlay zone will enable the City of Rolling Hills to accommodate its RHNA allocations under
the 4th and 5th Cycle RHNA requirements, including accommodation of affordable housing units
as well as emergency shelters and Single Room Occupancy Housing. The total number of units
that will be accommodated “by right” under the 4th and 5th Cycles would be a total of 1
units, including low income units and very low income units. Though emergency shelters and
Single Room Occupancy (SRO) residential uses are also currently permitted under the City’s
Municipal Code and may be allowed in the future, these units will not be allowed to be counted
as the total dwelling units required under the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA)
for all future Cycles. Additionally, the proposed Project would also allow for the continued use
of the public facilities, schools and transportation facilities at the site.
The Project site is not currently proposed for development. The development of a new overlay
zone, and all associated General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Map changes are currently being
undertaken by the City so as to provide the opportunity for additional housing on the site in the
future.
This document concludes that a Negative Declaration (ND) is the appropriate level of
environmental review for the proposed Project. Therefore, the IS/ND has been prepared in
accordance with Public Resources Code (PRC) Section §21000 et seq. and the California
23
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. P a g e | 7 November 2020
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), California Code of Regulations Section §15000 et seq. It
evaluates the potential environmental effects associated with the proposed Project.
1.1 Background
A jurisdiction’s General Plan is intended to maintain and augment its built and natural
environments, as well as to provide a vision for future development. Its Zoning Ordinance is
therefore one of its main tools to implement the jurisdiction’s land use policies and guide any
development. Any changes to a jurisdiction’s land use may typically require changes to its land
use and associated zoning.
The City of Rolling Hills adopted its first General Plan in June of 1990 and incorporated goals and
policies for six Elements - Land Use, Open Space and Conservation, Safety, Noise, Circulation, and
Housing. The Housing Element was last updated in 2014 to address the Planning period from 2014-
2021. The City’s Zoning Ordinance was originally published in 1979 with updates made to
incorporate an Overlay Zoning District (OZD-1) in 2012. As of February 24, 2020, the Zoning
Ordinance has been brought up to date through Ordinance No. 364.
1.2 Purpose and Legal Authority
In accordance with State CEQA Guidelines, the City of Rolling Hills, as the Lead Agency, has made
the determination that the preparation of an Initial Study is the appropriate level of environmental
review for the proposed Project. An Initial Study is conducted by a lead agency to determine
whether a project may have significant environmental impacts. If so, then the agency shall further
find than an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is appropriate to analyze the Project’s impacts.
However, if the lead agency finds that there is no evidence of the Project’s significant impacts on
the environment, then the lead agency shall prepare a Negative Declaration (ND) or a Mitigated
Negative Declaration (MND) for the proposed Project. Per the State CEQA Guidelines Section
§15070 MND or ND shall be prepared for a Project when:
a) The initial study shows there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before
the agency, that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment; or,
b) The initial study identifies potentially significant effects; but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before
the proposed negative declaration is released for public review would avoid the effects
or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur; and,
(2) There is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency, that the
proposed project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment.
If revisions are adopted in the proposed project in accordance with CEQA Guidelines
SectionI§15070(b), including the adoption of the mitigation measures included in the document,
then a mitigated negative declaration can be prepared.
24
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. P a g e | 8 November 2020
According to the State CEQA Guidelines, this IS/ND is intended as an informational document that
is required to be adopted by the Rolling Hills City Council. Based on the analysis provided by this
IS/ND, the City has determined that the proposed rezoning and establishment of a new mixed-use
multi-family overlay zone, also known as the Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone,
is the appropriate designation for the Project site. The City is also undertaking the necessary
General Plan Land Use Element, and Housing Element updates as well as all related Zoning
Ordinance and map changes, as required under the Proposed Project. The approximate 31-acre site
located at 38 Crest Road West (also known as the Palos Verdes Unified School District School site)
would not result in significant impacts on the environment from revisions to the City’s Zoning
Ordinance. However, any future land use changes and development pursuant to these revisions to
the Zoning Ordinance would be further subject to additional environmental review, as
appropriate.
1.3 Lead Agency
As defined by CEQA, the Lead Agency for a proposed Project is the public agency with primary
responsibility for carrying out or approving the Project (CEQA Guidelines Section §15367. The lead
agency then has discretionary authority over the proposed Project. Where two or public agencies
are involved in a project, CEQA Guidelines Section §15051(b)(1) states that “the lead agency will
normally be the agency with general governmental powers, such as a city or county, rather than
an agency with a single or limited purpose”. Based on these criteria, the City is the Lead Agency
for the purposes of the proposed Project.
25
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. P a g e | 9 November 2020
2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT TITLE:
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS:
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
CONTACT PERSON NAME AND PHONE NUMBER:
Meredith T. Elguira
Director
377-1521
PROJECT LOCATION:
38 Crest Road West, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 (see Figures 1 and 2).
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
The project site is designated “Very Low-Density Residential 2+ Net Acres/Dwelling
Unit” in the Rolling Hills General Plan. This allows for the development of single-
family residential units on two or more acre lots.
ZONING:
The project site is currently zoned - Residential Agriculture – Suburban with a minimum
lot size of two acres (RAS-2).
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Project Location
The Project site is located in Los Angeles County, at 38 Crest Road West, City of Rolling
Hills (Figure 1: Regional Location Map). It has a total acreage of 31.14 acres, with 27.58
acres of developed land and open areas and 3.56 acres of private access roadways (Figure
2: Project Location Map). The site is situated at the end of the City’s jurisdiction
and is bounded by Crest Road West to the north, open spaces and residential uses to the
east, south and west. State Highway 1 (SR-1) is approximately miles to the north of
the site, while Interstate 110 (I-110) is approximately miles to the east. The Pacific
Ocean is miles to the south and miles to the west of
the project site and the City. Access to the Project site is from Crest Road West.
26
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. P a g e | 10 November 2020
27
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. P a g e | 11 November 2020
28
Environmental –Planning – Engineering
Project Site
The approximate 31-acre site currently houses the Rancho Del Mar High School building, the Beach
Cities Learning Center, and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority (PVP Transit Authority;
PVPTA). This parcel of land is owned by the Palos Verdes Unified School District (PVUSD) and
has an existing school (Rancho Del Mar School) located at this site. However, the Rancho Del Mar
School facility is not being utilized as a school site at the present time. Access to the Project site is
through a private roadway that veers off Crest Road West. A few unpaved internal roadways
traverse the site. The site slopes from east to west, from the Beach Cities Learning Center to the
Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority, with an approximate 38 feet drop from east end of the
Project site. Vegetation on-site consists of a few trees around the existing buildings and a mix of
grasses and paved areas. The portion of the PVP Transit Authority site is primarily paved, with
few buildings, parking areas and storage buildings. The site is currently zoned Residential
Agriculture Suburban-2-Acres (RAS-2) and has a General Plan Land Use designation of Very Low-
Density Residential 2+ Net Acres.
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
Immediate land uses around the Project site are primarily large lot residential. Los Angeles County
Fire Station 56 is approximately 1,OOO feet to the east of the site, while St. John Fisher Church and
School site are about 2,000 feet to the east. Del Cerro Park is about 2,00 feet to the south-west of
the Project site (Table 1: Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning)
Project Components
The proposed Project would establish a new overlay zone (Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing
Overlay Zone) that would accommodate the existing uses on the site, as well as allow for new
multi-family and emergency shelters and Single Room Occupancy housing units to be developed
in the future (Figure 3: Existing and Proposed Zoning Map). The proposed Project would also
require the appropriate amendments to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Land Use
Map, and the Zoning Ordinance text and Map in order to accommodate the creation of the new
overlay zone. These changes would then allow for future construction of 1 clustered multi-
family units, consistent with the one unit/acre designation
Table 1: Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning
Location Jurisdiction Zoning Designation
North of
the Project
Site
City of Rolling Hills Residential Agriculture Suburban –
2-Acres (RAS-2)
South of
the Project
Site
City of Rancho Palos
Verdes
Residential Single Lot – 20, 000
Square Feet
East of the
Project Site
City of Rolling Hills Residential Agriculture Suburban –
1-Acre (RAS-1)
West of the
Project Site
City of Rancho Palos
Verdes
Residential Single Lot – 20, 000
Square Feet
29
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 13 City of Rolling Hills
30
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 14 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following specific components:
Preparation of a Negative Declaration for the General Plan and Zoning Amendment and associated
map changes.
Amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element to add new Overlay zone designation to be
known as the Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. The associated land use map is
being amended to add the overlay to the 31-acre Palos Verdes Unified School District (PVUSD)
site on Crest Road (also known as the Rancho Del Mar High School Site). Other amendments to
the Land Use Element will be made as needed to recognize that multi-family uses are permitted
and anticipated within this overlay area.
Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance (Title 17 of the Municipal Code) and related zoning map to
add the “Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone”. The City has one other overlay zone
that has been adopted and mapped for an area of smaller lots and steep terrain. (See Rolling Hills
Municipal Code Chapter 17.17 (Overlay Zoning District – 1 (OZD-1).) The number of units
allowed by the “base” General Plan designation on this site must be clustered; in other words, the
overlay allows 1 multi-family units on this site by right.
However, the Project is currently not being developed with any structures at the site. The proposed
overlay zone that would allow for the addition of new multi-family units would also assist the City
in meeting its future housing requirements mandated under the California Department of Housing
and Community Development (CA HCD). The City of Rolling Hills will be able to
accommodate its 4th and 5th Cycle housing needs for its Regional Housing Needs Allocation
(RHNA), including accommodation of affordable housing units. The new Overlay Zone
will also accommodate emergency shelters and Single Room Occupancy Housing as part of the
Housing Element Update.It should be noted, however, that the environmental review under
this IS/ND (Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone District IS/ND) is to only
evaluate all the planning document level changes that are being currently proposed (addition of a
new overlay zone for the City, related changes to the City’s Zoning Ordinance and Map, and
changes in the related General Plan Elements and Map). Any future new housing projects that
may result from these document level changes would require their own environmental reviews,
before any development changes are approved for the Project site. The City will thus undertake
the appropriate level of environmental review as Projects at this site are proposed and developed.
Project Approvals
As the Lead Agency, the City of Rolling Hills City Council has the ultimate authority to
approve or deny the Project. The proposed Project will require the following approvals:
Adoption of the Initial Study/ Negative Declaration
Creation of a new overlay zone (Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone)
Amendments to the City of Rolling Hills General Plan Land Use Element
Amendments to the City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance Text
Amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map
31
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 15 City of Rolling Hills
8. REQUIRED APPROVALS:
The City of Rolling Hills is the Lead Agency for the proposed Project, which is the creation of a
new overlay zone (Rancho Del Mar Overlay Zone), amendment to the City’s General Plan Land
Use Element, amendment to the related General Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map, and a
Zoning Ordinance text amendment to incorporate standards for the new overlay zone into Title 17
of the City’s Municipal Code . No discretionary approvals would be required from any other
agency.
9. HAVE CALIFORNIA NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBES AFFILIATED WITH THE
PROJECT AREA REQUESTED CONSULTATION PURSUANT TO PUBLIC
RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21080.3.1 IF SO, HAS HAD CONSULTATION BEEN
INITIATIED?
Tribal Consultation letters, pursuant to PRC §21080.3.1 were sent out by the City of Rolling Hills,
on October 16, 2020, in order to comply with the provisions of SB 18 and AB 52. A total of six
individual letters were sent to the following local tribes:
Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation
Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians
Gabrielino/Tongva Nation
Gabrielino Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council
Gabrielino – Tongva Tribe
Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians
32
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 16 City of Rolling Hills
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
3.1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project.
Aesthetics Agriculture and
Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology and Soils Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Hazards and Hazardous
Materials
Hydrology and Water
Quality
Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources
Noise Population/Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation/Traffi
c
Tribal Cultural Resources
Utilities and Service
Systems
Wildfire Findings of Mandatory
Significance
33
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 17 City of Rolling Hills
3.2 LEAD AGENCY DETERMINATION
Based on this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in
the Project have been made by or agreed to by the Project proponent. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed Project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed Project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or
“potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least
one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures
based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the
effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the
environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to
applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that
earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation
measures that are imposed upon the proposed Project, nothing further is
required.
Signature Agency
Printed Name/Title Date
34
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 18 City of Rolling Hills
4.0 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
4.1 Aesthetics
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
a.Have a substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista?
b.Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees,
rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a State Scenic
highway?
c. In non-urbanized areas, substantially
degrade the existing visual character
or quality of public views of the site
and its surroundings? (Public views
are those that are experienced from
publicly accessible vantage point). If
the project is in an urbanized area,
would the project conflict with
applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic quality?
d.Create a new source of substantial
light or glare which would adversely
affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills is characterized by beautiful wooded areas with deep canyons and hilly terrain
located on the Palos Verdes Peninsula. Views of the Pacific Ocean, Catalina Island, city lights, and Los
Angeles Harbor are special and unique qualities of property ownership in the City. It is located
approximately 3.5 miles from the Pacific Ocean to the west and 1.5 miles from the Pacific Ocean to the
south.
Though the City is considered an urban area, it mainly encompasses large, open area parcels with walking
and horse-riding trails that characterize the City as a more rural area. Many of these parcels are located on
slopes, which allow for the preservation of large amounts of privately owned open spaces. Laced
throughout the community are approximately 25 miles of private equestrian trails that are enjoyed by both
35
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 19 City of Rolling Hills
residents and non-residents, so long as non-residents obtain a City-issued permit. Even with these amounts
of scenic views and natural vegetation, the City does not have any designated Scenic Highways. There are
not any streams or water bodies located within the City. Major roadways include Crest Drive located north
of the Project site and running east to west, Palos Verdes Drive located outside of City boundaries and
running east to west, and Crenshaw Boulevard, also located outside of City boundaries and running north
to south.
DICUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
A scenic vista is typically an area that offers a scenic vantagepoint of natural resources such as the
ocean, mountain ranges, and distant city skylines. For CEQA purposes, scenic vistas generally provide
expansive views of a highly valued landscape for the enjoyment and benefit of the public. Some of the
major scenic vistas within the City are those associated with the Pacific Ocean, the San Pedro Harbor,
and the skyline of neighboring cities. The proposed Project includes the following components: a)
update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and
map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable
Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future, would allow for taller multi-
family structures on the existing site that could have an impact on scenic vistas from surrounding
properties, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time
and therefore does not degrade the views of any scenic vista. All future development resulting from
the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to
comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy level
document, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific visual impacts to scenic vistas, at this level
of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Therefore, the proposed Project
would have a less than significant impact on scenic vistas.
b. Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
The City of Rolling Hills currently does not have an Historic Preservation Ordinance and does not
have any State designated historic structures. The Project Site is located near the California State Route
(SR) 1 (Pacific Coast Highway and SR 213 (Western Avenue), which are located approximately 2.5
miles to the north and east of the City, respectively. Portions of Pacific Coast Highway are designated
as a State Scenic Route, but no portions of this highway is located within City boundaries. The City’s
General Plan does not identify any local scenic roadways in the City.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new buildings on the existing site that could have an
impact on scenic vistas from surrounding properties, as a policy-level document, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time and therefore does not
damage any scenic resources. All future development resulting from the implementation of the Land
36
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 20 City of Rolling Hills
Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan
policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific visual impacts to scenic vistas, at this level of environmental review. Future land
uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. The Proposed Project in itself would not substantially damage scenic
resources, including but limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state
scenic highway. The Project would therefore have no impac .
Would the project, in non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are
experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would
the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
Although the City’s General Plan describes the City of Rolling Hills as rural residential, the City
is actually located in an urban area. The City’s municipal code and General Policies incorporate
several provisions that are meant to preserve the visual character and private views for its
residence. The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan
Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c)
the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay
Zone. While these proposed changes in the future, would allow new and taller buildings on the
existing site that could have an impact on scenic vistas from surrounding properties, the Project in
itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time and therefore does
not degrade visual character or pubic views. All future development resulting from the
implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to
comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy
level document, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific visual impacts to scenic vistas, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project
would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Therefore, the Proposed
Project would have a less than significant impact on the existing visual character or quality of
public views of the site and its surroundings.
Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect
daytime or nighttime views in the area?
The City of Rolling Hills consists of only single-family homes that are located on large lots with ample
open space. The rural nature of the City does not emit significant amounts of ambient light. The
minimal light and glare in the City limits emanate only from residential outdoor lighting
including those on pedestrian and vehicular pathways, porches and exterior wall lighting, as well
as security lighting. The City’s Zoning Code does not include provisions for street lighting.
Though the Proposed Project would not directly result in any development in itself, the change in
General Plan Land Use Designation from “Educational” to “Residential Agricultural Suburban –
Acre”, and changes to the City’s Housing Element allocations could have impacts on light and
glare under future development. The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update
to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and
map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar
Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes would allow for new buildings on
the existing
37
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 21 City of Rolling Hills
site, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All
future development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning
changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design
standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific visual impacts
to scenic vistas, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of
the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The
Project would have a less than significant impact from new sources of substantial light or glare that
would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
38
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 22 City of Rolling Hills
4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
a.Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use?
b.Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract?
c.Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in
Public Resources Code section 12220(g)),
timberland (as defined by Public Resources
Code section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined by
Government Code section 51104(g))?
d.Result in the loss of forest land or
conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
e.Involve other changes in the existing
environment, which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forestland to non-forest use?
SETTING
According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), there are four primary agricultural
classifications – Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, Farmland of Local
Importance. Prime Farmland is land that has the best combination of physical and chemical characteristics
for producing food, feed, forage, fiber, and oilseed crops and is also available for these uses. Unique
Farmland as land other than Prime Farmland that is used for the production of specific high-value food
and fiber crops. Farmland of Statewide Importance is determined to be land that does not meet the criteria
for prime or unique farmland, but can be land that food, feed, fiber, forage and oilseed crops can be
produced. Farmland of Local Importance is any land designated for agriculture by local ordinance for food,
fiber, forage and oilseed crops.
The City of Rolling Hill’s topography includes steep hills, rocky terrain, and wooded brushes, all of which
do not exhibit characteristics determined to meet the criteria for Prime, Unique, Farmland of Statewide
39
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 23 City of Rolling Hills
Importance, or Farmland of Local Importance. The Department of Conservation (DOC) has not designated
any areas in the City as Prime, Unique, or Farmland of Statewide Importance.
The Williamson Act allows local governments to enter into contracts with private landowners for the
purpose of restricting specific parcels of land to agricultural or related open space use. Landowners can
then receive lower property tax assessments as the taxes would be based upon farming and open space
uses instead of full market value. According to the 2016-2017 Williamson Act Status Report, Los Angeles
County is a non-participating county, which is further demonstrated in the State of California Williamson
Act Contract Land map where the City of Rolling Hills is categorized under “non-enrolled land.” As a
result, the City is not enrolled in Williamson Act contracts and does not support forest land or forestry
resources.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a.Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance
(Farmland), as shown on maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
The California Department of Conservation’s (DOC) Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
and Williamson Act Maps do not show the Project site or the adjacent properties as areas that have
agricultural uses, or as areas that have been enrolled in a Williamson Act contract. The proposed
Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and
Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of
new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed
changes in the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a
policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific visual impacts to scenic vistas,
at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed
Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. However, since
there are no agricultural lands on the Project site, the Proposed Project in itself would not convert
Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, to non-agricultural use,
and there would be no impact.
b. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract?
The City of Rolling Hills General Plan Land Use Element and Land Use Policy Map do not show any
agricultural designations within the City, although the Zoning Map designates the current project site
as Residential Agriculture-Suburban, with a minimum lot size of 2-acres. The proposed Project
includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b)
related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new
Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in
the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future development resulting
from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to
comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy level
document, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific visual impacts to scenic vistas, at this level
of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. However, since there are no
40
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 24 City of Rolling Hills
agricultural lands on the Project site, the Proposed Project in itself would not conflict with existing
zoning for agricultural uses or a Williamson Act contract. and there would be no impact.
c. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in
Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)); timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section
4526); or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section
51104(g))?
The City of Rolling Hills is known as a rural city characterized by an abundance of landscaping
consisting of Pepper Trees, Geraniums, and Matilija Poppy. However, there are no zoning
designations for forest lands within the City, which in turn does not affect any forest lands on the
Project site. The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan
Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the
creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone.
While these proposed changes in the future, would allow new development on the existing Project
site, future development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element and zoning
changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design
standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific visual impacts
to scenic vistas, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of
the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation.
However, since there are no forest lands on the Project site, the Proposed Project would not conflict
with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned
Timberland Productions; there be no impact.
d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
The City of Rolling Hills does not contain or have any designations for forest lands. The proposed
Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and
Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of
new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed
changes in the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a
policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific visual impacts to scenic vistas,
at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed
Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. However, since
there are no forest lands on the Project site, the Proposed Project in itself would not result in the loss
of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. The proposed Project would have no
impact.
e. Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest
land to non-forest use?
The California Department of Conservation’s (DOC) Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
does not designate any areas within the City of Rolling Hills as Prime, Unique, Farmland of Statewide
Importance, or Farmland of Local Importance. Furthermore, the City’s General Plan Land Use Map
41
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 25 City of Rolling Hills
does not show any future land uses designated for farmland or forest land. The proposed Project
includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b)
related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new
Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in
the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future development resulting
from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to
comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy level
document, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific visual impacts to scenic vistas, at this level
of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. However, since there are no
agricultural lands on the Project site, the Proposed Project in itself would not result in conversion of
Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use; there would be no
impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
42
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 26 City of Rolling Hills
4.3 Air Quality
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
c. Conflict or obstruct implementation of
the applicable air quality plan?
d. Result in a cumulatively considerable
net increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable federal
or state ambient air quality standard?
e.Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
f. Result in other emissions (such as those
leading to odors) adversely affecting a
substantial number of people?
SETTING
Air pollution can have an adverse effect on the health and quality of life of those in areas that experience
particularly higher levels of pollutants. Pollutants are generally caused by the various emissions from such
things as mobile sources, power plants, agricultural operations and wood burning. The Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) determined the six most common air pollutants known as “criteria” pollutants,
that are the most detrimental to the environment and developed National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) to help combat environmental impacts. These pollutants include carbon monoxide, lead, ground-
level ozone, particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide. Primary standards are set at a level
intended to protect public health, including the health of at-risk populations, with an appropriate margin
of safety.
The Project site is located within the South Coast Air Basin (Basin), which is under the jurisdiction of the
South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). SCAQMD is responsible for monitoring criteria
air pollutant levels to ensure project meet either state and federal air quality standards or, to assist projects
develop strategies that will meet the standards. An air quality area basin is categorized as being in
“attainment” or “nonattainment” based on whether or not it meets it allocated air quality standards.
According to the EPA, the 2015 South Coast Air Basin Maximum Pollutant Concentrations (Figures 4.3.1:
2015 South Coast Air Basin Maximum Pollutant Concentration;, 4.3.2: Trend of Basin Days Exceeding
Federal Standards 1990-2015; and 4.3.3: 2015 South Coast Air Basin Quality Compared to Other U.S. Urban
Areas) in the Basin exceeded the pollutant concentration levels defined by the NAAQS for ozone, PM2.5,
and NO2, designating the Basin as an “extreme” nonattainment area.
43
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 27 City of Rolling Hills
Figure 4.3.1: 2015 South Coast Air Basin
Maximum Pollutant Concentrations
Source: CA Air Quality Management Plan, 2016; http://www.aqmd.gov/
Figure 4.3.2: Trend of Basin Days Exceeding
Federal Standards 1990-2015
Source: 2016 Air Quality management Plan; http://www.aqmd.gov/
44
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 28 City of Rolling Hills
Figure 4.3.3: 2015 South Coast Air Basin Quality
Compared to Other U.S. Urban Areas
Source: 2016 Air Quality management Plan; http://www.aqmd.gov/
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a.Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
The City’s goal is to conserve and enhance the City’s natural resources, facilitating in development in
a manner which reflects the characteristics, sensitivities and constraints of these resources. In events
where air quality becomes an issue, the City outlines in Policy 1.10 in the City of Rolling Hills General
Plan Open Space and Conservation Element utilizes the South Coast Air Quality Management Plan
(SCAQMP) as a source of reference when compliance with air quality standards are required. By using
this document as a reference, the City will continue to be consistent with the provisions outlined in
the SCAQMP.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new uses on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to the
related to changes to the applicable air quality plans, at this level of environmental review. Future
45
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 29 City of Rolling Hills
land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone and the proposed zoning and
General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA
regulation. The proposed Project in itself would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
appliable air quality plan and impacts are less than significant.
b. Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard?
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has designated the South Coast Air Basin (Basin) as an
extreme nonattainment area due to the high levels of criteria pollutants that are present in the Basin.
The proposed Project site is within the South Coast Air Basin which exceeds the pollutant
concentration levels for Ozone, PM 2.5 and NO2. As a result of the existing poor air quality, new
developments may add to and potentially increase the levels of criteria pollutants within the Basin.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new housing uses on the existing site, the Project in
itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development
resulting from the All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the
proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not
possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to the related to cumulative air pollutant increase, at
this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone and the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to
their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The proposed Project in itself would not
result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant, and would have less than
significant impact.
c. Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
The Air Resources Board (ARB) defines sensitive receptors as children, elderly, asthmatics and others
who are at a high risk of negative health outcomes due to exposure to air pollution. Areas or places
where sensitive receptors congregate are considered sensitive receptor locations, and are places such
as hospitals, and daycare centers. The Project site is currently a school site that includes a high school,
a learning center and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings and additional people on the existing site,
the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time and
therefore would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, at this time of
environmental review. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the
proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply
46
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 30 City of Rolling Hills
with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not
possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this level of environmental review. Since future
land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. While the proposed Project in itself would not expose
sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, impacts remain less than significant.
d. Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a
substantial number of people?
