01-25-2021_CCAgendaPacket1.CALL TO ORDER
2.ROLL CALL
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX (310) 377-7288
AGENDA
Regular Council Meeting
CITY COUNCIL
Monday, January 25, 2021
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
7:00 PM
This meeting is held pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on
March 17, 2020.
All Councilmembers will participate by teleconference. The meeting agenda is available on the City’s
website. A live audio of the City Council meeting will be available on the City’s website. Both the
agenda and the live audio can be found here: https://www.rolling-
hills.org/government/agenda/index.php.
Members of the public may observe and orally participate in the meeting via Zoom and or submit
written comments in real-time by emailing the City Clerk’s office at cityclerk@cityofrh.net. Your
comments will become part of the official meeting record. You must provide your full name, but please
do not provide any other personal information that you do not want to be published.
Zoom access: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87227175757?
pwd=VzNES3Q2NFprRk5BRmdUSktWb0hmUT09 Or dial (669) 900-9128
meeting ID: 872 2717 5757 passcode: 780609
Audio recordings to all the City Council meetings can be found here:
https://cms5.revize.com/revize/rollinghillsca/government/agenda/index.php
While on this page, locate the meeting date of interest then click on AUDIO. Another window will
appear. In the new window, you can select the agenda item of interest and listen to the audio by hitting
the play button. Written Action Minutes to the City Council meetings can be found in the AGENDA,
typically under Item 4A Minutes. Please contact the City Clerk at 310 377-1521 or email at
cityclerk@cityofrh.net for assistance.
Next Resolution No. 1271 Next Ordinance No. 370
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
1
3.OPEN AGENDA - PUBLIC COMMENT WELCOME
This is the appropriate time for members of the public to make comments regarding the items on
the consent calendar or items not listed on this agenda. Pursuant to the Brown Act, no action will
take place on any items not on the agenda.
4.CONSENT CALENDAR
Matters which may be acted upon by the City Council in a single motion. Any Councilmember may
request removal of any item from the Consent Calendar causing it to be considered under Council
Actions.
4.A.MINUTES: REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 11, 2021.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented.
4.B.PAYMENT OF BILLS.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented.
4.C.TONNAGE REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER, 2020.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented.
4.D.REPUBLIC SERVICES' 2021 CLEAN-UP SCHEDULE.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented.
4.E.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2020
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File
5.COMMISSION ITEMS
NONE.
6.PUBLIC HEARINGS
6.A.CONSIDER ORDINANCE NO. 369, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 17
(ZONING) OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADDÂ CHAPTER
17.19 (RANCHO DEL MAR HOUSING OPPORTUNITY ZONE) ESTABLISHING AN
OVERLAY ZONE TO ACCOMMODATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND
AMENDING SECTION 17.08.010 OF CHAPTER 17.08 (ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONES
AND BOUNDARIES) TO IDENTIFY THE OVERLAY ON THE ZONING MAP;Â AND
APPROVING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; AND CONSIDER RESOLUTION
NO. 1270 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, ADOPTING
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2020-01 TO THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
GENERAL PLAN, AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN TO ADOPT THE
LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT AND LAND USE POLICY MAP
AMENDMENT; AND APPROVING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
RECOMMENDATION: Open the public hearing, take public testimony, and continue
2021-01-11_CCMinutes v4.docx
Check Voucher Register - Council Report Expenditures from 1-25-2021.pdf
12.20 Rolling Hills Tonnage Report.pdf
Budget Comparative 12-31-20.pdf
2
the public hearing to February 8, 2021.
7.OLD BUSINESS
7.A.CONSIDER EASTFIELD UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING PROJECT ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT INITIATION OF PROPERTY OWNERS VOTING PROCESS.
RECOMMENDATION:
(1) Adopt Resolution No. 1268, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rolling
Hills, California, Declaring Its Intention to Take Proceedings Pursuant to the
Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 and to Issue Bonds Pursuant to the Improvement
Bond Act of 1915, and Make Certain Finding and Determinations in Connection
Therewith, All Relating to the Formation of City of Rolling Hills Assessment District
No. 2021-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements); and
(2) Adopt Resolution No. 1269, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rolling
Hills, California, Preliminarily Approving the Assessment Engineer’s Report and
Fixing the Time and Place of the Public Hearing for City of Rolling Hills Assessment
District No. 2021-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
7.B.CONSIDER JOINING THE PENINSULA ENHANCED WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM (EWMP).
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council (1) receive a presentation on the basis and
timing for participation in the Peninsula EWMP; (2) consider the choice of actions
evaluated by McGowan Consulting; and (3) provide direction to staff.
7.C.ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 365 OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA
PROHIBITING SMOKING IN AND ON PUBLIC PROPERTY AND IN AND ON
PRIVATE EASEMENTS, ROADS, AND TRAILS BY ADDING CHAPTER 8.40
(SMOKING PROHIBITED) TO TITLE 8 (HEALTH AND SAFETY) OF THE ROLLING
HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE; AND FINDING THE SAME EXEMPT FROM THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
Ordinance 369 Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay.docx
City Council Resolution 1270 Land Use Element Amendment.doc
ROLLING HILLS - Land Use Element-c1-c1.DOCX
Initial_Study_Neg_Declaration_RDMO.pdf
Comments_Received.pdf
Overlay_Zoning_Map.pdf
PC Reso 2020-09.pdf
PC Reso 2020-10.pdf
Signed Preliminary Engineer's Report Eastfield Undergrouding_Rolling Hills_01.25.21.pdf
Rolling Hills_Eastfield_CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY OF PETITION_03.03.20.pdf
Resolution 1268 Intention.docx
Resolution 1269 Fixing Date of Public Hearing (2).docx
Assessment District Boundary Map.pdf
EWMP_Decision_2021.01.25(Final).pptx
3
RECOMMENDATION: Waive full reading and adopt ordinance of the City Council
of the City of Rolling Hills adding Chapter 8.40 (Smoking Prohibited); and finding the
same exempt from CEQA.
7.D.ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 367 OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA,
REPEALING SECTIONS 10.12.050 (AUTHORITY OF GATE GUARDS) AND
10.12.060 (UNAUTHORIZED TRAFFIC DIRECTION PROHIBITED) OF CHAPTER
10.12 (TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY) OF TITLE 10 (VEHICLES AND
TRAFFIC); AND AMENDING CHAPTER 9.40 (TRESPASS) AND CHAPTER 9.44
(ENTERING PRIVATE PROPERTY UNDER FALSE PRETENSES) OF TITLE 9
(PUBLIC PEACE, MORALS AND WELFARE) OF THE ROLLING HILLS
MUNICIPAL CODE; AND FINDING THE SAME EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
REC OMM ENDATIO N : Waive full reading and adopt the ordinance of the City
Council of the City of Rolling Hills repealing sections 10.12.050 and 10.12.060 and
amending Chapter 9.40 and Chapter 9.44 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code; and
finding the same exempt from CEQA.
7.E.ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 368 OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA
AMENDING TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL
CODE TO ADD CHAPTER 17.48 (TEMPORARY USE PERMITS) ESTABLISHING
REGULATIONS OF CERTAIN TEMPORARY USES WITHIN THE CITY; AND
FINDING THE SAME EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT.
REC OMM ENDATIO N : Waive full reading and adopt the ordinance of the City
Council of the City of Rolling Hills amending Title 17 (Zoning) of the City of Rolling
Hills Municipal Code to add Chapter 17.48 (Temporary Use Permits) establishing
regulations of certain temporary uses within the City; and finding the same exempt
from CEQA.
8.NEW BUSINESS
9.MATTERS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS
10.MATTERS FROM STAFF
10.A.FIRE FUEL ABATEMENT ENFORCEMENT CASES QUARTERLY REPORT FOR
THE FOURTH QUARTER OF 2020 (OCTOBER 1 THROUGH DECEMBER 31).
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file as presented.
10.B.UPDATE REPORT ON THE PROGRESS OF THE SAFETY ELEMENT FUNDED BY
HAZARD MITIGATION PROGRAM GRANT FROM FEMA/CALOES (ORAL).
RECOMMENDATION: NONE.
Ordinance_365_Smoking_Ban_Final.pdf
Ordinance_367_Regulating_Trespass_and_Repealing_Gate_Attendant_Sections_Final.pdf
Ordinance_368_Temporary_Use_Permits_Final.pdf
4th Quarter Closed Code Cases.pdf
4th Quarter Open Code Chronological.pdf
4th Quarter Open Code Alphabetical 1.21.21.pdf
4
10.C.UPDATE REPORT ON ENGINEERING DESIGN OF 8' SEWER MAIN LINE ALONG
PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD AND ROLLING HILLS ROAD (ORAL).
RECOMMENDATION: NONE.
10.D.UPDATE ON VEGETATION MANAGEMENT/FIRE FUEL BREAKS FUNDED BY
HAZARD MITIGATION PROGRAM GRANT FROM FEMA/CALOES (ORAL).
RECOMMENDATION: None.
10.E.UPDATE ON HOUSING AND LAND USE SENATE BILL 9 (ATKINS) AND SENATE
BILL 10 (WIENER) (ORAL).
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.
11.CLOSED SESSION
NONE.
12.ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Monday, February 8, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. via Zoom.
Zoom access: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87227175757?
pwd=VzNES3Q2NFprRk5BRmdUSktWb0hmUT09 Or dial (669) 900-9128,
Meeting ID: 872 27175757 Passcode: 780609
Notice:
Public Comment is welcome on any item prior to City Council action on the item.
Documents pertaining to an agenda item received after the posting of the agenda are available for review in the City
Clerk's office or at the meeting at which the item will be considered.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting
due to your disability, please contact the City Clerk at (310) 377-1521 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to enable the
City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility and accommodation for your review of this agenda and
attendance at this meeting.
5
Agenda Item No.: 4.A
Mtg. Date: 01/25/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:MEREDITH ELGUIRA, PLANNING DIRECTOR
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:MINUTES: REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 11, 2021.
DATE:January 25, 2021
BACKGROUND:
NONE.
DISCUSSION:
NONE.
FISCAL IMPACT:
NONE.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve as presented.
ATTACHMENTS:
2021-01-11_CCMinutes v4.docx
6
MINUTES OF A
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA
MONDAY, JANUARY 11, 2020
1.CALL TO ORDER
The City Council of the City of Rolling Hills met in a regular meeting via Zoom
Teleconference on the above date at 7:00 p.m. via teleconference.
Mayor Pieper presiding.
2.ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, Wilson, and Black.
Absent: None
Staff Present:Elaine Jeng, City Manager
Meredith T. Elguira, Planning & Community Services Director
Jane Abzug, Assistant City Attorney
Terry Shea, Finance Director
3.OPEN AGENDA-PUBLIC COMMENT WELCOME
Resident Alfred Visco commented about an article that he read in the Palos Verdes Peninsula
News. The article was about a wildfire detecting camera system that was used by Cal Fire. He
would like to know if the City of Rolling Hills would consider using this system.
4.CONSENT CALENDAR
A. MINUTES: 1) REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 23, 2020; AND 2)
REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 14, 2020.
MOTION:It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer and seconded by Councilmember
Wilson to approve the amended meeting minutes.
AYES:COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, and Wilson
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Black
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
B. PAYMENT OF BILLS
C. REPUBLIC SERVICES RECYCLING TONNAGE REPORT FOR NOVEMBER
2020.
D. ANNUAL VENDOR LIST FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2021
7
Minutes 2
City Council Regular Meeting
January 11, 2021
F. CITY COUNCIL BUDGET CALENDAR FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-2022.
G. RESOLUTION 1268: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THECITY
OF ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OFCERTAIN CITY
RECORDS AS PROVIDED BY SECTION 34090 OF THEGOVERNMENT CODE
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
H. RECEIVE AND FILE ANNUAL REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019-2020TO THE
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROLBOARD AS
MANDATED BY THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUNICIPALSTORM WATER
PERMIT ORDER NO. R4-2012-0175, AMENDED BYORDER NO. WQ 2015-0075.
I. RECEIVE AND FILE COMMENT LETTERS TO THE LOS
ANGELESREGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD ON THE
DRAFTMS4 PERMIT AND THE MACHADO LAKE TMDLs.
MOTION: It was moved by Councilmember Black and seconded by Councilmember Wilson
to approve as presented 4B, 4C, 4D, 4F, 4G, 4H, 4I.
AYES:COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, Black, and Wilson
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
E. CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2021.
MOTION: It was moved by Councilmember Wilson and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Dieringer to approve 4E as presented with the addition of December 20, 2021 regular meeting.
AYES:COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, Black, and Wilson
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
J. CONTRACT AMENDMENT FOR CSG PLANNING CONSULTANT.
MOTION:It was moved by Mayor Piper and seconded by Council Member Wilson to
approve as presented and hold future discussion on contract amendment agenda placement.
AYES:COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, and Wilson
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Black
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
5.COMMISSION ITEMS
NONE.
8
Minutes 3
City Council Regular Meeting
January 11, 2021
6.PUBLIC HEARINGS
NONE.
7.OLD BUSINESS
NONE.
8.NEW BUSINESS
A. CONSIDER AND APPROVE A PROFFESIONAL SERVICES AGGREMMENT
WITH THE PECKHAM AND MCKENNEY INC. FIR RECRUITMENT
SERVICES.
MOTION:It was moved by Councilmember Mirsch and seconded by Councilmember
Wilson to enter into an agreement with Peckham and Mckenny Inc.
AYES:COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, Black and Wilson
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS
B. CONSIDER AND APPROVE AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA JOINT
POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY (CJPIA) FOR A LOAN TO FUND THE
CITY HALL AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA)
IMPROVEMENTS.
MOTION:It was moved by Councilmember Wilson and seconded by Councilmember
Mirsch to submit a loan application to CJPIA for the funding the City Hall ADA improvement
project.
AYES:COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, Black and Wilson
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
C. CONSIDER AND APPROVE AN AMENDED AGREEMENT WITH PACIFIC
ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING INC. TO PROVIDE DESIGN OF AN
EMERGENCY STANDBY GENERATOR FOR THE CITY HALL CAMPUS.
Resident Alfred Visco recommended the use of backup batteries to energize the City Hall
Campus during a power outage.
Assistant City Attorney Jane Abzug clarified the motion to amend No. 2 Paragraph 3 to an
amount not to exceed $40,840.59 and strike everything in Exhibit A Part 2 with exception of
the Assessment Box.
MOTION:It was moved by Councilmember Mirsch and seconded by Councilmember
Wilson to move forward as counsel defines.
9
Minutes 4
City Council Regular Meeting
January 11, 2021
AYES:COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, Black and Wilson
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
D. DISCUSS AND EVALUATE CURRENT LIST OF CITY COUNCIL AD HOC
SUBCOMMITEES.
MOTION:It was moved by Councilmember Black and seconded by Councilmember Mirsch
that the Fire Fuel Reduction Ad Hoc Committee become a Standing Committee.
AYES:COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, Wilson, and Black
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
9. MATTERS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL AND MEETING ATTENDANCE
REPORTS
Councilmember Dieringer recommended that staff agendize SB9 and SB10 for discussion for
the next City Council meeting.
10. MATTERS FROM STAFF
Assistant City Attorney Jane Abzug reported that the City, Brunner and Nakamura Mediation
will occur on Friday, January 15, 2021. Staff will report back.
11. CLOSED SESSION
NONE.
12. ADJOURNMENT
Hearing no further business before the City Council, Mayor Pieper adjourned the meeting at
8:41 PM. Next regular meeting: Monday, January 25, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. via City's website's
link at: https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/agenda/index.php
Zoom access:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87227175757?pwd=VzNES3Q2NFprRk5BRmdUSktWb0hm
T9 or dial (669) 900-9128, meeting ID: 872 2717 5757, passcode: 780609
10
Minutes 5
City Council Regular Meeting
January 11, 2021
Respectfully submitted,
____________________________________
Elaine Jeng, P.E.
Acting City Clerk
Approved,
______________________________________
Jeff Pieper
Mayor
11
Agenda Item No.: 4.B
Mtg. Date: 01/25/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:MEREDITH ELGUIRA, PLANNING DIRECTOR
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:PAYMENT OF BILLS.
DATE:January 25, 2021
BACKGROUND:
NONE
DISCUSSION:
NONE
FISCAL IMPACT:
NONE.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve as presented.
ATTACHMENTS:
Check Voucher Register - Council Report Expenditures from 1-25-2021.pdf
12
13
14
15
Agenda Item No.: 4.C
Mtg. Date: 01/25/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:MEREDITH ELGUIRA, PLANNING DIRECTOR
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:TONNAGE REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER, 2020.
DATE:January 25, 2021
BACKGROUND:
NONE.
DISCUSSION:
NONE.
FISCAL IMPACT:
NONE.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve as presented.
ATTACHMENTS:
12.20 Rolling Hills Tonnage Report.pdf
16
Franchise?Y
Mth/Yr Overall Commodity Tons Collected Tons Recovered Tons Disposed Diversion %
Jan-20 Trash 178.78 38.00 140.78 21.26%
Greenwaste 102.61 102.61 - 100.00%
Recycle 0.03 0.01 0.02 20.00%
Jan-20 Total 281.42 140.62 140.80 49.97%
Feb-20 Trash 159.76 8.21 151.55 5.14%
Greenwaste 95.32 95.32 - 100.00%
Recycle 2.18 0.44 1.74 20.00%
Feb-20 Total 257.26 103.97 153.29 40.41%
Mar-20 Trash 208.78 - 208.78 0.00%
Greenwaste 92.55 92.55 - 100.00%
Recycle 0.01 0.00 0.01 21.00%
Mar-20 Total 301.34 92.55 208.79 30.71%
Apr-20 Trash 203.94 20.06 183.88 9.84%
Greenwaste 146.90 146.90 - 100.00%
Apr-20 Total 350.84 166.96 183.88 47.59%
May-20 Trash 286.46 20.68 265.78 7.22%
Greenwaste 129.11 129.11 - 100.00%
May-20 Total 415.57 149.79 265.78 36.04%
Jun-20 Trash 279.97 61.66 218.31 22.02%
Greenwaste 95.19 95.19 - 100.00%
Jun-20 Total 375.16 156.85 218.31 41.81%
Jul-20 Trash 262.63 18.10 244.53 6.89%
Greenwaste 86.70 86.70 - 100.00%
Jul-20 Total 349.33 104.80 244.53 30.00%
Aug-20 Trash 238.25 26.63 211.62 11.18%
Greenwaste 64.07 64.07 - 100.00%
Aug-20 Total 302.32 90.70 211.62 30.00%
Sep-20 Trash 234.41 8.21 226.20 3.50%
Greenwaste 88.74 88.74 - 100.00%
Sep-20 Total 323.15 96.95 226.20 30.00%
Oct-20 Trash 269.63 28.79 240.84 10.68%
Greenwaste 74.41 74.41 - 100.00%
Oct-20 Total 344.04 103.20 240.84 30.00%
Nov-20 Trash 255.52 35.58 219.94 13.92%
Greenwaste 58.69 58.69 - 100.00%
Nov-20 Total 314.21 94.27 219.94 30.00%
Dec-20 Trash 240.13 23.86 216.27 9.94%
Greenwaste 68.83 68.83 - 100.00%
Dec-20 Total 308.96 92.69 216.27 30.00%
Grand Total 3,923.60 1,393.34 2,530.26 35.51%
1393.34
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS RESIDENTIAL FRANCHISE
2020
Contract Requires 50% Household -
17
Agenda Item No.: 4.D
Mtg. Date: 01/25/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:MEREDITH ELGUIRA, PLANNING DIRECTOR
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:REPUBLIC SERVICES' 2021 CLEAN-UP SCHEDULE.
DATE:January 25, 2021
BACKGROUND:
Republic Services' annual clean-up schedule proposal.
DISCUSSION:
Proposed 2021 clean-up dates:
Spring
March 17, 2021 greenwaste
March 24, 2021 bulk
March 27, 2021 shred/e-waste (3hrs, outside vendors + Republic Supervision)
Fall
October 20, 2021 greenwaste
October 27, 2021 bulk
October 30, 2021 shred / e-waste (3hrs, outside vendors + Republic Supervision)
FISCAL IMPACT:
NONE.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve as presented.
ATTACHMENTS:
18
Agenda Item No.: 4.E
Mtg. Date: 01/25/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:TERRY SHEA, FINANCE DIRECTOR
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDING DECEMBER
31, 2020
DATE:January 25, 2021
BACKGROUND:
None
DISCUSSION:
General Fund Budget Comparison for the Quarter Ending December 31, 2020.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and File.
ATTACHMENTS:
Budget Comparative 12-31-20.pdf
19
Page: 1
1/10/2021
YTD YTD YTD
Budget Actual Variance Percentage
1,190,300$ $ 534,799.20 $ (655,500.80) 44.93%
4,800 2,048.18 (2,751.82) 42.67%
33,500 34,040.88 540.88 101.61%
232,500 - (232,500.00) 0.00%
281,250 19,457.50 (261,792.50) 6.92%
20,000 14,558.33 (5,441.67) 72.79%
1,300 192.00 (1,108.00) 14.77%
19,000 3,627.94 (15,372.06) 19.09%
14,300 1,151.21 (13,148.79) 8.05%
585.0 Covid 19 Revenues - 50,000.00 50,000.00 #DIV/0!
68,000 34,493.00 (33,507.00) 50.73%
56,250 - (56,250.00) 0.00%
800 484.26 (315.74) 60.53%
600 350.00 (250.00) 58.33%
100,000 6,677.16 (93,322.84) 6.68%
- - - #DIV/0!
37,800 2,981.61 (34,818.39) 7.89%
24,000 12,000.00 (12,000.00) 50.00%
2,084,400 716,861.27 (1,367,538.73)34.39%
177,527 62,987.00 114,540.00 35.48%
177,527 62,987.00 114,540.00 35.48%
424,600 153,168.46 271,431.54 36.07%
10,500 8,436.00 2,064.00 80.34%
72,400 28,124.39 44,275.61 38.85%
7,700 3,940.74 3,759.26 51.18%
47,600 13,910.82 33,689.18 29.22%
30,300 16,629.09 13,670.91 54.88%
26,800 7,016.35 19,783.65 26.18%
2,000 458.82 1,541.18 22.94%
3,200 1,200.00 2,000.00 37.50%
60,000 18,651.41 41,348.59 31.09%
4,100 3,974.11 125.89 96.93%
11,300 7,607.00 3,693.00 67.32%
10,000 - 10,000.00 0.00%
2,000 357.16 1,642.84 17.86%
2,000 - 2,000.00 0.00%
500 25.94 474.06 5.19%
15,000 6,489.37 8,510.63 43.26%
6,100 3,202.16 2,897.84 52.49%
10,000 75.00 9,925.00 0.75%
6,000 2,862.91 3,137.09 47.72%
5,000 550.00 4,450.00 11.00%
1,500 325.00 1,175.00 21.67%
10,000 1,404.09 8,595.91 14.04%
90,000 44,035.80 45,964.20 48.93%
3,000 6,525.65 (3,525.65) 217.52%
6,000 19,258.40 (13,258.40) 320.97%
30,000 3,078.14 26,921.86 10.26%
84,200 31,406.94 52,793.06 37.30%
- 5,525.78 -5,525.78 #DIV/0!
981,800 388,239.53 593,560.47 39.54%
Current Year
As Of: 12/31/20
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
BUDGET COMPARISON GENERAL FUND
FY 2020-21 DECEMBER
City of Rolling Hills
405.0 Sales Tax
Fund: 01 - General Fund
Revenues
401.0 Property Taxes
410.0 Real Estate Transfer Tax
420.0 Motor Vehicles in Lieu Tax-VLF
440.0 Building & Other Permit Fees
450.0 Variance, Planning & Zoning
455.0 Animal Control Fees
460.0 Franchise Fees
480.0 Fines & Traffic Violations
600.0 City Hall Leasehold RHCA
620.0 Proposition A Exchange
650.0 PSAF & COPS
655.0 Burgler Alarm Responses
670.0 Interest Earned
675.0 Miscellaneous Revenue
699.0 Operating Transfer In
Expenditures
Dept: 00
999.0 Operating Transfer Out
Total Revenues
Dept: 01 City Administration
702.0 Salaries-Full Time
Total 00
710.0 Retirement CalPERS-Employer
703.0 Salaries-Part Time
715.0 Workers Compensation Insurance
717.0 Retiree Medical
716.0 Group Insurance
719.0 Deferred Compensation
718.0 Employer Payroll Taxes
740.0 Office Supplies & Expense
720.0 Auto Allowance
750.0 Dues & Subscriptions
745.0 Equipment Leasing Costs
757.0 Meetings Expense
755.0 Conference Expense
761.0 Auto Mileage
759.0 Training & Education
770.0 Telephone
765.0 Postage
775.0 City Council Expense
785.0 Codification
780.0 Minutes Clerk Meetings
795.0 Other Gen Admin Expense
790.0 Advertising
802.0 Legal Expenses-Other
801.0 City Attorney
820.0 Website
890.0 Consulting Fees
850.0 Election Expense City Council
950.0 Capital Outlay-Equipment
Total City Administration
670.0 Interest Earned Section 115
20
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
BUDGET COMPARISON GENERAL FUND
FY 2020-21 DECEMBER
Amended YTD YTD YTD
Budget Actual Variance Percentage
$ 2,100 -$ $ 2,100.00 0.00%
17,100 12,600.00 4,500.00 73.68%
103,683 32,503.25 71,179.75 31.35%
122,883 45,103.25 77,779.75 36.70%
196,700 96,020.52 100,679.48 48.82%
15,750 13,817.60 1,932.40 87.73%
33,800 17,521.00 16,279.00 51.84%
3,800 1,788.78 2,011.22 47.07%
16,200 6,793.20 9,406.80 41.93%
16,750 6,988.16 9,761.84 41.72%
2,400 275.00 2,125.00 11.46%
600 0.00 600.00 0.00%
5,000 0.00 5,000.00 0.00%
3,000 854.74 2,145.26 28.49%
2,000 0.00 2,000.00 0.00%
2,000 292.49 1,707.51 14.62%
47,000 7,676.00 39,324.00 16.33%
150,000 13,744.82 136,255.18 9.16%
124,000 83,593.44 40,406.56 67.41%
7,000 5,833.40 1,166.60 83.33%
196,400 61,731.43 134,668.57 31.43%
2,000 0.00 2,000.00 0.00%
824,400 316,930.58 507,469.42 38.44%
232,785 82,197.75 150,587.25 35.31%
3,000 133.04 2,866.96 4.43%
50,000 2,562.43 47,437.57 5.12%
6,000 2,230.85 3,769.15 37.18%
291,785 87,124.07 204,660.93 29.86%
27,600 16,707.46 10,892.54 60.53%
4,100 3,400.00 700.00 82.93%
11,000 0.00 11,000.00 0.00%
650 0.00 650.00 0.00%
29,000 5,127.53 23,872.47 17.68%
25,000 0.00 25,000.00 0.00%
97,350 25,234.99 72,115.01 25.92%
34,000 16,455.32 17,544.68 48.40%
20,000 7,628.89 12,371.11 38.14%
13,500 8,810.75 4,689.25 65.26%
67,500 32,894.96 34,605.04 48.73%
Total Expenditures and Transfers 2,563,245 958,514.38 1,604,730.62 37.39%
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (478,845)$ (241,653)$ 237,192$
1/10/2021
City of Rolling Hills
Page: 2
Current Year
As Of: 12/31/20
Expenditures
Dept: 05 Finance
750.0 Dues & Subscriptions
890.0 Consulting Fees
810.0 Annual Audit
Total Finance
Dept: 15 Planning & Development
702.0 Salaries-Full Time
710.0 Retirement CalPERS-Employer
703.0 Salaries-Part Time
715.0 Workers Compensation Insurance
716.0 Group Insurance
718.0 Employer Payroll Taxes
750.0 Dues & Subscriptions
720.0 Auto Allowance
758.0 Planning Commission Meeting
755.0 Conference Expense
776.0 Miscellaneous Expenses
759.0 Training & Education
872.0 Property Development-Legal Exp
878.0 Build Inspect. LA County/Willd
882.0 Variance & CUP Expense
881.0 Storm Water Management
884.0 Special Project Study & Consul
Total Planning & Development
950.0 Capital Outlay-Equipment
Dept: 25 Public Safety
830.0 Law Enforcement
833.0 Other Law Enforcement Expenses
838.0 Animal Control Expense
837.0 Wild Life Mgmt & Pest Control
Dept: 65 Non-Department
Total Public Safety
895.0 Insurance & Bond Expense
915.0 Community Recognition
901.0 South Bay Comm. Organization
917.0 Emergency Preparedness
916.0 Civil Defense Expense
985.0 Contingency
Dept: 75 City Properties
925.0 Utilities
Total Non-Department
932.0 Area Landscaping
Total City Properties
930.0 Repairs & Maintenance
21
Agenda Item No.: 6.A
Mtg. Date: 01/25/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:MEREDITH ELGUIRA, PLANNING DIRECTOR
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:CONSIDER ORDINANCE NO. 369, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE
17 (ZONING) OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD
CHAPTER 17.19 (RANCHO DEL MAR HOUSING OPPORTUNITY ZONE)
ESTABLISHING AN OVERLAY ZONE TO ACCOMMODATE
AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND AMENDING SECTION 17.08.010 OF
CHAPTER 17.08 (ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONES AND BOUNDARIES) TO
IDENTIFY THE OVERLAY ON THE ZONING MAP; AND APPROVING
THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; AND
CONSIDER RESOLUTION NO. 1270 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 2020-01 TO THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
GENERAL PLAN, AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN TO
ADOPT THE LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT AND LAND USE
POLICY MAP AMENDMENT; AND APPROVING THE NEGATIVE
DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
DATE:January 25, 2021
BACKGROUND:
Pursuant to the California State Housing-Element Law, the City of Rolling Hills (City) is in the process
of updating its Housing Element of the General Plan to address the planning period from 2014-2021.
The City last adopted their 2014-2021 Housing Element of the General Plan on February 10, 2014,
along with the associated General Plan Amendment. The City is currently moving forward with
bringing the 4th and 5th cycles into compliance with the Housing Element Regional Housing Needs
Assessment (RHNA). The update to the Housing Element of the General Plan includes identifying an
opportunity site within the City that would accommodate and meet RHNA numbers as assessed by the
HCD.
The update to the Housing Element of the General Plan includes a proposed Project that would establish
a new overlay zone that would accommodate the existing uses on the site, as well as allow for new
22
multi-family units to be developed. The proposed Project would also require the appropriate General
Plan and Zoning Ordinance amendment and associate maps to reflect the creation of the new overlay
zone. The zone change and new overlay zone will enable the City of Rolling Hills to start
accommodating its RHNA allocations. A feasible site located at 38 Crest Road West at the southern end
of the City has been selected to be utilized as the opportunity site for additional housing, including
affordable housing, emergency shelters, and Single Room Occupancy Housing.
DISCUSSION:
An approximately 31-acre site located at the western border of the City has been designated as an
opportunity site that would allow for the development of new housing units, including affordable
housing, emergency shelters, and Single Room Occupancy Housing. The site would require changes to
the General Plan Land Use Element, zone change and the creation of a new overlay zone to adequately
accommodate for RHNA unit numbers. The zone change and new overlay zone will enable the City of
Rolling Hills to accommodate its RHNA allocations under the 4th and 5th Cycle RHNA requirements,
including accommodation of affordable housing units as well as emergency shelters and Single Room
Occupancy Housing. The total number of units that will be accommodated “by right” under the 4th and
5th Cycles would be a total of 16 units, including low income units and very low-income units.
Additionally, the proposed Project would also allow for the continued use of the public facilities,
schools and transportation facilities at the site. Though emergency shelters and Single Room Occupancy
(SRO) residential uses are also currently permitted under the City’s Municipal Code and may be
allowed in the future, these units will not be allowed to be counted as the total dwelling units required
under the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for all future Cycles.
PROJECT SITE
The approximate 31-acre site currently houses the Rancho Del Mar High School building, the Beach
Cities Learning Center, and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority (PVP Transit Authority). This
parcel of land is owned by the Palos Verdes Unified School District (PVUSD) and has an existing
school (Rancho Del Mar School) located at this site. However, the Rancho Del Mar School facility is
not being utilized as a school site at the current time. Access to the Project site is through a private
roadway that veers off Crest Road West. A few unpaved internal roadways traverse the site. The site
slopes from east to west, from the Beach Cities Learning Center to the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit
Authority, with an approximate 38 feet drop from east end of the Project site. Vegetation on-site
consists of a few trees around the existing buildings and a mix of grasses and paved areas. The portion
of the PVP Transit Authority site is primarily paved, with few buildings, parking areas and storage
buildings. The site is currently zoned Residential Agriculture Suburban-2-Acres (RAS-2) and has a
General Plan Land Use designation of Very Low-Density Residential 2+ Net Acres. The Project site is
surrounded by RAS-2 zones to the east and north of Crest Road and is bounded by the City of Rancho
Palos Verdes to the west and south, with zoning designations of Residential Single Lot – 20,000 square
feet.
PROJECT COMPONENTS
The proposed Project would establish a new mixed-use-multi-family overlay zone (Rancho Del Mar
Housing Opportunity Overlay Zone) that would accommodate the existing uses on the site, as well as
allow for new multi-family residential, emergency shelters, transitional and Single Room Occupancy
23
housing units to be developed in the future. The proposed Project would require an amendment to the
General Plan Land Use Element, amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map, and
amendments to the Zoning Ordinance text in order to reflect the new overlay zone. These changes
would then allow for future construction of 16 clustered multi-family units, consistent with the 20
units/acre designation.
The proposed Project includes the following specific components:
Preparation of a Negative Declaration for the General Plan and Zoning Amendment and
associated map changes;
Amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element to add new Overlay zone designation to be
known as the Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay Zone. The associated land use map
is being amended to add the overlay to the 31-acre Palos Verdes Unified School District
(PVUSD) site at 38 Crest RoadWest (also known as the Rancho Del Mar High School Site). The
Overlay requires the allowable number of dwelling units on any site with this designation to be
clustered at a minimum of 20 units per acre. Other amendments to the Land Use Element will be
made as needed to recognize that multi-family uses are permitted and anticipated within this
overlay area.
Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance (Title 17 of the Municipal Code) and related zoning map to
add the “Rancho Del Mar Opportunity Overlay Zone”. The City has one other overlay zone that
has been adopted and mapped for an area of smaller lots and steep terrain. (See Rolling Hills
Municipal Code Chapter 17.17 (Overlay Zoning District – 1 (OZD-1).) The number of units
allowed by the “base” General Plan designation on this site must be clustered; in other words, the
overlay allows 16 multi-family units on this site by right.
