The URL can be used to link to this page

2500 Planning - Green Building Program Build It GreenGOING "GREEN" City Manager Dahlerbruch presented the staff report outlining going green programs that are available and information regarding what other cities are doing in regard to this subject. C' Discussion ensued regarding the programs outlined in the information provided by staff. Comments were offered regarding the carbon footprint the City is leaving on the environment i h due to the nature of the City. Comments were offered regarding the use of geothermal energy W/�� in large homes. It was suggested that the Wildlife Preservation Committee could expand their l scope to study these matters in the future. Councilmembers expressed support for the issue of going green and suggested that staff should continue to research what types of programs are available, monitor what other cities are doing regarding.going green, have information available for residents to educate them about green programs including alternative types of energy such as geothermal and windmills and, keep the City Council informed. ‘-g Mayor Pro Tem Hill costs at the landfills. disposal. Mayor Pro of the City Council. reported on increases over the next few years for solid waste disposal He was asked to find out whether this will have an effect on green waste Tern Hill also provided information regarding squirrels to the members J C (/ Mayor Pro Tent Hill r ,�I p1 landfill located in Rolling HillstEst Estates aslarcompostin� site. b I Hillss Estates' investigation into using a count 50TH ANNIVERSARY 1957 - 2007 C1t opelP,.9 JJd& INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No.: 8-B Mtg. Date: 11-26-07 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ANTON DAHLERBRUCH, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: GOING "GREEN" DATE: NOVEMBER 26, 2007 RECOMMENDATION It. is recommended that the City Council discuss the topic of "going green" relative to participating in the various initiatives described in the attached documents and direct staff to return to the City Council with additional information. Further, the City Council may want to consider policies and ultimately, direction to Planning Commission and staff on local measures to address global warming. BACKGROUND At the City Council meeting of October 22, 2007, in response to interest in water conservation, use of reclaimed water, gray water and alternative energy sources, staff was asked to agendize the general topic of going "green." This memorandum outlines the various initiatives that exist relative to being environmentally friendly. As illustrated in Exhibit 1, being an environmentally friendly city can take many forms. It can involve legislative changes that require different business or construction practices or involve a personal lifestyle change that individuals elect to implement. The combination is intended to reduce a community's "carbon footprint" and thus slow or stop global warming. The City of Rolling Hills, with only single-family. residential development, is unique. When zoning incentives are generally the mechanism to encourage environmentally sensitive development, legislative options available to the City for addressing global warming and going green are limited. Moreover, with the City's small size and infrastructure, the opportunity to modify its' business practices (e.g., purchasing) and reduce its carbon footprint (e.g., changing light bulbs) is limited as well. However, if there is interest in pursuing this matter, there are ways to participate. ® Printed on Recycled Paper DISCUSSION According to the City Roadmap for Residential Green Building published by the organization, "Build It Green," green buildings are "...designed, constructed and operated to conserve energy and water, provide a healthier indoor environment, safeguard natural resources, and foster livable communities. Think of green building as an improvement on, rather than a major departure from, conventional design and construction practices." The City of Rolling Hills does not have any barriers in its zoning or building code that prevent a resident from designing and constructing a "green" residence. The City allows, for example, solar panels, gray water systems, and environmentally friendly building materials. At one end of the spectrum, the City could require development to include such measures. On the other end of the spectrum, the City could disseminate information to residents that identifies the City's general support of such measures. In the middle, the City could annually recognize property owners who institute measures that demonstrate environmentally friendly practices. Relative to business practices at City Hall, priority can be given to the purchase of recycled materials, for example. Moreover, with the remodel of the City Hall lobby area, the City could evaluate carpet and furniture acquisition that meets certain environmentally friendly criteria. CONCLUSION In its 2006 session, the State legislature enacted a groundbreaking law known as the Global Warming Act of 2006 (Act). The Act created a statewide greenhouse gas (GHG) emission limit that requires the reduction of emissions by 25% by 2020. On or before January 1, 2008, it requires the state Air Resources Board (ARB) to adopt regulations requiring GHG emission sources to monitor and report their emissions to the ARB, and specifies detailed criteria for the adoption and compliance with those regulations. It also requires, on or before January 1, 2008, the ARB to adopt a statewide emissions limit on GHG emissions, specifies both a process and criteria for the adoption of the limit, and provides that the limit shall remain in effect after 2020 until otherwise amended or repealed. The ARB is also required to adopt the maximum feasible and cost-effective reductions in GHG emissions for sources and categories of sources subject to the ACT (excerpted from the League of California Cities 2006 Wrap Up). In some ways related to this, cities such as Santa Monica, Manhattan Beach, Hermosa Beach and Rolling Hills Estates have subscribed to a variety of state and national voluntary initiatives to demonstrate their commitment to curbing global warming. The initiatives include the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement (exhibit 2), Ahwahnee Principles (exhibit 3), and ICLEI Cities for Climate Protection (exhibit 4). Attached are staff reports from the City of Rolling Hills Estates that illustrate their considerations. AD/ Going Green Staff Report.doc THE SCIENCE AND POLICY OF CLIMATE CHANGE The Greenhouse Effect. According to scientific studies conducted by a host of academic and national research institutions throughout the world, global warming is already underway. The past century has witnessed a long-term buildup of carbon dioxide, methane, and other gases in the atmosphere. These gases act as a "greenhouse," trapping heat from the sun that would otherwise radiate back into space. This greenhouse effect has resulted in rising land and ocean temperatures, changes in storm and rainfall patterns, seasonal temperature variations, and rising sea levels. Exhibit 1 The Human Factor. The buildup of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has been linked to a variety of man-made causes. Some of these include: • Increased buming of fossil fuels • Industrial and agricultural practices • Loss of forests and other biological systems that store carbon OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOCAL LEADERSHIP Effective Climate Change Strategies and Resources. There are many strategies that local communities can employ to reduce carbon emissions and combat global warming, both in their own operations and throughout the community at large. In most cases, these strategies not only help the environment, they also save money and make great economic sense. Designing green buildings can reduce the substantial amount of energy it takes to construct and operate residential, commercial, industrial, and public buildings. Reducing waste and recycling cuts the amount of greenhouse gases that are generated tn,manufactum package, transport, and dispose of products and materials Planning and building "smart Urvwlti" communities can cut carbon emissions by reducing travel distances and making it easier to walk, bicycle, and use transit. Promoting individual and community action encourages people from all walks of life to reduce their own contribution to greenhouse gas emissions. Using nature to store carbon, for example by planting trees and maintaining forests, is the other side of the climate change equation. Conserving energy and ur;6iy it more officlently induces the amount of carbon dioxide and nther greenhouse gases that are pumped into the atmosphere. Buying "grave►" products and services hamesses the purchasing power of public agencies to improve environmental quality and reduce global warming. Using lower carbon fuels to power vehicles, run business, and generate electricity can cut carbon emissions substantially, while creating new local industries. Additional information on the Califomia Climate Action Network can be found on the Institute for Local Government's website at: www.ca-ilg.org/climatechange e Construct new agency buildings to meet green building standards 1. Reduce water consumption by 75% in new landscaping __ENERGYeEFFICIENCY,A.ND.CONSER ITAV ON - e Audit agency buildings and facilities for energy efficiency a Replace street and parking lot lights with more efficient alternatives e Partner with local utilities on community energy efficiency programs _ +_ ,GREEN :BUILDINGS_ _ Require all new buildings to exceed Title 24 energy standards by 25% _ • _ WASTE REDUCTION'AND,RECYCLING'_ Recognizing Local Actions that Make a Differenc e Best Practices for Climate Protection - Some Exa mples Action Good Better Best x x x x e Implement comprehensive agency -wide waste reduction and recycling X e Partner with local schools to reduce waste and recycle e Exceed state waste diversion and recycling goals — - 7.7 _ CLIMATE-FRIENDLY:P,UR'CHAWG. ,/ e Require that new agency equipment meet Energy Star standards -- e. Buy computer equipment that meets silver EPEAT. standards '. Contract with vendors that follow green practices -• .ALTErusikiiit`ENERGYRND L'UW,CARBON:FUELS' e Convert or replace agency vehicles to run on non -fossil fuels ho Install photovoltaic systems on agency buildings and parking lots do Recover methane gas from wastes and Use to generate electricity Employee incentives for ternatives�toinse'o D SMART,GROWTH,_ ,•� �� v`_ _ g pant auto commuting do Install traffic calming systems to increase pedestrian and cyclist safety 1. Incorporate smart growth desigii standards in local plans and zoning +t - _.