As discussed previously, the Project site is currently a school site that contains a high school, a learning
center and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority. The proposed Project includes the following
components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning
Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho
Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future, would allow
additional people on the existing site once it has been developed with new uses, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new structures at the current time. All future development
resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and the implementation of the
Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and
Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts
to the visual character of the area, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would
occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be to their own environmental reviews per CEQA
regulation and the Project would have a less than significant impact from odors and emissions on
people.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required
47
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 31 City of Rolling Hills
4.4 Biological Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant Impact No Impact
Would the Project:
g. Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications, on
any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by
the California Department of Fish and
Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
h. Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
i. Have a substantial adverse effect on state or
federally protected wetlands (including, but
not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal,
etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
j.Interfere substantially with the movement of
any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native
resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
k.Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
l. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills is located on the Palos Verdes Peninsula, in Los Angeles County, This hilltop
community supports a variety of plant and wildlife. The City’s plant life was established by imported
plants at the inception of the community since the natural state of the area included only coastal grass and
shrubs. As the community continued to establish, the developers planted trees and shrubs along the
48
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 32 City of Rolling Hills
roadsides and donated five Olive Trees to each homeowner whose lots were five or more acres. According
the City’s General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element, the more common plants that were
established in the community’s early stages of development were Pepper Trees, Geraniums and Matalijia
Poppy.
Biological Habitat
Due to City’s abundance of landscaping and open space areas, the City of Rolling Hills has become home
to a large variety of plant life and wildlife. Much of the plant life that are found in the City today resulted
from the importing of plants to supplement what was originally only coastal grasses and shrubs. Today,
the plant life ranges from several species of trees, flowers, and shrubs, giving the wildlife in the City a place
to nurture and form habitats.
There are several species of wildlife that can found nesting among both the vast open space areas and the
densely vegetated areas. The City’s General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element notes the types of
wildlife that can found include squirrels, gophers, skunks, mice, raccoon, opossum, foxes, lizards, snakes,
frogs and a wide variety of birds including owls and peacocks; pheasant and quail were also reintroduced
into the area.
Water Resources
The City receives its water sources from the Metropolitan Water District through the West Basin Municipal
Water District and the California Water Service Company. Due to the City’s location atop a tertiary deposit
of mudstones and diatomaceous shales, the City does not have any groundwater resources. The City also
does not contain any areas of natural water resources and is further separated from groundwater resources
by the Palos Verdes Fault.
Unavailability of groundwater and natural water resources requires that the City receive its water supply
exclusively from uninterrupted sources as allotted by the West Basin Municipal Water District and
Metropolitan Water District.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a.Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local
or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
According to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s California Natural Diversity Database
(CNDDB) maps, the City of Rolling Hills lies in the Torrance Quad which has identified several bird
and plant species that inhabit the City of Rolling Hills have been listed as threatened or endangered
species. However, the proposed Project site is already developed and there are no plant or animal
species that currently exist on the site. The proposed Project includes the following components: a)
update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and
map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable
Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future, would allow new development
49
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 33 City of Rolling Hills
on the existing Project site, future development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use
Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan
policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess
potential adverse effects on candidate, sensitive or special status species, at this level of environmental
review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. There would be no substantial adverse effects on
any endangered, sensitive, or special status species, and the Proposed Project would have no impact.
b. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
The City does not have any natural water resources that could be potential areas for riparian habitat.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future
development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning
changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design
standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential adverse effects on
candidate, sensitive or special status species, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses
that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. There would be no substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural community, and the Proposed Project would have no impact.
c. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands
(including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
No areas within the City or on the Project site are designated as a state or federally protected wetland.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future
development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning
changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design
standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential adverse effects on
candidate, sensitive or special status species, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses
that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. Since the Project, as proposed, would not have a substantial adverse
effect on state or federally protected wetlands, there would be no impact.
d. Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory
fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
50
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 34 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future
development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning
changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design
standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential adverse effects on
candidate, sensitive or special status species, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses
that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. Therefore, the Project would not interfere substantially with the
movement of any native resident of migratory fish, and there would be no impact.
e. Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources,
such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
The City of Rolling Hills General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element emphasizes the efforts to
conserve and enhance the City’s natural resources by facilitating development in a manner that
reflects the characteristics, sensitivities and constraints of the City’s natural resources. The proposed
Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and
Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of
new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed
changes in the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a
policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential adverse effects on candidate, sensitive or
special status species, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a
result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA
regulation. The Proposed Project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources. There would be no impact.
f. Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation
plan?
In response to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife
has developed Habitat Conservation Plans (HCP) to hold private and non-federal agencies
accountable for the preservation of endangered plants and wildlife. HCPs are planning documents
required as part of an application for an incidental take. Although, the Project site is located
approximately two miles from the boundaries of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Natural Community
Conservation Plan (NCCP)/Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), the Project site itself is not within the
jurisdiction of an HCP. Further, the proposed Project includes the following components: a) update
to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map
amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable
Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future, would allow new development
on the existing Project site, future development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use
51
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 35 City of Rolling Hills
Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan
policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess
potential adverse effects on candidate, sensitive or special status species, at this level of environmental
review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Project in itself would not conflict with the
provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. There would be no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
52
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 36 City of Rolling Hills
4.5 Cultural Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
m. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource as
defined in §15064.5?
n. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to §15064.5?
o.Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of formal cemeteries?
SETTING
An historical resource is defined as any object, building, structure, area, place, record, or manuscript which
a lead agency determines to be historically significant. Generally, a resource is considered by the lead
agency to be “historically significant” if the resource meets the criteria for listing on the California Register
of Historical Resources.
Although the City of Rolling Hills provides a definition for historical structures in its Zoning Ordinance,
no historical structures have been identified or designated within the City. Nor have any archeological
resources been identified with the City limits.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a.Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource
pursuant to §15064.5?
The City of Rolling Hills currently does not have any recognized or identified existing historical
resources that could be potentially disturbed as a result of the proposed Project.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development or project area construction, at the current time.
All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
53
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 37 City of Rolling Hills
potential site-specific impact to historical resources, at this level of environmental review. Future land
uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have a less than significant
impact.
b. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological
resource as defined in §15064.5?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for additional structures and uses on the existing site
that could affect unknown archeological resources, if any, the Project in itself does not propose or
authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the
creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element
updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As
policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to potential
archeological resources, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a
result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA
regulation. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have a less than significant impact on
archeological resources.
c. Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal
cemeteries?
The Proposed Project would not require digging or grading at the Project site at this current time,
since no developments are proposed at this time. Further, no archeological sites or the potential for
human remains have been identified either in the City, or on the Project site.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new structures on the existing site, the Project in
itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time and would not disturb
any potentially unknown human remains at the site. All future development resulting from the
creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element
updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As
policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Therefore, the Proposed Project
would have a less than significant impact on human remains.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
54
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 38 City of Rolling Hills
4.6 Energy
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
p. Result in potentially significant
environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of
energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
q. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan
for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
SETTING
In general, energy resources, particularly petroleum, have had a negative impact on the overall
environment resulting from the release of greenhouse gases (GHG). More importantly, these energy
resources are limited and require conservation and a more efficient method of usage. In 2019, the State of
California (State) adopted a California Energy Efficiency Action Plan (Action Plan) that outlines the issues,
opportunities, and savings pertaining to energy efficiency in California’s buildings, industrial, and
agricultural sectors. The Action Plan provides the State with a roadmap for an energy-efficient and low
carbon future for buildings and addresses the issues related to climate change and energy consumption.
The City of Rolling Hills incorporates these State-wide provisions for energy efficiency in its Climate Action
Plan (CAP) and emphasizes retrofits for existing buildings, energy performance requirements for new
construction, and water efficient landscaping. Additionally, the City’s General Plan Open Space Element
and Housing Element also provide policies that address energy efficiency.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or
operation?
The Proposed Project does not include any developments or construction that would require short or
long-term consumption of energy from heavy equipment, light-duty vehicles, machinery, and
generators. The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan
Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the
creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone.
While these proposed changes would allow for new energy uses on the existing site, the Project in
itself does not propose or authorize any new development, at the current time. Future land uses that
would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay the proposed zoning and General Plan
55
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 39 City of Rolling Hills
amendments would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. As policy
level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from wasteful and
unnecessary consumption of energy uses, at this level of environmental review. Therefore, since
the Proposed Project, in itself, would not result in environmental impacts due to wasteful, inefficient,
or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operations, there
would be no impact.
b. Would the project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy
efficiency?
The City of Rolling Hills Climate Action Plan includes energy efficient strategies that provide a
framework to help the City achieve measurable energy savings. Further, the City of Rolling Hills
General Plan contains provisions that permit the use of solar panels to maximize energy efficiency.
However, no provisions in both the Climate Action Plan and the General Plan apply to the proposed
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for new energy uses on the existing site, the Project in itself does not
propose or authorize any new development. All future development resulting from the
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific conflicts with State or local renewable energy plans, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone
and the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. The Project, in itself, would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local
plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency; therefore, there would be no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required
56
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 40 City of Rolling Hills
4.7 Geology and Soils
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
Would the Project:
r.Directly or indirectly cause potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk of
loss, injury, or death involving:
i.Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer
to Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii.Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv.Landslides?
s.Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
t.Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the Project, and potentially result in
on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
u.Be located on expansive soil, as defined in
Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial risks to life or
property?
v.Have soils incapable of adequately supporting
the use of septic tanks or alternative
wastewater disposal systems where sewers are
not available for the disposal of wastewater?
w.Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
57
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 41 City of Rolling Hills
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills is located in the Los Angeles Basin, and thus is located over one or more
earthquake faults. According to the City of Rolling Hills Hazard Mitigation Plan, the major faults that have
the potential to affect the greater Los Angeles Basin, and therefore the City of Rolling Hills are the Newport-
Inglewood, Palos Verdes, Santa Monica, and the Cabrillo faults. Further, the soil types found in the City
include “Altamira Shale” and basalt, which when in contact with one another, are conducive to land sliding
due to differences in permeability. The City’s proximity to several fault lines combined with the soil types
that make up the City’s terrain, as well as its location on or near sloped areas have the potential to cause
additional geologic hazards including liquefaction and landslides (see Figure 4: Landslide Hazards).
The City of Rolling Hills Hazard Mitigation Plan outlines mitigation measures in areas of prevention,
property protection, public education and awareness, natural resource protection, emergency services, and
structural projects, to provide the City with the proper goals and policies to help reduce potential geologic
hazards. The City of Rolling Hills General Plan Safety Element also lists a set of policies that provide
additional framework for reducing the social and economic disruptions caused by the effects of natural
hazards.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a.i. Directly or indirectly cause potential adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault?
The Department of Conservation’s (DOC) Earthquake Hazards Zone map does not indicate that
the City of Rolling Hills is located within an Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone, although there is a fault zone
located approximately 13 miles northeast in the City of Long Beach. However, the DOC Earthquake
Hazards Zone map designates the majority the parcels within the City as “earthquake hazard
parcels.”
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new buildings on the existing site that could have
adverse effects to the risk of loss, injury or death from earthquake faults, the Project in itself does not
propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed
zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the
City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to
assess potential site-specific impacts from ruptures of earthquake faults, at this level of environmental
review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Though the Project, in itself, would not directly or
58
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 42 City of Rolling Hills
indirectly cause potential adverse effects involving a known earthquake fault; impacts would remain
less than significant.
a.ii. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss,
injury, or death involving strong seismic ground shaking?
Parcels within the City are designated as “earthquake hazard parcels” and can be assumed that the
Project site will be exposed to seismic activity; however, there are no known faults located under the
Project site that would expose people or structures to adverse effects resulting from seismic ground
shaking.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new buildings on the existing site that could have
impacts from seismic ground shaking, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new
development at the current time. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay
zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required
to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it
is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from seismic ground shaking, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Impacts from exposure of people
or structures from seismic ground shaking would be less than significant
a.iii. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss,
injury, or death involving seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
According to the according to the DOC’s Hazards Zone Map, no areas within the Project site are
shown to be located within a liquefaction zone. The proposed Project includes the following
components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning
Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho
Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future, would allow
for new buildings on the existing site that could have impacts from seismic ground shaking, the Project
in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future
development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts from seismic relate ground failures, at this level of environmental
review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. While the Project itself would not expose people
or structures to potential adverse effects from seismic-related ground failure, impacts would be less
than significant
a.iv. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss,
injury, or death involving landslides?
Portions of the Project site are located within a landslide zone. To help mitigate potential hazards
caused by landslides, Policy 1.1 from the City of Rolling Hills General Plan Safety Element restricts
59
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 43 City of Rolling Hills
the expansion of existing development and construction of new development near active faults or
landslide areas. The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General
Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c)
the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone.
While these proposed changes in the future, would allow for new buildings on the existing site that
could have impacts from seismic ground shaking, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize
any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level
documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from potential landslides, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project
would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. While the Project as
proposed would not expose people or structures to potential adverse effects from landslides, i mpacts
would be less than significant.
60
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 44 City of Rolling Hills
61
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 45 City of Rolling Hills
b. Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new buildings on the existing site that could have
result on loss of topsoil or soil erosion, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new
development at the current time. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay
zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required
to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it
is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to soil loss or erosion, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Impacts would be less than
significant.
c. Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is made unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in on or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction,
or collapse?
The City of Rolling Hills Hazard Mitigation Plan notes that the majority of the City’s soil is composed
of “Altamira-Shale” and basalt, both of which, when combined, could result in landslides due to the
difference in permeability. Portions of the Project site are located in a landslide zone, but as mentioned,
policies in the City’s General Plan Safety Element restricts new development from occurring within
these zones. Furthermore, the DOC’s Hazards Zone map does not designate any areas of the Project
site as a liquefaction zone. Portions of the Project site are located within a landslide zone (see Figure
4.7.1; Landslide Hazards). To help mitigate potential hazards caused by landslides, Policy 1.1 from
the City of Rolling Hills General Plan Safety Element restricts the expansion of existing development
and construction of new development near active faults or landslide areas.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new buildings on the existing site that could have
impacts due to unstable soils, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development
at the current time. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the
proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not
possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from potential landslides, lateral spreading, or
liquefaction, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the
Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Though
the Project, as proposed, would not result in on – or – offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction, or collapse, impacts would be less than significant
d. Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1-B of the Uniform Building
Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?
62
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 46 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new development that could be located on expansive
soils on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at
the current time. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed
zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the
City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to
assess potential site-specific impacts expansive soils, at this level of environmental review. Future land
uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. Impacts would be less than significant.
e. Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new development and therefore site excavations on
the existing site the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current
time. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning
and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts to soils from the use of septic tanks or alternative waste disposal
systems, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the
Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The
Project, in itself, would not affect the need and availability of septic tanks or alternative wastewater
disposal systems; therefore, there would be no impact.
f. Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
The Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP) defines paleontological resources as “any fossilized
remains, traces, or imprints of organisms, preserved in or on the earth’s crust, that are of
paleontological interest and that provide information about the history of life on earth.” The proposed
Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and
Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of
new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed
changes in the future, would allow for new development and therefore site excavations on the existing
site the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All
future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts to paleontological resources, at this level of environmental review.
63
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 47 City of Rolling Hills
Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Though the University of California, Berkeley, Museum
of Paleontology localities database shows that there are no know paleontological resources in or
around the Project site, and the proposed Project in itself would not directly or indirectly destroy
resources, impacts would remain less than significant.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
64
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 48 City of Rolling Hills
4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significan
t Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
x.Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the environment?
y.Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of
reducing the emissions of greenhouse
gases?
SETTING
Greenhouse gases (GHG) have been a major contributor to the effects of global climate change, causing an
increase in “radiative forcing,” or a heating effect in the atmosphere. Greenhouse gases are gases are made
up primarily of four types of emissions: Carbon dioxide (CO2), is caused by burning fossil fuels, solid waste,
trees and other biological materials; Methane (CH4) is emitted directly during the production and transport
of coal, natural gas, and oil; Nitrous Oxide (N20) is produced during agricultural and industrial activities,
as well as combustion of fossil fuels and solid waste and during treatment of wastewater; and Flourinated
gases are caused by a variety of industrial processes and are emitted in smaller quantities but in a potent
form of greenhouse gases that are referred to as High Global Warming Potential (GWP) gases.
According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), greenhouse gas emissions in the United States
have increased by 3.7 percent since 1990, with the primary sources of emissions coming from
transportation, electricity production, industry (including fossil fuels for energy), commercial and
residential production of heat and handling of waste, agriculture, and land use and forestry. Figure 4.8.1,
Total U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Economic Sector in 2018 , demonstrates the total United States GHG
emissions by economic sector in 2018; transportation is the leading source of GHG emissions as it
contributes to the release of carbon dioxide, which was the primary pollutant emitted into the atmosphere
in 2018 (Figure 4.8.2, Total Greenhouse Gas Emission in 2018).
65
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 49 City of Rolling Hills
Figure 4.8.1: Total U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
by Economic Sector in 2018
Source: https://www.epa.gov/
Figure 4.8.2: Greenhouse Gas Emission in 2018
Source: https://www.epa.gov/
66
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 50 City of Rolling Hills
In an effort to reduce the rate of global warming caused by GHG emissions, the State of California passed
Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), the Global Warming Solutions Act (GWS Act) of 2006, which implements a
comprehensive, long-term approach to addressing climate change by requiring the State of California to
reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. Accordingly, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) has
developed a Scoping Plan to set forth a strategy for California to meet its GHG reduction goals.
In 2018, the City of Rolling Hills developed a Climate Action Plan (CAP) that focuses on the reduction of
greenhouse gas emissions within the City. In addition to its own policies, the CAP implements the goals
and policies laid out in CARB’s Scoping Plan in accordance with AB 32. The City’s CAP advances these
goals by streamlining efforts that establish specific initiatives and programs that target the reduction of
GHG emissions.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the environment?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new development that could directly or indirectly
generate GHG emissions on the existing site the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any
new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level
documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from GHG emissions, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project
would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Impacts would be less
than significant.
b. Would the project conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose
of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
The City of Rolling Hill’s Climate Action Plan (CAP) implements programs and initiatives that target
the reduction of greenhouse gases (GHG). This includes creating a City-wide Waste Plan that diverts
about 75% percent of waste from landfills, and the implementation of urban greening by preserving
and incorporating parks, forests, green roofs, local agriculture, street trees, and community gardens
to create a “carbon sink” where greenhouse gas emissions are stored instead of being emitted into the
atmosphere.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for uses on the existing site that could result in the
emission of greenhouse gases, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development
at the current time. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts
67
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 51 City of Rolling Hills
to the related to changes to the applicable air quality plans, at this level of environmental review. All
future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards Future development at the Project site would be subject
to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation, and would also be required to conform to
all applicable City, State, and Federal standards pertaining to greenhouse gases. There would be less
than significant impacts.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required
68
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 52 City of Rolling Hills
4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
z.Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
aa.Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials
into the environment?
bb.Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-quarter mile
of an existing or proposed school?
cc.Be located on a site which is included on a list
of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
dd.For a project located within an airport land
use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport
or public use airport, would the project result
in a safety hazard or excessive noise for
people residing or working in the project
area?
ee.Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
ff.Expose people or structures, either directly or
indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury
or death involving wildland fires?
SETTING
The City’s Hazard Mitigation Plan identifies the City as prone to earthquakes, wildfires, droughts, and land
movement. Due to its proximity to various fault lines (Figure 5: Fault Zones), the City may be most
69
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 53 City of Rolling Hills
vulnerable to earthquake hazards. In an effort to reduce potential hazards caused by earthquakes, the State
of California regulates development through implementation of Building Codes and by means of the
Alquist Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act of 1972 (Alquist-Priolo Act). The Alquist-Priolo Act was passed
to regulate development near active faults in order to mitigate the hazard of surface rupture. No areas
within the City are located within an Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone, and as such, the Project site also does not
contain areas located near an Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone. Hazards resulting from earthquakes are further
mitigated by the Seismic Hazard Mapping Act of 1990, which also tightens regulation for development
projects within seismic-prone areas.
A portion of the Project site has also been designated by the Department of Conservation (DOC) as a
landslide zone (Figure 5: Fault Zone Map). Earthquakes are identified as a major hazard to potential for the
City, as high magnitudes of ground-shaking can lead to liquefaction and landslides. The majority of the
City is located within a landslide zone (Figure 6: Regional Fault Zone Map) with a region of the City called
the Flying Triangle being an active landslide area. The City of Rolling Hills General Plan Safety Element
outlines goals and policies that address development in areas susceptible to landslides.
The City of Rolling Hills has not been identified as a drought hazard area. According to the updated
November 5, 2020 U.S. Drought Monitor map, the City is not located in a drought intensity area. The City
of Rolling Hills’ water resources are limited to external sources including the Metropolitan Water District
through the West Basin Municipal Water District and California Water Service Company (Cal Water).
No risks from hazardous materials or airport hazards have been identified to have an effect on the City due
to its distance from the nearest airport and landfill. Along with the Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP), the City
has developed a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) to mitigate the risks associated with the
identified wildfire hazards. The City’s Climate Action Plan (CAP) and General Plan Safety Element further
establishes policies and guidelines for hazard mitigation and preparedness, including methods for the
proper disposal and diversion of potential hazardous materials, such as municipal waste
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a.Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Project in itself would have no impact related to
routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials.
70
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 54 City of Rolling Hills
71
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 55 City of Rolling Hills
72
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 56 City of Rolling Hills
73
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 57 City of Rolling Hills
b. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials
into the environment?
The City of Rolling Hills Climate Action Plan (CAP) provides a guideline for the reduction and proper
diversion of hazardous materials, including residential, community, and municipal waste that have
the potential to release hazardous materials into the environment.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to the
public from accidental release of hazardous materials into the environment, at level of environmental
review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed
zoning and General Plan amendments would be required to comply with all applicable City standards
and also be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. While the Project as
proposed, would not result in the accidental release of hazardous materials into the environment,
impacts would remain less than significant.
c. Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within 0.25 mile of an existing or proposed school?
The proposed Project is located on a Palos Verdes Unified School District school site with existing
uses including Beach Cities Learning Center and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority.
Rancho Del Mar High School has relocated and does not currently operate on the site. The proposed
Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and
Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of
new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed
changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose
or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the
creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element
updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As
policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone,
the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. The Proposed Project in itself would not emit hazardous emissions or
handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 0.25 mile of an existing
or proposed school; it will therefore have no impact.
d. Would the project be located on a site included on a list of hazardous material sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard
to the public or the environment?
74
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 58 City of Rolling Hills
According to a California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) GeoTracker search, there
were three sites with leaking underground storage tanks (LUST sites) on and around the Project site
(see Figure 7: Clean Up Sites). The sites were determined to contain gasoline and hydrocarbons
resulting from leaking of underground storage tanks. Each of the three sites have been cleaned per
SWRCB standards and are now designated by the SWRCB as “complete and case closed.”
Furthermore, a search in the Superfund Enterprise Management Systems (SEMS) and Environmental
Facts (Envirofacts) database did not produce any results showing that the Project site is on or near a
hazardous waste facility. The closest hazardous waste site is located approximately three miles
northeast of the Project site, at 26301 Crenshaw Boulevard in the City of Rolling Hills Estates. The
Proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element
text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and
adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Impacts would be less than significant.
e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard
for people residing or working in the project area?
The nearest airport to the Project site is the Zamperini Field Airport located approximately 4 miles
north of the Project site at 3301 Airport Drive in the City of Torrance. Although the Project site may
experience occasional overhead flights, the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) does not designate
the Project site as an airport Runway Protection Zone (RPZ).
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Project would not result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the Project area due to airport hazards and will not conflict with any
existing airport land use plans. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have no impact.
75
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 59 City of Rolling Hills
f. Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Project in itself would have no impact related to
adopted emergency evacuation or response plans.
g. Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of
loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires?
According to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL Fire), the City has been
designated as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. The City has taken a proactive role in preparing
its residents for potential wildfires by developing the City of Rolling Hills Community Wildfires
Protection Plan (CWPP). The Plan outlines fire mitigation strategies by emphasizing vegetation and
electric powerline management, and “infrastructure hardening” where all structures will be required
to have a class A roof by 2030. The CWPP also provides evacuation strategies that educates and
prepares its residents for utilizing firefighting resources.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, hazards
mitigation plan, and emergency evacuation plan. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts from risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, at this level
of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews for all issue areas related to potential wildland fires.
Impacts would remain less than significant.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
76
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 60 City of Rolling Hills
4.10Hydrology and Water Quality
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
gg. Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface or
groundwater quality?
hh.Substantially decrease groundwater supplies
or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that the project may impede
sustainable groundwater management of the
basin?
ii.Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or
river or through the addition of impervious
surfaces, in a manner which would:
i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on-
or off-site;
ii) substantially increase the rate or amount
of surface runoff in a manner which would
result in flooding on- or offsite;
iii) create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
iv) impede or redirect flood flows?
jj.In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk
release of pollutants due to project
inundation?
kk.Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a
water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?
SETTING
Due to the City of Rolling Hill’s location atop a tertiary deposit of mudstones and diatomaceous shales, the
City does not have any groundwater resources. The City receives its water sources from the Metropolitan
77
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 61 City of Rolling Hills
Water District through the West Basin Municipal Water District (MWD) and the California Water Service
Company (Cal Water).
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Division of Drinking Water (DDW) regulates the
amount of contaminates in water provided by public water systems to ensure that tap water is safe to drink.
The City is located near the Pacific Ocean, but does not have any bodies of water within City boundaries
and is not located in a State-designated risk area for tsunami inundation (as shown on the Tsunami
Inundation Map for Emergency Planning Torrance Quadrangle/San Pedro Quadrangle). As such, the
Project site does not contain any bodies of water that could potentially be impacted by stormwater runoff
or discharge of pollutants.
The City of Rolling Hills complies with the provisions of the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) of 1972 and
the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Porter-Cologne Act) to regulate the discharge of
pollutants into other water resources. Title 17 of the City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code outlines the
provisions for reducing pollutants in stormwater discharge and non-stormwater discharges to storm sewer
systems. The City is located near the Pacific Ocean, but does not have any bodies of water within City
boundaries and is not located in a State-designated risk area for tsunami inundation (as shown on the
Tsunami Inundation Map for Emergency Planning Torrance Quadrangle/San Pedro Quadrangle).
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or
otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Additionally, new development projects on the
Project site would be required to comply with the regulations of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) as required by Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (CWA), established
by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to control direct stormwater discharges. The
Project in itself would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or
otherwise degrade surface or ground water quality, and would have no impact.
b. Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially
with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater
management of the basin?
