The URL can be used to link to this page

Fee Information 1992-1193THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTATES, CALIFORNIA FEES CHARGES FISCAL YEAR 1991-1992 INDEX DEPARTMENT/FEE CATEGORY I. FINANCE PAGE Business License Application. 3 Certain Businesses Permit Fee 3 Dance Permit 3' Entertainment Permit 3 Fire/Going Out of Business Sale 3 Fortune Telling 3 Solicitor's Permit (Commercial) 3 Solicitor's Permit (Non -Commercial) 3 II. GENERAL GOVERNMENT Fees and Charges Book 3 Annual Budget 3 Maps - see Planning also 3 Microfiche copies 3 Photocopies 3 Parking Permits 3 Returned Check 3 III. MISCELLANEOUS CODE ENFORCEMENT False Alarms 4 Noise Variance 4 Searchlight 4 Sound Amplification 4 IV. PLANNING Application to approve action 5 Civic Center Overlay 5 Conditional Use Permit 5 Continuance/Extensions 5 Demolition - Rehab Processing Fees 5 Environmental Assessment - Initial Studies 6 Environmental Impact Report 6 Grading Permit 6 Maps 6 Minor Deviation 6 Minor Land Subdivision - Filing of Tentative Map 6 Minor Land Subdivision - Appeal 6 Negative Declaration - Appeal 6 Neighborhood Compatibility 7 New Construction 7 On -Site Inspection 7 Over the Counter Planning Approval 7 Precise Plan of Design 7 Residential Building Records 7 - i - IV. PLANNING CONTINUED Residential Development Standards 7 Signs: Sign Permit 7 Temporary Sign in right-of-way 7 Special Use Permit 7 Subdivision - Development/Vesting Tentative Map 7 Temporary Use Permit 8 Variance 8 View Preservation Site Inspection 8 Zone Change 8 V. RECREATION Ernie Howlett Equestrian Facilities 9 Park Permit 10 Ernie Howlett - Kitchen Rental 10 Stable Board 10 Trailer Parking 10 Blanketing Fee 10 Special Recreation Events - City Celebration 10 Cross Country Run Tracy Austin Tennis Tournament Swimming 10 Tennis 11 APPENDIX PPD Class Descriptions Park Land Dedication Business License I. FINANCE Code Reference 730 767 811 832 836 783 769.13 777 791 Account Code 9000-7051 9000-7051 9000-7051 9000-7051 9000-7051 9000-7051 9000-7051 Description Approved Fee Business License Application - New License $20.00 - Renewal $10.00 Certain Businesses (760) - Application Fee $50.00 - Renewal $15.00 Dance Permit $50.00 Entertainment Permit - Appeal Revocation Fire/Going Out Business Fortune Telling - Application Fee - Business License $100.00 $100.00 $250.00 &$10/day max 50 days $50.00 $50.00 Solicitor's Permit (Commercial) - Fee Per Day $50.00 - Fee Per Quarter $200.00 - Fee Per Year $500.00 Solicitor's Permit (Non -Commercial) No fee II. GENERAL GOVERNMENT 9000-8301 9000-8301 9000-8301 9000-8310 - 9000-8301 Ord 466 Fees and Charges Book Annual Budget Microfiche copy Photocopies Maps - Peninsula Realtors - Trails/Bike Paths $ 3.50 $10.00 $1.00/page $0.25/page $0.50 $0.25 Parking Permits $25.00/permit Returned Check 3 $10.00 III. MISCELLANEOUS CODE ENFORCEMENT Code Reference Account Code Description Approved Fee 697.9 9000-7211 Alarm Fines - Install Alarm w/o permit - Failure to take corrective action:( - 1st Offense - 2nd Offense - 3rd & Subsequent - Operating audible alarm w/o 10 minute auto reset - Operating a direct dial service $100.00 $ 50.00 $100.00 $200.00 $100.00 $250.00 697.9 9000-7220 False Alarm Fines For false alarms within 6 month period - third false alarm - fourth false alarm - fifth false alarm - sixth false alarm - seventh and each subsequent $ 50.00 $1001.00 $150.00 $200.00 $250.00 695.14 9000-7211 Noise Variance - Application Fee $ 50.00 693 9000-8303 Searchlight Permit $100.00/day 695.13 9000-7211 Sound Amplification $ 50.00 4 IV. PLANNING Code Reference 2010 Reso 1549 2010 Res. 1549 2010 Res. 1549 2010 Res. 1549 1255 Account Code 9000-8101 9000-8101 Description Application for approval validating an action taken without having first formally sought required City approval. Conditional Use Permit Single Request Appeal Approved Fee Double the fee as set in this section $600.00 $300.00 9000-8101 Continuance of Matters Before City Council or Planning Commission - First request no fee - Second request 50% of original fee 9000-8101 9000-8101 - Each subsequent.' 50% +10% for each request Extension of Permit Time 50% o.f original fee Demolition/Rehab Processing Fees - Preparation of job specs actual cost - City Council Approval $ 80.00 - Compliance. Inspection actual cost - Billing $150.00 - Assessment Filing Fee $150.00 - Rehearing by Planning Commission on substandard declaration 5 $150.00 IV. PLANNING - CONTINUED Code Reference Account Code Description Approved Fee 2010 9000-8101 Environmental Assessment $250.00 * Res. 1549 * or actual cost + $205 whichever is greater subcontractor 2010 9000-8101 Environmental Impact actual cost Res. 1549 plus 20% admin Overhead 7005 c 9000-8101 Grading Permit 1-50 cubic yds $ 75.00 51-100 cubic yds $120.00 101-1,000 cubic yds $120.00 + $30 each add. yd over 100 1,001 cubic yds and up $390.00 + $30 each add. yd over 1,000 Maps 9000-8101 Blueprints of City Maps (ex - Zoning Map, Horse Overlay, etc.) 2010 9000-8101 Minor Deviation Res. 1549 Appeal to City. Council $ 10.00 $325.00 $160.00 Each additional request $160.00 on same application 1702 9000-8102 Minor Land Subdivision - Filing Tentative Map LA County fees + 21% 1708 - Appeal $300.00 2010 9000-8101 Negative Declaration Res. 1549 - Appeal $125.00 6 IV. PLANNING - CONTINUED Code Reference '2010 Account Code 9000-8101 883 9000-7081 Reso 1531 9000-8101 Reso 1656 2010 Res. 1549 1402 Reso 1531 2161 2010 Reso 1549 9000-8101 9000-8101 Description Approved Fee Neighborhood Compatibility Second Story Addition Appeal All Others - Appeal New Construction On -Site Inspection Over -the -Counter Approval $500.00 $250.00 $325.00 $175.00 $500/unit $150.00 $100.00 Precise Plan of Design See Appendix A for description of PPD Classes Class (1) Class (2) Class (3) $500.00 $250.00 Class (4) $600.00+ $300.00 +$0.15 per sq ft in excess 10,000 sq ft Class (5) $1,050.00+ $525.00 +$0.01 per sq ft in excess 50,000 sq ft Fee $200.00 $300.00 Appeal $100.00 $150.00 Residential Building Records $100.00 9000-8301 Residential Development Standards $5.00 9000-7131 9000-8101 sign Permit $100.00 Signs - Temporary - in no fee Right-of-way non-profit SpecialUse Permit $325.00 9000-8102 Subdivision LA County and - Development/Vesting consultant fees Tentative Map + 21% 7 IV. PLANNING - CONTINUED Code Reference Account Code Description Approved Fee 802 9000-8101 Temporary Use Permit Filing Fee $ 25.00 2010 9000-8101 Variance $500.00 - Appeal $250.00 - Each additional variance $250.00 request on same application 2010 9000-8101 View Preservation Site Reso. 1549 Inspection $ 25.00 2010 9000-8101 Zone Change Reso. 1549 - Single Request $600.00 - Appeal $300.00 - Each Additional 50% of Request basic fee 8 V. RECREATION Code Reference Account Code Description Approved Fee 1512-8621 Ernie Howlett Park Equestrian Facilities Rental Activity_ A Event English, Western or Combination B Dressage, Driving Shows C Clinic or Demonstrations that charge participants or spectators using two or more rings D Clinics or Demonstrations that charge participants or spectators and use Dressage Arena only Activity A & B C, D & E Cleanup and restoration due when event is scheduled Clinics and other uses that are free to public and participants Refundable Event A only Cleanup and restoration due when event is scheduled Damage deposit for use of City jumps Stall Rental/Day Box Stall Paddock Combo Renter responsible for own feeding cleaning and shavings Jump Rentals Charge/Dav $500.00 $200.00 $150.00 $ 50.00 no charge Charge $200.00 $100.00 $200.00 Charge $25/day $15/day $20/day Charge Rental of City Jumps $200/day 9 V. RECREATION - CONTINUED Code Reference Ord 610 Account Code 1512-8604 Rated Unrated- Dressage 9000-8203 1511-8601 Description Approved Fee Horseshows Warmup Regular Medal Warmup Regular Medal $ 5.00/ride $15.00/ride $20.00/class $ 5.00/ride $ 8.00/ride $10.00/class Regular Classes $35.00 AHSA Qualifying $35.00 if combined with regular $50.00 AHSA drug fee $ 3.00 AHSA nonmember $15.00 CDS nonmember $ 5.00 Park Permit Refundable Deposit $50.00 Rental Kitchen Facilities Ernie Howlett Park Non-refundable Rolling Hills Estates Equestrian Center $25.00 Stable Board - Box Stall $273/month - Pipe Corral with shavings - Pipe Corral Oat Hay $237/month $217/month $ 30/month Trailer Parking $25/month Blanketing Fee $2.00/day October through March 10 V. RECREATION - CONTINUED Code Reference Account Code Description Approved Fee Special Recreation Events 9000-8202 - City Celebration Steak Dinner $8.00 Hamburger Dinner $5.00 7350-8202 - Cross Country Run Pre -registration with shirt $13.00 without shirt $10.00 Race Day Registration w/shirt $15.00 without shirt $12.00 7350-8803 - Tracy Austin Tournament Tennis Member $20.00 Nonmember $25.00 9000-8201 Swimming Fees 1521-8801 Memberships - Individual - Family Less than 6 members Over 6 members - Seniors (over 62) Lessons Nonmember Daily Swim Fee Tennis Center Fees Memberships - Individual New member - Individual Renewal Before May 31, 1991 After May 31, 1991 - Family Renewal Before May 31, 1991 After May 31, 1991 11 $75.00 $110.00 $125.00 $ 25.00 $25.00 $ 2.00 $30.00 $25.00 $30.00 $60.00 $70.00 V. RECREATION - CONTINUED Code Reference Account Code - Description Approved Fee Tennis Center Fees 1521-8801 Daily Court Fees Members: Weekdays 8 am to close $4.50 Weekends/Holidays $5.50 Seniors & Youth $2.00 (18 & under, 62 & over) Non -Members: Weekdays 8 am to close $5.50 Weekends/Holidays $6.50 Seniors & Youth $3.25 Tournaments Court fees as determined $2.00 above plus surcharge per court 1521-8802 Tennis Balls $3.50 12 APPENDIX PPD CLASSES Class 1 - shall included: Alterations to exterior of structures. Additions to existing buildings in commercial districts not exceeding 400 sq. ft. floor area. Construction of new structure not exceeding 400 sq. ft. floor area. Alterations to existing vehicle parking and/or landscaping area. Class 2 - shall include: Additions to existing structure exceeding 400 sq. ft. and/or development of new building in an existing developed commercial center providing that such additions do not exceed 2,000 sq. ft. of total floor area. Class 3 - shall include: Additions to existing and/or new buildings to be developed commercial centers exceeding 2,000 sq. ft. of floor space, but less than 10,000 sq. ft. of floor area. Development of a previously undeveloped commercial site not exceeding 10,000 sq. ft. of floor area. Class 4 - 10,000 sq. Class 5 - 50,000 sq. shall include: All commercial development exceeding ft. of floor area and not exceeding 50,000 sq. ft. shall include: All commercial development exceeding ft. of floor area. The following items are provided for information of staff. The fees are not part of any revision by resolution: Park Land Dedication Fee: Refer to Municipal Code Sections 1606 - 1615 Business Licenses: Refer to Municipal Code Sections 730 -749.1 • or /l72- (".Nor ) -- c ( j1.o,�a�. Gha►y¢� �5' 0(; :XI -out) ir,-Aex 14 Rent e A ' LrAX c3►A Jv� 4\Se46r__ fc 614 _ r. 4± (61? aS0,00 of €0..c( Co5ti (30S. a 7 - 31 o.GO"t 3�s c -c4 + 3o ? 50%, of Ck (€(... —(e P-.: c Brat i)(.0 -A) Zw, 01A,,-8-0 ,) );(.A.A--e,_14 tvr_ y - — AC . 3 -311.4.100 ca,1. --+�w-- .p�•K_� a I eee. sc , oc. - 300. o� ----25_:-[--% di ` . G Atreip-e of ISo.c.c, ''''t_4_ ViCv,.) rieleicZilt_let_NA7-71 CAof )C•00 5;ife, IK, 1 4 r • Mc f : cefrii-4/J ice. 55C I Ceti e 1. ,___c_6. iii( • -0 P4,Ls Ver:k _. P(��tS - /060 10_15_0_ a_ - cci luop .6:426 7+ if 3 it 0,,r . _- _ f .1— Fund v,op —��-- — 4. -- -- t4c Mal 6 _ cot.Al k. _ use perm.: +7 _1_— e _ boc(opMAN I HO _ cf. Mat i atvc,C., - -= -- - — — (1 6Nc 1e ) a- ,Zon► ew (k�e�o�l, eA g _=sow-�r�- _61 b.O°_- a — ficS6t9 t .,99 Ake -4 Reok.e,4) '1,4 So if 460 7, 01035,4 la _Netbar- 16 6:1 iy — ---- __- / ovo-. ?� (LL k€. ___I-off /Coo • d -d I awc.Co4Ck MeN hoo 0-(i at ()LA) 1 + d-.3: pray (/�SC� pex r . Pee,cl SC 46.4 (e-uLe s vicui oeV 114e_IY, -)-11 AActift4Asti:d u.• Cotr_p_Ixo___C661‘ c4 Ce tcY -. 4,f, To_ P � cc 1Nves ; AJ p �,.t [ -o .�1 wcor a_s00 3 600 its .co gad) r(V.* “"`"A/4,1,11 RANCHO PALOS VERDES TELECOPIER: (310) 377-9868 CITY HALL: (310) 377-6008 FAX COVER SHEET TO: c1 -r), t_Lik)& N11 -1--S ATTN: LE. -.1.11S FAX NO.: 37 7R B8 TEL. NO.: _ g 72 15x) FROM: 5431.a cA2.. r CT4S DATE: W.S/q TOTAL PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): SUBJECT: DOCUMENT TELECOPIED: Jew F sc.-pc-4)14-e- C FFI TtV5-. —o { REMARKS: THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES USES A XEROX MODEL 7010 AUTOMATIC TELECOPIER WHICH IS COMPATIBLE WITH MOST GROUP 1, 2 & 3 TELECOPY MACHINES. 30940 HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD • RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CALIFORNIA 90274-5391 • (310) 377.0390 C:I.76QIM 30940 HAWTHORNE 8OULEVARD I RANCHO PALOS VERDES. CA 90274-S391 / (310) 3T7-0360 DSPARZtmr! OP INVIINNOSINTAL 9sRVZos lff.ct v. August 1, 1992 City Council Resolution No. 92-66 MINOR APPLICA2I012 Foss■ Asan•a/Men. oecu tten f 12 oartift0at et Caero1iaaaa 11,010 coastal 9ar.it (Roaring. Officer) - Ran-app•alabls $ 470 - Appsalabls $ 940 lamm t Procaaalna $ 36 Sep. w.11.0 artd _g .a 5 310 $ 40 per lour of review by City Q.oloav Inv atieatten Ps t Q.o10ev 1lanert R.yidr 41adla- 20 to 50 cubic yards or 2' cut/fill - S1 to 999 cubic yards - 3.000 to 9,999 cubic yards/Planning Comel.•lon approval required tor loss than 1,000 - 10,000 to 99.999 cubic yards - 100,000 cubic yards or grater • Considered a ataior applioat1on. L&,.d.eaea Plan Ch.tk nd naMeilee Lama Pamlly Dav Cara Iet Lin* Adloataant - 3 to 5 lots - 6 or more lets Geologist $ 160 Trust Deposit (amount of initial deposit d.t•roln.d by Staff) 5 191 390 1 S20 • $ )40 • $ 960 • $ 260 1 230 $ 4)0 plus Trust Deposit tot elty snglaoar coviw ?rust D.po.lt (aaeint of initial daposlt dstsrmined by Staff) ball' tot fabric • T.mpor•ry $ 300 • Permanent $ 460 flarnAlne C.rtif! tton Latter "$ 110 --4Bwlislon to ummoss, $ 27$ plus 115 par lot ati Par.it (Staff Review) - Temporary - Permanent 1 65 (one or memo) f 110 Alva 15 for each additional sign pit■ PLan Raves - Nov Residence $ 110 - Addition/Accessory structure 1 6S • Antenna $ 110 - Antenna approved by Planning Commission $ 260 Io.clai ARi.■1_ Pyrslt - Minor - Ms,or • So.¢1 Constpict en Perch Dpsolal Elsa Pr it Stroet Trss ?t it • - Up to 3 prop.rtie0 (6 trees man.) 1 510 - each additional tr•o $ 250 - Administration foe 1 125 i 240 t 500 $ 290 $ 410 - Trussing and removal based on actual cost, plus the adminiatrativ. fee. U!a tr�in•t_ lo* staff R•viw 9 360 • Appeal to Planning Commission 53,060 Xopat►tio_ lev j $ 110 itd i1 I i1 11!-'H ?.1 I .C1 C' d 8 2: c i i r it I r - .-1 ; it l 1 PAJOILlwridaJJAMO 111 Coastal Fermi% (planning Commission) - Non -appealable $ 770 - Appealable 61.150 ;distal tnoclfia PIOII- AMIM, • Initiation Request 8 330 - Application gpndltynal Ulm remit - Revision to existing CUP ! 600 - New Cur tor pre-existing use - mew CUP 62,600 ! 700 Trust Deposit (minimum initial deposit of $4,500) 8 600 ' aujanfntal Aiaeaamon% - Negative declaration $1,23.0 - environmental Impact Report Trust Deposit by Staff) Ril"-AMIL11222permit C2n.ral Plan Arwnd■aet - Initiation Request - Application • $ 130 $ 165 Trust Deposit by staff) ogp:rel rlantfQatyl_U►nf aM_.ChaDUR (any cambinetlon) - Initiation Request • Application 1 jabt YariatiQf 5f,ner tZC DtI. s P.r it naratort t:el■a nn prc.,L Ita� • Tentative • Taal I1 (►lanninq - Temporary - Permanent - Tentative F.�... - final iiei�OC! ■■■aw 1...tpttien P�f - Original application 12.900 - each additional co -applicant and/or property with foliage vb•n application is submitted - tor additional trees end veoatatlon to the original application once staff report and notice have been Limed 1 400 - tor additional properties with foliage or co•spplicents fitter. staff report end notice he,* been issued 1 SOO 8 330 Trust. Deposit by staff) 11.000 $ 320 Trust Deposit 1 730 (amount of initial deposit determined (amount of initial deposit determined (amount of initial deposit determined (minimum initial deposit of 63,620) -1. 67,620 plus Trust Depeeit for city snoinver review ! 600 plus Trust D•poeit for City engineer and City Attorney review eomelselon) 8 3?0 8 110 plus 120 for each additional sign . Trust Deposit (atinLxua initial deposit of 59.9001 11,026 plus Trust Deposit for City 6ngine•t end City Attorney review 11.140 8 400 1a a Trust Deposit (minimum initial deposit of 81.550) (except Coastal ►.rsits and Ue. Dotsrelnatlons) X701 A_PPLIC.TION (except Coastal Permits) y!N►LTY 711 $ 700 per appellant $ 940 per appellant Double the application fee $ 100 or the amount of the original permit, if lees poem rlli/yUeLI.0 'WICK 8 10 IMo rink PLANS S 26 per sot beyond those required for plan check CPspg 1/92 (PATRICIA'S DISK AND L1TT=RS & NISC. 028 DISK - /2rEESCHID) 3 RESOLUTION NO. 92-68 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR CITY SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992-93. WHEREASi .the City of Rancho Palos Verdes has conducted an extensive analysis of its services, the costs reasonably borne by the City in providing those services, the beneficiaries of those services, and the revenues produced by those paying fees and charges for special services; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to. comply with both the letter and the spirit of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution and limit the growth of taxes; and WHEREAS, the City desires to establish a policy of recovering the full costs reasonably borne of providing special services of a voluntary and limited nature, such that general taxes are not diverted from general services of a broad nature and thereby utilized to subsidize unfairly and inequitably such special services; and WHEREAS, heretofore the City Council has adopted Resolution No. 92- 67 on July 7, 1992, establishing its policy as to the recovery of costs and more particularly the percentage of costs reasonably borne to be recovered from users of City services and directing staff as to the methodology for implementing said Resolution; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 54994.1 the specific fees to be charged for services must be adopted by the City Council by Resolution, after providing notice and holding a public hearing; and WHEREAS, notice of public hearing has been provided per Government Code Section 6062a, oral and written presentations made and received, and the required public hearing held on July 7, 1992; and WHEREAS, a schedule of fees and charges to be paid by those requesting such special services needs to be adopted so that the City might carry into effect its policies; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council to develop a revised schedule of fees and charges based on the City's budgeted and projected costs reasonably borne for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 1992; and WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 6062a a general explanation of the hereinafter contained schedule of fees and charges has been published as required; and WHEREAS, all requirements of California Government Code Sections 66016 and 66018 are hereby found to have been complied with; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Fee Schedule Adoption. The schedule of fees and charges as shown on Attachments 1 and 2 (with accompanying notes) are hereby directed to be computed, applied, and charged by the various City departments, and to be collected by the City Finance Department for the herein listed special services when provided by the City or its designated contractors. Section 2. Separate Fee For Each Process. All fees set by this resolution are for each identified process; additional fees shall be required for each additional process or service that is requested or required. Where fees are indicated on a per unit of measurement basis the fee is for each identified unit or portion thereof within the indicated ranges of such units. A. Added Fees and Refunds. Where additional fees need to be charged and collected for completed staff work, or where a refund of excess deposited monies is due, and where such charge or refund is ten dollars ($10.00} or less, a charge or refund need not be made, pursuant to California Government Code Sections 29373.1 and 29375.1 and amendments thereto. Defining and Timing of Fee Schedule. Definitions regarding and the timing of the implementation of the hereinafter enumerated fee schedules shall be as stipulated in Resolution No.92-67. Section 3. Fullv Burdened Rates. "Fully Burdened Rates" shall be applied to all trust deposit charges or to collect fees for which a flat rate or per unit cost can not be established due. to the nature of the regulation, product, or service to be provided. Fully burdened rates shall be consistent with the definition of "costs reasonably borne" as defined in Resolution No. 92-67 and shall be applied as follows: Direct hourly salary plus applicable fringe benefit rate Services and supplies Contracted services Miscellaneous costs Direct expenses + Indirect expenses, including fixed asset recovery expenses and debt service costs + Departmental overhead Public Works ( 6% of direct expenses) Environmental Services ( 5% of direct expenses) Recreation and Parks (16% of direct expenses) + City overhead (15% of direct expenses) = FULLY BURDENED RATES -2- RESOL. NO. 92-68 Section 4. Interpretations. This Resolution may be interpreted by the several City department heads in consultation with'the City Manager and, should there be a conflict between two fees' then the lower in dollar amount of the two shall be applied. A. It is the intention of the City Council to review the fees and charges as determined and set out herein based on the City's next Annual Budget and all the City's costs reasonably borne as established at that time and, as and if warranted, to revise such fees and charges based thereon. Section 5. Constitutionality. If an portion of this resolution is declared invalid or unconstitutional then it is the intention of the City Council to have passed the entire Resolution and all its component parts, and all other sections of this Resolution shall remain in full force and effect. Section 6. Repealer. All resolutions and other actions of the City Council in conflict with the contents of this Resolution are hereby repealed. .Section 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall go into full force and effect August 1, 1992, but shall be subject to the terms and conditions of Resolution No. 92-67. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 1992. / S / .TARN r_ MCCTAnaART MAYOR ATTEST: /S/ JO PURCELL City Clerk State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) ss City of Rancho Palos Verdes) I, JO PURCELL, City Clerk of The City of Rancho Palos Verdes, hereby certify that the above Resolution No. 92-68 was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the said City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on July 7, 1992. CITY, CLERK CITY.OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES -3- RESOL. NO. 92-68 ATTACHMENT #1 MSI # SERVICE CENTER Proposed Fee COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES S-001 Certificate of Compliance Review 1,010 S-002 Appealable Coastal Permit Staff Review 940 S-003 ,.Non -Appealable Coastal Permit Staff Rev. 470 S-004 Fence. Wall & Hedge Permit Review 310 S-005 Geology Investigation Permit . 180 S-006 Geology Report Review la) S-007 Geological Assmt Report (b) S-008 Grading Plan Review/P.C. (c) S-009 Grading Plan Review/Staff (d) S-010 Large Family Day Care Permit Review 210.. S-011 Lot Line Adjustment Review (e) S-012 Parking Lot Permit Review (f) S-013 Reversion to Acreage Review (g) S-014 Sign Permit Review/P:C. (h) S-015 Temporary Sign Permit ReviewiP.C. (h) S-016 Sign Permit Review/Staff (h) S-017 Temporary Sign Permit/Staff. Review (h) S-018 Site Plan Review .(1) S-019. Special Animal Permit Review (j) S-020 Special Construction Permit Review 290 S-021 Special Use Permit Review 410 S-022 Street Tree Permit Review (k► S-023 Appealable Coastal Permit,P.C. Review t,150 S-024 Non -Appealable Coastal Permit.P.C. Review 720- S-025 Local Coastal Plan (LCP) Amendment (I) S-026 Conditional Use Permit Review (m) S-027 Encroachment Permit Review 700 S-028 Environmental Assmnt (Neg. Dec.) 1,230 S-029 Environmental Impact Report Review (n) S-030 Extreme Slope Permit Review 830 S-031 General Plan Amendment . (o) S-032 General Plan/Zone Change/LCP Amend. (p) S-033 Height Variation Review 1,000 S-034 Tentative Parcel Map Review (q) S-035 Tentative Tract Map Review (r) S-036 Final Parcel Map Review _ (s) S-037 Final Tract Map Review (t) S-038 Minor Exception Permit Review 320 S-039 Zone Change Review (u) S-040 Minor Application Appeal Processing 700 S-041 Moratorium Exclusion Request (v) S-042 Moratorium Exemption Request . 730 S-043 Variance Review 1,140 S-044 View Restoration Permit Review (w) S-045 Bus. License -Home Occupation Review 12 S-046 Major Project Appeal Processing (except coastal permits) 940 S-047 Landscape Plan Check and Inspection 240 S-048 Address Change Review (x) S-049 Public Improvement Parcel Plan Check (v) S-050 Public improvement Inspection (z) ATTACHMENT #1 Proposed MSI # SERVICE CENTER Fee S-051 Building and Grading Plan Check (Attach_ment #2) S-052 Plan Check Extension 60 S-053 Building & Grading Inspection (Attachment #2) S-054 Building Permit Extension 80 5-055 Special Building Investigation - per half hour 50 S-056 Use Determination / Staff 380 S-057 Use Determination / appeal to planning commission 1,060 S-058 Covenant Processing • 35 S-059 Vegetation Review 110 S-060 Planning Certification Letter 110 PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES • S-061 Municipal Cd/Local Ord. Enforcement Double permit fee S-062 Loud Party Noise Abatement (aa) S-063 False Alarm Response (bb) S-064 Animal Control (cc) S-065 Hazardous Material Response (dd) LEISURE AND CULTURAL SERVICES 5-067 Adult Sports/Recreation Classes 5-068 Youth Sports/Recreation Classes S-069 Private Youth Ballfield Usage 5-070 Private Adult Ballfield Usage 5-071 Special Events S-072 Therapeutic Recreation S-073 Youth. Camps S-074 Recreational Swimming S-075 Swimming Lessons S-076 Senior Citizen Facility Usage S-077 Trips/Outdoor Adventures S-078 Park Facility Rental S-079 Museum Services (P.V.I.C.) S-080 Museum Services (D.R.) S-081 Abalone Cove Shoreline Park - Parking lee) lee) Iff) (if) lee) lee) lee) (eel' lee) 0.00 lee) (gg) (hh) -(hh). (ll) MAINTENANCE SERVICES S-082 Street Cut Permits (mm) ADMINISTRATIVE AND FINANCE SERVICES S-097 New/Moved. Bus. License Application Rev. 5 S-098 Business License Renewal Processing 5 S-099 Returned Check (NSF) Processing 10 S-101 Document Printing & Copying (ii) S-102 Agenda/Minute Mailing Service 2 S-103 Document Certfication 35 S-104 Filming Permit Processing (ji) S-105 Assessment District Payoff Calculation 25 S-106 Delinquent Assessment Payoff Processing 25 -D S-107 Address Files - Public Review 10 S-108 Delinquent Refuse Collection 25 S-109 Mailing Lists (kk) —2— RESOL. 92-68 Attachment 1 - Notes to specific fees (a) S-006 Geology Report Review Trust Deposit - initial deposit determined by staff. Fully burdened rates charged against trust deposit (T.D.). S-007 Geological Assessment Report $80 per hour of review by contract geologist S-008 1,000 10,000 100,000 Grading Plan - 9,999 cu. - 99,000 cu. + cu. Review / Planning Commission yds. or PC approval req'd - $520 yds $740 -yds $960 (d) S-009 Grading Plan Review / Staff 20 - 50 cu yds $195 51 - 9.99 cu yds $390 (e) S-011 Lot Line Adjustment Review. 1 - 5 lots $430 + Trust Deposit for Engineering review 5 lots or more see (a) above Trust Deposit (f) S-012 Parking Lot Permit Review Permanent $460 Temporary $200 (g) S-013 Reversion to Acreage Review $275 + $15 per lot (h) S-014 thr-u S-017- Sign Permit Review Temporary (S-017) (S-015) Permanent (S•-016) (S-014) Sign Staff Review Only Staff/P.C. Review Sign Staff Review Only. Staff/P.C. Review (i) S-018 Site Plan Review New residence Accessory/Addition Antenna Antenna/P. C. Approval (j) S-019 Major Minor $ 65 $370' • $110 + $5'each $540 + $20 each $110 $ 65 $110 $260 Special Animal Permit Review $500 $250 add' 1 sign - add ' 1 sign (k) S-022 Street Tree Permit Review $550 - Up to 3 properties (6 trees maximum) $250 - Each additional tree in excess of 6 trees $125 - Administration fee (if trimming required) Trimming and removal based on actual cost + administration fee -1- RESOL. NO. 92-68 Izondno Falos Verb PLAt 3 FEES REVISED 10, 1990 CIL RESOLUTION NOS. 84-70, 86-8, 88-17, 88-68, 90-44, 90-43 Certificate of Compliance Coastal Permit, Hearings Officer - Appealable - Non -Appealable FEE $ 150+$10 per lot # $ 145 $ 65 Fence, Wall & Hedge Permit $ 70 Geology Investigation Permit $ 100 Geology Report Review Deposit $ 600 TD Grading: 20 to 50 c/yds. or 3' cut/fill 51 to 999 *1,000 to 9,999 or P.C. approval req'd *10,000 to 99,999 *>100,000 *Considered a major application Large Family Day Care Lot Line Adjustments Miscellaneous Hearing Parking Lot Permit - Permanent Temporary Reversion to Acreage Sign Permit - Permanent.Sign - Temporary (one or more) Site Plan Review Accessory/Addition - Antenna - Antenna Approved by P.C. Special Animal Permit - Major - Minor. Special Construction Permit Special Use Permit Street Tree Permit ADMINISTRATIVE FILINGS 75 150 235 335 435 145 150+$10 per lot 145 145 65 235+$10 per lot 145+$5 add'l 65 60 35 60 145. 