• -`'SCORING.AND;OFFSETTING:CARBONEMISSIONS_ e Preserve and enhance trees and vegetation on agency property a Implement'aicommunity-wide urban forestry program e Steer new development away from forests, farms and open spaces PROMOTING INDIVIDUAL AND,COMMUNITY ACTION - a. Develop a community -wide climate education initiative a. Join a regional climate action partnership with other communities e Establish an international climate partnership with a global sister city x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x We Welcome Your Feedback and Participation! CCAN is working with a broad array of technical advisors to develop a Climate Action Best Practices Certification Program for local climate protection efforts. For more information on the program, or to offer comments on our latest draft of the certification standards, contact us at climatcchangc n;ca-ilb.orb. 11/14/2007 08:36 Mayors for Climate Protection Mayors in the United States who have committed their cities to reducing greenhouse either through 9 house gas emission • The Cities for Climate Protection Campaign (CCP) or • The US Mayors Climate Protection Agreement comprise the ranks of the Mayors for Climate Protection at vww.coolma ors.or The Mayors for Climate Protection web site is one result of an ongoing collaboration organizations - the US Conference of Mayors, ICLEI - Local Governments for Susta Seattle, and the Sundance Preserve - to among four the United States. provide leadership to promote climate Inability, the City protection in cities it US Conference of Ma ors The US Conference of Mayors is the official nonpartisan organization of cities with populations of 30,000 or more. There are 1,139 such cities in the country tod by its chief elected official, the Mayor, ay, each represented p sented in the Conferen( ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainabilit ICLEI is an international association of 660 local governments. Its US operation United States in 1995 and has grown from a handful of local governments participating project to more than 160 cities and counties providing national leadershipP n was launched in the project to development. P tlimat ng in a pilot on climate protection and ICLEI's mission is to improve the global environment through local action. ICLEI tools, and technical assistance to help local governments measure and reduce emissions in their communities through its Cities for Climate Protectio R provides resources, take part in CCP, which has been designated as the enabling mechanism for greenhouse gas n0 campaign. Mayorslose o l m e Protection Agreement. the US Climate City of Seattle Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels launched The US Mayors Climate Protection Agreement 2005, the day the Kyoto Protocol went into effect in 141 countries, without US agreement calls for Seattle and other U.S. cities that have signed the g ant on February 16, goals of the Kyoto protocol, which call for a 7 Part oicipatioo. Teat e 300 cities have signed the agreement. Percent reduction in greenhouse gas oemesstionsor bClose c Sundance Preserve Nestled at the base of 12,000 -foot Mount Timpanogos in Utah, The Sundance maintaining the balance of art, nature and community as well as the cultivation ent, innovative thought amongst artists, scholars, scientists Preserve is dedicated t within the p ,public policy and business f IeadersindependResiding protected splendor of its own preserved lands, it is the mission of the Sundance Preserve action for the benefit of civil society. serve http://w,w.coolmayors.com/common/print_page.cfm?ClientlD=11061&QID=3491&Type=ReportDetail&TopiclD=0 Exhibit 2 Page 1 of 1 ENDORSING THE U.S. MAYORS CLIMATE PROTECTION AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the U.S. Conference of adopted strong Mayors has previously communities adpolicy resolutions calling for cities,cio to reduce global warming government to take actions pollution; and WHEREAS, the Inter -Governmental Panel Change (IPCC), the international co on Climate respected assemblage of scientists, mhaslfoundmthat climate disruption is a reality and that human activities are largely responsible for increasing concentrations of global warming pollution; and WHEREAS, recent, well -documented impacts of climate disruption include average global sea level increases of four to eight inches during the 20th century; percent decline in Arctic sea -ice thickness; and nine of the ten hottest years on record occurring in the past decade; and WHEREAS, climate disruption of the ma predicted by the scientific community magnitude c now ause extremely costly disruption of human and natural systems throughout the world including ased of floods or droughts; sea -level rises.thatrinteractsk with coastal storms to erode beaches, inundate land, andsdamage structures; more frequent and more frequent and extreme heat smog; and greater concentrations of WHEREAS, on February 16, 2005, the Kyoto Protocol, an international agreementthe 141address ountrieslthae daveuption, went into effect h ratified it to date; 38 of those countries are now legally required to reduce average 5.2 greenhouse gas emissions on percent below 1990 levels by 2012; and WHEREAS, the United States of five America, with less than percent of the world's population for producing approximately 25 is resworld'se pollutants; global warming is the world's ants; and WHEREAS, the Kyoto Protocol emissions reduction tar for the U.S. would have been 7 percent below 1990 get levels by 2012; and WHEREAS, many leading US companies greenhouse gas reduction pro that have adopted corporate social responsibil�tams to demonstrate expressed preference for the US tovadoe lto precise and mandatory emissions targets and timetablesas end by which to remain competitive means marketplace, to mitigate in international sound investment decisions; risk and to and promote WHEREAS, ' state and local governments throughout the United States are adoptingprograms emission reduction that this leadership targets coming from Republican and Democratic governors ernor and, mayors alike; and governors and WHEREAS, many cities throughout the nation and small, are reducin both large g through programs that global warming pollutants provide economic and quality of life benefits such as reduced energy bills, green e spac preservation, congestion, air quality improvements, reduced tr improved transportation choices, and economic development and energy conservation and new fob creation through energy technologies; and WHEREAS, mayors from around the nation U.S. Mayors Climate Protection A have signed the amended at the 73rd greement which, as meeting, reads: The U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement A. We urge the federal governments government and state or beat the targetenato t and programs to meet pollution levels to 7 g global warming 2012, including efforts to: reduce the United dependence on fossil fuels and accelerate the development of clean, nomical resources and fuel-efficiento technologiesenergy as conservation, methane recovery generation, waste to energy, for energy energy, fuel cells effi wind and solar efficient motor vehicles, and biofuels; B. We urge the U.S. Congress to ass n greenhouse gas reduction legislationpthat sincludes 1) clear timetables and emissions limits and 2) a flexible, market -based system of tradable allowances among emittin C. We will strive g industries; and to meet or exceed Kyoto Protocol targets for reducing global warmin taking actions in our g pollution communities such as: own operations and 1. Inventory global warming operations and in the emissions in City agt and community, set reduction create an action plan. 2. Adopt and enforce land -use sprawl, preserve policies that reduce open space, and create compact, walkable urban co 3• Promote transportationtoes; trails Ptions such as bicycle ,commute trip reduction programs, incentives for car 4. Increase the use ofpclean, alternative energy investing in "green tags", advocating for the of development energy resources P renewable for ener , recovering landfill methane qy production, and supporting the use of waste to energy technology; 5. Make energy efficiency Y a priority through buildings retrofitting energyh efficient lighting city urging employees to and money; conserve energy and save 6. Purchase only Energy appliances for Cityuse;ar S equipment and 7. Practice and }' promote sustainable building practices using the U.S. Green Building Council's LEED program or 8. Increase the avera fuel efficia similar system; of municipal fleet vehicles; reduceethency nmbe vehicles; launch an employee education r of including anti -idling program vehicles to bio-diesel; convert diesel 9. Evaluate opportunities to increase pum efficiency in water and wastewater systems; P recover wastewater treatment methane for energy production; 10. Increase recycling rates in City operations and in the community; 11.Maintain healthy urban forests planting to increase shading � promote tree and and to absorb CO2; 12. Help educate the public, schools, other jurisdictions, professional associations, business and industry about reducing global warming pollution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT of RESOLVED that The U.S. Conferenceteto A Mayors endorses the U.S. Agreement as amended by Mayors Climate Pro Conference of Mayors meeting the 73 around the nation to and urges mayors from U.S. join this effort. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED will work , The U.S. Conference in conjunction with ICLEI °f Mayors for Sustainability and other Local Governments to track progress and im appropriate organizations Mayors Climate plementation of the Protection Agreement U.S. 73rd annual U.S. Conference of Ma as amended b Mayors meeting. Y the ,77 krmalnee (rInc.0 Des Tor Aesoorce=00c0ent Commun0t0es, wrktc 179g1] 1] by the Locb Goyernment c m0saflo no o m eed the way ifor the Smart Gr© h moyement and New tAilhan.0%mo penc00ft proyoce a bktepr0nt Vorr ted. o c coa0s to mate compact, m0 .©o-use,wakable, tra.nat-oroont l dew -men-00,n op-- men-00,n thee oca commun0t0es. Ckdes and COMnt0 .S TAMS the rates o 0 ote tfroff7,0 to break the cyc e sprow)° N u ne the pew0y emerg0 ° d.o w towns across the natoon k00'f ofpeopfeoact0v0t0m and groat ub o l Ahwah . Prt c0p0 o� athona c h oc that's 'g the S0nco then, tics Qhwahnet Pr0ncop es for Ecooroc D op ent 0n '0997 and the Ahwahnee Water Rindp0es 0012065 haw. been dew aped to comp0emcnt th0s p0onevr0ng 0s0on° lh AD'(M°A' 1rA' knoS'AIJOS°0 ara C�I'/iC° %Immo (I A° Cafkg Men Ong WO) dkomftrl1�1 rcz,r;',),14;ACT The Ahwahnee Principles Preamble Existing patterns of urban and suburban development seri- ously impair our quality of life. The symptoms are: more congestion and air pollution resulting from our increased depend- ence on automo- biles, the loss of precious open space, the need for costly improvements to roads and public services, the inequitable distribu- tion of economic resources, and the loss of a sense of community. By drawing upon the best from the past and the pres- ent, we can plan communities that will more successfully serve the needs of those who live and work within them. Such planning should adhere to certain fundamental principles. K'. Community:•Princi 1 All planning should be in the form of complete and;integrates,, communities containing housing, shops, work places, schools,., -„ parks and civic facilities essential to the daily life of the, residents;,r' 2 Community size should be designed so that housing, ' jnhs, daily needs and other activities are within easy;: walking distance of each other. 3 As many activities as possible should be located within easy walking distance of transit stops. 4 A community should contain a diversity of housing.,:.. types to enable citizens from a wide range of economic levels and age groups to live withiirr its boundaries. 5 Businesses within the community should provide d range ofjob types for the com:munity's residents. 6 The location and character of tfcrcommunity should Lie consistent with a larger transit network. 7 The community should have a center focus that, :combines commercial; civic, cultural,ai rd re. rr- itinhal uses. Regional Principles 1 The regional land use planning structure should be integrated within a larger transportation network built around transit rather than freeways. 2 Regions should be bounded by and provide a continuous system of greenbelt/wildlife corridors to be determined by natural conditions. 3 Regional institutions al id services (government, stadiums, museums, etc.) should be located in the urban core. 4 Materials and methods of construction should be specific to the region, exhibiting continuity of history and culture and compatibility with the climate to encourage the development of local character and community identity. • ?©DI ]q'@©LS11QQ=aNalQfiQ C@MEMOO 8 The community should contain an ample supply,of specialized open space in the form of squares, greens:, and parks 'whose frequent use is encouraged through placement and design. 9 Public spaces should be designed to encourage the attention and. presence of people at all hours of the day and night. 10 Each community or cluster of communities should have a well defined edge; such as agricultural greenbelts or wildlife corridors, perma- nently protected from development. 