02-22-2021_CCAgendaPacket1.CALL TO ORDER
2.ROLL CALL
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX (310) 377-7288
AGENDA
Regular Council Meeting
CITY COUNCIL
Monday, February 22, 2021
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
7:00 PM
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA
This meeting is held pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on
March 17, 2020.
All Councilmembers will participate by teleconference. The meeting agenda is available on the City’s
website. A live audio of the City Council meeting will be available on the City’s website. Both the
agenda and the live audio can be found here: https://www.rolling-
hills.org/government/agenda/index.php.
Members of the public may observe and orally participate in the meeting via Zoom and or submit
written comments in real-time by emailing the City Clerk’s office at cityclerk@cityofrh.net. Your
comments will become part of the official meeting record. You must provide your full name, but please
do not provide any other personal information that you do not want to be published.
Zoom access: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87227175757?
pwd=VzNES3Q2NFprRk5BRmdUSktWb0hmUT09
Or dial (669) 900-9128
meeting ID: 872 2717 5757 passcode: 780609
Audio recordings to all the City Council meetings can be found here:
https://cms5.revize.com/revize/rollinghillsca/government/agenda/index.php
While on this page, locate the meeting date of interest then click on AUDIO. Another window will
appear. In the new window, you can select the agenda item of interest and listen to the audio by hitting
the play button. Written Action Minutes to the City Council meetings can be found in the AGENDA,
typically under Item 4A Minutes. Please contact the City Clerk at 310 377-1521 or email at
cityclerk@cityofrh.net for assistance.
Next Resolution No. 1272 Next Ordinance No. 370
1
3.OPEN AGENDA - PUBLIC COMMENT WELCOME
This is the appropriate time for members of the public to make comments regarding the items on
the consent calendar or items not listed on this agenda. Pursuant to the Brown Act, no action will
take place on any items not on the agenda.
4.CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
4.A.MINUTES: REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 8, 2021.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented.
5.CONSENT CALENDAR
Matters which may be acted upon by the City Council in a single motion. Any Councilmember may
request removal of any item from the Consent Calendar causing it to be considered under Council
Actions.
5.A.PAYMENT OF BILLS.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented.
5.B.PROGRESS UPDATE ON THE ENGINEERING DESIGN OF THE 8" SEWER MAIN
LINE ALONG PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD AND ROLLING HILLS ROAD.
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.
5.C.PROGRESS UPDATE ON THE CAL-OES/FEMA HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT
PROJECTS.
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.
5.D.ADOPT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS, CALIFORNIA AMENDING TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF THE ROLLING HILLS
MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADDÂ CHAPTER 17.19 (RANCHO DEL MAR HOUSING
OPPORTUNITY OVERLAY ZONE) ESTABLISHING AN OVERLAY ZONE TO
ACCOMMODATE HOUSING AND TO AMEND SECTION 17.08.010 (ZONES
ESTABLISHED) OF CHAPTER 17.08 (ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONES AND
BOUNDARIES) TO IDENTIFY THE OVERLAY ON THE ZONING MAP; AND
APPROVING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2021-02-08_CCMinutes_v6.pdf
Check Voucher Register - Council Report Expenditures from 2-22-2021.pdf
Check Voucher Register 2nd - Council Report Expenditures from 2-22-2021.pdf
SUPPLEMENTAL Check run.pdf
2020-12-24_Rolling Tech Memo_65%.pdf
201215 Cost Estimate 65%.pdf
Rolling Hills_Safety Element_Existing Conditions Report_Admin Draft.pdf
Crest Road Utility Undergrounding Maps.pptx
Rolling Hills SOW_2_10_21.docx
RH_FX_w_Canyon_020921 (1).pdf
losangelescounty (4) (1).pdf
VegetationManagementGrantProjectLocationPresentation2021-02-16_v2.pptx
2
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ADOPTING GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2020-01, AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT AND
LAND USE POLICY MAP TO ACCOMMODATE HOUSING; AND APPROVING THE
NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Ordinance No. 369, an ordinance amending Title 17
(Zoning) of the City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code and approving the Negative
Declaration 2020-01 in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA); and
Adopt Resolution No. 1270 of the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills, adopting
General Plan Amendment 2020-01 and approving Negative Declaration 2020-01 in
accordance with CEQA.
6.COMMISSION ITEMS
NONE.
7.PUBLIC HEARINGS
NONE.
8.OLD BUSINESS
8.A.CONSIDER AND APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 1271 TO AMEND RESOLUTION NO.
1263 THAT ACCEPTED STATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PER
CAPITA PROGRAM GRANT ALLOCATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $177,952 FROM
THE OFFICE OF GRANTS AND LOCAL SERVICES (OGALS) TO INCLUDE THE
URBAN COUNTY PER CAPITA ALLOCATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,156; AND
AMEND RESOLUTION NO. 1265 THAT TRANSFERREDÂ THE STATE
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PER CAPITA PROGRAM GRANT
ALLOCATION OF $177,952 TO ROLLING HILLS ESTATES FOR IMPROVEMENTS
TO THE GEORGE F. CANYON NATURE CENTER TO INCLUDE THE URBAN
COUNTY PER CAPITA ALLOCATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,156.
RECOMMENDATION: Approved as presented
8.B.PENINSULA CITIES JOINT LETTERS TO STATE REPRESENTATIVE OPPOSING
SENATE BILLS 9 AND 10.
RECOM MENDATION: Authorize the Mayor to sign joint letters of opposition to
Senate Bill 9 and 10 and discuss whether to support League of California Cities' letter.
CEQA.pdf
Ordinance No. 369 RDMO.pdf
CC Resolution 1270.pdf
ResolutionNo1271AMENDMENT_TO_Transfer_of_Per_Capita_Grant_Program_Funds-
c1.DOC
ResolutionNo1263-Approving_Application_for_Per_Capita_Grant_Program_Funds-
c1.PDF
ResolutionNo1265-Transfer_of_Per_Capita_Grant_Program_Funds-c1.PDF
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE SB 9.pdf
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE SB 10.pdf
League of Cities Sample Letter.docx
3
9.NEW BUSINESS
9.A.CONSIDER A REQUEST FROM ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
(RHCA) TO COST SHARE THE RESURFACING OF TENNIS COURTS 2 AND 3 PER
THE PROVISIONS OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT.
R E C O M M E N D AT I O N : Staff recommends that the City Council receive a
presentation from the RHCA on the proposed tennis courts resurfacing project and
approve RHCA's request to cost share the improvements.
9.B.CONSIDER AND APPROVE A PROJECT BASED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH JIMENEZ CONSULTING SOLUTIONS, LLC. TO COMPLETE
THREE ON-GOING TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS.
R E C O M M E N D AT I O N : Staff recommends that the City Council approve a
professional services agreement with Jimenez Consulting Solutions, LLC.
9.C.CONSIDER AND APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
BARRY MILLER CONSULTING TO PROVIDE CONSULTANT SERVICES TO
PREPARE THE CITY’S 6TH CYCLE HOUSING ELEMENT TO COMPLY WITH
THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT'S (HCD) REQUIREMENTS.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the City Manager, or her designee, to execute an
agreement, and any subsequent amendments, with Barry Miller Consulting, in an
amount not to exceed $42.410 for the proposed scope of work to prepare the 6th Cycle
Housing Element.
9.D.CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PERSONNEL COMMITTEE FOR
APPOINTMENTS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND TRAFFIC
COMMISSION.
RECOMMENDATION: The City Council Personnel Committee recommends the re-
appointment of Charlie Raine to the Traffic Commission for a four-year term
effective March 1, 2021 and Jana Cooley for a four-year term effective March 1, 2021.
The Personnel Committee also recommends the appointment of Abby Douglas to the
Planning Commission to serve the remaining term vacated by Commissioner Matt
Seaburn.
10.MATTERS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS
10.A.UPDATE ON THE PALOS VERDES PENINSULA EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
COMMITTEE AND REGIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMITTEE MEETINGS
HELD ON NOVEMBER 12, 2020 AND FEBRUARY 11, 2021 (VERBAL REPORT).
Draft SB9 Letter of Opposition.docx
Draft SB10 Letter of Opposition.docx
RHCALeaseAgreement2018-2028.pdf
RHCA_LtrRequestTennisCourtResurface2021-02-17.pdf
Agreement with Jimenez - 2021-c1_2021-02-19.pdf
Rolling Hills - SJ and JW time Nov and Dec 2020.pdf
Rolling HIlls - Resident Portal - Design Master - 2020.12.24 - Send_2020-12-29.pdf
Barry Miller Consulting Contract 2021.pdf
RollingHills6thCycleHousingProposal-BMiller.pdf
4
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.
11.MATTERS FROM STAFF
NONE.
12.CLOSED SESSION
12.A.CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6
CITY'S DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE: MAYOR JEFF PIEPER
UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEE: CITY MANAGER ELAINE JENG
RECOMMENDATION: None.
13.ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting will be held on Monday, MARCH 8, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. via Zoom. Zoom
access:
Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87227175757?pwd=VzNES3Q2NFprRk5BRmdUSktWb0hmUT09
Meeting ID: 872 2717 5757
Passcode: 780609
Notice:
Public Comment is welcome on any item prior to City Council action on the item.
Documents pertaining to an agenda item received after the posting of the agenda are available for review in the
City Clerk's office or at the meeting at which the item will be considered.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting due to your disability, please contact the City Clerk at (310) 377-1521 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting
to enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility and accommodation for your review of
this agenda and attendance at this meeting.
5
Agenda Item No.: 4.A
Mtg. Date: 02/22/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:DELIA ARANDA,
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:MINUTES: REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 8, 2021.
DATE:February 22, 2021
BACKGROUND:
None.
DISCUSSION:
None.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve as presented.
ATTACHMENTS:
2021-02-08_CCMinutes_v6.pdf
6
MINUTES OF A
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 08, 2021
1. CALL TO ORDER
The City Council of the City of Rolling Hills met via Zoom Teleconference on the above date
at 7:00 p.m. via teleconference.
Mayor Pieper presiding.
2. ROLL CALL
Present: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, Wilson, and Black.
Absent: None
Staff Present: Elaine Jeng, City Manager
Meredith T. Elguira, Planning & Community Services Director
Jane Abzug, Assistant City Attorney
Terry Shea, Finance Director
3. OPEN AGENDA-PUBLIC COMMENT WELCOME
NONE.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
4A MINUTES 1) REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 25, 2021.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer called for a motion to approve the minutes with edits
summarized by the City Manager and the motion was seconded by Council Member Wilson.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, and Wilson
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Black
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
4B PAYMENT OF BILLS
4C CAL RECYCLE 2019 ANNUAL REPORT
4D UPDATED FY 2020-2021 CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS.
4E PLANNING AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT RECORDS
MANAGEMENT UPDATE
MOTION: Council Member Mirsch called for a motion to approve consent items 4B, 4C,
4D and 4E and the motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, Black and Wilson
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
5. COMMISSION ITEMS
NONE.
7
Minutes 2
City Council Regular Meeting
February 8, 2021
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
6A CONSIDER ORDINANCE NO. 369, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 17
(ZONING) OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD
CHAPTER 17.19 (RANCHO DEL MAR HOUSING OPPORTUNITY ZONE)
ESTABLISHING AN OVERLAY ZONE TO ACCOMMODATE
AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND AMENDING SECTION 17.08.010 OF
CHAPTER 17.08 (ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONES AND BOUNDARIES) TO
IDENTIFY THE OVERLAY ON THE ZONING MAP AND APPROVING THE
NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA
QUALITY ACT; AND CONSIDER RESOLUTION NO. 1270 OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, ADOPTING GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2020-01 TO THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
GENERAL PLAN, AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN TO ADOPT
THE LAND USE ELEMENT AMENDMENT AND LAND USE POLICY MAP
AMENDMENT; AND APPROVING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT.
MOTION: Council Member Mirsch called for a motion to introduce first reading of
Ordinance 369, waive the first full reading of Ordinance 369, and bring back Ordinance 369
for second reading on consent calendar at the next City meeting, add verbiage to the Housing
Element as suggested by Barry Miller; and bring back the revised resolution No.1270 on the
consent calendar at the next City Council meeting. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro
Tem Dieringer.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, and Wilson
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Black
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS
7. OLD BUSINESS
NONE.
8. NEW BUSINESS
8A REVIEW OF FISCAL YEAR 2019/2020 AUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
MOTION: Council Member Wilson called for motion to receive and file and the motion
was seconded by Council Member Mirsch.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, Black and Wilson
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS
9. MATTERS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL AND MEETING ATTENDANCE REPORTS
NONE.
10. MATTERS FROM STAFF
10A FIRE FUEL ABATEMENT ENFORCEMENT CASES QUARTERLY REPORT
FOR THE 4TH QUARTER OF 2020(OCTOBER 1 THROUGH DECEMBER 31,
2020).
Mr. Alfred Visco suggested that the Fire Department provide a copy of the 410 inspection
reports to the City. Mr. Visco also requested more information on a fire fuel abatement code
case.
8
Minutes 3
City Council Regular Meeting
February 8, 2021
MOTION: Council Member Mirsch called for motion to receive and file and the motion
was seconded by Council Member Wilson.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, Black and Wilson
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS
10B UPDATE ON WATER QUALITY MONITORING IN THE SEPULVEDA
CANYON. (VERBAL REPORT)
MOTION: It was motioned by Pro Tem Mayor Dieringer to receive and file the report and
the motion seconded by Council Member Mirsch.
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Mayor Pieper, Dieringer, Mirsch, Black and Wilson
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS
11. CLOSED SESSION
NONE.
12. ADJOURNMENT
Hearing no further business before the City Council, the meeting adjourned at 9:15 PM. Next
regular meeting: Monday, February 22, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. via City's website's link at:
https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/agenda/index.php
Zoom access:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87227175757?pwd=VzNES3Q2NFprRk5BRmdUSktWb0hm
T9 or dial (669) 900-9128, meeting ID: 872 2717 5757, passcode: 780609
Respectfully submitted,
____________________________________
Elaine Jeng, P.E.
Acting City Clerk
Approved,
______________________________________
Jeff Pieper
Mayor
9
Agenda Item No.: 5.A
Mtg. Date: 02/22/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:STEPHANIE GRANT , ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:PAYMENT OF BILLS.
DATE:February 22, 2021
BACKGROUND:
None.
DISCUSSION:
None.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve as presented.
ATTACHMENTS:
Check Voucher Register - Council Report Expenditures from 2-22-2021.pdf
Check Voucher Register 2nd - Council Report Expenditures from 2-22-2021.pdf
SUPPLEMENTAL Check run.pdf
10
11
12
13
Agenda Item No.: 5.B
Mtg. Date: 02/22/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:ALAN PALERMO, PROJECT MANAGER
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:PROGRESS UPDATE ON THE ENGINEERING DESIGN OF THE 8"
SEWER MAIN LINE ALONG PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD AND
ROLLING HILLS ROAD.
DATE:February 22, 2021
BACKGROUND:
At the August 24, 2020 City Council Meeting, City Council considered and approved a Professional
Services Agreement with NV5 to prepare the Sewer Improvement Plans to upgrade the existing sewer
in Rolling Hills Road and for new sewer for a sewer connection to City of Rolling Hills terminating at
City Hall. The contract with NV5 was executed on September 28, 2020 and a kick-off meeting was held
October 7, 2020.
NV5 proceeded with with research and gathering the required information needed to prepare design
plans (construction documents) and prepare a CEQA Memorandum discussing an overview of the
CEQA Process and options for the City to consider for environmental clearances the project may
require.
This sewer improvement project crosses several jurisdictions (Rolling Hills Estates and City of
Torrance) in addition to the City of Rolling Hills. Approval from these jurisdictions will be required for
both the construction documents and CEQA Process. The CEQA Memorandum discussing the CEQA
Process was received December 16, 2020. Upon reviewing this memorandum, the City of Rolling Hills
proposed pursuing the Statutory Exemption. This exemption requires the other jurisdictions to agree
with this finding.
The CEQA Memorandum was routed to Rolling Hills Estates and City of Torrance in January 2021. In
early February 2021, both agencies responded and concurred with the City of Rolling Hills proposal to
pursue the Statutory Exemption.
NV5 submitted the 65% Design Plan and Specifications on December 24, 2020. The City of Rolling
Hills reviewed the 65% design plans and returned comments to NV5 on February 9, 2021 to address
and take the plans to a 90% design level. The 90% design plans will be routed to and reviewed by
Rolling Hills Estates, City of Torrance, and City of Rolling Hills.
14
DISCUSSION:
NV5 is currently reviewing the City of Rolling Hills comments on the CEQA Memorandum and the
65% design plans and will be meeting with City staff the week of February 22, 2021 to review any
issues before they complete the 90% design plans. The 90% design plans and package will be submitted
Mid-March 2021 (exact date to be discussed at meeting the week of February 22, 2021). The follow up
steps for the CEQA Process will also be discussed at the upcoming meeting.
Upon review by all agencies of the 90% design plans and package, NV5 will address all comments to
complete the design to a 100% design level for final review by all agencies. The project is currently
scheduled for all design to be completed in May 2021 and then bid for construction.
FISCAL IMPACT:
In the approved budget for FY2020-20201, $85,000 is budgeted in the Utility Fund for the engineering
design of the 8" sewer main. The budgeted amount is sufficient to fund the proposed fee of $81,196.
There have been no contract amendments to date for this project.
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
ATTACHMENTS:
2020-12-24_Rolling Tech Memo_65%.pdf
201215 Cost Estimate 65%.pdf
15
163 Technology Drive, Suite 100 | Irvine, CA 92618 | www.NV5.com | Office 949.585.0477 | Fax 949.409.8182
CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE - INFRASTRUCTURE - ENERGY - PROGRAM MANAGEMENT - ENVIRONMENTAL
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
To: City of Rolling Hills
Alan Palermo, P.E.
Date: 12/24/2020
From: David Maher, P.E.
Project Manager
Project: 8-inch Sewer Main Portuguese
Bend/ Rolling Hills Rd.
CC:
Subject: 65% Submittal
The intent of this Technical Memorandum is to describe NV5’s 65% design for the 8-inch sewer main in
Portuguese Bend/ Rolling Hills Road. The following Technical Memorandum will briefly summarize the
proposed design and provide additional recommendations and observations in this preliminary stage.
SEWER MAIN DESIGN
A. UPSIZING EXISTING 8” VCP TO 12”
i. ABANDONED STORM DRAIN
NV5 would like to bring attention that the 30% design has a bend between “Torrance
Manhole #8” and “Torrance MH #9” there is a bend to avoid n “existing 54” CMP storm
drain. A provided Torrance as-built WP-291 calls out that this storm drain is actually
abandoned. For this 65% design we have kept the bend, but recommend adding
language to the plans and specification that the contractor should pothole at this location
to confirm if the storm drain is actually abandoned. If the storm drain is abandoned then
the sewer line can avoid having a bend and can be built directly from manhole to
manhole.
ii. PIPE BURSTING
Pipe bursting is a common trenchless method of replacing buried pipelines without the
need for traditional construction trench. NV5 would like to discuss with the City of Rolling
Hills if this would be a method that the City would like to pursue for the upsizing section
within the City of Torrance. . If this is a method the City would like to pursue we will
update the design accordingly.
The general steps for pipe bursting are as follows:
Obtain as much history as possible about the pipe’s construction
and repair. Use closed circuit TV to view the pipe.
Install the bypass.
If necessary, construct access pits.
16
8-inch Sewer Main Portuguese Bend/Rolling Hills 12/24/2020
Page 2 of 4
Disconnect services.
Cut or remove possible impediments (e.g., ductile iron repair
couplings, steel repair couplings, valves, thick concrete
encasement).
Burst the old pipe (a typical rate is 100 ft per hour) and pull the
new pipe.
Pressure-test the pipe.
Tie the pipe into the existing system.
Reconnect services and remove the bypass.
COORDINATION
After review of this 65% submittal NV5 will prepare and submit the 90% plans for review to the City of
Rolling Hills as well as to the required coordinating parties, including City of Torrance, Los Angeles
County Sanitation District, and City of Rolling Hills Estates.
Enclosed:
- Appendix A: Preliminary Plans
- Appendix B: Utility Research Log
17
8-inch Sewer Main Portuguese Bend/Rolling Hills 12/24/2020
Page 3 of 4
163 Technology Drive, Suite 100 | Irvine, CA 92618 | www.NV5.com | Office 949.585.0477 | Fax 949.409.8182
CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE - INFRASTRUCTURE - ENERGY - PROGRAM MANAGEMENT - ENVIRONMENTAL
APPENDIX A
Preliminary Plans
18
8-INCH SEWER MAIN PORTUGUESEBEND/ROLLING HILLS ROADKnow what'sbelow.Calltwo working before you dig.RNo. 86136DAVI
D
AMIR MAHERCIVI
LR E GISTERED P
R
OFESSIONAL ENGINEERSTATE OF CAL
IFORNIA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTCITY OF ROLLING HILLS19
Know what'sbelow.Calltwo working before you dig.RNo. 86136DAVI
D
AMIR MAHERCIVI
LR E GISTERED P
R
OFESSIONAL ENGINEERSTATE OF CAL
IFORNIA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTCITY OF ROLLING HILLS20
1 inch = ft.GRAPHIC SCALE20Know what'sbelow.Calltwo working before you dig.RNo. 86136DAVI
D
AMIR MAHERCIVI
LR E GISTERED P
R
OFESSIONAL ENGINEERSTATE OF CAL
IFORNIA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTCITY OF ROLLING HILLSCRENSHAW BLVD21
1 inch = ft.GRAPHIC SCALE20Know what'sbelow.Calltwo working before you dig.RNo. 86136DAVI
D
AMIR MAHERCIVI
LR E GISTERED P
R
OFESSIONAL ENGINEERSTATE OF CAL
IFORNIA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTCITY OF ROLLING HILLSCRENSHAW BLVD22
1 inch = ft.GRAPHIC SCALE20Know what'sbelow.Calltwo working before you dig.RNo. 86136DAVI
D
AMIR MAHERCIVI
LR E GISTERED P
R
OFESSIONAL ENGINEERSTATE OF CAL
IFORNIA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTCITY OF ROLLING HILLS23
1 inch = ft.GRAPHIC SCALE20Know what'sbelow.Calltwo working before you dig.RNo. 86136DAVI
D
AMIR MAHERCIVI
LR E GISTERED P
R
OFESSIONAL ENGINEERSTATE OF CAL
IFORNIA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTCITY OF ROLLING HILLS24
1 inch = ft.GRAPHIC SCALE20Know what'sbelow.Calltwo working before you dig.RNo. 86136DAVI
D
AMIR MAHERCIVI
LR E GISTERED P
R
OFESSIONAL ENGINEERSTATE OF CAL
IFORNIA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTCITY OF ROLLING HILLSPALOS VERDES DR25
1 inch = ft.GRAPHIC SCALE20Know what'sbelow.Calltwo working before you dig.RNo. 86136DAVI
D
AMIR MAHERCIVI
LR E GISTERED P
R
OFESSIONAL ENGINEERSTATE OF CAL
IFORNIA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTCITY OF ROLLING HILLS26
SHEET NOTES:MANHOLE PENETRATION CONNECTIONSTA. 10+00 SEWER MANHOLE DETAILKnow what'sbelow.Calltwo working before you dig.RNo. 86136DAVI
D
AMIR MAHERCIVI
LR E GISTERED P
R
OFESSIONAL ENGINEERSTATE OF CAL
IFORNIA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTCITY OF ROLLING HILLSIN PROGRESS STA. XX+00 SEWER MANHOLE DETAILIN PROGRESS STA. XX+00 SEWER MANHOLE DETAILIN PROGRESS STA. XX+00 SEWER MANHOLE DETAILIN PROGRESS STA. XX+00 SEWER MANHOLE DETAILIN PROGRESS STA. XX+00 SEWER MANHOLE DETAILIN PROGRESS STA. XX+00 SEWER MANHOLE DETAILIN PROGRESS 27
8-inch Sewer Main Portuguese Bend/Rolling Hills 12/24/2020
Page 4 of 4
APPENDIX B
Utility Research Log
28
Utility Agencies Contact Person Street Address City, Zip STATE Telephone Nos.Email Status Comments
AT&T Distribution Cathy Hurtado (LA
County)714-666-5503 MA2797@att.com
Sent 10/9/2020
Sent 10/27/2020
Received 10/28/2020
No Utilities in Area
AT&T Transmission Joseph Forkert 22311 Brookhurst St. Suite
203 Huntiongton Beach, CA 92646 714-963-7964 joef@forkertengineering.com Sent 10/9/2020
Received 10/15/2020 No Utilities in Area
Cox Communications Thomas Eldred 29947 Avenida De Las
Banderas
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
92688 800-2906623
coxfacilityinquiries@cox.com
Sent 10/9/2020
Sent 10/27/2020
Sent 12/4/2020
3rd request Sent
California Water Service -
30940 Hawthorne
Boulevard Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
90275 310-257-1400
Maprequests-RDOM@calwater.com
Sent 10/9/2020
Sent 10/20/2020
Received 11/3/2020
As Builts in project folder
LA County Dept Public Works Received 10/9/2020 SD Plans pulled from
Website
Sanitation Districts of Los
Angeles County Adriana Raza Sent 10/9/2020
Received 10/22/2020 As Builts in project folder
MCI(Verizon)
Investigations@verizon.com
Sent 10/9/2020
Sent 10/27/2020
Sent 12/4/2020
3rd request Sent
Crown Castle - La and Ven Nick Belinksy 1500 Corporate Dr. Canonsburg, PA 888-632-0931 Fiber.dig@crowncastle.com
Sent 10/9/2020
Received Map 10/12/2020
Maps Received
10/12/2020
SC Gas
SoCalGasTransmissionUtilityRequest@semprautilities.com
Sent 10/9/2020
Received No Utility Notification
10/12/2020
No Utilities in Area
Spectrum(Charter)Brad A. Broullire
DL-socal-charter-engineering@charter.com
Sent 10/9/2020 Maps Received 10/9/2020
SCE Map Request 14005 S. Benson Ave Chino, CA 91710
maprequests@sce.com
Sent 10/9/2020
Received follow up email
10/27/2020
Map Received 10/29/2020
Frontier UTILITY COORDINATOR 624 S Grand Ave Los Angeles, CA 90017 213-542-0100 mcdonald.stephen@ftr.com; ray.roundtree@ftr.com
Sent 10/9/2020
Sent 12/4/2020 2nd request
City of Torrance Ted Symons 3031 Torrance Blvd Torrance, CA 90503 310-618-2831 tsymons@TorranceCA.gov
Sent 10/16/2020
Received 10/26/2020 As Builts in project folder
8-INCH SEWER MAIN
PORTUGUESE BEND
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
Page 1 of 1 12/24/2020
29
65% Submittal
Description Unit Cost Quantity Amount
Item
No. 8-inch Sewer Main Portuguese Bend
1 Mobilization 60,000 1 LS $60,000
2 Temporary Traffic Control Implementation 40,000 1 LS $40,000
3 Traffic Striping, Legends, Markers & Pavement Restoration 80,000 1 LS $80,000
4 Best Management Practices BMP 25,000 1 LS $25,000
5
Furnish, Install and Remove of Temporary Bypass Pumping system
with pipes and all Appurtenances 30,000 1 LS $30,000
6 Remove Existing 8” VCP sewer and Replace with 10” VCP sewer 500 350 LF $175,000
7 Remove Existing 8” VCP sewer and Replace With 12” VCP sewer 520 235 LF $122,200
8 Connect 12” VCP sewer main to existing manhole and modify the base 10,000 1 EA $10,000
9 Connect 10” VCP sewer main to existing manhole and modify the base 10,000 2 EA $20,000
10 Connect 8” VCP sewer main to existing manhole and modify the base 10,000 1 EA $10,000
11 Construct 8” VCP sewer main 420 1,215 LF $510,300
12 Construct new 48” precast concrete sewer manhole 13,000 3 EA $39,000
Subtotal $1,121,500
Contingency $336,450
ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST TOTAL 1,457,950$
Preliminary Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
30%
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
24-Dec-20
201215 Cost Estimate 65%.xlsx
30
65% Submittal
Description Unit Cost Quantity Amount
Preliminary Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
24-Dec-20
201215 Cost Estimate 65%.xlsx
31
Agenda Item No.: 5.C
Mtg. Date: 02/22/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:ELAINE JENG, CITY MANAGER
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:PROGRESS UPDATE ON THE CAL-OES/FEMA HAZARD MITIGATION
GRANT PROJECTS.
DATE:February 22, 2021
BACKGROUND:
To date, the City has been awarded grant funds for three projects from the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) Hazard Mitigation Grant program, administered by the California Office
of Emergency Services (CalOES): (1) Safety Element update, (2) Crest Road East Utility
Undergrounding, and (2) Vegetation Management/Fire Fuel Breaks.
DISCUSSION:
Safety Element Update
The City's Safety Element addresses a wide range of natural and human caused hazards and consists of
goals and policies aimed to reduce the risks associated with these hazards such as loss of life, injuries,
property damage, and economic and social dislocation. The City's Safety Element was adopted in 1990
and is in need of an update. The City applied for grant funds through the FEMA Hazard Mitigation
Program and was awarded $47,624 of Federal funds in September 18, 2019 to update the Safety
Element. The grant requires a local match of 25% or $15,875, bringing to total available funds for the
project to $63,499. The update to the Safety Element will comply with State mandates that went into
effect after the adoption of the plan in 1990:
SB1241 - Fire Hazard Safety
SB379 - Natural Hazard Adaptation and Resiliency
AB2140 - Integration of Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP)
In early June 2020, the City Council selected Rincon Consultants, Inc. (Rincon) after a competitive
solicitation for services to update the Safety Element. The project kick-off meeting was held in late
June. Two advisory meetings were held in December 2020 and January 2021. Attendees of the
advisory meetings included members of the LA County Fire Department, Sheriff's Department, Rolling
Hills Community Association, Block Captains, LA County Building and Safety, Rancho Palos Verdes
Emergency Preparedness/City staff. As of February 22, 2021, the existing conditions report has been
completed and the next step is to develop the initial draft of the Safety Element, including revising
32
policies. Approximately 50% of the project scope has been completed to date. As of December 31,
2020, the City requested $27,262 of expenses to be reimbursed by CalOES/FEMA. The City has been
reimbursed $14,356. Staff is working towards submitting a completed Safety Element to
CalOES/FEMA for final review and approval in June 2021 and City Council adoption in August 2021.
Crest Road East Utility Undergrounding Project
To preserve the rural character of Rolling Hills and to eliminate risks of wildfires, the City Council
encourages and supports utility undergrounding throughout the community. In line with this vision, the
City applied for grant funds through the FEMA Hazard Mitigation Program and on September 14, 2020,
the City was awarded $1,145,457 of Federal funds to underground utility infrastructure along Crest
Road East from the eastern city limits to the frontage of 67 Crest Road East. The grant requires a local
match of 25% or $381,819 for a total project amount of $1,527,276. The local match can be fulfilled
using the CPUC Rule 20A work credits.
The entire project can be characterized as a CPUC Rule 20A project. For Rule 20A projects, Southern
California Edison (SCE) handles the design, joint trench bidding and assist in the coordination with the
other utility companies. City staff held a kick-off meeting with SCE on January 13, 2021. SCE will
commence their work by preparing a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) estimate for the project. The
ROM is anticipated to be available by February 25, 2021. Once the ROM is reviewed and agreed upon
by the City, SCE will require 18 months to complete the final design of the project. During the site
survey conducted by CalOES in January 2020, there were approximately nine utility poles identified
along the project limits to be placed underground. This number may be adjusted depending on SCE's
findings during engineering design.
Vegetation Management/Fire Fuel Breaks
Located in a very high fire severity zone as characterized by Cal Fire, the City Council prioritizes
wildfire mitigation measures. The City applied for a grant of $731,358 through the FEMA Hazard
Mitigation Program for vegetation management and to create fire breaks. In November 18, 2020, the
City was awarded $242,625 of federal funds with a required local match of 25% or $80,875 for total
project amount of $323,500. CalOES/FEMA divided the City's grant request into two phases. The first
phase is consist of identify the scope of work, environmental assessment, site survey, and project
design. The second phase is consist of construction and offsite mitigation, if necessary. The awarded
funds to date only speak to the first phase. If the City is successful in achieving CalOES/FEMA's
approval for phase one of the work, the City will be awarded funds to the second phase of
approximately $611,000, including local match. The City is required to complete phase one within 12
months from the date of the grant award or November 2021.
The grant application noted that the project will provide vegetative management, a fuel break, and
erosion at the City's most fire-vulnerable interface. The City will work with the local Fire Department
to identify the best types of mitigation, vegetation management and erosion control based on
topography and geography of the area to be mitigated. City staff along with the Fire Department will
prepare a draft action plan, scope of work, and design plans for review and upon agreement of the core
representatives, finalize design and prepared to implement.
With a constrained schedule, city staff requested kick-off meeting with the Los Angeles County Fire
Department on December 17, 2020. Participating in the kick-off meeting were Mayor Pro Tem
Dieringer, Councilmember Mirsch, Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA) Board members
Anne Smith, and Ty Bobit, Lead Block Captains Arlene and Gene Honbo, City Manager and RHCA
Manager. From the Fire Department, Chief Scott Hale, Battalion Chief Brian Bennett, Battalion Chief
Jason Robertson, and Prescribed Fire and Fuels Manager Captain Michael Velazquez participated in the
33
kick-off meeting. At the conclusion of the December 2020 meeting, the Fire Department agreed to
come back to the group in mid-February 2021 with a list of prioritized locations to apply the grant
funds. Between December 2020, and February 2021, the Fire Department conducted multiple site visits
to Rolling Hills and drafted a report on their work approach. The group reconvened on February 17,
2021 and three high priority locations were identified as follows: (1) near the end of Quail Ridge Road,
(2) Paintbrush Canyon, along the length of the Painbrush Canyon Creek, and (3) south of Running
Brand Road within the limits of Rolling Hills.
Based on fire history in Rolling Hills, the recent major wildfire events were caused by southwest
originating winds. The recent wildfire events also occurred in the Palos Verdes Peninsula Preserve
coming up to the ridges in the City of Rolling Hills. Given the fire history, the elevation differences
and the possibility of fires in the Preserve rising fast into Rolling Hills, the Fire Department assessed
that it was necessary to reduce the fuel load in the three identified areas adjacent to the Preserve.
Coupled with the recent investment made by the City Council to reduce fuel load in the Preserve, the
selected project locations for the CalOES/FEMA grant would leverage the fuel reduction work
implemented to date.
City staff and the Fire Department will be meeting with CalOES on the week of February 22, 2021 to
get their feedback on the identified project location, and discuss the scope of work. The Fire
Department is proposing to perform the implementation portion of the project to help cut cost. This
proposal will also be discussed with CalOES.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Safety Element Update
General fund will be used to provide the required local match of $15,875. A portion of the local match
can be offset with in-kind match, such as staff's time to managing the project. Based on the project
schedule, the entire amount of the local match will be needed in Fiscal Year 2020-2021. Any
adjustments to the adopted budget to account for the local match will be assessed at mid-year budget.
Crest Road East Utility Undergrounding Project
Based on SCE's filing with the CPUC for 2020, and pursuant to the formula set out in the Tariff Rule
20A, the City of Rolling Hills was allocated $5,308 and that the City's work credit balance is
$1,201,768. The City's work credit will be used to meet the required local match of $381,819.
Allocation of this work credit will be included in the mid-year budget for FY2020-2021 and budget
adoption for FY2021-2022.
Vegetation Management/Fire Fuel Breaks
General fund will be used to meet the required local match of $80,875. The Fire Department proposed
to use their staff time to offset the City's local match. While the Fire Department is not a City
department, the Fire Department argues that they serve as an extension of city staff. This proposal will
be discussed with CalOES on the week of February 22, 2021. A portion of the local match can also be
offset with City's staff time. To budget conservatively, staff will recommend that the entire amount of
$80,875 to be budgeted. A portion of the local match will be included in the mid-year budget
adjustment for FY2020-2021 and at budget adoption for FY2021-2022.
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file.
ATTACHMENTS:
34
Rolling Hills_Safety Element_Existing Conditions Report_Admin Draft.pdf
Crest Road Utility Undergrounding Maps.pptx
Rolling Hills SOW_2_10_21.docx
RH_FX_w_Canyon_020921 (1).pdf
losangelescounty (4) (1).pdf
VegetationManagementGrantProjectLocationPresentation2021-02-16_v2.pptx
35
Rolling Hills General Plan Safety Element
Existing Conditions Report
prepared by
City of Rolling Hills
Planning and Community Services
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, California 90274
prepared with the assistance of
Rincon Consultants, Inc.
706 South Hill Street, Suite 1200
Los Angeles, California 90014
October 2020
36
37
Summary
Table of Contents
Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 1
Key Findings .................................................................................................................................... 1
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 2
Hazards of Concern................................................................................................................................. 7
Geologic Hazards ............................................................................................................................ 7
Flooding ........................................................................................................................................10
Wildland and Urban Fires .............................................................................................................13
Hazardous Materials .....................................................................................................................17
Emergency Response and Evacuation ..........................................................................................17
Climate Change Vulnerability ...............................................................................................................20
Exposure .......................................................................................................................................22
Community Sensitivity ..................................................................................................................26
Potential Impacts ..........................................................................................................................28
Adaptive Capacity .........................................................................................................................33
Vulnerability Scoring .....................................................................................................................34
Summary of Issues and Opportunities .................................................................................................37
Hazards of Concern and Community Sensitivity ...............................................................37
Opportunities ....................................................................................................................37
References ............................................................................................................................................39
Tables
Table 1 Rolling Hills Climate Summary ............................................................................................ 3
Table 2 Rolling Hills Demographic Characteristics ........................................................................... 4
Table 3 Faults Located within 50 Miles of Rolling Hills .................................................................... 9
Figure 8 Historical and Projected Annual Average Maximum Temperature in Rolling Hills ..........23
Figure 9 Number of Extreme Heat Days by Year in Rolling Hills .....................................................24
Table 4 Changes in Annual Average Precipitation .........................................................................25
Figure 10 Changes in Intensity of Extreme Precipitation Events in Rolling Hills...............................26
Table 5 Rolling Hills Existing Adaptive Capacity.............................................................................33
Table 6 Vulnerability Score Matrix ................................................................................................35
Table 7 Vulnerability Assessment Results .....................................................................................36
38
Figures
Figure 1 Critical Facilities Map .......................................................................................................... 6
Figure 2 Landslide Hazard Zones ...................................................................................................... 8
Figure 3 Active Faults in the Vicinity of Rolling Hills .......................................................................11
Figure 4 Rolling Hills Liquefaction Hazard Areas .............................................................................12
Figure 5 Dam Inundation Areas ......................................................................................................15
Figure 6 Fire Hazard Zones ..............................................................................................................16
Figure 7 Existing Evacuation Routes ...............................................................................................19
39
Summary
1
Summary
Key Findings
▪ The city is most at risks to impacts from wildfire, extreme heat, and landslide events, which are
all anticipated to increase as a result of climate change impacts. Vulnerable populations such as
older adults and residents with chronic health conditions are most at risk to extreme heat and
wildfire impacts. Access roads and residential structures are also the most vulnerable to wildfire
and landslide impacts from climate change.
▪ The city has a moderate risk for shaking potential from earthquakes.
▪ Flood risks in the city are minimal and limited to natural drainage areas in the canyons.
▪ Vegetation clearing along roadways is a concern and major goal for improving fire response and
evacuation in the city.
▪ Evacuation strategies and education are important to reduce risk from hazards due to the lack
of evacuation routes in the city and the remote development on private roads. The need to
further analyze evacuation routes and access is one of the most recent changes in Safety
Element requirements. A key opportunity for the Safety Element update is address specific
evacuation needs.
▪ The City has recently adopted a number of planning documents such as the Hazard Mitigation
Plan and Community Wildfire Protection Plan, which seek to reduce the risk of hazards in the
city. An opportunity for the Safety Element update would be to utilize existing
recommendations from the Community Wildfire Protection Plan as implementation tools for the
Safety Element.
40
This page intentionally left blank.
41
Introduction
3
Introduction
Section 65302(g) of the California Government Code requires that the General Plan include a Safety
Element for the protection of the community from any unreasonable risks associated with the
effects of seismically induced surface rupture, ground shaking, ground failure, tsunami, seiche, and
dam failure; slope instability leading to mudslides and landslides; subsidence and other geologic
hazards; flooding, wildland and urban fire, and climate change adaptation and resilience. In
addition, Safety Elements are required to address non-hazard specific issues such as peakload water
supply, evacuation routes, and military installations.
This Existing Conditions Report is a comprehensive assessment of natural and man-made hazards
for the City of Rolling Hills. The report serves as the foundation for the Safety Element and includes
detailed Geographic Information System (GIS) hazard mapping and analyses. The following City
plans were also utilized for this report along with existing local data from governmental agencies
and scientific research: Hazard Mitigation Plan, Community Wildfire Protection Plan, and the
existing Safety Element.
Setting
Rolling Hills covers an area of approximately four square-miles on the Palos Verdes peninsula,
approximately 18 miles south of downtown Los Angeles. The topography of the city and peninsula
area is unique in that is rises above the Los Angeles Basin with rolling hills, steep slopes, and
canyons. The city itself is located in the San Pedro Hills. Due to its location near the coast, the area is
cooler and has fewer air quality concerns compared to the nearby Los Angeles Basin. Table 1
summarizes the climatology of the area.
Table 1 Rolling Hills Climate Summary
Climate Character Estimate
Average Maximum / Maximum Temperature (Fahrenheit) 72 / 79
Average Minimum / Minimum Temperature (Fahrenheit) 52 / 44
Average Total Precipitation (inches) 13.6
Source: WRCC 2016
Rolling Hills is a residential community that consists of large parcels and ranch-style homes and has
a sizable older adult1 population of about 513 (28% of the city’s total population). The city is also an
equestrian community, as many of residents are horse owners or have horses on their property.
Important community demographic data for Rolling Hills is included in Table 2.
1 An older adult is any adult over the age of 65 years old.
42
Table 2 Rolling Hills Demographic Characteristics
Demographic Characteristics Estimate
General
Total Population 1,8601
Population under 10 years 7 percent
Population over 65 years 28 percent1
Race 77 percent White, 18 percent Asian, 5 percent
Hispanic/Latino
Disability (hearing, vision, cognitive, ambulatory) 12 percent
Housing
Total Households 6451
Average Household Size 2.76
Owner-occupied Households 96 percent
Population over 65 years living alone 15 percent of those over 65 years
Employment
Unemployment Rate 6 percent
Poverty Rate 2 percent
Median Income $ 239,000
Insurance Coverage 97 percent
Source: U.S. Census 2018
1Information obtained from the Community Wildfire Protection Plan, , which is includes more recent data than the U.S Census
Critical Facilities and Infrastructure
Critical facilities are places that provide emergency services or serve people who would be impacted
by an emergency. Examples include hospitals, fire stations, police stations, emergency services
facilities, utility facilities, and communication facilities. Critical facilities can also include the
transportation system and schools. Due to the size and composition of Rolling Hills, most of the
critical facilities that serve the city are located outside of City limits. Critical facilities that serve the
city are shown in Figure 1 and include:
Rolling Hills City Hall: 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA
Rolling Hills Community Association: 1 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA
Rancho Del Mar High School: 38 Crest Road West, Rolling Hills, CA
Storm Hill Park: Agua Magna Canyon, Rolling Hills
Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Lomita Station: 26123 Narbonne Avenue, Lomita, CA
Los Angeles County Fire Station No. 56: 12 Crest Road West, Rolling Hills, CA
Los Angeles County Communications Tower: 5741 Crestridge Road, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Southern California Edison Electrical Substation: Crestridge Road, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Southern California Edison Electrical Substation: Tarragon Road, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
43
Introduction
5
Southern California Edison Electrical Substation: 27873 Hawthorn Boulevard, Rancho Palos
Verdes, CA
California Water Service Reservoir: Palos Verdes Drive North/Palos Verdes Drive East (SW
corner), Rolling Hills Estates, CA
California Water Service Reservoir: 3960 East Crest Road, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
California Water Service Reservoir: Via Canada, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
California Water Service Reservoir: 1 Spur Lane, Rolling Hills, CA
California Water Service Reservoir: 60 Eastfield Drive, Rolling Hills, CA
Portuguese Bend Road
Crest Road
44
Figure 1 Critical Facilities Map
45
Hazards of Concern
7
Hazards of Concern
Geologic Hazards
Geologic processes that pose a threat to life, health, property, or infrastructure are considered
geologic hazards. Natural geologic hazards that have the potential to affect Rolling Hills include
seismic hazards, landslides, liquefaction, expansive soils, and weathering. In most cases, these
natural processes cannot be prevented; however, the magnitude of destruction resulting from
natural geologic hazards can be reduced through planning policies and measures.
Landslide Hazards
Landslide activity refers to a wide range of gravity driven downslope earth movement, including
rockslides, rotational slips, mudslides, and shallow debris flows. Geological and geomorphological
conditions such as soil type, soil strength, slope angle, and slope height predispose slopes to failure.
Other factors affecting the susceptibility to slope failure include the amount of precipitation,
vegetation on the slope, groundwater seepage, and human modifications to the slope. Landslides
often result in damage to property and roadways and can cause them to become unsafe due to
displacement of the subsurface.
A majority of the existing development in Rolling Hills is located on hilly terrain and have a greater
potential to experience landslide hazards. Many of the canyons in Rolling Hills exhibit steep slopes
with little vegetation coverage, leaving them susceptible to slope failure. Error! Reference source
not found. shows the landslide zones within the City of Rolling Hills, as mapped by the California
Geological Survey. Landslide activity has been well documented in the region. Relicts of landslides
and rockslides are present throughout the City of Rolling Hills. The following major landslides have
occurred within and adjacent to the city. All are within the landslide hazards areas identified in
Figure 2:
▪ Portuguese Bend Landslide: Beginning in2 1956 over approximately 270 acres in Rancho Palos
Verdes
▪ Abalone Cove Landslide: Beginning in 1974 over 80 acres in Rancho Palos Verdes
▪ Klondike Canyon Landslide: Beginning in 1979 over to the south near the coastline
▪ Flying Triangle Landslide: Beginning in 1970s or 1980s over approximately 70 acres in the
southeast area of the city
The Flying Triangle Landslide continues to impact the southeast portion of the city through impacts
to private roads and requiring above-ground utility lines. This area is relatively unsuitable for
development due to the ongoing changes in topography.
Seismic Hazards
Rolling Hills is located in a seismically active region of southern California. The last major earthquake
in the Los Angeles area was the 5.1 magnitude La Habra earthquake in 2014. Rolling Hills is located
within 50 miles of the Whittier fault, Newport-Inglewood fault, Palos Verdes fault, Malibu Coast
2 “Beginning in” is defined as the first noted event of major rock movement
46
Figure 2 Landslide Hazard Zones
47
Hazards of Concern
9
fault, Cabrillo fault, Santa Monica fault, and Redondo Canyon fault. Analysis of seismic data from the
region indicates that the Whittier and Newport-Inglewood faults may generate a maximum credible
earthquake of magnitude 7.3 and 6.9, respectively. Error! Reference source not found. shows the
faults in the vicinity of Rolling Hills.
Typically, seismic shaking and fault rupture are primary hazards as they occur as a direct result of
the interaction between the seismic wave energy and the earth’s surface. Secondary hazards, such
as liquefaction and earthquake-induced landslides, occur as a result of the primary earthquake
hazards. Often, earthquake activity can result in other effects such as building damage/collapse,
infrastructure failure, pipeline breakage, and damage to transportation and communication
facilities. The size of the earthquake and distance from the fault rupture zone typically determine
the severity of these events.
Seismic Shaking
Seismic shaking, or ground shaking, refers to the movement of the earth’s surface resulting from the
energy release by an earthquake. Seismic shaking is typically the primary cause of property damage
resulting from earthquake activity. Seismic shaking has the ability to destroy buildings, roadways,
powerlines, and pipelines. Energy transmitted through the ground has the potential to travel
hundreds of miles and may cause damage in many locations simultaneously. Closer proximity to the
fault rupture area results in stronger shaking in that location.
The amount of ground shaking that occurs in a location is dependent on the magnitude of the
earthquake, the distance from the epicenter, and local soil conditions. The intensity of ground
shaking is related to the peak ground velocity during an earthquake. According to the CGS Map
Sheet 48, the earthquake shaking potential for Rolling Hills is moderate. The intensity of seismic
shaking is measured using the Modified Mercalli scale.
According to the California Geologic Survey, an active fault is one that has experienced surface
movement in the past 11,000 years. The city is located near a number of active faults, including the
Cabrillo Fault within city limits. Table 3 includes a list of nearby faults, their respective distance from
the city, the maximum credible earthquake generated from each fault, and the likelihood of
earthquake occurrence in each case.
Table 3 Faults Located within 50 Miles of Rolling Hills
Fault Name Approximate Distance from Rolling Hills
Whittier 25 miles east
Newport-Inglewood 9 miles east
Palos Verdes Located within the City boundaries in the Northeast
Malibu Coast 20 miles northwest
Cabrillo Located within the City boundaries in the southwest
Santa Monica 20 miles north-northwest
The San Andreas fault is located approximately 80 miles to the east of Rolling Hills. Although the San
Andreas fault is located at a greater distance from the city, seismic shaking originating from
earthquakes occurring along the San Andreas fault poses a threat to the city. Error! Reference
source not found. identifies the active and inactive faults located within the city and vicinity.
48
Fault Rupture
Fault Rupture occurs when seismic movement on a fault breaks through the earth’s surface. Hazards
related to fault rupture arise when structures are built near or on top of an active fault. While there
are a number of seismically active faults in the city and region, there are no active faults with the
potential for ground rupture, defined by the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act and
delineated by CGS. Error! Reference source not found. shows the designated Alquist-Priolo study
zones, the closest of which is the Newport-Inglewood Fault approximately nine miles northeast of
the city.
Liquefaction and Settlement
Liquefaction is a ground failure phenomenon that occurs as a result of a seismic event. Liquefaction
increases water content in surface soils until the soil reaches a semi-liquid state, contributing to a
reduction in support, and ultimately resulting in shifting or subsidence of buildings and utilities.
Ground failure typically occurs when the following conditions exist:
▪ Loose, unconsolidated granular soils
▪ Shallow groundwater
▪ Strong seismic ground shaking
While the Rolling Hills has moderate to high seismic shaking potential, the subsurface soils generally
lacks saturated alluvial deposits and thick, granular soils. Error! Reference source not found. shows
the liquefaction hazard areas, which are located in the low-lying areas to the east and north,
generally surrounding the Los Angeles Harbor and Harbor Lake. Liquefaction potential for Rolling
Hills is low.
Earthquake Induced Landslides
Ground failure or destabilization of slopes resulting from an earthquake can also occur following
seismic activity in the form of Earthquake-Induced Landslides. Earthquake-induced landslides
typically occur in areas with steep slopes or unstable soil conditions. As discussed above under
Landslide Hazards, the risk of landslide activity in Rolling Hills is high. Much of the city overlies areas
that have been identified as landslide zones by the California Geological Survey. Risk of landslide
activity increases following rainfall events that result in saturated soils. Both shallow and deep
seeded landslides have historically occurred in the city.
Flooding
Rolling Hills participates in the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) National Flood
Insurance Program. According to the FEMA flood maps, the city is not located in a flood hazard area
and currently has a less than 0.2 percent annual chance to be inundated by flood waters as a result
of a storm event (FEMA 2008). Overall, the city is not in any immediate risk from flooding caused by
overflowing water bodies or heavy rains. However, runoff and minor flooding pose a risk if drainage
systems fail along canyon bottoms, where natural drainage leads to.
49
Hazards of Concern
11
Figure 3 Active Faults in the Vicinity of Rolling Hills
50
Figure 4 Rolling Hills Liquefaction Hazard Areas
51
Hazards of Concern
13
Dam Inundation
No water storage facilities that the State of California identifies as dams are located in Rolling Hills.
Just outside city limits are three water storage facilities identified as dams, which include:
▪ Palos Verdes Reservoir: Owned by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and
located at the southeast corner of Palos Verdes Drive East and Palos Verdes Drive North.
According to the California Department of Water Resources, the reservoir can hold
approximately 1,100 gallons of water and has an extremely high downstream hazard.
▪ 10 MG Walteria and 18 MG Walteria: Two reinforced concrete tanks which are owned by the
City of Torrance and located at Crenshaw Boulevard and Crest Road. The tanks can hold 31 and
58 acre-feet (AF) of water respectively.
Senate Bill 92, adopted in 2017, is a new dam safety requirement that requires dam owners to map
the downstream inundation areas for dams governed by the Department of Water Resources.
Figure 5 shows the inundation areas for the nearby water storage facilities. Due to their locations
and the topography of the area, the inundation areas do not enter or affect any portion of the city.
Wildland and Urban Fires
The entire City of Rolling Hills is designated a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) by the
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CalFire), as shown in Figure 6. Rolling Hills
terrain is comprised of several large and steep canyons that limit and challenge vegetation
management and present conditions where a fire can quickly travels up and downslope to nearby
homes. Due to the rural nature and large residential lots, many homes are surrounded by
substantial vegetation and dense brush than in more suburban settings. The bridle trails for hikers
and equestrian access also contain dense vegetation and management difficulties, which
contributes to the fire risk of the city. Electrical power lines pose a hazard to starting fires in the city
if lines are not automatically de-energized when knocked down by extreme weather or if the
surrounding vegetation is not adequately managed.
There is a history of fires in the city and the surrounding Palos Verdes Peninsula. Three major fires
have been documented on the Peninsula and in the city in:
▪ 1973: almost 1,000 acres burned and 13 homes destroyed
▪ 2005: 212 acres burned near Del Cero Park
▪ 2009: 230 acres burned and forced 1,200 residents on the Peninsula to evacuate
For many of the developed residences in the city that are vulnerable to fires, their risk may increase
with the presence of construction techniques that may not meet current wildfire standards. Rolling
Hills Building Code and Los Angeles County Fire Department, under the VHFHSZ standards, require
new development to include more stringent design and material standards for roofing, eaves, and
rafter tails as well as exterior finishes and fire buffer zones. While compliance with these standards
reduces the vulnerability to new structures, existing structures that have not complied with these
standards may be susceptible to undue fire risk.
Existing Fire Risk Reduction Strategies
▪ Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) Chapter 8.30: Fire Fuel Abatement
▪ VHRHSZ building requirements
52
▪ Los Angeles County Fire Department property line and structure vegetation buffer requirements
▪ Rolling Hills Community Wildfire Protection Plan vegetation management standard
recommendations
▪ Rolling Hills Community Association
53
Hazards of Concern
15
Figure 5 Dam Inundation Areas
54
Figure 6 Fire Hazard Zones
55
Hazards of Concern
17
Hazardous Materials
According to the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), there are no hazardous waste
sites or facilities in Rolling Hills (DTSC 2020). The city and surrounding area do not contain heavy
industrial uses that would create a hazardous material risk in the event of a spill, release, or natural
disaster.
The city is not located near any major transit routes involving transport of a substantial quantity of
hazardous material through the city. However, the nearby oil refineries (located along Sepulveda
Boulevard approximately six miles northeast) and Port operations (located approximately three
miles to the east) could create air quality impacts if wind patterns and release events occur. Air
quality impacts are discussed in the Open Space and Conservation Element of the Rolling Hills
General Plan.
Emergency Response and Evacuation
Police Response and Crime
The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department is contracted with the city to provide police services
and protection to the city. The Lomita Station of the Sheriff’s Department located at 26123
Narbonne Avenue, approximately 1.5 miles northeast of the Portuguese Bend Road entrance, serves
the city.
According to the Lomita Station crimes report from January 1, 2020 through June 30, 2020, Rolling
Hills had three reported crimes (LACSD 2020). The crimes were related to theft, assault, and
burglary. Outside the city limits and in the Lomita District, 433 crimes were reported during this
same period, 71 of which were violent crimes (LACSD 2020). The difference in crimes in the city and
the surrounding area is attributed to the private nature of the City. There are three entrances to the
city, all of which are gated and staffed 24 hours a day. Visitors are required to be on a resident’s
guest list in order to enter city limits. This reduces crime within the city and demand on Los Angeles
County Sheriff’s Department.
Fire Response
The Los Angeles County Fire Department provides emergency operations support to the City. Fire
Station 56, located at 12 Crest Road West, serves the city under Battalion 14, which also serves the
remaining Palos Verdes Peninsula, Lomita, and Catalina Island. Fire response constraints in the city
include ability to access certain homes or areas due to inadequate road widths for fire maneuvering.
One of the major topics of concern related to fire response in the city relates to vegetation clearing
along roadways. Ten-foot clearance on each side of the roadway, especially the limited access
roads, is important for fire response and evacuation during a fire, according to Scott Hale, Assistant
Fire Chief.
Evacuation Strategies and Routes
Because a variety of hazards could affect city residents, it is vital to identify critical routes for
evacuation in the event of a major event. Figure 7 identifies the existing evacuation routes in the
city, which are limited to:
▪ Main Gate at Rolling Hills Road and Palos Verdes Drive North
56
▪ Crest Gate at Crest Road near Crenshaw Blvd
▪ Eastfield Gate at Eastfield Drive and Palos Verdes Drive East
There is an additional Crest Road gate on the eastern side of the city, at the end of Crest Road East.