145 100 60 235 $ 100 * Amendment/Revisions Same as original.flat fee Appeal $ 135✓ Extension $ 100 Penalty Double flat fee Stamping of more than (3) required plans $ 25 per set Use Determination $ 75 Written Correspondence (Lending, Real $ 35 Estate and Escrow Institutions) P.C. = Planning Commission T.D. Trust Deposit; if processing costs exceed the deposit, an additional fee will be required. If the deposit exceeds the processing'costs, the remaining monies will be refunded. = Plus cost of City Engineer review. * = Up to three properties (maximum of 6 trees). $50 for each additional tree. Trimming and removal based on actual cost plus $25 administration fee. -- JUN 12 1991. CITY OF ROLLING HILLS By ".`MAJOR APPLICATIONS' FEES Commission $ 235 $ 145 Coastal Permit, Planning Appealable Non -Appealable' Coastal Plan Amendment $ 800 Coastal Plan Amendment Initiation Request $ 100 Conditional Use Permit $ 600 ✓ Encroachment Permit $ 145 Environmental Assessment (Negative $ 200 Declaration) Environmental Impact Report _$ . 1,000. V plus contract cost Extreme Slope Permit $ 305 General Plan Amendment $ 800 ✓ General Plan Amendment Initiation Request $ 100 General Plan/Zone Change/Coastal Plan $ 1,000 Amendment (any Application combination) Height Variation .$ 305 Maps: Parcel Map - Tentative $ 1;000 # - Final $ 500 * Tract and Vesting Maps - Tentative 2,500'# ✓ - Final $ •; 1;r *000 y Minor Exception Permit $ 145 Moratorium Exclusion $ 400 Moratorium Exemption Request $ 235 Variance $ 400✓ View Restoration Permit $ 400 ** Zone Change $ 600 ✓ ADMINISTRATIVE FILES Amendments/Revisions $ 1451 Appeals $ 235 ✓ Extension $ 100 ✓ Penalty ' - Double flat fee * = Plus the cost of City Attorney review of CC & R's. ** = $75 for each additional co -applicant and or property with foliage, when the application is submitted. $75 for the addition of trees and vegetation to the original application after the staff report and notice have been issued. $145 for the addition of new properties with foliage or co -applicants after the staff report and notice have been issued. # = Plus cost of City Engineer review. RESOLUTION NO. 614 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS SETTING FEES FOR PLANNING, ZONING, AND SUBDIVISION SERVICES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing variances, site development reviews, zone changes, conditional use permits and appeals, and shall be paid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Section 17.40.040 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: 1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $1,500.00 2. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW $1,500.00 3. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW - (MINOR) $ 750.00 4. Mini= $1,250.00 S. VARIANCE - (MINOR) 750.00 6. ZONE CHANG$ $2.000.00 7. CODE AMENDMENT - (NON -CITY INITIATED) $2,000.00 8. COMBINATION CASES Varies For multiple applications: The application fee shall be the sum of the largest fee plus fifty percent (SO%)of the basic fee of each additional application request. 9. FILING OF AN APPEAL Varies For filing an appeal of a decision of the Planning Commission: The appellant shall pay a fee equal to two-thirds of the amount of the original categorical application fee, to which the appeal relates, and, is the decision of the Planning Commission, from which the appellant appeals. • 10. ALL FEES RELATIVE TO ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Varies Environmental review fees shall be separate, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), be based on vendor cost and be in addition to those established herein SECTION 2. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing subdivisions and appeals, and shall be paid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Section 16.12.060 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: 1. SUBDIVISION MAP $1,500.00 2. POST TENTATIVE AND FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP APPROVAL Fees related to the processing of a tentative subdivision map and a final subdivision map, after City Council approval, shall be separate and in addition to those established herein. Varies I. ULU AN APPEAL • Varies For filing an appeal of a decision of the Planning Commission: The appellant shall pay a fee equal to two-thirds of the amount of the original categorical application fee, to which the appeal relates, and, is the decision of the Planning Commission, from which the appellant appeals. SECTION I. The fees set forth in Sections 1 and 2 above do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing such services. 1922. ATTEST: ,SECTION 4. Resolution Number 598 is hereby rescinded. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this - , day of City Clerk The foregoing Resolution No. 614 entitled: A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS SETTING FEES FOR PLANNING, ZONING, AND SUBDIVISION SERVICES was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on May 29, 1990 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Leeuwenburgh, Murdock, Pernell, Mayor Heinsheimer • NOES: None ABSENT: Councilwoman Swanson RESOLUTION R91-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALOS VERDEB ESTATES, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE FEE SCHEDULE FOR COPIES OF CITY DOCUMENTS WHEREAS, Section 6257 of the Government Code of the State of California provides that a request for a copy of an identifiable public record or information produced therefrom, or a certified copy of such record, shall be accompanied by payment of a fee or deposit to the local agency, provided such fee shall not exceed the actual cost of providing the copy, or the prescribed statutory fee, if any, whichever is less. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Palos Verdes Estates City Council as follows: SECTION 1: In light of the present economic situation and the ever-increasing rate of inflation, the Palos Verdes Estates City Council hereby finds and determines that in the interest of sound fiscal management, it is necessary for the City of Palos Verdes Estates to establish a fee schedule to reflect the actual cost to the City to provide the public with copies of its documents. The Council further finds that except as otherwise provided in Section 2, Paragraph 14 of this resolution, the fee schedule contained herein represents the actual costs to the City to provide the public with copies of its documents. SECTION 2. This Council hereby revises the fees for FORMS, MAPS, MINUTES, MEMORANDUMS AND THE PALOS VERDES ESTATES MUNICIPAL CODE, and other documents which are furnished by the City to the public upon request to be as follows: 1. palos Verdes Estates Municipal Code Complete Code S130.00 Cost per page .25 2. Certification of documents 2.00 1 t l: 3. Generate Plan Complete Plan 4. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 5. Preliminary or Annual Budget 6. M s sty of Palos Verdes Estates Street Maps (12 x 24) Street Maps (30 x 60) Zoning and Land Use Maps (24 x 20-1/2) 20.00 15.00 30.00 3.00 each 5.00 each 3.00 each 7. Minutes. and Agenda (for City Council and any and all City Commissions and Committees) Agendas 30.00 per body, per annum - Minutes 30.00 per body, per annum 0.25 per page (if not printed, see 19) (Said fees are payable in advance and do not include postage. Postage will be added accordingly.) 8. Ordinances and Resolutions (if already printed) 0.25 per page (if not printed, see 19) 9. Photocopies - all Departments each additional page 2.00 1st page 0.25 - 10. Voter Registration Confirmation Letter 3.00 each 11. Other ,Publications and Documents Any publication or document not listed above which becomes available shall be charged for at cost, plus 20%, rounded to the nearest even dollar. 12. Postaae All items which are mailed shall have the required postage and handling costs added to the fees set forth herein. 2 13. Researching Records Time for researching records will be based upon actual time spent by Staff multiplied by their effective cost per hour, plus 251. 14. EXCEPTIOR: The fees set forth herein do not apply to the following: (1) copies of reports and statements furnished to persons entitled to receive such copies under RoliticaLR,e£oxLin Act of 1974. The cost of any copy furnished pursuant thereto shall be ten cents ($0.10) per page in accordance with Government Code Section 81008, (2) copies of City documents for which the cost or fee for copying is established by statute. The cost of any copy furnished pursuant thereto shall be as provided by applicable statute. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this 14th day of May , 1991. ATTEST: arbara J., elver, CITY CLERK APPROVED„A TO FORM: Douglas Holland, CITY ATTORNEY 3 and D. Mattingly, RESOLUTION NO. R90-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALOS VERDES ESTATES, CALIFORNIA RAISING FEES FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES WHEREAS, the expense of providing engineering services has increased; and WHEREAS, the fiscal integrity of the City is dependent upon fees accurately reflecting the costs of the services for which they are imposed; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALOS VERDES ESTATES, California, does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: Each and every prior resolution which is modified or contradicted by this resolution is to that extent modified, and if need be to accomplish the purpose of this resolution, revoked in relevant part(s). SECTION 2: The amounts for the following Public Works fees shall be as follows: Fee Fee Amount C Dumpsters Curb and gutter Sidewalks Curb drains Driveways R sidential Commercial Masonry Mailboxes Other Public Works Permits SECTION 3: The amounts Department fees shall be as follows: Fee for Grading application Conditional Use Permit Variance Neighborhood Compatibility Review Lighting Permit Application Sign Plan Conceptual Review of Project $80.00 75.00 75.00 45.00 75.00 95.00 35.00 55.00/hr. the following Fee Amount $500.00 750.00 750.00 600.00 500.00 500.00 150.00 Planning C Non-standard Encroachments Tree topping/removal Planting Plans Preliminary Site Review by City Engineer or Geologist 125.00 100.00 125.00 75.00 Prior to action by City Council on any application, a revised application may be submitted for one half of the original application fee. SECTION 4: Until subsequently revised the amount for the following Building Department fees shall be as follows:_ Fee Fee Amount Real Property Records Report 65.00 Replacement of approved plan 20.00 Preliminary Site Review by City Engineer or Geologist 75.00 All other building and plan check fees shall be as indicated on Attachment A annexed hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS June 1990. ATTEST: 26th day of I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Palos Verdes Estates, California at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 26th day of June , 1990, by the following vote of the Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS Mayor Nyman, Councilmembers Mattingly, Gralow NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS None. ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS Councilmembers Moody, Humphrey APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY C r -3- X0105 V ercbbs L Arkk3 RESOLUTION NO. R90-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALOS VERDES ESTATES, CALIFORNIA RAISING FEES FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES - WHEREAS, has increased; and the expense of providing engineeringservices WHEREAS, the fiscal integrity of the City is dependent upon fees accurately reflecting the costs of the services for which they are imposed; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALOS VERDES ESTATES, California, does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: Each and every prior resolution which is modified or contradicted by this resolution is to that extent modified, and if need. be to accomplish the purpose of this resolution, revoked in relevant part(s). SECTION 2: The amounts for the following Public Works fees shall be as follows: Fee Fee Amount Dumpsters $80.00 Curb and -gutter 75.00 Sidewalks 75.00 Curb drains 45.00 Driveways R -q sidentia1 Commer- is al Mason-ry Mailboxes O her Public Works Permits SECTION 3: The amounts for the following Planning Department fees shall be as follows: 75.00 95.00 35.00 55.00/hr. Fee Fee Amount Grading -application Conditional Use Permit Variance Neighborhood Compatibility Review Lighting Permit Application Sign Plan icol . fr„- --3' Conceptual Review of Project vvahn-c h when 1#01,°14:"l. -1- $500.00✓ 750.00/ 750.00 600.00✓ 500.00 500.00 150.00✓ C. Non-standard Encroachments Tree topping/removal Planting Plans Preliminary Site Review by City Engineer or Geologist 125.00 100.00 125.00 75.00 Prior to action by City Council on any application, a revised application may be submitted for one half of the original application fee. SECTION 4: Until subsequently revised the amount for the following Building Department fees shall be as follows: Fee Fee Amount Real Property Records Report 65.00 Replacement of approved plan 20.00 Preliminary Site Review by City Engineer or Geologist 75.00 All other building and plan check fees shall be as indicated on Attachment A annexed hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26th day of June , 1990. ATTEST: -2- I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Palos Verdes Estates, California at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 26th day of June , 1990, by the following vote of the Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS Mayor Nyman, 'Councilmembers Mattingly, Gralow NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS None. ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS Councilmembers . Moody, Humphrey APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY -3- 9 b 0 0 It 4104- tow. p . rt 6 ..CoNCA per wt: - "1 r 5,146 mom, 1 p 7 ,5 _ .‘ %..4) c•-_01/410 •--__ V o.f_ic wc(', ---- cG ca,2 Nr�., lG ; oar) cx:o,J t.ii\Se)4(1,6( f6 :t 6A),/9,.. ..401 -J (ers) ) 2( __ E,l (,A) amenkli‘kej- 6 c uC) b r % prof 1 i�w per--d- a Y t , nl1( ;f : 4/J GCi �l I 6sa14 .tksjt j (3(aN &4e,&k' vc,0lo (s..}� (c-viej) ddieaj �P1� H1JG-l� -1 y9�' 1r M1 ♦vim , 10:30 FROM TO 3777288 P.01 CITY OF P. ,DS VERDES ESTL . ES FROM: (310) !78.0303 twos vei,0445, CITY MALL POST OFFICE BOX 1006 PALOS VEROES ESTA'Its CALIFORNIA 8°274.0283 CITY OF PALOS VERDES ESTATES 340 PALOS VERDES DRIVE WEST P. O. BOX 1086 PALOS VERDES ESTATES, CA 90'274-0283 (310) 378-0383 (310) 378-7820 (FAX) C TO: I/ JURISDICTION/COMPANY: TELECOPY COVER PAGE tom;` 20-'J% 4yz c\th.cs.J.d.) TITLE OF DOCUMENT: c_ # OF PAGES (INCLUDING TRANSMITTAL PAGE) i �., � /0 DATE AND TIME SENT: NOTES: IF YOU HAVE ANY DIFFICULTY RECEIVING THIS TRANSMISSION, PLEASE CALL BACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. THANK YOU. 340 PALOS VERDES DRIVE WEST PALOS VERDES ESTATES. CALIFORNIA 90274-122A ,RUC, --- -1992 10:30 FR0'l TO 3 I I 1288 P.0_ C RESOLUTION NO . R90-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OE THE CITY of PALOS VERDES ESTATES, CALIFORNIA RAISING FEES FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES WHEREAS, the expense of providing enginceriag services has increased; and WHEREAS, the fiscal integrity of the City is dependent upon fees accurately reflecting the costs of the services for which they are imposed; THE CITY COUNCIL OF TeE CITY OF PALOS VERDES ESTATES, California, does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: Each and every prior resolution. which is modified or contradicted by this resolution is to that extent modified, and if need be to accomplish the purpose of this resolution, revoked in relevant part(s). SECTION 2: The amounts for the following Public Works fees shall be as follows: Pee 'Fee Amount Dumpst:e rs Curb and gutter Sidewalks Curb drains Driveways Residential C' mmercia1 Masonry Mailboxes Other Public works Permits 'SECTION 3: The amounts Department fees shall be as follows: Fee $80.00 75.00 75.00 45.00 75.00 95.00 35.00 55.00/hr. for the 'following Planning Grading application Conditional Use Permit. Variance Neighborhood Compatibility Review Lighting Permit Application Sign Plan Conceptua i Review of Project -1- Fee Amount $500.00 750.00 750.00 600.00 500.00 50C.00 150.00 AUG-04-19S2 1.0: :1 FROM d TO .??7288 F.03 C Non-standard Encroachments Tree topping/removal Planting Plans Preliminary Site Review by City Engineer or Geologist 125.00 100.00 125.00 75.00 Prior to action by City Council on any application, revised application may be submitted for one half of the original application fee. SECTION 4: Until subsequently revised the amount for th following Building Department fees shall be as follows: Pee Fee Amount, Real Property Records Report 65.00 Replacement of approved plan 20.00 Preliminary Site Review by City Engineer or Geologist 75.00 Al other fees shall be s ldin indicated onlAttachment=A annexed hereto and lan candkincorporated here.n by this reference. PASSED AND , APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26th day . of June 1990. ATTEST: 7 �: HfA1 `u4- 1 iy 10:31 E' PUF'i • TO 3777288 P.04 RESOLITI'ION NO, R91-62 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF F.A.[ OS VERDES ESTATES, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING FEES FOR COASTAL PERMITS `WHEREAS, the fees for coastal permits have not been established, and; WHEREAS, the fiscal integrity of the City is dependent upon fees . urately reflecting the costs of the service for which they are imposed; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALOS VERDES ESTATES, California, does hereby resolve as follows: "T CTION 1: The amounts for the following fees shall bz as follows. Est Fee Amoutu Coastal Permit (solitary application) $750 Coastal Permit $375 (applied for in conjunction with neighborhood compatibility, variance or conditional use permit) Development in coastal zone that does not require Coastal Permit • by code • $50 PASSED AND APPROVED AND ADOPTED TICS 26th day of January , 1992. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROBERT V. WADDEN, JR, CITY TTORNEY j TOIL_ P.04 13"0�. H 0O�J� N E M E M 0 WO Vie-` DA /7 , IT` YV PM „�1 , �.1 ARSE NO v 3)0 g3Q '7 n �-(�` I + Car3o (N EXT. Y• E E s s. A G E 60 V Ex -f- '' 3o ^ SIGNED/ 'let PHONED BACK CALL RETURNED D!( SEE YOU TO� AGAIN ALL WAS IN ❑v URGENT P H 0 N E M E, M 0 TO _ DA( C� TI AM ,)j Z�PM F AREA CODE NO. __ EXT. M E S s A G E SIGNED PHONED BACK ❑ CALL RETURNED SEE YOUO AGAIN ALL WAS IN URGENT /kV jel clo. »J rw7 2 J O CJ»M /4 34 *- �f4 Q O. �l 0 of) ,200 pan p.��t9S 667 00S,e - l Ol 00g t Q$L p0 91( )1 -T "/� -41 rs/Drlyovv ...-re1)1 n 9t plc) -;S3-D-)'d )7C V0.)Cdij ._EZ *W - (W) r°•P° 14v Nonipr? ; 2t (16 Irv—'.yv+,a,1-0z 4Arv or,(19 21 °"141 ..lY L I -- 1 97 eT, Y• . .-'17...j1(61d7 ).1 _rIrrauho No-zi -t) ()00") 1 rpl, .ro d ‘74 ..) 7. --It& r 2 rJ 4 ti, ,111 a X4,5 L. 4:14J -a& 1ST) V 9 d e.,,,, r;s-d- rt' _1'M,y ,1 dO.,r v3 d Iv OS.) 9 SL\ I. Y ' -I Y Ot' (.1K13U:\ . 4,4.t)N. TA 1.4 \ , \ .4. 4 it j. CITY $F CAR t,N 701 EAS :i 4-..:i2 • ;i:1ir67 • CARSON 't -1 t 'x, CARSON, i. ys C I CY CLLKK-- 3777266 ; g 1/ • 2025 1290, 90745 - 2 1 3 830 • 7600 COVER'SHEET Date /`l/9Z Time Page 1Of Please deliver the following pages to Agency, C Q"F ra "'t r 4-i ��..f' Attention j Phone hltimber FAX Number C/ Comments on tha extents of transmission From Sender Department Phone Number FAX Number csvpvvrLv Ctol_a 75 /V. G)3 (213)513.624.3 The Cit f.0 soa.bica)F., x r. group 1 2 a 3 telecopy machti„s t t:c�u hgve it. ( 243 )eao 7r •F) L Dlspoaltlon • �t�-e.tiv r==u • t. p Li ata in it modit f .0 SENT BY:CITY OF CARSON 8- 4-d2 : 3:11PM : CITY CLERK- COMMUNITT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • SCHEDULE OF FEES EFFECTIVE DECEMBER If. 1191 1. Mobltshome Park Application Fo* $241.00 Plur for General Rent and Capital 11.14 per Improvement Rent Increaser space fa posing* cats per application 1. General Plan Amendment 12,100.00 2. Iene Change 11,100.00 3. Zoning Ordinance Amendment • 41.000.00 4. Conditional Use Permit 11, 100.00 1. Variance 1710.00 6. Design Overlay Review 4710.00 7. Extension of Time for Discretionary 1110.00 Permits 4. Environmental Assessment $10.00 plus tlnitlal Study) 1100.00 for a Negative Osctar*Uon determination Environments! Impact Report 10. Tentative Tract Map (original, revised or vesting) 11. Tentative Petra! Map (original, revised or vesting) 12. Development Agreement 13, Speclflc Plan Review /AL• / J� 12" V",rQ/`1 Q(7'v`�Y'QI Cf �iL+t / CI•!/Ca7�V 14. Mina Lot Line Adjustment'evlsw 11. Moblidame Ralocetlon Impact Report/ Modification or Extension et Time 16, MobIlsherns Park Application Fee fa General Rent and Capital tmprovenwrd Rentlncreasee 17. field Inspection Review 11. Release of Utllhies/Cartlflcates of Occupancy 11. Building RelocetIon Review 20. Certificate of Compliance Review 21. Parcel Msrye► Review 22. Extend Nonco ffrming Privilege Review 31. Bond Processing 24. Appeal on a Discretionary Permit action 21. Modification of Conditions of Discretionary Permits (No Public Nearing) tees, of contract 12,000.00 $2,000.00 12,000.00 plus 1100/gross a$ 46,000.00 plus 1100/yea{ sow 1314.00 14,000.00 plus 1100.00/unit 1241.00 plus 11.31 per space $43.119 110.00 1600.00 1300.10 1100.00 3600.00 130.00 112 of filing fee 1350.00 26, Modification of Conditions of Original filing DlatraUonary Permits lee (Pubile Hearing) • 27. Interpretation of toning Ordinance 1600.00 • 2.0. Billboard/Electric Message Road Fee 11,000,00(for flrst board) 430.00 (each additional board) 21. Document Copy 1.21 page 30. Microfiche $10.00 let document 11.50 each adUiUOMi Pair 31, Miner Records Research Intim 335.14 documenting toning and compllanco with applicable standards. One hour reseereh et Ins 13. Major Records Research overhead service fee on an hourly bails, reproduction cotta extra 33. Copies of Tapes 34. Mailing of Plenning Commission agenda fete sheet 31. All other appeals (Including Revocation) 16, 3ld9walk, Parking Lo! 1 Tent Sales/ sr..�.�......._ _ . 121.00/hour 120.00 each 110.00 year 1300.00 121.00 3777288: 2/ 2 3 e u � v, S--/ (tc sica -ica pop - — `'--f -mil -r 4- r►e f use ,per 4.e1/41(,.lopp6 _ -- to It ( ;Jo() t Zoe, t r►e J 13 Opc,11 • p.5 o r 1/ V. ' I I 1 � vv it la 1L..GP ms �1 .G (1.6 7[f�Jc�eNtM��— afi)(.cs-i-.-04 6cs-Situ gi - al) ).gam 6f1,02/. ptc,A) av-Aetkx&e/Jfr— fiG. _ '4 a't Pecc_Ise. Ply � as ft_ \ tk c, `4N (ijLe sJabv _ ri,rzr nit-77- Anc,N:f;c6f:t1J Ctvg,f_41..w____C6L1‘ Aw-A3 cf tOi.c (74,00 (09.U� CLJ 1,4,42,sv oflipo° C4t° a' 111 .00 or M;cam fi-sw c,D 12 1 �n •, � y, O i 51 ' '2136.u357 (4' _ CITY OF TOKR PLN 10001 • - i 3031TCity orr&.nce Blvd., TowL r C C� �:� `. . f r. i A Sch.edu1c? off? Karat. rgPE f ::: t 1_ nprmit r ision of Los �-r -NASti 17.7.1 x ,..,vrunental Assessment SiL/ r - •(Ewm. • -.3Yf�•'ar —�f'i frir MAPPING FEL API! PILter General Plan Amendment 6/ $ -Tr?' Vol ..7R" 6 ?•�'�' 1 ci Modification of CUP, PP, Pa /.0654--- $ Planning Commission Review 3,-7454tr. �� p "' $ Precise Plan of Development JZt) — `" . 2...1r26,77 f $ 634 ,/Tentative Tract Validation Permit . NJ Variance Waiver Zone Change $ - - $ $. per lot ,.., $41,056 — ��► $�4'' _ g s----- . $ 1,056 .. �l�.. $ 792 ��/b7 - �Qg�...r $ 1,056 Y $ ADMINISTRATIVE,M1SCEIJANEOUS PERMITS ..mac a = .1t Exception T_Ir FET 1 /3 107 41k nlas1oe ►7.Xemptivii Minor Modifi1'.ation • Satellite Dish Tune Extension • • '�.$ _ i-- QnA110CtQ r-• •' --- - 3,5d 1b3 • 'Joy r $ 3 1 . - 105 34, -' 1• - APPEALS: ALL APPEALS OF PLANNING DIRECICA ACTION. PI A.ti; 1`C < <r.:'.Ilr �:nt� ,� t i y:, A.ND ENkiry ,'4EN AL !t- ' i .v BOARD DECISIONS MUST BE FILE[) WITHIN 15 DAYS O1= Tn'. •.,': .`+I+L;'• r CH!: CLERK AT A COQ, 711(91 N.: t City of Ton *nce. d�xtnIz +� pn.rt•t l Xr., Torrance Olvd, Form.' t, CA 3i 61:11-5541 Planning Fee s Tie 1 Uxx I LN :A0er �....;.. ... +{k:.,":. i.., 4.1,4V .t,$ • Gamy., _4 ''nr•'a'eside1 a"L 1-dri.YrS Nt,?'ta. ide r t 'o !E , 'Ord Minot Modification Fate:' e oraryr Tent Tent EYi±1r n.s'otns, Re)oc 1 dt Company rfurmatiorr uests Ceres Rp.ort OCOpying g lisps 0480 Zoning Maps (s t) $ 2 $1 00 tat pa; $ ,10each %Ct , ,00-S4 411,1 004-1‘7.? Total: k'UZ )+ iat 1000 100-101-630004-10a) 100-101-630004- 100) 1W- 1;04-7.00) 100-101-630004-1000 t 1(0101-630004-1000 ` $41,0 4- GA f° fa • TOW- $ w .� T3 40 + -tax ($.2 1 rota!: „ 100-101430004-14715 1t -101-ega 4l f0,101-63/1006- '1 61 r>b9L1 BLDG & `;AI' t.TY. E J 001 Post -11.` 4 ara fax Itansrptal 1 °• /j'4 iee 77- 7Z tthJ w, sk From 1 From 101 n 100 cubic y,-�tLa:� 1.46 o 1 000 lubf r v,x'. ' From 100.1 to 10000 1ihio "� ,!,209 From l T 0 rrt t - ,,r e >� i. o 110000 c.. From 1. �� : r'r e e42 6146 f i _,� [- C. -;. !} J' �. .: . .� 1 3 �1 to 200000 cull. • f ,`, , 3J - - plus $84 tuw eac°r .y L•:.,- _, Frol 20O+Jo .o G . La? - ,, a•.ti 17 plus $44 - a- - _ s. a.... _ _ a„ for a n.,.A , ;j ' A. t' k _ . .0 S 4.); TABLE �'Xt . _..-_ - ,x r y_ a.s..._. Y._.sa &kt .6.0..-.sa �.It.' r}r A® •'��:M4i' T et: at.1 From 1 to 1.00 cubic a "dF 6166 From 101 to 1000 us 808 for adCA . + 9 x t. t 100 cub l,.. i r}rtH r y . ,� r m 1 001 tp _ 0000 �G , � t .. "r .e.c i F $1,00,)� �.r r x rst 1000 cubic ., . a >. p.�un $84 for eaon dJd i.t' canal 1.W103 ::.-16.1 r M_ From 1000 to s to 100000 s;4tkrlt.' yu:^ tr�,51 ,.j r Y 1L�,.. I t��4Ct �l1 f1 E`,.. i . �, 8b aCY tih •.�d? �.i fit -1',C0 tv t xL Wt 10000 t'ub . yar4L From 100001 Y 995-99!)9S9 cubic l ;F;_ti ,, Y�,�►.,�, Os )r fractioic t.h;re�.:� plus 2r 9 for a 85.274. tor:" t �r f_ r _t 10000°: cu �.�..___..plu.� each additional 10000 .1i1 L y r�i , ,r _,, • a .4 rr �... p,. ,.. . yr. -w. .a.d•,..a t e're r friction t ; } ,f it's t. `"00000 ctr! - hr. .l d A :i$ 'r c c1 3n +. .._ .w .-..« -.,. _ c.. -.,.,,...... From 1 to 1000 sq:uarc fcfit From 1001 to 10000 squar6 fec-t, i 46 From 10001 4o 20000 .09 Frvm 2000 j to square ss�?� �2a9 1s 0000 squaw: foe., 41-09 r, plus $84 for E� .� i i `•,4`- I.� �a =' U�1Cw �� From 100 to a each edd y ,;,e _ ti r�0i ;i~ �._ r(_ 0 f� q�ctae t 00999_059 sc�ua.ra te,'� 834 _ ` .tai � tor � � �?IC�, ,tt,r�a thereof •n'� r p1 � 3 foreach arid; 'k �4` r4 n r the., � ;ir •��. 1.1r r1Q � square:- f'esrE� 0T 1 'to 1000 squa.1-o f ret vm 10014 *to 10000 plus 644 for each �t�f±�w]:;��i a.3i7° r� From 10001 to 100000 squ,lre t ver o: fraction • th 4 r -o , plus I� ► $4L, to * hz t trzt 10000 sq t , f� •,* o� onrh 3,10,t:on r Ei le;(3., nwr. :}ec f Lt�.., ou 100001 to 99999y399 ctr1arc' t*, a i',. t cox O00oofsq 411E .t of r, 9 V19` loo t'h4 Ar t. . 0.0000 sqt. aro f:ut!* plus $8'4 for each AdelYt.{ one ` 1000o -014-T, ac o_ traction the uo4. c'ri/ 7e'•,'� "ea JO 0 3 Gc.f- — -- �� — — �ac.f r►ap use per i-`: - te evc lopi e& 4' _ 'W - =` 1 -__VOX 1614 e, - (c) , µ 11 (v',oar) Ci 1 J �i2,„,E, q3 c� I/jl72 _ 11.44-.4-zo...