The Project is currently not being developed with any structures at the site. The proposed overlay zone
that would allow for the future addition of new multi-family units would also assist the City in meeting
its future housing requirements mandated under the California Department of Housing and Community
Development (CA HCD). The City of Rolling Hills will be able to accommodate its RHNA allocations,
including accommodation of affordable housing units. The Overlay Zone will also accommodate
emergency shelters and Single Room Occupancy Housing as part of the Housing Element Update.
INITIAL STUDY/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial
Study/Negative Declaration was prepared in November 2020. The environmental analysis determined
that the Project would not have a significant effect on the environment, therefore a Negative Declaration
was prepared and circulated to the appropriate agencies for their review.
The purpose of the environmental review under the Initial Study/Negative Declaration (Rancho Del Mar
Housing Opportunity Overlay Zone IS/ND) is to evaluate all the planning document level changes that
are currently being proposed for the addition of a new overlay zone for the City, related changes to the
City’s Zoning Ordinance and Map, and changes in the related General Plan Elements and Map). Future
new housing projects that may result from these document level changes would require their own
environmental reviews, before any development changes are approved for the Project site. The City will
undertake the appropriate level of environmental review as Projects at this site are proposed and
developed.
CEQA guidelines require that local governments comply with Assembly Bill (AB) 52 to include
California Native American Tribes in the decision-making process by notifying the associated local
24
tribes of the Proposed Project. Local tribes have the opportunity to request consultation and provide
recommendations for mitigation measures that would help to preserve any potentially impacted tribal
and cultural resources resulting from the Project. The City sent out tribal consultation request letters to
five local tribes on Friday, October 16, 2020, and one letter on Saturday, October 17, 2020. Local tribes
had until January 21, 2021 to respond and request for consultation. As of January 22, 2021, no request
for consultation has been received.
PLANNING COMMISSION
On December 22, 2020, the Planning Commission was presented with the proposed amendments to the
Land Use Element, Land Use Map, Zoning Ordinance, Zoning Map and Initial Study/Negative
Declaration. Concerns regarding the location of the proposed multi-family development was brought up
and it was recommended that a specific location on site be identified for development. It was decided
that the area west of the PVP Transit facility would be the most suitable location for future housing
development. The proposed ordinance has been revised to reflect the proposed location within the
project site.
Subsequent communications between the City and HCD continued to keep HCD abreast of the latest
progress on the project. Based on additional communications with HCD, the City has been asked for
further revisions to the development standards to meet HCD's requirements, some of which are reflected
in the attached Ordinance. The City is continuing to work with HCD to ensure compliance of the 5th
Housing Cycle Element.
FISCAL IMPACT:
NONE.
RECOMMENDATION:
Open the public hearing, take public testimony, and continue the public hearing to February 8, 2021.
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance 369 Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay.docx
City Council Resolution 1270 Land Use Element Amendment.doc
ROLLING HILLS - Land Use Element-c1-c1.DOCX
Initial_Study_Neg_Declaration_RDMO.pdf
Comments_Received.pdf
Overlay_Zoning_Map.pdf
PC Reso 2020-09.pdf
PC Reso 2020-10.pdf
25
65277.00001\33367195.1 Page 1 of 11
ORDINANCE NO. 369
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA AMENDING
TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF THE ROLLING HILLS
MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD CHAPTER 17.19
(RANCHO DEL MAR HOUSING OPPORTUNITY
OVERLAY ZONE) ESTABLISHING AN OVERLAY
ZONE TO ACCOMMODATE HOUSING AND TO
AMEND SECTION 17.08.010 (ZONES ESTABLISHED)
OF CHAPTER 17.08 (ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONES
AND BOUNDARIES) TO IDENTIFY THE OVERLAY ON
THE ZONING MAP; AND APPROVING THE NEGATIVE
DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
RECITALS
A.The City Council of the City of Rolling Hills desires to amend its municipal code
to establish an overlay zone to accommodate housing;
B.On December 22, 2020, the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public
hearing and considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony
concerning the proposed ordinance. It adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council
adopt the proposed ordinance;
C.On January 6, 2021, the City gave public notice of the January 25, 2021 public
hearing to be held by the City Council on the proposed ordinance by publishing notice in the
Torrance Daily Breeze, a newspaper of general circulation; and
D.On January 25, 2021, the City Council held a duly-noticed public hearing and
considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning the
proposed ordinance.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.Section 17.08.010 (Zones established) of Chapter 17.08 (Establishment of Zones
and Boundaries) in Title 17 (Zoning) is hereby amended to read as follows:
Chapter 17.08 - ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONES AND BOUNDARIES
17.08.010 - Zones established.
Rolling Hills is a unique, well-established residential community. Development consists
almost exclusively of single-family residential houses on large lots. The General Plan of
the City of Rolling Hills establishes a policy to maintain the existing pattern and type of
26
65277.00001\33367195.1 Page 2 of 11
residential development, with support public facility uses. Toward the end of
implementing General Plan land use policy, zone districts are established as follows:
A. RA-S - Residential Agriculture-Suburban. The RA-S zone district is divided into
two sub-districts: RA-S-1 and RA-S-2. The suffix indicates the minimum lot size
requirement in net acres.
1. The Overlay Zoning District (OZD-1) overlies a portion of the RA-S-1 zone and is
identified on the zoning map.
2.The Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay Zoning District (RDMO)
overlies a portion of the RA-S-2 zone and is identified on the zoning map.
B. PF - Public Facilities.
Section 2.Chapter 17.19 (Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay Zone) is added to
Title 17 (Zoning) to read as follows:
Chapter 17.19 – RANCHO DEL MAR HOUSING OPPORTUNITY OVERLAY
ZONE
17.19.010 – Intent and purpose.
The Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay Zone (RDMO) is established by this
chapter to:
A. To provide regulations that implement the goals and policies of the general plan and
other similar long-range planning documents aimed at encouraging mixed-use
development within the City. The RDMO zone is further intended to serve as an
implementation tool of the City's land use and housing elements of the general plan
by facilitating further residential development.
B. The RDMO zone has the following major objectives:
1. Create "by-right" opportunities for housing;
2. Implement state laws that require cities to demonstrate available land capacity and
zoning tools to accommodate the City's current and projected need for housing;
3. Facilitate well-designed development projects that combine residential and
nonresidential uses (e.g., office, transit facility and other community amenities) to
promote a better balance of jobs and housing;
4. Encourage development that provides attractive features (e.g., landscaping, public
spaces, courtyards, etc.) designed to integrate the public realm (e.g., right of way,
walking path, etc.) with development on adjacent private property.
17.19.020 – Applicability.
The RDMO applies to 38 Crest Road West, Rolling Hills, California.
27
65277.00001\33367195.1 Page 3 of 11
17.19.030 – Uses Permitted.
No lot, premises, building, or structure shall be used for any use or purpose other than the
following:
A.Affordable Multi-family+;
B.Affordable Senior housing+;
C.Emergency Shelter+;
D.Single Room Occupancy*;
E.Daycare*;
F.School facilities*; and
G.Transit facilities*
*Requires Conditional Use Permit (RHMC Chapter 17.42)
+Requires Zone Clearance Permit (RHMC Chapter 17.44)
17.19.040 – Development Standards for Single Room Occupancy.
A.Single Room Occupancy Defined. “Single room occupancy (SRO) facility" means a
facility operated by a provider with six or more dwelling units for persons of lower
income where each unit has a minimum floor area of two hundred fifty square feet and
a maximum floor area of three hundred fifty square feet. These dwelling units must
have kitchen and bathroom facilities, and must be offered on a monthly basis or longer.
For the purposes of this definition, a "provider" means a government agency or private
nonprofit organization that provides or contracts with recognized community
organizations to provide SRO housing, and "lower income" has the meaning set forth
in Health and Safety Code Section 50079.5.
B. SRO housing shall conform to the following requirements:
1. SRO housing shall be limited to a total maximum number of six (6) units.
2. Occupancy shall be limited to maximum two persons per unit.
3. Minimum unit sizes (not including toilet compartment) shall be:
i. One person: one hundred fifty square feet.
ii. Two persons: one hundred seventy-five square feet.
4. Each SRO unit shall be provided with the following minimum amenities:
i. Kitchen sink with garbage disposal.
ii. A toilet and sink located in a separate room within the unit that is a minimum
twenty square feet.
iii. One closet per person.
iv. Telephone and cable TV hookups.
5. If full bathrooms are not provided in each unit, shared showers shall be provided
on each floor at a ratio of one per seven occupants on the same floor, with doors
lockable from the inside.
6. If full kitchens are not provided in each unit, shared kitchen facilities shall be
provided on each floor consisting of a range, sink with garbage disposal, and
refrigerator.
28
65277.00001\33367195.1 Page 4 of 11
7. If laundry facilities are not provided in each unit, common laundry facilities shall
be provided, with one washer and one dryer on the premises.
8.Elevators shall be required for SROs of two stories.
9. On-site management shall be provided at all times.
10. Off-street parking shall be provided at the rate of one-half spaces per unit, plus one
space for each employee on duty.
17.19.050 – Development Standards for Emergency Shelter.
A. Operational Requirements. An application for a permit to establish and operate an
emergency shelter shall be accompanied by a management and operations plan, which
shall establish hours of operation, staffing levels, maximum length of stay, size and
location of exterior and interior on-site waiting and intake areas, and security
procedures.
B. Developmental Requirements. Emergency Shelters shall conform to the following
requirements:
1. Maximum of twelve beds.
2. Minimum separation of three hundred feet between emergency shelters.
3. Facility Requirements.
i. Each occupant shall be provided a minimum of fifty square feet of personal
living space, not including space for common areas.
ii. Bathing facilities shall be provided in quantity and location as required by the
California Plumbing Code (Title 24 Part 5), and shall comply with the
accessibility requirements of the California Building Code (Title 24 Part 2).
iii. Shelters must provide a storage area for refuse and recyclables that is enclosed
by a six-foot-high landscape screen, solid wall, or fence, which is accessible to
collection vehicles on one side. The storage area must be large enough to
accommodate the number of bins that are required to provide the facility with
sufficient service so as to avoid the overflow of material outside of the bins
provided.
iv. The shelter may provide one or more of the following specific facilities and
services on site, including but not limited to:
(1) Commercial kitchen facilities designed and operated in compliance with the
California Retail Food Code;
(2) Dining area;
(3) Laundry room;
(4) Recreation room;
(5) Support services (e.g. training, counseling, etc.); and
(6) Child care facilities.
v. On-Site Waiting and Intake Areas. A minimum of five percent of the total
square footage of a shelter shall be designated for indoor on-site waiting and
intake areas to accommodate drop off, intake, and pickup. In addition, an
exterior waiting area shall be provided, the minimum size of which is equal to
or larger than the minimum interior waiting and intake area.
29
65277.00001\33367195.1 Page 5 of 11
vi. Off-Street Parking. Off-street parking shall be provided at the rate of one space
per four beds, plus one space for each staff person on duty.
17.19.060 – Development Standards for Multifamily Residential:
A. All multifamily residential projects shall be located west of the improved portion of
the PVPTA Facility and south of the access road.
B. All multifamily residential projects shall comply with the following development
standards:
Table 17.19.050A
Development Regulations—Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay Zone
(RDMO)
Development
Regulation RDMO Notes
1. Minimum density
(residential uses) 1du/2,178 sq.ft.
2. Maximum density
(residential uses)1du/1,742 sq.ft.
3. Minimum dwelling
unit size
Studio: 500250 sq. ft.
1-bdrm: 650400sq. ft.
2-bdrm: 800650sq. ft.
3-bdrm: 1,000900sq. ft.
4. Maximum building
height 2 stories/28 ft. Underground levels and mezzanines lofts
are allowed.
5. Distance between
buildings (minimum) 6 ft.
6. front yard setback 5 ft. (min); 15 ft. (max)
7. street side setback 5 ft. (min); 15 ft. (max)
8. side setback 5 ft. (min); No max
9. rear yard setback 10 ft. (min)
10. Setback from bottom
of slope 50 ft. minimum Building pad not to exceed 10% slope.
11. Permitted setback
encroachments 6 ft. into setbacks
Balconies, awning, porches, stairways and
similar elements may extend up to 6 ft.
into the setback. Cornices, eaves,
fireplaces, similar architectural features
may extend 4 ft. into the front and rear
setbacks and 3 ft. in interior setbacks.
30
65277.00001\33367195.1 Page 6 of 11
12. Maximum lot
coverage None Clustered in .8 acre.
Landscape/open space standards
13. Common open space
(multi-family residential) 150100 sq. ft. per unit
Parking Standards
14. Surface parking
20 ft. min. setback from
front lot line at driveway
entrance; 15 ft. min side
yard setback at driveway
entrance.
15. Garage/tuck-under
parking Prohibited along front
16. Underground/podium
parking
Allowed beneath
building footprint
17. Above-ground
parking structure
Permitted if screened
from views from public
right-of-way and
adjacent single-family
residential districts
Abbreviations: sq. ft. = square feet; ft. = feet or foot
C. All multifamily residential projects shall comply with the following densities based
on gross square footage of the lot:
Table 17.19.060A
Permitted Densities/Graduated Scale - Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity
Overlay Zone (RDMO)
Lot Size Square Feet # of Dwelling Units Square Feet of Lot Area
43,560 1/2,178 square feet*
*When calculating number of units, if insufficient area exists to provide the minimum lot
area for the additional unit, the total number of units shall be rounded down to the smaller
number.
17.19.070 – Parking regulations.
All allowed uses identified in Section 17.19.030 shall comply with the following:
A. Parking standards:
Table 17.19.070A
Parking Standards - Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay Zone (RDMO)
31
65277.00001\33367195.1 Page 7 of 11
Use Required Number of Spaces Notes
Multi-family
residential and
condominiums
Studio - 1 space per unit
One bedroom - 1 space per unit
Two bedrooms – 1.5 spaces per unit
Three or more bedrooms - 2.5 spaces per unit
Additional guest parking 1/4 space per unit
Per unit; Tandem
parking is allowed in
cases where multiple
spaces are assigned
to a single unit
Senior housing
1.0 spaces per unit for developments of 10 units or
less. For developments of 11 units or more, the
parking shall be 0.5 spaces per dwelling unit, or 10
spaces, whichever is greater. For developments of 10
or more units, 10 percent of the total required
parking shall be reserved for guest parking
Very low and low
income housing
units
1.0 space per very low or low income unit. This
parking ratio only applies to those units which are
designated for very low or low income. For
developments of 10 or more units, ten (10) percent of
the total required parking shall be reserved for guest
parking 1.1
Single Room
Occupancy
0.5 space per unit plus 1.0 space for each staff on
duty
Emergency
Shelter
1.0 space per four beds, plus 1.0 space for each staff
on duty
B. Reduced Parking. The Planning Commission and City Council may reduce the required
parking after considering documentation and a study provided by the applicant showing
infeasibility of providing required parking. Staff’s recommendation shall give weight
to all relevant facts, including but not limited to the following: availability and
accessibility of alternative parking; impact on adjacent residential neighborhoods;
existing or potential shared parking arrangements; the characteristics of the use,
including hours of operation and peak parking demand times; design and maintenance
of off-street parking that will be provided; and whether the proposed use is new or a
small addition to an existing use. Required parking shall comply with State law for
affordable housing units.
C. Electric Vehicle Charging Stations. In accordance with the California Green Building
Code (CALGreenCode), new buildings shall be electric vehicle charging station ready.
This requires residential properties to provide one 120V AC 20 amp and one 208/240V
40 amp, grounded AC outlet for each required parking space. The number of required
parking spaces for electric vehicle charging shall be as follows:
Table 17.17.080B
Electric Vehicle Charging Station Standards - Rancho Del Mar Housing
Opportunity Overlay Zone (RDMO)
32
65277.00001\33367195.1 Page 8 of 11
Total Number of Spaces Number of Required Electric Vehicle Charging Spaces
1-10 1
11-20 3
21-30 5
17.19.080 – Multifamily Residential Frontage type regulations.
A. Elevation of Ground Floor.
1. The elevation of the ground floor shall be elevated above the grade of the lot to
provide privacy for residences by preventing direct views into the home from the
sidewalk.
2. The ground floor elevation shall be located within five feet of the ground surface
of the adjacent sidewalk or walkway.
B. Minimum Ground Floor Ceiling Height. Ten (10) feet minimum (floor-to-floor
height).
C. Ground Floor Unit Entrances.
1. Entrances and windows shall be provided on the front of the facade to provide
eyes on the street and direct sidewalk access to the building.
2. Entrances to ground floor units that have street frontage may be provided through
a common lobby entrance and/or by private entrances from the adjacent sidewalk.
D. Upper Floor Unit Entrances. Entrances to upper floor units may be provided through
a common lobby entrance and/or by a common entrance along a facade fronting a
street.
E. Recessed Entrances. Entrances may be recessed into the facade.
F. Stoops and Front Porches.
1. Stoops and front porches may be provided in front of building and unit entrances.
2. Stoops and front porches may project up to five feet from the facade and project
into the setback.
G. Projecting Elements (Balconies, Roof Overhangs, Shade Structures, and Bay
Windows). Projecting Elements on upper floors may project four (4) feet from the
facade and project into the setback.
H. Sidewalk and Setback Treatment.
1. The public sidewalk shall be improved with street trees with an average spacing
of thirty (30) feet on-center and pedestrian-scaled street lights not to exceed 30
inches in height and maximum 25 Watts.
2. If the front facade is setback from the public sidewalk, the setback shall be
landscaped (excluding stoops/front porches and paved paths to building
entrances).
33
65277.00001\33367195.1 Page 9 of 11
17.19.090 – Multifamily Residential usable open space regulations.
A. Usable Open Space Defined. Usable open space areas are an open area or an indoor or
outdoor recreational facility which is designed and intended to be used for outdoor
living and/or recreation. Usable open space shall not include any portion of parking
areas, streets, driveways, pedestrian paths, or turnaround areas.
B. Usable Open Space Amenities/Facilities.
1. Each multifamily residential project shall include one usable open space amenity.
Each square foot of land area devoted to a usable open space amenity shall be
credited as common open space on a 1:1 basis.
2. The following listed recreational amenities satisfy the above recreational amenity
requirement:
i. Clubhouse
ii. Gym
iii. Children's playground equipment.
iv. Day care facility.
v. Other recreational amenities deemed adequate by the Planning and Community
Services Director.
17.19.100 - Multifamily Residential public space amenities requirements.
A. Each multifamily residential project shall include a public open space amenity. Each
square foot of land area devoted to a public space amenity shall be credited as common
open space on a 1:1 basis.
B. The following listed public space amenities satisfy the above public space amenity
requirement:
1. Formal Plazas. A formal plaza would be a publicly accessible open space which
has a design that is influenced by classical urban planning design. A formal plaza
would typically include some sort of central water fountain and/or symmetrical
landscaping.
2. Gardens. A garden can be located on the ground level or on upper levels of a
structure. Urban gardens include ornamental landscaping arranged in raised or at-
grade planters or planting areas, potted plants, and trees. Many times there are
sculptures or other forms of public art that are included within the urban garden.
3. Covered Colonnades. Colonnades are linear in design and generous in depth. The
intent is to provide a comfortably wide, covered pathway that is adjacent to the
openings of a building. Sometimes the second floor of a building is utilized to create
the "covered" element of the colonnade.
4. Pedestrian Alleys and Walkways. A pedestrian alley or walkway is typically a
"lane" that does not follow the alignment of a vehicular street, but provides a
pedestrian access to either a public space or some other feature within the interior
of a development. Pedestrian alleys or walkways must be designed in such a manner
so as to be inviting to pedestrians. Therefore, issues such as lighting, security, line
34
65277.00001\33367195.1 Page 10 of 11
of sight, cleanliness and visual appeal are important considerations to a well-
designed pedestrian alley or walkway. Sometimes public art, street furniture, and
access to public spaces are features of pedestrian alleys and walkways.
5. Bicycle Storage Areas. All developments shall provide common bicycle racks or
storage areas for the residents as follows: two (2) bicycle racks or storage units for
every five (5) dwelling units.
17.19.110 – Multifamily Residential Operational and Compatibility Standards
A. Trash Enclosures. Enclosures shall be required for refuse and recycling bins and there
location shall be clearly indicated on required site plan. Outside trash enclosures shall
be a minimum six (6) feet in height and shall be architecturally compatible with main
building. Enclosures are not permitted in required front yard or street side yard setback
area.
B. Landscaping. Landscaping shall comply with RHMC Chapter 13.18 (Water
Efficiency).
C. Screening and Buffering—Mechanical Equipment and Trash Facilities. All mechanical
equipment, heat, and air-conditioning equipment shall be architecturally screened from
view and buffered and trash facilities shall be screened and buffered.
D. Sound mitigation. Residential dwelling units shall be designed to be sound attenuated
against present and future project noise. New projects or new nonresidential uses in
existing projects shall provide an acoustical analysis report, by an acoustical engineer,
describing the acoustical design features of the structure required to satisfy the exterior
and interior noise standards.
Section 3.An Initial Study and Negative Declaration No. 2020-01 has been prepared,
processed, and noticed in accordance with CEQA (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.)
and the CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq.) for the
RDMO Zone. Pursuant to Section 15070, et seq of the CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds,
on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, that the proposed project
could not have a significant effect on the environment. Upon the basis of all of the evidence in
the record, the City Council finds that the Negative Declaration reflects the independent
judgment of the City Council and hereby approves the Negative Declaration.
Section 4.This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its passage and adoption pursuant
to California Government Code section 36937.
Section 5.The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this Ordinance;
cause it to be entered into the City of Rolling Hills’s book of original ordinances; make a note of
the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting; and, within fifteen days after the passage
and adoption of this Ordinance, cause it to be published or posted in accordance with California
law.
35
65277.00001\33367195.1 Page 11 of 11
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this ____ day of _____________ 2021.
JEFF PIEPER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
ELAINE JENG, ACTING CITY
CLERK
36
24438.00000\7541167.3
RESOLUTION NO. 1270
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS, ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 2020-01TO THE CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS GENERAL PLAN, AN AMENDMENT TO THE
GENERAL PLAN TO ADOPT THE LAND USE ELEMENT
AMENDMENT AND LAND USE POLICY MAP
AMENDMENT
RECITALS
A.Local governments are authorized by Government Code section 65350 et seq. to
prepare, adopt, and amend general plans;
B.The proposed amendments to the Land Use Element and Land Use Policy Map of
the City of Rolling Hills General Plan (“General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01) will create the
Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay at 38 Crest Road West, Rolling Hills, California
to allow multifamily housing at a density of 24 units per acre, single room occupancy, and
emergency shelters thereby implementing the overall policies and goals of the General Plan and
leaving the General Plan internally consistent;
C.The proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01 was sent to affected public
entities for their review and comment;
D.The proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01 was reviewed, studied, and
found to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") as more fully
described below;
E.On December 22, 2020, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed
public hearing and considered the staff report, written public comments, and oral public
testimony regarding the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01 and recommended
approval and adoption to the City Council;
F.On January 6, 2021, the City gave public notice of the consideration of the
proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01 by publishing notice in the Torrance Daily
Breeze, a newspaper of general circulation; and
G.On January 25, 2021, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing
and considered the staff report, written public comments, and oral public testimony regarding the
proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
37
City Council Resolution No. 1270
Page 2
Section 1.ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION (CEQA): An Initial Study and
Negative Declaration No. 2020-01 has been prepared, processed, and noticed in accordance with
CEQA (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (14 California
Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq.) for General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01. Pursuant
to Section 15070, et seq of the CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds, on the basis of
substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, that the proposed project could not have a
significant effect on the environment. Upon the basis of all of the evidence in the record, the City
Council finds that the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the City
Council and hereby approves the Negative Declaration.
Section 2.The City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01 an
Amendment to the General Plan to Adopt the Land Use Element Amendment and Land Use
Policy Map Amendment (Exhibit A), based upon the following findings:
A.The Land Use Element Amendment and Land Use Policy Map Amendment
appropriately update these two portions of the General Plan to address current
legal developments and required updates and to provide for integration and
consistency with the General Plan.
B.The Land Use Element Amendment and Land Use Policy Map Amendment
provide for development within the City that is consistent or compatible with the
General Plan and all of the other elements of the General Plan.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this __ day of ____, 2021 by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstaining:
Absent:
_________________________
Jeff Pieper, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________
Elaine Jeng, P.E.,
Acting City Clerk
Attachments:
Exhibit A Land Use Element Amendment and Land Use Policy Map Amendment to the
Rolling Hills General Plan
38
65277.00010\33543394.1
LAND USE ELEMENT
1
LAND USE ELEMENT
Rolling Hills
General Plan
39
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
-i-
INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................1
Purpose of the Element......................................................................................................1
Relationship to Other Elements.........................................................................................2
EXISTING LAND USE ................................................................................................................3
Residential..........................................................................................................................3
TABLE LU-1 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS EXISTING LAND USE
INVENTORY January 1989......................................................................1
Public/Association-Owned Facilities.................................................................................1
Education...........................................................................................................................1
Recreation..........................................................................................................................1
Vacant Land.......................................................................................................................1
SIGNIFICANT LAND USE ISSUES ...........................................................................................3
OVERVIEW OF LAND USE PLAN............................................................................................4
Residential Land Uses........................................................................................................ 4
Civic Center.......................................................................................................................4
TABLE LU-2 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GENERAL PLAN LAND
USE CATEGORIES..................................................................................5
Publicly-Owned Open Space.............................................................................................6
Landslide Hazard Overlay.................................................................................................6
Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay………………………………………….6
Implications of Land Use Policy........................................................................................ 7
TABLE LU-3 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTIMATED GENERAL
PLAN BUILDOUT NET INCREASE IN DEVELOPMENT................... 8
GOALS AND POLICIES..............................................................................................................9
40
65277.00010\33543394.1
LAND USE ELEMENT
1
LAND USE ELEMENT
INTRODUCTION
The City of Rolling Hills enjoys the advantages of being located on the San Pedro
Hills of the Palos Verdes Peninsula, including cool sea breezes and low
concentrations of smog in the summer months, more sunshine due to its elevation
above much of the coastal fog, and commanding views of the Pacific Ocean and
Los Angeles Basin. Due to its coastal location, Rolling Hills has been able to
avoid many of the air quality and traffic problems associated with growth in the
Los Angeles area. However, geologic hazards have greatly affected properties
within Rolling Hills and have forced the City to examine development policies
within certain areas of the community.
This Land Use Element describes official City policy for the location of land uses
and their orderly growth and development. It serves as a guide for public officials
and citizens to determine the best uses of lands within the City. To the private
citizen, the Land Use Element will set forth the type of neighborhood he or she
can expect to live in, the location and type of public facilities available, and the
time and distance required for travel to necessary activities. Public officials will
use the Land Use Element as a guide for placement of public facilities and
services, and for directing new development. The Element also serves as a basis
for definition of short-range and long-range capital improvement programs.
Purpose of the Element
The intent of the Land Use Element is to describe present and projected land use
activity within Rolling Hills. The Element also addresses crucial issues
concerning the relationship between land uses and environmental quality,
potential hazards, and social and economic objectives.
In accordance with the State of California General Plan Guidelines, the Land Use
Element serves the following purposes:
o Identifies land use issues;
o Provides a statement of land use policies and proposals,
distinguishing, when appropriate, between short, middle and long-
term periods of fulfillment;
o Describes land use density and land use intensities provided for
under the Plan, including the relationships of such uses to social,
environmental and economic goals and objectives;
o Provides for standards and criteria for physical development within
each use area with consideration for land capacity; and
41
65277.00010\33543394.1
LAND USE ELEMENT
2
o Describes and depicts land use patterns provided for under the
Plan.
Relationship to Other Elements
A major goal in this General Plan Update is to achieve internal consistency
throughout the various General Plan elements. Since the Land Use Element
regulates how land is utilized, it integrates and synthesizes most of the issues and
policies contained in the other Plan elements.
Specifically, the Land Use Element relates to the Housing Element by defining
the extent and density of future residential development in the City. The Land Use
Element is also coordinated with the Open Space/ Conservation Element in that
open space resources are designated on the Land Use Policy Map, and
environmental factors are considered in the location of land use types. The Land
Use Element also relates to the Safety and Noise Elements by integrating their
broad land use recommendations into detailed policies which apply to specific
geographic locations. Finally, the Circulation and Land Use Elements are
interrelated in that specific land use decisions depend upon traffic routes and
circulation patterns.
42
65277.00010\33543394.1
LAND USE ELEMENT
3
EXISTING LAND USE
The City of Rolling Hills is almost an entirely residential community of large
one+ acre parcels on 2.98 square miles of land. The land use pattern was
established with the original subdivision and sale of parcels which began in 1936.
Situated astride the San Pedro Hills of the Palos Verdes Peninsula, Rolling Hills is
characterized by white, single-story California ranch style homes with three-rail
fences and an abundance of equestrian facilities. Landscaping which was located
as parcels developed has matured, rendering the Rolling Hills area a heavily
wooded setting. Lot sizes range from a minimum of one acre to several acres in
size. Many lots contain a buildable ridge and steep arroyos.
Rolling Hills was created by A.E. Hanson and the Palos Verdes Corporation in
1936 following a generally unsuccessful attempt to sell 10 to 50 acre parcels as
“dude ranches” to residents of Los Angeles and Beverly Hills. The concept was
modified to offer one to five acre parcels to residents of closer-by communities
attracted to the cleaner, cooler air, sunshine and absence of congestion. One of
Rolling Hills’ unique features is the set of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions
which have assured the maintenance and uniformity of properties throughout the
years. Buildings are limited to one story in height with three-rail fences
surrounding the properties. Residences are strongly encouraged to be of a ranch
style, and are required to be painted white. All properties provide easements
which are primarily utilized for equestrian trails. The CC&Rs are enforced
through the Rolling Hills Community Association. Through the association, fees
are levied which are used for maintenance of the roads and recreational facilities.
Beginning in 1938, the 150-acre area known as the Flying Triangle was added to
the development’s original 600 acres. The Flying Triangle area has, in recent
years, been subject to major landslides resulting in building moratoriums for parts
of the area that are known to be at risk.
A comprehensive land use survey was undertaken by City staff in 2020 to identify
the extent of existing land uses in the community. Figure LU-1 illustrates existing
land uses in Rolling Hills; an existing land use map is also on file at City Hall.
Table LU-1, Existing Land Use Inventory, quantifies the acreage dedicated to the
various land uses present in Rolling Hills. The table is divided into five
residential density categories and categories for Public Facility, Education,
Recreation and Vacant Land. The following sections describe the nature of each
of these land uses in Rolling Hills.
BOX REPRESENTS MAP ON PAGE 4 OF PDF DOCUMENT
Residential
43
65277.00010\33543394.1
LAND USE ELEMENT
4
Rolling Hills is comprised almost exclusively of ranch style residential
homes. Large setback requirements and lot sizes, as well as topographic
constraints on many lots provide significant amounts of open space on
developed parcels that give the overall community a sense of openness.
Many of the lots are large enough to support horses, and many have
stables as accessory structures.
The character of residential development in Rolling Hills has changed
substantially over the years. Many homes are constructed to maximize the
building area on the lot. The increasing building size has also fostered a tendency
for more grading to prepare many of the steeper properties for a structure.
Increases in grading practices have had a significant effect on the natural
environment and viewscapes. These combined trends have significantly altered
the community’s character and affect surrounding properties. The results of a
Community Attitude Survey indicate a high level of concern among residents
related to residential development and design compatibility issues. In response to
those concerns, the City adopted a site plan review ordinance to preserve and
enhance the community’s character.
In addition to the changes in community character, increased building size and
related grading may have contributed to the instability of soil in the area of the
City known as the Flying Triangle. Combined with several winters of heavy
rainfall, increases in water discharged from septic systems and increased grading
are believed to have contributed to soil destabilization. Development in this area
is limited by the Building Code.
The need for housing across California has also resulted in the State requiring
cities to allow certain types of housing. In response to these State requirements,
the City has identified the Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay
(“RDMO”) Zone located over a specific parcel at 38 Crest Road West, Rolling
Hills, California to provide additional housing opportunities within the City.
In order to define the range of existing residential land use, five density ranges
were arrived upon. The five categories include parcels of 0-1 acres, 1-2 acres, 2-3
acres, 3-5 acres and 5+ acres. As illustrated in Table LU-1, approximately three
percent of the City’s developed residential acreage consists of parcels less than
one acre in size, 20 percent consists of parcels between 3-5 acres, with 1-2 acre
parcels, 2-3 acre parcels, and 5+ acre parcels each comprising 25 percent of the
City’s developed acreage. A total of 683 single-family dwelling units have been
developed in Rolling Hills on 1,636.8 acres of land.
44
65277.00010\33543394.1
LAND USE ELEMENT
1
TABLE LU-1
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
EXISTING LAND USE INVENTORY
January 1989
Land Use Acreage DUs
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
0-1 acre 49.6
1-2 acres 436.4
2-3 acres 430.5
3-5 acres 317.3
5+ acres 403.0
Total Residential 1,636.8 683
PUBLIC/ASSOCIATION-OWNED
FACILITIES 5.5
EDUCATION 30.3
RECREATION 33.3
VACANT LAND 203.1
Total Non-Residential 272.2
TOTAL ACREAGE 1,908.9
(2.98 sq.miles)
Source:City of Rolling Hills
compiled by Cotton/Beland/Associates, Inc.
45
65277.00010\33543394.1
LAND USE ELEMENT
1
Public/Association-Owned Facilities
Public facilities owned by the City of Rolling Hills and private facilities owned by
the Rolling Hills Community Association provide for the needs of the community.
The City owns the Rolling Hills Administrative Building which houses the offices
of the City of Rolling Hills and the Rolling Hills Community Association. The
City also owns a maintenance building, three tennis courts and two equestrian
riding rings.
The Community Association owns roadway easements and the guard gates. The
Palos Verdes Water Company owns two water tanks and several antenna towers
adjacent to and accessed through Rolling Hills. A major radar installation site is
contiguous to the City’s eastern boundary that is operated by the Federal
Aeronautic Administration. Finally, the Los Angeles County Fire Protection
District• owns and operates a Fire Station within the City. Table LU-1 shows
facilities owned by the City, other public entities, and the Community
Association. These facilities comprise a total of 5.5 acres within the community.
Education
The Palos Verdes Peninsula School District owns a site of 30.3 acres which is
located south of Crest Road along the City’s western boundary. The site is home
to the Rancho Del Mar Continuation High School which serves the Palos Verdes
Peninsula Unified School District. Access to the school district property is via
Crest Road outside the City.
Recreation
The City contains 33.3 acres of recreational open space. Opposite the City
administration building are three City-owned tennis courts which are operated and
maintained by the Rolling Hills Community Association. The courts are open to
Association members and their guests and are operated from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m.