11 Streets, pedestrian paths and bike paths should contribute to a system of fully connected and interesting routes to all destinations. Their design should encourage pedestrian and bicycle use by being small and spatially defined by buildings, trees and lighting; and by discouraging high-speed traffic. ft general Rather ernments should :lowing sou h Id take charge " ' - 6Q2? owth htquatiy princip es. Plans process updated r itk incorporate piecemeal process. redevelopment speci is a°option de ay. developed cag thro gh provided visual should specific mode s 12 Wherever possible, the natural terrain, drainage, and vegetation of the community sl wuld be preserved with superior examples contained within parks or greenbelts. 13 The community design should help conserve resources.and minimize waste. 14 Communities should provide for the efficient use of water through the use of natural drainage, drought tolerant landscaping and recycling. 15 The street orientation, the place- ment of buildings and the use of shading should contribute to the energy efficiency of the community. plans allowed prepared process should RD based co plying planning As. occur. MOAB participants proposals. l�l C 1991. Local Government Commission. Sacramento, CA 5 for •Economic Development s the smart -growth approaches to develop- ment began taking•root in the early 1990s, it became clear that a companion set of principles addressing°the-economic development aspects of creating more livable communities was also needed. The Ahwahnee Principles for Econoniic.Development were adopted in 1997, a half -dozen years following the establishment of the precepts for resource -efficient land use. ..Prosperity in the 21st century will be based on creating and maintaining a sustainable standard of living and a high quality of life for all. To meet this challenge, a new comprehensive model is emerging which embraces economic, social and environmental responsibility and recognizes the economic value of natural and human capital. 71. ❑ www.lgc.orglahwahnee/ecun_principles.html NPrincipleS Water - how we capture it, treat it, use it, control it, manage it and release it, - is vital to the 36 million people wl'&live in California and has a tremendous impact on our quality oflife, local budgets and day-to-day policy -making: Andas California adds another 12. million residents by 2030, water -resource challenges will be increasingly serious. Unless we locate new growth in the right places and develop it properly, the streams, rivers and lakes that receive runoff water vvill.become increasingly more polluted and the natural functions of watersheds that collect and cleanse our water supplies will diminish. Adopted in 2005, the 14 Ahwahnee Water Principles - identified by water experts at the federal, state and local levels as the. most effective and politically and economically viable least -cost options to help guide communities concerned about their future water supplies - can be grouped into four different categories: • 9 tf t` 41 ' 41I14/ Il , t," IV `3, 1 Growing in a water -wise manner. 2 Water -friendly neighborhood/site-scale planning and design strategies. 3 Water conservation approaches to make the most efficient use of our existing water supplies. 4 A -set of corollary guidelines that can help put these nine community principles into action through strategies for implementing pra tical steps to make the physical changes necessary to ensure water sustainability. The California State Water Resource Control Board now promotes tho principles and is using them as a way of prioritizing grants and -loans to local govern• ment. The,number of cities and counties adopting .these principles as policy is growing'every day. o www.lgc-orglahwahnee/h2o_principles.html editing+design: Dave Davis • Local Government Commission's Center for Livable Communities • 916 / 448-1198 • www.►gc.org u.: t_tties for climate protection 11/14/2007 08:3C I•C•L,E•I ICLEI worldwide member login US regional networks Local Governments for Sustainability._ ;s `� Exhibit 4 Programs� Cities for Climate Protection 11 .410 Soitvicas 'Nows $.: E3ants Contact Us how t itom 1 participan FA�s ants I pin us 1 ro ects 1 rest 1 Cities for Climate Protection® (CCP) is ICLEI's flagship campaign. The program is designed to educate and empower local governments worldwide to take action on climate change. CCP is a performance -oriented campaign that offers a framework for local governments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve livability within their municipalities. ICLEI's CCP Campaign was launched in 1993 when municipal leaders, invited by ICLEI, met at the United Nations in New York and adopted a declaration that called for the establishment of a worldwide movement of local governments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve air quality, and enhance urban sustainability. The CCP Campaign achieves these results by linking 1 climate change mitigation with actions that improve local air quality, reduce local governments' operating costs, and address other existing municipal concerns. The US CCP Campaign seeks to achieve significant reductions in US domestic greenhouse gas emissions by assisting local governments in taking action to reduce emissions and realize multiple benefits for their communities. Strategic Approach ICLEI uses the performance -oriented framework and methodology of the CCP Campaign's 55 Milestones to assist US local governments in developing and implementing harmonized local approaches for reducing global warming and air pollution emissions, with the additional benefit of improving community livability. CCP Funders The Cities for Climate Protection campaign in the US is supported 1 by the following foundations and agencies: • Alameda Count Waste Mana ement Authorit • Bullitt Foundation • Emily Hall Tremaine Foundation • Mann Communit Foundation • New York Communit Trust • Rockefeller Brothers Fund • Scherman Foundation • US Environmental Protection A enc State and Local Capacity Buildino Branch • US Environmental Protection A enc . ENERGY STAR • US -Japan Foundation http://www.iclei.org/index.php?id=1118 Search Search now! Page 1 of 2 ua: Liries ror climate protection 11/14/2007 08:30 / CCP Partners ICLEI strengthens the service it provides its members and campaign participants through strategic partnerships with the following organizations: • Clean Air -Cool Planet • Intertribal Council On Utilit Polic Intertribal COUP • The Climate Grouo • US Environmental Protection A enc ENERGY STAR ICLEI USA PrivaclLPolicv CoovriQht 8 Photo Credits © ICLEI 1995-2007. All rights reserved. Web site by LUCITA http://www.iclei.org/index.php?id=1118 Page 2 of 2 It-Lt1 US: how it works ,I.C•L E•1 USA Home ICLEI worldwide member login US regional networks Local Governments fo•r Sustainability — l! :tea About ICLEI Members Supporters Progroms CCP: How it works 11/14/2007 08:28. Services News,&\Events Contact Us CCP ome I Particioantc -----_ 1 oin us l ro a j§. I resources 1 FAQ§ Once cities join ICLEI-US and make the commitment to participate in the CCP Campaign, ICLEI provides experienced staff, software tools, and a wide variety of programs and technical assistance to help local governments reduce greenhouse gas emissions in an effective, efficient manner. Benefits of Participation ICLEI provides local governments that participate in the CCP Campaign with access to the following resources: • Software products and associated training to assist with the quantification of greenhouse gas reductions and other benefits of climate protection planning. • Access to a professional network of peers through listservs, newsletters, conferences, and workshops. • Toolkits, online resources, case studies, fact sheets, policy and practice manuals, and guides on approaches that other local governments have successfully used to reduce greenhouse gases. • Training workshops for staff and elected officials on how to develop and implement effective long-term emission reduction strategies. • Technical assistance in designing and implementing actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. • Notification of relevant grant opportunities. • Assistance in publicizing local climate protection successes. In addition, the communities that participate in CCP also benefit from the actions that they take to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through: • Financial savings in reduced utility and fuel costs to the local government, households, and businesses. • Improved local air quality, contributing to the general health and well being of the community. • Economic development and new local jobs as investments in locally produced energy products and services keep money circulating in the local economy. Getting Started Local governments begin participating in the CCP Campaign by passing a resolution pledging to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from their local government operations and throughout their communities. Each local government sets its own emission http://www.iclei.org/index.php?id=1120#milestones Search Search now! Page 1 of 3 ILLci uy now it works reduction ta and develops a Local Action Plan outlining actions that the city will pursue to meet its target. After passing the resolution, the local government designates a staff member and an elected official to serve as the city's liaisons to ICLEI. The liaisons then receive welcome packets from ICLEI that include a detailed Toolkit. This toolkit leads the local government staff person step-by-step through the 5 Milestone process. The 5 Milestones The methodology underlying the 5. Milestones of the CCP Campaign provides a simple, standardized means of calculating greenhouse gas emissions, of establishing targets to lower emissions, of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and of monitoring, measuring and reporting performance. ICLEI has developed a software tool that helps cities comply with the methodology. The 5 milestones are: 1. Conduct a baseline emissions inventory and forecast. Based on energy and waste data, the city calculates greenhouse gas emissions for a base year (e.g., 2000) and for a forecast year (e.g., 2015). The inventory and the forecast capture emissions from all municipal operations (e.g., city owned and/or operated buildings, streetlights, transit systems, wastewater treatment facilities) and from all community - related activities (e.g., residential and commercial buildings, motor vehicles, waste streams, industry). The inventory and forecast provide a benchmark against which the city can measure progress. 2. Adopt an emissions reduction target for the forecast year. The city passes a council resolution establishing an emission reduction target for the city. The target is essential both to foster political will and to create a framework to guide the planning and implementation of measures. 3. Develop a Local Action Plan. The local government develops a Local Action Plan that describes or lists the policies and measures that the local government will take to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and achieve its emissions reduction target. Most plans include a timeline, a description of financing mechanisms, and an assignment of responsibility to departments and staff. In addition to direct greenhouse gas reduction measures, most plans also incorporate public awareness and education efforts. The development of the Local Action Plan should include strong public input and involvement in order to build the consensus among stakeholders required to implement measures. 4. Implement policies and measures. The city implements the policies and measures contained in their Local Action Plan. Typical policies and measures implemented by CCP participants include energy efficiency improvements to municipal buildings and water treatment facilities, streetlight retrofits, public transit improvements, installation of renewable power applications, and methane recovery from waste management. 