Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2500 Planning - Fees
Minutes City Council Meetini 07/22/13 PUBLIC HEARINGS RESOLUTION NO. 1149 — A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING AND MODIFYING ROLLING HILLS MISCELLANEOUS FEES RELATED TO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES, ADDING THOSE FEES TO THE EXISTING SCHEDULE OF FEES, AND RESCINDING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 1119. Mayor Hill introduced the item and asked for staff's comments. Interim City Manager Burrellpresented the staff report and reviewed the proposed modifications to the City's fee schedule. Mayor Hill opened the public hearing and called for public comment. There was no public comment on the fee Resolution. Mayor Pro Tem Lay moved that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 1149 establishing and modifying Rolling Hills miscellaneous fees related to planning and development activities, adding those fees to the existing schedule of fees and rescinding Resolution No. 1119. Councilmember Black seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Black, Dieringer, Lay, Pieper and Mayor Hill. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. C.C. 07-13-2009 RESOLUTION NO. 1064. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING FEES FOR PERMITTING AND INSPECTION AND FOR THE INCLUSION OF SOLAR AND PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS AND APPURTENANT EQUIPMENT AND REPLACING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 1060 City Manager Dahlerbruch presented the proposed resolution which decreases the fees associated with solar and photovoltaic systems and appurtenant equipment. Dr. Ralph Black, 36 Saddleback Road addressed the members of the City Council stating that consideration should be given to the look and placement of solar panels and suggesting that the Council not make a decision on this item tonight. After discussion concerning the range of fees in other cities, and the City's authority to regulate from an architectural perspective, Mayor Pro Tem Pernell moved that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 1064 establishing fees for permitting and inspection and for the inclusion of solar and photovoltaic systems and appurtenant equipment and replacing City Council Resolution No. 1060. Councilmember Lay seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. C.C. 05-11-2009 PUBLIC HEARINGS A. RESOLUTION NO. 1060. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CONSOLIDATING SEVERAL PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED FEE RESOLUTIONS FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY INCLUDING BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO PLANNING, ZONING AND SUBDIVISION; ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS; ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION PERMITS; GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND PROCESSING: TRAFFIC REVIEW AND VIEW IMPAIRMENT REVIEW: AMENDING CERTAIN FEES AND ESTABLISHING NEW FEES RELATIVE TO LIGHTING ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION; CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND OTHER CITY SERVICES AND CHARGES AND REPEALING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS NO. 493, 494, 496, 691, 854, 931 AND 1034. City Manager Dahlerbruch presented the staff report in support of Resolution No. 1060 which consolidates several previously established fees resolutions combining them into one Resolution and establishes new fees relative to the lighting ,. ordinance implementation, construction and demolition ordinance implementation and other City services and charges. City Manager Dahlerbruch then reviewed each of the additional fees. He stated that the fees were reviewed by the Budget/Finance Subcommittee and changes were made based on recommendations from the Subcommittee. Mayor Heinsheimer opened the public hearing. Hearing no public testimony, Mayor Heinsheimer closed the public hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Pernell moved that the City Council waive full reading and adopt Resolution No. 1060. Councilmember Hill seconded the motion, which carried unanimously by those council members in attendance. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW FEES. City Manager presented the staff report providing information regarding the proposed fee schedule modification by the County for geotechnical report, site plan and review. He explained the previous and proposed method of calculating these fees. Hearing no discussion, Mayor Hill called for a motion. Mayor Pro Tern Heinsheimer moved that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 931 amending fees collected for geotechnical report, site and plan review services provided by the County of Los Angeles. Councilmember Pennell seconded the motion, which carried unanimously. OPEN AGENDA - APPROXTM, TTPT v u•nn n rR - PTT111Tr' ' "(W,f NT WELCOME • op CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING AND CHARGING ADMINISTRATIVE FEES FOR ILLEGAL OR "AS BUILT" STRUCTURES OR GRADING THAT REQUIRES DISCRETIONARY REVIEW BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 854: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING AN ADDITIONAL PROCESSING FEE FOR PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATIONS INVOLVING ILLEGAL OR "AS BUILT" PROJECTS, AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 691 REGARDING FEES. City Manager Nealis presented the staff report providing background regarding the Planning Commission recommendations regarding "as built" projects. He explained the penalty fees that the County assesses on projects that are constructed without benefit of building permits. Mayor Hill opened the public hearing and called for testimony. Mr. Ken Johnson, 29 Middleridge Lane South, commented on the proposed fee. In response to Mr. Johnson, City Manager Nealis explained that illegally constructed projects could still be required to be removed if approvals are not granted or if applications are not submitted. City Manager Nealis explained the steps that are taken by City and County staff when illegal construction is reported. Dr. Gordon Schaye, 58 Portuguese Bend Road, commented on structures on his property that the Rolling Hills Community Association considered to be illegal. Mr. Paul Grubbs, 1 Hackamore Road, commented on the condition of the property at 58 Eastfield Drive. In response, City Manager Nealis provided a brief summary of staffs efforts on that case. Hearing no further discussion, Mayor Hill closed the public hearing. Councilmembers discussed the proposed fee and whether it was enough to recuperate staffs time in investigating "as built" projects. City Manager Nealis presented an explanation of how staff arrived at the proposed fee. Councilmembers also discussed whether or not the fee was enough to discourage illegal construction in the City. City Treasurer Larry Courtright explained how the City's accounting system allocates all fees. Hearing no further discussion, Mayor Hill called for a motion. Councilmember Lay moved that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 8 :'4. Councilmember Pernell seconded the motion which carried unanimously. Staff was directed to review the Fee Resolution and provide a status report on this new fee to the City Council in six months. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO 691: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS SETTING FEES FOR PLANNING, ZONING SUBDIVISIONS, VIEW IMPAIRMENT, TRAFFIC COMMISSION REVIEW, AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, AND. RESCINDING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 614. City Manager Nealis presented a staff report outlining the proposed fees changes and recommended that Council adopt this resolution. After discussion, Councilmember Heinsheimer moved approval of Resolution No. 691 and Councilmember Pemell seconded the motion which carried 4-0-1. OLD BUSINESS • CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION The City Council and Staff discussed the following matters of citywideimportance throughout the course of the day long session: A. Jroposed Fe:Resolution.- - B. Refuse Collection Services. C. Underground Utilities. D. Status of Lease Agreement between the City and Rolling Hills Community Association. • E. Advertising in City Newsletter. F. Garage Sales. G. Status of Hardscape/City Hall Projects/Consideration of Landscape Plan. H. Status of Rancho Palos Verdes' Projects. I. Storage of Vehicles on Unimproved Lots in the Flying Triangle Area. J. Permit application fees for Traffic Commission hearings. K. Ordinance No. 236: Reflective devices. L. Ordinance No. 238: Prohibition of Skateboards. M. Ten Year Financial Plan. N. Community Recognition Awards. 0. City Council Committee Assignments. City Council Meeting Minutes August 14, 1992 -1- FEE SCHEDULE 1. Site Plan Review $1,500 2. Conditional Use Permit $1,500 3. Variance $1,250 4. Variance, Minor Minor deviation into required yard setback, not exceeding 5' and attached to main residential structure $750 5. Multiple discretionary reviews Most expensive fee for the first review and 1/2 fee for second view. No cost for third or more reviews. 6. Lighting Ordinance Modification $750 7. Outdoor Lighting Audit $150 (initiated by resident) 8. Time Extension $200 9. Zone Change $2,000 10. General Plan Amendment $2,000 11. Zoning/Subdivision Code Amendment $2,000 12. Discretionary Approval Modification $ 2/3 of original application fee 13. Appeal Fee $ 2/3 of original application fee 14. City Council or Planning Commission for interpretation $375. Fee to be credited if and miscellaneous reviews results in filing of a formal application to City Council or Planning Commission 15. Environmental Review for Determination of discretionary permits, preparation & staff review of Initial Study $200 16. Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Negative Declaration $1,000 (plus fee charged by the CA Dept. of Fish and Game, if applicable, as adjusted annually) 17. Environmental Impact Reports Consultant fee plus 20% 18. County Clerk Processing Fee County fee 19. Lot Line Adjustment $1,500 plus County fee 20.. Tentative Parcel/Tract Map $1,500 plus County fees plus 20% 21. Final Parcel/Tract Map . _ County fee plus 20% Resolution No. 1149 EFFECTIVE 9/20/2013 Public:FLYERS:Fee Schedule 2013.docx 22. Zoning violation and construction penalty fee Application for illegal or "as built" grading or construction or non-compliance with approved plans for projects that require Planning Commission review. Fee is charged in addition to the discretionary application review fee. $2,500 23. Stop work order $200 Fee charged for each additional "stop work order" that is issued beyond the original stop work order for illegal construction and grading activity requiring Planning Commission review and approval. 24. Service Request (For services provided by LA County not included in the General Services Agreement). County fee plus 20% 25. Appeal of Zone Clearance (For appeal of staff's decision) $375 26.- Stable Use Permit (For stables under 800 sq. ft. when Planning Commission review required) $375 27. Major Remodel Review (For remodel /addition where 50% or more of exterior walls are demolished) $375 28. View Impairment Application Fee (includes cost of mediation) Review by Committee on Trees and d Views Environmental Review Fees: Preparation and staff review of Initial Study Preparation of Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration $1,000 $2,000 (processing fee) $200 $1,000 plus fee charged by CA. Dept. of Fish & Game, if applicable, as adjusted annually. $300 29. Traffic Commission Review New driveways or other traffic related items. 30. General Plan $30. 31. Zoning Code $25 32. Subdivision. Code $25 33.. Budget $30 34. Zoning Map $3 35. Xeroxed Copies, each page. $0.25 36. Construction and Demolition $25 single project permit 37. False Alarms - Fee for 1st incident involving a false: alarm is waived 2nd 50 3rd $100 4th $150 5th $200 6th $250- TO: FROM: SUBJECT: aiRalle# qieek INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX. (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No.: 5-A Mtg. Date: 07-22-13 HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE I Y COUNCIL STEVE BURRELL, INTERIM CITY MANAGER ` RESOLUTION NO. 1149 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING AND MODIFYING ROLLING HILLS MISCELLENOUS FEES RELATED TO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES, ADDING THOSE FEES TO THE EXISTING SCHEDULE OF FEES, AND RESCINDING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 1119. DATE: JULY 22, 2013 ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 1149 Summary Chart of Proposed Changes FY 2012/2013 Consolidated Tax and Fee Schedule RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council consider establishing and modifying the fees as described herein and adopt the attached Resolution No. 1149 with the changes agreed upon. The FY 2012/2013 Consolidated Tax and Fee Schedule will be updated accordingly. BACKGROUND At is meeting of April 8, 2013, the City Council Finance / Budget Committee discussed potential updates to the City's Consolidated Tax and Fee Schedule. Subsequently, with City Council's "receive and file" of the notes from the meeting on April 22, 2013, staff agendized and noticed a Public Hearing for the consideration of Resolution 1149 updating the Consolidated Tax and Fee Schedule to be held on July 22, 2013. DISCUSSION The following describes the recommendations for new and modified fees that are not currently collected, do not cover the City's costs or require simple corrections in the Consolidated Tax and Fee Schedule: Page 1 of 5 1. Clarification of City Council or Planning Commission decision When a clarification of a zoning -related decision is necessary, the question at hand is normally presented to the body that made the final decision. If the decision was ultimately made by the City Council, the clarification is agendized for City Council review. If the Planning Commission made the final decision, the clarification is agendized for Planning Commission consideration. The fee for processing the clarification is later credited to the application fee if the deciding body determines an application must be submitted = for formal review of the project (e.g., for a Site Plan Review or Conditional Use Permit). As currently listed in ` the Consolidated Tax and Fee Schedule, there is a $375 fee for "Planning Commission interpretation and miscellaneous Planning Commission reviews." Staff recommends that the description of this fee be broadened to include "City Council." As such, the description would read as follows: Planning Commission and City Council interpretation, clarification and miscellaneous reviews. No change is proposed to the existing fee and, it is infrequent for an applicant to request a Clarification of a City Council or Planning Commission decision. 2.. County Clerk Processing Fee Resolution 1119 (Section 1, Q) specifies that the County Clerk's Processing Fee is $100. The County's fee has increased to $150 since the Resolution was adopted. Recognizing that this is not a City fee and the County changes their fee from time to time, staff recommends that $100 be replaced by "County fee." This fee, incidentally, does not appear on the Consolidated Tax and Fee Schedule so, it will be added accordingly. 3. Zoning violation and construction penalty In May 2009, the City Council increased the penalty for zoning and construction violations from $400 to $1,000. This penalty is applied when, for example, it is found that a structure is built larger than was permitted/ approved by the City. Such cases require a significant amount of staff time to process through code enforcement. It also involves extra time than would be usual for subsequently processing an as -built Site Plan Review. Moreover, a $1,000 penalty may seem a small price and minor deterrent in exchange for having a bigger structure. This past year, there have been two cases of note where the penalty has been applied. In turn, staff proposes the penalty be increased to $2,500. As a penalty, it is not necessary to equate the cost of providing a service to the amount. The penalty is applicable to the property owner/applicant. 4. Appeal of Zone Clearance (appeal of over-the-counter staff decision) Zone Clearance appeal involves a challenge to the staff decision on minor projects and project modifications that are approved "over-the-counter." Two years ago, the City received an appeal to a Zone Clearance that required approximately 6 hours of staff time as it progressed through Planning Commission and City Council hearings. While this has occurred just once in recent years, there have been periodic instances when questions arose that could have resulted in an Appeal of Zone Clearance. The cost of Page 2 of 5 processing such a request is calculated to be $900, however, staff recommends a fee of $375 to be consistent with the existing fee for Clarification of a Planning Commission decision. 5. Stable Use Permit for Planning Commission approval When it is necessary that an application for a Stable Use Permit for a stable under 800 sq. ft. be presented to the Planning Commission (e.g., resulting from staff inspection or objections of the use from the neighbors), the process in place necessitates that a hearing be scheduled before the Planning Commission. The hearing process involves a Planning Commission field trip to the site and notifying the neighbors, preparation of a Resolution by staff and a second meeting of the Planning Commission for adoption of the Resolution. At this time, there is no established fee for processing such applications. It is calculated to require 5 hours of staff time. In turn, an application/permit fee of $375 is recommended. 6. Major Remodel application fee Recently, the Municipal Code was amended to require neighbors' notification of proposed home remodels qualifying for "over-the-counter" approval where 50% or more of the walls of the existing home are demolished. In this process, the applicant silhouette's the proposed structure and, the City notifies neighbors within 1,000' radius of it. Although the City does not generally charge a fee for "over-the-counter" review and approval of projects, this new process will take several meetings between City staff and the applicant/agent, at least one field visit by staff to verify the silhouette, notifications of neighbors and, most likely, a variety of conversations (and/or visits to the property) between staff and adjacent neighbors. The additional staff time for this process is calculated to be 5 hours. Staff recommends an application fee of $375, to be comparable to the "Stable Use Permit". 7. Digital audio file (compact disk) of City Council and Planning Commission meetings The City's Consolidated Tax and Fee Schedule specifies a $25 cost for obtaining an analog audiotape of Planning Commission or City Council proceedings. However, City staff no longer uses audiotapes. Instead, the meetings are recorded digitally. Obtaining a digital copy of the proceedings involves burning a compact disc (CD) and approximately 5 to 15 minutes of time. At this time, there is no cost to the requesting party ' for obtaining a CD however, the cost to the City in staff time and materials ' is calculated to be a minimum of $2.42 per CD. Over the past several years, the City has received a significantly increased number of requests for CDs of City Council and Planning Commission meetings; in FY 12-13, it may be in the order of magnitude of 24 CDs that have been provided to people for a total cost to the City of $58.08. It is recommended that the City continue to provide this service at no cost to the public. Page 3 of 5 8. Construction and Demolition permit In 2011, the City Council updated the process and fees for issuing Construction and Demolition (C&D) waste hauling permits. However, in doing so, the Schedule of Fees and Charges was not correspondingly updated. Therefore, to match what is already approved and in -place, it is recommended that the City remove on the schedule the option for an "annual" permit. The City no longer provides annual permits. 9. Nuisance animal complaints (noisy animals, charging dogs, and attacking dogs) The City receives, on average, about 5 to 7 nuisance animal complaints a year ranging from biting dogs to noisy roosters. The Municipal Code specifies the process for addressing. the complaints. It involves initial (certified) letters and calls to the parties, an investigation and report by the Department of Animal Care and Control, and a final letter to the parties. Subsequent complaints on the same matter may require a formal hearing with all parties or other code enforcement procedures. On average, there has been approximately 1 hearing per year. The Department of Animal Care and Control generally spends approximately 2 to 4 hours on each nuisance animal investigation and report at approximately $77.00 per hour. Staff initially spends approximately 2 hours per case. If/when there is a second complaint and/or hearing, the number of hours and costs will at least double plus, there may be a cost for a hearing officer. The calculated cost to the City for processing an initial nuisance animal complaint is a minimum of $450.00. Processing the second complaint inclusive of hiring a hearing officer is calculated to an additional $500. It is recommended that the City continue to provide this service to residents at no cost. FISCAL IMPACT Staff based its fee proposals on Planning Director's fully allocated maximum hourly rate of $120.22/hours recognizing that administrative support of services also involves the time of office staff at a lower hourly rate and the City Manager at a higher hourly rate. Staff is unable to project the annual revenue resulting from the fee modifications herein however, without the appeal, clarification and stable fees referenced above, it is possible that the fees may generate additional annual revenue in the range of $7,500. NOTIFICATION The Gas Company, Southern California Edison and Building Industry Association of Southern California have been advised of this matter before the City Council per their request to be informed of any potential changes to the Schedule of Fees and Charges. In contrast, the fully burdened hourly rate of the Planning Director (simply hourly rate and benefits) is $80. Page 4 of 5 The Rolling Hills Community Association has been informed of this matter and, it has been published in the newspaper (Palos Verdes News). Additionally, the agenda for the City Council meeting specifying the City Council's consideration of a change to the Schedule of Fees and Charges has been printed in the City's newsletter. CONCLUSION The City Council is requested to consider Resolution No. 1149 to modify and add, various fees. Following adoption of the Resolution, the new schedule will become effective in 60 days. Attached for the City Council's reference is the Consolidated Tax and Fee Schedule representing all City's FY 2012/2013 taxes and fees before the automatic CPI increase for refuse collection (per the franchise agreement) and adjustments by Resolution 1149. The Consolidated Tax and Fee Schedule will be updated following the City Council's consideration of Resolution 1149. Page 5 of 5 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK RESOLUTION NO. 1149 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING AND MODIFYING ROLLING HILLS MISCELLENOUS FEES RELATED TO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES, ADDING THOSE FEES TO THE EXISTING SCHEDULE OF FEES, AND RESCINDING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 1119. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING . HILLS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing discretionary cases for Planning, Zoning and Subdivisions and shall be paid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Title 16 (Subdivision) and Title 17 (Zoning) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code:` A. Site Plan Review $ 1,500 B. Conditional Use Permit $ 1,500 C. Variance $ 1,250 D. Variance, Minor $ 750 1. Minor deviation into required yard setback, not exceeding 5' and attached to main residential structure Multiple discretionary reviews; Most expensive fee for the first review and 1/2 fee for second review. No cost for third or more reviews. F. Lighting Ordinance Modification $ 750 G. Outdoor Lighting Audit $ 150 (initiated by resident) H. Time extension $ 200 I. Zone Change $ 2,000 J. General Plan Amendment $ 2,000 K. Zoning/Subdivision Code Amendment $ 2,000 L Discretionary Approval Modification $ 2/3 of original application fee M Appeal Fee $ 2/3 of original application fee New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No. 1149 N. City Council and Planning Commission interpretation and miscellaneous reviews 0. Environmental Review fees for discretionary permits 1. Preparation and Staff Review of Initial Study 2. Preparation of Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration P. Q• R. S. T. U. Environmental Impact Reports County Clerk Processing Fee Lot Line Adjustment Tentative Parcel/Tract Map Final Parcel/Tract Map Zoning violation and construction penalty fee 1. Applications for illegal or "as built" grading or construction or non-compliance with approved plans for projects that require Planning Commission review. Fee is charged in addition to the discretionary application review fee. $ 375 Fee to be credited if results in filing of a formal application to City Council or Planning Commission $ 200 $ 1,000 (plus fee charged by CA Department of Fish and Game, if applicable, as adjusted annually) Consultant fee, plus 20% County fee $ 1,500, plus County fee $ $1,500, plus County fees plus 20% County fee plus 20% $ 2,500 V. Stop work order $ 200 1. Fee charged for each additional "stop work order" that is issued beyond the original stop work order for illegal construction and grading activity . W. Service Request County fee plus 20% (For services provided by L.A. County not included in the General Services Agreement) X. Appeal of Zone Clearance $ 375 Y. Stable Use Permit $ 375 (For stables under 800 sq ft considered by the Planning Commission) New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No. 1149 2 Major Remodel Review $375 (For remodels of more than 50% demolition) Section 2. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing View Impairment and Traffic Commission cases: A. View Impairment 1. Application Fee (includes costs of mediation) $1,000 2. Review by Committee on Trees and Views Processing fee $2,000 3 Environmental Review Fees Preparation and Staff Review of Initial Study $ 200 Preparation of Negative Declaration or $1,000 Mitigated Negative Declaration (plus fee charged by CA Department of Fish and game, if applicable, as adjusted annually) Traffic Commission Review New driveways or other traffic $ 300 related items Section 3. The following fees are established and charged for General Administration processing: A. B. General Plan Zoning Code $30 $ 25 C. Subdivision Code $ 25 Meeting Tapes (Audio) $ 25 Xeroxed copies,each page New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution. No. 1149 H. False Alarms Fee for 1st incident involving a false alarm is waived. $ 50 $100 $150 $200 $250 Section 4. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit pursuant to Title 15, (Building and Construction) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: A. 1. BUILDING PERMIT Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Building Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. PARKS AND RECREATION Each new residential dwelling shall pay 2% of the first $100,000 of construction valuation, plus 0.5% of such valuation over $ 100,000. B. PLUMBING PERMIT C MECHANICAL PERMIT ELECTRICAL PERMIT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Plumbing Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Mechanical Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Electrical Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. 0.42% of the valuation of the proposed structures; however, minimum fee shall be $535.00 and the maximum fee shall be $3;588.00 SOLAR AND PHOTOVOLTAIC The amount set forth in the Los SYSTEMS AND APPURTENANT Angeles County Building and EQUIPMENT Electrical Codes for each fee; table and schedule therein, plus $60.11 City administrative fee. New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No: 1149 Section 5. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit pursuant to Title 15, (Building and Construction) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code for review conducted by the City's contract building official, other than Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety: A. BUILDING PERMIT PLUMBING PERMIT` C. MECHANICAL PERMIT ELECTRICAL PERMIT GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW SOLAR AND PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS AND APPURTENANT In addition to the provisions of Section 4 A.1 of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's, contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4 B. of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4 C of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4 D of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4 E of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fess shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provision of Section 4F of this resolution, a 25% surcharge New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No. 1149 on Los AnglesCountyDepartment of Building and Safety fees, plus $60.11' City administrative fee, shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. Section 6. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit relating to construction and demolition waster A. CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION PERMIT Section 7. The new fees set forth do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing such services. Council Resolution No. 1119 is hereby rescinded. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 22t day of July 2013. Heidi Luce Deputy City Clerk Frank E. Hill Mayor New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No. 1149 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1149 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING AND MODIFYING MISCELLENOUS FEES, ADDING THOSE FEES TO THE EXISTING SCHEDULE OF FEES, AND RESCINDING CITY. COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 1119. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on July 8, 2013 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT; ABSTAIN: and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. HEIDI LUCE DEPUTY CITY CLERK New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No. 1149 7 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Schedule of Fees and Charges Summary Chart of Proposed Changes Reference Purpose Current Fee/Penalty Proposed Fee/Penalty Section 1. Subsection N For the resources necessary in preparation for City Council's interpretation of a prior decision when the process does not involve the Planning Commission; fee is to be consistent with application cost of Planning Commission interpretations. $0 $375 Section 1. Subsection Q To pass through the County fee as modified from time to time. $100 "County fee" (currently $150) Section 1. Subsection U Increase penalty as a disincentive for zoning or construction violation. $1,000 $2,500 Section 1. Subsection X For resources necessary to process and appeal of staff's decision on minor projects and project modifications that are approved "over-the-counter". $0 $375 Section 1. Subsection Y To cover the administrative cost of processing a Stable Use Permit for a stable under 800 sq. ft. when it becomes necessary to present to the Planning Commission. $0 $375 Section 1. Subsection Z For major remodels involving over 50% of the residence, processing the application and review through staff. $0 $375 Section 6. Subsection A Correct text to reflect existing permit and process. $0 $0 Page 1 of 1 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Consolidated TAX and FEE SCHEDULE for FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 ITEM FEES CODE/RESO NO. DATE ADOPTED TAXES Real Property Transfer Tax Cable Television Franchise Property value exceeds $100,000 - a tax at the rate of 27.5 cents for each five hundred dollars or fractional part thereof. 2.50% of gross annual receipts BUILDING AND SAFETY PERMITS BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL PERMITS (LA COUNTY) Two and one half times the amount set forth in the LA County Building Code for each fee. Two and one half times the amount set forth in the LA County Plumbing Code for each fee. Two and one half times the amount set forth in the LA County Mechanical Code for each fee. Two and one half times the amount set forth in the LA County Electrical Code for each fee. New residential dwelling - 2% of the first $100,00 of construction valuation, plus 0.5% of such valuation over $100,000 The amount set forth in the Los Angeles County Bulding and Electrical Codes for each fee, table and schedule therein, plus $60.11 City administrative fee. Building Permit Plumbing Permit Mechanical Permit Electrical Permit Park & Recreation Fund Fee Solar and Photovoltaic Systems and Appurtenant Equipment GEOTECHNICAL FEES Ordinance No. 72 December 11, 1967 Resolution No. 823 July 28, 1997 Resolution No. 496 August 23, 1982 Resolution No. 1064 July 13, 2009 0.42% of the valuation of the proposed structure Resolution No. 931 Minimum charge - $525 Maximum charge - $3,588 PERMITTING PROCESS THROUGH A CITY APPROVED CONSULTANT Building, Plumbing, Mechanical, and Electrical 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees Solar and Photovoltaic Systems and 25%surcharge on Los Angeles County Appurtenant Equipment Department of Building and Safety fees, plus $60.11 City administrative fee PLANNING, ZONING AND SUBDIVISIONS Conditional Use Permits Site Plan Review Variance Variance, Minor Discretionary Approval Modification Zone Change Zoning Amendment General Plan Amendment Lot Line Adjustment Tentative Parcel Map Tentative Tract Map Appeal Fee Environmental Impact Report Extension of Time Final Parcel or Tract Map Multiple Discretionary Reviews Lighting Ordinance Modification Outdoor Lighting Audit $1,500 $1,500 $1,250 $750 2/3 of original application fee $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $1,500 $1,500 and county fees plus 20% $1,500 and county fees plus 20% 2/3 of original application fee City consultant fee + 20% $200 County fees plus 20% Most expensive fee for the first review and 1/2 of the fee for the second review. No fee for third or more reviews $750 $150 1of3 . April 14, 2003 Resolution No. 1034 February 11, 2008 Resolution No. 1064 July 13, 2009 Resolution No. 691 September 28, 1992 Resolution No. 1060 May 11, 2009 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Consolidated TAX and FEE SCHEDULE for FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 . ITEM FEES CODE/RESO NO. DATE ADOPTED Planning Commission Intrepretation and Misc. $375 - fee to be credited if results in filing of Planning Commission Reviews forml application to the Planning Commission PLANNING, ZONING AND SUBDIVISIONS (CONTINUED) Environmental Review fees for discretionary permits Preparation and Staff Review of Initial Study $200 Preparation of Negative Declaration or $1,000 plus fee charged by the CA Dept. of Fish Mitigated Negative Declaration . and Game, if applicable, as adjusted annually Service Request County fees plus 20% Construction and Demolition Waste Permit $25 single project permit $250 annual permit Resolution No. 1119 April 23, 2012 ADDITIONAL PROCESSING FEE Resolution No. 854 January 25, 1999 Planning & Zoning Applications involving illegal Administrative Fee $1,000 Resolution No. 1060 May 11, 2009 or "as built" structures or grading that require Stop Work Order $200 Planning Commission review. TRAFFIC COMMISSION REVIEW New driveways or other traffic related items -$300 VIEW IMPAIRMENT Application Fee (includes costs of mediation) $1,000 Review by Committee on Trees and Views $2,000 Processing fee Environmental Review Fees Preparation and Staff Review of Initial Study $200 Preparation of Negative Declaration or $1,000 plus fee charged by the CA Dept. of Fish Mitigated Negative Declaration and Game, if applicable, as adjusted annually GENERAL ADMINISTRATION - PROCESSING FEES General Plan $30 Zoning Code $25 Budget $30 Meeting Tapes (Audio) $25 Zoning Map $3 Xeroxed Copies, each page $0.25 FALSE ALARM Fee for 1st incident involving a false alarm is waived 2nd $50 3rd $100 4th $150 5th $200 6th $250 BAIL/FINE SCHEDULE FOR VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS As set forth in Bail/Fine Schedule for Title 10 Violations,. PARKING VIOLATION/CITATION PENALTY SCHEDULE Pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 40203.5 and 40225 2 of 3 Resolution No. 691 September 28, 1992 Resolution No. 1119 April 23, 2012 Resolution No. 691 September 28, 1992 Resolution No. 1119 April 23, 2012 Resolution No. 791 Resolution No. 799. Resolution No. 824 Resolution No. 1072 Resolution No. 1101 Resolution No. 717 Resolution No. 740 Resolution No. 824 August 12, 1996 October 28, 1996 July 28, 1997 September 14, 2009 January 10, 2011 November 22, 1993 May 9, 1994. July 28, 1997 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Consolidated TAX and FEE SCHEDULE for FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 ITEM FEES CODE/RESO NO. DATE ADOPTED DOG/CAT LICENSE FEES Dog, unaltered Dog, spayed/neutered with Certificate of Sterility Metallic dog tag Penalty for not renewing license Duplicate dog tag Transfer fee Appeal fee Cat, unaltered, lifetime (optional) Cat, spayed/neutered, lifetime (optional) with Certificate of Sterility QUIMBY ACT FEES FOR SUBDIVISIONS SOLID WASTE COLLECTION FEES $18 $9 $5 $25 $5 $3 $40 $10 $5 Park in -lieu fees and/or dedication of land when subdividing property. FY 2012/13 Annual Fee - $1,065.25 PERMITS RELATIVE TO EXTRA LARGE VEHICLES ACCESSING THE CITY $75 per vehicle (The City does not collect this fee.) Resolution No. 527 Municipal Code Section 16.28.150 Resolution No. 1051 Resolution No. 637 April 23, 1984 March 2005 January 12, 2009 March 25, 1991 • RESOLUTION NO. 1149 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING AND MODIFYING ROLLING HILLS MISCELLANEOUS FEES RELATED TO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVII1ES, ADDING THOSE FEES TO THE EXISTING SCHEDULE OF FEES, AND RESCINDING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 1119. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing discretionary cases for Planning, Zoning and Subdivisions and shall be paid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Title 16 (Subdivision) and Title 17 (Zoning) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: A. -B. C. D. Site Plan Review Conditional Use Permit Variance Variance, Minor $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,250 $ 750 1. Minor deviation into required yard setback, not exceeding 5' and attached to main residential structure E. Multiple discretionary reviews; F. G. H. I. J. K. L M. N. Most expensive fee for the first review and 1/2 fee for second review. No cost for third or more reviews. Lighting Ordinance Modification $ 750 Outdoor Lighting Audit Time extension Zone Change General Plan Amendment Zoning/Subdivision Code Amendment Discretionary Approval Modification Appeal Fee City Council and Planning Commission interpretation and miscellaneous reviews O. Environmental Review fees for discretionary permits 1. Preparation and Staff Review of Initial Study 2. Preparation of Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No. 1149 1 $ 750 (initiated by resident) $ 200 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2/3 of original application fee $ 2/3 of original application fee $ 375 Fee to be credited if results in filing of a formal application to City Council or Planning Commission $ 200 $ 1,000 (plus fee charged by CA Department of Fish and Game, if applicable, as adjusted annually) P. Envirori al.Impact Reports Consultant fee, 020% Q. County Clerk Processing Fee County fee R. Lot Line Adjustment $ 1,500, plus County fee S. Tentative Parcel/Tract Map $ $1,500, plus County fees plus 20% T. Final Parcel/Tract Map County fee plus 20% U. Zoning violation and construction $ 2,500 penalty fee 1. Applications for illegal or "as built" grading or construction or non-compliance with approved plans for projects that require Planning Commission review. Fee is chargedin addition to the discretionary application review fee. V. Stop work order $ 200 1. Fee charged for each additional "stop work order" that is issued beyond the original stop work order for illegal construction and grading activity . W. Service Request County fee plus 20% (For services provided by L.A. County not included in the General Services Agreement) X. Appeal of Zone Clearance $ 375 Y. Stable Use Permit $ 375 (For stables under 800 sq ft considered by the Planning Commission) Z. Major Remodel Review $375 (For remodels of more than 50% demolition) Section 2. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing View Impairment and Traffic Commission cases: A. View Impairment 1. Application Fee (includes costs of mediation) $1,000 2. Review by Committee on Trees and Views Processing fee $2,000 3. Environmental Review Fees A. Preparation and Staff Review of Initial Study $ 200 B. Preparation of Negative Declaration or $1,000 Mitigated Negative Declaration (plus fee charged by CA Department of Fish and game, if applicable, as adjusted annually) B. Traffic Commission Review 1. New driveways or other traffic $ 300 related items New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No. 1149 2 Section 3. following fees are established and Administration proce g: A. General Plan $ 30 B. • Zoning Code $ 25 C. Subdivision Code $ 25 D. Meeting Tapes (Audio) $ 25 E. Budget $ 30 F. Zoning Map $ 3 G. Xeroxed copies, each page $ 0.25 arged for General H. False Alarms Fee for 1St incident involving a false alarm is waived 2nd $ 50 3rd $100 4th $150 5th $ 200 6th $ 250 Section 4. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit pursuant to Title 15, (Building and Construction) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: A. 1. BUILDING PERMIT Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Building Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. 2. PARKS AND RECREATION Each new residential dwelling shall pay 2% of the first $100,000 of construction valuation, plus 0.5% of such valuation over $ 100,000. B. PLUMBING PERMIT C. MECHANICAL PERMIT D. ELECTRICAL PERMIT E. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, Sl1'E AND PLAN REVIEW Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Plumbing Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Mechanical Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Electrical Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. 0.42% of the valuation of the proposed structures; however, minimum fee shall be $535.00 and the maximum fee shall be $3,588.00 F. SOLAR AND PHOTOVOLTAIC The amount set forth in the Los SYSTEMS AND APPURTENANT Angeles County Building and EQUIPMENT Electrical Codes for each fee, table and schedule therein, plus $60.11 City administrative fee. New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No: 1149 3 Section 5. Tiillowing fees are established and shall be ted for each permit pursuant to Title 15, (Building and Construction) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code for review conducted by the City's contract building official, other than Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety: A. BUILDING PERMIT B. PLUMBING PERMIT C. MECHANICAL PERMIT D. ELECTRICAL PERMIT E. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SI1E AND PLAN REVIEW In addition to the provisions of Section 4 A.1 of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official: In addition to the provisions of Section 4 B. of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4 C of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4 D of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4 E of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fess shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. F. SOLAR AND PHOTOVOLTAIC In addition to the provision of Section SYSTEMS AND APPURTENANT 4F of this resolution, a 25% surcharge EQUIPMENT on Los Angles County Department of Building and Safety fees, plus $60.11 City administrative fee, shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. Section 6. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit relating to construction and demolition waste: A. CONSTRUCTION AND $ 25 single project permit DEMOLITION PERMIT New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No. 1149 4 Section 7. ew fees set forth do not exceed the estiid reasonable cost of providing such service Section 8. The City Council Resolution No. 1119 is hereby rescinded. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADO1'1ED this 22nd day of July 2013. \)QP Frank . Hill Mayor AI I EST: Heidi Luce Deputy City Clerk New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No. 1149 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) §§ I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1149 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING AND MODIFYING MISCELLENOUS FEES, ADDING THOSE FEES TO THE EXISTING SCHEDULE OF FEES, AND RESCINDING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 1119. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on July 22, 2013 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmember Black, Dieringer, Lay, Pieper and Mayor Hill. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. ctiliatce HEIDI LUCE DEPUTY CITY CLERK New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No. 1149 6 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL AND POSTING STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ss I am a citizen of the United States. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within proceeding; my business address is 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. On the 11th day of July , 2013, I serve the within City Council - Notice of Public Hearing Misc Fees related to planning and development activities and rescending City Council Resolution No. 1119 a copy of which is annexed hereto and made a part hereof, on the .person, or persons, named below by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Rolling Hills, California addressed as follows: E -MAILED MAILED DELIVERED PVP NEWS None. None. Published twice (7/11 and 7/18) Also posted at City Hall I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the 11t day of July , 2013 at Rolling Hills, California. EWA NIKODEM ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT • ge-'* Re de wo qeek INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE. IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills will hold a public hearing during its regularly scheduled meeting to be held on Monday, July 22, 2013, commencing at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California to consider the following: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING AND MODIFYING ROLLING HILLS MISCELLENOUS FEES RELATED TO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES, ADDING THOSE FEES TO THE EXISTING SCHEDULE OF FEES, AND RESCINDING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 1119. A copy of the proposed resolution and explanation/justification for the changes to the fees can be reviewed at the City Hall Administration Building located at 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA during regular business hours. qqa lCi) HEIDI LUCE DEPUTY CITY CLERK Published twice in the Palos Verdes Peninsula News Thursday, July 11, 2013 and Thursday, July 18, 2013 publichearing-FEES.doc etre/ di Rd/4v Wed INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 FEE SCHEDULE 1. Site Plan Review $1,500 2. Conditional Use. Permit $1,500 3. Variance $1,250 4. Variance, Minor Minor deviation into required yard setback, not exceeding 5' and attached to main residential structure 5. Multiple discretionary reviews $750 Most expensive fee for the first review and 1/2 fee for second review. No cost for third or more reviews. 