78
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 62 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Since the City does not have a supply of
groundwater resources due to its location atop ridges and canyons, the Project as proposed, would
not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge, and impacts would remain less than significant.
c.(i) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition
of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or
siltation on- or off-site?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from
changes to drainage at the Project site, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that
would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan
amendments would be required to comply with all applicable City standards and also be subject
to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Project would not substantially alter
the existing drainage pattern of the site or area that could result in erosion of siltation; impacts
would be less than significant.
c.(ii) Would the project substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner
which would result in flooding on- or off-site?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
79
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 63 City of Rolling Hills
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from
changes to drainage at the Project site, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that
would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan
amendments would required to comply with all applicable City standards and also be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Project would not substantially increase
the rate or amount of surface runoff that would create flooding on – or off-site. Impacts would be less
than significant.
c.(iii) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition
of impervious surfaces, in a manner that would create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from
changes to drainage patterns and water runoff at the Project site, at this level of environmental review.
Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning
and General Plan amendments would be required to comply with all applicable City standards and
also be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Impacts would be less than
significant.
c.(iv) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition
of impervious surfaces, in a manner that would impede or redirect flood flows?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from
changes to drainage patterns that could impede or redirect flood flows at the Project site, at this level
of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay
zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be required to comply with all
applicable City standards and also be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA
regulation. Impacts would be less than significant.
80
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 64 City of Rolling Hills
d. Would the project in flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due
to project inundation?
The Project site is located less than two miles from the Pacific Ocean; however, the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) lists the City as an “area of minimal flood hazard”. Additionally, there
are no other large bodies of water with the City of Rolling.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from
floods, tsunamis, seiche zones or pollutant release from project inundation, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone,
the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Impacts are less than significant.
e. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan
or sustainable groundwater management plan?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to
water quality, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to
the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore
be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. These future uses would remain
consistent with the City’s existing land use plan, policy or regulations and would not result in
environmental effects. Therefore, there would be no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
81
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 65 City of Rolling Hills
4.11Land Use and Planning
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significan
t Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
ll.Physically divide an established community?
mm.Cause a significant environmental
impact due to a conflict with any land use
plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills is primarily a residential community with large acre lots, equestrian trails, tennis
courts and walking trails located over a 2.98 square mile area. Residential uses account for about 1,637 acres
of the total 1,909 acres (approximate) of land within the City, leaving about 176 acres available for an
additional 59 single-family dwelling units. About 33 acres of land within the City are used for recreation
uses, while educational uses utilize about 30 acres. Public or Rolling Hills Community Association owned
land uses account for about 5.5 acres of the City’s total land area. The land uses include the area around
the City’s Civic Center and two City owned equestrian riding rings. The City also includes about 203 acres
of vacant land. The general topography of the area consists of rolling hillsides that are subject to landslides.
The Project site encompasses the approximate 30-acre education use parcel owned by the Palos Verdes
Peninsula School District. Uses on this site include facilities for the Rancho Del Mar Continuation
High School, the Beach Cities Learning Center, and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority.
Access to the Project site is through a private roadway that veers off Crest Road West. A few unpaved
interval roadways traverse the site. The site slopes from east to west, from the Beach Cities Learning
Center to the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority, with an approximate 38 feet drop from one
end of the Project site to the other. Vegetation on-site consists of a few trees around the school sites and a
mix of grasses and paved areas. The portion of the PVP Transit Authority site is primarily paved, with
few buildings, parking areas and storage buildings. The site is currently zoned Residential Agriculture
Suburban-2-Acres (RAS-2) with a General Plan Land Use Designation of very-low density residential
with 2+ net acres/dwelling unit.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project physically divide an established community?
82
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 66 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. These future uses would remain consistent with
the City’s existing land use plan, policy or regulations and would not result in environmental effects.
Therefore, the proposed Project would not physically divide an established community and
there would be no impact.
b. Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any
land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. These future uses would remain consistent with
the City’s existing land use plan, policy or regulations and would not result in environmental effects.
Therefore, there would be no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
83
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 67 City of Rolling Hills
4.12Mineral Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
nn.Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to the
region and the residents of the state?
oo.Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan, or other land use plan?
SETTING
Mineral resources typically include oil and gas deposits, and nonfuel deposit such metals boron
compounds, clays, limestone, gypsum, salt, sand, gravel, and crushed stone. California is the largest
producer of sand and gravel in the United States and Los Angeles County area has large quantities of sand
and gravel.
The California Department of Conservation provides guidelines for the classification and designation of
mineral lands and separates Mineral Resource Zones (MRZ) into six categories: MRZ-1; MRZ-2a; MRZ-2b;
MRZ-3a; MRZ-3b; and MRZ-4.
MRZ-1 zones are areas where adequate geologic information indicates that no significant mineral deposits
are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood exists for their presence.
MRZ-2a zones are areas underlain by mineral deposits where geologic data show that significant measured
or indicated resources are present. As shown on the diagram of the California Mineral Land Classification
System, Areas classified MRZ-2a contain discovered mineral deposits that are either measured or indicated
reserves as determined by such evidence as drilling records, sample analysis, surface exposure, and mine
information. Land included in the MRZ-2a category is of prime importance because it contains known
economic mineral deposits. A typical MRZ-2a area would include an operating mine, or an area where
extensive sampling indicates the presence of a significant mineral deposit.
MRZ-2b zones are areas underlain by mineral deposits where geologic information indicates that significant
inferred resources are present. Areas classified MRZ-2b contain discovered deposits that are either inferred
reserves or deposits that are presently sub-economic as determined by limited sample analysis, exposure, and
past mining history. Typical MRZ-2b area would include sites where there are good geologic reasons to
believe that an extension of an operating mine exists or where there is an exposure of mineralization of
economic importance.
MRZ-3a zones are areas containing known mineral deposits that may qualify as mineral resources. MRZ-
3a areas are considered to have a moderate potential for the discovery of economic mineral deposits. MRZ-3
84
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 68 City of Rolling Hills
An example of a MRZ-3a area would be where there is direct evidence of a surface exposure of a geologic
unit, such as a limestone body, known to be or to contain a mineral resource elsewhere but has not been
sampled or tested at the current location.
MRZ-3b zones are areas containing inferred mineral deposits that may qualify as mineral resources. Land
classified MRZ-3b represents areas in geologic settings which appear to be favorable environments for the
occurrence of specific mineral deposits, such as areas where indirect evidence exists for a geophysical or
geochemical anomaly along a permissible structure indicating the possible presence of a mineral deposit
MRZ-4 zones are areas where geologic information does not rule out either the presence or absence of mineral
resources. The distinction between the MRZ-1 and MRZ-4 categories is important for land-use
considerations.
The City of Rolling Hills has been identified by the California Division of Mines and Geology as being
located in Mineral Resource Zone 1 (MRZ-1), which determines that the City does not have significant
mineral deposits and that there is little likelihood for their presence. The City’s General Plan Open Space
and Conservation Element also does not identify any mineral resources or mines the City of Rolling Hills
area. Consequently, the Project site does not contain any significant mineral deposits.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would
be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While there
may be proposed changes at the Project site in the future, the Project in itself does not propose or
authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the
implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As policy level documents,
it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts at this level of environmental review and
future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
environmental reviews for all issue areas. However, sincere there are no known mineral resources
sites in the City limits, there would be no impact.
b. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan?
85
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 69 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While there
may be proposed changes at the Project site in the future, the Project in itself does not propose or
authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the
implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As policy level documents,
it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts at this level of environmental review and
future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
environmental reviews for all issue areas. However, sincere there are no known mineral resources
sites in the City limits, there would be no loss of a locally known mineral resource and there would
therefore be no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
86
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 70 City of Rolling Hills
4.13Noise
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
pp.Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels
in the vicinity of the project in excess of
standards established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
qq.Generation of excessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne noise levels?
rr.For a project located within the vicinity of
a private airstrip or an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working
in the project area to excessive noise levels?
SETTING
Noise is typically defined as any disturbing or unwanted sound that interferes or harms humans or wildlife.
Sound becomes unwanted when unwanted when it interferes with daily activities such as sleeping,
conversation, or disrupts or diminishes one’s quality of life. The health effects associated with noise are
often related to stress and stress-related illnesses such as high blood pressure, speech interference, hearing
and sleep loss, and disruption of productivity. Just like air pollution or water pollution, noise can just as
much cause substantial environmental impacts that become a source of pollution.
The City of Rolling Hills generally has a quiet sound environment with very few sources of noise. Such
sources of noise within the City include transportation noise from Palos Verdes Drive located on the
northern boundary of the City, aircraft noise from occasional overfly of small aircrafts from Torrance
Airport located to the north of the City, and stationary noise from pool equipment, air conditioners, music,
leaf blowers, tennis courts, and paddle tennis courts. Noise Sensitive Receptors in the City include the
public school located on the western boundary of the City, and as an entirely residential community, all of
the City of Rolling Hills can be considered noise sensitive. To ensure its residents are protected from
excessive noise pollution, the City’s General Plan Noise Element includes goals and policies that address
existing noise conflicts as well as forecasted noise pollution from future development and other
environmental source.
87
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 71 City of Rolling Hills
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient
noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local
general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
Ambient noise is defined as all the noise that is present in a given environment and is often referred
to as “background noise.” The levels of ambient noise can have substantial health and safety
implications if noise levels are not abated and properly mandated. The City has remained an
exclusively residential community where a quiet rural atmosphere has been maintained. The
proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element
text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and
adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for taller multi-family structures on the existing site, the Project in
itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development
resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land
Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Since the Proposed Project in itself would not
generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels, there would be no
impact.
b. Would the project generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
Groundborne vibration and noise are typically generated from roadway traffic and construction
activities. The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan
Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the
creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone.
While these proposed changes would allow for residential and related uses on the existing site, the
Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future
development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would
occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan
amendments would therefore be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation.
The Proposed Project would not generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise
levels; there would be no impact.
c. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public
use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
88
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 72 City of Rolling Hills
The nearest airport from the Project site is Torrance Airport and is located more than two miles, or
approximately more than four miles northeast of the Project site. The proposed Project includes the
following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related
Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone,
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes would allow for
residential and related uses on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any
new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level
documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this level of environmental
review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed
zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their own environmental reviews
per CEQA regulation. The Proposed Project in itself would not expose people residing or working in
the project area to excessive airport noise levels, and there would be no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
89
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 73 City of Rolling Hills
4.14Population and Housing
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
ss.Induce substantial unplanned population
growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example,
through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
tt.Displace substantial numbers of existing
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills is located on the Palos Verdes Peninsula in Los Angeles County. Incorporated in
1957, the City has a rural an equestrian character, with large lots, equestrian trails and open space areas.
There is approximately 200 acres of vacant land in the City.
As of 2018, the City had a population of approximately 1,939, according to the Southern California
Association of Governments (SCAG)’s Local Profiles Report for the City. This is an increase of 79 people
from the SCAG estimate of 1,860 people in 2010, and an increase of 68 people from the California
Department of Finance (DOF) estimates for 2000. The City is primarily Non-Hispanic White (about 72%),
with a small mix of Asians (at 16%), African Americans, Native Americans and Pacific Islander
(approximately 12%).
According to the SCAG report, housing type in the City is predominantly single family residential (99%)
with one multi-family unit (0.1% of the total housing stock). Development in the City of Rolling Hills is
controlled by Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs). These limit development in the City to
single family residences on once-acre and two-acre lots. While the City has been primarily built out, there
are some limited opportunities for growth and new housing. According to the City’s Housing Element,
about 89% of the City’s residents commuted outside the City to work, while about 11% of residences
worked from home. According the SCAG’s Local Profiles Report for the City of Rolling Hills, there were
0.5 permits per 1,000 residents in 2000, and no permits issued for residential units in 2018.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructure)?
90
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 74 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new uses on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Proposed Project could eventually induce
unplanned population growth in the area by allowing future new homes. Impacts would therefore
remain less than significant.
b. Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new uses on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific, at this level of
environmental review. Moreover, there are currently no existing housing or people on the Project site.
Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone and the proposed
zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their own environmental reviews
per CEQA regulation. The Proposed Project in itself would not displace any existing housing or
people and there would be no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
91
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 75 City of Rolling Hills
4.15Public Services
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant Impact
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
uu.Result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new
or physically altered governmental facilities,
need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public
services:
i. Fire protection?
ii. Police protection?
iii. Schools?
iv. Parks
v. Other public facilities?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills is primarily a residential community with very few public facilities within its
boundaries. Public services are provided to the City by the Los Angeles County Fire Department; Station
No. 56, the Los Angeles County Sheriff Department (LACSD) (located in the City of Lomita); and the Palos
Verdes Unified School District (PVUSD). Storm Hill Park is the only park facility located within the City,
and there are no libraries within City boundaries.
The Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) Station 56 is located within City boundaries at 12 Crest
Road West, Rolling Hills, California 90274, approximately half a mile to the east of the Project site. The
LACFD works closely with the City to prepare and educate the community on evacuation procedures,
creating defensible space around a home and on retrofitting a home with fire-resistant materials. The City
also contracts with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department and is served by the Lomita Station
located outside of City boundaries at 2623 Narbonne Avenue, Lomita, California, 90717, approximately
five miles north of the City.
The City of Rolling Hills is served by the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District (PVPUSD), with
school levels ranging from elementary to adult education. An existing public high school facility, the
Rancho Del Mar High School, is the only school facility located in the City. However, the school has moved
92
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 76 City of Rolling Hills
its operations to a new location outside of the City, approximately seven miles to the northwest, at 375 Via
Almar in the City of Palos Verdes Estates.
Although the City has a large inventory of open space areas such as bridle trails and tennis courts, there is
only one area within the city that is designated as a park. Storm Hill Park is located on the northwestern
border of the City at Storm Hill Lane where approximately 25 miles of private equestrian trails are located
and are maintained by the City of Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA). Trails are open to both
residents and non-residents. Non-residents are required to obtain a permit from the City prior to utilizing
the trails.
Library services are offered through the Palos Verdes Library District at three locations outside of the City:
Peninsula Center Library at 701 Silver Spur Road in the community of the City of Rolling Hills Estates,
approximately two miles northwest of the City; Malaga Cove Library located in the City of Palos Verdes
Estates, at 2400 Via Campesina, about six miles northwest of the City; and Miralest Library located in City
of Rancho Palos Verdes, at 29089 Palos Verdes Drive East, about three miles west of the City of Rolling
Hills.
The Project site is located on an existing school site where Rancho Del Mar High School previously
operated. The High School has relocated its operations, but the facility remains on the site, along with Beach
Cities Learning Center and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority (PVPTA), which are both still
operating on the Project site.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a.i. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered fire protection facilities, or the need for new or
physically altered fire protection facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,
response times or other performance objectives?
The City’s fire protection, rescue services, and medical services are provided by the Los Angeles
County Fire Department (LACFD) Fire Station No. 56 is the nearest fire station to the Project site, and
is located at 12 Crest Road West, about 1.2 miles southeast of the Project Site. The proposed Project
includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b)
related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new
Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in
the future would allow new buildings and additional people on the existing site that could
incrementally increase the demand for fire protection services, the Project in itself does not propose
or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the
implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, hazards mitigation plan,
and emergency evacuation plan. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-
specific impacts to fire protection services or utilities, at this level of environmental review. Future
land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
93
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 77 City of Rolling Hills
environmental reviews for all issue areas including fire emergency response. There would be no
impact.
a.ii. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered police protection facilities, or the need for new or
physically altered police protection facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,
response times or other performance objectives?
The City of Rolling Hills receives police protection services from the Lomita Station of the Los Angeles
County Sherriff Department (LACSD). The Lomita Station is located at 26123 Narbonne Avenue in
the City of Lomita, approximately 5.2 miles northeast of the Project site.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings and additional people on the existing site
that could incrementally increase the demand for police protection services, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to
comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As policy level
documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to potential additional police
protection facilities or services or utilities, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that
would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews
for all issue areas including police protection services, and there would be no impact.
a.iii. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered schools, or the need for new or physically altered
schools, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order
to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives?
The proposed Project is a change in zoning classification of the Palos Verdes Unified School District
site at 38 Crest Road West. The school site is currently occupied by a high school facility, a learning
center, and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority. The proposed Project includes the following
components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning
Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho
Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future, would allow
new buildings and additional people on the existing site that could incrementally increase the demand
for additional school facilities and services, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new
development at the current time. All future development resulting from the implementation of the
Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s General
Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to
assess potential site-specific impacts to fire protection services or utilities, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
94
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 78 City of Rolling Hills
be subject to their own environmental reviews for all issue areas including additional school facilities,
if needed. There would be no impact.
a.iv.Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered parks, or the need for new or physically altered
parks, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order
to maintain acceptable service ratios or other performance objectives?
The City has several areas that serve recreational purposes for both residents and non-residents. There
are currently three tennis courts, eight-acres of City-owned open space, equestrian facilities, and
approximately 25 miles of private trails for horseback riders and pedestrians. The proposed Project
includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b)
related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new
Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in
the future, would allow new buildings and additional people on the existing site which could
incrementally increase the demand for recreational uses, the Project in itself does not propose or
authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the
implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As policy level documents,
it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to recreational facilities, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews for all issue areas including future recreational uses.
Since there would be no substantial adverse physical impacts on parks, the proposed Project would
have no impact.
a.v. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered public facilities, or the need for new or physically
altered public facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for other public facilities?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings and additional people on the existing site
and that could result in the need for new or altered public facilities, the Project in itself does not
propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to
comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As policy level
documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to public facilities, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews for all issue areas and there would be no impact.
The proposed Project would therefore have no impact.
95
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 79 City of Rolling Hills
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
96
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 80 City of Rolling Hills
4.16Recreation
Would the Project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
vv.Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would
occur or be accelerated?
ww.Does the project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills abound in recreational opportunities, from publicly owned open space areas,
tennis courts and equestrian trails, to hillside open spaces. There are three tennis courts owned by the City
and two equestrian riding rings within the City. Approximately 25-30 miles of private equestrian trails
operated by the Rolling Hills Community Association are open to riders and joggers from the City as well
as neighboring jurisdictions. Due to the topography in the City of Rolling Hills, a substantial portion of the
area has steep hillsides and canyons.
In addition to outdoor recreational opportunities, the City also offers its residents various exclusive
recreational club privileges. The Caballeros group was initially formed for residents who shared an interest
in horseback riding. Today, the Group has a network of people, both riders and non-riders, who come
together to continue to share their interests in both horseback riding as well as in maintaining the trails
within the City. The City also hosts a Tennis Club and Social Club that allows both old and new residents
to participate in tournaments, monthly socials, annual exhibition matches, holiday parties, and weekend
getaways. The Women’s Community Club of Rolling Hills also hosts a number of events for the City,
including Children’s Easter and Holiday parties, Spring Tea, luncheons, and neighborhood meetings.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future would allow for population growth, additional buildings and
potentially new recreation uses on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize
97
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 81 City of Rolling Hills
any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the implementation
of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not
possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to the physical deterioration of neighborhood or
regional parks, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to
the creation of the overlay zone and the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be
subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. In addition, any future land uses
that may include parks and recreational facilities would be subject to a project-by-project impact
analysis. The proposed Project would therefore have a less than significant impact.
b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
The proposed Project in itself does not include the construction or expansion of recreational facilities.
As mentioned in the discussion above, the proposed Project includes the following components: a)
update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and
map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable
Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes would allow for population growth, new
buildings and potentially the construction or expansion of new recreation uses on the existing site,
the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development. All future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, and
would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Any future land uses that
could require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities may have physical effects on the
environment. However, these facilities would be subject to a project-by-project impact analysis, and
the proposed Project would therefore have a less than significant impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
98
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 82 City of Rolling Hills
4.17 Transportation/Traffic
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
xx.Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or
policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?
yy.Would the project conflict or be inconsistent
with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
zz.Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g., farm equipment)?
aaa. Result in inadequate emergency access?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills has a unique street system that consists exclusively of private roadways, which
are the easements owned by the City of Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA), created for
recreational purposes. These private streets include a combination of pathways for vehicles, bicycles,
horses, and pedestrians.
There are five major collector streets in the City: Portuguese Bend Road, Crest Road, Eastfield Drive,
Southfield Drive, and Saddleback Road. Parking is allowed on the shoulder areas along some portions of
collector roads where landscaping is not prohibitive, but the majority of off-street parking is provided in
conjunction with City residents
The Palos Verdes Peninsula (PVP) Transit Authority is located within the City at 38 Crest Road West but
does not provide direct transit services for the City since the roadways are all private. Transit services are
provided by the Regional Transit District (RTD) along Palos Verdes Drive North located on the southern
perimeter of the City of Rolling Hills, located outside of its boundaries.
According the City’s General Plan Circulation Element, there are approximately 25 miles of
equestrian/hiking trails provided within the community of Rolling Hills on private property easements
where motorists and bicyclists are prohibited. Pedestrians can utilize the trail system as there are no
sidewalks provided along the collector roads.
99
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 83 City of Rolling Hills
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation
system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
The City’s General Plan Circulation Element addresses goals and policies that enforces a safe and
efficient circulation system to help protect and maintain the existing private roadways that run
throughout the City. The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the
General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map
amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable
Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future, would allow for uses on the
existing site that could have an impact on the City’s existing circulation system, as a policy-level
document, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current
time. All future development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates,
the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts to the related to changes to the applicable air quality plans, at this level
of environmental review. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the
proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The proposed Project in itself does not conflict with a
program, plan, ordinance, or strategy addressing the City of Rolling Hills’ existing circulation system,
plan, ordinance; there would be no impact.
b. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision
(b)?
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b) provides specific considerations for determining whether or a
project would have transportation impacts and identifies vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as the
appropriate measure of transportation impacts.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for new uses and associated transportation uses, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development, at this current time. All future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not
possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this level of environmental review. All future
development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards would be subject to their own environmental reviews per
CEQA regulation. The proposed Project would have less than significant impacts in relation with
CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b).
100
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 84 City of Rolling Hills
c. Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible use (e.g., farm equipment)?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for new buildings with unique design features, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development. All future development resulting from the
creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element
updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As
policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from transportation
related geometric design features, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would
occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per
CEQA regulation. Though the proposed Project in itself would not substantially increase hazards due
to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible use (e.g.,
farm equipment). Impacts would be less than significant.
d. Would the project result in inadequate emergency access?
Existing emergency access is provided to the Project site via a private access road that branches off
from Crest Road West.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for additional population and therefore access needs for
emergency vehicles and services on the existing site, as a policy-level document, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates, the creation of the overlay zone
and the proposed zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies
and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific
impacts, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the
Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The
proposed Project in would not result in inadequate emergency access and would have no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
101
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 85 City of Rolling Hills
4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
bbb.Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of a tribal cultural resource,
defined in Public Resources Code section
21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural
landscape that is geographically defined in
terms of the size and scope of the landscape,
sacred place, or object with cultural value to
a California Native American tribe, and that
is:
i. Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in Public
Resources Code section 5020.1(k).
ii.A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be significant
pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code
Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set
forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource
Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall
consider the significance of the resource
to a California Native American tribe.
SETTING
The State of California Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) for Native American Consultation requires the Lead
Agency for any project to consult with all California Native American tribes, traditionally and culturally
associated with the project area. AB 52 and Senate Bill (SB) 18 allows for associated California Native
American Tribes to aid in the protection of tribal and cultural resources affecting the Project site by
providing recommendations for mitigation and protection. Under AB 52, agencies proposing a Project that
requires a Notice of Preparation, Notice of Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) or Notice of Negative
Declaration (ND) are required to establish consultation with tribes that are traditionally and culturally
affiliated to the geographic area where a project is located. Tribes notified under the requirements of AB 52
have 30 days to respond in writing of their request for consultation on the proposed project. Under AB 52,
SB 18 applies to lead agencies proposing to adopt or amend a General Plan, Specific Plan or Open Space
Designations. Like AB 52, SB 18 requires that local governments contact tribes about the opportunity to
102
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 86 City of Rolling Hills
consult on a proposed project; however, instead of 30 days to respond, tribes have 90 days to request
consultation.
In compliance with AB 52, the City, as the Lead Agency for this Project distributed project notification
letters to the following six tribes on October 16 and 17, 2020: Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh
Nation; Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians; Gabrieleno/Tongva Nation; Gabrielino
Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council; Gabrielino/Tongva Tribe; and Soboba Band of Luiseno
Indians. Should any Native American tribes seek consultation with the City of Rolling Hills, under the
requirements of SB 18, the City will commence tribal consultation at that time.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a.i. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource
as defined in Public Resources Code 21074 that is listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public
Resources Code section 5020.1(k)?
The City of Rolling Hills is not currently listed on the California Register of Historical Resources, or
in a local register of historical resources as defined in PRC Code section §5020.1(k). The proposed
Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and
Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of
new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed
changes in the future, would allow for new development and therefore site excavations on the existing
site the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All
future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts to tribal cultural resources, at this level of environmental review. Future
land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Additionally, while the six afore-mentioned Native
American tribes were notified of this particular Project, each future redevelopment project at the
proposed Project site would entail its own tribal consultation. The proposed Project in itself would
not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal resources and therefore there
would be less than significant impact.
a.ii. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in a resource determined by the lead agency,
in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set
forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth
in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new development and therefore site excavations on
the existing site the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current
103
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 87 City of Rolling Hills
time All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts to tribal cultural resources, at this level of environmental review. Future
land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Additionally, while the six afore-mentioned Native
American tribes were notified of this particular Project, each future redevelopment project at the
proposed Project site would entail its own tribal consultation. The proposed Project in itself would
not have a substantial adverse change on the significance in a California Native Tribal resource and
therefore there would be less than significant impacts.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
104
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 88 City of Rolling Hills
4.19Utilities and Service Systems
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
ccc.Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
ddd.Have sufficient water supplies available
to serve the project and reasonably
foreseeable future development during
normal, dry and multiple dry years?
eee.Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider which serves
or may serve the project that it has adequate
capacity to serve the project’s projected
demand in addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
fff.Generate solid waste in excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the
attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
ggg.Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills has adopted the appropriate sections of the Los Angeles County Health and Safety
Code (Title 11) and the Los Angeles County Plumbing Code (Title 28). In 2018, the City entered into a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Los Angeles County (County) in order to be covered under
the County’s Local Agency Management Program’s (LAMP) provisions and restrictions. As a result, the
City is covered under the provisions and restrictions of LAMP and maintenance and installation of all
onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS) is authorized to be done by the Department of Public Health
(DPH). LAMP also authorizes the Department of Public Health (DPH) to implement alternate standards
including the conditions that allow DPH to issue operating permits for Non-Conventional Onsite
Wastewater Treatment Systems (NOWTS). The City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code defines NOWTS as
an onsite wastewater treatment system that utilizes one or more supplemental treatment components to
provide further treatment of sewage effluent prior to discharging into the dispersal system. Supplemental
105
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 89 City of Rolling Hills
treatment components can include a three-compartment treatment tank, aerator, filter pods, pump,
ultraviolet disinfection, clarifier, and effluent filtration. Without the adoption of the LAMP, residents
whose properties do not meet the requirements for the installation of a low risk system would be required
to apply for a Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) permit from the local Water Board, pay annual fees
to the Water Board, and comply with quarterly monitoring requirements.