__pqi_cci /sop_ ___ --OrXv- 1(4_5. co 1 � K -0c)- I6 00 +- G:Nc. 161S. ''L C/LItn¢, 2-ONf Arrnelk§rfteAti- Uiro.0)-'.eJ- I qe`" ") 6:4401. ( (.cam L;NG OkS \ ) "-,,cqA- ccf.wj 170-1q$ f66:14 (eIR 161/5 -co -; 6.4 K. go - gy.cO � F C$ o 0 ( & ,,,A1 cL ) --() fi ?3+ (�(q:04,A-e,_14turt._ �. %► \#7 �3_. �r i- �_-per 7 cl-`1 efe.c.Ase. 0,6-4 e, i -c 'O/ -- (a/Le ck) rvg_ Me N - (tAC(C.f%Cotki/J to V OAP-. a ,„Go ,v tic). o Or r' C C 3`7 CITY OF HAWTHORNE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 'CITY Of 0000 MIICMSOaf' 4455 Wait 126th Street • Hawthorne, California 90250 T1L3tAZ O. (110 ) 171-7033 TRANSMISSION I3f7OAMITZOW $XIIT The following pages are for: Name of Individual: Name of Firm: City and State: FAX Number: (of recipient) From: Special Instructions: (310) 970-7941 3 77- 72.8' H'F'--- j7L.l;kl5 Der14 Total Number of Pages Sent 7 ,(Including Information Sheet) Documents are being transmitted from: (Name) If there are any problems during the transmission of these documents, please call (310) 970-7941 as soon as possible Verificat on Information: Date 1 Time: 3:36 By Whom: s 4_, 7C, CITY OF HAWTHORNE PLANNING DEPARTMENT RUNG FEES Effective: January 1, 1992 TYPE OF APPLICATION 1. GENERAL PLAN AMENOSENT Bas.: For parcels 20.00dof land area or le Additional Base: For each additional 10,00 land area thereafter Pre.Env.Asses: For parcels20,00040 land area or less Add.Pre.Env.Asees: Each add.10,0 • • ' • land area • Negative Declar: For parcels 20, • ( 1 ' . land area or less Add. Neg. Declar: Each add. 10 II 4 s • land area FEE BREAKDOWN $2.363.00 $ 219.100 X $ 121.00 $ 28.00 S 329.00 $ 55.00 X FEE CHARGED $ TOTAL FEES: $ 2 CHANGE OF ZONE Basic For parcels 20.00dot land area or $2,407.00 $ Additional Base: For each additional 10,000Y'bf land area thereafter $ 219.0OX = $ Pre.Env.Asses: For parcels 20,0110kf area or less $ 121.00 $ Add.Pre.Env.Asses:Each add.10, I • 1 ' . land area $ 28.00X = $ • Negative Declar: For parcels 20,1 , + . land area or less $ 329.00 $ Add. Neg. Declar. Each add. 10,00 • 1. land area $ 55.00X = $ TOTAL � $ 3 VARIANCE Base: For parcels 20,0000of land area or lesg $1,645.00 $ Additional Base: For each additional 10,000%f land area thereafter $ 110.O0X = $ Pre.Env.Asses: For parcels20,00046 land area or less $ 121.00 $ Add.Pre.Env.Asses:Each add.10,0 I I land area $ 28.00X = $ • Negative Declar: For parcels 20.4 • i " . land area or less $ 329.00 $ Add. Neg. Declar Each add. 10,000IFbf land area $ 55.00X = $ TOTAL FEES; City of Hawthorne Planning Department 1992 Land Use Application Filing Fees TYPE OF APPLICATION FEE BREAKDOWN FEE CHARGED 4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (Except Condominiums) 8aee: For parcels20,00 af land area or 1 $1,645.00 Additional Base: For each additional 10,00dr''of land area thereafter 4. $ 110.00X = Pre.EnvAsses 0'r"For parcels 20,00 of land area or less $ 121.00 Add.Pr+e_EnvAssesrEach add.10,00 I • land area $ 28.00 X = • Negative Declr. For parcels 20,01 • " • land area or less $ 329.00 Add. Neg. Declar. Each add. 10,00 • '' • land area $ 55.00 X = $ $ S S. $ TOTAL FEES $ S. CONDI TiONAL USE PERMIT FOR CONDOMINIUMS Base: For parcels 20,0000of land area or Additional Base: For each additional 10,00drof land area thereafter I For each new unit For each converted unit Pre.Env.Asses: For parcels 20,00 of land area Add.Pre.EnvAsses: Each add.10,00 * Negative Elector: For parcels_20,0 Add. Nag. °eclar: Each add. 10,0 $1,992.00 $ $ 110.00X = $ $ 165AOX = $ $ 740.00X = S $ 121.00 $ of land area $ 28.00X = $ of land area or less $ 329.00 $ land area 8 55.00X = $ **Additional Fee - $15.00 annual inspection fee for each unit, Minimum Foe $60.00 TOTAL FEES: $ 6. UNCLASSIFIED USE PERMIT Base: For parcels 20,00dr'of land area or le $2,363.00 $ Additional Base: For each additional 10,00 Land area thereafter $ 219.00X = $ Pre.Env.Asses: For parcels 20,00006of land area or less $ 121.00 , $ Add_Pre.EnvAsses: Each add.10,00 1 " • land area $ 28.00 X = S • Negative Oeclar: For parcels 20,0 ' • " . land area or less $ 329.00 S Add. AdNag. Declar: Each add. 10,00 " • land area $ 55.00X = $ TOTAL FEES: $ 2 City of Hawthorne Planning Department 1992 Land Use Application Filing Fees TYPE OF APPiJCAT1ON T. SUBDIVISION OF LAND (Tentative Tract Map) Base: For parcels 20,004'o( land area or less Additional Base: For each lot or piece' Pre.Env.Aesss: For parcels 20,000 Add.Pr+e.Env.Asses:Each add.10,0 Negative Declar: For parcels 20, Add. Neg. Declar: Each add. 10,00 area or less land area land area or less land area 8. LOT SPLIT (Tentative Parcel Map) Base: Far parcels20,000'of land area or less Additional Base: For each lot or p cel Pre.Env.Assee; For parcels 20,000 and area or less Add.Pre.Env.Asses: Each add.10, + + + •'' • land area ' Negative Declar: For parcels 20 do + of land area or less Add. Neg. Debiar: Each add. 10,00 rand area 9. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT FEE BREAKDOWN $1,645.00 $ 165.00 X $ 121.00 $ 28.00X $ 329.00 $ 55.00 X TOTAL FEE& FEE CHARGED $ $ $1,645.00 $ 165.00X $ 121.00 $ 28.00X $ 329.00 $ 55.00 X TOTAL FEES $ lase: For reviewand documentation 10. RELOCATION PERMIT $ 1.645.00 Base: For review and public heariga Pre.Env.Asses: For parcels20,001 Add.Preinv.Asses: Each add.10,00 • Negative Declar: For parcels 20,00 Add. Neg. Declar: Each add. 10,00 d area or less land area) land area or less land area $1.645.00 $ 121.00 $ 28.00X $ 329.00 $ 55.00 x = 3 TOTAL FEES $ $ _AIM! Uk Y Y tWWIYi�L7M(i i1. d rs�Ii l�l�� LY��1a� YYY�iLY1(r 1992 Land Use Application Filing Fees SENT BY:REDEVELOPMENT DEPT TYPE OF APPLICATION 11. RELOCATION IMPACT REPORT Base: For parcels 20,00dof land area or Iasi Additional Base: For each additional 10,00x# of land area thereafter Pre.Erw.Asses: For parcels 20,000'rof nd area Add.Pre.Env.Asses:Each add.10,00 land area Negative Declar. For parcels 20.00 • " • land area or less Add. Neg. Declar: Each add. 10,001 ' • land area FEE BREAKDOWN _ FEE CHARGED $2,363.00 $ 219.00X $ 121.00 $ 28.00X $ 329.00 $ 55.00X S S TOTAL FEES: S 12. HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT Bases For review and public hearing (Includes the business liceatsefee) $ 709-00 13. PETITION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE Base: For review and public hearing Preliminary Environmental Assesment * Negative Declaration S 2,363 00 S 121.00 S 329.00 TOTAL FEES: S 2•,813.00 14. PETITION FOR CLARIFICATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OR APPEAL. FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION Base: For review and public hearing $ 2`363.00 15. REHEARING ON NEW EVIDENCE Bases For reviewand public hearing ONIGNIALFEE City of Hawthorne Planning Department 1992 Land Use Application Filing Fees TYPE OF APPLICATION 16. APPEALS Base: For reviewand public hearing FEE BREAKDOWN T. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT A. Consultant cost of preparing EIR (consultant to be selected by the City) B. Staff Review of consultant prepared EIR, 20% of cost of preparing the EIR. 18. APPLJCATION MICROFILMING OF DOCUMENTS AND PLANS 8 112" x 11' Documents $ .85 per sheet X Plans: $ 2.22 per sheet X �. Zoning Status Report 2. Other Research and Written Reports 3. Purchase of the General Plan 4. Purchase of a Zoning Map 5. Purchase of a Land Use Policy Map 6. Photocopies 7. Microfilmed 8 1/2' X 11' Documents Microfilmed Plans 8. Planning Commission Agenda Plarnnning Commission Minutes ADDITIONAL FEES *61.00 $ 61.00 per hour - minimum 2 hours $ 73.00 $ 6.50 $ 4.25 $ .36 per copy $ -65 per copy $ 1.10 per copy $ 1.10 $ 4.15 per meeting City of Hawthorne Planning Department 1992 Land Use Application Filing Fees DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT APPUCAT1ON HUNG FEE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASSEMBLY MILL 3155„ CHAPTER 17.06 All Applications are subject to one or more of the following fees as mandated by the State Department of Fish and Game: Applicable Fees: Environmental Impact Report Negative Declaration Application Fee Water Diversion (Water Resources Control Board Only) County Administrative Fee (Notice of Exemption) Total Fees: $ 850.00 $1,250.00 $ 850.00 $ 25.00 $ NOTE: (CHECKS MUST BE MADE OUT TO: LOS ANGELES COUNTY RECORDER) 6 WEN BY : REDEVELOPhMENT DEPT ' 1 ! ; 8- 5-92 ;11 : 06PA ; Exhibit "A" City of Hawthorne Department of Building ands Safety Schedule of Construction Permit and Inapsctlon Pees January 1, 1991 TADLa i$Q. 3•® • OLDZ2O 9Bam.12 pug (Booed upon Volume of Material Handled) 2139707033-+ 93777288;# 2 PAga 16 1.50 cub -.c. yerda • •♦ e • • • • R`'• • r o. a. •.•.... a i. a.. •. r...4 Sl to 100 cubic yardo......: ♦ . JJ3�09 01.12 -do 101 to 1000 0 . yds.•o+t.eao•e4s, _�•��:•.e........•.•.....0 4 w Eu ..22, Q r 1QLS�.ia •� ii. ?i �`i�r1�`'� �i� : 104 ups 1001 to 10,000 ou. ydu.,.....„_, 0 lRlsill S 11.2 poie%. �?QA1 , ,,.; � i � ivs: .,-, ,,,z,tos.mg, mar Lflajaamadm. 10,001 to 100,000 cu. yd0.•:. , s.issi..u344.oe ****** .9,422.6.42 over 100_ V4 100,001 Ou.yde or moro•...e•..... I 4 IF •.•1,} A44..00 Q oa pelt. , -0 0,,1 aV .� 22,4 .i-. OTHER INSPECTIONS AND marti 1. Inspectiono outoido oS no ;n1 buo1.nceb hours., per houxoA..� .._..._.•. (m3 dmun ohtteo s' tth Kett 'b) 2. Roinepection few 0000000d =dor provioiono ag 8oction 30D } Inopootionci for which no foo ics 1 pecifically indicated, par hour (minimum charge - two t elur3) 3. * Or the total hourly coot to is tho greatoat. Thio coot ovarhsad, oquipmont, ho.arly of tho amp2,ayoaa involved • wy\a iNIV1 9I 0 44.91)? x._00* 0 J000, tho 1.iAW�iltk� uhicAovu6 c3Aa11 11.0,144o au orvioion, vo Q :1 IA46 33?ogt'SO • SENT BY:REDEVELOPMENT DEPT t t ; 5- 5-92 ;11:06AM : 2139707033 93777268;i# 1 • CITY OF HAWTHORNE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 44SS west 126th Street. hawttlorna,t".ai,:Ornta902S0 'CITY 0f GOGO i m' TRI, mx na ■...131 419.3A 713 TRAMB tI9530j INFORMATION SHEET The following pagan are for: Name of Individual: Nara of Firm: City anc State: FAX Number: (of recipient) From: Special Inetrvctions: (213) 970.7941 Total Number of Pages Sent . (Including Infor:rati,, , S ►e et) Documents are +Mng Tranamittod frau: \\\ (karat). If there are any 7roblemn during t!;o transmiasit:n of these documents, p'' w =1 (213) 970-7941 as noon as possible. Verification Information: Date: Time: By Whom: 0 • • • b 1 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA April 17, 1990 -=An adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of Rolling -x Hills was called to order at 7:35 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the City Hall/Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling 1 -Hills, California, by Mayor Leeuwenburgh on Tuesday, April 17, 1990. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilwoman Murdock, Councilman Pernell, Councilwoman Swanson, Mayor Leeuwenburgh ABSENT: Councilman Heinsheimer (excused) ALSO PRESENT: Terrence L. Belanger Ray Hamada L. D. Courtright Julie Roberts Chief James Corbett Capt. Dennis Gillard Ann Johnson Kurt Donat Flavio Bisignano Tom Boyd Kent Browning Bill Cross Evie Hankins Frank Hill Ken Leeuwenburgh Beverly Pernell Ron Warmbier City Manager Principal Planner City Treasurer Secretary L.A. Co. Fire Dept. Lomita Sheriff's Stn. Los Angeles Times Architect Resident Resident Resident Resident Resident Resident Resident Resident Resident CANVASS OF GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION ON APRIL 10. 1990 CERTIFICATION OF CANVASS OF GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION The City Manager certified the results of the General Municipal Election held on April 10, 1990, pursuant to "Exhibit A" (attached). RESOLUTION NO. 605: RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION, DECLARING THE RESULT AND OTHER MATTERS PROVIDED BY LAW Councilman Pernell moved approval and adoption of Resolution No. 605, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON APRIL 10, 1990, DECLARING THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW". Councilwoman Swanson seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. ADMINISTRATION OF OATHS OF OFFICE The City Clerk administered the oaths of office to Councilmembers Leeuwenburgh, Murdock, and Swanson, who were reelected at the General Municipal Election on April 10, 1990, for four year terms as Members of the City Council. RECESS The meeting was recessed for a brief reception. The meeting was reconvened at 8:00 p.m. OPEN AGENDA Dr. Flavio Bisignano, Member of the Wildlife Preservation Committee, reported on the preparations for a booth at the Earth Day celebration on April 22, 1990, at Palos Verdes High School from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The City Manager noted that a resident of Rolling Hills, Mr. John Rowlands, provided a banner to place in the City's booth. Councilwoman Swanson requested that a letter of appreciation be sent to Mr. Rowlands. Mr. Bill Cross, 63 Portuguese Bend Road South, inquired about the status of the slab protruding into the roadway on Portuguese Bend Road South, in the Flying Triangle area. The City Manager indicated that the City has put in a rehabilitation order with Los Angeles County, as well as for the neighboring property and 4 Wrangler. The Planner. commented that the County has notified the property owners of their responsibility. The City Manager explained that the City will proceed with the rehabilitation if the property owners neglect to take act, and would be billed for the cost of the rehabilitation. Councilwoman Swanson verified that when the slab is removed, it would be done in a safe and appropriate manner. Mayor Leeuwenburgh asked that staff report back to the Council on the progress of this matter. CONSENT CALENDAR Resolution No. 606 regarding establishing an investment policy, and the minutes of March 26, 1990, were removed from the Consent Calendar. Councilwoman Swanson moved that the remaining items on the Consent Calendar be approved and accepted as presented. Councilman Pernell seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of an adjourned meeting of the City Council on April 9, 1990, were approved as written. Councilman Pernell moved that the minutes of a regular meeting of the City Council on March 26, 1990, be approved as corrected. Councilwoman Murdock seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. PAYMENT OF BILLS Demands Nos. 4448 through 4462, in the amount of 16,142.71, and demands nos. 4463 through 4500, in the amount of $40,885.35, were approved for payment from the General Fund. REJECTION OF CLAIM BY CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY The Council voted unanimously to California Water Service Company. RESOLUTION NO. 606: A RESOLUTION OF THE ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING AN INVESTMENT POLICY) reject the claim filed by CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF POLICY - (AMENDING EXISTING The City Manager explained that Resolution No. 606 had been revised, eliminating irrelevant paragraphs which were not pertinent to Rolling Hills. The revised resolution reflects the recommendation to amend the City's existing investment policy to expand investment alternatives. He noted that the expanded investment menu has one common restriction, i.e., that all investment of monies must be with financial instruments that are federally insured. Councilman Parnell suggested that in the next to last paragraph the word "daily" be eliminated. Councilwoman Swanson moved that Resolution No. 606, entitled 'A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING AN INVESTMENT POLICY", be approved and adopted, as amended. The motion was seconded by Councilman Pernell, and carried unanimously. 417 OLD BUSINESS 00 10 -3 GO ORDINANCE NO. 224: GOVERNING FR_MCHZSE FOR CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEn The City Manager explained that this is an ordinance, drafted by the City Attorney, governing franchises for cable television systems granted by the City and amending Title 5 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. The ordinance was introduced at the March 26, 1990, Council meeting, and is before the City Council for its second reading and adoption. Councilwoman Murdock inquired if the City Attorney had provided a written opinion regarding the issue of the Council's authority to grant rights over private property. The City Manager advised the Council that, to date, a written opinion has not bean received. Councilman Pernell suggested that this be held on the agenda, and continued to the next meeting, to allow the City Attorney the opportunity to provide a written opinion. He also suggested that a copy of this ordinance be forwarded to the Rolling Hills Community Association Board of Directors and their legal counsel, for review. The City Council concurred, and Mayor Leeuwenburgh ordered that this matter be continued to the Council's next meeting on April 23, 1990. Councilwoman Swanson pointed out that representatives of the Community Association have participated in the discussions regarding cable television and the franchising process. The City Manager clarified that this ordinance does not, in any way, usurp the authority of the Rolling Hills Community Association. NEW BUSINESS There were no matters of New Business for the Council's consideration. PUBLIC HEARINQ ZONING CASE NO. 417, KENT BROWNING, 64 SADDLEBACK ROAD Zoning Case No. 417 is a request for Site Plan Review for a proposed detached garage/stable structure, residential addition, and relocated pool. The Planning Commission, on March 17, 1990, voted unanimously to grant Site Plan Review approval for this project. The City Council chose to take jurisdiction of Zoning Case No. 417, and scheduled a public hearing for April 17, 1990. The Principal Planner briefed the City Council. He explained that the applicants, Mr. and Mrs. Kent Browning, have proposed the construction of a detached garage and barn building, at 64 Saddleback Road. The garage portion of the structure is proposed to be 1,848 square feet. The barn portion of the structure is proposed to be 848 square feet. The total square footage of the proposed structure would be approximately 2,696. The overall height of the proposed building will be 25.5 feet. The net area of the property is 151,685 square feet. With the addition of the 2,696 square foot garage/barn, the structural lot coverage would be 8,529 square feet, equalling 5.61 of the net lot area. The existing garage, which is attached to the residence, is proposed to be converted to living area. It appears I that the primary issues to be considered are: 1. The conversion of the attached garage area to living area; 2. The construction of a detached garage building to fulfill the minimum two -car, enclosed garage requirement; 3. The construction of a barn or stable, which is attached to the primary garage structure, specifically, a two-story barn; 418 4. The compatibility of the mixed -use configuration of a garage and a barn/stable, specifically, with the primary garage; and, 5. The construction of a i.e., will the building other livestock, or, for barn/stable related to intended use, be used for the keeping of horses or other purposes. This is the first mixed -use proposal Ordinance does not address the mixed -use Council will be establishing a policy as proposals will be handled, in the future. of its kind. The Zoning issue. Therefore, the to how these types of Mayor Leeuwenburgh invited comments from the audience. Mr. Kent Browning, 64 Saddleback Road, expressed his confusion and frustration at the application process. He, indicated that he was willing to respond to any concerns that the Council has. Councilwoman Murdock explained the process. She advised Mr. Browning that the Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council, and makes recommendations to the Council. e final action is the responsibility of the City Council. Councilwoman Murdock explained that the City Council has concerns about this new type of development application, i.e., mixed -use, and feels that this should be examined closely to establish a policy. Additionally, the Council concurred that a field inspection would be appropriate, and that it should be scheduled at a time when Councilman Heinsheimer is able to be present, since he was the one that initially expressed concerns. Mr. Browning proceeded to explain the reason for the request for the six -car detached garage, which is that he collects antique cars. Mr. Kurt Donat, architect for the project, explained the proposal and pointed out that it will be built on a caisson beam system. He also explained that it was felt preferable not to have two separate structures, which explains the mixed -use design. Councilwoman Swanson noted the minimal corral size, and Mr. Browning explained that there is no place near the barn adequate for horses to graze. It was noted by staff that there will be a separation wall dividing the barn/stable from the garage, and the mixed -use will not have an interior access. A11 circulation on the property will be completely interior to the property, and completely outside any easement or setback areas. Mayor Leeuwenburgh directed that this matter be continued to the next regular meeting of the City Council, on April 23, 1990, and indicated that at that meeting a field trip would be scheduled, probably for the week of April 30th to allow Councilman Heinsheimer the opportunity to participate in the field inspection. NATTERS FROM MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION (CCCA) MEETINQ Mayor Leeuwenburgh announced that the California Contract Cities Association (CCCA) will be meeting tomorrow to elect a First Vice Monts.President Councilmannd cond Pernellei indicated that w President. The meet ing will be in South El he would attend. SANZTAT ON DISTRMI MEETT 2 Mayor Leeuwenburgh reported that the Sanitation District would be meeting tomorrow. The Sanitation District has offered to be the lead 419 agency for SB 939, on recycling. They are proposing to help cities write a boilerplate proposal for implementing SB 939. TRASH 2000 Mayor Leeuwenburgh reported that she and the City Manager attended the "Trash 2000" seminar at Claremont -McKenna College on April 4, discussing SB 939 and its implementation. ;AGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES (LOCC) MEETING The Mayor reported that at the last League of California Cities ,:ACC) meeting, SB 1 (the transit bill) was discussed again, which had already been defeated twice previously. Ultimately, the League voted to endorse Polanco's bill (2541). NATTERS FROM STAFF RECYCLING PROGRAM CO The City Manager reported that the Sub -committee and staff need oI meet to develop a proposal for the City of Rolling Hills, to commend to the City Council. CIL RETREAT Q The City Manager suggested that discussion on the status of 1989 Council retreat matters, and the scheduling of a date for the 1990 Council retreat, be continued to the next meeting when the full Council is present. CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION 1CCCA) ANNUAL SEMINAR The City Manager announced that the Annual Municipal Seminar, onsored by the California Contract Cities Association, is scheduled r May 17-20, 1990, in Palm Springs. Reservations have been made for 1 Councilmembers. BUDGET WORKSHEET The City Manager advised the Council that a budget worksheet had been included in their packets, for their review. He indicated that there is a revision, which would be distributed under separate cover. Staff recommended that at the next Council meeting, the Budget Sub -committee be directed to meet with the City Treasurer, City Manager, and Finance Officer to discuss the direction of the budget for the next fiscal year. It appears that the budget process is on schedule with the calendar. ,SOUTH BAY CORRIDOR STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING The City Manager announced that there would be a meeting of the South Bay Corridor Steering. Committee on April 19, 1990. NEWS RELEASE A news release has been prepared regarding the recent court decisions on property in the Flying Triangle area. A copy of the news r ease will be transmitted to the various newspapers in the area. $ TH DAY The City Manager reported that Earth Day will be observed on the Peninsula at Palos Verdes High School, on Sunday, April 22, 1990, where groups from the South Bay will be presenting information to the various communities. The City of Rolling Hills will be represented, and will have a booth at the high school. The booth will be staffed by Members of the Wildlife Preservation Committee, and various informative environmental handouts will be provided. 5 420a Acco myi fursON The City Treasurer reminded position, Treasurer by the Council that position, now of herd retirement. Young, will be v the accountante announcement scheduled He suggested that ajoicated due Iton the with the Council's Personnel Sub -Committee, mmi joint meeting be representative from the Personnel Sub -Committee, City staff, a Association, and the Association Manard oer, f Directors of the description that can be g to discuss and preparemanjob description meeting Fridayn published soon as possible. morning, April 20, 1990. Mr. Courtright CAD SESSION A Closed Session was not requested. Mayor Leeuwenburgh adjourned the meeting at 9:30 p.m. APPROVED: Mayor City Clerk 421 EXHIBIT "A" CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF CANVASS I, Terrence L. Belanger, City Clerk of the City of Rolling Hills, County of Los Angeles, State of California, authorized by Resolution No. 604, adopted by the City Council on March 26, 1990, do certify that I have canvassed the return of the General Municipal Election held on April 10, 1990, and find that the whole number of ballots cast in the City, except absent voter ballots, was 528, that the whole number of absent voter ballots cast in the City was 114, making a total of 642 ballots cast in the City, that the number of votes given at each precinct and the number of votes given in the City to persons voted for and the respective offices for which the persons were candidates, were as follows: For�MEMBER of the CITY COUNCIL Name Martin L. Rosenzweig Frank Hill Virginia A. (tinny) Leeuwenburgh Joanne E. (Jody) Murdock Gordana Swanson Ann M. Carley City Clerk Dated: April 17. 1990 Total Absentee Votes Pct. 1 Ballots Cast 197 39 236 142 23 165 319 73 392 319 72 391 360 90 450 179 32 211 7 422 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA April 23, 1990 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills was called to order at 7:37 p.m. in the Council Chamber at the City Hall/Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rollinc Hills, California, by Mayor Leeuwenburgh on Monday, April 23, 1990. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilwoman Murdock, Councilman Pernell, Councilwoman Swanson, Mayor Leeuwenburgh ABSENT: Councilman Heinsheimer'(excused) ALSO PRESENT: Terrence L. Belanger L. D. Courtright Kevin Ennis Julie Roberts Chief James Corbett Capt. Dennis Gillard Ann Johnson Anne La Jeunesse Douglas McHattie Bill Cross Evie Hankins Frank Hill Betsy Raine Allan Roberts Marge Schmit V'Etta Virtue John Welbourn CONSENT CALENDAR City Manager City Treasurer Asst. City Attorney Secretary L. A. Co. Fire Dept. Lomita Sheriff's Stn. Los Angeles Times Peninsula News South Bay Engineering Resident Resident Resident Resident Resident Resident Resident Resident Councilwoman Swanson requested that the minutes of April 17, 1990, be removed from the Consent Calendar. She then moved that the remaining items on the Consent Calendar be approved as presented. The motion was seconded by Councilwoman Murdock, and it carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilwoman Swanson requested that the minutes of April 17, 1990, be amended to reflect the fact that Resolution No. 606, establishing an investment policy, is an amendment to the City's existing investment policy. Subsequently, Councilwoman Swanson moved that the minutes of April 17, 1990, be approved as amended. Councilwoman Murdock seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. PAYMENT OF BILIS Demands Nos. 4501 throug:at 4528, in the amount of $23,169.19, wen approved for payment from the General Fund. FINANCIAL STATEMENT The Financial Statement for the month of March, 1990, was accepted as presented. 423 RESOLUTION NO. 607: PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S MEDICAL AND HOSPITAL CARE ACT Resolution No. 607, entitled "RESOLUTION TO BE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S MEDICAL AND HOSPITAL CARE ACT", was unanimously approved and adopted. OLD BUSINESS ORDINANCE NO. 224: GOVERNING FRANCHISES FOR CABLE TELEVISION This matter was continued from the Council's meeting on April 17, 1990, to allow the City Attorney the opportunity to prepare a written opinion regarding the City's authority to establish a franchise on private property. The City Attorney is finalizing the opinion, and staff requested that this matter be continued to the Council's meeting on May 14, 1990. There being no objections, Mayor Leeuwenburgh so ordered. PRESENTATION OF PLAQUES OF RECOGNITION CO Mayor Leeuwenburgh presented Mr. Larry Courtright, City Treasurer, with a City plaque in recognition of his many years of dedicated service to the City of Rolling Hills. Councilwoman Murdock presented Planning Commission Chairman Allan m Roberts with a City plaque as a token of appreciation for his many Q years of dedicated service. Councilman Pernell presented Mrs. Evie Hankins, Planning Commissioner, with a City plaque in appreciation of her service and dedication to the community. Planning Commissioner Betsy Raine was presented a City plaque by Councilwoman Swanson, in honor of her service to the City of Rolling Hills. Councilman Pernell recognized Mrs. Marge Schmit, and presented her with a City plaque for her many years of dedicated service on the Rolling Hills Traffic Commission. Mrs. V'Etta Virtue was recognized and honored for her service on the Traffic Commission, and Councilwoman Murdock presented her with a City plaque as a token of appreciation. Mayor Leeuwenburgh presented Mr. John Welbourn with a City plaque in honor and recognition of his service on the Traffic Commission. Councilwoman Swanson suggested that the recognition of these individuals be advertised in the newsletter. NEW BUSINESS REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS - APRIL 7, 1990 The City Manager informed the Council that the Principal Planner, Mr. Ray Hamada, was attending a seminar at UCLA, and, thus, was unable to attend the meeting. Therefore, the City Manager indicated that he would be presenting the reports of the Planning Commission. ZONING CASE NO. 405. GLOVER SANDERS. 