This gate has just been updated with a motor and has no guards. This gate is available as an
emergency exit to the city during emergencies, but only those with access to the gate key can open
it (which includes Los Angeles County Sheriff and Fire Departments). Therefore, the city only has
three main evacuation routes. The recently adopted Community Wildfire Protection Plan for the city
establishes evacuation strategies and methodologies for the city, which include:
▪ Using the City’s Block Captains as important coordinators and managers of residents in the 24
City zones3
▪ Communication goals between the City, emergency responders, Rolling Hills Community
Association, and residents
▪ Details for residents regarding how people get notified during an actual evacuation and the
responsibilities and operations of the Emergency Operations Center
▪ Traffic control responsibilities and levels
▪ Identification of special need residents who may need specific attention and/or assistance
3 The city is divided into 24 zones and each zone has 2-3 block captains to represent the residents within the zone.
57
Hazards of Concern
19
Figure 7 Existing Evacuation Routes
58
This page intentionally left blank.
59
Climate Change Vulnerability
21
Climate Change Vulnerability
In accordance with Senate Bill 379, this section provides a climate change vulnerability assessment
for Rolling Hills, which evaluates the potential impacts of climate change on community assets and
populations. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report
defines vulnerability as “the propensity or predisposition to be adversely affected.” It adds that
vulnerability “encompasses a variety of concepts and elements including sensitivity or susceptibility
to harm and lack of capacity to cope and adapt” (IPCC, 2013). Understanding the vulnerabilities that
the city may face due to climate change provides a foundation to define future adaptation strategies
for the Safety Element update and other planning efforts in Rolling Hills and the region.
Consistent with the California Adaptation Planning Guide (Cal OES 2020) the assessment is
comprised of the following five elements:
▪ Exposure – the nature and degree to which the community experiences a stress or hazard;
▪ Sensitivity – the aspects of the community (i.e., people, structures, and functions) most affected
by the identified exposures;
▪ Potential Impacts – the nature and degree to which the community is affected by a given
stressor, change, or disturbance;
▪ Adaptive Capacity – the ability to cope with extreme events, to make changes, or to transform
to a greater extent, including the ability to moderate potential damages and to take advantage
of opportunities; and
▪ Vulnerability Scoring – systematic scoring based on potential impacts and adaptive capacity, to
inform major climate vulnerabilities to address adaptation framework strategies.
In addition to City data, Cal-Adapt was used to complete the assessment. Cal-Adapt is an interactive,
online platform developed by the University of California and Berkeley to synthesize climate change
projections and climate impact research for California’s scientists and planners. This assessment
uses Cal-Adapt to study potential future changes in average and extreme temperatures,
precipitation, wildfire, and storms. Cal-Adapt is consistent with State guidance to use the “best
available science” for evaluating climate change vulnerability.
This assessment uses two greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions scenarios included in Cal-Adapts
analysis: Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5 and RCP 8.5. RCP 4.5 describes a scenario
in which GHG emissions peak around 2050, decline over the next 30 years and then stabilize by
2100 while RCP 8.5 is the scenario in which GHG emissions continue to rise through the middle of
the century before leveling off around 2100. The climate projections used in this report are from
four models selected by California’s Climate Action Team Research Working Group and the
California Department of Water Resources. These models include:
▪ A warm/dry simulation (HadGEM2-ES)
▪ A cooler/wetter simulation (CNRM-CM5)
▪ An average simulation (CanESM2)
60
▪ The model that presents a simulation most unlike these three and incorporates 10 other
models, for full representation of possible forecasts (MIROC5)4
The average of the model projections is used in this analysis.
Exposure
Climate change is a global phenomenon that has the potential to adversely affect local health,
natural resources, infrastructure, emergency response, and many other facets of society. Projected
changes to climate are dependent on location. According to Cal-Adapt, climate change could lead to
increasing temperatures, temperature extremes, and changes in precipitation patterns in Rolling
Hills. These conditions could lead to exposure associated with extreme heat, drought, wildfires, and
extreme storms in the region. The climate hazards of concern for Rolling Hills addressed in this
analysis are:
▪ Extreme Heat
▪ Storms and Extreme Weather
▪ Drought
▪ Wildfire
Extreme Heat
Figure 8 below shows observed and projected annual average maximum temperature in Rolling
Hills. As shown in Figure 8, average temperatures in the city and region have increased, which is a
trend at both the local scale and the global scale. Compared to 1990, annual average maximum
temperatures in Rolling Hills are expected to rise between 1.8°F and 6.6°F by the end of the century,
depending on the GHG emissions scenario (CEC 2020).
4 There were 10 California GCM models that were ranked from 1-10 by California’s Climate Action Team Research Working Group and the
California Department of Water Resources for different temperature and precipitation factors. The models ranged from the “warm/dry”
model which had all metrics closest to 1 to the “cool/wet” model which had all metrics closest to 10. The MIROC5 displays a pattern of
ranking that is most unlike the other 3 models and therefore, is included to represent the full spread of all 10 model simulations.
61
Climate Change Vulnerability
23
Figure 8 Historical and Projected Annual Average Maximum Temperature in Rolling
Hills5
Extreme heat is a period when temperatures are abnormally high relative to the normal
temperature range. There are generally three types of extreme heat events:
▪ Extreme Heat Days: a day during which the maximum temperature surpasses 98 percent of all
historic high temperatures for the area, using the time between April and October from 1950 to
2005 as the baseline
▪ Warm Nights: a day between April to October when the minimum temperature exceeds 98
percent of all historic minimum daytime temperatures observed between 1950 to 2005
▪ Extreme Heat Waves: a successive series of extreme heat days and warm nights where extreme
temperatures do not abate. While no universally accepted minimum length of time for a
heatwave event exists, Cal-Adapt considers four, successive extreme heat days and warm nights
to be the minimum threshold for an extreme heatwave
Extreme heat events will feel different from region to region since different areas have different
historic high temperatures. For example, an extreme heat day on the coast will feel different than
an extreme heat day in the desert. According to Cal-Adapt, an extreme heat day in Rolling Hills
involves a temperature that exceeds 91.7 ̊F (CEC 2020).
Historically (between 1950 and 2005), Rolling Hills experienced an average four extreme heat days
per year, typically occurring between April and October. As a result of rising average temperatures
and climate change as discussed above, the city is projected to experience between 8 and 14
extreme heat days annually from 2030 to 2099 under medium and high emissions projections (CEC
5 Chart shows annual average maximum temperature for Rolling Hills (Grid Cell 33.78125, -118.34375) under RCP 8.5 (emissions continue
to rise strongly through 2050 and plateau around 2100)
62
2020). As shown in Figure 9, the number of extreme heat days each year is variable, but overall they
are increasing from historic averages and would continue to increase through the century.
Figure 9 Number of Extreme Heat Days by Year in Rolling Hills6
Extreme heat waves are defined as four or more consecutive extreme heat days. These events have
been historically infrequent in Rolling Hills, with the historical average being 0.3 heat waves
annually. The city is expected to experience a minor increase in heat wave frequency as the climate
changes. Between 2030 and 2099, the city is projected to experience between 0.4 and 1.1 heat
waves per year (CEC 2020).
Drought
Droughts are somewhat frequent in California, and currently approximately 42 percent of
California’s population are in a drought, or in an abnormally dry area (NIDIS 2020). Changes in
weather patterns resulting in increases in global average temperatures are already causing
decreases in snowpack, which provides as much as a third of California’s water supply (DWR 2019).
According to the U.S. Drought Monitor, Los Angeles County and Rolling Hills are not currently
experiencing drought conditions based on this mapping (National Drought Mitigation Center 2020).
Southern California is not currently considered to be in a drought condition, while other parts of the
State (northern California and the Sierra Nevada mountain range) are experiencing moderate
drought conditions due to lower than average precipitation.
The projected changes in annual precipitation for Rolling Hills are shown in Table 4. Under both the
medium and high GHG emissions scenarios, Rolling Hills is not expected to experience substantial
changes in average precipitation. However, the city would experience increased variability in
precipitation. The city’s minimum annual precipitation would decrease while the maximum annual
precipitation would increase under both emissions scenarios.
6 Chart shows the number of days in a year when daily maximum temperature is above the extreme hear threshold of 91.7 ̊F for Rolling
Hills (Grid Cell 33.78125, -118.34375) under RCP 8.5
63
Climate Change Vulnerability
25
Table 4 Changes in Annual Average Precipitation
Scenario
Annual Precipitation
Minimum (inches) Average (inches) Maximum (inches)
Historical Average (1950-2005) 6.7 19.2 37.0
Medium Emissions Scenario (2030-2099) 6.0 21.3 48.2
High Emissions Scenario (2030-2099) 4.8 22.2 57.0
Source: CEC 2020
While overall precipitation levels are expected to change substantially in the city, a drought may
occur when conditions in areas where water sources are located experience drought conditions,
even though the local region does not. Rolling Hills obtains its water from the Palos Verdes District
of the California Water Service. Water supply from the District to this area is purchased from the
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD), which imports its water from the
Colorado River and State Water Project from northern California.
Recent research suggests that extended drought occurrence could become more pervasive in future
decades (CEC 2020). An extended drought scenario is predicted for all of California from 2051 to
2070 under a climate model using business as usual conditions. The extended drought scenario is
based on the average annual precipitation over 20 years. This average value equates to 78 percent
of the historic median annual precipitation averaged for the North Coast and Sierra California
Climate Tracker regions. Overall precipitation levels in the city are not expected to be significantly
impacted. However, variability in precipitation and drought conditions in other areas of the state
could impact water supply.
Wildfire
Wildfire hazards to the city are widespread and discussed above under Hazards of Concern.
Wildfires in the city are influenced by a range of factors including droughts, severe winds, wildfire
fuel (i.e. dry vegetation), and previous wildfire suppression activity. Climate change is expected to
exacerbate wildfire risk by creating hotter and drier landscapes, as discussed above under Extreme
Heat, which are more susceptible to burning.
Cal-Adapt provides projections for annual mean hectares burned. This projection only accounts for
areas that could experience wildfire events. Los Angeles County wildfire occurrence is anticipated to
increase under all emissions and population scenarios from historic averages (CEC 2020). In 2020
alone, California has experienced six of the 20 largest fires in modern history and as of the date of
this report, over three million acres of land have burned. These fires arose during extreme fire
weather conditions and record-breaking heat waves across California. The observed frequency of
autumn days with extreme fire weather, which are associated with extreme autumn wildfires, has
more than doubled in California since the early 1980s (Goss et al. 2020). Due to the increases in
factors that contribute to wildfires (variability in precipitation, hotter and dryer landscapes) and
because the city is in a VHFZSZ, it is expected to see an increase in wildfire hazards due to climate
change.
Storms and Extreme Weather
A warming climate is likely to influence the frequency and intensity of storms. Both increased
temperatures and altered precipitation patterns can lead to altered seasons and intense rainstorms
in Rolling Hills. As depicted in Figure 10, there is a high degree of variability in these extreme
64
precipitation event projections, with some models projecting little to no change while others project
increased intensity (CEC 2020) These projections further vary depending on the return period7
selected. Increasing intensity of rainstorms could result in more flooding, which could adversely
affect human safety in Rolling Hills. During years of intense levels of precipitation and storms, the
city could also see an increase in the number of landslides or make landslides greater than usual.
Due to the number of landslide hazard zones in the city, as shown in 2, Rolling Hills may see an
increase in landslides due to changes in precipitation from climate change.
Figure 10 Changes in Intensity of Extreme Precipitation Events in Rolling Hills8
Community Sensitivity
As climate change occurs, communities will be affected to varying degrees depending on the
exposure levels as well as how sensitive the communities are to impacts. Virtually all people and
assets in a community will be affected by climate change in some way. However, it is not usually
feasible to assess the vulnerability of every population group or every asset in the community. The
sensitivity of a community depends on the aspects of the community (i.e., specific populations and
assets) most affected by the identified exposures, and how prevalent they are in the community.
As described in the Exposure section above, the most likely primary impacts of climate change that
Rolling Hills may experience include extreme heat, increases in wildfire risk and prevalence, and
drought conditions affecting water supply. This section of the Vulnerability Analysis identifies the
7 Average time between extreme events (e.g. “1 in 100 year event”)
8 Chart shows estimated intensity (Return Level) of Extreme Precipitation events which are exceeded on average once every 20 years
(Return Period) for Rolling Hills (Grid Cell 33.78125, -118.34375) under RCP 8.5 emissions scenario. Extreme precipitation events are
described as days during a water year (Oct-Sept) with 2-day rainfall totals above an extreme threshold of 1.02 inches.
65
Climate Change Vulnerability
27
sensitive areas of the Rolling Hills community from the demographic and community facility
information in the Introduction section above and is based on the following categories:
▪ Populations
▪ Infrastructure
▪ Buildings and Facilities
▪ Services
Populations
The vulnerability assessment considers the following population groups that may be
disproportionally harmed by the impacts of climate change in Rolling Hills.
Children: Approximately 6.6 percent of the total population in Rolling Hills are ten years old or
younger.
Persons in poverty: This is identified for people living in households with an income below the
poverty limit, which is $26,200 for a household of four people. There are approximately 26 people in
Rolling Hills who live in poverty, or approximately 1.6 percent of the total population for whom
poverty status can be determined.
Persons with chronic health conditions: These are people who have a long-term or permanent
health condition that can create regular challenges in their day-to-day lives. These health problems
include obesity, cancer, heart disease, and arthritis. In addition, those with any kind of disability,
including mobility challenges, hearing, or vision impairments, behavioral disabilities, and challenges
living independently or taking care of themselves. Approximately 11.5 percent of the population
have identified having a disability.
Renters: These are people who live in homes that they (or the head of their household) do not own.
Approximately 24 housing units, or 4 percent of the housing units in Rolling Hills, are renter-
occupied.
Older adults: These are persons 65 years or older are more at risk for climate change impacts,
especially those living alone. 28 percent of the population of Rolling Hills are over 65 years, and 15
percent of those over 65 years live alone.
Limited English proficiency: Approximately three percent of households have identified being
limited English-speaking. Of those, a majority spoke Asian and Pacific Island languages and Spanish.
Infrastructure
The vulnerability assessment considers the following infrastructure in the city that was identified as
bring sensitive to climate change impacts.
Access Roads: These roadways are one of a few, or the only, ways in and out of some communities
or neighborhoods. The single or limited number of entry and exit points does not make the road
itself more vulnerable than other roads, but loss of these roadways can effectively cut off large
numbers of people from other areas in the Palos Verdes Peninsula and the rest of Los Angeles
County. Portuguese Bend Road and Crest Road are the primary access roads into and out of the city.
Bridle Trails: Throughout the community are over 25 miles of trails available to city residents and
non-city residents who obtain permits. The trails are maintained by the Rolling Hills Community
Association and located primarily in canyon areas.
66
Electrical Substations: Electrical substations are facilities that convert electricity from one voltage to
another, making it suitable for long-distance transmission or for use by homes, businesses, and
other electrical customers. There are no electrical substations located within city limits, but three
are located near the city in Rancho Palos Verdes and owned/operated by Southern California
Edison.
Electrical Utility Lines: These lines transmit and deliver electricity from Southern California Edison to
the city. The city has both underground and overhead electric utility lines.
Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines: Natural gas pipelines carry large volumes of natural gas
between communities. There are no transmissions lines in the city. One transmission line ends at
the intersection of Rolling Hills Road and Palos Verdes Drive, adjacent to city limits.
Water Reservoirs and System: The system that stores and supplies drinking water for residents.
Palos Verdes Water District of the California Water Service supplies water to Rolling Hills. There are
two California Water Service water reservoirs within the city limits.
Building and Facilities
Residential Structures: Residential structures in Rolling Hills consist of single-family dwellings and
are the main type of building in the city.
Community Facilities and Government Buildings: Community and government facilities are public
properties and are important to the residents as well as the operation of the city. Rolling Hills is a
private community. Therefore, community and government facilities are available only to its
residents, which are the Rolling Hills Community Association and City Hall.
Community Parks: Storm Hill is an open space area owned by the City which is utilized for
equestrian purposes. The City also has two equestrian rings and tennis courts.
Schools: Rancho Del Mar High School is the only school in the city
Public Safety Facilities: Public safety facilities include sheriff and fire buildings. Los Angeles County
Fire Station 56 is located within the city. The Lomita Station of the Los Angeles County Sheriff serves
the city but is not located within the city limits.
Services
Public Safety Response: Public safety services are provided by law enforcement and fire agencies.
These agencies include the Los Angeles County Sheriff and Fire Departments.
Water Services: These services involve treating and transporting water to be used by customers and
transporting and treating wastewater so it can be safely released into the environment. California
Water Service provides drinking water to the city.
Energy delivery: Energy services in Rolling Hills include electricity and natural gas delivered through
utility lines from Southern California Edison and Southern California Gas Company.
Potential Impacts
Impact vulnerability is the nature and degree to which the community is affected by a given
stressor, change, or disturbance. As climate change continues to progress, increased stress to
vulnerable community populations, infrastructure, building and facilities, and services are expected.
As described in the Exposure section above, the most likely primary impacts of climate change
67
Climate Change Vulnerability
29
Rolling Hills may experience include extreme heat, wildfire, and drought conditions impacting water
supply. The vulnerability of Rolling Hills to the primary exposures of climate change is discussed
below. The vulnerability scores discussed in the Vulnerability Scoring section are based on the
potential impact analysis below. Each of the vulnerable areas in the city were given a low, medium,
or high vulnerability to the potential impacts, based off the descriptions in the Vulnerability Scoring
section.
Temperature and Extreme Heat
As describe in the Exposure section above, Rolling Hills may experience a variety of impacts from
climate change, which include an increase of average annual maximum temperature between 1.8°F
and 6.6°F by the end of the century (CEC 2020) This increase in temperature may result in changes
in seasonal patterns, an increase in heat waves, drought, and potentially increased storm frequency
and intensity. Rolling Hills is expected to experience between 8 and 14 extreme heat days annually.
Overall quality of life in the city would be impacted during extreme heat events as outdoor activities
would be limited and overall comfort reduced.
The potential direct and indirect impacts to community populations, infrastructure, building and
facilities, and services are described below.
Populations
The vulnerable populations discussed above that are most at risk to extreme heat impacts from
climate change are older adults, individuals with chronic conditions such as heart and lung disease,
diabetes, and mental illnesses, children, and those who are economically disadvantaged.
The primary vulnerable population to temperature increases and extreme heat in Rolling Hills is
older adults, as 28 percent of the city’s population is over 65 years. Older adults do not adjust as
well as young people to sudden changes in temperature and are more likely to have medical
conditions that can worsen with extreme heat (CDC 2017a). Older adults who are living along are
even more at risk as the actions necessary to mitigation extreme heat are more difficult alone.
Getting water, changing clothes, showering, or turning on the air conditioner may be more difficult
for older adults with physical disabilities and do not have a living partner to assist them. Children are
also at risk to extreme heat impacts, especially those under the age of four, due to their less-
developed physiology, immune system, and dependence on others (CDC 2019).
Extreme heat can be highly dangerous to persons with chronic health conditions, because very high
temperatures can exacerbate diabetes, cardiovascular conditions, respiratory ailments, and other
diseases. Some of these people have weakened immune systems which can make them more likely
to contract illnesses and vulnerable to human health hazards. In addition, they may be taking
medications that make the effects of extreme hear worse (CDC 2017b).
While there are not many households in poverty in the city, those who are have limited financial
resources to upgrade their homes and use air conditioning to better resist extreme heat.
Each of the vulnerable populations has a high potential impact from extreme heat.
Infrastructure
Extreme heat and temperature increase due to climate change would not directly impact
infrastructure in Rolling Hills. Indirect impacts on electrical substations and utility lines could occur
from increased use of the system from running air conditioners, leading to power outages in the
68
city. In addition, indirect impacts to the water system through increased evaporation or water use
could occur. These infrastructure facilities would have a medium potential impact from extreme
heat.
Building and Facilities
Extreme heat and temperature increase due to climate change would not directly affect buildings or
facilities in Rolling Hills. Extreme heat and temperature increases could impact the ability for
residents to enjoy community park facilities. In addition, extreme heat could create wildfire
conditions which could indirectly impact all buildings and facilities within the city. Overall, there is a
low potential impact from extreme heat to City buildings and facilities.
Services
The important services discussed above that are most at risk to extreme heat impacts from climate
change are water services and energy delivery.
High temperatures would contribute to a reduced water supply. For instance, higher temperatures
will melt the Sierra snowpack earlier and drive the snowline higher. In addition to a reduction in
precipitation falling as snow, higher temperatures would result in less snowpack to supply water to
California users (CNRA 2009). Increased temperatures could therefore result in decreased potable
water supply for the city which relies on imported water from the State Water Project and Colorado
River water (Cal Water 2016). Therefore, there is a medium potential impact for high temperatures
and drought on the city.
Long periods of intense heat may result in increased use of electricity for home cooling purposes
that could tax the overall electrical system and result in electricity restrictions or blackouts. During
extreme heat events in August 2020, California had its first rolling blackouts since 2001. Therefore,
the city will experience greater potential for power outages due to climate change and has a
medium potential impact.
Storms/Extreme Weather and Drought
As mentioned in the Exposure section above, the storm and extreme weather projections for Rolling
Hills show variability, with some models projecting little to no change while others project increased
intensity. This could result in impacts to community populations, infrastructure, building and
facilities, and services, particularly related to temporary flooding and landslides which can be
triggered from intense rainfall events. The city currently has a less than 0.2 percent annual chance
to be inundated by flood waters as a result of a storm event (FEMA 2008). Increases in intense
precipitation could result in slope failures in landslide prone areas shown in Error! Reference source
not found., including the existing Flying Triangle Landslide area.
As discussed in the Exposure section above, Rolling Hills is not expected to experience substantial
changes in average precipitation. However, the city receives its water from the Colorado River and
State Water Project from northern California, and extended drought scenario is predicted for these
areas, which equates to 78 percent of the historic median annual precipitation. Therefore, areas
that supply water to Rolling Hills and other jurisdictions are expected to see a 22 percent reduction
of their water supply, which could reduce the amount of potable water available for delivery to the
city.
69
Climate Change Vulnerability
31
Populations
The city’s older adults and those with chronic health conditions are the populations in Rolling Hills
that are more at risk of injury and or death resulting from minor floods or fallen trees created by
more intense storms induced by climate change. Indirect impacts to these populations from impacts
to the transportation system could include reduced access to emergency response and health
centers for those who need consistent medical care. There is a medium potential for impacts to
these vulnerable populations.
Infrastructure
Critical infrastructure most at risk in Rolling Hills to minor flooding impacts and landslides from
increased storms would be access roads, bridle trails, electrical utility lines, and water systems.
Because Portuguese Bend Road and Crest Road are critical for access to and evacuation from the
city, any damage or closure can effectively isolate areas of the city, potentially creating severe
health and safety risks. Bridle trails are predominantly located in canyon areas, which would be
more susceptible to flooding and landslides. Landslides could impact utilities, as seen in the existing
Flying Triangle Landslide area, which has moved utility lines above ground in certain areas due to
the continuous movement of the earth in this area. Due to the limited accessibility of the city, there
is a medium potential impact for access roads and bridle trails and a low potential impact for the
remaining vulnerable infrastructure.
Building and Facilities
Buildings and facilities most at risk from impacts of more intense storms would be residential
structures and community parks. The proper functioning residential septic systems could be
impacted by more intense rainfall and minor flooding. In addition, landslides could be triggered as
indirect impacts from more intense storms and rainfall. Residential structures located in landslide
hazard areas shown in Error! Reference source not found. could be impacted. In addition, the
Storm Hill open space area is an important facility in the city and is also located in a landslide area.
Due to the variability in weather projections, there is a low potential impact for buildings and
facilities.
Services
Increased storm intensity and drought conditions from climate change could impact public safety
response, energy delivery and water services in the city. Emergency response systems could be
impacted from flooding or landslides within or outside of city limits, which could restrict the ability
for emergency response to access the city and impact response times.
More intense storms could adversely affect electricity delivery from Southern California Edison from
power outages caused by downed electrical utility lines from wind of landslide events. In addition,
water service from the California Water Service Palos Verdes District could be affected by increased
drought conditions throughout the state. There is a medium potential impact for buildings and
facilities.
Wildfire
Wildfires in Los Angeles County are projected to increase under all emissions and population
scenarios. As discussed in the Exposure section above, wildfire hazards to the city are widespread
and wildfire conditions are expected to be exacerbated by a range of factors including droughts,
70
more severe winds, wildfire fuel (i.e. dry vegetation), and hotter and drier landscapes from
increased temperatures and extreme heat.
Populations
The vulnerable populations discussed above that are most at risk to increases in wildfire from
climate change are older adults, persons in poverty, and persons with chronic health conditions.
Older adults are almost three times more likely to die in a fire than the overall population (USFA
2017), and typically have increased mobility issues or mental health. Therefore, older adults,
especially those in the city living alone, have more difficulties evacuating to safe areas when there is
a need. Those in Rolling Hills with limited financial resources are more unlikely to retrofit their
homes to better resist climate-related hazards such as wildfires.
In addition to direct impacts, indirect impacts such as poor air quality also creates public health
hazards to the city. Recent California wildfires in August and September 2020 had areas of California
recording the worst air quality in the world and highlighted the hazards of secondary impacts from
wildfires, which could impact the city from fires throughout the State. Older adults and individuals
with chronic health conditions are likely to be impacted most by these secondary impacts. Also,
those with limited finances or without air conditioning would be impacted by secondary smoke
impacts that occur during local and regional wildfires. There is a high potential for wildfire impacts
on the vulnerable populations.
Infrastructure
All city infrastructure is located in a VHFHSZ. The critical infrastructure most at risk to increased
wildfire impacts would be access roads, bridle trails, above ground electrical utility lines, and water
systems. Portuguese Bend Road and Crest Road are critical for access to and evacuation from many
areas of the city. Wildfires may not significantly damage the infrastructure, but they could result in
closure or the inability to travel on them during wildfire events, which can isolate areas of the city
and create severe health and safety risks. There is a high potential for impacts to access roads from
wildfires.
Wildfires are unlikely to substantially damage trails directly, but they can force widespread trail
closures which are an important asset to the community. Above ground electrical lines are also at
risk from wildfires and could impact electricity services to residents in Rolling Hills. Water systems
could be directly affected by wildfires in addition to indirect impacts from water use from
firefighting activities and peakload water supply in remote portions of the city. There is a medium
potential for impact to these infrastructures.
Building and Facilities
As discussed under Hazards of Concern section, all of Rolling Hills is designated a VHFHSZ.
Therefore, all buildings and facilities within the city are at risk of increased wildfires caused by
climate change. The greatest potential impact of life and well-being would be to residential
structures, which are the primary structures in the city. In addition, impacts to Rolling Hills
Community Association and City Hall structures would impact community functions and government
services. There is a high potential for impact to buildings and facilities from wildfire.
71
Climate Change Vulnerability
33
Services
Energy delivery, specifically electricity delivery, could be impacted from increased wildfires. Direct
impacts to Southern California Edison electricity transmission infrastructure could impact power in
the city. In addition, utility companies have begun shutting off power to areas to avoid wildfires
during times when weather creates high wildfire risk. In addition, public safety services could be
strained during wildfire events, which are expected to increase. There is a medium potential for
impacts to services in the city from wildfire.
Adaptive Capacity
Adaptive capacity is the current ability to cope with climate change impacts to community
populations and assets (Cal OES 2020). Specifically, adaptative capacity is the ability to mitigate the
potential impacts and damages or take advantage of the opportunities from climate change. Many
communities have adaptive capacity in the form of policies, plans, programs, or institutions. Rolling
Hills has actively taken steps to increase the city’s adaptive capacity, which include preparing a
community wildfire protection plan, hazard mitigation plan, undergrounding utility lines, and
adopting strict new building standards. Table 5 lists various guiding documents, projects, plans, and
policies that have an underlying emphasis on adaptive capacity in the city.
Table 5 Rolling Hills Existing Adaptive Capacity
Project, Policy, or Plan Year Established Climate Change
Impact
City of Rolling Hill Community Wildfire Protection Plan 2020 Wildfire
City of Rolling Hills Safety Element 2003 Wildfire, Storms
California Water Service Palos Verdes Water District Urban Water
Management Plan
2016 Drought
Utility Undergrounding Requirement n/a Wildfire
Fire Prevention Power Line Undergrounding 2020 Wildfire
RHMC Chapter 8.30: Fire Fuel Abatement n/a Wildfire
Hazard Mitigation Plan 2019 Wildfire, Drought,
Storm-induced
Landslides
Emergency Operations Plan 2020 Wildfire, Storm,
Extreme Heat
Emergency Notification and Notify Me n/a Wildfire, Storms
VHFHSZ Building Requirements n/a Wildfire
Rolling Hills Municipal Code Requirements for lot slope and lot stability n/a Storm-Induced
Landslides
Rolling Hills has a number of plans and policies specific to wildfire hazards. The city’s recently
adopted the Community Wildfire Protection Plan that includes fire mitigation strategies and
evacuations strategies specific for the city. In addition, the Hazard Mitigation Plan provides an
analysis of historical hazards, a local hazard assessment, hazard impacts on the community, and
recommended mitigation strategies. The City requires the undergrounding of utility lines with
specific home upgrades and has a reimbursement program for utility pole replacement. In addition,
72
building code requirements for development within VHFHSZ, such as Class A roofing, would help
reduce wildfire impacts to structures in the city.
The Rolling Hills Building and Zoning Codes include controls on development on steep slopes and
canyon bottoms. In addition, development requires proof of stability of the property through
geotechnical reports and only a percentage of each lot can be disturbed.
The Palos Verdes Water District’s Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) provides water supply
and demand projections and includes a climate change analysis. The 2015 UWMP projected that
water supply reductions to the District due to climate change would be small for through the end of
the century. In addition, the UWMP includes a water shortage contingency plan and demand
reduction measures in the event water supply to the District is impacts from drought due to climate
change.
In addition, the city’s population has a high degree of adaptive capacity due to the high levels of
home ownership, low poverty levels, and high average income levels. These characteristics improve
resident’s ability to upgrade their homes and come back from potential impacts to their property
from wildfire and extreme storm events.
Vulnerability Scoring
Vulnerability scores are based on the combination of potential impacts from climate hazards and
adaptive capacity in order to identify the climate vulnerabilities in the city to address with additional
adaptation strategies. A vulnerability score was determined for each sensitivity area based on the
potential impacts and adaptive capacity from climate change in the city. Vulnerability was accessed
on a scale from 1 to 5:
▪ V-1: Minimal Vulnerability
▪ V-2: Low Vulnerability
▪ V-3: Moderate Vulnerability
▪ V-4: High
▪ V-5: Severe
Cal OES recommended the following scoring rubric to determine the vulnerability score for the
potential impacts and adaptive capacity.
▪ Low Potential Impact: Impact is unlikely based on projected exposure; would
result in minor consequences to public health, safety, and/or other metrics of concern
▪ Medium Potential Impact: Impact is somewhat likely based on projected exposure; would
result in some consequences to public health, safety, and/or other metrics of concern
▪ High Potential Impact: Impact is highly likely based on projected exposure; would result in
substantial consequences to public health, safety, and/or other metrics of concern
▪ Low Adaptive Capacity: The population or asset lacks capacity to manage climate impact; major
changes would be required
▪ Medium Adaptive Capacity: The population or asset has some capacity to manage climate
impact; some changes would be required
▪ High Adaptive Capacity: The population or asset has high capacity to manage climate impact;
minimal to no changes are required
73
Climate Change Vulnerability
35
Table 6 shows how the final vulnerability score was determined. To summarize, potential impacts
from climate change that are highly likely to occur in the city based on projected exposure would
create a high vulnerability score. However, if the city has a high adaptive capacity to manage the
impact, then the overall vulnerability score would be reduced.
Table 6 Vulnerability Score Matrix Potential Impacts High V-3 V-4 V-5
Medium V-2 V-3 V-4
Low V-1 V-2 V-3
High Medium Low
Adaptive Capacity
The vulnerability scoring for the identified population and assets for each climate impact is included
below in Table 7 and based on Cal OES California Adaptation Planning Guide. For those populations
and assets that are not anticipated to be impacted directly or indirectly from the identified climate
impacts, no vulnerabilty score or color is provided. For example, drought impacts on children were
determined to not be a threat in Rolling Hills.
For the purposes of this vulnerability assessment, a score of V-4 or V-5 is considered significant.
Populations and assets that score at least a V-4 for one or more exposures are considered
substantially vulnerable. As shown in Table 7, the potential impacts from climate change the city’s
population and assets are most vulnerable to are wildfire, extreme heat, and landslides. Vulnerable
populations such as older adults, residents with chronic health conditions, and those with financial
trouble are most at risk to extreme heat and wildfire impacts and are substantially vulnerable to
climate change impacts in the city. Access roads and residential structures are also the most
vulnerable to wildfire and landslide impacts from climate change. Overall, climate change impacts
on wildfire are the greatest potential impact to the city. While the City has adopted a significant
number of adaptation strategies related to wildfire impacts, because they were recently adopted
and some of the strategies were included as recommendations, it will be important to determine
and monitor if implementation is occurring and which recommendations should be included in the
Safety Element update.
This vulnerability assessment and the results in Table 7 will be used to identify specific policies and
implementable strategies for adapting to climate change in the Safety Element, thus making the
Rolling Hills community more resilient.
74
Table 7 Vulnerability Assessment Results
Community Sensitivity Storms/Extreme Weather Extreme Heat Wildfire Landslides
Population
Children V-3 V-2 V-2
Persons with Chronic
Health Conditions
V-2 V-4 V-4 V-2
Persons in Poverty V-2 V-3 V-4 V-2
Renters V-3 V-2 V-2
Older Adults V-2 V-4 V-4 V-2
Limited English Speaking V-2 V-2
Infrastructure
Access Roads V-2 V-4 V-3
Bridle Trails V-2 V-3 V-2
Electrical Substations V-1 V-2 V-3
Electrical Utility Lines V-2 V-1 V-3 V-2
Natural Gas Transmission
Pipelines
V-2 V-2
Water Reservoirs and
Systems
V-1 V-2 V-3 V-3
Buildings and Facilities
Residential Structures V-1 V-5 V-3
Community Facilities and
Government Buildings
V-1 V-4 V-1
Community Parks V-1 V-1 V-3 V-3
Schools V-1 V-3 V-1
Public Safety Facilities V-1 V-3 V-1
Services
Public Safety Response V-2 V-3 V-1
Water Services V-2 V-2 V-3 V-2
Energy Delivery V-2 V-3 V-4 V-2
Notes: Drought was not included in this table because the city’s vulnerability to drought is primarily low. White boxes indicate very low to now vulnerability.
75
Summary of Issues and Opportunities
37
Summary of Issues and Opportunities
Existing hazards of concern in the city that should be a major focus of the Safety Element update
include landslide and wildfire hazards. In addition, emergency response and evacuation should be a
focus due to the city’s accessibility issues. Climate change is expected to increase potential hazards
the city experiences. From the vulnerability analysis, the city is most vulnerable to wildfire impacts,
extreme heat, and landslides impacts from climate change.
Hazards of Concern and Community Sensitivity
While there are a number of hazards that could impacts the city, the following are hazards of
concern that pose the greatest challenge to the city.
Wildfire
The greatest hazard of concern for the city is wildfire as the entire city limits are within a VHFHSZ
and the city contains many remote areas and limited evacuation routes. Some existing residential
and accessory structures are not built to current standards that apply to VHFHSZ and as a result
many of these structures may require mitigation and retrofit to reduce this potential threat. The
areas most vulnerable to wildfire impacts include older adults, persons with chronic health
conditions, residential structures, government and community buildings, and access roads.
Landslides
Landslides are also a major concern for the city, whether they are earthquake induced, induced
from high precipitation events, or occur due to the underlying soil conditions. Existing landslides are
impacting the southern portion of the city. Climate change has the potential to create more
landslide events if Rolling Hills experiences more intense storms and precipitation events. The areas
most vulnerable to landslide impacts include access roads, residential structures, and community
parks.
Extreme Heat
The city is expected to see increases in the number and length of extreme heat days and events due
to climate change, which could impact vulnerable people in the city and lead to increased wildfire
risks. The areas most vulnerable to extreme heat impacts from climate change include older adults,
persons with chronic health conditions, and the energy system.
Opportunities
The need to further analyze evacuation routes and access is one of the most recent changes in
Safety Element requirements. These new requirements focus on the identification of areas where
routes are lacking or inadequate. A key opportunity for the Safety Element update is address
specific evacuation needs.
The City has recently adopted a number of planning documents, such as the Hazard Mitigation Plan
and Community Wildfire Protection Plan, that seek to reduce the risk of hazards in the city. Many of
the strategies included in these documents are recommendations and are used for educational
purposes. An opportunity for the Safety Element update would be to include the recommendations
76
as implementation tools for the Safety Element and to conduct outreach with the community to
determine if community preparedness is occurring.
The California Legislature recently adopted Senate Bill 182 (SB 182) and is awaiting Governor
approval. SB 182 would require the Safety Element to include a comprehensive retrofit strategy as
necessary to reduce the risk of property loss and damage during wildfires. Additionally, in order to
reduce development pressures in the VHFHSZ through the Regional Housing Needs Allocation
process, SB 182 requires a lower proportion of state housing allocation to jurisdictions that meet
specified conditions. The City should monitor and incorporate these elements as necessary.
77
References
39
References
California Department of Toxic Substances and Control (DTSC). 2020. Envirostor.
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/?myaddress=rolling+hills%2C+ca. Accessed
August 2020.
California Department of Water Resources (DWR). 2019. Climate Change Basics. Available at
https://water.ca.gov/Water-Basics/Climate-Change-Basics. Accessed September 2020.
California Governors Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES). 2020. California Adaptation Planning
Guide. June 2020.
California Water Service (Cal Water). 2016. 2015 Urban Water Management Plan: Palos Verdes
District. June 2016.
Center for Disease Control (CDC). 2017a. Heat and Older Adults.
https://www.cdc.gov/disasters/extremeheat/older-adults-heat.html. Accessed September
2020.
____. 2017b. Heat and People with Chronic Medical Conditions.
https://www.cdc.gov/disasters/extremeheat/medical.html. Accessed September 2020.
____. 2019. Heat and Infants and Children.
https://www.cdc.gov/disasters/extremeheat/children.html. Accessed September 2020.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2008. Flood Insurance Rate Map 06037C1940F.
Goss, Michael et al. 2020. Climate change is increasing the likelihood of extreme autumn wildfire
conditions across California. Environmental Research Letters 15.094016
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2013. IPCC Fifth Assessment Report: Climate
Change 2013. Working Group I: The Physical Science Basis. Accessible at:
http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/
Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (LACSD). 2020. Lomita Station Part I Crimes.
http://shq.lasdnews.net/CrimeStats/CAASS/Patrol-CurrentMonth-YTD.PDF. Accessed
August 2020.
National Drought Mitigation Center. 2020. U.S. Drought Monitor: California. September 15, 2020.
https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/CurrentMap/StateDroughtMonitor.aspx?CA. Accessed
September 2020.
National Integrated Drought Information System (NIDIS). 2020. Drought in California.
https://www.drought.gov/drought/states/california. Accessed October 2020.
Rolling Hills, City of. 1990. General Plan Safety Element. June 25, 1990.
____. 2019. Hazard Mitigation Plan. January 16, 2019.
____. 2020. Community Wildfire Protection Plan. July 2020.
University of California, Berkeley and California Energy Commission (CEC). 2020. Cal-Adapt.
https://cal-adapt.org/. Accessed August 2020.
78
U.S. Census Bureau. 2018. Rolling Hills, City 2018 ACS 5-Year Estimates.
https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=Rolling%20Hills%20city,%20California&g=1600000U
S0662602&tid=ACSDP5Y2018.DP05&hidePreview=false.
Western Region Climate Center (WRCC). 2016. Period of Record Monthly Climate Summary.
https://wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl?ca8973. Accessed August 2020.
79
Regional Map – City of Rolling Hills
Rolling Hills
80
City Aerial Map – City of Rolling Hills
Rolling Hills
81
Project Map – City of Rolling Hills
Area
of
work
Rolling Hills
82
Aerial Crest Road East Area of Work Map – City of Rolling Hills
83
Staging Map – City of Rolling Hills
Staging Areas
(Easements only)
84
Aerial Project Map – City of Rolling Hills
Path of Power Lines
(To Be Undergrounded)
85
Project Pathway Map – City of Rolling Hills
86
City of ROLLING HILLS: Scope of Work
Project Description Summary:Paragraph summarizing proposed project
including the location, habitable structures, and acres treated, etc.
The proposed Hazardous Fuel Reduction project will take place within the city limits of
Rolling Hills located in the Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, with 685 homes and 1,960
residents. Project will target canyons in the community for fuel modification. The goal is
to reduce the fuel by 50% - 70% tonnage per acre in targeted canyons. Thus creating a
defensible space required to protect life and property in case of a damaging wildland
fire. We have identified 11 canyons with approximately 187 acres that can be treated to
provide protection to the communities of Rolling Hills. These canyons have been
identified using topography, local weather patterns, fuel load, fire history, and density of
homes. Environmental health, natural habitat for wildlife, and stable hillsides for erosion
control are considered in the plan. There are three primary ways to remove hazardous
fuels from the environment.
Prescribed Fire – a form of land management in which fire is intentionally
applied to vegetation. Prescribed fires are conducted under desired weather and
fuel conditions to meet specific objectives, such as to restore adapted
ecosystems or limit the amount of dry brush in area prone to wildfires.
Mechanical Fuel Treatments – are fuel treatments using machine activities
designed to change the size and arrangement of the bio mass. These treatment
methods include thinning, chipping, and pruning of lower tree branches.
Goats – are used for fuel load reduction in dense understory and utilized in
areas to rugged for mechanized equipment. This technique takes time and the
returning of goats to the sites of fuel mitigation for up to four years.
A. Scope of Work
This item is broken into project specific criteria for Hazardous Fuel Reduction:
Section 1:Hazardous Fuel Reduction/Removal of Dead or Dying Tree Projects
1. Describe the geographic scope of the project, including an estimate of the
number of habitable structures and the names of the general communities that
will benefit.
Many of the homes in Rolling Hills are located at the top of ridgelines with the canyon
drainages below. Canyons have large amounts of untreated vegetation that can
threaten the homes in wildfire. This project will focus on 11 canyons identified. This
project protects over 685 homes, 1,960 residents within the 3 miles squared in City of
Rolling Hills.
87
City of ROLLING HILLS: Scope of Work
2. Describe the goals, objectives, and expected outcomes of the project.
Fuel reduction projects and vegetation treatments have been proven as a means of
reducing wildfire hazards, catastrophic fire and its threat to public, firefighter safety, and
damage to property. The objective is to remove enough vegetation (fuel) so that when a
wildfire burns, it is less severe and can be easier to manage. When vegetation or fuel
accumulates, it allows fires to burn hotter, faster, and with higher flame lengths. When
fire encounters areas of continuous brush or small trees, it can burn these “ladder fuels”
and quickly move from a ground fire into treetops.
Our goal is to reduce the hazardous fuels identified by 50% - 70% of tonnage per acre
in Rolling Hills identified canyons. Create proper spacing for less fuel continuity to limit
fire spread and intensity of fire in steep canyons that can quickly travel up to structures
built on ridges and in saddles. The County of Los Angeles Fire Department has
categorized the canyons in the following way; canyons that would be at risk from wind
driven fires originating from the southwest. These canyons are Paint Brush Canyon,
Portuguese Canyon, Altamira Canyon, and Forrestal Canyon. Based on fire history
maps these south facing canyons have the highest risk for a wildfire in the future.
(see attached map RH_FXw_Canyon_020921)
Canyons that would be at high risk during northeast winds; Georgeff Canyon, Purple
Canyon, Willow Canyon, Sepulveda Canyon, Blackwater Canyon, John’s Canyon, Agua
Magna Canyon. Most medium or larger fuels are located in the bottom of drainages
with pockets of fuel on north facing slopes. Access to vegetation in the bottom of these
canyons would be difficult, so hauling out material for chipping would have to be
planned accordingly. Weed whip the fine fuels, target trees for removal which would
enhance better fuel spacing.
Some properties have extended the clearance from there fence line down mid slope into
the canyon below. This could set the example for other property owners to continue
fuels reduction in these canyons. Continue mid slope down into the canyon with homes
above, target vegetation for removal with spacing in mind, removing fuel continuity.
Some of the canyons do have access to use mechanical equipment and to chip
removed materials. Larger brush in the canyons could be trimmed up and ladder fuels
removed. Expected out come with these fuels reductions would help slow rate of
spread of fire, reduce flame lengths, lower amount of ember cast, reduce fire intensity in
case of wild fire. This would allow for better defensible space for structures and allow
firefighters opportunities to aggressively suppress wildland fire with ground and air
resources.
88
City of ROLLING HILLS: Scope of Work
3. Provide a clear rationale for how the proposed project will reduce the risks
associated with wildfire to structures within the WUI.
Rolling Hills Terrain is comprised of many large and steep canyons that are the targets
for this hazardous fuels reduction project. Each one of the canyons has homes lining
the ridgelines. Home owners have done a good job with brush clearance 100’ from
structures but with the heavy fuel load in the canyons below topography and wind driven
fires will threaten structures with flame lengths and ember cast. The alignment of the
canyons makes them more at risk from winds of different directions. Strategically
removing vegetation will give proper spacing to slow the rate of spread of fire in these
canyons. Trimming and liming trees will reduce ladder fuels and help to keep the fire
from getting into the canopy’s, this will reduce flame length and ember cast that could
threaten structures in the community.
4. Identify any additional assets at risk to wildfire that will benefit from the
proposed project. These may include, but are not limited to, domestic and
municipal water supplies, power lines, communication facilities and community
centers.
Two immediate communities with schools and parks, mud and debris flow basins and
high voltage transmission lines. General communities that will benefit will be City of
Rolling Hills. Neighboring cities would benefit on the Peninsula, Palos Verdes, Palos
Verdes Hills, Rancho Palos Verdes, and also bordering south Bay City Torrance. The
Land Conservancies, Oil Refineries, Trump National Golf Course to the north, with port
of Los Angeles to the east. Palos Verdes Peninsula population is at 65,008.
5. Is the scale of the project appropriate to achieve the stated goals, objectives
and outcomes discussed in Item 2 above?
The scale of this project can be tailored to each individual canyon. With 11 canyons
identified each canyon will be on its own scale of difficulty. The amount of funding
appropriated through the grant for the project should go to the greater good of the
community. Focus on canyons with highest threat of fire. With vegetation management
there is always ongoing maintenance every year. The project is appropriate and
achievable as it is tailored to each canyon, the canyons will not be completely altered
manicured landscape. In some of the identified canyons the amount of money to fund
the removal would exceed the grant funds. So the prescription on those canyons would
be to build on what the city and property owners have already done. Focus on fuel
modification from the structures to the canyon bottoms. This project can be the
example of what the community needs to keep moving forward towards the achievable
outcome of canyons with less fire hazards toward the community.
89
City of ROLLING HILLS: Scope of Work
B. Degree of Risk
1. Discuss the location of the project in relation to areas of moderate, high, or
very high fire hazard severity zone as identified by the latest Fire and Resource
Assessment Program maps.
According to the latest Fire and Resource Assessment Program map, The Rolling Hills
the Local Responsible Area (LRA), is a Very High Fire Hazard
Severity Zone (VHFHSZ). Very High Severity Zones and what they are: Government
Code 51175-89 directs the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL
FIRE) to identify areas of very high fire hazard severity zones within Local
Responsibility Areas (LRA). Mapping of the areas, referred to as Very High Fire
Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ), is based on data and models of, potential fuels over
a 30-50 year time horizon and their associated expended fire behavior, and expected
burn probabilities to quantify the likelihood and nature of vegetation fire exposure
(including firebrands) Local Responsibility Area VHFHS2 maps were initially developed
in the mid-1990s and are now being updated based on improve models incorporating
wind as well. These new maps should be out sometime in the next year.
(see attached map losanglescounty)
90
Palos Verdes Dr S
AguaArmaga
CanyonOpen
Space
LosVerdesGolf
Course
Monaco
RanchoPalos
Verdes
213
Crest Rd Pal
os
VerdesDrN
Pal os Verdes Dr N
HighridgeRdCrenshaw Bl vd
Palos
Ve
r
desDrSPalos
V
e
r
desDrS
W9thSt
W25thSt
TrumpNational
GolfClub
ForrestalNature
Preserve
Portuguese
BendNature
Preserve
AbaloneCove
ShorelinePark
DeaneDana
FriendshipPark
GeorgeF
CanyonNature
Parkand
Preserve
Miraleste
OCEAN
FIRE; 1992
PALOS VERDES
FIRE; 1992
SAN RAMON
FIRE; 1995
CREST FIRE;
1993 SAN
CLEMENTE; 2005
PV; 2009
SantaClarita
LongBeach
LosAngeles
Angeles
NationalForest Rolling Hills Peninsula:
Fire History and Canyons at Risk
(1992 to 2020)
FPU
NAD 83
02/09/21
0 10.5 Km
0 10.5 MiNorth East South West Other
1992 1993 1995 2005 2009
Potential Fire Risk From:
Historical Fire Year:
91
118"54'0"W 118"48'0"W 118'42'0"W 118'36'0"W 118'30'0'W 118°24'0'W 118°18'0"W 118°12'0'W 118"6'0'W 118"0'0'W 117°54'0"W 117°48'0"W 11T42'0"W 117"36'0"W
VERY HIGH FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES IN LRA
34"54'0"N
I
34°4S'~"N
34'42'0"N
34"36'0"N
34"30'0"N
34"24'0"N
34"1 S'O"N
34"12'0"N
34"6'0"N
34"0'0"N
33 '54'0"N
33''48'0"N
33' 42'0"N
33 ' 36 '0"N
/
I
I I
L/ ! 'i°' • -;,__ '1'
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
,/
/
\
I
'·
0 \.\,:
\
\ ~ \-
\ -'--,,
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\___
\
\
\
\
\
\
' :3
"1
• ..o _)
' ( .,
\
I
\ '
\-f
\
\
\
I
\
\
l
I
\ ,..1_-~
Santa Catalina
Island
1,500 000
' .,-;-..(
\' 11'
' \.
\
-
1 2 000.000
The State of California and the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection make no representations
or warranties regarding the accuracy of data or maps. Neither the State nor the Department shall be
liable under any circumstances for any direct, special, incidental, or consequential damages with
respect to any claim by any user or third party on account of, or arising from, the use of data or maps.
Obtain FRAP maps, data, metadata and publications on the Internet at http://frap.cdf.ca.gov
For more information, contact CDF-FRAP, PO Box 944246, Sacramento, CA 94244-2460, (916) 327-3939.
As Recommended By CAL FIRE
--------------------------------I
'
'
,......._..,_~ 1 } c:r,. .. ,,.,~\
1, '
l
,f
l
-+
r
+-
I
l l
08N
4
i
T
,-.c:,.--·-·-------------'
-...,-----~-~-------~-,~----\ -~-r · I 1·------------I ,' ---•-·--""-·,) i/ . . { , I
0 N
i
T
-l-.
r
T
t
'
Three Points
I
Jf I '. I
' ! ~-
r
I
I
-t
I
I f
l
t
~-
T
I
i
J
1-
f
-i:----
' "
t
=
-+
'
---·-
+
r f-I
\
t+'-
i
I ,,
> ,'
)
I
I
+
i I
=!
!
~-.1--~~
1
!
.I
1--t
I -,-'
I
I
I
'I __
I
_J
I
i
I -,
' J
~
I
1
I __L•
I
o
I
(/)
~ -r· a:i "4+--'1 rn I -I\ ::0 \,.,, l' z C I ' -,.... ~ / \ ......... ,:...,' ::0
I • • I
~! \\ 0
R. ir ' ic, i Z 11:_:, ~~'"es --i Q
'•·.,,,
I \ o i o
C -,
:._.-. I z ,:;-·, • • __j
l~j -, -<
SI •
,r"-~ -....._/
~="l --j-----~ \
.J,
I
' I
I
San Clemente
Island
1 ;500 ,000
..
: ; : :,;.: : " ;
.
/
~.;-~,-,,,
'~,)
,.. ... L
. ~,ttll"~~l~!!j
0
: : :,~:: '.: ;,;;~ +:: ::,:: :1.
'; ( : : : : . .. ·,~-
N
" ''
w -;;;;,/ kE
I I /i \I
'
s
- -
'} ----
\j
- - -
Miles
0 10 - -- - -
Kilometers
California Teale Albers, NAO 1983
Scale 1: 150,000
at 35 .5" X 46"
September 2011
Jerry Brown, Governor, State of California
John Laird, Secretary for Resources, The Natural Resources Agency
Ken Pimlott, Director, Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
\
\ ~t~~~i,~d~;f -?.
: :,: '.:,:i ::: ,;:;;;;J : ;:': :}::-:. . . .... : fJ.;.; : ;-;.; :.· .....
_; '. ';'.': :,: {-
.-,-.. ,_,.
ORANGE COUNTY
Fire Hazard Severity Zones
Local Responsib1l1tyArea state or Federal Responsib1l1ty Areas
-VHFHSZ
1111 Non-VHFHSZ
D Incorporated Cities
----· County Boundary
VHFHSZ
Non-VHFHSZ
'
Government Code 51175-89 directs the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) to identify
areas of very high fire hazard severity zones within Local Responsibility Neas (LRA). Mapping of the areas, refetTed
lo as Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ), is based on data and mocJels of, potential fuels over a 30-50
year time horizon and their associated expeded fire behavior, and expected burn probabilities to quantify the likelihood
and nature of vegetation fire exposure (including firebrands) to buildings Details on the project and speci"fic modeling
methodology can be found al http·/lfra p cdf ca .govlp roje_ct51ha zar d/,mel h ocJs l,t r,:1 Local Responsibility Area VHFHS2
maps were initially developed in the mid-1990s and are now being updated based on improved science
mapping techniques and data
In late 2005 to be effective in 2008 the California Building Comm1ss1on adopted California Bu1ld1ng Code Chapter ?A
requ1r1ng nev.-buildings in VH FHS2s to use 1gnit1on resistant construction methocJs and materials These ne-.v codes
include provisions to improve the ignition resistance of bu1ld1ngs, especially from firebrands. The updated very high fire
hazard severity zoo es will be used by building officials for ne-,v building permits in LRA. The updated zones will also be
used to 1dent1fy property whose owners must comply with natural hazards disclosure requirements at time of property
sale and 100 foot defensible space clearance It 1s likely that the fire hazard seventy zones will be used for updates to
the safety element of general plans .
This specific map 1s based on a geographic 1nfamat1on system dataset that depicts final CAL FIRE recommendations
for Very High FHSZs within the local jurisdiction The process of finalizing these boundarie5 involved an e:-::tensive local
review proces5. the details ofwh1ch are available at htt p ://frap .cdf .ca .gov/projec tS/ha za rd/bln et /(cl1ck on "Coot1nue
as guest without logging in"J-Local government ha5 120 days to designate, by ordinance, very high fire hazard severity
zones within its jurisdiction after receiving the recommendation Local government can add additional VHFHSZs.
There is no requirement for local government to report their final action to CAL FIRE when the recommended zones are
adopted. Consequently, u5ers are directed lo the appropriate local entity (county, city, fire department, or Fire
Protectioo District) to determine the status of the local 1ire hazard severity zone ordinance
'
I
I
I
--
------------
,:-·-·J
' '• I '· . '-'
i
I ---'-
' -,
' ' '· ' \
' '· ' \
'
-----
' ·, -,_
MAP IDI VHFHSZmap_19
DATA SOURCES
CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZL06_ 1)
CAL FIRE Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA-Los Angeles (c19fhszl06_5)
CAL FIRE Incorporated Cities (lncorp10_3) 92
Three priority locations
identified by the Fire
Department:
(1) near the end of
Quail Ridge Road,
(2) Paintbrush Canyon
along the length of
the Paintbrush
Canyon Creek
within the limits of
Rolling Hills,
(3) south of Running
Brand Road
1
2
3
93
GOOD EXAMPLES
94
95
96
BAD EXAMPLES
97
98
99
100
Agenda Item No.: 5.D
Mtg. Date: 02/22/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:MEREDITH ELGUIRA, PLANNING DIRECTOR
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:ADOPT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA AMENDING TITLE 17 (ZONING) OF
THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD CHAPTER 17.19
(RANCHO DEL MAR HOUSING OPPORTUNITY OVERLAY ZONE)
ESTABLISHING AN OVERLAY ZONE TO ACCOMMODATE HOUSING
AND TO AMEND SECTION 17.08.010 (ZONES ESTABLISHED) OF
CHAPTER 17.08 (ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONES AND BOUNDARIES) TO
IDENTIFY THE OVERLAY ON THE ZONING MAP; AND APPROVING
THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; AND ADOPT A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2020-01,
AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT AND LAND USE POLICY MAP
TO ACCOMMODATE HOUSING; AND APPROVING THE NEGATIVE
DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
DATE:February 22, 2021
BACKGROUND:
On February 8, 2021, the City Council directed staff to finalize Ordinance No. 369 and Resolution No.
1270 for adoption at the next City Council meeting.
DISCUSSION:
Additional language in the Land Use Element was added to emphasize that the City of Rolling Hills, to
avoid penalties, is proposing to revise its land use element and zoning code to meet state mandates
requiring the City to provide affordable housing units within its boundaries. Mathematical clarifications
were also made to avoid misinterpretation of the application of the zoning code and land use element.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost of preparing the ordinance, resolution and CEQA compliance is included in the adopted budget
for FY 2020-2021.