The City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code also outlines provisions for domestic wastewater, defining it as
wastewater normally discharged from plumbing fixtures, appliances, and other household and commercial
devices including toilets, sinks, showers, and bathtubs. Strict provisions on the requirements for onsite
wastewater treatment systems are outlined in the City’s Zoning Code, ensuring that construction plans
proposing a new OWTS are thoroughly reviewed prior to approval and issuance of permits. The Code
further enforces the discharge of toxic materials or liquids that flow onto the surface of any land or body
of water.
The Project site is located on an existing school site that is developed with existing structures and has an
established utilities system that serves the site. Any future development on the Project site would be
required to comply with the existing City and County standards for the maintenance of the existing utility
systems.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a.Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications
facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings on the existing site that may require
water, wastewater storm drainage, electric power, natural as, or telecommunications facilities, the
Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future
development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning
changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design
standards. Since there are no new land development project involved specific to the proposed Project
under evaluation, there would be no requirement for the construction or relocation of new or
expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-
specific impacts from the relocation or constructions of water, wastewater, storm drainage, power,
gas, or telecommunications facilities, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that
would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews
for all of these issue areas related to utilities and service systems. Impacts would be less than
significant.
b. Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably
foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
106
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 90 City of Rolling Hills
The Project site is currently developed with Del Mar High School, Beach Cities Learning Center and
the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority, where water supply facilities are already established
and maintained. The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General
Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c)
the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone.
While these proposed changes would allow for new development and therefore potential future need
for sufficient water supplies on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any
new development. All future development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use
Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan
policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, hazards mitigation plan, and emergency evacuation
plan. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to water
supply levels, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of
the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews for all issue areas related
to the availability of water supply; impacts would therefore be less than significant.
c. Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or
may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in
addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new uses on the existing site that may affect wastewater
capacity, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time.
All future development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and
zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and
Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts
to future wastewater demand, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would
occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews for all
issue areas including fire pollutant risks. Impacts would be less than significant.
d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
107
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 91 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As
policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to existing local
infrastructure, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of
the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews for issue areas related to
the capacity of local infrastructure. While the Proposed Project would not create excess solid waste or
impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals; impacts would be less than significant.
e. Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future would allow for additional development on the site and therefore the
potential future need for solid waste facilities, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any
new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the implementation of
the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy level document, it is not
possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to solid waste facilities, at this level of environmental
review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Proposed Project in itself would not generate
solid waste. Therefore, the Project could have effects on federal, state, or local management and
reduction statutes that regulate solid waste, impacts would be less than significant.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
108
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 92 City of Rolling Hills
4.20Wildfire
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
If located in or near state responsibility areas or
lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the project:
a)Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which
could cause significant environmental
effects?
b)Due to slope, prevailing winds, and
other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks,
and thereby expose project occupants
to, pollutant concentrations from a
wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a
wildfire?
c)Require the installation or maintenance
of associated infrastructure (such as
roads, fuel breaks, emergency water
sources, power lines or other utilities)
that may exacerbate fire risk or that may
result in temporary or ongoing impacts
to the environment?
d)Expose people or structures to
significant risks, including downslope
or downstream flooding or landslides,
as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
SETTING
The State of California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) maps areas of fire hazards
based on a number of factors such as terrain, slope, weather, fuels, and other. A Fire Hazard Severity Zone
(FHSZ) map allows an area to evaluate wildfire hazards based on their degree of severity (very high, high,
and moderate). Though FHSZs cannot predict where potential wildfire may occur, they do identify areas
where wildfire hazards may be severe and therefore cause greater damages to life and property. All local
jurisdictions in California are required to identify their areas of Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) which
are based on vegetation density, slope severity, fire weather, and other factors. CAL FIRE identifies three
fire hazard zones based on increasing severity from fires – moderate, high, and very high.
109
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 93 City of Rolling Hills
Wildfire protection in California is the responsibility of the State and local governments, as well as the
federal government. The State of California has therefore prepared FHSZ maps to evaluate likely risks for
wildfire over a 30-50 year period. Lands where the State has financial responsibility for wildland fire
protection are designated as State Responsibility Areas (SRAs) and Local Responsibility Areas (LRAs).
Typically, Moderate, high, and very high FHSZs are found in SRAS where the State has financial
responsibility for fire protection and prevention. SRAs are areas where the State of California has financial
responsibility for fire protection, while LRAs include incorporated cities, cultivated lands, and even desert
areas. Fire protection for LRAs are typically provided by fire protection districts, a jurisdiction’s fire
department, or by CAL FIRE under contract to local governments.
The City of Rolling Hills is located in Very High Fire Standard Severity Zone (VHFSSZ), as determined by
CAL FIRE. The City prepared a Hazard Mitigation Plan in 2019 which included discussions for wildfire
hazards, as well as a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) in July 2020. As a designated VHFSSZ
(see Figure 8: Fire Hazards) the City is vulnerable to brush fire hazards. Steep hillsides, cliffs and canyons
along with vast areas of native and non-native vegetation. The severe risks to loss of life or injury,
destruction of buildings, road closures, and loss of domestic animals as well as wildlife, among others, are
some of the main effects of wildfires. The City of Rolling Hills has adopted a Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP)
in 2019, as well as a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) in July 2020. Based on the community’s
concerns regarding fire fuel in the canyon areas of the City, fire mitigation strategies were developed from
a variety of sources, the City has developed best strategies to implement to help mitigate wildfires caused
by fire fuel. Additionally, the City has coordinated with the Los Angeles County Fire Department to
develop options in dealing with vegetation management, including infrastructure hardening, vegetation
management, maintenance of electric power lines, and inspections and enforcement.
The City of Rolling Hills Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) also identifies wildfires as a potential hazard
within the City and includes discussions on the community’s wildfire issues. Through its contract with the
Los Angeles County Fire Department, the City requires and administers precautionary measures to create
defensible space for all properties within the City, particularly in the maintenance of structures and
vegetation. The HMP further enforces the goals of wildfire mitigation that are consistent with the City’s
CWPP, with policies implemented to reduce threats to public safety and protect property from brush fire
hazards.
110
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 94 City of Rolling Hills
111
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 95 City of Rolling Hills
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, hazards
mitigation plan, and emergency evacuation plan. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts to emergency response plans, at this level of environmental review.
Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
environmental reviews for all issue areas including fire emergency response. Though the proposed
Project in itself would not by itself impair any emergency response and evacuations plans, the Project
site’s location in a VHFSSZ impact would result in a less than significant impact.
b. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the project due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire
risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone . While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, hazards
mitigation plan, and emergency evacuation plan. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts from wildfire risks and exposure to pollutant concentrations form
wildfires, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the
Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews for all issue areas including
fire pollutant risks. The Proposed Project site’s location in a VHFSSZ would result in a less than
significant impact.
c. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such
as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate
fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
Even though the City is located in a Very High Fire Standard Severity Zone, the Project site is primarily
developed with urban uses related to schools and a public transit facility. The proposed Project
112
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 96 City of Rolling Hills
includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b)
related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new
Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in
the future, would allow new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose or
authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the
implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, hazards mitigation plan,
and emergency evacuation plan. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-
specific impacts to wildfire risks from future maintenance or installation of infrastructure, at this level
of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews for all wildfire related issue areas; however, the
proposed Project site’s location in a VHFSSZ would result in a less than significant impact.
d. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or
downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage
changes?
The Project site is primarily developed with urban uses related to schools and a public transit facility
and is located in a Very High Fire Standard Severity Zone. The proposed Project includes the
following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related
Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone,
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future,
would allow new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any
new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the implementation of
the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, hazards mitigation plan, and emergency
evacuation plan. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts
from post-fire slope instability or drainage changes, at this level of environmental review. Future land
uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental
reviews for all wildfire related issue areas; however, since the proposed Project site is located in a
VHFSSZ, impacts would remain less than significant.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
113
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 97 City of Rolling Hills
4.20 MANDATORY SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
hhh.Does the Project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the number
or restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
iii.Does the Project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects)?
jjj.Does the Project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
SETTING
As discussed in Section 1, Aesthetics, the City of Rolling Hills is beautiful wooded City with scenic views
of the Pacific Ocean, Catalina Island, city lights, and Los Angeles Harbor. In order to preserve the aesthetics
and natural resources that characterize the City, goals and policies are enforced throughout the City’s
General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and other local management plans. Residence adhere strictly to these
policies to maintain the quality of the environment and the continued preservation of the plant and wildlife
within the City.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to
drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
114
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 98 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for new developments on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the
creation of the overlay zone and the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject
to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The proposed Project would not
substantially degrade the quality of the environment or have an effect on the fish and wildlife
population within the City; there would be no impact.
b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects,
and the effects of probable future projects)?
Cumulative development in the City consists primarily of single-family residences, with the exception
of City Hall, Los Angeles County Fire Department Station (LACFD) No. 56, Rancho Del Mar High
School, and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority. The proposed Project includes the
following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related
Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone,
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes would allow for
new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new
development. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone and the
proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject to their own environmental reviews
per CEQA regulation. The proposed Project would not have impacts that are cumulatively
considerable; there would be no impact.
c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself does not
propose or authorize any new development. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the
creation of the overlay zone and the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject
to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The proposed Project would have no
impact on the environment that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
115
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 99 City of Rolling Hills
5.0 REFERENCES
DOCUMENTS
Air Quality Management District. 2016. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and California
Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) Attainment Status for South Coast Air Basin. South Coast Air Quality
Management District.
Air Quality Management District. 2017. 2016 Air Quality Management Plan. South Coast Air Quality
Management District
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 2020. Public Resources Code 21000–21189.
California Department of Conservation (DOC). 2019. The Williamson Act Status Report 2016-17. United
States.
California Department of Conservations (DOC). 2000. Guidelines for Classification and Designation of Mineral
Lands. State of California.
California Water Service. 2018. 2018 Water Quality Report. Rancho Dominguez District, California.
City of Rolling Hills. 2018. Climate Action Plan. Rolling Hills, California.
City of Rolling Hills. 2018. City Council Agenda Item No. 4-B. City of Rolling Hills, California
City of Rolling Hills. 2019. City of Rolling Hills 2019 Hazard Mitigation Plan. City of Rolling Hills, California.
City of Rolling Hills. June 1990. General Plan Land Use Element. Rolling Hills, California.
City of Rolling Hills. June 1990. General Plan Noise Element. Rolling Hills, California.
City of Rolling Hills. June 1990. General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element. Rolling Hills, California.
City of Rolling Hills. June 1990. General Plan Safety Element. Rolling Hills, California
City of Rolling Hills. June 1990. General Plan Circulation Element. Rolling Hills, California.
City of Rolling Hills. August 2019. Storm Hill Land Road and LLA Modification Project. Rolling Hills,
California.
Department of Conservation. 2009. Tsunami Inundation Map for Emergency Planning Torrance Quadrangle/San
Pedro Quadrangle. State of California.
Environmental Protection Agency. 2015. America’s Children and the Environment. United States.
Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). 2020. Tribal Consultation Under AB 52: Requirements and
Best Practices. State of California.
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). 2019. Profile of the City of Rolling Hills. Rolling
Hills, California.
California Energy Commission. 2019. 2019 California Energy Efficiency Action Plan. State of California.
116
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 100 City of Rolling Hills
WEBSITES
Architectural Geographic Information System (ArcGIS). 2020.
<https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html> accessed November 2020.
California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2020. <https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/qaweb/site.php?s_arb_code=70073>
accessed October 2020.
California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2020. <https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/capp-resource-center/community-
assessment/sensitive-receptor-assessment> accessed October 2020.
California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2020. <https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/> accessed November 2020.
California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2020. <https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/fact-sheets/ab-32-global-
warming-solutions-act-2006> accessed November 2020.
California Code of Regulations, West Law. 2020. <https://govt.westlaw.com/calregs/Document> accessed
October 2020.
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL Fire). 2020. <https://gis.data.ca.gov/datasets/>
accessed October 2020.
California Division of Mines and Geology. 2020. <https://www.conservation.ca.gov/> accessed October 2020.
California Legislative Information. 2020. <https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/> accessed October 2020
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2020. <https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB> accessed November
2020.
City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code. 2020.
<https://library.municode.com/ca/rolling_hills/codes/code_of_ordinances> accessed October 2020.
County of Los Angeles Public Health. 2020. <http://www.publichealth.lacounty.gov> accessed October 2020.
Department of Conservation. 2020. <https://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/wa> accessed October 2020.
Department of Conservation. 2020. <https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/> accessed October
2020.
117
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 101 City of Rolling Hills
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 2020.
<https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/environmental-review/airport-hazards/> accessed October 2020.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2020. <https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-
emissions accessed> November 2020.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2020. <https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-clean-water-
act> accessed November 2020.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2008. <https://msc.fema.gov/portal/r> accessed October 2020.
Moloney & Associates Acoustic and Environmental Associates. 2020.
<https://acoustic-environmental.ie/ground-borne- vibration.> accessed October 2020.
Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA). 2020. <http://www.rhca.org/info.php?pnum=17> accessed
November 2020.
Safeopedia. 2018. <https://www.safeopedia.com/definition/5568/ambient-noise> accessed October 2020.
Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. 2020. <http://vertpaleo.org/The-Society/Advocacy/Paleontological-Resources-
Preservation-Act.aspx> accessed October 2020.
South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2020. <http://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/clean-air-
plans/air-quality-mgt-plan> accessed October 2020.
State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). 2020. <https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map> accessed
October 2020.
UC Museum of Paleontology. 2020. <https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/collections/databases/> accessed October 2020.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2020.
<https://www.nrcs.usda.gov> accessed October 2020.
United States Department of Fish and Wildlife – Endangered Species. 2020.
<https://www.fws.gov/endangered/what-we-do/hcp-overview.html> accessed October 2020.
United States Drought Monitor. 2020. <https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/> accessed November 2020.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2020.
<https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/ancl.html> accessed October 2020.
118
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 102 City of Rolling Hills
United State Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2020. <https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-
greenhouse-gases>accessed October 2020.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2020. <https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-
change-indicators-climate-forcing> accessed October 2020.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2020. <https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overvie>
accessed October 2020.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2020. <https://www.epa.gov/enviro/sems-search>
accessed October 2020.
119
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 103 City of Rolling Hills
120
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 104 City of Rolling Hills
121
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 105 City of Rolling Hills
122
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 106 City of Rolling Hills
123
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 107 City of Rolling Hills
124
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 108 City of Rolling Hills
125
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 109 City of Rolling Hills
126
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 P a g e | 110 City of Rolling Hills
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
RESOLUTION NO. 1270
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ADOPTING GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2020-01, AMENDING THE
LAND USE ELEMENT AND LAND USE POLICY
MAP TO ACCOMMODATE HOUSING; AND
APPROVING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
RECITALS
A.Pursuant to its obligation under Government Code § 65583.2, the City Council of
the City of Rolling Hills needs to amend its Land Use Element and Land Use Policy Map of the
City of Rolling Hills General Plan (“General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01”) to allow
multifamily housing, single room occupancy, and emergency shelters;
B. The proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01 was sent to affected public
entities for their review and comment;
C. The proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01 was reviewed, studied, and
found to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA");
D. On December 22, 2020, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed
public hearing and considered the staff report, written public comments, and oral public
testimony regarding the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01 and recommended
approval and adoption to the City Council;
E. On January 6, 2021, the City gave public notice of the consideration of a proposed
General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01 by publishing notice in the Torrance Daily Breeze, a
newspaper of general circulation;
F. On January 25, 2021, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing
and considered the staff report, written public comments, and oral public testimony regarding the
proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01. The City Council continued the public hearing
to its February 8, 2021 meeting;
G. On February 8, 2021, the City Council held a duly-noticed public hearing and
considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning proposed
General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
154
City Council Resolution No. 1270
Page 2
Section 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION (CEQA): An Initial Study and
Negative Declaration No. 2020-01 has been prepared, processed, and noticed in accordance with
CEQA (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (14 California
Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq.) for General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01. Pursuant
to Section 15070, et seq of the CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds, on the basis of
substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, that the proposed project could not have a
significant effect on the environment. Upon the basis of all of the evidence in the record, the City
Council finds that the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the City
Council and hereby approves the Negative Declaration.
Section 2. The City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01,
Amending the Land Use Element and Land Use Policy Map (Exhibit A), based upon the
following findings:
A.The Land Use Element Amendment and Land Use Policy Map Amendment
appropriately update these two portions of the General Plan to address current
legal developments and required updates and to provide for integration and
consistency with the General Plan.
B.The Land Use Element Amendment and Land Use Policy Map Amendment
provide for development within the City that is consistent or compatible with the
General Plan and all of the other elements of the General Plan.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of March, 2021 by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstaining:
Absent:
_________________________
Jeff Pieper, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________
Elaine Jeng, P.E.
Acting City Clerk
Attachments:
Exhibit A: Land Use Element Amendment and Land Use Policy Map Amendment to
the Rolling Hills General Plan
155
LAND USE ELEMENT
LAND USE ELEMENT
Rolling Hills
General Plan
EXHIBIT A
156
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
-i-
INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1
Purpose of the Element ...................................................................................................... 1
Relationship to Other Elements ......................................................................................... 2
EXISTING LAND USE ................................................................................................................ 3
Residential.......................................................................................................................... 3
TABLE LU-1 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS EXISTING LAND USE
INVENTORY January 1989 ...................................................................... 1
Public/Association-Owned Facilities ................................................................................. 1
Education ........................................................................................................................... 1
Recreation .......................................................................................................................... 1
Vacant Land ....................................................................................................................... 1
SIGNIFICANT LAND USE ISSUES ........................................................................................... 3
OVERVIEW OF LAND USE PLAN ............................................................................................ 4
Residential Land Uses........................................................................................................ 4
Civic Center ....................................................................................................................... 4
TABLE LU-2 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GENERAL PLAN LAND
USE CATEGORIES .................................................................................. 5
Publicly-Owned Open Space ............................................................................................. 6
Landslide Hazard Overlay ................................................................................................. 6
Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay………………………………………….6
Implications of Land Use Policy........................................................................................ 7
TABLE LU-3 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTIMATED GENERAL
PLAN BUILDOUT NET INCREASE IN DEVELOPMENT................... 8
GOALS AND POLICIES .............................................................................................................. 9
157
LAND USE ELEMENT
LAND USE ELEMENT
INTRODUCTION
The City of Rolling Hills enjoys the advantages of being located on the San Pedro
Hills of the Palos Verdes Peninsula, including cool sea breezes and low
concentrations of smog in the summer months, more sunshine due to its elevation
above much of the coastal fog, and commanding views of the Pacific Ocean and
Los Angeles Basin. Due to its coastal location, Rolling Hills has been able to
avoid many of the air quality and traffic problems associated with growth in the
Los Angeles area. However, geologic hazards have greatly affected properties
within Rolling Hills and have forced the City to examine development policies
within certain areas of the community.
This Land Use Element describes official City policy for the location of land uses
and their orderly growth and development. It serves as a guide for public officials
and citizens to determine the best uses of lands within the City. To the private
citizen, the Land Use Element will set forth the type of neighborhood he or she
can expect to live in, the location and type of public facilities available, and the
time and distance required for travel to necessary activities. Public officials will
use the Land Use Element as a guide for placement of public facilities and
services, and for directing new development. The Element also serves as a basis
for definition of short-range and long-range capital improvement programs.
Purpose of the Element
The intent of the Land Use Element is to describe present and projected land use
activity within Rolling Hills. The Element also addresses crucial issues
concerning the relationship between land uses and environmental quality,
potential hazards, and social and economic objectives.
In accordance with the State of California General Plan Guidelines, the Land Use
Element serves the following purposes:
o Identifies land use issues;
o Provides a statement of land use policies and proposals,
distinguishing, when appropriate, between short, middle and long-
term periods of fulfillment;
o Describes land use density and land use intensities provided for
under the Plan, including the relationships of such uses to social,
environmental and economic goals and objectives;
o Provides for standards and criteria for physical development within
each use area with consideration for land capacity; and
158
LAND USE ELEMENT
o Describes and depicts land use patterns provided for under the
Plan.
In response to the State of California Department of Housing and Community
Development’s (“HCD”) December 28, 2018 letter regarding the City’s
noncompliance with the State Housing Element Law and subsequent instructions
from HCD staff for the City to achieve compliance and to avoid penalty, the Land
Use Element must now make provision for multifamily housing, single room
occupancy, and emergency shelters through the creation of the Rancho Del Mar
Housing Opportunity Overlay (“RDMO”) located over a specific parcel at 38
Crest Road West, Rolling Hills, California.
Relationship to Other Elements
A major goal in this General Plan Update is to achieve internal consistency
throughout the various General Plan elements. Since the Land Use Element
regulates how land is utilized, it integrates and synthesizes most of the issues and
policies contained in the other Plan elements.
Specifically, the Land Use Element relates to the Housing Element by defining
the extent and density of future residential development in the City. The Land Use
Element is also coordinated with the Open Space/ Conservation Element in that
open space resources are designated on the Land Use Policy Map, and
environmental factors are considered in the location of land use types. The Land
Use Element also relates to the Safety and Noise Elements by integrating their
broad land use recommendations into detailed policies which apply to specific
geographic locations. Finally, the Circulation and Land Use Elements are
interrelated in that specific land use decisions depend upon traffic routes and
circulation patterns.
159
LAND USE ELEMENT
EXISTING LAND USE
The City of Rolling Hills is almost an entirely residential community of large
one+ acre parcels on 2.98 square miles of land. The land use pattern was
established with the original subdivision and sale of parcels which began in 1936.
Situated astride the San Pedro Hills of the Palos Verdes Peninsula, Rolling Hills is
characterized by white, single-story California ranch style homes with three-rail
fences and an abundance of equestrian facilities. Landscaping which was located
as parcels developed has matured, rendering the Rolling Hills area a heavily
wooded setting. Lot sizes range from a minimum of one acre to several acres in
size. Many lots contain a buildable ridge and steep arroyos.
Rolling Hills was created by A.E. Hanson and the Palos Verdes Corporation in
1936 following a generally unsuccessful attempt to sell 10 to 50 acre parcels as
“dude ranches” to residents of Los Angeles and Beverly Hills. The concept was
modified to offer one to five acre parcels to residents of closer-by communities
attracted to the cleaner, cooler air, sunshine and absence of congestion. One of
Rolling Hills’ unique features is the set of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions
which have assured the maintenance and uniformity of properties throughout the
years. Buildings are limited to one story in height with three-rail fences
surrounding the properties. Residences are strongly encouraged to be of a ranch
style, and are required to be painted white. All properties provide easements
which are primarily utilized for equestrian trails. The CC&Rs are enforced
through the Rolling Hills Community Association. Through the association, fees
are levied which are used for maintenance of the roads and recreational facilities.
Beginning in 1938, the 150-acre area known as the Flying Triangle was added to
the development’s original 600 acres. The Flying Triangle area has, in recent
years, been subject to major landslides resulting in building moratoriums for parts
of the area that are known to be at risk.
To comply with State mandates, a comprehensive land use survey was undertaken
by City staff in 2020 to identify the extent of existing land uses in the community.
Figure LU-1 illustrates existing land uses in Rolling Hills; an existing land use
map is also on file at City Hall. Table LU-1, Existing Land Use Inventory,
quantifies the acreage dedicated to the various land uses present in Rolling Hills.
The table is divided into five residential density categories and categories for
Public Facility, Education, Recreation and Vacant Land. The following sections
describe the nature of each of these land uses in Rolling Hills.
BOX REPRESENTS MAP ON PAGE 4 OF PDF DOCUMENT
Residential
160
LAND USE ELEMENT
Rolling Hills is comprised almost exclusively of ranch style residential
homes. Large setback requirements and lot sizes, as well as topographic
constraints on many lots provide significant amounts of open space on
developed parcels that give the overall community a sense of openness.
Many of the lots are large enough to support horses, and many have
stables as accessory structures.
The character of residential development in Rolling Hills has changed
substantially over the years. Many homes are constructed to maximize the
building area on the lot. The increasing building size has also fostered a tendency
for more grading to prepare many of the steeper properties for a structure.
Increases in grading practices have had a significant effect on the natural
environment and viewscapes. These combined trends have significantly altered
the community’s character and affect surrounding properties. The results of a
Community Attitude Survey indicate a high level of concern among residents
related to residential development and design compatibility issues. In response to
those concerns, the City adopted a site plan review ordinance to preserve and
enhance the community’s character.
In addition to the changes in community character, increased building size and
related grading may have contributed to the instability of soil in the area of the
City known as the Flying Triangle. Combined with several winters of heavy
rainfall, increases in water discharged from septic systems and increased grading
are believed to have contributed to soil destabilization. Development in this area
is limited by the Building Code.
The need for housing across California has also resulted in the State requiring
cities to allow certain types of housing. In response to these State requirements,
the City has identified the RDMO Zone located over a specific parcel at 38 Crest
Road West, Rolling Hills, California to provide additional housing opportunities
within the City.
In order to define the range of existing residential land use, five density ranges
were arrived upon. The five categories include parcels of 0-1 acres, 1-2 acres, 2-3
acres, 3-5 acres and 5+ acres. As illustrated in Table LU-1, approximately three
percent of the City’s developed residential acreage consists of parcels less than
one acre in size, 20 percent consists of parcels between 3-5 acres, with 1-2 acre
parcels, 2-3 acre parcels, and 5+ acre parcels each comprising 25 percent of the
City’s developed acreage. A total of 683 single-family dwelling units have been
developed in Rolling Hills on 1,636.8 acres of land.
161
LAND USE ELEMENT
TABLE LU-1
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
EXISTING LAND USE INVENTORY
January 1989
Land Use Acreage DUs
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
0-1 acre 49.6
1-2 acres 436.4
2-3 acres 430.5
3-5 acres 317.3
5+ acres 403.0
Total Residential 1,636.8 683
PUBLIC/ASSOCIATION-OWNED
FACILITIES 5.5
EDUCATION 31.14
RECREATION 33.3
VACANT LAND 203.1
Total Non-Residential 272.2
TOTAL ACREAGE 1,908.9
(2.98 sq.miles)
Source: City of Rolling Hills
compiled by Cotton/Beland/Associates, Inc.