Also contained within the City are two riding rings and a series of trails. The trails
are an extensive network laced throughout the City affording hikers and
equestrians alike varied opportunities within the community’s boundaries. Also
available for recreational use within Rolling Hills is an 8.01 acre parcel on the
north end of Storm Hill which was dedicated through provisions of the Quimby
Act. The property is open to City residents for use as an open equestrian area.
Vacant Land
Of the numerous vacant properties in Rolling Hills, many are constrained from
future developments. The area within the Flying Triangle which is subject to
landslides is under a moratorium and will not likely be buildable into the
foreseeable future due to building code requirements which do not permit
construction in geologically unstable areas. Other properties exist which are
constrained due to excessive slopes on the property. It is estimated that there are
203.1 acres of vacant, residentially zoned land within the City. Of that total,
46
65277.00010\33543394.1
LAND USE ELEMENT
2
172.75 acres are unconstrained (either located outside the Flying Triangle and/or
not constrained by slope) and, subject to site plan review requirements, may
accommodate a maximum of 59 additional residential units.
47
65277.00010\33543394.1
LAND USE ELEMENT
3
SIGNIFICANT LAND USE ISSUES
The following list is a summary of issues and opportunities relating to land use
that have been identified in Rolling Hills from the Community Attitude Survey
and through discussions with the General Plan Advisory Committee and other
City committees. These issues are addressed in the Goals and Policies of this
Land Use Element.
o The landslide area within the Flying Triangle has rendered a large
amount of land within the City’s southwest area unsuitable for
residential development, and is subject to ongoing changes in
topography.
o Due to the constraints of the landslide area within the Flying
Triangle, a large amount of open space remains open to alternative
uses such as recreation or study of such geologic hazards.
o The City’s topography renders large parts of many parcels
constrained, thus leaving smaller areas available for development.
Recent residential construction has maximized lot coverage
through extensive grading.
o Grading of individual lots have significantly altered the topography
and drainage patterns on many lots thus eliminating certain
viewscapes and diminishing of the natural character of the City.
o New residential development within the community has changed
significantly in character from the original residential
developments, thus generating an increasing degree of
incompatibility between adjacent uses.
o The increasing size and bulk of recent residential developments
within Rolling Hills and the surrounding area have substantially
reduced the natural, rural environment which has characterized
Rolling Hills in the past.
o The use of private septic systems within the City may have
contributed to soil instability. While lot size does not mandate a
conversion to a common sewage system, the City may facilitate
such a conversion.
o The need for housing within the City has required the
implementation of the RDMO Zone to allow for uses, including
multifamily, single room occupancy, and emergency shelters.
48
65277.00010\33543394.1
LAND USE ELEMENT
4
OVERVIEW OF LAND USE PLAN
The Rolling Hills Land Use Policy Map is presented in Figure LU-2. The Map
provides a graphic representation of the General Plan’s development policies and
indicates land uses as they are designated and for which policies and standards
have been formulated. The major goal of Rolling Hills’ General Plan Update is to
maintain and foster the community’s rural and residential environment while
ensuring that new development is in conformance with established community
standards.
The land use classifications designated by the General Plan provide for the
development of the community’s limited vacant properties in a manner that is
consistent with established and approved development patterns. The land use
classifications established by this General Plan Update reflect a system that is
different but generally consistent with the previous land use classifications. The
City’s policy retains the existing low-density land use pattern, while
accommodating a range of housing types as required by State law. Table LU-2
presents the list of updated General Plan land use categories, their general
development standards and characteristics. The following discussion will
elaborate on the location and intent of the General Plan land uses.
Residential Land Uses
The Plan continues the City’s two existing residential land use categories - Low
Density and Very Low Density. The former mandates establishes a density of one
unit per acre and the latter establishes a density of one unit per two acres. Zoning
provisions have been developed to allow accessory dwelling units. Through these
classifications, the City will be able to ensure that the remaining undeveloped
properties throughout Rolling Hills will be developed at densities that are
compatible with existing residential development.
Civic Center
The Civic Center designation has been added to the Land Use Policy Map to
specify the 1.3 acre area that is currently used by the City for its administrative
offices. The Civic Center land use category has been created to accurately reflect
uses that exist within the City, and to provide consistency between the General
Plan Land Use Policy Map and the Zoning Map.
BOX REPRESENTS MAP THAT WAS ON PAGE 11 OF PDF
49
65277.00010\33543394.1
LAND USE ELEMENT
5
TABLE LU-2
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE CATEGORIES
Designation
Development
Standards
Development
Characteristics
Residential
Very Low Density
Low Density
2+ net acres/dwelling
unit, single story
1-2 net acres/dwelling
unit, single story
Single-family homes on
large lots, usually custom
designed. Parcels often
contain varied topography
and canyon areas.
Single-family homes on
large lots, often custom
designed.
Public
Civic Center
Publicly-Owned Open
Space
Single story
Development prohibited
City Hall and associated
facilities.
Equestrian riding rings and
undeveloped open space
areas owned by the City.
Landslide Hazard
Overlay
Development prohibited
unless landslide hazard is
mitigated
Active landslide areas
requiring mitigation of
geologic hazards prior to
development.
Rancho Del Mar Housing
Opportunity Overlay
Public Facilities permitted.
Two story construction
permitted.
Multifamily Housing
permitted up to 24 units
per acre.
School Facilities
Transportation Facilities
Clustered Housing and
Special Housing Types
50
65277.00010\33543394.1
LAND USE ELEMENT
6
Publicly-Owned Open Space
While the majority of recreational open space within the community is maintained
by the Rolling Hills Community Association, a limited amount of open space is
also owned by the City. Areas of publicly-owned open space lie at the northern
end of Storm Hill where a parcel of eight acres was dedicated to the City through
the provisions of the Quimby Act. Also included as publicly owned open space
are the two equestrian riding rings owned by the City. The purpose of separating
out publicly-owned open space is to identify lands that are owned and maintained
by the City and will remain as open space. In addition, this land use category
could also be utilized in the future for any additional open space land purchased
by the City.
Landslide Hazard Overlay
A Landslide Hazard Overlay classification has been created to address the
landslide hazards present in Rolling Hills. Landslide hazards have occurred most
notably in the Flying Triangle area beginning in 1980. The reasons for the onset
of landslide activity are multiple and are addressed in detail in the Safety Element.
The Landslide Hazard Overlay classification has been developed to further
establish the City’s continuing policy which prohibits development in areas which
are known to be subject to active landslides, specifically the Flying Triangle.
Establishing this policy in the General Plan provides the framework for the
inclusion of specific criteria in the Zoning Ordinance. Residential development
will be permitted pursuant to the underlying zoning, only where evidence can be
provided that establishes such development as posing no hazard to the property or
adjacent properties. This evidence will be formed on a case by case basis upon
review of geologic and soils information and hydrologic and topographic
analyses. The Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance, upon revision, will specify
development constraints in overlay areas.
Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay (RDMO) Zone
A RDMO Zone has been created to meet State housing requirements and
provide opportunities for a variety of housing types. The City is required
by State law to plan for its fair share of regional housing needs, including
housing for all income groups. Because Rolling Hills is developed with
large, environmentally constrained lots that make higher densities
impractical, the City has determined that the best way to accomplish the
State requirements is through providing opportunities with a combination
of accessory dwelling units (“in-law apartments”) and multifamily
housing.
The City has identified a specific parcel located at 38 Crest Road West,
Rolling Hills, California to accommodate it share of regional housing
needs. The 30.3-acre parcel is designated Very Low Density Residential,
51
65277.00010\33543394.1
LAND USE ELEMENT
7
which allows one unit per two acres—or 15 units for the entire site. To
meet the current and projected housing needs of the City, the City is
creating an overlay zone on the specific parcel located at 38 Crest Road
West, Rolling Hills, California to allow multifamily residential housing at
the maximum density of 24 units per acre. The Rolling Hills Zoning
Ordinance includes an overlay zoning district which codifies this
requirement.
Other land uses, such as public facilities, parks, and transportation
facilities, are permitted within this overlay.
Implications of Land Use Policy
The Land Use Element provides for the continued residential emphasis of the
Rolling Hills community. The General Plan ensures that this growth will take
place in a way that promotes compatibility with adjacent properties, preserves the
existing rural residential character, and is environmentally sensitive. The amount
of additional growth that can be accommodated under this General Plan is
presented as Table LU-3. As this table illustrates, the Plan only provides for the
expansion of residential uses.
52
65277.00010\33543394.1
LAND USE ELEMENT
8
TABLE LU-3
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
ESTIMATED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT
NET INCREASE IN DEVELOPMENT
Residential Acres Dwelling Units Population
Very Low Density 148.50 49 156.8
Low Density 24.25 10 32.0
(RDMO)(30.3)(24)(76.8)
Totals 172.75 73 265.6
Based on an average household size of 3.2 persons.
Source:City of Rolling Hills
Cotton/Beland/Associates, Inc.
The Plan accommodates a maximum net increase of 59 single-family dwelling
units and 24 multifamily dwelling units. The majority of this growth would occur
on the properties under the Very Low Density classification, residential
development on 2+ acre parcels. Growth in the residential areas will occur under
different circumstances. The population of Rolling Hills as of January 1, 1989
was 2,092. Over the City’s 2.98 square miles the population density is 702
persons per square mile. Based on Department of Finance estimates of an average
3.2 persons per household in Rolling Hills, an additional 266 persons could reside
in the City under General Plan buildout.
53
65277.00010\33543394.1
LAND USE ELEMENT
9
GOALS AND POLICIES
The following goals and policies reflect current land use issues affecting the
community of Rolling Hills and will serve as a guide to future policy decisions
made for the City.
GOAL 1: Maintain Rolling Hills’ distinctive rural residential character.
Policy 1.1: Maintain the City’s one and two acre minimum lot size requirements.
Policy 1.2: Maintain the City’s one story height limitation for single-family
residences to preserve scenic viewsheds.
Policy 1.3: Require the use of landscaping which is compatible with the City’s
rural character.
Policy 1.4: Require that development conform with the City’s existing low-
profile, ranch style architecture.
Policy 1.5: Preserve a natural twilight environment at night by prohibiting street
lighting and uplighting of landscaping and minimizing driveway lighting.
Policy 1.6: Evaluate the City’s existing requirement for minimum stable size to
assess its appropriateness and effectiveness.GOAL 2: Accommodate
development which is compatible with and complements existing land uses.
Policy 2.1: Evaluate the City’s lot coverage standards to assess their effectiveness
in providing for development which is compatible with adjacent uses.
Policy 2.2: Require that lighting of residential properties not adversely affect
adjacent residences.
Policy 2.3: Maintain and provide regulations for sufficient setbacks and
easements to provide buffers between residential uses.
Policy 2.4:Ensure the siting of buildings maintain and preserve viewscapes from
adjacent structures through the site review process.
GOAL 3: Accommodate development that is sensitive to the natural
environment and accounts for environmental hazards.
Policy 3.1: Establish a Landslide Overlay classification to reflect the more
stringent development standards the City has applied to development in active
landslide areas.
Policy 3.2:Maintain strict grading practices to preserve the community’s natural
terrain.
54
65277.00010\33543394.1
LAND USE ELEMENT
10
Policy 3.3:Require the use of native, naturally fire resistant landscape materials
in development.
Policy 3.4:Maintain the City’s open space requirement to preserve natural
vegetation and wildlife habitat.
Policy 3.5: Facilitate the preservation and restoration of viewscapes through the
removal of obstructions.
GOAL 4: Accommodate development that provides housing opportunities.
Policy 4.1: Ensure that zoning regulations provide for a variety of housing
types, as required by State law and in a manner that is compatible with the
other policies expressed in the Land Use Element.
55
Environmental – Planning – Engineering
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing
Overlay Zone
Initial Study –Negative Declaration
prepared for
City of Rolling Hiils
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, California 90274
prepared by
CSG Consultants, Inc.
3707 W. Garden Grove Boulevard, Suite 100
Orange, California 90274
November 2020
56
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. Page | 2 November 2020
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION 6
1.1. Background 7
1.2 Purpose and Legal Authority 7
1.3 Lead Agency 8
2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 9
2.1 Project Title 9
2.2 Lead Agency Name and Address 9
2.3 Contact Person Name and Phone Number 9
2.4 Project Location 9
2.5 General Plan Designation 9
2.6 Zoning 9
2.7 Project Description 9
2.8 Required Approvals 14
2.9 Tribal Consultation 14
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 15
3.1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected 16
3.2 Lead Agency Determination 17
4.0 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 17
4.1 Aesthetics 17
4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources 21
4.3 Air Quality 25
4.4 Biological Resources 30
4.5 Cultural Resources 35
4.6 Energy 37
4.7 Geology and Soils 39
4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 47
4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 51
4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality 60
4.11 Land Use and Planning 65
4.12 Mineral Resources 67
4.13 Noise 70
4.14 Population Housing 73
4.15 Public Services 75
4.16 Recreation 80
57
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. Page | 3 November 2020
4.17 Transportation and Traffic 82
4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources 85
4.19 Utilities and Service Systems 88
4.20 Wildfire 92
4.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance 97
5.0 REFERENCES 99
FIGURES
1. Regional Map 103
2. Project Location 104
3. Existing and Proposed Project Site 105
4. Landslide Hazard Zones 106
5. Fault Zones ______ 107
6. Clean Up Sites 108
7. Fire Hazard Zones 109
TABLES
Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning 110
58
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. Page | 4 November 2020
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
ALUC Airport Land Use Commission
AQMP Air Quality Management Plan
ARB Air Resources Board
AB Assembly Bill
CAL Fire California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
Action Plan California Energy Efficiency Action Plan
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CNDDB California Natural Diversity Database
Cal Water California Water Service Company
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
CAP Climate Action Plan
CWPP Community Wildfire Protection Plan
CC&Rs Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions
DOC Department of Conservation
DOF Department of Finance
DPH Department of Public Health
DDW Division of Drinking Water
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
FHSZ Fire Hazard Severity Zone
GWP Global Warming Potential
GHG Greenhouse Gases
HCP Habitat Conservation Plan
HCD Housing and Community Development
IS Initial Study
LU Land Use
LAMP Local Agency Management Program
LRA Local Resources Area
LAC Los Angeles County
LACFD Los Angeles County Fire Department
LACSD Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department
MOU Memorandum of Understanding
MRZ Mineral Resources Zone
MWD Municipal Water District
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NCCP Natural Community Conservation Plan
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
59
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. Page | 5 November 2020
NAHC Native American Heritage Commission
SB 18 Native American Heritage Commission Establishment
AB 52 Native American Historic Resource Protection Act
NCCP Natural Community Conservation Plan
ND Negative Declaration
NO2 Nitrogen Oxide
NOWTS Non-Conventional Onsite Wastewater Treatment
OWTS Onsite Wastewater Treatment System
OZD-1 Overlay Zone District 1
O2 Ozone
PVPTA Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority
PVUSD Palos Verdes Unified School District
PM-25 Particulate Matter
RTD Regional Transit District
RAS-1 Residential Agriculture Suburban 1+ Acres
RAS-2 Residential Agriculture Suburban 2+ Acres
RHCA Rolling Hills Community Association
RPV Runway Protection Zone
SB Senate Bill
SVP Society of Vertebrate Paleontology
SCAQMD Southern California Air Quality Management District
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SRA State Resources Area
SR State Route
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management Systems
USDA United States Department of Agriculture
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled
VHFSSZ Very High Fire Standard Severity Zone
60
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. Page | 6 November 2020
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This document constitutes an Initial Study (IS) that evaluates the potential environmental effects
of the City of Rolling Hills’ (City; Rolling Hills) proposed overlay zone at the property at 38 Crest
Road West (Project; proposed Project), also known as the Palos Verdes Unified School District
school site; the addition of a Mixed-Use Multi-Family Overlay Zone (Rancho Del Mar Affordable
Housing Overlay Zone); all associated General Plan Land Use Element updates; as well as all
related Zoning Ordinance and associated Map changes.
The proposed Project would establish a new mixed-use, multi-family overlay zone that would
accommodate the existing uses on the site, as well as allow for new multi-family units to be
developed at a future date. The proposed Project would include:
• The creation of a new overlay designation – Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay
Zone;
• Amendments to the City’s General Plan Land Element and Map;
• Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance (Title 17 of the Municipal Code) and related zoning map
to add the new “Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone”. The City has one other
overlay zone that has been adopted and mapped for an area of smaller lots and steep terrain.
(See Rolling Hills Municipal Code Chapter 17.17 (Overlay Zoning District – 1 (OZD-1).) The
number of units allowed by the “base” General Plan designation on this site must be clustered;
in other words, the overlay allows 15 multi-family units on this site by right.
• Preparation of an Initial Study/Negative Declaration (IS/ND) for the Proposed Project.
The City is undertaking this Project as part of its Housing Element Update. The zone change and
new overlay zone will enable the City of Rolling Hills to accommodate its RHNA allocations under
the 4th and 5th Cycle RHNA requirements, including accommodation of affordable housing units
as well as emergency shelters and Single Room Occupancy Housing. The total number of units that
will be accommodated “by right” under the 4th and 5th Cycles would be a total of 15 units,
including low income units and very low income units. Though emergency shelters and Single
Room Occupancy (SRO) residential uses are also currently permitted under the City’s Municipal
Code and may be allowed in the future, these units will not be allowed to be counted as the total
dwelling units required under the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for all future
Cycles. Additionally, the proposed Project would also allow for the continued use of the public
facilities, schools and transportation facilities at the site.
The Project site is not currently proposed for development. The development of a new overlay
zone, and all associated General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Map changes are currently being
undertaken by the City so as to provide the opportunity for additional housing on the site in the
future.
This document concludes that a Negative Declaration (ND) is the appropriate level of
environmental review for the proposed Project. Therefore, the IS/ND has been prepared in
accordance with Public Resources Code (PRC) Section §21000 et seq. and the California
61
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. Page | 7 November 2020
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), California Code of Regulations Section §15000 et seq. It
evaluates the potential environmental effects associated with the proposed Project.
1.1 Background
A jurisdiction’s General Plan is intended to maintain and augment its built and natural
environments, as well as to provide a vision for future development. Its Zoning Ordinance is
therefore one of its main tools to implement the jurisdiction’s land use policies and guide any
development. Any changes to a jurisdiction’s land use may typically require changes to its land
use and associated zoning.
The City of Rolling Hills adopted its first General Plan in June of 1990 and incorporated goals and
policies for six Elements - Land Use, Open Space and Conservation, Safety, Noise, Circulation, and
Housing. The Housing Element was last updated in 2014 to address the Planning period from 2014-
2021. The City’s Zoning Ordinance was originally published in 1979 with updates made to
incorporate an Overlay Zoning District (OZD-1) in 2012. As of February 24, 2020, the Zoning
Ordinance has been brought up to date through Ordinance No. 364.
1.2 Purpose and Legal Authority
In accordance with State CEQA Guidelines, the City of Rolling Hills, as the Lead Agency, has made
the determination that the preparation of an Initial Study is the appropriate level of environmental
review for the proposed Project. An Initial Study is conducted by a lead agency to determine
whether a project may have significant environmental impacts. If so, then the agency shall further
find than an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is appropriate to analyze the Project’s impacts.
However, if the lead agency finds that there is no evidence of the Project’s significant impacts on
the environment, then the lead agency shall prepare a Negative Declaration (ND) or a Mitigated
Negative Declaration (MND) for the proposed Project. Per the State CEQA Guidelines Section
§15070 MND or ND shall be prepared for a Project when:
a) The initial study shows there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before
the agency, that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment; or,
b) The initial study identifies potentially significant effects; but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before
the proposed negative declaration is released for public review would avoid the effects
or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur; and,
(2) There is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency, that the
proposed project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment.
If revisions are adopted in the proposed project in accordance with CEQA Guidelines
SectionI§15070(b), including the adoption of the mitigation measures included in the document,
then a mitigated negative declaration can be prepared.
62
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. Page | 8 November 2020
According to the State CEQA Guidelines, this IS/ND is intended as an informational document that
is required to be adopted by the Rolling Hills City Council. Based on the analysis provided by this
IS/ND, the City has determined that the proposed rezoning and establishment of a new mixed-use
multi-family overlay zone, also known as the Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone,
is the appropriate designation for the Project site. The City is also undertaking the necessary
General Plan Land Use Element, and Housing Element updates as well as all related Zoning
Ordinance and map changes, as required under the Proposed Project. The approximate 31-acre site
located at 38 Crest Road West (also known as the Palos Verdes Unified School District School site)
would not result in significant impacts on the environment from revisions to the City’s Zoning
Ordinance. However, any future land use changes and development pursuant to these revisions to
the Zoning Ordinance would be further subject to additional environmental review, as
appropriate.
1.3 Lead Agency
As defined by CEQA, the Lead Agency for a proposed Project is the public agency with primary
responsibility for carrying out or approving the Project (CEQA Guidelines Section §15367. The lead
agency then has discretionary authority over the proposed Project. Where two or public agencies
are involved in a project, CEQA Guidelines Section §15051(b)(1) states that “the lead agency will
normally be the agency with general governmental powers, such as a city or county, rather than
an agency with a single or limited purpose”. Based on these criteria, the City is the Lead Agency
for the purposes of the proposed Project.
63
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. Page | 9 November 2020
2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
1. PROJECT TITLE:
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
2. LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS:
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
3. CONTACT PERSON NAME AND PHONE NUMBER:
Meredith T. Elguira
Planning Director
(310) 377-1521
4. PROJECT LOCATION:
38 Crest Road West, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 (see Figures 1 and 2).
5. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
The project site is designated “Very Low-Density Residential 2+ Net Acres/Dwelling Unit”
in the Rolling Hills General Plan. This allows for the development of single-family
residential units on two or more acre lots.
6. ZONING:
The project site is currently zoned - Residential Agriculture – Suburban with a minimum
lot size of two acres (RAS-2).
7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Project Location
The Project site is located in Los Angeles County, at 38 Crest Road West, City of Rolling
Hills (Figure 1: Regional Location Map). It has a total acreage of 31.14 acres, with 27.58
acres of developed land and open areas and 3.56 acres of private access roadways (Figure
2: Project Location Map). The site is situated at the southern end of the City’s jurisdiction
and is bounded by Crest Road West to the north, open spaces and residential uses to the
east, south and west. State Highway 1 (SR-1) is approximately 3 miles to the north of the
site, while Interstate 110 (I-110) is approximately miles to the east. The Pacific Ocean is 1.5
miles to the south and 3.5 miles to the west of the project site and the City. Access to the
Project site is from Crest Road West.
64
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. Page | 10 November 2020
65
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. Page | 11 November 2020
66
Environmental – Planning – Engineering
Project Site
The approximate 31-acre site currently houses the Rancho Del Mar High School building, the Beach
Cities Learning Center, and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority (PVP Transit Authority;
PVPTA). This parcel of land is owned by the Palos Verdes Unified School District (PVUSD) and
has an existing school (Rancho Del Mar School) located at this site. However, the Rancho Del Mar
School facility is not being utilized as a school site at the present time. Access to the Project site is
through a private roadway that veers off Crest Road West. A few unpaved internal roadways
traverse the site. The site slopes from east to west, from the Beach Cities Learning Center to the
Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority, with an approximate 38 feet drop from east end of the
Project site. Vegetation on-site consists of a few trees around the existing buildings and a mix of
grasses and paved areas. The portion of the PVP Transit Authority site is primarily paved, with
few buildings, parking areas and storage buildings. The site is currently zoned Residential
Agriculture Suburban-2-Acres (RAS-2) and has a General Plan Land Use designation of Very Low-
Density Residential 2+ Net Acres.
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
Immediate land uses around the Project site are primarily large lot residential. Los Angeles County
Fire Station 56 is approximately 1,OOO feet to the east of the site, while St. John Fisher Church and
School site are about 2,000 feet to the east. Del Cerro Park is about 2,00 feet to the south-west of the
Project site (Table 1: Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning)
Project Components
The proposed Project would establish a new overlay zone (Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing
Overlay Zone) that would accommodate the existing uses on the site, as well as allow for new
multi-family and emergency shelters and Single Room Occupancy housing units to be developed
in the future (Figure 3: Existing and Proposed Zoning Map). The proposed Project would also
require the appropriate amendments to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Land Use
Map, and the Zoning Ordinance text and Map in order to accommodate the creation of the new
overlay zone. These changes would then allow for future construction of 15 clustered multi-family
units, consistent with the one unit/acre designation.
Table 1: Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning
Location Jurisdiction Zoning Designation
North of
the Project
Site
City of Rolling Hills Residential Agriculture Suburban –
2-Acres (RAS-2)
South of
the Project
Site
City of Rancho Palos
Verdes
Residential Single Lot – 20, 000
Square Feet
East of the
Project Site
City of Rolling Hills Residential Agriculture Suburban –
1-Acre (RAS-1)
West of the
Project Site
City of Rancho Palos
Verdes
Residential Single Lot – 20, 000
Square Feet
67
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 13 City of Rolling Hills
68
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 14 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following specific components:
• Preparation of a Negative Declaration for the General Plan and Zoning Amendment and associated
map changes.
• Amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element to add new Overlay zone designation to be
known as the Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. The associated land use map is
being amended to add the overlay to the 31-acre Palos Verdes Unified School District (PVUSD) site
on Crest Road (also known as the Rancho Del Mar High School Site). Other amendments to the
Land Use Element will be made as needed to recognize that multi-family uses are permitted and
anticipated within this overlay area.
• Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance (Title 17 of the Municipal Code) and related zoning map to
add the “Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone”. The City has one other overlay zone
that has been adopted and mapped for an area of smaller lots and steep terrain. (See Rolling Hills
Municipal Code Chapter 17.17 (Overlay Zoning District – 1 (OZD-1).) The number of units allowed
by the “base” General Plan designation on this site must be clustered; in other words, the overlay
allows 15 multi-family units on this site by right.
However, the Project is currently not being developed with any structures at the site. The proposed
overlay zone that would allow for the addition of new multi-family units would also assist the City
in meeting its future housing requirements mandated under the California Department of Housing
and Community Development (CA HCD). The City of Rolling Hills will be able to accommodate
its 4th and 5th Cycle housing needs for its Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), including
accommodation of affordable housing units. The new Overlay Zone will also accommodate
emergency shelters and Single Room Occupancy Housing as part of the Housing Element Update.
It should be noted, however, that the environmental review under this IS/ND (Rancho Del Mar
Affordable Housing Overlay Zone District IS/ND) is to only evaluate all the planning document
level changes that are being currently proposed (addition of a new overlay zone for the City, related
changes to the City’s Zoning Ordinance and Map, and changes in the related General Plan
Elements and Map). Any future new housing projects that may result from these document level
changes would require their own environmental reviews, before any development changes are
approved for the Project site. The City will thus undertake the appropriate level of environmental
review as Projects at this site are proposed and developed.
Project Approvals
As the Lead Agency, the City of Rolling Hills City Council has the ultimate authority to
approve or deny the Project. The proposed Project will require the following approvals:
• Adoption of the Initial Study/ Negative Declaration
• Creation of a new overlay zone (Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone)
• Amendments to the City of Rolling Hills General Plan Land Use Element
• Amendments to the City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance Text
• Amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map
69
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 15 City of Rolling Hills
8. REQUIRED APPROVALS:
The City of Rolling Hills is the Lead Agency for the proposed Project, which is the creation of a
new overlay zone (Rancho Del Mar Overlay Zone), amendment to the City’s General Plan Land
Use Element, amendment to the related General Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map, and a
Zoning Ordinance text amendment to incorporate standards for the new overlay zone into Title 17
of the City’s Municipal Code . No discretionary approvals would be required from any other
agency.
9. HAVE CALIFORNIA NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBES AFFILIATED WITH THE
PROJECT AREA REQUESTED CONSULTATION PURSUANT TO PUBLIC
RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21080.3.1 IF SO, HAS HAD CONSULTATION BEEN
INITIATIED?
Tribal Consultation letters, pursuant to PRC §21080.3.1 were sent out by the City of Rolling Hills,
on October 16, 2020, in order to comply with the provisions of SB 18 and AB 52. A total of six
individual letters were sent to the following local tribes:
• Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation
• Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians
• Gabrielino/Tongva Nation
• Gabrielino Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council
• Gabrielino – Tongva Tribe
• Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians
70
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 16 City of Rolling Hills
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
3.1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project.
Aesthetics Agriculture and
Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology and Soils Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Hazards and Hazardous
Materials
Hydrology and Water
Quality
Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources
Noise Population/Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation/Traffi
c
Tribal Cultural Resources
Utilities and Service
Systems
Wildfire Findings of Mandatory
Significance
71
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 17 City of Rolling Hills
3.2 LEAD AGENCY DETERMINATION
Based on this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in
the Project have been made by or agreed to by the Project proponent. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed Project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed Project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or
“potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least
one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures
based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the
effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the
environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to
applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that
earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation
measures that are imposed upon the proposed Project, nothing further is
required.
Signature Agency
Printed Name/Title Date
72
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 18 City of Rolling Hills
4.0 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
4.1 Aesthetics
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista?
b. Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees,
rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a State Scenic
highway?
c. In non-urbanized areas, substantially
degrade the existing visual character
or quality of public views of the site
and its surroundings? (Public views
are those that are experienced from
publicly accessible vantage point). If
the project is in an urbanized area,
would the project conflict with
applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic quality?
d. Create a new source of substantial
light or glare which would adversely
affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills is characterized by beautiful wooded areas with deep canyons and hilly terrain
located on the Palos Verdes Peninsula. Views of the Pacific Ocean, Catalina Island, city lights, and Los
Angeles Harbor are special and unique qualities of property ownership in the City. It is located
approximately 3.5 miles from the Pacific Ocean to the west and 1.5 miles from the Pacific Ocean, to the
south.
Though the City is considered an urban area, it mainly encompasses large, open area parcels with walking
and horse-riding trails that characterize the City as a more rural area. Many of these parcels are located on
slopes, which allow for the preservation of large amounts of privately owned open spaces. Laced
throughout the community are approximately 25 miles of private equestrian trails that are enjoyed by both
73
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 19 City of Rolling Hills
residents and non-residents, so long as non-residents obtain a City-issued permit. Even with these amounts
of scenic views and natural vegetation, the City does not have any designated Scenic Highways. There are
not any streams or water bodies located within the City. Major roadways include Crest Drive located north
of the Project site and running east to west, Palos Verdes Drive located outside of City boundaries and
running east to west, and Crenshaw Boulevard, also located outside of City boundaries and running north
to south.
DICUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
A scenic vista is typically an area that offers a scenic vantagepoint of natural resources such as the
ocean, mountain ranges, and distant city skylines. For CEQA purposes, scenic vistas generally provide
expansive views of a highly valued landscape for the enjoyment and benefit of the public. Some of the
major scenic vistas within the City are those associated with the Pacific Ocean, the San Pedro Harbor,
and the skyline of neighboring cities. The proposed Project includes the following components: a)
update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and
map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable
Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future, would allow for taller multi-
family structures on the existing site that could have an impact on scenic vistas from surrounding
properties, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time
and therefore does not degrade the views of any scenic vista. All future development resulting from
the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to
comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy level
document, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific visual impacts to scenic vistas, at this level
of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Therefore, the proposed Project
would have a less than significant impact on scenic vistas.
b. Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
The City of Rolling Hills currently does not have an Historic Preservation Ordinance and does not
have any State designated historic structures. The Project Site is located near the California State Route
(SR) 1 (Pacific Coast Highway and SR 213 (Western Avenue), which are located approximately 2.5
miles to the north and east of the City, respectively. Portions of Pacific Coast Highway are designated
as a State Scenic Route, but no portions of this highway is located within City boundaries. The City’s
General Plan does not identify any local scenic roadways in the City.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new buildings on the existing site that could have an
impact on scenic vistas from surrounding properties, as a policy-level document, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time and therefore does not
damage any scenic resources. All future development resulting from the implementation of the Land
74
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 20 City of Rolling Hills
Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan
policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific visual impacts to scenic vistas, at this level of environmental review. Future land
uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. The Proposed Project in itself would not substantially damage scenic
resources, including but limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state
scenic highway. The Project would therefore have no impact.
c. Would the project, in non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are
experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would
the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
Although the City’s General Plan describes the City of Rolling Hills as rural residential, the City is
actually located in an urban area. The City’s municipal code and General Policies incorporate several
provisions that are meant to preserve the visual character and private views for its residence. The
proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element
text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and
adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new and taller buildings on the existing site that could
have an impact on scenic vistas from surrounding properties, the Project in itself does not propose or
authorize any new development at the current time and therefore does not degrade visual character
or pubic views. All future development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element
updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies,
Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential
site-specific visual impacts to scenic vistas, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that
would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews
per CEQA regulation. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have a less than significant impact on
the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings.
d. Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect
daytime or nighttime views in the area?
The City of Rolling Hills consists of only single-family homes that are located on large lots with ample
open space. The rural nature of the City does not emit significant amounts of ambient light. The
minimal light and glare in the City limits emanate only from residential outdoor lighting including
those on pedestrian and vehicular pathways, porches and exterior wall lighting, as well as security
lighting. The City’s Zoning Code does not include provisions for street lighting.
Though the Proposed Project would not directly result in any development in itself, the change in
General Plan Land Use Designation from “Educational” to “Residential Agricultural Suburban – 1
Acre”, and changes to the City’s Housing Element allocations could have impacts on light and glare
under future development. The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the
General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map
amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable
Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes would allow for new buildings on the existing
75
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 21 City of Rolling Hills
site, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All
future development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning
changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design
standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific visual impacts
to scenic vistas, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of
the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The
Project would have a less than significant impact from new sources of substantial light or glare that
would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
76
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 22 City of Rolling Hills
4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use?
b. Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract?
c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in
Public Resources Code section 12220(g)),
timberland (as defined by Public Resources
Code section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined by
Government Code section 51104(g))?
d. Result in the loss of forest land or
conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
e. Involve other changes in the existing
environment, which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forestland to non-forest use?
SETTING
According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), there are four primary agricultural
classifications – Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, Farmland of Local
Importance. Prime Farmland is land that has the best combination of physical and chemical characteristics
for producing food, feed, forage, fiber, and oilseed crops and is also available for these uses. Unique
Farmland as land other than Prime Farmland that is used for the production of specific high-value food
and fiber crops. Farmland of Statewide Importance is determined to be land that does not meet the criteria
for prime or unique farmland, but can be land that food, feed, fiber, forage and oilseed crops can be
produced. Farmland of Local Importance is any land designated for agriculture by local ordinance for food,
fiber, forage and oilseed crops.