101
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Ordinance No. 369, an ordinance amending Title 17 (Zoning) of the City of Rolling Hills
Municipal Code to add Chapter 17.19 (Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Zone) establishing an
overlay zone to accommodate multiple housing, emergency shelter and single room occupancy and
amending Section 17.08.010 of Chapter 17.08 (Establishment of Zones and Boundaries) to identify the
overlay on the zoning map and approving the Negative Declaration 2020-01 in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
Adopt Resolution No. 1270 of the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills, adopting General Plan
Amendment 2020-01 to the City of Rolling Hills General Plan, an amendment to the General Plan to
adopt the Land Use Element Amendment and Land Use Policy Map Amendment; and approving
Negative Declaration 2020-01 in accordance with CEQA.
ATTACHMENTS:
CEQA.pdf
Ordinance No. 369 RDMO.pdf
CC Resolution 1270.pdf
102
Environmental – Planning – Engineering
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing
Overlay Zone
Initial Study –Negative Declaration
prepared for
City of Rolling Hiils
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, California 90274
prepared by
CSG Consultants, Inc.
3707 W. Garden Grove Boulevard, Suite 100
Orange, California 90274
November 2020
103
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. Page | 2 November 2020
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION 6
1.1. Background 7
1.2 Purpose and Legal Authority 7
1.3 Lead Agency 8
2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 9
2.1 Project Title 9
2.2 Lead Agency Name and Address 9
2.3 Contact Person Name and Phone Number 9
2.4 Project Location 9
2.5 General Plan Designation 9
2.6 Zoning 9
2.7 Project Description 9
2.8 Required Approvals 14
2.9 Tribal Consultation 14
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 15
3.1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected 16
3.2 Lead Agency Determination 17
4.0 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 17
4.1 Aesthetics 17
4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources 21
4.3 Air Quality 25
4.4 Biological Resources 30
4.5 Cultural Resources 35
4.6 Energy 37
4.7 Geology and Soils 39
4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 47
4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 51
4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality 60
4.11 Land Use and Planning 65
4.12 Mineral Resources 67
4.13 Noise 70
4.14 Population Housing 73
4.15 Public Services 75
4.16 Recreation 80
104
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. Page | 3 November 2020
4.17 Transportation and Traffic 82
4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources 85
4.19 Utilities and Service Systems 88
4.20 Wildfire 92
4.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance 97
5.0 REFERENCES 99
FIGURES
1. Regional Map 103
2. Project Location 104
3. Existing and Proposed Project Site 105
4. Landslide Hazard Zones 106
5. Fault Zones ______ 107
6. Clean Up Sites 108
7. Fire Hazard Zones 109
TABLES
Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning 110
105
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. Page | 4 November 2020
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
ALUC Airport Land Use Commission
AQMP Air Quality Management Plan
ARB Air Resources Board
AB Assembly Bill
CAL Fire California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
Action Plan California Energy Efficiency Action Plan
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CNDDB California Natural Diversity Database
Cal Water California Water Service Company
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
CAP Climate Action Plan
CWPP Community Wildfire Protection Plan
CC&Rs Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions
DOC Department of Conservation
DOF Department of Finance
DPH Department of Public Health
DDW Division of Drinking Water
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
FHSZ Fire Hazard Severity Zone
GWP Global Warming Potential
GHG Greenhouse Gases
HCP Habitat Conservation Plan
HCD Housing and Community Development
IS Initial Study
LU Land Use
LAMP Local Agency Management Program
LRA Local Resources Area
LAC Los Angeles County
LACFD Los Angeles County Fire Department
LACSD Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department
MOU Memorandum of Understanding
MRZ Mineral Resources Zone
MWD Municipal Water District
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NCCP Natural Community Conservation Plan
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
106
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. Page | 5 November 2020
NAHC Native American Heritage Commission
SB 18 Native American Heritage Commission Establishment
AB 52 Native American Historic Resource Protection Act
NCCP Natural Community Conservation Plan
ND Negative Declaration
NO2 Nitrogen Oxide
NOWTS Non-Conventional Onsite Wastewater Treatment
OWTS Onsite Wastewater Treatment System
OZD-1 Overlay Zone District 1
O2 Ozone
PVPTA Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority
PVUSD Palos Verdes Unified School District
PM-25 Particulate Matter
RTD Regional Transit District
RAS-1 Residential Agriculture Suburban 1+ Acres
RAS-2 Residential Agriculture Suburban 2+ Acres
RHCA Rolling Hills Community Association
RPV Runway Protection Zone
SB Senate Bill
SVP Society of Vertebrate Paleontology
SCAQMD Southern California Air Quality Management District
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SRA State Resources Area
SR State Route
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management Systems
USDA United States Department of Agriculture
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled
VHFSSZ Very High Fire Standard Severity Zone
107
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. Page | 6 November 2020
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This document constitutes an Initial Study (IS) that evaluates the potential environmental effects
of the City of Rolling Hills’ (City; Rolling Hills) proposed overlay zone at the property at 38 Crest
Road West (Project; proposed Project), also known as the Palos Verdes Unified School District
school site; the addition of a Mixed-Use Multi-Family Overlay Zone (Rancho Del Mar Affordable
Housing Overlay Zone); all associated General Plan Land Use Element updates; as well as all
related Zoning Ordinance and associated Map changes.
The proposed Project would establish a new mixed-use, multi-family overlay zone that would
accommodate the existing uses on the site, as well as allow for new multi-family units to be
developed at a future date. The proposed Project would include:
• The creation of a new overlay designation – Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay
Zone;
• Amendments to the City’s General Plan Land Element and Map;
• Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance (Title 17 of the Municipal Code) and related zoning map
to add the new “Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone”. The City has one other
overlay zone that has been adopted and mapped for an area of smaller lots and steep terrain.
(See Rolling Hills Municipal Code Chapter 17.17 (Overlay Zoning District – 1 (OZD-1).) The
number of units allowed by the “base” General Plan designation on this site must be clustered;
in other words, the overlay allows 15 multi-family units on this site by right.
• Preparation of an Initial Study/Negative Declaration (IS/ND) for the Proposed Project.
The City is undertaking this Project as part of its Housing Element Update. The zone change and
new overlay zone will enable the City of Rolling Hills to accommodate its RHNA allocations under
the 4th and 5th Cycle RHNA requirements, including accommodation of affordable housing units
as well as emergency shelters and Single Room Occupancy Housing. The total number of units that
will be accommodated “by right” under the 4th and 5th Cycles would be a total of 15 units,
including low income units and very low income units. Though emergency shelters and Single
Room Occupancy (SRO) residential uses are also currently permitted under the City’s Municipal
Code and may be allowed in the future, these units will not be allowed to be counted as the total
dwelling units required under the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for all future
Cycles. Additionally, the proposed Project would also allow for the continued use of the public
facilities, schools and transportation facilities at the site.
The Project site is not currently proposed for development. The development of a new overlay
zone, and all associated General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Map changes are currently being
undertaken by the City so as to provide the opportunity for additional housing on the site in the
future.
This document concludes that a Negative Declaration (ND) is the appropriate level of
environmental review for the proposed Project. Therefore, the IS/ND has been prepared in
accordance with Public Resources Code (PRC) Section §21000 et seq. and the California
108
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. Page | 7 November 2020
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), California Code of Regulations Section §15000 et seq. It
evaluates the potential environmental effects associated with the proposed Project.
1.1 Background
A jurisdiction’s General Plan is intended to maintain and augment its built and natural
environments, as well as to provide a vision for future development. Its Zoning Ordinance is
therefore one of its main tools to implement the jurisdiction’s land use policies and guide any
development. Any changes to a jurisdiction’s land use may typically require changes to its land
use and associated zoning.
The City of Rolling Hills adopted its first General Plan in June of 1990 and incorporated goals and
policies for six Elements - Land Use, Open Space and Conservation, Safety, Noise, Circulation, and
Housing. The Housing Element was last updated in 2014 to address the Planning period from 2014-
2021. The City’s Zoning Ordinance was originally published in 1979 with updates made to
incorporate an Overlay Zoning District (OZD-1) in 2012. As of February 24, 2020, the Zoning
Ordinance has been brought up to date through Ordinance No. 364.
1.2 Purpose and Legal Authority
In accordance with State CEQA Guidelines, the City of Rolling Hills, as the Lead Agency, has made
the determination that the preparation of an Initial Study is the appropriate level of environmental
review for the proposed Project. An Initial Study is conducted by a lead agency to determine
whether a project may have significant environmental impacts. If so, then the agency shall further
find than an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is appropriate to analyze the Project’s impacts.
However, if the lead agency finds that there is no evidence of the Project’s significant impacts on
the environment, then the lead agency shall prepare a Negative Declaration (ND) or a Mitigated
Negative Declaration (MND) for the proposed Project. Per the State CEQA Guidelines Section
§15070 MND or ND shall be prepared for a Project when:
a) The initial study shows there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before
the agency, that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment; or,
b) The initial study identifies potentially significant effects; but:
(1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before
the proposed negative declaration is released for public review would avoid the effects
or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur; and,
(2) There is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency, that the
proposed project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment.
If revisions are adopted in the proposed project in accordance with CEQA Guidelines
SectionI§15070(b), including the adoption of the mitigation measures included in the document,
then a mitigated negative declaration can be prepared.
109
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. Page | 8 November 2020
According to the State CEQA Guidelines, this IS/ND is intended as an informational document that
is required to be adopted by the Rolling Hills City Council. Based on the analysis provided by this
IS/ND, the City has determined that the proposed rezoning and establishment of a new mixed-use
multi-family overlay zone, also known as the Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone,
is the appropriate designation for the Project site. The City is also undertaking the necessary
General Plan Land Use Element, and Housing Element updates as well as all related Zoning
Ordinance and map changes, as required under the Proposed Project. The approximate 31-acre site
located at 38 Crest Road West (also known as the Palos Verdes Unified School District School site)
would not result in significant impacts on the environment from revisions to the City’s Zoning
Ordinance. However, any future land use changes and development pursuant to these revisions to
the Zoning Ordinance would be further subject to additional environmental review, as
appropriate.
1.3 Lead Agency
As defined by CEQA, the Lead Agency for a proposed Project is the public agency with primary
responsibility for carrying out or approving the Project (CEQA Guidelines Section §15367. The lead
agency then has discretionary authority over the proposed Project. Where two or public agencies
are involved in a project, CEQA Guidelines Section §15051(b)(1) states that “the lead agency will
normally be the agency with general governmental powers, such as a city or county, rather than
an agency with a single or limited purpose”. Based on these criteria, the City is the Lead Agency
for the purposes of the proposed Project.
110
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. Page | 9 November 2020
2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
1. PROJECT TITLE:
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
2. LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS:
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
3. CONTACT PERSON NAME AND PHONE NUMBER:
Meredith T. Elguira
Planning Director
(310) 377-1521
4. PROJECT LOCATION:
38 Crest Road West, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 (see Figures 1 and 2).
5. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
The project site is designated “Very Low-Density Residential 2+ Net Acres/Dwelling Unit”
in the Rolling Hills General Plan. This allows for the development of single-family
residential units on two or more acre lots.
6. ZONING:
The project site is currently zoned - Residential Agriculture – Suburban with a minimum
lot size of two acres (RAS-2).
7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Project Location
The Project site is located in Los Angeles County, at 38 Crest Road West, City of Rolling
Hills (Figure 1: Regional Location Map). It has a total acreage of 31.14 acres, with 27.58
acres of developed land and open areas and 3.56 acres of private access roadways (Figure
2: Project Location Map). The site is situated at the southern end of the City’s jurisdiction
and is bounded by Crest Road West to the north, open spaces and residential uses to the
east, south and west. State Highway 1 (SR-1) is approximately 3 miles to the north of the
site, while Interstate 110 (I-110) is approximately miles to the east. The Pacific Ocean is 1.5
miles to the south and 3.5 miles to the west of the project site and the City. Access to the
Project site is from Crest Road West.
111
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. Page | 10 November 2020
112
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
CSG Consultants, Inc. Page | 11 November 2020
113
Environmental – Planning – Engineering
Project Site
The approximate 31-acre site currently houses the Rancho Del Mar High School building, the Beach
Cities Learning Center, and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority (PVP Transit Authority;
PVPTA). This parcel of land is owned by the Palos Verdes Unified School District (PVUSD) and
has an existing school (Rancho Del Mar School) located at this site. However, the Rancho Del Mar
School facility is not being utilized as a school site at the present time. Access to the Project site is
through a private roadway that veers off Crest Road West. A few unpaved internal roadways
traverse the site. The site slopes from east to west, from the Beach Cities Learning Center to the
Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority, with an approximate 38 feet drop from east end of the
Project site. Vegetation on-site consists of a few trees around the existing buildings and a mix of
grasses and paved areas. The portion of the PVP Transit Authority site is primarily paved, with
few buildings, parking areas and storage buildings. The site is currently zoned Residential
Agriculture Suburban-2-Acres (RAS-2) and has a General Plan Land Use designation of Very Low-
Density Residential 2+ Net Acres.
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
Immediate land uses around the Project site are primarily large lot residential. Los Angeles County
Fire Station 56 is approximately 1,OOO feet to the east of the site, while St. John Fisher Church and
School site are about 2,000 feet to the east. Del Cerro Park is about 2,00 feet to the south-west of the
Project site (Table 1: Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning)
Project Components
The proposed Project would establish a new overlay zone (Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing
Overlay Zone) that would accommodate the existing uses on the site, as well as allow for new
multi-family and emergency shelters and Single Room Occupancy housing units to be developed
in the future (Figure 3: Existing and Proposed Zoning Map). The proposed Project would also
require the appropriate amendments to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Land Use
Map, and the Zoning Ordinance text and Map in order to accommodate the creation of the new
overlay zone. These changes would then allow for future construction of 15 clustered multi-family
units, consistent with the one unit/acre designation.
Table 1: Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning
Location Jurisdiction Zoning Designation
North of
the Project
Site
City of Rolling Hills Residential Agriculture Suburban –
2-Acres (RAS-2)
South of
the Project
Site
City of Rancho Palos
Verdes
Residential Single Lot – 20, 000
Square Feet
East of the
Project Site
City of Rolling Hills Residential Agriculture Suburban –
1-Acre (RAS-1)
West of the
Project Site
City of Rancho Palos
Verdes
Residential Single Lot – 20, 000
Square Feet
114
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 13 City of Rolling Hills
115
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 14 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following specific components:
• Preparation of a Negative Declaration for the General Plan and Zoning Amendment and associated
map changes.
• Amendment to the General Plan Land Use Element to add new Overlay zone designation to be
known as the Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. The associated land use map is
being amended to add the overlay to the 31-acre Palos Verdes Unified School District (PVUSD) site
on Crest Road (also known as the Rancho Del Mar High School Site). Other amendments to the
Land Use Element will be made as needed to recognize that multi-family uses are permitted and
anticipated within this overlay area.
• Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance (Title 17 of the Municipal Code) and related zoning map to
add the “Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone”. The City has one other overlay zone
that has been adopted and mapped for an area of smaller lots and steep terrain. (See Rolling Hills
Municipal Code Chapter 17.17 (Overlay Zoning District – 1 (OZD-1).) The number of units allowed
by the “base” General Plan designation on this site must be clustered; in other words, the overlay
allows 15 multi-family units on this site by right.
However, the Project is currently not being developed with any structures at the site. The proposed
overlay zone that would allow for the addition of new multi-family units would also assist the City
in meeting its future housing requirements mandated under the California Department of Housing
and Community Development (CA HCD). The City of Rolling Hills will be able to accommodate
its 4th and 5th Cycle housing needs for its Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), including
accommodation of affordable housing units. The new Overlay Zone will also accommodate
emergency shelters and Single Room Occupancy Housing as part of the Housing Element Update.
It should be noted, however, that the environmental review under this IS/ND (Rancho Del Mar
Affordable Housing Overlay Zone District IS/ND) is to only evaluate all the planning document
level changes that are being currently proposed (addition of a new overlay zone for the City, related
changes to the City’s Zoning Ordinance and Map, and changes in the related General Plan
Elements and Map). Any future new housing projects that may result from these document level
changes would require their own environmental reviews, before any development changes are
approved for the Project site. The City will thus undertake the appropriate level of environmental
review as Projects at this site are proposed and developed.
Project Approvals
As the Lead Agency, the City of Rolling Hills City Council has the ultimate authority to
approve or deny the Project. The proposed Project will require the following approvals:
• Adoption of the Initial Study/ Negative Declaration
• Creation of a new overlay zone (Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone)
• Amendments to the City of Rolling Hills General Plan Land Use Element
• Amendments to the City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance Text
• Amendments to the General Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map
116
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 15 City of Rolling Hills
8. REQUIRED APPROVALS:
The City of Rolling Hills is the Lead Agency for the proposed Project, which is the creation of a
new overlay zone (Rancho Del Mar Overlay Zone), amendment to the City’s General Plan Land
Use Element, amendment to the related General Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map, and a
Zoning Ordinance text amendment to incorporate standards for the new overlay zone into Title 17
of the City’s Municipal Code . No discretionary approvals would be required from any other
agency.
9. HAVE CALIFORNIA NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBES AFFILIATED WITH THE
PROJECT AREA REQUESTED CONSULTATION PURSUANT TO PUBLIC
RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21080.3.1 IF SO, HAS HAD CONSULTATION BEEN
INITIATIED?
Tribal Consultation letters, pursuant to PRC §21080.3.1 were sent out by the City of Rolling Hills,
on October 16, 2020, in order to comply with the provisions of SB 18 and AB 52. A total of six
individual letters were sent to the following local tribes:
• Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation
• Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians
• Gabrielino/Tongva Nation
• Gabrielino Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council
• Gabrielino – Tongva Tribe
• Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians
117
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 16 City of Rolling Hills
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
3.1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project.
Aesthetics Agriculture and
Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology and Soils Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Hazards and Hazardous
Materials
Hydrology and Water
Quality
Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources
Noise Population/Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation/Traffi
c
Tribal Cultural Resources
Utilities and Service
Systems
Wildfire Findings of Mandatory
Significance
118
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 17 City of Rolling Hills
3.2 LEAD AGENCY DETERMINATION
Based on this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in
the Project have been made by or agreed to by the Project proponent. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed Project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed Project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or
“potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least
one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures
based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the
effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the
environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to
applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that
earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation
measures that are imposed upon the proposed Project, nothing further is
required.
Signature Agency
Printed Name/Title Date
119
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 18 City of Rolling Hills
4.0 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
4.1 Aesthetics
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista?
b. Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees,
rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a State Scenic
highway?
c. In non-urbanized areas, substantially
degrade the existing visual character
or quality of public views of the site
and its surroundings? (Public views
are those that are experienced from
publicly accessible vantage point). If
the project is in an urbanized area,
would the project conflict with
applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic quality?
d. Create a new source of substantial
light or glare which would adversely
affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills is characterized by beautiful wooded areas with deep canyons and hilly terrain
located on the Palos Verdes Peninsula. Views of the Pacific Ocean, Catalina Island, city lights, and Los
Angeles Harbor are special and unique qualities of property ownership in the City. It is located
approximately 3.5 miles from the Pacific Ocean to the west and 1.5 miles from the Pacific Ocean, to the
south.
Though the City is considered an urban area, it mainly encompasses large, open area parcels with walking
and horse-riding trails that characterize the City as a more rural area. Many of these parcels are located on
slopes, which allow for the preservation of large amounts of privately owned open spaces. Laced
throughout the community are approximately 25 miles of private equestrian trails that are enjoyed by both
120
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 19 City of Rolling Hills
residents and non-residents, so long as non-residents obtain a City-issued permit. Even with these amounts
of scenic views and natural vegetation, the City does not have any designated Scenic Highways. There are
not any streams or water bodies located within the City. Major roadways include Crest Drive located north
of the Project site and running east to west, Palos Verdes Drive located outside of City boundaries and
running east to west, and Crenshaw Boulevard, also located outside of City boundaries and running north
to south.
DICUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
A scenic vista is typically an area that offers a scenic vantagepoint of natural resources such as the
ocean, mountain ranges, and distant city skylines. For CEQA purposes, scenic vistas generally provide
expansive views of a highly valued landscape for the enjoyment and benefit of the public. Some of the
major scenic vistas within the City are those associated with the Pacific Ocean, the San Pedro Harbor,
and the skyline of neighboring cities. The proposed Project includes the following components: a)
update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and
map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable
Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future, would allow for taller multi-
family structures on the existing site that could have an impact on scenic vistas from surrounding
properties, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time
and therefore does not degrade the views of any scenic vista. All future development resulting from
the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to
comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy level
document, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific visual impacts to scenic vistas, at this level
of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Therefore, the proposed Project
would have a less than significant impact on scenic vistas.
b. Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
The City of Rolling Hills currently does not have an Historic Preservation Ordinance and does not
have any State designated historic structures. The Project Site is located near the California State Route
(SR) 1 (Pacific Coast Highway and SR 213 (Western Avenue), which are located approximately 2.5
miles to the north and east of the City, respectively. Portions of Pacific Coast Highway are designated
as a State Scenic Route, but no portions of this highway is located within City boundaries. The City’s
General Plan does not identify any local scenic roadways in the City.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new buildings on the existing site that could have an
impact on scenic vistas from surrounding properties, as a policy-level document, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time and therefore does not
damage any scenic resources. All future development resulting from the implementation of the Land
121
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 20 City of Rolling Hills
Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan
policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific visual impacts to scenic vistas, at this level of environmental review. Future land
uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. The Proposed Project in itself would not substantially damage scenic
resources, including but limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state
scenic highway. The Project would therefore have no impact.
c. Would the project, in non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are
experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would
the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
Although the City’s General Plan describes the City of Rolling Hills as rural residential, the City is
actually located in an urban area. The City’s municipal code and General Policies incorporate several
provisions that are meant to preserve the visual character and private views for its residence. The
proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element
text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and
adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new and taller buildings on the existing site that could
have an impact on scenic vistas from surrounding properties, the Project in itself does not propose or
authorize any new development at the current time and therefore does not degrade visual character
or pubic views. All future development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element
updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies,
Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential
site-specific visual impacts to scenic vistas, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that
would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews
per CEQA regulation. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have a less than significant impact on
the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings.
d. Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect
daytime or nighttime views in the area?
The City of Rolling Hills consists of only single-family homes that are located on large lots with ample
open space. The rural nature of the City does not emit significant amounts of ambient light. The
minimal light and glare in the City limits emanate only from residential outdoor lighting including
those on pedestrian and vehicular pathways, porches and exterior wall lighting, as well as security
lighting. The City’s Zoning Code does not include provisions for street lighting.
Though the Proposed Project would not directly result in any development in itself, the change in
General Plan Land Use Designation from “Educational” to “Residential Agricultural Suburban – 1
Acre”, and changes to the City’s Housing Element allocations could have impacts on light and glare
under future development. The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the
General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map
amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable
Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes would allow for new buildings on the existing
122
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 21 City of Rolling Hills
site, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All
future development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning
changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design
standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific visual impacts
to scenic vistas, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of
the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The
Project would have a less than significant impact from new sources of substantial light or glare that
would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
123
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 22 City of Rolling Hills
4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use?
b. Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract?
c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in
Public Resources Code section 12220(g)),
timberland (as defined by Public Resources
Code section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined by
Government Code section 51104(g))?
d. Result in the loss of forest land or
conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
e. Involve other changes in the existing
environment, which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forestland to non-forest use?
SETTING
According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), there are four primary agricultural
classifications – Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, Farmland of Local
Importance. Prime Farmland is land that has the best combination of physical and chemical characteristics
for producing food, feed, forage, fiber, and oilseed crops and is also available for these uses. Unique
Farmland as land other than Prime Farmland that is used for the production of specific high-value food
and fiber crops. Farmland of Statewide Importance is determined to be land that does not meet the criteria
for prime or unique farmland, but can be land that food, feed, fiber, forage and oilseed crops can be
produced. Farmland of Local Importance is any land designated for agriculture by local ordinance for food,
fiber, forage and oilseed crops.
The City of Rolling Hill’s topography includes steep hills, rocky terrain, and wooded brushes, all of which
do not exhibit characteristics determined to meet the criteria for Prime, Unique, Farmland of Statewide
124
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 23 City of Rolling Hills
Importance, or Farmland of Local Importance. The Department of Conservation (DOC) has not designated
any areas in the City as Prime, Unique, or Farmland of Statewide Importance.
The Williamson Act allows local governments to enter into contracts with private landowners for the
purpose of restricting specific parcels of land to agricultural or related open space use. Landowners can
then receive lower property tax assessments as the taxes would be based upon farming and open space
uses instead of full market value. According to the 2016-2017 Williamson Act Status Report, Los Angeles
County is a non-participating county, which is further demonstrated in the State of California Williamson
Act Contract Land map where the City of Rolling Hills is categorized under “non-enrolled land.” As a
result, the City is not enrolled in Williamson Act contracts and does not support forest land or forestry
resources.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance
(Farmland), as shown on maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
The California Department of Conservation’s (DOC) Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
and Williamson Act Maps do not show the Project site or the adjacent properties as areas that have
agricultural uses, or as areas that have been enrolled in a Williamson Act contract. The proposed
Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and
Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of
new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed
changes in the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a
policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific visual impacts to scenic vistas,
at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed
Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. However, since
there are no agricultural lands on the Project site, the Proposed Project in itself would not convert
Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, to non-agricultural use,
and there would be no impact.
b. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract?
The City of Rolling Hills General Plan Land Use Element and Land Use Policy Map do not show any
agricultural designations within the City, although the Zoning Map designates the current project site
as Residential Agriculture-Suburban, with a minimum lot size of 2-acres. The proposed Project
includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b)
related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new
Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in
the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future development resulting
from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to
comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy level
document, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific visual impacts to scenic vistas, at this level
of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. However, since there are no
125
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 24 City of Rolling Hills
agricultural lands on the Project site, the Proposed Project in itself would not conflict with existing
zoning for agricultural uses or a Williamson Act contract. and there would be no impact.
c. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in
Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)); timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section
4526); or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section
51104(g))?
The City of Rolling Hills is known as a rural city characterized by an abundance of landscaping
consisting of Pepper Trees, Geraniums, and Matilija Poppy. However, there are no zoning
designations for forest lands within the City, which in turn does not affect any forest lands on the
Project site. The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan
Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the
creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone.
While these proposed changes in the future, would allow new development on the existing Project
site, future development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element and zoning
changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design
standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific visual impacts
to scenic vistas, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of
the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation.
However, since there are no forest lands on the Project site, the Proposed Project would not conflict
with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned
Timberland Productions; there be no impact.
d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
The City of Rolling Hills does not contain or have any designations for forest lands. The proposed
Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and
Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of
new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed
changes in the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a
policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific visual impacts to scenic vistas,
at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed
Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. However, since
there are no forest lands on the Project site, the Proposed Project in itself would not result in the loss
of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. The proposed Project would have no
impact.
e. Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest
land to non-forest use?
The California Department of Conservation’s (DOC) Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
does not designate any areas within the City of Rolling Hills as Prime, Unique, Farmland of Statewide
Importance, or Farmland of Local Importance. Furthermore, the City’s General Plan Land Use Map
126
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 25 City of Rolling Hills
does not show any future land uses designated for farmland or forest land. The proposed Project
includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b)
related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new
Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in
the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future development resulting
from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to
comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy level
document, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific visual impacts to scenic vistas, at this level
of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. However, since there are no
agricultural lands on the Project site, the Proposed Project in itself would not result in conversion of
Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use; there would be no
impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
127
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 26 City of Rolling Hills
4.3 Air Quality
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
c. Conflict or obstruct implementation of
the applicable air quality plan?
d. Result in a cumulatively considerable
net increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable federal
or state ambient air quality standard?
e. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
f. Result in other emissions (such as those
leading to odors) adversely affecting a
substantial number of people?
SETTING
Air pollution can have an adverse effect on the health and quality of life of those in areas that experience
particularly higher levels of pollutants. Pollutants are generally caused by the various emissions from such
things as mobile sources, power plants, agricultural operations and wood burning. The Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) determined the six most common air pollutants known as “criteria” pollutants,
that are the most detrimental to the environment and developed National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) to help combat environmental impacts. These pollutants include carbon monoxide, lead, ground-
level ozone, particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide. Primary standards are set at a level
intended to protect public health, including the health of at-risk populations, with an appropriate margin
of safety.
The Project site is located within the South Coast Air Basin (Basin), which is under the jurisdiction of the
South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). SCAQMD is responsible for monitoring criteria
air pollutant levels to ensure project meet either state and federal air quality standards or, to assist projects
develop strategies that will meet the standards. An air quality area basin is categorized as being in
“attainment” or “nonattainment” based on whether or not it meets it allocated air quality standards.
According to the EPA, the 2015 South Coast Air Basin Maximum Pollutant Concentrations (Figures 4.3.1:
2015 South Coast Air Basin Maximum Pollutant Concentration;, 4.3.2: Trend of Basin Days Exceeding
Federal Standards 1990-2015; and 4.3.3: 2015 South Coast Air Basin Quality Compared to Other U.S. Urban
Areas) in the Basin exceeded the pollutant concentration levels defined by the NAAQS for ozone, PM2.5,
and NO2, designating the Basin as an “extreme” nonattainment area.
128
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 27 City of Rolling Hills
Figure 4.3.1: 2015 South Coast Air Basin
Maximum Pollutant Concentrations
Source: CA Air Quality Management Plan, 2016; http://www.aqmd.gov/
Figure 4.3.2: Trend of Basin Days Exceeding
Federal Standards 1990-2015
Source: 2016 Air Quality management Plan; http://www.aqmd.gov/
129
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 28 City of Rolling Hills
Figure 4.3.3: 2015 South Coast Air Basin Quality
Compared to Other U.S. Urban Areas
Source: 2016 Air Quality management Plan; http://www.aqmd.gov/
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
The City’s goal is to conserve and enhance the City’s natural resources, facilitating in development in
a manner which reflects the characteristics, sensitivities and constraints of these resources. In events
where air quality becomes an issue, the City outlines in Policy 1.10 in the City of Rolling Hills General
Plan Open Space and Conservation Element utilizes the South Coast Air Quality Management Plan
(SCAQMP) as a source of reference when compliance with air quality standards are required. By using
this document as a reference, the City will continue to be consistent with the provisions outlined in
the SCAQMP.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new uses on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to the
related to changes to the applicable air quality plans, at this level of environmental review. Future
130
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 29 City of Rolling Hills
land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone and the proposed zoning and
General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA
regulation. The proposed Project in itself would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
appliable air quality plan and impacts are less than significant.
b. Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard?
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has designated the South Coast Air Basin (Basin) as an
extreme nonattainment area due to the high levels of criteria pollutants that are present in the Basin.
The proposed Project site is within the South Coast Air Basin which exceeds the pollutant
concentration levels for Ozone, PM2.5 and NO2. As a result of the existing poor air quality, new
developments may add to and potentially increase the levels of criteria pollutants within the Basin.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new housing uses on the existing site, the Project in
itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development
resulting from the All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the
proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not
possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to the related to cumulative air pollutant increase, at
this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone and the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to
their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The proposed Project in itself would not
result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant, and would have less than
significant impact.
c. Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
The Air Resources Board (ARB) defines sensitive receptors as children, elderly, asthmatics and others
who are at a high risk of negative health outcomes due to exposure to air pollution. Areas or places
where sensitive receptors congregate are considered sensitive receptor locations, and are places such
as hospitals, and daycare centers. The Project site is currently a school site that includes a high school,
a learning center and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings and additional people on the existing site,
the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time and
therefore would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, at this time of
environmental review. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the
proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply
131
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 30 City of Rolling Hills
with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not
possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this level of environmental review. Since future
land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. While the proposed Project in itself would not expose
sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, impacts remain less than significant.
d. Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a
substantial number of people?
As discussed previously, the Project site is currently a school site that contains a high school, a learning
center and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority. The proposed Project includes the following
components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning
Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho
Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future, would allow
additional people on the existing site once it has been developed with new uses, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new structures at the current time. All future development
resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and the implementation of the
Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and
Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts
to the visual character of the area, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would
occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be to their own environmental reviews per CEQA
regulation and the Project would have a less than significant impact from odors and emissions on
people.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required
132
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 31 City of Rolling Hills
4.4 Biological Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant Impact No Impact
Would the Project:
g. Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications, on
any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by
the California Department of Fish and
Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
h. Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
i. Have a substantial adverse effect on state or
federally protected wetlands (including, but
not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal,
etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
j. Interfere substantially with the movement of
any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native
resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
k. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
l. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills is located on the Palos Verdes Peninsula, in Los Angeles County, This hilltop
community supports a variety of plant and wildlife. The City’s plant life was established by imported
plants at the inception of the community since the natural state of the area included only coastal grass and
shrubs. As the community continued to establish, the developers planted trees and shrubs along the
133
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 32 City of Rolling Hills
roadsides and donated five Olive Trees to each homeowner whose lots were five or more acres. According
the City’s General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element, the more common plants that were
established in the community’s early stages of development were Pepper Trees, Geraniums and Matalijia
Poppy.
Biological Habitat
Due to City’s abundance of landscaping and open space areas, the City of Rolling Hills has become home
to a large variety of plant life and wildlife. Much of the plant life that are found in the City today resulted
from the importing of plants to supplement what was originally only coastal grasses and shrubs. Today,
the plant life ranges from several species of trees, flowers, and shrubs, giving the wildlife in the City a place
to nurture and form habitats.
There are several species of wildlife that can found nesting among both the vast open space areas and the
densely vegetated areas. The City’s General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element notes the types of
wildlife that can found include squirrels, gophers, skunks, mice, raccoon, opossum, foxes, lizards, snakes,
frogs and a wide variety of birds including owls and peacocks; pheasant and quail were also reintroduced
into the area.
Water Resources
The City receives its water sources from the Metropolitan Water District through the West Basin Municipal
Water District and the California Water Service Company. Due to the City’s location atop a tertiary deposit
of mudstones and diatomaceous shales, the City does not have any groundwater resources. The City also
does not contain any areas of natural water resources and is further separated from groundwater resources
by the Palos Verdes Fault.
Unavailability of groundwater and natural water resources requires that the City receive its water supply
exclusively from uninterrupted sources as allotted by the West Basin Municipal Water District and
Metropolitan Water District.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local
or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
According to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s California Natural Diversity Database
(CNDDB) maps, the City of Rolling Hills lies in the Torrance Quad which has identified several bird
and plant species that inhabit the City of Rolling Hills have been listed as threatened or endangered
species. However, the proposed Project site is already developed and there are no plant or animal
species that currently exist on the site. The proposed Project includes the following components: a)
update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and
map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable
Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future, would allow new development
134
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 33 City of Rolling Hills
on the existing Project site, future development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use
Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan
policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess
potential adverse effects on candidate, sensitive or special status species, at this level of environmental
review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. There would be no substantial adverse effects on
any endangered, sensitive, or special status species, and the Proposed Project would have no impact.
b. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
The City does not have any natural water resources that could be potential areas for riparian habitat.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future
development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning
changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design
standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential adverse effects on
candidate, sensitive or special status species, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses
that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. There would be no substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural community, and the Proposed Project would have no impact.
c. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands
(including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
No areas within the City or on the Project site are designated as a state or federally protected wetland.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future
development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning
changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design
standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential adverse effects on
candidate, sensitive or special status species, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses
that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. Since the Project, as proposed, would not have a substantial adverse
effect on state or federally protected wetlands, there would be no impact.
d. Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory
fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
135
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 34 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future
development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning
changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design
standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential adverse effects on
candidate, sensitive or special status species, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses
that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. Therefore, the Project would not interfere substantially with the
movement of any native resident of migratory fish, and there would be no impact.
e. Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources,
such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
The City of Rolling Hills General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element emphasizes the efforts to
conserve and enhance the City’s natural resources by facilitating development in a manner that
reflects the characteristics, sensitivities and constraints of the City’s natural resources. The proposed
Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and
Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of
new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed
changes in the future, would allow new development on the existing Project site, future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a
policy level document, it is not possible to assess potential adverse effects on candidate, sensitive or
special status species, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a
result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA
regulation. The Proposed Project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources. There would be no impact.
f. Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation
plan?
In response to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife
has developed Habitat Conservation Plans (HCP) to hold private and non-federal agencies
accountable for the preservation of endangered plants and wildlife. HCPs are planning documents
required as part of an application for an incidental take. Although, the Project site is located
approximately two miles from the boundaries of the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Natural Community
Conservation Plan (NCCP)/Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), the Project site itself is not within the
jurisdiction of an HCP. Further, the proposed Project includes the following components: a) update
to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map
amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable
Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future, would allow new development
on the existing Project site, future development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use
136
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 35 City of Rolling Hills
Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan
policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy level document, it is not possible to assess
potential adverse effects on candidate, sensitive or special status species, at this level of environmental
review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Project in itself would not conflict with the
provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. There would be no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
137
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 36 City of Rolling Hills
4.5 Cultural Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
m. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource as
defined in §15064.5?
n. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to §15064.5?
o. Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of formal cemeteries?
SETTING
An historical resource is defined as any object, building, structure, area, place, record, or manuscript which
a lead agency determines to be historically significant. Generally, a resource is considered by the lead
agency to be “historically significant” if the resource meets the criteria for listing on the California Register
of Historical Resources.
Although the City of Rolling Hills provides a definition for historical structures in its Zoning Ordinance,
no historical structures have been identified or designated within the City. Nor have any archeological
resources been identified with the City limits.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource
pursuant to §15064.5?
The City of Rolling Hills currently does not have any recognized or identified existing historical
resources that could be potentially disturbed as a result of the proposed Project.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development or project area construction, at the current time.
All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
138
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 37 City of Rolling Hills
potential site-specific impact to historical resources, at this level of environmental review. Future land
uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have a less than significant
impact.
b. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological
resource as defined in §15064.5?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for additional structures and uses on the existing site
that could affect unknown archeological resources, if any, the Project in itself does not propose or
authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the
creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element
updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As
policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to potential
archeological resources, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a
result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA
regulation. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have a less than significant impact on
archeological resources.
c. Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal
cemeteries?
The Proposed Project would not require digging or grading at the Project site at this current time,
since no developments are proposed at this time. Further, no archeological sites or the potential for
human remains have been identified either in the City, or on the Project site.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new structures on the existing site, the Project in
itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time and would not disturb
any potentially unknown human remains at the site. All future development resulting from the
creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element
updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As
policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Therefore, the Proposed Project
would have a less than significant impact on human remains.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
139
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 38 City of Rolling Hills
4.6 Energy
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
p. Result in potentially significant
environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of
energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
q. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan
for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
SETTING
In general, energy resources, particularly petroleum, have had a negative impact on the overall
environment resulting from the release of greenhouse gases (GHG). More importantly, these energy
resources are limited and require conservation and a more efficient method of usage. In 2019, the State of
California (State) adopted a California Energy Efficiency Action Plan (Action Plan) that outlines the issues,
opportunities, and savings pertaining to energy efficiency in California’s buildings, industrial, and
agricultural sectors. The Action Plan provides the State with a roadmap for an energy-efficient and low
carbon future for buildings and addresses the issues related to climate change and energy consumption.
The City of Rolling Hills incorporates these State-wide provisions for energy efficiency in its Climate Action
Plan (CAP) and emphasizes retrofits for existing buildings, energy performance requirements for new
construction, and water efficient landscaping. Additionally, the City’s General Plan Open Space Element
and Housing Element also provide policies that address energy efficiency.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or
operation?
The Proposed Project does not include any developments or construction that would require short or
long-term consumption of energy from heavy equipment, light-duty vehicles, machinery, and
generators. The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan
Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the
creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone.
While these proposed changes would allow for new energy uses on the existing site, the Project in
itself does not propose or authorize any new development, at the current time. Future land uses that
would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay the proposed zoning and General Plan
140
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 39 City of Rolling Hills
amendments would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. As policy
level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from wasteful and
unnecessary consumption of energy uses, at this level of environmental review. Therefore, since
the Proposed Project, in itself, would not result in environmental impacts due to wasteful, inefficient,
or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operations, there
would be no impact.
b. Would the project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy
efficiency?
The City of Rolling Hills Climate Action Plan includes energy efficient strategies that provide a
framework to help the City achieve measurable energy savings. Further, the City of Rolling Hills
General Plan contains provisions that permit the use of solar panels to maximize energy efficiency.
However, no provisions in both the Climate Action Plan and the General Plan apply to the proposed
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for new energy uses on the existing site, the Project in itself does not
propose or authorize any new development. All future development resulting from the
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific conflicts with State or local renewable energy plans, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone
and the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. The Project, in itself, would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local
plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency; therefore, there would be no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required
141
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 40 City of Rolling Hills
4.7 Geology and Soils
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant Impact
No
Impact
Would the Project:
r. Directly or indirectly cause potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk of
loss, injury, or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer
to Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv. Landslides?
s. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
t. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the Project, and potentially result in
on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
u. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in
Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial risks to life or
property?
v. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting
the use of septic tanks or alternative
wastewater disposal systems where sewers are
not available for the disposal of wastewater?
w. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
142
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 41 City of Rolling Hills
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills is located in the Los Angeles Basin, and thus is located over one or more
earthquake faults. According to the City of Rolling Hills Hazard Mitigation Plan, the major faults that have
the potential to affect the greater Los Angeles Basin, and therefore the City of Rolling Hills are the Newport-
Inglewood, Palos Verdes, Santa Monica, and the Cabrillo faults. Further, the soil types found in the City
include “Altamira Shale” and basalt, which when in contact with one another, are conducive to land sliding
due to differences in permeability. The City’s proximity to several fault lines combined with the soil types
that make up the City’s terrain, as well as its location on or near sloped areas have the potential to cause
additional geologic hazards including liquefaction and landslides (see Figure 4: Landslide Hazards).
The City of Rolling Hills Hazard Mitigation Plan outlines mitigation measures in areas of prevention,
property protection, public education and awareness, natural resource protection, emergency services, and
structural projects, to provide the City with the proper goals and policies to help reduce potential geologic
hazards. The City of Rolling Hills General Plan Safety Element also lists a set of policies that provide
additional framework for reducing the social and economic disruptions caused by the effects of natural
hazards.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a.i. Directly or indirectly cause potential adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault?
The Department of Conservation’s (DOC) Earthquake Hazards Zone map does not indicate that
the City of Rolling Hills is located within an Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone, although there is a fault zone
located approximately 13 miles northeast in the City of Long Beach. However, the DOC Earthquake
Hazards Zone map designates the majority the parcels within the City as “earthquake hazard
parcels.”
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new buildings on the existing site that could have
adverse effects to the risk of loss, injury or death from earthquake faults, the Project in itself does not
propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed
zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the
City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to
assess potential site-specific impacts from ruptures of earthquake faults, at this level of environmental
review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Though the Project, in itself, would not directly or
143
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 42 City of Rolling Hills
indirectly cause potential adverse effects involving a known earthquake fault; impacts would remain
less than significant.
a.ii. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss,
injury, or death involving strong seismic ground shaking?
Parcels within the City are designated as “earthquake hazard parcels” and can be assumed that the
Project site will be exposed to seismic activity; however, there are no known faults located under the
Project site that would expose people or structures to adverse effects resulting from seismic ground
shaking.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new buildings on the existing site that could have
impacts from seismic ground shaking, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new
development at the current time. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay
zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required
to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it
is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from seismic ground shaking, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Impacts from exposure of people
or structures from seismic ground shaking would be less than significant
a.iii. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss,
injury, or death involving seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
According to the according to the DOC’s Hazards Zone Map, no areas within the Project site are
shown to be located within a liquefaction zone. The proposed Project includes the following
components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning
Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho
Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future, would allow
for new buildings on the existing site that could have impacts from seismic ground shaking, the Project
in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future
development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts from seismic relate ground failures, at this level of environmental
review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. While the Project itself would not expose people
or structures to potential adverse effects from seismic-related ground failure, impacts would be less
than significant
a.iv. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss,
injury, or death involving landslides?
Portions of the Project site are located within a landslide zone. To help mitigate potential hazards
caused by landslides, Policy 1.1 from the City of Rolling Hills General Plan Safety Element restricts
144
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 43 City of Rolling Hills
the expansion of existing development and construction of new development near active faults or
landslide areas. The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General
Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c)
the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone.
While these proposed changes in the future, would allow for new buildings on the existing site that
could have impacts from seismic ground shaking, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize
any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level
documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from potential landslides, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project
would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. While the Project as
proposed would not expose people or structures to potential adverse effects from landslides, impacts
would be less than significant.
145
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 44 City of Rolling Hills
146
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 45 City of Rolling Hills
b. Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new buildings on the existing site that could have
result on loss of topsoil or soil erosion, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new
development at the current time. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay
zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required
to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it
is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to soil loss or erosion, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Impacts would be less than
significant.
c. Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is made unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in on or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction,
or collapse?
The City of Rolling Hills Hazard Mitigation Plan notes that the majority of the City’s soil is composed
of “Altamira-Shale” and basalt, both of which, when combined, could result in landslides due to the
difference in permeability. Portions of the Project site are located in a landslide zone, but as mentioned,
policies in the City’s General Plan Safety Element restricts new development from occurring within
these zones. Furthermore, the DOC’s Hazards Zone map does not designate any areas of the Project
site as a liquefaction zone. Portions of the Project site are located within a landslide zone (see Figure
4.7.1; Landslide Hazards). To help mitigate potential hazards caused by landslides, Policy 1.1 from
the City of Rolling Hills General Plan Safety Element restricts the expansion of existing development
and construction of new development near active faults or landslide areas.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new buildings on the existing site that could have
impacts due to unstable soils, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development
at the current time. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the
proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not
possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from potential landslides, lateral spreading, or
liquefaction, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the
Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Though
the Project, as proposed, would not result in on – or – offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction, or collapse, impacts would be less than significant
d. Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1-B of the Uniform Building
Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?
147
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 46 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new development that could be located on expansive
soils on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at
the current time. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed
zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the
City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to
assess potential site-specific impacts expansive soils, at this level of environmental review. Future land
uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. Impacts would be less than significant.
e. Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new development and therefore site excavations on
the existing site the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current
time. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning
and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts to soils from the use of septic tanks or alternative waste disposal
systems, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the
Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The
Project, in itself, would not affect the need and availability of septic tanks or alternative wastewater
disposal systems; therefore, there would be no impact.
f. Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
The Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP) defines paleontological resources as “any fossilized
remains, traces, or imprints of organisms, preserved in or on the earth’s crust, that are of
paleontological interest and that provide information about the history of life on earth.” The proposed
Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and
Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of
new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed
changes in the future, would allow for new development and therefore site excavations on the existing
site the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All
future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts to paleontological resources, at this level of environmental review.
148
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 47 City of Rolling Hills
Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Though the University of California, Berkeley, Museum
of Paleontology localities database shows that there are no know paleontological resources in or
around the Project site, and the proposed Project in itself would not directly or indirectly destroy
resources, impacts would remain less than significant.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
149
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 48 City of Rolling Hills
4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significan
t Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
x. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the environment?
y. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of
reducing the emissions of greenhouse
gases?
SETTING
Greenhouse gases (GHG) have been a major contributor to the effects of global climate change, causing an
increase in “radiative forcing,” or a heating effect in the atmosphere. Greenhouse gases are gases are made
up primarily of four types of emissions: Carbon dioxide (CO2), is caused by burning fossil fuels, solid waste,
trees and other biological materials; Methane (CH4) is emitted directly during the production and transport
of coal, natural gas, and oil; Nitrous Oxide (N20) is produced during agricultural and industrial activities,
as well as combustion of fossil fuels and solid waste and during treatment of wastewater; and Flourinated
gases are caused by a variety of industrial processes and are emitted in smaller quantities but in a potent
form of greenhouse gases that are referred to as High Global Warming Potential (GWP) gases.
According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), greenhouse gas emissions in the United States
have increased by 3.7 percent since 1990, with the primary sources of emissions coming from
transportation, electricity production, industry (including fossil fuels for energy), commercial and
residential production of heat and handling of waste, agriculture, and land use and forestry. Figure 4.8.1,
Total U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Economic Sector in 2018, demonstrates the total United States GHG
emissions by economic sector in 2018; transportation is the leading source of GHG emissions as it
contributes to the release of carbon dioxide, which was the primary pollutant emitted into the atmosphere
in 2018 (Figure 4.8.2, Total Greenhouse Gas Emission in 2018).
150
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 49 City of Rolling Hills
Figure 4.8.1: Total U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
by Economic Sector in 2018
Source: https://www.epa.gov/
Figure 4.8.2: Greenhouse Gas Emission in 2018
Source: https://www.epa.gov/
151
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 50 City of Rolling Hills
In an effort to reduce the rate of global warming caused by GHG emissions, the State of California passed
Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), the Global Warming Solutions Act (GWS Act) of 2006, which implements a
comprehensive, long-term approach to addressing climate change by requiring the State of California to
reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. Accordingly, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) has
developed a Scoping Plan to set forth a strategy for California to meet its GHG reduction goals.
In 2018, the City of Rolling Hills developed a Climate Action Plan (CAP) that focuses on the reduction of
greenhouse gas emissions within the City. In addition to its own policies, the CAP implements the goals
and policies laid out in CARB’s Scoping Plan in accordance with AB 32. The City’s CAP advances these
goals by streamlining efforts that establish specific initiatives and programs that target the reduction of
GHG emissions.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the environment?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new development that could directly or indirectly
generate GHG emissions on the existing site the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any
new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level
documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from GHG emissions, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project
would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Impacts would be less
than significant.
b. Would the project conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose
of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
The City of Rolling Hill’s Climate Action Plan (CAP) implements programs and initiatives that target
the reduction of greenhouse gases (GHG). This includes creating a City-wide Waste Plan that diverts
about 75% percent of waste from landfills, and the implementation of urban greening by preserving
and incorporating parks, forests, green roofs, local agriculture, street trees, and community gardens
to create a “carbon sink” where greenhouse gas emissions are stored instead of being emitted into the
atmosphere.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for uses on the existing site that could result in the
emission of greenhouse gases, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development
at the current time. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts
152
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 51 City of Rolling Hills
to the related to changes to the applicable air quality plans, at this level of environmental review. All
future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards Future development at the Project site would be subject
to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation, and would also be required to conform to
all applicable City, State, and Federal standards pertaining to greenhouse gases. There would be less
than significant impacts.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required
153
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 52 City of Rolling Hills
4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
z. Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
aa. Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials
into the environment?
bb. Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-quarter mile
of an existing or proposed school?
cc. Be located on a site which is included on a list
of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
dd. For a project located within an airport land
use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport
or public use airport, would the project result
in a safety hazard or excessive noise for
people residing or working in the project
area?
ee. Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
ff. Expose people or structures, either directly or
indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury
or death involving wildland fires?
SETTING
The City’s Hazard Mitigation Plan identifies the City as prone to earthquakes, wildfires, droughts, and land
movement. Due to its proximity to various fault lines (Figure 5: Fault Zones), the City may be most
154
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 53 City of Rolling Hills
vulnerable to earthquake hazards. In an effort to reduce potential hazards caused by earthquakes, the State
of California regulates development through implementation of Building Codes and by means of the
Alquist Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act of 1972 (Alquist-Priolo Act). The Alquist-Priolo Act was passed
to regulate development near active faults in order to mitigate the hazard of surface rupture. No areas
within the City are located within an Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone, and as such, the Project site also does not
contain areas located near an Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone. Hazards resulting from earthquakes are further
mitigated by the Seismic Hazard Mapping Act of 1990, which also tightens regulation for development
projects within seismic-prone areas.
A portion of the Project site has also been designated by the Department of Conservation (DOC) as a
landslide zone (Figure 5: Fault Zone Map). Earthquakes are identified as a major hazard to potential for the
City, as high magnitudes of ground-shaking can lead to liquefaction and landslides. The majority of the
City is located within a landslide zone (Figure 6: Regional Fault Zone Map) with a region of the City called
the Flying Triangle being an active landslide area. The City of Rolling Hills General Plan Safety Element
outlines goals and policies that address development in areas susceptible to landslides.
The City of Rolling Hills has not been identified as a drought hazard area. According to the updated
November 5, 2020 U.S. Drought Monitor map, the City is not located in a drought intensity area. The City
of Rolling Hills’ water resources are limited to external sources including the Metropolitan Water District
through the West Basin Municipal Water District and California Water Service Company (Cal Water).
No risks from hazardous materials or airport hazards have been identified to have an effect on the City due
to its distance from the nearest airport and landfill. Along with the Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP), the City
has developed a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) to mitigate the risks associated with the
identified wildfire hazards. The City’s Climate Action Plan (CAP) and General Plan Safety Element further
establishes policies and guidelines for hazard mitigation and preparedness, including methods for the
proper disposal and diversion of potential hazardous materials, such as municipal waste
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Project in itself would have no impact related to
routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials.
155
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 54 City of Rolling Hills
156
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 55 City of Rolling Hills
157
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 56 City of Rolling Hills
158
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 57 City of Rolling Hills
b. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials
into the environment?
The City of Rolling Hills Climate Action Plan (CAP) provides a guideline for the reduction and proper
diversion of hazardous materials, including residential, community, and municipal waste that have
the potential to release hazardous materials into the environment.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to the
public from accidental release of hazardous materials into the environment, at level of environmental
review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed
zoning and General Plan amendments would be required to comply with all applicable City standards
and also be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. While the Project as
proposed, would not result in the accidental release of hazardous materials into the environment,
impacts would remain less than significant.
c. Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within 0.25 mile of an existing or proposed school?
The proposed Project is located on a Palos Verdes Unified School District school site with existing
uses including Beach Cities Learning Center and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority.
Rancho Del Mar High School has relocated and does not currently operate on the site. The proposed
Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and
Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of
new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed
changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose
or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the
creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element
updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As
policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone,
the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject to their own environmental
reviews per CEQA regulation. The Proposed Project in itself would not emit hazardous emissions or
handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 0.25 mile of an existing
or proposed school; it will therefore have no impact.
d. Would the project be located on a site included on a list of hazardous material sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard
to the public or the environment?
159
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 58 City of Rolling Hills
According to a California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) GeoTracker search, there
were three sites with leaking underground storage tanks (LUST sites) on and around the Project site
(see Figure 7: Clean Up Sites). The sites were determined to contain gasoline and hydrocarbons
resulting from leaking of underground storage tanks. Each of the three sites have been cleaned per
SWRCB standards and are now designated by the SWRCB as “complete and case closed.”
Furthermore, a search in the Superfund Enterprise Management Systems (SEMS) and Environmental
Facts (Envirofacts) database did not produce any results showing that the Project site is on or near a
hazardous waste facility. The closest hazardous waste site is located approximately three miles
northeast of the Project site, at 26301 Crenshaw Boulevard in the City of Rolling Hills Estates. The
Proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element
text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and
adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Impacts would be less than significant.
e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard
for people residing or working in the project area?
The nearest airport to the Project site is the Zamperini Field Airport located approximately 4 miles
north of the Project site at 3301 Airport Drive in the City of Torrance. Although the Project site may
experience occasional overhead flights, the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) does not designate
the Project site as an airport Runway Protection Zone (RPZ).
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Project would not result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the Project area due to airport hazards and will not conflict with any
existing airport land use plans. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have no impact.
160
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 59 City of Rolling Hills
f. Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Project in itself would have no impact related to
adopted emergency evacuation or response plans.
g. Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of
loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires?
According to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL Fire), the City has been
designated as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. The City has taken a proactive role in preparing
its residents for potential wildfires by developing the City of Rolling Hills Community Wildfires
Protection Plan (CWPP). The Plan outlines fire mitigation strategies by emphasizing vegetation and
electric powerline management, and “infrastructure hardening” where all structures will be required
to have a class A roof by 2030. The CWPP also provides evacuation strategies that educates and
prepares its residents for utilizing firefighting resources.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, hazards
mitigation plan, and emergency evacuation plan. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts from risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, at this level
of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews for all issue areas related to potential wildland fires.
Impacts would remain less than significant.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
161
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 60 City of Rolling Hills
4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
gg. Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface or
groundwater quality?
hh. Substantially decrease groundwater supplies
or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that the project may impede
sustainable groundwater management of the
basin?
ii. Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or
river or through the addition of impervious
surfaces, in a manner which would:
i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on-
or off-site;
ii) substantially increase the rate or amount
of surface runoff in a manner which would
result in flooding on- or offsite;
iii) create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
iv) impede or redirect flood flows?
jj. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk
release of pollutants due to project
inundation?
kk. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a
water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?
SETTING
Due to the City of Rolling Hill’s location atop a tertiary deposit of mudstones and diatomaceous shales, the
City does not have any groundwater resources. The City receives its water sources from the Metropolitan
162
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 61 City of Rolling Hills
Water District through the West Basin Municipal Water District (MWD) and the California Water Service
Company (Cal Water).
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Division of Drinking Water (DDW) regulates the
amount of contaminates in water provided by public water systems to ensure that tap water is safe to drink.
The City is located near the Pacific Ocean, but does not have any bodies of water within City boundaries
and is not located in a State-designated risk area for tsunami inundation (as shown on the Tsunami
Inundation Map for Emergency Planning Torrance Quadrangle/San Pedro Quadrangle). As such, the
Project site does not contain any bodies of water that could potentially be impacted by stormwater runoff
or discharge of pollutants.
The City of Rolling Hills complies with the provisions of the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) of 1972 and
the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Porter-Cologne Act) to regulate the discharge of
pollutants into other water resources. Title 17 of the City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code outlines the
provisions for reducing pollutants in stormwater discharge and non-stormwater discharges to storm sewer
systems. The City is located near the Pacific Ocean, but does not have any bodies of water within City
boundaries and is not located in a State-designated risk area for tsunami inundation (as shown on the
Tsunami Inundation Map for Emergency Planning Torrance Quadrangle/San Pedro Quadrangle).