69 EASTFIELD DRIVE This is a request to modify the previously approved site plan to allow for the installation of a swimming pool and spa, at 69 Eastfield Drive, and, accordingly, to amend the Resolution of Approval. The City Manager explained that the previous site plan incorporated the building but not the swimming pool or spa. The revised plan will encompass a 495 square foot pool and spa, and approximately 1,310 2 424 square feet of additional decking. This would result in a structural lot coverage of approximately eleven percent (114) and a total lot coverage of approximately twenty-one percent (21%). The Planning recommendation for from the Council, file. Commission reviewed this matter, and reports a approval. There were no questions or objections and the report of approval was received for the ZONING CASE NO. 412: GORDON SIU. 9 CABALLEROS RQAD; MANSOOR MIRSAIDI, 1 MAVERICK LANE Zoning Case No. 412 is a request, by Mr. Gordon Siu, for a Variance to the side yard setback requirements to construct an addition to the existing residence at 9 Caballeros Road, and for Site Plan Review of the proposed residential additions. A joint application was also filed by Mr. Gordon Siu with respect to 9 Caballeros Road (Lot 32 -SK) and Dr. and Mrs. Mansoor Mirsaidi with respect to 1 Maverick Lane (Lot 31 -SK), requesting a Variance to construct a retaining wall, portions of which lie on both parcels described above. The reason for the joint application is as a result of a court agreement between the Mirsaidis and the previous property owner of 9 Caballeros Road (Stinnett) relating to the use of the easement between these two properties. The Planning Commission approved this application at their April 7, 1990, adjourned meeting. Subsequently, Dr. and Mrs. Mirsaidi, pursuant to their letter dated April 23, 1990, have indicated that they have not reviewed or approved the proposed plan, and, therefore, requested that the Council take no action. Staff proposed that the Council take jurisdiction of this matter for the purpose of remanding it back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration. Councilman Pernell moved that the Council take jurisdiction, and that the matter be remanded back to the Planning Commission for clarification and resolution. Councilwoman Swanson seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. The Council was advised that the appropriate action would be to take jurisdiction and set a public hearing. Following the public hearing, the matter could be remanded back to the Planning Commission. Councilman Pernell moved to reconsider his previous motion. Councilwoman Swanson seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. Mr. Doug McHattie, South Bay Engineering, indicated that he was also surprised by the correspondence from the Mirsaidis. He feels there is a simple misunderstanding, and that it is possible the problem could be resolved in the next couple of weeks. Councilman Pernell moved to take jurisdiction of Zoning Case No. 412, and schedule a public hearing for May 14, 1990. Councilwoman Swanson seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. ZONING CASE NO. 414. RICHARD COLYEAR. 35 CREST ROAD WEST This is a request, by Richard Colyear, for a Certificate of Compliance for a Lot Line Adjustment for real property in the vicinity of Chestnut Lane (Lot 241 -A -1 -MS) and real property located at 35 Crest Road West (Lot 241 -A -2 -MS). After three public hearings and a field inspection of the subject parcels, the Planning Commission voted to deny this request, since there was insufficient evidence presented by the applicant to find that Lot 241 -A -1 -MS would comply with Section 17.16.115 of the Municipal Code requiring each parcel to be developed with a driveway to a maintained roadway. The Planning Commission also determined that the two parcels created by the lot line adjustment would not conform 3 425 to local zoning and building ordinances since Lot 241 -A -1 -MS would not have the required minimum frontage of 150 feet. The Commission also lacked sufficient evidence to find that the two parcels would comply with the Site Plan Review Ordinance standards contained in Section 17.34.040, prohibiting extensive grading and requiring the preservation of natural slopes. Subsequently, Mr. Martin Fischer, legal counsel for Mr. Richard Colyear, wrote a letter, dated April 16, 1990, for the purpose of filing an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision. In addition, the required filing fee was submitted under protest. Councilwoman Swanson moved that a public hearing be scheduled for Tuesday, May 29, 1990, to hear the appeal. Councilman Pernell seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. OPEN AGENDA Mayor Leeuwenburgh invited comments from the public on any topic not on the agenda. No one spoke on the Open Agenda. co REPORT RE: PLANNING APPLICATION FEES The City Manager presented a brief staff report on recommended 10 changes to the various Planning, Zoning and Subdivision fees. The City Manager advised the Council that there must be notice m given of the Council's intention to reconsider the fees charged for Q the various planning activities, and the report gust be available for public review for 15 days, prior to the Council taking action. The proposed changes were highlighted, as follows: Minor Site Review Minor Variance Subdivision Map Filing Fee Code Amendment (non -City initiated) Filing an Appeal S 750.00 (new) S 750.00 (previously $1,000) $1,500.00 (new) $2,000.00 (previously $2,500) Varies -- (previously $3,500) The fee shall be equal to the amount of the original categorical application fee to which the appeal relates. Staff re-evaluated the previous $3,500 filing fee for an appeal of a Planning Commission decision, and concluded that the fee may have created a barrier to reasonable access to the appeal process. Thus, it was suggested that a more reasonable fee for filing an appeal would be the amount of the original categorical application. It was noted, however, that there had been justifiable evidence in past cases to justify the $3,500 fee. The staff report indicated that the fee for a Variance is $1,500.00. The City Manager advised that this was a typographical error; the amount should be $1,250.00, and will be so corrected. Councilman Pernell expressed concern about the fee potentially discouraging an individual from availing himself/herself of the appeal process. There was discussion regarding the fee for filing an ?,peal. Staff explained the _basis for the fee determination. The Council was advised that the fee is based on the estimated reasonable :ost of processing an application, per staff analysis. Councilman Pernell suggested that in the "Analysis of Cost Profiles" section of the report, a column be added for "Appeal", with the appropriate cost breakdowns. Councilwoman Swanson suggested that the report be revised to reflect the current versus proposed fees, on the attached "Schedule of Fees". 4 426 The format of the report will be revised, per the comments and suggestions of the Council, and this matter will be brought back to the Council for consideration at their meeting on May 14, 1990. PUBLIC HEARINGS - CONTINUED ZONING CASE NO. 417, KENT BROWNING. 64 SADDLEBACK ROAD The purpose for continuing the public hearing to this evening, was to schedule a field trip that would be mutually acceptable to all the Members of the City Council. Therefore, a field trip was scheduled for Monday, April 30, 1990, at 7:30 a.m. Staff was asked to inform Councilman Heinsheimer of the date of the field trip, and to advise the applicant's architect to have all proposed development staked. REVISED GENERAL PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR REVISED GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING ORDINANCE This public hearing was continued from the February 12th Council meeting. At that meeting the Council directed the Consultant, Cotton/Beland/Associates (CBA), to perform some specific work related to developing criteria which may or may not be utilized if a second -unit provision were to be incorporated into the General Plan, and, ultimately, the Zoning Ordinance. The Consultant has been working on the development of those criteria. Subsequently, there have .been some text changes to the General Plan and to the Environmental Impact Report. The changes to.the Environmental Impact Report have been determined not to be substantive, and, therefore, the EIR would not have to be recirculated. Thus, staff recommended that the public hearing on the Revised General Plan be continued to May 14, 1990, and that the public hearing be renoticed. Further, regarding the Environmental Impact Report, staff recommended that, following the public hearing this evening, the public hearing be closed and that this matter be continued to the Council meeting on May 14, 1990. The purpose for closing the public hearing on the EIR is to end the public comment period, so that all written and oral comments can be incorporated into the final report. Mayor Leeuwenburgh opened the public hearing, and invited comments from the audience on the Revised General Plan and on the Environmental Impact Report for the Revised General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. There were no public comments on these issues. Councilwoman Swanson moved that the public hearing on the Environmental Impact Report for the Revised General Plan and Zoning Ordinance be closed, and that consideration of the final EIR be set for the meeting on May 14. Further, that the public hearing on the Revised General Plan be continued to the Council meeting on May 14, 1990, and that the public hearing be renoticed. Councilman Pernell seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. MATTERS FROM MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS Mayor Leeuwenburgh advised the Members of the City Council to mark their selections, and forward their preferences to Mayor Pro Tem Heinsheimer at their earliest convenience. Staff was also reminded to prepare the appropriate resolutions designating the delegates and alternates to the various boards. DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION PERIOD Councilwoman Swanson commented on the issue of the length of construction time on development projects in the City. This seems to be an on -going problem, and she would like to revisit this issue. Therefore, the matter was tentatively scheduled for the May 29th meeting. 5 427 CALIFORNIA CONTRACT CITIES ASSOCIATION (CCCA) MEETING Councilman Pernell reported that he attended the California Contract Cities Association (CCCA) meeting, at which the following officers were elected: James Van Horn, 1st Vice President; Dennis McDonald, 2nd Vice President; Randy Bomgaars, Treasurer; Ruth Aldaco, Secretary. SANITATION DISTRICT Mayor Leeuwenburgh reported on the activities of the County Sanitation District. CO T..� MATTERS FROM STAFF In RECYCLING PROGRAM TRAFFIC IMPACT ON PALOS VERDES DRIVE NORTH Mayor Leeuwenburgh requested that staff monitor the discussions concerning the possible closure of Via Valmonte at the Torrance boundary. If it happens it would have a tremendous impact on the traffic on Palos Verdes Drive North. Additionally, staff was asked to request that Rolling Hills be included on the EIR review mailing list. The City Manager reported on the progress of the development of a Q recycling program for the City, and indicated that a sample recycling container, the kind that would be used at individual residences, would be available this week for the Council's inspection. The City Manager discussed the state mandate, enacted by AB 939, that each city prepare and adopt a Recycling Element, and that it be implemented by 1992. It is anticipated that the City of Rolling Hills will have a recycling program established by July, 1990. Councilman Pernell and Councilwoman Swanson suggested that the City staff provide a leadership role by recycling, wherever possible, at the work place. EARTH DAY The at Palos Wildlife generated City Manager that the Earth Day celebration was April 22nd, Verdes High School, and it was a huge success. The City's Preservation Committee had a booth at this event, and it a great deal of interest and activity. The City Manager noted that he obtained a small paperback book of environmental tips. Hence, staff will attempt to publish some type of environmental tip in each newsletter. STATUS OF 1989 COUNCIL RETREAT ITEMS This matter was held on the agenda until the full Council can be present. ,STATUS OF REHABILITATION OF PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD SOUTH There was no new additional information to report at this time. Staff will continue to monitor the situation. SENIOR ACCOUNTANT POSITION The City Council Personnel Sub -Committee and Rolling Hills Community Association Personnel Committee met with staff last week to develop a position description and salary for the position that will replace the Assistant Finance Officer position when Norma Young retires in July. Councilman Pernell commented that the meeting was a very positive one. 6 428 Subsequently, the City Manager reported that the recruitment process has begun. JOHNS CANYON/CHESTNUT LANE SEWER PROPOSAL Staff is awaiting information from Evensen Dodge, Financial Consultants, on estimated funding costs for this project. COUNCIL REORGANIZATION Since Mayor Pro Tem Heinsheimer was unable to attend, due to his flight being delayed, the Council reorganization was postponed until tomorrow evening. • CLOSED SESSION A Closed Session was not requested. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Leeuwenburgh adjourned the meeting at 9:45 p.m., to Tuesday, April 24, 1990, at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at City Hall. APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor 429 MINUTES OF ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA APRIL 24, 1990 An adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills was called to order at 5:10 p.m., in the Council Chambers, at the City Hall/Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California, Mayor Leeuwenburgh, on Tuesday, April 24, 1990. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilman Pernell, Councilwoman Swanson, Councilwoman Murdock, Mayor Pro Tem Heinsheimer, Mayor Leeuwenburgh ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Terrence L. Belanger City Manager CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION Election of Mayor Mayor Leeuwenburgh moved the appointment of Mayor Pro Tem Tom Heinsheimer as Mayor of the City of Rolling Hills. Councilwoman Murdock seconded the motion. The motion to appoint Tom Heinsheimer as Mayor was approved, with five (5) affirmative votes and no negative votes. Presentation to Mayor Leeuwenburgh Mayor Heinsheimer presented a special plaque to outgoing Mayor Leeuwenburgh, which commemorated her exceptional year of service and leadership, to the people of Rolling Hills. Election of Mayor Pro Tem Mayor Heinsheimer moved the appointment of Councilman Godfrey Pernell as Mayor Pro Tem of the City of Rolling • Hills. Councilwoman Murdock seconded the motion. The motion to appoint Godfrey Pernell as Mayor Pro Tem was approved, with five (5) affirmative votes and no negative votes. MATTERS FROM MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL City Council Committee Assignments - 1990 Mayor Heinsheimer led a discussion regarding the appointment of delegates and alternates to outside agencies and committees, as well as, appointments to the various City Council sub -committees. There was a suggestion, by Mayor Heinsheimer that the the list of sub -committees be reduced, by consolidating triem into five (5) or six (6) functional areas. Councilwoman Swanson suggested that the sub -committee consolidations be a matter for discussion at the upcoming Council/Staff Retreat. The Council decided to leave the sub -committee assignments as they are currently. The matter will be finalized at the May 31 - June 2, 1990 Retreat. 430 hDJOURNMENT Mayor Heinsheimer adjourned the meeting at 5:56 p.m.. The meeting was adjourned to 7:30 a.m., April 30, 1990, 64 Saddleback Road, Rolling Hills, California. APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor 431 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA April 30, 1990 An adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills, was called to order by Mayor Heinsheimer at 7:30 a.m., at the property located at 64 Saddleback Road, Rolling Hills, on Monday, April 30, 1990. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilwoman Leeuwenburgh, Councilwoman Murdock, Councilman Pernell, Councilwoman Swanson, Mayor Heinsheimer ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Terrence L. Belanger Ray Hamada Jody Browning Kent Browning FIELD INVESTIGATION City Manager Principal Planner Resident Resident The staff and Members of the City Council met at the Browning residence, 64 Saddleback Road, to conduct an on -site investigation of the proposed development project referred to as Zoning Case No. 417, a request for Site Plan Review of a proposed detached garage/stable structure. Subsequently, the meeting was recessed to the Council Chamber at City Hall for further discussion and consideration. MEETING RECONVENED Mayor Heinsheimer reconvened the meeting at 8:20 a.m. RESOLUTION NO. 608 The City Manager explained that this resolution amends Resolution 607, authorizing enrollment for medical and hospital care through PERS, and establishes a floor for the amount of the employer's contribution. Councilman Pernell moved that Resolution No. 608, entitled "RESOLUTION TO BE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S MEDICAL AND HOSPITAL CARE ACT, AND FIXING THE EMPLOYER'S CONTRIBUTION AT AN AMOUNT NOT GREATER THAN THAT PRESCRIBED BY SECTION 22825 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE", be approved and adopted. Councilwoman Swanson seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. CITY HALL REMODEL The City Manager reported that the City received only one (1) bid for the City Administration Building Expansion and Remodeling. The bid that was received did not conform to the requirements of the bid documents. However, the bid amount was within the project estimate of $10,000 to $15,000. This matter has been discussed with the City Attorney. It was staff's recommendation that the Council reject the bid as being unresponsive, find that the statutorily required process will not result in responsive bids, and determine it appropriate and necessary to direct staff to solicit "open market" bids. Councilwoman Swanson moved that the staff recommendation be approved. Councilman Pernell seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. 432 CONSIDERATION OF POLICY RE: MIXED -USE STRUCTURES The Council discussed the staff report on a draft policy statement for conditions of approval for mixed -use structures. Staff informed the Council that the Planning Commission has continued further consideration of this type of application until a more defined policy is developed. The Planning Commission has appointed a sub -committee to study this matter. Staff recommended that the draft policy be referred to the Planning Commission sub -committee for review and consideration. + The Council felt that the primary issues of concern are the potential for use as a second dwelling unit, establishment of a mechanism to ensure compliance, and remedies for non-compliance. Councilwoman Leeuwenburgh felt that there should be a size limitation for a mixed -use structure. Councilwoman Swanson commented that it would be beneficial to have a joint meeting with the Planning Commission to discuss the development of a mixed -use policy. ZONING CASE NO. 417, KENT BROWNING. 64 SADDLEBACK ROAD The applicant is requesting Site Plan Review approval for a proposed detached garage/stable structure at 64 Saddleback Road. The Council conducted an on -site investigation of this proposal, and returned to City Hall for further discussion and deliberations. This matter was discussed extensively. The major concerns of the Council were: (1) the potential use of the structure as a second unit; (2) the size of the structure; and, (3) the location relative to the main residence. The applicants responded to the concerns of the Council with reasonable explanations, and after much discussion, Councilman Pernell moved that Zoning Case No. 417, Site Plan Review for a proposed detached garage/stable structure, be approved subject to the following conditions, in addition to the standard conditions of approval: 1. If the garage and stable are used for purposes other than specified, the structure shall be removed. 2. Any additional garage space or structure shall require a Site Plan Review approval. 3. There shall be townhouse -type separation/fire wall between the garage and stable, and there shall be no interior access or circulation between the two. The motion was seconded by Councilwoman Swanson. There being no objections to the motion, it carried unanimously. Councilwoman Swanson remarked that this should not be viewed as a precedent setting case. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Heinsheimer adjourned the meeting at 10:08 a.m., to Monday, May 14, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. APPROVED: Mayor City Clerk 2 CITY OF HAWTHORNE JUN 12 1991 PLANNING DEPARTMENT FILING FEES CITY OF ROLLING HULLS Effective: January 1, 1991 acre 1---) 9) S(SLO 5CI Type of Application / Fee Breakdown 1.GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT Fee tharged Base: For parcels 20,000 of land area or less $2287. Add.Base: For each add. 10,000 of land area $212.X _ = $ Pre.Env.Asses: For parcels 20,000 of land area $ 117. Add.Pre.Env.Asses: Each add.10,000 of land area) $27.X _ = $ * Negative Declar: For parcels 20,000 of land area or less $ 318. Add. Neg. Declar: Each add. 10,000 of land area $53.X _ = $ TOTAL • 2.CHANGE OF ZONE Base: For parcels 20,000 of land area or less $2330. Add.Base: For each add. 10,000 of land area $212.X _ = $ Pre.Env.Asses: For parcels 20,000 of land area $ 117. Add.Pre.Env.Asses: Each add.10,000 of land area)$ 27.X _ = $ * Negative Declar: For parcels 20,000 of land area or less $ 318. Add. Neg. Declar: Each add. 10,000 of land area $53.X _ = $ TOTAL 3. VARIANCE Base: For parcels 20,000 of land area or less $1592. Add.Base: For each add. 10,000 of land area $106.X _ = $ Pre.Env.Asses: For parcels 20,000 of land area $ 117. Add.Pre.Env.Asses: Each add.10,000 of land area)$ 27.X _ = $ . * Negative Declar: For parcels 20,000 of land area or less $ 318. Add. Neg. Declar: Each add. 10,000 of land area $53.X _ = $ . TOTAL 4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (Except Condominiums) Base: For parcels 20,000 of land area or less $1592. Add.Base: For each add. 10,000 of land area $106.X _ _ $ . Pre.Env.Asses: For parcels 20,000 of land area $ 117. Add.Pre.Env.Asses: Each add.10,000 of land area)$ 27.X _ = $ * Negative Declar: For parcels 20,000 of land area or less $ 318. Add. Neg. Declar: Each add. 10,000 of land area $53.X _ = $ . TOTAL Page `.2• of 4 Type of Application / Fee Breakdown Fee •. Charged 5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CONDOMINIUMS Base: For parcels 20,000 of land area or less $1928. Add.Base: For each add. 10,000 of land area $106.X _ = $ . For each new unit $159,.X _ _ $ . For each converted unit $716.X _ = $ . Pre.Env.Asses: For parcels 20,000 of land area $ 117. Add.Pre.Env.Asses: Each add.10,000 of land area)$ 27.X _ = $ * Negative Declar: For parcels 20,000 of land area or less $ 318. Add. Neg. Declar: Each add. 10,000 of land area $53.X _ = $ TOTAL **Additional Fee - $15.annual inspection fee for each unit, Minimum Fee $60. 6. UNCLASSIFIED USE PERMIT Base: For. parcels 20,000 of land area or less $2287. Add.Base: For each add. 10,000 of land area $212.X _ = $ Pre.Env.Asses: For parcels 20,000 of land area $ 117. Add.Pre.Env.Asses: Each add.10,000 of land area)$ 27.X _ = $ * Negative Declar: For parcels 20,000 of land area or less $ 318. Add. Neg. Declar: Each add. 10,000 of land area $53.X _ = $ • TOTAL 7. SUBDIVISION OF LAND (Tentative Tract Map) Base: For a Tentative Tract Map $1592. Add.Base: For each lot or parcel $159.X _ = $ . Pre.Env.Asses: For parcels 20,000 of land area $ 117. Add.Pre.Env.Asses: Each add.10,000 of land area)$ 27.X _ _ $ . * Negative Declar: For parcels 20,000 of land area or less $ 318. Add. Neg. Declar: Each add. 10,000 of land area $53.X _ = $ . TOTAL 8. LOT SPLIT (Tentative Parcel Map) Base: For a Tentative Parcel Map $1592. Add.Base: For each lot or parcel $159.X _ = $ . Pre.Env.Asses: For parcels 20,000 of land area $ 117. Add.Pre.Env.Asses: Each add.10,000 of land area)$ 27.X _ = $ . * Negative Declar: For parcels 20,000 of land area or less $ 318. Add. Neg. Declar: Each add. 10,000 of land area $53.X _ = $ . TOTAL 9. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT Base: For review and documentation $1592. 1 Page 3 of 4 Type of Application / Fee Breakdown Fee Charged 10. RELOCATION PERMIT Base: For review and public hearing $1592. Pre.Env.Asses: For parcels 20,000 of land area $ 117. Add.Pre.Env.Asses: Each add.10,000 of land area)$ 27.X _ = $ * Negative Declar: For parcels 20,000 of land area or less $ 318. Add. Neg. Declar: Each add. 10,000 of land area $53.X = $ TOTAL 11. RELOCATION IMPACT REPORT Base: For parcels 20,000 of land area or less $2287. Add.Base: For each add. 10,000 of land area $212.X _ = $ Pre.Env.Asses: For parcels 20,000 of land area $ 117. Add.Pre.Env.Asses: Each add.10,000 of land area) $27.X _ _ $ * Negative Declar: For parcels 20,000 of land area or less $ 318. Add. Neg. Declar: Each add. 10,000 of land area $53.X _ = $ TOTAL 11. HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT Base: For review and public hearing (Includes the business license fee) $ 686. 12. PETITION FOR AMENDMENT OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE Base: For review and public hearing $2287. Preliminary Environmental Assesment $ 117. * Negative Declaration $ 318. 13. PETITION FOR CLARIFICATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE Base: For review and public hearing $2287. 14. REHEARING ON NEW EVIDENCE Base: For review and public hearing Original Fee 15. APPEALS Base: For review and public hearing 3/4 of Original Fee 16. MICROFILMING OF PLANS AND DOCUMENTS 8 1/2" x 11" Documents: $.80 per sheet $ .80 X Plans: $2.15 per sheet $2.15 X = TOTAL Page 4 of 4 ADDITIONAL FEES 1. Zoning Status Report = $.59.00 2. Other Research and Written Reports = $59.00 Per Hour/Minimum 2 Hours 3. Purchase of the General Plan = $70.00 4. Purchase of a Zoning Map = $6.00 5. Purchase of a Land Use Policy Map = $4.00 6. Photocopies - $.35 Per Copy 7. Copies of Microfilmed 8 1/2" X 11" Documents = $ .60 per sheet Copies of Microfilmed Plans = $1.06 per sheet 8. Prepaid Mailing of Agenda & Minutes: Agenda = $1.06 per meeting. Minutes = $4.00 per meeting 0, .j5 ANITA G. KROEGER Associate Planner HAWTHORNE CALIFORNIA PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF HAWTHORNE 4455 WEST 126th STREET - -- HAWTHORNE, CA 90250 (213) 970-7939 - -(213) 970-7033 FAX i1\kfoP41t r16Nk CoPt k AID p may, , � 1-0�1�1. vii G �z`'{ . 1 ,i s4J. 00.0o i • AWAJ . 300 , o0 I bxitincthirk. n veiymkr Tinkk 07, of 01,1\Aci-e -1-e, / Gli vi ‘rayk Yv 6t/ Pc -S -5 i d . 0 o acii-vo . CPcp+- -t- 4( 205 ►(\vk (or 1 A- 0,G -h4,. co 5f- t 2DV, 7 A. d, V' -t n. (TV -CA,- ► t & '( J (V.vo • �l iv1Lr D.?ivi �"l*c✓i cjo . o • 1.-/Wr‘ov [ovy4 514,1dA‘vi-c-Avi - 1,-- A fce-5 t Z1°I A-rpca•Q $00 . O U II Nryt hizol Gal/TAMP 7 it fi /0O /co 1Y 3 I U.\ nn - fitC I -ccAl7/v‘ 4.t U . G O ?Arwczit- 7 I6kAk, crb VcY‘ekk &va/Ytrrs;) G lct' (1) %°O . I G G ti 30o d�G 3 506 z50 ii. LA eo 300 'Pe.e-.)icts AA 7.ki pccdyd.5 tiz co 00 5 wofr,, Afw,i-- ----(AA_ feAci4A) 2-1-0. . 1-0-1,, A-vJv s- zs .oa ZS . o 0 .4: - - _ r • \MT LV' ' a. - mod ' ca. (0 0 . 00 locrpcAk 0 .0 0 T_,_e, v 'ai4. eirix - 25. o0 V-e,'lJ b -A( - ri• ii-c f--- 6'00 o0 1 4,a 3DO oa ,e--c Acid� fi GI. e ves� 54>X, o/ —ern,-h r\kAA\cA. .0b, Gi j ./ ffIr ? Ight/KA 57-W r c-pfi aU - / 0 70 of- col 3i/i, l 6 ,h5L 71it 540 ° ,.f- / 0 ` hit-fov-v PchrA-P ocz55l P'ee5 ,..