The City of Rolling Hill’s topography includes steep hills, rocky terrain, and wooded brushes, all of which
do not exhibit characteristics determined to meet the criteria for Prime, Unique, Farmland of Statewide
77
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 23 City of Rolling Hills
Importance, or Farmland of Local Importance. The Department of Conservation (DOC) has not designated
any areas in the City as Prime, Unique, or Farmland of Statewide Importance.
The Williamson Act allows local governments to enter into contracts with private landowners for the
purpose of restricting specific parcels of land to agricultural or related open space use. Landowners can
then receive lower property tax assessments as the taxes would be based upon farming and open space
uses instead of full market value. According to the 2016-2017 Williamson Act Status Report, Los Angeles
County is a non-participating county, which is further demonstrated in the State of California Williamson
Act Contract Land map where the City of Rolling Hills is categorized under “non-enrolled land.” As a
result, the City is not enrolled in Williamson Act contracts and does not support forest land or forestry
resources.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance
(Farmland), as shown on maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
The California Department of Conservation’s (DOC) Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
and Williamson Act Maps do not show the Project site or the adjacent properties as areas that have
agricultural uses, or as areas that have been enrolled in a Williamson Act contract. The proposed
Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and
Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of
new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed
changes in the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a
policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific visual impacts to scenic vistas,
at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed
Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. However, since
there are no agricultural lands on the Project site, the Proposed Project in itself would not convert
Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, to non-agricultural use,
and there would be no impact.
b. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract?
The City of Rolling Hills General Plan Land Use Element and Land Use Policy Map do not show any
agricultural designations within the City, although the Zoning Map designates the current project site
as Residential Agriculture-Suburban, with a minimum lot size of 2-acres. The proposed Project
includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b)
related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new
Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in
the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future development resulting
from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to
comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy level
document, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific visual impacts to scenic vistas, at this level
of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. However, since there are no
78
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 24 City of Rolling Hills
agricultural lands on the Project site, the Proposed Project in itself would not conflict with existing
zoning for agricultural uses or a Williamson Act contract. and there would be no impact.
c. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in
Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)); timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section
4526); or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section
51104(g))?
The City of Rolling Hills is known as a rural city characterized by an abundance of landscaping
consisting of Pepper Trees, Geraniums, and Matilija Poppy. However, there are no zoning
designations for forest lands within the City, which in turn does not affect any forest lands on the
Project site. The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan
Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the
creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone.
While these proposed changes in the future, would allow new development on the existing Project
site, future development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element and zoning
changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design
standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific visual impacts
to scenic vistas, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of
the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation.
However, since there are no forest lands on the Project site, the Proposed Project would not conflict
with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned
Timberland Productions; there be no impact.
d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
The City of Rolling Hills does not contain or have any designations for forest lands. The proposed
Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and
Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of
new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed
changes in the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a
policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific visual impacts to scenic vistas,
at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed
Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. However, since
there are no forest lands on the Project site, the Proposed Project in itself would not result in the loss
of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. The proposed Project would have no
impact.
e. Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest
land to non-forest use?
The California Department of Conservation’s (DOC) Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
does not designate any areas within the City of Rolling Hills as Prime, Unique, Farmland of Statewide
Importance, or Farmland of Local Importance. Furthermore, the City’s General Plan Land Use Map
79
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 25 City of Rolling Hills
does not show any future land uses designated for farmland or forest land. The proposed Project
includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b)
related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new
Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in
the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future development resulting
from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to
comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy level
document, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific visual impacts to scenic vistas, at this level
of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. However, since there are no
agricultural lands on the Project site, the Proposed Project in itself would not result in conversion of
Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use; there would be no
impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
80
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 26 City of Rolling Hills
4.3 Air Quality
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
c. Conflict or obstruct implementation of
the applicable air quality plan?
d. Result in a cumulatively considerable
net increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable federal
or state ambient air quality standard?
e. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
f. Result in other emissions (such as those
leading to odors) adversely affecting a
substantial number of people?
SETTING
Air pollution can have an adverse effect on the health and quality of life of those in areas that experience
particularly higher levels of pollutants. Pollutants are generally caused by the various emissions from such
things as mobile sources, power plants, agricultural operations and wood burning. The Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) determined the six most common air pollutants known as “criteria” pollutants,
that are the most detrimental to the environment and developed National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) to help combat environmental impacts. These pollutants include carbon monoxide, lead, ground-
level ozone, particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide. Primary standards are set at a level
intended to protect public health, including the health of at-risk populations, with an appropriate margin
of safety.
The Project site is located within the South Coast Air Basin (Basin), which is under the jurisdiction of the
South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). SCAQMD is responsible for monitoring criteria
air pollutant levels to ensure project meet either state and federal air quality standards or, to assist projects
develop strategies that will meet the standards. An air quality area basin is categorized as being in
“attainment” or “nonattainment” based on whether or not it meets it allocated air quality standards.
According to the EPA, the 2015 South Coast Air Basin Maximum Pollutant Concentrations (Figures 4.3.1:
2015 South Coast Air Basin Maximum Pollutant Concentration;, 4.3.2: Trend of Basin Days Exceeding
Federal Standards 1990-2015; and 4.3.3: 2015 South Coast Air Basin Quality Compared to Other U.S. Urban
Areas) in the Basin exceeded the pollutant concentration levels defined by the NAAQS for ozone, PM2.5,
and NO2, designating the Basin as an “extreme” nonattainment area.
81
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 27 City of Rolling Hills
Figure 4.3.1: 2015 South Coast Air Basin
Maximum Pollutant Concentrations
Source: CA Air Quality Management Plan, 2016; http://www.aqmd.gov/
Figure 4.3.2: Trend of Basin Days Exceeding
Federal Standards 1990-2015
Source: 2016 Air Quality management Plan; http://www.aqmd.gov/
82
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 28 City of Rolling Hills
Figure 4.3.3: 2015 South Coast Air Basin Quality
Compared to Other U.S. Urban Areas
Source: 2016 Air Quality management Plan; http://www.aqmd.gov/
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
The City’s goal is to conserve and enhance the City’s natural resources, facilitating in development in
a manner which reflects the characteristics, sensitivities and constraints of these resources. In events
where air quality becomes an issue, the City outlines in Policy 1.10 in the City of Rolling Hills General
Plan Open Space and Conservation Element utilizes the South Coast Air Quality Management Plan
(SCAQMP) as a source of reference when compliance with air quality standards are required. By using
this document as a reference, the City will continue to be consistent with the provisions outlined in
the SCAQMP.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new uses on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to the
related to changes to the applicable air quality plans, at this level of environmental review. Future
83
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 29 City of Rolling Hills
land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone and the proposed zoning and
General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA
regulation. The proposed Project in itself would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
appliable air quality plan and impacts are less than significant.
b. Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard?
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has designated the South Coast Air Basin (Basin) as an
extreme nonattainment area due to the high levels of criteria pollutants that are present in the Basin.
The proposed Project site is within the South Coast Air Basin which exceeds the pollutant
concentration levels for Ozone, PM2.5 and NO2. As a result of the existing poor air quality, new
developments may add to and potentially increase the levels of criteria pollutants within the Basin.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new housing uses on the existing site, the Project in
itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development
resulting from the All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the
proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not
possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to the related to cumulative air pollutant increase, at
this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone and the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to
their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The proposed Project in itself would not
result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant, and would have less than
significant impact.
c. Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
The Air Resources Board (ARB) defines sensitive receptors as children, elderly, asthmatics and others
who are at a high risk of negative health outcomes due to exposure to air pollution. Areas or places
where sensitive receptors congregate are considered sensitive receptor locations, and are places such
as hospitals, and daycare centers. The Project site is currently a school site that includes a high school,
a learning center and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings and additional people on the existing site,
the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time and
therefore would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, at this time of
environmental review. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the
proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply
84
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 30 City of Rolling Hills
with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not
possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this level of environmental review. Since future
land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. While the proposed Project in itself would not expose
sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, impacts remain less than significant.
d. Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a
substantial number of people?
As discussed previously, the Project site is currently a school site that contains a high school, a learning
center and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority. The proposed Project includes the following
components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning
Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho
Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future, would allow
additional people on the existing site once it has been developed with new uses, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new structures at the current time. All future development
resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and the implementation of the
Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and
Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts
to the visual character of the area, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would
occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be to their own environmental reviews per CEQA
regulation and the Project would have a less than significant impact from odors and emissions on
people.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required
85
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 31 City of Rolling Hills
4.4 Biological Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant Impact No Impact
Would the Project:
g. Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications, on
any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by
the California Department of Fish and
Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
h. Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
i. Have a substantial adverse effect on state or
federally protected wetlands (including, but
not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal,
etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
j. Interfere substantially with the movement of
any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native
resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
k. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
l. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills is located on the Palos Verdes Peninsula, in Los Angeles County, This hilltop
community supports a variety of plant and wildlife. The City’s plant life was established by imported
plants at the inception of the community since the natural state of the area included only coastal grass and
shrubs. As the community continued to establish, the developers planted trees and shrubs along the
86
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 32 City of Rolling Hills
roadsides and donated five Olive Trees to each homeowner whose lots were five or more acres. According
the City’s General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element, the more common plants that were
established in the community’s early stages of development were Pepper Trees, Geraniums and Matalijia
Poppy.
Biological Habitat
Due to City’s abundance of landscaping and open space areas, the City of Rolling Hills has become home
to a large variety of plant life and wildlife. Much of the plant life that are found in the City today resulted
from the importing of plants to supplement what was originally only coastal grasses and shrubs. Today,
the plant life ranges from several species of trees, flowers, and shrubs, giving the wildlife in the City a place
to nurture and form habitats.
There are several species of wildlife that can found nesting among both the vast open space areas and the
densely vegetated areas. The City’s General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element notes the types of
wildlife that can found include squirrels, gophers, skunks, mice, raccoon, opossum, foxes, lizards, snakes,
frogs and a wide variety of birds including owls and peacocks; pheasant and quail were also reintroduced
into the area.
Water Resources
The City receives its water sources from the Metropolitan Water District through the West Basin Municipal
Water District and the California Water Service Company. Due to the City’s location atop a tertiary deposit
of mudstones and diatomaceous shales, the City does not have any groundwater resources. The City also
does not contain any areas of natural water resources and is further separated from groundwater resources
by the Palos Verdes Fault.
Unavailability of groundwater and natural water resources requires that the City receive its water supply
exclusively from uninterrupted sources as allotted by the West Basin Municipal Water District and
Metropolitan Water District.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local
or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
According to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s California Natural Diversity Database
(CNDDB) maps, the City of Rolling Hills lies in the Torrance Quad which has identified several bird
and plant species that inhabit the City of Rolling Hills have been listed as threatened or endangered
species. However, the proposed Project site is already developed and there are no plant or animal
species that currently exist on the site. The proposed Project includes the following components: a)
update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and
map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable
Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future, would allow new development
87
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 33 City of Rolling Hills
on the existing Project site, future development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use
Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan
policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess
potential adverse effects on candidate, sensitive or special status species, at this level of environmental
review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. There would be no substantial adverse effects on
any endangered, sensitive, or special status species, and the Proposed Project would have no impact.
b. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
The City does not have any natural water resources that could be potential areas for riparian habitat.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future
development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning
changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design
standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential adverse effects on
candidate, sensitive or special status species, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses
that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. There would be no substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural community, and the Proposed Project would have no impact.
c. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands
(including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
No areas within the City or on the Project site are designated as a state or federally protected wetland.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future
development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning
changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design
standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential adverse effects on
candidate, sensitive or special status species, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses
that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. Since the Project, as proposed, would not have a substantial adverse
effect on state or federally protected wetlands, there would be no impact.
d. Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory
fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
88
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 34 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future
development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning
changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design
standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential adverse effects on
candidate, sensitive or special status species, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses
that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. Therefore, the Project would not interfere substantially with the
movement of any native resident of migratory fish, and there would be no impact.
e. Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources,
such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
The City of Rolling Hills General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element emphasizes the efforts to
conserve and enhance the City’s natural resources by facilitating development in a manner that
reflects the characteristics, sensitivities and constraints of the City’s natural resources. The proposed
Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and
Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of
new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed
changes in the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a
policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential adverse effects on candidate, sensitive or
special status species, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a
result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA
regulation. The Proposed Project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources. There would be no impact.
f. Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation
plan?
In response to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife
has developed Habitat Conservation Plans (HCP) to hold private and non-federal agencies
accountable for the preservation of endangered plants and wildlife. HCPs are planning documents
required as part of an application for an incidental take. Although, the Project site is located
approximately two miles from the boundaries of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Natural Community
Conservation Plan (NCCP)/Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), the Project site itself is not within the
jurisdiction of an HCP. Further, the proposed Project includes the following components: a) update
to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map
amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable
Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future, would allow new development
on the existing Project site, future development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use
89
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 35 City of Rolling Hills
Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan
policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess
potential adverse effects on candidate, sensitive or special status species, at this level of environmental
review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Project in itself would not conflict with the
provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. There would be no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
90
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 36 City of Rolling Hills
4.5 Cultural Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
m. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource as
defined in §15064.5?
n. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to §15064.5?
o. Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of formal cemeteries?
SETTING
An historical resource is defined as any object, building, structure, area, place, record, or manuscript which
a lead agency determines to be historically significant. Generally, a resource is considered by the lead
agency to be “historically significant” if the resource meets the criteria for listing on the California Register
of Historical Resources.
Although the City of Rolling Hills provides a definition for historical structures in its Zoning Ordinance,
no historical structures have been identified or designated within the City. Nor have any archeological
resources been identified with the City limits.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource
pursuant to §15064.5?
The City of Rolling Hills currently does not have any recognized or identified existing historical
resources that could be potentially disturbed as a result of the proposed Project.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development or project area construction, at the current time.
All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
91
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 37 City of Rolling Hills
potential site-specific impact to historical resources, at this level of environmental review. Future land
uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have a less than significant
impact.
b. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological
resource as defined in §15064.5?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for additional structures and uses on the existing site
that could affect unknown archeological resources, if any, the Project in itself does not propose or
authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the
creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element
updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As
policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to potential
archeological resources, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a
result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA
regulation. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have a less than significant impact on
archeological resources.
c. Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal
cemeteries?
The Proposed Project would not require digging or grading at the Project site at this current time,
since no developments are proposed at this time. Further, no archeological sites or the potential for
human remains have been identified either in the City, or on the Project site.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new structures on the existing site, the Project in
itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time and would not disturb
any potentially unknown human remains at the site. All future development resulting from the
creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element
updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As
policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Therefore, the Proposed Project
would have a less than significant impact on human remains.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
92
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 38 City of Rolling Hills
4.6 Energy
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
p. Result in potentially significant
environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of
energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
q. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan
for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
SETTING
In general, energy resources, particularly petroleum, have had a negative impact on the overall
environment resulting from the release of greenhouse gases (GHG). More importantly, these energy
resources are limited and require conservation and a more efficient method of usage. In 2019, the State of
California (State) adopted a California Energy Efficiency Action Plan (Action Plan) that outlines the issues,
opportunities, and savings pertaining to energy efficiency in California’s buildings, industrial, and
agricultural sectors. The Action Plan provides the State with a roadmap for an energy-efficient and low
carbon future for buildings and addresses the issues related to climate change and energy consumption.
The City of Rolling Hills incorporates these State-wide provisions for energy efficiency in its Climate Action
Plan (CAP) and emphasizes retrofits for existing buildings, energy performance requirements for new
construction, and water efficient landscaping. Additionally, the City’s General Plan Open Space Element
and Housing Element also provide policies that address energy efficiency.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or
operation?
The Proposed Project does not include any developments or construction that would require short or
long-term consumption of energy from heavy equipment, light-duty vehicles, machinery, and
generators. The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan
Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the
creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone.
While these proposed changes would allow for new energy uses on the existing site, the Project in
itself does not propose or authorize any new development, at the current time. Future land uses that
would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay the proposed zoning and General Plan
93
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 39 City of Rolling Hills
amendments would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. As policy
level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from wasteful and
unnecessary consumption of energy uses, at this level of environmental review. Therefore, since
the Proposed Project, in itself, would not result in environmental impacts due to wasteful, inefficient,
or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operations, there
would be no impact.
b. Would the project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy
efficiency?
The City of Rolling Hills Climate Action Plan includes energy efficient strategies that provide a
framework to help the City achieve measurable energy savings. Further, the City of Rolling Hills
General Plan contains provisions that permit the use of solar panels to maximize energy efficiency.
However, no provisions in both the Climate Action Plan and the General Plan apply to the proposed
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for new energy uses on the existing site, the Project in itself does not
propose or authorize any new development. All future development resulting from the
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific conflicts with State or local renewable energy plans, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone
and the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. The Project, in itself, would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local
plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency; therefore, there would be no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required
94
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 40 City of Rolling Hills
4.7 Geology and Soils
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
Would the Project:
r. Directly or indirectly cause potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk of
loss, injury, or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer
to Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv. Landslides?
s. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
t. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the Project, and potentially result in
on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
u. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in
Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial risks to life or
property?
v. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting
the use of septic tanks or alternative
wastewater disposal systems where sewers are
not available for the disposal of wastewater?
w. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
95
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 41 City of Rolling Hills
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills is located in the Los Angeles Basin, and thus is located over one or more
earthquake faults. According to the City of Rolling Hills Hazard Mitigation Plan, the major faults that have
the potential to affect the greater Los Angeles Basin, and therefore the City of Rolling Hills are the Newport-
Inglewood, Palos Verdes, Santa Monica, and the Cabrillo faults. Further, the soil types found in the City
include “Altamira Shale” and basalt, which when in contact with one another, are conducive to land sliding
due to differences in permeability. The City’s proximity to several fault lines combined with the soil types
that make up the City’s terrain, as well as its location on or near sloped areas have the potential to cause
additional geologic hazards including liquefaction and landslides (see Figure 4: Landslide Hazards).
The City of Rolling Hills Hazard Mitigation Plan outlines mitigation measures in areas of prevention,
property protection, public education and awareness, natural resource protection, emergency services, and
structural projects, to provide the City with the proper goals and policies to help reduce potential geologic
hazards. The City of Rolling Hills General Plan Safety Element also lists a set of policies that provide
additional framework for reducing the social and economic disruptions caused by the effects of natural
hazards.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a.i. Directly or indirectly cause potential adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault?
The Department of Conservation’s (DOC) Earthquake Hazards Zone map does not indicate that
the City of Rolling Hills is located within an Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone, although there is a fault zone
located approximately 13 miles northeast in the City of Long Beach. However, the DOC Earthquake
Hazards Zone map designates the majority the parcels within the City as “earthquake hazard
parcels.”
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new buildings on the existing site that could have
adverse effects to the risk of loss, injury or death from earthquake faults, the Project in itself does not
propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed
zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the
City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to
assess potential site-specific impacts from ruptures of earthquake faults, at this level of environmental
review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Though the Project, in itself, would not directly or
96
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 42 City of Rolling Hills
indirectly cause potential adverse effects involving a known earthquake fault; impacts would remain
less than significant.
a.ii. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss,
injury, or death involving strong seismic ground shaking?
Parcels within the City are designated as “earthquake hazard parcels” and can be assumed that the
Project site will be exposed to seismic activity; however, there are no known faults located under the
Project site that would expose people or structures to adverse effects resulting from seismic ground
shaking.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new buildings on the existing site that could have
impacts from seismic ground shaking, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new
development at the current time. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay
zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required
to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it
is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from seismic ground shaking, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Impacts from exposure of people
or structures from seismic ground shaking would be less than significant
a.iii. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss,
injury, or death involving seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
According to the according to the DOC’s Hazards Zone Map, no areas within the Project site are
shown to be located within a liquefaction zone. The proposed Project includes the following
components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning
Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho
Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future, would allow
for new buildings on the existing site that could have impacts from seismic ground shaking, the Project
in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future
development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts from seismic relate ground failures, at this level of environmental
review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. While the Project itself would not expose people
or structures to potential adverse effects from seismic-related ground failure, impacts would be less
than significant
a.iv. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss,
injury, or death involving landslides?
Portions of the Project site are located within a landslide zone. To help mitigate potential hazards
caused by landslides, Policy 1.1 from the City of Rolling Hills General Plan Safety Element restricts
97
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 43 City of Rolling Hills
the expansion of existing development and construction of new development near active faults or
landslide areas. The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General
Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c)
the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone.
While these proposed changes in the future, would allow for new buildings on the existing site that
could have impacts from seismic ground shaking, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize
any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level
documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from potential landslides, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project
would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. While the Project as
proposed would not expose people or structures to potential adverse effects from landslides, impacts
would be less than significant.
98
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 44 City of Rolling Hills
99
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 45 City of Rolling Hills
b. Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new buildings on the existing site that could have
result on loss of topsoil or soil erosion, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new
development at the current time. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay
zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required
to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it
is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to soil loss or erosion, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Impacts would be less than
significant.
c. Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is made unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in on or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction,
or collapse?
The City of Rolling Hills Hazard Mitigation Plan notes that the majority of the City’s soil is composed
of “Altamira-Shale” and basalt, both of which, when combined, could result in landslides due to the
difference in permeability. Portions of the Project site are located in a landslide zone, but as mentioned,
policies in the City’s General Plan Safety Element restricts new development from occurring within
these zones. Furthermore, the DOC’s Hazards Zone map does not designate any areas of the Project
site as a liquefaction zone. Portions of the Project site are located within a landslide zone (see Figure
4.7.1; Landslide Hazards). To help mitigate potential hazards caused by landslides, Policy 1.1 from
the City of Rolling Hills General Plan Safety Element restricts the expansion of existing development
and construction of new development near active faults or landslide areas.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new buildings on the existing site that could have
impacts due to unstable soils, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development
at the current time. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the
proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not
possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from potential landslides, lateral spreading, or
liquefaction, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the
Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Though
the Project, as proposed, would not result in on – or – offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction, or collapse, impacts would be less than significant
d. Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1-B of the Uniform Building
Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?
100
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 46 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new development that could be located on expansive
soils on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at
the current time. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed
zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the
City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to
assess potential site-specific impacts expansive soils, at this level of environmental review. Future land
uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. Impacts would be less than significant.
e. Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new development and therefore site excavations on
the existing site the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current
time. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning
and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts to soils from the use of septic tanks or alternative waste disposal
systems, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the
Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The
Project, in itself, would not affect the need and availability of septic tanks or alternative wastewater
disposal systems; therefore, there would be no impact.
f. Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
The Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP) defines paleontological resources as “any fossilized
remains, traces, or imprints of organisms, preserved in or on the earth’s crust, that are of
paleontological interest and that provide information about the history of life on earth.” The proposed
Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and
Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of
new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed
changes in the future, would allow for new development and therefore site excavations on the existing
site the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All
future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts to paleontological resources, at this level of environmental review.
101
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 47 City of Rolling Hills
Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Though the University of California, Berkeley, Museum
of Paleontology localities database shows that there are no know paleontological resources in or
around the Project site, and the proposed Project in itself would not directly or indirectly destroy
resources, impacts would remain less than significant.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
102
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 48 City of Rolling Hills
4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significan
t Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
x. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the environment?
y. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of
reducing the emissions of greenhouse
gases?
SETTING
Greenhouse gases (GHG) have been a major contributor to the effects of global climate change, causing an
increase in “radiative forcing,” or a heating effect in the atmosphere. Greenhouse gases are gases are made
up primarily of four types of emissions: Carbon dioxide (CO2), is caused by burning fossil fuels, solid waste,
trees and other biological materials; Methane (CH4) is emitted directly during the production and transport
of coal, natural gas, and oil; Nitrous Oxide (N20) is produced during agricultural and industrial activities,
as well as combustion of fossil fuels and solid waste and during treatment of wastewater; and Flourinated
gases are caused by a variety of industrial processes and are emitted in smaller quantities but in a potent
form of greenhouse gases that are referred to as High Global Warming Potential (GWP) gases.
According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), greenhouse gas emissions in the United States
have increased by 3.7 percent since 1990, with the primary sources of emissions coming from
transportation, electricity production, industry (including fossil fuels for energy), commercial and
residential production of heat and handling of waste, agriculture, and land use and forestry. Figure 4.8.1,
Total U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Economic Sector in 2018, demonstrates the total United States GHG
emissions by economic sector in 2018; transportation is the leading source of GHG emissions as it
contributes to the release of carbon dioxide, which was the primary pollutant emitted into the atmosphere
in 2018 (Figure 4.8.2, Total Greenhouse Gas Emission in 2018).
103
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 49 City of Rolling Hills
Figure 4.8.1: Total U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
by Economic Sector in 2018
Source: https://www.epa.gov/
Figure 4.8.2: Greenhouse Gas Emission in 2018
Source: https://www.epa.gov/
104
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 50 City of Rolling Hills
In an effort to reduce the rate of global warming caused by GHG emissions, the State of California passed
Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), the Global Warming Solutions Act (GWS Act) of 2006, which implements a
comprehensive, long-term approach to addressing climate change by requiring the State of California to
reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. Accordingly, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) has
developed a Scoping Plan to set forth a strategy for California to meet its GHG reduction goals.
In 2018, the City of Rolling Hills developed a Climate Action Plan (CAP) that focuses on the reduction of
greenhouse gas emissions within the City. In addition to its own policies, the CAP implements the goals
and policies laid out in CARB’s Scoping Plan in accordance with AB 32. The City’s CAP advances these
goals by streamlining efforts that establish specific initiatives and programs that target the reduction of
GHG emissions.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the environment?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new development that could directly or indirectly
generate GHG emissions on the existing site the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any
new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level
documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from GHG emissions, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project
would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Impacts would be less
than significant.
b. Would the project conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose
of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
The City of Rolling Hill’s Climate Action Plan (CAP) implements programs and initiatives that target
the reduction of greenhouse gases (GHG). This includes creating a City-wide Waste Plan that diverts
about 75% percent of waste from landfills, and the implementation of urban greening by preserving
and incorporating parks, forests, green roofs, local agriculture, street trees, and community gardens
to create a “carbon sink” where greenhouse gas emissions are stored instead of being emitted into the
atmosphere.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for uses on the existing site that could result in the
emission of greenhouse gases, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development
at the current time. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts
105
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 51 City of Rolling Hills
to the related to changes to the applicable air quality plans, at this level of environmental review. All
future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards Future development at the Project site would be subject
to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation, and would also be required to conform to
all applicable City, State, and Federal standards pertaining to greenhouse gases. There would be less
than significant impacts.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required
106
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 52 City of Rolling Hills
4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
z. Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
aa. Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials
into the environment?
bb. Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-quarter mile
of an existing or proposed school?
cc. Be located on a site which is included on a list
of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
dd. For a project located within an airport land
use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport
or public use airport, would the project result
in a safety hazard or excessive noise for
people residing or working in the project
area?
ee. Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
ff. Expose people or structures, either directly or
indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury
or death involving wildland fires?
SETTING
The City’s Hazard Mitigation Plan identifies the City as prone to earthquakes, wildfires, droughts, and land
movement. Due to its proximity to various fault lines (Figure 5: Fault Zones), the City may be most
107
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 53 City of Rolling Hills
vulnerable to earthquake hazards. In an effort to reduce potential hazards caused by earthquakes, the State
of California regulates development through implementation of Building Codes and by means of the
Alquist Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act of 1972 (Alquist-Priolo Act). The Alquist-Priolo Act was passed
to regulate development near active faults in order to mitigate the hazard of surface rupture. No areas
within the City are located within an Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone, and as such, the Project site also does not
contain areas located near an Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone. Hazards resulting from earthquakes are further
mitigated by the Seismic Hazard Mapping Act of 1990, which also tightens regulation for development
projects within seismic-prone areas.
A portion of the Project site has also been designated by the Department of Conservation (DOC) as a
landslide zone (Figure 5: Fault Zone Map). Earthquakes are identified as a major hazard to potential for the
City, as high magnitudes of ground-shaking can lead to liquefaction and landslides. The majority of the
City is located within a landslide zone (Figure 6: Regional Fault Zone Map) with a region of the City called
the Flying Triangle being an active landslide area. The City of Rolling Hills General Plan Safety Element
outlines goals and policies that address development in areas susceptible to landslides.
The City of Rolling Hills has not been identified as a drought hazard area. According to the updated
November 5, 2020 U.S. Drought Monitor map, the City is not located in a drought intensity area. The City
of Rolling Hills’ water resources are limited to external sources including the Metropolitan Water District
through the West Basin Municipal Water District and California Water Service Company (Cal Water).
No risks from hazardous materials or airport hazards have been identified to have an effect on the City due
to its distance from the nearest airport and landfill. Along with the Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP), the City
has developed a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) to mitigate the risks associated with the
identified wildfire hazards. The City’s Climate Action Plan (CAP) and General Plan Safety Element further
establishes policies and guidelines for hazard mitigation and preparedness, including methods for the
proper disposal and diversion of potential hazardous materials, such as municipal waste
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Project in itself would have no impact related to
routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials.
108
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 54 City of Rolling Hills
109
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 55 City of Rolling Hills
110
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 56 City of Rolling Hills
111
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 57 City of Rolling Hills
b. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials
into the environment?
The City of Rolling Hills Climate Action Plan (CAP) provides a guideline for the reduction and proper
diversion of hazardous materials, including residential, community, and municipal waste that have
the potential to release hazardous materials into the environment.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to the
public from accidental release of hazardous materials into the environment, at level of environmental
review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed
zoning and General Plan amendments would be required to comply with all applicable City standards
and also be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. While the Project as
proposed, would not result in the accidental release of hazardous materials into the environment,
impacts would remain less than significant.
c. Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within 0.25 mile of an existing or proposed school?
The proposed Project is located on a Palos Verdes Unified School District school site with existing
uses including Beach Cities Learning Center and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority.
Rancho Del Mar High School has relocated and does not currently operate on the site. The proposed
Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and
Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of
new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed
changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose
or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the
creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element
updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As
policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone,
the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. The Proposed Project in itself would not emit hazardous emissions or
handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 0.25 mile of an existing
or proposed school; it will therefore have no impact.
d. Would the project be located on a site included on a list of hazardous material sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard
to the public or the environment?
112
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 58 City of Rolling Hills
According to a California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) GeoTracker search, there
were three sites with leaking underground storage tanks (LUST sites) on and around the Project site
(see Figure 7: Clean Up Sites). The sites were determined to contain gasoline and hydrocarbons
resulting from leaking of underground storage tanks. Each of the three sites have been cleaned per
SWRCB standards and are now designated by the SWRCB as “complete and case closed.”
Furthermore, a search in the Superfund Enterprise Management Systems (SEMS) and Environmental
Facts (Envirofacts) database did not produce any results showing that the Project site is on or near a
hazardous waste facility. The closest hazardous waste site is located approximately three miles
northeast of the Project site, at 26301 Crenshaw Boulevard in the City of Rolling Hills Estates. The
Proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element
text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and
adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Impacts would be less than significant.
e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard
for people residing or working in the project area?
The nearest airport to the Project site is the Zamperini Field Airport located approximately 4 miles
north of the Project site at 3301 Airport Drive in the City of Torrance. Although the Project site may
experience occasional overhead flights, the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) does not designate
the Project site as an airport Runway Protection Zone (RPZ).
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Project would not result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the Project area due to airport hazards and will not conflict with any
existing airport land use plans. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have no impact.
113
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 59 City of Rolling Hills
f. Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Project in itself would have no impact related to
adopted emergency evacuation or response plans.
g. Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of
loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires?
According to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL Fire), the City has been
designated as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. The City has taken a proactive role in preparing
its residents for potential wildfires by developing the City of Rolling Hills Community Wildfires
Protection Plan (CWPP). The Plan outlines fire mitigation strategies by emphasizing vegetation and
electric powerline management, and “infrastructure hardening” where all structures will be required
to have a class A roof by 2030. The CWPP also provides evacuation strategies that educates and
prepares its residents for utilizing firefighting resources.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, hazards
mitigation plan, and emergency evacuation plan. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts from risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, at this level
of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews for all issue areas related to potential wildland fires.
Impacts would remain less than significant.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
114
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 60 City of Rolling Hills
4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
gg. Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface or
groundwater quality?
hh. Substantially decrease groundwater supplies
or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that the project may impede
sustainable groundwater management of the
basin?
ii. Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or
river or through the addition of impervious
surfaces, in a manner which would:
i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on-
or off-site;
ii) substantially increase the rate or amount
of surface runoff in a manner which would
result in flooding on- or offsite;
iii) create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
iv) impede or redirect flood flows?
jj. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk
release of pollutants due to project
inundation?
kk. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a
water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?
SETTING
Due to the City of Rolling Hill’s location atop a tertiary deposit of mudstones and diatomaceous shales, the
City does not have any groundwater resources. The City receives its water sources from the Metropolitan
115
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 61 City of Rolling Hills
Water District through the West Basin Municipal Water District (MWD) and the California Water Service
Company (Cal Water).
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Division of Drinking Water (DDW) regulates the
amount of contaminates in water provided by public water systems to ensure that tap water is safe to drink.
The City is located near the Pacific Ocean, but does not have any bodies of water within City boundaries
and is not located in a State-designated risk area for tsunami inundation (as shown on the Tsunami
Inundation Map for Emergency Planning Torrance Quadrangle/San Pedro Quadrangle). As such, the
Project site does not contain any bodies of water that could potentially be impacted by stormwater runoff
or discharge of pollutants.
The City of Rolling Hills complies with the provisions of the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) of 1972 and
the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Porter-Cologne Act) to regulate the discharge of
pollutants into other water resources. Title 17 of the City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code outlines the
provisions for reducing pollutants in stormwater discharge and non-stormwater discharges to storm sewer
systems. The City is located near the Pacific Ocean, but does not have any bodies of water within City
boundaries and is not located in a State-designated risk area for tsunami inundation (as shown on the
Tsunami Inundation Map for Emergency Planning Torrance Quadrangle/San Pedro Quadrangle).
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or
otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Additionally, new development projects on the
Project site would be required to comply with the regulations of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) as required by Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (CWA), established
by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to control direct stormwater discharges. The
Project in itself would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or
otherwise degrade surface or ground water quality, and would have no impact.
b. Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially
with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater
management of the basin?
116
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 62 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Since the City does not have a supply of
groundwater resources due to its location atop ridges and canyons, the Project as proposed, would
not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge, and impacts would remain less than significant.
c.(i) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition
of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or
siltation on- or off-site?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from
changes to drainage at the Project site, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that
would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan
amendments would be required to comply with all applicable City standards and also be subject to
their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Project would not substantially alter
the existing drainage pattern of the site or area that could result in erosion of siltation;
impacts would be less than significant.
c.(ii) Would the project substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner
which would result in flooding on- or off-site?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
117
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 63 City of Rolling Hills
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from
changes to drainage at the Project site, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that
would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan
amendments would required to comply with all applicable City standards and also be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Project would not substantially increase
the rate or amount of surface runoff that would create flooding on – or off-site. Impacts would be less
than significant.
c.(iii) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition
of impervious surfaces, in a manner that would create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from
changes to drainage patterns and water runoff at the Project site, at this level of environmental review.
Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning
and General Plan amendments would be required to comply with all applicable City standards and
also be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Impacts would be less than
significant.
c.(iv) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition
of impervious surfaces, in a manner that would impede or redirect flood flows?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from
changes to drainage patterns that could impede or redirect flood flows at the Project site, at this level
of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay
zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be required to comply with all
applicable City standards and also be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA
regulation. Impacts would be less than significant.
118
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 64 City of Rolling Hills
d. Would the project in flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due
to project inundation?
The Project site is located less than two miles from the Pacific Ocean; however, the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) lists the City as an “area of minimal flood hazard”. Additionally, there
are no other large bodies of water with the City of Rolling.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from
floods, tsunamis, seiche zones or pollutant release from project inundation, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone,
the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Impacts are less than significant.
e. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan
or sustainable groundwater management plan?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to
water quality, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to
the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore
be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. These future uses would remain
consistent with the City’s existing land use plan, policy or regulations and would not result in
environmental effects. Therefore, there would be no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
119
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 65 City of Rolling Hills
4.11 Land Use and Planning
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significan
t Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
ll. Physically divide an established community?
mm. Cause a significant environmental
impact due to a conflict with any land use
plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills is primarily a residential community with large acre lots, equestrian trails, tennis
courts and walking trails located over a 2.98 square mile area. Residential uses account for about 1,637 acres
of the total 1,909 acres (approximate) of land within the City, leaving about 176 acres available for an
additional 59 single-family dwelling units. About 33 acres of land within the City are used for recreation
uses, while educational uses utilize about 30 acres. Public or Rolling Hills Community Association owned
land uses account for about 5.5 acres of the City’s total land area. The land uses include the area around
the City’s Civic Center and two City owned equestrian riding rings. The City also includes about 203 acres
of vacant land. The general topography of the area consists of rolling hillsides that are subject to landslides.
The Project site encompasses the approximate 30-acre education use parcel owned by the Palos
Verdes Peninsula School District. Uses on this site include facilities for the Rancho Del Mar
Continuation High School, the Beach Cities Learning Center, and the Palos Verdes Peninsula
Transit Authority. Access to the Project site is through a private roadway that veers off Crest Road
West. A few unpaved interval roadways traverse the site. The site slopes from east to west, from
the Beach Cities Learning Center to the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority, with an
approximate 38 feet drop from one end of the Project site to the other. Vegetation on-site consists
of a few trees around the school sites and a mix of grasses and paved areas. The portion of the
PVP Transit Authority site is primarily paved, with few buildings, parking areas and storage
buildings. The site is currently zoned Residential Agriculture Suburban-2-Acres (RAS-2) with a
General Plan Land Use Designation of very-low density residential with 2+ net acres/dwelling
unit.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project physically divide an established community?
120
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 66 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. These future uses would remain consistent with
the City’s existing land use plan, policy or regulations and would not result in environmental effects.
Therefore, the proposed Project would not physically divide an established community and
there would be no impact.
b. Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any
land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. These future uses would remain consistent with
the City’s existing land use plan, policy or regulations and would not result in environmental effects.
Therefore, there would be no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
121
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 67 City of Rolling Hills
4.12 Mineral Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
nn. Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to the
region and the residents of the state?
oo. Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan, or other land use plan?
SETTING
Mineral resources typically include oil and gas deposits, and nonfuel deposit such metals boron
compounds, clays, limestone, gypsum, salt, sand, gravel, and crushed stone. California is the largest
producer of sand and gravel in the United States and Los Angeles County area has large quantities of sand
and gravel.
The California Department of Conservation provides guidelines for the classification and designation of
mineral lands and separates Mineral Resource Zones (MRZ) into six categories: MRZ-1; MRZ-2a; MRZ-2b;
MRZ-3a; MRZ-3b; and MRZ-4.
• MRZ-1 zones are areas where adequate geologic information indicates that no significant mineral deposits
are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood exists for their presence.
• MRZ-2a zones are areas underlain by mineral deposits where geologic data show that significant measured
or indicated resources are present. As shown on the diagram of the California Mineral Land Classification
System, Areas classified MRZ-2a contain discovered mineral deposits that are either measured or indicated
reserves as determined by such evidence as drilling records, sample analysis, surface exposure, and mine
information. Land included in the MRZ-2a category is of prime importance because it contains known
economic mineral deposits. A typical MRZ-2a area would include an operating mine, or an area where
extensive sampling indicates the presence of a significant mineral deposit.
• MRZ-2b zones are areas underlain by mineral deposits where geologic information indicates that significant
inferred resources are present. Areas classified MRZ-2b contain discovered deposits that are either inferred
reserves or deposits that are presently sub-economic as determined by limited sample analysis, exposure, and
past mining history. Typical MRZ-2b area would include sites where there are good geologic reasons to
believe that an extension of an operating mine exists or where there is an exposure of mineralization of
economic importance.
• MRZ-3a zones are areas containing known mineral deposits that may qualify as mineral resources. MRZ-
3a areas are considered to have a moderate potential for the discovery of economic mineral deposits. MRZ-3
122
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 68 City of Rolling Hills
An example of a MRZ-3a area would be where there is direct evidence of a surface exposure of a geologic
unit, such as a limestone body, known to be or to contain a mineral resource elsewhere but has not been
sampled or tested at the current location.
• MRZ-3b zones are areas containing inferred mineral deposits that may qualify as mineral resources. Land
classified MRZ-3b represents areas in geologic settings which appear to be favorable environments for the
occurrence of specific mineral deposits, such as areas where indirect evidence exists for a geophysical or
geochemical anomaly along a permissible structure indicating the possible presence of a mineral deposit
• MRZ-4 zones are areas where geologic information does not rule out either the presence or absence of mineral
resources. The distinction between the MRZ-1 and MRZ-4 categories is important for land-use
considerations.
The City of Rolling Hills has been identified by the California Division of Mines and Geology as being
located in Mineral Resource Zone 1 (MRZ-1), which determines that the City does not have significant
mineral deposits and that there is little likelihood for their presence. The City’s General Plan Open Space
and Conservation Element also does not identify any mineral resources or mines the City of Rolling Hills
area. Consequently, the Project site does not contain any significant mineral deposits.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would
be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While there
may be proposed changes at the Project site in the future, the Project in itself does not propose or
authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the
implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As policy level documents,
it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts at this level of environmental review and
future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
environmental reviews for all issue areas. However, sincere there are no known mineral resources
sites in the City limits, there would be no impact.
b. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan?
123
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 69 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While there
may be proposed changes at the Project site in the future, the Project in itself does not propose or
authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the
implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As policy level documents,
it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts at this level of environmental review and
future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
environmental reviews for all issue areas. However, sincere there are no known mineral resources
sites in the City limits, there would be no loss of a locally known mineral resource and there would
therefore be no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
124
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 70 City of Rolling Hills
4.13 Noise
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
pp. Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels
in the vicinity of the project in excess of
standards established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
qq. Generation of excessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne noise levels?
rr. For a project located within the vicinity of
a private airstrip or an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working
in the project area to excessive noise levels?
SETTING
Noise is typically defined as any disturbing or unwanted sound that interferes or harms humans or wildlife.
Sound becomes unwanted when unwanted when it interferes with daily activities such as sleeping,
conversation, or disrupts or diminishes one’s quality of life. The health effects associated with noise are
often related to stress and stress-related illnesses such as high blood pressure, speech interference, hearing
and sleep loss, and disruption of productivity. Just like air pollution or water pollution, noise can just as
much cause substantial environmental impacts that become a source of pollution.
The City of Rolling Hills generally has a quiet sound environment with very few sources of noise. Such
sources of noise within the City include transportation noise from Palos Verdes Drive located on the
northern boundary of the City, aircraft noise from occasional overfly of small aircrafts from Torrance
Airport located to the north of the City, and stationary noise from pool equipment, air conditioners, music,
leaf blowers, tennis courts, and paddle tennis courts. Noise Sensitive Receptors in the City include the
public school located on the western boundary of the City, and as an entirely residential community, all of
the City of Rolling Hills can be considered noise sensitive. To ensure its residents are protected from
excessive noise pollution, the City’s General Plan Noise Element includes goals and policies that address
existing noise conflicts as well as forecasted noise pollution from future development and other
environmental source.
125
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 71 City of Rolling Hills
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient
noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local
general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
Ambient noise is defined as all the noise that is present in a given environment and is often referred
to as “background noise.” The levels of ambient noise can have substantial health and safety
implications if noise levels are not abated and properly mandated. The City has remained an
exclusively residential community where a quiet rural atmosphere has been maintained. The
proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element
text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and
adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for taller multi-family structures on the existing site, the Project in
itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development
resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land
Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Since the Proposed Project in itself would not
generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels, there would be no
impact.
b. Would the project generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
Groundborne vibration and noise are typically generated from roadway traffic and construction
activities. The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan
Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the
creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone.
While these proposed changes would allow for residential and related uses on the existing site, the
Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future
development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would
occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan
amendments would therefore be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation.
The Proposed Project would not generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise
levels; there would be no impact.
c. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public
use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
126
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 72 City of Rolling Hills
The nearest airport from the Project site is Torrance Airport and is located more than two miles, or
approximately more than four miles northeast of the Project site. The proposed Project includes the
following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related
Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone,
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes would allow for
residential and related uses on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any
new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level
documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this level of environmental
review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed
zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their own environmental reviews
per CEQA regulation. The Proposed Project in itself would not expose people residing or working in
the project area to excessive airport noise levels, and there would be no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
127
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 73 City of Rolling Hills
4.14 Population and Housing
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
ss. Induce substantial unplanned population
growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example,
through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
tt. Displace substantial numbers of existing
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills is located on the Palos Verdes Peninsula in Los Angeles County. Incorporated in
1957, the City has a rural an equestrian character, with large lots, equestrian trails and open space areas.
There is approximately 200 acres of vacant land in the City.
As of 2018, the City had a population of approximately 1,939, according to the Southern California
Association of Governments (SCAG)’s Local Profiles Report for the City. This is an increase of 79 people
from the SCAG estimate of 1,860 people in 2010, and an increase of 68 people from the California
Department of Finance (DOF) estimates for 2000. The City is primarily Non-Hispanic White (about 72%),
with a small mix of Asians (at 16%), African Americans, Native Americans and Pacific Islander
(approximately 12%).
According to the SCAG report, housing type in the City is predominantly single family residential (99%)
with one multi-family unit (0.1% of the total housing stock). Development in the City of Rolling Hills is
controlled by Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs). These limit development in the City to
single family residences on once-acre and two-acre lots. While the City has been primarily built out, there
are some limited opportunities for growth and new housing. According to the City’s Housing Element,
about 89% of the City’s residents commuted outside the City to work, while about 11% of residences
worked from home. According the SCAG’s Local Profiles Report for the City of Rolling Hills, there were
0.5 permits per 1,000 residents in 2000, and no permits issued for residential units in 2018.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructure)?
128
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 74 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new uses on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Proposed Project could eventually induce
unplanned population growth in the area by allowing future new homes. Impacts would therefore
remain less than significant.
b. Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new uses on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific, at this level of
environmental review. Moreover, there are currently no existing housing or people on the Project site.
Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone and the proposed
zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their own environmental reviews
per CEQA regulation. The Proposed Project in itself would not displace any existing housing or
people and there would be no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
129
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 75 City of Rolling Hills
4.15 Public Services
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant Impact
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
uu. Result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new
or physically altered governmental facilities,
need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public
services:
i. Fire protection?
ii. Police protection?
iii. Schools?
iv. Parks
v. Other public facilities?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills is primarily a residential community with very few public facilities within its
boundaries. Public services are provided to the City by the Los Angeles County Fire Department; Station
No. 56, the Los Angeles County Sheriff Department (LACSD) (located in the City of Lomita); and the Palos
Verdes Unified School District (PVUSD). Storm Hill Park is the only park facility located within the City,
and there are no libraries within City boundaries.
The Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) Station 56 is located within City boundaries at 12 Crest
Road West, Rolling Hills, California 90274, approximately half a mile to the east of the Project site. The
LACFD works closely with the City to prepare and educate the community on evacuation procedures,
creating defensible space around a home and on retrofitting a home with fire-resistant materials. The City
also contracts with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department and is served by the Lomita Station
located outside of City boundaries at 2623 Narbonne Avenue, Lomita, California, 90717, approximately
five miles north of the City.
The City of Rolling Hills is served by the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District (PVPUSD), with
school levels ranging from elementary to adult education. An existing public high school facility, the
Rancho Del Mar High School, is the only school facility located in the City. However, the school has moved
130
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 76 City of Rolling Hills
its operations to a new location outside of the City, approximately seven miles to the northwest, at 375 Via
Almar in the City of Palos Verdes Estates.
Although the City has a large inventory of open space areas such as bridle trails and tennis courts, there is
only one area within the city that is designated as a park. Storm Hill Park is located on the northwestern
border of the City at Storm Hill Lane where approximately 25 miles of private equestrian trails are located
and are maintained by the City of Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA). Trails are open to both
residents and non-residents. Non-residents are required to obtain a permit from the City prior to utilizing
the trails.
Library services are offered through the Palos Verdes Library District at three locations outside of the City:
Peninsula Center Library at 701 Silver Spur Road in the community of the City of Rolling Hills Estates,
approximately two miles northwest of the City; Malaga Cove Library located in the City of Palos Verdes
Estates, at 2400 Via Campesina, about six miles northwest of the City; and Miralest Library located in City
of Rancho Palos Verdes, at 29089 Palos Verdes Drive East, about three miles west of the City of Rolling
Hills.
The Project site is located on an existing school site where Rancho Del Mar High School previously
operated. The High School has relocated its operations, but the facility remains on the site, along with Beach
Cities Learning Center and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority (PVPTA), which are both still
operating on the Project site.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a.i. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered fire protection facilities, or the need for new or
physically altered fire protection facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,
response times or other performance objectives?
The City’s fire protection, rescue services, and medical services are provided by the Los Angeles
County Fire Department (LACFD) Fire Station No. 56 is the nearest fire station to the Project site, and
is located at 12 Crest Road West, about 1.2 miles southeast of the Project Site. The proposed Project
includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b)
related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new
Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in
the future would allow new buildings and additional people on the existing site that could
incrementally increase the demand for fire protection services, the Project in itself does not propose
or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the
implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, hazards mitigation plan,
and emergency evacuation plan. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-
specific impacts to fire protection services or utilities, at this level of environmental review. Future
land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
131
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 77 City of Rolling Hills
environmental reviews for all issue areas including fire emergency response. There would be no
impact.
a.ii. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered police protection facilities, or the need for new or
physically altered police protection facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,
response times or other performance objectives?
The City of Rolling Hills receives police protection services from the Lomita Station of the Los Angeles
County Sherriff Department (LACSD). The Lomita Station is located at 26123 Narbonne Avenue in
the City of Lomita, approximately 5.2 miles northeast of the Project site.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings and additional people on the existing site
that could incrementally increase the demand for police protection services, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to
comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As policy level
documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to potential additional police
protection facilities or services or utilities, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that
would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews
for all issue areas including police protection services, and there would be no impact.
a.iii. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered schools, or the need for new or physically altered
schools, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order
to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives?
The proposed Project is a change in zoning classification of the Palos Verdes Unified School District
site at 38 Crest Road West. The school site is currently occupied by a high school facility, a learning
center, and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority. The proposed Project includes the following
components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning
Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho
Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future, would allow
new buildings and additional people on the existing site that could incrementally increase the demand
for additional school facilities and services, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new
development at the current time. All future development resulting from the implementation of the
Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s General
Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to
assess potential site-specific impacts to fire protection services or utilities, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
132
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 78 City of Rolling Hills
be subject to their own environmental reviews for all issue areas including additional school facilities,
if needed. There would be no impact.
a.iv. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered parks, or the need for new or physically altered
parks, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order
to maintain acceptable service ratios or other performance objectives?
The City has several areas that serve recreational purposes for both residents and non-residents. There
are currently three tennis courts, eight-acres of City-owned open space, equestrian facilities, and
approximately 25 miles of private trails for horseback riders and pedestrians. The proposed Project
includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b)
related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new
Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in
the future, would allow new buildings and additional people on the existing site which could
incrementally increase the demand for recreational uses, the Project in itself does not propose or
authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the
implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As policy level documents,
it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to recreational facilities, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews for all issue areas including future recreational uses.
Since there would be no substantial adverse physical impacts on parks, the proposed Project would
have no impact.
a.v. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered public facilities, or the need for new or physically
altered public facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for other public facilities?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings and additional people on the existing site
and that could result in the need for new or altered public facilities, the Project in itself does not
propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to
comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As policy level
documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to public facilities, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews for all issue areas and there would be no impact.
The proposed Project would therefore have no impact.
133
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 79 City of Rolling Hills
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
134
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 80 City of Rolling Hills
4.16 Recreation
Would the Project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
vv. Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would
occur or be accelerated?
ww. Does the project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills abound in recreational opportunities, from publicly owned open space areas,
tennis courts and equestrian trails, to hillside open spaces. There are three tennis courts owned by the City
and two equestrian riding rings within the City. Approximately 25-30 miles of private equestrian trails
operated by the Rolling Hills Community Association are open to riders and joggers from the City as well
as neighboring jurisdictions. Due to the topography in the City of Rolling Hills, a substantial portion of the
area has steep hillsides and canyons.
In addition to outdoor recreational opportunities, the City also offers its residents various exclusive
recreational club privileges. The Caballeros group was initially formed for residents who shared an interest
in horseback riding. Today, the Group has a network of people, both riders and non-riders, who come
together to continue to share their interests in both horseback riding as well as in maintaining the trails
within the City. The City also hosts a Tennis Club and Social Club that allows both old and new residents
to participate in tournaments, monthly socials, annual exhibition matches, holiday parties, and weekend
getaways. The Women’s Community Club of Rolling Hills also hosts a number of events for the City,
including Children’s Easter and Holiday parties, Spring Tea, luncheons, and neighborhood meetings.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future would allow for population growth, additional buildings and
potentially new recreation uses on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize
135
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 81 City of Rolling Hills
any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the implementation
of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not
possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to the physical deterioration of neighborhood or
regional parks, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to
the creation of the overlay zone and the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be
subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. In addition, any future land uses
that may include parks and recreational facilities would be subject to a project-by-project impact
analysis. The proposed Project would therefore have a less than significant impact.
b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
The proposed Project in itself does not include the construction or expansion of recreational facilities.
As mentioned in the discussion above, the proposed Project includes the following components: a)
update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and
map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable
Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes would allow for population growth, new
buildings and potentially the construction or expansion of new recreation uses on the existing site,
the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development. All future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, and
would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Any future land uses that
could require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities may have physical effects on the
environment. However, these facilities would be subject to a project-by-project impact analysis, and
the proposed Project would therefore have a less than significant impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
136
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 82 City of Rolling Hills
4.17 Transportation/Traffic
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
xx. Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or
policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?
yy. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent
with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
zz. Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g., farm equipment)?
aaa. Result in inadequate emergency access?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills has a unique street system that consists exclusively of private roadways, which
are the easements owned by the City of Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA), created for
recreational purposes. These private streets include a combination of pathways for vehicles, bicycles,
horses, and pedestrians.
There are five major collector streets in the City: Portuguese Bend Road, Crest Road, Eastfield Drive,
Southfield Drive, and Saddleback Road. Parking is allowed on the shoulder areas along some portions of
collector roads where landscaping is not prohibitive, but the majority of off-street parking is provided in
conjunction with City residents
The Palos Verdes Peninsula (PVP) Transit Authority is located within the City at 38 Crest Road West but
does not provide direct transit services for the City since the roadways are all private. Transit services are
provided by the Regional Transit District (RTD) along Palos Verdes Drive North located on the southern
perimeter of the City of Rolling Hills, located outside of its boundaries.
According the City’s General Plan Circulation Element, there are approximately 25 miles of
equestrian/hiking trails provided within the community of Rolling Hills on private property easements
where motorists and bicyclists are prohibited. Pedestrians can utilize the trail system as there are no
sidewalks provided along the collector roads.
137
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 83 City of Rolling Hills
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation
system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
The City’s General Plan Circulation Element addresses goals and policies that enforces a safe and
efficient circulation system to help protect and maintain the existing private roadways that run
throughout the City. The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the
General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map
amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable
Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future, would allow for uses on the
existing site that could have an impact on the City’s existing circulation system, as a policy-level
document, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current
time. All future development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates,
the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts to the related to changes to the applicable air quality plans, at this level
of environmental review. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the
proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The proposed Project in itself does not conflict with a
program, plan, ordinance, or strategy addressing the City of Rolling Hills’ existing circulation system,
plan, ordinance; there would be no impact.
b. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision
(b)?
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b) provides specific considerations for determining whether or a
project would have transportation impacts and identifies vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as the
appropriate measure of transportation impacts.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for new uses and associated transportation uses, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development, at this current time. All future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not
possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this level of environmental review. All future
development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards would be subject to their own environmental reviews per
CEQA regulation. The proposed Project would have less than significant impacts in relation with
CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b).
138
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 84 City of Rolling Hills
c. Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible use (e.g., farm equipment)?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for new buildings with unique design features, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development. All future development resulting from the
creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element
updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As
policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from transportation
related geometric design features, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would
occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per
CEQA regulation. Though the proposed Project in itself would not substantially increase hazards due
to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible use (e.g.,
farm equipment). Impacts would be less than significant.
d. Would the project result in inadequate emergency access?
Existing emergency access is provided to the Project site via a private access road that branches off
from Crest Road West.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for additional population and therefore access needs for
emergency vehicles and services on the existing site, as a policy-level document, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates, the creation of the overlay zone
and the proposed zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies
and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific
impacts, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the
Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The
proposed Project in would not result in inadequate emergency access and would have no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
139
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 85 City of Rolling Hills
4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
bbb. Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of a tribal cultural resource,
defined in Public Resources Code section
21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural
landscape that is geographically defined in
terms of the size and scope of the landscape,
sacred place, or object with cultural value to
a California Native American tribe, and that
is:
i. Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in Public
Resources Code section 5020.1(k).
ii. A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be significant
pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code
Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set
forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource
Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall
consider the significance of the resource
to a California Native American tribe.
SETTING
The State of California Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) for Native American Consultation requires the Lead
Agency for any project to consult with all California Native American tribes, traditionally and culturally
associated with the project area. AB 52 and Senate Bill (SB) 18 allows for associated California Native
American Tribes to aid in the protection of tribal and cultural resources affecting the Project site by
providing recommendations for mitigation and protection. Under AB 52, agencies proposing a Project that
requires a Notice of Preparation, Notice of Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) or Notice of Negative
Declaration (ND) are required to establish consultation with tribes that are traditionally and culturally
affiliated to the geographic area where a project is located. Tribes notified under the requirements of AB 52
have 30 days to respond in writing of their request for consultation on the proposed project. Under AB 52,
SB 18 applies to lead agencies proposing to adopt or amend a General Plan, Specific Plan or Open Space
Designations. Like AB 52, SB 18 requires that local governments contact tribes about the opportunity to
140
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 86 City of Rolling Hills
consult on a proposed project; however, instead of 30 days to respond, tribes have 90 days to request
consultation.
In compliance with AB 52, the City, as the Lead Agency for this Project distributed project notification
letters to the following six tribes on October 16 and 17, 2020: Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh
Nation; Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians; Gabrieleno/Tongva Nation; Gabrielino
Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council; Gabrielino/Tongva Tribe; and Soboba Band of Luiseno
Indians. Should any Native American tribes seek consultation with the City of Rolling Hills, under the
requirements of SB 18, the City will commence tribal consultation at that time.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a.i. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource
as defined in Public Resources Code 21074 that is listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public
Resources Code section 5020.1(k)?
The City of Rolling Hills is not currently listed on the California Register of Historical Resources, or
in a local register of historical resources as defined in PRC Code section §5020.1(k). The proposed
Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and
Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of
new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed
changes in the future, would allow for new development and therefore site excavations on the existing
site the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All
future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts to tribal cultural resources, at this level of environmental review. Future
land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Additionally, while the six afore-mentioned Native
American tribes were notified of this particular Project, each future redevelopment project at the
proposed Project site would entail its own tribal consultation. The proposed Project in itself would
not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal resources and therefore there
would be less than significant impact.
a.ii. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in a resource determined by the lead agency,
in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set
forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth
in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new development and therefore site excavations on
the existing site the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current
141
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 87 City of Rolling Hills
time All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts to tribal cultural resources, at this level of environmental review. Future
land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Additionally, while the six afore-mentioned Native
American tribes were notified of this particular Project, each future redevelopment project at the
proposed Project site would entail its own tribal consultation. The proposed Project in itself would
not have a substantial adverse change on the significance in a California Native Tribal resource and
therefore there would be less than significant impacts.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
142
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 88 City of Rolling Hills
4.19 Utilities and Service Systems
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
ccc. Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
ddd. Have sufficient water supplies available
to serve the project and reasonably
foreseeable future development during
normal, dry and multiple dry years?
eee. Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider which serves
or may serve the project that it has adequate
capacity to serve the project’s projected
demand in addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
fff. Generate solid waste in excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the
attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
ggg. Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills has adopted the appropriate sections of the Los Angeles County Health and Safety
Code (Title 11) and the Los Angeles County Plumbing Code (Title 28). In 2018, the City entered into a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Los Angeles County (County) in order to be covered under
the County’s Local Agency Management Program’s (LAMP) provisions and restrictions. As a result, the
City is covered under the provisions and restrictions of LAMP and maintenance and installation of all
onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS) is authorized to be done by the Department of Public Health
(DPH). LAMP also authorizes the Department of Public Health (DPH) to implement alternate standards
including the conditions that allow DPH to issue operating permits for Non-Conventional Onsite
Wastewater Treatment Systems (NOWTS). The City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code defines NOWTS as
an onsite wastewater treatment system that utilizes one or more supplemental treatment components to
provide further treatment of sewage effluent prior to discharging into the dispersal system. Supplemental
143
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 89 City of Rolling Hills
treatment components can include a three-compartment treatment tank, aerator, filter pods, pump,
ultraviolet disinfection, clarifier, and effluent filtration. Without the adoption of the LAMP, residents
whose properties do not meet the requirements for the installation of a low risk system would be required
to apply for a Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) permit from the local Water Board, pay annual fees
to the Water Board, and comply with quarterly monitoring requirements.
The City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code also outlines provisions for domestic wastewater, defining it as
wastewater normally discharged from plumbing fixtures, appliances, and other household and commercial
devices including toilets, sinks, showers, and bathtubs. Strict provisions on the requirements for onsite
wastewater treatment systems are outlined in the City’s Zoning Code, ensuring that construction plans
proposing a new OWTS are thoroughly reviewed prior to approval and issuance of permits. The Code
further enforces the discharge of toxic materials or liquids that flow onto the surface of any land or body
of water.
The Project site is located on an existing school site that is developed with existing structures and has an
established utilities system that serves the site. Any future development on the Project site would be
required to comply with the existing City and County standards for the maintenance of the existing utility
systems.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications
facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings on the existing site that may require
water, wastewater storm drainage, electric power, natural as, or telecommunications facilities, the
Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future
development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning
changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design
standards. Since there are no new land development project involved specific to the proposed Project
under evaluation, there would be no requirement for the construction or relocation of new or
expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-
specific impacts from the relocation or constructions of water, wastewater, storm drainage, power,
gas, or telecommunications facilities, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that
would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews
for all of these issue areas related to utilities and service systems. Impacts would be less than
significant.
b. Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably
foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
144
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 90 City of Rolling Hills
The Project site is currently developed with Del Mar High School, Beach Cities Learning Center and
the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority, where water supply facilities are already established
and maintained. The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General
Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c)
the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone.
While these proposed changes would allow for new development and therefore potential future need
for sufficient water supplies on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any
new development. All future development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use
Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan
policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, hazards mitigation plan, and emergency evacuation
plan. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to water
supply levels, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of
the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews for all issue areas related
to the availability of water supply; impacts would therefore be less than significant.
c. Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or
may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in
addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new uses on the existing site that may affect wastewater
capacity, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time.
All future development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and
zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and
Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts
to future wastewater demand, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would
occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews for all
issue areas including fire pollutant risks. Impacts would be less than significant.
d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
145
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 91 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As
policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to existing local
infrastructure, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of
the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews for issue areas related to
the capacity of local infrastructure. While the Proposed Project would not create excess solid waste or
impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals; impacts would be less than significant.
e. Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future would allow for additional development on the site and therefore the
potential future need for solid waste facilities, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any
new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the implementation of
the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy level document, it is not
possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to solid waste facilities, at this level of environmental
review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Proposed Project in itself would not generate
solid waste. Therefore, the Project could have effects on federal, state, or local management and
reduction statutes that regulate solid waste, impacts would be less than significant.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
146
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 92 City of Rolling Hills
4.20 Wildfire
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
If located in or near state responsibility areas or
lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which
could cause significant environmental
effects?
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and
other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks,
and thereby expose project occupants
to, pollutant concentrations from a
wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a
wildfire?
c) Require the installation or maintenance
of associated infrastructure (such as
roads, fuel breaks, emergency water
sources, power lines or other utilities)
that may exacerbate fire risk or that may
result in temporary or ongoing impacts
to the environment?
d) Expose people or structures to
significant risks, including downslope
or downstream flooding or landslides,
as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
SETTING
The State of California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) maps areas of fire hazards
based on a number of factors such as terrain, slope, weather, fuels, and other. A Fire Hazard Severity Zone
(FHSZ) map allows an area to evaluate wildfire hazards based on their degree of severity (very high, high,
and moderate). Though FHSZs cannot predict where potential wildfire may occur, they do identify areas
where wildfire hazards may be severe and therefore cause greater damages to life and property. All local
jurisdictions in California are required to identify their areas of Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) which
are based on vegetation density, slope severity, fire weather, and other factors. CAL FIRE identifies three
fire hazard zones based on increasing severity from fires – moderate, high, and very high.
147
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 93 City of Rolling Hills
Wildfire protection in California is the responsibility of the State and local governments, as well as the
federal government. The State of California has therefore prepared FHSZ maps to evaluate likely risks for
wildfire over a 30-50 year period. Lands where the State has financial responsibility for wildland fire
protection are designated as State Responsibility Areas (SRAs) and Local Responsibility Areas (LRAs).
Typically, Moderate, high, and very high FHSZs are found in SRAS where the State has financial
responsibility for fire protection and prevention. SRAs are areas where the State of California has financial
responsibility for fire protection, while LRAs include incorporated cities, cultivated lands, and even desert
areas. Fire protection for LRAs are typically provided by fire protection districts, a jurisdiction’s fire
department, or by CAL FIRE under contract to local governments.
The City of Rolling Hills is located in Very High Fire Standard Severity Zone (VHFSSZ), as determined by
CAL FIRE. The City prepared a Hazard Mitigation Plan in 2019 which included discussions for wildfire
hazards, as well as a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) in July 2020. As a designated VHFSSZ
(see Figure 8: Fire Hazards) the City is vulnerable to brush fire hazards. Steep hillsides, cliffs and canyons
along with vast areas of native and non-native vegetation. The severe risks to loss of life or injury,
destruction of buildings, road closures, and loss of domestic animals as well as wildlife, among others, are
some of the main effects of wildfires. The City of Rolling Hills has adopted a Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP)
in 2019, as well as a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) in July 2020. Based on the community’s
concerns regarding fire fuel in the canyon areas of the City, fire mitigation strategies were developed from
a variety of sources, the City has developed best strategies to implement to help mitigate wildfires caused
by fire fuel. Additionally, the City has coordinated with the Los Angeles County Fire Department to
develop options in dealing with vegetation management, including infrastructure hardening, vegetation
management, maintenance of electric power lines, and inspections and enforcement.
The City of Rolling Hills Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) also identifies wildfires as a potential hazard
within the City and includes discussions on the community’s wildfire issues. Through its contract with the
Los Angeles County Fire Department, the City requires and administers precautionary measures to create
defensible space for all properties within the City, particularly in the maintenance of structures and
vegetation. The HMP further enforces the goals of wildfire mitigation that are consistent with the City’s
CWPP, with policies implemented to reduce threats to public safety and protect property from brush fire
hazards.
148
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 94 City of Rolling Hills
149
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 95 City of Rolling Hills
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, hazards
mitigation plan, and emergency evacuation plan. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts to emergency response plans, at this level of environmental review.
Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
environmental reviews for all issue areas including fire emergency response. Though the proposed
Project in itself would not by itself impair any emergency response and evacuations plans, the Project
site’s location in a VHFSSZ impact would result in a less than significant impact.
b. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the project due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire
risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, hazards
mitigation plan, and emergency evacuation plan. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts from wildfire risks and exposure to pollutant concentrations form
wildfires, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the
Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews for all issue areas including
fire pollutant risks. The Proposed Project site’s location in a VHFSSZ would result in a less than
significant impact.
c. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such
as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate
fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
Even though the City is located in a Very High Fire Standard Severity Zone, the Project site is primarily
developed with urban uses related to schools and a public transit facility. The proposed Project
150
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 96 City of Rolling Hills
includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b)
related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new
Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in
the future, would allow new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose or
authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the
implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, hazards mitigation plan,
and emergency evacuation plan. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-
specific impacts to wildfire risks from future maintenance or installation of infrastructure, at this level
of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews for all wildfire related issue areas; however, the
proposed Project site’s location in a VHFSSZ would result in a less than significant impact.
d. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or
downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage
changes?
The Project site is primarily developed with urban uses related to schools and a public transit facility
and is located in a Very High Fire Standard Severity Zone. The proposed Project includes the
following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related
Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone,
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future,
would allow new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any
new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the implementation of
the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, hazards mitigation plan, and emergency
evacuation plan. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts
from post-fire slope instability or drainage changes, at this level of environmental review. Future land
uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental
reviews for all wildfire related issue areas; however, since the proposed Project site is located in a
VHFSSZ, impacts would remain less than significant.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
151
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 97 City of Rolling Hills
4.20 MANDATORY SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
hhh. Does the Project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the number
or restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
iii. Does the Project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects)?
jjj. Does the Project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
SETTING
As discussed in Section 1, Aesthetics, the City of Rolling Hills is beautiful wooded City with scenic views
of the Pacific Ocean, Catalina Island, city lights, and Los Angeles Harbor. In order to preserve the aesthetics
and natural resources that characterize the City, goals and policies are enforced throughout the City’s
General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and other local management plans. Residence adhere strictly to these
policies to maintain the quality of the environment and the continued preservation of the plant and wildlife
within the City.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to
drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
152
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 98 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for new developments on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the
creation of the overlay zone and the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject
to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The proposed Project would not
substantially degrade the quality of the environment or have an effect on the fish and wildlife
population within the City; there would be no impact.
b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects,
and the effects of probable future projects)?