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or
otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Additionally, new development projects on the
Project site would be required to comply with the regulations of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) as required by Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (CWA), established
by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to control direct stormwater discharges. The
Project in itself would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or
otherwise degrade surface or ground water quality, and would have no impact.
b. Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially
with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater
management of the basin?
163
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 62 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Since the City does not have a supply of
groundwater resources due to its location atop ridges and canyons, the Project as proposed, would
not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge, and impacts would remain less than significant.
c.(i) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition
of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or
siltation on- or off-site?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from
changes to drainage at the Project site, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that
would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan
amendments would be required to comply with all applicable City standards and also be subject to
their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Project would not substantially alter
the existing drainage pattern of the site or area that could result in erosion of siltation;
impacts would be less than significant.
c.(ii) Would the project substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner
which would result in flooding on- or off-site?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
164
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 63 City of Rolling Hills
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from
changes to drainage at the Project site, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that
would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan
amendments would required to comply with all applicable City standards and also be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Project would not substantially increase
the rate or amount of surface runoff that would create flooding on – or off-site. Impacts would be less
than significant.
c.(iii) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition
of impervious surfaces, in a manner that would create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from
changes to drainage patterns and water runoff at the Project site, at this level of environmental review.
Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning
and General Plan amendments would be required to comply with all applicable City standards and
also be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Impacts would be less than
significant.
c.(iv) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition
of impervious surfaces, in a manner that would impede or redirect flood flows?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from
changes to drainage patterns that could impede or redirect flood flows at the Project site, at this level
of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay
zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be required to comply with all
applicable City standards and also be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA
regulation. Impacts would be less than significant.
165
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 64 City of Rolling Hills
d. Would the project in flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due
to project inundation?
The Project site is located less than two miles from the Pacific Ocean; however, the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) lists the City as an “area of minimal flood hazard”. Additionally, there
are no other large bodies of water with the City of Rolling.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from
floods, tsunamis, seiche zones or pollutant release from project inundation, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone,
the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Impacts are less than significant.
e. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan
or sustainable groundwater management plan?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to
water quality, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to
the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore
be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. These future uses would remain
consistent with the City’s existing land use plan, policy or regulations and would not result in
environmental effects. Therefore, there would be no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
166
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 65 City of Rolling Hills
4.11 Land Use and Planning
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significan
t Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
ll. Physically divide an established community?
mm. Cause a significant environmental
impact due to a conflict with any land use
plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills is primarily a residential community with large acre lots, equestrian trails, tennis
courts and walking trails located over a 2.98 square mile area. Residential uses account for about 1,637 acres
of the total 1,909 acres (approximate) of land within the City, leaving about 176 acres available for an
additional 59 single-family dwelling units. About 33 acres of land within the City are used for recreation
uses, while educational uses utilize about 30 acres. Public or Rolling Hills Community Association owned
land uses account for about 5.5 acres of the City’s total land area. The land uses include the area around
the City’s Civic Center and two City owned equestrian riding rings. The City also includes about 203 acres
of vacant land. The general topography of the area consists of rolling hillsides that are subject to landslides.
The Project site encompasses the approximate 30-acre education use parcel owned by the Palos
Verdes Peninsula School District. Uses on this site include facilities for the Rancho Del Mar
Continuation High School, the Beach Cities Learning Center, and the Palos Verdes Peninsula
Transit Authority. Access to the Project site is through a private roadway that veers off Crest Road
West. A few unpaved interval roadways traverse the site. The site slopes from east to west, from
the Beach Cities Learning Center to the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority, with an
approximate 38 feet drop from one end of the Project site to the other. Vegetation on-site consists
of a few trees around the school sites and a mix of grasses and paved areas. The portion of the
PVP Transit Authority site is primarily paved, with few buildings, parking areas and storage
buildings. The site is currently zoned Residential Agriculture Suburban-2-Acres (RAS-2) with a
General Plan Land Use Designation of very-low density residential with 2+ net acres/dwelling
unit.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project physically divide an established community?
167
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 66 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. These future uses would remain consistent with
the City’s existing land use plan, policy or regulations and would not result in environmental effects.
Therefore, the proposed Project would not physically divide an established community and
there would be no impact.
b. Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any
land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for future development on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. These future uses would remain consistent with
the City’s existing land use plan, policy or regulations and would not result in environmental effects.
Therefore, there would be no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
168
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 67 City of Rolling Hills
4.12 Mineral Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
nn. Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to the
region and the residents of the state?
oo. Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan, or other land use plan?
SETTING
Mineral resources typically include oil and gas deposits, and nonfuel deposit such metals boron
compounds, clays, limestone, gypsum, salt, sand, gravel, and crushed stone. California is the largest
producer of sand and gravel in the United States and Los Angeles County area has large quantities of sand
and gravel.
The California Department of Conservation provides guidelines for the classification and designation of
mineral lands and separates Mineral Resource Zones (MRZ) into six categories: MRZ-1; MRZ-2a; MRZ-2b;
MRZ-3a; MRZ-3b; and MRZ-4.
• MRZ-1 zones are areas where adequate geologic information indicates that no significant mineral deposits
are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood exists for their presence.
• MRZ-2a zones are areas underlain by mineral deposits where geologic data show that significant measured
or indicated resources are present. As shown on the diagram of the California Mineral Land Classification
System, Areas classified MRZ-2a contain discovered mineral deposits that are either measured or indicated
reserves as determined by such evidence as drilling records, sample analysis, surface exposure, and mine
information. Land included in the MRZ-2a category is of prime importance because it contains known
economic mineral deposits. A typical MRZ-2a area would include an operating mine, or an area where
extensive sampling indicates the presence of a significant mineral deposit.
• MRZ-2b zones are areas underlain by mineral deposits where geologic information indicates that significant
inferred resources are present. Areas classified MRZ-2b contain discovered deposits that are either inferred
reserves or deposits that are presently sub-economic as determined by limited sample analysis, exposure, and
past mining history. Typical MRZ-2b area would include sites where there are good geologic reasons to
believe that an extension of an operating mine exists or where there is an exposure of mineralization of
economic importance.
• MRZ-3a zones are areas containing known mineral deposits that may qualify as mineral resources. MRZ-
3a areas are considered to have a moderate potential for the discovery of economic mineral deposits. MRZ-3
169
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 68 City of Rolling Hills
An example of a MRZ-3a area would be where there is direct evidence of a surface exposure of a geologic
unit, such as a limestone body, known to be or to contain a mineral resource elsewhere but has not been
sampled or tested at the current location.
• MRZ-3b zones are areas containing inferred mineral deposits that may qualify as mineral resources. Land
classified MRZ-3b represents areas in geologic settings which appear to be favorable environments for the
occurrence of specific mineral deposits, such as areas where indirect evidence exists for a geophysical or
geochemical anomaly along a permissible structure indicating the possible presence of a mineral deposit
• MRZ-4 zones are areas where geologic information does not rule out either the presence or absence of mineral
resources. The distinction between the MRZ-1 and MRZ-4 categories is important for land-use
considerations.
The City of Rolling Hills has been identified by the California Division of Mines and Geology as being
located in Mineral Resource Zone 1 (MRZ-1), which determines that the City does not have significant
mineral deposits and that there is little likelihood for their presence. The City’s General Plan Open Space
and Conservation Element also does not identify any mineral resources or mines the City of Rolling Hills
area. Consequently, the Project site does not contain any significant mineral deposits.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would
be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While there
may be proposed changes at the Project site in the future, the Project in itself does not propose or
authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the
implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As policy level documents,
it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts at this level of environmental review and
future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
environmental reviews for all issue areas. However, sincere there are no known mineral resources
sites in the City limits, there would be no impact.
b. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan?
170
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 69 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While there
may be proposed changes at the Project site in the future, the Project in itself does not propose or
authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the
implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As policy level documents,
it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts at this level of environmental review and
future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
environmental reviews for all issue areas. However, sincere there are no known mineral resources
sites in the City limits, there would be no loss of a locally known mineral resource and there would
therefore be no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
171
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 70 City of Rolling Hills
4.13 Noise
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
pp. Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels
in the vicinity of the project in excess of
standards established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
qq. Generation of excessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne noise levels?
rr. For a project located within the vicinity of
a private airstrip or an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working
in the project area to excessive noise levels?
SETTING
Noise is typically defined as any disturbing or unwanted sound that interferes or harms humans or wildlife.
Sound becomes unwanted when unwanted when it interferes with daily activities such as sleeping,
conversation, or disrupts or diminishes one’s quality of life. The health effects associated with noise are
often related to stress and stress-related illnesses such as high blood pressure, speech interference, hearing
and sleep loss, and disruption of productivity. Just like air pollution or water pollution, noise can just as
much cause substantial environmental impacts that become a source of pollution.
The City of Rolling Hills generally has a quiet sound environment with very few sources of noise. Such
sources of noise within the City include transportation noise from Palos Verdes Drive located on the
northern boundary of the City, aircraft noise from occasional overfly of small aircrafts from Torrance
Airport located to the north of the City, and stationary noise from pool equipment, air conditioners, music,
leaf blowers, tennis courts, and paddle tennis courts. Noise Sensitive Receptors in the City include the
public school located on the western boundary of the City, and as an entirely residential community, all of
the City of Rolling Hills can be considered noise sensitive. To ensure its residents are protected from
excessive noise pollution, the City’s General Plan Noise Element includes goals and policies that address
existing noise conflicts as well as forecasted noise pollution from future development and other
environmental source.
172
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 71 City of Rolling Hills
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient
noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local
general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
Ambient noise is defined as all the noise that is present in a given environment and is often referred
to as “background noise.” The levels of ambient noise can have substantial health and safety
implications if noise levels are not abated and properly mandated. The City has remained an
exclusively residential community where a quiet rural atmosphere has been maintained. The
proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element
text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and
adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for taller multi-family structures on the existing site, the Project in
itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development
resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land
Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Since the Proposed Project in itself would not
generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels, there would be no
impact.
b. Would the project generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
Groundborne vibration and noise are typically generated from roadway traffic and construction
activities. The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan
Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the
creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone.
While these proposed changes would allow for residential and related uses on the existing site, the
Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future
development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would
occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan
amendments would therefore be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation.
The Proposed Project would not generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise
levels; there would be no impact.
c. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public
use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
173
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 72 City of Rolling Hills
The nearest airport from the Project site is Torrance Airport and is located more than two miles, or
approximately more than four miles northeast of the Project site. The proposed Project includes the
following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related
Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone,
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes would allow for
residential and related uses on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any
new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level
documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this level of environmental
review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed
zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their own environmental reviews
per CEQA regulation. The Proposed Project in itself would not expose people residing or working in
the project area to excessive airport noise levels, and there would be no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
174
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 73 City of Rolling Hills
4.14 Population and Housing
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
ss. Induce substantial unplanned population
growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example,
through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
tt. Displace substantial numbers of existing
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills is located on the Palos Verdes Peninsula in Los Angeles County. Incorporated in
1957, the City has a rural an equestrian character, with large lots, equestrian trails and open space areas.
There is approximately 200 acres of vacant land in the City.
As of 2018, the City had a population of approximately 1,939, according to the Southern California
Association of Governments (SCAG)’s Local Profiles Report for the City. This is an increase of 79 people
from the SCAG estimate of 1,860 people in 2010, and an increase of 68 people from the California
Department of Finance (DOF) estimates for 2000. The City is primarily Non-Hispanic White (about 72%),
with a small mix of Asians (at 16%), African Americans, Native Americans and Pacific Islander
(approximately 12%).
According to the SCAG report, housing type in the City is predominantly single family residential (99%)
with one multi-family unit (0.1% of the total housing stock). Development in the City of Rolling Hills is
controlled by Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs). These limit development in the City to
single family residences on once-acre and two-acre lots. While the City has been primarily built out, there
are some limited opportunities for growth and new housing. According to the City’s Housing Element,
about 89% of the City’s residents commuted outside the City to work, while about 11% of residences
worked from home. According the SCAG’s Local Profiles Report for the City of Rolling Hills, there were
0.5 permits per 1,000 residents in 2000, and no permits issued for residential units in 2018.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructure)?
175
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 74 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new uses on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this
level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the
overlay zone, the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Proposed Project could eventually induce
unplanned population growth in the area by allowing future new homes. Impacts would therefore
remain less than significant.
b. Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new uses on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use
Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design
standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific, at this level of
environmental review. Moreover, there are currently no existing housing or people on the Project site.
Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone and the proposed
zoning and General Plan amendments would therefore be subject to their own environmental reviews
per CEQA regulation. The Proposed Project in itself would not displace any existing housing or
people and there would be no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
176
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 75 City of Rolling Hills
4.15 Public Services
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant Impact
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
uu. Result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new
or physically altered governmental facilities,
need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public
services:
i. Fire protection?
ii. Police protection?
iii. Schools?
iv. Parks
v. Other public facilities?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills is primarily a residential community with very few public facilities within its
boundaries. Public services are provided to the City by the Los Angeles County Fire Department; Station
No. 56, the Los Angeles County Sheriff Department (LACSD) (located in the City of Lomita); and the Palos
Verdes Unified School District (PVUSD). Storm Hill Park is the only park facility located within the City,
and there are no libraries within City boundaries.
The Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) Station 56 is located within City boundaries at 12 Crest
Road West, Rolling Hills, California 90274, approximately half a mile to the east of the Project site. The
LACFD works closely with the City to prepare and educate the community on evacuation procedures,
creating defensible space around a home and on retrofitting a home with fire-resistant materials. The City
also contracts with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department and is served by the Lomita Station
located outside of City boundaries at 2623 Narbonne Avenue, Lomita, California, 90717, approximately
five miles north of the City.
The City of Rolling Hills is served by the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District (PVPUSD), with
school levels ranging from elementary to adult education. An existing public high school facility, the
Rancho Del Mar High School, is the only school facility located in the City. However, the school has moved
177
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 76 City of Rolling Hills
its operations to a new location outside of the City, approximately seven miles to the northwest, at 375 Via
Almar in the City of Palos Verdes Estates.
Although the City has a large inventory of open space areas such as bridle trails and tennis courts, there is
only one area within the city that is designated as a park. Storm Hill Park is located on the northwestern
border of the City at Storm Hill Lane where approximately 25 miles of private equestrian trails are located
and are maintained by the City of Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA). Trails are open to both
residents and non-residents. Non-residents are required to obtain a permit from the City prior to utilizing
the trails.
Library services are offered through the Palos Verdes Library District at three locations outside of the City:
Peninsula Center Library at 701 Silver Spur Road in the community of the City of Rolling Hills Estates,
approximately two miles northwest of the City; Malaga Cove Library located in the City of Palos Verdes
Estates, at 2400 Via Campesina, about six miles northwest of the City; and Miralest Library located in City
of Rancho Palos Verdes, at 29089 Palos Verdes Drive East, about three miles west of the City of Rolling
Hills.
The Project site is located on an existing school site where Rancho Del Mar High School previously
operated. The High School has relocated its operations, but the facility remains on the site, along with Beach
Cities Learning Center and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority (PVPTA), which are both still
operating on the Project site.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a.i. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered fire protection facilities, or the need for new or
physically altered fire protection facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,
response times or other performance objectives?
The City’s fire protection, rescue services, and medical services are provided by the Los Angeles
County Fire Department (LACFD) Fire Station No. 56 is the nearest fire station to the Project site, and
is located at 12 Crest Road West, about 1.2 miles southeast of the Project Site. The proposed Project
includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b)
related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new
Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in
the future would allow new buildings and additional people on the existing site that could
incrementally increase the demand for fire protection services, the Project in itself does not propose
or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the
implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, hazards mitigation plan,
and emergency evacuation plan. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-
specific impacts to fire protection services or utilities, at this level of environmental review. Future
land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
178
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 77 City of Rolling Hills
environmental reviews for all issue areas including fire emergency response. There would be no
impact.
a.ii. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered police protection facilities, or the need for new or
physically altered police protection facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,
response times or other performance objectives?
The City of Rolling Hills receives police protection services from the Lomita Station of the Los Angeles
County Sherriff Department (LACSD). The Lomita Station is located at 26123 Narbonne Avenue in
the City of Lomita, approximately 5.2 miles northeast of the Project site.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings and additional people on the existing site
that could incrementally increase the demand for police protection services, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to
comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As policy level
documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to potential additional police
protection facilities or services or utilities, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that
would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews
for all issue areas including police protection services, and there would be no impact.
a.iii. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered schools, or the need for new or physically altered
schools, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order
to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives?
The proposed Project is a change in zoning classification of the Palos Verdes Unified School District
site at 38 Crest Road West. The school site is currently occupied by a high school facility, a learning
center, and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority. The proposed Project includes the following
components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning
Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho
Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future, would allow
new buildings and additional people on the existing site that could incrementally increase the demand
for additional school facilities and services, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new
development at the current time. All future development resulting from the implementation of the
Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s General
Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to
assess potential site-specific impacts to fire protection services or utilities, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
179
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 78 City of Rolling Hills
be subject to their own environmental reviews for all issue areas including additional school facilities,
if needed. There would be no impact.
a.iv. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered parks, or the need for new or physically altered
parks, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order
to maintain acceptable service ratios or other performance objectives?
The City has several areas that serve recreational purposes for both residents and non-residents. There
are currently three tennis courts, eight-acres of City-owned open space, equestrian facilities, and
approximately 25 miles of private trails for horseback riders and pedestrians. The proposed Project
includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b)
related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new
Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in
the future, would allow new buildings and additional people on the existing site which could
incrementally increase the demand for recreational uses, the Project in itself does not propose or
authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the
implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As policy level documents,
it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to recreational facilities, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews for all issue areas including future recreational uses.
Since there would be no substantial adverse physical impacts on parks, the proposed Project would
have no impact.
a.v. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered public facilities, or the need for new or physically
altered public facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for other public facilities?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings and additional people on the existing site
and that could result in the need for new or altered public facilities, the Project in itself does not
propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting
from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to
comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As policy level
documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to public facilities, at this level of
environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews for all issue areas and there would be no impact.
The proposed Project would therefore have no impact.
180
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 79 City of Rolling Hills
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
181
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 80 City of Rolling Hills
4.16 Recreation
Would the Project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
vv. Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would
occur or be accelerated?
ww. Does the project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills abound in recreational opportunities, from publicly owned open space areas,
tennis courts and equestrian trails, to hillside open spaces. There are three tennis courts owned by the City
and two equestrian riding rings within the City. Approximately 25-30 miles of private equestrian trails
operated by the Rolling Hills Community Association are open to riders and joggers from the City as well
as neighboring jurisdictions. Due to the topography in the City of Rolling Hills, a substantial portion of the
area has steep hillsides and canyons.
In addition to outdoor recreational opportunities, the City also offers its residents various exclusive
recreational club privileges. The Caballeros group was initially formed for residents who shared an interest
in horseback riding. Today, the Group has a network of people, both riders and non-riders, who come
together to continue to share their interests in both horseback riding as well as in maintaining the trails
within the City. The City also hosts a Tennis Club and Social Club that allows both old and new residents
to participate in tournaments, monthly socials, annual exhibition matches, holiday parties, and weekend
getaways. The Women’s Community Club of Rolling Hills also hosts a number of events for the City,
including Children’s Easter and Holiday parties, Spring Tea, luncheons, and neighborhood meetings.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future would allow for population growth, additional buildings and
potentially new recreation uses on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize
182
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 81 City of Rolling Hills
any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the implementation
of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not
possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to the physical deterioration of neighborhood or
regional parks, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to
the creation of the overlay zone and the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be
subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. In addition, any future land uses
that may include parks and recreational facilities would be subject to a project-by-project impact
analysis. The proposed Project would therefore have a less than significant impact.
b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
The proposed Project in itself does not include the construction or expansion of recreational facilities.
As mentioned in the discussion above, the proposed Project includes the following components: a)
update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and
map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable
Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes would allow for population growth, new
buildings and potentially the construction or expansion of new recreation uses on the existing site,
the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development. All future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, and
would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Any future land uses that
could require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities may have physical effects on the
environment. However, these facilities would be subject to a project-by-project impact analysis, and
the proposed Project would therefore have a less than significant impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
183
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 82 City of Rolling Hills
4.17 Transportation/Traffic
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
xx. Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or
policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?
yy. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent
with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
zz. Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g., farm equipment)?
aaa. Result in inadequate emergency access?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills has a unique street system that consists exclusively of private roadways, which
are the easements owned by the City of Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA), created for
recreational purposes. These private streets include a combination of pathways for vehicles, bicycles,
horses, and pedestrians.
There are five major collector streets in the City: Portuguese Bend Road, Crest Road, Eastfield Drive,
Southfield Drive, and Saddleback Road. Parking is allowed on the shoulder areas along some portions of
collector roads where landscaping is not prohibitive, but the majority of off-street parking is provided in
conjunction with City residents
The Palos Verdes Peninsula (PVP) Transit Authority is located within the City at 38 Crest Road West but
does not provide direct transit services for the City since the roadways are all private. Transit services are
provided by the Regional Transit District (RTD) along Palos Verdes Drive North located on the southern
perimeter of the City of Rolling Hills, located outside of its boundaries.
According the City’s General Plan Circulation Element, there are approximately 25 miles of
equestrian/hiking trails provided within the community of Rolling Hills on private property easements
where motorists and bicyclists are prohibited. Pedestrians can utilize the trail system as there are no
sidewalks provided along the collector roads.
184
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 83 City of Rolling Hills
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation
system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
The City’s General Plan Circulation Element addresses goals and policies that enforces a safe and
efficient circulation system to help protect and maintain the existing private roadways that run
throughout the City. The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the
General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map
amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable
Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future, would allow for uses on the
existing site that could have an impact on the City’s existing circulation system, as a policy-level
document, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current
time. All future development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates,
the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts to the related to changes to the applicable air quality plans, at this level
of environmental review. All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the
proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The proposed Project in itself does not conflict with a
program, plan, ordinance, or strategy addressing the City of Rolling Hills’ existing circulation system,
plan, ordinance; there would be no impact.
b. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision
(b)?
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b) provides specific considerations for determining whether or a
project would have transportation impacts and identifies vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as the
appropriate measure of transportation impacts.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for new uses and associated transportation uses, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development, at this current time. All future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not
possible to assess potential site-specific impacts, at this level of environmental review. All future
development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards would be subject to their own environmental reviews per
CEQA regulation. The proposed Project would have less than significant impacts in relation with
CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b).
185
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 84 City of Rolling Hills
c. Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible use (e.g., farm equipment)?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for new buildings with unique design features, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development. All future development resulting from the
creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and implementation of the Land Use Element
updates would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Design standards. As
policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts from transportation
related geometric design features, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would
occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per
CEQA regulation. Though the proposed Project in itself would not substantially increase hazards due
to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible use (e.g.,
farm equipment). Impacts would be less than significant.
d. Would the project result in inadequate emergency access?
Existing emergency access is provided to the Project site via a private access road that branches off
from Crest Road West.
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for additional population and therefore access needs for
emergency vehicles and services on the existing site, as a policy-level document, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates, the creation of the overlay zone
and the proposed zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies
and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific
impacts, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the
Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The
proposed Project in would not result in inadequate emergency access and would have no impact.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
186
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 85 City of Rolling Hills
4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
bbb. Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of a tribal cultural resource,
defined in Public Resources Code section
21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural
landscape that is geographically defined in
terms of the size and scope of the landscape,
sacred place, or object with cultural value to
a California Native American tribe, and that
is:
i. Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in Public
Resources Code section 5020.1(k).
ii. A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be significant
pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code
Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set
forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource
Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall
consider the significance of the resource
to a California Native American tribe.
SETTING
The State of California Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) for Native American Consultation requires the Lead
Agency for any project to consult with all California Native American tribes, traditionally and culturally
associated with the project area. AB 52 and Senate Bill (SB) 18 allows for associated California Native
American Tribes to aid in the protection of tribal and cultural resources affecting the Project site by
providing recommendations for mitigation and protection. Under AB 52, agencies proposing a Project that
requires a Notice of Preparation, Notice of Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) or Notice of Negative
Declaration (ND) are required to establish consultation with tribes that are traditionally and culturally
affiliated to the geographic area where a project is located. Tribes notified under the requirements of AB 52
have 30 days to respond in writing of their request for consultation on the proposed project. Under AB 52,
SB 18 applies to lead agencies proposing to adopt or amend a General Plan, Specific Plan or Open Space
Designations. Like AB 52, SB 18 requires that local governments contact tribes about the opportunity to
187
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 86 City of Rolling Hills
consult on a proposed project; however, instead of 30 days to respond, tribes have 90 days to request
consultation.
In compliance with AB 52, the City, as the Lead Agency for this Project distributed project notification
letters to the following six tribes on October 16 and 17, 2020: Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh
Nation; Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians; Gabrieleno/Tongva Nation; Gabrielino
Tongva Indians of California Tribal Council; Gabrielino/Tongva Tribe; and Soboba Band of Luiseno
Indians. Should any Native American tribes seek consultation with the City of Rolling Hills, under the
requirements of SB 18, the City will commence tribal consultation at that time.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a.i. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource
as defined in Public Resources Code 21074 that is listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public
Resources Code section 5020.1(k)?
The City of Rolling Hills is not currently listed on the California Register of Historical Resources, or
in a local register of historical resources as defined in PRC Code section §5020.1(k). The proposed
Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and
Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of
new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed
changes in the future, would allow for new development and therefore site excavations on the existing
site the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All
future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts to tribal cultural resources, at this level of environmental review. Future
land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Additionally, while the six afore-mentioned Native
American tribes were notified of this particular Project, each future redevelopment project at the
proposed Project site would entail its own tribal consultation. The proposed Project in itself would
not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal resources and therefore there
would be less than significant impact.
a.ii. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in a resource determined by the lead agency,
in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set
forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth
in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow for new development and therefore site excavations on
the existing site the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current
188
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 87 City of Rolling Hills
time All future development resulting from the creation of the overlay zone, the proposed zoning and
implementation of the Land Use Element updates would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies and Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts to tribal cultural resources, at this level of environmental review. Future
land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. Additionally, while the six afore-mentioned Native
American tribes were notified of this particular Project, each future redevelopment project at the
proposed Project site would entail its own tribal consultation. The proposed Project in itself would
not have a substantial adverse change on the significance in a California Native Tribal resource and
therefore there would be less than significant impacts.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None required.
189
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 88 City of Rolling Hills
4.19 Utilities and Service Systems
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Would the Project:
ccc. Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
ddd. Have sufficient water supplies available
to serve the project and reasonably
foreseeable future development during
normal, dry and multiple dry years?
eee. Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider which serves
or may serve the project that it has adequate
capacity to serve the project’s projected
demand in addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
fff. Generate solid waste in excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the
attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
ggg. Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
SETTING
The City of Rolling Hills has adopted the appropriate sections of the Los Angeles County Health and Safety
Code (Title 11) and the Los Angeles County Plumbing Code (Title 28). In 2018, the City entered into a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Los Angeles County (County) in order to be covered under
the County’s Local Agency Management Program’s (LAMP) provisions and restrictions. As a result, the
City is covered under the provisions and restrictions of LAMP and maintenance and installation of all
onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS) is authorized to be done by the Department of Public Health
(DPH). LAMP also authorizes the Department of Public Health (DPH) to implement alternate standards
including the conditions that allow DPH to issue operating permits for Non-Conventional Onsite
Wastewater Treatment Systems (NOWTS). The City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code defines NOWTS as
an onsite wastewater treatment system that utilizes one or more supplemental treatment components to
provide further treatment of sewage effluent prior to discharging into the dispersal system. Supplemental
190
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 89 City of Rolling Hills
treatment components can include a three-compartment treatment tank, aerator, filter pods, pump,
ultraviolet disinfection, clarifier, and effluent filtration. Without the adoption of the LAMP, residents
whose properties do not meet the requirements for the installation of a low risk system would be required
to apply for a Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) permit from the local Water Board, pay annual fees
to the Water Board, and comply with quarterly monitoring requirements.
The City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code also outlines provisions for domestic wastewater, defining it as
wastewater normally discharged from plumbing fixtures, appliances, and other household and commercial
devices including toilets, sinks, showers, and bathtubs. Strict provisions on the requirements for onsite
wastewater treatment systems are outlined in the City’s Zoning Code, ensuring that construction plans
proposing a new OWTS are thoroughly reviewed prior to approval and issuance of permits. The Code
further enforces the discharge of toxic materials or liquids that flow onto the surface of any land or body
of water.
The Project site is located on an existing school site that is developed with existing structures and has an
established utilities system that serves the site. Any future development on the Project site would be
required to comply with the existing City and County standards for the maintenance of the existing utility
systems.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications
facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings on the existing site that may require
water, wastewater storm drainage, electric power, natural as, or telecommunications facilities, the
Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future
development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning
changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design
standards. Since there are no new land development project involved specific to the proposed Project
under evaluation, there would be no requirement for the construction or relocation of new or
expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-
specific impacts from the relocation or constructions of water, wastewater, storm drainage, power,
gas, or telecommunications facilities, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that
would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews
for all of these issue areas related to utilities and service systems. Impacts would be less than
significant.
b. Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably
foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
191
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 90 City of Rolling Hills
The Project site is currently developed with Del Mar High School, Beach Cities Learning Center and
the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority, where water supply facilities are already established
and maintained. The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General
Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c)
the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone.
While these proposed changes would allow for new development and therefore potential future need
for sufficient water supplies on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any
new development. All future development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use
Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan
policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, hazards mitigation plan, and emergency evacuation
plan. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to water
supply levels, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of
the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews for all issue areas related
to the availability of water supply; impacts would therefore be less than significant.
c. Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or
may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in
addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new uses on the existing site that may affect wastewater
capacity, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time.
All future development resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and
zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and
Design standards. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts
to future wastewater demand, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would
occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews for all
issue areas including fire pollutant risks. Impacts would be less than significant.
d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
192
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 91 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As
policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to existing local
infrastructure, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of
the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews for issue areas related to
the capacity of local infrastructure. While the Proposed Project would not create excess solid waste or
impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals; impacts would be less than significant.
e. Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future would allow for additional development on the site and therefore the
potential future need for solid waste facilities, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any
new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the implementation of
the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards. As a policy level document, it is not
possible to assess potential site-specific impacts to solid waste facilities, at this level of environmental
review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their
own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The Proposed Project in itself would not generate
solid waste. Therefore, the Project could have effects on federal, state, or local management and
reduction statutes that regulate solid waste, impacts would be less than significant.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
193
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 92 City of Rolling Hills
4.20 Wildfire
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
If located in or near state responsibility areas or
lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which
could cause significant environmental
effects?
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and
other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks,
and thereby expose project occupants
to, pollutant concentrations from a
wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a
wildfire?
c) Require the installation or maintenance
of associated infrastructure (such as
roads, fuel breaks, emergency water
sources, power lines or other utilities)
that may exacerbate fire risk or that may
result in temporary or ongoing impacts
to the environment?
d) Expose people or structures to
significant risks, including downslope
or downstream flooding or landslides,
as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
SETTING
The State of California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) maps areas of fire hazards
based on a number of factors such as terrain, slope, weather, fuels, and other. A Fire Hazard Severity Zone
(FHSZ) map allows an area to evaluate wildfire hazards based on their degree of severity (very high, high,
and moderate). Though FHSZs cannot predict where potential wildfire may occur, they do identify areas
where wildfire hazards may be severe and therefore cause greater damages to life and property. All local
jurisdictions in California are required to identify their areas of Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) which
are based on vegetation density, slope severity, fire weather, and other factors. CAL FIRE identifies three
fire hazard zones based on increasing severity from fires – moderate, high, and very high.
194
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 93 City of Rolling Hills
Wildfire protection in California is the responsibility of the State and local governments, as well as the
federal government. The State of California has therefore prepared FHSZ maps to evaluate likely risks for
wildfire over a 30-50 year period. Lands where the State has financial responsibility for wildland fire
protection are designated as State Responsibility Areas (SRAs) and Local Responsibility Areas (LRAs).
Typically, Moderate, high, and very high FHSZs are found in SRAS where the State has financial
responsibility for fire protection and prevention. SRAs are areas where the State of California has financial
responsibility for fire protection, while LRAs include incorporated cities, cultivated lands, and even desert
areas. Fire protection for LRAs are typically provided by fire protection districts, a jurisdiction’s fire
department, or by CAL FIRE under contract to local governments.
The City of Rolling Hills is located in Very High Fire Standard Severity Zone (VHFSSZ), as determined by
CAL FIRE. The City prepared a Hazard Mitigation Plan in 2019 which included discussions for wildfire
hazards, as well as a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) in July 2020. As a designated VHFSSZ
(see Figure 8: Fire Hazards) the City is vulnerable to brush fire hazards. Steep hillsides, cliffs and canyons
along with vast areas of native and non-native vegetation. The severe risks to loss of life or injury,
destruction of buildings, road closures, and loss of domestic animals as well as wildlife, among others, are
some of the main effects of wildfires. The City of Rolling Hills has adopted a Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP)
in 2019, as well as a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) in July 2020. Based on the community’s
concerns regarding fire fuel in the canyon areas of the City, fire mitigation strategies were developed from
a variety of sources, the City has developed best strategies to implement to help mitigate wildfires caused
by fire fuel. Additionally, the City has coordinated with the Los Angeles County Fire Department to
develop options in dealing with vegetation management, including infrastructure hardening, vegetation
management, maintenance of electric power lines, and inspections and enforcement.
The City of Rolling Hills Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) also identifies wildfires as a potential hazard
within the City and includes discussions on the community’s wildfire issues. Through its contract with the
Los Angeles County Fire Department, the City requires and administers precautionary measures to create
defensible space for all properties within the City, particularly in the maintenance of structures and
vegetation. The HMP further enforces the goals of wildfire mitigation that are consistent with the City’s
CWPP, with policies implemented to reduce threats to public safety and protect property from brush fire
hazards.
195
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 94 City of Rolling Hills
196
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 95 City of Rolling Hills
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, hazards
mitigation plan, and emergency evacuation plan. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts to emergency response plans, at this level of environmental review.
Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own
environmental reviews for all issue areas including fire emergency response. Though the proposed
Project in itself would not by itself impair any emergency response and evacuations plans, the Project
site’s location in a VHFSSZ impact would result in a less than significant impact.
b. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the project due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire
risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes in the future, would allow new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself
does not propose or authorize any new development at the current time. All future development
resulting from the implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be
required to comply with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, hazards
mitigation plan, and emergency evacuation plan. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess
potential site-specific impacts from wildfire risks and exposure to pollutant concentrations form
wildfires, at this level of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the
Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental reviews for all issue areas including
fire pollutant risks. The Proposed Project site’s location in a VHFSSZ would result in a less than
significant impact.
c. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such
as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate
fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
Even though the City is located in a Very High Fire Standard Severity Zone, the Project site is primarily
developed with urban uses related to schools and a public transit facility. The proposed Project
197
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 96 City of Rolling Hills
includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b)
related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new
Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in
the future, would allow new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose or
authorize any new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the
implementation of the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply
with the City’s General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, hazards mitigation plan,
and emergency evacuation plan. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-
specific impacts to wildfire risks from future maintenance or installation of infrastructure, at this level
of environmental review. Future land uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would
be subject to their own environmental reviews for all wildfire related issue areas; however, the
proposed Project site’s location in a VHFSSZ would result in a less than significant impact.
d. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or
downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage
changes?
The Project site is primarily developed with urban uses related to schools and a public transit facility
and is located in a Very High Fire Standard Severity Zone. The proposed Project includes the
following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related
Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone,
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes in the future,
would allow new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any
new development at the current time. All future development resulting from the implementation of
the Land Use Element updates and zoning changes would be required to comply with the City’s
General Plan policies, Zoning Code, and Design standards, hazards mitigation plan, and emergency
evacuation plan. As policy level documents, it is not possible to assess potential site-specific impacts
from post-fire slope instability or drainage changes, at this level of environmental review. Future land
uses that would occur as a result of the Proposed Project would be subject to their own environmental
reviews for all wildfire related issue areas; however, since the proposed Project site is located in a
VHFSSZ, impacts would remain less than significant.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
198
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 97 City of Rolling Hills
4.20 MANDATORY SIGNIFICANCE OF FINDINGS
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
hhh. Does the Project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the number
or restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
iii. Does the Project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects)?
jjj. Does the Project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
SETTING
As discussed in Section 1, Aesthetics, the City of Rolling Hills is beautiful wooded City with scenic views
of the Pacific Ocean, Catalina Island, city lights, and Los Angeles Harbor. In order to preserve the aesthetics
and natural resources that characterize the City, goals and policies are enforced throughout the City’s
General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and other local management plans. Residence adhere strictly to these
policies to maintain the quality of the environment and the continued preservation of the plant and wildlife
within the City.
DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS
a. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to
drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
199
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 98 City of Rolling Hills
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for new developments on the existing site, the Project in itself does
not propose or authorize any new development. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the
creation of the overlay zone and the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject
to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The proposed Project would not
substantially degrade the quality of the environment or have an effect on the fish and wildlife
population within the City; there would be no impact.
b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects,
and the effects of probable future projects)?
Cumulative development in the City consists primarily of single-family residences, with the exception
of City Hall, Los Angeles County Fire Department Station (LACFD) No. 56, Rancho Del Mar High
School, and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority. The proposed Project includes the
following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use Element text and Map; b) related
Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation and adoption of new Overlay Zone,
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these proposed changes would allow for
new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself does not propose or authorize any new
development. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the creation of the overlay zone and the
proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject to their own environmental reviews
per CEQA regulation. The proposed Project would not have impacts that are cumulatively
considerable; there would be no impact.
c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
The proposed Project includes the following components: a) update to the General Plan Land Use
Element text and Map; b) related Zoning Ordinance text and map amendments; and c) the creation
and adoption of new Overlay Zone, Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. While these
proposed changes would allow for new buildings on the existing site, the Project in itself does not
propose or authorize any new development. Future land uses that would occur pursuant to the
creation of the overlay zone and the proposed zoning and General Plan amendments would be subject
to their own environmental reviews per CEQA regulation. The proposed Project would have no
impact on the environment that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings.
MITIGATION MEASURES
None Required.
200
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 99 City of Rolling Hills
5.0 REFERENCES
DOCUMENTS
Air Quality Management District. 2016. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and California
Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) Attainment Status for South Coast Air Basin. South Coast Air Quality
Management District.
Air Quality Management District. 2017. 2016 Air Quality Management Plan. South Coast Air Quality
Management District
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 2020. Public Resources Code 21000–21189.
California Department of Conservation (DOC). 2019. The Williamson Act Status Report 2016-17. United
States.
California Department of Conservations (DOC). 2000. Guidelines for Classification and Designation of Mineral
Lands. State of California.
California Water Service. 2018. 2018 Water Quality Report. Rancho Dominguez District, California.
City of Rolling Hills. 2018. Climate Action Plan. Rolling Hills, California.
City of Rolling Hills. 2018. City Council Agenda Item No. 4-B. City of Rolling Hills, California
City of Rolling Hills. 2019. City of Rolling Hills 2019 Hazard Mitigation Plan. City of Rolling Hills, California.
City of Rolling Hills. June 1990. General Plan Land Use Element. Rolling Hills, California.
City of Rolling Hills. June 1990. General Plan Noise Element. Rolling Hills, California.
City of Rolling Hills. June 1990. General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element. Rolling Hills, California.
City of Rolling Hills. June 1990. General Plan Safety Element. Rolling Hills, California
City of Rolling Hills. June 1990. General Plan Circulation Element. Rolling Hills, California.
City of Rolling Hills. August 2019. Storm Hill Land Road and LLA Modification Project. Rolling Hills,
California.
Department of Conservation. 2009. Tsunami Inundation Map for Emergency Planning Torrance Quadrangle/San
Pedro Quadrangle. State of California.
Environmental Protection Agency. 2015. America’s Children and the Environment. United States.
Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). 2020. Tribal Consultation Under AB 52: Requirements and
Best Practices. State of California.
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). 2019. Profile of the City of Rolling Hills. Rolling
Hills, California.
California Energy Commission. 2019. 2019 California Energy Efficiency Action Plan. State of California.
201
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 100 City of Rolling Hills
WEBSITES
Architectural Geographic Information System (ArcGIS). 2020.
<https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html> accessed November 2020.
California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2020. <https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/qaweb/site.php?s_arb_code=70073>
accessed October 2020.
California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2020. <https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/capp-resource-center/community-
assessment/sensitive-receptor-assessment> accessed October 2020.
California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2020. <https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/> accessed November 2020.
California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2020. <https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/fact-sheets/ab-32-global-
warming-solutions-act-2006> accessed November 2020.
California Code of Regulations, West Law. 2020. <https://govt.westlaw.com/calregs/Document> accessed
October 2020.
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL Fire). 2020. <https://gis.data.ca.gov/datasets/>
accessed October 2020.
California Division of Mines and Geology. 2020. <https://www.conservation.ca.gov/> accessed October 2020.
California Legislative Information. 2020. <https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/> accessed October 2020
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2020. <https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB> accessed November
2020.
City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code. 2020.
<https://library.municode.com/ca/rolling_hills/codes/code_of_ordinances> accessed October 2020.
County of Los Angeles Public Health. 2020. <http://www.publichealth.lacounty.gov> accessed October 2020.
Department of Conservation. 2020. <https://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/wa> accessed October 2020.
Department of Conservation. 2020. <https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/> accessed October
2020.
202
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 101 City of Rolling Hills
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 2020.
<https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/environmental-review/airport-hazards/> accessed October 2020.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2020. <https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-
emissions accessed> November 2020.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2020. <https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-clean-water-
act> accessed November 2020.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2008. <https://msc.fema.gov/portal/r> accessed October 2020.
Moloney & Associates Acoustic and Environmental Associates. 2020.
<https://acoustic-environmental.ie/ground-borne- vibration.> accessed October 2020.
Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA). 2020. <http://www.rhca.org/info.php?pnum=17> accessed
November 2020.
Safeopedia. 2018. <https://www.safeopedia.com/definition/5568/ambient-noise> accessed October 2020.
Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. 2020. <http://vertpaleo.org/The-Society/Advocacy/Paleontological-Resources-
Preservation-Act.aspx> accessed October 2020.
South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2020. <http://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/clean-air-
plans/air-quality-mgt-plan> accessed October 2020.
State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). 2020. <https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map> accessed
October 2020.
UC Museum of Paleontology. 2020. <https://ucmp.berkeley.edu/collections/databases/> accessed October 2020.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2020.
<https://www.nrcs.usda.gov> accessed October 2020.
United States Department of Fish and Wildlife – Endangered Species. 2020.
<https://www.fws.gov/endangered/what-we-do/hcp-overview.html> accessed October 2020.
United States Drought Monitor. 2020. <https://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/> accessed November 2020.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2020.
<https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/ancl.html> accessed October 2020.
203
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 102 City of Rolling Hills
United State Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2020. <https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-
greenhouse-gases> accessed October 2020.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2020. <https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-
change-indicators-climate-forcing> accessed October 2020.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2020. <https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overvie>
accessed October 2020.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2020. <https://www.epa.gov/enviro/sems-search>
accessed October 2020.
204
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 103 City of Rolling Hills
205
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 104 City of Rolling Hills
206
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 105 City of Rolling Hills
207
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 106 City of Rolling Hills
208
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 107 City of Rolling Hills
209
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 108 City of Rolling Hills
210
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 109 City of Rolling Hills
211
City of Rolling Hills
Rancho Del Mar Affordable Housing Overlay Zone
Initial Study/Negative Declaration
November 2020 Page | 110 City of Rolling Hills
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
65277.00001\33367195.1
Page 1 of 11
ORDINANCE NO. 369
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA AMENDING TITLE 17
(ZONING) OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO
ADD CHAPTER 17.19 (RANCHO DEL MAR HOUSING
OPPORTUNITY OVERLAY ZONE) ESTABLISHING AN
OVERLAY ZONE TO ACCOMMODATE HOUSING AND TO
AMEND SECTION 17.08.010 (ZONES ESTABLISHED) OF
CHAPTER 17.08 (ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONES AND
BOUNDARIES) TO IDENTIFY THE OVERLAY ON THE
ZONING MAP; AND APPROVING THE NEGATIVE
DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
RECITALS
A. Pursuant to its obligation under Government Code § 65583.2, the City Council of
the City of Rolling Hills needs to amend its municipal code to establish an overlay zone to
accommodate housing;
B. On December 22, 2020, the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public
hearing and considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony
concerning a proposed ordinance. It adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council
adopt the proposed ordinance;
C. On January 6, 2021, the City gave public notice of the January 25, 2021 public
hearing to be held by the City Council on the proposed ordinance by publishing notice in the
Torrance Daily Breeze, a newspaper of general circulation;
D. On January 25, 2021, the City Council held a duly-noticed public hearing and
considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning the
proposed ordinance. Staff introduced changes to the proposed ordinance warranting referral back
to the Planning Commission under Government Code § 65857. The City Council continued the
public hearing to its February 8, 2021 meeting;
E. On February 5, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public
meeting to consider the changes introduced by staff and considered the staff report,
recommendations by staff, and public comments concerning the proposed ordinance. It adopted a
resolution recommending that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance; and
F. On February 8, 2021, the City Council held a duly-noticed public hearing and
considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning the
proposed ordinance.
253
65277.00001\33367195.1
Page 2 of 11
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 17.08.010 (Zones established) of Chapter 17.08 (Establishment of Zones
and Boundaries) in Title 17 (Zoning) is hereby amended to read as follows:
Chapter 17.08 - ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONES AND BOUNDARIES
17.08.010 - Zones established.
Rolling Hills is a unique, well-established residential community. Development consists
almost exclusively of single-family residential houses on large lots. The General Plan of
the City of Rolling Hills establishes a policy to maintain the existing pattern and type of
residential development, with support public facility uses. Toward the end of
implementing General Plan land use policy, zone districts are established as follows:
A. RA-S - Residential Agriculture-Suburban. The RA-S zone district is divided into
two sub-districts: RA-S-1 and RA-S-2. The suffix indicates the minimum lot size
requirement in net acres.
1. The Overlay Zoning District (OZD-1) overlies a portion of the RA-S-1 zone and is
identified on the zoning map.
2. The Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay Zoning District (RDMO)
overlies a portion of the RA-S-2 zone and is identified on the zoning map.
B. PF - Public Facilities.
Section 2. Chapter 17.19 (Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay Zone) is added to
Title 17 (Zoning) to read as follows:
Chapter 17.19 – RANCHO DEL MAR HOUSING OPPORTUNITY OVERLAY
ZONE
17.19.010 – Intent and purpose.
The Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay Zone (RDMO) is established by this
chapter to:
A. To provide regulations that implement the goals and policies of the general plan and
other similar long-range planning documents aimed at encouraging mixed-use
development within the City. The RDMO zone is further intended to serve as an
implementation tool of the City's land use and housing elements of the general plan
by facilitating further residential development.
B. The RDMO zone has the following major objectives:
1. Create "by-right" opportunities for housing;
254
65277.00001\33367195.1
Page 3 of 11
2. Implement state laws that require cities to demonstrate available land capacity and
zoning tools to accommodate the City's current and projected need for housing;
3. Facilitate well-designed development projects that combine residential and
nonresidential uses (e.g., office, transit facility and other community amenities) to
promote a better balance of jobs and housing;
4. Encourage development that provides attractive features (e.g., landscaping, public
spaces, courtyards, etc.) designed to integrate the public realm (e.g., right of way,
walking path, etc.) with development on adjacent private property.
17.19.020 – Applicability.
The RDMO applies to 38 Crest Road West, Rolling Hills, California.
17.19.030 – Uses Permitted.
No lot, premises, building, or structure shall be used for any use or purpose other than the
following:
A. Affordable Multi-family+^;
B. Affordable Senior housing+;
C. Emergency Shelter+;
D. Single Room Occupancy*;
E. Daycare*;
F. School facilities*;
G. Transit facilities*.
*Requires Conditional Use Permit (RHMC Chapter 17.42)
+Requires Zone Clearance Permit (RHMC Chapter 17.44)
^Requires compliance with Government Code Section 65583.2(h)
17.19.040 – Development Standards for Single Room Occupancy.
A. Single Room Occupancy Defined. “Single room occupancy (SRO) facility" means a
facility operated by a provider with six or more dwelling units for persons of lower
income where each unit has a minimum floor area of two hundred fifty square feet and
a maximum floor area of three hundred fifty square feet. These dwelling units must be
offered on a monthly basis or longer. For the purposes of this definition, a "provider"
means a government agency or private nonprofit organization that provides or contracts
with recognized community organizations to provide SRO housing, and "lower
income" has the meaning set forth in Health and Safety Code Section 50079.5.
B. SRO housing shall conform to the following requirements:
1. SRO housing shall be limited to a total maximum number of eight (8) units.
2. Occupancy shall be limited to maximum two persons per unit.
3. Each SRO unit shall be provided with the following minimum amenities:
i. Kitchen sink with garbage disposal.
255
65277.00001\33367195.1
Page 4 of 11
ii. A toilet and sink located in a separate room within the unit that is a minimum
twenty square feet.
iii. One closet per person.
iv. Telephone and cable TV hookups.
4. If full bathrooms are not provided in each unit, shared showers shall be provided
on each floor at a ratio of one per seven units on the same floor, with doors lockable
from the inside.
5. If full kitchens are not provided in each unit, shared kitchen facilities shall be
provided on each floor consisting of a range, sink with garbage disposal, and
refrigerator.
6. If laundry facilities are not provided in each unit, common laundry facilities shall
be provided, with one washer and one dryer on the premises.
7. On-site management shall be provided.
8. Off-street parking shall be provided at the rate of one-half spaces per unit, plus one
space for each employee on duty.
17.19.050 – Development Standards for Emergency Shelter.
A. Operational Requirements. An application for a permit to establish and operate an
emergency shelter shall be accompanied by a management and operations plan, which
shall establish hours of operation, staffing levels, maximum length of stay, size and
location of exterior and interior on-site waiting and intake areas, and security
procedures.
B. Developmental Requirements. Emergency Shelters shall conform to the following
requirements:
1. Maximum of twelve beds.
2. Minimum separation of three hundred feet between emergency shelters.
3. Facility Requirements.
i. Each occupant shall be provided a minimum of fifty square feet of personal
living space, not including space for common areas.
ii. Bathing facilities shall be provided in quantity and location as required by the
California Plumbing Code (Title 24 Part 5), and shall comply with the
accessibility requirements of the California Building Code (Title 24 Part 2).
iii. Shelters must provide a storage area for refuse and recyclables that is enclosed
by a six-foot-high landscape screen, solid wall, or fence, which is accessible to
collection vehicles on one side. The storage area must be large enough to
accommodate the number of bins that are required to provide the facility with
sufficient service so as to avoid the overflow of material outside of the bins
provided.
iv. The shelter may provide one or more of the following specific facilities and
services on site, including but not limited to:
(1) Commercial kitchen facilities designed and operated in compliance with the
California Retail Food Code;
(2) Dining area;
(3) Laundry room;
256
65277.00001\33367195.1
Page 5 of 11
(4) Recreation room;
(5) Support services (e.g. training, counseling, etc.); and
(6) Child care facilities.
v. On-Site Waiting and Intake Areas. A minimum of five percent of the total
square footage of a shelter shall be designated for indoor on-site waiting and
intake areas to accommodate drop off, intake, and pickup. In addition, an
exterior waiting area shall be provided, the minimum size of which is equal to
or larger than the minimum interior waiting and intake area.
vi. Off-Street Parking. One space of off-street parking shall be provided for each
staff person on duty.
17.19.060 – Development Standards for Multifamily Residential:
A. All multifamily residential projects shall be located west of the improved portion of
the PVPTA Facility and south of the access road.
B. All multifamily residential projects shall comply with the following development
standards:
Table 17.19.050A
Multifamily Residential Development Standards—Rancho Del Mar Housing
Opportunity Overlay Zone (RDMO)
Development
Regulation RDMO Notes
1. Minimum density
(residential uses)
1du/2,178 sq.ft. (i.e., 20
units per acre)
2. Maximum density
(residential uses)
1du/1815 sq.ft. (i.e., 24
units per acre)
3. Maximum number of
units 16 units
4. Minimum dwelling
unit size
Studio: 250 sq. ft.
1-bdrm: 400 sq. ft.
2-bdrm: 650 sq. ft.
3-bdrm: 900 sq. ft.
5. Maximum building
height 2 stories/28 ft. Minimum roof pitch: 3½:12
6. Distance between
buildings (minimum) 6 ft.
7.. front yard setback 5 ft. (min); 15 ft. (max)
8.. street side setback 5 ft. (min); 15 ft. (max)
257
65277.00001\33367195.1
Page 6 of 11
9. side setback 5 ft. (min); No max
10. rear yard setback 10 ft. (min)
11. Setback from bottom
of slope 50 ft. minimum Building pad not to exceed 10% slope.
12. Permitted setback
encroachments 6 ft. into setbacks
Balconies, awning, porches, stairways and
similar elements may extend up to 6 ft.
into the setback. Cornices, eaves,
fireplaces, similar architectural features
may extend 4 ft. into the front and rear
setbacks and 3 ft. in interior setbacks.
13. Maximum
Development site .8 acre
Landscape/open space standards
14. Common open space
(multi-family residential) 100 sq. ft. per unit
Parking Standards
15. Surface parking
20 ft. min. setback from
front lot line at
driveway entrance; 15
ft. min side yard
setback at driveway
entrance.
16. Garage/tuck-under
parking Prohibited along front
17. Underground/podium
parking
Allowed beneath
building footprint
Abbreviations: sq. ft. = square feet; ft. = feet or foot
17.19.070 – Parking regulations.
All allowed uses identified in Section 17.19.030 shall comply with the following:
A. Parking standards:
Table 17.19.070A
Parking Standards - Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay Zone (RDMO)
Use Required Number of Spaces Notes
Multi-family
residential and
condominiums
Studio - 1 space per unit
One bedroom - 1 space per unit
Two bedrooms – 1.5 spaces per unit
Per unit; Tandem
parking is allowed in
cases where multiple
258
65277.00001\33367195.1
Page 7 of 11
Three or more bedrooms - 2.5 spaces per unit
Additional guest parking 1/4 space per unit
spaces are assigned
to a single unit
Senior housing
1.0 spaces per unit for developments of 10 units or
less. For developments of 11 units or more, the
parking shall be 0.5 spaces per dwelling unit, or 10
spaces, whichever is greater. For developments of 10
or more units, 10 percent of the total required
parking shall be reserved for guest parking
Very low and low
income housing
units
1.0 space per very low or low income unit. This
parking ratio only applies to those units which are
designated for very low or low income. For
developments of 10 or more units, ten (10) percent of
the total required parking shall be reserved for guest
parking 1.1
Single Room
Occupancy
0.5 space per unit plus 1.0 space for each staff on
duty
Emergency
Shelter 1.0 space for each staff on duty
B. Reduced Parking. The Planning Commission and City Council may reduce the required
parking after considering documentation and a study provided by the applicant showing
infeasibility of providing required parking. Staff’s recommendation shall give weight
to all relevant facts, including but not limited to the following: availability and
accessibility of alternative parking; impact on adjacent residential neighborhoods;
existing or potential shared parking arrangements; the characteristics of the use,
including hours of operation and peak parking demand times; design and maintenance
of off-street parking that will be provided; and whether the proposed use is new or a
small addition to an existing use. Required parking shall comply with State law for
affordable housing units.
C. Electric Vehicle Charging Stations. In accordance with the California Green Building
Code (CALGreen Code), new buildings shall be electric vehicle charging station ready.
This requires residential properties to provide one 120V AC 20 amp and one 208/240V
40 amp, grounded AC outlet for each required parking space. The number of required
parking spaces for electric vehicle charging shall be as follows:
Table 17.17.080B
Electric Vehicle Charging Station Standards - Rancho Del Mar Housing
Opportunity Overlay Zone (RDMO)
Total Number of Spaces Number of Required Electric Vehicle Charging Spaces
1-10 1
11-20 3
259
65277.00001\33367195.1
Page 8 of 11
21-30 5
17.19.080 – Multifamily Residential Frontage type regulations.
A. Elevation of Ground Floor.
1. The elevation of the ground floor shall be elevated above the grade of the lot to
provide privacy for residences by preventing direct views into the home from the
sidewalk.
2. The ground floor elevation shall be located within five feet of the ground surface
of the adjacent sidewalk or walkway.
B. Minimum Ground Floor Ceiling Height. Ten (10) feet minimum (floor-to-floor
height).
C. Ground Floor Unit Entrances.
1. Entrances and windows shall be provided on the front of the facade to provide
eyes on the street and direct sidewalk access to the building.
2. Entrances to ground floor units that have street frontage may be provided through
a common lobby entrance and/or by private entrances from the adjacent sidewalk.
D. Upper Floor Unit Entrances. Entrances to upper floor units may be provided through
a common lobby entrance and/or by a common entrance along a facade fronting a
street.
E. Recessed Entrances. Entrances may be recessed into the facade.
F. Stoops and Front Porches.
1. Stoops and front porches may be provided in front of building and unit entrances.
2. Stoops and front porches may project up to five feet from the facade and project
into the setback.
G. Projecting Elements (Balconies, Roof Overhangs, Shade Structures, and Bay
Windows). Projecting Elements on upper floors may project four (4) feet from the
facade and project into the setback.
H. Sidewalk and Setback Treatment.
1. The public sidewalk shall be improved with street trees with an average spacing
of thirty (30) feet on-center and pedestrian-scaled lights not to exceed 30 inches in
height and maximum 25 Watts.