162
LAND USE ELEMENT
Public/Association-Owned Facilities
Public facilities owned by the City of Rolling Hills and private facilities owned by
the Rolling Hills Community Association provide for the needs of the community.
The City owns the Rolling Hills Administrative Building which houses the offices
of the City of Rolling Hills and the Rolling Hills Community Association. The
City also owns a maintenance building, three tennis courts and two equestrian
riding rings.
The Community Association owns roadway easements and the guard gates. The
Palos Verdes Water Company owns two water tanks and several antenna towers
adjacent to and accessed through Rolling Hills. A major radar installation site is
contiguous to the City’s eastern boundary that is operated by the Federal
Aeronautic Administration. Finally, the Los Angeles County Fire Protection
District• owns and operates a Fire Station within the City. Table LU-1 shows
facilities owned by the City, other public entities, and the Community
Association. These facilities comprise a total of 5.5 acres within the community.
Education
The Palos Verdes Peninsula School District owns a site of 31.14 acres which is
located south of Crest Road along the City’s western boundary. The site is home
to the Rancho Del Mar Continuation High School which serves the Palos Verdes
Peninsula Unified School District. Access to the school district property is via
Crest Road outside the City.
Recreation
The City contains 33.3 acres of recreational open space. Opposite the City
administration building are three City-owned tennis courts which are operated and
maintained by the Rolling Hills Community Association. The courts are open to
Association members and their guests and are operated from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m.
Also contained within the City are two riding rings and a series of trails. The trails
are an extensive network laced throughout the City affording hikers and
equestrians alike varied opportunities within the community’s boundaries. Also
available for recreational use within Rolling Hills is an 8.01 acre parcel on the
north end of Storm Hill which was dedicated through provisions of the Quimby
Act. The property is open to City residents for use as an open equestrian area.
Vacant Land
Of the numerous vacant properties in Rolling Hills, many are constrained from
future developments. The area within the Flying Triangle which is subject to
landslides is under a moratorium and will not likely be buildable into the
foreseeable future due to building code requirements which do not permit
construction in geologically unstable areas. Other properties exist which are
constrained due to excessive slopes on the property. It is estimated that there are
203.1 acres of vacant, residentially zoned land within the City. Of that total,
163
LAND USE ELEMENT
172.75 acres are unconstrained (either located outside the Flying Triangle and/or
not constrained by slope) and, subject to site plan review requirements, may
accommodate a maximum of 59 additional residential units.
164
LAND USE ELEMENT
SIGNIFICANT LAND USE ISSUES
The following list is a summary of issues and opportunities relating to land use
that have been identified in Rolling Hills from the Community Attitude Survey
and through discussions with the General Plan Advisory Committee and other
City committees. These issues are addressed in the Goals and Policies of this
Land Use Element.
o The landslide area within the Flying Triangle has rendered a large
amount of land within the City’s southwest area unsuitable for
residential development, and is subject to ongoing changes in
topography.
o Due to the constraints of the landslide area within the Flying
Triangle, a large amount of open space remains open to alternative
uses such as recreation or study of such geologic hazards.
o The City’s topography renders large parts of many parcels
constrained, thus leaving smaller areas available for development.
Recent residential construction has maximized lot coverage
through extensive grading.
o Grading of individual lots have significantly altered the topography
and drainage patterns on many lots thus eliminating certain
viewscapes and diminishing of the natural character of the City.
o New residential development within the community has changed
significantly in character from the original residential
developments, thus generating an increasing degree of
incompatibility between adjacent uses.
o The increasing size and bulk of recent residential developments
within Rolling Hills and the surrounding area have substantially
reduced the natural, rural environment which has characterized
Rolling Hills in the past.
o The use of private septic systems within the City may have
contributed to soil instability. While lot size does not mandate a
conversion to a common sewage system, the City may facilitate
such a conversion.
o The need for housing within the City has required the
implementation of the RDMO Zone to allow for uses, including
multifamily, single room occupancy, and emergency shelters.
165
LAND USE ELEMENT
OVERVIEW OF LAND USE PLAN
The Rolling Hills Land Use Policy Map is presented in Figure LU-2. The Map
provides a graphic representation of the General Plan’s development policies and
indicates land uses as they are designated and for which policies and standards
have been formulated. The major goal of Rolling Hills’ General Plan Update is to
maintain and foster the community’s rural and residential environment while
ensuring that new development is in conformance with established community
standards.
The land use classifications designated by the General Plan provide for the
development of the community’s limited vacant properties in a manner that is
consistent with established and approved development patterns. The land use
classifications established by this General Plan Update reflect a system that is
different but generally consistent with the previous land use classifications. The
City’s policy retains the existing low-density land use pattern, while
accommodating a range of housing types as required by State law. Table LU-2
presents the list of updated General Plan land use categories, their general
development standards and characteristics. The following discussion will
elaborate on the location and intent of the General Plan land uses.
Residential Land Uses
The Plan continues the City’s two existing residential land use categories - Low
Density and Very Low Density. The former mandates establishes a density of one
unit per acre and the latter establishes a density of one unit per two acres. Zoning
provisions have been developed to allow accessory dwelling units. Through these
classifications, the City will be able to ensure that the remaining undeveloped
properties throughout Rolling Hills will be developed at densities that are
compatible with existing residential development.
Civic Center
The Civic Center designation has been added to the Land Use Policy Map to
specify the 1.3 acre area that is currently used by the City for its administrative
offices. The Civic Center land use category has been created to accurately reflect
uses that exist within the City, and to provide consistency between the General
Plan Land Use Policy Map and the Zoning Map.
BOX REPRESENTS MAP THAT WAS ON PAGE 11 OF PDF
166
LAND USE ELEMENT
TABLE LU-2
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE CATEGORIES
Designation
Development
Standards
Development
Characteristics
Residential
Very Low Density
Low Density
2+ net acres/dwelling
unit, single story
1-2 net acres/dwelling
unit, single story
Single-family homes on
large lots, usually custom
designed. Parcels often
contain varied topography
and canyon areas.
Single-family homes on
large lots, often custom
designed.
Public
Civic Center
Publicly-Owned Open
Space
Single story
Development prohibited
City Hall and associated
facilities.
Equestrian riding rings and
undeveloped open space
areas owned by the City.
Landslide Hazard
Overlay
Development prohibited
unless landslide hazard is
mitigated
Active landslide areas
requiring mitigation of
geologic hazards prior to
development.
Rancho Del Mar Housing
Opportunity Overlay
Public Facilities permitted.
Two story construction
permitted.
Multifamily Housing
permitted, not to exceed 16
units for the entire overlay
site.
School Facilities
Transportation Facilities
Clustered Housing and
Special Housing Types
167
LAND USE ELEMENT
Publicly-Owned Open Space
While the majority of recreational open space within the community is maintained
by the Rolling Hills Community Association, a limited amount of open space is
also owned by the City. Areas of publicly-owned open space lie at the northern
end of Storm Hill where a parcel of eight acres was dedicated to the City through
the provisions of the Quimby Act. Also included as publicly owned open space
are the two equestrian riding rings owned by the City. The purpose of separating
out publicly-owned open space is to identify lands that are owned and maintained
by the City and will remain as open space. In addition, this land use category
could also be utilized in the future for any additional open space land purchased
by the City.
Landslide Hazard Overlay
A Landslide Hazard Overlay classification has been created to address the
landslide hazards present in Rolling Hills. Landslide hazards have occurred most
notably in the Flying Triangle area beginning in 1980. The reasons for the onset
of landslide activity are multiple and are addressed in detail in the Safety Element.
The Landslide Hazard Overlay classification has been developed to further
establish the City’s continuing policy which prohibits development in areas which
are known to be subject to active landslides, specifically the Flying Triangle.
Establishing this policy in the General Plan provides the framework for the
inclusion of specific criteria in the Zoning Ordinance. Residential development
will be permitted pursuant to the underlying zoning, only where evidence can be
provided that establishes such development as posing no hazard to the property or
adjacent properties. This evidence will be formed on a case by case basis upon
review of geologic and soils information and hydrologic and topographic
analyses. The Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance, upon revision, will specify
development constraints in overlay areas.
Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay (RDMO) Zone
A RDMO Zone has been created to meet State housing requirements and
provide opportunities for a variety of housing types. The City is required
by State law to plan for its fair share of regional housing needs, including
housing for all income groups. Because Rolling Hills is developed with
large, environmentally constrained lots that make higher densities
impractical, the City has determined that the best way to accomplish the
State requirements is through providing opportunities with a combination
of accessory dwelling units (“in-law apartments”) and multifamily
housing.
The City has identified a specific parcel located at 38 Crest Road West,
Rolling Hills, California to accommodate it share of regional housing
needs. The 31.14-acre parcel is designated Very Low Density Residential,
168
LAND USE ELEMENT
which allows one unit per two acres—or 16 units for the entire site
(rounding up from 15.57). To meet the current and projected housing
needs of the City, the City is creating an overlay zone on the specific
parcel located at 38 Crest Road West, Rolling Hills, California to allow
multifamily residential housing, not to exceed 16 units for the entire
overlay site. The Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance includes an overlay
zoning district which codifies this requirement.
Other land uses, such as public facilities, parks, and transportation
facilities, are permitted within this overlay.
Implications of Land Use Policy
The Land Use Element provides for the continued residential emphasis of the
Rolling Hills community. The General Plan ensures that this growth will take
place in a way that promotes compatibility with adjacent properties, preserves the
existing rural residential character, and is environmentally sensitive. The amount
of additional growth that can be accommodated under this General Plan is
presented as Table LU-3. As this table illustrates, the Plan only provides for the
expansion of residential uses.
169
LAND USE ELEMENT
TABLE LU-3
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
ESTIMATED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT
NET INCREASE IN DEVELOPMENT
Residential Acres Dwelling Units Population
Very Low Density 148.50 49 156.8
Low Density 24.25 10 32.0
(RDMO) (31.14) (16) (51.2)
Totals 203.89 75 240
Based on an average household size of 3.2 persons.
Source: City of Rolling Hills
Cotton/Beland/Associates, Inc.
The Plan accommodates a maximum net increase of 59 single-family dwelling
units and 16 multifamily dwelling units. The majority of this growth would occur
on the properties under the Very Low Density classification, residential
development on 2+ acre parcels. Growth in the residential areas will occur under
different circumstances. The population of Rolling Hills as of January 1, 1989
was 2,092. Over the City’s 2.98 square miles the population density is 702
persons per square mile. Based on Department of Finance estimates of an average
3.2 persons per household in Rolling Hills, an additional 240 persons could reside
in the City under General Plan buildout.
170
LAND USE ELEMENT
GOALS AND POLICIES
The following goals and policies reflect current land use issues affecting the
community of Rolling Hills and will serve as a guide to future policy decisions
made for the City.
GOAL 1: Maintain Rolling Hills’ distinctive rural residential character.
Policy 1.1: Maintain the City’s one and two acre minimum lot size requirements.
Policy 1.2: Maintain the City’s one story height limitation for single-family
residences to preserve scenic viewsheds.
Policy 1.3: Require the use of landscaping which is compatible with the City’s
rural character.
Policy 1.4: Require that development conform with the City’s existing low-
profile, ranch style architecture.
Policy 1.5: Preserve a natural twilight environment at night by prohibiting street
lighting and uplighting of landscaping and minimizing driveway lighting.
Policy 1.6: Evaluate the City’s existing requirement for minimum stable size to
assess its appropriateness and effectiveness.
GOAL 2: Accommodate development which is compatible with and
complements existing land uses.
Policy 2.1: Evaluate the City’s lot coverage standards to assess their effectiveness
in providing for development which is compatible with adjacent uses.
Policy 2.2: Require that lighting of residential properties not adversely affect
adjacent residences.
Policy 2.3: Maintain and provide regulations for sufficient setbacks and
easements to provide buffers between residential uses.
Policy 2.4: Ensure the siting of buildings maintain and preserve viewscapes from
adjacent structures through the site review process.
GOAL 3: Accommodate development that is sensitive to the natural
environment and accounts for environmental hazards.
Policy 3.1: Establish a Landslide Overlay classification to reflect the more
stringent development standards the City has applied to development in active
landslide areas.
Policy 3.2: Maintain strict grading practices to preserve the community’s natural
terrain.
171
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy 3.3: Require the use of native, naturally fire resistant landscape materials
in development.
Policy 3.4: Maintain the City’s open space requirement to preserve natural
vegetation and wildlife habitat.
Policy 3.5: Facilitate the preservation and restoration of viewscapes through the
removal of obstructions.
GOAL 4: Fulfill State-mandated obligation to provide housing opportunities.
Policy 4.1: Establish zoning regulations that provide for a variety of housing
types, as required by State law and in a manner that is compatible with the other
policies expressed in the Land Use Element.
172
173
65277.00001\33367195.1
Page 1 of 11
ORDINANCE NO. 369
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA AMENDING TITLE 17
(ZONING) OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO
ADD CHAPTER 17.19 (RANCHO DEL MAR HOUSING
OPPORTUNITY OVERLAY ZONE) ESTABLISHING AN
OVERLAY ZONE TO ACCOMMODATE HOUSING AND TO
AMEND SECTION 17.08.010 (ZONES ESTABLISHED) OF
CHAPTER 17.08 (ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONES AND
BOUNDARIES) TO IDENTIFY THE OVERLAY ON THE
ZONING MAP; AND APPROVING THE NEGATIVE
DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
RECITALS
A. Pursuant to its obligation under Government Code § 65583.2, the City Council of
the City of Rolling Hills needs to amend its municipal code to establish an overlay zone to
accommodate housing;
B. On December 22, 2020, the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public
hearing and considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony
concerning a proposed ordinance. It adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council
adopt the proposed ordinance;
C. On January 6, 2021, the City gave public notice of the January 25, 2021 public
hearing to be held by the City Council on the proposed ordinance by publishing notice in the
Torrance Daily Breeze, a newspaper of general circulation;
D. On January 25, 2021, the City Council held a duly-noticed public hearing and
considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning the
proposed ordinance. Staff introduced changes to the proposed ordinance warranting referral back
to the Planning Commission under Government Code § 65857. The City Council continued the
public hearing to its February 8, 2021 meeting;
E. On February 5, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public
meeting to consider the changes introduced by staff and considered the staff report,
recommendations by staff, and public comments concerning the proposed ordinance. It adopted a
resolution recommending that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance; and
F. On February 8, 2021, the City Council held a duly-noticed public hearing and
considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning the
proposed ordinance.
174
65277.00001\33367195.1
Page 2 of 11
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 17.08.010 (Zones established) of Chapter 17.08 (Establishment of Zones
and Boundaries) in Title 17 (Zoning) is hereby amended to read as follows:
Chapter 17.08 - ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONES AND BOUNDARIES
17.08.010 - Zones established.
Rolling Hills is a unique, well-established residential community. Development consists
almost exclusively of single-family residential houses on large lots. The General Plan of
the City of Rolling Hills establishes a policy to maintain the existing pattern and type of
residential development, with support public facility uses. Toward the end of
implementing General Plan land use policy, zone districts are established as follows:
A. RA-S - Residential Agriculture-Suburban. The RA-S zone district is divided into
two sub-districts: RA-S-1 and RA-S-2. The suffix indicates the minimum lot size
requirement in net acres.
1. The Overlay Zoning District (OZD-1) overlies a portion of the RA-S-1 zone and is
identified on the zoning map.
2. The Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay Zoning District (RDMO)
overlies a portion of the RA-S-2 zone and is identified on the zoning map.
B. PF - Public Facilities.
Section 2. Chapter 17.19 (Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay Zone) is added to
Title 17 (Zoning) to read as follows:
Chapter 17.19 – RANCHO DEL MAR HOUSING OPPORTUNITY OVERLAY
ZONE
17.19.010 – Intent and purpose.
The Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay Zone (RDMO) is established by this
chapter to:
A. To provide regulations that implement the goals and policies of the general plan and
other similar long-range planning documents aimed at encouraging mixed-use
development within the City. The RDMO zone is further intended to serve as an
implementation tool of the City's land use and housing elements of the general plan
by facilitating further residential development.
B. The RDMO zone has the following major objectives:
1. Create "by-right" opportunities for housing;
175
65277.00001\33367195.1
Page 3 of 11
2. Implement state laws that require cities to demonstrate available land capacity and
zoning tools to accommodate the City's current and projected need for housing;
3. Facilitate well-designed development projects that combine residential and
nonresidential uses (e.g., office, transit facility and other community amenities) to
promote a better balance of jobs and housing;
4. Encourage development that provides attractive features (e.g., landscaping, public
spaces, courtyards, etc.) designed to integrate the public realm (e.g., right of way,
walking path, etc.) with development on adjacent private property.
17.19.020 – Applicability.
The RDMO applies to 38 Crest Road West, Rolling Hills, California.
17.19.030 – Uses Permitted.
No lot, premises, building, or structure shall be used for any use or purpose other than the
following:
A. Affordable Multi-family+^;
B. Affordable Senior housing+;
C. Emergency Shelter+;
D. Single Room Occupancy*;
E. Daycare*;
F. School facilities*;
G. Transit facilities*.
*Requires Conditional Use Permit (RHMC Chapter 17.42)
+Requires Zone Clearance Permit (RHMC Chapter 17.44)
^Requires compliance with Government Code Section 65583.2(h)
17.19.040 – Development Standards for Single Room Occupancy.
A. Single Room Occupancy Defined. “Single room occupancy (SRO) facility" means a
facility operated by a provider with six or more dwelling units for persons of lower
income where each unit has a minimum floor area of two hundred fifty square feet and
a maximum floor area of three hundred fifty square feet. These dwelling units must be
offered on a monthly basis or longer. For the purposes of this definition, a "provider"
means a government agency or private nonprofit organization that provides or contracts
with recognized community organizations to provide SRO housing, and "lower
income" has the meaning set forth in Health and Safety Code Section 50079.5.
B. SRO housing shall conform to the following requirements:
1. SRO housing shall be limited to a total maximum number of eight (8) units.
2. Occupancy shall be limited to maximum two persons per unit.
3. Each SRO unit shall be provided with the following minimum amenities:
i. Kitchen sink with garbage disposal.
176
65277.00001\33367195.1
Page 4 of 11
ii. A toilet and sink located in a separate room within the unit that is a minimum
twenty square feet.
iii. One closet per person.
iv. Telephone and cable TV hookups.
4. If full bathrooms are not provided in each unit, shared showers shall be provided
on each floor at a ratio of one per seven units on the same floor, with doors lockable
from the inside.
5. If full kitchens are not provided in each unit, shared kitchen facilities shall be
provided on each floor consisting of a range, sink with garbage disposal, and
refrigerator.
6. If laundry facilities are not provided in each unit, common laundry facilities shall
be provided, with one washer and one dryer on the premises.
7. On-site management shall be provided.
8. Off-street parking shall be provided at the rate of one-half spaces per unit, plus one
space for each employee on duty.
17.19.050 – Development Standards for Emergency Shelter.
A. Operational Requirements. An application for a permit to establish and operate an
emergency shelter shall be accompanied by a management and operations plan, which
shall establish hours of operation, staffing levels, maximum length of stay, size and
location of exterior and interior on-site waiting and intake areas, and security
procedures.
B. Developmental Requirements. Emergency Shelters shall conform to the following
requirements:
1. Maximum of twelve beds.
2. Minimum separation of three hundred feet between emergency shelters.
3. Facility Requirements.
i. Each occupant shall be provided a minimum of fifty square feet of personal
living space, not including space for common areas.
ii. Bathing facilities shall be provided in quantity and location as required by the
California Plumbing Code (Title 24 Part 5), and shall comply with the
accessibility requirements of the California Building Code (Title 24 Part 2).
iii. Shelters must provide a storage area for refuse and recyclables that is enclosed
by a six-foot-high landscape screen, solid wall, or fence, which is accessible to
collection vehicles on one side. The storage area must be large enough to
accommodate the number of bins that are required to provide the facility with
sufficient service so as to avoid the overflow of material outside of the bins
provided.
iv. The shelter may provide one or more of the following specific facilities and
services on site, including but not limited to:
(1) Commercial kitchen facilities designed and operated in compliance with the
California Retail Food Code;
(2) Dining area;
(3) Laundry room;
177
65277.00001\33367195.1
Page 5 of 11
(4) Recreation room;
(5) Support services (e.g. training, counseling, etc.); and
(6) Child care facilities.
v. On-Site Waiting and Intake Areas. A minimum of five percent of the total
square footage of a shelter shall be designated for indoor on-site waiting and
intake areas to accommodate drop off, intake, and pickup. In addition, an
exterior waiting area shall be provided, the minimum size of which is equal to
or larger than the minimum interior waiting and intake area.
vi. Off-Street Parking. One space of off-street parking shall be provided for each
staff person on duty.
17.19.060 – Development Standards for Multifamily Residential:
A. All multifamily residential projects shall be located west of the improved portion of
the PVPTA Facility and south of the access road.
B. All multifamily residential projects shall comply with the following development
standards:
Table 17.19.050A
Multifamily Residential Development Standards—Rancho Del Mar Housing
Opportunity Overlay Zone (RDMO)
Development
Regulation RDMO Notes
1. Minimum density
(residential uses)
1du/2,178 sq.ft. (i.e., 20
units per acre)
2. Maximum density
(residential uses)
1du/1815 sq.ft. (i.e., 24
units per acre)
3. Maximum number of
units 16 units
4. Minimum dwelling
unit size
Studio: 250 sq. ft.
1-bdrm: 400 sq. ft.
2-bdrm: 650 sq. ft.
3-bdrm: 900 sq. ft.
5. Maximum building
height 2 stories/28 ft. Minimum roof pitch: 3½:12
6. Distance between
buildings (minimum) 6 ft.
7.. front yard setback 5 ft. (min); 15 ft. (max)
8.. street side setback 5 ft. (min); 15 ft. (max)
178
65277.00001\33367195.1
Page 6 of 11
9. side setback 5 ft. (min); No max
10. rear yard setback 10 ft. (min)
11. Setback from bottom
of slope 50 ft. minimum Building pad not to exceed 10% slope.
12. Permitted setback
encroachments 6 ft. into setbacks
Balconies, awning, porches, stairways and
similar elements may extend up to 6 ft.
into the setback. Cornices, eaves,
fireplaces, similar architectural features
may extend 4 ft. into the front and rear
setbacks and 3 ft. in interior setbacks.
13. Maximum
Development site .8 acre
Landscape/open space standards
14. Common open space
(multi-family residential) 100 sq. ft. per unit
Parking Standards
15. Surface parking
20 ft. min. setback from
front lot line at
driveway entrance; 15
ft. min side yard
setback at driveway
entrance.
16. Garage/tuck-under
parking Prohibited along front
17. Underground/podium
parking
Allowed beneath
building footprint
Abbreviations: sq. ft. = square feet; ft. = feet or foot
17.19.070 – Parking regulations.
All allowed uses identified in Section 17.19.030 shall comply with the following:
A. Parking standards:
Table 17.19.070A
Parking Standards - Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay Zone (RDMO)
Use Required Number of Spaces Notes
Multi-family
residential and
condominiums
Studio - 1 space per unit
One bedroom - 1 space per unit
Two bedrooms – 1.5 spaces per unit
Per unit; Tandem
parking is allowed in
cases where multiple
179
65277.00001\33367195.1
Page 7 of 11
Three or more bedrooms - 2.5 spaces per unit
Additional guest parking 1/4 space per unit
spaces are assigned
to a single unit
Senior housing
1.0 spaces per unit for developments of 10 units or
less. For developments of 11 units or more, the
parking shall be 0.5 spaces per dwelling unit, or 10
spaces, whichever is greater. For developments of 10
or more units, 10 percent of the total required
parking shall be reserved for guest parking
Very low and low
income housing
units
1.0 space per very low or low income unit. This
parking ratio only applies to those units which are
designated for very low or low income. For
developments of 10 or more units, ten (10) percent of
the total required parking shall be reserved for guest
parking 1.1
Single Room
Occupancy
0.5 space per unit plus 1.0 space for each staff on
duty
Emergency
Shelter 1.0 space for each staff on duty
B. Reduced Parking. The Planning Commission and City Council may reduce the required
parking after considering documentation and a study provided by the applicant showing
infeasibility of providing required parking. Staff’s recommendation shall give weight
to all relevant facts, including but not limited to the following: availability and
accessibility of alternative parking; impact on adjacent residential neighborhoods;
existing or potential shared parking arrangements; the characteristics of the use,
including hours of operation and peak parking demand times; design and maintenance
of off-street parking that will be provided; and whether the proposed use is new or a
small addition to an existing use. Required parking shall comply with State law for
affordable housing units.
C. Electric Vehicle Charging Stations. In accordance with the California Green Building
Code (CALGreen Code), new buildings shall be electric vehicle charging station ready.
This requires residential properties to provide one 120V AC 20 amp and one 208/240V
40 amp, grounded AC outlet for each required parking space. The number of required
parking spaces for electric vehicle charging shall be as follows:
Table 17.17.080B
Electric Vehicle Charging Station Standards - Rancho Del Mar Housing
Opportunity Overlay Zone (RDMO)
Total Number of Spaces Number of Required Electric Vehicle Charging Spaces
1-10 1
11-20 3
180
65277.00001\33367195.1
Page 8 of 11
21-30 5
17.19.080 – Multifamily Residential Frontage type regulations.
A. Elevation of Ground Floor.
1. The elevation of the ground floor shall be elevated above the grade of the lot to
provide privacy for residences by preventing direct views into the home from the
sidewalk.
2. The ground floor elevation shall be located within five feet of the ground surface
of the adjacent sidewalk or walkway.
B. Minimum Ground Floor Ceiling Height. Ten (10) feet minimum (floor-to-floor
height).
C. Ground Floor Unit Entrances.
1. Entrances and windows shall be provided on the front of the facade to provide
eyes on the street and direct sidewalk access to the building.
2. Entrances to ground floor units that have street frontage may be provided through
a common lobby entrance and/or by private entrances from the adjacent sidewalk.
D. Upper Floor Unit Entrances. Entrances to upper floor units may be provided through
a common lobby entrance and/or by a common entrance along a facade fronting a
street.