5. Monitor and verify results. Monitoring and verifying progress on the implementation of measures to reduce or avoid greenhouse gas emissions is an ongoing process. Monitoring begins once measures are implemented and continues for the life of the measures, providing important feedback that http://www.iclei.org/index.php?id=1120#milestones 11/14/2007 08:28 Page 2 of 3 ICLEI US: how it works 11/14/2007 08:28 A can be to improve the measures over time. ICLEI s software provides a -uniform methodology for cities to report on measures. Technical Assistance ICLEI provides cities that participate in the CCP Campaign with a range of technical assistance. Some of the assistance is available for free to participating local governments. Other assistance is available for hire from ICLEI. In general, ICLEI offers assistance in four discrete categories. • Inventory Assistance. ICLEI can assist local governments in conducting their baseline emission inventories and their emission forecasts, helping the city understand how and from whom to collect the necessary data. Alternatively, ICLEI can conduct the entire inventory and forecast on behalf of the city, presenting the results to city staff, elected officials and the community as and when requested by the city. If you would like assistance with conducting your inventory, please contact us. • Measures Identification and Quantification Assistance. ICLEI can assist local governments in identifying potential measures that the city can take to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. ICLEI can also help the city quantify the emission reductions and other benefits (financial, quality of life) from the full range of possible policies and measures. If you would like assistance in identifying measures or quantifying the impact of measures, please contact us. • Policy Assistance. ICLEI provides case studies, fact sheets, agenda reports, sample resolutions, policy frameworks, model ordinance language, and links to key technical information that can assist local governments implement a wide range of measures. Check out the Tools section for more details. • Software Assistance. ICLEI can answer most of your questions regarding the use of the CACP software. If ICLEI cannot answer your question, we will refer you to the developer of the software. ICLEI USA Erivac ij Coovriaht 8 Photo Creditc © ICLEI 1995-2007. All rights reserved. Web site by L CITA http://www.iclel.org/index.php?id=1120#milestones cij Page 3 of 3 lmenrpmrm,rd September 18, 1957 Staff Report City of Rolling Hills Estates DATE: SEPTEMBER 27, 2005 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: NIKI CUTLER, SENIOR PLANNER SUBJECT: GREEN BUILDING RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS OVERVIEW The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of research into green buildings and discuss policy issues for further consideration. BACKGROUND Pursuant to City Council request, staff has researched green building standards to deter how they may apply in the City. Accordingly, the discussion below provides a general research summary and issues for City Council consideration. mine DISCUSSION The United States Green Building Council (USGBC) is a coalition of building indu representatives working to promote buildings that are environmental)y responsible btry and healthy places to live and work. Members of the USGBC developed the LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Green Building Rating System as a vol 'profitable, based national standard for developing high-performance, sustainable buildings. For auntary, consensus - e projects can be submitted for LEED review to determine their certification level which ranges from "certified" to "platinum" depending on the type and number of sustainable elements incorporated into the project. g s At the state level, Governor Schwarzenegger issued Executive Order S-20-04 in December 2004 which requires the implementation of more energy efficient measures for state-ownof ed buildings. Among other requirements, all new and renovated state buildings are required e uire achieve at least a Silver LEED certification. Also, more stringent requirements have been added to Title 24 of the Energy Code including standards for installation of "cool" roofs (which are more reflective and reduce HVAC usage) in some commercial construction. Thus, it appears that some green building elements are being incorporated into general construction requirements, and it is possible that further requirements could be incorporated in the future. Several local jurisdictions nationwide have established green building ordinances/guidelines new construction. Most of the jurisdictions that have adopted green building ordinances/guidelines appear g es for to be large to mid -sized (i.e., Chicago, Portland, Los Angeles, Oakland, Scottsdale, Santa Monica). In addition, many apply only to municipal construction although some jursdictionsbu(i Calabasas,ordinancesappear t nPleasa to on, 1 and Austin) apply green building standards to commercial development. Most jurisdictions do not appear to require green development of residential uses; however, Boulder, CO requires new residential construction or additions over 500 square feet to comply with the city - established green points program. No other cities on the Palos Verdes Peninsula are pursuing green building ordinances/guidelines at this time. Should the City Council desire to establish a green building ordinance/guidelines, some policy decisions should be considered including those described below. • A determination would need to be made regarding whether the City would establish an ordinance or voluntary guidelines for green construction. If guidelines were established, it may be beneficial to establish incentives for utilization of the green guidelines. Incentives other jurisdictions use include density bonuses, reduced development fees, rebate programs, and preferential building permit review. • A determination would need to be made regarding whether the ordinance/guidelines would apply to municipal, commercial, or residential construction, or some combination thereof. As mentioned previously, most jurisdictions do not have requirements for residential construction. Alameda County, Santa Monica, and Santa Barbara County do have residential guidelines for building green. It may be possible to establish green building requirements/guidelines in the City's commercial district although it may be beneficial to undertake a cost/benefit analysis to determine potential impacts to developers. Green building requirements for municipal buildings may also be considered to apply to future construction of municipal stables, City Hall, park, or other public facilities. Park and Activities Commissioner Deborah Davis provided the City with an analysis of the construction of municipal stables pursuant to LEED requirements late last year. Also, Alameda County in northern California has developed a Civic Green Building Model Ordinance which is included as Attachment 1 herein for your reference. • If an ordinance were established which requires LEED certification of buildings, the desired certification level and threshold for ordinance applicability would need to be established. For instance, the ordinance in Oakland applies to municipal improvement projects valued at over $3 million and requires LEED Silver certification. • Implementation of the City's green building program be considered. Either the City would need to designate andtrain a staff membersoneed o totprovide technical assistance and administer the City's program, or consultant services may be required. Several jurisdictions established task forces to consider and develop guidelines/ordinances. This may be beneficial for the City to bring City Hall staff, Los Angeles County Building Department and Public Works staff, representatives from service providers, and the community together to develop an ordinance/guidelines, discuss implementation, and identify potential incentives that could be provided to developers. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council discuss issues related to green buildings and provide staff with further direction. EXHIBITS Attached 1. Alameda County — Civic Green Building Model Ordinance cm.9.27.05.doc 2 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: OVERVIEW Staff Report City of Rolling Hills Estates MAY 9, 2006 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL NIKI CUTLER, SENIOR PLANNER GREEN BUILDING REPORT AND UPDATE consideration of the City Council. related to green buildings purpose of this report is to provide further information ings for the BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION At the last City Council meeting, the Council discussed green building issues and di to continue green building research. It was discussed that guidelines for residential and staff mixed - use construction are desired, and there was interest in programs/rebates offered by utility companies. Since the last meeting, staff has contacted staff from the City o and nica to discuss their green building program, tility researched the Build It Green organization as discussed below, and further researched Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design programs. Furthermore, staff attempted to contact a consultant representative from Ken Associates to discuss green building alternatives. As of this writing, staff w (Leach consultant staff, but additional information may be available prior to the Council as unable to reach Kay This report provides further discussion of green building options for single - in I - meeting. famiprojects, discusses utility company programs/rebates, and further ds cus es the d mixed-usehwahnee Principles as provided at the last meeting. Ahwahnee Sin le-Famil Residential Develo ment For consideration of the Council, the previous staff California Green Builder (CGB) Program. Created program provides for voluntary review of production stringent green building guidelines. report provided information related to the by the Building Industry Association, this single family residences for adherence to In addition to the CGB Program, Build It Green has developed New Home Cons Building Guidelines that are applicable to developers and builders as well as individual owners. Build It Green is a professional non-profit membership organization Construction Green to promote healthy, energy and resource -efficient buildings in California. home • adapted from the Alameda County New Home Construction Greeng zation whose mission is were first developed in 2000 through a collaborative efforts among niaThe guidelines are experts, and e ne2000 stuff. The guidelines o Building Guidelines which a builders, green building establish a voluntary "green points" 2. program wherein users can judge the level of green components incorporated in their project. The guidelines comprehensively address many aspects of construction includi ng: 9 • site considerations; • landscaping; • foundation; • structural frame; • exterior finish; • plumbing; • appliances; • insulation; • heating, ventilation and air conditioning; • building performance; • renewable energy; • finishes; and • flooring. It is staffs understanding that the Build It Green guidelines can be adapted into comprehensive set of voluntary guidelines that could be adopted by the City. These guidelines are included herein as Attachment 1 for consideration of the Council. Mixed -Use Development Staff has further researched LEED programs to determine how mixed -use projects may addressed. As the Council may recall, the LEED Green Building Rating System is a voluntary,be consensus -based national standard for developing high-performance, sustainable buildings. For a fee, projects can be submitted for LEED review to determine their certification level. he LEED- New Construction (LEED-NC) g elements are incorporated into future mixed-usex projects.be used to ensure that green building Submittal to LEED would be voluntary by builders. The LEED cost for design review ranges from approximately $2,000 to $13,000 depending on size of building and LEED g green buildings bymember hip status. Further, construction review