2. If the front facade is setback from the public sidewalk, the setback shall be
landscaped (excluding stoops/front porches and paved paths to building
entrances).
17.19.090 – Multifamily Residential usable open space regulations.
260
65277.00001\33367195.1
Page 9 of 11
A. Usable Open Space Defined. Usable open space areas are an open area or an indoor or
outdoor recreational facility which is designed and intended to be used for outdoor
living and/or recreation. Usable open space shall not include any portion of parking
areas, streets, driveways, pedestrian paths, or turnaround areas.
B. Usable Open Space Amenities/Facilities.
1. Each multifamily residential project shall include one usable open space amenity.
Each square foot of land area devoted to a usable open space amenity shall be
credited as common open space on a 1:1 basis.
2. The following listed recreational amenities satisfy the above recreational amenity
requirement:
i. Clubhouse
ii. Gym
iii. Children's playground equipment.
iv. Day care facility.
v. Other recreational amenities deemed adequate by the Planning and Community
Services Director.
17.19.100 - Multifamily Residential public space amenities requirements.
A. Each multifamily residential project shall include a public open space amenity. Each
square foot of land area devoted to a public space amenity shall be credited as common
open space on a 1:1 basis.
B. The following listed public space amenities satisfy the above public space amenity
requirement:
1. Formal Plazas. A formal plaza would be a publicly accessible open space which
has a design that is influenced by classical urban planning design. A formal plaza
would typically include some sort of central water fountain and/or symmetrical
landscaping.
2. Gardens. A garden can be located on the ground level or on upper levels of a
structure. Urban gardens include ornamental landscaping arranged in raised or at-
grade planters or planting areas, potted plants, and trees. Many times there are
sculptures or other forms of public art that are included within the urban garden.
3. Covered Colonnades. Colonnades are linear in design and generous in depth. The
intent is to provide a comfortably wide, covered pathway that is adjacent to the
openings of a building. Sometimes the second floor of a building is utilized to create
the "covered" element of the colonnade.
4. Pedestrian Alleys and Walkways. A pedestrian alley or walkway is typically a
"lane" that does not follow the alignment of a vehicular street, but provides a
pedestrian access to either a public space or some other feature within the interior
of a development. Pedestrian alleys or walkways must be designed in such a manner
so as to be inviting to pedestrians. Therefore, issues such as lighting, security, line
of sight, cleanliness and visual appeal are important considerations to a well-
designed pedestrian alley or walkway. Sometimes public art, street furniture, and
access to public spaces are features of pedestrian alleys and walkways.
261
65277.00001\33367195.1
Page 10 of 11
5. Bicycle Storage Areas. All developments shall provide common bicycle racks or
storage areas for the residents as follows: two (2) bicycle racks or storage units for
every five (5) dwelling units.
17.19.110 – Multifamily Residential Operational and Compatibility Standards
A. Trash Enclosures. Enclosures shall be required for refuse and recycling bins and there
location shall be clearly indicated on required site plan. Outside trash enclosures shall
be a minimum six (6) feet in height and shall be architecturally compatible with main
building. Enclosures are not permitted in required front yard or street side yard setback
area.
B. Landscaping. Landscaping shall comply with RHMC Chapter 13.18 (Water
Efficiency).
C. Screening and Buffering—Mechanical Equipment and Trash Facilities. All mechanical
equipment, heat, and air-conditioning equipment shall be architecturally screened from
view and buffered and trash facilities shall be screened and buffered.
D. Sound mitigation. Residential dwelling units shall be designed to be sound attenuated
against present and future project noise. New projects or new nonresidential uses in
existing projects shall provide an acoustical analysis report, by an acoustical engineer,
describing the acoustical design features of the structure required to satisfy the exterior
and interior noise standards.
Section 3. An Initial Study and Negative Declaration No. 2020-01 has been prepared,
processed, and noticed in accordance with CEQA (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.)
and the CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq.) for the
RDMO Zone. Pursuant to Section 15070, et seq of the CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds,
on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, that the proposed project
could not have a significant effect on the environment. Upon the basis of all of the evidence in
the record, the City Council finds that the Negative Declaration reflects the independent
judgment of the City Council and hereby approves the Negative Declaration.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its passage and adoption pursuant
to California Government Code section 36937.
Section 5. The City Clerk is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this Ordinance;
cause it to be entered into the City of Rolling Hills’s book of original ordinances; make a note of
the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting; and, within fifteen days after the passage
and adoption of this Ordinance, cause it to be published or posted in accordance with California
law.
262
65277.00001\33367195.1 Page 11 of 11
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 22nd day of February, 2021.
JEFF PIEPER MAYOR
ATTEST:
ELAINE JENG, P.E.
ACTING CITY CLERK
263
LA County - LARIAC 2014
Overlay
Overlay Zoning District - 1
Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay
Zoning
PF
RAS-1
RAS-2
264
RESOLUTION NO. 1270
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ADOPTING GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2020-01, AMENDING THE
LAND USE ELEMENT AND LAND USE POLICY
MAP TO ACCOMMODATE HOUSING; AND
APPROVING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
RECITALS
A.Pursuant to its obligation under Government Code § 65583.2, the City Council of
the City of Rolling Hills needs to amend its Land Use Element and Land Use Policy Map of the
City of Rolling Hills General Plan (“General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01”) to allow
multifamily housing, single room occupancy, and emergency shelters;
B. The proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01 was sent to affected public
entities for their review and comment;
C. The proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01 was reviewed, studied, and
found to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA");
D. On December 22, 2020, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed
public hearing and considered the staff report, written public comments, and oral public
testimony regarding the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01 and recommended
approval and adoption to the City Council;
E. On January 6, 2021, the City gave public notice of the consideration of a proposed
General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01 by publishing notice in the Torrance Daily Breeze, a
newspaper of general circulation;
F. On January 25, 2021, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing
and considered the staff report, written public comments, and oral public testimony regarding the
proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01. The City Council continued the public hearing
to its February 8, 2021 meeting;
G. On February 8, 2021, the City Council held a duly-noticed public hearing and
considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning proposed
General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
265
City Council Resolution No. 1270
Page 2
Section 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION (CEQA): An Initial Study and
Negative Declaration No. 2020-01 has been prepared, processed, and noticed in accordance with
CEQA (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the CEQA Guidelines (14 California
Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq.) for General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01. Pursuant
to Section 15070, et seq of the CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds, on the basis of
substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, that the proposed project could not have a
significant effect on the environment. Upon the basis of all of the evidence in the record, the City
Council finds that the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the City
Council and hereby approves the Negative Declaration.
Section 2. The City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. 2020-01,
Amending the Land Use Element and Land Use Policy Map (Exhibit A), based upon the
following findings:
A.The Land Use Element Amendment and Land Use Policy Map Amendment
appropriately update these two portions of the General Plan to address current
legal developments and required updates and to provide for integration and
consistency with the General Plan.
B.The Land Use Element Amendment and Land Use Policy Map Amendment
provide for development within the City that is consistent or compatible with the
General Plan and all of the other elements of the General Plan.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of February, 2021 by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstaining:
Absent:
_________________________
Jeff Pieper, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________
Elaine Jeng, P.E.
Acting City Clerk
Attachments:
Exhibit A: Land Use Element Amendment and Land Use Policy Map Amendment to
the Rolling Hills General Plan
266
LAND USE ELEMENT
LAND USE ELEMENT
Rolling Hills
General Plan
267
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
-i-
INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1
Purpose of the Element ...................................................................................................... 1
Relationship to Other Elements ......................................................................................... 2
EXISTING LAND USE ................................................................................................................ 3
Residential.......................................................................................................................... 3
TABLE LU-1 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS EXISTING LAND USE
INVENTORY January 1989 ...................................................................... 1
Public/Association-Owned Facilities ................................................................................. 1
Education ........................................................................................................................... 1
Recreation .......................................................................................................................... 1
Vacant Land ....................................................................................................................... 1
SIGNIFICANT LAND USE ISSUES ........................................................................................... 3
OVERVIEW OF LAND USE PLAN ............................................................................................ 4
Residential Land Uses........................................................................................................ 4
Civic Center ....................................................................................................................... 4
TABLE LU-2 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GENERAL PLAN LAND
USE CATEGORIES .................................................................................. 5
Publicly-Owned Open Space ............................................................................................. 6
Landslide Hazard Overlay ................................................................................................. 6
Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay………………………………………….6
Implications of Land Use Policy........................................................................................ 7
TABLE LU-3 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTIMATED GENERAL
PLAN BUILDOUT NET INCREASE IN DEVELOPMENT................... 8
GOALS AND POLICIES .............................................................................................................. 9
268
LAND USE ELEMENT
LAND USE ELEMENT
INTRODUCTION
The City of Rolling Hills enjoys the advantages of being located on the San Pedro
Hills of the Palos Verdes Peninsula, including cool sea breezes and low
concentrations of smog in the summer months, more sunshine due to its elevation
above much of the coastal fog, and commanding views of the Pacific Ocean and
Los Angeles Basin. Due to its coastal location, Rolling Hills has been able to
avoid many of the air quality and traffic problems associated with growth in the
Los Angeles area. However, geologic hazards have greatly affected properties
within Rolling Hills and have forced the City to examine development policies
within certain areas of the community.
This Land Use Element describes official City policy for the location of land uses
and their orderly growth and development. It serves as a guide for public officials
and citizens to determine the best uses of lands within the City. To the private
citizen, the Land Use Element will set forth the type of neighborhood he or she
can expect to live in, the location and type of public facilities available, and the
time and distance required for travel to necessary activities. Public officials will
use the Land Use Element as a guide for placement of public facilities and
services, and for directing new development. The Element also serves as a basis
for definition of short-range and long-range capital improvement programs.
Purpose of the Element
The intent of the Land Use Element is to describe present and projected land use
activity within Rolling Hills. The Element also addresses crucial issues
concerning the relationship between land uses and environmental quality,
potential hazards, and social and economic objectives.
In accordance with the State of California General Plan Guidelines, the Land Use
Element serves the following purposes:
o Identifies land use issues;
o Provides a statement of land use policies and proposals,
distinguishing, when appropriate, between short, middle and long-
term periods of fulfillment;
o Describes land use density and land use intensities provided for
under the Plan, including the relationships of such uses to social,
environmental and economic goals and objectives;
o Provides for standards and criteria for physical development within
each use area with consideration for land capacity; and
269
LAND USE ELEMENT
o Describes and depicts land use patterns provided for under the
Plan.
In response to the State of California Department of Housing and Community
Development’s (“HCD”) December 28, 2018 letter regarding the City’s
noncompliance with the State Housing Element Law and subsequent instructions
from HCD staff for the City to achieve compliance and to avoid penalty, the Land
Use Element must now make provision for multifamily housing, single room
occupancy, and emergency shelters through the creation of the Rancho Del Mar
Housing Opportunity Overlay (“RDMO”) located over a specific parcel at 38
Crest Road West, Rolling Hills, California.
Relationship to Other Elements
A major goal in this General Plan Update is to achieve internal consistency
throughout the various General Plan elements. Since the Land Use Element
regulates how land is utilized, it integrates and synthesizes most of the issues and
policies contained in the other Plan elements.
Specifically, the Land Use Element relates to the Housing Element by defining
the extent and density of future residential development in the City. The Land Use
Element is also coordinated with the Open Space/ Conservation Element in that
open space resources are designated on the Land Use Policy Map, and
environmental factors are considered in the location of land use types. The Land
Use Element also relates to the Safety and Noise Elements by integrating their
broad land use recommendations into detailed policies which apply to specific
geographic locations. Finally, the Circulation and Land Use Elements are
interrelated in that specific land use decisions depend upon traffic routes and
circulation patterns.
270
LAND USE ELEMENT
EXISTING LAND USE
The City of Rolling Hills is almost an entirely residential community of large
one+ acre parcels on 2.98 square miles of land. The land use pattern was
established with the original subdivision and sale of parcels which began in 1936.
Situated astride the San Pedro Hills of the Palos Verdes Peninsula, Rolling Hills is
characterized by white, single-story California ranch style homes with three-rail
fences and an abundance of equestrian facilities. Landscaping which was located
as parcels developed has matured, rendering the Rolling Hills area a heavily
wooded setting. Lot sizes range from a minimum of one acre to several acres in
size. Many lots contain a buildable ridge and steep arroyos.
Rolling Hills was created by A.E. Hanson and the Palos Verdes Corporation in
1936 following a generally unsuccessful attempt to sell 10 to 50 acre parcels as
“dude ranches” to residents of Los Angeles and Beverly Hills. The concept was
modified to offer one to five acre parcels to residents of closer-by communities
attracted to the cleaner, cooler air, sunshine and absence of congestion. One of
Rolling Hills’ unique features is the set of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions
which have assured the maintenance and uniformity of properties throughout the
years. Buildings are limited to one story in height with three-rail fences
surrounding the properties. Residences are strongly encouraged to be of a ranch
style, and are required to be painted white. All properties provide easements
which are primarily utilized for equestrian trails. The CC&Rs are enforced
through the Rolling Hills Community Association. Through the association, fees
are levied which are used for maintenance of the roads and recreational facilities.
Beginning in 1938, the 150-acre area known as the Flying Triangle was added to
the development’s original 600 acres. The Flying Triangle area has, in recent
years, been subject to major landslides resulting in building moratoriums for parts
of the area that are known to be at risk.
To comply with State mandates, a comprehensive land use survey was undertaken
by City staff in 2020 to identify the extent of existing land uses in the community.
Figure LU-1 illustrates existing land uses in Rolling Hills; an existing land use
map is also on file at City Hall. Table LU-1, Existing Land Use Inventory,
quantifies the acreage dedicated to the various land uses present in Rolling Hills.
The table is divided into five residential density categories and categories for
Public Facility, Education, Recreation and Vacant Land. The following sections
describe the nature of each of these land uses in Rolling Hills.
BOX REPRESENTS MAP ON PAGE 4 OF PDF DOCUMENT
Residential
271
LAND USE ELEMENT
Rolling Hills is comprised almost exclusively of ranch style residential
homes. Large setback requirements and lot sizes, as well as topographic
constraints on many lots provide significant amounts of open space on
developed parcels that give the overall community a sense of openness.
Many of the lots are large enough to support horses, and many have
stables as accessory structures.
The character of residential development in Rolling Hills has changed
substantially over the years. Many homes are constructed to maximize the
building area on the lot. The increasing building size has also fostered a tendency
for more grading to prepare many of the steeper properties for a structure.
Increases in grading practices have had a significant effect on the natural
environment and viewscapes. These combined trends have significantly altered
the community’s character and affect surrounding properties. The results of a
Community Attitude Survey indicate a high level of concern among residents
related to residential development and design compatibility issues. In response to
those concerns, the City adopted a site plan review ordinance to preserve and
enhance the community’s character.
In addition to the changes in community character, increased building size and
related grading may have contributed to the instability of soil in the area of the
City known as the Flying Triangle. Combined with several winters of heavy
rainfall, increases in water discharged from septic systems and increased grading
are believed to have contributed to soil destabilization. Development in this area
is limited by the Building Code.
The need for housing across California has also resulted in the State requiring
cities to allow certain types of housing. In response to these State requirements,
the City has identified the RDMO Zone located over a specific parcel at 38 Crest
Road West, Rolling Hills, California to provide additional housing opportunities
within the City.
In order to define the range of existing residential land use, five density ranges
were arrived upon. The five categories include parcels of 0-1 acres, 1-2 acres, 2-3
acres, 3-5 acres and 5+ acres. As illustrated in Table LU-1, approximately three
percent of the City’s developed residential acreage consists of parcels less than
one acre in size, 20 percent consists of parcels between 3-5 acres, with 1-2 acre
parcels, 2-3 acre parcels, and 5+ acre parcels each comprising 25 percent of the
City’s developed acreage. A total of 683 single-family dwelling units have been
developed in Rolling Hills on 1,636.8 acres of land.
272
LAND USE ELEMENT
TABLE LU-1
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
EXISTING LAND USE INVENTORY
January 1989
Land Use Acreage DUs
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
0-1 acre 49.6
1-2 acres 436.4
2-3 acres 430.5
3-5 acres 317.3
5+ acres 403.0
Total Residential 1,636.8 683
PUBLIC/ASSOCIATION-OWNED
FACILITIES 5.5
EDUCATION 31.14
RECREATION 33.3
VACANT LAND 203.1
Total Non-Residential 272.2
TOTAL ACREAGE 1,908.9
(2.98 sq.miles)
Source: City of Rolling Hills
compiled by Cotton/Beland/Associates, Inc.
273
LAND USE ELEMENT
Public/Association-Owned Facilities
Public facilities owned by the City of Rolling Hills and private facilities owned by
the Rolling Hills Community Association provide for the needs of the community.
The City owns the Rolling Hills Administrative Building which houses the offices
of the City of Rolling Hills and the Rolling Hills Community Association. The
City also owns a maintenance building, three tennis courts and two equestrian
riding rings.
The Community Association owns roadway easements and the guard gates. The
Palos Verdes Water Company owns two water tanks and several antenna towers
adjacent to and accessed through Rolling Hills. A major radar installation site is
contiguous to the City’s eastern boundary that is operated by the Federal
Aeronautic Administration. Finally, the Los Angeles County Fire Protection
District• owns and operates a Fire Station within the City. Table LU-1 shows
facilities owned by the City, other public entities, and the Community
Association. These facilities comprise a total of 5.5 acres within the community.
Education
The Palos Verdes Peninsula School District owns a site of 31.14 acres which is
located south of Crest Road along the City’s western boundary. The site is home
to the Rancho Del Mar Continuation High School which serves the Palos Verdes
Peninsula Unified School District. Access to the school district property is via
Crest Road outside the City.
Recreation
The City contains 33.3 acres of recreational open space. Opposite the City
administration building are three City-owned tennis courts which are operated and
maintained by the Rolling Hills Community Association. The courts are open to
Association members and their guests and are operated from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m.
Also contained within the City are two riding rings and a series of trails. The trails
are an extensive network laced throughout the City affording hikers and
equestrians alike varied opportunities within the community’s boundaries. Also
available for recreational use within Rolling Hills is an 8.01 acre parcel on the
north end of Storm Hill which was dedicated through provisions of the Quimby
Act. The property is open to City residents for use as an open equestrian area.
Vacant Land
Of the numerous vacant properties in Rolling Hills, many are constrained from
future developments. The area within the Flying Triangle which is subject to
landslides is under a moratorium and will not likely be buildable into the
foreseeable future due to building code requirements which do not permit
construction in geologically unstable areas. Other properties exist which are
constrained due to excessive slopes on the property. It is estimated that there are
203.1 acres of vacant, residentially zoned land within the City. Of that total,
274
LAND USE ELEMENT
172.75 acres are unconstrained (either located outside the Flying Triangle and/or
not constrained by slope) and, subject to site plan review requirements, may
accommodate a maximum of 59 additional residential units.
275
LAND USE ELEMENT
SIGNIFICANT LAND USE ISSUES
The following list is a summary of issues and opportunities relating to land use
that have been identified in Rolling Hills from the Community Attitude Survey
and through discussions with the General Plan Advisory Committee and other
City committees. These issues are addressed in the Goals and Policies of this
Land Use Element.
o The landslide area within the Flying Triangle has rendered a large
amount of land within the City’s southwest area unsuitable for
residential development, and is subject to ongoing changes in
topography.
o Due to the constraints of the landslide area within the Flying
Triangle, a large amount of open space remains open to alternative
uses such as recreation or study of such geologic hazards.
o The City’s topography renders large parts of many parcels
constrained, thus leaving smaller areas available for development.
Recent residential construction has maximized lot coverage
through extensive grading.
o Grading of individual lots have significantly altered the topography
and drainage patterns on many lots thus eliminating certain
viewscapes and diminishing of the natural character of the City.
o New residential development within the community has changed
significantly in character from the original residential
developments, thus generating an increasing degree of
incompatibility between adjacent uses.
o The increasing size and bulk of recent residential developments
within Rolling Hills and the surrounding area have substantially
reduced the natural, rural environment which has characterized
Rolling Hills in the past.
o The use of private septic systems within the City may have
contributed to soil instability. While lot size does not mandate a
conversion to a common sewage system, the City may facilitate
such a conversion.
o The need for housing within the City has required the
implementation of the RDMO Zone to allow for uses, including
multifamily, single room occupancy, and emergency shelters.
276
LAND USE ELEMENT
OVERVIEW OF LAND USE PLAN
The Rolling Hills Land Use Policy Map is presented in Figure LU-2. The Map
provides a graphic representation of the General Plan’s development policies and
indicates land uses as they are designated and for which policies and standards
have been formulated. The major goal of Rolling Hills’ General Plan Update is to
maintain and foster the community’s rural and residential environment while
ensuring that new development is in conformance with established community
standards.
The land use classifications designated by the General Plan provide for the
development of the community’s limited vacant properties in a manner that is
consistent with established and approved development patterns. The land use
classifications established by this General Plan Update reflect a system that is
different but generally consistent with the previous land use classifications. The
City’s policy retains the existing low-density land use pattern, while
accommodating a range of housing types as required by State law. Table LU-2
presents the list of updated General Plan land use categories, their general
development standards and characteristics. The following discussion will
elaborate on the location and intent of the General Plan land uses.
Residential Land Uses
The Plan continues the City’s two existing residential land use categories - Low
Density and Very Low Density. The former mandates establishes a density of one
unit per acre and the latter establishes a density of one unit per two acres. Zoning
provisions have been developed to allow accessory dwelling units. Through these
classifications, the City will be able to ensure that the remaining undeveloped
properties throughout Rolling Hills will be developed at densities that are
compatible with existing residential development.
Civic Center
The Civic Center designation has been added to the Land Use Policy Map to
specify the 1.3 acre area that is currently used by the City for its administrative
offices. The Civic Center land use category has been created to accurately reflect
uses that exist within the City, and to provide consistency between the General
Plan Land Use Policy Map and the Zoning Map.
BOX REPRESENTS MAP THAT WAS ON PAGE 11 OF PDF
277
LAND USE ELEMENT
TABLE LU-2
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE CATEGORIES
Designation
Development
Standards
Development
Characteristics
Residential
Very Low Density
Low Density
2+ net acres/dwelling
unit, single story
1-2 net acres/dwelling
unit, single story
Single-family homes on
large lots, usually custom
designed. Parcels often
contain varied topography
and canyon areas.
Single-family homes on
large lots, often custom
designed.
Public
Civic Center
Publicly-Owned Open
Space
Single story
Development prohibited
City Hall and associated
facilities.
Equestrian riding rings and
undeveloped open space
areas owned by the City.
Landslide Hazard
Overlay
Development prohibited
unless landslide hazard is
mitigated
Active landslide areas
requiring mitigation of
geologic hazards prior to
development.
Rancho Del Mar Housing
Opportunity Overlay
Public Facilities permitted.
Two story construction
permitted.
Multifamily Housing
permitted, not to exceed 16
units for the entire overlay
site.
School Facilities
Transportation Facilities
Clustered Housing and
Special Housing Types
278
LAND USE ELEMENT
Publicly-Owned Open Space
While the majority of recreational open space within the community is maintained
by the Rolling Hills Community Association, a limited amount of open space is
also owned by the City. Areas of publicly-owned open space lie at the northern
end of Storm Hill where a parcel of eight acres was dedicated to the City through
the provisions of the Quimby Act. Also included as publicly owned open space
are the two equestrian riding rings owned by the City. The purpose of separating
out publicly-owned open space is to identify lands that are owned and maintained
by the City and will remain as open space. In addition, this land use category
could also be utilized in the future for any additional open space land purchased
by the City.
Landslide Hazard Overlay
A Landslide Hazard Overlay classification has been created to address the
landslide hazards present in Rolling Hills. Landslide hazards have occurred most
notably in the Flying Triangle area beginning in 1980. The reasons for the onset
of landslide activity are multiple and are addressed in detail in the Safety Element.
The Landslide Hazard Overlay classification has been developed to further
establish the City’s continuing policy which prohibits development in areas which
are known to be subject to active landslides, specifically the Flying Triangle.
Establishing this policy in the General Plan provides the framework for the
inclusion of specific criteria in the Zoning Ordinance. Residential development
will be permitted pursuant to the underlying zoning, only where evidence can be
provided that establishes such development as posing no hazard to the property or
adjacent properties. This evidence will be formed on a case by case basis upon
review of geologic and soils information and hydrologic and topographic
analyses. The Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance, upon revision, will specify
development constraints in overlay areas.
Rancho Del Mar Housing Opportunity Overlay (RDMO) Zone
A RDMO Zone has been created to meet State housing requirements and
provide opportunities for a variety of housing types. The City is required
by State law to plan for its fair share of regional housing needs, including
housing for all income groups. Because Rolling Hills is developed with
large, environmentally constrained lots that make higher densities
impractical, the City has determined that the best way to accomplish the
State requirements is through providing opportunities with a combination
of accessory dwelling units (“in-law apartments”) and multifamily
housing.
The City has identified a specific parcel located at 38 Crest Road West,
Rolling Hills, California to accommodate it share of regional housing
needs. The 31.14-acre parcel is designated Very Low Density Residential,
279
LAND USE ELEMENT
which allows one unit per two acres—or 16 units for the entire site
(rounding up from 15.57). To meet the current and projected housing
needs of the City, the City is creating an overlay zone on the specific
parcel located at 38 Crest Road West, Rolling Hills, California to allow
multifamily residential housing, not to exceed 16 units for the entire
overlay site. The Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance includes an overlay
zoning district which codifies this requirement.
Other land uses, such as public facilities, parks, and transportation
facilities, are permitted within this overlay.
Implications of Land Use Policy
The Land Use Element provides for the continued residential emphasis of the
Rolling Hills community. The General Plan ensures that this growth will take
place in a way that promotes compatibility with adjacent properties, preserves the
existing rural residential character, and is environmentally sensitive. The amount
of additional growth that can be accommodated under this General Plan is
presented as Table LU-3. As this table illustrates, the Plan only provides for the
expansion of residential uses.
280
LAND USE ELEMENT
TABLE LU-3
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
ESTIMATED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT
NET INCREASE IN DEVELOPMENT
Residential Acres Dwelling Units Population
Very Low Density 148.50 49 156.8
Low Density 24.25 10 32.0
(RDMO) (31.14) (16) (51.2)
Totals 203.89 75 240
Based on an average household size of 3.2 persons.
Source: City of Rolling Hills
Cotton/Beland/Associates, Inc.
The Plan accommodates a maximum net increase of 59 single-family dwelling
units and 16 multifamily dwelling units. The majority of this growth would occur
on the properties under the Very Low Density classification, residential
development on 2+ acre parcels. Growth in the residential areas will occur under
different circumstances. The population of Rolling Hills as of January 1, 1989
was 2,092. Over the City’s 2.98 square miles the population density is 702
persons per square mile. Based on Department of Finance estimates of an average
3.2 persons per household in Rolling Hills, an additional 240 persons could reside
in the City under General Plan buildout.
281
LAND USE ELEMENT
GOALS AND POLICIES
The following goals and policies reflect current land use issues affecting the
community of Rolling Hills and will serve as a guide to future policy decisions
made for the City.
GOAL 1: Maintain Rolling Hills’ distinctive rural residential character.
Policy 1.1: Maintain the City’s one and two acre minimum lot size requirements.
Policy 1.2: Maintain the City’s one story height limitation for single-family
residences to preserve scenic viewsheds.
Policy 1.3: Require the use of landscaping which is compatible with the City’s
rural character.
Policy 1.4: Require that development conform with the City’s existing low-
profile, ranch style architecture.
Policy 1.5: Preserve a natural twilight environment at night by prohibiting street
lighting and uplighting of landscaping and minimizing driveway lighting.
Policy 1.6: Evaluate the City’s existing requirement for minimum stable size to
assess its appropriateness and effectiveness.
GOAL 2: Accommodate development which is compatible with and
complements existing land uses.
Policy 2.1: Evaluate the City’s lot coverage standards to assess their effectiveness
in providing for development which is compatible with adjacent uses.
Policy 2.2: Require that lighting of residential properties not adversely affect
adjacent residences.
Policy 2.3: Maintain and provide regulations for sufficient setbacks and
easements to provide buffers between residential uses.
Policy 2.4: Ensure the siting of buildings maintain and preserve viewscapes from
adjacent structures through the site review process.
GOAL 3: Accommodate development that is sensitive to the natural
environment and accounts for environmental hazards.
Policy 3.1: Establish a Landslide Overlay classification to reflect the more
stringent development standards the City has applied to development in active
landslide areas.
Policy 3.2: Maintain strict grading practices to preserve the community’s natural
terrain.
282
LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy 3.3: Require the use of native, naturally fire resistant landscape materials
in development.
Policy 3.4: Maintain the City’s open space requirement to preserve natural
vegetation and wildlife habitat.
Policy 3.5: Facilitate the preservation and restoration of viewscapes through the
removal of obstructions.
GOAL 4: Fulfill State-mandated obligation to provide housing opportunities.
Policy 4.1: Establish zoning regulations that provide for a variety of housing
types, as required by State law and in a manner that is compatible with the other
policies expressed in the Land Use Element.
283
284
Agenda Item No.: 8.A
Mtg. Date: 02/22/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:ALAN PALERMO, PROJECT MANAGER
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:CONSIDER AND APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 1271 TO AMEND
RESOLUTION NO. 1263 THAT ACCEPTED STATE DEPARTMENT OF
PARKS AND RECREATION PER CAPITA PROGRAM GRANT
ALLOCATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $177,952 FROM THE OFFICE OF
GRANTS AND LOCAL SERVICES (OGALS) TO INCLUDE THE URBAN
COUNTY PER CAPITA ALLOCATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,156;
AND AMEND RESOLUTION NO. 1265 THAT TRANSFERRED THE
STATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PER CAPITA
PROGRAM GRANT ALLOCATION OF $177,952 TO ROLLING HILLS
ESTATES FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE GEORGE F. CANYON
NATURE CENTER TO INCLUDE THE URBAN COUNTY PER CAPITA
ALLOCATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,156.
DATE:February 22, 2021
BACKGROUND:
City Council approval is requested for the City of Rolling Hills to approve a resolution to accept grant
funding for the “Per Capita Program” from the Office of Grants and Local Services (OGALS), State
Department of Parks and Recreation. The City was awarded a grant fund allocation in the amount of
$177,952 from the "Per Capita Program" and is required to approve a resolution accepting these grant
funds.
At the September 28, 2020 City Council meeting, the requirements listed in the resolution to accept the
funds would be resource intensive and the Council concluded that the requirements cannot be met. The
City Council directed staff to explore the following:
1. Can the funds be sold to another agency as with the Los Angeles County Proposition A allocation for
transit programs?
2. Can the funds be used fire fuel abatement in the Nature Preserve?
The Prop 68 Per Capita grant funds cannot be sold to another agency but can be transferred to another
285
agency. Per Capita funds can only be used for capital improvement. Maintenance and projects relating
to maintenance of past projects or facilities is not eligible. Fire fuel abatement is considered
maintenance, not capital improvement therefore ineligible for Per Capita program funds.
At the September 28, 2020 meeting, staff presented an eligible project on the Peninsula for the Prop 68
Per Capita funding: redesign of the George F. Canyon Nature Center in the City of Rolling Hills
Estates. In August 2020, Rolling Hills Estates inquired about Rolling Hills' Per Capita program
allocation and requested the allocation to be transferred to support capital improvements to the George
F. Canyon Nature Center.
In November 2020 City Council approved Resolution No. 1263 to accept the grant funds, and
Resolution No. 1265 to approve a transfer the City of Rolling Hills Per Capita Grant Fund allocation of
$177,952 to Rolling Hills Estates.
The signed resolutions were sent to the Project Officer at the Office of Grants and Local Services
(OGALS) and the City was informed there is also an allocation in the amount of $1,156 for the Urban
County Per Capita allocation that the City needs to address.
DISCUSSION:
The City of Rolling Hills proposes to accept the $1,156 Urban County Per Capita allocation as
stipulated in the Per Capita Program Procedural Guide and proposes to transfer these grant funds to the
City of Rolling Hills Estates.
Resolution No. 1271 amends previously approved Resolution No. 1263 to include the $1,156 Urban
County Per Capita Grant allocation the City of Rolling Hills will accept.
Resolution No. 1271 amends previously approved Resolution No. 1265 to include the $1,156 Urban
County Per Capita Grant allocation the City of Rolling Hills will be accepting and will be transfer their
Urban County Per Capita Program Grants funds to Rolling Hills Estates.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Passing Resolution No. 1271 amending Resolution No. 1263 accepting the Urban County Per Capita
allocation and amending Resolution No. 1265 transfer the Urban County Per Capita allocation to an
eligible city will not have any fiscal impact on the City.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution No. 1271 amending Resolution No. 1263
accepting the Per Capita Program Grant Fund allocation in the amount of $177,952 to include the
$1,156 Urban County Per Capita allocation; and that amends Resolution No. 1265 transferring the Per
Capita Program Grant Fund allocation in the amount of $177,952, to include the $1,156 Urban County
Per Capita allocation to Rolling Hills Estates.
ATTACHMENTS:
ResolutionNo1271AMENDMENT_TO_Transfer_of_Per_Capita_Grant_Program_Funds-c1.DOC
ResolutionNo1263-Approving_Application_for_Per_Capita_Grant_Program_Funds-c1.PDF
ResolutionNo1265-Transfer_of_Per_Capita_Grant_Program_Funds-c1.PDF
286
RESOLUTION NO. 1271
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AMENDING
RESOLUTION NOS. 1263 AND 1265 TO
AUTHORIZE THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS TO
TRANSFER $1,156 OF ITS URBAN COUNTY PER
CAPITA ALLOCATION TO THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS ESTATES AND APPROVE THE
FILING OF A PROJECT APPLICATION BY THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTATES BASED ON
THIS TRANSFERRED AMOUNT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1.Recitals.
A.On November 23, 2020, the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills
adopted Resolution No. 1265 authorizing the City of Rolling Hills to transfer $177,952 of
the General Per Capita Program allocation and $0 of the Urban County Per Capita
allocation under the Per Capita Grant Program (“Program”) designated for the City of
Rolling Hills to the City of Rolling Hills Estates.
B.Concurrently, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 1263 approving
the filing of a project application by the City of Rolling Hills Estates based on, at least in
part, the $177,952 of the General Per Capita Program Allocation and $0 of the Urban
County Per Capita allocation under the Program transferred by the City of Rolling Hills
to the City of Rolling Hills Estates pursuant to Resolution No. 1265.
C.Following the adoption of Resolution Nos. 1265 and 1263, City of Rolling
Hills staff learned that the City of Rolling Hills was allocated $1,156 of Urban County
Per Capita funds under the Program.
D.The City Council of the City of Rolling Hills desires to amend Resolution
Nos. 1265 and 1263 to identify $1,156 of Urban County Per Capita funds instead of $0 of
Urban County Per Capita funds.
Section 2.Section 2 of Resolution No. 1265 shall be amended to replace $0 of the
Urban County Per Capita allocation with $1,156 of the Urban County Per
Capita allocation.
Section 3.Section 2 of Resolution No. 1263 shall be amended to replace $0 of the
Urban County Per Capita allocation with $1,156 of the Urban County Per
Capita allocation.
287
Section 4.All sections in Resolution Nos. 1265 and 1263 not amended by this
Resolution shall remain in full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of February 2021.
______________________________
JEFF PIEPER
MAYOR
ATTEST:
___________________________
ELAINE JENG, P.E.
ACTING CITY CLERK
288
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
The foregoing Resolution No. 1271 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AMENDING
RESOLUTION NOS. 1263 AND 1265 TO
AUTHORIZE THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS TO
TRANSFER $1,156 OF ITS URBAN COUNTY PER
CAPITA ALLOCATION TO THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS ESTATES AND APPROVE THE
FILING OF A PROJECT APPLICATION BY THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTATES BASED ON
THIS TRANSFERRED AMOUNT
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 22nd day of
February 2021, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
___________________________
ELAINE JENG, P.E.
ACTING CITY CLERK
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
Agenda Item No.: 8.B
Mtg. Date: 02/22/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:MEREDITH ELGUIRA, PLANNING DIRECTOR
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:PENINSULA CITIES JOINT LETTERS TO STATE REPRESENTATIVE
OPPOSING SENATE BILLS 9 AND 10.
DATE:February 22, 2021
BACKGROUND:
In December 2020, many housing density bills that came close to passing were reintroduced by State
legislators. Senate Bill 9 (Atkins) replaced SB 1120. Senate Bill 9 would allow for the creation of
accessory dwelling units by local ordinance, if the local agency has not adopted an ordinance. The bill
would also allow for the construction of two units per lot and allow subdivision of parcels through the
ministerial process. Both newly created parcels must be equal in size and no smaller than 1,200 square
feet. SB 9 would allow up to six residential units per parcel on a single family residential zoned lot.
Senate Bill 10 (Weiner) replaces Senate Bill 902. The proposed Bill would authorize a local government
to pass an ordinance to zone any parcel for up to 10 units of residential density per parcel if the parcel is
located in a transit-rich, a jobs-rich area, or an urban infill site.
DISCUSSION:
Senate Bill 9 and Senate Bill 10 continue to usurp the local jurisdictions' powers to shape the
development of their cities and protect the quality of life of their citizens. These two bills will increase
the housing densities in the local area but there is no guarantee that the proposed developments will help
alleviate the need for affordable housing units. These bills have no provisions for development of below
market rate housing units.
The approval of SB 9 and SB 10 would have adverse impacts on the Peninsula cities. The Peninsula is
not a job rich area that is highly accessible by public transit. Most people travel outside of the area to
work. Increasing density without improving the infrastructure could potentially cause a huge strain on
the local streets, sewer capacity and water supply. More importantly, increasing the density in an area
located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone with limited access in and out of the area poses a
great threat to public health, safety and welfare.
Attached, for the City Council's consideration, are SB 9 and SB 10 joint Peninsula Cities' letters of
opposition. These draft letters have been forwarded to the three adjacent cities for their consideration
and input. Lastly, the League of California Cities has also prepared a template letter opposing SB 9.
This letter opposes SB 9 unless amendments were made to the bill. Staff views the proposed
296
amendments as falling short of protecting the City's authority on development and will still allow a one-
size fits all strategy to increase density in the area. The amendments will not protect the unique value
and character of the City of Rolling Hills.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost to prepare opposition letters to Senate Bill 9 and 10 is included in the adopted budget for Fiscal
Year 2020-2021.
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor to sign joint letters of opposition to Senate Bill 9 and 10 and discuss whether to
support League of California Cities' letter.
ATTACHMENTS:
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE SB 9.pdf
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE SB 10.pdf
League of Cities Sample Letter.docx
Draft SB9 Letter of Opposition.docx
Draft SB10 Letter of Opposition.docx
297
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2021–2022 REGULAR SESSION
SENATE BILL NO. 9
Introduced by Senators Atkins, Caballero, Rubio, and Wiener
(Coauthors: Senators Gonzalez and McGuire)
(Coauthor: Assembly Member Robert Rivas)
December 07, 2020
An act to amend Section 66452.6 of, and to add Sections 65852.21 and 66411.7 to, the
Government Code, relating to land use.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
SB 9, as introduced, Atkins. Housing development: approvals.
The Planning and Zoning Law provides for the creation of accessory dwelling units by local
ordinance, or, if a local agency has not adopted an ordinance, by ministerial approval, in
accordance with specified standards and conditions.
This bill, among other things, would require a proposed housing development containing 2
residential units within a single-family residential zone to be considered ministerially, without
discretionary review or hearing, if the proposed housing development meets certain
requirements, including, but not limited to, that the proposed housing development would not
require demolition or alteration of housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or
law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low
income, that the proposed housing development does not allow for the demolition of more than
25% of the existing exterior structural walls, except as provided, and that the development is not
located within a historic district, is not included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, or is
not within a site that is legally designated or listed as a city or county landmark or historic
property or district.
The bill would set forth what a local agency can and cannot require in approving the construction
of 2 residential units, including, but not limited to, authorizing a city or county to impose
objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design standards, as
defined, unless those standards would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of
up to 2 units, prohibiting the imposition of setback requirements under certain circumstances,
and setting maximum setback requirements under all other circumstances.
The Subdivision Map Act vests the authority to regulate and control the design and improvement
of subdivisions in the legislative body of a local agency and sets forth procedures governing the
local agency’s processing, approval, conditional approval or disapproval, and filing of tentative,
final, and parcel maps, and the modification of those maps. Under the Subdivision Map Act, an
approved or conditionally approved tentative map expires 24 months after its approval or
conditional approval or after any additional period of time as prescribed by local ordinance, not
to exceed an additional 12 months, except as provided.
298
This bill, among other things, would require a city or county to ministerially approve a parcel
map or tentative and final map for an urban lot split that meets certain requirements, including,
but not limited to, that the urban lot split would not require the demolition or alteration of
housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels
affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income, that the parcel is
located within a residential zone, and that the parcel is not located within a historic district, is not
included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, or is not within a site that is legally
designated or listed as a city or county landmark or historic property or district.
The bill would set forth what a local agency can and cannot require in approving an urban lot
split, including, but not limited to, authorizing a city or county to impose objective zoning
standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design standards, as defined, unless
those standards would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of 2 units on
either of the resulting parcels, prohibiting the imposition of setback requirements under certain
circumstances, and setting maximum setback requirements under all other circumstances.
The bill would also extend the limit on the additional period that may be provided by ordinance,
as described above, from 12 months to 24 months and would make other conforming or
nonsubstantive changes.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to
prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report
on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the
environment. CEQA does not apply to the approval of ministerial projects.
This bill, by establishing the ministerial review processes described above, would thereby
exempt the approval of projects subject to those processes from CEQA.
The California Coastal Act of 1976 provides for the planning and regulation of development,
under a coastal development permit process, within the coastal zone, as defined, that shall be
based on various coastal resources planning and management policies set forth in the act.
This bill would exempt a local government from being required to hold public hearings for
coastal development permit applications for housing developments and urban lot splits pursuant
to the above provisions.
By increasing the duties of local agencies with respect to land use regulations, the bill would
impose a state-mandated local program.
The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide
concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for
certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that
reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
299
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YES
Bill Text
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
Section 65852.21 is added to the Government Code, to read:
65852.21.
(a) A proposed housing development containing two residential units within a single-family
residential zone shall be considered ministerially, without discretionary review or a hearing, if
the proposed housing development meets all of the following requirements:
(1) The parcel subject to the proposed housing development is located within a city the
boundaries of which include some portion of either an urbanized area or urban cluster, as
designated by the United States Census Bureau, or, for unincorporated areas, a legal parcel
wholly within the boundaries of an urbanized area or urban cluster, as designated by the United
States Census Bureau.
(2) The parcel satisfies the requirements specified in subparagraphs (B) to (K), inclusive, of
paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 65913.4.
(3) Notwithstanding any provision of this section or any local law, the proposed housing
development would not require demolition or alteration of any of the following types of housing:
(A) Housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels
affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income.
(B) Housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity’s valid
exercise of its police power.
(C) Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the last three years.
(4) The parcel subject to the proposed housing development is not a parcel on which an owner of
residential real property has exercised the owner’s rights under Chapter 12.75 (commencing with
Section 7060) of Division 7 of Title 1 to withdraw accommodations from rent or lease within 15
years before the date that the development proponent submits an application.
(5) The proposed housing development does not allow the demolition of more than 25 percent of
the existing exterior structural walls, unless the housing development meets at least one of the
following conditions:
(A) If a local ordinance so allows.
(B) The site has not been occupied by a tenant in the last three years.
300
(6) The development is not located within a historic district or property included on the State
Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the Public Resources Code, or
within a site that is designated or listed as a city or county landmark or historic property or
district pursuant to a city or county ordinance.
(b) (1) Notwithstanding any local law and except as provided in paragraph (2), a city or county
may impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design
review standards that do not conflict with this section.
(2) (A) The city or county shall not impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision
standards, and objective design standards that would have the effect of physically precluding the
construction of up to two units.
(B) (i) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), no setback shall be required for an existing structure
or a structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing
structure.
(ii) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), in all other circumstances not described in clause (i), a
local government may require a setback of up to four feet from the side and rear lot lines.
(c) In addition to any conditions established in accordance with subdivision (b), a local agency
may require any of the following conditions when considering an application for two residential
units as provided for in this section:
(1) Off-street parking of up to one space per unit, except that a local agency shall not impose
parking requirements in either of the following instances:
(A) The parcel is located within one-half mile walking distance of either a high-quality transit
corridor, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, or a major
transit stop, as defined in Section 21064.3 of the Public Resources Code.
(B) There is a car share vehicle located within one block of the parcel.
(2) For residential units connected to an onsite wastewater treatment system, a percolation test
completed within the last five years, or, if the percolation test has been recertified, within the last
10 years.
(d) A local agency shall require that a rental of any unit created pursuant to this section be for a
term longer than 30 days.
(e) Notwithstanding Section 65852.2, a local agency shall not be required to permit an accessory
dwelling unit on parcels that use both the authority contained within this section and the
authority contained in Section 66411.7.
(f) Notwithstanding subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b), an application shall
not be rejected solely because it proposes adjacent or connected structures provided that the
structures meet building code safety standards and are sufficient to allow separate conveyance.
(g) Local agencies shall include units constructed pursuant to this section in the annual housing
element report as required by subparagraph (I) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section
65400.
301
(h) For purposes of this section, all of the following apply:
(1) A housing development contains two residential units if the development proposes two new
units or if it proposes to add one new unit to an existing unit.
(2) The terms “objective zoning standards,” “objective subdivision standards,” and “objective
design review standards” mean standards that involve no personal or subjective judgment by a
public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or
criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public
official prior to submittal. These standards may be embodied in alternative objective land use
specifications adopted by a city or county, and may include, but are not limited to, housing
overlay zones, specific plans, inclusionary zoning ordinances, and density bonus ordinances.
(i) A local agency may adopt an ordinance to implement the provisions of this section. An
ordinance adopted to implement this section shall not be considered a project under Division 13
(commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code.
(j) Nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede or in any way alter or lessen the effect
or application of the California Coastal Act of 1976 (Division 20 (commencing with Section
30000) of the Public Resources Code), except that the local government shall not be required to
hold public hearings for coastal development permit applications for a housing development
pursuant to this section.
SEC. 2.
Section 66411.7 is added to the Government Code, to read:
66411.7.
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this division and any local law, a city or county shall
ministerially approve, as set forth in this section, a parcel map or tentative and final map for an
urban lot split that meets all the following requirements:
(1) The parcel map or tentative and final map subdivides an existing parcel to create two new
parcels of equal size.
(2) (A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), both newly created parcels are no smaller than
1,200 square feet.
(B) A local agency may by ordinance adopt a smaller minimum lot size subject to ministerial
approval under this subdivision.
(3) The parcel being subdivided meets all the following requirements:
(A) The parcel is located within a residential zone.
(B) The parcel subject to the proposed urban lot split is located within a city the boundaries of
which include some portion of either an urbanized area or urban cluster, as designated by the
United States Census Bureau, or, for unincorporated areas, a legal parcel wholly within the
boundaries of an urbanized area or urban cluster, as designated by the United States Census
Bureau.
302
(C) The parcel satisfies the requirements specified in subparagraphs (B) to (K), inclusive, of
paragraph (6) of subdivision (a) of Section 65913.4.
(D) The proposed urban lot split would not require demolition or alteration of any of the
following types of housing:
(i) Housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels
affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low income.
(ii) Housing that is subject to any form of rent or price control through a public entity’s valid
exercise of its police power.
(iii) A parcel or parcels on which an owner of residential real property has exercised the owner’s
rights under Chapter 12.75 (commencing with Section 7060) of Division 7 of Title 1 to withdraw
accommodations from rent or lease within 15 years before the date that the development
proponent submits an application.
(iv) Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the last three years.
(E) The parcel is not located within a historic district or property included on the State Historic
Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the Public Resources Code, or within a site
that is designated or listed as a city or county landmark or historic property or district pursuant to
a city or county ordinance.
(F) The parcel has not been established through prior exercise of an urban lot split as provided
for in this section.
(G) Neither the owner of the parcel being subdivided nor any person acting in concert with the
owner has previously subdivided an adjacent parcel using an urban lot split as provided for in
this section.
(b) An application for an urban lot split shall be approved in accordance with the following
requirements:
(1) A local agency shall approve or deny an application for an urban lot split ministerially
without discretionary review.
(2) A local agency shall approve an urban lot split only if it conforms to all applicable objective
requirements of the Subdivision Map Act (Division 2 (commencing with Section 66410)), except
as otherwise expressly provided in this section.
(3) Notwithstanding Section 66411.1, a local agency shall not impose regulations that require
dedications of rights-of-way or the construction of offsite improvements for the parcels being
created as a condition of issuing a parcel map or tentative and final map for an urban lot split.
(c) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), notwithstanding any local law, a city or county may
impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design review
standards applicable to a parcel created by an urban lot split that do not conflict with this section.
(2) A local agency shall not impose objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards,
and objective design review standards that would have the effect of physically precluding the
construction of two units on either of the resulting parcels.
303
(3) (A) Notwithstanding paragraph (2), no setback shall be required for an existing structure or a
structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure.
(B) Notwithstanding paragraph (2), in all other circumstances not described in subparagraph (A),
a local government may require a setback of up to four feet from the side and rear lot lines.
(d) In addition to any conditions established in accordance with subdivision (c), a local agency
may require any of the following conditions when considering an application for an urban lot
split:
(1) Easements required for the provision of public services and facilities.
(2) A requirement that the parcels have access to, provide access to, or adjoin the public right-of-
way.
(3) Off-street parking of up to one space per unit, except that a local agency shall not impose
parking requirements in either of the following instances:
(A) The parcel is located within one-half mile walking distance of either a high-quality transit
corridor as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, or a major
transit stop as defined in Section 21064.3 of the Public Resources Code.
(B) There is a car share vehicle located within one block of the parcel.
(e) A local agency shall require that the uses allowed on a lot created by this section be limited to
residential uses.
(f) A local agency shall require that a rental of any unit created pursuant to this section be for a
term longer than 30 days.
(g) A local agency shall not require, as a condition for ministerial approval of a permit
application for the creation of an urban lot split, the correction of nonconforming zoning
conditions.
(h) Notwithstanding Section 65852.2, a local agency shall not be required to permit an accessory
dwelling unit on parcels that use both the authority contained within this section and the
authority contained in Section 65852.21.
(i) Notwithstanding paragraph (3) of subdivision (c), an application shall not be rejected solely
because it proposes adjacent or connected structures provided that the structures meet building
code safety standards and are sufficient to allow separate conveyance.
(j) Local agencies shall include the number of applications for urban lot splits pursuant to this
section in the annual housing element report as required by subparagraph (I) of paragraph (2) of
subdivision (a) of Section 65400.
(k) For purposes of this section, the terms “objective zoning standards,” “objective subdivision
standards,” and “objective design review standards” mean standards that involve no personal or
subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external
and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant
or proponent and the public official prior to submittal. These standards may be embodied in
alternative objective land use specifications adopted by a city or county, and may include, but are
304
not limited to, housing overlay zones, specific plans, inclusionary zoning ordinances, and density
bonus ordinances.
(l) A local agency may adopt an ordinance to implement the provisions of this section. An
ordinance adopted to implement this section shall not be considered a project under Division 13
(commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code.
(m) Nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede or in any way alter or lessen the effect
or application of the California Coastal Act of 1976 (Division 20 (commencing with Section
30000) of the Public Resources Code), except that the local government shall not be required to
hold public hearings for coastal development permit applications for urban lot splits pursuant to
this section.
SEC. 3.
Section 66452.6 of the Government Code is amended to read:
66452.6.
(a) (1) An approved or conditionally approved tentative map shall expire 24 months after its
approval or conditional approval, or after any additional period of time as may be prescribed by
local ordinance, not to exceed an additional 12 24 months. However, if the subdivider is required
to expend two hundred thirty-six thousand seven hundred ninety dollars ($236,790) or more to
construct, improve, or finance the construction or improvement of public improvements outside
the property boundaries of the tentative map, excluding improvements of public rights-of-way
which that abut the boundary of the property to be subdivided and which that are reasonably
related to the development of that property, each filing of a final map authorized by Section
66456.1 shall extend the expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map by
36 48 months from the date of its expiration, as provided in this section, or the date of the
previously filed final map, whichever is later. The extensions shall not extend the tentative map
more than 10 years from its approval or conditional approval. However, a tentative map on
property subject to a development agreement authorized by Article 2.5 (commencing with
Section 65864) of Chapter 4 of Division 1 may be extended for the period of time provided for in
the agreement, but not beyond the duration of the agreement. The number of phased final maps
that may be filed shall be determined by the advisory agency at the time of the approval or
conditional approval of the tentative map.
(2) Commencing January 1, 2012, and each calendar year thereafter, the amount of two hundred
thirty-six thousand seven hundred ninety dollars ($236,790) shall be annually increased by
operation of law according to the adjustment for inflation set forth in the statewide cost index for
class B construction, as determined by the State Allocation Board at its January meeting. The
effective date of each annual adjustment shall be March 1. The adjusted amount shall apply to
tentative and vesting tentative maps whose applications were received after the effective date of
the adjustment.
(3) “Public improvements,” as used in this subdivision, include traffic controls, streets, roads,
highways, freeways, bridges, overcrossings, street interchanges, flood control or storm drain
facilities, sewer facilities, water facilities, and lighting facilities.
305
(b) (1) The period of time specified in subdivision (a), including any extension thereof granted
pursuant to subdivision (e), shall not include any period of time during which a development
moratorium, imposed after approval of the tentative map, is in existence. However, the length of
the moratorium shall not exceed five years.
(2) The length of time specified in paragraph (1) shall be extended for up to three years, but in no
event beyond January 1, 1992, during the pendency of any lawsuit in which the subdivider
asserts, and the local agency which that approved or conditionally approved the tentative map
denies, the existence or application of a development moratorium to the tentative map.
(3) Once a development moratorium is terminated, the map shall be valid for the same period of
time as was left to run on the map at the time that the moratorium was imposed. However, if the
remaining time is less than 120 days, the map shall be valid for 120 days following the
termination of the moratorium.
(c) The period of time specified in subdivision (a), including any extension thereof granted
pursuant to subdivision (e), shall not include the period of time during which a lawsuit involving
the approval or conditional approval of the tentative map is or was pending in a court of
competent jurisdiction, if the stay of the time period is approved by the local agency pursuant to
this section. After service of the initial petition or complaint in the lawsuit upon the local agency,
the subdivider may apply to the local agency for a stay pursuant to the local agency’s adopted
procedures. Within 40 days after receiving the application, the local agency shall either stay the
time period for up to five years or deny the requested stay. The local agency may, by ordinance,
establish procedures for reviewing the requests, including, but not limited to, notice and hearing
requirements, appeal procedures, and other administrative requirements.
(d) The expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map shall terminate all
proceedings and no final map or parcel map of all or any portion of the real property included
within the tentative map shall be filed with the legislative body without first processing a new
tentative map. Once a timely filing is made, subsequent actions of the local agency, including,
but not limited to, processing, approving, and recording, may lawfully occur after the date of
expiration of the tentative map. Delivery to the county surveyor or city engineer shall be deemed
a timely filing for purposes of this section.
(e) Upon application of the subdivider filed prior to before the expiration of the approved or
conditionally approved tentative map, the time at which the map expires pursuant to subdivision
(a) may be extended by the legislative body or by an advisory agency authorized to approve or
conditionally approve tentative maps for a period or periods not exceeding a total of six years.
The period of extension specified in this subdivision shall be in addition to the period of time
provided by subdivision (a). Prior to Before the expiration of an approved or conditionally
approved tentative map, upon an application by the subdivider to extend that map, the map shall
automatically be extended for 60 days or until the application for the extension is approved,
conditionally approved, or denied, whichever occurs first. If the advisory agency denies a
subdivider’s application for an extension, the subdivider may appeal to the legislative body
within 15 days after the advisory agency has denied the extension.
(f) For purposes of this section, a development moratorium includes a water or sewer
moratorium, or a water and sewer moratorium, as well as other actions of public agencies which
that regulate land use, development, or the provision of services to the land, including the public
306
agency with the authority to approve or conditionally approve the tentative map, which thereafter
prevents, prohibits, or delays the approval of a final or parcel map. A development moratorium
shall also be deemed to exist for purposes of this section for any period of time during which a
condition imposed by the city or county could not be satisfied because of either of the following:
(1) The condition was one that, by its nature, necessitated action by the city or county, and the
city or county either did not take the necessary action or by its own action or inaction was
prevented or delayed in taking the necessary action prior to before expiration of the tentative
map.
(2) The condition necessitates acquisition of real property or any interest in real property from a
public agency, other than the city or county that approved or conditionally approved the tentative
map, and that other public agency fails or refuses to convey the property interest necessary to
satisfy the condition. However, nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to require any
public agency to convey any interest in real property owned by it. A development moratorium
specified in this paragraph shall be deemed to have been imposed either on the date of approval
or conditional approval of the tentative map, if evidence was included in the public record that
the public agency which that owns or controls the real property or any interest therein may refuse
to convey that property or interest, or on the date that the public agency which that owns or
controls the real property or any interest therein receives an offer by the subdivider to purchase
that property or interest for fair market value, whichever is later. A development moratorium
specified in this paragraph shall extend the tentative map up to the maximum period as set forth
in subdivision (b), but not later than January 1, 1992, so long as the public agency which that
owns or controls the real property or any interest therein fails or refuses to convey the necessary
property interest, regardless of the reason for the failure or refusal, except that the development
moratorium shall be deemed to terminate 60 days after the public agency has officially made,
and communicated to the subdivider, a written offer or commitment binding on the agency to
convey the necessary property interest for a fair market value, paid in a reasonable time and
manner.