Cumulative development in the City consists primarily of single-family residences, with the exception
of City Hall, Los Angeles County Fire Department Station (LACFD) No. 56, Rancho Del Mar High
School, and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority. The proposed Project includes the
following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related
Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone,
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes would allow for
new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new
development. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone and the
proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject to their own environmental reviews
per CEQA regulation. The proposed Project would not have impacts that are cumulatively
considerable; there would be no impact.
c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself does not
propose or authorize any new development. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the
creation of the overlay zone and the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject
to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The proposed Project would have no
impact on the environment that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
153
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 99 City of Rolling Hills
5.0 REFERENCES
DOCUMENTS
Air Quality Management District. 2016. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and California
Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) Attainment Status for South Coast Air Basin. South Coast Air Quality
Management District.
Air Quality Management District. 2017. 2016 Air Quality Management Plan. South Coast Air Quality
Management District
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 2020. Public Resources Code 21000–21189.
California Department of Conservation (DOC). 2019. The Williamson Act Status Report 2016-17. United
States.
California Department of Conservations (DOC). 2000. Guidelines for Classification and Designation of Mineral
Lands. State of California.
California Water Service. 2018. 2018 Water Quality Report. Rancho Dominguez District, California.
City of Rolling Hills. 2018. Climate Action Plan. Rolling Hills, California.
City of Rolling Hills. 2018. City Council Agenda Item No. 4-B. City of Rolling Hills, California
City of Rolling Hills. 2019. City of Rolling Hills 2019 Hazard Mitigation Plan. City of Rolling Hills, California.
City of Rolling Hills. June 1990. General Plan Land Use Element. Rolling Hills, California.
City of Rolling Hills. June 1990. General Plan Noise Element. Rolling Hills, California.
City of Rolling Hills. June 1990. General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element. Rolling Hills, California.
City of Rolling Hills. June 1990. General Plan Safety Element. Rolling Hills, California
City of Rolling Hills. June 1990. General Plan Circulation Element. Rolling Hills, California.
City of Rolling Hills. August 2019. Storm Hill Land Road and LLA Modification Project. Rolling Hills,
California.
Department of Conservation. 2009. Tsunami Inundation Map for Emergency Planning Torrance Quadrangle/San
Pedro Quadrangle. State of California.
Environmental Protection Agency. 2015. America’s Children and the Environment. United States.
Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). 2020. Tribal Consultation Under AB 52: Requirements and
Best Practices. State of California.
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). 2019. Profile of the City of Rolling Hills. Rolling
Hills, California.
California Energy Commission. 2019. 2019 California Energy Efficiency Action Plan. State of California.
154
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 100 City of Rolling Hills
WEBSITES
Architectural Geographic Information System (ArcGIS). 2020.
<https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html> accessed November 2020.
California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2020. <https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/qaweb/site.php?s_arb_code=70073>
accessed October 2020.
California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2020. <https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/capp-resource-center/community-
assessment/sensitive-receptor-assessment> accessed October 2020.
California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2020. <https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/> accessed November 2020.
California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2020. <https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/fact-sheets/ab-32-global-
warming-solutions-act-2006> accessed November 2020.
California Code of Regulations, West Law. 2020. <https://govt.westlaw.com/calregs/Document> accessed
October 2020.
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL Fire). 2020. <https://gis.data.ca.gov/datasets/>
accessed October 2020.
California Division of Mines and Geology. 2020. <https://www.conservation.ca.gov/> accessed October 2020.
California Legislative Information. 2020. <https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/> accessed October 2020
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2020. <https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB> accessed November
2020.
City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code. 2020.
<https://library.municode.com/ca/rolling_hills/codes/code_of_ordinances> accessed October 2020.
County of Los Angeles Public Health. 2020. <http://www.publichealth.lacounty.gov> accessed October 2020.
Department of Conservation. 2020. <https://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/wa> accessed October 2020.
Department of Conservation. 2020. <https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/> accessed October
2020.
155
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 101 City of Rolling Hills
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 2020.
<https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/environmental-review/airport-hazards/> accessed October 2020.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2020. <https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-
emissions accessed> November 2020.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2020. <https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-clean-water-
act> accessed November 2020.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2008. <https://msc.fema.gov/portal/r> accessed October 2020.
Moloney & Associates Acoustic and Environmental Associates. 2020.
<https://acoustic-environmental.ie/ground-borne- vibration.> accessed October 2020.
Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA). 2020. <http://www.rhca.org/info.php?pnum=17> accessed
November 2020.
Safeopedia. 2018. <https://www.safeopedia.com/definition/5568/ambient-noise> accessed October 2020.
Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. 2020. <http://vertpaleo.org/The-Society/Advocacy/Paleontological-Resources-
Preservation-Act.aspx> accessed October 2020.
South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2020. <http://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/clean-air-
plans/air-quality-mgt-plan> accessed October 2020.
State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). 2020. <https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map> accessed
October 2020.
UC Museum of Paleontology. 2020. <https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/collections/databases/> accessed October 2020.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2020.
<https://www.nrcs.usda.gov> accessed October 2020.
United States Department of Fish and Wildlife – Endangered Species. 2020.
<https://www.fws.gov/endangered/what-we-do/hcp-overview.html> accessed October 2020.
United States Drought Monitor. 2020. <https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/> accessed November 2020.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2020.
<https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/ancl.html> accessed October 2020.
156
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 102 City of Rolling Hills
United State Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2020. <https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-
greenhouse-gases> accessed October 2020.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2020. <https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-
change-indicators-climate-forcing> accessed October 2020.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2020. <https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overvie>
accessed October 2020.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2020. <https://www.epa.gov/enviro/sems-search>
accessed October 2020.
157
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 103 City of Rolling Hills
158
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 104 City of Rolling Hills
159
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 105 City of Rolling Hills
160
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 106 City of Rolling Hills
161
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 107 City of Rolling Hills
162
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 108 City of Rolling Hills
163
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 109 City of Rolling Hills
164
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 110 City of Rolling Hills
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
LA County - LARIAC 2014
Overlay
Overlay Zoning District - 1
Rancho Del Mar Housing O pportunity Overlay
Zoning
PF
RAS-1
RAS-2
206
65277.00001\33367195.1 Page 1 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-09
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF
THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD
CHAPTER 17.19 (RANCHO DEL MAR HOUSING
OPPORTUNITY ZONE) ESTABLISHING AN OVERLAY
ZONE TO ACCOMMODATE HOUSING AND
AMENDING SECTION 17.08.010 OF CHAPTER 17.08
(ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONES AND BOUNDARIES) TO
IDENTIFY THE OVERLAY ON THE ZONING MAP;
AND DETERMINING THE ORDINANCE TO BE
EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT.
RECITALS
A. The Planning Commission is in the process of considering amendments to the Land
Use Element and Land Use Policy Map of the City’s General Plan as well as amendments to the
City’s zoning ordinance to accommodate housing needs.
B. On December 22, 2020, the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public
hearing and considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony
concerning the enclosed zoning ordinance to establish an overlay zone to accommodate housing.
(Exhibit A.) An Initial Study and Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act to evaluate whether adoption of the RDMO Zone would
result in any significant impacts. (Exhibit B.)
C. All other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION (CEQA): An Initial Study and
Negative Declaration No. 2020-01 (Exhibit B) has been prepared, processed, and noticed in
accordance with CEQA (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines
(14 California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq.) for the RDMO Zone. Pursuant to
Section 15070, et seq of the CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission finds, on the basis of
substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, that the proposed project could not have a
significant effect on the environment. Upon the basis of all of the evidence in the record, the
Planning Commission finds that the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the
Planning Agency and hereby recommends approval of the Negative Declaration by the City
Council.
Section 2.Based on the entire record before the Planning Commission, and all written and
oral evidence presented, the Planning Commission hereby finds that the enclosed ordinance is
207
65277.00001\33367195.1 Page 2 of 2
consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan
relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities.
Section 3.Based on the entire record before the Planning Commission, and all written and
oral evidence presented, the Planning Commission hereby finds that the proposed ordinance is
consistent with the City’s General Plan.
Section 4.The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the
enclosed ordinance (Exhibit A) entitled: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 17 (ZONING)
OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD CHAPTER 17.19 (RANCHO DEL
MAR HOUSING OPPORTUNITY ZONE) ESTABLISHING AN OVERLAY ZONE TO
ACCOMMODATE HOUSING AND AMENDING SECTION 17.08.010 OF CHAPTER 17.08
(ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONES AND BOUNDARIES) TO IDENTIFY THE OVERLAY ON
THE ZONING MAP; AND DETERMINING THE ORDINANCE TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
Section 5.This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption.
PASSED, AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of December, 2020 by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstaining:
Absent:
_________________________
Brad Chelf, Chair
ATTEST:
____________________
City Clerk
Attachments:
Exhibit A: Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration 2020-01
Exhibit B: RDMO Zone
208
24438.00000\7541167.3
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
ADOPT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2020-10
TO THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GENERAL PLAN,
AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN TO
ADOPT THE LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT
AND LAND USE POLICY MAP AMENDMENT
RECITALS
A. Local governments are authorized by Government Code section 65350 et seq. to
prepare, adopt, and amend general plans; and
B. The proposed amendments to the Land Use Element and Land Use Policy Map of
the City of Rolling Hills General Plan ("Amendments" or “General Plan Amendment No. 2020-
01”) to create the Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay at 38 Crest Road West, Rolling
Hills, California to allow multifamily housing at a density of 24 units per acre, single room
occupancy, and emergency shelters implements the overall policies and goals of the general plan
and leaves the general plan internally consistent; and
C. The Amendments were sent to affected public entities for their review and
comment; and
D. The Amendments were reviewed, studied, and found to comply with the
California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") as more fully described below; and
E. On December 22, 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rolling Hills
("Planning Commission") conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Amendments at which
time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the Amendments were heard and the
Amendments were fully studied; and
F. All other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION (CEQA): An Initial Study and
Negative Declaration No. 2020-01 (Exhibit A) has been prepared, processed, and noticed in
accordance with CEQA (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA
Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq.) for General Plan
Amendment No. 2020-01. Pursuant to Section 15070, et seq of the CEQA Guidelines, the
Planning Commission finds, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record,
that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment. Upon the basis
209
of all of the evidence in the record, the Planning Commission finds that the Negative Declaration
reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Agency and hereby recommends approval of
the Negative Declaration by the City Council.
Section 2.The Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council the approval
of General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01, an Amendment to the General Plan to Adopt the Land
Use Element Amendment and Land Use Policy Map Amendment (Exhibit B), based upon the
following findings:
A. The Land Use Element Amendment and Land Use Policy Map Amendment
appropriately update these two portions of the General Plan to address current
legal developments, required updates, and to provide for integration and
consistency with the General Plan.
B. The Land Use Element Amendment and Land Use Policy Map Amendment
provide for development within the City that is consistent or compatible with the
General Plan and all of the other Elements of the General Plan.
Section 3.This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption.
PASSED, AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of December, 2020 by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstaining:
Absent:
_________________________
Brad Chelf, Chair
ATTEST:
____________________
City Clerk
Attachments:
Exhibit A: Initial Study and Negative Declaration 2020-01
Exhibit B: Land Use Element Amendment and Land Use Policy Map Amendment to
the Rolling Hills General Plan
210
Agenda Item No.: 7.A
Mtg. Date: 01/25/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:ELAINE JENG, CITY MANAGER
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:CONSIDER EASTFIELD UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING PROJECT
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT INITIATION OF PROPERTY OWNERS
VOTING PROCESS.
DATE:January 25, 2021
BACKGROUND:
Property owners along Eastfield Drive within the City have submitted petitions requesting the formation
of an underground utility assessment district. NV5, the City’s Assessment Engineer, has certified the
petitions for the proposed City of Rolling Hills Assessment District No. 2021-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility
Improvements) (“AD 2021-1”). The City Council is now being asked to preliminarily approve the
Assessment Engineer ’s Report, declare its intention to levy assessments and issue bonds to finance the
undergrounding, and set March 22, 2021 as the time and place of a Public Hearing for AD 2021-1.
DISCUSSION:
Owners of property located in the proposed assessment district submitted petitions to the City
requesting the formation of a special assessment district to underground overhead utilities. On March 3,
2020, the Assessment Engineer certified that owners representing more than 50 percent of the
assessable property area within the proposed assessment district had signed a petition for
undergrounding overhead utilities. The proposed assessment district consists of 19 properties located
along Eastfield Drive.
AD 2021-1 Assessment District is being proposed for the conversion of existing overhead utilities to
underground locations. The property owners within the proposed AD 2021-1 will bear the costs of the
improvements and associated proceedings, with the exception that the City has agreed to contribute
one-third of the assessment engineering and design engineering costs.
The Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 governs the procedures used to create the proposed AD 2021-
1. Bonds issued under the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 carry up to a 30-year term and are issued to
finance assessments not paid in cash within 30 days after confirmation of the assessment.
211
If after the balloting and tabulation of ballots at the public hearing, a majority of the owners of the
properties within the assessment district vote in favor of the assessment district, the City Council may
adopt a resolution creating the assessment district and levying the assessment. Thereafter, a cash
collection period would take place to provide property owners with an opportunity to pay their share of
the assessment. Should the property owners choose not to make the cash payment, assessment liens
would be recorded on the titles of each property in the assessment district and will be collected on
property tax bills.
The total assessment for the proposed AD 2021-1 is estimated as follows:
Proposed Assessment District No. 2021-1
ITEM COST
Cost of Design and Construction $ 3,051,225.80
Incidental Costs and Expenses $ 190,057.00
Financing (Bond) Costs $ 279,107.29
Estimated Total Cost: $ 3,520,390.09
Costs associated with Southern California Edison’s and Frontier ’s improvements have increased
dramatically. The proposed assessments on the properties within the proposed AD 2021-1 range from
$148,356.21 to $210,590.56.
In addition to the payment of a portion of the assessment, each property owner will be responsible for
the costs of connecting the main service conduit in the right-of-way to the property owner's home or
business. The cost to the property owner for this conversion varies depending on the condition and
location of the current electrical service. Each property owner is encouraged to contact a licensed
electrical contractor to assess the particular property needs.
In his Preliminary Assessment Engineer ’s Report, the Assessment Engineer used a lot size methodology
to apportion assessments within each district in light of the fact that all properties are receiving the
same safety, connection, and aesthetic benefit. The special benefits from undergrounding the overhead
utilities are defined as follows:
Improved Aesthetics Benefit . This benefit relates to the improved aesthetics of the streetscape
due to the removal of overhead wires and utility poles. For the purposes of Engineer ’s Report, a
street is defined as either a street or alley. The removal of guy wires and other support structures
related to the overhead facilities are included in the definition of improved aesthetics. Properties
that are directly adjacent to overhead facilities receive an aesthetic benefit. This benefit is based
on the area of the parcel.
Safety Benefit. This benefit relates to the additional safety of having the overhead distribution
wires placed underground and having the power poles removed, which eliminates the threat of
downed utility lines and poles due to wind, rain, and other unforeseeable events. Falling facilities
can lead to personal injuries, damage to structures, and fires. Properties immediately adjacent to
the facilities usually have a greater risk. Furthermore, in areas like Eastfield Drive, fallen lines
and poles have negative effects by blocking driveways and causing property damage. Properties
that are adjacent to, or in proximity of, overhead facilities receive a safety benefit. This benefit is
based on the average area of the parcels in the proposed AD 2021-1.
Reliability Benefit. This benefit relates to the enhanced reliability of service from the utilities
being underground, due' to having all new wires and equipment and having that equipment
underground, which reduces the threat of service interruption from downed lines. When
212
compared to overhead systems, fewer outages occur due to various acts of nature, traffic
collisions, and obstructions (such as trees). Properties that are connected to, or have the ability to
connect to, the facilities proposed to be undergrounded receive a reliability benefit. This benefit
is based on the average area of the parcels in the proposed AD 2021-1.
FISCAL IMPACT:
To proceed to the balloting for the proposed AD 2021-1, there is no new fiscal impact. However, the
City has previously approved professional services contracts with Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth as
bond counsel to the City with respect to formation of the proposed AD 2021-1, NV5 as the Assessment
Engineer, and Urban Futures, Inc. as the City’s Municipal Advisor. If the formation of the proposed
AD 2021-1 is not successful, then fees for such services will be paid from property owners deposits and
from the General Fund.
The City has previously agreed to contribute one-third of the costs to the assessment engineering and
design engineering associated with the proposed AD 2021-1, and to date has expended approximatel y
$32,782. Additional staff costs for overseeing the project has been included in the Fiscal Year 20/21
Budget. The City does not expect to be reimbursed for such costs. All other funds will be provided by
property owner contributions and/or bonds proceeds if the proposed AD 2021-1 is approved.
RECOMMENDATION:
(1) Adopt Resolution No. 1268, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills,
California, Declaring Its Intention to Take Proceedings Pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of
1913 and to Issue Bonds Pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, and Make Certain Finding
and Determinations in Connection Therewith, All Relating to the Formation of City of Rolling Hills
Assessment District No. 2021-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements); and
(2) Adopt Resolution No. 1269, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills,
California, Preliminarily Approving the Assessment Engineer ’s Report and Fixing the Time and Place
of the Public Hearing for City of Rolling Hills Assessment District No. 2021-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility
Improvements)
ATTACHMENTS:
Signed Preliminary Engineer's Report Eastfield Undergrouding_Rolling Hills_01.25.21.pdf
Rolling Hills_Eastfield_CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY OF PETITION_03.03.20.pdf
Resolution 1268 Intention.docx
Resolution 1269 Fixing Date of Public Hearing (2).docx
Assessment District Boundary Map.pdf
213
PRELIMINARY ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR UNDERGROUNDING UTILITY
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2020-1 (EASTFIELD DRIVE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS)
PREPARED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
January 25, 2021 214
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Introduction and Certifications ........................................................................................ 1
PART I Plans and Specifications ................................................................................... 5
PART II Cost Estimate ................................................................................................... 6
PART III Assessment Roll and Method of Assessment Spread ....................................... 7
Table 1 - Assessment Roll ................................................................................ 9
Debt Limit Valuation ...................................................................................... 10
Exhibit 1-Method and Formula of Assessment Spread .................................. 11
PART IV Annual Administrative Assessment ............................................................... 17
PART V Diagram of Assessment District ..................................................................... 18
PART VI Description of Facilities.................................................................................. 20
Right-of-Way Certificate ................................................................................ 22
Certification of Completion of Environmental Proceedings .......................... 23
APPENDIX
A. Assessment Calculations
215
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 2
AGENCY: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
PROJECT: UNDERGROUNDING UTILITY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
TO: CITY COUNCIL
ENGINEER'S "REPORT" PURSUANT TO THE
PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 2961 AND 10204
OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
The purpose of this Assessment District is to provide financing to underground power, telephone and
cable facilities in the area known as Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements. The proposed underground
utility improvements will provide conversion to an upgraded utility system and will enhance
neighborhood aesthetics, safety and reliability.
The construction of these improvements will conform to existing City of Rolling Hills, Southern
California Edison, Crown Castle, Cox and Frontier standards. By virtue of such improvements,
the proposed improvements are of special and direct benefit to these properties.
Pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID of the State Constitution, Part 7.5 of the "Special Assessment
Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931'', being Division 4 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California, and the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division
12 of said Code, and the Resolution of Intention, adopted by the City Council of the CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS, State of California, in connection with the proceedings for Undergrounding Utility Assessment
District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements) (hereinafter referred to as the “Assessment
District”), I, Jeffrey M. Cooper, P.E., a Registered Professional Engineer and authorized representative
of NV5, Inc., the duly appointed Engineer of Work, herewith submits the “Report” for the Assessment
District, consisting of six (6) parts as stated below.
PART I
This part contains the plans and specifications which describe the general nature, location and extent
for the proposed improvements to be constructed, and are filed herewith and made a part hereof.
Said plans and specifications are on file in the Office of the Superintendent of Streets.
PART II
This part contains an estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements, including capitalized
interest, if any, incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith as set forth herein and attached
hereto.
216
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 3
PART III
This part consists of the following information:
A. A proposed assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses of the proposed
improvements upon the several subdivisions of land within the Assessment District, in
proportion to the special benefits to be received by such subdivisions from said improvements,
which is set forth upon the assessment roll filed herewith and made a part hereof.
B. The total amount, as near as may be determined, of the total principal sum of all unpaid special
assessments and special assessments required or proposed to be levied under any completed
or pending assessment proceedings, other than that contemplated for the Assessment District,
which would require an investigation and report under the "Special Assessment Investigation,
Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931" against the total area proposed to be assessed.
C. The total true value, determined from the latest Assessor's roll, of the parcels of land and
improvements which are proposed to be assessed.
PART IV
This part contains the proposed maximum annual administrative assessment to be levied upon each
subdivision or parcel of land within the Assessment District to pay the costs incurred by the CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS, and not otherwise reimbursed, resulting from the administration and collection of
assessments, from the administration and registration of any associated bonds and reserve or other
related funds, or both.
PART V
This part contains a map showing the boundaries of the Assessment District, and a diagram showing
the Assessment District, the boundaries and the dimensions of the subdivisions of land within said
Assessment District, as the same existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. The
Boundary Map and Assessment Diagram are filed herewith and made a part hereof, and part of the
assessment.
217
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 4
PART VI
This part shall consist of the following information:
A. Description of facilities
B. Right-of-Way Certificate
C. Environmental Certificate
This report is submitted on January 25, 2021
NV5, INC.
JEFFREY M. COOPER, P.E.
R.C.E. No. 31572
ENGINEER OF WORK
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
218
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 5
PART I
Plans and Specifications
The plans and specifications to construct the utility undergrounding improvements, and any ancillary
improvements thereof, for the area generally described as Undergrounding Utility Assessment District
No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements) describe the general nature, location and extent of
the improvements for Assessment District are referenced herein and incorporated as if attached and
a part of this Report.
Final plans and specifications have been prepared for the City by the utility companies and are on file
in the office of the Superintendent of Streets.
219
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 6
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Final
Utility Engineering & Construction
Southern California Edison (includes $50,000 credit for design)$1,281,935.00 -$
Frontier $883,382.00 -$
Crown Castle $287,061.00 -$
Cox $321,463.64 -$
$2,773,841.64 -$
Contingency 10%$277,384.16 -$
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $3,051,225.80 -$
INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
Assessment Engineering (City of Rolling Hills contributed 1/3 of cost)$19,090.00 -$
Design Engineering (RHCA and City of Rolling Hills contributed 1/3 of cost each)$25,067.00 -$
City/Consultant Inspection $33,800.00 -$
City Administration $0.00 -$
Financial Advisor/Bank Counsel $21,000.00 -$
Bond Counsel $37,500.00 -$
Printing, Advertisting, Notices $1,000.00 -$
Miscellaneous $1,000.00 -$
Underwriter $51,600.00 -$
Subtotal Incidental Expenses $190,057.00 -$
Construction $3,051,225.80 -$
Subtotal Incidental & Construction $3,241,282.80 -$
FINANCIAL COSTS
Bond Reserve $279,107.29 -$
Subtotal & Financial Costs $279,107.29 -$
TOTAL ESTMATE $3,520,390.09 -$
Estimated Costs
Part II
Cost Estimate
220
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 7
Part III
Assessment Roll and Method of Assessment Spread
WHEREAS, on __________, 2021 the City Council of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, State of California,
did, pursuant to the provisions of the 1913 Act "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 ", being Division
12 of the Streets and Highways Code, of the State of California, adopt its Resolution of Intention No.
2021-_____, for the installation and construction of certain public improvements, together with
appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection therewith (the “improvements”), in a special
assessment district known and designated as “Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1
(Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)” (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); and
WHEREAS, said Resolution of Intention, as required by Law, did direct the Engineer of Work to make
and file a "Report", consisting of the following as required by Section 10204 of the Act:
a. Plans and Specifications
b. A general description of works or appliances already installed and any other property necessary
or convenient for the operation of the improvement, if the works, appliances, or property are
to be acquired as part of the improvement.
c. Cost Estimates
d. Assessment Diagram showing the Assessment District and the subdivisions of land therein;
e. A proposed assessment of the costs and expenses of the works of improvement levied upon the
parcels within the boundaries of the Assessment District;
f. The proposed maximum annual assessment to be levied upon each subdivision or parcel of land
within the Assessment District to pay the costs incurred by the City and not otherwise
reimbursed resulting from the administration and collection of assessments or from the
administration and registration of any associated bonds and reserve or other related funds.
For particulars, reference is made to the Resolution of Intention as previously adopted.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, JEFFREY M. COOPER, P.E., the authorized representative of NV5, pursuant to
Article XIIID of the California Constitution and the “Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", do hereby
submit the following:
1. Pursuant to the provisions of Law and the Resolution of Intention, I have assessed the costs and
expenses of the works of improvement to be performed in the Assessment District upon the
parcels of land in the Assessment District specially benefited thereby in direct proportion and
relation to the special benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For particulars as to the
identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein.
2. As required by law, a Diagram is hereto attached, showing the Assessment District, as well as
the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said
221
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 8
District as the same existed at the time of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, each of
which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots respectively have been given a separate number
upon said Diagram and in said Assessment Roll.
3. The subdivisions and parcels of land the numbers therein as shown on the respective
Assessment Diagram as attached hereto correspond with the numbers as appearing on the
Assessment Roll as contained herein.
4. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that bonds will be issued in accordance with Division 10 of the Streets
and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915"), to
represent all unpaid assessments, which bonds shall be issued in one or more series, each with
a term not to exceed the legal maximum term as authorized by law, THIRTY-NINE (39) YEARS
from the 2nd day of September next succeeding twelve (12) months from their date. Said bonds
shall bear interest at a rate not to exceed the current legal maximum rate of 12% per annum.
5. By virtue of the authority contained in said "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", and by
further direction and order of the legislative body, I hereby recommend the following
Assessment to cover the costs and expenses of the works of improvement for the Assessment
District based on the costs and expenses as set forth below:
As Preliminary Approved As Confirmed
Estimated Cost of Construction: $3,051,225.80
Estimated Incidental Expenses: $190,057.00
Estimated Financial Costs: $279,107.29
Estimated Contribution: $0
Estimated Total to Assessment: $3,520,390.09
For particulars as to the individual assessments and their descriptions, reference is made to
Table l (Assessment Roll) attached hereto.
6. The Method of Spread of Assessment is as set forth in the exhibit identified as Part III (Exhibit I),
which is attached hereto, referenced and so incorporated.
222
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 9
Table 1
Assessment
Asmt
No.
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Total True
Value**
Existing
Liens*
Assessments
as
Preliminarily
Approved
Assessments
as
Confirmed and
Recorded
Value To
Lien Ratio
1 7567-002-008 $1,437,281.00 -188,807.00$ -7.6
2 7567-002-007 $2,625,385.00 -190,854.19$ -13.8
3 7567-002-006 $2,589,625.00 -210,590.56$ -12.3
4 7567-002-005 $2,161,284.00 -191,536.21$ -11.3
5 7567-002-004 $1,334,968.00 -148,356.86$ -9.0
6 7567-003-021 $1,463,287.00 -181,492.97$ -8.1
7 7567-003-027 $2,362,470.00 -185,766.42$ -12.7
8 7567-003-026 $1,378,199.00 -188,732.86$ -7.3
9 7567-003-025 $2,250,020.00 -190,723.04$ -11.8
10 7567-003-022 $2,283,678.00 -192,803.31$ -11.8
11 7567-003-020 $1,475,000.00 -196,119.89$ -7.5
12 7567-003-047 $2,024,700.00 -172,505.82$ -11.7
13 7567-003-046 $2,065,561.00 -177,435.06$ -11.6
14 7567-003-045 $1,773,865.00 -172,967.72$ -10.3
15 7567-003-044 $398,468.00 -174,729.80$ -2.3
16 7567-003-043 $1,497,997.00 -172,735.06$ -8.7
17 7567-003-042 $1,688,184.00 -197,202.22$ -8.6
18 7567-003-041 $2,568,944.00 -188,296.05$ -13.6
19 7567-003-040 $5,534,231.00 -198,735.05$ -27.8
[1] Amounts shown may be one (1) penny off due to rounding
[1]
223
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 10
Table 2
Debt Limit Valuation
A. ESTIMATED BALANCE TO ASSESSMENT (Not including city owned parcels) $3,520,390.09
B. UNPAID SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $0
TOTAL A& B $3,520,390.09
C. TRUE VALUE OF PARCELS (Not including city owned parcels) $38,913,147.00
AVERAGE VALUE TO LIEN RATIO 11:1
* Unpaid Special Assessments shall consist of the total principal sum of all unpaid special assessments
previously levied or proposed to be levied other than in the instant proceedings.
** True Value of Parcels means the total value of the land and improvements as estimated and shown
on the last equalized roll of the County or as otherwise reasonably calculated.
This report does not represent a recommendation of parcel value, economic viability or financial
feasibility, as that is not the responsibility of the Assessment Engineer.
CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned Assessment Engineer, do hereby certify that (i) the total amount of the principal
sum of the special assessments proposed to be levied, together with the principal amount of
previously levied special assessments, as set forth above, do not exceed one-half (1/2) the total true
value of the parcels proposed to be assessed, and (ii) the amount proposed to be assessed upon any
parcel does not exceed one-half of the true value of the parcel.
EXECUTED ON January 25, 2021
NV5, INC.
JEFFREY M. COOPER, P.E.
R.C.E. No. 31572
ENGINEER OF WORK
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
224
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 11
Exhibit 1
Method and Formula of Assessment Spread
Since the improvements are to be funded by the levying of assessments, the "Municipal Improvement
Act of 1913" and Article XIIID of the State Constitution require that assessments must be based on the
special benefit that the properties receive from the works of improvement. In addition, Section 4 of
Article XIIID of the State Constitution requires that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the
reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Section 4 provides that
only special benefits are assessable and the local agency levying the assessment must separate the
general benefits from the special benefits. It also provides that parcels within a district that are owned
or used by any public agency, the State of California, or the United States shall not be exempt from
assessment unless the agency can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that those publicly
owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit. Neither the Act nor the State Constitution specifies
the method or formula that should be used to apportion the costs to properties in any special
assessment district proceedings.
The responsibility for recommending an apportionment of the costs to properties which specially
benefit from the improvements rests with the Assessment Engineer, who is appointed for the purpose
of making an analysis of the facts and determining the correct apportionment of the assessment
obligation. In order to apportion the assessments to each parcel in direct proportion with the special
benefit which it will receive from the improvements, an analysis has been completed and is used as the
basis for apportioning costs to each property within the Assessment District.
Based upon an analysis of the special benefit to be received by each parcel from the construction of
the works of improvement, the Assessment Engineer recommends the apportionment of costs as
outlined below. The final authority and action rests with the City Council after hearing all testimony
and evidence presented at a public hearing, and tabulating the assessment ballots previously mailed to
all record owners of property within the Assessment District. Upon the conclusion of the public
hearing, the City Council must make the final determination whether or not the assessment spread has
been made in direct proportion to the special benefits received by each parcel within the Assessment
District. Ballot tabulation will be done at that time and, if a majority of the returned ballots weighted
by assessment amount are not in opposition to the Assessment District, the City Council may form the
Assessment District.
The following sections set forth the methodology used to apportion the costs of the improvements to
each parcel.
SPECIAL BENEFITS
In further making the analysis, it is necessary that the properties receive a special benefit distinguished
from general benefits conferred on real property located in the District or to the public at large.
225
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 12
The purpose of this Assessment District is to provide the financing to underground existing overhead
electrical, telephone and cable facilities as well as rehabilitate the affected portions of streets and
alleys within the District. These facilities are the direct source of service to the properties within the
Assessment District.
The proposed replacement of existing overhead utility facilities (power, telephone and cable facilities)
with underground facilities and removal of the existing utility poles and the overhead wires will provide
a special benefit to the parcels connected to and adjacent to, or in near proximity of, the facilities as
follows:
□ Improved Aesthetics Benefit. This benefit relates to the improved aesthetics of the streetscape
due to the removal of overhead wires and utility poles. For the purposes of this report, a street
is defined as either a street or alley. The removal of guy wires and other support structures
related to the overhead facilities are included in the definition of improved aesthetics.
Properties that are directly adjacent to overhead facilities receive an aesthetic benefit. This
benefit is based on the area of the parcel.
□ Safety Benefit. This benefit relates to the additional safety of having the overhead distribution
wires placed underground and having the power poles removed, which eliminates the threat of
downed utility lines and poles due to wind, rain and other unforeseeable events. Falling
facilities can lead to personal injuries and damage to structures, including fire. Properties
immediately adjacent to the facilities usually have a greater risk. Furthermore, in areas like
Eastfield Drive, the negative effects of falling lines and poles are widespread including
blocked driveways and property damage due to impact. Properties that are adjacent to, or in
proximity of, overhead facilities receive a safety benefit. This benefit is based on the average
area of the parcels in the District.
□ Reliability Benefit. This benefit relates to the enhanced reliability of service from the utilities
being underground, due' to having all new wires and equipment and having that equipment
underground, which reduces the threat of service interruption from downed lines. When
compared to overhead systems, fewer outages occur due to various acts of nature, traffic
collisions and obstructions (such as trees). Properties that are connected to, or have the ability
to connect to, the facilities proposed to be undergrounded receive a reliability benefit. This
benefit is based on the average area of the parcels in the District.
By virtue of such special benefits, the proposed improvements will provide a higher level of service,
increase the desirability of the properties and will specifically enhance the values of the properties
within the Assessment District. Therefore, the proposed improvements are of direct and special benefit
to these properties.
226
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 13
GENERAL BENEFITS
Section 4 of Article XIIID requires that the general benefits imparted by the utility undergrounding
project be separated from the special benefits and that only the special benefit portion of the costs of
the project be assessed against those parcels which are identified as receiving special benefits.
Separating the general from the special benefits requires an examination of the facts and
circumstances of the project and the property being assessed.
In this particular assessment district, the streets along which the existing overhead utility facilities
are being undergrounded function as local and collector streets. No other roadways are designated
as an arterial, a major arterial or a scenic corridor in the Transportation Element of the City's
General Plan. Furthermore, the City has an established network of arterial streets which appear to
function as intended to provide for the movement of traffic around and through the community at
large without the need to utilize local collector streets for such purposes. Under these circumstances,
any use of the streets within the assessment district as ''through" streets is incidental.