costs range from $500 to $5,000 for LEED mem addition, there can be a "first cost" to developers for incorporating green components in design. hers. . In a report to California's Sustainable Building Task Force entitled The Costs and Fina Benefits of Green Buildings, it is estimated that the first cost of developing s by developers is about 2% above standard construction costs (see Attachment 2 for report's Executive Summary). Over time, however, it is concluded that these costs are exceede savings due to energy efficient design. d by by Should the City chose to encourage LEED certification, establishing builder incentives m desirable. The City of Santa Monica, for instance, provides expedited building ay be processing for projects applying for LEED certification. It can be noted that the services of W Ci ty cost, staff lldan are used for the processing of mixed -use projects. For a nominal fee at permit could work with Wlldan to ensure that these projects are expedited through building plan the Other incentive options that the City could consider include: ck. • Local funding sources — Some cities establish grant programs to assist developers with initial green building costs, LEED certification process fees, etc. For instance, the City of Santa Monica provides $20,000 to $35,000 for projects applying for LEED certification cation from user utility taxes. • Other financial incentives — Another option that may be considered is the reduction of building permit fees for projects applying for LEED certification. Should the Council desire, staff can pursue research related to impacts to the City for reduced permit fees. 2 • Publicity — Buildings,applying.for LEED certification could be profiled in the City newsletter and in local media press .releases, and flyers about the projects could be created with availability at City Hall and "on' our website. Utility Company Programs/Rebates Staff researched Southern California Edison, California Water Company, and Southern California Gas Company to determine programs/rebates available which are included as Attachment 3. Many of these programs/rebates apply to the purchase of energy efficient appliances for homes and businesses. As mentioned in the last staff report, staff will continue to publicize these programs/rebates in the City newsletter as appropriate at City Hall. Links from our website to utility company websites where the programs are profiled could also be provided. Ahwahnee Principles With the last staff report, staff provided the Ahwahnee Water Principles for Resource Efficient Land Use and Resource Efficient Communities. If desired by the Council, these principles could be adopted by the Council. Developers could then be provided these principles in conjunction with review of development proposals. The principles could also be posted on our website with any other green building information adopted by the Council. Furthermore, the principles could also be considered for incorporation into the General Plan when it is next updated. CONCLUSION It is staffs understanding that the Council would like to encourage the incorporation of green building components into single-family homes and mixed -use projects in the City. Staff has found that production single-family homes can be addressed by the California Green Builder Program. Residential development guidelines can be adapted from Build It Green for single- family home remodels and new construction. Mixed -use projects can be encouraged to apply for LEED certification under the LEED-NC program. Incentives for LEED certification could include expedited permit processing, local funding sources, other financial incentives, and publicity. In addition, the Ahwahnee Principles could be adopted by the Council to further encourage green development with ultimate incorporation into the General Plan. Any green program established by the City could be advertised on the City website accompanied by links to programs/rebates available through various utility companies. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council discuss these and other green building issues and provide staff with further direction. EXHIBITS Attached 1. New Home Construction Green Building Guidelines 2. Executive Summary - The Costs and Financial Benefits of Green Buildings 3. Utility Company Programs/Rebates cm.5.9.06.doc new logo 3 Staff Report City of Rolling Hills Estates DATE: JUNE 13, 2006 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: NIKI CUTLER, SENIOR PLANNER SUBJECT: GREEN BUILDING REPORT AND UPDATE OVERVIEW The purpose of this report is to summarize City Council actions related to green building discussions and to transmit associated resolutions. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION At the last City Council meeting, the Council reviewed further information related to green buildings and discussed options for the City. The City Council directed staff to: 1. Prepare a resolution adopting the Alameda County New Home Construction Green Building Guidelines as a City reference document; 2. Encourage residential and mixed -use construction projects to use the LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Green Building Rating System; and 3. Prepare a resolution adopting the Ahwahnee Principles. Resolution No. 2103 is included as Attachment 1 for the adoption of the Alameda County New Home Construction Green Building Guidelines as a City reference document. Further, the resolution encourages construction projects in the City to apply for LEED Home and New Construction certification. Attachment 2 provides Resolution No. 2104 for the adoption of the Ahwahnee Water Principles for Resource -Efficient Land Use. It can be noted that alternate Ahwahnee Principles for Resource -Efficient Communities and Economic Development also exist (see Attachment 3). In the context of the discussion at the last meeting, staff believes the City Council would like to adopt the Water Principles for Resource -Efficient Land Use as included in Resolution No. 2104. In addition, if the Council desires, staff can also prepare resolutions adopting the principles for Resource -Efficient Communities and Economic Development. At the last meeting, Council also asked that staff include some energy efficiency information in the summer newsletter. While there was no room remaining in the summer newsletter, staff would like to note that it will provide this information in the fall newsletter. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution Nos. 2103 and 2104. EXHIBITS Attached 1. Resolution No. 2103 2. Resolution No. 2104 3. Ahwahnee Principles for Resource -Efficient Communities and Economic Development cm.6.13.06.doc CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTATES LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. 2103 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTATES, ADOPTING THE ALAMEDA COUNTY NEW HOME CONSTRUCTION GREEN BUILDING GUIDELINES FOR NEW HOME CONSTRUCTION AS A CITY REFERENCE DOCUMENT AND ENCOURAGING THE USE OF THE LEED (LEADERSHIP IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN) GREEN BUILDING RATING SYSTEM® FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY WHEREAS, the City of Rolling Hills Estates' General Plan sets forth goals for preserving and improving the City's natural and built environment, protecting the health of its residents and visitors, and fostering its economy; and WHEREAS, green building is a whole systems approach to the design, construction, and operation of buildings, which employs materials and methods that promote natural resource conservation, energy and water efficiency, and good indoor air quality; and WHEREAS, green buildings benefit building industry professionals, residents and communities by improving construction • quality, increasing building durability, reducing utility, maintenance, water and energy costs, creating healthier homes, and enhancing comfort and livability; and WHEREAS, in recent years, green building design, construction, and operational techniques have become increasingly widespread in California and the nation, with many homeowners, businesses, and building professionals voluntarily seeking to incorporate green building techniques into their projects; and WHEREAS, the Alameda County Waste Management Authority had developed a series of voluntary guidelines designed specifically for the residential building industry including the New Home Construction Green Building Guidelines that provide helpful and valuable guidance for applying these techniques to residential building projects; and WHEREAS, the practices contained in the Alameda County New Home Construction Green Building Guidelines were selected for their viability in today's market and their ability to promote sustainable buildings and communities; and WHEREAS, a number of cities and counties throughout California have used these guidelines; and WHEREAS, the adoption of the Alameda County New Home Construction Green Building Guidelines as a reference document would not constitute a "project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Act; and WHEREAS, the LEED (Leadership In Energy And Environmental Design) Green Building Rating System® Vies' established by the- United- States Green Building Council as a voluntary, consensus -based national standard for developing high-performance, sustainable buildings; and WHEREAS, LEED was created to define "green building" by establishing a common standard of measurement, promote integrated and whole -building design practices, recognize environmental leadership in the building industry, stimulate green competition, raise consumer awareness of green building benefits, and transform the building market; and WHEREAS, LEED for Homes (LEED-H) is currently a pilot program which serves as a voluntary initiative promoting the transformation of the mainstream home building industry towards more sustainable practices; and WHEREAS, LEED for New Construction and Major Renovations (LEED-NC) is a green building rating system that was designed to guide and distinguish high-performance commercial and institutional projects; and Resolution No. 2103 June 13, 2006 NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills Estates does hereby adopt the Alameda County New Home Construction Green Building Guidelines incorporated herein by reference, as they may be amended from time to time, as a City reference document and that private residential developers should be encouraged to use these green building guidelines in the design, construction and operation whenever feasible. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills Estates does hereby encourage residential projects to apply for LEED-H certification when available and for projects in the City's mixed -use areas to apply for LEED-NC certification. As an incentive for applying, the City shall, to the extent possible, expedite the issuance of building permits for the associated project as well as provide positive exposure of the project on the City's website and in the City's newsletter. SECTION 1. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall keep a copy of same with such other documents and records of proceedings as may be designated by the City Manager. ADOPTED this 13`" day of June, 2006. STEVEN ZUCKERMAN, MAYOR ATTEST: DOUGLAS R. PRICHARD, CITY CLERK I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 2103 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills Estates at a regular meeting held thereof on the 13"' day of June, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DOUGLAS R. PRICHARD, CITY CLERK Resolution No. 2103 June 13, 2006 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTATES LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. 