SEC. 4.
The Legislature finds and declares that ensuring access to affordable housing is a matter of
statewide concern and not a municipal affair as that term is used in Section 5 of Article XI of the
California Constitution. Therefore, Sections 1 and 2 of this act adding Sections 65852.21 and
66411.7 to the Government Code and Section 3 of this act amending Section 66452.6 of the
Government Code apply to all cities, including charter cities.
SEC. 5.
No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the
California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service
charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by
this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
307
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2021–2022 REGULAR SESSION
SENATE BILL NO. 10
Introduced by Senator Wiener
(Principal coauthors: Senators Atkins and Caballero)
(Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Robert Rivas)
December 07, 2020
An act to add Section 65913.5 to the Government Code, relating to land use.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
SB 10, as introduced, Wiener. Planning and zoning: housing development: density.
The Planning and Zoning Law requires a city or county to adopt a general plan for land use
development within its boundaries that includes, among other things, a housing element. Existing
law requires an attached housing development to be a permitted use, not subject to a conditional
use permit, on any parcel zoned for multifamily housing if at least certain percentages of the
units are available at affordable housing costs to very low income, lower income, and moderate-
income households for at least 30 years and if the project meets specified conditions relating to
location and being subject to a discretionary decision other than a conditional use permit.
Existing law provides for various incentives intended to facilitate and expedite the construction
of affordable housing.
This bill would, notwithstanding any local restrictions on adopting zoning ordinances, authorize
a local government to pass an ordinance to zone any parcel for up to 10 units of residential
density per parcel, at a height specified in the ordinance, if the parcel is located in a transit-rich
area, a jobs-rich area, or an urban infill site, as those terms are defined. In this regard, the bill
would require the Department of Housing and Community Development, in consultation with
the Office of Planning and Research, to determine jobs-rich areas and publish a map of those
areas every 5 years, commencing January 1, 2022, based on specified criteria. The bill would
specify that an ordinance adopted under these provisions is not a project for purposes of the
California Environmental Quality Act. The bill would prohibit a residential or mixed-use
residential project consisting of 10 or more units that is located on a parcel rezoned pursuant to
these provisions from being approved ministerially or by right.
This bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide
concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.
Digest Key
Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NO
308
Bill Text
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
Section 65913.5 is added to the Government Code, to read:
65913.5.
(a) (1) Notwithstanding any local restrictions on adopting zoning ordinances enacted by the
jurisdiction, including restrictions enacted by a local voter initiative, that limit the legislative
body’s ability to adopt zoning ordinances, a local government may pass an ordinance to zone a
parcel for up to 10 units of residential density per parcel, at a height specified by the local
government in the ordinance, if the parcel is located in one of the following:
(A) A transit-rich area.
(B) A jobs-rich area.
(C) An urban infill site.
(2) An ordinance adopted in accordance with this subdivision shall not constitute a “project” for
purposes of Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code.
(3) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to parcels located within a very high fire hazard severity zone,
as determined by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Section 51178, or
within a high or very high fire hazard severity zone as indicated on maps adopted by the
Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Section 4202 of the Public Resources
Code. This paragraph does not apply to parcels excluded from the specified hazard zones by a
local agency pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 51179, or sites that have adopted fire hazard
mitigation measures pursuant to existing building standards or state fire mitigation measures
applicable to the development.
(b) (1) Notwithstanding any other law, a residential or mixed-use residential project consisting of
more than 10 new residential units on one or more parcels that have been zoned to permit
residential development pursuant to this section shall not be approved ministerially or by right,
and shall not be exempt from Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public
Resources Code.
(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to a project to create no more than two accessory dwelling units
and no more than two junior accessory dwelling units per parcel pursuant to Sections 65852.2
and 65852.22 of the Government Code.
(3) A project may not be divided into smaller projects in order to exclude the project from the
prohibition in this subdivision.
(c) For purposes of this section:
(1) “High-quality bus corridor” means a corridor with fixed route bus service that meets all of the
following criteria:
309
(A) It has average service intervals of no more than 15 minutes during the three peak hours
between 6 a.m. to 10 a.m., inclusive, and the three peak hours between 3 p.m. and 7 p.m.,
inclusive, on Monday through Friday.
(B) It has average service intervals of no more than 20 minutes during the hours of 6 a.m. to 10
a.m., inclusive, on Monday through Friday.
(C) It has average intervals of no more than 30 minutes during the hours of 8 a.m. to 10 p.m.,
inclusive, on Saturday and Sunday.
(2) (A) “Jobs-rich area” means an area identified by the Department of Housing and
Community Development in consultation with the Office of Planning and Research that is high
opportunity and either is jobs rich or would enable shorter commute distances based on whether,
in a regional analysis, the tract meets both of the following:
(i) The tract is high opportunity, meaning its characteristics are associated with positive
educational and economic outcomes for households of all income levels residing in the tract.
(ii) The tract meets either of the following criteria:
(I) New housing sited in the tract would enable residents to live near more jobs than is typical for
tracts in the region.
(II) New housing sited in the tract would enable shorter commute distances for residents, relative
to existing commute patterns and jobs-housing fit.
(B) The Department of Housing and Community Development shall, commencing on January 1,
2022, publish and update, every five years thereafter, a map of the state showing the areas
identified by the department as “jobs-rich areas.”
(3) “Transit-rich area” means a parcel within one-half mile of a major transit stop, as defined in
Section 21064.3 of the Public Resources Code, or a parcel on a high-quality bus corridor.
(4) “Urban infill site” means a site that satisfies all of the following:
(A) A site that is a legal parcel or parcels located in a city if, and only if, the city boundaries
include some portion of either an urbanized area or urban cluster, as designated by the United
States Census Bureau, or, for unincorporated areas, a legal parcel or parcels wholly within the
boundaries of an urbanized area or urban cluster, as designated by the United States Census
Bureau.
(B) A site in which at least 75 percent of the perimeter of the site adjoins parcels that are
developed with urban uses. For the purposes of this section, parcels that are only separated by a
street or highway shall be considered to be adjoined.
(C) A site that is zoned for residential use or residential mixed-use development, or has a general
plan designation that allows residential use or a mix of residential and nonresidential uses, with
at least two-thirds of the square footage of the development designated for residential use.
(d) The Legislature finds and declares that ensuring the adequate production of affordable
housing is a matter of statewide concern and is not a municipal affair as that term is used in
310
Section 5 of Article XI of the California Constitution. Therefore, this section applies to all cities,
including charter cities.
311
***CITY LETTERHEAD***
February 23, 2021
The Honorable Toni Atkins
President pro Tempore, California State Senate
State Capitol Building, Room 205
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: SB 9 (Atkins) Increased Density in Single-Family Zones
Oppose Unless Amended (As Introduced 12/7/2020)
Dear Senate President pro Tempore Atkins,
The City of Rolling Hills writes to express an Oppose Unless Amended position on your SB 9,
which would require a local government to ministerially approve a housing development
containing two residential units in single-family residential zones. Additionally, this measure
would require local governments to ministerially approve urban lot splits.
Housing affordability and homelessness are among the most critical issues facing California cities.
Affordably priced homes are out of reach for many people and housing is not being built fast
enough to meet the current or projected needs of people living in the state. Cities lay the
groundwork for housing production by planning and zoning new projects in their communities
based on extensive public input and engagement, state housing laws, and the needs of the
building industry.
While your desire to pursue a housing production proposal is appreciated, unfortunately, SB 9 as
currently drafted would not spur much needed housing construction in a manner that supports
local flexibility, decision-making, and community input. State driven ministerial or by-right
housing approval processes fail to recognize the extensive public engagement associated with
developing and adopting zoning ordinances and housing elements that are certified by the
California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).
The Cityof Rolling Hills requests the following amendments in order to address our concerns and
remove our opposition:
312
Clarify that a property owner using SB 9 is limited to constructing two residential units,
not two residential units and additional accessory dwelling units (ADUs) on the same
parcel;
Require a housing developer to acquire a building permit within one year of a lot split, so
that speculators do not sell lots and never build homes;
Allow local governments to require adequate access for police, fire and other public safety
vehicles and equipment;
Prohibit developers from using SB 9 in very high fire hazard severity zones;
Allow cities to determine a range of lot sizes suitable for SB 9 development projects;
Ensure HCD provides Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) credit for production of
SB 9 units;
Allow local governments to take into account local conditions such as hillsides, lot
dimensions, natural hazards, available infrastructure, etc. when approving or denying
housing project applications;
Allow local governments to continue to determine parking standards; and
Ensure large-scale investors and builders do not exploit SB 9 provisions.
The City of Rolling Hills is committed to being part of the solution to the housing shortfall across
all income levels and will continue to work collaboratively with you to spur much needed housing
construction. Thank you for considering the above amendments.
For these reasons, the City of Rolling Hills opposes SB 9 (Atkins) unless it is amended to address
our concerns.
Sincerely,
JEFF PIEPER
MAYOR
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
cc. Ben Allen, Senator, 26th State Senate District
Al Muratsuchi, Assembly Member, 66th Assembly District
Jeffrey Kiernan, League Regional Public Affairs Manager (via email)
Meg Desmond, League of California Cities (via email)
313
February XX, 2021
The Honorable Toni Atkins
President pro Tempore, California State Senate
State Capitol Building, Room 205
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: SB 9 (Atkins) Increased Density in Single-Family Zones
Dear Senate President pro Tempore Atkins:
The Cities of Palos Verdes Estates, Rancho Palos Verdes, Rolling Hills and Rolling Hills Estates
(Peninsula Cities) strongly object to SB 9 which attempts to undermine local authority and
control. This bill will have a significant impact on how we effectively regulate and develop as we
deem appropriate for our cities.
Efforts to increase development of housing must take into consideration local values and
conditions. A one-size fits all approach does not work for the Peninsula Cities. Increasing
housing density in a Very High Fire Severity zone poses a great threat to public health, safety
and welfare. The peninsula has limited access in and out of the area. Increasing the population
could be life threatening to many of our residents and their animals in case of an emergency.
While we appreciate efforts to ensure that all Californians have access to affordable housing,
this bill destroys local control and more significantly, it fails to take into account our local
conditions that could potentially put our residents in grave danger, for these reasons the
Peninsula Cities oppose SB 9.
Sincerely,
Mayor Mayor Mayor Mayor
Palos Verdes Estates Rancho Palos Verdes City of Rolling Hills Rolling Hills Estates
314
cc:Ben Allen, Senator, 26th State Senate District
Al Muratsuchi, Assembly Member, 66th Assembly District
Jeff Kiernan, League of California Cities
Meg Desmond, League of California Cities
Marcel Rodarte, California Contract Cities Association
Palos Verdes Estates City Council
Rancho Palos Verdes City Council
City of Rolling Hills City Council
Rolling Hills Estates City Council
315
February XX, 2021
The Honorable Scott Wiener
California State Senate
State Capitol, Room 5100
Sacramento, CA 95814
SUBJECT: Notice of Opposition to SB 10
Dear Senator Wiener:
The Cities of Palos Verdes Estates, Rancho Palos Verdes, Rolling Hills and Rolling Hills Estates
(Peninsula Cities) strongly object to SB 10 which attempts to undermine local authority and
control. This bill will have a significant impact on how we effectively regulate and develop as we
deem appropriate for our cities.
Increasing housing density to accommodate up to 10 units per parcel if the parcel is located in a
“jobs-rich”, a “transit-rich” or an “urban infill site” could have a tremendous adverse impact on
parcels located in adjacent cities. However, the affected property owners are stripped of their
rights to voice their concerns about the project because SB 10 skips the CEQA process where
stakeholders are typically given the opportunity to provide their input on a proposed
development.
Additionally, increasing density by up to 10 units per parcel in a Very High Fire Severity zone
poses a great threat to public health, safety and welfare. The peninsula has limited access in
and out of the area. Increasing the population could be life threatening to many of our
residents and their animals in case of an emergency.
While we appreciate efforts to ensure that all Californians have access to affordable housing,
this bill strips away the rights of our local residents and it fails to take into account our local
conditions that could potentially put our residents in grave danger, for these reasons the
Peninsula Cities oppose SB 10.
Sincerely,
316
Mayor Mayor Mayor Mayor
Palos Verdes Estates Rancho Palos Verdes City of Rolling Hills Rolling Hills Estates
cc:Ben Allen, Senator, 26th State Senate District
Al Muratsuchi, Assembly Member, 66th Assembly District
Jeff Kiernan, League of California Cities
Meg Desmond, League of California Cities
Marcel Rodarte, California Contract Cities Association
Palos Verdes Estates City Council
Rancho Palos Verdes City Council
City of Rolling Hills City Council
Rolling Hills Estates City Council
317
Agenda Item No.: 9.A
Mtg. Date: 02/22/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:ELAINE JENG, CITY MANAGER
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:CONSIDER A REQUEST FROM ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION (RHCA) TO COST SHARE THE RESURFACING OF
TENNIS COURTS 2 AND 3 PER THE PROVISIONS OF THE LEASE
AGREEMENT.
DATE:February 22, 2021
BACKGROUND:
The City of Rolling Hills executed a lease agreement with the Rolling Hills Community Association
(RHCA) in 2018 for a term of ten years to 2028. The lease agreement allows the RHCA to operate City
owned facilities. City owned facilities include the Building (for RHCA's administration, and for RHCA
Board meetings); the Hesse's Gap Riding Ring; the Tennis Courts; the Parking Areas; and the Storm Hill
Park.
Section 9 Maintenance and Repairs of the lease agreement, under subsection a(vi), states the following:
"Notwithstanding anything provided herein to the contrary, City shall be solely responsible for
performing all repairs and maintenance to the Parking Area, but Association shall reimburse City,
within 10 days after receipt of a written demand therefore, for one-half (1/2) of the costs incurred by
City in repairing and maintaining the Parking Areas, or for performing any alterations or additions to
the Parking Areas. Moreover, so long as City uses the Tennis Courts, City agrees to reimburse
Association for one-half (1/2) of the costs incurred by Association in repairing and maintaining the
Tennis Courts. Finally, City Hall, at City's sole cost and expense, provide weekly landscape
maintenance to the Parking Areas and Tennis Courts."
DISCUSSION:
City staff received a letter from RHCA dated February 16, 2021 stating that members of the Tennis
Club reported the need to have the courts resurfaced. In response, RHCA solicited cost estimates to
resurface courts. Based on RHCA's solicitations, Tennis Court number 1 requires a new concrete
overlay and the cost to place the overlay is in the range of $69,000 to $84,000. Tennis Courts number 2
and 3 are suitable for the conventional resurfacing for a total cost of $12,150. At the February 4, 2021
RHCA Board meeting, the Board of Directors approved resurfacing Tennis Courts number 2 and 3 and
ordered the work to commence immediately. At the same meeting, the Board of Directors also stated
318
that they will consider budgeting for the concrete overlay at Tennis Court number 1 for Fiscal Year
2021-2022. RHCA requested that the City Council permit the RHCA to resurface Tennis Courts
number 2 and 3, pay half of the resurfacing cost ($6,075) per Section 9 of the lease agreement, and
budget funding to cost share the concrete overlay for Tennis Court number 1 for Fiscal Year 2021-2022.
FISCAL IMPACT:
In the adopted City budget for Fiscal Year 2020-2021, $50,000 is available from the Capital Project
Fund under Non-Building Improvements - Tennis Courts account 40-947. If the City Council should
approve RHCA's request to resurface Tennis Courts 2 and 3 and cost share the resurfacing, the amount
of $6,075 can be drawn from account 40-947.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council receive a presentation from the RHCA on the proposed tennis
courts resurfacing and approve RHCA's request to cost share the improvements.
ATTACHMENTS:
RHCALeaseAgreement2018-2028.pdf
RHCA_LtrRequestTennisCourtResurface2021-02-17.pdf
319
Page 1
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
LEASE AGREEMENT
This Lease ("Lease'') is made and executed as of this Ii./ ~y of M ~ , ;l.o J & , by and
between the City of Rolling Hills (the "City"), a municipal corporation; and the Rolling Hills
Community Association of Rancho Palos Verdes (the "Association"), a California non-profit
corporation.
Recitals
A. City and Association were parties to a now expired lease dated June 17, 1993, as
amended by an amendment to the lease dated November 13, 2000, covering the Building,
Hesse's Gap Riding Ring, Tennis Courts, and Parking Area (as herein defined).
B. City and Association are parties to another lease dated June 1, 2003, as amended by four
(4) amendments on April 1, 2007~ April I, 2010; June 1, 2013; and June 26, 2017, by
which City leased the Premises (as herein defined) to Association. This lease expires on
May 31, 2018.
C. City and Association desire to enter into this Lease, effective as of the Commencement
Date as specified below, and thereby supersede all other leases.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. FUNDAMENTAL LEASE PROVISIONS:
(a) Time:
(i) Lease Tenn: 120 months.
(ii) Commencement Date: June 1, 2018
(iii.) Expiration Date: May 31, 2028.
(b) Rent: $6,998.00 per month for the ten-year lease period.
(c) Use of Premises: The Premises shall be used as fo llows:
652 77.00001 \30940221.1
(i) The "Building" shall be used by Association for its administration
and for meetings of the Association and its board and members,
320
Page2
and other purposes compatible with the use for which it was
designed.
(ii) The "Hesse's Gap Riding Ring" and the "ClifHix Riding Ring"
shall be used for riding ring purposes, and other purposes
'compatible With the use for which they were designed.
(iii) The "Tennis Courts" shall be used for playing recreational tennis,
and other purposes compatible with the use for which they were
designed.
(iv) The "Parking Areas" shall be used by Association only for parking
of vehicles by Association, its employees, guests, board members,
and invitees, and for pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress.
(v) The "Storm Hill Park" shall be used as a passive park for such
activities as hiking, picnicking, horseback riding, walking, and
jogging. Additional uses must be approved by the City and
consistent with the City's goals of low intensity and equestrian
uses.
( d) Address for Payments of Rent and Notices:
To City:
To Association:
No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, California 90274
Attn: City Manager
No. 1 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, California 90274
Attn: Community Association Manager
2 . PREMISES. In consideration of the Association's payment of the rent, and the
performance of covenants and conditions herein contained, City hereby leases to
Association, and Association hereby hires from City, upon the tenns and
conditions set forth herein, the following real property and improvements (herein
referred to as the "Premises"). The Premises consist of the following:
(a) The building improved thereon (herein referred to as the "Building"),
located at No. 1 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California 90274.
(b) The undivided right to use in common with City one-half (1/2) of the
parking spaces improved on the real property identified as the Parking
65277.00001 \30940221.1
321
Page 3
Area (the "Parking Area"), located between the Building and the City Hall
building at No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling :Hills, California 90274,
together with all roads and walkways to and from the Parking Area for
pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress.
(c) The Caballeros Riding Ring at Hesse's Gap Riding Ring (the "Hesse's
Gap Riding Ring"), located at Poppy Trail and Portuguese Bend Road,
Rolling Hills, California 90274.
(d) The ClifHix Riding Ring (the "ClifHix Riding Ring"), located at the end
of Buggy Whip Drive, Rolling Hills, California 90274. ·
( e) The undivided right to use in common with City the Tennis Courts (the
''Tennis Courtsu), located at Portuguese Bend Road and Palos Verdes
Drive North, Rolling Hills, California 90274.
(f) The Storm Hill Park ("Storm Hill Park"), an approximately eight (8) acre
park identified as Assessors Parcel Number 7570-024-900 approved and
recorded in Parcel Map Number 26356.
3. TERM. The term of this Lease shall be that period set forth in Section l(a)(i)
hereof. The term shall commence on the Commencement Date set forth in Section
l(a)(ii) hereof, and shall expire on the date set forth in Section l(a)(iii) hereof.
Effective as of the Commencement Date, the prior leases identified in Recitals A
and B shall be deemed terminated and of no further force or effect, except for the
indemnity obligations describ~ therein, and except for any accrued, unpaid rent,
or other charges, which shall survive such termination.
4. RENT. Association shall pay City monthly in advance, without deduction or
offset, as rent, $6,998.00.
5. CONDITION AND ACCEPTANCE OF PREMISES. Association hereby accepts
the Premises, including but not limited to the Building, in their condition existing
as of the date hereof, subject to all applicable zoning, municipal, county, and state
laws, ordinances, and regulations governing and regulating the use of the
Premises, and any covenants or restrictions of record, and accepts this Lease
subject thereto and to all matters disclosed thereby and by any exhibits attached
hereto. Association acknowledges that neither City nor City's agents have made
any representation or warranty as to the present or future suitability of the
Premises, including but not limited to the Building, for Association's intended use
thereof, nor has City agreed to undertake any modification, alteration, or
65277.00001 \30940221.1
322
Page4
improvement to the Premises, including but not limited to the Building, except as
provided in this Lease.
6. TAXES. Association shall pay to the appropriate taxing authority all real
property taxes, assessments (general, special, ordinary or extraordinary)
possessory interest taxes, license fees, improvement bond or bonded indebtedness,
levy or tax, and any personal property taxes attributable to personal property at
the Premises, if any are applicable to Association or the Premises, or
Association's interest therein, accruing during the term of this Lease. All such
payments shall be made at least ten (10) days prior to the delinquency date of
such payment. Association shall promptly furnish City with satisfactory evidence
that such taxes have been paid. Association may lawfully contest, by appropriate
proceedings at Association's sole cost and expense, any taxes or assessments, and
may defer payments of the same during any appeal, provided such defense does
not adversely affect City's interest in the Premises. If any such taxes paid by
Association shall cover any period of time prior to or after the expiration of the
term hereof, Association's obligation for such taxes shall be equitably prorated to
cover only the period of time within the tax fiscal year during which this Lease
shall be in effect, and City shall reimburse Association to the extent required. If
Association shall fail to pay any such taxes, City shall have the right to pay the
same, in which case Association shall repay such amount to City with
Association's next rent installment, plus any damages caused by such failure.
7. USE OF PREMISES.
(a) The Premises shall be used and occupied by Association for the purposes
described in Section 1 ( c) hereof, and for such other uses that are not
incompatible with the primary uses set forth in Section 1 ( c ).
(b) Association shall, at Association's expense, comply promptly with all
applicable statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations, orders, covenants and
restrictions of record, and requirements in effect during the term or any
part of the term hereof, regulating the use by Association of the Premises,
including but not limited to the Building. Association shall not use nor
permit the use of the Premises in any manner that will tend to create waste
or a nuisance.
8. ALTERATIONS. Except for interior, nonstructural, nonsystemic alterations or
additions not cumulatively costing in excess of Ten Thousand Dollars
($10,000.00) in any calendar year, Association shall not make or allow any other
alterations, additions, or improvements in or to the Premises, including but not
limited to the Building, without City's prior written consent, and then only by
65277.00001 \30940221.1
323
Page 5
contractors or mechanics approved in advance in writing by City, which shall not
unreasonably withhold consent. In each instance where Association requires
City's approval of an alteration, Association shall furnish City with plans showing
the proposed alteration to the Premises, including but not limited to the Building.
Association covenants and agrees that all work done by or pursuant to the
direction and instruction of Association shall be performed in full compliance
with all laws, rules, orders, ordinances, directions, regulations, and requirements
of all governmental agencies, offices, departments, bureaus, and boards having
jurisdiction, and in full compliance with the rules, orders, directions, regulations,
and requirements of the Insurance Service Office, and of any similar body. Before
commencing any work, Association shall give City at least five (5) days written
notice of the proposed commencement of such work and shall, if required by City,
secme at Association's own cost and expense, a completion and lien indemnity
bond, satisfactory to City, for said work. City shall have the right at all times to
post notices of non-responsibility on the Premises and record verified copies
thereof in connection with all work of any kind upon the Premises.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Association shall not make any alterations or
additions whatsoever to the Parking Areas without City's prior written consent,
which may be withheld in City's sole discretion.
9. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS .
(a) Except as herein specifically provided to the contrary, Association shall at
Association's sole cost and expense keep and maintain the Premises,
including but not limited to the Building, clean and in good condition and
repair. Damage thereto from causes beyond the reasonable control of
Association and ordinary wear and tear is excepted. Association shall also:
(i) Keep the Premises, including the Parking Area, free of litter and
debris and shall regularly clear all drain catch basins of debris.
(ii) Maintain all landscaping (except in the Parking Area and Tennis
Courts).
(iii) Perform all sprinkler repairs or modifications, necessary painting
repairs of structures (including fencing), necessary lighting,
electrical, or plumbing repairs, and weed abatement (excluding the
Parking Area and Tennis Courts). as required by the Los Angeles
County Fire Department.
(iv) Repair and maintain the roof and structural portions of the
Building and building systems. City shall not be liable or have
65277.00001 \30940221.1
324
Page 6
65277.00001 \30940221.1
responsibility for any repairs or maintenance to the Building or the
Premises, including the septic tanks servicing the Building and the
guard station, except as specifically provided herein to the
contrary.
(v) Provide the services of one (1) maintenance worker to perform five
(5) hours of maintenance and repair work around the Premises per
month for the term of the Lease. Association shall make the
maintenance worker available to City such that he or she may
perform the following services:
a. Removal of downed tree limbs;
b. Unclogging Parking Area drains;
c. Power washing concrete walkways;
d. Performing small painting projects;
e. Repairing three (3) rail fences;
f. Repairing any damaged, cracked, or broken asphalt;
g . Spreading woodchips around Parking Area planters;
h. Replacing exterior lights on Premises;
1. Cleanup of debris around the Premises, as necessary;
and
J. Any other similar tasks which a handyman would
normally perform.
Any unused portion of the five ( 5) hours per month allotted to the
City for maintenance and repair work shall carry over to the
following month and may accumulate; similarly, City may
deliberately accrue unused time in order to apply it towards larger
projects. Any services requested shall be performed as soon as
reasonably possible pursuant to the availability of maintenance
staff, and in no event more than ten (10) days after the request for
services is first made by the City. Following any aforementioned
maintenance work, Association shall submit to the City per month,
as applicable, a document detailing the scope of work including,
but not limited to, any costs attributable to the City, the specific
tasks performed, the hours expended per task, any supplies or
materials used, and any extra assistance utilized in the performance
of the requested task.
(vi) Upon termination of the Lease, Association shall surrender the
Premises to City in the same condition as when Association's
occupation of the Premises commenced, ordinary wear and tear
325
Page7
and damage from causes beyond the reasonable control of
Association excepted.
Association waives the right to make rep~ at City's expense
under Subsection 1 of Section 1932, Sections 1941 and 1942 of the
California Civil Code, or any other such law, statute, or similar
ordinance now or hereafter in effect.
Subject to the provisions of Section 16 hereof, all damage or injury
to the Premises, including but not limited to the Building, caused
by the act or negligence of Association, its employees, agents, or
visitors, shall promptly be repaired by Association at its sole cost
and expense, to the reasonable satisfaction of City. After first
giving Association an opportunity to do so, City may make any
repairs which are not promptly made by Association and charge
Association the cost thereof as additional rent.
Notwithstanding anything provided herein to the contrary, City
shall be solely responsible for performing all repairs and
maintenance to the Parking Area, but Association shall reimburse
City, within 10 days ·after receipt of a written demand therefore, for
one-half (112) of the costs incurred by City in repairing and
maintaining the Parking Areas, or for performing any alterations or
additions to the Parking Areas. Moreover, so long as City uses the
Tennis Courts, City agrees to reimburse Association for one-half
(1/2) of the costs incurred by Association in repairing and
maintaining the Tennis Courts. Finally, City shall, at City's sole
cost and expense, provide weekly landscape maintenance to the
Parking Areas and Tennis Courts.
Notwithstanding anything provided herein to the contrary,
Association shall be solely responsible for performing all
maintenance of the equestrian facilities subject to this Lease, but
City shall reimburse Association, within 10 days after receipt of a
written demand therefore, for one-half (112) of the costs incurred
by Association in maintaining the equestrian facilities, not to
exceed Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) per year.
(b) If the Insurance Services Office or any other si.inilar body or bureau
department or official of the state, county, or city government or any
governmental authority having jurisdiction, require that any changes,
modifications, replacements, alterations, or additional equipment be made
65277.00001 \30940221.1
326
Page8
or supplied in or to any sprinkler system, heat, or smoke detection system
or any other so called life-safety system by reason of Association's use of
the Premises, or the location of partitions, trade fixtures, or other contents
of the Premises, or if any such changes, modifications, replacements,
alterations, or additional equipment become necessary to prevent the
imposition of a penalty or charge against the full allowance for any such
system in the insurance rate as fixed by said Office or by any insurance
company, Association shall, at Association's cost and expense, make and
supply such changes, modifications, replacements, alterations, or
additional equipment; provided, however, if such requirements are of a
capital nature, Association shall have the option to terminate this Lease in
lieu of constructing such improvements.
10. LIENS. Association shall keep the Premises, including the Building, and the
property upon which the Premises are situated, free from any liens arising out of
the work performed, materials furnished, or obligations incurred by Association.
Association further covenants and agrees that should any mechanic's lien be filed
against the Premises, including but not limited to against the Building, for work
claimed to have been done for or materials claimed to have been furnished to
Association, said lien will be discharged by Association, by bond or otherwise,
within ten (10) days after the filing thereof, at the cost and expense of
Association.
11. UTILITIES. The Association shall be responsible for the costs of the utilities to
the Building and other leased Premises, including, Hesse's Gap Riding Ring, Clif
Hix Riding Ring and Storm Hill Park. The City shall be responsible for the costs
of the utilities to its Building, the City Hall Parking areas and the Tennis Courts.
12. RIGHT OF ENTRY BY CITY. City and its agents shall have the right to enter
the Premises, including the Building, at all reasonable times upon prior reasonable
notice to Association for the purpose of examining or inspecting the same, or in
the case of an emergency. City shall invite Association to have a representative of
Association accompany City in any such inspection, but if Association shall not
personally be present to open and permit an entry into the Premises, including but
not limited to the Building, at any time when such an entry by City is necessary
by reason of emergency, City may enter by means of a master key or pass key or
may enter forcibly, without liability to Association except for any failure to
exercise due care for Association's property, and any such entry by City shall not
under any circumstances be construed or deemed to be a forcible or unlawful
entry into, or a detainer of, the Premises, or an eviction of Association from the
Premises or any portion thereof
65277.00001\30940221.1
327
Page9
13. INDEMNIFICATION AND WAIVER. Association hereby agrees to indemnify,
protect, and hold City hannless against and from any and all liabilities and claims
of damages or injury arising from Association's use of the Premises, the Building
and adjacent Parking Areas, or from any activity, work, or thing done, permitted
or suffered by Association in the Premises, Building, and adjacent Parking Areas,
and shall further indemnify, protect, and hold harmless City against and from any
and all liability for claims arising from any breach or default in the performance
of any obligation on Association's part to be performed under the terms of this
Lease, or arising from any act, neglect, fault, or omission of the Association, or of
its agents, employees, visitors, invitees, or licensees, and from and against all
costs, attorneys' fees, expenses, and liabilities incurred in or about any such
claim, action, or proceeding brought thereon; and in case any action or proceeding
is brought against City by reason of such claim, Association, upon notice from
City, shall defend the same at Association's expense by counsel reasonably
satisfactory to and approved by City. Association, as a material part of the
consideration to City, hereby assumes all risk of damage to Association's property
or injury to Association's employees, agents, visitors, invitees, and licensees in or
upon the Premises, including the Building and Parking Areas, and Association
hereby waives all claims in respect thereof, from any cause whatsoever, against
City. City shall not be liable to Association for any damage therefrom to
Association or Association's property from any cause beyond City's reasonable
control. Association hereby agrees that in no event shall City be liable for any
consequential damages.
14. INSURANCE.
(a) At all times during the term hereof, Association shall maintain in effect
policies of Property Insurance, including fire and extended coverage
insurance providing coverage for the following: (i) the Building, Hesse's
Gap Riding Ring, ClifHix Riding Ring, Tennis Courts, Storm Hill Park,
and leasehold improvements (including any alterations, additions, or
improvements as may be made by Association pursuant to provisions
hereof), and (ii) trade fixtures and other personal property, on or upon the
Premises, in an amount not less than one hundred percent ( 100%) of their
actual replacement cost during the term of this Lease. The Property
Insurance shall provide protection against any peril included within the
classification "Fire and Extended Coverage" together with insurance
against vandalism, malicious mischief, earthquakes, and special extended
eri1 f"al} • k" th • ed . fL . • d ) p eds f p s , ns as &e term 1s us m :.ue msurance m ustry . roce o
such insurance shall be used for the repair or replacement of the property
so insured. Upon termination of this Lease following a casualty as set
65277.00001 \30940221.1
328
Page 10
forth herein, the proceeds under {ii) above shall be paid to Tenant, and the
balance shall be paid to Landlord.
{b) Association shall, at all times during the tenn hereof and at its own cost
and expense, procure and continue in force comprehensive General
Liability Insurance for bodily injury and property damage, adequate to
protect City against liability for injury to or death of any person, arising in
connection with the Premises. Such insurance at all times shall be in an
amount of not less than a combined single limit of Five Million Dollars
{$5,000,000), insuring against any and all liability of the insured with
respect to said Premises or arising out of the use or occupancy thereof.
{ c) All insurance required to be carried by Association hereunder shall be
issued by responsible insurance companies possessing a Besfs rating of
no less than A-:VII, qualified to do business in the State of California, and
reasonably acceptable to City. Each policy shall name City an additional
insured, and copies of all policies or certificates of insurance evidencing
the existence and amounts of such insurance shall be delivered to City by
Association. No such policy shall be cancelable except after thirty {30)
days prior written notice to City. Association shall furnish City with
renewals or "binders" of any such policy at least thirty {30) days prior to
the expiration thereof. Association agrees that if Association does not take
out and maintain such insurance, City may {but shall not be required to)
procure said insurance on Association's behalf and charge the Association
the premiums, payable upon demand.
{d) Not less often than every three {3) years during the term of this Lease,
Association and City shall agree in writing on the full replacement cost of
the Premises pursuant to this Section. If, in the reasonable opinion of City,
the amount or type of public liability and property damage insurance
coverage, or any other amount or type of insurance at that time is not
adequate or not provided for herein, Association shall either acquire or
increase the insurance coverage as required by either City or City's lender.
15. WAIVERS OF SUBROGATION. Each of the parties hereby waives any and all
rights of recovery against the other or against any other tenant or occupant of the
Premises, or against the officers, employees, agents, representatives, customers,
and business visitors of such other party or of such other tenant or occupant of the
Premises, for loss or damage to such waiving party or its property or the property
of others under its control, arising from any cause insured against under the
standard form of property insurance policy with all permissible extensions and
endorsements covering extended perils or under any other policy of insurance
65277.00001\30940221.1
329
Page 11
carried by such waiving party in lieu thereof, to the extent such policies then in
force permit such waiver.
16. DAMAGE OR DESTRUCTION.
(a) In the event the Premises, including but not limited to the Building, are
damaged by any casualty, Association shall be responsible for repairing
such damage and restoring the Premises, including but not limited to the
Building, except in the following circumstances:
(i) The repair or restoration thereof, in City's opinion, cannot be
completed within one hundred eighty (180) days of
commencement of repair or restoration; or
{ii) The repair or restoration is not covered by insurance, or the
estimated cost thereof exceeds by fifty percent (50%) the insurance
proceeds available for repair or restoration plus any amount which
Association is obligated or elects to pay for such repair or
restoration; or
(iii) The estimated cost of repair or restoration of the Premises exceeds
fifty percent (50%) of the full replacement cost of the Building; or
(iv) The Building cannot be restored except in a substantially different
structural or architectural form than existed before the damage and
destruction.
In any of these events, either City or Association shall have the option to
either terminate this Lease or to repair or restore the Premises, including
but not limited to the Building. In the event that either party elects to
terminate this Lease, the terminating party shall give notice to the other
within sixty ( 60) days after the occurrence of such damage, terminating
this Lease as of the date specified in such notice, which date shall not be
more than thirty (30) days after the giving of such notice. In the event such
notice is given, this Lease shall expire and all interest of Association in the
Premises shall terminate on the date specified in the effective notice.
(b) Upon any termination of this Lease under any of the provisions of this
Article, the parties shall be released thereby, without further obligation to
the other, from the date possession of the Premises is surrendered to the
City, except for items which have theretofore accrued and are then unpaid.
652 77.00001 \30940221.1
330
Page 12
(c) If this Lease is terminated by either party as provided hereunder,
Association sha)l deliver and assign to City all proceeds of insurance
payable on the policies of insurance that Association is required to carry
hereunder.
(d) The provisions of Section 1932, Subdivision 2, and Section 1933,
Subdivision 4, of the Civil Code of the State of California, including any
amendments thereto and any other law which may hereinafter be in force
during the term of this Lease which authorizes the termination of the
Lease upon the partial or complete destruction of the Premises, are hereby
waived by Association.
17. EMINENT DOMAIN. If the whole or part of the Premises shall be taken or shall
substantially interfere with Association's use and occupancy, under power of
eminent domain, or sold, transferred, or conveyed in lieu thereof, either
Association or City may terminate this Lease as of the date of such condemnation
or as of the date possession is taken by the condemning authority, whichever date
occurs later. No award for any partial or entire taking shall be apportioned, and
Association hereby assigns to City any award which may be made in such taking
or condemnation, together with any and all rights of Association now or hereafter
arising in or to the same or any part thereof; provided, however, that nothing
contained herein shall be deemed to give City any interest in or require
Association to assign to City any award made to Association for the taking of
personal property and fixtures belonging to Association and removable by
Association at the expiration of the term hereof, as provided hereunder, or for the
interruption of, or damage to Association's business or for Association's
relocation expenses recoverable against the condemning authority. Nothing
contained herein shall be construed as a waiver of the City's right to condemn the
Premises.
18 . DEFAULT.
(a) Any of the following events shall constitute a default under this Lease by
Association:
(i) Association's failure to pay any rent or other charges on their due
date and the continuation of such delinquency for 15 consecutive
days after written notice thereof from City;
(ii) Association's abandonment of the Premises;
65277.00001 \30940221.1
331
Page 13
652 77.0 0001 \30940221.1
(iii) Except as expressly permitted under this Lease, any attempted
conveyance, assignment, mortgage, or subletting of this Lease;
(iv) Association's general assignment or arrangement for the benefit of
creditors; the filing by or against Association of a petition to have
Association adjudged bankrupt or a petition for reorganization or
arrangement under any law relating to bankruptcy and the failure
of Association, or Association's trustee-in-bankruptcy (as the case
may be) to assume this Lease within sixty ( 60) days after the date
of the filing of the petition, (or within such additional time as the
court may fix for cause within such sixty (60) day period), or the
rejection of this Lease by Association or the trustee of Association
during such sixty (60) day period; the taking of any action at the
corporate level by Association to authorize the filing of a petition-
in-bankruptcy on behalf of Association; the appointment by a court
other than a bankruptcy court of a trustee or receiver to take
possession of substantially all of Association's assets located at the
Premises or of Association's interest in this Lease unless
possession is restored to Association within thirty (30) days;
(v) If Association shall be adjudicated insolvent pursuant to the
provisions of any present or future insolvency law under the laws
of the State of California, or if any proceedings are filed by or
against Association under the United States Bankruptcy Code (11
U.S.C. § 101 et seq.}, or any similar provisions of any future federal
bankruptcy law, or if a receiver or a trustee of the property of
Association shall be appointed under California law by reason of
Association's insolvency or inability to pay its debts as they
become due or otherwise; or if any assignment shall be made of
Association's property for the benefit of creditors under California
law;
(vi) The failure by Association to observe or perform any covenant,
condition, or provision in this Lease not already specifically
mentioned in this Section, where such failure is material and
continues for thirty (30) days after written notice from City
notifying Association of such failure; provided, however that if the
nature of Association's default is such that more than thirty (30)
days are reasonably required fer its cure, then Association shall not
be deemed to be in default if Association commenced to cure such
default within said 30-day period and thereafter diligently
prosecutes such cure to completion.
332
Page 14
65277.00001 \30940221.1
(vii) In the event of any default by Association, City may promptly or at
any time thereafter, upon notice and demand and without limiting
City in the exercise of any other right or remedy which City may
have by reason of such default or breach, terminate Association's
right to possession of the Premises by any lawful means, in which
case this Lease shall terminate and Association shall immediately
surrender possession of the Premises to City. In such event, City
shall be entitled to recover from Association any amount provided
by California Civil Code Section 1951 .2, plus any other amount
necessary to compensate City for all detriment proximately caused
by Association's failure to perform its obligations under this Lease
or which in the ordinary course of things would be likely to result
therefrom, including, but not limited to, the cost of recovering
possession of the Premises, expenses ofreletting (including
advertising), brokerage commissions and fees , costs of putting the
Premises in good order, condition and repair, including necessary
renovation and alteration of the Premises including the Building,
reasonable attorney's fees, court costs, all costs for maintaining the
Premises including the Building, all costs incurred in the
appointment of and performance by a receiver to protect the
Premises including the Building or City's interest under the Lease,
and any other reasonable cost; or pursue any other remedy now or
hereafter available to City under the laws or judicial decisions of
the State of California.
(viii) Even though Association may have breached this Lease and
abandoned the Premises, at City's option this Lease shall continue
in effect for so long as City does not terminate Association's right
to possession, and City may enforce all of its rights and remedies
hereunder, including the right to recover rent as it comes due under
this Lease , and in such event City will pennit Association to sublet
the Premises or to assign its interest in the Lease, or both, with the
consent of City, which consent will not unreasonably be withheld
provided the proposed assignee or sublessee is reasonably
satisfactory to City as to credit and will occupy the Premises for
the same purposes specified herein. For purposes of this subsection
( c ), the following shall not constitute a termination of
Association's right to possession: (i) acts of maintenance or
preservation or efforts to relet the Premises; or (ii) the appointment
of a receiver under the initiative of City to protect City's interest
under this Lease.
333
Page 15
19. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING.
(a) Association acknowledges that the Premises are uniquely beneficial to the
Association. Therefore, Association shall not assign or transfer this Lease,
or any interest therein, and shall not sublet the Premises or any part
thereof, or any right or privilege appurtenant thereto, or suffer any other
person (the invitees, agents, and servants of Association excepted) to
occupy or use the Premises, or any portion thereof, or agree to any of the
foregoing, without in each case first obtaining the written consent of City,
which may be granted or withheld in City's sole and absolute discretion.
Any such assignment, transfer, pledge, hypothecation, encumbrance,
sublease or occupation of, or the use of the Premises by any other person
without such consent, shall be void. Neither this Lease nor any interest of
Association herein shall be assignable by operation oflaw, without the
written consent of City. Any consent to any assignment, transfer, pledge,
hypothecation, encumbrance, sublease, or occupation or use of the
Premises by any other person which may be given by City shall not
constitute a waiver by City of the provisions of this Section or a release of
Association from the full performance by it of the covenants herein
contained.
(b) Each permitted assignee, transferee, or sublessee, other than City, shall
assume and be deemed to have assumed this Lease and shall be and
remain liable jointly and severally with Association for the payment of the
rent and for the due performance or satisfaction of all of the provisions,
covenants, conditions, and agreements herein contained on Association's
part to be performed or satisfied. No permitted assignment shall be
binding on City unless such assignee or Association shall deliver to City a
counterpart of such assignment which contains a covenant of assumption
by the assignee, but the failure or refusal of the assignee to execute such
instrument of assumption shall not release or discharge the assignee from
its liability as set forth above.
20. ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATES. Association shall at any time, upon not less than
ten (10) days' prior written notice from City, execute, acknowledge, and deliver
to City a statement in writing certifying, affirming, or confirming certain
information including, without limitatio~ that this Lease is unmodified and in full
force and effect (or, if modified, stating the nature of such modification and
certifying that this Lease, as so modifi~ is in full force and effect} and the dates
to which the rental, if any, and other charges, if any, are paid in advance, and
acknowledging that there are not, to Association's knowledge, any uncured
defaults on the part of City hereunder, and no events or conditions then in
65277.00001 \30940221.1
334
Page 16
existence which, with the passage of time or notice or both, would constitute a
default on the part of City hereunder, or specifying such defaults, events, or
conditions, if any are claimed. It is expressly understood and agreed that any
prospective purchaser or encumbrancer of all or any portion of the Premises or of
the real property of which it is a part shall be entitled to rely upon any such
statement. Association's failure to deliver such statement within such time shall,
at the option of City, constitute a material breach or default under this Lease. If
such option is not so exercised by City (and despite any later delivery by
Association of such statement), Association's failure to deliver same in a timely
manner shall be conclusive upon Association that (i) this Lease is in full force and
effect without modification except as may be represented by City; (ii) there are no
uncured defaults in City's performance; and (iii) not more than two (2) months'
rental has been paid in advance.
21. INTEREST ON PAST DUE OBLIGATIONS. Except as otherwise expressly
provided in this Lease, any amount due from Association to City hereunder which
is not paid when due shall bear interest at the highest rate then allowed to be
changed by non-exempt lenders under the usury laws of the State of California
from the date due until the date paid.
22. ARBITRATION. In the event that the parties have failed for a period of
sixty (60) days to reach agreement on any controversies, claims, and matters of
difference, the parties agree to submit such controversies, claims, and matters of
difference to arbitration according to the rules and practices of the American
Arbitration Association in force. This submission and agreement to arbitrate shall
be specifically enforceable. There shall be three (3) arbitrators who shall be
residents of the City and members of the Association. One (1) arbitrator shall be
appointed by the City, one (1) by the Association, and those two (2) shall select
the third arbitrator. A decision agreed on by two (2) of the arbitrators shall be the
decision of the arbitration panel. The parties agree to abide by all awards rendered
in such proceedings. Such awards shall be final and binding and there shall be no
appeal therefrom.
23. CITY'S DEFAULTS. City shall not be deemed to be in default in the
performance of any obligation required to be performed by it hereunder unless
and until it has failed to perform such obligation for thirty (30) days after written
notice by Association to City specifying wherein City has failed to perform such
obligation; provided, however, that if the nature of City's obligation is such that
more than thirty (30) days are required for its performance then City shall not be
deemed to be in default if it shall commence such performance within such thirty
(30)-day period and thereafter diligently prosecute or pursue the same to
completion. In no event shall Association have the right to terminate this Lease as
65277.00001 \30940221.1
335
Page 17
a result of Association's default, and Association's remedies shall be limited to
damages or an injunction.
24. HOLDING OVER. Should Association, with or without City's written consent,
hold over after the termination of this Lease, such possession by Association shall
be deemed to be a month-to-month tenancy terminable by thirty (30) days' notice
given at any time, upon each and all of the terms herein provided as may be
applicable to a month-to-month tenancy and any such holding over shall not
constitute an extension of this Lease. The foregoing provisions of this Article are
in addition to and do not affect City's right of re--entry or any other rights of City
hereunder or as otherwise provided by law. If Association fails to surrender the
Premises upon the expiration of this Lease despite demand to do so by City,
Association shall indemnify and hold City harmless from all losses or liability,
including without limitation, any claim made by any succeeding tenant or entity
founded on or resulting from such failure to surrender, and any loss of rent from
prospective tenant or entity.
25. W AIYER. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by either
party to this Lease on the occurrence of any default by the other party to this
Lease shall impair such a right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. The receipt
and acceptance by City of delinquent rent shall not constitute a waiver of any
other default; it shall constitute only a waiver of timely payment for the particular
rent payment involved. No act or conduct of City, including, without limitation,
the acceptance of the keys to the Premises, shall constitute an acceptance of the
surrender of the Premises by Association before the expiration of the term. Only
written notice from City to Association shall constitute acceptance of the
surrender of the Premises and accomplish a termination of the Lease. City's
consent to or approval of any act by Association requiring City's consent or
approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary City's consent to or
approval of any subsequent act by Association. Any waiver by either party of any
default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default
concerning the same or any other provision of the Lease.
26. FORCE MAJEURE. Whenever a day is appointed herein on which, or a period
of time is appointed within which, either party hereto is required to do or
complete any act, matter, or thing, the time for the doing or completion thereof
shall be extended by a period of time equal to the number of days on or during
which such party is prevented from, or is unreasonably interfered with, the doing
or completion of such act, matter, or thing because of strikes, lock-outs,
embargoes, unavailability of labor or materials, wars, insurrections, rebellions,
civil disorder, declaration of national emergencies, acts of God, or other causes
beyond such party's reasonable control (financial inability excepted); provided,
65277.00001 \30940221.1
336
Page 18
however, nothing contained in this Section shall excuse Association from the
prompt payment of any rental or other charge required of Association hereunder,
except as specifically provided in Section hereof to the contrary.
27. MISCELLANEOUS.
(a) Any provision of this Lease which shall prove to be invalid, void, or
illegal shall in no way affect, impair, or invalidate any other provision
hereof and such other provisions shall remain in full force and effect.
(b) In the event of any litigation between Association and City, to enforce any
provision of this Lease or any right of either party hereto, or to secure a
judicial determination of any right or obligation of either party hereto, the
unsuccessful party in such litigation shall pay to the successful party all
reasonable costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees,
incurred therein. Moreover, if either party hereto without fault is made a
party to any litigation instituted by or against any other party to this Lease,
such other party shall indemnify City or Association, as the case may be,
against and save it harmless from all costs and expenses, including
reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred by it in connection therewith.
( c) Time is of the essence hereunder.
( d) The section captions contained in this Lease are for convenience and do
not in any way limit or amplify any term or provision of this Lease and
shall have no effect on its interpretation.
(e) The terms "City" and "Association" as used herein shall include the plural
as well as the singular, and the neuter shall include the masculine and
feminine genders. The obligations herein imposed upon Association shall
be joint and several as to each of the persons, firms, or corporations of
which Association may be composed.
(f) This Lease and the exhibits and any rider or addendum attached hereto
constitute the entire agreement between the parties hereto with respect to
the subject matter hereof, and no prior agreement or understanding
pertaining to any such matter shall be effective for any purpose. No
provision of this Lease may be amended or supplemented except by an
agreement in writing signed by the parties hereto or their successors in
interest.
65277.00001\3094-0221 .1
337
Page 19
(g) lbis Lease shall be interpreted and enforced in accordance with the laws
of the State of California, which shall apply in all respects, including
statutes oflimitation, to any disputes or controversies arising out of or
pertaining to this Lease.
(h) Upon Association's observing and performing all of the covenants,
conditions, and provisions on Association's part to be observed and
performed hereunder, Association shall have quiet possession of the
Premises for the entire term hereof, subject to all of the provisions of this
Lease.
(i). Except as otherwise provided in this Lease, all of the covenants,
conditions, and provisions of this Lease shall be binding upon and shall
inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, personal
representatives, successors, and assigns.
G) Any notice required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be in writing
and may be given by personal delivery or by certified mail, return receipt
requested, addressed to Association or to City at the addresses provided in
Section 1 ( d) hereof. Either party may by proper notice to the other specify
a different address for notice purposes.
(k) The text of this Lease shall be construed, in all respects, according to its
fair meaning, and not strictly for or against either City or Association.
(1) This Lease shall not be recorded, except that if City requests Association
to do so, the parties shall execute a memorandum of this Lease in
recordable form and Association shall execute and deliver to City on the
expiration or termination of this Lease, immediately on City's request, a
quitclaim deed to the Premises, in recordable form, designating City as
transferee. All expenses incurred shall be borne by City.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Lease as of the day and
year first above written.
65277.00001 \30940221.1
338
Page20
AITEST:
65277.00001\30940221.1
ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION OF RANCHO PALOS
VERDES
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
Agenda Item No.: 9.B
Mtg. Date: 02/22/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:ELAINE JENG, CITY MANAGER
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:CONSIDER AND APPROVE A PROJECT BASED PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JIMENEZ CONSULTING SOLUTIONS,
LLC. TO COMPLETE THREE ON-GOING TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS.
DATE:February 22, 2021
BACKGROUND:
One of the City Council's strategic goals is to improve communication with the community and provide
timely notifications. In support of this goal, the City migrated to a newly design website in March
2020. For cost effective and timely deployment, the new website was launched with little contents with
the intention of working with relevant stakeholders to build the site with current information. The
pages on the website that are dedicated to support the Block Captain Program needed specialized
expertise and the City Council engaged the services of Jimenez Consulting Solutions, LLC. (Jimenez
Consulting) in May 2020.
Upon the completion of the web pages and functionalities dedicated to support the Block Captain
Program, the City was deploying a number of technology applications and upgrades that needed
expertise to complete the projects. Deployments include the launch of IWOQs - permit tracking system
interface through the City's website, digitized records searchable through the City's website, Voice Over
Internet Protocol (VOIP) phone system, online survey forms through the City's website, and collection
of emergency preparedness survey data (database development). There were many other small projects
and tasks associated with each of these higher level applications. To support city staff in the
deployment of technology applications, the City Council approved a retainer agreement with Jimenez
Consulting to provide 28.5 hours of as-needed services for the months of August 2020, September
2020, October 2020, November 2020, and December 2020.
Most technology applications have been deployed successfully. City staff is accessing the digitized
records using a simple to use query system. The digitized records will be released to the public once
staff verifies a select few records to ensure that those files are not confidential files. IWOQ is being
used by internal staff and testing is being conducted with select external parties for quality assurance.
The City's VOIP phone system went live on February 17, 2021.
353
DISCUSSION:
In November 2020 and December 2020, Jimenez Consulting worked with City staff in identifying a
solution to be able to maintain a database of residents' contact information for emergency notifications.
The residents' database is also necessary for Block Captains to conduct their outreach in their zones.
Previous Block Captain Lead Marcia Gold collected information from the community to assist with
emergency response. For example, she asked if residents have construction equipment, are they
medical professionals, have pools that can provide additional water supply for fire fighting, or a
household with special needs. Towards the end of December 2020, a viable solution was devised as
follows: use a low code development application to custom design a database that would include data
points collected by Ms. Gold, City staff to populate the database with available data, and transition the
database to the Block Captains so that they can maintain the residents records within their zone with
City staff having administrative oversight.
Low code is a approach to software development that eliminates the need to write code. Low code
allows the ability to build, edit, and test custom applications using visual, point-and-click tools instead
of hand-coding. Low code is a cost effective alternative to hiring a programmer to develop a custom
application. Jimenez Consulting explored two platforms and ultimately based on functionalities and
cost, the Caspio platform was selected. Jimenez Consulting also created a database model to ensure
that the end product will meet the city's needs. The City needs to have a well maintained database of
residents' information to be able to notify each of the 690 households in the community in the event of
an emergency.
Jimenez Consulting exhausted the available budget at the end of December 2020 to continue the
development work on the database. Additionally, Jimenez Consulting was also working on the trading
post (allowing community members to advertise items for trade or give-away) through the City's
website. To complete these two projects, staff is recommending that the City Council continue to
engage Jimenez Consulting using a project based agreement with defined budget for each project and a
completion date for each project.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The project based agreement would require $11,900. This expense can be funded using the salary
savings in Fiscal Year 2020-2021.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve a professional services agreement with Jimenez
Consulting Solutions, LLC.
ATTACHMENTS:
Agreement with Jimenez - 2021-c1_2021-02-19.pdf
Rolling Hills - SJ and JW time Nov and Dec 2020.pdf
Rolling HIlls - Resident Portal - Design Master - 2020.12.24 - Send_2020-12-29.pdf
354
Page 1 of 7
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR WEBSITE DESIGN
THIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR WEBSITE DESIGN
SERVICES (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of February 22, 2021 by and between
the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, a municipal corporation ("City"), and JIMENEZ CONSULTING
SOLUTIONS, L.L.C., a limited liability company (the “Consultant”).
R E C I T A L S
A. City desires to retain Consultant to provide the City with website design services
to create a resident portal and trading post portal on the City’s website, to update the City’s
home page on its website, and to provide the City with as-needed support;
B. Consultant is well qualified by reason of education, training, and experience; and
C. Consultant is willing to render such services on the terms and conditions as
hereinafter defined.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the covenants and
agreements set forth below, City and Consultant agree as follows:
1. Scope of Work. Consultant shall perform in a manner satisfactory to City the
functions and duties set forth in the Scope of Work, attached hereto as Exhibit A and
incorporated herein by reference.
2. Cost. City agrees to pay Consultant for the services required by this Agreement
$21,000, representing the total cost for all labor, equipment, supplies, expenses, and materials
incurred by Consultant. Consultant shall submit invoices with details of performed work in
duplicate and addressed to the City Manager, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California
90274 twice a month (at mid-month and month-end) for actual hours worked during that period.
City will make payment for all work performed to City’s reasonable satisfaction within 30 days
of receipt of an invoice. The Agreement shall not exceed a total amount of $21,000.
3. Commencement of the Work. Consultant shall commence work under this
Agreement upon complete execution of this Agreement.
4. Accounting Records. Consultant must maintain accounting records and other
evidence pertaining to costs incurred, which records and documents shall be kept available at
the Consultant’s California office during the contract period and thereafter for three years from
the date of final payment. Consultant shall provide the City access to such records for approval,
funding, or auditing the project, during normal business hours upon reasonable notice, the
reasonable cost of which shall be borne by the City.
5. City Data. City Data includes the City’s data that is collected, used, processed,
stored, or generated as a result of the use of Consultant’s services. City will own all rights in
355
Page 2 of 7
and to City Data to the extent allowable by law, and any derivative works of City Data will
remain the exclusive property of City.
6. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be valid until January 1, 2022.
7. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time without cause by
either party giving ten (10) calendar days’ advance written notice of termination to the other
party. In the event of a breach or a default in the performance of this Agreement, the non-
defaulting party may terminate the Agreement immediately, provided that the defaulting or
breaching party has failed to cure or to make reasonable progress towards curing the default
within three (3) calendar days of receipt of notice demanding a cure.