- -b ) ' AppliVeLf SO ,c7o �llih� H -I15 NZI-1.e • is oths0 if\43 o iYopo5►moo ornoun ?cAr,r„u .?.v. 1 5 cvt t`c ft . Coo „ " _5oo( -510 Cody 1ST ttst Witatt4Cx) `V G ' Cuy ofieo lli,.y Jh/'h INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 AGENDA ITEM 9-A MEETING DATE 4/11/94 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL --.ATTENTION: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER FROM: LOLA M. UNGAR, PRINCIPAL PLANNER SUBJECT: PENALTY FEES FOR PLANNING APPLICATIONS & BUILDING PERMITS FOLLOWING ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION OR "AS BUILT" SURVEY Staff inquired about penalty fees charged to applicants for Planning Applications & Building Permits following illegal construction or "as built," meaning that required applications were not filed and an inspector did not inspect during construction for the following cities: PLANNING APPLICATIONS Palos Verdes Estates Rolling Hills Estates Rolling Hills Rancho Palos Verdes BUILDING & SAFETY PERMITS Palos Verdes Estates Rancho Palos Verdes Rolling Hills Rolling Hills Estates RECOMMENDATION Double Fee Double Fee Regular Fee Double Fee Ten times Fee on public property Double Fee on private property Double Fee Double Fee Double Fee It would be in order for members of the City Council to consider this report and provide appropriate direction to staff. C'44 /0/iL, J1 fF INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 TO: LOLA UNGAR, PRINCIPAL PLANNER FROM: STEPHEN Y. ARYAN, ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN SUBJECT: PLANNING FEE SCHEDULE SURVEY DATE: APRIL 11, 1994 CITIES: RPV PVE RHE Torr. Lomita C.U.P: $1600-$2400 $945.00 $600.00 $1,129.00 $300.00 S.D.R.: $110.00 $760.00 $325-$500 $1,1486.00 $75.00 Variance: $1,140.00 $945.00 $500.00 $1,401.00 $300.00 Variance(Minor): $1,140.00 $945.00 $325.00 $814.00 $75.00 C.U.P = S.D.R = Conditional Use Permit Site Development Review THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS: C.U.P = S.D.R. = Variance = Variance Minor = $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,250.00 $750.00 Printed on Recycled Paper. FEE ,...HEDULE SURVEY - AUGUST, 15,2 5,.0.!16 ,IL!. ;AN:;e ov ?v ..}ATE, ;7 E is;E: OhaAsE:E :4:1;0N aapT 4nhyi CONC iION6L USE PER'ii 1.500.".9 ' i,000 - 2.400.90 150.00' 600.00 !.172.00 ..500.00 1.645.00! SUE OEVE-OPNENI REVIEW 1, 00.00 w 110.00 000.00 525 - 500.00 none none :lone .••AiA140IM1ie9R 65.00 0 none none none 0 VARIANCE 1,250.00 1,140.00 750.00 500.00 1,112.00 750.00 1,645.00+ VARIANCE (NINORi 150.00 1,140.00 750.00 500.00 1,172.00 150.00 1,645.00! FEE ___HEDULE SURVEY - AUGUST, L_,_' CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 1,500.00 SITE DEV. REVIEW (MINOR) VARIANCE VARIANCE (MINOR; ZONE CHANGE ZONING AMENDMENT APPEAL FEE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW e II-INr, ,HILLS RANCHO PV 1.500.00 / 1.000 - 2.400.00 110.00 65.00 1,250.00 1,140.00 750.00 1,140.00 2,000.00 4,450.00 2,000.00 165.00 2/3 orig. fee 1,000 - 1,050.00 110 ra 1,230.00 ENVIR. IMPACT REPORT (EIR) app. pays City determined conslt. fee+?1Dy Staff EXTENSIONS OF TIME I2?D 100.00 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT GRADING PERMIT ENCROACHMENT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ANTENNA APPROVAL TEMPORARY USE PERMIT VIEW IMPAIRMENT MODIFICATION FEE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TENTATIVE TRACT NAP FINAL PARCEL NAP FINAL TRACT MAP GEOL. ASSESMENT GEOL. INVESTIGATION PERMIT GEOL. REPORT REVIEW 1,500.00 430.00 + trust dep. LA Co. X 2.5% 195 - 960.00 see variance • 700.00 2,000.00 0 0 500.00 varies 165.00 110 - 250.00 none 2,200 - 3,600.00 145.00 1,500,90/ 2,280 + up to 20% 'ZO' , 'L adain fee + tr. dep 1.500.0 Q 9,900 + up to 201 1.14 Alin fee + tr. dep 0 avio 0 app. pays LA Co. App. pays LA Co. App. pays LA Co. 500 + up to 20% admin fee + tr. dep 1,025 + up to 201 adain fee + tr. dep PV ESTATES 3H ESTATES TORRANCE 750.00 600.00 1,172.00 +00.00 325 - 500.00 none 0 none none 750.00 500.00 1,172.00 150.00 500.00 1,172.00 0 600.00 1,243.00 0 0 912.00 0 150 - 300.00 80.00 0 205.00+ 901.00 CARSON 1,500.00 none none 150.00 150.00 2,500.00 1,000.00 1/2 filing fee 150.00 HAWTHORNE 1.645.00+ none 0 1,645.00+ 1,645.00+ 2,401.00+ 2,363.004 3/4 orig. fee 450.00 app.. pays City cost + 20% app. pays City LA Co + 101 conslt + 201 conslt. fee conslt. fee 0 50% of orig. 109.00 150.00 orig. app. fee fee 25.00 0 • 1,063.00 300.00 '1,645.00 500.00 15-390.00 146 - 5,214.00 LA Co 0 2% 80 - 2,664.00+ 125.00 0 1,172.00 750.00 1,645.00+ 0 600.00 912.00 2,500.00 2,363.00+ 15.00 150.00 109.00 none 0 0 25.00 none none 0 0 25.00 inspec. prior to constr. none none only 0 0 380.00-1,112.00 250.00 or 0 or orig. fee org. fee pending LA Co. + 21% 1,112.00 2,000.00 1,645.00+ development pending LA Co. + 21% 1,112.00 2,000.00 1,645.00' development pending LA Co. + 21% 0 0 0 development pending LA Co. + 211 0 0 0 development 0 75.00 150.00 app. pays LA Co. app. pays LA Co. app. Pays LA Co. PCUCOAI ebaiu Cc: City 0/ leollin _WSJ INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX: (213) 377-7288 MEETING DATE: AUGUST 13, 1992 TC: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ATTENTION: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER FROM: LOLA M. UNGAR, PRINCIPAL PLANNER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CITY FEE CHANGES BACKGROUND Staff has determined that certain current fees do not reflect costs to the City. Some fees have far exceeded expenses, i.e. plan modification, environmental review, environmental impact report, view impairment, and subdivision fees. The last time that fees were changed was May 29, 1990, Resolution No. 614 (attached). At that time, some fees were not defined or included, such as, minor Site Development Review, minor Variance, and General Administration fees. Since then, other cities, county, and state requirements now require fees and administrative oversight by the City and Planning Department, (i.e. As of January, 1991, a Negative Declaration requires a fee of $1,250 to the Dept. of Fish & Game, plus $25 to record with the County Recorder), in addition to the administrative time and energy devoted by the City Manager, Planner, Bookkeeper, Deputy City Clerk, Clerk Typist and consultation with the City Attorney (used mostly for subdivisions and tennis court cases). For these reasons, the City of Rolling Hills needs to reevaluate fees. Staff conducted a survey of nearby cities that offer similar services and their fees. We have included the cities of Rancho Palos Verdes, Palos Verdes Estates, Rolling Hills Estates, Torrance, Carson and Hawthorne (attached). . It should also be noted that the City of Rancho Palos Verdes recently had a cost control system prepared by a consultant (Management Services Institute, Inc. of Anaheim, CA) which was completed in March, 1992. While their conclusions were more intensive than necessary for our needs, they suggest that the cost of services be adjusted to the level of benefits. And, that community development services, which mainly benefit the developer or property owner, are specialized services which should be supported by developers and not by general taxes. They say that were no development to take place, most of the costs could be eliminated, or at least, significantly reduced. FEES PAGE 2 The results of the survey show that many of our fees are comparable to other cities, except for the City of Palos Verdes Estates which charges a utility tax and parcel taxes. Note the 20% add-on fee and trust deposit requirements for the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. These fees are a direct result of their cost control system. DISCUSSION Plan Modification: Modifying an existing plan that goes beyond the intent of the original approval requires the same procedures as other discretionary cases. The present resolution states that the fee "varies" with no guidelines. Staff proposes a minimum 2/3 of original fee. Variance (Minor): The current schedule does not define a minor Variance. The previous resolution No. 598 defined it as "Minor deviatin into required yard setback not exceeding 10' and attached to main residential structure" but was rescinded. Because the entire process is the same and requires the same noticing, reports, etc., other cities do not have a discount and charge the same fee. Staff proposes to omit this fee. Site Development Review (Minor): There is no record of what this applies to. We propose to omit this designation as well. Multiple applications: Other cities do not charge less for multiple applications. Therefore, staff proposes eliminating the reduced rate. Environmental review: Environmental review varies in each case and needs to be addressed even though most discretionary cases in Rolling Hills are exempt because they are single family dwellings. But, special development, including recreation courts and subdivisions should pay some administrative fee because they require an intricate procedure of noticing and formal documentation. Therefore, staff proposes that $200 be charged for all environmental review in addition to any county and state fees required. Environmental Impact Report: Because the negotiation and choice of consultant and intricate procedure of noticing and formal documentation involved with the report is so lengthy and time consuming, involving all members of the City staff, we propose that 20% should be added to the consultant's fee. View Impairment: At present, we charge $500 for these cases and then, pay $1,500 for the mediator...Therefore, staff proposes a minimum fee of $2,000. Subdivision fees: At present, we charge $1,500 each for these cases. Currently, there are five subdivision cases being processed FEES PAGE 3 and all members of the staff have spent numerous hours in the past one and a half years involved with pushing the cases forward, meeting with applicants, meeting with the County Subdivision Committee, forwarding bills, and updating the status of these cases. Therefore, staff proposes an•additional 20% be added to all county fees charged to us in these cases. General Administration Fees: Many requests are made of City staff for copies of documents and tapes. So, to defray the administrative costs in staff's use of time and energy we have also included comparable rates for these documents. ALTERNATIVES 1. Status quo 2. Approve some fee changes 3. Approve all fee changes RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached proposed fee structure. FEE SCHEDULE SURVEY -AUGUST, 1992 1 ROLLING HILLS RANCHO PV PV ESTATES RH ESTATES TORRANCE CARSON HAWTHORNE 1 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1,500.00 1,000 - 2,400.00 150.00 600.00 1;112.00 1,500.00 1.645.00+ SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 1,500.00 110.00 600.00 325 - 500.00 none none none SITE DEV. REVIEW (MINOR) 150.00 65.00 0 none none none 0 VARIANCE 1,250.00 1,140.00 150.00 500.00 1,112.00 150.00 1,645.00+ VARIANCE (MINOR) 150.00 1,140.00 150.00 500.00 1,112.00 150.00 1,645.00+ ZONE CHANGE 2,000.00 4,450.00 0 600.00 1,243.00 2,500.00 2,401.00+ ZONING AMENDMENT 2,000.00 165.00 0 0 912.00 1,000.00 2,363.00+ APPEAL FEE 2/3 orig. fee 1,000 - 1,050.00 0 150 - 300.00 80.00 1/2 filing 3/4 orig. fee fee ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW varies 1,230.00 0 205.00+ 901.00 150.00 450.00 ENVIR. IMPACT REPORT (EIR) app. pays City determined app. pays City cost + 20% app. pays City LA Co + 10% conslt + 20% conslt. fee by Staff conslt. fee conslt. ,fee EXTENSIONS OF TIME 0 100.00 0 50% of orig. 109.00 150.00 orig. app. fee fee LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1,500.00 430.00 + 25.00 0 1,063.00 300.00 1,645.00 trust dep. GRADING PERMIT LA Co. X 2.5% 195 - 960.00 500.00 15-390.00 146 - 5,214.00 LA Co X 21 80 - 2,664.00+ ENCROACHMENT see variance 100.00 125.00 0 1,172.00 150.00 1,645.00+ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2,000.00 165.00 0 600.00 972.00 2,500.00 2,363.00+ ANTENNA APPROVAL 0 110 - 250.00 15.00 150.00 109.00 none 0 TEMPORARY USE PERMIT 0 none 0 25.00 none none 0 VIEW IMPAIRMENT 500.00 2,200 - 3,600.00 0 25.00 inspec. prior to constr. none none only MODIFICATION FEE varies 145.00 0 0 380.00-1,112.00 250.00 or 0 or orig. fee org. fee TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 1,500.00 2,280 + up to 20% pending LA Co. + 21% 1,112.00 2,000.00 1,645.00♦ adain fee + tr. dep development TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 1,500.00 9,900 + up to 20% pending LA Co. + 21% 1,112.00 2,000.00 1,645.00+ adtin fee + tr. dep development FINAL PARCEL MAP 0 500 + up to 20% pending LA Co. + 21% 0 0 0 adain fee + tr. dep development FINAL TRACT MAP 0 1,025 + up to 20% pending LA Co. + 21% 0 0 0 adain fee + tr. dep development GEOL. ASSESMENT app. pays 0 app. pays LA Co. LA Co. GEOL. INVESTIGATION App. pays 15.00 app. pays PERMIT LA Co. LA Co. GEOL. REPORT REVIEW App. pays 750.00 app. pays LA Co. LA Co. GENERAL ADMIN. FEES GENERAL PLAN COPIES ZONING CODE COPIES BUDGET COPIES MEETING TAPES(AUDIO) ZONING MAPS XEROXED COPIES FALSE ALARMS - 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH 5TH 30.00 41.00 10.00 20.00 0 25.00 20.00 10.00 2.00 1st pg. 1 25.00 .2S each addit. 35.00 10.00 25.00 tape your 25.00 loaner copy own 3.00 2.00 3-5.00 .50 .25 3.00 1st pg. t 25.00 .25 .25 each addit. 50.00 50.00 25.00 50.00 100.00 100.00 150.00 • 150.00 200.00 250.00 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PROPOSED FEE CHANGES I EXISTING ,.PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1,500.00 Ste' SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 1,500.00 SAME SITE OEV. REVIEW (MINOR) 750.00 OMIT VARIANCE 1,250.00 SAME VARIANCE (MINOR) 750.00 OMIT ZONE CHANGE 2,000.00 SAME ZONING AMENDMENT 2,000.00 SAME APPEAL FEE 2/3 orig. fee SAME ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW varies $200+county & state fees ENYIR. IMPACT REPORT (EIR) aPP• Pays City. appl.pays City conslt. fee ' consult.fee+20% EXTENSIONS OF TIME 0 $200 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1,500.00 SAME GRADING PERMIT LA Co. X 2.52 : SAME ENCROACHMENT see variance GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2,000.00 SAME ANTENNA APPROVAL 0 i SAME TEMPORARY USE PERMIT 0 ; SAME VIEW IMPAIRMENT 500.00 ; $2,000 MODIFICATION FEE varies 2/3 orig.fee TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 1,500.00 ' $1,500+20$/County fees TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 1,500.00 $1,500+20$/County fees FINAL PARCEL MAP 0 20%/County fees FINAL TRACT MAP 0 20%/County fees GEOL. ASSESNENT GEOL. INVESTIGATION PERMIT GEOL. REPORT REVIEW M. Pays LA Co. App. pays LA Co. App. pays LA Co. GENERAL ADMIN. FEES GENERAL PLAN COPIES 30.00 ZONING CODE COPIES 10.00 BUDGET COPIES 0 MEETING TAPES(AUOIO) 25.00 ZONING MAPS 3.00 XEROXED COPIES .2S SAME SAME SAME SAME $25 (New code) $30 SAME SAME SAME FALSE ALARMS - 1ST 2N0 3RD ITH (14 50.00 $50 $100 $150 $200 .$7rn July 24, 1991 To: Lola, Craig Fran: Jennifer RE: Fees for reviewing Parcel Maps Here is the information I gathered fran the peninsula cities and Lomita regarding the fees for Parcel Maps. In addition to the County fee, each City charges: RANCHO PALOS VERDES (Contact: Phabio) * Tentative Parcel Map $1,000 * Final Parcel Map .$500 * Tentative Tract and Vesting Map $2,500 * Final Tract and Vesting Map $1,000 PALOS VERDES ESTATES (Contact: Mona) P.V.E. does not charge. any additional fee. ROLLING HILLS ESTATES (Contact: David) L.A. County fees + Consultation fees + R.H.E. .21% R.H.E. charges 21% for all subdivision work in addition to County fees. IOMIITA $300 + $50 per unit (parcel) Lomita charges this fee for both parcels & tracts. FALSE ALARMS - 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH 5TH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ' 1,500.00 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 1,500.00 SITE OEV. REVIEW (MINOR) VARIANCE 1,250.00 VARIANCE (MINOR) 150.00 ZONE CHANGE 2,000.00 ZONING AMENDMENT 2,000.00 APPEAL FEE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 2/3 orig. fee FEE SCHEDULE SURVEY _,,__AUGUST, %1992 ROLLING HILLS RANCHO PV PV ESTATES RH ESTATES TORRANCE 1,000 - 2,400.00 150.00 600.00 1,172.00 110.00 600.00 325 - 500.00 none 65.00 0 none 1,140.00 150.00 500.00 1,140.00 150.00 500.00 4,450.00 0' 600.00 165.00 0 0 1,000 - 1,050.00 0 150 - 300.00 80.00 1,230.00 0 205.00+ 901.00 • ENVIR. IMPACT REPORT (EIR) app. pays City determined conslt. fee4by Staff EXTENSIONS OF TIME lZ0D 100.00 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT GRADING PERMIT ENCROACHMENT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ANTENNA APPROVAL TEMPORARY USE PERMIT VIEW IMPAIRMENT MODIFICATION FEE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FINAL PARCEL MAP FINAL TRACT MAP GEOL. ASSESMENT GEOL. INVESTIGATION PERMIT GEOL. REPORT REVIEW 1,500.00 LA Co. X 2.5% 430.00 + trust dep. 195 - 960.00 see variance 100.00 2,000.00 0 0 500.00 varies app. pays City cost + 20% conslt. fee 0 50% of orig. fee 25.00 0 500.00 125.00 165.00 0 110 - 250.00 none 0 2,200 - 3,600.00 0 145.00 0 1,500,.0 2,280 + up to 20% 14)7s admin fee + tr. dep 1,500.00 9,900 + up to 20% /1.144,'2;!,t61, adain fee + tr. dep 0 500 + up to 20% adain fee + tr. dep 0 1,025 + up to 20% admin fee + tr. dep app. pays LA Co. App. Pays LA Co. App. pays LA Co. 15.00 pending development pending development pending development pending development 0 75.00 150.00 none 1,112.00 1,172.00 1,243.00 972.00 CARSON HAWTHORNE . 1,500.00 1,645.00+ none none none 150.00 750.00 2,500.00 0 1,645.00+ 1,645.0.0+ 2,401.00+ 1,000.00 2,363.00+ 1/2 filing 3/4 orig. fee fee 150.00 450.00 app. pays City LA Co + 10% conslt + 20% conslt. fee 109.00 1,063.00 150.00 orig. app. fee 300.00 1,645.00 15-390.00 146 - 5,214.00 LA Co X 2% 80 - 2,664.00+ 0 1,172.00 600.00 972.00 150.00 109.00 25.00 none 25.00 inspec. prior to constr. only 0 380.00-1,112.00 LA Co. + 21% 1,112.00 LA Co. + 21% 1,112.00 LA Co. + 21% 0 LA Co. + 21% 0 app. pays LA Co. app. pays LA Co. app. pays LA Co. 750.00 1,645.00+ 2,500.00 2,363.00+ none 0 none 0 none none 250.00 or 0 or orig. fee org. fee 2,000.00 1,645.00+ 2,000.00 1,645.00+ 0 0 0 0 GENERAL ADMIN. FEES GENERAL PLAN COPIES ZONING CODE COPIES BUDGET COPIES MEETING TAPES(AUDIO) ZONING MAPS 30.00 41.00 20.00 10.00 20.00 0 25.00 25.00 3.00 tape your own 2.00 XEROXED COPIES .25 3.00 1st pg. d .25 each addit. 50.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 70.00 2.00 1st pg, d 25.00 .25 each addit. 35.00 10.00 25.00 3-5.00 25.00 25.00 loaner copy .50 .25 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 CITY OF . ROLLING HILLS PROPOSED FEE CHANGES I ..P EXISTING T�OPOSID CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1,500.00 . SAME SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 1,500.00 ' SAME SITE DEV. REVIEW (MINOR) 150.00 , OMIT VARIANCE 1,250.00 SAME VARIANCE (MINOR) 150.00 LONE CHANGE 2,000.00 ZONING AMENDMENT 2,000.00 SAME APPEAL FEE 2/3 orig. fee ; SAME ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW varies ENVIR. IMPACT REPORT (EIR) app. pays City conslt. fee EXTENSIONS OF TIME 0 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT GRADING PERMIT ENCROACHMENT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ANTENNA APPROVAL 0 TEMPORARY USE PERMIT 0 VIEW IMPAIRMENT 500.00 MODIFICATION FEE varies TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 1,500.00 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 1,500.00 FINAL PARCEL MAP 0 FINAL TRACT MAP 0 OMIT SAME .$200+county & state fees appl.pays City consult.fee+20% $200 1,500.00 SAME LA Co. X 2.51 SAME see variance 2,000.00 j SAME SAME SAME $2,000 2/3 orig.fee. $1,500+20%/County. fees. $1;500+20%/County fees 20%/County fees 20%/County fees GEOL. ASSESMENT app. pays , SAME LA Co. GEOL. INVESTIGATION App. pays i SAME PERMIT LA Co. GEOL. REPORT REVIEW App. pays SAME LA Co. GENERAL ADMIN. FEES GENERAL PLAN COPIES ZONING CODE COPIES BUDGET COPIES MEETING TAPES(AUOIO) ZONING MAPS XEROXED COPIES .2S FALSE ALARMS - 1ST 50.00 2ND 3RD 4TH SIN 30.00 i SAME 10.00 $25 (New code) 0 $30 25.00 SAME 3.00 SAME SAME $50 $100 $150 $200 Szs1_ FEE: ROLLING HILLS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1,500.00 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 1,500.00 SITE OEV. REVIEW (MINOR) 150.00 VARIANCE 1,250.00 VARIANCE (MINOR) 150.00 ZONE CHANGE 2,000.00 ZONING AMENDMENT 2,000.00 APPEAL FEE 2/3 orig. fee ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW varies ENVIR. IMPACT REPORT (EIR) app. pays City conslt. fee EXTENSIONS OF TIME 0 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1,500.00 �. GRADING PERMIT LA Co. X 2.52 ENCROACHMENT see variance GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2,000.00 ANTENNA APPROVAL 0 TEMPORARY USE PERMIT 0_ VIEW IMPAIRMENT 500.00 MODIFICATION FEE varies TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 1,500.00 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 1,500.00 FINAL PARCEL MAP 0 FINAL TRACT MAP 0 6E01. ASSESMENT GEOL. INVESTIGATION PERMIT 6E01. REPORT REVIEW app. pays LA Co. App. pays LA Co. App. pays LA Co. GENERAL ADMIN. FEES GENERAL PLAN COPIES 30.00 ZONING CODE COPIES 10.00 BUDGET COPIES 0. MEETING TAPES(AUDIO) 25.00 ZONING MAPS 3.00 XEROXED COPIES .25 FALSE ALARMS - 1ST 50.00 2ND 3RD 4TH STH • —s, tl t V RESOLUTION 1N0. 614 co icr W A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS SETTING FEES FOR PLANNING, ZONING, AND SUBDIVISION SERVICES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing variances, site development reviews, zone changes, conditional use permits and appeals, and shall be paid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Section 17.40.040 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: 1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $1,500.00 2. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 51,500.00 3. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW - (MINOR) $ 750.00 4. VARIANCE $1,250.00 S. VARIANCX - (MINOR) 750.00 6. ;ONE CHANG/ $2,000.00 7. CODE AMD:NDMENT - (NON -CITY INITIATED) $2,000.00 S. COMBINATION CASES Varies For multiple applications: The application fee shall be the sus of the largest fee plus fifty percent (50%) of the basic fee of each additional application request. 9. FILING OF AN APPEAL Varies For filing an appeal of a decision of the Planning Commission: The appellant shall pay a !es equal to two-thirds of the amount of the original categorical application fee, to which the appeal relates, and, is the decision of the Planning Commission, from which the appellant appeals. 10. ALL FEES RELATIVE TO ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Varies Environmental review fees shall be separate, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), be based on vendor cost and be in addition to those established herein SECTION Z. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing subdivisions and appeals, and shall be paid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Section 16.12.060 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: 1. SUBDIVISION MAP $1,500.00 2. posT TENTATIVE AND FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP APPROVAL Fees related to the processing of a tentative subdivision map and a final subdivision map, after City Council approval, shall be separate and in addition to those established herein. Varies 3. FILING OF AN APPLAL For filing an appeal of a decision of the Planning Commission: The appellant shall pay a fee equal to two-thirds of the amount of the original categorical application fee, to which the appeal relates, and, is the decision of the Planning Commission, from which the appellant appeals. SECTION 3. The fees set forth in Sections 1 and 2 above do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing such services. SECTION 4. Resolution Number 598 is hereby rescinded. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this - , day of 1924. 1 ATTEST: City Clerk varies The foregoing Resolution No. 614 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS SETTING FEES FOR PLANNING, ZONING, AND SUBDIVISION SERVICES was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on May 29, 1990 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Leeuwenburgh, Murdock, Pernell, Mayor Heinsheimer NOES: None ABSENT: Councilwoman Swanson 109 RESOLUTION NO. 598 A .RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS INCREASING FEES FOR PLANNING AND ZONING SERVICES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section X. The following fees are .established and charged for applications for processing variances, site development reviews, zone changes, conditional use permits and appeals, and shall be paid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Section 17.40.040 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: 1. VARIANCES 00 Ckl uJ CO Q a. Minor deviation into required yard setback not exceeding ten feet (10') and attached to main residential structure $1,000.00 b. A11 others (front yard detached structure, rear, side encroachment, etc.) S1,250.00 2.. CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS 3. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 4. ZONE CHANGE 5. CODE AMENDMENT NON -CITY INITIATED 6. COMBINATION CASES $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 For multiple applications: The application fee shall be the sum of the largest fee plus 50 percent (50%) of the basic fee of each additional application request. 7. FILING OF AN APPEAL $3,500.00 8. ALL FEES RELATIVE TO ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), shall be separate, based on vendor cost and in addition to those established herein. Section 2. The fees set forth in Section 1 do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing such services. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 28th day of August , 19.89. ATTEST: e •� ty City Clerk G lv%vs`'� QQ-t . W.! L b cLi u 1 Mayor 110 ORDINANCE NO. 598 The foregoing Resolution No.598 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS INCREASING FEES FOR PLANNING AND ZONING SERVICES was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council *on August 28, 1989 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Murdock, Pernell, Swanson Mayor Pro Tem Heinsheimer NOES: None ABSENT: Mayor Leeuwenburgh v City of Rolling Hills Estates 2 Fees & Charges Fiscal Year 1992 - 1993 (NTATIVE PARCEL MAP TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FINAL PARCEL MAP FINAL TRACT MAP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SITE DEV. REVIEW (MINOR) VARIANCE VARIANCE (MINOR AGM0467) ZONE CHANGE ZONING AMENDMENT /'�De APPEAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW OT LINE ADJUSTMENT GRADING PERMIT NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATABILITY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (EIR) EXTENSIONS op TIM 6 ENCROACHMENT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ANTENNA APPROVAL TEMPORARY USE PERMIT PRECISE PLAN ROLLING HILLS 1,500.00 1,500.00 0 0 1,500.00 1,500.00 750.00 1,250.00 750.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 2/3 org fee varies (?) 1,500.00 LA Co X 2.510 see ite -Plan. Rev. app. pays consultant 0 see variance 2,000.000 0 see Site Plan RANCHO PV 2,260.00 + trst dep 9,900.00 trst dep 500'.00 + trst dep 1,025.00 + trst dep 1,000 - 2,400.00 110.00 65.00 1,140.00 1,140.00 4,450.00 165.00 1,000 - 1,050 1,230.00 430.00 + trst 195 - 960.00 see Site Plan Determined by 100.00 700.00 165.00 '110 - 250.00 e0 Rev. VIEW IMPAIRMENT MODIFICATION FEE -.mmISEWpR PLAN CHECK IGE ' ASSE IENT LGEOL'INVESTIGATION PERMIT GEOlr• REPORT REVIEW 500.00 varies (?) LACo X 2.5°70 (vA% Lower PV ESTATES 0 0 4 III 0 750.00 0 750.00 750.00 0 0 .00 0 0 25.00 500_. 0 602,-,4159 app. pays 0 125.00 0 75.00 0 0 cor r in -per fee 2,200 - 3,600.00 +0 145.00 • RH ESTATES LA Co. + 21% LA. Co. + 21% LA Co. + 21% LA -Co. + 21% 60.0.00 none none 500.00 500.00 600.00 0 150 - 300.00 205.00+ 7 =3-90, 0 325 - 5, ITO Per (11r. f(g0 1T a`P S WE dep Rev - Staff 0 0 75.00 750.00 consultant cost + 20% 50% of ozjg. fee 0 600.00 150.00 25.00 100 - 300.00 if any 150.00 25.00 inspec. 0 • TORRANCE 1,172.00 1,172.00 0 1,172.00 none none 1,172.00 1,172.00 1,243.00 972.00 80.00 901.00 1,063.00 146 - 5,274.00 none app. pays 109.00 1,172.00 972.00 109.00 none 1,389.00 in Bldg. Permit Pnor-I-o asuttritti 380.00-1,172.00 0 conslt. CARSON 2,000.00 2,000.00 0 _" 0 1,500.00�pp __ �� none 750.00 750.00 2,500.00 1,000.00 1/2 filiing fee 150.00 300.00 LA Co X 2% none LA Co + 10% 150.00 750.00 2,500.00 none none 4,000.00+ 45.00 none 250.00 or org fee in Bldg. Permit fee 114.5.A41 HAWTHORNE 1,645.00+ 1,645.00+ 0 1,645.00+ 0 0 1,645.00+ 1,645.00+ 2,407.00+ 2,363.00+ 3/4 org. fee 450.00 1,645.00 80 - 2,664.00+ e conslt + 20% org. app. fee 1,645.00+ 2,363.00+ 0 0 2,360.00+ 150.00 none 0 or org. fee (c131 05 of Vt0([ x:115 R_ PO ((IAo c, a -c=c-) ' 4c . el") s,., - ,,,-JAn c.„).& 0.uo D -,s, 6 a r' X39-4 0)- ` 6:A ei t"J_n ta- S .0v ter r 20"):, Nip ?