6. Lighting Ordinance Modification $750 7. Outdoor Lighting Audit $150 (initiated by resident) 8. Time Extension $200 9. Zone Change $2,000 10. General Plan Amendment $2,000 - 11. Zoning/Subdivision Code Amendment $2,000 12. Discretionary Approval Modification $ 2/3 of original application fee 13. Appeal Fee $ 2/3 of original application fee 14. Planning Commission interpretation & miscellaneous $375. Fee to be credited if Planning Commission reviews results in filing of a formal application to Planning Comm. 15. Environmental Review for Determination of discretionary permits, preparation & staff review of Initial Study 16. Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration 17. Environmental Impact Reports $200 $1,000 (plus fee charged by the CA Dept. of Fish and Game, if applicable, as adjusted annually) Consultant fee, plus 20% 18. County Clerk Processing Fee $100 19. Lot Line Adjustment $1,500 plus County fee 20. Tentative Parcel/Tract Map $1,500 plus County fees, plus 20% 21. Final Parcel/Tract Map 22. Zoning violation and construction penalty fee Application for illegal or "as built" grading or construction or non- compliance with approved plans that require Planning Commission review. Fee is charged in addition to the discretionary application review fee. 23. Stop work order Fee charged for each additional "stop work order" that is issued beyond the original stop work order for illegal construction and grading activity requiring Planning Commission review and approval. County fee plus 20% 24. Service Request (For services provided by LA County not included in the General Services Agreement). 25. View Impairment Complaint Application Fee Review by Committee on Trees and Views Environmental Review Fees: Preparation and staff review of Initial Study Preparation of Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration 26. Traffic Commission Review New driveways or other traffic related items 27. General Plan $1,000 $200 County fee plus 20% $1,000 (includes cost of mediation $2,000 (processing fee) $200 $1,000 plus fee charged by CA Dept. of Fish & Game, if applicable, as adjusted annually $300 $30 28. Zoning Code $25 29. Subdivision Code $25 30. Meeting Tapes (audio) $25 31. Budget $30 32. Zoning Map $3 33. Xerox Copies, each page $0.25 34. Construction & Demolition Waste Permit $25 single project permit 35. False Alarms - Fee for 1St incident involving a false alarm is waived 2nd $50 3rd $100 4th $150 5th $200 6th $250 PUBLIC:FLYERS:FEE SCHEDULE Rev April,2011.docx 1. Site Plan Review FEE SCHEDULE $1,500 2. Conditional Use Permit $1,500 4. Variance, Minor Minor deviation into required yard setback, not exceeding 5' and attached to main residential structure 3. Variance $1,250, $750 5. Multiple discretionary reviews Most expensive fee for the first review and 1/2 fee for second view. No cost for third or more reviews. 6. Lighting Ordinance Modification li 7. Outdoor Lighting Audit $750 $150 (initiated by resident) 8. Time Extension If r 9. Zone Change 11 $200 $2,000 10. General Plan Amendment $2,000 11. Zoning/Subdivision Code Amendment $2,000 12. Discretionary Approval Modification $ 2/3 of original application fee 13. Appeal Fee $ 2/3 of original application fee 14. Planning Commission interpretation & miscellaneous $375. Fee to be credited if Planning Commission reviews results in filing of a formal application to Planning Comm. 15. Environmental Review for Determination of discretionary permits, preparation & staff review of Initial Study $200 16. Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative .Negative Declaration $1,000 (plus fee charged by the CA Dept. of Fish and Game, if applicable, as adjusted annually) 17. Environmental Impact Reports Consultant fee, plus 20% 18. County Clerk Processing Fee $100 19. Lot Line Adjustment $1,500 plus County fee Resolution 1119 Public:FLYERS:Fee Schedule 2011 Final 20. Tentative Parcel/Tract Map $1,500 plus County fees plus 20% County fee plus 20% 21. Final Parcel/Tract Map 22. Zoning violation and construction penalty fee $,1,000 • Application for illegal or "as built" grading or construction or non-compliance with approved plans that require Planning Commission review. Fee is charged in addition to the discretionary application review fee. 23. Stop work order 200 • Fee charged for each additional "stop work order" thatis issued beyond the original stop work order for illegal construction and grading activity requiring Planning Commission review and approval. 24. Service Request County fee plus 20% • (For services provided by LA County not included in th)e General Services Agreement). 25. View Impairment a Application Fee (includes cost of mediation) o fReview by Committee on Trees and Views p En furor mental Review Fees: Preparation and staff review of Initial Study Preparation of Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration 26. Traffic Commission Review • New driveways or other traffic related items. 27. General Plan $1,000 "$2,000 (processing fee) $200 $1,000 plus fee charged by CA Dept. of Fish & Game, if applicable, as adjusted annually. $300 $30 28. Zoning Code $25 29. Subdivision Code $25 30. Meeting Tapes (Audio) $25 31. Budget $30 32. Zoning Map $3 33. Xeroxed Copies, each page $0.25 34. Construction and Demolition $25 single project permit 35. False Alarms - Fee for 1st incident involving a false alarm is waived 2nd $50 H 3rd $100 4th /f• 5th • 6th $150 $200 $250 H. 1 . J. K. L M. RESOLUTION NO. 1119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING = FEES FOR VIEW IMPAIRMENT CASES AND FALSE ALARMS, AND REVISING FEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR DISCRETIONARY PERMITS, ADDING THOSE FEES TO THE EXISTING SCHEDULE OF FEES, AND RESCINDING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 1064. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE. CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing discretionary cases for Planning, Zoning and Subdivisions and shall be paid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Title 16 (Subdivision) and Title 17 (Zoning) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: A.- C. Site Plan Review Conditional Use Permit Variance Variance, Minor $ 1,500 $ 1,500 - $1,250 $ 750 1. Minor deviation into required yard setback, not exceeding 5' and attached to main residential structure E. Multiple discretionary reviews; Most expensive fee for the first review and 1/2 fee for second review. No cost for third or more reviews. F Lighting Ordinance Modification" $ 750 G. Outdoor Lighting Audit $ 150 (initiated by resident) Time extension $ 200 Zone Change $ 2,000 General Plan Amendment $ 2,000 Zoning/Subdivision Code Amendment $ 2,000 Discretionary Approval Modification $ 2/3 of original application fee Appeal Fee Planning Commission interpretation and miscellaneous Planning Commission reviews Environmental Review fees for discretionary permits '. 1. Preparation and Staff Review of InitialStudy Preparation of Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1119 $ 2/3 of original application fee $ 375: Fee to be credited if results in filing of a formal application to Planning Commission $200 $ 1,000 (plus fee charged by CA Department of Fish and Game, if applicable, as adjusted annually) Environmental Impact Reports Consultant fee, plus 20% Q. .County Clerk Processing Fee $ 100 R. LotLine Adjustment $ 1,500, plus County fee S. Tentative Parcel/Tract Map $ $1,500, plus County fees plus 20% T. Final Parcel/Tract Map County fee plus 20% U. Zoning violation and construction $ 1,000 penalty fee 1. Applications for illegal or "as built" grading or construction or non-compliance with approved plans that require Planning Commission review. Fee is charged in addition to: the discretionary application review fee. Stop work order $ 200 1. Fee charged for each additional "stop work order" that is issued beyond the original stop work order for illegal construction and grading activity requiring Planning Commission review and. approval. Service Request County fee plus 20% (For services provided by L.A. County not included in the General Services Agreement) Section 2. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing View Impairment and Traffic Commission cases: View Impairment 1. Application Fee (includes costs of mediation) 2. Review by Committee on Trees and Views Processing fee $2,000 Environmental Review Fees $1,000 A. Preparation and Staff Review of Initial Study $ 200 B. Preparation of Negative Declaration or $1,000 Mitigated Negative Declaration (plus fee charged by CA Department of Fish. and game, if applicable, as adjusted annually) Traffic Commission Review 1. New driveways or other traffic $ 300 related items Section 3. The following fees are established and charged for General Administration processing: A. General Plan $ 30 B. - Zoning Code $ 25 New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1119 2 Subdivision Code $ 25 Meeting Tapes (Audio) $ 25 Budget . $ 30 Zoning Map $ 3 Xeroxed copies, each page $ 0.25 False Alarms Fee for 1st incident involving a false alarm is, waived 2nd , $.50 3rd $100 4th . $150 5th. $200 6th $ 250 Section 4. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit pursuant to Title 15, (Building and Construction) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: A. 1. BUILDING PERMIT Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Building Code for each fee, table and schedule therein: 2 PARKS AND RECREATION Each new residential dwelling shall. pay 2% of the first $100,000 of construction valuation, plus 0.5% of such valuation over $ 100,000. PLUMBING PERMIT Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Plumbing Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Mechanical Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Electrical Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. 0.42% of the valuation of the proposed: structures; however, minimum fee shall:`' be $535.00 and the maximum fee shall be $3,588.00, SOLAR AND PHOTOVOLTAIC . The amount set forth in the Los SYSTEMS AND APPURTENANT Angeles County Building and EQUIPMENT Electrical Codes foreach fee, table and schedule therein, plus $60.11 City administrative fee. MECHANICAL PERMIT ELECTRICAL PERMIT GEOTECHNICAL .REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW Section 5. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each. permit .. pursuant to Title 15, (Building and Construction) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code for review conducted by the City's contract building official, other than Los` Angeles County. Department of Building and Safety: New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1119 3 A BUILDING PERMIT B PLUMBING PERMIT C. MECHANICAL PERMIT D.` ELECTRICAL PERMIT E. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW SOLAR AND. PHOTOVOLTAIC.. SYSTEMS AND APPURTENANT. EQUIPMENT. Inaddition to the provisions of Section 4 A.1 of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4 B. of this resolution, a 25%: surcharge on Los Angeles County.Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the - City's contract building official. Inaddition to the provisions of Section- 4 C; of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4.D of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged forthe alternative use of the City's contract building official. • In addition to the provisions of Section 4 E of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los. Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fess shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In; addition to the provision of Section 4F of resolution, a 25% surcharge, on Los Angles County. Department of Building and Safety fees, plus $60.11 City administrative fee, shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. Section 6.. The following fees' are established and shall be collected for each permit relating to construction and demolition waste: A. CONSTRUCTION AND $ 25 single project permit DEMOLITION $ 250 annual permit Section 7. The new fees set forth in Section 2 above do not exceed theestimated reasonablecost of providing such services. . Section 8. The City Council Resolution No. 1064 ishereby rescinded. -: New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1119. 4 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADO1'1'r,D this 23rd day of April 2012. DR. J MES BLACK, MAYOR Al I EST: . Heidi Luce Deputy City Clerk New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1119 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS - - ) I certify that the foregoing. Resolution No.1119 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING FEES FOR VIEW IMPAIRMENT CASES AND FALSE ALARMS, AND REVISING FEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR DISCRETIONARY PERMITS, ADDING THOSE FEES .TO THE EXISTING. SCHEDULE OF FEES, AND RESCINDING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 1064. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of. the City Council on April 23, 2012 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Heinsheimer, Lay and Pernell. NOES: Councilmember Hill and Mayor Black. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None: and in compliance with the laws of .California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. n HEIDI LUCE, DEPUTY CITY CLERK . New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1119 6 FEE SCHEDULE 1. Site Plan Review $1,500 2. Conditional Use Permit $1,500 3. Variance $1,250 4. Variance, Minor $750 • Minor deviation into required yard setback, not exceeding 5' and attached to main residential structure 5. Multiple discretionary reviews Most expensive fee for the first review and'/2 fee for second view. No cost for third or more reviews. 6.. Lighting Ordinance Modification $750 7. Outdoor Lighting Audit $150 (initiated by resident) 8. Time Extension $200 9. Zone Change $2,000 10. General Plan Amendment $2,000 11. Zoning/Subdivision Code Amendment $2,000 12. Discretionary Approval Modification $ 2/3 of original application fee 13. Appeal Fee $ 2/3 of original application fee 14. Planning Commission interpretation & miscellaneous $375. Fee to be credited if Planning Commission reviews results in filing of a formal application to Planning Commission 15. Environmental Review for Determination $200 of discretionary permits (% 16. Negative Declaration As adjusted annually by the CA Dept. of Fish and Game, plus 20% 17. Mitigated Negative Declaration As adjusted annually by the CA Dept. of Fish and Game, plus 20% 18. Environmental Impact Reports Consultant fee, plus 20% Resolution 1064 Public:FLYERS:Fee Schedule 2009 Final 19. County Clerk Processing Fee $100 20. Lot Line Adjustment $1,500 plus County fee 21`.- Tentative Parcel/Tract Map, ,. $1,500 plus County fees plus 20% 22. Final Parcel/Tract Map County iee plus 20% 23. Zoning violation and construction pena4 tee $1,000 • Application for illegal or "as built" grading or construction or non. compliance with approved plans that mg, ire Planning Commission review. Fee is charged in addition to the discretionary application review fee. 24. Stop work order $200 • Fee charged for each additional "stop work order" that is issued beyond the original stop workorderfor illegal- construction and grading activity`requiring Planning Commission review and approval.: 25. Service Request County fee plus 20% • (For services provid-d uy LA County not included in the General Services Agreement). 26. View Impairment $500 27. Traffic Commission Review. $300 New driveways ^r father traffic related items. 28. Constrrtion and Demolition $25 single project permit $250 annual permit 29. General Plan $30 30. Zoning Code $25 31. Subdivision Code $25 32. Meeting Tapes (Audio) $25 33. Budget $30 34. Zoning Map $3 35. Xeroxed Copics, each page. $0.25. 35. False Alarms 1st $50 2nd •. 3rd 4`" $1oo;. $150.., $20!1 • 5th $250 • • RESOLUTION NO. 1064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING FEES FOR PERMITTING AND INSPECTION AND FOR THE INCLUSION OF SOLAR AND PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS AND APPURTENANT EQUIPMENT AND REPLACING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 1060. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing discretionary cases for Planning, Zoning and Subdivisions and shall be paid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Title 16 (Subdivision) and Title 17 (Zoning) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: A. Site Plan Review B. Conditional Use Permit C. Variance D. Variance, Minor $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,250 $ 750 1. Minor deviation into required yard setback, not exceeding 5' and attached to main residential structure E. Multiple discretionary reviews; F. G. H. I. J• K. Lighting Ordinance Modification Most expensive fee for the first review and 1/2 fee for second review. No cost for third or more reviews. $ 750 Outdoor Lighting Audit $ 150 (initiated by resident) Time extension $ 200 Zone Change $ 2,000 General Plan Amendment $ 2,000 Zoning/Subdivision Code Amendment $ 2,000 L Discretionary Approval Modification M. Appeal Fee N. Planning Commission interpretation and miscellaneous Planning Commission reviews O. P. R. $ 2/3 of original application fee $ 2/3 of original application fee $ 375. Fee to be credited if results in filing of a formal application to Planning Commission Environmental Review for $ 200 Determination of discretionary permits Negative Declaration Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Impact Reports New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1064 1 As adjusted annually by the CA Dept. of Fish and Game, plus 20% As adjusted annually by the CA Dept. of Fish and Game, plus 20% Consultant fee, plus 20% S. County COProcessing Fee $ 100 T. Lot Line Adjustment $ 1,500, plus County fee U. Tentative Parcel/Tract Map $ $1,500, plus County fees plus 20% V. Final Parcel/Tract Map County fee plus 20% W. Zoning violation and construction $ 1,000 penalty fee 1. Applications for illegal or "as built" grading or construction or non-compliance with approved plans that require Planning Commission review. Fee is charged in addition to the discretionary application review fee. X. Stop work order $ 200 1. Fee charged for each additional "stop work order" that is issued beyond the original stop work order for illegal construction and grading activity requiring Planning Commission review and approval. Y. Service Request County fee plus 20% (For services provided by L.A. County not included in the General Services Agreement) Section 2. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing View Impairment and Traffic Commission cases: A. View Impairment $ 500 B. Traffic Commission Review 1. New driveways or other traffic $ 300 related items Section 3. The following fees are established and charged for General Administration processing: A. General Plan $ 30 B. Zoning Code $ 25 C. Subdivision Code $ 25 D. Meeting Tapes (Audio) $ 25 E. Budget $ 30 F. Zoning Map $ 3 G. Xeroxed copies, each page $ 0.25 H. False Alarms 1st $ 50 2nd $100 3rd $150 4th $ 200 5th $ 250 Section 4. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit pursuant to Title 15, (Building and Construction) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1064 2 A. 1. *DING PERMIT Two and one-likmes the amount set forth in the Building Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. 2. PARKS AND RECREATION Each new residential dwelling shall pay 2% of the first $100,000 of construction valuation, plus 0.5% of such valuation over $ 100,000. B. PLUMBING PERMIT C. MECHANICAL PERMIT D. ELECTRICAL PERMIT E. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Plumbing Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Mechanical Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Electrical Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. 0.42% of the valuation of the proposed structures; however, minimum fee shall be $535.00 and the maximum fee shall be $3,588.00 F. SOLAR AND PHOTOVOLTAIC The amount set forth in the Los SYSTEMS AND APPURTENANT Angeles County Building and EQUIPMENT Electrical Codes for each fee, table and schedule therein, plus $60.11 City administrative fee. Section 5. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit pursuant to Title 15, (Building and Construction) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code for review conducted by the City's contract building official, other than Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety: A. BUILDING PERMIT B. PLUMBING PERMIT C. MECHANICAL PERMIT New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1064 3 In addition to the provisions of Section 4 A.1 of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4 B. of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4 C of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. D. ELECTRI• PERMIT In addition to thOvisions of Section 4 D of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. E. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, S1 AND PLAN REVIEW In addition to the provisions of Section 4 E of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fess shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. F. SOLAR AND PHOTOVOLTAIC In addition to the provision of Section SYSTEMS AND APPURTENANT 4F of this resolution, a 25% surcharge EQUIPMENT on Los Angles County Department of Building and Safety fees, plus $60.11 City administrative fee, shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. Section 6. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit relating to construction and demolition waste: A. CONSTRUU 11ON AND $ 25 single project permit DEMOLITION $ 250 annual permit Section 7. The new fees set forth in Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 above do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing such services. Section 8. The City Council Resolution No. 1060 is hereby repealed. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADO1'1'LD this 13th day of July 2009. 'HO S HE1NSHEIMER, MAYOR ATTEST: Outlaw, Heidi Luce Deputy City Clerk New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1064 4 STA i'F OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1064 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING FEES FOR PERMITTING AND INSPECl'ION AND FOR THE INCLUSION OF SOLAR AND PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS AND APPURTENANT EQUIPMENT AND REPLACING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 1060. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on July 13, 2009 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Councilmembers Black, Hill, Lay, Mayor Pro Tern Pernell and Mayor Heinsheimer. None. None. None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. - New and amended provisions arc in bold Resolution No 1064 5 DEPUTY CITY CLERK • RESOLUTION NO. 1064 J. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING FEES FOR PERMITTING AND INSPECTION AND FOR THE INCLUSION OF SOLAR AND PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS AND APPURTENANT EQUIPMENT AND REPLACING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 1060. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing discretionary cases for Planning, Zoning and Subdivisions and shall be paid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Title 16 (Subdivision) and Title 17 (Zoning) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: A. Site Plan Review B. Conditional Use Permit C. Variance $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,250 D. Variance, Minor $ 750 1. Minor deviation into required yard setback, not exceeding 5' and attached to main residential structure E. Multiple discretionary reviews; F. Lighting Ordinance Modification G. Outdoor Lighting Audit H. Time extension I. Zone Change General Plan Amendment Most expensive fee for the first review and 1/2 fee for second review. No cost for third or more reviews. $ 750 $ 150 (initiated by resident) $ 200 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 K. Zoning/Subdivision Code Amendment $ 2,000 L Discretionary Approval Modification M. Appeal Fee N. Planning Commission interpretation and miscellaneous Planning Commission reviews O. Environmental Review for Determination of discretionary permits P. Negative Declaration Q. Mitigated Negative Declaration R. Environmental Impact Reports New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1064 1 $ 2/3 of original application fee $ 2/3 of original application fee $ 375. Fee to be credited if results in filing of a formal application to Planning Commission $ 200 As adjusted annually by the CA Dept. of Fish and Game, plus 20% As adjusted annually by the CA Dept. of Fish and Game, plus 20% Consultant fee, plus 20% S. County C 'rocessing Fee $ 100 • T. Lot Line Adjustment $ 1,500, plus County fee U. Tentative Parcel/Tract Map $ $1,500, plus County fees plus 20% V. Final Parcel/Tract Map County fee plus 20% W. Zoning violation and construction $ 1,000 penalty fee 1. Applications for illegal or "as built" grading or construction or non-compliance with approved plans that require Planning Commission review. Fee is charged in addition to the discretionary application review fee. X. Stop work order $ 200 1. Fee charged for each additional "stop work order" that is issued beyond the original stop work order for illegal construction and grading activity requiring Planning Commission review and approval. Y. Service Request County fee plus 20% (For services provided by L.A. County not included in the General Services Agreement) Section 2. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing View Impairment and Traffic Commission cases: A. View Impairment B. Traffic Commission Review $ 500 1. New driveways or other traffic $ 300 related items Section 3. The following fees are established and charged for General Administration processing: A. General Plan $ 30 B. Zoning Code $ 25 C. Subdivision Code $ 25 D. Meeting Tapes (Audio) $ 25 E. Budget $ 30 F. Zoning Map $ 3 G. Xeroxed copies, each page $ 0.25 H. False Alarms 1St $ 50 2nd $100 3rd $150 4th $ 200 5th $ 250 Section 4. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit pursuant to Title 15, (Building and Construction) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1064 2 - A. 1. B)ING PERMIT Two and one -Mmes the amount set forth in the Building Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. 2. PARKS AND RECREATION Each new residential dwelling shall pay 2% of the first $100,000 of construction valuation, plus 0.5% of such valuation over $ 100,000. B. PLUMBING PERMIT C. MECHANICAL PERMIT D. ELECTRICAL PERMIT E. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SI I'h AND PLAN REVIEW Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Plumbing Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Mechanical Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Electrical Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. 0.42% of the valuation of the proposed structures; however, minimum fee shall be $535.00 and the maximum fee shall be $3,588.00 E. SOLAR AND PHOTOVOLTAIC The amount set forth in the Los SYSTEMS AND APPURTENANT Angeles County Building and EQUIPMENT Electrical Codes for each fee, table and schedule therein, plus $60.11 City. administrative fee. Section 5. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit pursuant to Title 15, (Building and Construction) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code for review conducted by the City's contract building official, other than Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety: A. BUILDING PERMIT B. PLUMBING PERMIT C. MECHANICAL PERMIT New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1064 3 In addition to the provisions of Section 4 A.1 of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4 B. of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. . In addition to the provisions of Section 4 C of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. D. ELECTRI•PERMIT In addition to theibisions of Section 4 D of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. E. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW In addition to the provisions of Section 4 E of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fess shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. F. SOLAR AND PHOTOVOLTAIC In addition to the provision of Section SYSTEMS AND APPURTENANT 4F of this resolution, a 25% surcharge EQUIPMENT on Los Angles County Department of Building and Safety fees, plus $60.11 City administrative fee, shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. Section 6. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit relating to construction and demolition waste: A. CONS t7LUCTION AND $ 25 single project permit DEMOLITION $ 250 annual permit Section 7. The new fees set forth in Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 above do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing such services. Section 8. The City Council Resolution No. 1060 is hereby repealed. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADO151"hD this 13th day of July 2009. HO HEINSHEIMER, MAYOR Heidi Luce Deputy City Clerk New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1064 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1064 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING • HILLS ESTABLISHING FEES FOR PERMITTING AND INSPECTION AND FOR THE INCLUSION OF SOLAR AND PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS AND APPURTENANT EQUIPMENT AND REPLACING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 1060. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on July 13, 2009 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Councilmembers Black, Hill, Lay, Mayor Pro Tern Pernell and Mayor Heinsheimer. None. None. None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1064 5 DEPUTY CITY CLERK • RESOLUTION NO. 1064 J• A RESOLUTION OF THE CI Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING FEES FOR PERM1iTING AND INSPECTION AND FOR THE INCLUSION OF SOLAR AND PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS AND APPURTENANT EQUIPMENT AND REPLACING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 1060. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing discretionary cases for Planning, Zoning and Subdivisions and shall be paid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Title 16 (Subdivision) and Title 17 (Zoning) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: A. Site Plan Review B. C. D. E. Conditional Use Permit Variance Variance, Minor $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,250 $ 750 1. Minor deviation into required yard setback, not exceeding 5' and attached to main residential structure Multiple discretionary reviews; F. Lighting Ordinance Modification G. Outdoor Lighting Audit H. Time extension I. Zone Change General Plan Amendment Most expensive fee for the first review and 1/2 fee for second review. No cost for third or more reviews. $ 750 $ 150 (initiated by resident) $ 200 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 K. . Zoning/Subdivision Code Amendment $ 2,000 L Discretionary Approval Modification M. Appeal Fee N. Planning Commission interpretation and miscellaneous Planning Corrunission reviews O. Environmental Review for Determination of discretionary permits P. Negative Declaration Q. Mitigated Negative Declaration R. Environmental Impact Reports New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1064 1 $ 2/3 of original application fee $ 2/3 of original application fee $ 375. Fee to be credited if results in filing of a formal application to Planning Commission $ 200 As adjusted annually by the CA Dept. of Fish and Game, plus 20% As adjusted annually by the CA Dept. of Fish and Game, plus 20% Consultant fee, plus 20% County 11, Processing Fee Lot Line Adjustment Tentative Parcel; Tract Map Final Parcel/Tract Map Zoning violation and construction penalty fee $ 100 • $ 1,500, plus County fee $ $1,500, plus County fees plus 20% County fee plus 20% $ 1,000 1. Applications for illegal or "as built" grading or construction or non-compliance with approved plans that require Planning Commission review. Fee is charged in addition to the discretionary application review fee. X. Stop work order $ 200 1. Fee charged for each additional "stop work order" that is issued beyond the original stop work order for illegal construction and grading activity requiring Planning Commission review and approval. Y. Service Request County fee plus 20% (For services provided by L.A. County not included in the General Services Agreement) Section 2. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing View Impairment and Traffic Commission cases: A. View Impairment $ 500 B. Traffic Commission Review 1. New driveways or other traffic $ 300 related items Section 3. The following Administration processing: fees are established and charged for General A. General Plan B. Zoning Code C. Subdivision Code D. Meeting Tapes (Audio) E. Budget F. Zoning Map G. Xeroxed copies, each page H. False Alarms 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th $ 30 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ 30 $3 $ 0.25 $ 50 $100 $150 $ 200 $ 250 Section 4. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit pursuant to Title 15, (Building and Construction) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1064 2 A. 1: 41/LDsI.NG PERMIT Two and onea/times the amount set forth in the Building Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. 2. PARKS AND RECREATION Each new residential dwelling shall pay 2% of the first $100,000 of construction valuation, plus 0.5% of such valuation over $ 100,000. B. PLUMBING PERMIT C. MECHANICAL PERMIT D. ELECTRICAL PERMIT E. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW E. SOLAR AND PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS AND APPURTENANT EQUIPMENT Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Plumbing Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Mechanical Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Electrical Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. 0.42% of the valuation of the proposed structures; however, minimum fee shall be $535.00 and the maximum fee shall be $3,588.00 The amount set forth in the Los Angeles County Building and Electrical Codes for each fee, table and schedule therein, plus $50.11 City administrative fee. Section 5. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit pursuant to Title 15, (Building and Construction) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code for review conducted by the City's contract building official, other than Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety: A. BUILDING PERMIT B. PLUMBING PERMIT C. MECHANICAL PERMIT New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1064 3 In addition to the provisions of Section 4 A.1 of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4 B. of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4 C of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. D. ELECTI PERMIT E. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW In addition to tl visions of Section 4 D of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4 E of this resolution, a 25 % surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fess shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. F. SOLAR AND PHOTOVOLTAIC In addition to the provision of Section SYSTEMS AND APPURTENANT 4F of this resolution, a 25% surcharge EQUIPMENT on Los Angles County Department of Building and Safety fees, plus $60.11 City administrative fee, shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. Section 6. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit relating to construction and demolition waste: A. CONSTRUCTION AND $ 25 single project permit DEMOLITION $ 250 annual permit Section 7. The new fees set forth in Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 above do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing such services. Section 8: The City Council Resolution No. 1060 is hereby repealed. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 13th day of July 2009. HO l HEINSHEIMER, MAYOR AI I hST: • ledittla Heidi Luce Deputy City Clerk New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1064 4 f • • STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1064 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING • HILLS ESTABLISHLNG FEES FOR FERMI ITING AND INSPECION AND FOR THE INCLUSION OF SOLAR AND PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS AND APPURTENANT EQUIPMENT AND REPLACING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.1060. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on July 13, 2009 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Councilmembers Black, Hill, Lay, Mayor Pro Tem Pernell and Mayor Heinsheimer. None. None. None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. Neu; and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1064 DEPUTY CITY CLERK • Residential Photovoltaic Fees CONY OF LOS ANGELES For a single family dwelling with an inverter less or equal to 10 kw, the following fees will apply: Electrical Permit Permit Issuance Fee $26.10 Inverter $18.70 - Plan Review — 1 -hour $103.10 Building Permit Permit Issuance Fee Plan Review — 1 -hour Inspection — 1 -hour $147.90 $26.10 $103.10 $92.50 $221.70 TO —AL $369.60 For a single family dwelling with an inverter over 10 kw and less or equal to 50 kw, the following fees will apply: Electrical Permit Permit Issuance Fee $26.10 Inverter $43.50 Plan Review — 2 -hour $206.20 Building Permit Permit Issuance Fee Plan Review — 2 -hour Inspection — 2 -hour $275.80 $26.10 $206.20 $185.00 $417.30 TOTAL $693.1 n Co erciai Photovoltaic Fees Electrical fees are based on the number of units, while the building fees are based on the project valuation. • RESOLUTION NO. 1060 110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CONSOLIDATING SEVERAL PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED FEE RESOLUTIONS FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY INCLUDING BUT NOT BE LIMII'bD TO PLANNING, ZONING AND SUBDIVISION; ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS; ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION PERMITS; GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND PROCESSING: TRAFFIC REVIEW AND VIEW IMPAIRMENT REVIEW: AMENDING CERTAIN PEES AND ESTABLISHING NEW FEES RELATIVE TO LIGHTING ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION; CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND OTHER CITY SERVICES AND CHARGES AND REPEALING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS NO. 493, 494, 496, 691, 854, 931 and 1034. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing discretionary cases for Planning, Zoning and Subdivisions and shall be paid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Title 16 (Subdivision) and Title 17 (Zoning) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: A. Site Plan Review B. Conditional Use Permit C. Variance D. Variance, Minor $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,250 $ 750 1. Minor deviation into required yard setback, not exceeding 5' and attached to main residential structure E. Multiple discretionary reviews; F. G. H. I. J. K. L M. N. Most expensive fee for the first review and 1/2 fee for second review. No cost for third or more reviews. Lighting Ordinance Modification $ 750 Outdoor Lighting Audit $ 150 (initiated by resident) Time extension $ 200 Zone Change $ 2,000 General Plan Amendment $ 2,000 Zoning/Subdivision Code Amendment $ 2,000 Discretionary Approval Modification Appeal Fee Planning Commission interpretation and miscellaneous Planning Commission reviews $ 2/3 of original application fee $ 2/3 of original application fee $ 375. Fee to be credited if results in filing of a formal application to Planning Commission O. Environmental Review for $ 200 Determination of discretionary permits New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1060 1 J P. Negative Declaration Q. Mitigated Negative Declaration R. Environmental Impact Reports S. County Clerk Processing Fee T: • Lot Line Adjustment U. Tentative Parcel/Tract Map V. Final Parcel/Tract Map W. Zoning violation and construction penalty fee As adjusted annually by the CA Dept. of Fish and Game, plus 20% As adjusted annually by the CA Dept. of Fish and Game, plus 20% Consultant fee, plus 20% $ 100 $ 1,500, plus County fee $ $1,500, plus County fees plus 20% County fee plus 20% $ 1,000 1. Applications for illegal or "as built" grading or construction or non-compliance with approved plans that require Planning Commission review. Fee is charged in addition to the discretionary application review fee X. Stop work order $ 200 1. Fee charged for each additional "stop work order" that is issued beyond the original stop work order for illegal construction and grading activity requiring Planning Commission review and approval Y. Service Request County fee plus 20% (For services provided by L.A. County not included in the General Services Agreement) Section 2. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing View Impairment and Traffic Commission cases: A. View Impairment $ 500 B. Traffic Commission Review 1. New driveways or other traffic $ 300 related items Section 3. The _ following fees are established and charged for General Administration processing: A. B. C. D. E. F. General Plan Zoning Code Subdivision Code Meeting Tapes (Audio) Budget Zoning Map $ 30 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ 30 $3 New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1060 2 G. n!. oxed copies, each page $ 0.25 H. False Alarms 1st $ 50 2nd $ 100 3rd $150 4th $ 200 5th $ 250 Section 4. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit pursuant to Title 15, (Building and Construction) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: A. 1. BUILDING PERMIT Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Building Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. 2. PARKS AND RECREATION Each new residential dwelling shall pay 2% of the first $100,000 of construction valuation, plus 0.5% of such valuation over $ 100,000. B. PLUMBING PERMIT C. MECHANICAL PERMIT D. ELECTRICAL PERMIT E. GEOlECHNICAL REPORT,. SITE AND PLAN REVIEW Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Plumbing Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Mechanical Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Electrical Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. 0.42% of the valuation of the proposed structures; however, minimum fee shall be $535.00 and the maximum fee shall be $3,588.00 Section 5. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit pursuant to Title 15, (Building and Construction) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code for review conducted by the City's contract building official, other than Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety: A. BUILDING PERMIT B. PLUMBING PERMIT New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1060 3 In addition to the provisions of Section 4 A.1 of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4 B. of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. C. MECHAI. L PERMIT D. - ELECTRICAL PERMIT E. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW In addition to thlOvisions of Section 4 C of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4 D of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4 E of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fess shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. Section 6. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit relating to construction and demolition waste: A. CONSTRUCTION AND $ 25 single project permit DEMOLITION $ 250 annual permit Section 7. The new fees set forth in this Resolution denoted in bold do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing such services as demonstrated in the calculations set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Calculations in reference to the original fees established by Resolutions 493, 494, 496, 691, 854, 931 and 1034 are available at City Hall. Section 8. The City Council Resolutions Nos. 493, 494, 496, 691, 854, 931 and 1034 are hereby rescinded. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 11th day of ; •y, 200 Heidi Luce Interim Deputy City Clerk New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1060 4 THM4 ' HE SHEIMER, MAYOR STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) §§ I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1060 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CONSOLIDATING SEVERAL PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED FEE RESOLUTIONS FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY INCLUDING BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO PLANNING, ZONING AND SUBDIVISION; ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS; ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION PERMITS; GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND PROCESSING: TRAFFIC REVIEW AND VIEW IMPAIRMENT REVIEW: AMENDING CERTAIN FEES AND ESTABLISHING NEW FEES RELATIVE TO LIGHTING ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION; CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND OTHER CITY SERVICES AND CHARGES AND REPEALING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS NO. 493, 494, 496, 691, 854, 931 and 1034. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on May 11, 2009 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers•Black, Hill, Mayor. Pro Tem Pernell and Mayor Heinsheimer. NOES: None. ABSENT: Councilmember Lay. ABSTAIN: None . and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. DEPUTY CITY CLERK New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1060 5 • RESOLUTION NO. 1060 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CONSOLIDATING SEVERAL PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED FhE RESOLUTIONS FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY INCLUDING BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO PLANNING, ZONING AND SUBDIVISION; ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS; ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION PERMITS; GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND PROCESSING: TRAFFIC REVIEW AND VIEW IMPAIRMENT REVIEW: AMENDING CERTAIN FEES AND ESTABLISHING NEW FEES RELATIVE TO LIGHTING ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION; CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND OTHER CITY SERVICES AND CHARGES AND REPEALING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS NO. 493, 494, 496, 691, 854, 931 and 1034. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing discretionary cases for Planning, Zoning and Subdivisions and shall be paid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Title 16 (Subdivision) and Title 17 (Zoning) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: A. B. C. D. Site Plan Review Conditional Use Permit Variance Variance, Minor $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,250 $ 750 1. Minor deviation into required yard setback, not exceeding 5' an attached to main residential structure E. Multiple discretionary reviews; F. G. H. I. J. K. L M. N. Lighting Ordinance Modification Outdoor Lighting Audit Time extension Zone Change General Plan Amendment Zoning/Subdivision Code Amendment Discretionary Approval Modification Appeal Fee Planning Commission interpretation and miscellaneous Planning Commission reviews O. Environmental Review for Determination of discretionary permits New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1060 1 Most expensive fee for the first review and 1/2 fee for second review. No cost for third or more reviews. $ 750 $ 150 (initiated by resident) $ 200 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2/3 of original application fee $ 2/3 of original application fee $ 375. Fee to be credited if results in filing of a formal application to Planning Commission $ 200 P. Negative Declaration Q. Mitigated Negative Declaration R. Environmental Impact Reports S. County Clerk Processing Fee T. - Lot Line Adjustment U. Tentative Parcel/Tract Map V. Final Parcel/Tract Map W. Zoning violation and construction penalty fee As adjusted annually by the CA Dept. of Fish and Game, plus 20% As adjusted annually by the CA Dept. of Fish and Game, plus 20% Consultant fee, plus 20% $ 100 $ 1,500, plus County fee $ $1,500, plus County fees plus 20% County fee plus 20% $ 1,000 1. Applications for illegal or "as built" grading or construction or non-compliance with approved plans that require Planning Commission review. Fee is charged in addition to the discretionary application review fee X. Stop work order $ 200 1. Fee charged for each additional "stop work order" that is issued beyond the original stop work order for illegal construction and grading activity requiring Planning Commission review and approval Y. Service Request County fee plus 20% (For services provided by L.A. County not included in the General Services Agreement) Section 2. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing View Impairment and Traffic Commission cases: A. View Impairment $ 500 B. Traffic Commission Review 1. New driveways or other traffic $ 300 related items Section 3. The following fees are established and charged for General Administration processing: A. B. C. D. E. F. General Plan Zoning Code Subdivision Code Meeting Tapes (Audio) Budget Zoning Map $ 30 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ 30 $3 New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1060 2 G. liked copies, each page $ 0.25 • H. False Alarms 1St $ 50 2=1d $ 100 3rd $ 150 4th $ 200 5th $ 250 Section 4. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit pursuant to Title 15, (Building and Construction) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: A. 1. BUILDING PERMIT Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Building Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. 2. PARKS AND RECREATION Each new residential dwelling shall pay 2% of the first $100,000 of construction valuation, plus 0.5% of such valuation over $ 100,000. B. PLUMBING PERMIT C. MECHANICAL PERMIT D. ELECTRICAL PERMIT E. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Plumbing Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Mechanical Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Electrical Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. 0.42% of the valuation of the proposed structures; however, minimum fee shall be $535.00 and the maximum fee shall be $3,588.00 Section 5. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit pursuant to Title 15, (Building and Construction) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code for review conducted by the City's contract building official, other than Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety: A. BUILDING PERMIT B. PLUMBING PERMIT New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1060 3 In addition to the provisions of Section 4 A.1 of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4 B. of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. C. MECHANOL PERMIT D. ELECTRICAL PERMIT E. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SI l'h AND PLAN REVIEW In addition to thelikisions of Section 4 C of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4 D of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4 E of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fess shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. Section 6. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit relating to construction and demolition waste: A. CONSTRUCTION AND $ 25 single project permit DEMOLITION $ 250 annual permit Section 7. The new fees set forth in this Resolution denoted in bold do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing such services as demonstrated in the calculations set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Calculations in reference to the original fees established by Resolutions 493, 494, 496, 691, 854, 931 and 1034 are available at City Hall. Section 8. The City Council Resolutions Nos. 493, 494, 496, 691, 854, 931 and 1034 are hereby rescinded. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 11th day of Heidi Luce Interim Deputy City Clerk New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1060 4 y, 200 TH m4 HE -SHEIMER, MAYOR STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1060 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CONSOLIDATING SEVERAL PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED FEE RESOLUTIONS FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY INCLUDING BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO PLANNING, ZONING AND SUBDIVISION; ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS; ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION PERMITS; GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND PROCESSING: TRAFFIC REVIEW AND VIEW IMPAIRMENT REVIEW: AMENDING CERTAIN FEES AND ESTABLISHING NEW FEES RELATIVE TO LIGHTING ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION; CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND OTHER CITY SERVICES AND CHARGES AND REPEALING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS NO. 493, 494, 496, 691, 854; 931 and 1034. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on May 11, 2009 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers'ABlack, Hill, Mayor_Pro Tem Pernell and Mayor Heinsheimer. NOES: None. ABSENT: Councilmember Lay. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. DEPUTY CITY CLERK New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1060 5 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No.: 5-A Mtg. Date: 05-11-09 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: ANTON DAHLERBRUCH, CITY MANAGER Ad SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 1060. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CONSOLIDATING SEVERAL PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED FEE RESOLUTIONS FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY INCLUDING BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO PLANNING, ZONING AND SUBDIVISION; ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS; ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION PERMITS; GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND PROCESSING: TRAFFIC REVIEW AND VIEW IMPAIRMENT REVIEW: AMENDING CERTAIN FEES AND ESTABLISHING NEW FEES RELATIVE TO LIGHTING ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION; CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND OTHER CITY SERVICES AND CHARGES AND REPEALING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS NO. 493, 494, 496, 691, 854, 931 AND 1034. DATE: MAY 11, 2009 ATTACHMENTS Summary of eight (8) proposed new/modified fees for FY 09/10 Resolution No. 1060 w/ Attachment A RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council conduct a public hearing to consider the eight proposed new/modified fees and adopt the attached Resolution for implementation of the fees effective July 1, 2009. BACKGROUND In coordination with adoption of the 2009/10 fiscal year (FY) budget, recognizing ordinances that were passed during FY 2008/09 and the opportunity to address a few Page 1 of 4 • • outstanding items, eight (8) new or modified fees are proposed for City Council adoption effective July 1, 2009. The 8 proposed fees have been reviewed by the City Council Finance / Budget Subcommittee (Subcommittee) and, they are being forwarded to the full City Council, for a public hearing and approval, with the Subcommittee's concurrence. For administrative ease, the proposed Resolution incorporates all planning and building fees so, for future reference, they all can be found in one document (currently, there are multiple authorizing Resolutions for building and planning fees). DISCUSSION The 8 new/modified fees are as follows: 1. Lighting Modification Background: In 2008, with adoption of the new outdoor lighting ordinance, residents are provided the opportunity to apply to the Planning Commission for an exception to the lighting requirements. The application, review and approval process is similar to, but not exactly the same as, the Variance process. Since adoption of the ordinance, no applications have been submitted for a lighting modification. Proposed Fee: $750 (same as a Minor Variance). Full cost recovery is approximately $975. 2. Lighting Inspection Background: In 2008, with adoption of the new outdoor lighting ordinance, residents are provided the opportunity to request the City conduct an inspection of their outdoor lights. The inspection, which takes place during the evening hours, is voluntary; this fee does not apply when there is an inspection generated from code enforcement. The inspection would be provided by City staff and if necessary, a technician with electrical or lighting knowledge and experience. Since adoption of the ordinance, there has been one request for a lighting inspection (there have been several inspections related to code enforcement). Proposed Fee: $150. Full cost recovery is approximately $410. 3. Service Request Background: The City has a "General Services Agreement" with Los Angeles County for a variety of services such as the processing of tentative and final parcel maps. The City charges an applicant the County fee plus 20% to cover the costs of providing the service. From time to time, however, there are services provided by the County that are outside the agreement. The City passes through the County fees to the applicant but does not recover its administrative costs. One example is the County's review of sanitary sewer construction. Proposed Fee: Actual fees plus 20% to 'cover City costs (and consistent with the "General Services Agreement" process). Page 2 of 4 • • 4. Construction and Demolition Waste Permit Background: In February 2009, the City adopted a Solid Waste Ordinance that required haulers of construction and demolition waste to obtain an annual permit from the City. The permit is intended to ensure that the collected waste is appropriately diverted from the landfills. For administration of the permit and monitoring of the disposal, a fee is proposed to cover staff costs. Implementation of a construction and demolition waste recycling program is necessary for compliance with State recycling and diversion requirements. Proposed Fee: $25 for a single project (for the small hauler with fewer projects in the City) or $250 for an annual permit (for haulers with multiple projects in the City throughout a year). Based on historical construction activity, it is estimated there could be as many as 30 construction projects initiated in a year. Full cost recovery is approximately $290 per project. Implementation of the permit requirement will begin on July 1, 2009. 5. Non -Compliance Penalty Background: If construction takes place on a property without City authorization and the type of construction necessitates Planning Commission review and approval, the resident violator is assessed a penalty of $400. As a stronger disincentive to commencing construction without the prerequisite Planning Commission approval, a larger penalty is proposed. Proposed Penalty: $1,000. 6. CEQA Review Background: With some project applications, it is necessary that the State Department of Fish and Game and the County City Clerk's Office participate in the environmental review. The current fee schedule is outdated in relation to the fees charged by the State and County and, it does not reflect the City's administrative costfor processing the fees. In the resolution they are listed separately and referred to as Negative Declaration and Mitigated Negative Declaration. Proposed Fee: Actual fees plus 20% to cover City costs (and consistent with the "General Services Agreement" process). 7. Interpretation Fee Background: Periodically, staff is requested by a resident to ask the Planning Commission to interpret a previously made finding or conclusion. In forwarding the request to.. the Commission, staff must research the matter and prepare a report for the Commission's consideration, which can take a substantial amount of time and research. Proposed Fee: $375 for an interpretation by the Planning Commission. This fee would be credited toward an application submitted to the Commission on the subject matter. Full cost recovery is approximately $385. Page 3 of 4 8. Graduated Scale for Multiple Reviews Background: Currently, when an applicant submits an application for a Variance and a Conditional Use Permit, for example, the applicant is charged the full cost of each application. However, the evaluation of the applications occurs simultaneously and one report is presented to the Planning Commission. Proposed Fee: The highest amount application plus half the cost of the second application. Third and additional applications submitted simultaneously, will have no cost. FISCAL IMPACT The proposed fees are based on the cost of providing the associated service and, from the Subcommittee's perspective, a sense of reasonableness. They are not expected to have a large impact on the City's total revenues. With the exception of #4 and #8 above, the services referenced are infrequent. For the Construction and Demolition Waste Permit, revenue will offset City expenses for a program that is necessary to implement. In implementing a Graduated Scale for Multiple, Reviews, the City will see a small reduction in fees collected in relation to site plan reviews. NOTIFICATION As is standard practice, a draft version of the City Council agenda, inclusive of this action item, was included the last Citywide newsletter. Additionally, the Rolling Hills Community Association, Southern California Edison and The Gas Company have been advised of this matter before the City Council. CONCLUSION The City Council is requested to hold a public hearing and consider the proposed Resolution adopting the 8 new/modified fees. AD:hl Page4of4 City of Rolling Hills Proposed Flew/Modified Fees FY 09/10 Current Change Full Cost Proposed (Notes 1 Lighting Modification For requests to the Planning Commission and City Council to consid a modification to the current outdoor lighting ordinance $0.00 New Fee Recovery $750.00 Infrequent $977.93 Fee is same as a minor variance 2 Lighting Inspection For voluntary requests to the City for inspection of outdoor lighting $0.00 New Fee $410.44 $150.00 Infrequent Not for code enforcement 3 Service Request For services provided thru the City by the County not included in the General Services Agreement County fee Adds City overhead County fees + 20% County fees + 20% Consistent w/ GS agrmt 4 Construction Demolition Permit Authorized haulers to collect C&D Waste, requires 50% diversion of waste, includes waste monitoring $0.00 New Fee $291.63 $25 for single pjt $250 for multiple pjts +/- 30 pjts/yr Annual permit 5 Non -Compliance Penalty Increases the penalty for non-compliance with zoning code and construction plans if Planning Commission review necessary $400.00 Increase N/A $1,000.00 Infrequent 6 CEQA Review Updates amount of pass -through of County Clerk and State Fish & Game fees to applicant $1,300 F&G $50 Cty Clk Update Fees + 20% Fees + 20% 7 Intrepretation Fee Requests interpretation of muni code requiring Planning Commission review $0.00 New Fee $388.05 $375.00 Infrequent Fee to be credit toward Png Cm application 8 Graduated Scale for Multiple Reviews Modifies current practice of charging applicant full cost of each request on one project (CUP, Variance, etc.) when the reviews occur simultaneously Fixed amt per request Reduction N/A High fee+1/2 of second rqst No chrg for third rqst +/- 25 pjts/yr • RESOLUTION NO. 1060 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CONSOLIDATING SEVERAL PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED FEE RESOLUTIONS FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY INCLUDING BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO PLANNING, ZONING AND SUBDIVISION; ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS; ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION PERMITS; GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND PROCESSING: TRAFFIC REVIEW AND VIEW IMPAIRMENT REVIEW: AMENDING CERTAIN FEES AND ESTABLISHING NEW FEES RELATIVE TO LIGHTING ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION; CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND OTHER CITY SERVICES AND CHARGES AND REPEALING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS NO. 493, 494, 496, 691, 854, 931 and 1034. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing discretionary cases for Planning, Zoning and Subdivisions and shall be paid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Title 16 (Subdivision) and Title 17 (Zoning) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: A. B. C. D. Site Plan Review Conditional Use Permit Variance Variance, Minor $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,250 $ 750 1. Minor deviation into required yard setback, not exceeding 5' and attached to main residential structure E. Multiple discretionary reviews; F. Lighting Ordinance Modification G. Outdoor Lighting Audit H. Time extension New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1060 1 Most expensive fee for the first review and 1/2 fee for second review. No cost for third or more reviews. $ 750 $ 150 (initiated by resident) $ 200 • I. Zone Change General Plan Amendment $ 2,000 $ 2,000 K. Zoning/Subdivision Code Amendment $ 2,000 L Discretionary Approval Modification M. Appeal Fee N. Planning Commission interpretation and miscellaneous Planning Commission reviews 0. Environmental Review for Determination of discretionary permits P. Negative Declaration Q. Mitigated Negative Declaration R. Environmental Impact Reports S. County Clerk Processing Fee T. Lot Line Adjustment U. Tentative Parcel/Tract Map V. Final Parcel/Tract Map W. Zoning violation and construction penalty fee s $ 2/3 of original application fee $ 2/3 of original application fee $ 375. Fee to be credited if results in filing of a formal application to Planning Commission $ 200 As adjusted annually by the CA Dept. of Fish and Game, plus 20% As adjusted annually by the CA Dept. of Fish and Game, plus 20% Consultant fee, plus 20% $ 100 $ 1,500, plus County fee $ $1,500, plus County fees plus 20% County fee plus 20% $ 1,000 1. Applications for illegal or "as built" grading or construction or non-compliance with approved plans that require Planning Commission review. Fee is charged in addition to the discretionary application review fee Stop work order $ 200 1. Fee charged for each additional "stop work order" that is issued beyond the original stop work order for illegal construction and New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1060 c� grading activity requiring Planning Commission review and • • � g approval Section 2. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing View Impairment and Traffic Commission cases: A. View Impairment B. Traffic Commission Review $ 500 1. New driveways or other traffic $ 300 related items Section 3. The following fees are established and charged for General Administration processing: A. General Plan $ 30 B. Zoning Code $ 25 C. Subdivision Code $ 25 D. Meeting Tapes (Audio) $ 25 E. Budget $ 30 F. Zoning Map $ 3 G. Xeroxed copies, each page $ 0.25 H. False Alarms 1St $ 50 2nd $100 3rd $ 150 4th $ 200 5th $ 250 Section 4. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit pursuant to Title 15, (Building and Construction) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: A. 1. BUILDING PERMIT New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1060 C Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Building Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. 2. PARKS AND RECREATION Each new residential dwelling shallpay 2% of the first $100,000 of construction valuation, plus 0.5% of such valuation over $ 100,000. B. PLUMBING PERMIT C. MECHANICAL PERMIT D ELECTRICAL PERMIT E. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Plumbing Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Mechanical Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. Two and one-half times the amount set forth in the Electrical Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. 0.42% of the valuation of the proposed structures; however, minimum fee shall be $535.00 and the maximum fee shall be $3,588.00 Section 5. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit pursuant to Title 15, (Building and Construction) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code for review conducted by the City's contract building official, other than Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety: A. BUILDING PERMIT B. PLUMBING PERMIT New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1060 4 In addition to the provisions of Section 4 A.1 of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4 B. of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. C. MECHANICAL PERMIT D. ELECTRICAL PERMIT E. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW • In addition to the provisions of Section 4 C of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4 D of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. In addition to the provisions of Section 4 E of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fess shall be charged for the alternative use of the City's contract building official. Section 6. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit relating to construction and demolition waste: A. CONSTRUCTION AND $ 25 single project permit DEMOLITION $ 250 annual permit Section 7. The new fees set forth in this Resolution denoted in bold do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing such services as demonstrated in the calculations set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Calculations in reference to the original fees established by Resolutions 493, 494, 496, 691, 854, 931 and 1034 are available at City Hall. Section 8. The City Council Resolutions Nos. 493, 494, 496, 691, 854, 931 and 1034 are hereby rescinded. New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1060 5 PASSED, APPROVE', AND ADOPTED this 11th day of tik, 2009. THOMAS HEINSHEIMER, MAYOR A11EST: Heidi Luce Interim Deputy City Clerk New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1060 6 • STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) )§ I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1060 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CONSOLIDATING SEVERAL PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED FEE RESOLUTIONS FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY INCLUDING BUT NOT BE LIMITED. TO PLANNING, ZONING AND SUBDIVISION; ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS; ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION PERMITS; GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND PROCESSING: TRAFFIC REVIEW AND VIEW IMPAIRMENT REVIEW: AMENDING CERTAIN FEES AND ESTABLISHING NEW FEES RELATIVE TO LIGHTING ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION; CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND OTHER CITY SERVICES AND CHARGES AND REPEALING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS NO. 493, 494, 496, 691, 854, 931 and 1034. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on May 11, 2009 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. DEPUTY CITY CLERK New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1060 ' 7 EXH BIT A • FY 09/10 Proposed Fee Calculation Detail . Fee Activity Lighting Modification Review App Neighbor Addresses Evening Field Trip Staff report Plg Comm mtg Minute Reso Yolanta $120.22 Ewa $75.51 Heidi $107.53 Mail notices Post mtg Pig Comm mtg Minutes Tony Field Trip $215.39 Pig Comm mtg TOTAL Lighting Inspection Yolanta $120.22 Inspector $127.5 $85 TOTAL Service Request A service request outside the General Services Agreement. Review App Contract Admin Report findings Inspection Report For staff report, letters, communications with county and applicant, mailings, filing Hours 0.5 0.25 0.5 1 0.5 2 0.25 0.15 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 1 0.5 Cost $60.11 $30.06 $60.11 $120.22 $60.11 $240.44 $18.88 $11.33 $53.77 $107.53 $107.70 $107.70 $977.93 $60.11 $120.22 $60.11 $127.50 $42.50 $410.44 20% is County fees + consistent with 20% administrative fee or other county services EXHIBIT A Fee Activity Hours Cost Construction & Demolition Permit Yolanta Review App 0.25 $30.06 $120.22 Issue Permit 0.25 $30.06 Review Final Rpt 0.5 $60.11 Ewa File 0.25 $18.88 $75.51 Issue receipt 0.15 $11.33 jim Accounting 0.15 $19.95 $133.03 City Attorney Enforcement 0.25 $43.75 $175.00 SW Consultant Monitor 0.5 $77.50 $155.00 TOTAL $291.63 Non -Compliance Penalty $1,000 Currently $400 per occurance CEQA Review Fish & Game fees 20% is State fees + Currently $1,300 consistent with 20% fixed amount administrative fee for pass through of other government services County Clerk 20% is County fees + Processing. fees consistent with 20% Currently $50 fixed administrative amount fee for pass through of other government services EXHIBIT A Intrepretation Fee Yolanta Review request 0.5 $60.11 $120.22 Research 0.5 $60.11 Staff Report 0.5 $60.11 Ping Comm 0.5 $60.11 Response 0.5 $60.11 City Attorney Review 0.5 $87.50 $175.00 TOTAL $388.05 Graduated Scale for Multiple Reviews Highest fee Second add'. review Third/add'I reviews Qt 1st Review 1/2 of actual fee No charge Agenda Item No.: 5-A Mtg. Date: 05-11-09 Please note the following addition to Resolution No. 1060 (to be added on circle page 8 of the Resolution) Y. Service Request County fee plus 20% (For services provided by L.A. County not included in the General Services Agreement) • -111)0 ou ae.) cigli) Q16 • • Y. Service Request County fee plus 20% (For services provided by L.A. County not included in the General Services Agreement) Palos Verdes Peninsula News 550 Deep Valley Dr. Ste 293B Rolling Hills Estates CA 90274 Proof of Publication (2015.5 C.C.P) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I am a citizen of the United States, and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years; and I am not a party to or interested in the notice published. I am the chief legal advertising clerk of the publisher of the PALOS VERDES PENINSULA NEWS . a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published Twice weekly in the City of Rolling Hills Estates County of Los Angeles, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, under the date of February 15, 1977 Case Number C824957, that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to -wit: April 30 All in the year 2009 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct Dated at Rolling Hills Estates, California, this 30th day of April 2009 Signature +, H 1. y lHn Hills PVPN # 9288 i?V.P.,News:No. 9288: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 'IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City,' Council of the City of Rolling Hills will hold a public"hearing: during their regularly scheduled meeting to be held .on Monday, May 91; •2009`, commencing et.7 30 p.m.;: in the" Council ,Chambers at: City.Hall,:.2 Portuguese Bend; Road,' Rolling Hills, California to consider the following RESOLUTION NO. ,1060:. A RESOLUTION ,OF:' CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CONSOLIDATING ; SEVERAL PREVIOUSLY ESTAB LISHED FEE RESOLUTIONS FOR SERVICES PROVID- ED BY -THE CITY INCLUDING BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO' PLANNING, ZONING AND SUBDIVISION; ENVI- RONMENTAL REVIEWS; ISSUANCE OF GONSTRUC TION PERMITS; GENERAL; ADMINISTRATION: AND, PROCESSING: TRAFFIC REVIEW AND VIEW IMPAIR- MENT REVIEW:- AMENDING CERTAIN 'FEES. AND ESTABLISHING NEW FEES, RELATIVE LIGHTING -: ORDINANCE .:IMPLEMENTATION;: CONSTRUCTION AND :DEMOLITION ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND OTHER CITY SERVICES AND CHARGES AND `s REPEALING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS NO. 493, 494,:496, 691, 854, 931 and 1034 :. • Any person wishing to review the documents pertaining to the Ordinance may do so prior to the public hearing at City Hall, 2. Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills any time during office. hours. The staff report will=be available after 4:00 pm on Friday,- May 8, 2009. City Hall office hours are Monday through Friday from 7:30 a.m..to 5:00 p.m. Heidi Luce • ., DEPUTY CITY CLERK Published in the -Palos ' Verdes -Peninsula News April 30, 2009.-:. MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Anton Dahlerbruch, City Manager 9 SUBJECT: DATE: Proposed New/Modified Fees for FY 09/10 April 24, 2009 CC: Yolanta Schwartz, Planning Director Jim Walker, Interim Finance Director Attachments: Proposed New/Modified Fees FY 09/10 (1 page) Draft Resolution BACKGROUND At the City Council meeting of May 11, 2009, a public hearing is scheduled to consider adding/modifying a select number of fees and charges (8, to be exact). For administrative ease, the proposed Resolution for adopting the updates incorporates all planning and building fees so, for future reference, they can be found in one document (currently, there are multiple authorizing Resolutions for building and planning fees).. Following the public hearing and adoption of the Resolution, they will become effective on July 1, 2009. The eight proposed fees have been reviewed by the City Council Finance / Budget Subcommittee (Subcommittee) and, they are being forwarded to the full City Council with the Subcommittee's concurrence. In advance of the scheduled public hearing, they are summarized in the one -page attachment, preceding the attached draft Resolution, for the City Council's review. If there are questions about the fees, please advise. For your information, the fees proposed herein do not pertain to the City Council's discussion several months ago about the structure of user fees. The structure of the City's user fees are an unrelated matter that per the City Council's direction, has been delegated to the Subcommittee for further evaluation. The Subcommittee will be discussing the topic over several months following adoption of the annual budget. DISCUSSION Eight new/modified fees are proposed for City Council approval on May 11 as follows: Page 1 of 3 1. Lighting Modification Background: In 2008, with adoption of the new outdoor lighting ordinance, residents are provided the opportunity to apply to the Planning Commission for an exception to the lighting requirements. The application, review and approval process is similar to, but not exactly the same as, the Variance process. Since adoption of the ordinance, no applications have been submitted for a lighting modification. Proposed Fee: $750 (same as a Minor Variance). Full cost recovery is approximately $975. 2. Lighting Inspection Background: In 2008, with adoption of the new outdoor lighting ordinance, residents are provided the opportunity to request the City conduct an inspection of their outdoor lights to determine compliance. The inspection request is voluntary and it takes place during the evening hours. This fee does not apply when there is an inspection generated from code enforcement. Since adoption of the ordinance, there has been one request for a lighting inspection (there have been several inspections related to code enforcement). - Proposed Fee: $150. Full cost recovery is approximately $410. 3. Service Request Background: The City has a "General Services Agreement" with Los Angeles County for a variety of services such as the processing of tentative and final parcel maps. The City charges an applicant the County fee plus 20% to cover the costs of providing the service. From time to time, however, there are services provided by the County that are outside the agreement. The City passes through the County fees to the applicant but does not recover its administrative costs. One example is the County's review of sanitary sewer construction. Proposed Fee: Actual County fees plus 20% to cover City costs. 4. Construction and Demolition Permit Background: In February 2009, the City adopted a Solid Waste Ordinance that required haulers of construction and demolition waste to obtain an annual permit from the City. The permit is intended to ensure that the collected waste is appropriately diverted from the landfills. For administration of the permit and monitoring of the disposal, a fee is proposed to cover staff costs. Proposed Fee: $25 for a single project (for the small hauler with fewer projects in the City) or $250 for an annual permit (for haulers with multiple projects in the City throughout a year). Based on historical construction activity, it is estimated there could be as many as 30 construction projects initiated in a year. Full cost recovery is approximately $290 per project. 5. Non -Compliance Penalty Background: If construction takes place on a property without City authorization' and the type of construction necessitates Planning Commission review and approval, the resident violator is assessed a penalty of $400. As a stronger disincentive to commencing construction without the prerequisite Planning Commission approval, a larger penalty is proposed. Proposed Penalty: $1,000. Page 2 of 3 • 6. CEQA Review Background: With some project applications, it is necessary that the State Department of Fish and Game and the County City Clerk's Office participate in the environmental review. The current fee schedule is outdated in relation to the fees charged by the State and County and, it does not reflect the City's administrative cost for processing the fees. Proposed Fee: Actual fees plus 20% to cover City costs. 7. Interpretation Fee and Miscellaneous Review by the Planning Commission Background: Periodically, staff is requested by a resident to ask the Planning Commission to interpret a previous finding or conclusion or to make other determination (i.e. location of setbacks on irregular lots). In forwarding the request to the Commission, staff must research the matter and prepare a report for the Commission's consideration, which can take a substantial amount of time and research. Proposed Fee: $375 for an interpretation/determination by the Planning Commission. This fee would be credited toward an application submitted to the Commission on the subject matter. Full cost recovery is approximately $385. 8. Graduated Scale for Multiple Reviews Background: Currently, when an applicant submits an application for a Variance and a Conditional Use Permit, for example, the applicant is charged the full cost of each application. However, the evaluation of the applications occurs simultaneously and one report is presented to the Planning Commission. Proposed Fee: The highest application amount plus half the cost of the second application. Third and additional applications submitted simultaneously will have no cost. RECOMMENDATION The City Council is encouraged to advise if there are any questions regarding the eight fees noted above. AD/hl 04-24-09 Proposed Fees Memo Page 3 of 3 City of Rollins Hills Proposed New/Modified Fees FY 09/10 Current Change Full Cost Proposed Notes 1 Lighting Modification For requests to the Planning Commission and City Council to consid a modification to the current outdoor lighting ordinance $0.00 New Fee Recovery $750.00 Infrequent $977.93 Fee is same as a minor variance 2 Lighting Inspection For voluntary requests to the City for inspection of outdoor lighting $0.00 New Fee $410.44 $150.00 Infrequent Not for code enforcement 3 Service Request For services provided thru the City by the County not included in the General Services Agreement County fee Adds City overhead County fees + 20% County fees + 20% Consistent w/ GS agrmt 4 Construction & Demolition Permit Authorized haulers to collect C&D Waste, requires 50% diversion of waste, includes waste monitoring $0.00 New Fee $291.63 $25 for single pjt $250 for multiple pjts +/- 30 pjts/yr Annual permit 5 Non -Compliance Penalty Increases the penalty for non-compliance with zoning code and construction plans if Planning Commission review necessary $400.00 Increase N/A $1,000.00 Infrequent 6 CEQA Review Updates amount of pass -through of County Clerk and State Fish & Game fees to applicant $1,300 F&G $50 Cty CIk Update Fees + 20% Fees + 20% 7 Intrepretation Fee Requests interpretation of muni code requiring Planning Commission review $0.00 New Fee $388.05 $375.00 Infrequent Fee to be credit toward Png Cm application 8 Graduated Scale for Multiple Reviews Modifies current practice of charging applicant full cost of each request on one project (CUP, Variance, etc.) when the reviews occur simultaneously Fixed amt per request Reduction N/A High fee+1/2 of second rqst No chrg for third rqst +/- 25 pjts/yr r • • F. RESOLUTION NO. 1060 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CONSOLIDATING SEVERAL PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED FEE RESOLUTIONS FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY INCLUDING BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO PLANNING, ZONING AND SUBDIVISION; ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS; ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION PERMITS; GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND PROCESSING: TRAFFIC REVIEW AND VIEW IMPAIRMENT REVIEW: AMENDING CERTAIN :;FJES AND ESTABLISHING NEW FEES RELATIVE TO LIGHTING ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION; CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION ORIDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND OTHER CITY SERVICES AND CHARGES, AND REPEALING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS/NO. 493, 494, 496, 691, 854, 931 and 1034. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLINGHILLS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing discretionary cases for Pl , Za Viand S ubdivisions and shall be paid p g ?, g fig h� by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Title 16 (Subdivision) and Title 17 (Zoning) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: A. Site Plan Revie B. Conditional -Use Permit C. Variartc3 D. Variance, attached to main resit $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,250 $ 750 nor 'eviction into required yard setback, not exceeding 5' and ential structure Multiple discretionary reviews; Most expensive fee for the first review and 1/2 fee for second review. No cost for third or more reviews. Lighting Ordinance Modification $ 750 G. Outdoor Lighting Audit $ 150 (initiated by resident) H. Time extension $ 200 I. Zone Change $ 2,000 New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1060. 1 • • J. K. L Discretionary Approval Modification M. Appeal Fee N. General Plan Amendment $ 2,000 Zoning/Subdivision Code Amendment $ 2,000 $ 2/3 of original application fee $ 2/3 of original application fee Planning Commission interpretation $ 375. Fee to be credited if and miscellaneous Planning results in filing' of a"formal Commission reviews application to Plannieg, Commission ' 0. Environmental Review for deteintination of discretionary permits P. Negative Declaration Q. Mitigated Negative Declaration- R. Environmental Impact Reporis S. County Clerk Processing Fe T. Lot Line Ac lt. slr ent U. TentativcParcel V. Final Parcel / Tract Map W, i violation and construction penatty,fce As adjusted annually by the Ca. Dept. of Fish and Game, plus 20% As adjusted annually by the Ca. ept . pf Fish and Game, plus 20% Consultant fee, plus 20% $ 100 $ 1,500, plus County fee $ $1,500, plus County fees plus 20% County fee plus 20% $ 1,000 1. Applications for illegal or "as built" grading or construction or non-compliance with approved plans that require Planning Commission evaew. Fee is charged in addition to the discretionary application eview fee X. Stop work order $ 200 1. Fee charged for each additional "stop work order" that is issued beyond the original stop work order for illegal construction and grading activity requiring Planning Commission review and approval New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1060. 2 • Section 2. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing View Impairment and Traffic Commission cases: A. View Impaiiiiient $ 500 B. Traffic Commission Review 1. New driveways or other traffic $ 300 related items Section 3. The following fees are established and charged r General Administration processing: A. General Plan B. Zoning Code C. Subdivision Code $ 25 D. Meeting Tapes (Au c io) _ $ 5. E. Budget F. Zoning Map G. Xeroxed copies, each page $ 0.25 H. 'False Alari n 3rd 4th 5th $3 $ 30 $ 50 $ 100 $ 150 $ 200 $ 250 Section 4. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit purrs aft- t to Title 15,'(Building and Construction) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: A 1 /' `- ' BUILDING PERMIT Two and one half times the amount set forth in the Building Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. 2. PARKS AND RECREATION Each new residential dwelling shall pay 2% of the first $100,000 of construction valuation, plus 0.5% of such valuation over $ 100,000. New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1060. 3 • • B. PLUMBING PERMIT C. MECHANICAL PERMIT D. ELECTRICAL PERMIT E. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW Two and one half times the amount set forth in the Plumbing Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. Two and one half times the amount set forth in the Mechanical Code for each fee, table and schedule therein. Two and one half times the amount set forth in the Efeetricat Code for each fee, table and. schedule there , 0.42%4?the valuation of the%proposed struefures; however, minimum fee shall e y$535.00eand the maximum fee shall e\:$3,58$:00 Section 5. The following fees are established and shall be collected for each permit pursuant to Title 15, (Building and Construction) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code for review conducted by a City -approved consultant other than Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety: A. BUILDING PERMIT In addition to the provisions of Section 4 A.1 of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City -approved consultant. RMIT In addition to the provisions of Section 4 B. of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City -approved consultant. C. <MECHANICAL PERMIT In addition to the provisions of Section 4 C of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City -approved consultant. New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1060. 4 t • • D. ELECTRICAL PERMIT E. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REV( In addition to the provisions of Section 4 D of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City - approved consultant In addition to;the provisions of Section 4 E of this resolution ca 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County apartment of Building and Safety fess shall be char ged for, the alternative use of the City -approved consultant. Section 6. The following fees are establis and shall be collected for each permit relating to construction and demolition waste: A. CONSTRUCTION ND $ 25 single project permit DEMOLITION $ 250'annual3permit Section 7. The fees set forth in Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 above do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing such services. Section 8. •Tile City Council Resolutions Nos. 493, 494, 496, 691, 854, 931 and 1034 are hereby rescinded. ND ADOPTED this day of , 2009. THOMAS HEINSHEIMER, MAYOR ATTEST: Heidi Luce Interim Deputy City Clerk New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1060. 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) §§ I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE/CI F ROLLING HILLS CONSOLIDATING SEVERAL PREVIOUSW.ESTABLISHED FEE RESOLUTIONS FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY INCLUDING BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO PLANNING, ZONING AND SUBDIVISION; ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS; ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION PERMITS; GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND PROCESSING: TRAFFIC REVIEW AND VIEW IMPAIRMENT REVIEW: A TDING CERTAIN FEES AND ESTABLISHING NEW FEES RELATIVE` TO)LIGHTING ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION; CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND OTHER CITY SERVICES AND CHARGES AND REPEALING CITY COUNCIL SOLUTIONS NO: 493, 494, 496, 691, 854, 931 and 1034. was approved and ado following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTA and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. New and amended provisions are in bold Resolution No 1060. 2009 by the DEPUTY CITY CLERK 6 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL AND POSTING STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I am a citizen of the United States. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within proceeding; my business address is 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. On the 28th day of April , 2009, I serve the within CITY COUNCIL — Notice of Public Hearing Resolution No. 1060 establishing new fees a copy of which is annexed hereto and made a part hereof, on the person, or persons, named below by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Rolling Hills, California addressed as follows: EMAILED PV News Also posted at City Hall. MAILED DELIVERED None None. I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the 28th day of April , 2009 at Rolling Hills, California. EWA NIKODEM ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT 1City./ Hin • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills will hold a public hearing during their regularly scheduled meeting to be held on Monday, May 11, 2009, commencing at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California to consider the following: RESOLUTION NO. 1060: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CONSOLIDATING SEVERAL PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED FEE RESOLUTIONS FOR SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY INCLUDING BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO PLANNING, ZONING AND SUBDIVISION; ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS; ISSUANCE OF, CONSTRUCTION PERMITS; GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND PROCESSING: TRAFFIC REVIEW AND VIEW IMPAIRMENT REVIEW: AMENDING CERTAIN FEES AND ESTABLISHING NEW FEES RELATIVE TO LIGHTING ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION; CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTATION AND OTHER CITY SERVICES AND CHARGES AND REPEALING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS NO. 493, 494, 496, 691, 854, 931 and 1034. Any person wishing to review the documents pertaining to the Ordinance may do so prior to the public hearing at City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills any time during office hours. The staff report will be available after 4:00 pm 011 Friday, May 8, 2009. City Hall office hours are Monday through Friday from 7:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 3-(eidCi _Luce DEPUTY CITY CLERK Publish once in the Palos Verdes Peninsula News Thursday, April 30, 2009 Printed on Recycled Paper Ctty f,errnS�v�u INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: ANTON DAHLERBRUCH SUBJECT: FEES AND CHARGES DATE: FEBRUARY 22, 2008 The City charges fees for planning -related services (discretionary review) such as site plan review and applications for a conditional use permit and a variance. These fees are paid by an applicant at City Hall when submitting an application. Thereafter, with approval of the project by the Planning Commission and City Council, an applicant submits detailed construction plans to the City's contractor (either the Los Angeles County Department of Building & Safety (County) or Willdan) for plan check. Following plan check, an applicant then obtains a building permit for building construction and inspection. An applicant pays a separate fee for plan check and a building permit. Fees for most all of the City's discretionary review services are based on a study conducted in 1996. The study has not been updated since 1996. County fees for plan check and building permits are based on the valuation of the project and, the fees -are updated annually based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Based on a 1985 Resolution adopted by the City Council, the County also charges a 2.5 multiplier on their fees on behalf of the City. The cumulative fees are collected from the applicant by the County and deposited in a County account. The County, in turn, keeps track of the staff time needed for providing the designated service(s) and on a monthly basis, sends the City a statement. Typically, in comparing the hours provided for the service(s) to the total fees collected, the County remits funds to the City to cover City costs. On average, over the past five years, 40% to 50% of the total fees collected are remitted to the City. Attached you will find, for comparative purposes, the multipliers applied by other cities. Recently, the City executed an agreement with Willdan for plan check, permitting and inspection