The properties situated within the assessment district are used almost exclusively as residential. Under
this circumstance, the impacts, both visual and safety, are largely isolated to those properties (and the
persons who inhabit them) which front on the local streets, with only incidental impacts on those who
visit homes within the assessment district or who pass through the assessment district on trips
originating outside the boundary and having a destination outside the boundary.
Based on these facts and circumstances, any general benefits to the property within the Assessment
District in general, to the surrounding community and to the public at large from the project of
undergrounding these local overhead utility facilities on the local streets and alleys, such as to the
general public visiting in cars, on bikes or on foot, are incidental and do not exceed five percent (5%) of
the estimated project costs. This general benefit portion of the cost is more than offset by the
approximate 20% percent utility company contribution (included in the cost estimate on page 7 as net
costs). Therefore, the remainder of the project design and construction costs represents the local and
special benefits to the parcels within the Assessment District. Because only the net amount of
$3,520,390.09 is apportioned to the parcels within the District, no parcel is assessed more than its
proportional share of the special benefits from the improvements.
227
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 14
METHODOLOGY
Based upon the findings described above, the special benefit received by the properties within the
boundaries of the Assessment District is the conversion from an overhead to an underground utility
system resulting in additional safety, enhanced reliability, and improved aesthetics to the adjacent
properties.
Based on these conditions, it is our conclusion that the improvements specially benefit all assessed
properties in the Assessment District.
To establish the benefit to the individual parcels within the Assessment District, the highest and best
use of each property is considered. For example, a vacant property is considered developed to its
highest potential and connected to the system.
The more a property is developed, the more it benefits from the proposed improvements. All of the
properties within this Assessment District are zoned residential. There is a direct correlation
between the size of a property and the extent to which a property may develop. Because parcel size
is one of the main limiting factors for what can be built on a property, or the extent the property is
developed, the size of each parcel is used as the base unit for measuring benefit.
228
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 15
The special benefits from the undergrounding of overhead utilities are categorized into the three (3)
distinct benefits identified above. All parcels within the District receive 3 of the 3 benefits. For the
Improved Aesthetics Benefit, the parcel area is multiplied by 1 to calculate the "Aesthetics Benefit
Area.” For the Reliability Benefit and Safety Benefit, the average parcel area within the district is
determined and applied to the parcel, the “Reliability Benefit Area” and “Safety Benefit Area” are the
average size of parcels in the District. The Assessed Benefit Area per parcel is equal to the Aesthetics
Benefit Area plus the Safety Benefit Area plus the Reliability Benefit Area, divided by 3.
ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT
Each parcel will be apportioned its fair share of the construction costs based on the Assessed Benefit
Area calculated for each property.
Incidental Expenses and Financial Costs have been assessed to the entire Assessment District on a
prorata basis relative to the total construction cost allocations.
The individual assessment calculations are provided in Appendix A. For particulars to the Assessment
Roll, reference is made to Table 1 in Part III of this report.
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the assessments for the referenced Assessment District have been
spread in direct accordance with the special benefits that each parcel receives from the works of
improvement.
Dated: January 25, 2021
NV5, INC.
JEFFREY M. COOPER, P.E.
R.C.E. No. 31572
ENGINEER OF WORK
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
229
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 16
I, as CITY CLERK of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA do
hereby certify that the foregoing Assessment, together with the Diagram attached thereto, was filed in
my office on the day of , 2021.
CITY CLERK
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
I, as CITY CLERK of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA do
hereby certify that the foregoing Assessment, together with the Diagram attached thereto, was
preliminarily approved by the City Council of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA, on
the day of , 2021.
CITY CLERK
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
I, as CITY CLERK of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA do
hereby certify that the foregoing Assessment, together with the Diagram attached thereto, was
approved and confirmed by the City Council of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA, on
the day of , 2021.
CITY CLERK
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
I, as SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS of the CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS, CALIFORNIA do hereby certify that the foregoing Assessment, together with the Diagram attached
thereto, was recorded in my office on the day of , 2021.
SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
230
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 17
PART IV
Annual Administrative Assessment
A proposed maximum annual administrative assessment shall be levied on each parcel of land and
subdivision of land within the Assessment District to pay for necessary costs and expenses incurred by
the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, and not otherwise reimbursed, resulting from the administration and
collection of assessments, from the administration or registration of any bonds and reserve or other
related funds, or both. The maximum assessment is authorized pursuant to the provisions of Section
10204(f) of the Streets and Highways Code and shall not exceed two hundred dollars ($200) per parcel
per year, subject to an annual increase based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI), during the preceding
year ending in January, for all Urban Consumers in the Los Angeles, Riverside, and Orange County
areas. The exact amount of the administration charge will be established each year by the
Superintendent of Streets.
This administration assessment is separate from, and in addition to, (a) the per-parcel collection fee that
may be added to each annual assessment under California Streets and Highways Code Sections 8682 (to
cover expenses of collection) and 8682.1 (to cover bond administration costs), and (b) any fees payable
to the City in connection with Assessment prepayments after the issuance of Bonds, apportionment of
Assessments to reflect parcels splits or parcel mergers, and late charges and penalties for delinquent
Assessment installments.
The annual administrative assessment will be collected in the same manner and in the same
installments as the assessment levied to pay for the cost of the works of improvement.
231
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 18
PART V
Diagram of Assessment
A reduced copy of the Assessment Diagram is attached hereto. Full-sized copies of the Boundary Map
and Assessment Diagram are on file in the Office of the City Clerk, of the City of Rolling Hills.
As required by the Act, the Assessment Diagram shows the exterior boundaries of the Assessment
District and the assessment number assigned to each parcel of land corresponding to its number as it
appears in the Assessment Roll contained in Part III Table I. The Assessor's Parcel Number is also shown
for each parcel as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention and reference is
hereby made to the Assessor's Parcel Maps of the County of Los Angeles for the boundaries and
dimensions of each parcel of land.
232
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 19
233
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 20
Part VI
Description of Facilities
Section 10100 of the Act provides for the legislative body of any municipality to finance certain capital
facilities and services within or along its streets or any public way or easement. The following is a list of
proposed improvements as allowed under the Act to be installed, or improved under the provisions of
the Act, including the acquisition of required right-of-way and/or property. For the general location of
the improvements to be constructed referenced is hereby made to the Plans and Specifications
described in Part I of this report.
The following improvements are proposed to be constructed and installed in the general location
referred to as Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility
Improvements).
1. Acquisition of any required easements or rights-of-way.
2. Removal of existing utility poles.
3. Removal of overhead resident service drops.
4. Construction of mainline underground power, telephone and cable conduit, with appurtenant
manholes and pullboxes, and installation of cabling, wiring and other facilities.
5. Construction of service conduit and appurtenances.
The improvements will be designed by the Southern California Edison Company, Charter and
Frontier. The utility companies will be responsible for inspecting the work for their facilities and the
City of Rolling Hills will inspect the work to ensure conformance to City standards and specifications
where applicable.
The City will also construct additional pavement rehabilitation as needed for the project.
Once completed, the underground facilities will become the property and responsibility of Southern
California Edison Company, Charter, and Frontier.
Each owner of property located within the Assessment District will be responsible for arranging for and
paying for work on his or her property necessary to connect facilities constructed by the public utilities
in the public streets and alleys to the points of connection on the private property. Conversion of
individual service connections on private property is not included in the work done by the Assessment
District.
The estimated time for completion of the undergrounding of the utilities is 36 months after the sale of
bonds. Property owners will be required to provide necessary underground connections within 120
days of the completion of the underground facilities.
234
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 21
Failure to convert individual service connections on private property may result in a recommendation
to the City Council that the public utilities be directed to discontinue service to that property pursuant
to Section 15.32.100 of the Municipal Code. Overhead facilities cannot be removed until all overhead
service has been discontinued.
235
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 22
Right-of -Way Certificate
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
The undersigned hereby CERTIFIES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY that the following is all true and
correct.
That at all time herein mentioned, the undersigned was, and now is, the authorized representative of
the duly appointed SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA.
That there have now been instituted proceedings under the provisions of Article XIIID of the California
Constitution, and the "Municipal Improvements Act of 1913," being Division 12 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California, for the construction of certain public improvements in a
special assessment district known and designated as UNDERGROUNDING UTILITY ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements) (hereinafter referred to as the
"Assessment District").
THE UNDERSIGNED STATES AND CERTIFIES AS FOLLOWS:
All easements or right-of-way necessary for the construction and installation of the public
improvements of the Assessment District either have been obtained or are in process of being
obtained and will be obtained and in the possession of the affected utility company, the City, the
County of Los Angeles or the State of California prior to commencement of the construction
and installation of such public improvements.
EXECUTED this day of , 2021 at CITY OF ROLLING HILLS,
California.
SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
State of California
By:
236
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 23
Certificate of Completion of Environmental Proceedings
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
The undersigned, under penalty of perjury, CERTIFIES as follows:
1. That I am the person who authorized to prepare and process all environmental documentation as
needed as it relates to the formation of the special Assessment District being formed pursuant to the
provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913" being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways
Code of the State of California, said special Assessment District known and designated as
UNDERGROUNDING UTILITY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility
Improvements) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District").
2. The specific environmental proceedings relating to this Assessment District that have been
completed are as follows:
CEQA compliance review:
The proposed project is Categorically Exempt (Class 2) from the provisions of CEQA (replacement or
reconstructions).
3. I do hereby certify that all environmental evaluation proceedings necessary for the formation of the
Assessment District have been completed to my satisfaction, and that no further environmental
proceedings are necessary.
EXECUTED this day of , 2021 at CITY OF ROLLING HILLS,
California.
By:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
237
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 24
APPENDIX
A. Assessment Calculations
238
City of Rolling Hills
Undergrounding Utility Assessment District No. 2020-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)
Preliminary Engineer's Report
January 25, 2021 | 25
Property
Address
Asmt
No.
Assessor's Parcel
Number
Parcel
Area (sf)
Assigned
Connections
Aesthetics
Benefit
(YES/NO)
Aesthetics
Benefit
Area
Safety
Benefit
(YES/NO)
Safety
Benefit
Area
Reliability
Benefit
Area
Assessed
Benefit Area
Construction &
Contingency Costs
Incidental
Expenses
Bond
Costs
Preliminary
Total
Assessment
Cash
Payments
21 EASTFIELD DR. 1 7567-002-008 57,242 1 YES 57,242 YES 54,152.74 54,152.74 55,182.49 163,644.59$ 10,193.21$ 14,969.20$ 188,807.00$ 173,837.80$
23 EASTFIELD DR. 2 7567-002-007 59,037 1 YES 59,037 YES 54,152.74 54,152.74 55,780.82 165,418.95$ 10,303.74$ 15,131.50$ 190,854.19$ 175,722.69$
25 EASTFIELD DR. 3 7567-002-006 76,342 1 YES 76,342 YES 54,152.74 54,152.74 61,549.16 182,525.04$ 11,369.25$ 16,696.26$ 210,590.56$ 193,894.29$
27 EASTFIELD DR. 4 7567-002-005 59,635 1 YES 59,635 YES 54,152.74 54,152.74 55,980.16 166,010.08$ 10,340.56$ 15,185.58$ 191,536.21$ 176,350.64$
29 EASTFIELD DR. 5 7567-002-004 21,775 1 YES 21,775 YES 54,152.74 54,152.74 43,360.16 128,585.26$ 8,009.41$ 11,762.19$ 148,356.86$ 136,594.67$
2 CHUCKWAGON DR. 6 7567-003-021 50,829 1 YES 50,829 YES 54,152.74 54,152.74 53,044.82 157,305.30$ 9,798.35$ 14,389.32$ 181,492.97$ 167,103.65$
31 EASTFIELD DR. 7 7567-003-027 54,576 1 YES 54,576 YES 54,152.74 54,152.74 54,293.82 161,009.23$ 10,029.06$ 14,728.13$ 185,766.42$ 171,038.29$
33 EASTFIELD DR.8 7567-003-026 57,177 1 YES 57,177 YES 54,152.74 54,152.74 55,160.82 163,580.33$ 10,189.21$ 14,963.32$ 188,732.86$ 173,769.54$
35 EASTFIELD DR. 9 7567-003-025 58,922 1 YES 58,922 YES 54,152.74 54,152.74 55,742.49 165,305.27$ 10,296.66$ 15,121.11$ 190,723.04$ 175,601.93$
4 CHUCKWAGON DR.10 7567-003-022 60,746 1 YES 60,746 YES 54,152.74 54,152.74 56,350.49 167,108.31$ 10,408.97$ 15,286.04$ 192,803.31$ 177,517.27$
37 EASTFIELD DR. 11 7567-003-020 63,654 1 YES 63,654 YES 54,152.74 54,152.74 57,319.82 169,982.88$ 10,588.02$ 15,548.98$ 196,119.89$ 180,570.90$
34 EASTFIELD DR. 12 7567-003-047 42,949 1 YES 42,949 YES 54,152.74 54,152.74 50,418.16 149,515.88$ 9,313.16$ 13,676.79$ 172,505.82$ 158,829.03$
32 EASTFIELD DR. 13 7567-003-046 47,271 1 YES 47,271 YES 54,152.74 54,152.74 51,858.82 153,788.20$ 9,579.27$ 14,067.59$ 177,435.06$ 163,367.47$
30 EASTFIELD DR.14 7567-003-045 43,354 1 YES 43,354 YES 54,152.74 54,152.74 50,553.16 149,916.22$ 9,338.09$ 13,713.41$ 172,967.72$ 159,254.31$
28 EASTFIELD DR.15 7567-003-044 44,899 1 YES 44,899 YES 54,152.74 54,152.74 51,068.16 151,443.46$ 9,433.22$ 13,853.11$ 174,729.80$ 160,876.68$
26 EASTFIELD DR. 16 7567-003-043 43,150 1 YES 43,150 YES 54,152.74 54,152.74 50,485.16 149,714.57$ 9,325.53$ 13,694.96$ 172,735.06$ 159,040.10$
24 EASTFIELD DR.17 7567-003-042 64,603 1 YES 64,603 YES 54,152.74 54,152.74 57,636.16 170,920.97$ 10,646.45$ 15,634.79$ 197,202.22$ 181,567.43$
22 EASTFIELD DR.18 7567-003-041 56,794 1 YES 56,794 YES 54,152.74 54,152.74 55,033.16 163,201.73$ 10,165.63$ 14,928.69$ 188,296.05$ 173,367.36$
20 EASTFIELD DR.19 7567-003-040 65,947 1 YES 65,947 YES 54,152.74 54,152.74 58,084.16 172,249.53$ 10,729.21$ 15,756.32$ 198,735.05$ 182,978.73$
Totals 1,028,902.00 3,051,225.80$ 190,057.00$ 279,107.29$ 3,520,390.09$ 3,241,282.80$
[1] Parcel area adjusted to account for undeveloped land on slope
[2] Amounts shown may be one (1) penny off due to rounding
[2][2]
239
Jeffrey M. Cooper, P.E.
Vice President
NV5
Phone: (949) 585-0477
Email: Jeff.Cooper@nv5.com
240
CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY OF PETITION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
The undersigned hereby CERTIFIES as follows:
That I am the duly appointed ASSESSMENT ENGINEER of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA.
That on the 3rd day of March, 2020, I reviewed a Petition for the formation of an Assessment
District for certain public works improvement, together with appurtenances, appurtenant work
and acquisition, where necessary, in a special assessment district known and designated as
UNDERGROUND UTILITY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2020-1 (EASTFIELD DRIVE UTILITY
IMPROVEMENTS) (hereinafter referred to as the “Assessment District”), a copy of which is on file
in the Office of the City Clerk.
The undersigned hereby further specifically certifies as follows:
1. That I caused said Petition to be examined and my examination revealed that said Petition
was signed by not less than five (5) owners of assessable land in the proposed Assessment
District as shown by the last equalized assessment roll used by the City, owning lands
constituting more than fifty percent (50%) of the area of all assessable lands within the
proposed Assessment District, all as prescribed by Section 5896.6 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California.
2. Said Petition did represent sixty and seven-tenths of a percent (60.7%) of the assessable
area of property within the proposed boundaries of the Assessment District.
Executed this 3rd day of March, 2020 at Irvine, California.
____________________________________
JEFFREY M. COOPER, P.E.
NV5, ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
241
Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth
Draft of 1/20/21
4832-6859-9508v3/200289-0003
RESOLUTION NO. 1268
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO THE
MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913 AND TO ISSUE
BONDS PURSUANT TO THE IMPROVEMENT BOND ACT
OF 1915, AND MAKE CERTAIN FINDINGS AND
DETERMINATIONS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, ALL
RELATING TO THE FORMATION OF CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2021-1 (EASTFIELD
DRIVE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA, RESOLVES
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.The City Council finds as follows:
A.The City Council of the City of Rolling Hills (the “City”) desires to provide certain
property located along Eastfield Drive within the City with the undergrounding of electric, telephone
and cable facilities, and the removal of poles, overhead wires, guys, anchors and appurtenant work
therewith as further described in Section 4 hereof (the “Improvements”) and to order the formation of
an assessment district to pay the costs thereof under and pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913 (the “1913 Act”).
B.The proposed assessment district, if it is formed, is to be known and designated as the
City of Rolling Hills Assessment District No. 2021-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements) (the
“Assessment District”).
C.The proposed boundaries of the Assessment District are shown on a map which
indicates by a boundary line the extent of the territory proposed to be included in the Assessment
District, which map is designated “Proposed Boundaries of City of Rolling Hills Assessment District
No. 2021-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility Improvements)” (the “Map”), which Map is on file in the Office
of the City Clerk.
D.The City Council has been presented with petitions signed by property owners
located within the boundaries of the proposed Assessment District representing in excess of 50% of
the assessable acreage within the Assessment District requesting the formation of the Assessment
District to finance the Improvements as required by the 1913 Act.
E.Pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Section 5896.8, there is on file
with the City Clerk a certificate of NV5 (the “Assessment Engineer”) certifying the sufficiency of
such petitions.
F.It appears to the City Council that an Assessment District should be formed to
finance the installation of said Improvements under the provisions of the 1913 Act.
242
2
4832-6859-9508v3/200289-0003
G.The City Engineer, with the assistance of the Assessment Engineer, is competent to
make and file with the City Clerk the report with regard to the Improvements, which report is
required by the 1913 Act to be made and filed.
H.The conversion of overhead electric utility distribution system facilities to
underground, including connection to existing overhead electric utility distribution lines where the
surface is restored to the condition existing prior to undergrounding, is categorically exempt from the
California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) (“CEQA”) and
its implementing guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq.) (the
“Guidelines”) pursuant to Section 15302(d) of the Guidelines.
I.Before ordering the Improvements, the City Council is required, under the 1913 Act,
to adopt a resolution declaring its intention to do so.
J.The City Council intends to consider issuing bonds secured by the assessments to be
levied on property in the Assessment District pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, being
Division 10 (commencing with Section 8500) of the Streets and Highways Code (the “1915 Act”).
K.Before issuing bonds, the City Council is required, under the 1915 Act, to adopt a
resolution declaring its intention to do so.
SECTION 2.The above recitals, and each of them, are true and correct.
SECTION 3.The Map is hereby approved, adopted and declared to describe the proposed
boundaries of the Assessment District; and it shall govern for all details as to the extent of the
Assessment District. The City Clerk is hereby directed to endorse their certificate on the original of
the Map evidencing the date and adoption of this resolution and to file said Map in the Office of the
City Clerk, and to file or cause to be filed a copy of said Map so endorsed with the County Recorder
of Los Angeles County, California within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of the resolution fixing
the time and place of hearing on the formation and extent of the Assessment District.
SECTION 4.The Improvements generally include the undergrounding of existing electric,
telephone and cable facilities, including the removal of poles, overhead wires, guys and anchors and
the installation of new underground service connections and new streetlights and appurtenant work
therewith along Eastfield Drive as further shown on the Map. The improvements will be designed by
the Southern California Edison Company (“Edison”) and other utility providers. Edison or its
subcontractors will construct the improvements, and the City will inspect the work to ensure
conformance to City standards and specifications where applicable. Once completed, the
underground facilities will become the property and responsibility of Edison and such other utility
providers. Each owner of property located within the Assessment District will be responsible for
arranging for and paying for work on his property necessary to connect facilities constructed by the
public utilities in the public streets to the points of connection on the private property. Conversion of
individual service connections on private property is not included in the work done by the
Assessment District. Failure to convert individual service connections on private property may result
in a recommendation to the City Council that the public utilities be directed to discontinue service to
that property. Overhead facilities cannot be removed until all overhead service has been
discontinued.
243
3
4832-6859-9508v3/200289-0003
SECTION 5.The City Council hereby finds and declares that the public interest and necessity
require the Improvements, and the Improvements will be of direct and special benefit to the
properties and land within the Assessment District. The City Council hereby declares its intention to
order the conversion of the existing overhead electric and communication facilities to underground
locations, and the acquisition of the Improvements, to make the expenses thereof chargeable upon the
area included within the Assessment District, and to form the Assessment District.
SECTION 6.The City Council further declares its intention to levy a special assessment upon the
land within the Assessment District in accordance with the respective special and direct benefit to be
received by each parcel of land from the Improvements.
SECTION 7.This City Council finds and determines that before ordering the acquisition of the
Improvements it shall take proceedings pursuant to the 1913 Act and pursuant to Part 7.5 of the
Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931, Streets and
Highways Code Section 2960 et seq. (the “1931 Act”).
SECTION 8.The City has selected NV5 as the Assessment Engineer for the formation of the
Assessment District. The Assessment Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to make and file
with the City Clerk a written report with regard to the 1913 Act (the “Report”), which Report shall
comply with the requirements of Section 10204 and Section 2961 of the Streets and Highways Code
and Article XIIID of the California Constitution and shall contain the following:
(a)Plans and specifications for the Improvements;
(b)A general description of works or appliances already installed and any other property
necessary or convenient for the operation of the Improvements, if the works, appliances or property
are to be acquired as part of the Improvements;
(c)An estimate of the cost of the Improvements, and the cost of land, rights of ways,
easements, and incidental expenses in connection with the Improvements, including the cost of
registering bonds;
(d)A diagram showing the exterior boundaries of the Assessment District, the
boundaries of any zones within the Assessment District and the lines and dimensions of each parcel
of land within the Assessment District as they existed at the time of passage of this resolution (each
subdivision to be given a separate number on the diagram); and
(e)A proposed assessment of the total amount of the cost and expenses of the proposed
Improvements upon the several subdivisions of land in the Assessment District in proportion to the
estimated benefits to be received by such subdivision, respectively, from the Improvements (the
assessment shall refer to the subdivisions by their respective numbers assigned as provided in (d)
above).
(f)A proposed maximum annual assessment upon each of the several subdivisions of
land in the Assessment District to pay costs incurred by the City and not otherwise reimbursed which
result from the administration and collection of assessments or from the administration or registration
of any associated bonds and reserve or other related funds.
244
4
4832-6859-9508v3/200289-0003
In addition, the Report shall contain the information required by the 1931 Act as set forth in
Streets and Highways Code Section 2961(b), including:
(a)The total amount, as near as may be determined, of the total principal sum of all
unpaid special assessments and special assessments required or proposed to be levied under any
completed or pending assessment proceedings, other than the proposed assessments to be levied with
respect to the Assessment District, which would require an investigation and report under the 1931
Act against the total area proposed to be assessed; and
(b)The total true value, as near as may be determined, of the parcels of land and
improvements within the Assessment District which are proposed to be assessed. Total true value
may be estimated as the full cash value of the parcels as shown upon the last equalized assessment
roll of the county. Alternatively, total true value may be determined by other reasonable means,
including, but not limited to, by adjusting the value shown on the last equalized assessment roll to
correct for deviations from market value due to Article XIIIA of the California Constitution.
SECTION 9.Notice is hereby given that serial or term bonds to represent unpaid assessments and
to bear interest at a rate not to exceed 12 percent per annum will be issued in the manner provided in
the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 to represent the unpaid assessments and the last installment of
such bonds shall mature a maximum of 30 years from the second day of September next succeeding
12 months from their date. The principal amount of such bonds maturing or becoming subject to
mandatory prior redemption each year shall not be an amount equal to an even annual proportion of
the aggregate principal amount of the bonds, but rather (except as specifically otherwise provided by
the City Council in connection with the sale of such bonds), shall be an amount which, when added
to the amount of interest payable in each year, will be a sum which is substantially equal in each
year, except for the moneys falling due on the first maturity or mandatory prior redemption date of
the bonds which shall be adjusted to reflect the amount of interest earned from the date when the
bonds bear interest to the date when the first interest is payable on the bonds. Such bonds shall be
serviced and collected by the City Treasurer or by such registrar and/or paying agent(s) as this City
Council may from time to time designate.
SECTION 10. Following the acquisition of the Improvements and the payment of all incidental
expenses in connection with the formation of the Assessment District and the issuance of bonds
pursuant to the 1915 Act, any surplus remaining in the improvement fund established for the
Assessment District shall be used as determined by the City Council as provided in Section 10427 of
the Streets and Highways Code.
SECTION 11. The provisions of Part 11.1 of the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, providing an
alternative procedure for the advance payment of assessments and the calling of bonds, shall apply.
SECTION 12. Except as specifically otherwise provided for herein, the Improvements shall be made
and ordered pursuant to the provisions of the 1913 Act.
SECTION 13. The City Council hereby determines that the City will not obligate itself to advance
available funds from its treasury to cure any deficiency which may occur in the bond redemption
fund established for the Assessment District.
245
5
4832-6859-9508v3/200289-0003
SECTION 14. The public interests will not be served by allowing the property owners to take any
contract to be let for the construction of the Improvements, and no notice of award of contract shall
be published.
SECTION 15. It is hereby determined that the bonds proposed to be issued in these proceedings may
be refunded. Any adjustment to assessments resulting from such refunding shall be done on a pro
rata basis as required pursuant to Section 8571.5 of the Streets and Highways Code. Any such
refunding shall be pursuant to the provisions of Division 11.5 (commencing with Section 9500) of
the Streets and Highways Code, except that, if, following the filing of the report specified in Section
9523 and any subsequent modifications of the report, the City Council finds that all of the conditions
specified in Section 9525 are satisfied and that the adjustments to assessments are on a pro rata basis,
the City Council may approve and confirm the report and any, without further proceedings,
authorize, issue, and sell the refunding bonds pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 9600)
of Division 11.5 of the Streets and Highways Code. Any such refunding bonds shall bear interest at
the rate of not to exceed twelve percent (12%) per annum, or such higher rate of interest as may be
authorized by applicable law at the time of sale of such bonds; and the last installment of such bonds
shall mature on such date as will be determined by the City Council in the proceedings for such
refunding.
SECTION 16. It is in the public interest and more economical to do certain work on private property
to eliminate any disparity in level or size between the Improvements and private property and to add
the actual cost of such work to the Assessment of the property to which such work was done;
provided that no work of this nature shall be performed until and unless the written consent of the
owner of property is first obtained.
SECTION 17. Pursuant to Streets and Highways code Section 10110, the City intends to enter into
agreements with Southern California Edison and the other utility providers, and any agreement
between the City and Southern California Edison, or any other public utility for the ownership,
management, or control of the underground electric, telephone and cable facilities to be installed
pursuant to the Improvements, would benefit any current or future residents of the Assessment
District.
SECTION 18. Pursuant to Section 15302(d) of the Guidelines, the undergrounding of the
Improvements will have no significant effect on the environment and is categorically exempt from
CEQA. The City Clerk is directed to cause a notice of exemption to be posted as required by law.
SECTION 19. All inquiries for any and all information relating to these proceedings, including
information relating to protest procedures, should be directed to:
Elaine Jeng, City Manager
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
SECTION 20. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.
SECTION 21. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it
into the book of original resolutions.
246
6
4832-6859-9508v3/200289-0003
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED on January 25, 2021.
____________________________________
JEFF PIEPER
MAYOR
ATTEST:
ELAINE JENG, P.E.
ACTING CITY CLERK
247
Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth
Draft of 1/20/21
4824-8072-5716v3/200289-0003
RESOLUTION NO. 1269
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA,PRELIMINARILY
APPROVING THE ASSESSMENT ENGINEER’S REPORT
AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE OF THE PUBLIC
HEARING FOR CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 2021-1 (EASTFIELD DRIVE UTILITY
IMPROVEMENTS)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA, RESOLVES
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
A.By Resolution No. 1269 (the “Resolution of Intention”) in the proceedings for the
formation of City of Rolling Hills Assessment District No. 2021-1 (Eastfield Drive Utility
Improvements) (the “Assessment District”) this City Council ordered a report (the “Report”)
prepared by NV5 (the “Assessment Engineer”) under and pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID
of the California Constitution (“Article XIIID”), the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 (the
“1913 Act”), and, in particular, Section 10204 of the California Streets and Highways Code.
B.The Assessment Engineer has prepared the Report and filed the same with the City
Clerk, and the City Clerk has presented the Report to this City Council for consideration.
SECTION 2.The Report is preliminarily approved, and the City Clerk is directed to endorse the
fact and date of such approval on the Report and to file the Report in the office of the City Clerk.
The Report shall stand as the report for the purpose of all subsequent proceedings under the 1913 Act
and Article XIIID, except that it may be conformed, modified or corrected as provided in the
1913 Act and Article XIIID.
SECTION 3.Pursuant to Section 2961 of the Streets and Highways Code and based on the
information set forth in the Report, this City Council finds that the total amount of the principal sum
of all unpaid special assessments levied against the parcels proposed to be assessed, other than
contemplated by the present proceedings, plus the principal amount of the special assessment
proposed to be levied in the instant proceedings, do not exceed one-half of the total value of the
parcels proposed to be assessed, as computed pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section
2961.
SECTION 4.A public hearing shall be held on March 22, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. at the regular meeting
place of the City Council at City Hall Council Chambers, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills,
California 90274 to hear and consider protests and objections to the proposed Assessment District
and the Report and to receive and count the ballots for and against the proposed Assessment District.
SECTION 5.At least 45 days prior to the public hearing referred to in Section 2 hereof, the City
Clerk shall cause a notice of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention, the filing of the Report and
the setting of time and place for said public meeting and the public hearing referred to in Section 2
hereof to be mailed, postage prepaid, to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed and
248
2
4824-8072-5716v3/200289-0003
whose names and addresses appear on the last equalized County of Los Angeles assessment roll or
the State Board of Equalization assessment roll, as the case may be, or who are known to the City
Clerk. Such notice shall conform in all respects to the provisions of Section 53753 of the California
Government Code and Article XIIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution.
SECTION 6.This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.
SECTION 7.The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it
into the book of original resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED on January 25, 2021.
____________________________________
JEFF PIEPER
MAYOR
ATTEST:
ELAINE JENG, P.E.
ACTING CITY CLERK
249
250
Agenda Item No.: 7.B
Mtg. Date: 01/25/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:ELAINE JENG, CITY MANAGER
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:CONSIDER JOINING THE PENINSULA ENHANCED WATERSHED
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (EWMP).
DATE:January 25, 2021
BACKGROUND:
On September 28, 2020 City staff, with assistance from McGowan Consulting, delivered a presentation
to City Council on the pros and cons of participating in the Palos Verdes Peninsula Enhanced
Watershed Management Program (Peninsula EWMP). The presentation also outlined two points in time
at which the City could elect to participate in the Peninsula EWMP: (1) when the Peninsula Watershed
Management Group (Peninsula Group) finalizes a memorandum of understanding (MOU) for jointly
contracting for the update of the Peninsula EWMP or (2) when the next Regional Municipal Stormwater
Permit is adopted. At the conclusion of City Council’s deliberation, staff was directed to bring the issue
back to the Council for consideration when the Peninsula Group finalizes the MOU.
DISCUSSION:
City staff is bringing this issue back to City Council as previously directed since the Peninsula Group is
currently considering an MOU regarding the administration and cost sharing for revision of the
Peninsula EWMP and reasonable assurance analysis. It is anticipated that this MOU will be considered
and approved in February by the three other incorporated cities on the Palos Verdes Peninsula and the
County of Los Angeles for the Unincorporated Peninsula Area. If the City were to participate in this
cost sharing MOU, City staff would need to promptly notify the other agencies and request to be
included so that the MOU could be revised prior to consideration by those agencies’ respective
governing boards. If the City does not take such an action now, there will be one additional opportunity
to join the Peninsula EWMP via notification to the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board
(Regional Board) at the time the Regional Municipal Permit is adopted. If the City chooses to wait for
this second decision point and determines to join at that point, it would need to contract separately for
consulting services to revise the Peninsula EWMP and conduct the reasonable assurance analysis
required to receive approval of the revised EWMP by the Regional Board.
251
Key information that is needed to make the decision whether to join the Peninsula EWMP is not yet
available to the City. This information includes monitoring data from the newly established Sepulveda
Canyon monitoring site in the City and a determination by the Regional Board whether to extend the
final compliance deadlines for the Machado Lake Nutrients and Pesticides & PCBs TMDLs. Although
the first major storm of the year yielded 1.25 inches of rainfall on December 28, 2020, no flow was
produced at the Sepulveda Canyon monitoring station because soils were very dry and all rainfall was
absorbed by soils on properties and in canyons, generating no measurable flow at the sampling point.
The contractor ’s sampling team is using this information and the remote flow monitoring sensor at the
site to make adjustments to their sampling strategy to improve the likelihood of successfully sampling
any runoff that may be generated from subsequent rainfall events this season. With respect to the
Machado Lake Nutrients and Pesticides PCBs TMDLs, the Peninsula Group has scheduled a meeting
with Regional Board staff to discuss and following that meeting we will have a better indication of the
likelihood and timing of a schedule extension.
These issues have been discussed with the office of the City Attorney and they are in agreement with
staff ’s recommendation to take no action at this time to join the Peninsula EWMP via the MOU and
thereby defer this decision until the Regional Stormwater Permit is ready for adoption when more of the
key information will be available to support the decision. The attached presentation by McGowan
Consulting provides further details to inform the City Council’s decision and explain the basis for
staff’s recommendation.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Depending on City Council’s direction to staff, the City would need to program an additional $30K in
the Fiscal Year 2020-21 budget to join the MOU now or if it is determined to join the Peninsula EWMP
when the Regional Permit is adopted, approximately $70K will need to be allocated in the Fiscal Year
2021-22 budget. The City could use its Measure W funds to offset the additional expense in Fiscal
Year 2021-22.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council (1) receive a presentation on the basis and timing for
participation in the Peninsula EWMP; (2) consider the choice of actions evaluated by McGowan
Consulting; and (3) provide direction to staff.