E. Recessed Entrances. Entrances may be recessed into the facade.
F. Stoops and Front Porches.
1. Stoops and front porches may be provided in front of building and unit entrances.
2. Stoops and front porches may project up to five feet from the facade and project
into the setback.
G. Projecting Elements (Balconies, Roof Overhangs, Shade Structures, and Bay
Windows). Projecting Elements on upper floors may project four (4) feet from the
facade and project into the setback.
H. Sidewalk and Setback Treatment.
1. The public sidewalk shall be improved with street trees with an average spacing
of thirty (30) feet on-center and pedestrian-scaled lights not to exceed 30 inches in
height and maximum 25 Watts.
2. If the front facade is setback from the public sidewalk, the setback shall be
landscaped (excluding stoops/front porches and paved paths to building
entrances).
17.19.090 – Multifamily Residential usable open space regulations.
181
65277.00001\33367195.1
Page 9 of 11
A. Usable Open Space Defined. Usable open space areas are an open area or an indoor or
outdoor recreational facility which is designed and intended to be used for outdoor
living and/or recreation. Usable open space shall not include any portion of parking
areas, streets, driveways, pedestrian paths, or turnaround areas.
B. Usable Open Space Amenities/Facilities.
1. Each multifamily residential project shall include one usable open space amenity.
Each square foot of land area devoted to a usable open space amenity shall be
credited as common open space on a 1:1 basis.
2. The following listed recreational amenities satisfy the above recreational amenity
requirement:
i. Clubhouse
ii. Gym
iii. Children's playground equipment.
iv. Day care facility.
v. Other recreational amenities deemed adequate by the Planning and Community
Services Director.
17.19.100 - Multifamily Residential public space amenities requirements.
A. Each multifamily residential project shall include a public open space amenity. Each
square foot of land area devoted to a public space amenity shall be credited as common
open space on a 1:1 basis.
B. The following listed public space amenities satisfy the above public space amenity
requirement:
1. Formal Plazas. A formal plaza would be a publicly accessible open space which
has a design that is influenced by classical urban planning design. A formal plaza
would typically include some sort of central water fountain and/or symmetrical
landscaping.
2. Gardens. A garden can be located on the ground level or on upper levels of a
structure. Urban gardens include ornamental landscaping arranged in raised or at-
grade planters or planting areas, potted plants, and trees. Many times there are
sculptures or other forms of public art that are included within the urban garden.
3. Covered Colonnades. Colonnades are linear in design and generous in depth. The
intent is to provide a comfortably wide, covered pathway that is adjacent to the
openings of a building. Sometimes the second floor of a building is utilized to create
the "covered" element of the colonnade.
4. Pedestrian Alleys and Walkways. A pedestrian alley or walkway is typically a
"lane" that does not follow the alignment of a vehicular street, but provides a
pedestrian access to either a public space or some other feature within the interior
of a development. Pedestrian alleys or walkways must be designed in such a manner
so as to be inviting to pedestrians. Therefore, issues such as lighting, security, line
of sight, cleanliness and visual appeal are important considerations to a well-
designed pedestrian alley or walkway. Sometimes public art, street furniture, and
access to public spaces are features of pedestrian alleys and walkways.
182
65277.00001\33367195.1
Page 10 of 11
5. Bicycle Storage Areas. All developments shall provide common bicycle racks or
storage areas for the residents as follows: two (2) bicycle racks or storage units for
every five (5) dwelling units.
17.19.110 – Multifamily Residential Operational and Compatibility Standards
A. Trash Enclosures. Enclosures shall be required for refuse and recycling bins and there
location shall be clearly indicated on required site plan. Outside trash enclosures shall
be a minimum six (6) feet in height and shall be architecturally compatible with main
building. Enclosures are not permitted in required front yard or street side yard setback
area.
B. Landscaping. Landscaping shall comply with RHMC Chapter 13.18 (Water
Efficiency).
C. Screening and Buffering—Mechanical Equipment and Trash Facilities. All mechanical
equipment, heat, and air-conditioning equipment shall be architecturally screened from
view and buffered and trash facilities shall be screened and buffered.
D. Sound mitigation. Residential dwelling units shall be designed to be sound attenuated
against present and future project noise. New projects or new nonresidential uses in
existing projects shall provide an acoustical analysis report, by an acoustical engineer,
describing the acoustical design features of the structure required to satisfy the exterior
and interior noise standards.
Section 3. An Initial Study and Negative Declaration No. 2020-01 has been prepared,
processed, and noticed in accordance with CEQA (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.)
and the CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq.) for the
RDMO Zone. Pursuant to Section 15070, et seq of the CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds,
on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, that the proposed project
could not have a significant effect on the environment. Upon the basis of all of the evidence in
the record, the City Council finds that the Negative Declaration reflects the independent
judgment of the City Council and hereby approves the Negative Declaration.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its passage and adoption pursuant
to California Government Code section 36937.
Section 5. The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this Ordinance;
cause it to be entered into the City of Rolling Hills’s book of original ordinances; make a note of
the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting; and, within fifteen days after the passage
and adoption of this Ordinance, cause it to be published or posted in accordance with California
law.
183
65277.00001\33367195.1 Page 11 of 11
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 8TH day of March, 2021.
JEFF PIEPER MAYOR
ATTEST:
ELAINE JENG, P.E.
ACTING CITY CLERK
184
LA County - LARIAC 2014
Overlay
Overlay Zoning District - 1
Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay
Zoning
PF
RAS-1
RAS-2
185
Agenda Item No.: 5.D
Mtg. Date: 03/08/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:MEREDITH ELGUIRA, PLANNING DIRECTOR
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:JOINT PENINSULA LETTERS FOR REOPENING OF BUSINESSES AND
SB9 AND CITY'S OPPOSITION LETTERS TO SB 9 AND 10.
DATE:March 08, 2021
BACKGROUND:
The Peninsula cities submitted a joint letter proposing a more localized approach to reopening
requirements for businesses and a joint opposition letter to SB9. The letters were signed by the four
Peninsula Mayors and mailed on February 26, 2021. Additionally, the City submitted its own letters
opposing SB 9 and 10.
DISCUSSION:
None.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
ATTACHMENTS:
Final_PV Peninsula Cities_Vaccination Reopening Metric.pdf
Final SB 9 Atkins Increased Density in Single-Family Zones.pdf
RH SB 9 and 10 Letters.pdf
186
February 26, 2021
The Honorable Gavin Newsom
1303 10th Street, Suite 1173
Sacramento, CA 95814
L.A. County Board of Supervisors
Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration
500 West Temple Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
SUBJECT: Support for Including Vaccination Rate as a Metric to Reopen
Businesses
Dear Governor Newsom, Chair Solis, and Members of the Board of Supervisors:
The four cities on the Palos Verdes Peninsula, firmly joined together by a common
cause, are writing to you today to request that you consider vaccination rates as a key
metric for reopening businesses, taking a more localized approach to reopening
requirements. We have continued to support and amplify the importance of a
decentralized approach to the pandemic response, given the vast size of L.A. County.
As we begin to move closer to the red tier, we encourage the state to consider
vaccination rates, in addition to case and positivity rates, when determining tiers.
The cities of Rancho Palos Verdes, Palos Verdes Estates, Rolling Hills and Rolling Hills
Estates thank you for your continued efforts to distribute the COVID-19 vaccine as
quickly and equitably as possible. As of February 22, 2021, over 25% of the Peninsula
community have been vaccinated with the first dose of vaccine. Further, nearly 20% of
the Beach cities communities that surround the Peninsula have also been vaccinated.
This data comes directly from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health.
These vaccination rates stand in stark contrast to the county’s vaccination rate of just
over 16%. While we appreciate the significant logistical undertaking to provide
vaccinations across the county, we feel that this contrast illustrates the necessity for a
more localized approach to tier determination.
There have been no non-residential outbreaks of COVID-19 in our four cities, and no
businesses on the Peninsula have been issued a citation due to lack of compliance with
Health Officer Orders. Our businesses continue to demonstrate a commitment to
ensuring the health and well-being of their employees and customers, and this should
be a factor in determining the relative safety of the community to move into less
DocuSign Envelope ID: 96BCF895-E23C-40BE-9A79-26ACD6D55958
187
Governor Newsom and L.A. County Board of Supervisors
February 26, 2021
Page 2
restrictive tiers. Our cities and our residents are fully prepared to maintain the safety
practices that have allowed us to slow the spread of COVID-19 thus far.
As we all collectively move forward on the path to recovery, we would like to thank you
for your consideration of this request along with your continued efforts to support our
communities and the businesses that sustain them.
Sincerely,
Eric Alegria Michael Kemps
Mayor, City of Rancho Palos Verdes Mayor, City of Palos Verdes Estates
Jeff Pieper Steven Zuckerman
Mayor, City of Rolling Hills Mayor, City of Rolling Hills Estates
cc: Ben Allen, Senator, 26th State Senate District
Al Muratsuchi, Assembly Member, 66th Assembly District
Rancho Palos Verdes City Council
Palos Verdes Estates City Council
Rolling Hills City Council
Rolling Hills Estates City Council
Eileen Hupp, Palos Verdes Peninsula Chamber of Commerce
Jeff Kiernan, League of California Cities
Marcel Rodarte, Caifornia Contract Cities Association
Jacki Bacharach, South Bay Cities Council of Governments
DocuSign Envelope ID: 96BCF895-E23C-40BE-9A79-26ACD6D55958
188
February 26, 2021
The Honorable Toni Atkins
President pro Tempore, California State Senate
State Capitol Building, Room 205
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: SB 9 (Atkins) Increased Density in Single-Family Zones
Dear Senate President pro Tempore Atkins:
The Cities of Palos Verdes Estates, Rancho Palos Verdes, Rolling Hills and Rolling Hills
Estates (Peninsula Cities) strongly object to SB 9 which attempts to undermine local
authority and control. This bill will have a significant impact on how we effectively
regulate and develop as we deem appropriate for our cities.
Efforts to increase development of housing must take into consideration local values
and conditions. A one-size fits all approach does not work for the Peninsula Cities.
Increasing housing density in a Very High Fire Severity zone poses a great threat to
public health, safety and welfare. The peninsula has limited access in and out of the
area. Increasing the population could be life threatening to many of our residents and
their animals in case of an emergency.
While we appreciate efforts to ensure that all Californians have access to affordable
housing, this bill destroys local control and more significantly, it fails to take into account
our local conditions that could potentially put our residents in grave danger. The
Peninsula Cities are committed to being part of the solution to the housing shortfall
across all income levels and remain open to housing-related legislation that supports
local flexibility, decision-making, and community input. For these reasons the Peninsula
Cities oppose SB 9 (Atkins) unless it is amended to address our concerns.
Sincerely,
Eric Alegria Michael Kemps
Mayor, City of Rancho Palos Verdes Mayor, City of Palos Verdes Estates
DocuSign Envelope ID: F313F8AB-B0B1-45DC-9CCB-51E698CA5611
189
SB 9 (Atkins) Increased Density in Single-Family Zones
February 26, 2021
Page 2
Jeff Pieper Steven Zuckerman
Mayor, City of Rolling Hills Mayor, City of Rolling Hills Estates
cc: Ben Allen, Senator, 26th State Senate District
Al Muratsuchi, Assembly Member, 66th Assembly District
Jeff Kiernan, League of California Cities
Meg Desmond, League of California Cities
Marcel Rodarte, California Contract Cities Association
Palos Verdes Estates City Council
Rancho Palos Verdes City Council
City of Rolling Hills City Council
Rolling Hills Estates City Council
DocuSign Envelope ID: F313F8AB-B0B1-45DC-9CCB-51E698CA5611
190
191
192
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310)377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
March 1, 2021
The Honorable Toni Atkins
President pro Tempore, California State Senate
Capitol Building, Room 205
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: SB 9 (Atkins) Increased Density in Single-Family Zones
Dear Senate President pro Tempore Atkins:
The City of Rolling Hills strongly objects to SB 9 which attempts to undermine local authority and
control. This bill will have a significant impact on how we effectively regulate and develop as we
deem appropriate for our cities.
Efforts to increase development of housing must take into consideration local values and
conditions. A one-size fits all approach does not work for the City of Rolling Hills. Increasing
housing density in a Very High Fire Severity Zone poses a great threat to public health, safety
and welfare. The City has limited access in and out of the area. Increasing the population could
be life threatening to many of our residents and their animals in case of an emergency.
While we appreciate efforts to ensure that all Californians have access to affordable housing, this
bill destroys local control and more significantly, it fails to take into account our local conditions
that could potentially put our residents in grave danger. The City of Rolling Hills is committed to
being part of the solution to the housing shortfall across all income levels but we do not support
legislations that do not allow local flexibility, strip away rights of local jurisdictions to make their
own land use decision and prohibit community input. For these reasons the City of Rolling Hills
opposes SB 9 (Atkins).
Sincerely,
Jeff Pieper
Mayor, City of Rolling Hills
<j Printed on Recycled Paper 193
194
Agenda Item No.: 5.E
Mtg. Date: 03/08/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:MEREDITH ELGUIRA, PLANNING DIRECTOR
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:
RESOLUTION NO. 1272 (PREVIOUSLY NO. 1268) OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING THE
DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN CITY RECORDS AS PROVIDED BY
SECTION 34090 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA.
DATE:March 08, 2021
BACKGROUND:
The proposed Resolution No. 1272 Destruction of Certain City Records was previously approved under
Resolution No. 1268. Resolution No. "1268" was inadvertently used twice and the records are now
being corrected to eliminate the duplicate numbers. Resolution No. 1268 will address the Eastfield
undergrounding intention to issue bonds as approved by the City Council on January 25, 2021.
RESOLUTION NO. 1268 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO THE
MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913 AND TO ISSUE BONDS PURSUANT TO THE
IMPROVEMENT BOND ACT OF 1915, AND MAKE CERTAIN FINDINGS AND
DETERMINATIONS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, ALL RELATING TO THE FORMATION
OF CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2021-1 (EASTFIELD DRIVE
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS)
RESOLUTION NO. 1272 (PREVIOUSLY NO. 1268) OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN CITY RECORDS AS
PROVIDED BY SECTION 34090 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA.
DISCUSSION:
None.
195
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve as presented.
ATTACHMENTS:
CCResolutionNo1272.pdf
196
-1-
RESOLUTION NO. 1272
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN
CITY RECORDS AS PROVIDED BY SECTION 34090 OF THE
GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the keeping of numerous records after a certain length of time is not necessary
for the effective and efficient operation of the government of the City of Rolling Hills; and
WHEREAS, Section 34090 of the Government Code of the State of California provides a
procedure whereby any City record which has served its purpose and is no longer required may be
destroyed.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The records of the City of Rolling Hills as set forth in the attached
Destruction of Records Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit “A” are hereby authorized to be destroyed as
provided by Section 34090 of the Government Code.
Section 2. The provisions of Section 1 above do not authorize the destruction of:
a) Records affecting the title to real property or liens thereon.
b) Court records.
c)Records required to be kept by statute.
d) Records less than two years old.
e)Minutes, ordinances, or resolutions of the legislative body or a city board or
commission.
Section 3. The written consent of the City Attorney has been obtained for this
destruction.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of March, 2021
____________________________________
JEFF PIEPER
MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________
ELAINE JENG, P.E.
ACTING CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 1272 (Previously Resolution No. 1268)
197
Resolution No. 1272 (Previously Resolution No. 1268) -2-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1272 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN
CITY RECORDS AS PROVIDED BY SECTION 34090 OF THE
GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on March 8, 2021 by the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
ELAINE JENG, P.E.
ACTING CITY CLERK
CONSENT TO DESTRUCTION OF RECORDS
The undersigned, City Attorney for the City of Rolling Hills hereby consents to the
destruction of the records of the City of Rolling Hills as set forth in the attached Destruction of Records
Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit “A” as provided by Section 34090 of the Government Code.
Dated ______________
__________________________________________
MICHAEL JENKINS
CITY ATTORNEY
198
EXHIBIT A
1-7-2021
199
200
Agenda Item No.: 9.A
Mtg. Date: 03/08/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:ELAINE JENG, CITY MANAGER
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:CONSIDER AND DISCUSS AN INCENTIVE PROGRAM FOR FIRE FUEL
MANAGEMENT IN THE CANYONS.
DATE:March 08, 2021
BACKGROUND:
In November 2019, the City conducted a community survey related to emergency preparedness for
wildfire events. In the open ended survey question asking about the community's top concern, survey
responses showed residents were fearful of the amount of fire fuel in the canyons. In subsequent Block
Captain meetings, zone meetings with the community, and at City Council meetings, the consistent
feedback was that the fire fuel in the canyons needs to be abated.
Community feedback also indicated that some residents are unaware that property owners are
responsible for land management within the boundaries of their property including the canyons.
Community feedback also indicated that some residents are unaware of the City's Dead Vegetation
Ordinance. City staff has been working with the Block Captain Program to educate residents and
utilizing the Blue Newsletter to disseminate information.
The Dead Vegetation Ordinance requires residents to remove any dead vegetation on the property. To
eliminate fire fuel in the community, in 2018, the City Council decided to proactively enforce the Dead
Vegetation Ordinance by adding a full time position to inspect the community for dead vegetation.
Since 2019, City staff reports to the City Council on a quarterly basis the number of Dead Vegetation
code cases. City staff also provides these statistics in the Blue Newsletter periodically. Based on two
years of data on Dead Vegetation code cases, this approach to eliminating fire fuel in community has
been slow and in most cases require an expert to verify that the vegetation in question is determined to
be dead.
The Block Captain Program continues to focus on educating the community on their responsibilities to
their land, and also provide guidance on best practices recommended by the Los Angeles County Fire
Department. Recently, the Los Angeles County Fire Department implemented the year-round
inspections focusing on the fire fuel on the roadside. Although numerous efforts have been
implemented since 2019 to eliminate fire fuel in the community, there has been no targeted program for
201
the fire fuel in the canyons.
In November 2020, the City was awarded grant funds by FEMA/CalOES to identify priority areas in the
community for vegetation management and creating fire breaks. Working with the Los Angeles County
Fire Department to determine the priority areas, the group discussed programs that could leverage the
canyon work elsewhere in the community. The group is comprised of members of the Rolling Hills
Community Association (RHCA), members of the City Council, the Los Angeles County Fire
Department personnel, City Manager, Association Manager and the Lead Block Captains.
DISCUSSION:
The Los Angeles County Fire Department educated the group that the proper vegetation management is
not to remove all the vegetation but to strategically place them in a mosaic pattern that prevents fire
ladder. Fire ladder occurs when the fire builds momentum from dense fuel and it is even more
concerning in the canyon as the incline of the slope boosts the speed fire spread.
In consideration of all the strategies to abate fire fuel in the community currently in place, one possible
program to add to the tool box is an incentive program to eliminate fire fuel in the canyons. City staff
discussed provisions of an incentive program with the Los Angeles County Fire Department, solicited
feedback from the Block Captains and discussed constraints with the City Attorney. The Los Angeles
County Fire Department and the Block Captains expressed support for an incentive program.
Constraints discussed with the Attorney include the eligibility criteria, availability to all members of the
community, and possible types of incentives including financial contribution from the City. The
recently awarded funds from FEMA/CalOES cannot be used for the incentive program; the funds must
be used for capital improvement as outlined in the grant documents.
Similar to wildfire mitigation, the City Council highly encourages utility undergrounding by requiring
certain development projects to underground electrical lines from the residential panel to the distribution
point. The City Council also applied for grants to underground utility infrastructure and is in support of
the formation of assessment districts to fund utility undergrounding projects. Most recently, the City
Council adopted a policy to contribute funds to undergrounding utility poles that are not a part of
assessment districts. The policy was developed by a committee of the City Council. The City Council
can consider a similar process to develop the provisions of an incentive program for fire fuel
management in the canyons.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Efforts related to emergency preparedness are included in the adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2020-
2021.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council consider an incentive program to eliminate fire fuel in the
canyons, discuss elements of the program, and provide direction to staff.
ATTACHMENTS:
202
Agenda Item No.: 9.B
Mtg. Date: 03/08/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:MEREDITH ELGUIRA, PLANNING DIRECTOR
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:REPORT ON FINDINGS OF ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU)
SURVEY ADMINISTERED TO ROLLING HILLS RESIDENTS IN THE
LAST QUARTER OF 2020
DATE:March 08, 2021
BACKGROUND:
Staff administered a survey of Rolling Hills residents to evaluate opportunities for ADUs, and general
attitudes about ADUs in the community. The survey was mailed to every home in the City in October
2020 and an electronic version via SurveyMonkey was posted on the City's website. Residents
submitted surveys through mid-December. The survey was advertised on the Blue Newsletter several
times to encourage participation. One hundred ninety-seven surveys were returned, bringing the total
response rate close to 28 percent.
DISCUSSION:
The analysis of the ADU survey was prepared by Barry Miller, see attachment. The findings of the
survey was included in the revised 5th Cycle Housing Element that was submitted to HCD on February
26, 2021. It will also be used to support the City's proposal to use ADUs as a viable option to meet the
City's 6th Cycle Housing Element affordable housing obligation.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
ATTACHMENTS:
030821-ADUSurveyRHCCStaffReport.pdf
203
Page 1
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
REPORT ON FINDINGS OF ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) SURVEY
ADMINISTERED TO ROLLING HILLS RESIDENTS IN THE LAST QUARTER OF 2020
Prepared by: Barry Miller Consulting
State law requires all cities and counties in California to adopt a Housing Element as part of their General
Plans. The Housing Element must show that each community is doing its fair share to meet the region’s
housing needs and has adopted policies and regulations that implement State housing laws. The Housing
Element must also demonstrate that the City is actively engaging its residents in the development of its
policies and housing programs. Surveys are an effective way to do this, as they provide an easy
opportunity for the entire community to offer feedback.
In 2017, the State approved legislation requiring all cities and counties to allow Accessory Dwelling
Units (ADUs) and to establish streamlined permitting for ADUs meeting certain development standards.
The City of Rolling Hills adopted ADU legislation conforming to the State requirements in February
2018. In 2019, additional legislation regarding ADUs was adopted, requiring revisions to the City’s
ordinance. The additional legislation affects provisions for “Junior” ADUs (small ADUs that are
repurposed from existing habitable floor space), the number of ADUs permitted per parcel, and the City’s
ability to collect impact fees for ADUs. Rolling Hills amended its ADU ordinance in early 2020 to
implement these new requirements.
As the City of Rolling Hills prepares for its 2021-2029 Housing Element, it has an opportunity to use
ADUs to meet a portion of its State-mandated Regional Housing Needs Allocation. State law requires
that the City demonstrate the capacity for 20 very low-income units, nine low-income units, 11 moderate-
income units and five above moderate-income units (45 units total). ADUs can meet the entire moderate-
income need and a portion of the very low- and low-income need. This can avoid the need to rezone
property to multi-family housing or increase the number of units allowed in the recently created
Affordable Housing Overlay Zone.
Prior to developing possible ADU programs for City Council, Planning Commission, and community
discussion, Staff administered a survey of Rolling Hills residents to evaluate opportunities for ADUs,
and general attitudes about ADUs in the community. The survey was designed and mailed to every
home in the city in October 2020. Residents had roughly one month to return it. An option was provided
to reply electronically via SurveyMonkey.
Approximately 190 surveys were returned, for a response rate of 27 percent. Another seven surveys
were received by SurveyMonkey, bringing the total response rate to 28 percent. The survey represents
the views and experiences of more than one in four Rolling Hills households.
204
Page 2
Demographics of Survey Respondents
Figure 1 compares demographics for the survey respondents and residents in the city as a whole.
Respondents tended to be older than Rolling Hills residents as a whole and were mostly long-time
residents. About two-thirds of the respondents were 65 or older and 25 percent were 50-64. By contrast,
about 42 percent of the City’s adult residents are over 65 and 36 percent are 50-64. About 42 percent of
the respondents had lived in Rolling Hills for more than 30 years and only 20 percent had lived in the
city for less than 10 years. By contrast, about 27 percent of all residents have lived in Rolling Hills for
more than 30 years and 31 percent have lived in the city for less than 10 years.
The distribution of respondents by household size was close to the citywide average. Approximately 65
percent lived in one and two person households, which is similar to the citywide average. Only seven
percent lived in households with five or more residents, which is just below the citywide average. Of
the 194 respondents who indicated their housing tenure, 192 were owners and two were renters. This is
equivalent to one percent of the respondents, whereas renters represent about five percent of Rolling
Hills households.
Responses to the survey were completely anonymous. Respondents were given the option of phoning
the City if they had questions or wanted more information about ADUs.
205
Page 3
Figure 1: Demographics of Survey Respondents Relative to All Rolling Hills Residents
0
10
20
30
40
50
Less than 10 yrs 10-20 yrs 20-30 yrs 30+ yrs
Length of Residency in Rolling Hills
Survey Respondents All Rolling Hills Residents
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1 Person 2 Persons 3 Persons 4 Persons 5 Persons 6+ Persons
Household Size
Survey Respondents All Rolling Hills Residents
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
20-35 35-49 50-64 65+
Percent by Age Group
Survey Respondents All Rolling Hills Residents
206
Page 4
Suitability of the Property for an ADU
Question 1 asked respondents to indicate if their property contained an ADU or other habitable spaces
which could potentially be used as an ADU. Respondents were asked to check “all choices that apply,”
so the results are not additive.
Thirteen of the respondents indicated they had a legally permitted ADU on their properties with a
separate kitchen, bath, and entrance. Some of these units may have been legally created in 2018-2020
after the City adopted its ADU Ordinance, but some likely already existed and are legally classified as
guest quarters rather than permitted ADUs.
Thirty-four respondents, or roughly 25 percent of the total, indicated they had a secondary building on
their properties with an indoor kitchen, bathroom, heat and plumbing. This included guest houses/
casitas, pool houses, habitable barns, and similar features that could be considered potential ADUs even
if they are not used for habitation by another household. Ten respondents indicated they had a second
kitchen in their homes. Eighteen said they had another space in their home that could “easily be
converted” to a separate dwelling or junior ADU. While some respondents may have counted the same
space twice, roughly half indicated they had spaces on their properties with the potential to be used as
an ADU or JADU. This is further supported by the responses to Question 2 below.
Current Use of ADUs and Spaces Suitable as ADUs
Question 2 asked how the spaces described in Question 1 were being used. Only three of the respondents
indicated they were renting ADUs to a paying tenant. Seven indicated that the space was used by a
caregiver or domestic employee, while eleven had a family member or long-term occupant living in the
unit. Collectively, this represents 21 units, or just over 10 percent of the respondent households. The
remainder of the respondents with potential ADU space indicated they used these spaces for house guests
or their own families, or that the space was unoccupied or used as storage.