_c_No • g -AU • xe(of ,ycc11'6 e5 • t10-o0 • • 1o) o f\j`eC ;_� tom' -s SO, too, /So 2cot aso" • xCrOL(d' CoPF 9 `cur INDEX DEPARTMENT/FEE CATEGORY I. FINANCE PAGE Business License Application 3 Certain Businesses Permit Fee 3 Dance Permit 3 Entertainment Permit 3 Fire/Going Out of Business Sale 3 Fortune Telling 3 Solicitor's Permit (Commercial) 3 Solicitor's Permit (Non -Commercial) 3 II. GENERAL GOVERNMENT Fees and Charges Book 3 Annual Budget 3 Maps - see Planning also 3 Microfiche copies 3 Photocopies 3 Parking Permits 3 Returned Check 3 III. MISCELLANEOUS CODE ENFORCEMENT False Alarms 4 Noise Variance 4 Searchlight 4 Sound Amplification 4 IV. PLANNING Application to approve action 5 Conditional Use Permit 5 Continuance/Extensions 5 Demolition - Rehab Processing Fees 5 Environmental Assessment - Initial Studies 6 Environmental Impact Report 6 Grading Permit 6 Maps 6 Minor Deviation 6 Minor. Land Subdivision - Filing of Tentative Map 6 Minor Land Subdivision - Appeal 6 Negative Declaration - Appeal 6 Neighborhood Compatibility 7 New Construction 7 On -Site Inspection 7 Over the Counter Planning Approval 7 Precise Plan of Design 7 Residential Building Records 7 - i - IV. PLANNING CONTINUED Residential Development Standards Signs: Sign Permit Temporary Sign in right-of-way Special Use Permit Subdivision - Development/Vesting Tentative Map Temporary Use Permit Variance View Preservation Site Inspection Zone Change V. RECREATION Ernie Howlett Park Permit Ernie Howlett Stable Board Non -Resident Boarder Trailer Parking Special Recreation Events Swimming Tennis Non -Resident Recreation APPENDIX PPD Class Descriptions Park Land Dedication Business License Equestrian Facilities - Kitchen Rental Surcharge - City Celebration Cross Country Run Tracy Austin Tennis Tournament Surcharge 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 12 I. FINANCE Code Reference 730 767 811 832 836 , 783 769.13 777 Account Code 900-7051 9000-7051 9000-7051 9000-7051 9000-7051 9000-7051 9000-7051 791 II. GENERAL GOVERNMENT 9000-8301 9000-8301 9000-8301 9000-8310 9000-8301 Ord 466 Description Approved Fee Business License New License - Renewal Application $20.00 $10.00 Certain Businesses (760) - Application Fee $50.00 - Renewal $15.00 Dance Permit $50.00 Entertainment Permit - Appeal Revocation Fire/Going Out Business Fortune Telling - Application Fee - Business License $100.00 $100.00 $250.00 & $10/day max 50 days $50.00 $50.00 Solicitor's Permit (Commercial) - Fee Per Day $50.00 - Fee Per Quarter $200.00 - Fee Per Year $500.00 Solicitor's Permit (Non -Commercial) No Fee Fees and Charges Book Annual Budget Microfiche copy Photocopies Maps - Peninsula Realtors - Trails/Bike Paths $1 $0 Parking Permits $25. Returned Check $ 3.50 $10.00 .00/page .25/page $0.50 $0.25 00/permit $10.00 III. MISCELLANEOUS CODE ENFORCEMENT Code Reference Account Code Description Approved Fee 697.9 9000-7211 Alarm Fines Install Alarm w/o permit $100.00 Failure to take corrective action: 1st Offense 2nd Offense 3rd & Subsequent $ 50.00 $100.00 $200.00 . Operating audible alarm w/o 10 minute auto reset $100.00 Operating a direct dial service $250.00 697.9 9000-7220 False Alarm Fines For false alarms within 6 month period - third false alarm $ 50.00 - fourth false alarm $100.00 - fifth false alarm $150.00 sixth false alarm $200.00 seventh and each subsequent $250.00 695.14 9000-7211 Noise Variance - Application Fee $ 50.00 693 9000-8303 Searchlight Permit $100.00/day 695.13 9000-7211 Sound Amplification $ 50.00 4 IV. PLANNING Code Reference 2010 Reso 1549 2010 Res. 1549 Account Code 9000-8101 9000-8101 Description Application for approval validating an action taken without having first formally sought required City approval. Conditional Use Permit Single Request Appeal 2010 9000-8101 Continuance of Matters Res. 1549 2010 , Res. 1549 1255 9000-8101 9000-8101 Approved Fee Double the fee as set in this section $600.00 $300.00 Before City Council or Planning Commission - First request - Second request - Each subsequent no fee 50% of original fee 50% +10% for each request Extension of Permit Time 50% ' of original fee Demolition/Rehab Processing Fees Preparation of job specs actual cost City Council Approval - Compliance Inspection Billing Assessment Filing Fee Rehearing by Planning Commission on substandard declaration $ 80.00 actual cost $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 IV. PLANNING - CONTINUED Code Reference 2010 Res. 1549 Account Code Description 9000-8101 Environmental Assessment * or actual cost + $205 whichever is greater 2010 9000-8101 Environmental Impact Res. 1549 7005 c 2010 Res. 1549 9000-8101 9000-8101 9000-8101 Grading Permit 1-50 cubic yds 51-100 cubic yds 101-1,000 cubic yds $30 each add. yd 1,001 cubic yds and up $30 each add. yd Maps Blueprints of City Maps (ex - Zoning Map, Horse Overlay, etc.) Minor Deviation Appeal to City Council 1702 9000-8102 Minor Land Subdivision - Filing Tentative Map 1708 - Appeal 2010 9000-8101 Negative Declaration Res. 1549 - Appeal $125.00 Approved Fee $250.00 * subcontractor actual cost plus 20% admin Overhead $ 75.00 $120.00 $120.00 + over 100 $390.00 + over 1,0000 $ 10.00 $325.00 $160.00 LA County fees + 21% $300.00 IV. PLANNING - CONTINUED Code Reference Account Code Description Approved Fee 2010 9000-8101 Neighborhood Compatibility Second Story Addition $500.00 Appeal $250.00 All Others $325.00 Appeal $175.00 883 9000-7081 New Construction $500/unit Reso 1531 9000-8101 On -Site Inspection $150.00 Reso 1656 9000-8101 Over -the -Counter Approval $100.00 2010 9000-8101 Precise Plan of Design Res. 1549 See Appendix A for description of PPD Classes Class (1) Fee Appeal $200.00 $100.00 Class (2) $300.00 $150.00 Class (3) $500.00 $250.00 Class (4) $600.00+ $300.00 +$0.15 per sq ft in excess 10,000 sq ft Class (5) $1,050.00+ $525.00 +$0.01 per sq ft in excess 50,000 sq ft 1402 9000-8101 Residential Building Records $100.00 Reso 1531 9000-8301 Residential Development Standards $5.00 2161 9000-7131 Sign Permit $100.00 2010 Reso 1549 9000-8101 Signs - Temporary - in Right-of-way no fee non-profit Special Use Permit $325.00 9000-8102 Subdivision LA County and - Development/Vesting consultant fees Tentative Map + 21% IV. PLANNING - CONTINUED Code Reference Account Code Description Approved Fee 802 9000-8101 Temporary Use Permit Filing Fee $ 25.00 2010 Reso. 1549 9000-8101 Variance $500.00 - Appeal $250.00 2010 9000-8101 View Preservation Site Reso. 1549 Inspection $ 25.00 2010 Reso. 1549 9000-8101 Zone Change - Single Request $600.00 - Appeal $300.00 - Each Additional 50% of Request basic fee V. RECREATION Code Reference Account Code Description Approved Fee 1512-8621 Ernie Howlett Park Equestrian Facilities Rental Activity Event Charge/Day A English, Western or Combination $500.00 B C D Dressage, Driving Shows Clinic or Demonstrations that charge participants or spectators using two or more rings Clinics or Demonstrations that charge participants or spectators and use Dressage Arena only E Clinics and other uses that are free to public and participants Activity Refundable Event A & B Cleanup and restoration due when event is scheduled C, D & E Cleanup and restoration due when event is scheduled A only Damage deposit for use of City jumps Stall Rental/Day Box Stall Paddock Combo Renter responsible for own feeding cleaning and shavings Jump Rentals $200.00 $150.00 $ 50.00 max or $5/ride no charge Charge $200.00 $100.00 $200.00 Charge $15/day $10/day $20/day Charge Rental of City Jumps $200/day V. RECREATION - CONTINUED Code Reference Account Code Description Approved Fee 1512-8604 Horseshows Rated Warmup $ 5.00/ride Regular $15.00/ride Medal $20.00/class Unrated Dressage Warmup $ 5.00/ride Regular $ 8.00/ride Medal $10.00/class Regular Classes $35.00 AHSA Qualifying $35.00 if combined with regular $50.00 AHSA drug fee $ 3.00 AHSA nonmember $15.00 CDS nonmember $ 5.00 Ord 610 Park Permit Refundable Deposit $50.00 9000-8203 1511-8601 1511-8604 1511-8601 Rental Kitchen Facilities Ernie Howlett Park Non-refundable $25.00 Rolling Hills Estates Equestrian Center Stable Board - Box:Stall. $275/month Pipe Corral with shavings $240/month - Pipe Corral $220/month Oat Hay $ 30/month Non -Resident Baorder Surcahrge $ 10/month Trailer Parking $ 25/month 10 V. RECREATION - CONTINUED Code Reference Account Code Description Approved Fee Special Recreation Events 9000-8202 - City Celebration Steak Dinner $8.00 Hamburger Dinner $5.00. 7350-8202 - Cross Country Run Pre -registration with shirt $12.00 without shirt $ 9.00 7350-8803 Race Day Registration w/shirt without shirt - Tracy Austin Tournament Tennis Member Nonmember 9000-8201 Swimming Fees 1521-8801 Memberships - Individual - Family Less than 6 members Over 6 members - Seniors (over 62) Lessons Nonmember Daily Swim Fee Tennis Center Fees Memberships Individual New member Individual Renewal Before May 31, 1991 After May 31, 1991 Family Renewal Before May 31, 1991 After May 31, 1991 11 $15.00 $12.00 $25.00 $30.00 $75.00 $110.00 $125.00 $ 25.00 $25.00 $ 2.00 $30.00 $25.00 $30.00 $60.00 $70.00 V. RECREATION - CONTINUED Code Reference Account Code Description Tennis Center Fees 1521-8801 Daily Court Fees Approved Fee Members: Weekdays 8 am to close $4.50 Weekends/Holidays $5.50 Seniors & Youth $2.00 (18 & under, 62 & over) Non -Members: Weekdays 8 am to close $5.50 Weekends/Holidays $6.50 Seniors & Youth $3.25 1521-8802 Tournaments Court fees as determined $2.00 above plus surcharge per court Tennis Balls $3.50 APPENDIX PPD CLASSES Class 1 - shall included: Alterations to exterior of structures. Additions to existing buildings in commercial districts not exceeding 400 sq. ft. floor area. Construction of new structure not exceeding 400 sq. ft. floor area. Alterations to existing vehicle parking and/or landscaping area. Class 2 - shall include: Additions to existing structure exceeding 400 sq. ft. and/or development of new building in an existing developed commercial center providing that such additions do not exceed 2,000 sq. ft. of total floor area. Class 3 - shall include: Additions to existing and/or new buildings to be developed commercial centers exceeding 2,000 sq. ft. of floor space, but less than 10,000 sq. ft. of floor area. Development of a previously undeveloped commercial site not exceeding 10,000 sq. ft. of floor area. Class 4 - shall include: All commercial development exceeding 10,000 sq. ft. of floor area and not exceeding 50,000 sq. ft. Class 5 - shall include: All commercial development exceeding 50,000 sq. ft. of floor area. The following items are provided for information of staff. The fees are not part of any revision by resolution: Park Land Dedication Fee: Refer to Municipal Code Sections 1606 -1615 Business Licenses: Refer to Municipal Code Sections 730 -749.1 13 ITSAVI JUN 10 1992 co QE ROLLING HILLS Exhibit "A" City of Hawthorne Department of Building and Safety Schedule of Construction Permit and Inspection Fees January 1, 1991 TABLE 3-A - BUILDING PERMIT FEES Permit Issuance Fee $ 16.00 TOTAL VALUATION FEE $0 to $500 $ 19.00 $501 to $2,000 $ 19.00 plus $ 2.40 per $100 over $50.0 $2,001 to $25,000 $ 64.00 plus $ 10.50 per $1,000 over $2,000 $25,001 to $50,000 $ 317.00 plus $ 7.75 per $1,000 over $25,000 $50,001 to $100,000 $ 517.00 plus $ 5.25 per $1,000 over $50,000 $100,001 and over $ 817.00 plus $ 4.25 per $1,000 over $100,000 Page 1 PLAN CHECK FEES Building Code Plan Review = 85% of Building Permit Fee $27.00 minimum Energy Plan Check Fee = 20% of Building Permit Fee $11.00 minimum Handicapped Access Plan Check = 10% of Building Permit Fee $ 27.00 minimum AB 3205 Hazardous Materials = 10% of Building Permit Fee $ 53.00 minimum OTHER INSPECTIONS AND FEES 1. Property Field Inspection Report: A. Group M or R-3 Occupancy $ 133.00* B. Group R-1 Occupancy, per each 5 dwelling units or fraction thereof, minimum $ 265.00* C. All other uses, by affected floor area: less than 5,000 square feet,minimum $ 265.00 * 5,001 to 10,000 square feet, minimum $ 318.00 * Exhibit "A" City of Hawthorne Department of Building and Safety Schedule of Construction Permit and Inspection Fees January 1, 1991 Page 2 Table 3-A - continued 2. Inspections outside normal hours: A. Weekdays, per hour $ 64.00 ( 2 hour minimum ) B. Saturday, per hour $ 60.00 ( 4 hour minimum ) C. Sunday and Holidays, per hour $ 60.00 ( 8 hour minimum ) 3. Reinspection fee per 305(g), per hour $ 53.00 ( 1 hour minimum ) 4. Inspections for which a fee is not specified, per hour, $ 53.00 ( 1 hour 'minimum ) 5. Additional plan review (changes, additions, or revisions) with no change in building valuation, per hour $ 53.00 ( 1 hour minimum ) 6. Search of Office Records and Record Research, per hour $ 32.00 ( $10.00 minimum ) NOTE: See No.7 below for fee of copies of documents,,. on microfilm. Copies of documents not on'micro"' film will be charged at the cost to reproduces the document. 7. Microfilming of Plans and Documents A. Convert to microfilm 1. Plans $ 2.00/sheet 2. 8 1/2" x 11" documents $ .75/sheet B. Copy of microfilmed documents 1. Plans $ 1.00/sheet 2. 8 1/2" x 11" documents $ .50/sheet 8. Replace Inspection Record Card $ 53.00 9. Process permit via mail, if applicable, per permit $ 3.00 * or the total hourly cost to the City, including supervision, overhead, equipment, wages and benefits of the employees involved Exhibit "A" City of Hawthorne Department of Building and Safety Schedule of Construction Permit and Inspection Fees January 1, 1991 Page 3 TABLE NO. 3-B - ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES Permit Issuance For issuing each permit $ 16.00 For issuing each supplemental permit $ 5.00 Plan Check Fee = 50% of Electrical Permit Fee, $ 53.00 minimum A separate electrical plan shall be submitted, and a separate electrical plan check fee shall be paid, for the following projects: a. Residential projects for the construction of more than 3 dwelling units b. Commercial, Industrial and Manufacturing projects, new, additions, alterations or repairs. Plans may be waived for minor alterations and repairs by the Director of Building and Safety. c. Projects requiring the installation of an electrical service greater than 400 amp rating. These plans shall be stamped and signed by a registered electrical engineer. UNIT FEE SCHEDULE Private Swimming Pools For new private, residential, in -ground, spas and\or pools for single-family and multifamily occupancies, including a complete system of necessary branch circuit wiring, bonding, grounding, underwater lighting, water pumping and other similar electrical equipment directly related to the operation of swimming pool, excluding electric water heater, each $ 39.00 For other types of swimming pools, therapeutic whirl- pools, spas and alterations to existing swimming pools, each $ 27.00 Exhibit "A" City of Hawthorne Department of Building and Safety Schedule of Construction Permit and Inspection Fees January 1, 1991 Table 3-B - continued Carnivals and Circuses Page 4 Carnivals, circuses, or other traveling shows or exhibitions utilizing transportable -type rides, booths, displays and attractions. For electric generators and electrically driven rides, each $19.00 For mechanically driven rides and walk-through attractions or displays having electric lighting, each $ 8.00 For a system of area and booth lighting, each . . . .$ 8.00 For a permanently installed, rides, booths, displays and attractions, use the UNIT FEE SCHEDULE. Temporary Power Service For temporary service power pole or pedestal including all pole or pedestal -mounted receptacle outlets and appurtenances, each $27.00 For a temporary distribution system and temporary lighting and receptacle outlets for construction sites, decorative light, Christmas tree sales lots, fireworks stands, etc., each $11.00 BRANCH CIRCUIT, CONDUIT AND UNIT FEE SCHEDULE (Note: 1. The following do not include permit issuing fee. 2. Where appropriate either fee schedule may be used.) Branch Circuit Fees Branch circuit fees apply to new branch circuit wiring and the lighting fixtures, switches and receptacles which are supplied by these branch circuits, including their outlets. For 15 or 20 ampere 120 volt lighting or general use receptacles: 1 to 10 branch circuits inclusive, each $ 8.00 11 to 40 branch circuits inclusive, each $ 7.00 41 or more branch circuits, each $ 6.00 For 15 or 20 ampere 120 volt or 240 volt single appliance circuit $11.00 For 15 or 20 ampere 208 volt to 277 volt lighting, each $13.00 Exhibit "A" City of Hawthorne Department of Building and Safety Schedule of Construction Permit and Inspection Fees January 1, 1991 Table 3-B - continued Conduit Only Installations Page 5 For single conduit installations, per lineal foot $ 0.05 Receptacle, Switch and Lighting Outlets For receptacle, switch, lighting or other outlets at which current is used or controlled, except services, feeders and meters. First 20, each $ 1.00 Additional outlets, each $ .65 Note: For multi -outlet assemblies, each 5 feet or fraction thereof may be considered as one outlet. Lighting Fixtures For lighting fixtures, sockets or other lamp -holding devices First 20, each $ 1.00 Additional fixtures, each $ .65 For pole or platform -mounted lighting fixtures, each $ 1.00 For the theatrical -type lighting fixtures or assemblies, each $ 1.00 Residential Appliances For fixed residential appliances or receptacle outlets for same, including wall -mounted electric ovens; counter -mounted cooking tops; electric ranges, self- contained room, console, or through -wall air conditioners; space heaters; food waster grinders; dishwashers; washing machines;water heaters; clothes dryers; or other motor -operated appliances not exceeding one horsepower (HP) in rating, each $ 5.00 Note: 1. For other types of air conditioners and other motor -driven appliances having larger electrical ratings, see Power Apparatus. Exhibit "A" City of Hawthorne Department of Building and Safety Schedule of Construction Permit and Inspection Fees January 1, 1991 Page 6 Table 3-B - continued Non-residential Appliances For non-residential appliances and self-contained factory - wired, nonresidential appliances not exceeding one horsepower (HP), kilowatt (KW), or kilovolt -ampere (KVA), in rating including medical and dental devices food, beverage, and ice cream cabinets; illuminated show cases; drinking fountains; vending machines; laundry machines; or other similar types of equipment, each $ 7.00 Note: For other types of air conditioners and other motor -driven in appliances having larger electrical cal ratings, see Power Apparatus. Power Apparatus For motors, generators, transformers, rectifiers, synchronous converters, capacitors, industrial heating, air conditioners and heat pumps, cooking or baking equipment and other apparatus, as following: Rating in horsepower (HP), kilowatts (KW), kilovolt - amperes (KVA), or kilovolt -amperes reactive (KVAR): Up to and including 1, each $ 7.00 Over 1 and not over 10, each $ 10.00 Over 10 and not over 50, each $23.00 Over 50 and not over 100, each $40.00 Over 100, each $69.00 Note: For equipment or appliances having more than one motor, transformer, heater, etc., the sum of the combined ratings may be used. These fees include all switches, circuit breakers, contractors, thermostats, relays and other directly related control equipment. Busways For trolley and plug -in -type busways, each 100 feet or fraction thereof $13.00 Note: An additional fee will be required for lighting fixtures, motors and other appliances that are connected to trolley and plug -in -type busways. No fee is required Exhibit "A" City of Hawthorne Department of Building and Safety Schedule of Construction Permit and Inspection Fees January 1, 1991 Table 3-B - continued Signs, Outline Lighting and Marquees Page 7 For signs, outline lighting systems or marquees supplied from one branch circuit, each $ 21.00 For additional branch circuits within the same sign, outline lighting system or marquee, each $ 6.00 Services For services of 600 volts or less and not over 200 amperes in rating, each $ 21.00 For services of 600 volts or less and over 200 to 1000 amperes in rating, each $ 40.00 For services over 600 volts or over 1000 in rating, each $ 80.00 Miscellaneous Apparatus, Conduits and Conductors For electrical apparatus, conduits and conductors for which a permit is required but for which no fee is herein set forth $ 48.00 Note: This fee is not applicable when a fee is paid for one or more services, outlets, fixtures appliances, power apparatus, busways, signs or other equipment. Other Inspections and Fees: 1. Inspections outside of normal business hours, per hour (minimum charge - 2 hours) $ 64.00 2. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of Section 305 (g) $ 53.00 3. Inspection for which no fee is specifically indicated (minimum charge - one hour) $ 53.00* Plan Checking Fee 1. Plan checking fee shall be assessed for all commercial and industrial projects, and for residential projects of greater than 3 dwelling units. Exhibit "A" City of Hawthorne Department of Building and Safety Schedule of Construction Permit and Inspection Fees January 1, 1991 Page 8 Table 3-B - continued 2. Plan checking fee shall be equal to fifty percent (50%) of the required electrical permit fee, provided however, the minimum fee shall be $ 53.00 3. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to approved plans $ 53.00* (minimum charge - one hour) 4. For investigation and review of test reports from testing laboratories and agencies. Reports for one (1) to ten (10) electrical items, apparatus, machine tools, appliances, or other electrical equipment ' $ 100.00 For eleven (11) to twenty (20) items $ 200.00 For more than twenty (20) items $ 300.00 * *Note Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved. Exhibit "A" City of Hawthorne Department of Building and Safety Schedule of Construction Permit and Inspection Fees January 1, 1991 Page 9 TABLE NO 3-C - MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES Permit Issuance 1. For the issuance of each permit $ 16.00 2. For issuing each supplement permit $ 5.00 Plan Check Fee = 50% of Mechanical Permit Fee, $53.00 minimum UNIT FEE SCHEDULE 1. For the installation, alteration or relocation of each forced air or gravity -type furnace, refrigeration compressor or absorption unit, and for each fuel burning furnace, heater, boiler and vented decorative appliance including vents attached thereto: up to and including 100,000 btu/h $ 13.00 over 100,000 Btu/h through 1,000,000 btu/h..$ 25.00 over 1,000,000 btu/h $ 64.00 NOTE: 1) For a refrigeration system rating; one horsepower, one ton or 12,000 btu shall mean the same quantity 2) For steam boilers rated in boiler horsepower, one horsepower shall equal 50,000 btu 2. For each air inlet and air outlet served by any heating, ventilation, and/or air-conditioning system $ 2.00 OR If the number of inlets and/or outlets is not known, for each 1,000 sq.ft. or fraction thereof of condition floor area $ 18.00 3. For the installation, relocation or replacement of each appliance vent installed and not included in an appliance permit $ 6.00 4. For each air -handling unit which is a portion of a factory -assembled appliance, cooling unit, evaporative cooler or absorption unit Up to and including 2,000 cfm $ 11.00 Over 2,000 and up to and including 10,000 cfm $ 19.00 Over 10,000 cfm $ 32.00 Exhibit "A" City of Hawthorne Department of Building and Safety Schedule of Construction Permit and Inspection Fees January 1, 1991 Page 10 Table 3-C - continued NOTE: This fee shall not apply to an air handling unit which is a portion of a factory assembled air-conditioning appliance for which a permit is required elsewhere in the Uniform Mechanical Code and this fee schedule. 5. For each evaporative cooler other than portable type $ 11.00 6. For each ventilation fan connected to a single register each fan up to 10 $ 8.00 each fan over 10 $ 3.00 7. For each ventilation system which is not a portion of any heating or air-conditioning system authorized by a permit $ 16.00 8. For the installation of each commercial kitchen hood or spray booth which is served by mechanical exhaust, including the fans and ducts attached thereto $ 32.00 9. For the installation of each fire damper $ 5.00 10. For the installation or relocation of each domestic type incinerator $ 12.00 11. For the installation or relocation of each commercial or industrial -type incinerator $ 48.00 12. For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this code $ 13.00 Other Inspections and Fees: 1. Inspections outside of normal business hours, per hour $ 64.00* (minimum charge - two hours) 2. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of Section 305 (g) $ 53.00* 3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated $ 53.00* (minimum charge - two hours) Exhibit "A" City of Hawthorne Department of Building and Safety Schedule of Construction Permit and Inspection Fees January 1, 1991 Page 11 Table 3-C - continued 4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to approved plans $ 53.00* * PER HOUR Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved. Exhibit "A" City of Hawthorne Department of Building and Safety Schedule of Construction Permit and Inspection Fees January 1, 1991 Page 12 TABLE NO. 3-D - PLUMBING PERMIT FEES PERMIT ISSUANCE 1. For the issuance of each permit $ 16.00 0% 2. For issuing each supplemental permit $ 5.00 0% Plan Check Fee = 50% of Plumbing Permit Fee, $53.00 minimum Plans are required for 1) residential projects of 10 units or more, and 2) all non-residential projects. The Building Official may waive this requirement for unusual conditions. UNIT FEE SCHEDULE 1. For each fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one trap ( including water, drainage piping, and backflow protection therefore). $ 8.00 2. For each building sewer and each trailer park sewer, or the extension of an existing house lateral ( a separate permit required of each connection or extension ) $ 22.00 3. Rainwater systems - per drain (inside building) $ 8.00 4. For each cesspool (where permitted) $ 24.00 0% 5. For each private sewage disposal system $ 48.00 0% 6. For each water heater and/or vent $ 8.00 0% 7. For each industrial waste pretreatment including its trap and vent, excepting kitchen -type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps $ 13.00 0% 8. Water piping installation, alteration, or repair and/or water -treating equipment, each $ 8.00 9. For repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping, each fixture $ 8.00 10. For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter, including backflow protection devices therefor $ 10.00 0% Exhibit "A" City of Hawthorne Department of Building and Safety Schedule of Construction Permit and Inspection Fees January 1, 1991 Page 13 Table 3-D - continued 11. For atmospheric -type vacuum breakers not included it Item 2 : 1 to 5 $ 8.00 0% over 5 each $ 2.00 12. For each backflow protective device other than atmosphere -type vacuum breakers: 2 inches and smaller $ 8.00 0% over 2 inches $ 16.00 0% 13. For each gas piping system of one to four outlets $ 8.00 14. For each gas piping system of five or more outlets, per outlet $ 2.00 15. For each -swimming pool, spa or similar recreationa•1`pool, including drainage piping, water piping, and gas piping $ 48.00 NEW 16. For each solar potable water -heating system, including water heater and vent $ 27.00 NEW OTHER INSPECTIONS AND FEES: 1. Inspections outside of normal business hours $ 64.00* (minimum charge - two hours) 2. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of Section 305 (g) $ 53.00* 3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated, per hour $ 53.00* (minimum charge - two hours) 4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to approved plans per hour $ 53.00* (minimum charge - two hours) * Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits Exhibit "A". City of Hawthorne Department of Building and Safety Schedule of Construction Permit and Inspection Fees January 1, 1991 Page 14 TABLE NO. 3-E ELEVATOR PERMIT FEES New Installations: Passenger or freight elevator, escalator, moving walk: Up to and including $40,000 of valuation $ 58.00 Over $40,000 of valuation $ 58.00 plus $1.00 for each $1,000 of fraction thereof over $40,000 Dumbwaiter or private residence elevator: Up to and including $10,000 of valuation $ 16.00 Over $10,000 of valuation $ 16.00 plus $1.00 for each $1,000 or fraction thereof over $10,000 Major Alterations: Fees for major alterations shall be as set forth in Table No. 3-A. Installation fees include charges for the first year's annual inspection fee and charges for electrical equipment on the conveyance side of the disconnect switch. Exhibit "A" City of Hawthorne Department of Building and Safety Schedule of Construction Permit and Inspection Fees January 1, 1991 Page 15 TABLE NO. 3-F - GRADING PLAN CHECK FEES (Based upon Volume of Material Handled) 1-50 cubic yards (Plans not required) $ 0.00 51 to 100 cubic yards $180.00 101 to 1000 cu. yds $180.00 plus $ 52.25 per 100 cu. yds. or fraction thereof over 100 cu.yds. 1001 to 10,000 cu. yds $675.00 plus $ 43.25 per 1,000 cu. yds or fraction thereof over 1,000 cu. yds. 10,001 to 100,000 cu. yds $1089.00 plus $25.00 per 1,000 cu. yds. or fraction thereof over 10,000 cu. yds. 100,001 cu.yds or more $3519.00 plus $ 71.25 per 10,000 cu. yds. or fraction thereof over 100,001 cu. yds. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to approved plans, per hour $ 53.00* (Minimum charge - one hour) * PER HOUR Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved. Exhibit "A" City of Hawthorne Department of Building and Safety Schedule of Construction Permit and Inspection Fees January 1, 1991 Page 16 TABLE NO. 3-G - GRADING PERMIT FEES (Based upon Volume of Material Handled) 1-50 cubic yards $ 80.00 51 to 100 cubic yards $117.00 101 to 1000 cu. yds $117.00 plus $ 37.50 per 100 cu. yds. or fraction thereof over 100 cu.yds. 1001 to 10,000 cu. yds $477.00 plus $ 31.25 per 1,000 cu. yds or fraction thereof over 1,000 cu. yds. 10,001 to 100,000 cu. yds $774.00 plus $20.00 per 1,000 cu. yds. or fraction thereof over 10,000 cu. yds. 100,001 cu.yds or more $2664.00 plus $ 50.00 per 10,000 cu. yds. or fraction thereof over 100,001 cu. yds. OTHER INSPECTIONS AND FEES: 1. Inspections outside of normal business hours, per hour $ 64.00* (minimum charge - two hours) 2. Reinspection fees assessed under provisions of Section 305 (g) $ 53.00* 3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated, per hour $ 53.00* (minimum charge - two hours) * Or the total hourly cost to the jurisdiction, whichever is the greatest. This cost shall include supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of the employees involved. G:\wp\djG:\WP\MED\9lfees FEE k F ; r4 NEW FeES V Pow — Inctnn.ln0] , ,Yii . G , 'tom IV i iCr1 `JCJy v Ic..g, -- --1. pll.l'_1S '' - 11 .� J-ly 'V ce , aRarfCK - q?c"S 9637-3e "` -- J 4DvvVJ .1F 1aS- 4.511,:IM.1+ 1� ._ 1'1(�� T t r -To crnG 6 Cam+- ( e 7 \. g G� 11�►r1 Merin 1,,--:--,.e.15 . 5c ofri 9 ii��►-�►-losol, p Bey, of 1 1.1 J lEvu 0 �, 11 tl Scc <,,-xIo c) i c '1 • j 2 [ t� ' / /J/ �--- i ,,,i _C� i .,,. S "`.v.� $8.00 "00. 0C I jc 00.00 ^I o XJ '7 _;co 1 `- 55,w Gov\diPoY &1 V1'SG TC4 Lot 1,500 tD;OU d --,s.0�0 (,2.6,--o ' 1, 0G0 Gf o. 00 , 00 , c 15 • 00 ) 1 000. vo - • 46'� e ° Ail , 00 O 0 , 0 GJ1tGVCVc VY1 �! l eiV \C / qP curt- ''‘eiv 1,ISOG. U ; , ►L15.OU I��o, %� i..000, ,00.0 C r,. 0.00 :=F N Siteixficksixneint Rw►e r) w (Mino 15o.''co . } �. �' ~ ' ,? N 4 UaY I�cc 1 �00C� < , 'XY \ ` � �, -�.5O pa lop 1 ,( ,co � o,00 3 :0.00 7 mil. o0 3 'r la -S.( 50.00 5,00 • a9 .coo 1 '55, `3C) 3u.5, of W 5 VarlanCc (Mihcv)? moo, co J 6 to } - ic, CktrrG a,�.Co (y00.00 G�rJ teL�' NQf t�vti RQ 4-- hNeT HAVE 1WN GnhES < L9CXD.0t21U .,,000.00 '-�-%-0.00 3 00 1a a, GO ai5ov, oG '6155.00 epc \1, (L0 a.Q-51, 00 Acmr-ici,rn cAcli aiC O 00 Hc),00 0.00 5e5 liAR,AnE6 0.00 . -7 `A,00 _ . 1', 000,00 qj• .00 _ _ W : \ VP\1z1E5 a.. . vo p . (>O V Pt%1 ES .6o;ioo lc 0.00 t60 00 /z. n�iY 1 fcc oR Z°fo OotoG•G• Plwnn�n oUr1G 330, 00 ya, i �l� Grp vital f�c 1 �v. 00 ./1"'\ 4 ori9ne.1\ •rcG Li_ �, �� •....ee� ��c'r 1 7�j. �p� 10 ) W 0 00 ?j �i . 00 � SAO 1�eG o�� ' �] . v0 � 5 . ao NEcx• I 0 � - C,�=. \O �� ./A+1' Wed Env► ronlmcniz,11 Review VARA t<S . aka C0 0 .,0 ,0 O, vo o �bs-h ,- ac.60 ISO, GO E 9 � 6 ; vi i, x�brt\ S t• 1 Hap 1;vi00. yo o ,00 �.;5�-0 4v. ,✓• .�'� � �e „�;� A. 1, {e� + ,�t ip 1►000,00 1f;0.00 -1-6 1►o-t , 5 S.o0 ggo,00 a-, ,Oo (r 5, 0o 0 03 \GS1,10 11 0,21, OO 2c 5,(y) ) oto.o0 l5 uW)-pGr' ►-root 51, v,5 el ;erc, +l VAR 1 ...5 1) OW .COI P U, ',1' 0.00 CN,NOK INGLUveD) >_o� LI�e /\oljustM' ck..\t. ►50. DU t ►o.00per l01 • _ Ie)0400 i. 5t 5. oo . 3ov•Uo 5�1;., 00 12 13 GTY0 c1 \ r\g . A '7 /E2 1 Gl--, - • co -'{35. cc 5 oo, cO 100. CO UCH iro•CO i .: 14 1`10ign19JYt'100o1 i,<,\•,iro,iibiti%V • 100; rcntrc�ct tp �rG GIR VARIES o,s ' REVoRT co,- 25'/s 00 15 �Y1V11'GY�► rltiYl� IYY��?itGi' (E1R� 1, c.o. co -�e�nnGGr Eyes (APN-rGANr. ,,y c, (..oST •.- QUA/. elm �hovtvhCc� ,,„, EX iv l .� c...F � GtT`f T� f firkz ,E ouT ow 5 rioT TIAVA Pa CIO n0iGIiY1GlI EGG MO ipUi �'2 , 1 o, 00 NO CNi\1�� 16 EAtc4,..61(JriS 17 horoc%dnmci►+ tt-IS. oo 125, 00 GIOAGYG1i ?Inn hrfo o1`f reArt - q • uc °lo •00 -1 0 , CU 7t 0 , 00 0.0O of , GO j ?,C O . Oo , o r oo , "1"74,-k-, L90 18 19 VtA • . Alnit rlG1 Ved P vi `�' G l 5. 00 t ;t5.00 , :rmrtf•`1G 5V '' '- u5E PERnrt' �,o NC PS Pl AA, ti 5AA, 51TE PI.AN REV 1E`N 15, CO MAIL ?5g111 INC, IK.T 1NGi_Ltvc'y us FIL.,Nr, FEE � " COHow,- 69 00. CO ,riu.6,P�.p IN N lr' FEE Q5 ,CO o _ o� 5 ' 20 ,,t ; , nr i‘,1.,-.1.-;,-, ;47_4 l.0 ..+ x ... caNTL of Atr GRi. O3 \V . 00 ob ' 21 1.....7.f':_,% \4n 1n r" f ��; -1: �?��. `1- ;? 1�O.GO aG0.Gib-1O.00 1IWO• O. —c5,00 a coo, cc 1 1,15. o0. 22 IVrcot5c YI't1n 2 pe o .00 150 00 115,0'0 0 c -Is, o I •00 23 Fico kY\S-xci cv- RCM 24 1 4 •1 •I I , Te4. P Mio temiztto.fid &Aid pai4dediiiiipwr 26 1 27 p -r _ _ 11( ir . i t 28 - • • MD&di t Lai (O N `e/ 29 d Om c e(, `_ ., 30 31 • ,Vid not morel, 0.00'5 I'�lartning * ��1�.+n� ' �/ GJt/t/7diViO\OY1 SC4 VIGC5 1 - f-hhcst '7ri LG 2 LOvNJcSt ?r►co 3P\ P\V&ra (i06A' 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 C6r6i i iUYic tjtC 17cyr'h.i .t . \, c-63 .TsO 300,0o 1, a-1 .----------.2.- � .ve..1 :, r yp_ ILA / WO' W CIO • Ov of 1 g " ! ! a 3 5IG rjC,vG OPVy1G+�! RG/10W(Mincr� ^'•rte. � , • 00 � e 00 N 4 VairAA -a Va,riO.V'CA CM►riot) I, $35•.Z� \0O 00�r 7."25: 4f -75o.15, •, A. i ;;, _ . A; - .. . „ N- z 5 750, 00 00 551.50 J 6 .c1(1e Cha 41 , -) • CO boo, oo I , 010. a1,7 r J I p 7 Cc4 Altrr,ntinner~ " oz, a 6700 - Ii --i5, 06 1,1%1, [ft, W 8 1— 1v of ay. P LAS ,50 o,00 a-1a.`bI 9 Emir-ay' ci V /vao0 cC�W v�- 7 3i G .00 3-7. 00 NeGe. 110. . to a 10 5tA kivI-d17l VIGIF , L•A•Lant► -icc +ate. ?00+401' 1, S,,$V { ° ;." 11 Post Tci,6,-hvc and 'Fi na I 5ubclVi5\Cfl Te►1-161? APpru�/a1 I000 ��r 150 era t 'f 1lp • 8 v 12 mot` Lmc Ac1p strn \ 501a •00 150.00 �.-64. 00 _ , t.� ,,,. 13 ara\tno AppvIcafii Rtiro co.cc) --1S.O0 3ht5.00 ► 14 1{��rij�r 1��1YC [XL1 C` b i 1 �/1 l5/W W •W 3� V - ; \ '- 15 fi` �_/E� Lj G\GQC.M`Gl ¢,-1crA C,06+., on 009x{ 16 ...,tsfficl: 150.00 \00.00 1 U . [ply . 17 EnGroaGhn'le,trit- I l -I-" ,) , 00 1 ot-J,c j t35. 00 18 CICAAPKC, Q Pla44 Po 4 me r,`t' i'rel`i , too .00. GO 1, a•a5.15 19 hOCX \rot aWvu 08 ?. G., Igo , CO /5, CYO II I , �5 20 Sop/rgodme Nobsc i 31c-1, Co 3 \ei ,00 3°1.00 • . ; 21 Fv‘i Fccs - -remp. u` 'Pcrn-itt (Cj , CO a5 , CO g ii • a5 22 23 7rr,c•i 'P V K.-1 . • - Q,cr,o, 0? _75.0° At. CO $ Fr\ O-.6 115.0a . r—jeic\ Cf--r,r-An RCAAC+,V \ 50 s 00 24 i 25 * i-lyy.,.Vtb(5 not 26 IGlitil f 1GG1AdVeit 1 27 tr,w rCRAla CikiaVtg 28 29 1iWfhuLc-sg- nriCAAruj Vary lv zGtGh caSC 30 V 31 r � , it 4 Poet•k' Ore s Fax transmittal Memo r:, 310 3 7"7-- I W 1 'elephcr 6. 7672 No of FO^4C To.+q ar � � Y From Ctimceay 4LAJ D f&10(40 �ocstcAA Oe t merge �;'1 S" tcirl4 G ) Fox 4 `yieDhor4 t r%- vt / 3 7 d,pc trrf pew!) ��Cgrtlt/✓jpickup ---`— j`n 7. 8, Modification 9. k 10. Tract Map 11. Parcel Map 12, :°:nvironmental Assessment Q'iof) 791.90 477.25 141.70✓ 1268.10 954.45f 45/ 634.60 13, Map and/or Conditional '.se Permit extension$ 162.55 14. Coastal Development Permit a) Non -advertised 38.55 b) Advertised 162.55 15. Site Plan Review 509.55 16. Development Agreement_---). 1268.10 SECTION 2, The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of thi. s resolution, shall enter the same in the Rook of Resolutions of said city, and shall, cause the action of the City Council in adopting the same to to entered in the official minutes of said City Council. Passed, approved, and 4 -adopted -this -9th day of June , 1992. ATTEST: City Clerk (SEAL) Plan 4./92 Mayo Pro Tem APPROVED AS TO FORM: City A orney (2) 9mwmmrommmm— 137-:'=4 c EA -r-'' 0T 4 :0h, ,?1 :,? :11-7,3d ' .i. i _ ;'7 I t'c : C 1 E6, -50-911i7! s Pottat" brt j d Fifx1Vansmittal Memo Tp Coa'Pi^ry -lo 7-1---TP-99 Totowa+ Fix: 7872 , No 01 Paoas Todoy alter, � ., .. From � ! � Cer' *'V C• J/ Coca c c,` n v DepX014 i Us 1)1,(2,)41? O48 Q MCA tJOeShMr Tar9{hOr'� i 31f -c 37 Row% 0CNIIto rAckup RESOLUTION N , 2 L A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY. COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RBDONDO PEACH, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING FEE'S FOR PLANNING APPLICATIONS AND PERMITS WHEREAS, it is necessary for the City to assess fees to ,:ftsnt the costs of services and materials, including those for planning applications and permits, pfovided to the public; WHEREAS, such fees should not exceed the reasonable cost of pro-iding such services and materials; MARAS, the fee schedule set forth below has been prepared to recover the estimated cost to the City of providing such planning related services. NCB•,. TEMOTORE0 THS WAIOR AND CITY COUNC1 J, Glr TUE CITY OF REDONDO BEAU BIND D aR, S l AS rol Ws That the a: oui is forth; in Z1)1 f,1A schedule. r ' r» do not exceed the reasonah11 s~:,,tim4t.ed cost to the City of providing planning related services as. shown by the report of the City Manager thereon placed on file,with the office of the City Clerk. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Redondo Beach as follows: SECTION 1, The feer for Planning Applications and Permits are hereby fixed and set as fol,lows; A. Planning 8'4es 1. Variance Jo Am Edit 1 11 l J b)Single-family homes 2 - •-••- •f Land Use District onal Use Permit 5. ,„./..-. ^n4'1 Use Permit - Cond^,r4-4,--- Plan 4/92 (plus $509.55 per —,. 1.,,. -^ndominiums, plus a stte':7l mental fee of $159.).2' for con-' ..rxnium conversion) i 319.90 953.40 - 1268.10 791.90 1013.90 2OTs:Ot. '31 H_i$ OTC036 J5 -',j I ): T 3:3T (UOJb0 &- c,n • pS or 6A p°fsct rbp_ it "tio-oi- P"<<c(- � �- — ' 6 cf.95 - _comcA _t.. _use- - i e,,c to fr (";Nor) — - _ CL..n¢. ;ZNt D NeeAlat ouiroo,,.,,e.nka.( e ) (, wc, Okib' v-cs c - cX+.wJ ci c1 YS 6 3y. 60 c.,15af.6 w; (eiR) P caP .ss •j C'Nt.for•G``^eA %t.N2rat ()LA) prof'- - -tA - -perrt±:1 eces_tsc :fe.,(1____imspeocl-;64Lrev_Le 61/4) Vic, __ '10..0",[c i'tAeN t-- ` nn HI. Mc kaput/1/4J fu. la Ctkotr (3t eV IGua eta ►J ii Va, 68: 10 r co/ COMMUNIT'QFVELOPMENT DEPARTMLJ Revised Fees Effective February 1, 1991 1. General Plan Amendment 82,500.00 2. Zone Change - ; $2,500.00 . / i 3. Zoning Code Amendment - s l $1,000.00 Spedfie Plan Review r � „ANC 1Gy $0.000.00 pia (Ir r ` GJ $100.00/pose acre Development Agreement $2,000.00 plus SIG.:AI/grim acre Conditional Use Permit 81.500.00 1 7. Verlaine 8750.00 ✓ S. Design Overlay Review $751.00 9. Tentative Tract Map $2,00/.111 ✓ (original, revised or vesting) 10. Tentative Parcel Map $2,000.00 (original, revised or vesting) j 11. Minor Lot Line A4natment $300.04 V/ 12. Certificate of Compliance 8301.01 13. Parcel Merger Review $100.00 le. Appeal on a Plating Application 1/2 original ✓ filing fee 15. Extension of Nonconforming Privilege $400.0(1 16. Interpretation of Zoning Ordinance 8000.00 17. Minor Development Modification Review $250.00 (No Public Hearing) IL Major Development Modification Review Original filingJ fee 19. Environmental Asse ment $50.00 ‘/ 20. Negative Declaration $100.00 . 21. Environmental Impact Report 10% of contract to prepare EIR 22. Mobilehome Relocation Impact Report / $4,000.00 pha Modification or Extension of Time $100.00/unit 23. Building Relocation Review $00.00 20.• Administrative Plot Plan Review $55.00 25. Field Inspection Review $45.00 26. Final Occupancy Review/Release of Utilities $10.00 27. Bond Processing $50.00 1L Temporary Sign Permit $25.00 (Streamers, banners S pennants) 29. Special Event Permit 825.00 (Sidewalk, parking lot a tent sales) 30. Document Copy 8.25/page 11. Microfiche $10.00 1st document $1.50 each additional :2. Planning Status Report $55.00 3. Copies of Tapes $20.00 each 14. Records Research $25.00 per hour For overhead service fee and hourly as necessary, pies reproduction costs. Is, Mailing of Planning Commission $50.00 year Agenda Face Sheet •f1/- ,/007 ygspq JUN 1 3 1991 CITY OF ROLLING POLLS l July 24, 1991 To: Lola, Craig From: Jennifer ' RE: Fees for reviewing Parcel Maps Here is the information I gathered fran the peninsula cities and Lomita regarding the fees for Parcel Maps. In addition to the County fee, each City charges: RANCHO PALS VERDES (Contact: Phabio) * Tentative Parcel Map $1,000 * Final Parcel Map .$500 * Tentative Tract and Vesting Map $2,500 * Final Tract and Vesting Map $1,000 PALDS VERDES ESTATES (Contact: Nona) P.V.E. does not charge. any additional fee. ROLLING HILLS ESTATES (Contact: David) L.A. County fees + Consultation fees + R.H.E. 21% R.H.E. charges 21% for all subdivision work in addition to County fees. LO ITA $300 + $50 per unit (parcel) Lomita charges this fee for both parcels & tracts. ••••• ••wr...r AN*" ...M.K, • lAct) deo (NI/lit lAtt 03 °Ail' Do 664\ RESOLUTION NO. 7240 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF riu: CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CALIFORNIA REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 7011 AND ESTABLISHING FEES FOR PLANNING APPLICATIONS AND PERMITS WHEREAS, it is incumbent upon the City to charge filing fees commensurate with the expenses involved in processing Planning Application and Permits; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the City of Redondo Beach as follows: SECTION 1. Resolution No. 7011 adopted August 16, 1988, is hereby repealed., SECTION 2. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapters 1, 2 and 3, Title 10, of the Redondo Beach Municipal Code, the filing fees for the various types of Planning Applications and Permits shall be as follows: A. Planning Fees 1. Variance a) All land uses except single-family homes $535 b) Single-family homes 295r.%j 2. Change of Land Use District 880 3. Planned Development 1,170 4. Conditional Use Permit 7301/ 5. Conditional Use Permit - Condominiums (plus $470 per unit for condominiums, plus a supplemental fee of .$1,470 for condominium conversion) plg.fee 5/21/90 1 935 6. Unclassified Use Permit $730 7. Sign Review 440 8. Modification 130 9. House Moving Permit 1,170 10. Tract Map 880 ✓ 11. Parcel Map 880 12. Environmental Assessment 585 ✓ 13. Map and/or Conditional Use Permit extensions 150v✓ 14. Coastal Development Permit a) Non -advertised 35 b) Advertised 150 15. Site Plan Review 470✓ 16. Development Agreement 1,170 SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, shall enter the same in the Book of Resolutions o± said,city, and shall cause the action of the City Council in adopting the 'same to be entered in the official minutes of said City Council. Passed, approved, and adopted this 19th day of ' June , 1990. q plg.fee 5/21/90 2 Mayor 26 -4 - 7"d RF,Ps NC/6 PERMIT TYPE Conditional Use Permit Division of Lot Environmental Assessment General Plan Amendment Modification of CUP, PP, PCR Modification of Variance Planning Commission Review �. Precise Plan of Development Tentative Tract vsr: Va? Validation Permit Variance Waiver Zone Change BASE FEE ,/$ 1,000 $ 900 ✓$ 750 i$ 750 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 ,/$ 1,000 ,,$ 1,200 ✓$ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 750 ✓ $ 1,000 HALF FEE, IF MULTIPLE FILING $ 500 $ 450 $ 375 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $600 $ 500 $ 500 $ 375 $ 500 NOTIFICATION FEE $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ 145 $ 80 $ 145 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ 80 $ 145 $— $ 145 ENGINEERING MAPPING FEE 8 $ 23 per lot $ 8 $ 8 $ 23 per lot ADMINISTRATIVE/MISC PERMITS Home Occupation Permit Fence Height Exception Carnival Nonresidential Trailer Parking Lot Sales/Exceptions Temporary Tent Satellite Dish Minor Modification Minor Hillside Exemption Time Extension Relocation Zoning Permit Title Company Info Requests $ 100 $ 180 $ 150 (Non-profit Exempt) $150 $ 150 $ 150 $100 $ 350 $ 115 $100 $ 75 $ 33 APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISIONS ON: Conditional Use Permit Division of Lot Environmental Assessment Modification of CUP, PP, PCR Planning Commission Review Precise Plan of Development Tentative Tract Validation Permit Waiver APPEAL OF PLANNING DIRECTOR ACTION ON: Administrative Approval/Denial ALL APPEALS MUST BE FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK COST $ 80.00 Planning Department Fee Name: Date: ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVALS/MISC. FEE ACCOUNT • Title company information requests $ 33 100-101-630004-1000 • Minor modification $350 100-101-630004-1000 • Satellite dish $100 100-101-630004-1000 • Carnivals, nonresidential trailers, parking lot sales $150 100.101-630004-1000 • Minor hillside additions/exemptions $115 100-101-630004-1000 • Temporary tent $150 100-101-630004-1000 • Time extensions, relocation zoning permits $100 100-101-630004-1000 • Photocopying $1.00 First Page $ .10 Each Add'l Page Total: $ 100-101-630004-1478 • Zoning maps (large) $8.00 + Tax ($.52) Total: $ 100-101-630004-1478 • Zoning maps (small) $3.00 + Tax ($.20) Total: $ 100-101-630004-1478 Revised: 7/1/90 CITY LAD/"A ZONING FEES Zone change_ General Tlan Amendment Conditional Use Permit Variance Precise Plan or Site Plan Review 5i 9ovrAa A Peivieiv-) Minor Plot Plan Appeals ENVIRONMENTAL FEES Initial Study Negative Declaration E.I.R. JUN 1 2 1991 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS By.. c_po ✓ o0 ✓ .3D —0— s O 0 0 SUBDIVISION FEES Tentative Tract Map ✓ 300 ;- 50/ hrt- Tent at ive Tract Map for Condominiums Sao-4-'5a/cohCA Tentative Parcel Map Soo -so/(ef - Parcel Merger — ° — Lot Line Adjustment ✓ ism Park Fees 30o/(s.{- + 012J1,441 Compiled by C4 -IA I2 f Phone No. (72-1-2,) o iy RICHARD KAWASAKI CITY PLANNER TEL(213) 24300 NARBONNE AVENUE, LOMITA, CALIFORNIA 90717 FAX 325-7110 (213) 325.4024 ACCT .4 1) 3812 2) 3805 3) 3803 4) 3810 5) 3811 6) • 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) 16) 17) 18) 3884 3866 3857 3885 3888 3867 3809 3883 3886 3808 3887 3868 3839 • CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING FEES CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PLUS CONDOMINIUM UP TO 8 UNITS - PER UNIT CONDOMINIUM MORE THAN 8 UNITS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT* ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FINAL MAP GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ZONE CHANGE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NONCONFORMING REMODEL PARKING PLAN PERMITTED USE REQUEST PLANNING COMMISSION APPEALS PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TENTATIVE MAP FOR SUBDIVISION/LOT SPLIT TENTATIVE / FINAL MAP EXTENSION TEXT AMENDMENT, PRIVATE VARIANCE VOLUNTARY LOT MERGER 300' RADIUS NOTICING XEROX COPIES 19) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 20) APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL (FILE IN CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) 300' RADIUS NOTICING, APPEAL TO COUNCIL 21) ZONING ORDINANCES (IN CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) FEE JUN 13 1991 ✓ $600CITY OF ROLLING HILLS $1116- -- $1200 $320 ✓$295 $225 ./$1200 ✓$515 $670 $920 $325 ✓$330 ✓$1145 ✓$920 ✓$225 $445 J$925 $160 ✓ $34O 7,11 $ 1 1st Pg. $ .20 Extras $1,500 Deposit $348.50 $ 9-0--U•0 $16 $10 For 1 Year Update * AMENDMENT OF EXISTING ACTIVITY OR AMORTIZATION OF EXISTING GRANDFATHERED ACTIVITY ** FEES HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED AS A RESULT OF CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 90-5422. Revised 1/2/91 p/fee RESOLUTION NO. CC -9008-79 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING AND ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE OF MISCELLANEOUS FEES FOR SERVICES AND MATERIAL PROVIDED TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND REPEALING ALL PRIOR RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH. WHEREAS, requests are received from the general public for copies of the Lawndale Municipal Code, ordinances, resolutions, minutes, agendas, lists, budgets and related material, and for use of copying and facsimile equipment for personal documents; and WHEREAS, the provision of such copies and use of such equipment constitute an expense to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. PROCEDURE. Any member of the general public wishing copies of any public record, as defined by the California Public Records Act, in the possession of the City, shall apply to the City officer having possession and custody of.such documents ("City Officer") for copies of such documents during normal business hours. Upon payment of the fees set forth herein, the City Officer shall make or authorize any other City employee to make such copies except as provided for any business or organization that is not directly affiliated, authorized or employed by the City of Lawndale or any other governmental agency. SECTION 2. EXCEPTIONS: The public records which are subject to disclosure pursuant to this Resolution shall not include any public record which is exempt from disclosure pursuant to the Public Records Act, and the City Officer shall determine whether such records are exempt prior to disclosure. In addition, nothing contained in this Resolution shall be construed to require the City Officer or any other City employee to compile records or prepare documents which are not already in existence nor to assign employees to produce documents when it is inconvenient or may interfere with the accomplishment of tasks already assigned to such employees. SECTION 3. `FEE'S Fees are hereby adopted to compensate the City for the costs of providing the services as described in Attachment "A" to this Resolution and by this reference incorporated herein. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE: All fees are effective on July 1 of each fiscal year. Changes in fees shall be scheduled annually in April. From time to time, changes or new fees may be necessary and shall be included as amendments to this Resolution as they occur. RESOLUTION NO. CC -9008-79 ESTABLISHING MISCELLANEOUS FEES -1- SECTION S. REPEAL OF PRIOR RESOLUTION. All portions of Resolution No. CC -8809-63 which are inconsistent with the provisions of this Resolution are hereby repealed. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of August, 1990. MAYOR, CITY OF LAWND ATTEST: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF LAWNDALE ) I, NEIL K. ROTH, City Clerk of the City of Lawndale, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. CC -9008-79 was duly approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lawndale at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 2nd day of August, 1990, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Hofmann, Norman, Rudolph, Johnson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 1QP.QV • \- CITY CLERK, CITY OF LAWNDALE RESOLUTION NO. CC -9008-79 ESTABLISHING MISCELLANEOUS FEES -2- ATTACHMENT "A" RESOLUTION NO. CC -9008-79 CITY OF LAWNDALE FEE SCHEDULE FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 A T TACH` TENT RESOLUTION NO. CC -9008-79 General and Miscellaneous Fees A. Reproduction Work 1. Xerox copies 2. Copies from microfilm 3. Copies of audio tapes 4. Copies of video tapes 5. Computer printout B. Agendas and Minutes. 1. Less than 20 pages 2. More than 20 pages, maps, diagrams, graphs, illustrations $0.20 per page $1.00 per page $15.00 per copy if blank tape provided $20.00 per copy if blank tape not provided $15.00 per copy if blank tape provided $25.00 per copy if blank tape not provided $0.50 per page plus $25.00 database look up charge Fees based on per page reproduction charge (refer to A.1) Fees based on per page reproduction charge, plus actual cost of reproduction of special materials. A deposit may be required in advance upon the decision of the City officer. C. Bound Reports and4 Cher Piblication8 1. Budget $35.00 2. Annual Financial Report $10.00 3. General Plan $50.00 4. Municipal Code - Hard Back . a. Initial Purchase $55.00 b. Annual.Supplements $15.00 5. Municipal Code - Soft Back a. Initial Purchase $20..00 b. Annual Supplements $15.00 6. Individual Articles within Municipal Code, when requested separately 7. Zoning Ordinance 8. Zoning Maps 9. All Others -2- $5.00 per Article $20.00 $2.00 each Cost determined upon publication M ATTACHMENT "1" RESOLUTION NO. CC -9008-79 D. Special Services The first three charges are annually determined by the Finance Department and are to be used throughout the City where services call for direct costs with a ONE-HALF HOUR MINIMUM CHARGE unless otherwise stated. 1. Staff Services 2. Attorney's Services 3. Field Employees Services a. Regular b. Overtime 4. Research 5. Bad Check 6. Certification of Document 7. Sale of City Memorabilia a. City Pins b. Other 8. Facsimile a. b. Services First two pages Each additional page $65.00 per hour $150.00 per hour $45.00 per hour $67.50 per hour Plus actual vehicle rental charges if applicable Direct staff services coats $10.00 plus 10% of check $5.00 $5.00 each -General Public $2.00 each -City Employees Price determined by cost plus California state sales tax $4.50 $2.00 E. Charges for other services may be set by the Finance Director based upon actual coat y. -3- CiTY OF EL SEGUNDO FEES FOR PLANNING SERVICES Type of Activity 1. Commercial, Industrial structures with floor area more than 15.000 st 1. Commercial, Industrial structures with floor area 15.000 or less 2. Single family in conjunction with 10 or 3. Multi -family with more than 6 units 1. 2. Single family wkh less than 10 units Multi family with 6 units or Tess Subdivision Zoning Re -class / Amendment Precise Plan Commercial Precise Plan Residential Unclassilled Use Permit Variance/CUP Residential Variance/CUP Non -Residential Adlustments Appeals Environmental Review Smoky Hollow Floating Zone Smoky Hollow Site Plan .Business License Review Preliminary Review Letter of Clarification 1835 2645 3060 N/A 2130 N/A 1835 1020 460 4105 2085 1180 15 155 120 935 1320 1560 1135 1085. 935 935 520 235 3605 1060 750 6 80 60 675 ✓ 935 `/ NSA • 810\/ 780 ✓ 675 ✓ N/A 375. 170 ✓ 37 \/ N/A N/A 5 55 45 0 176 N Cinf74(mo...tint\ ycc6veA 0,(cAt -1.- -Q ?vums) Air -C, T)CNCiI,v ` -e,vi co ..CO • \ ax-i aj C) -750 . co -5W 150 , CO ______:._I • - (/o6 G _ f°'Cw1. cit�1pk 1 y%. -- o .oc ' I i\n_ o•- n v-) p oL 1 . LCo . CO n J ' Si\V1Ircnn ry Q v aI RGvI \ CAD•Od i N �• _ \ ` �1n l odic v `d1 wl d .c3c) - • \ - • cAsvttY tCt • LX0� j vy 0 , Cho - C AnCA,ca1 "P1,At- pyyz Vl.ol- • - 150 „co F\1i �X , CO , Ft .6 I r1 Gti cin o -CO CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPME PLANNING/ZONING PEE SCHEDULE AMENDMENTS (Fee Res. Pgs. 46, 47, 49) 1;411R JUN 1 7 1991 CITY OF 4i, HIS Conditional Use Permit Amendment (Residential) $ 216.00 ** Conditional Use Permit Amendment (Commercial) $ 358.00 *** General Plan or Specific Plan Amendment $ 729.00 ** Residential Planned Develop. Permit Amendment $ 216.00 Zoning Code Text Amendment $ 729.00 ** ✓ Zoning Map Amendment $ 729.00 ** APPEALS (Fee Res. Pg. 46) Appeal to City Council of decision of lower body (e.g. Board of Zoning Adjustment, Planning Commission) $ (see note) NOTE: Fee is equivalent to 1/2 of initial filing fee, minimum $187.00 Appeal to City Council of Admin. decision $ 290.00 * COASTAL (Fee Res. Pg. 48) Approval in Concept $ 50.00 Coastal Development Permit(Public Hearing)$ 717.00 COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (Fee Res. Pg. 49) Amendment to existing CPD Permit $ 216.00 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (Fee Res. Pg. 47) Residential (i.e. Condo project) $ 588.00 * Commercial $ 729.00 ** CONDOMINIUM FEES (Fee Res. Pg. 47, 48) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (less than 4 units) $ TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (4 or more units) $ VESTING MAP (Add to subdivision fee) $ 588.00 437.00 588.00 150.00 * ** *** (Above fees for initial filing; see Subdivision Map fees below additional fees applicable at time of final Parcel/Tract filing) SUBDIVISION MAPS: (PARCEL/TRACT MAPS) (Fee Res. Pgs. 47, Tentative Parcel Map (less than 4 lots/condo units) $ 437.00 Tentative Tract Map (4 or more lots/units)$ 588.00 Vesting Map Fee (if a "Vesting Map") $ 150.00 Final Parcel Map/ Final Tract Map $ 209.00 ✓ _Mapping Deposits (pd. at Final Map appl.) $ 368.00 Quimby (Park & Rec) Fee $1,400.00/ Time Extension Applications Minor Lot Line Adjustment Consolidation of two or more parcels (PM) Reversion to Acreage Parcel Map VARIANCE/MINOR EXCEPTION (Fee Res. Pg. 48) Zone Variance Minor Exception 48, * **✓ new lot/unit $ 182.00 $ 187.00✓ .$ 209.00 $ 209.00 40. 