2104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTATES, ADOPTING THE AHWAHNEE WATER PRINCIPLES FOR RESOURCE -EFFICIENT LAND USE WHEREAS, cities are facing major challenges with water contamination, storm water runoff, flood damage liability, and concerns about whether there will be enough reliable water for current residents as well as for new development, issues that impact city budgets and taxpayers; and WHEREAS, land use decisions made at the local level have major impacts on local, regional, and state water resources in terms of quality, quantity, and availability; and WHEREAS, the Local Government Commission, in partnership with the League of California Cities and the California State Association of Counties, sought funding from the State Water Resources Control Board to develop principles related to water efficiency and land use; and WHEREAS, the Local Government Commission developed a set of principles known as the Ahwanhee Water Principles for Resource -Efficient Land Use which provide the opportunity to reduce costs and improve the reliability and quality of our water resources, and which complement the earlier Ahwahnee Principles for Resource -Efficient Communities; and WHEREAS, the General Assembly of the League of California Cities assembled in Annual Conference in San Francisco, October 8, 2005, that the League encourages its member cities to consider the Ahwahnee Water Principles for Resource -Efficient Land Use and encourages the use of the Principles in future land use decisions; and NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills Estates does hereby adopt the Ahwahnee Water Principles for Resource -Efficient Land Use as follows: Preamble Cities and counties are facing major challenges with water contamination, storm water runoff, flood damage liability, and concerns about whether there will be enough reliable water for current residents as well as for new development. These issues impact city and county budgets and taxpayers. Fortunately there are a number of stewardship actions that cities and counties can take that reduce costs and improve the reliability and quality of our water resources. The Water Principles below complement the Ahwahnee Principles for Resource -Efficient Communities that were developed in 1991. Many cities and counties are already using them to improve the vitality and prosperity of their communities. Community Principles 1. Community design should be compact, mixed use, walkable and transit -oriented so that automobile -generated urban runoff pollutants are minimized and the open lands that absorb water are preserved to the maximum extent possible. (See the Ahwahnee Principles for Resource -Efficient Communities). 2. Natural resources such as wetlands, flood plains, recharge zones, riparian areas, open space, and native habitats should be identified, preserved and restored as valued assets for flood protection, water quality improvement, groundwater recharge, habitat, and overall long-term water resource sustainability. 3. Water holding areas such as creek beds, recessed athletic fields, ponds, cisterns, and other features that serve to recharge groundwater, reduce runoff, improve water quality and decrease flooding should be incorporated into the urban landscape. 4. All aspects of landscaping from the selection of plants to soil preparation and the installation of irrigation systems should be designed to reduce water demand, retain runoff, decrease flooding, and recharge groundwater. 5. Permeable surfaces should be used for hardscape. Impervious surfaces such as driveways, streets, and parking lots should be minimized so that land is available to absorb storm water, reduce polluted urban runoff, recharge groundwater and reduce flooding. Resolution No. 2104 June 13, 2006 6. Dual plumbing that allows graywater from showers, sinks and washers to be reused for landscape irrigation should be included in the infrastructure of new development. 7. Community design should maximize the use of recycled water for appropriate applications including outdoor irrigation, toilet flushing, and commercial and industrial processes. Purple pipe should be installed in all new construction and remodeled buildings in anticipation of the future availability of recycled water. 8. Urban water conservation technologies such as low -flow toilets, efficient clothes washers, and more efficient water -using industrial equipment should be incorporated in all new construction and retrofitted in remodeled buildings. 9. Ground water treatment and brackish water desalination should be pursued when necessary to maximize locally available, drought -proof water supplies. Implementation Principles 1. Water supply agencies should be consulted early in the land use decision -making process regarding technology, demographics and growth projections. 2. City and county officials, the watershed council, LAFCO, special districts and other stakeholders sharing watersheds should collaborate to take advantage of the benefits and synergies of water resource planning at a watershed level. 3. The best, multi -benefit and integrated strategies and projects should be identified and implemented before less integrated proposals, unless urgency demands otherwise. 4. From start to finish, projects and programs should involve the public, build relationships, and increase the sharing of and access to information. 5. Plans, programs, projects and policies should be monitored and evaluated to determine if the expected results are achieved and to improve future practices. SECTION 1. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall keep a copy of same with such other documents and records of proceedings as may be designated by the City Manager. ADOPTED this 13'" day of June, 2006. STEVEN ZUCKERMAN, MAYOR ATTEST: DOUGLAS R. PRICHARD, CITY CLERK I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 2104 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills Estates at a regular meeting held thereof on the 13th day of June, 2006, by the following vote: AYES:.. NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DOUGLAS R. PRICHARD, CITY CLERK Resolution No. 2104 June 13, 2006 Staff Report City of Rolling Hills Estates DATE: MARCH 27, 2007 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: KELLEY THOM, ASSOCIATE PLANNER SUBJECT: COOL CITIES REPORT AND UPDATE OVERVIEW The purpose of this report is to provide further information related to the "Cool Cities" campaign for the consideration of the City Council. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION Mayor Seamans and resident Barbara Epstein have suggested that the City consider joining a nation-wide movement to help ease pollution and the effects of global warming by becoming a "Cool City". As such, staff has compiled this report and reference material for the Council's review. With the scientific community concluding that burning fossil fuels increases the global temperatures and that delaying action will increase the risk of adverse environmental effects, the "Cool Cities" campaign which was initiated by Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels, has been developed for citizens and local officials to participate in reducing energy waste and heat - trapping global warming pollution in their cities. Attachment 1 provides a resource guide; -"Cool Cities: Solving Global Warming One City at a Time," which was prepared by the Sierra Club. The report presents global warming solutions that many cities across the United States have already adopted and outlines strategies including using cleaner vehicles, being more energy efficient, and using renewable energy. Within these strategies, the guide provides various solutions and city case -studies with web links to learn more. In addition, to help ensure participating cities are living up to the "Cool Cities" goals, four milestones to be met have been identified as follows (see Attachment 2): • Milestone #1: Establish Cool Cities Campaign • Milestone #2: Engage the Community • Milestone #3: City Signs the U.S. Mayor's Climate Protection Agreement • Milestone #4: Implementing Smart Energy Solutions Under milestones #1 and #2, the City would have an established group of local citizens who are committed to reducing global emissions in their city, including writing letters to the Mayor, talking with neighbors, raising the issue with the media, and generating support for local action. Barbara Epstein, who is also an active member of the Environmental Priorities Network (EPN), has written two letters to the City Council and provided information on global warming consequences and solutions (see Attachment 3). Under milestone #3, the Mayor would sign the U.S. Mayor's Climate Protection Agreement (see Attachment 4). This would commit the City to reducing its global warming emissions 7% below the 1990 levels by 2012 through actions such as increasing energy efficiency, and promoting use of clean and renewable energy resources. Examples of solutions the City could implement include "greening" their fleets with hybrid gas -electric and other vehicles that go farther on a gallon of gas, and upgrading the lighting in existing buildings to be more energy efficient and reduce global warming pollution. Also provided is a list of the California cities whose Mayors have signed this agreement (see Attachment 5) and the "Cool Cities" profile for Seattle, Washington (see Attachment 6). Finally, milestone #4 focuses on the City's commitment to taking action. At this stage, the City would adopt policies that reduce global warming emissions, lower energy bills, and make the City a cleaner place to live. In order to achieve this last milestone, the City would need to conduct a Global Warming Emissions Inventory, create a solutions plan, and implement and monitor progress. These steps would identify the City's major CO2 sources (and opportunities for reductions), provide a baseline to assess progress, develop a solutions plan to reduce emissions, and put the plan into action with periodic monitoring. It should be noted that a Global Warming Emissions Inventory would require the expertise of a consultant and would be at -cost to the City. Staff will continue to research potential funding options, including Federal grant monies, and report back to the Council at a future date CONCLUSION Staff believes that the "Cool Cities" campaign is compatible with the City's commitment to resource efficient 'green' design and recognizes that there is a growing consensus in the community for the City to be more environmentally pro -active. Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council direct staff to prepare a resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign the U.S. Mayor's Climate Protection Agreement and take the first step to becoming a "Cool City." RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council direct staff to prepare a resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign the U.S. Mayor's Climate Protection Agreement. EXHIBITS Attached 1. "Cool Cities", Sierra Club's Guide to Local Global Warming Solutions 2. "Cool Cities" Milestones 3. Letters and global warming information from Barbara Epstein 4. U.S. Conference of Mayor's Climate Protection Agreement, including Letter to Mayor, Draft Resolution, Signature Page and Contact Information 5. Sierra Club's list of California Cities 6. "Cool Cities" Profile for Seattle, Washington cm.3.27.07.doc 0 2 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTATES LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. 