ATTACHMENTS:
EWMP_Decision_2021.01.25(Final).pptx
252
Decision-making for joining
Watershed Management Program
City of Rolling Hills| January 25, 2021 | Kathleen McGowan, McGowan Consulting
253
Outline
•Results of Sepulveda Canyon Wet Weather Monitoring
Event #1
•Updated Schedule of Decisions and Key Events
•Key Information Not Yet Available
•Basis for Participation in EWMP
•Staff Recommendation: Wait until 2nd Decision Point
(MS4 Permit Adoption) to Join EWMP
•Questions & Discussion
2
254
December 28, 2021
Sepulveda
Canyon
Monitoring •First significant storm of 2020-21 wet season, very
dry soils
•~1.2” of rain fell in 24-hrs between 12am on
December 28 and 12am on December 29
•No flow observed from Sepulveda Canyon,
•(water in storm drain originated from ponded water
outside of pipe)
•Suggests potential stormwater retentive capacity in
Sepulveda Canyon, but more data is needed
255
Updated Schedule of Decisions and Key Events
Decision Point (#)or Key Event Revised Dates
#1: Peninsula Group MOU for E/WMP Update Jan-Feb 2021 Oct-Nov 2020
TMDL Extension via Basin Plan Amendment Feb – Mar 2021Oct 2020 – Jan
#2: Regional Stormwater Permit Adoption June-July 2021 April – May
Peninsula E/WMP Update Submittal Deadline June 30, 2021
Regional Permit Effective Date
Notice of Intent to Participate in E/WMP July 1, 2021
Effective Date of TMDL Extension ? Oct – Dec 2021
4
256
Decision whether to Join Peninsula
EWMP
Staff Recommendation: Wait for Decision Point #2
257
Key Information Not Yet Available
•No City-specific Stormwater Quality Monitoring Data yet
•First major storm of the year produced no flow at Sepulveda Canyon
despite rainfall of 1.25 inches in 24 hours
•Flow-monitoring and water quality data collection continuing
•Regional Board has not yet determined whether/when to extend
Machado Lake TMDL final compliance deadlines
6
258
Participation in Peninsula E/WMP
Alternative Compliance Options
only available through E/WMP:
1.City’s canyons retain the design storm
(85%, 24-hr runoff volume)
2.Combination of City’s canyons and
downstream regional projects retain the
design storm
3.Nutrient TMDL, only:
Combination of City’s canyons and
downstream regional projects retain/treat
the TMDL critical annual volume
Not needed:
A.If City’s individual monitoring
demonstrates discharges at or
below numeric pollutant limits for
all TMDLs
B.Nutrient TMDL, only:
Special study demonstrating
canyons retain the TMDL critical
annual volume
7
259
Machado Lake TMDLs Final Deadline Extension
Time Extension needed
to construct downstream projects
for Options 2 or 3:
2.Combination of City’s canyons and
downstream regional projects retain
the design storm
3.Combination of City’s canyons and
downstream regional projects
retain/treat the Nutrient TMDL
critical annual volume
Allow time for Pesticide & PCB TMDL
reconsideration to develop mass-based
compliance option
Not needed if:
•Pollutant limits are met in
City’s discharge
or
•City’s canyons retain the
design storm
•(85%, 24-hr runoff volume)
8
260
Cost Implications of Timing of Decision to Join EWMP
Join EWMP now via
participation in Peninsula
EWMP/RAA MOU
•Cost: ~$30K to incorporate City
into joint modeling effort and
EWMP update
•FY2021 budget
Wait until MS4 Permit is
adopted
•Cost: ~$70K to conduct
hydrologic and water quality
modeling and incorporating City
into EWMP
•FY2122 Budget
•Can use Safe Clean Water
Municipal Funds to cover
9
261
Wait for Decision Point #2 (May/June 2021)
when more information is available
to decide whether to join Peninsula Watershed
Management Program
Staff Recommendation (Supported by City Attorney)
262
Questions & Discussion
Thank You
263
12
264
Agenda Item No.: 7.C
Mtg. Date: 01/25/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:MEREDITH ELGUIRA, PLANNING DIRECTOR
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 365 OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS,
CALIFORNIA PROHIBITING SMOKING IN AND ON PUBLIC
PROPERTY AND IN AND ON PRIVATE EASEMENTS, ROADS, AND
TRAILS BY ADDING CHAPTER 8.40 (SMOKING PROHIBITED) TO
TITLE 8 (HEALTH AND SAFETY) OF THE ROLLING HILLS
MUNICIPAL CODE; AND FINDING THE SAME EXEMPT FROM THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
DATE:January 25, 2021
BACKGROUND:
This proposed ordinance was introduced for first reading at the December 14, 2020 City Council
Meeting. After consideration and discussion by the City Council, the proposed ordinance was approved
for a second reading and adoption.
DISCUSSION:
The City Attorney drafted Ordinance No. 365 proposing to ban smoking in public places and on private
easements, roads, and trails by adding Chapter 8.40 Smoking Prohibited to Title 8 Health and Safety of
the City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code. The ordinance will ban smoking on public property, private
easements, roads and trails. It will reduce fire hazards in a high fire severity zone. The proposed
amendments will protect public health, safety and welfare of the community.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fees for legal counsel to review and address the resident's request for municipal code changes and
the drafting of ordinance are funded by FY 2020-21 approved budget for legal services.
RECOMMENDATION:
Waive full reading and adopt ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills adding Chapter
8.40 (Smoking Prohibited); and finding the same exempt from CEQA.
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance_365_Smoking_Ban_Final.pdf
265
ORDINANCE NO. 20-365
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
PROHIBITING SMOKING IN AND ON PUBLIC
PROPERTY AND IN AND ON PRIVATE EASEMENTS,
ROADS, AND TRAILS BY ADDING CHAPTER 8.40
(SMOKING PROHIBITED) TO TITLE 8 (HEALTH AND
SAFETY) OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE;
AND FINDING THE SAME EXEMPT FROM THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findings.
A. Tobacco use causes death and disease and continues to be an urgent public health
challenge, as evidenced by the fact that approximately 480,000 people die prematurely in the
United States from smoking-related diseases every year.
B. Exposure to secondhand smoke causes death and disease, as evidenced by the fact
that secondhand smoke is responsible for approximately 41,000 deaths each year in the United
States.
C. Laws restricting use of electronic smoking devices also have benefits to the public
as evidenced by the fact that the State of California’s Tobacco Education and Research Oversight
Committee “opposes the use of e-cigarettes in all areas where other tobacco products are banned.”
D. State law prohibits smoking in certain areas, such as in certain publicly owned
buildings, and expressly authorizes local communities to enact additional restrictions, including
authority to completely ban smoking (Health & Safety Code §118910).
E. There is broad public recognition of the dangers of secondhand smoke and support
for smoke free air laws. As of January 2015, there were at least 382 California cities and counties
with local laws restricting smoking in recreational areas, 101 with local laws restricting smoking
in all outdoor dining places, and 126 with local laws restricting smoking within 20 feet (or more)
of entryways. Further, as of March 2018, there were at least 104 California cities and counties with
comprehensive outdoor secondhand smoke ordinances. Lastly, as of July 1, 2018, at least 120 local
jurisdictions in California prohibited the use of electronic smoking devices in specific locations.
F. Cigarettes are a major and persistent source of litter as they are often cast onto
sidewalks and streets and frequently end up in streams, rivers, bays, lagoons, and ultimately the
ocean.
G. As many as 90 percent of wildland fires in the United States are caused by people,
according to the U.S. Department of Interior. Some human-caused fires result from campfires left
unattended, downed power lines, and negligently discarded cigarettes.
266
H. The City of Rolling Hills has been designated a “Very High Fire Severity Zone.”
I. The City has already taken actions to reduce and address the risk of fires within the
City, such as adopting a Fire Fuel Abatement Ordinance (Rolling Hills Municipal Code Chapter
8.30) to reduce the amount of dead vegetation within the City and adopting a Community Wildfire
Protection Plan.
J. Still, in 2020 alone, six of the top twenty largest California wildlife fires have
occurred, according to CalFire. Strong wind conditions, dry weather, and dry and dense vegetation
contributed to the fire and loss of approximately 115,796 acres in the Bobcat Fire in Los Angeles
County, 33,424 acres in the Apple Fire in Riverside County, and 22,744 acres in the El Dorado
Fire in San Bernardino County.
K. These fires have resulted in tragic loss of life along with enormous property losses.
L. The City Council finds that smoke-free public property and smoke-free private
easements, roads, and trails will improve air quality and reduce fire hazards within the City; it will
reduce the risk that persons are subjected to inhaling second hand smoke and also reduce the risk
that lit, heated, or ignited cigars, cigarettes, pipes, electronic smoking devices, or any other lit,
heated, or ignited tobacco or plant products will be used, discarded, or left unattended by persons
on such property.
M. The City Council wishes to amend the Municipal Code to address the health and
fire hazards by identifying areas within the City where smoking is prohibited.
SECTION 2. Title 8 (Health and Safety) is hereby amended by adding Chapter 8.40 (Smoking
Prohibited) to read as follows:
CHAPTER 8.40 SMOKING PROHIBITED.
8.40.010 Definitions
For purposes of this chapter, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
"Electronic smoking device" means an electronic device that can be used to deliver
an inhaled dose of nicotine, or other substances, including any component, part, or
accessory of such device, whether or not sold separately. This definition includes any such
device, whether manufactured, distributed, marketed, or sold as an electronic cigarette, an
electronic cigar, an electronic cigarillo, an electronic pipe, an electronic hookah, or any
other product name or descriptor, including any component, part or accessory of such
device, whether or not sold separately.
"Public property" means any indoor or outdoor public property, including, but not
limited to, any publicly owned buildings, parking lots, riding rings, tennis courts, parks,
roads, streets, and sidewalks.
267
“Smoking” means inhaling, exhaling, burning, or carrying any lighted or heated
cigar, cigarette, or pipe, or any other lighted or heated tobacco or plant product intended
for inhalation, whether natural or synthetic, in any manner or in any form. “Smoking”
includes the use of an electronic smoking device that creates an aerosol or vapor, in any
manner or in any form, or the use of any oral smoking device for the purpose of
circumventing the prohibition of smoking.
8.40.020 Smoking in and on public property prohibited.
In addition to all places where smoking is prohibited under state or federal law, in
which case those laws apply, no person shall smoke in or on any public property. Such
prohibition extends to smoking in vehicles on public property.
8.40.030 Smoking in and on private easements, roads, and trails prohibited.
In addition to all places where smoking is prohibited under state or federal law, in
which case those laws apply, no person shall smoke in or on any private easement, road,
or trail. Such prohibition extends to smoking in vehicles on any private easement, road, or
trail.
8.40.040 Violation—Penalty.
Violations of this Chapter may be punished as a misdemeanor or infraction at the
discretion of the city attorney or city prosecutor in accordance with Chapter 1.08 of this
Code.
SECTION 3: CEQA. This ordinance was assessed in accordance with the authority and
criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA
Guidelines. The City Council hereby finds that under Section 15061(B)(3) of the State CEQA
Guidelines, this ordinance is exempt from the requirements of CEQA because it can be seen with
certainty that the provisions contained herein would not have the potential for causing a significant
effect on the environment. It also finds the ordinance is exempt from the requirements of CEQA
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 as an action by a regulatory agency taken
to protect the environment and natural resources.
SECTION 4: Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its passage and
adoption pursuant to California Government Code section 36937.
SECTION 5: Certification. The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of
this Ordinance; cause it to be entered into the City of Rolling Hills’ book of original ordinances;
make a note of the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting; and, within fifteen days
after the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, cause it to be published or posted in accordance
with California law.
268
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 25th day of January, 2021.
VOTE: AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
______________________________
JEFF PIEPER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________
ELAINE JENG, P.E.
ACTING CITY CLERK
269
Agenda Item No.: 7.D
Mtg. Date: 01/25/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:MEREDITH ELGUIRA, PLANNING DIRECTOR
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 367 OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS,
CALIFORNIA, REPEALING SECTIONS 10.12.050 (AUTHORITY OF
GATE GUARDS) AND 10.12.060 (UNAUTHORIZED TRAFFIC
DIRECTION PROHIBITED) OF CHAPTER 10.12 (TRAFFIC
ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY) OF TITLE 10 (VEHICLES AND
TRAFFIC); AND AMENDING CHAPTER 9.40 (TRESPASS) AND
CHAPTER 9.44 (ENTERING PRIVATE PROPERTY UNDER FALSE
PRETENSES) OF TITLE 9 (PUBLIC PEACE, MORALS AND WELFARE)
OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE; AND FINDING THE
SAME EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT.
DATE:January 25, 2021
BACKGROUND:
This proposed ordinance was introduced for first reading at the December 14, 2020 City Council
Meeting. After consideration and discussion by the City Council, the proposed ordinance was approved
for a second reading and adoption.
DISCUSSION:
The proposed ordinance proposes to repeal Sections 10.12.050 and 10.12.060 of Chapter 10.12 (Traffic
Enforcement Authority) of Title 10 (Vehicles and Traffic) and amends Chapter 9.40 (Trespass) and
Chapter 9.44 (Entering Private Property Under False Pretenses of Title 9 (Public Peace, Morals and
Welfare) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fees for legal counsel to review and address the resident's request for municipal code changes and
the drafting of ordinance are funded by FY 2020-21 approved budget for legal services.
RECOMMENDATION:
Waive full reading and adopt the ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills repealing
sections 10.12.050 and 10.12.060 and amending Chapter 9.40 and Chapter 9.44 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code; and finding the same exempt from CEQA.
270
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance_367_Regulating_Trespass_and_Repealing_Gate_Attendant_Sections_Final.pdf
271
1
ORDINANCE NO. 367
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING SECTIONS
10.12.050 (AUTHORITY OF GATE GUARDS) AND
10.12.060 (UNAUTHORIZED TRAFFIC DIRECTION
PROHIBITED) OF CHAPTER 10.12 (TRAFFIC
ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY) OF TITLE 10
(VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC); AND AMENDING
CHAPTER 9.40 (TRESPASS) AND CHAPTER 9.44
(ENTERING PRIVATE PROPERTY UNDER FALSE
PRETENSES) OF TITLE 9 (PUBLIC PEACE,
MORALS AND WELFARE) OF THE ROLLING
HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 10.12.050 (Authority of Gate Guards) of Chapter 10.12
(Traffic Enforcement Authority) of Title 10 (Vehicles and Traffic) of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code is hereby repealed.
SECTION 2. Section 10.12.060 (Unauthorized traffic direction prohibited) of
Chapter 10.12 (Traffic Enforcement Authority) of Title 10 (Vehicles and Traffic) of the
Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby repealed.
SECTION 3. Chapter 9.40 (Trespass) of Title 9 (Public Peace, Morals and
Welfare) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is amended to read as follows:
Chapter 9.40 – TRESPASS
9.40.010 – Definitions.
A. For the purposes of this chapter, “private property” is defined to be any
real property, including but not limited to, buildings, structures, yards, open
spaces, walkways, courtyards, driveways, carports, parking areas, vacant lots and
easements, private roads, and trails, except land which is owned or lawfully
possessed by any governmental entity or agency.
B. For the purposes of this chapter, “public property” is defined to be any real
property, including but not limited to, buildings, structures, yards, open spaces,
walkways, courtyards, driveways, carports, parking areas, vacant lots and
easements, roads, and trails, which is owned or lawfully possessed by any
governmental entity or agency.
9.40.020 - Unauthorized remaining on property prohibited.
No person shall remain upon any public or private property after being
notified by the owner, lessee, person in charge thereof, or any person authorized
272
2
to restrict such property, or by a Sheriff’s deputy acting at the request of any such
person, to remove therefrom.
9.40.030 - Unauthorized entrance on property prohibited.
No person, without the permission, express or implied, of the owner of,
lessee of, person in charge of, or person authorized to impose restrictions on
public or private property shall enter upon such property after having been
notified by the owner of, lessee of, person in charge of, any person authorized to
impose restrictions on such property, or by a Sheriff’s deputy acting at the request
of any such person, to keep off or keep away therefrom.
9.40.040 - Unauthorized removal from property prohibited.
No person, without the permission, express or implied, of the owner of,
lessee of, person in charge of, or person authorized to impose restrictions on
public or private property shall enter upon such property to damage, destroy, or
remove, or cause to be damaged, destroyed, or removed, any stakes, fences, or
signs intended to designate the boundaries and limits of any such property.
9.40.050 - Violation—Penalty.
Violations of this Chapter may be punished as a misdemeanor or
infraction at the discretion of the city attorney or city prosecutor in accordance
with Chapter 1.08 of this Code.
9.40.060 – Exceptions.
The provisions of this chapter shall not apply in any of the following
instances:
A. When its application results in or is coupled with an act prohibited by any
provision of law relating to prohibited discrimination against any person on
account of sex, race, color, religion, creed, ancestry, national origin, disability,
medical condition, marital status, or sexual orientation.
B. When its application would result in an interference with or inhibition of
peaceful labor picketing or other lawful labor activities on public property.
C. When its application would result in an interference with or inhibition of
activities protected by the California or United States constitutions, including, but
not limited to free speech and freedom of assembly rights on public property, if
any.
SECTION 4. Chapter 9.44 (Entering Private Property Under False Pretenses) of
Title 9 (Public Peace, Morals and Welfare) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is
amended to read as follows:
273
3
Chapter 9.44 - ENTERING PROPERTY UNDER FALSE PRETENSES
9.44.010 - Definitions.
A. For the purposes of this chapter, “private property” is defined to be any
real property, including but not limited to, buildings, structures, yards, open
spaces, walkways, courtyards, driveways, carports, parking areas, vacant lots and
easements, private roads, and trails, except land which is owned or lawfully
possessed by any governmental entity or agency.
B. For the purposes of this chapter, “public property” is defined to be any real
property, including but not limited to, buildings, structures, yards, open spaces,
walkways, courtyards, driveways, carports, parking areas, vacant lots and
easements, roads, and trails, which is owned or lawfully possessed by any
governmental entity or agency.
9.44.020 - Giving false information to property owners prohibited when.
It is unlawful for any person to willfully give false information to, or to
deceive by any other means, any owner of, lessee of, person in charge of, or
person authorized to impose restrictions on public or private property, for the
purpose of gaining permission to enter or use such property.
9.44.030 - Violation—Penalty.
Violations of this Chapter may be punished as a misdemeanor or infraction at
the discretion of the city attorney or city prosecutor in accordance with Chapter
1.08 of this Code.
9.44.040 – Exceptions.
The provisions of this chapter shall not apply in any of the following
instances:
A. When its application results in or is coupled with an act prohibited by any
provision of law relating to prohibited discrimination against any person on
account of sex, race, color, religion, creed, ancestry, national origin, disability,
medical condition, marital status, or sexual orientation.
B. When its application would result in an interference with or inhibition of
peaceful labor picketing or other lawful labor activities on public property.
C. When its application would result in an interference with or inhibition of
activities protected by the California or United States constitutions, including, but
not limited to free speech and freedom of assembly rights on public property, if
any.
274
4
SECTION 5. The City Council hereby finds and determines that this ordinance
is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to
Section 15061(b)(3) (“Common Sense Exemption”) of the CEQA Guidelines as it can be
said with certainty that there will be no environmental impact from the provisions
associated with this ordinance.
SECTION 6. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its passage and
adoption pursuant to California Government Code section 36937.
SECTION 7. The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of
this Ordinance; cause it to be entered into the City of Rolling Hills’s book of original
ordinances; make a note of the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting; and,
within fifteen days after the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, cause it to be
published or posted in accordance with California law.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 25th day of January, 2021.
VOTE: AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
______________________________
JEFF PIEPER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________
ELAINE JENG, P.E.
ACTING CITY CLERK
275
Agenda Item No.: 7.E
Mtg. Date: 01/25/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:MEREDITH ELGUIRA, PLANNING DIRECTOR
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 368 OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS,
CALIFORNIA AMENDING TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD CHAPTER 17.48
(TEMPORARY USE PERMITS) ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS OF
CERTAIN TEMPORARY USES WITHIN THE CITY; AND FINDING THE
SAME EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT.
DATE:January 25, 2021
BACKGROUND:
This proposed ordinance was introduced for first reading at the December 14, 2020 City Council
Meeting. After consideration and discussion by the City Council, the proposed ordinance was approved
for a second reading and adoption.
DISCUSSION:
The proposed ordinance establishes standards for construction related temporary uses such as
construction fences, construction offices, storage containers, portable toilets, construction power poles
and construction materials. The Municipal Code currently does not have any existing standards that
regulate construction uses and thus, many of the construction related uses tend to stay on site for
extended period of time even without construction activities occurring. Adopting the proposed
ordinance would allow staff to review the proposed uses, advise improvements, impose time limits,
ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses and minimize or avoid visual blight in the community.
The ordinance will apply to existing temporary construction uses currently in place at construction sites.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fees for legal counsel to review and address the resident's request for municipal code changes and
the drafting of ordinance are funded by FY 2020-21 approved budget for legal services.
RECOMMENDATION:
Waive full reading and adopt the ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills amending
Title 17 (Zoning) of the City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code to add Chapter 17.48 (Temporary Use
Permits) establishing regulations of certain temporary uses within the City; and finding the same
276
exempt from CEQA.
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance_368_Temporary_Use_Permits_Final.pdf
277
ORDINANCE NO.368
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA AMENDING TITLE 17
(ZONING) OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO
ADD CHAPTER 17.48 (TEMPORARY USE PERMITS)
ESTABLISHING A PROCESS BY WHICH PERSONS CAN
REQUEST A SHORT TERM USE THAT IS ACCEPTABLE
BECAUSE OF ITS TEMPORARY NATURE AND
DETERMINING THE ORDINANCE TO BE EXEMPT FROM
THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT.
RECITALS
A. The City desires to amend its municipal code to establish a process for reviewing
proposed temporary uses to ensure that basic health, safety, and community welfare standards
are met, while approving suitable temporary uses with the minimum necessary conditions or
limitations consistent with the temporary nature of the activity;
B. Staff and the City Attorney prepared the proposed ordinance, including the
proposed language and terminology and any additional information and documents deemed
necessary for the Planning Commission to take action;
C. On November 7, 2020, the City gave public notice of the November 19, 2020
public hearing to be held by the Planning Commission on the proposed ordinance by publishing
notice in the Torrance Daily Breeze a newspaper of general circulation;
D. On November 19, 2020, the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public
hearing and considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony
concerning the proposed ordinance. It adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council
adopt the proposed ordinance;
E. On December 2, 2020 the City gave public notice of the December 14, 2020
public hearing to be held by the City Council on the proposed ordinance to be considered by
publishing notice in the Torrance Daily Breeze a newspaper of general circulation; and
F. December 14, 2020, the City Council held a duly-noticed public hearing and
considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning the
proposed ordinance.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Title 17 (Zoning) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is amended to add Chapter
17.48 (Temporary Use Permits) to read as follows:
278
Chapter 17.48 Temporary Use Permits
17.48.010 Purpose
This chapter provides a process for reviewing proposed temporary uses to ensure
that basic health, safety, and community welfare standards are met, while approving
suitable temporary uses with the minimum necessary conditions or limitations consistent
with the temporary nature of the activity. A temporary use permit allows short-term
activities that might not meet the normal development or use standards of the applicable
zoning district, but may otherwise be acceptable because of their temporary nature.
However, these activities should be regulated to avoid incompatibility between the
proposed activity and surrounding areas.
17.48.020 Applicability.
A. Permit Requirement. A temporary use permit approved by the applicable
review authority shall be required for all uses identified in Section 17.48.040 (Allowed
Temporary Uses), and shall be issued before the commencement of the activity.
B. Exempt Activities. Emergency public health and safety activities are exempt
from the requirement for a temporary use permit and other city approval.
17.48.030 Review Authority.
Director Review (Temporary Uses). The Planning and Community Services
Director (“Director”) shall be responsible for the review and approval of all permits for
temporary uses identified in Section 17.48.040 (Allowed Temporary Uses), and the
extension of these permits.
17.48.040 Allowed Temporary Uses.
The following temporary uses may be allowed, subject to the issuance of a
temporary use permit by the applicable review authority.
A. Temporary Structures for Active Construction Sites and Time Periods.
1. Temporary Construction Fences. A temporary construction fence is
permitted, provided the construction activity is occurring and it is occurring outside of the
structure or on the exterior of the structure on the subject property. A temporary
construction fence is permitted for an initial period of 6 months. The use may be renewed
for subsequent time periods of up to 6 months each at the discretion of the applicable
review authority.
2. Temporary Construction Offices. A temporary construction office is
permitted, provided the construction activity is occurring. A temporary construction
office is permitted for an initial period of 6 months. The use may be renewed for
279
subsequent time periods of up to 6 months each at the discretion of the applicable review
authority.
3. Temporary Construction Storage Containers. One temporary construction
storage container (up to 8 feet wide and 40 feet long) is permitted, provided the
construction activity is occurring. A temporary construction storage container is
permitted for an initial period of 6 months. The use may be renewed for subsequent time
periods of up to 6 months each at the discretion of the applicable review authority.
4. Temporary Self-Contained Portable Toilets. A temporary self-contained
portable toilet is permitted, provided the construction activity is occurring. A temporary
self-contained portable toilet is permitted for an initial period of 6 months. The use may
be renewed for subsequent time periods of up to 6 months each at the discretion of the
applicable review authority.
5. Temporary Construction Power Pole. A temporary construction power pole
is permitted, provided the construction activity is occurring. A temporary construction
power pole is permitted for an initial period of 6 months. The use may be renewed for
subsequent time periods of up to 6 months each at the discretion of the applicable review
authority.
B. Temporary Structures for Non-Active Construction Sites and Time Periods.
1. Storage. Temporary, portable storage units, such as PODs or U-PACKS,
are allowed to be located on driveways for no more than a week.
2. Self-Contained Portable Toilets
a. A temporary self-contained portable toilet is permitted, during
interruption of sewer or septic service for emergencies or planned upgrades/repairs. The
use of self-contained portable toilets is limited to the time period of the interruption of
sewer or septic service.
b. A temporary self-contained portable toilet is permitted, during special
events such as wedding receptions or family reunions on private property. The use of
self-contained portable toilets is limited to four calendar days or less.
3. Stockpiling. Temporary storage of clean dirt, sand, gravel, or similar non-
polluting materials for a limited period of time, on a property where such material is not
proposed to be used for construction activities.
C. Similar Temporary Uses. Similar temporary uses which, in the opinion of the
review authority, are compatible with the zoning district and surrounding land uses.
280
17.48.050 Application Filing, Processing, and Review.
A. Application Preparation and Filing – General Application Requirements. An
application for a temporary use permit shall be prepared, filed, and processed in
compliance with Chapter 17.30 (Application Procedures). It is the responsibility of the
applicant to establish evidence in support of the findings required by Section 17.48.060
(Findings and Decision – Temporary Use Permits), below.
B. Time for Filing.
1. A temporary use permit application for Temporary Self-Contained
Portable Toilets on Non-Active Construction Sites shall be filed at least 48 hours in
advance of the proposed commencement of the use unless in the case of an emergency.
2. A temporary use permit application for the remaining authorized
temporary uses shall be filed at least 14 days in advance of the proposed commencement
of the use unless in the case of an emergency.
C. Public Notice and Hearing. The type and extent of public notice provided to
area residents shall be determined by the Planning and Community Services Director for
temporary use permits, and the extensions of these permits. The applicant shall pay for all
noticing costs.
D. Additional Permits Required. Temporary uses may be subject to additional
permits and other city approvals, licenses, and inspections required by applicable laws or
regulations.
17.48.060 Findings and Decision – Temporary Use Permits.
A temporary use permit may be approved, modified, or conditioned only if the
review authority first finds that:
A. The proposed temporary use is allowed within the applicable zoning district
with the approval of a temporary use permit and complies with all other applicable
provisions of this Zoning Ordinance and the Municipal Code; and
B. The proposed temporary use would not unduly impair the integrity and
character of the zoning district in which it is located; and
C. Appropriate measures have been taken to protect the public health, safety, and
general welfare to minimize detrimental effects on adjacent properties.
17.48 .070 Conditions of Approval.
In approving a temporary use permit, the review authority may impose reasonable
and necessary specific design, locational, and operational conditions to ensure that:
281
A. The use is limited to a duration that is less than the maximum allowed
duration, as determined appropriate by the review authority;
B. The site is physically adequate for the type, density, and intensity of use being
proposed, including the absence of physical constraints;
C. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed use
are compatible with the existing and future land uses on-site and in the vicinity of the
subject property;
D. The temporary use will be removed and the site restored as necessary to
ensure that no changes to the site will limit the range of possible future land uses
otherwise allowed by this Zoning Ordinance;
E. The use will comply with applicable provisions of other local, State, or
Federal laws or regulations; and
F. Any other pertinent factors affecting the operation of the temporary use will be
addressed, including the following, to ensure the orderly and efficient operation of the
proposed use, in compliance with the intent and purpose of this chapter.
17.48.080 Development and Operating Standards.
A. General Standards. Standards for heights, setbacks, and other structure and
property development standards that apply to the category of use or the zoning district of
the subject parcel shall be used as a guide for determining the appropriate development
standards for temporary uses. However, the review authority may authorize an
adjustment from the specific requirements as deemed necessary and appropriate.
B. Standards for Specific Temporary Activities. Specific temporary land use
activities shall comply with the development standards identified in Title 17 (Zoning) as
applicable to the use, in addition to those identified in subsection A of this section, and
Section 17.48.070 (Conditions of Approval).
17.48.090 Post-Approval Procedures.
A. Appeal. The approval, denial, or revocation of a temporary use permit may be
appealed in compliance with Chapter 17.55.
B. Revocation. A temporary use permit may be revoked or modified by the
Director on the following grounds:
1. That the approval was obtained by fraud, or that the applicant made a
materially false representation on the subject application; or
282
2. That the approval is being or recently has been exercised contrary to or in
violation of the terms or conditions of such approval or other authorization; or
3. That the approval is or recently has been exercised in violation of any
statute, law or regulation; or
4. That the use for which approval was granted, or other use(s) not directly
related, is exercised in a manner detrimental to the public health and safety or in a
manner which constitutes a nuisance.
C. Extension of the Permit. The Director may extend the operational length of the
temporary use permit if the delay is beyond the control of and was not the result of
actions by the permittee for up to the period of the delay.
D. Expiration. A temporary use permit shall be considered to have expired when
the approved use has ceased or was suspended.
17.48.100 Enforcement.
A. Maintaining a temporary use authorized by Section 17.48.040 without a valid
permit is hereby declared to be a public nuisance.
B. Maintaining a temporary use authorized by Section 17.48.040 without a valid
permit is an infraction and subject to the penalty provisions identified in Section
1.08.020.
Section 2. The project is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061.b.3 of the CEQA Guidelines because adoption of the zoning
ordinance amendment is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which
have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment, and this project does not
have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. The resulting uses would
be exempt from CEQA under Sections 15301, 15303, 15304, and 15332 of the CEQA
Guidelines, as minor alterations to project sites and buildings that do not increase intensity or
density within an urban area with availability of all services.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its passage and adoption pursuant
to California Government Code section 36937.
Section 4. The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this Ordinance;
cause it to be entered into the City of Rolling Hills’s book of original ordinances; make a note of
the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting; and, within fifteen days after the passage
and adoption of this Ordinance, cause it to be published or posted in accordance with California
law.
283
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 25th day of January, 2021.
VOTE: AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
______________________________
JEFF PIEPER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________
ELAINE JENG, P.E.
ACTING CITY CLERK
284
Agenda Item No.: 10.A
Mtg. Date: 01/25/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:DELIA ARANDA,
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:FIRE FUEL ABATEMENT ENFORCEMENT CASES QUARTERLY
REPORT FOR THE FOURTH QUARTER OF 2020 (OCTOBER 1
THROUGH DECEMBER 31).
DATE:January 25, 2021
BACKGROUND:
The Code Enforcement division provides quarterly updates on code enforcement cases and fuel
abatement cases which consist of active and closed cases. The attachments show active and closed cases
consisting mainly of unpermitted work, dead vegetation and code violation complaints from neighbors.
DISCUSSION:
In the fourth quarter of 2020 (October 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020), three (3) new fire fuel
abatement violation cases were opened and two (2) new complaints unrelated to fire fuel abatement
violations were received and opened. During that same period 23 non-fire fuel abatement violations and
one (1) vegetation related cases were closed.
All dead vegetation cases from 2018 through 2019 have been closed with no further action needed.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact.
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file as presented.
ATTACHMENTS:
4th Quarter Closed Code Cases.pdf
4th Quarter Open Code Chronological.pdf
285
4th Quarter Open Code Alphabetical 1.21.21.pdf
286
287
288
289
290
291
Agenda Item No.: 10.B
Mtg. Date: 01/25/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:MEREDITH ELGUIRA, PLANNING DIRECTOR
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:UPDATE REPORT ON THE PROGRESS OF THE SAFETY ELEMENT
FUNDED BY HAZARD MITIGATION PROGRAM GRANT FROM
FEMA/CALOES (ORAL).
DATE:January 25, 2021
BACKGROUND:
NONE
DISCUSSION:
NONE.
FISCAL IMPACT:
NONE.
RECOMMENDATION:
NONE.
ATTACHMENTS:
292
Agenda Item No.: 10.C
Mtg. Date: 01/25/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:ELAINE JENG, CITY MANAGER
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:UPDATE REPORT ON ENGINEERING DESIGN OF 8' SEWER MAIN
LINE ALONG PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD AND ROLLING HILLS
ROAD (ORAL).
DATE:January 25, 2021
BACKGROUND:
NONE.
DISCUSSION:
NONE.
FISCAL IMPACT:
NONE
RECOMMENDATION:
NONE.
ATTACHMENTS:
293
Agenda Item No.: 10.D
Mtg. Date: 01/25/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:ELAINE JENG, CITY MANAGER
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:UPDATE ON VEGETATION MANAGEMENT/FIRE FUEL BREAKS
FUNDED BY HAZARD MITIGATION PROGRAM GRANT FROM
FEMA/CALOES (ORAL).
DATE:January 25, 2021
BACKGROUND:
NONE.
DISCUSSION:
NONE.
FISCAL IMPACT:
NONE.
RECOMMENDATION:
NONE.
ATTACHMENTS:
294
Agenda Item No.: 10.E
Mtg. Date: 01/25/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:MEREDITH ELGUIRA, PLANNING DIRECTOR
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:UPDATE ON HOUSING AND LAND USE SENATE BILL 9 (ATKINS) AND
SENATE BILL 10 (WIENER) (ORAL).
DATE:January 25, 2021
BACKGROUND:
NONE
DISCUSSION:
NONE.
FISCAL IMPACT:
NONE.
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
ATTACHMENTS:
295