The survey findings indicate that ADUs (or “unintended” ADUs such as guest houses) already represent
a component of the Rolling Hills housing supply. The survey suggests that there is potential to expand
the number of permitted ADUs in the future, even without any new construction. About 15 percent of
the respondents (30 in total) indicated they had potential ADU space on their properties that was vacant
or used for storage.
Respondents were asked the square footage of the spaces they were describing. Figure 2 shows the
distribution. More than 100 responses were received, with a median size of about 600 square feet.
Respondents who had rented ADUs on their properties were given the option of reporting the rent that
was being charged. Two of the three households who indicated they had a paying tenant replied. The
monthly rents charged for these units were $950 in one case and $1,500 in another. Based on HCD
income limits for Los Angeles County, the $950 unit would be considered affordable to a very low-
income household of one or more persons. The $1,500 unit would be considered affordable to a low-
income household of one or more persons. These units are presumed to have been created or legalized
between 2018 and 2020, following adoption of the ADU ordinance.
207
Page 5
Figure 2: Square Footage of Spaces Reported by Respondents as Potential ADUs on their Properties,
Including Guest Houses
Income Characteristics of Households in Occupied Units
Those who indicated their ADU (or “unintended” ADU/ guest house/ secondary space) was occupied by
someone who was not part of their household were asked to describe the number of residents and total
income of the occupants. The numeric HCD 2020 income limits (dollar amounts) and number of persons
in the household were used so that the occupants could be easily identified using HCD’s income
categories.
There were 12 responses to this question, or about six percent of all surveys returned. This presumably
includes the small number of units that are rented as ADUs, plus those occupied by caretakers, domestic
employees, and other long-term occupants. The distribution by HCD’s income categories is shown in
Table 1 below:
Table 1
Household Size and Income of Households Occupying Formal or Unintended ADUs
Income 1 person 2 person 3 person 4 person 5 person 6+ person TOTAL
Extremely Low 1 1 2
Very Low 2 2
Low 1 1
Moderate/
Above Mod 1 4 1 1 7
TOTAL 5 4 1 1 0 1 12
The data indicates that roughly half of the survey respondents’ ADUs (including those which may be
unpermitted and used “informally” on a long-term basis) provided housing for low-, very low-, and
extremely low-income households.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
>300 301-450 451-650 651-800 801-1000 1000+Number of UnitsSquare Footage
208
Page 6
Interest in Developing an ADU
Question 4 asked respondents if they might be interested in developing an ADU if they didn’t currently
have one. There were 164 responses to this question, with 24 percent indicating “Yes” and 15 percent
indicating “Maybe.” Another 40 percent indicated “No” and 14 percent indicated “Probably Not.” The
responses are shown graphically in Figure 3 below.
The pie chart suggests that more than half of the City’s residents are not interested in developing an
ADU on their properties, and another quarter are undecided or not interested at this time. To determine
if there were regulatory barriers to construction, Question 4 included a follow up asking why respondents
were not interested. The responses suggest it is mostly a lifestyle choice rather than the result of
regulatory or cost barriers. About one-third (51) listed the loss of privacy as a factor, and another one-
third (48) indicated they didn’t want to deal with tenants. The number of respondents listing the
“permitting process” as a factor was small (27 out of 164) and the percentage listing “cost” as a factor
(24 out of 164) was even smaller. About 10 percent of the respondents cited lack of space as their reason.
Figure 3: Level of Interest in ADU development (N=164)
No (65)
40%
Probably Not
(23)
14%Not Sure (11)
7%
Maybe, but not
now (25)
15%
Yes (40)
24%
Question: If you don’t have a
legal ADU on your property,
would you consider developing
one? (164 replies)
209
Page 7
Location of Possible ADUs
Those who expressed some interest in adding an ADU were asked where they might locate the ADU on
their properties. The responses may help guide City programs. There were 85 responses, representing
more than 40 percent of all surveys returned. Conversion of an existing accessory building (such as a
guest house or barn) was the most commonly selected choice (38 responses), followed by a new detached
structure (21 responses) and conversion of existing space in the house (6 responses). Only one
respondent indicated they would build an addition to their home.
Nineteen of the respondents were not sure where they might locate an ADU. Again, a majority (about
115) were not interested in adding an ADU.
The responses suggest stronger demand for traditional ADUs than Junior ADUs, given the large number
of respondents indicating they would build or convert an accessory structure, rather than use space within
their own homes.
Likely Use of Future ADUs
Respondents were asked how they would use an ADU on their property if they developed one in the
future. The responses to this question are important, as the objective of the program is
to create housing. Using the ADU as a home office or space for occasional house guests would not
accomplish State-mandated program goals. Figure 4 shows the responses to the question.
Figure 4: Likely Use of Future ADUs (N=192)
For rent to a tenant
(16)
8%
For a family
member
(60)
31%
For
myself
(18)
9%
For an employee or
caregiver (48)
24%
For occasional
visitors (50)
25%
Other (5)
3%
Question: If you had a legal
ADU on your property, how
would you most likely use it?
(192 replies)
210
Page 8
The responses indicate that roughly one-third would use the ADU for another household, including 16
who suggested they would rent it to a tenant and 48 who suggested they would use it for a domestic
employee or caregiver. The latter statistic is important, as it suggests a potential resource for local health
care workers, elder care professionals, construction and landscape workers, and others who may work
in Rolling Hills but lack the financial resources to live here. Nearly a third of the respondents indicated
they would use the ADU for a family member. The family member could be an extension of their own
household or a relative or relatives living independently as a separate household. It is worth noting that
only a quarter of the respondents indicated they would use the ADU for occasional visitors—historically,
this has been the intended use of guest houses in the city.
Use of ADUs as Affordable Housing
Respondents were asked if they would consider limiting the rent on an ADU so that the unit was
affordable to a lower income household. The question specifically asked if the respondent would
consider a deed restriction that maintained the rent at a reduced rate (such as $1,200/ month for a two-
person household) to help the City meet its State-mandated affordable housing requirements. Of the 194
surveys returned, 25 indicated they would consider this and another 20 indicated they might consider
this (“maybe”). This represents nearly one-quarter of the total respondents. Another one-quarter
indicated they would need more information before deciding. About 35 percent indicated they would
not consider a lower income affordability restriction and 15 percent did not respond.
Figure 5 shows the responses to this question. The data suggests that an “affordable” ADU program
could generate sufficient participation for the City to meet its entire lower-income housing allocation
through ADUs.
Figure 5: Viability of ADUs to Meet Very Low Income Housing Assignment (N=194)
Yes (25)
13%
Maybe
(20)
10%
Need More Info
(53)
27%
No (68)
35%
Didn't reply (28)
15%
Question: If you
had a legal ADU
on your property,
would you
consider a deed
restriction that
maintained the
rent at a reduced
rate to help the
City meet its
State-mandated
affordable
housing
requirements?
211
Page 9
For the 98 respondents who answered “Yes”, “Maybe,” or “Need More Information”, the survey asked
a follow-up question, which is the maximum length of time the respondent would consider acceptable
for an affordability deed restriction. Two respondents did not reply, but the other 96 provided the
answers below:
• 20 would consider a 5-year term
• 2 would consider a 10-year term
• 3 would consider a 20-year term
• 17 would consider a deed restriction that ended when they sold the house
• 59 were not sure or answered “other”
The responses suggest that long-term deed restrictions (10 or 20 years) and affordability contracts that
“run with the land” would have limited participation. Residents are more open to short-term
arrangements such as five-year affordability terms, and flexible arrangements that would not encumber
the resale of their homes. This is an important consideration in the event a program is developed.
Incentives
The final question in the survey asked respondents to select from a menu of possible incentives that
might make a rent-restriction on an ADU more acceptable to them. Respondents were invited to select
as many of the choices as they wanted. The most frequently selected options are shown in descending
order in Figure 6 below.
Figure 6: Ranking of Potential Affordable ADU Incentives
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Question: What
incentives might
make a rent
restriction more
attractive to you?
212
Page 10
The most frequently selected option was “nothing.” However, 55 respondents indicated that fee waivers
or reductions would be an incentive, and 50 said expedited permitting would be an incentive. Many
respondents were also supportive of the idea of rent-restricted ADUs serving local essential service
workers such as fire-fighters and teachers. The least popular incentive was assistance in finding a tenant.
Other Comments
The survey provided an opportunity for residents to make general open-ended comments on ADUs and
housing issues in Rolling Hills, as well as the factors the City should consider as new ADU policies and
regulations are developed. Feedback was provided by 52 of the respondents. This is summarized below.
A majority of the open-ended comments expressed negative views about ADUs and their potential
impacts on the character of Rolling Hills, as well as concerns with State housing mandates and the
erosion of local land use control. Numerous concerns were raised about safety, security, and privacy.
There were also concerns expressed about noise, parking, traffic, evacuation capacity, and impacts on
the community’s rural, equestrian feel. Some respondents expressed concerns that they would not be
able to choose their own tenants if they created an ADU or would be penalized if they created an ADU
but did not rent it. Questions were also raised about property tax impacts, septic system impacts, and
whether tenants would pay association dues and have access to RHCA facilities.
There were also supportive comments, particularly from persons interested in creating ADUs for aging
parents, or for themselves to age in place while renting out their primary home. Several respondents
indicated an interest in renting space to a care giver. One respondent suggested prioritizing rentals to
employees of the RHCA. Some respondents expressed their support for the idea of using the school
property to meet affordable housing needs rather than relying on ADUs.
213
Agenda Item No.: 9.C
Mtg. Date: 03/08/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:ALAN PALERMO, PROJECT MANAGER
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:PROGRESS UPDATE ON THE ENGINEERING DESIGN OF ADA
IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR ROLLING HILLS CITY HALL
DATE:March 08, 2021
BACKGROUND:
In December 2019, the City released an RFP for Architectural and Engineering Design Services to
prepare ADA Improvement Plans for Rolling Hills City Hall, excluding building exterior path of travel.
At the January 27, 2020 City Council Meeting, City Council considered and approved a Professional
Services Agreement with Pacific Architecture and Engineering, Inc. to prepare Improvement Plans
(ADA and Space Planning) for City of Rolling Hills City Hall. A kick off meeting with Pacific
Architecture and Engineering, Inc. was held February 27, 2020.
At the May 26, 2020 City Council Meeting, City Council received a presentation from staff on the
options developed to bring the restrooms to comply with ADA and related codes.
At the July 13, 2020 City Council Meeting, City Council received a presentation from staff with
additional information to the two preferred options including opinions of probable costs of construction.
DISCUSSION:
Pacific Architecture and Engineering, Inc. is preparing the 65% plans for submittal to the City the week
of March 8, 2021. In addition to the 65% plans, they will be submitting materials and color samples for
City staff to view and make decisions on materials and colors that will be incorporated into the plans
and an updated opinion of probable costs for construction for the project.
City Staff will review the 65% plans, material samples, color samples, and make recommendations for
any proposed changes in the project before returning to Pacific Architecture, Inc. and authorize to
proceed to 90% design plans and specifications
FISCAL IMPACT:
214
The project is budgeted under the Capital Improvement Program FY / 2020-2021. There has been one
contract amendment with Pacific Architecture and Engineering, Inc. to date for this project.
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and File
ATTACHMENTS:
20200509_rollinghills_costestimate10.pdf
20200612_Council_paritition_revised.pdf
20200704_rhada_OPTION_1_2.pdf
rolling_hills_city_hall__option1_202006008_Layout1__1_.pdf
rolling_hills_city_hall__option2_202006008d_Layout1__1_.pdf
Staff_Reports.pdf
215
ROLLING HILLS CITY HALL RENOVATIONS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA
10% SCHEMATIC DESIGN COST ESTIMATE
May 9, 2020
20-06
PREPARED BY
PACIFIC ARCHITECTURE & ENGINEERING, INC.
HERMOSA BEACH, CA
Rev 0
RHWCC JOB NUMBER:
216
PACIFIC ARCH & ENG, INC.0FFICE: 310-698-8711 DATE: 05/09/20
2447 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE 218 RHW NO: 20-06
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 REV: 0
PROJECT:ROLLING HILLS CITY HALL RENOVATIONS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA
OWNER:CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
CLIENT:CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DESIGN TEAM:PACIFIC ARCHITECTURE & ENGINEERING. INC.
ARCHITECTURAL: PACIFIC ARCH & ENG
STRUCTURAL:TBD
MECHANICAL:TBD
ELECTRICAL:TBD
ESTIMATING TEAM:
ARCH/STRUCT: RW
PLUMBING:RW
ELECTRICAL:RW
CHECKED BY:JFH
ESTIMATE LEVEL:10% SCHEMATIC DESIGN COST ESTIMATE
ESTIMATE TYPE:OPINION OF COST
PLAN DATE:2020-05-06, 3 PAGES
SPEC DATE:NONE
PROJECT TYPE:ADA & NON-ADA UPGRADES
PROJECT SCOPE:
ESTIMATE BASIS:
THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS IS MODERNIZING THEIR CITY HALL BUILDING WITH ADA UPGRADES
THIS COST ESTIMATE IS DEFINED AS AN “OPINION OF COST” MEANING THAT THE COSTS REFLECTED IN THE ESTIMATE ARE THE
CONSIDERED OPINION OF THE ESTIMATOR BASED ON THE CURRENT COSTS OF MATERIAL AND LABOR, UPON INFORMATION
AVAILABLE IN PUBLISHED REFERENCE SOURCES, HISTORICAL COST DATA, CLIENT OR VENDOR PROVIDED COST DATA AND THE
PERSONAL EXPERIENCE OF THE ESTIMATOR. THE FINAL COST OF THE PROJECT MAY VARY FROM THE ESTIMATOR’S “OPINION OF COST”
BASED ON FACTORS BEYOND THE CONTROL OF THE ESTIMATOR SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE NUMBER OF GENERAL
CONTRACTORS AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS PARTICIPATING IN THE BID PROCESS; SUDDEN CHANGES IN NATIONAL AND LOCAL
MARKET CONDITIONS; THE NATIONAL AND LOCAL ECONOMY; AND DECISIONS MADE BY THE CLIENT.
Page 1 of 3 217
PACIFIC ARCH & ENG, INC.0FFICE: 310-698-8711 DATE: 05/09/20
2447 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE 218 RHW NO: 20-06
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 REV: 0
COMPETITIVE BIDDING:
ESCALATION:
WAGE RATES:
WORK SCOPE CHANGES:
PHASES:NONE
PRORATES: AREA SF: GSF
GENERAL CONDITIONS:25.0%ADA AREAS 0
DESIGN CONTINGENCY:35.0%NON-ADA AREAS 0
ESCALATION:2.1%
INSURANCE & BONDS:1.2%
OVERHEAD & PROFIT:25.0%TOTAL BUILDING AREA 0
ESCALATION:
ESCALATION (9 MONTHS TO MPC AT 3.5% P/A)
ESCALATION PER YEAR:3.5%
ESTIMATE DATE:05/09/20
START DATE:09/01/20 CONST. LEN: 6.0 MONTHS
FINISH DATE:03/01/21 MID-POINT: 7.0 MONTHS
THE PRICES IN THIS ESTIMATE ARE BASED ON COMPETITIVE BIDDING. COMPETITIVE BIDDING IS RECEIVING RESPONSIVE BIDS FROM AT
LEASTFIVEORMOREGENERALCONTRACTORSANDTHREEORMORERESPONSIVEBIDSFROMMAJORSUBCONTRACTORSOR
TRADES. MAJOR SUBCONTRACTORS ARE CONCRETE, MASONRY, STRUCTURAL STEEL, FRAMING, ROOFING, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING
AND ELECTRICAL SUBCONTRACTORS AND ANY OTHER MAJOR COMPONENTS OF THE PROJECT.
WITHOUT COMPETITIVE BIDDING, CONTRACTOR BIDS CAN AND HAVE RANGED FROM 25% TO 100% AND MORE OVER THE PRICES IN
THIS ESTIMATE, DEPENDING ON THE SIZE OF THE JOB. WITH COMPETITIVE BIDDING, CONTRACTOR BIDS CAN RANGE AS LOW AS 25%
BELOW THE PRICES IN THIS ESTIMATE BASED ON CURRENT MARKET CONDITIONS.
ESCALATION IS BASED ON 3.5% PER YEAR AND CARRIED FROM THE ESTIMATE DATE TO THE MID-POINT OF CONSTRUCTION. ONE
MAJOR FACTOR IN ESCALATION IS INFLATION AND WE MAY BE IN A PERIOD WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR EXTREME INFLATIONARY
PRESSURES. THERE ARE TOO MANY VARIABLES TO DETERMINE HOW ESCALATION WILL IMPACT ANY SPECIFIC PROJECT. THERE MAY
ONLY BE NEGLIGIBLE IMPACT OR IT MAY BE GREATER THAN PREDICTED.
THIS OPINION OF COST IS BASED ON MARKET WAGE-RATES & CONDITIONS AND CURRENTLY APPLICABLE PREVAILING WAGES IN LOS
ANGELES COUNTY.
THE USER IS CAUTIONED THAT SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN THE SCOPE OF THE PROJECT, OR ALTERATIONS TO THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS
AFTER COMPLETION OF THIS OPINION OF COST ESTIMATE CAN CAUSE MAJOR COST CHANGES. IN THIS CIRCUMSTANCE, RHWCC
SHOULD BE NOTIFIED AND AN APPROPRIATE ADJUSTMENT MADE TO THIS OPINION OF COST ESTIMATE.
Page 2 of 3 218
PACIFIC ARCH & ENG, INC.0FFICE: 310-698-8711 DATE: 05/09/20
2447 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE 218 RHW NO: 20-06
HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90254 REV: 0
SUPPLIER PROVIDED QUOTES & OTHER CONTACTS:
NONE
GENERAL EXCLUSIONS (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED):
1.ARCHITECTURAL FEES, ENGINEERING FEES & OTHER SOFT COSTS.
2.THE COST OF LAND & EASEMENT ACQUISITION.
3.ASSESSMENTS, TAXES, FINANCE, LEGAL & DEVELOPMENT CHARGES.
4.COMPRESSION OF SCHEDULE & PREMIUM OR SHIFT WORK.
5.RESTRICTIONS ON THE CONTRACTOR'S WORKING HOURS.
6.BUILDER'S RISK, PROJECT WRAP-UP & OTHER OWNER PROVIDED INSURANCE PROGRAMS.
7.SUSTAINABLE DESIGN & LEED REQUIREMENTS.
8.H AZARDOUS MATERIAL HANDLING, DISPOSAL & ABATEMENT.
9.ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MITIGATION.
10.OWNER SUPPLIED & INSTALLED FURNITURE, FIXTURES & EQUIPMENT.
11.LOOSE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED.
Page 3 of 3 219
PROJECT:ROLLING HILLS CITY HALL RENOVATIONS RHWCC JOB NO: 20-06
LOCATION:ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA PREPARED BY: RW
CLIENT:CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CHECKED BY: JFH
DESCRIPTION:PROJECT SUMMARY ESTIMATE DATE: 05/09/20
REV: 0
10% SCHEMATIC DESIGN COST ESTIMATE
TAB DESCRIPTION ADJ SF UNIT COST TOTAL
PROJECT SUMMARY
OPTION 1 - RESTROOMS & RECONFIGURATION 1,390 SF $483.04 671,420$
OPTION 2 - RESTROOMS 260 SF $1,033.31 268,660$
SPECULATIVE BID RANGE FORECAST
BASED ON CURRENT MARKET CONDITIONS
AND GENERAL CONTRACTOR BIDDER PARTICIPATION LEVELS
%OPTION 1 OPTION 2
1 - 2 GC BIDDERS 100%1,342,840$ 537,320$
2 - 3 GC BIDDERS 75%1,174,990$ 470,160$
3 - 4 GC BIDDERS 50%1,007,130$ 402,990$
4 - 5 GC BIDDERS 25%839,280$ 335,830$
5 - 6 GC BIDDERS 0%671,420$ 268,660$
6 - 7 GC BIDDERS -5%637,850$ 255,230$
7 - 8 GC BIDDERS -10%604,280$ 241,800$
8 - 9 GC BIDDERS -15%570,710$ 228,370$
10 + GC BIDDERS -20%537,140$ 214,930$
NOTE: THE BASIC CONCEPT IS THAT HISTORICALLY WITH FEWER GC BIDDERS PRICES WILL
GENERALLY RISE AND WITH MORE GC BIDDERS PRICES WILL GENERALLY FALL.
5/9/2020 Rolling Hills City Hall Renovations 10% SD Estimate Rev 0 (F-86)Page 1 of 1 220
PROJECT:ROLLING HILLS CITY HALL RENOVATIONS RHWCC JOB NO.: 20-06
LOCATION:ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA PREPARED BY: RW
CLIENT:CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CHECKED BY: JFH
DESCRIPTION:OPTION 1 - RESTROOMS & MISC. AREAS ESTIMATE DATE: 05/09/20
ADJUSTED GSF: 1,390
REV 0
10% SCHEMATIC DESIGN COST ESTIMATE
ITEM #DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL
OPTION 1
1.10 GENERAL CONDITIONS INCLUDED IN PRORATES - NONE
2.10 SITEWORK 7.1% 17.99 25,000
2.20 DEMOLITION 8.2% 20.86 28,990
3.10 CONCRETE 5.5% 13.95 19,390
6.10 CARPENTRY 7.5% 19.05 26,480
8.10 DOORS & WINDOWS 10.9% 27.68 38,480
9.10 FINISHES 18.8% 47.68 66,280
9.50 TILE 4.4% 11.28 15,680
10.10 SPECIALTIES 2.4% 6.06 8,430
15.10 PLUMBING 10.5% 26.62 37,000
15.20 FIRE PROTECTION 1.0% 2.50 3,480
15.30 HVAC 9.9% 25.00 34,750
16.10 ELECTRICAL 13.8% 35.00 48,650
TOTAL DIRECT COST $253.68 352,610$
PRORATES
GENERAL CONDITIONS 20.0%70,530
DESIGN CONTINGENCY 35.0%123,420
ESCALATION 2.1%7,410
SUBTOTAL $398.54 553,970$
CONTRACTOR BURDENS
BONDS 1.2%6,650
OVERHEAD & PROFIT 20.0%110,800
OPTION 1 - TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $483.04 671,420$
5/9/2020 Rolling Hills City Hall Renovations 10% SD Estimate Rev 0 pg4 Page 1 of 5 221
PROJECT:ROLLING HILLS CITY HALL RENOVATIONS RHWCC JOB NO.: 20-06
LOCATION:ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA PREPARED BY: RW
CLIENT:CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CHECKED BY: JFH
DESCRIPTION:OPTION 1 - RESTROOMS & MISC. AREAS ESTIMATE DATE: 05/09/20
ADJUSTED GSF: 1,390
REV 0
10% SCHEMATIC DESIGN COST ESTIMATE
ITEM #DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL
1.10 GENERAL CONDITIONS
See Prorates Above. 0.00 -
-
SUBTOTAL 1.10 $0.00 SF NONE
2.10 SITEWORK
Sewer Line, 4"150 LF 100.00 15,000
Restore Landscaping & Hardscape (Allowance)1 LS 10,000.00 10,000
-
SUBTOTAL 2.10 $17.99 SF 25,000
2.20 DEMOLITION
Mass Demolition Areas (Per SF Allowance)1,200 SF 15.00 18,000
Demo for New Restroom Concrete 224 SF 10.00 2,240
Demo Flooring Only (Per SF Allowance)190 SF 5.00 950
Haul & Disposal Fees (Allowance)1 LS 5,300.00 5,300
Sawcutting (Allowance)1 LS 2,500.00 2,500
-
SUBTOTAL 2.20 $20.86 SF 28,990
3.10 CONCRETE
New Restroom Sloping Concrete & Substrate 224 SF 35.00 7,840
Float & Level Previous Restroom Floor 70 SF 10.00 700
Concrete Curb, 6"90 LF 65.00 5,850
Misc. Concrete Work (Allowance)1 LS 5,000.00 5,000
-
SUBTOTAL 3.10 $13.95 SF 19,390
5/9/2020 Rolling Hills City Hall Renovations 10% SD Estimate Rev 0 pg4 Page 2 of 5 222
PROJECT:ROLLING HILLS CITY HALL RENOVATIONS RHWCC JOB NO.: 20-06
LOCATION:ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA PREPARED BY: RW
CLIENT:CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CHECKED BY: JFH
DESCRIPTION:OPTION 1 - RESTROOMS & MISC. AREAS ESTIMATE DATE: 05/09/20
ADJUSTED GSF: 1,390
REV 0
10% SCHEMATIC DESIGN COST ESTIMATE
ITEM #DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL
6.10 CARPENTRY
Rough Carpentry
Wood Framed Walls, 2x4 1,250 SF 10.00 12,500
Wood Framed Walls, 2x8 200 SF 12.50 2,500
Reframe (e) Door Openings 6 EA 500.00 3,000
Finish Carpentry
Lobby Reception Desk, 10 lf 1 EA 5,000.00 5,000
Misc. Finish Carpentry (Per SF Allowance)1,390 SF 2.50 3,480
-
SUBTOTAL 6.10 $19.05 SF 26,480
8.10 DOORS & WINDOWS
New Interior Doors, SC Wood, 3'x7'13 EA 2,960.00 38,480
Includes Frames & Standard Hardware -
-
SUBTOTAL 8.10 $27.68 SF 38,480
9.10 FINISHES
Wall Finishes
New Walls, 2x4 x 125 lf 1,250 SF 20.00 25,000
New Walls, 2x8 x 20 lf 200 SF 25.00 5,000
Misc. Patch & Repair (Per SF Allowance)1,390 SF 2.50 3,480
Walls include gypboard, sound batts & paint.