729.00 ** ✓ 365.00 ,/ for Map 49) 4ISCEL•LANEOUS PLANNING APPLICATIONS Building Relocation Permit (Fee Res. Pg. 47) $ 729.00 Development Agreement (Fee Res. Pg. 49) $ 1,306.00 Large Family Day Care $ 216.00 Lot Merger/Unmerger $ 729.00 Lot Merger Appeal (of Planning Commission determination) $ 365.00 Neighborhood Overlay District Application (Fee Res. Pg. 48) $ 1,000.00 Planned Development Plan (Fee Res. Pg. 48) $ 1,000.00 Residential Planned Development Permit $ 729.00 Specific Plan (Fee Res. Pg. 48) $ 2,000.00 Senior Citizen Residential Planned Development' Permit (Fee Res. Pg. 48) .C.004$ 729,00 Special Permit (including Special Events) $ 437.00 Development Agreement (Fee Res. Pg. 49) $ -1,306.00 Temporary Use Permit (per M.C.10-3.414) $ 216.00 ENVIRONMENTAL FEES ** ** Whether a project qualifies for an Environmental Assessment filing as, "Categorically Exempt -No Initial Study Required", depends on the nature of the project. Those applications shown without an asterisk are "ministerial projects" per the City's adopted CEQA Guidelines. To assign a fee, use the following schedule. Any questions concerning the level of environmental review necessary should be directed to the Department of Community Development, phone 213/545-5621, Ext.292. * Environmental Assessment (No Initial Study/ Categorically Exempt from CEQA) $ 379.00 Environmental Assessment (Initial Study/Not Categorically Exempt from CEQA) $ 500.00 Fee depends upon nature of project; consult project Planner prior to submitting application. RB:AST md: C:\wp51\document\rosemary\fees.sch CITY COUNCIL CHARLES BELBA HAROLD S. CROYTS ROBERT T. HARGRAVE PETER J. ROSSICK CHUCK TAYLOR June 26, 1991 PRINCIPAL PLANNER ROLLING HILLS PLAN. DEPT. #2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS CA 90274 16/4/4-' Dear F310 . I FO�i CITY OF LO ADMINISTRATION WALKER J. RITTER CITY ADMINISTRATOR JUN 2 8 1991 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS TOMITA CLERK Thank you for your response to our questionnaire on development impact fees. Attached is a short report summarizing the information we received. Two cities sent their responses too. late to be included. A copy of those responses are attached for your information. I am sure that the survey does not reveal any earthshaking information. However, it may initiate some worthwhile exchange of information between city staffs. In conducting the survey, I sensed some uncertainty about the nature of impact fees. If you would like more information about the topic, try to get a copy of American Planning Associations's P.A.S. Report No. 408, "The Calculation of Proportionate -Share Impact fees". I have included a copy of a table from that report so you can compareyour city with a national study done in 1987-88. Our developer -resident who initiated the survey complimented all the staff from the various cities that he surveyed to check our information. He stated at a City Council meeting that he was treated very politely and that the staff were particularly eager to be helpful. If there are questions about the survey or if you want to get in touch with a person from another city who filled out the questionnaire, please call me. Sincerely, RICHARD KAWASAKI CITY PLANNER Enclosures CITY HALL OFFICES • 24300 NARBONNE AVENUE, LOMITA, CALIFORNIA 90717 • (213) 325-7110 ErtlE[Mq ,JUN 2 8 1991 A COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES ITY OF ROLLING HILLS • BACKGROUND Early this year a developer with a tentative tract map approved for 9 single family lots, objected to the parkland fee amount required by the City of Lomita. In addition, other issues were raised relative to the application of the fee requirement to tract maps only and to the 3 acre per 1000 population goal for parkland in the City. In response, the City Council directed staff to do a comparison study of other cities with parkland fees, and Council also requested that -staff gather information about development impact fees in other cities. As referenced in this study, development impact fees are exacted to cover or partially cover costs to a city relative to infrastructure repairs, maintenance and/or improvements. These may be road repairs, traffic signal improvements, water main upgrade, etc., which are not part of the improvements required as a condition of a zoning or subdivision approval. The addition of a residence is judged to have some general impact on the city-wide service systems and a fee, usually derived in a proportionate formula, is required to offset the resultant costs to the city. THE SURVEY A questionnaire was sent to 42 cities reported in a California Office and Planning Research document as having a requirement for parkland fees relative to residential development. The 42 cities selected are located in Los Angeles and Orange Counties. A copy of the questionnaire is attached. It was kept simple to keep staff worktime at the responding cities to a minimum. A request was made to attach supporting documents, i.e., ordinances, resolutions or worksheets. Follow-up phone calls were made to cities which had not responded after several weeks. Thirty-four cities respo nded to the survey. One city, La Palma, has no development impact fees. The responding cities ranged from Palmdale on the north to San Clemente on the south and from Agoura Hills on the west to Claremont on the east. The cities appear to be almost equally divided among those cities which are still developing at a fairly rapid rate, those which were substantially developed in the last 20-25 years and those where recent development is mostly infill or replacement. In population the cities range from Rolling Hills (1,871) to Huntington Park (181,519). THE RESPONSES - As expected, residential development in almost all the cities is subject to a school impact fee ranging from $1.50 to $1.58 per square foot of habitable space. Twenty-four of the participating cities have sewer fees in excess of the cost of inspections. Much of these fees, usually es toward administered by sanitation or sewer districts, g capital improvement of the sewer systems. There are three cities which collect city sewer fees in addition to district fees. Only six cities in the survey have general development impact fees. The great majority of the cities have fees specific to the part of the city service system needing upgrades, i.e., sewer, road, drainage, etc. On the other hand, the cities with the general developmentimpact fees also have impact fees for specific service needs. Twelve cities collect fees to offset water facility improvements. About half of these are cities with older urban development and aging water facilities. The other cities are relatively new cities. The purpose of the fees collected in these latter cities cannot be so easily speculated as in the case of the former cities. Nine cities have a road or traffic impact fee. Seven of these are in Orange County. Most of the road fees are earmarked for freeway construction or improvements. This is to be expected in areas where rapid urbanization out- stripped the state's ability to make freeway improvements. The two Los Angeles County cities with road fees, Palmdale and Agoura Hills, are also recent high growth areas. Culver City and Rancho Palos Verdes collect fees to provide art in public oesplaces. haveAgoura in -lieu fee uschedule ires an aesthetic, to provide review but dd off -site art. A number of cities require fees for drainage control. Some are foothill towns and others are in low-lying areas with a history of poor drainage. Several cities have fees to underground utilities. One has a beach parking impact fee. Rancho Palos Verdes has an environmental excise tax to defray ecological and environmental costs of development. The city is a coastal city with a substantial attentamount isfgiven tospace geologicalresources and areas where special concerns. PARK FEES As stated before, the main purpose of this survey was to compare park fees. There were four cities which reported they -had no parkland fees even though this fee was ttheen e initial criterion for inclusion in this survey.. cities responded that a set fee was required per unit or bedroom. The remaining fourteen cities use a formula to determine the fee. The basic Quimby Act -type ordinance uses a parkland goal in acres per 1000 population, a dwelling unit density in persons per dwelling unit, the number of dwelling units and a land value. One of the fourteen cities does not use any of these elements and therefore was not regarded to have a Quimby Act parkland ordinance. Many Quimby ordinances were adopted with a table in which much of the math has been worked out to indicate the number of square feet of parkland dedication required per dwelling unit. To determine the fee for a development, the number of dwellings and the land value are entered in the formula. Almost all cities require a parkland dedication or fee for parcel map approval. In fact, many cities require park fees on permits for single family homes even though there is no subdivision map. Only two cities use a parkland goal less than the suggested state standard of 3 acres per 1000 population. Of the 14 cities with a Quimby Ordinance, seven use thestate recommended parkland goal and six use a higher standard ranging from 4 to 10 acres per 1000 population. All the Quimby ordinances use a fair market value of land as part of the fee calculation. No information was received about the setting of fees by , cities not using a Quimby Act formula except that Palmdale conducts a study every few years to determine the cost of developing an acre of park. The fee is related to development costs, tied to the cost of living index and adjusted yearly until a new study is done. Their current cost estimate is $147,000 per acre of park. It is assumed that land acquisition is included in this cost. To make use of this estimate, one must take into account relative land costs. C:cprsnfe.bgi A P P E N D I X The following_ tables were developed from the survey responses. Table 1 includes assumptions about the single family house for which the fees are calculatedrfees ry ylgon the fees are set fees per unit but many information like square footage. The assumPtions ate that the house is 2500 square feet, 4 bedrooms, $175,000, in a 7 lot subdiv lon wich $SOOh000.d1These assumptions land and which is appraisedat were mrde test the doenotrmulas necessarilylve to one to depict areal anonother. life situation. Table 2 shows more detailed information about the responses on park fees. It was intended to reveal how cities apply the Quimby Act. Those cities indicating that a set fee was applied were not requested to submit supporting ordinances in the follow-up. The adopting ordinances may contain elements from the Quimby Act. C:cprsnfe.bgi/pg4 TABLE 1 ESTIMATED SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR .SELECTED CITIES a. UNDERGROUND UTILITY b. HILLSIDE UTILITY c. PER CUBIC FT OF DRAINAGE d. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES e. DRAINAGE CITY NAME_ SCHOOLS WATER POLICE FIRE SEWERS TRAFFIC & PARKS DEV. OTHER ROADS AGOURA HILLS 3750 2440 2357 ANAHEIM BALDWIN PARK BREA CARSON CLAREMONT COMPTON COSTA MESA CUDAHY CULVER CITY CYPRESS DUARTE FOUNTAIN VALLEY GARDEN GROVE HERMOSA BEACH 3900 3900 DID NOT RESPOND 3950 3975 3950 650 3750 600 3950 3750 3950 3950 3750 600 3750 950 3900 2280 910 1020 500 500 CITY 940 DISTRICT 1000 1000 2034 2280 1175 . - 4590 to 2500 990 350 3427 4019 0 1000 5286 4400 2500 f. EARTHQUAKE MONITORS _g. ENVIRONMENTAL EXCISE TAX h. BEACH PARKING i. TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR DID NOT RESPOND OTHER 12000 a 4341 c 2510 b 7348 1545 3839 4125 1750 d 715 e 12 f 2250 2750 e 1200 6500 400 e to 1400 1250 1060, 4290 TOTAL 8547 10199 5810 0 10256 . 26656 to 2.9166 . 8100 13243 8789 .11659; 12722. to 14047 8367 '. 9700 12800 to 13800 10500 TABLE 1 ESTIMATED SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR SELECTED CITIES CITY NAME HIDDEN HILLS HUNTINGTON BEACH LA PALMA LA VERNE LAGUNA BEACH LAKEWOOD LOS ALAMITOS LOS ANGELES MANHATTAN BEACH MISSION VIFJO NEWPORT BEACH NORWALK PALMDALE PARAMOUNT• a. UNDERGROUND UTILITY b. HILLSIDE UTILITY c. PER CUBIC FT OF DRAINAGE d. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES e. DRAINAGE SCHOOLS WATER POLICE FIRE SEWERS TRAFFIC & PARKS DEV. OTHER ROADS DID NOT RESPOND 3950 60 0 0 957 DID NOT RESPOND 0 3900 DID NOT RESPOND 0 3950 3750 3950 0 3900 186 360 DID NOT RESPOND f. EARTHQUAKE MONITORS g. ENVIRONMENTAL EXCISE TAX h. BEACH PARKING i. TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR 2280 750 3120 786 e to 1000 350 e 350 a DID NOT RESPOND 90 CITY 3427 950 DISTRICT 3125 DID NOT RESPOND 1060 1400 3266 6500 2280 1020 468 1100 990 2864 200 CITY 1250 1020 DISTRICT 1432 ' 6894 525 2185 i to 2822 1715 12250 d 1093 e to 3121 OTHER TOTAL 0 10946 to 11160 0 2017 0 4467 7025 0 2460 13716 17066 to 17703 18935 6515 to 8543 6556 TABLE 1 ESTIMATED SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT FEES FOR SELECTED CITIES CITY NAME SCHOOLS WATER POLICE PICO RIVERA DID NOT RESPOND PLACENTIA 3750 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 3750 ROLLING HILLS 3750 ROLLING HILLS ESTATE 3750 SAN CLEMENTE SAN DIMAS SAN FERNANDO SANTA MONICA SIGNAL HILL • TEMPLE CITY WEST COVINA WESTMINSTER LOMITA a. UNDERGROUND UTILITY b. HILLSIDE UTILITY c. PER CUBIC FT OF DRAINAGE d. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES e. DRAINAGE FIRE SEWERS TRAFFIC & PARKS DEV. OTHER ROADS . DID .NOT RESPOND 263 1040 1040 789 4978 5600 1040 3875 500 3950 341 420 415 2090 4275 400 to 5962 to 8361 3750 3950 925 3900 505 to 1680 DID NOT RESPOND DID NOT RESPOND DID NOT RESPOND 3750 825, 3950 1750 1300 1313 1040 2292 749 200 1000 f. EARTHQUAKE MONITORS g. ENVIRONMENTAL EXCISE TAX. h. BEACH PARKING i. TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR 584 e to 943 1387.g 3500 d DID NOT RESPOND DID NOT RESPOND DID NOT RESPOND 75.0 4080 1000 300 1500 h OTHER TOTAL 0 10364 to 10723 15277 4790 .r 9165 13391 to 21349 - 6042 6924 6918 to 8093 0 0 0 5325 12120 CITY NAME TABLE 2 PARKLAND FEES QUIMBY APPLIED PARK DWELLING FAIR OR SET TO ACRES/ UNIT MKT. FEE PARCEL 1000 DENSITY VALUE MAP Agoura Hills Quimby yes 3 3.7 . yes Anaheim Fee yes 0 -- Baldwin Park No fee -- - Carson Quimby yes 4 3.7 yes Claremont Fee yes Compton Not Quimby No yes Costa Mesa Fee yes Cudahy Quimby yes 3 0 yes. Culver City Quimby yes 3 2.75 yes Cypress Quimby yes 3 3.06, yes Duarte Quimby yes 2.5. 3.1 yes Fountain Valley , Fee yes Garden- Grove Fee yes Hermosa Beach. Fee yes Huntington Beach Fee La Palma No fee La Verne No fee Lakewood Quimby yes 4 2.9 yes Los Alamitos Fee yes - -- • T A B L E 2 PARKLAND FEES CITY NAME QUIMBY APPLIED PARK DWELLING FAIR OR SET TO ACRES/. UNIT MKT. FEE PARCEL 1000 DENSITY VALUE MAP Manhattan Beach Fee yes Mission Viejo Quimby yes 5 2.59 yes Newport Beach Fee: Norwalk Quimby yes 3 yes Palmdale Fee yes Paramount Fee yes 2 Placentia Fee yes -- Rancho Palos Verdes Quimby yes 4 2.8 yes Rolling Hills No fee Rolling Hills Est. Quimby yes 4 3.1 yes San Clemente Fee yes San Dimas 1 Quimby no 10 3.2 yes San Fernando Quimby yes 3 3.5 yes Santa Monica Fee yes Westminster - Fee yes Lomita Quimby no 3 2.72 yes IMO OM m• IWO CITY OF CONTACT PERSON TELEPHONE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISIONS Please indicate per unit fee in spaces provided or attach formula. SCHOOLS WATER POLICE FIRE SEWER ROAD PARK - STREET TREES OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) D%20.43 TABLE 3. NATIONAL AVERAGES FOR IMPACT FEES BY TYPE Single -Family General General General Home, Industry Office Retail Type of Impact Fee Per Unit Per 1,000 Square Feet Road Low $ 130 $ 18 $ 18 $ 54 High 4,271 950 3,589 7,327 Average 946 338 1,139 2,038 Median 804 250 1,000 1,497 Parks Low 80 NF NF NF High 562 NF NF NF Average 223 NF NF NF Median 185 NF NF NF Public Facilities Low 53 24 60 92 High 329 57 161 167 Average 107 33 82 130 Median 61 28 62 123 Police Protection Low 6 14 19 20 High 111 137 142 299 Average 51 49 79 111 Median 48 33 60 88 Fire Protection Low 15 6 15 22 High 150 57 98 139 Average 76 29 50 70 Median 62 25 37 39 Library Low 21 NF NF NF High 190 NF NF NF Average 90 NF NF NF Median 87 NF NF NF Schools Low 135 NF NF NF High 2,096 NF NF NF Average 606 NF NF NF Median 416 NF NF NF Total Average 2,100 449 1,350 2,349 Median 1,663 335 1,159 1,747 Note: NF —No Fee Sources: Arthur D. Little and Co., 1987, and Growth Management Studies, University of Florida, 1988. calculation procedures. Here it is possible to observe the relationship between impact fees and subdivision dedication requirements. Subdivision dedications are permissible, first, because the improvements dedicated are needed by that development and, second, because such improvements ben- efit that development. Impact fees must pass the same test of reasonableness. As with dedications, it is vital for com- munities using impact fees to be able to show that the facilities for which impact fees are to be paid are needed because of development. It must also be shown that the facilities provided by these fees will reasonably benefit or serve the developments paying the fees. With this said, the next chapter will consider how a community can calculate proportionate -share impact fees. 7 CITY OF I -01v Bs ci1' CONTACT PERSO St/ SO r VV! r01."i TELEPHONE -111+ "117 "07/3 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISIONS Please indicate per unit fee in spaces provided or attach formula. SCHOOLS WATER POLICE FIRE SEWER '1/2,5,50, `,o ROAD PARK STREET TREES OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) 7)r -a s%no o+ o A1! N/4 If /4 D4120.43 zs , o6 NIA .r&Z2.S Apr Acre '1" EOd St0 'HO 'H.IWO1 J0 AlI0 tEOb SEC CIE 9E:bt EE —b0 —t66 RESOLUTION NO. 83-2159 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TALE CITY ESTABLISHING FEES FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT SERVICES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TETPLE CITY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 78-472 the following fees are hereby established for the Planning Department: Conditional Use Permit $300 Zone Variance: Multiple Residential & Commercial $190 Single Family Residential $100 Zone.Change X335 Minor Zoning Modification $ 35 • Zone Variance & Conditional Use Permit $405 (if application made at same time) Zone Variance or Conditional Use Permit & $440 lot split (if appliction made at same time) All appeals (except appeal of Modification) $ 70 Modification of conditional Use Permit or $120 Zone Variance Appeal of Modification $ 35 Lot Combination $ 80 Minor Lot Line Adjustment $155 Environmental Impact Report (Res. 82-2042) Residential Planned Development: $335 Provisional Plan Precise Plan 5260 • Stock Cooperative (conversion or new development) 5300 Subdivision Fees Tentative Parcel Map '$335 plus , $350 deposit Final Parcel Map Fees payable co County as charged by•County $475 plus $500 deposit Fees Payable to County as charged by County ' $335 Tentative Tract Map Final Tract Map General Plan Amendment LOS ANGELES COUN1 IEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL P 320 WEST TE1tir,.c JTREET LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA 90012 INING FILING FEES ENVIRONMENTAL FEES (1) (2) INITIAL STUDY MINOR EIR • (3) MAJOR EIR • (4) SIGNIFICANT ECOLOGICAL AREA TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (SEATAC) REVIEW 1;270.00 51,195.00, plus $280 for each factor identified as having a potential significant effect in the initial study. *2,140.00, plus $280 for each factor identified as having a potential significant effect in the initial study. *125.00 ' For the purpose of fee determination an Environmental Impact Report shall be considered major as opposed to minor where the initial study discloses more than throc tact'rs indicating a possible significant effect on the environment. SUBDIVISION FEES (1) TENTATIVE TRACT REVISIONS Before Tentative Approval After Tentative Approval (2) MINOR LAND DIVISION REVISIONS Before Tentative Approval After Tentative Approval (3) CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (4) MINOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT (5) PARCEL MAP WAIVER (6) CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION NOTIFICAITON (7) MULTI -UNIT CONDO/APTMT/ STOCK COOPERATIVE (Parcel Maps) (8) MULTI -UNIT CONDO/APTMT/ STOCK COOPERATIVE (Tract Maps) *2.510.00 pot 1-10). plus *60/101 11-25, plus $30/lot 26-50, plus 512/lot 51+ *450.00 beginning with the third major revision and for each additional major revision thereafter. 30% of the filing fee required for the filing of an original map (major revision); $505.00 (minor revision) 51,925.00 $450.00 beginning with the third major revision and for each additional major revision thereafter. 5640.00 (major revision) 5505.00 (minor revision) 5250.00 plus an additional 5122.00 for subsequent requests requring the recordation of documents, including the Clearance of Conditions and Amendments; OR 560.00 where a Notice of Intent to File a Notice of Violation or Notice of Violation is filed on residential property. which is owner occupied *215.00 $445.00 $9.00/unit 51,925 plus S10/unit (100 units or less); SS/unit (101-500); $2/unit (501+). $2.510 pot 1-10) plus $60/101(11-25): $30/101(26-50): *121101 (51+); plus 510/unit (100 units or less); $5/unit (101-500); $2/unit (501+) ZONING S FEE '.;:::....< (3) (4) ANIMAL PERMIT APPROVAL IN CONCEPT (tor Coastal Commission) AVIATION CASE CEMETER`.! PERMIT (5) COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT *155.00; plus an additional *61.5.00 with hearing. $24.00 5595.00 52.235.00. plus sum determined to be adequate to defray cost of notification requirements. *280.00; except where a public hearing is required an additional tee of $2.235.00 shall be paid. However, when filed concurrently with any other application, petition or tentative map required by this Title 22 or by Title 21 of this code which is the subject of a public hearing for the same or substantially the same property, no separate fee shall be charged for such coastal development permit. • ZONING FEES (cont.l (6) (7) (8) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 32.235.00, plus sum determined to be adequate to defray FOR LAND RECLAMATION cost of required publication and/or posting. PROJECTS (9) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 62235.00 for each sign or 2 of more sign faces on the same FOR SUBDIVISION sign structure If they relate to the same subdivision DIRECTIONAL SIGN development. (10) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $1285.00 FOR LOWS MODERATE INCOME HOUSING (11) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $265.00 APPEAL TO THE RPC (12) DEVELOPMENT $2200.00 except where a petition for change of zone for the same or substantially the same property is filed concurrently, AGREEMENT no separate fee shall be charged. (13) EXPLOSIVE STORAGE *2x.00 (14) HIGHWAY REALIGNMENT 62.910.00 (15) MOBILEHOME PERMITS 62235.00: time extenstione $120.00 (16) NONCONFORMING USE! $2235.00 STRUCTURE REVIEW (17) OAK TREE PERMIT $125.00 (18) PARKING PERMIT S2.235.00 (19) PLAN AMENDMENT, LOCAL $1,490.00 (20) PLAN AMENDMENT, 62205.00 COUNTYWIDE (21)• SITE PLAN REVIEW $125.00, including intial or revised plan, director's review. Coastal Commission exemptions. (22) SITE PLAN REVIEW, $280.00. where site plan has 20.000 or more sq ft COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL of gross floor area. (23) SITE PLAN REVIEW. $280.00 RESIDENTIAL IN HILLSIDE AREAS (24) SITE PLAN REVIEW $265.00 APPEAL TO THE RPC (25) SPECIFIC PLANS $2,640.00 (26) SURFACE MINING PERMIT! $2235.00 RECLAMATION PLANS (27) TEMPORARY USE PERMITS $125.00; plus an additional $280.00 with public hearing. (28) VARIANCE $2,235.00 . A (29) ZONE CHANGES s $2,835.00 • $125.00 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT. AMENDMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT .32,235.00 .! FEE REDUCTIONS FOR MULTIPLE CONCURRENT CASE FILINGS — When more than a oiled application, petition or tentative map for the same or substantially thesame r th ereafter ledll concurrently, the total filing tee for the second and each additional application be reduced by $250.00. respectively. Revised January 1991 Land Development Management Agency MI SURCHARGE FEES COUNTY OF LOS ANGLES DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL PLANNING 320 WEST TEMPLESTREET LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA 90012 ENVIRONMENTAL SURCHARGE (1) INITIAL STUDY NO FEE (2) . MINOR EIR• NO FEE (3) MAJOR EIR• NO FEE SUBDIVISION SURCHARGE (1) TENTATIVE TRACT OR REACTIVATION IN WHICH NO CONDOMINIUMS ARE PROPOSED Per Lot LOTS 1 -25 $30.00 LOTS 26 = 50 $20.00 LOTS 51 - 100. $15.00 LOTS 101 - 200 $10.00 LOTS 201+ $ 5.00 B. CONDOMINIUM PROJECT Units 1 - 50 Units 51 - 100 Units 101 - 200 Per Unit $10.00 $ 5.00 $ 3.00 NO SURCHARGE FEE SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ANY UNIT(S) IN EXCESS OF 200 UNITS (2) MINOR LAND DIVISION OR R EACTI V ATi)N :$300.004 • (3) REVISIONS NO FEE (4) CERTIFICATE OF 4 NO FEE • COMPLIANCE (5) MINOR LOT LINE * NO FEE ADJUSTMENT (6) PARCEL MAP WAIVER $25.00 (7) CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION NO FEE NOTIFICATION (Ordinance NO. 12.364) ZONING SURCHARGE (1) ANIMAL PERMIT NO FEE (2) APPROVAL IN CONCEPT NO FEE (for Coastal Commission) (3) CEMETERY PERMIT 'NO FEE (4) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $50.00 (5) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $50.00 FOR LAND RECLAMATION PROJECTS (6) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ' NO FEE FOR SUBDIVISION DIRECTIONAL SIGN (7) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - $50.00 HILLSIDE MANAGEMENT AND SIGNIFICANT ECOLOGICAL AREAS (8) VARIANCES $50.00 • (9) DIRECTOR'S REVIEW NO FEE ZONING SURCHARGE (contd.) • Effective May 25, 1986 110) EXPLOSIVE STORAGE PERMITS N( (11) MOBILEHOME PERMITS NO FEE (12) NONCONFORMING USE/ NO FEE STRUCTURE REVIEW (13) PARKIIQG PERMIT NO FEE (14) PLOT PLAN REVIEW NO FEE (15) REVISED PLOT PLAN REVIEW NO FEE (16) SETBACK MODIFICATIONS NO FEE (17) SURFACE MINING PERMIT NO FEE AND/OR RECLAMATION PLANS (18) ZONE CHANGES 9400.00 (19) ZONE CHANGES EQUESTRIAN $400.00 DISTRICT (20) HIGHWAY REALIGNMENT NO FEE (21) LOW HOUSING&MOPERMIT E INCOME $50.00 (22) TEMPORARY USE PERMIT NO FEE (23) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT $600.00 (24)' ENVIRONMENTAL NO FEE DOCUMENTATION t (25) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT $400.00 (26) OAK TREE PERMIT NO FEE L.A. COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING CONTRACT CITY PLANNING SERVICES CHARGES ACCRUED DURING APRIL, 1991 CITY OF RO ING HILLS No. 049102 **********************************************************************************************************:-*************** RACT/M DIV EMPLOYEE --- DAY CHARGE --- --- NIGHT CHARGE --- --- MILEAGE CHARGE --- ITEM :ASE N'. SEC NUMBER HOURS RATE AMOUNT HOURS RATE AMOUNT MILES RATE AI'7CJNT CHARGES it******** ***************************************************************************************************k*************** Pi 1410250 i� 21 1815 4.00 56.88 227.52 -0- 56.88 -0- 52 .25 13.00 021. 0Izc 11 137183 3.00 48.35 145.05 -0- 48.35 -0- -0- .25 -C- 021444 l 11 137183 3.00 48.35 145.05 -0- 48.35 -0- -0- .25 -C- 021486 /is51 11 137183 3.00 48.35 145.05 -0- 48.35 -0- -0- .25 -C- 022334 11 137183 3.00 48.35 145.05 -0- 48.35 -0- -0- .25 022333 11 137183 2.00 48.35 96.70 -0- 48.35 -0- -0- .25 �5 X103024 EsViria4 14 140338 1.00 56.88 56.88 -0- 56.88 -0- -0- .25 J..40 021400 11 85572 3.00 41.18 123.54 -0- 41.18 -0- -0- .25 021444 4 j 11 85572 4.00 41.18 164.72 -0- 41.18 -0- -0- .25 021486 11 85572 4.00 41.18 164.72 -0- 41.18 -0- -0- .25 022333 11 85572 3.00 41.18 123.54 -0- 41.18 -0- -0- .25 022334 11 85572 3.00 41.18 123.54 -0- 41.18 -0- -0- .25 -0- 240.52 145.05 145.05 145.05 145.05 96.70 56.88 123.54 164.72 164.72 123.54 123.54 • TOTAL DUE THIS PERIOD 1,674.36 THE BILLING TRANSACTIONS REFLECT THE CHARGES FOR PLANNING SERVICES RENDERED DURING THE PERIOD SHOW, PLEASE REMIT CHARGES PAYABLE TO: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL PLANNING 320 WEST TEMPLE STREET LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 SHOULD YOU HAVE QUESTIONS CONCERNING THESE CHARGES; PLEASE CONTACT DING DICHOSO, ADMIN. SERV. 974,i -c: -M- - L.A. COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING CONTRACT CITY PLANNING SERVICES CHARGES ACCRUED DURING JUNE, 1992 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS No. 069?;317 **********************************************************************************************************,l****************** TRACT/MAP DIV EMPLOYEE --- DAY CHARGE --- --- NIGHT CHARGE --- --- MILEAGE CHARGE --- ITEM . CASE NO. SEC NUMBER HOURS RATE AMOUNT HOURS RATE AMOUNT MILES RATE kMOUNT CHARGES ********************************************************************************************************t****************** 200322 21 1815 1.00 63.06 63.06 4.00 63.06 .252.24 58 .25 14.50 329.80 102502 11 137183. 6.00 53.58 321.48 -0- 53.58 -0- -0- .25 -0- 321.48 AMOUNT DUE THIS PERIOD 651.28 THE BILLING TRANSACTIONS REFLECT THE CHARGES FOR PLANNING SERVICES RENDERED DURING THE PERIOD SHOWN. PLEASE REMIT CHARGES PAYABLE TO: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL PLANNING 320 WEST TEMPLE STREET LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 SHOULD YOU HAVE QUESTIONS CONCERNING THESE CHARGES; PLEASE CONTACT DING DICHOSO, ADMIN. SERV. 974-6473