If this Agreement is terminated pursuant to any of the provisions contained hereinabove,
and if requested to do so in writing by the City, the Consultant shall, within seven (7) calendar
days after receipt of such written request, deliver and turn over to the City all of its preparation
and work on documents which were done to the date of the receipt of the notice of termination.
The terms "preparation" and "work" as used in this paragraph, shall refer to and include all
other data and materials of whatever type that have been gathered by the Consultant, and
contemplated to be used or actually used, in the preparation of the services identified in Exhibit
A.
8. Insurance.
A. Without limiting Consultant’s obligations arising under Section 9 of this
Agreement (Indemnity), Consultant shall not begin work under this Agreement until it obtains
policies of insurance required under this section. The insurance shall cover Consultant, its
agents, representatives, and employees in connection with the performance of work under this
Agreement, and shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. Insurance
coverage shall be as follows:
i. Automobile Liability Insurance with minimum coverage of $300,000 for
property damage, $300,000 for injury to one person/single occurrence, and $300,000 for injury
to more than one person/single occurrence.
ii. General Liability Insurance, insuring City, its elected and appointed
officers, agents, and employees from claims for damages for bodily injury, personal injury, and
property damage, including contractual liability and products and completed operations liability,
which may arise from Consultant’s actions under this Agreement, whether or not done by
Consultant or anyone directly or indirectly employed by Consultant. Such insurance shall have
a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000.
iii. Worker’s Compensation Insurance for all Consultant’s employees to the
extent required by the State of California.
iv. Professional Liability Coverage. The Consultant shall maintain
professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging
negligent acts, errors, or omissions which may arise from the Consultant’s operations under
this Agreement, whether such operations be by the Consultant or by its employees,
356
Page 3 of 7
subconsultants, or subcontractors. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one
million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single-
limit-per-occurrence basis.
B. Deductibility Limits for policies referred to in subparagraphs A(i) through
(iii) shall not exceed $5,000 per occurrence.
C. Additional Insured. City and its elected and appointed officers, agents, and
employees shall be named as additional insureds on policies referred to in subparagraphs A(i)
and (ii).
D. Primary Insurance. The insurance required in subparagraphs A(i) and (ii)
shall be primary and not excess coverage.
E. Evidence of Insurance. Consultant shall furnish City, prior to the execution
of this Agreement, satisfactory evidence of the insurance required, issued by an insurer
authorized to do business in California, and an endorsement to each such policy of insurance
evidencing that each carrier is required to give City at least 30 days prior written notice of the
cancellation of any policy during the effective period of the Agreement. All required insurance
policies are subject to approval of the City Attorney. Failure on the part of Consultant to procure
or maintain said insurance in full force and effect shall constitute a material breach of this
Agreement.
9. Indemnity.
Consultant shall indemnify, defend with counsel approved by City, and hold
harmless City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers from and against all liability,
loss, damage, expense, cost (including without limitation reasonable attorney’s fees, expert
fees, and all other costs and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection
with and to the extent of Consultant’s negligence or other wrongful conduct in Consultant’s
performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in
this Agreement, regardless of City’s passive negligence, but excepting such loss or damage
which is caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of the City. The Consultant
shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City (and its officers, officials,
employees, and volunteers) covered by this indemnity obligation. It is expressly understood
and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is
permitted by the law of the State of California and will survive termination of this Agreement.
10. Quality of Work Performed. All work shall be performed to the highest
professional standards.
11. Personnel. City has engaged Consultant by virtue of the specialized expertise
and reputation in the field of website design for government agencies. Consequently, all work
shall be performed by Consultant. Susan Jimenez, President & CEO, will be the primary person
performing the Services.
12. Compliance with All Laws. Consultant shall comply with all City, State, and
Federal laws in the performance of its services.
357
Page 4 of 7
13. Assignment/Subcontracting. Consultant shall not be permitted to subcontract
or assign any portion of this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. The
performance of either party's duties are also not delegable without the prior written consent of
the other party. Any attempted or purported subcontract, assign, or delegation of any of the
rights or obligations of either party without the prior written consent of the other shall be void
and of no force and effect.
14. Attorney's Fees. In any action brought to declare the rights granted herein or to
enforce any of the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award of
reasonable attorney's fees in an amount determined by the court.
15. Non-discrimination. Consultant shall not discriminate in the hiring of employees
or in the employment of subconsultants on any basis prohibited by law.
16. Independent Contractor. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to City,
a wholly independent contractor. Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control of the
conduct of Consultant or any of the Consultant's employees, except as herein set forth.
Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or
employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Consultant shall be solely
responsible for all contributions, payments, or withholdings normally made on behalf of an
employee including but not limited to, state and federal income taxes, federal social security
contributions, California State disability insurance taxes, and unemployment insurance
contributions. City shall issue Consultant a Form 1099 in connection with the compensation
paid hereunder, and Consultant shall pay all required taxes on amounts paid hereunder.
17. Notices. All notices and communications shall be sent to the parties at the
following addresses:
CITY: City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, California 90274
ATTN.: Elaine Jeng, City Manager
Email: ejeng@cityofrh.net
CONSULTANT: Jimenez Consulting Solutions, LLC
6709 East Calle Redondo
Scottsdale, Arizona 85251
ATTN.: Susan R. Jimenez, President & CEO
Email: susan.jimenez@jimenezconsulting.com
Notice shall only be given by personal delivery, e-mail, overnight delivery, or certified or
registered mail with return receipt. Notice will be deemed to have been duly given when
received if personally delivered; when receipt is electronically confirmed if transmitted by e-
mail; the day after it is sent if sent for next day delivery by recognized overnight delivery service;
and upon receipt if sent by certified or registered mail with return receipt requested.
358
Page 5 of 7
18. Conflict of Interest. Consultant affirms and warrants that she has no financial,
contractual, or other interest or obligation that conflicts with or is harmful to the performance of
her obligations under this Agreement. Consultant shall not during the term of this Agreement
knowingly obtain such an interest or incur such an obligation.
19. Amendment. It is mutually understood and agree that no alteration or variation
of the terms of this Agreement, or any subcontract requiring the approval of the City, shall be
valid unless made in writing, signed by the parties hereto, and approved by all necessary
parties.
20. Authorized Signature. Consultant affirms that the signatures, titles, and seals
set forth hereinafter in execution of this Agreement represent all individuals, firm members,
partners, joint ventures, and/or corporate officers having a principal interest herein.
21. Entire Agreement; Modification. This Agreement supersedes any and all other
agreements, either oral or written, between the parties and contains all of the covenants and
agreements between the parties. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no
representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made
by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein, and that
any other agreement, statements or promise not contained in this Agreement shall not be valid
or binding. Any modification of this Agreement will be effective only if signed by the party to be
charged. The parties acknowledge and agree that their respective obligations under the
Agreement have been fully discharged.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date
and year first above written.
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CONSULTANT
___________________________ _____________________________
ELAINE JENG SUSAN R. JIMENEZ
CITY MANAGER PRESIDENT & CEO
DATE:_____________ DATE:_____________
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk
359
Page 6 of 7
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________
City Attorney
EXHIBIT A
360
Page 7 of 7
SCOPE OF WORK
1. Create Resident Portal
Consultant will develop a database application using the Caspio platform to address the
requirements we have discussed with you and other key members of the Block Captain
program. This application will be accessible to City residents via the Rolling Hills website, and
will allow residents to securely access and update their personal information. City staff and
Block Captains will use this application to facilitate communications and follow up with
residents on a variety of topics, including emergency notification and management.
Resident Portal – $7,000 (40 hours max)
Deliverable Date: __March 31, 2021__________
2. Create Trading Post
Consultant will develop a database application using the Caspio Platform that will provide City
residents with a tool for listing, reviewing, buying, and selling personal items. As with the
Resident Portal, residents will access this application via the Rolling Hills website.
Trading Post - $2,625 (15 hours max)
Deliverable Date: __March 31, 2021__________
3. Update Website Home Page Updates
Consultant will coordinate the completion of the design, development, and implementation of
changes to the Home Page of the Rolling Hills website by Revize. The changes shall include
restructuring the Home Page to eliminate the two vertical columns of information and to create
a page where new information is presented as the page scrolls from top to bottom.
Website Home Page - $525 (3 hours max)
Deliverable Date: __March 1, 2021__________
4. As Needed Support
Consultant will provide support to City staff on an as needed basis relating to Consultant’s
creation of the Resident Portal identified in Task 1 and the City’s use of such portal.
As-Needed Support - $1,750 (10 hours max)
361
Resource Client Project Date Hours Description
Sue Rolling Hills Retainer Agmt 11/1/2020 3
Follow up with Kirsten re: getting videos posted; edit and
post 10/8 Block Captain meeting video
Sue Rolling Hills Retainer Agmt 11/2/2020 2
Follow up with Kirsten re: which videos I have received,
what they think they have sent, dates I have not yet
received, etc.
Sue Rolling Hills Retainer Agmt 11/5/2020 2
Follow up with Eva (Nextiva) re: status of phone
installation; resend signed agreement to Eva; additional
follow up (multiple iterations) with Kirsten re: what videos
they have sent to me, which are edited and posted, etc.
Resolve issues/confusion with missing videos
Sue Rolling Hills Retainer Agmt 11/9/2020 1 Call with Connie regarding Survey Monkey issues
Sue Rolling Hills Retainer Agmt 11/10/2020 2
Follow up with Elaine re: phone status, Revize, Survey
Monkey; follow up with Kirsten re: call to train her on
editing and posting videos
Sue Rolling Hills Retainer Agmt 11/12/2020 2
Status meeting with Elaine - discuss phone installation,
Revize agreement, Home Page and Blog requirements,
prioritization of back-end database solution; follow up with
Robert (Revize) regarding separating agreement for blog
and Home Page, changes to Home Page agreement
Sue Rolling Hills Retainer Agmt 11/13/2020 2
Follow up with Kirsten to schedule call for video training;
talk with Jeff re: bolt-on database ideas
Sue Rolling Hills Retainer Agmt 11/16/2020 3
Coordinate meeting details with Kirsten; create/update and
send draft of instructions for editing and uploading videos,
conduct training call with Kirsten
Sue Rolling Hills Retainer Agmt 11/18/2020 1
Follow up with Robert (Revize) - 3rd Request - re Home
Page and Blog app; update Elaine on response from Robert
Sue Rolling Hills Retainer Agmt 11/19/2020 2
Call with Jeff re: backend database solution for Resident
Portal; send info to Jeff regarding Block Captain data,
reports, etc.
Jeff Whitfill Rolling Hills Resident Portal 11/19/2020 3
2.25 hours evaluating online database options and meeting
with vendors to determine feasibility for use on Rolling
Hills website. 45 minute call with Sue to review options
and provide status update.
Sue Rolling Hills Retainer Agmt 11/20/2020 1
Send status update to Elaine re: Home Page, Blog app,
progress on Resident Portal database solution, coordinate
with Elaine for upcoming meetings (changes due to
calendar conflicts, holiday, etc.)
Jeff Whitfill Rolling Hills Resident Portal 11/29/2020 1
Prepare PowerPoint overview of online database solution
for resident web portal, tasks and time estimates.
Sue Rolling Hills Retainer Agmt 12/7/2020 2
Status call with Elaine, follow up with Jeff re: Resident
Portal; follow up with Revize re: Trading Post and Home
Page updates
Sue Rolling Hills Retainer Agmt 12/11/2020 2
Call with Jeff re: status of Resident Portal work/next
steps/etc.; review information from RH Block Captain
program (previous reports, excel sheets, etc.)
Jeff Whitfill Rolling Hills Resident Portal 12/11/2020 4
Start trial of Caspio online database platform. Start table
design process. Organize Rolling Hills data for import and
import into Caspio for Properties table. One hour call with
Sue to review progress, get feedback from RH discussions
and plan next steps.
Jeff Whitfill Rolling Hills Resident Portal 12/14/2020 3
Finish table design process for all four data tables
(Resident, Household, and Properties) and perform initial
build in Caspio. Start work on validation / lookups for fields
and learning Caspio table functions.
362
Resource Client Project Date Hours Description
Jeff Whitfill Rolling Hills Resident Portal 12/16/2020 1
In Caspio, setup primary keys, table relationships and
figure out formula fields.
Sue Rolling Hills Retainer Agmt 12/17/2020 2
Call with Jeff and Elaine to review Resident Portal design,
questions, clarify requirements, etc. Follow up with Jeff on
next steps after call; send digned agreement to Robert re
Home page and Blog App - clarify/explain RH wants to have
Home page changes done ASAP, but hold on Blog App... we
are exploring external database solution
Jeff Whitfill Rolling Hills Resident Portal 12/17/2020 3
Review Caspio documentation and create first form in
Caspio for the household table. 1.5 hour call with Sue and
Elaine to review questions and database design. Update
design documents and Caspio based on call.
Jeff Whitfill Rolling Hills Resident Portal 12/18/2020 2
Review Caspio documentation and training for purposes of
setting up child forms, authentications, and record level
security. Testing and changes to application testing
security.
Sue Rolling Hills Retainer Agmt 12/21/2020 2
Call with Jeff and Arlene Honbo to review database design
for Resident Portal, discuss requirements, etc.
Jeff Whitfill Rolling Hills Resident Portal 12/21/2020 3
Add questions from current resident questionnaire sent by
Elaine to design document. 2 hour call with Arlene and Sue
to review database design, discuss requirements, and
review resident portal questionnaire. Changes to the portal
design document based on call with Arlene.
Sue Rolling Hills Retainer Agmt 12/22/2020 3
Call with Jeff, Arlene, and Gene Honbo to review current
design for Resident Portal and discuss data needs, security,
database structure, etc.
Jeff Whitfill Rolling Hills Resident Portal 12/22/2020 3
30 minutes preparing for meeting. 2.5 hour call with Elaine,
Gene and Arlene discuss Resident Portal requirements and
design in detail.
Jeff Whitfill Rolling Hills Resident Portal 12/24/2020 1
1 hour updating design document with changes from call
and finalizing design. Sent design to team for review. Call
with Caspio to ask questions and extend trial.
Jeff Whitfill Rolling Hills Resident Portal 12/29/2020 1
Call with call with Caspio to verify functionality, discuss
outstanding questions, and discuss procedure for signing
up / converting trial to paid access. 15 minutes of carryover
from Wednesday 12/30.
Sue Rolling Hills Retainer Agmt 12/30/2020 2
Call with Jeff, Elaine, Arlene, and Gene to review database,
security, and functionality requirements for Resident
Portal; follow up with Revize re: status of Home Page
updates
Jeff Whitfill Rolling Hills Resident Portal 12/30/2020 1
1.25 hour call with Elaine, Arlene, and Gene to finalize
requirements for design, discuss additional block captain
requirements, and purchase Caspio with Elaine.
Sue Rolling Hills Retainer Agmt 1/4/2021 2
Follow up with Robert (Revize) - re Home Page and Blog
app; call with Robert to clarify next steps; Prepare and
send detailed status update with hours to Elaine
Sue Rolling Hills Retainer Agmt 1/15/2021 3
Review Home Page updates made by Revize, multiple
emails and calls with Robert to troubleshoot, RE-explain
our request (including creating a diagram for him of what
the screen should look like), multiple follow ups, several
iterations
Sue Rolling Hills Retainer Agmt 1/18/2021 2
More follow up (multiple emails, calls) with Robert re:
rollback of live site to original layout
363
Rolling Hills Resident Portal Tables Stamp for last updated
Note: Block Captain table or lookup tables may be added, if necessary based on disucssion. Notes fields need to be reviewed with Rolling Hills.
Field Name Field Label Field Type Drop Down / Check Box
Choices Form Text Visitbility Editable By Notes
HouseholdID Household ID Autonumber Hidden N/A Database field
PropertyID Property ID Foreign Key Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
Displays as Address field from
Property Table
HouseholdType Household Type Drop Down
Owner Occupied /
Renter Occupied /
Business
Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
NumOfAdults Text Box How many adults live in the
household?Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
NumOfChildren Text Box How many children live in the
household?Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
SpecialNeeds Special Needs Check Box
Does anyone in the house have any
special needs or require assistance
during an emergency?
Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
SpecialNeedsDescription Text Box
Primary language other
than English; Physical
disability; Others
Please describe…Special Needs =
"Y"
Resident / Block
Captain / City Elaine/Honbos 12-29-2020
CannotCallForHelp Cannot Call or Signal for
Assistance Check Box Are they NOT able to call or signal for
assitance?
Special Needs =
"Y"
Resident / Block
Captain / City
Consolidate with line 13 above.
Elaine/Honbos 12-29-2020
AuxiliaryPump Auxiliary Pump Check Box
Do you have an auxiliary pump to
deploy pool water for extinguishing a
fire?
Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
HAMRadio HAM Radio Multiselect Drop Down Hand Held / Base
Station
Do you have the following Ham Radio
equipment?Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
HAMRadioVolunteer HAM Radio Emergency Check Box Would you volunteer to opeate your
radio in the event of an emergency?
HAMRadio <>
"Blank"
Resident / Block
Captain / City
Horses Number of Horses Text Box
How many horses or other large
animals do you have? (A large animal is
defined as one that requires transport
by trailer)
Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
CaballerosEvacuationPla
n
Caballeros Evacuation
Plan Check Box
Are you working with the Caballeros
program for the evacuation of your
horses during an emergency?
Horses > 0 Resident / Block
Captain / City
HorseMarker Horse Marker Check Box Is your property sign marked to
indicate that you have a horses?Horses > 0 Resident / Block
Captain / City
Languages Languages Multiselect Drop Down Preloaded with all
languages.
What languages, other than English,
are spoken by members of your
household?
Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
Field Name Field Label Field Type Drop Down / Check Box
Choices Form Text Visibility Editable By Notes
ResidentID Resident ID Autonumber Hidden N/A Datbase field
HouseholdID Household ID Foreign Key Hidden N/A Automatically set to household
from which it was created
ResidentType Resident Type Drop Down Owner, Renter,
Company, Trust, Other Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
Title Title Drop Down Mr., Mrs., Ms., Dr.Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
First First Text Box Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
Last Last Text Box Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
Phone Phone Text Box Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
Email Email Text Box Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
MedicalDoctor Medical Doctor Check Box Is this person a medical doctor?Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
MedicalField Medical Field Text Box What field or specialty?MedicalDoctor
="Y"
Resident / Block
Captain / City
Nurse Nurse Check Box Is this person a nurse?Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
FirstResponder First Responder Multiselect Drop Down
Law Enforcement,
Firefighter, Paramedic,
EMT
Does this person have experience as a
first responder?Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
MilitaryExperience Military Experience Drop Down
Active Military, Retired
Military, Military
Reserve
Does this person have any military
experience?Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
MilitaryExperienceDetail
s
Military Experience
Details Text Box What branch and field?MilitaryExperienc
e = Not Blank
Resident / Block
Captain / City
ConstructionExperience Building & Construction
Training Multiselect Drop Down
Building Inspector,
Electrician, General
Contractor, Structural
Engineer, Architect,
Plumber, Carpenter,
Other
Does this person have training in the
following building and construction
professions?
Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
Household Table
Resident Table
364
EmergencyTraining Emergency Training Multiselect Drop Down
CPR, First Aid, Shelter
Management, Disaster
Prepardedness, Disaster
Management, Red Cross
Operations, Hazerdous
Material Handling,
Community Emergency
Response (CERT)
Is anyone trained in the following
emergency skills?Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
HAMRadioCertified HAM Radio Certified Check Box Is this person HAM Radio Certified?Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
EmergencyVolunteer Emergency Volunteer Check Box
Are they willing to volunteer to assist
in an emergency? (e.g. Contact
neighbors, assist with evacuations,
etc.)
Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
Field Name Field Label Field Type Drop Down / Check Box
Choices Form Text Visibility Editable By Notes
AccessorParcelNumber Accessor Parcel Number Text Box City New field. I need the parcel
numbers.
SubZone Sub Zone Foreign Key City Lookup to Sub Zone table
HouseNumber House Number Number City
StreetName Street Name Text Box City
City City Text Box City
State State Text Box City
Zip Zip Text Box City
LotCategory LotCategory Text Box Under Construction,
Unbuildable Lot, Empty City New field added based on
reoccuring notes
PoolSpa Pool or Spa Drop Down Pool, Spa Does your property have a built in Pool
or Spa?Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
PoolSpaDecal Pool and Spa Decal Check Box Is your property sign marked with a
decal to indicate you have a pool?PoolSpa <> Blank Resident / Block
Captain / City
AccessIssues Access Issues Text Box
Please describe if rescuers would have
a difficult time entering or exiting your
property
Always Resident / Block
Captain / City
Notes Notes Text Box City
StreetAddress Street Address Formula HouseNumber &
StreetName Always City
Field Name Field Label Field Type Drop Down / Check Box
Choices Form Text Visibility Editable By Notes
SubZone Sub Zone Text Box All City Need to discuss this table with Jeff.
Elaine/Honbos 12-29-2020
Zone Zone Number All City
SubZoneDescription Sub Zone Description Text Box All City
BlockCaptain Block Captain Text Box All City Links to ResidentID
Note: If a SubZone can have more than one block captain then an additional table will be required.
Block Captains Priority color code. Elaine/Honbos 12
Volunteer Role(s)Dropdown with Other
Professional / Other skills? (Marketing, training, etcDropdown with Other
Property Table
Sub Zone Table
365
Agenda Item No.: 9.C
Mtg. Date: 02/22/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:MEREDITH ELGUIRA, PLANNING DIRECTOR
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:CONSIDER AND APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH BARRY MILLER CONSULTING TO PROVIDE
CONSULTANT SERVICES TO PREPARE THE CITY’S 6 TH CYCLE
HOUSING ELEMENT TO COMPLY WITH THE CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT'S
(HCD) REQUIREMENTS.
DATE:February 22, 2021
BACKGROUND:
California state law requires that each city and county adopt a general plan to guide its physical
growth and development for the next 15 to 20 years. The general plan represents a community’s
vision of its future and is a statement of its values, priorities, needs and concerns. The general
plan is required to be prepared in accordance with the requirements of California Government
Codes Section 65300 et seq. The general plan addresses the seven mandatory elements of the
California Government Code, which are land use, circulation, housing, open space, conservation,
noise and safety.
DISCUSSION:
The City of Rolling Hills is starting its efforts to prepare the 6th Cycle Housing Element which is due in
October 2021.The City advertised a Request for Proposal for planning services to prepare the 6th Cycle
Housing Element. One proposal was received from Barry Miller Consulting.
Barry Miller Consulting is the consultant currently finalizing the City's 5th Cycle Housing Element. Mr.
Miller is very familiar with the development constraints in the City of Rolling Hills. He understands the
concerns of the community in regards to high density residential developments and their potential
impacts to the character of the City and quality of life. His personal knowledge of the City's goals and
objectives and current housing policies and practices provide a seamless transition to continue working
on next cycle of the Housing Element.
Given the City's topographical constraints, existing land use, density, limited land availability, distance
from job centers, lack of access to public transportation and high fire severity zone location, the City is
p r o posing to meet its Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) through the use of Accessory
Dwelling Units (ADU). Using ADUs to meet RHNA requirements is a non-traditional way of meeting
affordable housing units and thus, more work is involved in trying to prove its viability to HCD. The
366
City and Mr. Miller have started this conversation with HCD and the agency is aware that the City will
be proposing to use ADUs to meet its affordable housing obligations. Mr. Miller has prepared housing
elements using the same strategy. He is well-qualified to prepare the City's housing element.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost to revise the Housing Element has been appropriated in the Planning and Community Services
Department's FY 2020-2021 Budget. The LEAP grant awarded to the City in 2020 will also help defray
some of the costs to prepare the element.
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the City Manager, or her designee, to execute an agreement, and any subsequent
amendments, with Barry Miller Consulting, in an amount not to exceed $42.410 for the proposed scope
of work to prepare the 6th Cycle Housing Element.
ATTACHMENTS:
Barry Miller Consulting Contract 2021.pdf
RollingHills6thCycleHousingProposal-BMiller.pdf
367
1
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE (2021-2029)
This Agreement is made and entered into on February 22, 2021 by and between
the City of Rolling Hills (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), and Barry Miller
Consulting (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant").
R E C I T A L S
A. The City does not have the personnel able and available to perform the
services required under this Agreement.
B. The City desires to contract for consulting services to assist with its
General Plan Housing Element update (2021-2029).
C. The Consultant warrants to the City that it has the qualifications,
experience, and facilities to perform properly and timely the services under this
Agreement.
D. The City desires to contract with the Consultant to perform the services as
described in Exhibit A of this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Consultant agree as follows:
1.0 SCOPE OF THE CONSULTANT’S SERVICES. The Consultant agrees to
provide the services and perform the tasks set forth in the Scope of Work, attached to and
made part of this Agreement as Exhibit A, except that, to the extent that any provision in
Exhibit A conflicts with this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall govern.
The Scope of Work may be amended from time to time in writing and signed by both
parties by way of written amendment to this Agreement.
2.0 TERM OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement will become effective upon
execution by both parties and will remain in effect until March 1, 2022 unless otherwise
expressly extended and agreed to by both parties in writing or terminated by either party
as provided herein.
3.0 CITY AGENT. The City Manager, or her designee, for the purposes of this
Agreement, is the agent for the City; whenever approval or authorization is required,
Consultant understands that the City Manager, or her designee, has the authority to
provide that approval or authorization.
4.0 COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES.
4.1 The City shall pay the Consultant for its professional services rendered
and costs incurred pursuant to this Agreement in accordance with Exhibit A, subject to a
368
2
do not exceed amount in the amount of $42,410. No additional compensation shall be
paid for any other expenses incurred, unless first approved by the City Manager, or her
designee, in writing.
4.2 The Consultant shall submit to the City, by no later than the 10th day of
each month, its bill for services itemizing the fees and costs incurred during the previous
month. The City shall pay the Consultant all uncontested amounts set forth in the
Consultant's bill within 30 days after it is received.
5.0 CONFLICT OF INTEREST . The Consultant represents that it presently has no
interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in any real property located
in the City which may be affected by the services to be performed by the Consultant
under this Agreement. The Consultant further represents that in performance of this
Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it.
5.1 The Consultant represents that no City employee or official has a material
financial interest in the Consultant’s business. During the term of this Agreement and as a
result of being awarded this contract, the Consultant shall not offer, encourage, or accept
any financial interest in the Consultant’s business by any City employee or official.
5.2 If a portion of the Consultant’s services called for under this Agreement
shall ultimately be paid for by reimbursement from and through an agreement with a
developer of any land within the City or with a City franchisee, the Consultant warrants
that it has not performed any work for such developer/franchisee within the last 12
months, and shall not negotiate, offer, or accept any contract or request to perform
services for that identified developer/franchisee during the term of this Agreement.
6.0 TERMINATION. Either the City Manager or the Consultant may terminate
this Agreement, without cause, by giving the other party thirty (30) calendar days written
notice of such termination and the effective date thereof.
6.1 In the event of such termination, all finished or unfinished documents,
reports, photographs, films, charts, data, studies, surveys, drawings, models, maps, or
other documentation prepared by or in the possession of the Consultant under this
Agreement shall be returned to the City. Consultant shall prepare and shall be entitled to
receive compensation pursuant to a close-out bill for services rendered in a manner
reasonably satisfactory to the City and fees incurred pursuant to this Agreement through
the notice of termination.
6.2 If the Consultant or the City fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its
obligations under this Agreement, or if the Consultant or the City violate any of the
covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, the Consultant or the City shall
have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to the other party of
such termination and specifying the effective date of such termination. The Consultant
shall be entitled to receive compensation in accordance with the terms of this Agreement
for any work satisfactorily completed hereunder. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the
369
3
Consultant shall not be relieved of liability for damage sustained by virtue of any breach
of this Agreement and any payments due under this Agreement may be withheld to off-
set anticipated damages.
7.0 INSURANCE.
7.1 Without limiting Consultant’s obligations arising under paragraph 8 -
Indemnity, Consultant shall not begin work under this Agreement until it obtains policies
of insurance required under this section. The insurance shall cover Consultant, its agents,
representatives, and employees in connection with the performance of work under this
Agreement, and shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement. Insurance
coverage shall be as follows:
7.1.1 General Liability Insurance insuring City of Rolling Hills, its
elected and appointed officers, agents, and employees from claims for damages
for personal injury, including death, as well as from claims for property damage
which may arise from Consultant’s actions under this Agreement, whether or not
done by Consultant or anyone directly or indirectly employed by Consultant. Such
insurance shall have a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000.
7.1.2 Automobile Liability Insurance covering bodily injury and
property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection
with the work to be performed under this Agreement in an amount of not less than
$1,000,000 combined single limit for each occurrence. If Consultant or
Consultant’s employees will use personal automobiles in any way on this project,
Consultant shall obtain evidence of personal automobile liability coverage for
each such person.
7.1.3 Worker’s Compensation Insurance for all Consultant’s employees
to the extent required by the State of California. Consultant shall similarly require
all authorized subcontractors pursuant to this Agreement to provide such
compensation insurance for their respective employees. This provision shall not
apply if Consultant has no employees performing work under this Agreement. If
Consultant has no employees for the purposes of this Agreement, Consultant shall
sign the “Certificate of Exemption from Workers’ Compensation Insurance”
which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as “Exhibit B.”
7.1.4 Professional Liability Coverage for professional errors and
omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts,
errors, or omissions which may arise from the Consultant’s operations under this
Agreement, whether such operations are by the Consultant or by its employees,
subcontractors, or subconsultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less
than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual aggregate basis, or
a combined single-limit-per-occurrence basis. When coverage is provided on a
“claims made basis,” Consultant will continue to renew the insurance for a period
of three (3) years after this Agreement expires or is terminated. Such insurance
370
4
will have the same coverage and limits as the policy that was in effect during the
term of this Agreement, and will cover Consultant for all claims made by City
arising out of any errors or omissions of Consultant, or its officers, employees, or
agents during the time this Agreement was in effect.
7.2 Deductibility Limits for policies referred to in subparagraphs 7.1.1 and
7.1.2 shall not exceed $5,000 per occurrence.
7.3 Additional Insured. City of Rolling Hills, its elected and appointed
officers, agents, and employees shall be named as additional insureds on policies referred
to in subparagraphs 7.1.1 and 7.1.2.
7.4 Primary Insurance. The insurance required in subparagraphs 7.1.1 and
7.1.2 shall be primary and not excess coverage.
7.5 Evidence of Insurance. Consultant shall furnish City, prior to the
execution of this Agreement satisfactory evidence of the insurance required issued by an
insurer authorized to do business in California, and an endorsement to each such policy
of insurance evidencing that each carrier is required to give City at least 30 days prior
written notice of the cancellation of any policy during the effective period of the
Agreement. All required insurance policies are subject to approval of the City Attorney.
Failure on the part of Consultant to procure or maintain said insurance in full force and
effect shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement or procure or renew such
insurance, and pay any premiums therefore at Consultant’s expense.
8.0 INDEMNIFICATION. Consultant shall indemnify, defend with counsel
approved by City, and hold harmless City, its officers, officials, employees and
volunteers from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, cost (including without
limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation)
of every nature arising out of or in connection with Consultant’s performance of work
hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement,
regardless of City’s passive negligence, but excepting such loss or damage which is
caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of the City. Should City in its
sole discretion find Consultant’s legal counsel unacceptable, then Consultant shall
reimburse the City its costs of defense, including without limitation reasonable attorneys
fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation. The Consultant shall promptly
pay any final judgment rendered against the City (and its officers, officials, employees
and volunteers) covered by this indemnity obligation. It is expressly understood and
agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is
permitted by the law of the State of California and will survive termination of this
Agreement.
9.0 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.
9.1 Non-Assignability. The Consultant shall not assign or transfer any
interest in this Agreement without the express prior written consent of the City.
371
5
9.2 Subcontracting. The Consultant shall not be permitted to subcontract any
portion of this Agreement without the express written consent of the City.
9.3 Non-Discrimination. The Consultant shall not discriminate as to race,
creed, gender, color, national origin or sexual orientation in the performance of its
services and duties pursuant to this Agreement, and will comply with all applicable laws,
ordinances and codes of the federal, state, county and city governments.
9.4 Compliance with Applicable Law. The Consultant shall
comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and codes of the federal, state, county and
city governments.
9.5 Independent Contractor. This Agreement is by and between the City
and the Consultant and is not intended, and shall not be construed, to create the
relationship of agency, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association, as
between the City and the Consultant. The Consultant shall be an independent contractor,
and shall have no power to incur any debt or obligation for or on behalf of the City.
Neither the City nor any of its officers or employees shall have any control over the
conduct of the Consultant, or any of the Consultant’s employees, except as herein set
forth, and the Consultant expressly warrants not to, at any time or in any manner,
represent that it, or any of its agents, servants, or employees are in any manner employees
of the City, it being distinctly understood that the Consultant is and shall at all times
remain to the City a wholly independent contractor and the Consultant's obligations to the
City are solely such as are prescribed by this Agreement. Each Consultant employee shall
remain in the fulltime employ of Consultant, and the City shall have no liability for
payment to such Consultant employee of any compensation or benefits, including but not
limited to workers’ compensation coverage, in connection with the performance of duties
for the City.
9.6 Copyright. No reports, maps, or other documents produced in whole or in
part under this Agreement shall be the subject of an application for copyright by or on
behalf of the Consultant.
9.7 Legal Construction.
9.7.1 This Agreement is made and entered into in the State of California
and shall in all respects be interpreted, enforced, and governed under the laws of the State
of California.
9.7.2 This Agreement shall be construed without regard to the identity of
the persons who drafted its various provisions. Each and every provision of this
Agreement shall be construed as though each of the parties participated equally in the
drafting of same, and any rule of construction that a document is to be construed against
the drafting party shall not be applicable to this Agreement.
372
6
9.7.3 The article and section, captions and headings herein have been
inserted for convenience only and shall not be considered or referred to in resolving
questions or interpretation or construction.
9.7.4 Whenever in this Agreement the context may so require, the
masculine gender shall be deemed to refer to and include the feminine and neuter, and the
singular shall refer to and include the plural.
9.8 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts and as
so executed shall constitute an agreement which shall be binding upon all parties hereto.
9.9 Final Payment Acceptance Constitutes Release. The acceptance by the
Consultant of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a
release of the City from all claims and liabilities for compensation to the Consultant for
anything done, furnished or relating to the Consultant’s work or services. Acceptance of
payment shall be any negotiation of the City’s check or the failure to make a written extra
compensation claim within ten (10) calendar days of the receipt of that check. However,
approval or payment by the City shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the
responsibility and liability of the Consultant, its employees, sub-contractors, and agents
for the accuracy and competency of the information provided or work performed; nor
shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or
liability by the City for any defect or error in the work prepared by the Consultant, its
employees, sub-contractors, and agents.
9.10 Corrections. In addition to the above indemnification obligations, the
Consultant shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the work which may be disclosed
during the City’s review of the Consultant’s report or plans. Should the Consultant fail to
make such correction in a reasonably timely manner, such correction shall be made by
the City, and the cost thereof shall be charged to the Consultant.
9.11 Files. All files of the Consultant pertaining to the City shall be and remain
the property of the City. The Consultant will control the physical location of such files
during the term of this Agreement and shall provide City with the files upon termination
of the Agreement. Consultant will be entitled to retain copies of such files upon
termination of this Agreement in accordance with law.
9.12 Waiver; Remedies Cumulative. Failure by a party to insist upon the
performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the other party, irrespective of
the length of time for which such failure continues, shall not constitute a waiver of such
party's right to demand compliance by such other party in the future. No waiver by a
party of a default or breach of the other party shall be effective or binding upon such
party unless made in writing by such party, and no such waiver shall be implied from any
omissions by a party to take any action with respect to such default or breach. No express
written waiver of a specified default or breach shall affect any other default or breach, or
cover any other period of time, other than any default or breach or period of time
specified. All of the remedies permitted or available to a party under this Agreement, or
373
7
at law or in equity, shall be cumulative and alternative, and invocation of any such right
or remedy shall not constitute a waiver or election of remedies with respect to any other
permitted or available right of remedy.
9.13 Mitigation of Damages. In all such situations arising out of this
Agreement, the parties shall attempt to avoid and minimize the damages resulting from
the conduct of the other party.
9.14 Partial Invalidity. If any provision in this Agreement is held by a court
of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions
will nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way.
9.15 Attorneys' Fees. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each will
bear his/her or its own costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees arising out of and/or connected
with the negotiation, drafting and execution of the Agreement, and all matters arising out
of or connected therewith except that, in the event any action is brought by any party
hereto to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to
reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in addition to all other relief to which that party or
those parties may be entitled.
9.16 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the whole agreement
between the City and the Consultant, and neither party has made any representations to
the other except as expressly contained herein. Neither party, in executing or performing
this Agreement, is relying upon any statement or information not contained in this
Agreement. Any changes or modifications to this Agreement must be made in writing
appropriately executed by both the City and the Consultant.
9.17 Warranty of Authorized Signatories. Each of the signatories hereto
warrants and represents that he or she is competent and authorized to enter into this
Agreement on behalf of the party for whom he or she purports to sign.
10.0 NOTICES. Any notice required to be given hereunder shall be deemed to
have been given by depositing said notice in the United States mail, postage prepaid, and
addressed as follows:
CITY: CONSULTANT:
Elaine Jeng, P.E., Joe Power, MA, Vice President
City Manager Barry Miller Consulting
2 Portuguese Bend Road 817 Alvarado Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Berkeley, CA 94705
TEL (310) 377-1521 TEL 510-847-0068
11.0. DISCLOSURE REQUIRED. (City and Consultant initials required at 11.1)
11.1 Disclosure Required. By their respective initials next to this paragraph,
City and Consultant hereby acknowledge that Consultant is a “consultant” for the
374
8
purposes of the California Political Reform Act because Consultant’s duties would
require him or her to make one or more of the governmental decisions set forth in Fair
Political Practices Commission Regulation 18700.3(a) or otherwise serves in a staff
capacity for which disclosure would otherwise be required were Consultant employed by
the City. Consultant hereby acknowledges his or her assuming-office, annual, and
leaving-office financial reporting obligations under the California Political Reform Act
and the City’s Conflict of Interest Code and agrees to comply with those obligations at
his or her expense. Prior to consultant commencing services hereunder, the City’s
Manager shall prepare and deliver to consultant a memorandum detailing the extent of
Consultant’s disclosure obligations in accordance with the City’s Conflict of Interest
Code.
City Initials ______
Consultant Initials_________
11.2 Disclosure Not Required. By their initials next to this paragraph, City
and Consultant hereby acknowledge that Consultant is not a “consultant” for the purpose
of the California Political Reform Act because Consultant’s duties and responsibilities
are not within the scope of the definition of consultant in Fair Political Practice
Commission Regulation 18700.3(a) and is otherwise not serving in staff capacity in
accordance with the City’s Conflict of Interest Code.
City Initials ______
Consultant Initials ______
This Agreement is executed on _______________, 2021, at City of Rolling Hills,
California.
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS: CONSULTANT:
___________________________________ ______________________________
Elaine Jeng, P.E., City Manager By: Barry Miller, FAICP
ATTEST:
___________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
Michael Jenkins, City Attorney
375
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 1
Scope Of Work
This section of the proposal provides a synopsis of the project and my experience working on General
Plan Updates and Housing Element Updates, including prior experience with the City of Rolling Hills. It
then presents a detailed step-by-step breakdown of tasks, including time/cost estimates and
deliverables. The Scope of Work follows the tasks laid out in the City’s Request for Proposals.
SYNOPSIS OF PROJECT
Like all cities in Greater Los Angeles, the City of Rolling Hills is required to submit an updated Housing
Element to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) by October 2021. The
Element must demonstrate that Rolling Hills has the capacity to accommodate its fair share of the
region’s housing needs, as determined by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG).
The City’s allocation is 45 units, including 20 very low income, nine low -income, 11 moderate income,
and five above moderate income units.
While most cities meet their very low and low income allocations through higher-density zoning, Rolling
Hills will meet its allocations through accessory dwelling units (ADUs). ADUs provide a much more
effective approach for Rolling Hills given the City’s severe environmental constraints, lack of suitable
land for higher densities, and lack of a community sewerage system. Moreover, Rolling Hills large ranch-
style homes—many with accessory structures—and its large parcel sizes, make the community ideally
positioned for ADUs.
Merely allowing ADUs is not sufficient to attain a certified Housing Element. Under SB 686, Rolling Hills
must demonstrate that it is working to affirmatively further fair housing. The City would be unlikely to
generate 20 very low income ADUs in eight years if it relied on market forces alone. Programs will be
needed to incentivize affordable and rent-restricted ADUs, including “Junior” ADUs that are created
within the footprint of existing homes. This will require creative solutions that reflect input from the
community, and that ideally benefit existing Rolling Hills residents such as seniors, caregivers, domestic
employees, and persons with lower incomes.
Time is of the essence. With a due date of October, it will be important to hit the ground running once a
consultant is selected. The schedule should accommodate review of a Draft by HCD prior to adoption,
which essentially means a document should be ready in June, just four months after the project starts.
Prior to that time, new policies and strategies will need to be vetted with the community, the Planning
Commission, and City Council. Once a Draft is ready, ongoing communication with HCD will be
important to ensure that the document adopted by the City Council meets all Government Code
requirements.
EXHIBIT A
376
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 2
DETAILED SCOPE
The following Scope of Work will be performed. Please note that all work described here would be
performed by Barry Miller, as he is a sole proprietor with no employees.
Task One: Project Administration
1.1 Project Kick-Off Meeting
Barry Miller will convene a kick-off meeting with City staff and the environmental consultant to
discuss expectations for the project and establish protocols for coordination, reporting,
deliverables, and sharing project information. As needed, meetings with the City Manager and
City Attorney also will be scheduled. Goals and objectives for the project will be prepared and
distributed in advance of the meeting, discussed at the meeting, and refined as needed
afterwards. After the meeting, a summary will be prepared identifying action items.
Separately from the kick-off meeting, Barry Miller will convene a teleconference with HCD to be
attended by the City’s Project Manager and the City Manager. The purpose is to clearly
establish the State’s expectations, discuss the status of the City’s certification efforts, and
identify key milestones and communication protocols for engaging the State HCD in the Housing
Element process.
1.2 Project Schedule
Within one week of the kick-off meeting, Barry Miller will provide a project schedule that
includes tasks and milestones to ensure certification of the Housing Element prior to the
October 15, 2021 deadline. The schedule will list project tasks and milestones, include tentative
dates (or time windows) for key public meetings and community engagement activities,
required tribal consultation activities (SB 18/ AB 52), relevant CEQA deadlines, and timelines for
responses to HCD review. The Project Schedule will be vetted with the City’s Project Manager
and modified as needed on a monthly basis as the project progresses. If delays are anticipated,
Barry will advise the City’s Project Manager on the strategies to correct and mitigate.
1.3 Project Coordination
Barry Miller will meet with City staff via teleconference at least once every two weeks over the
course of the project. In the later months of the project, some of these meetings may take
place on site at City Hall. The purpose of these meetings is to review the status of project
deliverables and events, discuss potential housing policies and strategies, respond to comments
from State reviewers, and synthesize feedback from the public, the Planning Commission, and
the City Council. When needed, a written summary of these meetings will be provided.
377
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 3
1.4 Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Support
Barry will work with staff to monitor any changes to the Rolling Hills 6th Cycle RHNA that may
occur as a result of appeals now being settled by SCAG. While the City has not appealed its
allocation, it is recognized that successful appeals by other cities in the SCAG region could result
in reallocations to other cities. Barry Miller will monitor this process to ensure that Rolling Hills
is not adversely affected, and will prepare correspondence on the City’s behalf as needed to
ensure the City’s interests are represented.
Task 1 Deliverables and Time Estimates
Task Hours Deliverables
Task 1.1 8 Meeting Summary
Task 1.2 2 Project Schedule and Milestones
Task 1.3 12 Meeting Summaries, as Needed
Task 1.4 2 Memoranda, as Needed
Total 24
Task Two: Prepare Amended Housing Element
2.1 Review and Evaluation of Existing Housing Element
An evaluation of the existing 5th Cycle Element will be prepared, documenting the City’s progress
toward meeting the objectives and milestones of that document. Because the 5th Cycle Element
is new, the evaluation will look more broadly at the City’s housing achievements between 2014
and 2021, including its passage of ADU regulations, creation of an Afforadble Housing Overlay
Zone, adoption of reasonable accommodation procedures, and allowance for a variety of
housing types. The review also will consider the continued relevance of data and maps in the
existing Element, and identify what information needs to be updated for the 6th Cycle. The
City’s progress in meeting its prior RHNA will be documented, and any “carry-over” from prior
cycles will be cited.
2.2 Housing Needs Assessment
A Housing Needs Assessment will be provided, as required by the State Government Code. The
Needs Assessment will update all data tables, maps, and graphs in the existing Element, using
the most current available Census data as well as current data on real estate, the economy,
vacancy rates, and housing trends. Trends in population, age, ethnicity, income, household type
and size, tenure, cost burden, and overcrowding all will be documented. Trends in local
construction, building permits and housing type, ADU production, and housing units added or
replaced annually will be documented. Data for Rolling Hills will be compared to other cities on
the Palos Verdes Peninsula and to Los Angeles County and/or the State of California. The Needs
Assessment will also cover persons with special housing needs, including seniors, persons with
378
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 4
disabilities, homeless, farmworkers, extremely low-income residents, large households, and
single parent households. It will also address residential energy conservation measures.
2.3 Opportunity Site Analysis
An analysis of housing opportunities in Rolling Hills will be provided. Vacant sites in Rolling Hills
will be identified and mapped, including an assessment of each site’s development potential.
Sites that are constrained by landslide hazards, limited access, steep slopes, or dimensions that
make them difficult to develop will be identified and mapped. This analysis will also consider
the potential for lot splits (based on current zoning), and opportunities to redevelop properties
that may be underutilized. Since there are no commercial sites, the focus would be on public
land and residential sites that may be developed at much lower intensities than allowed by
zoning.
A summary of development potential associated with the opportunity sites will be prepared.
2.4 Housing Constraints Analysis
Barry Miller will complete the state-mandated constraints analysis. Attributes of zoning, such as
minimum lot size standards, maximum densities, lot coverage requirements, parking standards,
and use permit requirements, will be addressed. Consistent with state law, the analysis will also
address constraints to particular housing types, including accessory dwelling units, emergency
shelters, SROs, and transitional housing. Changes resulting from the recent 5th Cycle Housing
Element will be noted. This task will also look at the building and permitting process in Rolling
Hills, including factors such as processing times, locally unique building code standards, fees
(compared to other cities), and site improvement requirements. Design review and subdivision
standards also will be reviewed.
Non-governmental constraints will be assessed as part of this task. These include the availability
of infrastructure, traffic congestion, school capacity, and environmental constraints. Financial
constraints also will be considered. This includes land and construction costs, and issues relating
to financing and mortgage lending. As required by new Housing Element laws, this section also
will examine constraints associated with NIMBYism and labor shortages.
2.5 Proposed ADU Analysis and Justification
An evaluation of the potential for Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units
(ADUs and JADUs) will be provided. The evaluation will need to demonstrate that the City has
the capacity to produce at least 40 ADUs over the planning period, or about five per year. The
City’s recent track record of ADU production will be documented, and the feasibility of ramping
up production to a higher rate will be cited.
The analysis of ADU potential will be primarily based on the characteristics of the Rolling Hills
housing stock, as well as the responses to the City’s November 2020 survey of all residents on
ADU/JADU potential. The extent and number of guesthouses, casitas, pool houses, habitable
379
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 5
barns, outbuildings, and property features that could support an ADU or JADU will be cited.
Many—if not most—homes in Rolling Hills include spaces that could potentially be converted to
ADUs, or existing “unintended” ADUs that could be legalized for habitation. Parcel data from
the Los Angeles County Assessor’s Office can be used as one means of evaluating ADU potential,
as it typically includes information such as total floor area and number of bedrooms for each
parcel.
Typical rents for ADUs will be estimated using on-line ADU rental listings (Craigslist, etc.) and
other industry sources, based on properties in Rolling Hills and in other cities on the Palos
Verdes Peninsula. Barry Miller will use a variety of data sources (including the American
Community Survey, tax assessor records, etc.) and input from staff and other community
stakeholders to estimate the extent to which low and very low income households currently
reside in ADUs in Rolling Hills. This is an important data point to support the conclusion that
ADUs already provide an affordable housing resource in the city and provide housing for home
care providers and domestic employees.
2.6 Development of Housing Element Goals, Quantified Objectives, and Polices
Barry Miller will prepare the goals, objectives, and policies for the revised Housing Element. The
2021-2029 objectives will reflect the RHNA targets, as well as other objectives that may be
identified through the community engagement process. Existing policies will be carried forward
to the greatest extent possible. Where appropriate, new policies will be added to address
emerging housing issues and new state requirements.
This task will include a review of the other elements of the General Plan to ensure consistency.
Where needed, amendments to other elements of the General Plan may be proposed to reflect
new housing policies. This includes any elements to the Safety Element to achieve compliance
with SB 379 (Resilience) and SB 1241 (Wildfire hazard reduction).
2.7 Development of Housing Element Action Program
Barry Miller will prepare the mandatory Housing Element Action program. Many of the actions
are on-going activities and will be carried forward from the existing Housing Element, but some
will be new. For each action, a priority will be assigned, responsible parties will be identified,
and an estimated timetable for implementation will be provided. The programs will need to
demonstrate that Rolling Hills is “affirmatively furthering fair housing.”
ADU-related program recommendations will be made based on the Task 2.5 analysis. These
may include general recommendations supporting ADU and JADU construction (education and
awareness programs, website materials, etc.), incentives for owners with “unintended” ADUs to
register them as dwelling units, incentives for including new ADUs in new or remodeled homes
(such as reduced permit costs or solid waste collection costs), incentives for rent-restricted
ADUs (such as low interest loans or grants for increasing septic system capacity, participation of
non-profits such as Habitat for Humanity, etc.), and strategies to encourage home-sharing and
rental of rooms for seniors living alone.
380
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 6
2.8 Revised Maps and Figures
Maps and figures in the Housing Element will be prepared. Some of the maps in the 5th Cycle
Element may be carried forward, but new Maps of housing opportunity sites and other spatial
data may be needed. Barry will work with the City’s environmental consultant to develop these
maps, as they will also be needed in whatever CEQA document is prepared to support the
Housing Element.
Task 2 Deliverables and Time Estimates
Task Hours Deliverables
Task 2.1 8 Draft Review and Evaluation of 5th Cycle Housing Element Chapter
Task 2.2 18 Draft Housing Needs Assessment Chapter
Task 2.3 10 Draft Opportunity Site Analysis Chapter
Task 2.4 14 Draft Constraints Analysis Chapter
Task 2.5 20 Draft ADU Analysis and Justification Chapter
Task 2.6 12 Draft Goals, Objectives, and Policies, and Related General Plan
Amendments
Task 2.7 24 Draft Housing Action Program, Including ADU Production Strategy
Task 2.8 6 Revised Maps and Figures
Total 112
Task Three: Community Engagement
3.1 Community Outreach Program
A Community Engagement Strategy will be developed and implemented for the Housing
Element. The Strategy will ensure that a broad array of community interests is represented,
including Rolling Hills residents, Councilmembers and Planning Commissioners, and local
housing advocates and stakeholder groups. Project-specific outreach materials will be prepared
and a unique project identity or “brand” will be established. A dedicated Housing Element
webpage will be designed for the City’s website, with materials posted to the site as they are
developed.
Specific components of the outreach program will be developed collaboratively with staff. At
minimum, they would include:
• One meeting each with the Planning Commission and City Council. The purpose of these
meetings is to provide an overview of the project, create an opportunity for the public
to speak, and enable Commissioners and Council members to express their views on
potential policies and strategies.
• Two Community Workshops. The first workshop would likely be a virtual (Zoom)
workshop, since it would be convened in April-May. Zoom polling features could be
381
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 7
used so that residents can weigh in on different strategies for meeting future housing
needs, with real-time poll results. Each polling question would be followed by a
discussion of the topic, allowing participants to verbalize their views. The second
workshop would be in Summer 2021, upon release of the Draft Element. Depending on
health orders at the time, an “in person” event could be scheduled. One possibility
would be to format the second workshop as an “open house” to assist residents
interested in ADUs, including information on resources, prototypes, and the process for
developing ADUs on their properties.
• Two to three focus groups. Each focus group would include four to six participants.
These could include residents, housing advocates, service providers, and other groups
who have an interest in local housing policy. A group (such as a task force) that meets
monthly throughout the project is not envisioned or budgeted. Given the short
turnaround time for the project, other means of input may be more effective.
• Surveys. The City administered an ADU survey as part of its 5th Cycle Element. A follow
up survey could be considered for the 6th Cycle, testing various ADU incentives.
• Media. A combination of print media and web-based media will be used to reach
residents, advise them of opportunities to participate, and provide information on
proposed policies and programs, and ways to comment. This would include articles in
the City’s newsletter, one or more press releases for the Peninsula News and/or Daily
Breeze, and a project webpage with Frequently Asked Questions and documents related
to the Housing Element.
3.2 Presentation Materials
Task 3.2 covers preparation of the materials to be used in Task 3.1. This includes PowerPoint
presentations and talking points for Workshops and Meetings, exhibits and display boards, staff
reports and Focus Group questions, articles, and branding materials.
Task 3 Deliverables and Time Estimates (*)
Task Hours Deliverables
Task 3.1 32 Community Engagement Strategy Memo
Community Workshop Summaries
Focus Group Meeting Summaries
Surveys and Survey Report Findings
Press Releases/ Newsletter Articles
City Housing Web Page
Task 3.2 24 Presentation Materials: PowerPoint Presentations, Display Boards
and Exhibits; Project Branding Materials, Staff reports for PC and CC
meetings
Total 56
* Note: One Planning Commission and one City Council meetings are included here; two Planning
Commission meetings and two City Council meetings are included in Task 5.
382
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 8
Task Four: Environmental Coordination
4.1 Assistance to Environmental Consultant
The City intends to retain its own environmental consultant under a separate contract to conduct the
appropriate level of environmental review for the Housing Element. Based on the 5th Cycle experience,
this will likely be an Initial Study and Negative Declaration. Barry Miller will work with the
environmental consultant throughout the project to advise on CEQA-related issues, and the
characteristics of the “project.” Barry Miller will assist the Environmental Consultant in drafting the
Project Description and will review all sections of the Administrative Draft, Screencheck Draft, and Public
Review Draft environmental document to ensure that these documents accurately describe Housing
Element policies and programs, and appropriately assess potential impacts. The environmental
consultant will conduct all required outreach, noticing and filing, and tribal consultation for the CEQA
review.
4.2 Response to Comments
Barry Miller will assist the City and CEQA consultant in responding to any comments received on the
CEQA document.
Task 4 Deliverables and Time Estimates
Task Hours Deliverables
Task 4.1 4 Redlined Drafts of CEQA document with B. Miller edits
Task 4.2 2 Responses to Comments (as needed)
Total 6
Task Five: Facilitation of Housing Element Review and Approval
This work scope includes an Administrative Draft for staff, two Public Review Drafts, and the Final
Element. The First Public Review Draft is the document to be submitted to HCD for their initial review
and comment. The Second Public Review Draft would incorporate changes made in response to HCD’s
letter. The Final Element would be the adopted document, inclusive of any changes made during the
formal public hearings of the Planning Commission and Council. Both the first and second Public Review
Drafts will be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council in formal public hearings. This task
includes budget for two Planning Commission hearings and two City Council hearings.
All documents will be in Microsoft Word format for ease of editing. Documents will also be saved as PDF
files so they can be safely posted to the website and included in agenda packets. Graphics such as
photos, sidebars, maps, and text boxes will be included to make the document more compelling and
user-friendly.
383
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 9
5.1 Administrative Draft Housing Element
Per the City’s RFP, Task 5.1 includes submittal of an Administrative Draft for each element of the
Housing Element to the City for review. The hours shown in the budget for this task below only include
the Admin Draft Plan Introduction, Table of Contents, Cover, and Appendices. Hours associated with
production of the Administrative Drafts of the other Chapters (Evaluation of the Prior Element, the
Needs Assessment, the Opportunity Sites analysis, the Constraints analysis, the ADU strategy, the
Goals/Policies, and the Action Program) are already covered under Task 2.
5.2 First Public Review Draft Housing Element
Revisions to each chapter of the Administrative Draft will be made in response to Staff comments. The
document will be assembled and published as a “First Public Review Draft.” This document will be
presented to the Planning Commission and City Council in sequential public hearings. Public notice of
the document’s availability and hearing dates will be provided, including notification to the City’s
interested parties list, newspaper ads, and notification to adjoining cities and other stakeholders. Barry
Miller will prepare the staff reports for the Planning Commission and City Council hearings and the
PowerPoint presentations for each meeting.
The purpose of these hearings is not to adopt the Element, but rather to request City Council approval
to submit the Draft to HCD for their initial technical review. This review is important to ensure that the
document ultimately adopted by the City Council is compliant with the Government Code.
Barry Miller will facilitate ongoing communication with HCD, both during preparation of the Draft
Housing Element and during their technical review. This is often an iterative process, with regular
consultation, emailing, and phone communication on key issues.
5.3 Second Public Review Draft Housing Element
Once HCD’s comment letter is received, Barry will work collaboratively with City staff and the HCD
reviewer to determine what specific revisions are required to achieve compliance. The revisions will be
made and a detailed annotated summary of each HCD comment, followed by the City’s response and
proposed revisions to the document, will be made. A “redlined” version of the Public Review Draft will
be prepared highlighting the changes. A “clean” version also will be prepared.