2124 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTATES, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE U.S. MAYORS CLIMATE PROTECTION AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the U.S. Conference of Mayors has previously adopted strong policy resolutions calling for cities, communities and the federal government to take actions to reduce global warming pollution; and WHEREAS, the inter -Governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the international community's most respected assemblage of scientists, is clear that there is no longer any credible doubt that climate disruption is a reality and that human activities are largely responsible for increasing concentrations of global warming pollution; and WHEREAS, recent, well -documented impacts of climate disruption include average global sea level increases of four to eight inches during the 20th century; a 40% decline in Arctic sea -ice thickness; and nine of the ten hottest years on record occurring in the past decade; and WHEREAS, climate disruption of the magnitude now predicted by the scientific community will cause extremely costly disruption of human and natural systems throughout the world including: increased risk of floods or droughts; sea -level rises that interact with coastal storms to erode beaches, inundate land, and damage structures; more frequent and extreme heat waves, more frequent and greater concentrations of smog; and WHEREAS, on February 16, 2005, the Kyoto Protocol, an international agreement to address climate disruption, entered into force in the one hundred and forty-one countries that have ratified it to date; thirty-eight of those countries are now legally required to reduce greenhouse gas emissions on average 5.2 percent below 1990 levels by 2012; and WHEREAS, the United States of America, with less than five percent of the world's population, is responsible for producing approximately'25%`of the world's global warming pollutants yet is not a party to the Kyoto Protocol; and ,., s WHEREAS, the Kyoto Protocol emissions reduction target for the U.S., had it ratified the treaty, would have been 7% below 1990 levels by 2012; and WHEREAS, many leading U.S. companies that have adopted greenhouse gas reduction programs to demonstrate corporate social responsibility have also publicly expressed preference for the U.S. to adopt precise and mandatory emissions targets and timetables as a means by which to remain competitive in the international marketplace, to mitigate financial risk and to promote sound investment decisions; and WHEREAS, state and local governments throughout the United States are adopting emission reduction targets and programs and that this leadership is bipartisan, coming from Republican and Democratic governors and mayors alike; and Resolution No. 2124 April 10, 2007 CD_ WHEREAS, many cities throughout the nation, both large and small, are reducing global warming pollutants through programs that provide economic and quality of life benefits such as reduced energy bills, green space preservation, air quality improvements, reduced traffic congestion, improved transportation choices, and economic development and job creation through energy conservation and new energy technologies; and WHEREAS, mayors from around the nation have signed the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement (Exhibit A) which reads: The U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement A. We urge the federal government and state governments to enact policies and programs to meet or beat the Kyoto Protocol target of reducing global warming pollution levels to 7% below 1990 levels by 2012, including efforts to: reduce the United States' dependence on fossil fuels and accelerate the development of clean, economical energy resources and fuel -efficient technologies such as conservation, methane recovery for energy generation, wind and solar energy, fuel cells, efficient motor vehicles, and biofuels; B. We urge the U.S. Congress to pass the bipartisan Climate Stewardship Act sponsored by Senators McCain and Lieberman and Representatives Gilchrist and Olver, which would create a flexible, market -based system of tradable allowances among emitting industries; and C. We will strive to meet or exceed Kyoto Protocol targets for reducing global warming pollution by taking actions in our own operations and communities such as: 1. Inventory global warming emissions in City operations and in the community, set reduction targets and create an action plan; 2. Adopt and enforce land -use policies that reduce sprawl, preserve open space, and create compact, walkable urban communities; 3. Promote transportation options such as bicycle trails, commute trip reduction programs, incentives for car pooling and public transit; 4. Increase the use of clean, alternative energy by, for example, investing in "green tags", advocating for the development of renewable energy resources, and recovering landfill methane for energy production; 5. Make energy efficiency a priority through building code improvements, retrofitting city facilities with energy efficient lighting and urging employees to conserve energy and save money; 6. Purchase only Energy Star equipment and appliances for City use; 7. Practice and promote sustainable building practices using the U.S. Green Building Council's LEED program or similar system; 8. Increase the average fuel efficiency of municipal fleet vehicles; reduce the number of vehicles; launch an employee education program including anti -idling messages; convert diesel vehicles to bio-diesel; 9. Evaluate opportunities to increase pump efficiency in water and wastewater systems; recover wastewater treatment methane for energy production; 10. Increase recycling rates in City operations and in the community; 11. Maintain healthy urban forests; promote tree planting to increase shading and to absorb CO2; and 12. Help educate the public, schools, other jurisdictions, professional associations, business and industry about reducing global warming pollution. Resolution No. 2124 April 10, 2007 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills Estates authorizes the Mayor to sign the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement Signature Page included herein as Exhibit A. SECTION 1. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall keep a copy of same with such other documents and records of proceedings as may be designated by the City Manager. ADOPTED this 10th day of April, 2007. SUSAN SEAMANS, MAYOR ATTEST: DOUGLAS R. PRICHARD, CITY CLERK I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 2124 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills Estates at a regular meeting held thereof on the 10th day of April, 2007, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DOUGLAS R. PRICHARD, CITY CLERK Resolution No. 2124 April 10, 2007 Staff Report DATE: OCTOBER 23, 2007 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: KELLEY THOM, ASSOCIATE PLANNER GREG GRAMMER, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND PARTICIPATION IN THE CLIMATE PROTECTION CAMPAIGN OVERVIEW The purpose of this report is to provide an update on the City's current sustainability programs and activities, and to provide further information related to developing an Environmental Advisory Committee and participating in "The Cities for Climate Protection Campaign" for the consideration of the City Council. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION On June 12, 2006, the City Council adopted two resolutions to encourage environmentally sensitive design within the City. Resolution No. 2103, adopted the Alameda County New Home Construction Green Building Guidelines as a City reference document. The guidelines summarize ways that sustainable design elements can be incorporated into single-family remodel or new construction projects and provides a self -tracking green points system to indicate the number and type of green elements that are utilized. The resolution further encourages larger residential new construction and mixed -use projects to apply for LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Green Building Rating System® national certification to recognize sustainable design elements. Resolution No. 2104, adopted the Ahwahnee Water Principles for Resource -Efficient Land Use. These principles indicate stewardship actions that cities and counties can take to reduce costs and improve the reliability and quality of our water resources. The City Council will remain cognizant of these principles in forming policies that affect water resources. On March 27, 2007, the City Council approved signing on the U.S. Mayor's Climate Protection Agreement, as part of the milestones of the "Cool Cities" campaign. This committed the City to reducing its global warming emissions through actions such as increasing energy efficiency, and promoting use of clean and renewable energy resources. This would also entail conducting a global emissions inventory, creating a solutions plan, implement and monitor progress. 05) On October 17, 2007, staff attended the South Bay Cities Green Building Task Force meeting, sponsored by the South Bay Cities Council of Governments and the South Bay Energy Savings Center, for the purpose of exchanging information between other South Bay cities. One of the issues discussed was conducting a global emissions inventory, as it is a key milestone of the U.S. Mayor's Climate Protection Agreement. Since the member cities in the South Bay region vary in size, demographics, and land - use, the discussion considered the feasibility of each city preparing its own global emissions inventory, or to work collectively with the other South Bay cities. Also mentioned was the organization, Local Governments for Sustainability (ICLEI), for technical assistance on the global emissions inventory. As an international membership association of local governments, ICLEI is dedicated to addressing environmental issues through local action, such as engaging communities in reducing the pollution that causes global warming through its hallmark program, "The Cities for Climate Protection" (CCP) Campaign. In addition, more than 250 cities, towns, and counties in the United States, and more than 770 communities worldwide, are ICLEI members and participate in the CCP Campaign. A city can participate in the CCP Campaign by joining ICLEI and adopting a resolution or by making an executive proclamation that commits to reducing local emissions that contribute to global warming. The process consists of five milestones: 1. Conduct a local emissions inventory and forecast of greenhouse gas emissions 2. Adopt an emissions reduction target 3. Draft an action plan to achieve the target 4. Implement the action plan 5. Evaluate, report on progress, and update plans The annual membership fee for ICLEI is based on population, and the membership provides discounts on publications, events and qualification software. For cities with populations of up to 50,000 residents, the annual fee is $600.00. ICLEI will also provide technical assistance, emissions analysis software, case studies, training workshops, publications, and other learning, networking and recognition opportunities.. In addition, CCP participants have access to a global network of local governments that act to protect the climate through innovative and proven projects. As a member of ICLEI, the CCP Campaign is free. Developing an Environmental Advisory Committee The goals of the committee could be limited to issues related to global warming and climate change, but may include other sustainable measures such as water conservation and waste diversion. In keeping with the composition of the Traffic and Safety Committee and the Equestrian Committee, the Environmental Advisory Committee could be comprised of the following: • One City Council member • One Planning Commission member • One Park and Activities member • Six members of the public appointed by the City Council As a starting point, the committee could review_what other cities in the region are doing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and.other pollutants. Attached is a list of the City's recent environmental accomplishments. CONCLUSION Staff believes that the formation of an Environmental Advisory Committee will allow the City to monitor the progress it makes towards meeting the goals of the U.S. Mayor's Climate Protection Agreement as part of the "Cool Cities" campaign, and to provide an opportunity for the City's residents to live in a more sustainable community. Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council direct staff to prepare a resolution authorizing the formation of such a committee and a second resolution for ICLEI membership and participation in the Climate Protection Campaign (CCP). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council direct staff to prepare a resolution authorizing the formation of an Environmental Advisory Committee, and a second'resolution for ICLEI membership and participation in the Climate Protection Campaign (CCP). EXHIBITS Attached 1. U.S. Conference of Mayor's Climate Protection Agreement 2. ICLEI FAQ: Cities for Climate Change (CCP) 3. "Taking The Greener Path," List of environmental accomplishments by the City of Rolling Hills Estates cm.10.23.07.doc CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTATES "TAKING THE GREENER PATH" The City of Rolling Hills Estates is dedicated to "taking the greener path" to protect the environment by preserving open space, public bridle trails and the native habitat. Our community has a high level of environmental awareness, and, as such, our City's policies and ordinances mandate clean streets, residences, trails, and commercial areas. While we are looking at forming a "Green Ribbon Task Force" to explore how our City can reduce its carbon footprint, we have already taken a number of steps to cut down on air pollution and the emissions of greenhouse gases, as well as reduce, reuse and recycle solid waste, decrease storm water pollution and urban runoff, increase water conservation, and restore and protect our natural surroundings: • Earlier this year, the City Council adopted the Sierra Club's Cool Cities Initiative and authorized the Mayor to sign the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement, pledging to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 7% by 2012. • Our City adopted the Alameda County New Home Construction Green Building Guidelines as a City reference document, and encourages the use of the LEED Green Building Rating System for construction projects within the City. • We recently implemented a new street sweeping contract, which requires the use of state-of-the-art equipment (certified by the Air Quality Management District) to reduce the emission of particulate air pollution from paved roads utilizing less polluting vehicles and alternative fuel vehicles. • Our City converted all traffic signal lights from incandescent to energy -efficient LED, a 90% energy savings. • Our City also adopted the Ahwahnee Water Principles for Resource -Efficient Land Use. • We have reduced the frequency of trash and recycling pickup to once per week to increase collection efficiency and minimize consumption of fossil fuels, air emissions, as well as wear -and -tear on our roads. • The City rolled out a new state-of-the-art, three -cart system, making it easy for residents to recycle household plastic and glass containers, cans, and paper, as well as green waste. As a result, there has been a substantial increase in waste diversion, with Rolling Hills Estates residents consistently keeping more than 65% of their waste out of the trash carts and out of landfills. • Under our new residential solid waste collection program, the City has increased curbside collection of used oil by 160% and used oil filters by 590%. • We have implemented a proactive litter abatement program for keeping public rights -of -way, streets, medians, parks, and trails free of litter and debris. All public streets are swept on a weekly basis, following the day of trash collection. • We routinely screen our storm drain system to identify and eliminate illicit connections and discharge to ensure that only clean water should be discharged to the storm drain system. • Most City parks and many transit stops are equipped with separate beverage container recycling collection containers along with trash cans. • Our City inspects businesses to ensure that any outdoor activities are conducted in a manner that does not discharge pollutants to the storm drain system and minimizes the potential for contact of pollutants with storm water runoff. • As an equestrian community, our City prohibits the improper disposal of horse manure by requiring that it be kept in an enclosed container designed for such purpose. Manure that is not used for composting must be removed completely from individual properties at least once per week. • Our City parks are maintained with the minimum amount of fertilizer necessary. Playing fields are fertilized twice per year and fully composted top dressing is applied once per year. • Our Maintenance Department has integrated pest management practices which call for using physical barriers and controls first and, when necessary, the least toxic chemical control that is effective. For example, wood chips are used in lieu of herbicide for weed control on horse trails. • Our irrigation systems in City parks and recreational areas frequently inspected for broken heads, overspray, and muddy areas. • We require that new landscapes to be designed to conserve water using a water budget approach. These requirements apply to new landscaping for commercial, office and institutional developments and to developer -installed landscaping in residential subdivisions. • In partnership with the Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy, our City is removing invasive and exotic plants, and conducting habitat enhancement and restoration of the native habitat in our George F Canyon Nature Preserve. South Bay Cities Green Task Force Thursday, October 11 1:00 pm - 3:00 pm @ Manhattan Beach Police Conference Room 400/420 15th Street This will be a kickoff meeting for ALL city staff & commissioners dealing with environmental issues. With the passage of AB 32, the increase in activities of the South Bay Energy Savings Center and the increased interest of many of the South Bay cities in preserving the quality of our lives through a focus on environmental stewardship, we know that cities are forming task forces and assigning staff to become cool cities, developing plans to reduce carbon footprints, establishing sustainability criteria, increasing their conservation efforts and so forth. The SBCCOG is convening the SB Cities Green Task Force for city staff, commissions and community members who are working with their cities on these environmental issues to come together to share ideas and opportunities, review goals and determine opportunities for the cities to work together more effectively than working individually. At this first meeting, we would like each city to come prepared to give a brief overview (ca. 5 minutes) related to their goals and objectives for being a Sustainable/Cool/Green city. This would include whether there is council direction, community involvement, timelines, challenges, etc. Handouts are also encouraged. Then the group will discuss opportunities for collaboration and information exchange. The goal for the meeting is to conclude with a direction and next steps. To plan the meeting to use everyone's time most efficiently, please RSVP to kathie@sbesc.com with the names of attendees from your city and the name of the person presenting your city overview. Jacki elty f ell,.g JO, INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 50TH ANNIVERSARY 1957 - 2007 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Anton Dahlerbruch, City Manager,(,/ SUBJECT: Green Building Standards DATE: June 25, 2007 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 Attached you will find a report from Planning Director Yolanta Schwartz regarding a Peninsula cities meeting on June 14, 2007. With "environmental sustainability" and "global warming" becoming increasingly important in the policy and planning arenas, building green is becoming more popular. We will continue to monitor the topic as well as the progress of our neighboring cities. Staff will keep the City Council apprised. AD/ 06-25-07building gre.doc Printed on Recycled Paper Memo To: Anton Dahlerbruch From: Yolanta Schwartz, Planning Director Subject: Build It Green Date: 6/25/2007 As reported to you previously, the cities of Rancho Palos Verdes and Rolling Hills Estates are developing a "Green Building" program. Their goal is to have all four cities on the Peninsula to develop and implement similar programs. Green Buildings are buildings that are partially or entirely constructed from certified recyded content materials, utilize solar panels, water efficient technologies such as pervious cement for driveways or grass crete, are equipped with energy conservation appliances, are designed to take advantage of the sun rays, are landscaped with water efficient plants and irrigation methods and generally are sustained by a healthy connection between the natural and built environment. The concept of "Build it Green" or Green Building also includes deconstruction of structures rather than demolition. Deconstruction is "demolition with care", where construction materials, windows, doors and other structural members that are reusable or recyclable are removed with care (rather than demolished) and are reconstructed or recycled and used elsewhere. RPV invited representatives from all four Peninsula Cities to attend a meeting to share the concept and aspects of their proposed program. The meeting was held at PVE City Hall on June 14, 2007. Councilmember Frank Hill and his wife Maureen, Krishna - City's planning intern, Roy Itani-LA County Building and Safety District Engineer and I represented Rolling Hills. The concept of building green buildings is becoming very popular nationwide. The State of California is becoming a champion of this type of construction. Several northern California cities and Counties, especially Alameda County, have developed programs for requiring construction of "Green Buildings" , mostly in commercial and industrial applications. However, the new push is to promote such construction in single family residences. The City of RHE passed a resolution adopting Alameda County's New Home Construction Green Building Guidelines as their template for voluntary participation in building green single family residences. At the meeting, RPV staff gave a presentation on what constitutes "Green Building" and what is envisioned for their City. They are proposing a voluntary program, but are struggling with what incentives should be provided to property owners so that they would want to build green. It was established that the cost of 1„J building green is higher at the onset of construction, but in the long run such construction saves money on utilities and could improve indoor living environment. The City of RPV has invited the other three Peninsula Cities to develop a similar program and share the same guidelines and incentives, so that an architect working on a project in RPV would have the same guidelines and incentives for his client as in the other Peninsula cities. Staff and City Council members from PVE, that were present at the meeting, spoke very favorably of this concept and of developing a common program and incentives in all four cities. RHE is already on board with their resolution in support of building green, but have not developed the details of a program that can be promoted. The RHE staff and Council members present at the meeting were also in favor of collaborating with the other cities. Build it Green is a concept in construction that is not going to go away. However, such construction is more costly than conventional construction. It is believed, but no one has any statistics yet, that in the long run living in a "Green Building" will be less costly and more environmentally friendly and healthy than living in a house of conventional construction. With cost of construction being high as it is, I am not convinced that most people would want to add to their initial cost to implement green building construction concepts. However, I would like to propose that staff continue to attend the meetings with the other Peninsula cities to follow the progress of developing the program, including the incentives, and provide input. Once the program guidelines are developed, we can determine if Rolling Hills should or should not adopt them and cooperate with the other cities to promote the program. RPV is planning follow up meetings with local architects and the South Bay Energy Savings Center and then with other stakeholders, before adopting .a formal program.