Flooring
Resilient Flooring 570 SF 10.00 5,700
Carpet Tiles 110 SF 10.00 1,100
Lobby Brick (Remove & Replace)380 SF 20.00 7,600
Vinyl Base, 4"410 LF 7.50 3,080
Ceilings
Acoustic Ceiling Tile, 2x4 1,060 SF 7.50 7,950
Suspended Gypboard Ceiling 224 SF 15.00 3,360
Paint Gypboard Ceiling 224 SF 2.50 560
5/9/2020 Rolling Hills City Hall Renovations 10% SD Estimate Rev 0 pg4 Page 3 of 5 223
PROJECT:ROLLING HILLS CITY HALL RENOVATIONS RHWCC JOB NO.: 20-06
LOCATION:ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA PREPARED BY: RW
CLIENT:CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CHECKED BY: JFH
DESCRIPTION:OPTION 1 - RESTROOMS & MISC. AREAS ESTIMATE DATE: 05/09/20
ADJUSTED GSF: 1,390
REV 0
10% SCHEMATIC DESIGN COST ESTIMATE
ITEM #DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL
Additional Painting
Paint/Stain Doors 13 EA 150.00 1,950
Misc. Additional Painting (Allowance)1 LS 1,500.00 1,500
-
SUBTOTAL 9.10 $47.68 SF 66,280
9.50 TILE
Ceramic Tile, Floor 224 SF 25.00 5,600
Ceramic Tile, Wainscot, 4'336 SF 30.00 10,080
-
SUBTOTAL 9.50 $11.28 SF 15,680
10.10 SPECIALTIES
Toilet Partitions & Accessories
Toilet Partition, ADA 1 EA 1,500.00 1,500
Toilet Partition, Door & Panel 1 EA 500.00 500
Coat Hooks 3 EA 75.00 230
Grab Bar Sets 2 EA 350.00 700
Mirrors 3 EA 120.00 360
Paper Towel Dispenser & Waste Combo 2 EA 750.00 1,500
Seat Cover Dispensers 3 EA 75.00 230
Soap Dispensers 3 EA 75.00 230
Toilet Paper Dispensers 3 EA 75.00 230
General Building Specialties
Corner Guards 8 EA 75.00 600
Markerboards, 6'x4'1 EA 600.00 600
TV Wall Mounting Bracket 1 EA 750.00 750
Misc. General Building Specialties (Allowance)1 LS 1,000.00 1,000
-
SUBTOTAL 10.10 $6.06 SF 8,430
5/9/2020 Rolling Hills City Hall Renovations 10% SD Estimate Rev 0 pg4 Page 4 of 5 224
PROJECT:ROLLING HILLS CITY HALL RENOVATIONS RHWCC JOB NO.: 20-06
LOCATION:ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA PREPARED BY: RW
CLIENT:CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CHECKED BY: JFH
DESCRIPTION:OPTION 1 - RESTROOMS & MISC. AREAS ESTIMATE DATE: 05/09/20
ADJUSTED GSF: 1,390
REV 0
10% SCHEMATIC DESIGN COST ESTIMATE
ITEM # DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL
15.10 PLUMBING
Toilets 3 EA 2,500.00 7,500
Urinals 1 EA 1,500.00 1,500
Lavatories 3 EA 1,000.00 3,000
Plumbing Rough-Ins 7 EA 3,500.00 24,500
Sterilization & Testing 1 LS 1,000.00 500
-
SUBTOTAL 15.10 $26.62 SF 37,000
15.20 FIRE PROTECTION
Adjust Sprinkler Heads (Per SF Allowance) 1,390 SF 2.50 3,480
-
SUBTOTAL 15.20 $2.50 SF 3,480
15.30 HVAC
Reconfigure Existing HVAC (Per SF Allowance) 1,390 SF 25.00 34,750
-
SUBTOTAL 15.30 $25.00 SF 34,750
16.10 ELECTRICAL
Reconfigure Existing Electrical (Per SF Allowance) 1,390 SF 35.00 48,650
-
SUBTOTAL 16.10 $35.00 SF 48,650
5/9/2020 Rolling Hills City Hall Renovations 10% SD Estimate Rev 0 pg4 Page 5 of 5
225
PROJECT:ROLLING HILLS CITY HALL RENOVATIONS RHWCC JOB NO.: 20-06
LOCATION:ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA PREPARED BY: RW
CLIENT:CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CHECKED BY: JFH
DESCRIPTION:OPTION 2 - RESTROOMS ONLY ESTIMATE DATE: 05/09/20
ADJUSTED GSF: 260
REV 0
10% SCHEMATIC DESIGN COST ESTIMATE
ITEM #DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL
OPTION 2
1.10 GENERAL CONDITIONS INCLUDED IN PRORATES - NONE
2.10 SITEWORK 0.0%- NONE
2.20 DEMOLITION 7.0% 35.38 9,200
3.10 CONCRETE 11.9% 60.04 15,610
6.10 CARPENTRY 4.6% 23.46 6,100
8.10 DOORS & WINDOWS 6.8% 34.15 8,880
9.10 FINISHES 12.3% 62.23 16,180
9.50 TILE 13.2% 66.81 17,370
10.10 SPECIALTIES 3.6% 18.19 4,730
15.10 PLUMBING 28.2% 142.31 37,000
15.20 FIRE PROTECTION 0.5% 2.50 650
15.30 HVAC 4.9% 25.00 6,500
16.10 ELECTRICAL 6.9% 35.00 9,100
TOTAL DIRECT COST $505.08 131,320$
PRORATES
GENERAL CONDITIONS 25.0%32,830
DESIGN CONTINGENCY 35.0%45,970
ESCALATION 2.1%2,760
SUBTOTAL $818.77 212,880$
CONTRACTOR BURDENS
BONDS 1.2%2,560
OVERHEAD & PROFIT 25.0%53,220
OPTION 2 - TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $1,033.31 268,660$
5/9/2020 Rolling Hills City Hall Renovations 10% SD Estimate Rev 0 pg4 Page 1 of 5 226
PROJECT:ROLLING HILLS CITY HALL RENOVATIONS RHWCC JOB NO.: 20-06
LOCATION:ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA PREPARED BY: RW
CLIENT:CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CHECKED BY: JFH
DESCRIPTION:OPTION 2 - RESTROOMS ONLY ESTIMATE DATE: 05/09/20
ADJUSTED GSF: 260
REV 0
10% SCHEMATIC DESIGN COST ESTIMATE
ITEM # DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL
1.10 GENERAL CONDITIONS
See Prorates Above. 0.00 -
-
SUBTOTAL 1.10 $0.00 SF NONE
2.10 SITEWORK
None -
-
SUBTOTAL 2.10 $0.00 SF NONE
2.20 DEMOLITION
Mass Demolition Areas (Per SF Allowance) 260 SF 15.00 3,900
Demo for New Restroom Concrete 260 SF 10.00 2,600
Haul & Disposal Fees (Allowance) 1 LS 1,700.00 1,700
Sawcutting (Allowance) 1 LS 1,000.00 1,000
-
SUBTOTAL 2.20 $35.38 SF 9,200
3.10 CONCRETE
New Restroom Sloping Concrete & Substrate 210 SF 35.00 7,350
Concrete Curb, 6" 104 LF 65.00 6,760
Misc. Concrete Work (Allowance) 1 LS 1,500.00 1,500
-
SUBTOTAL 3.10 $60.04 SF 15,610
5/9/2020 Rolling Hills City Hall Renovations 10% SD Estimate Rev 0 pg4 Page 2 of 5 227
PROJECT:ROLLING HILLS CITY HALL RENOVATIONS RHWCC JOB NO.: 20-06
LOCATION:ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA PREPARED BY: RW
CLIENT:CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CHECKED BY: JFH
DESCRIPTION:OPTION 2 - RESTROOMS ONLY ESTIMATE DATE: 05/09/20
ADJUSTED GSF: 260
REV 0
10% SCHEMATIC DESIGN COST ESTIMATE
ITEM # DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL
6.10 CARPENTRY
Rough Carpentry
Wood Framed Walls, 2x4 120 SF 10.00 1,200
Wood Framed Walls, Dbl 2x4 340 SF 12.50 4,250
Finish Carpentry
Misc. Finish Carpentry (Per SF Allowance) 260 SF 2.50 650
-
SUBTOTAL 6.10 $23.46 SF 6,100
8.10 DOORS & WINDOWS
New Interior Doors, SC Wood, 3'x7' 3 EA 2,960.00 8,880
Includes Frames & Standard Hardware
-
SUBTOTAL 8.10 $34.15 SF 8,880
9.10 FINISHES
Wall Finishes
New Walls, 2x4 x 12 lf 120 SF 20.00 2,400
New Walls, Dbl 2x4 x 34 lf 340 SF 25.00 8,500
Misc. Patch & Repair (Per SF Allowance) 260 SF 2.50 650
Walls include gypboard, sound batts & paint.
Ceilings
Suspended Gypboard Ceiling 210 SF 15.00 3,150
Paint Gypboard Ceiling 210 SF 2.50 530
Additional Painting
Paint/Stain Doors 3 EA 150.00 450
Misc. Additional Painting (Allowance) 1 LS 500.00 500
-
SUBTOTAL 9.10 $62.23 SF 16,180
5/9/2020 Rolling Hills City Hall Renovations 10% SD Estimate Rev 0 pg4 Page 3 of 5
228
PROJECT:ROLLING HILLS CITY HALL RENOVATIONS RHWCC JOB NO.: 20-06
LOCATION:ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA PREPARED BY: RW
CLIENT:CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CHECKED BY: JFH
DESCRIPTION:OPTION 2 - RESTROOMS ONLY ESTIMATE DATE: 05/09/20
ADJUSTED GSF: 260
REV 0
10% SCHEMATIC DESIGN COST ESTIMATE
ITEM # DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL
9.50 TILE
Ceramic Tile, Floor 210 SF 25.00 5,250
Ceramic Tile, Wainscot, 4' 404 SF 30.00 12,120
-
SUBTOTAL 9.50 $66.81 SF 17,370
10.10 SPECIALTIES
Toilet Accessories
Coat Hooks 3 EA 75.00 230
Grab Bar Sets 2 EA 350.00 700
Mirrors 3 EA 120.00 360
Paper Towel Dispenser & Waste Combo 3 EA 750.00 2,250
Seat Cover Dispensers 3 EA 75.00 230
Soap Dispensers 3 EA 75.00 230
Toilet Paper Dispensers 3 EA 75.00 230
General Building Specialties
Misc. General Building Specialties (Allowance) 1 LS 500.00 500
-
SUBTOTAL 10.10 $18.19 SF 4,730
15.10 PLUMBING
Toilets 3 EA 2,500.00 7,500
Urinals 1 EA 1,500.00 1,500
Lavatories 3 EA 1,000.00 3,000
Plumbing Rough-Ins 7 EA 3,500.00 24,500
Sterilization & Testing 1 LS 500.00 500
-
SUBTOTAL 15.10 $142.31 SF 37,000
15.20 FIRE PROTECTION
Adjust Sprinkler Heads (Per SF Allowance) 260 SF 2.50 650
-
SUBTOTAL 15.20 $2.50 SF 650
5/9/2020 Rolling Hills City Hall Renovations 10% SD Estimate Rev 0 pg4 Page 4 of 5
229
PROJECT:ROLLING HILLS CITY HALL RENOVATIONS RHWCC JOB NO.: 20-06
LOCATION:ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA PREPARED BY: RW
CLIENT:CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CHECKED BY: JFH
DESCRIPTION:OPTION 2 - RESTROOMS ONLY ESTIMATE DATE: 05/09/20
ADJUSTED GSF: 260
REV 0
10% SCHEMATIC DESIGN COST ESTIMATE
ITEM # DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL
15.30 HVAC
Reconfigure Existing HVAC (Per SF Allowance) 260 SF 25.00 6,500
-
SUBTOTAL 15.30 $25.00 SF 6,500
16.10 ELECTRICAL
Reconfigure Existing Electrical (Per SF Allowance) 260 SF 35.00 9,100
-
SUBTOTAL 16.10 $35.00 SF 9,100
5/9/2020 Rolling Hills City Hall Renovations 10% SD Estimate Rev 0 pg4 Page 5 of 5
230
PROJECT:ROLLING HILLS CITY HALL RENOVATIONS RHWCC JOB NO: 20-06
LOCATION:ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA
CLIENT:CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DESCRIPTION:PROJECT SUMMARY ESTIMATE DATE: 06/12/20
REV: 0
Moveable counter and partition
TAB DESCRIPTION ADJ SF UNIT COST TOTAL
PROJECT SUMMARY
Moveable counter and partition 80 SF $205.88 16,470$
SPECULATIVE BID RANGE FORECAST
BASED ON CURRENT MARKET CONDITIONS
AND GENERAL CONTRACTOR BIDDER PARTICIPATION LEVELS
% Partition
1 - 2 GC BIDDERS 100% 32,940$
2 - 3 GC BIDDERS 75% 28,830$
3 - 4 GC BIDDERS 50% 24,710$
4 - 5 GC BIDDERS 25% 20,590$
5 - 6 GC BIDDERS 0% 16,470$
6 - 7 GC BIDDERS -5% 15,650$
7 - 8 GC BIDDERS -10% 14,830$
8 - 9 GC BIDDERS -15% 14,000$
10 + GC BIDDERS -20% 13,180$
NOTE: THE BASIC CONCEPT IS THAT HISTORICALLY WITH FEWER GC BIDDERS PRICES WILL
GENERALLY RISE AND WITH MORE GC BIDDERS PRICES WILL GENERALLY FALL.
6/12/2020 Partition 20200612 (F-86) Page 1 of 1
231
PROJECT:ROLLING HILLS CITY HALL RENOVATIONS RHWCC JOB NO.: 20-06
LOCATION:ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA
CLIENT:CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DESCRIPTION:Moveable Partition at Council Chamber ESTIMATE DATE: 06/12/20
ADJUSTED GSF: 80
REV 0
Moveable counter and partition
ITEM # DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL
1.10 GENERAL CONDITIONS INCLUDED IN PRORATES - NONE
2.10 SITEWORK 0.0% - NONE
2.20 DEMOLITION 19.4% 25.00 2,000
3.10 CONCRETE 0.0% - NONE
6.10 CARPENTRY 58.3% 75.00 6,000
8.10 DOORS & WINDOWS 4.9% 6.25 500
9.10 FINISHES 6.8% 8.75 700
9.50 TILE 10.7% 13.75 1,100
10.10 SPECIALTIES 0.0% - NONE
15.10 PLUMBING 0.0% - NONE
15.20 FIRE PROTECTION 0.0% - NONE
15.30 HVAC 0.0% - NONE
16.10 ELECTRICAL 0.0% - NONE
TOTAL DIRECT COST $128.75 10,300$
PRORATES
GENERAL CONDITIONS 20.0% 2,060
DESIGN CONTINGENCY 10.0% 1,030
ESCALATION 1.8% 190
SUBTOTAL $169.75 13,580$
CONTRACTOR BURDENS
BONDS 1.2% 170
OVERHEAD & PROFIT 20.0% 2,720
- TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $205.88 16,470$
6/12/2020 Partition 20200612 Page 1 of 2
232
PROJECT:ROLLING HILLS CITY HALL RENOVATIONS RHWCC JOB NO.: 20-06
LOCATION:ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA
CLIENT:CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DESCRIPTION:Moveable Partition at Council Chamber ESTIMATE DATE: 06/12/20
ADJUSTED GSF: 80
REV 0
Moveable counter and partition
ITEM # DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL
1.10 GENERAL CONDITIONS
See Prorates Above. 0.00 -
SUBTOTAL 1.10 $0.00 SF NONE
2.20 DEMOLITION
Mass Demolition Areas (Per SF Allowance) 80 SF 15.00 1,200
Haul & Disposal Fees (Allowance) 1 LS 800.00 800
SUBTOTAL 2.20 $25.00 SF 2,000
6.10 CARPENTRY
Rough Carpentry
Reframe (e) - EA - -
Finish Carpentry
Lobby Reception Desk, 10 lf 1 EA 6,000.00 6,000
SUBTOTAL 6.10 $75.00 SF 6,000
8.10 DOORS & WINDOWS
New moveable partition 1 EA 500.00 500
SUBTOTAL 8.10 $6.25 SF 500
9.10 FINISHES
Wall Finishes
Misc. Patch & Repair (Per SF Allowance) 80 SF 2.50 200
Misc. Additional Painting (Allowance) 1 LS 500.00 500
SUBTOTAL 9.10 $8.75 SF 700
9.50 TILE
Ceramic Tile, Floor 44 SF 25.00 1,100
SUBTOTAL 9.50 $13.75 SF 1,100
6/12/2020 Partition 20200612 Page 2 of 2
233
Pacific Architecture and Engineering, Inc.
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CITY HALL
FEE FOR OPTION 1 AND 2
July 1, 2020
Pacific Architecture and Engineering(PAC) Design Team understands the Scope of Work to be:
OPTION 1
Option 1 creates new ADA compliant restrooms adjacent to lobby. Reception area is reconfigured to
have a moveable reception desk and partition. Copy Room is relocated, and Meeting Room, and Coffee
Room is created where existing restrooms are located. Electrical Room and Water heater are relocated.
Fee: $61,272.00
OPTION 2
Restrooms are reconfigured to have one ADA compliant all gender restroom and two additional all
gender restrooms where current restrooms are located. Electrical Room, Coffee area and water heater
are relocated.
Fee: $28,513.00
Task 1 – Programming
The Design Team will first conduct a site visit, field measure and create as-builts that capture the
dimensions required for ADA compliant upgrades as identified in the third party survey.
The new 2019 California Building Code Chapter 11b shall be applied towards ADA upgrades and the
Design Team will recommend the most feasible way to complete ADA upgrades. There may be more
than one way to achieve ADA compliance and the Design Team will discuss alternatives with the City.
Please note that ADA compliance not listed in the survey may be triggered.
If Cost Estimate is beyond City’s expectations, City and Design Team will discuss options for the Scope of
Work.
• Review of draft Accessibility Survey/Transition Plan, research code, site visits, field measurements
• Schematic plans/concept plans
• Coordination and up to 3 meetings with City Staff / City’s designated Project Manager
• A preliminary cost estimate (order of magnitude) will be prepared on schematic/concept plans
approved by the City.
Task 2 – Construction Documents(Plans), Specifications, Estimates
In this phase the drawings will be further developed, with a demolition plan, door schedule, door
hardware, threshold details restroom plans, restroom partition details, fixture details, ADA mounting
heights, ADA signage details, accessory details.
234
Pacific Architecture and Engineering, Inc.
The restroom reconfiguration shall show relocation of fixtures requiring trenching of of slab on grade,
relocation of partitions, electrical fixtures and venting if necessary.
The design team will discuss construction phasing expectations for the project with the City.
• Provide 90% Construction Documents, Specifications, and Construction Cost Estimate based on
approved Schematic Plans for City review
• Provide a draft construction phasing plan to allow the City to implement the entirety of
improvements in phases if required
• Provide 100% Construction Documents, Specifications, and Construction Cost Estimate addressing
City comments on the 90% submittal City review and approval
• Provide final 100% Construction Documents, Specifications, and Construction Cost Estimate address
any City comments on the 100% submittal
• Provide final construction phasing plan
• Coordination and up to 2 meetings with City Staff / City’s designated Project Manager
Task 3 – Bid Support
Assist the City in preparation of Bid Package and provide responses to questions received during the bid
phase.
Task 4 – Construction Support
Construction Support services during construction of the improvements from the approved final
Construction Documents and Specifications including but not limited to.:
• Attend 3 meetings during construction phase
• Respond to Requests for Information (RFI)
• Plan interpretation
• Review and provide recommendations to Change Order requests
• Review Submittals and its conformance to plans and Specifications
• Prepare as-builts
Notes: This proposal assumes the project has no federal funding or is associated with any Federal Entity.
Geotechnical Report, Lead and Asbestos Testing and Remediation
This proposal assumes there are no major structural modifications necessary and no bearing walls are
affected, and whole building structural calculations are not necessary. Fees are estimated on a Time and
Material basis. City shall provide utility survey.
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
COUNCIL CHAMBER
LOBBY
RECEPTION
CITY MANAGER
ARCHITECTURAL ROOM
WORKROOM
ARCHITECTURAL VAULT
HT:8'2"
23'-734"
11'-7"HT:8'2"
15'-818"
2'-218"
CASEWORK
CASEWORK 3'6" high
10'-1"
31'-6"
31'-4"
20'-10"15'-5"
23'-6"
EACH DOOR 3'
32'-6"
31'-7"
5'
CEILING 8 '2"
10'-6"
3'-5"
3'-612"
15'-5"
15'-634"
11'
32'-6"
24'-6"
15'-012"
DOOR 2-10WIDE, 7'9 HIGHT
3'-10"
GLASS WALL WOOD FRAME
15'-6"
CASEWORK 3'6" high
13'-6"
CLOSET
BOOK KEEPER CITY CLERK\
412"
3'-334"
6'-10"
23'-9"16'-034"
3'-678"6'-734"
10'-214"6'-012"6'-012"
3'-1"
3'-512"
3'-012"
2'-2"
10'-814"
4'-134"
1'-712"
ITWATER HEATERCOFFEE
WOMEN
ADA
ALL GENDER
Radius Radius
Radius Radius
6'-114"
2'-812"
4'-8"RadiusRadiusADA
MENS MEN
COMPARISON OF SIZE
243
LOBBY
RECEPTION
CITY MANAGER
ARCHITECTURAL ROOM
WORKROOM
ARCHITECTURAL VAULT
HT:8'2"
23'-734"
11'-7"HT:8'2"
15'-818"
2'-218"
CASEWORK
CASEWORK 3'6" high
10'-1"
31'-6"
31'-4"
20'-10"15'-5"
23'-6"
EACH DOOR 3'
32'-6"
31'-7"
5'
3'-5"
3'-612"
15'-5"
15'-634"
11'
32'-6"
24'-6"
15'-012"
3'-10"
15'-6"
CASEWORK 3'6" high
13'-6"
BOOK KEEPER CITY CLERK\
412"
ALL GENDER RadiusRadius
ADARadiusRadiusRadiusRadiusALL
ALL
DISPLACED
IT PHONE DATA
WATER HEATER
COFFEE
REFRIGERATOR
GENDER
GENDER
PUBLIC RESTROOM
DOORS OPEN OUT TO
HALL WAY ODOR NOISE
ISSUES, NOT ENOUGH
ROOM FOR DOUBLE
DOOR
10'-818"
23'-778"
11'-6"
5'-318"5'-914"
244
COUNCIL CHAMBER
LOBBY
RECEPTION
CITY MANAGER
ARCHITECTURAL ROOMARCHITECTURAL VAULT
23'-734"
11'-7"HT:8'2"
2'-218"
CASEWORK
31'-6"
23'-6"
EACH DOOR 3'
32'-6"
31'-7"
5'
CEILING 8 '2"
10'-6"
3'-5"
3'-612"
15'-634"
11'
32'-6"
24'-6"
15'-012"
CLOSET
BOOK KEEPER CITY CLERK\
412"
3'-678"6'-112"
10'-214"6'-012"6'-012"
3'-8"
3'-512"
3'-012"
2'-2"
10'-814"
4'-134"
1'-712"
ITWATER HEATERCOFFEE
MENSWOMEN
ONE NEW AT LOBBY
RadiusRadiusADA
COPY
ALL GENDER
EXISTING CORRIDOR
WIDTHS DO NOT MEET
BUILDING CODE SO
WALLS NEED TO BE
DEMO'D AND WOULD
NEED TO BE WIDENED
IF PLUMBING IS ROUTED
HERE, CONSIDER
MOVING RESTROOMS
AND CAPTURE SPACE
AT EXISTING
RESTROOMS
CONVERT TO SINGLE
USER
CONVERT TO SINGLE
USER
245
LOBBY
RECEPTION
CITY MANAGER
OFFICE
COPY
BOOK KEEPER CITY CLERK
WOMEN
ADA
ALL GENDER
Radius Radius
Radius Radius
6'-114"
2'-812"
4'-8"Radius
RadiusADA
STORAGEMEETING
7'-738"10'-214"
COFFEE IT
PUBLIC
RESTROOM TO
BE SEPARATED
FROM PRIVATE
SPACE
THIS COULD BE
SEPARATED
INTO TWO ALL
GENDERS BUT
WOULD BE
MORE COSTLY
MORE WALLS
VS TOILET
COMPARTMENTS 21'-434"
12'-018"
SEPARATION OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
246
247
COUNCIL CHAMBER
LOBBY
RECEPTION
CITY MANAGER
ARCHITECTURAL ROOM
WORKROOM
ARCHITECTURAL VAULT
HT:8'2"
23'-734"
11'-7"HT:8'2"
15'-818"
2'-218"
CASEWORK
CASEWORK 3'6" high
10'-1"
31'-6"
31'-4"
20'-10"15'-5"
23'-6"
EACH DOOR 3'
32'-6"
31'-7"
CEILING LOW 8 '7.5"
CEILING HIGH 13'9"
5'
3'-5"
3'-612"
15'-5"
15'-634"
11'
32'-6"
24'-6"
15'-012"
DOOR 2-10WIDE, 7'9 HIGHT
3'-10"
SLIDING DOOR 3' LEAVES
GLASS WALL WOOD FRAME
15'-6"
CASEWORK 3'6" high
13'-6"
BOOK KEEPER CITY CLERK\
412"
3'-512"WOMEN
ADA
ALL GENDER
Radius Radius
Radius Radius
6'-114"
2'-812"
4'-8"RadiusRadiusADA
3'-378"
NOT ENOUGH SPACE IN FRONT OF DOOR
PER CODE
20'-612"
10'-818"
THIS ORIENTATION DOESNT FIT
248
249
250
251
Agenda Item No.: 11.A
Mtg. Date: 03/08/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:CONNIE VIRAMONTES , ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION (CPUC) RULE 20A
TARIFF PROGRAM. (VERBAL REPORT)
DATE:March 08, 2021
BACKGROUND:
None.
DISCUSSION:
None.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
ATTACHMENTS:
252
Agenda Item No.: 12.A
Mtg. Date: 03/08/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:CONNIE VIRAMONTES , ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6
CITY’S DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE: MAYOR JEFF PIEPER
UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEE: CITY MANAGER ELAINE JENG
DATE:March 08, 2021
BACKGROUND:
None.
DISCUSSION:
None.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
RECOMMENDATION:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
253
Agenda Item No.: 12.B
Mtg. Date: 03/08/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:MEREDITH ELGUIRA, PLANNING DIRECTOR
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: INITIATION OF
LITIGATION
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(d)(4)
THE CITY FINDS, BASED ON THE ADVICE FROM LEGAL COUNSEL,
THAT DISCUSSION IN OPEN SESSION WILL PREJUDICE THE
POSITION OF THE CITY IN THE LITIGATION.
NUMBER OF POTENTIAL CASES: 1
DATE:March 08, 2021
BACKGROUND:
None.
DISCUSSION:
None.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
254
RECOMMENDATION:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
255