The Second Public Review Draft will be published and circulated. Public hearings before the Planning
Commission and City Council will be held to adopt the Element. Barry Miller will prepare the staff
reports and resolutions for the Planning Commission and City Council hearings, along with the
PowerPoint presentations for each meeting. Any additional changes made to incorporate public
comments and changes recommended by the Planning Commission and City Council will be annotated
following the meeting.
384
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 10
5.4 Final Housing Element
Barry Miller will incorporate any revisions approved by the City Council into the Second Public Review
document in order to create the “Final” Housing Element (e.g., the Adopted document). He will prepare
the City’s formal transmittal letter and facilitate its submittal to HCD. Barry will be available to respond
to any questions or comments during the 30-day HCD review period. Barry will work with City staff to
complete any filings associated with adoption and certification.
5.5 Public Noticing
Barry will work in collaboration with City staff to prepare required notices and advertisements for public
meetings, including the two Planning Commission and two City Council adoption hearings. As noted
under Task 4, he will work with the City’s environmental consultant to do SB 18/ AB 52 tribal
consultation. It is presumed that the City itself will handle printing and mailing of notices, and
placement of advertisements. Barry can prepare the contents of these notices, but the City itself would
do the actual filing, following accepted City protocol and requirements.
Task 5 Deliverables and Time Estimates
Task Hours Deliverables
Task 5.1 8 Administrative Draft Housing Element (integrating work products
from Task 2 with the Introduction, Table of Contents, Cover, and
Appendices)
Task 5.2 8 First Public Review Draft Element (Draft for HCD)
Staff Reports and Presentation Materials for PC and CC Meetings
Task 5.3 32 Second Public Review Draft Element (Draft for adoption)
Staff Reports and Presentation Materials for PC and CC Meetings
Task 5.4 6 Final Housing Element
Task 5.5 2 Public Noticing
Total 56
385
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 11
BUDGET ESTIMATE
The table below provides a budget estimate for the total project, summarizing the hours associated with
each task and multiplying those totals by an hourly rate of $150. The total base estimate for the project
is $38,100. Per the City’s RFP, a 10 percent contingency has been added to accommodate unanticipated
activities. A $500 materials budget also has been included, to cover printing costs, teleconferencing
needs (Zoom webinars for public meetings, etc.), and other incidental costs. Although I do anticipate
travel to Rolling Hills over the course of the project, there would be no charge for travel time or
associated expenses.
Task Hours Budget
Administration 24 $3,600
Prepare Amended Housing Element 112 $16,800
Community Engagement 56 $8,400
Environmental Coordination 6 $900
Facilitation of Housing Element Review and Approval 56 $8,400
SUB-TOTAL 254 $38,100
10% contingency to accommodate
unanticipated activities or time requirements
$3,810
Material costs (Printing, Meeting Materials) $500
PROJECT TOTAL $42,410
386
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 12
Project Schedule
This section of the proposal provides a proposed project schedule, corresponding to the Scope of Work
and milestones established in the City’s RFP.
FLOW CHART
A project flow chart is included on the following page. The flow chart identifies the overall sequencing
of tasks, key milestones, and projected completion dates for each task (or grouping of tasks). The blue
triangles in the chart indicate key engagement points, including two community meetings (in May and
September), and three pairs of Planning Commission and City Council meetings that would occur in
April, June, and September.
FOCUS OF EACH MEETING
Per the City’s RFP, the table below indicates the focus of the major meetings shown in the flow chart.
Incidental meetings with staff, such as the project kickoff meeting, meetings with the environmental
consultant, and meetings with the HCD reviewer, are not included. The focus is on key public-facing
meetings. Barry Miller will be in attendance at every meeting listed (virtual attendance via Zoom is
anticipated for most of these meetings—at least those occurring before Summer 2021). Cost
information for these meetings is included in the prior section on the project budget.
Meeting Timing Meeting Focus
Planning Commission April 2021 Overview of Project, Key Issues, Discussion of Possible
ADU Strategies
City Council April 2021 Same agenda as Planning Commission
Community Workshop May 2021 General Discussion of housing issues, State
requirements, and Possible ADU Strategies
Stakeholder Meetings April-May 2021 Listening sessions on key housing issues
Planning Commission June 2021 Review of First Draft Element prior to HCD Submittal
City Council June 2021 Authorization to Submit First Draft to HCD for Review
Community Open House Sept 2021 Education/ Q&A on Proposed ADU strategies and
Options for Homeowners to Build an ADU
Planning Commission Sept 2021 Recommend adoption of Element to City Council
City Council Oct 2021 Adopt Housing Element
LIST AND DESCRIPTION OF FINAL PRODUCTS
This information is presented in the prior section. A list of deliverables is provided at the end of each
major task description.
387
ROLLING HILLS HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATEPROJECT SCHEDULEWeek123456 89101112131415 1718192021222324 2627282930313233 3536Task 1: Kickoff Meetings and Schedule Refinement Ongoing Administration and CoordinationSTARTTasks 2.1‐2.5: Evaluation, Needs Assessment, Site Analysis, Constraints, ADU AssessmentTasks 2.6‐2.8: Policies, Action Programs, MapsTask 3: Community EngagementEngagement Plan Stakeholder MeetingsInitial study sessions with Planning Commission and City CouncilCommunity Workshop Community Open HouseTask 4: Environmental Coordination(Task 2 Admin Draft Chapters) Task 5.1: Administrative Draft ElementTask 5.2: First Public Review Draft ElementPlanning Commission and Council HearingsHCD Technical ReviewRespond to HCDTask 5.3: 2nd Public Review DraftPlanning Commission and Council HearingsTask 5.4: Final ElementSUBMIT DOC TO HCDKey Public Engagement OpportunityFEBRUARY7MARCH APRIL34SEPTEMBER OCTOBER16MAY JUN25JULY AUGUST
388
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 14
Project Team
This section of the proposal describes the proposed staffing for the services provided. As indicated in
the City’s Request for Proposal, it includes a list of personnel and their responsibilities.
As a sole proprietor and independent consultant, Barry Miller would provide all services associated with
this project. A resume for Barry Miller is included on the next page.
List of Personnel and Responsibilities
1. Barry Miller, FAICP
Professional Title: Principal
Specific Responsibilities on the Project:
• Project Management for each phase of the project
• Communication and Liaison with City
• Communication and Liaison with HCD
• Data Collection and Analysis
• Report Preparation
• Presentations and Facilitation
• Document Production
Anticipated Workload During the Project
Barry Miller’s other work commitments from February to October 2021 are as follows (estimated
number of hours appear in the table):
Estimated Hours by Month
City Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
Rolling Hills 5th Cycle Housing
Element
30
City of San Rafael General Plan
(Plan now in public hearings;
adoption expected in June 2021)
50 50 40 30 20
Contra Costa County General Plan
(Subcontractor to PlaceWorks)
40 30 10 -- 20 20 20 20 20
Piedmont Housing Element
(due to HCD in Jan 2023
10 10 10 10 10 20 20 20 20
Albany Housing Element
(due to HCD in Jan 2023)
-- -- 10 10 20 20 20 40 40
TOTAL 130 90 70 50 70 60 60 80 80
389
EXHIBIT B
WORKERS COMPENSATION
Certificate of Exemption from
Workers’ Compensation Insurance
TO: City of Rolling Hills
SUBJECT: Sole Proprietor/Partnership/Closely Held Corporation
with No Employees
Please let this memorandum notify City of Rolling Hills that I am a
sole proprietor
partnership
nonprofit organization
closely held corporation
and do not have any employees whose employment requires me to carry workers’
compensation insurance. Therefore, I do not carry worker’s compensation insurance
coverage.
Consultant Signature ____________________________
Printed Name of Consultant ____________________________
Date
390
Proposal for Services
Housing Element Update (2021-2029)
Submitted to:
City of Rolling Hills
Submitted by:
Barry Miller Consulting
January 26, 2021
391
392
817 Alvarado Road
Berkeley, CA 94705
510-847-0068
barry@barrymiller.net
January 25, 2021
Meredith T. Elguira,
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Re: Proposal for Housing Element
Dear Meredith:
I am pleased to submit the attached for proposal for services to complete the 6th Cycle Housing Element
for the City of Rolling Hills. I have enjoyed working with the City on the 5th Cycle Element. My
familiarity with the City and its housing issues will enable completion of the 6th Cycle Element in an
efficient, timely, cost-effective manner.
The attached proposal corresponds to the contents specified by the City’s Request for Proposals and
includes a scope of work, project schedule, description of the project team, relevant experience,
references, and a cost estimate. In this instance, the project team consists only of myself, as I am a sole
proprietor. As a one-person firm, I provide personalized, responsive services at a more affordable rate
than you will find with larger consulting firms. I will work collaboratively with you and other City staff,
as well as your CEQA consultants, to complete the work professionally and in a way that meets
Government Code requirements while reflecting the City’s values and physical constraints.
My recent work in Rolling Hills has given me helpful insight into potential strategies for meeting the
City’s housing assignments through Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). As you know, my work
experience in the Bay Area has included creative solutions for cities seeking to meet their Regional
Housing Needs Allocations through ADUs. I am excited about the prospect of developing such programs
for Rolling Hills.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can provide more information on any aspect of this proposal, or if
you seek revisions to the proposed scope or budget.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Best Regards-
Barry Miller, FAICP
393
394
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 1
Scope Of Work
This section of the proposal provides a synopsis of the project and my experience working on General
Plan Updates and Housing Element Updates, including prior experience with the City of Rolling Hills. It
then presents a detailed step-by-step breakdown of tasks, including time/cost estimates and
deliverables. The Scope of Work follows the tasks laid out in the City’s Request for Proposals.
SYNOPSIS OF PROJECT
Like all cities in Greater Los Angeles, the City of Rolling Hills is required to submit an updated Housing
Element to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) by October 2021. The
Element must demonstrate that Rolling Hills has the capacity to accommodate its fair share of the
region’s housing needs, as determined by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG).
The City’s allocation is 45 units, including 20 very low income, nine low -income, 11 moderate income,
and five above moderate income units.
While most cities meet their very low and low income allocations through higher-density zoning, Rolling
Hills will meet its allocations through accessory dwelling units (ADUs). ADUs provide a much more
effective approach for Rolling Hills given the City’s severe environmental constraints, lack of suitable
land for higher densities, and lack of a community sewerage system. Moreover, Rolling Hills large ranch-
style homes—many with accessory structures—and its large parcel sizes, make the community ideally
positioned for ADUs.
Merely allowing ADUs is not sufficient to attain a certified Housing Element. Under SB 686, Rolling Hills
must demonstrate that it is working to affirmatively further fair housing. The City would be unlikely to
generate 20 very low income ADUs in eight years if it relied on market forces alone. Programs will be
needed to incentivize affordable and rent-restricted ADUs, including “Junior” ADUs that are created
within the footprint of existing homes. This will require creative solutions that reflect input from the
community, and that ideally benefit existing Rolling Hills residents such as seniors, caregivers, domestic
employees, and persons with lower incomes.
Time is of the essence. With a due date of October, it will be important to hit the ground running once a
consultant is selected. The schedule should accommodate review of a Draft by HCD prior to adoption,
which essentially means a document should be ready in June, just four months after the project starts.
Prior to that time, new policies and strategies will need to be vetted with the community, the Planning
Commission, and City Council. Once a Draft is ready, ongoing communication with HCD will be
important to ensure that the document adopted by the City Council meets all Government Code
requirements.
395
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 2
DETAILED SCOPE
The following Scope of Work will be performed. Please note that all work described here would be
performed by Barry Miller, as he is a sole proprietor with no employees.
Task One: Project Administration
1.1 Project Kick-Off Meeting
Barry Miller will convene a kick-off meeting with City staff and the environmental consultant to
discuss expectations for the project and establish protocols for coordination, reporting,
deliverables, and sharing project information. As needed, meetings with the City Manager and
City Attorney also will be scheduled. Goals and objectives for the project will be prepared and
distributed in advance of the meeting, discussed at the meeting, and refined as needed
afterwards. After the meeting, a summary will be prepared identifying action items.
Separately from the kick-off meeting, Barry Miller will convene a teleconference with HCD to be
attended by the City’s Project Manager and the City Manager. The purpose is to clearly
establish the State’s expectations, discuss the status of the City’s certification efforts, and
identify key milestones and communication protocols for engaging the State HCD in the Housing
Element process.
1.2 Project Schedule
Within one week of the kick-off meeting, Barry Miller will provide a project schedule that
includes tasks and milestones to ensure certification of the Housing Element prior to the
October 15, 2021 deadline. The schedule will list project tasks and milestones, include tentative
dates (or time windows) for key public meetings and community engagement activities,
required tribal consultation activities (SB 18/ AB 52), relevant CEQA deadlines, and timelines for
responses to HCD review. The Project Schedule will be vetted with the City’s Project Manager
and modified as needed on a monthly basis as the project progresses. If delays are anticipated,
Barry will advise the City’s Project Manager on the strategies to correct and mitigate.
1.3 Project Coordination
Barry Miller will meet with City staff via teleconference at least once every two weeks over the
course of the project. In the later months of the project, some of these meetings may take
place on site at City Hall. The purpose of these meetings is to review the status of project
deliverables and events, discuss potential housing policies and strategies, respond to comments
from State reviewers, and synthesize feedback from the public, the Planning Commission, and
the City Council. When needed, a written summary of these meetings will be provided.
396
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 3
1.4 Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Support
Barry will work with staff to monitor any changes to the Rolling Hills 6th Cycle RHNA that may
occur as a result of appeals now being settled by SCAG. While the City has not appealed its
allocation, it is recognized that successful appeals by other cities in the SCAG region could result
in reallocations to other cities. Barry Miller will monitor this process to ensure that Rolling Hills
is not adversely affected, and will prepare correspondence on the City’s behalf as needed to
ensure the City’s interests are represented.
Task 1 Deliverables and Time Estimates
Task Hours Deliverables
Task 1.1 8 Meeting Summary
Task 1.2 2 Project Schedule and Milestones
Task 1.3 12 Meeting Summaries, as Needed
Task 1.4 2 Memoranda, as Needed
Total 24
Task Two: Prepare Amended Housing Element
2.1 Review and Evaluation of Existing Housing Element
An evaluation of the existing 5th Cycle Element will be prepared, documenting the City’s progress
toward meeting the objectives and milestones of that document. Because the 5th Cycle Element
is new, the evaluation will look more broadly at the City’s housing achievements between 2014
and 2021, including its passage of ADU regulations, creation of an Afforadble Housing Overlay
Zone, adoption of reasonable accommodation procedures, and allowance for a variety of
housing types. The review also will consider the continued relevance of data and maps in the
existing Element, and identify what information needs to be updated for the 6th Cycle. The
City’s progress in meeting its prior RHNA will be documented, and any “carry-over” from prior
cycles will be cited.
2.2 Housing Needs Assessment
A Housing Needs Assessment will be provided, as required by the State Government Code. The
Needs Assessment will update all data tables, maps, and graphs in the existing Element, using
the most current available Census data as well as current data on real estate, the economy,
vacancy rates, and housing trends. Trends in population, age, ethnicity, income, household type
and size, tenure, cost burden, and overcrowding all will be documented. Trends in local
construction, building permits and housing type, ADU production, and housing units added or
replaced annually will be documented. Data for Rolling Hills will be compared to other cities on
the Palos Verdes Peninsula and to Los Angeles County and/or the State of California. The Needs
Assessment will also cover persons with special housing needs, including seniors, persons with
397
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 4
disabilities, homeless, farmworkers, extremely low-income residents, large households, and
single parent households. It will also address residential energy conservation measures.
2.3 Opportunity Site Analysis
An analysis of housing opportunities in Rolling Hills will be provided. Vacant sites in Rolling Hills
will be identified and mapped, including an assessment of each site’s development potential.
Sites that are constrained by landslide hazards, limited access, steep slopes, or dimensions that
make them difficult to develop will be identified and mapped. This analysis will also consider
the potential for lot splits (based on current zoning), and opportunities to redevelop properties
that may be underutilized. Since there are no commercial sites, the focus would be on public
land and residential sites that may be developed at much lower intensities than allowed by
zoning.
A summary of development potential associated with the opportunity sites will be prepared.
2.4 Housing Constraints Analysis
Barry Miller will complete the state-mandated constraints analysis. Attributes of zoning, such as
minimum lot size standards, maximum densities, lot coverage requirements, parking standards,
and use permit requirements, will be addressed. Consistent with state law, the analysis will also
address constraints to particular housing types, including accessory dwelling units, emergency
shelters, SROs, and transitional housing. Changes resulting from the recent 5th Cycle Housing
Element will be noted. This task will also look at the building and permitting process in Rolling
Hills, including factors such as processing times, locally unique building code standards, fees
(compared to other cities), and site improvement requirements. Design review and subdivision
standards also will be reviewed.
Non-governmental constraints will be assessed as part of this task. These include the availability
of infrastructure, traffic congestion, school capacity, and environmental constraints. Financial
constraints also will be considered. This includes land and construction costs, and issues relating
to financing and mortgage lending. As required by new Housing Element laws, this section also
will examine constraints associated with NIMBYism and labor shortages.
2.5 Proposed ADU Analysis and Justification
An evaluation of the potential for Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units
(ADUs and JADUs) will be provided. The evaluation will need to demonstrate that the City has
the capacity to produce at least 40 ADUs over the planning period, or about five per year. The
City’s recent track record of ADU production will be documented, and the feasibility of ramping
up production to a higher rate will be cited.
The analysis of ADU potential will be primarily based on the characteristics of the Rolling Hills
housing stock, as well as the responses to the City’s November 2020 survey of all residents on
ADU/JADU potential. The extent and number of guesthouses, casitas, pool houses, habitable
398
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 5
barns, outbuildings, and property features that could support an ADU or JADU will be cited.
Many—if not most—homes in Rolling Hills include spaces that could potentially be converted to
ADUs, or existing “unintended” ADUs that could be legalized for habitation. Parcel data from
the Los Angeles County Assessor’s Office can be used as one means of evaluating ADU potential,
as it typically includes information such as total floor area and number of bedrooms for each
parcel.
Typical rents for ADUs will be estimated using on-line ADU rental listings (Craigslist, etc.) and
other industry sources, based on properties in Rolling Hills and in other cities on the Palos
Verdes Peninsula. Barry Miller will use a variety of data sources (including the American
Community Survey, tax assessor records, etc.) and input from staff and other community
stakeholders to estimate the extent to which low and very low income households currently
reside in ADUs in Rolling Hills. This is an important data point to support the conclusion that
ADUs already provide an affordable housing resource in the city and provide housing for home
care providers and domestic employees.
2.6 Development of Housing Element Goals, Quantified Objectives, and Polices
Barry Miller will prepare the goals, objectives, and policies for the revised Housing Element. The
2021-2029 objectives will reflect the RHNA targets, as well as other objectives that may be
identified through the community engagement process. Existing policies will be carried forward
to the greatest extent possible. Where appropriate, new policies will be added to address
emerging housing issues and new state requirements.
This task will include a review of the other elements of the General Plan to ensure consistency.
Where needed, amendments to other elements of the General Plan may be proposed to reflect
new housing policies. This includes any elements to the Safety Element to achieve compliance
with SB 379 (Resilience) and SB 1241 (Wildfire hazard reduction).
2.7 Development of Housing Element Action Program
Barry Miller will prepare the mandatory Housing Element Action program. Many of the actions
are on-going activities and will be carried forward from the existing Housing Element, but some
will be new. For each action, a priority will be assigned, responsible parties will be identified,
and an estimated timetable for implementation will be provided. The programs will need to
demonstrate that Rolling Hills is “affirmatively furthering fair housing.”
ADU-related program recommendations will be made based on the Task 2.5 analysis. These
may include general recommendations supporting ADU and JADU construction (education and
awareness programs, website materials, etc.), incentives for owners with “unintended” ADUs to
register them as dwelling units, incentives for including new ADUs in new or remodeled homes
(such as reduced permit costs or solid waste collection costs), incentives for rent-restricted
ADUs (such as low interest loans or grants for increasing septic system capacity, participation of
non-profits such as Habitat for Humanity, etc.), and strategies to encourage home-sharing and
rental of rooms for seniors living alone.
399
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 6
2.8 Revised Maps and Figures
Maps and figures in the Housing Element will be prepared. Some of the maps in the 5th Cycle
Element may be carried forward, but new Maps of housing opportunity sites and other spatial
data may be needed. Barry will work with the City’s environmental consultant to develop these
maps, as they will also be needed in whatever CEQA document is prepared to support the
Housing Element.
Task 2 Deliverables and Time Estimates
Task Hours Deliverables
Task 2.1 8 Draft Review and Evaluation of 5th Cycle Housing Element Chapter
Task 2.2 18 Draft Housing Needs Assessment Chapter
Task 2.3 10 Draft Opportunity Site Analysis Chapter
Task 2.4 14 Draft Constraints Analysis Chapter
Task 2.5 20 Draft ADU Analysis and Justification Chapter
Task 2.6 12 Draft Goals, Objectives, and Policies, and Related General Plan
Amendments
Task 2.7 24 Draft Housing Action Program, Including ADU Production Strategy
Task 2.8 6 Revised Maps and Figures
Total 112
Task Three: Community Engagement
3.1 Community Outreach Program
A Community Engagement Strategy will be developed and implemented for the Housing
Element. The Strategy will ensure that a broad array of community interests is represented,
including Rolling Hills residents, Councilmembers and Planning Commissioners, and local
housing advocates and stakeholder groups. Project-specific outreach materials will be prepared
and a unique project identity or “brand” will be established. A dedicated Housing Element
webpage will be designed for the City’s website, with materials posted to the site as they are
developed.
Specific components of the outreach program will be developed collaboratively with staff. At
minimum, they would include:
• One meeting each with the Planning Commission and City Council. The purpose of these
meetings is to provide an overview of the project, create an opportunity for the public
to speak, and enable Commissioners and Council members to express their views on
potential policies and strategies.
• Two Community Workshops. The first workshop would likely be a virtual (Zoom)
workshop, since it would be convened in April-May. Zoom polling features could be
400
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 7
used so that residents can weigh in on different strategies for meeting future housing
needs, with real-time poll results. Each polling question would be followed by a
discussion of the topic, allowing participants to verbalize their views. The second
workshop would be in Summer 2021, upon release of the Draft Element. Depending on
health orders at the time, an “in person” event could be scheduled. One possibility
would be to format the second workshop as an “open house” to assist residents
interested in ADUs, including information on resources, prototypes, and the process for
developing ADUs on their properties.
• Two to three focus groups. Each focus group would include four to six participants.
These could include residents, housing advocates, service providers, and other groups
who have an interest in local housing policy. A group (such as a task force) that meets
monthly throughout the project is not envisioned or budgeted. Given the short
turnaround time for the project, other means of input may be more effective.
• Surveys. The City administered an ADU survey as part of its 5th Cycle Element. A follow
up survey could be considered for the 6th Cycle, testing various ADU incentives.
• Media. A combination of print media and web-based media will be used to reach
residents, advise them of opportunities to participate, and provide information on
proposed policies and programs, and ways to comment. This would include articles in
the City’s newsletter, one or more press releases for the Peninsula News and/or Daily
Breeze, and a project webpage with Frequently Asked Questions and documents related
to the Housing Element.
3.2 Presentation Materials
Task 3.2 covers preparation of the materials to be used in Task 3.1. This includes PowerPoint
presentations and talking points for Workshops and Meetings, exhibits and display boards, staff
reports and Focus Group questions, articles, and branding materials.
Task 3 Deliverables and Time Estimates (*)
Task Hours Deliverables
Task 3.1 32 Community Engagement Strategy Memo
Community Workshop Summaries
Focus Group Meeting Summaries
Surveys and Survey Report Findings
Press Releases/ Newsletter Articles
City Housing Web Page
Task 3.2 24 Presentation Materials: PowerPoint Presentations, Display Boards
and Exhibits; Project Branding Materials, Staff reports for PC and CC
meetings
Total 56
* Note: One Planning Commission and one City Council meetings are included here; two Planning
Commission meetings and two City Council meetings are included in Task 5.
401
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 8
Task Four: Environmental Coordination
4.1 Assistance to Environmental Consultant
The City intends to retain its own environmental consultant under a separate contract to conduct the
appropriate level of environmental review for the Housing Element. Based on the 5th Cycle experience,
this will likely be an Initial Study and Negative Declaration. Barry Miller will work with the
environmental consultant throughout the project to advise on CEQA-related issues, and the
characteristics of the “project.” Barry Miller will assist the Environmental Consultant in drafting the
Project Description and will review all sections of the Administrative Draft, Screencheck Draft, and Public
Review Draft environmental document to ensure that these documents accurately describe Housing
Element policies and programs, and appropriately assess potential impacts. The environmental
consultant will conduct all required outreach, noticing and filing, and tribal consultation for the CEQA
review.
4.2 Response to Comments
Barry Miller will assist the City and CEQA consultant in responding to any comments received on the
CEQA document.
Task 4 Deliverables and Time Estimates
Task Hours Deliverables
Task 4.1 4 Redlined Drafts of CEQA document with B. Miller edits
Task 4.2 2 Responses to Comments (as needed)
Total 6
Task Five: Facilitation of Housing Element Review and Approval
This work scope includes an Administrative Draft for staff, two Public Review Drafts, and the Final
Element. The First Public Review Draft is the document to be submitted to HCD for their initial review
and comment. The Second Public Review Draft would incorporate changes made in response to HCD’s
letter. The Final Element would be the adopted document, inclusive of any changes made during the
formal public hearings of the Planning Commission and Council. Both the first and second Public Review
Drafts will be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council in formal public hearings. This task
includes budget for two Planning Commission hearings and two City Council hearings.
All documents will be in Microsoft Word format for ease of editing. Documents will also be saved as PDF
files so they can be safely posted to the website and included in agenda packets. Graphics such as
photos, sidebars, maps, and text boxes will be included to make the document more compelling and
user-friendly.
402
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 9
5.1 Administrative Draft Housing Element
Per the City’s RFP, Task 5.1 includes submittal of an Administrative Draft for each element of the
Housing Element to the City for review. The hours shown in the budget for this task below only include
the Admin Draft Plan Introduction, Table of Contents, Cover, and Appendices. Hours associated with
production of the Administrative Drafts of the other Chapters (Evaluation of the Prior Element, the
Needs Assessment, the Opportunity Sites analysis, the Constraints analysis, the ADU strategy, the
Goals/Policies, and the Action Program) are already covered under Task 2.
5.2 First Public Review Draft Housing Element
Revisions to each chapter of the Administrative Draft will be made in response to Staff comments. The
document will be assembled and published as a “First Public Review Draft.” This document will be
presented to the Planning Commission and City Council in sequential public hearings. Public notice of
the document’s availability and hearing dates will be provided, including notification to the City’s
interested parties list, newspaper ads, and notification to adjoining cities and other stakeholders. Barry
Miller will prepare the staff reports for the Planning Commission and City Council hearings and the
PowerPoint presentations for each meeting.
The purpose of these hearings is not to adopt the Element, but rather to request City Council approval
to submit the Draft to HCD for their initial technical review. This review is important to ensure that the
document ultimately adopted by the City Council is compliant with the Government Code.
Barry Miller will facilitate ongoing communication with HCD, both during preparation of the Draft
Housing Element and during their technical review. This is often an iterative process, with regular
consultation, emailing, and phone communication on key issues.
5.3 Second Public Review Draft Housing Element
Once HCD’s comment letter is received, Barry will work collaboratively with City staff and the HCD
reviewer to determine what specific revisions are required to achieve compliance. The revisions will be
made and a detailed annotated summary of each HCD comment, followed by the City’s response and
proposed revisions to the document, will be made. A “redlined” version of the Public Review Draft will
be prepared highlighting the changes. A “clean” version also will be prepared.
The Second Public Review Draft will be published and circulated. Public hearings before the Planning
Commission and City Council will be held to adopt the Element. Barry Miller will prepare the staff
reports and resolutions for the Planning Commission and City Council hearings, along with the
PowerPoint presentations for each meeting. Any additional changes made to incorporate public
comments and changes recommended by the Planning Commission and City Council will be annotated
following the meeting.
403
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 10
5.4 Final Housing Element
Barry Miller will incorporate any revisions approved by the City Council into the Second Public Review
document in order to create the “Final” Housing Element (e.g., the Adopted document). He will prepare
the City’s formal transmittal letter and facilitate its submittal to HCD. Barry will be available to respond
to any questions or comments during the 30-day HCD review period. Barry will work with City staff to
complete any filings associated with adoption and certification.
5.5 Public Noticing
Barry will work in collaboration with City staff to prepare required notices and advertisements for public
meetings, including the two Planning Commission and two City Council adoption hearings. As noted
under Task 4, he will work with the City’s environmental consultant to do SB 18/ AB 52 tribal
consultation. It is presumed that the City itself will handle printing and mailing of notices, and
placement of advertisements. Barry can prepare the contents of these notices, but the City itself would
do the actual filing, following accepted City protocol and requirements.
Task 5 Deliverables and Time Estimates
Task Hours Deliverables
Task 5.1 8 Administrative Draft Housing Element (integrating work products
from Task 2 with the Introduction, Table of Contents, Cover, and
Appendices)
Task 5.2 8 First Public Review Draft Element (Draft for HCD)
Staff Reports and Presentation Materials for PC and CC Meetings
Task 5.3 32 Second Public Review Draft Element (Draft for adoption)
Staff Reports and Presentation Materials for PC and CC Meetings
Task 5.4 6 Final Housing Element
Task 5.5 2 Public Noticing
Total 56
404
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 11
BUDGET ESTIMATE
The table below provides a budget estimate for the total project, summarizing the hours associated with
each task and multiplying those totals by an hourly rate of $150. The total base estimate for the project
is $38,100. Per the City’s RFP, a 10 percent contingency has been added to accommodate unanticipated
activities. A $500 materials budget also has been included, to cover printing costs, teleconferencing
needs (Zoom webinars for public meetings, etc.), and other incidental costs. Although I do anticipate
travel to Rolling Hills over the course of the project, there would be no charge for travel time or
associated expenses.
Task Hours Budget
Administration 24 $3,600
Prepare Amended Housing Element 112 $16,800
Community Engagement 56 $8,400
Environmental Coordination 6 $900
Facilitation of Housing Element Review and Approval 56 $8,400
SUB-TOTAL 254 $38,100
10% contingency to accommodate
unanticipated activities or time requirements
$3,810
Material costs (Printing, Meeting Materials) $500
PROJECT TOTAL $42,410
405
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 12
Project Schedule
This section of the proposal provides a proposed project schedule, corresponding to the Scope of Work
and milestones established in the City’s RFP.
FLOW CHART
A project flow chart is included on the following page. The flow chart identifies the overall sequencing
of tasks, key milestones, and projected completion dates for each task (or grouping of tasks). The blue
triangles in the chart indicate key engagement points, including two community meetings (in May and
September), and three pairs of Planning Commission and City Council meetings that would occur in
April, June, and September.
FOCUS OF EACH MEETING
Per the City’s RFP, the table below indicates the focus of the major meetings shown in the flow chart.
Incidental meetings with staff, such as the project kickoff meeting, meetings with the environmental
consultant, and meetings with the HCD reviewer, are not included. The focus is on key public-facing
meetings. Barry Miller will be in attendance at every meeting listed (virtual attendance via Zoom is
anticipated for most of these meetings—at least those occurring before Summer 2021). Cost
information for these meetings is included in the prior section on the project budget.
Meeting Timing Meeting Focus
Planning Commission April 2021 Overview of Project, Key Issues, Discussion of Possible
ADU Strategies
City Council April 2021 Same agenda as Planning Commission
Community Workshop May 2021 General Discussion of housing issues, State
requirements, and Possible ADU Strategies
Stakeholder Meetings April-May 2021 Listening sessions on key housing issues
Planning Commission June 2021 Review of First Draft Element prior to HCD Submittal
City Council June 2021 Authorization to Submit First Draft to HCD for Review
Community Open House Sept 2021 Education/ Q&A on Proposed ADU strategies and
Options for Homeowners to Build an ADU
Planning Commission Sept 2021 Recommend adoption of Element to City Council
City Council Oct 2021 Adopt Housing Element
LIST AND DESCRIPTION OF FINAL PRODUCTS
This information is presented in the prior section. A list of deliverables is provided at the end of each
major task description.
406
ROLLING HILLS HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATEPROJECT SCHEDULEWeek123456 89101112131415 1718192021222324 2627282930313233 3536Task 1: Kickoff Meetings and Schedule Refinement Ongoing Administration and CoordinationSTARTTasks 2.1‐2.5: Evaluation, Needs Assessment, Site Analysis, Constraints, ADU AssessmentTasks 2.6‐2.8: Policies, Action Programs, MapsTask 3: Community EngagementEngagement Plan Stakeholder MeetingsInitial study sessions with Planning Commission and City CouncilCommunity Workshop Community Open HouseTask 4: Environmental Coordination(Task 2 Admin Draft Chapters) Task 5.1: Administrative Draft ElementTask 5.2: First Public Review Draft ElementPlanning Commission and Council HearingsHCD Technical ReviewRespond to HCDTask 5.3: 2nd Public Review DraftPlanning Commission and Council HearingsTask 5.4: Final ElementSUBMIT DOC TO HCDKey Public Engagement OpportunityFEBRUARY7MARCH APRIL34SEPTEMBER OCTOBER16MAY JUN25JULY AUGUST
407
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 14
Project Team
This section of the proposal describes the proposed staffing for the services provided. As indicated in
the City’s Request for Proposal, it includes a list of personnel and their responsibilities.
As a sole proprietor and independent consultant, Barry Miller would provide all services associated with
this project. A resume for Barry Miller is included on the next page.
List of Personnel and Responsibilities
1. Barry Miller, FAICP
Professional Title: Principal
Specific Responsibilities on the Project:
• Project Management for each phase of the project
• Communication and Liaison with City
• Communication and Liaison with HCD
• Data Collection and Analysis
• Report Preparation
• Presentations and Facilitation
• Document Production
Anticipated Workload During the Project
Barry Miller’s other work commitments from February to October 2021 are as follows (estimated
number of hours appear in the table):
Estimated Hours by Month
City Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
Rolling Hills 5th Cycle Housing
Element
30
City of San Rafael General Plan
(Plan now in public hearings;
adoption expected in June 2021)
50 50 40 30 20
Contra Costa County General Plan
(Subcontractor to PlaceWorks)
40 30 10 -- 20 20 20 20 20
Piedmont Housing Element
(due to HCD in Jan 2023
10 10 10 10 10 20 20 20 20
Albany Housing Element
(due to HCD in Jan 2023)
-- -- 10 10 20 20 20 40 40
TOTAL 130 90 70 50 70 60 60 80 80
408
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 15
Barry J Miller, FAICP
Resume
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Barry Miller Consulting (2007-present)
Provide consulting services to local governments and private firms throughout
the United States, with an emphasis on comprehensive plan updates, land use
studies, housing elements, and implementation programs. Services include the
design and implementation of community outreach programs, data collection
and analysis, mapping and field research, policy development, and report author-
ship, editing, and production. Recent clients include the cities of Albany, Berkeley,
Oakland, San Leandro, Danville, Piedmont, Concord, Newark, Orinda, Fremont,
Riverside, Rolling Hills, San Rafael, and Walnut Creek.
Washington, DC Office of Planning (2002 –2006)
Associate Director of Comprehensive Planning
Project manager for the first major revision of the District of Columbia’s
Comprehensive Plan since 1984. Managed team of 11 consulting firms and $2.8
million budget, had primary responsibility for Plan authorship and mapping,
conducted more than 100 large public meetings, served as liaison to more than
65 public agencies, collected and analyzed long-range planning data, and
developed Plan goals, policies and actions.
Barry Miller Consulting (1991- 2003)
See description above. Completed projects include General Plans for San
Leandro, Palo Alto, San Juan Bautista, and Danville, California, the Comprehensive
Plan for Walt Disney World, Florida (with Sedway Consulting); the Local Coastal
Plan for Half Moon Bay; Housing Elements for Milpitas, San Leandro, and
Piedmont, and the Oakland General Plan and Zoning Ordinance revision.
Sedway Cooke Associates San Francisco, CA
Senior Associate (1989 – 1990); Associate Planner (1986 -1989);
Planner II (1985 -1986)
Principal planner on five comprehensive plans, and on selected elements of
comprehensive plans in two counties. Team participant on a variety of
environmental, urban design, and implementation studies in California, Florida,
Iowa, Ohio, Oregon, and Texas.
Planning Research Corporation (PRC) Houston, TX
Project Planner (1983-1985)
Conducted site analysis and land planning studies. Prepared feasibility reports
for large-scale mixed use developments in Austin, Dallas, Denver, Houston, and
San Antonio. Principal author of plans for new towns in Texas and Nigeria.
Responsible for marketing of firm's comprehensive planning services in Texas.
CONTACT
817 Alvarado Road * Berkeley, CA 94705 * 510-847-0068
barry@barrymiller.net
Education
Master of City and Regional
Planning (1983)
University of California, Berkeley
Bachelor of Arts, Urban and
Regional Planning (1981)
University of Illinois, Urbana-
Champaign
Professional Affiliations
Member, American Planning
Association since 1983
Member, American Institute of
Certified Planners, since 1989
FAICP Fellow, since 2012
Civic Affiliations
Chair, Oakland Parks and
Recreation Commission
(2009-2017)
Founding Member,
Claremont Canyon Conservancy
(2002)
Board Member,
Oakland Parks and Recreation
Foundation (2016-current)
409
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 16
Relevant Experience
This section of the proposal describes the qualifications of Barry Miller Consulting, including information
on projects completed in the last five years that are similar in size and scope. This section begins with
an overview of the firm, demonstrating its capacity to provide the services requested. Several project
profiles are then included, highlighting work performed by Barry Miller in other cities. As requested by
the City of Rolling Hills, hyperlinks to work products are included for each project (rather than including
these documents in an Appendix).
Barry Miller Consulting: Overview of Firm
Barry Miller Consulting is a California-based urban planning firm. The firm is a sole proprietorship,
owned and operated by Barry Miller, FAICP. Barry has been in business for 29 years and has been a
practicing urban planner for 35 years. He provides a broad range of services to his clients, focusing on
general plan project management, policy development, and plan writing. Since starting his firm, he has
prepared general plans or plan elements for more than a dozen cities in California.
Barry is known for his strategic, thoughtful approach to planning, skillful project management, effective
listening, clear writing, and commitment to delivering the highest quality work products. As a one -
person firm, Barry provides highly personalized and responsive service at an affordable rate. Although
he is physically located in the Bay Area, Barry has worked in the Southern California market and is
familiar with the local landscape. In the current era of Zoom meetings and remote work, he is readily
available to participate in teleconferences, virtual hearings and workshops, and live-streamed
Commission and Council hearings.
Housing Elements completed by Barry Miller include:
• Albany (4th and 5th Cycle)
• Piedmont (3rd, 4th, and 5th Cycle)
• Orinda (4th Cycle)
• San Leandro (3rd, 4th, and 5th Cycle)
• Milpitas (3rd Cycle, opportunity sites analysis)
• Concord (5th Cycle, constraints analysis and housing opportunity sites analysis)
• Rolling Hills (5th Cycle in progress, estimated completion February 2021)
As a result of his prior work on Housing Elements, Barry has a well-established rapport with the State
Department of Housing and Community Development. Barry also drafted the Accessory Dwelling Unit
(ADU) regulations for Fremont and San Leandro, and prepared amendments to the Danville General Plan
Land Use Map and categories to accommodate the City’s RHNA during the 5th Cycle. He also developed
Piedmont’s rent-restricted ADU program and revised the Piedmont zoning regulations to encourage
mixed use development in the City’s commercial zoning district.
410
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 17
Project Profile: Piedmont Housing Element
Piedmont is an affluent, almost entirely residential city of approximately 4,000 homes located 10 miles
east of San Francisco. Its population is 11,000, with a median household income of $212,000 and a
median home value of $2.3 million. The City’s land area is 1.7 square miles. Piedmont was primarily
developed between 1910 and 1930 and reached full buildout in the 1960s. Its housing opportunities are
limited to about 50 scattered vacant lots, all constrained by steep slopes, limited access, and high fire
hazards. The City’s public lands are fully developed or committed to park uses and schools, and its 3.3
acres of commercially zoned property are fully occupied by local-serving businesses.
Piedmont’s RHNA during the last three cycles has ranged from 40 to 60 units. In the last cycle, 63
percent of the allocation was for low- and very low-income households. The City’s ability to meet its
RHNA is constrained not only by its land supply, but also by a City Charter provision that requires a
citywide vote prior to the rezoning of property. All but a handful of the City’s lots are zoned for single
family homes.
Given the significant constraints to meeting the “affordable” component of Piedmont’s RHNA on land
zoned for multi-family housing, Barry Miller worked with City staff, residents, the Planning Commission,
and the City Council to make the case to HCD that the City could meet it’s RHNA through Accessory
Dwelling Units (ADUs). During the 1990s, Piedmont had an outright prohibition on ADUs. As part of
their third cycle Housing Element, the Council ended the prohibition and legalized previously unlawful
units, requiring that they be brought up to code where necessary.
411
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 18
During the early 2000s, the City went a step further and created a rent-restricted ADU program for
interested property owners. Barry worked with the City to draft the program requirements, including
incentives for property owners willing to impose a 10-year deed restriction on the units, and the
rental/occupancy terms and duration. Incentives included a waiver of parking requirements, which
previously had discouraged many owners from creating ADUs or legalizing “unintended” ADUs on their
properties.
Piedmont’s 2007-2014 Element was certified, largely as a result of the ADU program. Its 2015-2023
Element was certified based on the continuing success of that program, which resulted in 13 rent-
restricted units during the 2007-14 period. The American Planning Association (APA) recognized the
success of this program with an “Implementation” Award in 2015.
State legislation in 2017 impeded the City’s ability to use the parking waiver as an incentive (since it
prohibited local governments from requiring off-street parking for ADUs if they were located near
transit, a criteria that encompasses most of Piedmont). As a result, the City has developed other
incentives for rent restrictions and has demonstrated to HCD that small ADUs (including Junior ADUs)
meet the criteria for “low” income units. Piedmont is also making the case that its “extremely low”
income needs can be met through measures such as home sharing and renting of spare rooms.
Barry continues to provide housing-related services to the City of Piedmont, including development of
new incentives for rent-restricted ADUs, and other strategies to demonstrate the city’s capacity to meet
its “very low” income allocation.
Client name: City of Piedmont
Project Start/End Dates: Ongoing, but most recent Housing Element was 2014-15
Client Representative: Kevin Jackson, Planning Director
Phone Number: 510-420-3039
Email: kjackson@piedmont.ca.gov
Link to Project
Project Profile: Albany Housing Element
Albany is known for its traditional neighborhoods, strong sense of community, great schools, and
engaged citizenry. City staff submitted a Draft Housing Element to HCD early in the Fourth Cycle RHNA
(2007-2014) and received a lengthy letter indicating the element was not yet in compliance. Due to
staffing cuts induced by the recession, the City was unable to respond to the comments and continued
through most of the planning period without a certified Housing Element. In 2013, with just a year
remaining in the planning period, the City found itself facing a potential legal challenge triggered by the
lack of a certified Element. At that time, Albany retained Barry Miller to comprehensively respond to
HCD’s comments and work with the community and State to develop a compliant element.
Barry worked not only with City staff, but also with the City’s legal counsel, housing advocates (including
those challenging the City on its housing policies), Council, Commissions, and public, to develop a
412
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 19
compliant Housing Element. The work, which was completed in about six months, became the first step
of a three-year process that also included preparation of the fifth cycle (2015-2023) Element, a complete
overhaul and update of the Albany General Plan, and a full Environmental Impact Report.
The Albany Housing Element includes many provisions for Accessory Dwelling Units. A survey of ADU
owners was completed as part of the process, allowing the City to conclude that roughly 15 percent of
its ADUs met low-income criteria, 80 percent met moderate-income criteria, and 5 percent met above
moderate-income criteria. HCD permitted the City to include 32 accessory dwelling units in its
opportunity sites analysis.
The Albany General Plan Update was the first citywide plan in over 20 years. Over a two-year period,
Barry facilitated some 30 study sessions with the Planning and Zoning Commission, the City Council, and
other City Commissions to build consensus on new policies and action programs. The 2035 Plan includes
strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, improving conditions for pedestrians and bicyclists,
linking the city to its waterfront, and expanding affordable housing opportunities. The revised General
Plan was adopted on April 18, 2016.
Client name: City of Albany
Project Start/End Dates: 2013-2016
Client Representative: Anne Hersch, Planning Manager
Phone Number: 510-528-5765
Email: ahersch@albanyca.org
Link to Project
413
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 20
Project Profile: San Leandro General Plan and Housing Elements
Barry served as the Project Manager for the San Leandro General Plan Update in 1999-2002 and returned
to manage the Plan Update from 2014-2016. Both updates won Awards of Excellence from the American
Planning Association. The first update shifted the City’s focus from suburban-style, auto-oriented
development to strategic infill development around the City’s two BART stations. The more recent update
focused on transformation of San Leandro’s economy, the introduction of “smart city” technology to local
infrastructure and services, and creative placemaking to enhance the city’s identity and built environment.
Barry has also served as Project Manager for San Leandro’s last three Housing Element Updates (covering
RHNA cycles 3, 4, and 5). He assisted the City in implementing these elements by updating the City’s
accessory dwelling unit ordinance, creating a new zoning district for areas transitioning from industrial to
residential use, and amending existing zoning regulations and maps to increase the City’s housing
capacity. Barry worked with the community to rezone several key sites identified in the 2014 -2016
Element for higher density uses, allowing them to qualify as eligible to meet the City’s allocation for very
low- and low-income households. He also facilitated the community meetings and Planning Commission
meetings on the new ADU standards, which departed from the State’s “default” standards in response to
feedback received from the public and neighborhood organizations.
Client name: City of San Leandro
Project Start/End Dates: 2014-2016
Client Representative: Tom Liao, Community Development Director
Phone Number: 510-577-3350
Email: tliao@sanleandro.org
Link to Project
414
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 21
Project Profile: Fairview Specific Plan
Barry Miller served as the project manager for Alameda County’s Fairview Specific Plan Update. The Draft
Plan was completed in 2019 and has been in public hearings for the last several months. It is anticipated
to be adopted by the Alameda County Board of Supervisors by March 2021. While this is not a Housing
Element project per se, Fairview is a well-established equestrian community in a high fire hazard zone. Its
physical form resembles Rolling Hills in some respects, with large lots, split-rail fences, horse barns and
stables, and large homes with the potential for accessory dwellings. Much of the community has five-acre
minimum zoning.
Barry Miller was retained to comprehensively update the 1997 Specific Plan for this unincorporated area.
This required closely working with the community to address issues common in large lot, equestrian
communities, including visual and aesthetic impacts, grading and earth movement, fire hazards and access
constraints, road design standards that accommodate horses, and odor/ water quality issues associated
with horses and other livestock. Barry prepared new standards for lot coverage, floor area ratio,
development on steep slopes, parking, and other aspects of site development as part of this process.
Client name: County of Alameda
Project Start/End Dates: 2018-2020
Client Representative: Albert Lopez, Planning Director
Phone Number: 510-670-5426
Email: albert.lopez@acgov.org
Link to Project
415
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 22
Project Profile: Rolling Hills 2014-2021 Housing Element
Barry Miller is currently assisting the City of Rolling Hills in completing its Fifth Cycle Element. The Element
was initially submitted to HCD in 2013 but was returned to the City in 2014 with direction for substantial
revisions and edits. Staff edited the document to respond to State comments and the City adopted it in
2014; however, it was still determined to be non-compliant. In 2019, the City reached an agreement with
HCD to submit a compliant element by the end of 2020. Barry Miller was retained in September 2020 to
assist in this process. He has primarily served as a liaison between the City and HCD to address HCD
objections regarding opportunities for multi-family housing and special needs housing in the City, and in
gaining HCD’s acceptance of an underutilized Palos Verdes Unified School District property as a suitable
housing site.
Barry assisted staff in developing an Affordable Housing Overlay Zone, and in making strategic revisions
to the Housing Element that respond to State comments. He also developed an Accessory Dwelling Unit
Survey for the City, building the foundation for a 6th Cycle Housing Element that is based on ADUs rather
than traditional multi-family housing. Barry is presently completing a revised Draft 5th Cycle Element for
the City, to be submitted to HCD in February 2021, following Planning Commission and City Council
hearings.
Client name: City of Rolling Hills
Project Start/End Dates: 2020-2021
Client Representative: Meredith Elguira, Planning Director
416
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 23
Public Outreach Experience
Barry Miller has been a practicing urban
planner for 35 years. Over the course of his
career he has developed and implemented
community engagement strategies for at least
two dozen communities, ranging from
agricultural counties to Washington, DC. His
experience is summarized in the bulleted list
below:
• Community Engagement Strategies.
Barry regularly prepares Community
Engagement Strategies as part of his work. They are an essential first step in any planning project.
• Presentations to Planning Commissions and City Councils. As a project manager, Barry routinely
presents agenda items to Planning Commissions and City Councils. He facilitates discussions of
complex planning topics by elected officials and City boards and commissions on a weekly basis.
• Facilitation of Focus Groups. Barry organizes and facilitates Focus Groups on planning topics with
individual stakeholders and with groups of stakeholders. He has performed this role on the Housing
Elements for Fremont, San Leandro, and Concord; and on the General Plans for San Leandro,
Piedmont, and San Rafael.
• Steering Committees. Barry regularly serves as staff to project Steering Committees. He recently
facilitated 25 three-hour meetings of a 24-person Steering Committee for the San Rafael General
Plan over a two-year period. He has also facilitated meetings of a 7-person Steering Committee for
the Piedmont Housing Element, a 50-member Steering Committee for the San Leandro General Plan,
and a 28-member Steering Committee for the Washington DC Comprehensive Plan. During the past
year, he has convened multiple “virtual” Steering Committee meetings on the Zoom platform.
• Community Workshops. Barry has designed and facilitated community workshops for the Piedmont
Housing Element, the San Leandro Housing Element (see photo on P. 20), the Fremont Housing
Element, and the San Rafael
General Plan. More recently, he
facilitated a community workshop
on housing issues for the Bay Area
community of Irvington and
another on development issues in
the unincorporated community of
Fairview. Barry designs workshop
materials, presentation boards, and
interactive exercises (including real-
time polling), prepares PowerPoint
presentations, and develops
summaries following the meetings.
417
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 24
• Youth Outreach. Barry has
conducted focused outreach
programs and meetings with
youth, including a city planning
“lesson plan” for fourth graders,
and collaborative efforts with local
schools to engage kids in planning.
• Media. Barry regularly prepares
brochures and print media for
planning projects, including Housing Elements and General Plan Updates. He frequently prepares
content for City websites and social media posts. He also prepares project newsletters, and other
documents that distill lengthy plans into clear, easy to understand summaries.
• Pop-Up Workshops. Barry regularly designs and facilitates “pop up” events on planning projects at
local farmers markets, street fairs, and special events. He developed the “Albany Housing
Challenge,” engaging over 100 passers-by during the City’s annual Street Fair (see photo on P. 19).
• Engagement of Under-represented Communities. Barry regularly works with non-profit housing
advocacy groups to give voice to non-English speaking residents, hearing and sight impaired
residents, and lower income households in the planning process. In his recent work in San Rafael,
he partnered with local non-profit (Canal Alliance) as they conducted Spanish-language interviews
on the City’s future with more than 100 residents.
• Press-Releases. Barry has prepared press releases for local newspapers and other media outlets,
both to generate a “buzz” prior to upcoming community workshops and events, and to report out
on planning projects.
• Speech-Writing. Barry has prepared speeches and talking points for elected officials, including the
Mayors of Washington DC, Oakland, San Leandro, and San Rafael.
• Surveys. Barry has developed dozens of paper and electronic surveys for planning projects,
including the recent Rolling Hills Accessory Dwelling Unit survey.
418
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 25
References
Client Representative: Kevin Jackson, Planning Director
City of Piedmont
120 Vista Avenue
Piedmont CA 94611
Phone Number: 510-420-3039
Email: kjackson@piedmont.ca.gov
Work Description: Piedmont Housing Element, Third (2001), Fourth (2007), and Fifth
(2014) Cycles
Piedmont General Plan (2009)
Housing Policy and RHNA Advisor (current)
Client Representative: Paul Jensen, Director of Community Development
City of San Rafael
1800 Fifth Avenue
San Rafael, CA 94901
Phone Number 415-485-5064
Email: paul.jensen@cityofsanrafael.org
Work Description: San Rafael 2040 General Plan (2018-2021)
San Rafael Downtown Precise Plan (2019-2021)
Client Representative: Tom Liao, Director of Community Development
City of San Leandro
835 East 14th Street
San Leandro, CA 94577
Phone Number: (510) 577-6003
Email: tliao@sanleandro.org
Work Description: San Leandro Housing Element, Third (2001), Fourth (2007), and Fifth (
2014) Cycles
San Leandro General Plan (1999-2002 and 2014-16)
ADU Regulations (2017) and Zoning Ordinance Revisions (2016-17)
419
Proposal for Services * Rolling Hills 2021-2029 Housing Element Page 26
Fee Schedule
Barry Miller is a sole proprietor and has no employees. His hourly billing rate is $150. Work is billed
monthly or bi-monthly on a time and materials basis, with not to exceed limits for services. Barry does
not bill for travel time.
Please note that a cost estimate for the 6th Cycle Housing Element is included at the end of Section 2 of
this proposal, as requested by the City’s RFP. Per the City’s request, a 10 percent contingency has been
added to the project budget for unforeseen expenses.
Barry Miller Consulting meets all insurance requirements specified by the City’s standard Professional
Services Agreement. These include:
1) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance with a combined single limit of $1,000,000 covering
bodily injury and property damage. In the event Barry is selected for this project, he will add the
City, the Rolling Hills Community Association, and other parties specified by the City as
additional insured, in accordance with the City’s request.
2) Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance with a combined single limit of $1,000,000 per
occurrence, including coverage for owned, hired, and non-owned automobiles. In the event
Barry is selected for this project, he will add the City, the Rolling Hills Community Association,
and other parties specified by the City as additional insured, in accordance with the City’s
request.
Because Barry is a sole practitioner, he is exempt from Workers Compensation Insurance requirements.
He will provide a statement of exemption to the City’s satisfaction in the event he is selected for this
project.
420
Agenda Item No.: 9.D
Mtg. Date: 02/22/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:MEREDITH ELGUIRA, PLANNING DIRECTOR
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PERSONNEL
COMMITTEE FOR APPOINTMENTS TO THE PLANNING
COMMISSION AND TRAFFIC COMMISSION.
DATE:February 22, 2021
BACKGROUND:
The terms of one Planning Commissioner, Jana Cooley and one Traffic Commissioner, Charlie Raine
expired in January 2021. Appointed commissioners serve a term of four years, starting on January 1
and ending on January 1. The appointment process was delayed for terms commencing on January 1,
2021 to March 1, 2021. This delay will not change the term expiration date of January 1, 2025.
In November 2020, upon direction from the City Council, the staff began advertising for letters of
interest from residents desiring to serve on the Planning Commission and Traffic Commission. The
notices of the opportunity were included in the City's newsletters and posted at City Hall for over 30
days. Subsequent to the initial announcement of the two positions, Planning Commissioner Matt
Seaburn submitted his resignation in January 2021. Mr. Seaburn's term would have expired on January
1, 2022.
DISCUSSION:
In response to the notice, incumbent Planning Commissioner Jana submitted a letter expressing interest
in continuing to serve on the Planning Commission. Three other letters of interest, from Arun Bhumitra,
Nikos Constance and Abby Douglas, were received.
For the Traffic Commission, incumbent Charlie Raine submitted a letter expressing interest in
continuing to serve on the Traffic Commission. No other letters of interest were received for Traffic
Commission.
421
On February 16, 2021 and February 17, 2021, the City Council Personnel Committee conducted
interviews with three Planning Commission candidates. Incumbents were not interviewed. Candidate
Arun Bhumitra later requested to withdraw his application from consideration.
For the Planning Commission, the Personnel Committee expressed that the two applicants interviewed
have specific experiences and perspectives that would serve the City well and could constructively
contribute to the challenging decisions and tasks of the Planning Commission. However, after much
consideration, the Committee recommends to re-appoint the incumbent Commissioner. The
incumbent’s past performances coupled with her background, interest and knowledge of issues facing
the Planning Commission were the primary factors for the reappointment. In consideration of the two
applicants to fulfil the remaining term vacated by Planning Commissioner Seaburn, the Personnel
Committee recommends the appointment of Abby Douglas.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost to conduct the appointment process is included in the adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2020-
2021.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council Personnel Committee recommends the re-appointment of Charlie Raine to the Traffic
Commission for a four-year term effective March 1, 2021 and Jana Cooley for a four-year term
effective March 1, 2021. The Personnel Committee also recommends the appointment of Abby
Douglas to the Planning Commission to serve the remaining term vacated by Commissioner Matt
Seaburn.
ATTACHMENTS:
422
Agenda Item No.: 10.A
Mtg. Date: 02/22/2021
TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM:ELAINE JENG, CITY MANAGER
THRU:ELAINE JENG P.E., CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT:UPDATE ON THE PALOS VERDES PENINSULA EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS COMMITTEE AND REGIONAL LAW
ENFORCEMENT COMMITTEE MEETINGS HELD ON NOVEMBER 12,
2020 AND FEBRUARY 11, 2021 (VERBAL REPORT).
DATE:February 22, 2021
BACKGROUND:
None.
DISCUSSION:
None.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
RECOMMENDATION:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
423