services. Willdan committed in their agreement to provide their services in what is projected to be half the time of the County. Page 1 of 3 Printed on Recycled Paper Willdan will be charging the applicant the same total fees as the County plus a City surcharge of 25%. The cost of Willdan's services are projected to be more than the County. As such, the surcharge is to reflect the City's added cost of contract administration and direct service to applicants. DISCUSSION It appears that the City does not have documentation to justify its multiplier applied to County fees. As such, it may be that the fees generated from the multiplier exceed the City's value added to the cost of providing the County service. Moreover, the user fee study justifying the City's fees for discretionary review is over 10 years old and, they may also not reflect the cost of providing services. Therefore, as part of the proposed 2008-09 budget, staff will be proposing to complete a user fee analysis. The user fee analysis would be conducted by tracking all staff hours (including the City Attorney) and costs (including, for example, the value of building space). Upon completion of the analysis, a report will be prepared that provides the City Council with the total costs in comparison to existing fees, thus providing the City Council with the opportunity to evaluate the options and consider modifications. CONCLUSION If there are questions with regard to this approach, please let me know. AD/ 02-22-08packet memo re fees.doc cc: Nan Huang, Finance Director Page 2 of 3. Attachment Comparative Multipliers Provided By: Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety, Lomita Office The following is a list of contract cities that apply a multiplier grouped by whether or not they have been annually adjusting by the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Cities that update fees annually by the CPI Artesia (except Permit Issuing Fee) - Cerritos Duarte - Industry - Lomita - Rolling Hills Rolling Hills Estates (new construction) - Rolling Hills Estates (remodels) Westlake Village - Cities that do not update fees by the CPI Carson - Commerce - Irwindale - La Canada Flintridge - Lakewood - La Mirada - Lawndale Santa Fe Springs - Temple City - Multiplier 2 1 2 1 2 2.5 3 2 2 Multiplier 2 based on 1991 fees Based on a County derivative 1.25 based on 2004 fees Based on a County derivative Based on a County derivative Based on a County derivative 1.5 based on 2004 fees 1 based on 2004 fees 1.5 based on 2002 fees Page 3 of 3 Asia. 4gEsPa dfallIEZet, 412115116. airaillib 1996 FEE STUlY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ATTN: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER FROM: CRAIG MOONEYHAM, ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN RE: CITY COST RELATIONS TO FEE SCHEDULE DATE: JULY 29, 1996 BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the appropriateness of Rolling Hills' fees for. services. The primary research involved ascertaining the costs of labor and material associated with each particular fee. All employees were surveyed in regards to time involved with performing each specific task. Labor costs were determined by establishing the cost per hour for each employee, including base salary and support costs.' Support costs represent the City's contribution to employee insurance, PERS, FICA, Medicare, Work. Comp., State U.I. and auto allowance. This figure was then multiplied by employee hours contributed to the task. Research was also conducted regarding. a Dog Attack Appeal where no fee exists. FINDINGS: The findings of this study indicate that the labor and material expense to the City of Rolling Hills is equal to or in excess of the fees currently charged. The survey also showed costs to administer a Dog Attack Appeal Fee at $708.09. All work used in determining the aforementioned claims and figures is included. CRN:cam fees e 0/ INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Review ❑ Variance $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,250 ❑ Variance, Minor $ 750 Minor deviation into required yard setback, not exceeding 5' and attached to main residential structure ❑ Plan Modification 2/3 of original application fee FEE SCHEDULE* O Zone Change NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS. CALIF_ 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX (310) 377.7288 $ 2,000 ❑ Zoning Amendment $ 2,000 ❑ General Plan Amendment $ 2,000 O Lot Line Adjustment O Tentative Parcel Map (Subdivision of 2 - 4 parcels) O Tentative Tract Map (Subdivision of 5+ parcels) $ 1,500 $ 1,500 and county fees plus 20% $ 1,500 and county fees plus 20% Required with li above applications (singular or combined) by state government code. 0 - Environmental Review $ 200 plus county & state fees ❑ Appeal Fee ❑ Negative Declaration ❑ Environmental Impact Report (EIR) ❑ Extension of Time ❑ Final Parcel or Tract Map 2/3 of original application fee $ 1,275 City consultant fee plus 20% $ 200 County fees plus 20% ❑ TRAFFIC COMMISSION REVIEW New driveways or other related items ❑ VIEW IMPAIRMENT COMMII'1"hE REVIEW Impairment of view $ 300 $ 500 EXAMPLE 1: EXAMPLE 2: EXAMPLE 3: Request for a Conditional Use Permit (S1,500) and Variance ($1,250) for a mixed use structure that encroaches into a setback also requires an Environmental Review ($200) for a total of $2,950. Request for Tentative Parcel and Tract Map (S1,500) for subdivision, require an Environmental Review ($200) plus a Negative Declaration ($1,275) for a total of S2,975. Anything under the double line requires a single fee. ° In accordance with RESOLUTION NO. 691 r3ATFTl CFPTP'A1 pv IQ ,on," RESOLUTION NO. 691 A RESOLUTION OF THE C. :.' COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS SEIZING FEES FOR PLANNING, ZONING, SUBDIVISIONS, VIEW IMPAIRMENT, TRAFFIC COMMISSION REVIEW, AND, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, AND RESCINDING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 614. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing discretionary cases for Planning and Zoning, and Subdivisions and shall be paid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Sections 17.40.040 and 16.12.060 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: A. Conditional Use Permit B. Site Plan Review C Variance D Variance, Minor 1. Minor deviation into required yard setback, not exceeding 5' and attached to main residential structure. E. Plan Modification F. Appeal Fee G Zone Change H Zoning Amendment I General -Plan Amendment J " Environmental Review K Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Extension of Time Lot line Adjustment Tentative Parcel Map Tentative Tract Map Final Parcel or Tract Map $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,250 $ 750 2/3 of original application fee 2/3 of original application fee $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $200 plus. county & state fees City consultant fee plus 20% $ 200 $ 1,500 $;1,500' and county fees plus 20% $ 1,500 and county fees plus 20% County fees plus 20% Section 2. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing View Impairment and Traffic Commission cases: View Impairment Traffic Commission Review 1 New driveways or other traffic related items. $ 500 $. 300 SUMMATION CHART TASKS EMPLOYEE LABOR (HRS) LABOR COSTS MATERIAL COSTS CUMULATIVE COST OF TASK CURRENT FEE 1) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 40.05 $1,582.90 $168.33 $1,751,23 $1,500.00 2) SITE PLAN REVIEW 39.3 $1,567.46 $168.33 $1,735.79 $1,500.00 3) VARIANCE 34.8 $1,343.62 $168.33 $1,511.95 $1,250.00 4) MINOR VARIANCE 32.8 $1,247.52 $28.33 $1,275.85 $750.00 5) PLAN MODIFICATION 29.1. $1,128.45 $28.33 $1,156.78 2/3 ORIGINAL FEE 6) ZONE CHANGE/AMENDMENT 52.8 $2,064.32 $168.33 $2,232.65 $2,000.00 7) LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 46.3 $1,777.75 $28.33 $1,806.08 $1,500.00 8) SUBDIVISION/PARCEL TRACT MAP 75,3 $2,913.70 $168.33 $3,082.03 $1,500.00 9) FINAL PARCEL OR TRACT MAP 15.75 $652.45 $0.32 $652.77 $1,500.00 10) APPEAL FEE 9.55 $418.40 $0.64. $419.04 COUNTY FEE PLUS 20% 11) NEGATIVE DECLARATION 8.75 $366.56 $0.32 $366.88 2/3 ORIGINAL FEE 12) EXTENSION OF TIME 7.55 $332.98 $0.64 $333.62 $0.00 13) ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 6.5 $245.38 $38.46 $283,84 $200.00 14) TRAFFIC COMMISSION REVIEW 6 $350.10 $23.50 $373.60 $300.00 15) VIEW IMPAIRMENT COMMITTEE REVIEW 11 $641.85 $1,647.74 $2,289.59 $500.00 STAFF LABOR NAME TITLE BASE SALARY SUPPORT COST TOTAL ANNUAL COST HOURLY COST CRAIGN EALlS _..__ _....-- CITY MANAGER ---._... __-- $75,762.00 $38,012 31 $113,774.31 - $58_35 LOLA UNGAR PRINCIPLE PLANNER $53,004.24 $20,612.78 . $73,617.02 $37.75 NAN HUANG SENIOR ACCOUNTANT $45,815,52 $19,425.33 $32,620.42* $33.46 MARILYN KERN DEPUTY CITY CLERK $31,122.00 $11,927.00 $43,049.95 $22.08 MELINDA SCHOEN CLERK TYPIST $21,294.00 $13,643.22 --$34,937.22 $17.92 CRAIG MOONEYHAM ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN $5,928.00 $636.07 $6,654.07 $6.73 GINNY WILSON BOOK KEEPER $7,280 00 $4,027.35* - - -- --- -------$11.06 $77470 _ *COST SPLIT WITH RHCA Conditional Use Permit Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig .Nealis 8 58.35 $468.80 Lola Ungar 26.8 37.75 $1,011.70 Marilyn Kern 2 22.08 $44.16 Melinda Schoen 3.25 17.92 $58.24 $1,582.90 Site Plan Review Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 8 58.35 $466.80 Lola Ungar 26.8 37.75 $1,011.70 Marilyn Kern 2 22.08 $44.16 Melinda Schoen 2.5 17.92 $44.80 $1,567.46 Variance Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 5 58:35 $291.75 Lola. Ungar 25.8 37.75 $973.95 Marilyn Kern 1.5 22.08 $33.12 Melinda Schoen 2.5 17.92 $44.80 $1,343.62 Page 1 MINOR VARIANCE Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 4 $58.35 $233.40 Lola Ungar 24.8 $37.75 $936.20 Marilyn Kern 1.5 $22.08 $33.12 Melinda Schoen 2.5 $17.92 $44.80 $1,247.52 PLAN MODIFICATION Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 5 $58.35. $291.75 Lola Ungar 20,1 $37.75 $758.78 Marilyn Kern 1.5 $22.08 $33.12 Melinda Schoen 2.5 $17.92 $44.80 $1,128.45 ZONE CHANGE/AMENDMENT Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 7 $58.35 $408.45 Lola Ungar 41.8 $37.75 $1,577.95 Marilyn Kern 1.5 $22.08 ' : $33.12 Melinda Schoen 2.5^ $17.92 $44.80 $2,064.32 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1 Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 5 $58.35 $291.75 Lola Ungar 37.3 $37.75 $1,408.08 Marilyn Kern 1.5 $22.08 $33.12 Melinda Schoen 2.5 $17.92 $44.80 $1,777.75 SUBDIVISION/PARCEL-TRACT MAP Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 7 $58.35 $408.45 Lola Ungar 64.3 $37.75 $2,427.33 $33.12 Marilyn Kern 1.5 $22.08 Melinda Schoen 2.5 $17.92 $44.80 $2,913.70 FINAL PARCEL -TRACT MAP Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 3 $58.35 $175.05 Lola Ungar 12.5 $37.75 $471.88 Marilyn Kern 0.25 $22.08 $5.52 Melinda Schoen 0 $17.92 $0.00 $652.45 APPEAL FEE Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis - 3 $58.35 $175.05 Lola Ungar 6.3 $37.75 $237.83 Marilyn Kern 0.25 $22.08 $5.52 Melinda Schoen 0 $17,92 $0.00 $418.40 NEGATIVE DECLARATION Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 2 $58.35 $116,70 Lola Ungar 6,5 $37.75 245.38 Marilyn Kern 0 $22.08 $0.00 Melinda Schoen 0.25 $17.92 $4.48 $366.56 EXTENSION OF TIME Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 3 $58.35 $175.05 $143.45 Lola Ungar 3.8 $37.75 Marilyn Kern 0.25 $22.08 $5.52 $8.96 Melinda Schoen 0.5 $17.92 $332.98 DOG ATTACK APPEAL Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 11 58.35 $641.85 Lola Ungar 0 37.75 $0.00 Marilyn Kern 3 22.08 $66.24 Melinda Schoen 0 17.92 moo $ 708.09 TRAFFIC COMMISSION REVIEW Craig Nealis 6 $58.35 $350.10 Lola Ungar 0 $37.75 $0.00 Marilyn Kern 0 $22.08 $0.00 Melinda Schoen 0 $17.92 $0.00 $350.10 VIEW IMPAIRMENT REVIEW Employee Hours Cost 1 Totals Craig Nealis 11 $58.35 $641,85 Lola Ungar 0. $37.75 $0.00 Marilyn Kern 0 $22.08 $0.00 Melinda Schoen 0 $17.92 $0.00 $641.85 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis $58.35 $0.00 Lola Ungar 6.5 $37.75 $245.38 Marilyn Kern 0 $22.08 $0.00 Melinda Schoen 0 $17.92 $0.00 $245.38 PLANNING TASKS VS. TIME CITY MANAGER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (May require Negative Declaration) TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review 1.0 Public Hearing Notice Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates 1,0 Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 2.0 City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant .5 Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Traffic Commission review (driveway) 1.5" Traffic Engineer review (driveway) 1.0 Meeting with Planner .5 Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 7.0 SITE PLAN REVIEW May require Negative. Declaration) TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review 1.0 Public Hearing Notice .. Notice to residents Status & field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates 1.0 Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 2.0 City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant ,5 Resolution preparation Certified letter w/ plan & appeal period Landscape plan to consultant Traffic Commission review (driveway) 1.5 Traffic Engineer review (driveway) 1.0 Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner :5 Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 8.0 VARIANCE TASK AVERAGE T1riiE/HOURS Environmental review Application review 1.0 Public Hearing Notice Notice to residents Status & field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates 1.0 Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 2.0 City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period Landscape plan to. consultant Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner .5 Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 5.0 MINOR VARIANCE TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review 1.0 Public Hearing Notice Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates 1.0 Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 1.0 City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping• Results of case letter to applicant Resolution. preparation Certified letter w/plan ::& appeal period Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner .5 Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 4.0 PLAN MODIFICATION TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review 1.0 Public Hearing Notice Notice to residents Status & field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates 1.0 Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 2.0 City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation C.ertified letter w/plan & appeal period Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner .5 Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 5.0 ZONE CHANGE, ZONING AMENDMENT, AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (Also require Negative Declaration) TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review 1.0 Public Hearing Notice Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates 1.0 Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall &Field Trip) 2.0 City Council reports Phone calls application Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan Meeting with Planner .5 Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 5.0 LOT LINE ADIUSTMENT TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review 1.0 Public Hearing Notice Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation /updates 1.0 Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 2.0. City. Council reports Phone calls application Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan Certificate of Compliance Form + Meets and. Bounds Review County Fees Meeting with Planner .5 Staff Meeting .5. TOTAL 5.0 SUBDIVISION/TENTATIVE PARCEL OR TRACT MAP TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Regional Planning review meeting Environmental review Application review 1.0 Public Hearing Notice Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates 1.0 Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 2.0 City Council reports Phone calls application Results of case letter to applicant " Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan County Fees Meeting with Planner :5 Staff Meeting .5 Traffic Commission review (driveway) 1.0 Traffic Engineer review (driveway). 1.0 TOTAL. 7.0 .AL PARCEL OR TRA TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Review of Final Map 1.0 Staff report Final Map to City Council 1.0 Final Map Recordation letter County Fees Meeting with Planner 5 Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 3.0 APPEAL FEE TASK 1 AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Notification letter to applicant Staff report 1.0 City Council meeting 1.0 Results of case letter to applicant Phone calls Meeting with Planner .5 `, Staff Meeting • 5 TOTAL ( 3.0 NEGATIVE DECLARATI TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Complete CEQA forms 1.0 Notices to Govm't. Agencies/County Letter to applicant Notice of Determination to County Meeting with Planner • 5 Staff Meeting 5 TOTAL 2.0 EXTENSION OF TIME TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Notification letter to applicant Staff report 1.0 Planning Commission meeting 1.0 Results of case letter to applicant Phone calls Meeting with Planner 5 Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 1 3.0 ANNING TASKS VS. TIME PRINCIPAL PLANNER _CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (May require Negative Declaration) TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review - 5 . Application review 3.0 Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents - 5 Status and field trip letters to applicant 1..0 Staff report preparation/updates 6.0 'Applicant meetings 1.0 Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 2.0 City Council report 1.0 Phone calls application Sr landscaping 1.5 Results of case letter to applicant :5 Resolution preparation 6.0 Certified letter w/plan & appeal period .8 Landscape plan to consultant .5 Landscape plan bond .5 Traffic Commission review (driveway) Traffic Engineer review (driveway) Follow -Up Meeting with Applicant 1.0 Follow -Up Staff Meeting : .5 TOTAL 26.8 SITE PLAN REVIEW (May. require Negative Declaration TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review .5 Application review 3.0 Public Hearing Notice 5 Notice to residents 5 Status & fieldtrig letters to applicant 1:0` Staff report preparation/updates 6.0 Applicant meetings 1.0 Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 2.0_ City Council report 1.0 Phone calls application & landscaping 1.5 Results of case letter to applicant :5 Resolution preparation 6.0 Certified letter w/plan & appeal period .8 Landscape plan to consultant .5 Traffic Commission review (driveway) Traffic Engineer review (driveway) Landscape plan bond._ . ;5_ Follow -Up Meeting with Applicant 1.0 Follow -Up Staff Meeting ,5 TOTAL 26.8 VARIANCE TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review .5 Application review 3.0 Public Hearing Notice ,5 Notice to residents .5 Status & field trip letters to applicant 1.0 `. Staff report preparation/updates 6.0 Applicant meetings 1.0 Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 2.0 City Council report . 1.0 Phone calls application & landscaping 1.5 Results of case letter to applicant .5 Resolution preparation 5.0 Certified letter w/ plan appeal period .8 Landscape plan to consultant .5 Landscape plan bond .5 Follow -Up Meeting with Applicant 1.0 Follow -Up Staff Meeting • 5 TOTAL 25.8 MINOR VARIANCE TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review .5 Application review 2.0 Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents ` .5 Status and field trip letters to applicant 1.0 Staff report preparation/updates 6.0 Applicant meetings 1.0 Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) -2,0 City Council report 1.0 Phone calls application & landscaping 1.5 Results of case letter to applicant .5, Resolution preparation 5.0 Certified letter w/plan & appeal period .8 Landscape plan to consultant . .5 Landscape plan bond ,5 Follow -Up Meeting with Applicant 1.0 Follow -Up Staff Meeting. .5 TOTAL ` :. 24.8 PLAN MODIFICATION TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review 5 Application review 1.0 Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to `residents .5 Status.&rfieldtrip letters to applicant 1.0 Staff report preparation/updates ' 2.5 Applicant meetings 1.0 Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 1.0 City Council report .8 Phone calls application & landscaping ' 1.5 Results of case letter to applicant .5, Resolution preparation 60 Certified letter w/plan & appeal period .8 Landscape plan to consultant 5 Landscape plan bond ; • Follow -Up Meeting with Applicant 1.0 Follow -Up Staff Meeting 5 TOTAL 20.1 ZONE CHANGE, ZONING AMENDMENT, AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (Also require Negative Declaration) TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review 5 , Application review 2.0 Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents .5 Status and field trip letters to applicant 10 Staff report preparation/updates 12.0 Applicant meetings 30 Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 3.0 City Council reports 3.0 Phone calls application 1.5 Results of case letter to applicant . .5 Resolution preparation 12.0 Certified letter w/plan 8 Follow -Up Meeting with Applicant 1.0 Follow -Up Staff Meeting .5 . - TOTAL _ 41.8 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review .5 Application review 8.0 Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents .5 Status and field trip letters to applicant . 1.0 Staff report preparation/updates 8.0 Applicant meetings 2.0 Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 3.0 City Council reports 1.0 Phone calls application 1.0` Results of case letter to applicant . 5 Resolution preparation 6.0 Certified letter w/plan Certificate of Compliance Form + Meets and Bounds Review 3.0 County Fees , Unknown Follow -Up Meetin&with Applicant 1.0 Follow -Up Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 37.3 SUBDIVISION/TENTATIVE PARCEL OR TRACT MAP TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Regional Planning review meeting 3.0 Environmental review 5 Application review 8.0 Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents .5 Status and field trip letters to applicant ; 1.0 Staff report preparation/updates : 12.0 Applicant meetings 3.0 Public meetings (City Hall &. Field Trip) 3.0 City Council reports 3.0 Phone calls, application 1.5 , Results of case letter to applicant .5 Resolution preparation 24.0 Certified letter w/plan .8 County Fees. Unknown Follow -Up. Meeting with, Applicant 2.0 Follow -Up Staff Meeting 1.0 Traffic Commission review (driveway) Traffic Engineer' review (driveway) TOTAL ,__ . .: _ . . __ . � `..64:3. FINAL PARCEL OR TRACT MAP TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Review of FinalMap 8.0 Staff report Final Map to City Council 2.0 Final Map Recordation letter .5 County Fees Unknown Meeting with Applicant .5 Staff Meeting .5 Follow -Up Meeting with Applicant .5 Follow -Up Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 12.5 APPEAL FEE TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Notification letter to applicant .5 Staff report 2.0 City Council meeting .3 Results of case letter to applicant .5 Phone calls .5 Meeting with Applicant .5 Staff Meeting .5 Follow -Up Meeting with Applicant .5 Follow -Up Staff Meeting 1.0 TOTAL 6.3 NEGATIVE DECLARATION TASK . AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review .5 Complete CEQA forms 3.0 Notices.to Gov't. Agencies/County 2.0 Letter to applicant 5 Notice of Determination to County .5 Meeting with Applicant. Staff Meeting TOTAL 6.5 EXTENSION OF TIME TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Notification letter to applicant 5 Staff report 2.0 Planning Commission meeting .3 Results of case letter to applicant .5 Phone calls .5 Meeting with Applicant Staff Meeting TOTAL 3.8 'LANNING TASKS VS. TIME DEPUTY CITY CLERK CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (May require Negative Declaration) TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .25 Notice to residents .25 Status and field trip letters to. applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) .50 City Council report .50 Phone calls application _& landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period. Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Traffic Commission. review (driveway) .50 Traffic Engineer review (driveway) Meeting with Planner StaffMeeting TOTAL 2.0 SITE PLAN REVIEW May require Negative Declaration TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .25 Notice to residents .25 Status & field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) .50 City Council report .50 Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter Iv /plan & appeal period Landscape plan to consultant Traffic Commission review (driveway) :50 Traffic Engineerreview (driveway) Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL 2:0 VARIANCE TASK AVERAGE Tlleit/HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .25 Notice to residents .25 Status & field trip letters to applicant Staffreport preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall &Field Trip) .50 City Council report .- ' .50 Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL I 1.5 MINOR VARIANCE TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review. Application review Public Hearing Notice .25 Notice to residents .25 Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings .50 Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) .50 City Council report Phone .calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to -applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/ plan & appeal period Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL I 1.5 PLAN MODIFICATION TASK 1 AVERAGE.TIME/HOURS" Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .25 Notice to residents - .25 Status & field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/ updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) .50 City Council report .50 Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL 1.5 ZONE CHANGE, ZONING AMENDMENT, AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (Also require.Negative Declaration) TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .25 Notice to residents .25 Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) .50 City Council reports .50 Phone calls application Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan Meeting with. Planner. Staff Meeting TOTAL 1.5 'LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT TASK AVERAGE TIME/ HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .25 Notice to residents .25 Status and field trip letters to. applicant Staff report preparation/ updates Applicant meetings, Public meetings (City Hall :& Field Trip) .50 City Council reports .50 Phone calls application Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/ plan Certificate of Compliance Form + Meets and Bounds Review County Fees Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL 1.5 SUBDIVISION/TENTATIVE PARCEL OR TRACT MAP TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Regional Planning review meeting Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .25 Notice to residents .25 Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) .50 City Council reports .50 Phone calls application Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan County Fees Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting Traffic Commission review (driveway) .25 Traffic Engineer review (driveway) TOTAL 1.75 TASK . 1 AVERAGE TIME /HOURS. Review of Final Map Staff report Final Map to City Council .25 Final Map Recordation letter County Fees Meeting with Planner Staff, Meeting TOTAL .25 APPEAL FEE TASK I AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Notification letter to applicant Staff report City Council meeting .25 Results of case letter to applicant Phone calls Meeting with Planner ; Staff Meeting TOTAL .25 NEGATIVE DECLARATION TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Complete CEQA forms Notices to Govm't. Agencies /County Letter to applicant Notice of Determination to. CounV Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL EXTENSION OF TIME TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Notification letter to applicant Staff report Planning`Commission meeting .25 Results of case letter to applicant Phone calls Meeting with Planner . Staff Meeting TOTAL .25 'LANNING TASKS VS. TIME CLERK/ TYPIST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (May require Negative Declaration) TASK AVERAGE TIME /HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents 1.5 Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) .5 City Council report Phone calls application &-landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation .25 Certified letter w/ plan & appeal period .5 Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Traffic Commission review. (driveway) Traffic Engineer review (driveway) Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL 3.25 SITE PLAN REVIEW (May require Negative Declaration) TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents 1.5 Status & field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council report. Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period .5 Landscape plan to consultant Traffic Commission review (driveway) Traffic Engineer review (driveway) Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL 2.5 VARIANCE TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents 1.5 Status & field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period .5 Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL 2:5 MINOR VARIANCE TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents 1.5 Status and field trip letter's to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City_ Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution- preparation Certified letter w/ plan & appeal period .5 Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL 2.5 PLAN MODIFICATION TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice. .5 Notice to residents 1.5 Status & field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period .5 Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting, TOTAL 2.5 ZONE CHANGE, ZONING AMENDMENT, AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (Also require Negative Declaration) TASK . AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents 1.5 Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council reports Phone calls application Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan .5 Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL 2.5 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents 1.5 Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council reports Phone calls application Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/ plan .5 Certificate of Compliance Form + Meets and Bounds Review County Fees Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL 2.5 SUBDIVISION /TENTATIVE PARCEL OR TRACT MAP TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Regional Planning review meeting Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice 5 Notice to residents 1.5 Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council reports Phone calls application Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan .5 County Fees Meeting with Planner Staff. Meeting Traffic Commission review (driveway) Traffic Engineer review (driveway) TOTAL 2.5 h 4AL PARCEL OR TRACT MAP TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Review of Final Map Staff report Final Map to City Council Final Map Recordation letter County Fees Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL ,. 0 APPEAL FEE TASK. AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Notification letter to applicant Staff report City Council meeting Results of case letter to applicant Phone calls Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL p NEGATIVE DECLARATION TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Complete CEQA forms Notices to Govm't. Agencies/County Letter to applicant .25 Notice of Determination to. County Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL .25 EXTENSION OF TIME TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Notification letter to applicant .25 Staff report Planning Commission meeting Results of case letter to applicant 25 Phone calls Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL .50 NNING TASKS vs. MATERIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (May require Negative Declaration} TASK (: MATERIAL COSTS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice $23.50 Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant ` $0.96 Staff report preparation/updates Applicant' meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping. Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period $2.20 .+ $1.67 POSTAGE Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Traffic Commission review (driveway) Public Hearing Notice in Newspaper $140.00 Meeting with Planner- _ Staff Meeting TOTAL $168.33 SI'Z'E PLAN REVIEW May require Negative Declarati TASK MATERIAL COSTS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice $23.50 Notice to residents Status & field trip letters to applicant $0.96 Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation { Certified letter w/plan & appeal period . $2.20 + $1.67 POSTAGE Landscape plan to consultant Traffic Commission review (driveway) Public Hearing Notice in Newspaper . $140.00 Landscape plan bond Meeting with. Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL $168.33 TASK MATERIAL COSTS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice $23.50 Notice to residents Status & field trip letters to applicant $0.96 Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City. Hall & Field Trip) City Council report Phone calls application &landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period $2.20 + $1.67 POSTAGE Public Hearing Notice in Newspaper . $140.00 Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL $168.33 MINOR VARIANCE TASK MATERIAL COSTS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice $23.50 Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant $0.96 Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall Sr Field Trip) City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan Sr appeal period $2.20 + $1.67 POSTAGE Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL $28.33 PLAN TASK ' MATERIAL COSTS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice - $23.50 Notice to residents Status & field trip letters to applicant $0.96 Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period $2.20 + $1.67 POSTAGE Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL $28.33 ZONE CHANGE, ZONING AMENDMENT, AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (Also. require Negative Declaration) TASK MATERIAL"COSTS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice $23.50 Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant $0.96 Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council reports Public Hearing Notice in Newspaper $140.00 Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan $2.20 + $1.67 POSTAGE Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL $168.33 LOT LINE. ADJUSTMENT TASK MATERIAL .COSTS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice $23.50 Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant $0.96 Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council reports Phone calls application Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/ plan $2.20 + $1.67 POSTAGE. Certificate of Compliance Form + Meets and Bounds Review County Fees Meeting with Planner , Staff Meeting TOTAL $28.33 SUBDIVISION/TENTATIVE PARCEL OR TRACT MAP TASK MATERIAL COSTS Regional Planning review meeting Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice $23.50 Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant $0.96 Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council reports Public Hearing Notice in Newspaper $140.00 Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan $2.20 + $1.67 POSTAGE County Fees Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting. Traffic Commission review (driveway) Traffic Engineer review (driveway) TOTAL $168.33 FINAL PARCEL OR TRACT MAP TASK �. MATERIAL COSTS Review of Final Map Staff report Final Map to City Council Final Map Recordation letter $0.32 County Fees Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL ) $0.32 APPEAL FEE TASK MATERIAL COSTS Notification letter to applicant $0.32 Staff report City Council meeting Results of case letter to applicant $0.32 Phone calls Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL $0.64 NEGATIVE DECLARATION [We have been charging $1,275 ($1,250 Fish & Game fee + $25 County Clerk filing fee) but, have been advised by the County Clerk that this isno longer necessary. All cases have been waived by Fish & Game and we returned the $1,250 fee to the applicant after 6 months. The County Clerk kept the $25)1. TASK . MATERIAL COSTS Environmental review Complete CEQA forms Notices to Govm't. Agencies/ County Letter to applicant Notice of Determination to County Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL $0.00 EXTENSION OF TIME TASK MATERIAL COSTS Notification letter to applicant $0.32 Staff report Planning Commission meeting Results of case letter to applicant $0.32 Phone calls Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL $0.64 AFFIC COMMISSION REVIEW TASK MATERIAL COSTS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case.letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appealperiod- Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Traffic Commission review (driveway) Traffic Engineer review (driveway) Staff Meeting Follow -Up Staff Meeting TOTAL $0:00 VIEW IMPAIRMENT COMMITTEE REVIEW TASK MATERIAL COSTS Environmental Review Application review Public Hearing Notice Notice to residents $23.50 Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/ updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip). City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results ofcase letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period $7.74 Landscape plan to consultant Public Hearing Notice in Newspaper $140.00 Mediation Expenses $1500.00 Traffic Engineer review (driveway) _ .. Staff Meeting Follow -Up Staff Meeting TOTAL $1,671.24 ;NNING TASKS vs. MATERIAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW TASK MATERIAL COSTS Fee to County Clerk $25.00 Application review Public Hearing Notice Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff reportpreparation / updates Letters to Applicants $0.96 Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council report Phone calls application &landscaping Resultsof case letter to applicant Negative Declaration $12.50 Certified letter w/plan & appeal period Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Traffic Commission review (driveway) Traffic Engineer review (driveway) Staff Meeting . Follow -Up Staff Meeting TOTAL $38.46 WI LLDAN Financial Services City of Rolling Hills Comprehensive User Fee Study Monday, February 23, 2009 extending your reach • WI LLDAN Financial Services User Fee Studies extending your reach According to California law, a City can impose fees for government services when: — Individual use of the service is voluntary — The fee charged is reasonably related to the level of service and the cost of providing the service • A User Fee Study helps to ensure that the City's fees: — Meet the statutory test — Recover up to 100% of its costs in providing services — Identifies where the General Fund is subsidizing current fees City of Rolling Hills —User Fee Analysis 12 WI LLDAN Financial Services User Fee Study Components extending your reach • A review of the department budgets • Identification of appropriate overhead cost allocations • A comprehensive listing of each department's staffing levels and associated fully burdened hourly pay rates • A time/materials survey of each service for which a fee is contemplated • User Fee Schedule City of Rolling Hills —User Fee Analysis 13 WI LLDAN Financial Services User Fee Analysis Methodology extending your reach • Case Study Method - estimates actual labor and material costs associatedwith providing a unit of service to a single user - Costs are based on: ■ Interviews with staff ■ A records review ■ A "time and materials" analysis based on actual costs including staff time (at fully burdened rates) and material costs (including outside contractor costs, if applicable) City of Rolling Hills —User Fee Analysis 14 WI LLDAN Financial Services User Fee Data Collection extending your reach • User Fee Studies use three cost layers that, when combined, constitute the fully burdened cost of a service; these cost layers are defined as: — Direct Labor - staff hours spent directly on fee -related services — Departmental Overhead - hours spent on staff supervision and administrative activities and applicable supplies and materials costs — Central Services Overhead - costs of Central Services Departments that support the Operating Departments City of Rolling Hills —User Fee Analysis 15 extending your reach WI LLDAN Financial Services User Fee Cost Layers Personnel Costs (Salary & Benefits) City of Rolling Hills —User Fee Analysis 16 • WI LLDAN Financial Services extending your reach Fully Burdened Hourly Rates Example ©f Ron KKR, -Usw Fm®. Pta Departmental Indirect Costs Administration -Personnel Costs Operations Total Departmental Indirect Costs WI LLDAN Financial Services Time/Materials Surveys extending your reach • A Time/Materials Survey determines the amount of time each employee spends on a service — Employees may spend anywhere from a few minutes to several hours on a service o A Time/Materials Survey provides department management with an opportunity to assess the time requirements for each service City of Rolling Hills —User Fee Analysis f 8 extending your reach WI LLDAN Financial Services TimetateriaIs Survey Exarr►ple Time (in minutes) determined by City staff. WI LLDAN Financial Services extending your reach Questions & Answers City of Rolling Hills —User Fee Analysis 110 Projected fiscal impact re: planning services* Total Cases 12 10 3 3 11 1 3 2 25 User Fee Per Case $ 5,362 $ 4,653 $ 5,362 $ 5,362 $ 1,561 $ 1,524 $ 1,187 $ 2,705 User Fee Revenues $ 64,344 $ 46,530 $ 16,086 $ 16,086 $ 17,171 $ 1,524 $ 3,561 $ 5,410 $ 170,712 FY 2007/2008 Actual Revenue Use Fee Study Difference Full Cost Recovery Building Permits Revenues County Pln Rev, Bldg & Inspc Fee Revenue $ 558,080.94 (B&S Inspection Charges to City) (192,156.25) Net Permit Fee Revenue 365,924.69 Administrative Fee Revenue $ 91,940.00 * Estimated based on 58 OTC permits, 25 PC approvals and 83 (58+25) bldg permits City Variance, Ping & Zoning Fee Revenue Total Revenues 40,850.00 170,712.00 406,774.69 $ 262,652.00 $ (144,122.69) Will vary depending on the valuation threshold for the "Administrative Fee" and if there is an increased level code enforcement activities Off Kfith ser 9G- e p U Anticipated financial impact to City from recommendations • +/- $145,000 reduction in planning -related revenue (8.6%) • Increase in traffic and animal related revenues • City's fixed costs to be covered by tax revenue in annual budget; discretionary expenditures to be covered by building revenue. Notes: FY 08/09 Adopted Revenue Budget $ 805,000 — Tax revenue $ 147,000 — Motor Vehicle License fee $ 400,000 — Building fee (generated from multiplier) $ 50,600 — Other Licenses & Permits (City collected) $ 13,200 — Fines and Violations $ 187,191 — Use of Money $ 80,000 — Other revenue $1,682,991 - Total Budgeted Revenue City of Rolling Hills —User Fee Analysis 12 Summary of recommendations • Full cost recovery fees for planning and other City services (e.g. animal - related services) • New "Administrative Fee" at Building and Safety counter (applied when the valuation of a project is at an established threshold) • Elimination of 2.5 multiplier at Building and Safety counter • No change in penalty fees (e.g., false alarms) Reduced fees for copies of documents City of Rolling Hills —User Fee Analysis 13 Pro Con Receive revenue at the time service is provided City fees appear higher than other cities Service fees collected sooner for deposit in bank 2 -years from now, people do not recall the reduction in fees With economic slowdown, City may see little impact City personnel collect fees at counter (rather than fees paid at Bldg & Safety Upfront fees could reduce development speculation Applicant pays actual cost for service City of Rolling Hills —User Fee Analysis 14 Next steps • Recommended fees from User Study will be proposed for FY 09/10 Schedule of Fees and Charges; public hearing scheduled for May 11, 2009 • Will include additional new fees for outdoor lighting inspection and C&D waste monitoring • Staff to monitor revenue in 2009/10 and report quarterly to City Council • Financial impact to be analyzed for consideration of changes City of Rolling Hills —User Fee Analysis 15 ofieling INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ANTON DAHLERBRUCH FEES AND CHARGES FEBRUARY 22, 2008 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 The City charges fees for planning -related services (discretionary review) such as site plan review and applications for a conditional use permit and a variance. These fees are paid by an applicant at City Hall when submitting an application. Thereafter, with approval of the project by the Planning Commission and City Council, an applicant submits detailed construction plans to the City's contractor (either the Los Angeles County Department of Building & Safety (County) or Willdan) for plan check. Following plan check, an applicant then obtains a building permit for building construction and inspection. An applicant pays a separate fee for plan check and a building permit. Fees for most all of the City's discretionary review services are based on a study conducted in 1996. The study has not been updated since 1996. County fees for plan check and building permits are based on the valuation of the project and, the fees are updated annually based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Based on a 1985 Resolution adopted by the City Council, the County also charges a 2.5 multiplier on their fees on behalf of the City. The cumulative fees are collected from the applicant by the County and deposited in a County account. The County, in turn, keeps track of the staff time needed for providing the designated service(s) and on a monthly basis, sends the City a statement. Typically, in comparing the hours provided for the service(s) to the total fees collected, the County remits funds to the City to cover City costs.. On average, over the past five years, 40% to 50% of the total fees collected are remitted to the City. Attached you will find, for comparative purposes, the multipliers applied by other cities. Recently, the City executed an agreement with Willdan for plan check, permitting and inspection services. Willdan committed in their agreement to provide their services in what is projected to be half the time of the County. Page 1 of 3 Printed on Recycled Paper • • Willdan will be charging the applicant the same total fees as the County plus a City surcharge of 25%. The cost of Willdan's services are projected to be more than the County. As such, the surcharge is to reflect the City's added cost of contract administration and direct service to applicants. DISCUSSION It appears that the City does not have documentation to justify its multiplier applied to County fees. As such, it may be that the fees generated from the multiplier exceed the City's value added to the cost of providing the County service. Moreover, the user fee study justifying the City's fees for discretionary review is over 10 years old and, they may also not reflect the cost of providing services. Therefore, as part of the proposed 2008-09 budget, staff will be proposing to complete a user fee analysis. The user fee analysis would be conducted by tracking all staff hours (including the City Attorney) and costs (including, for example, the value of building space). Upon completion of the analysis, a report will be prepared that provides the City Council with the total costs in comparison to existing fees, thus providing the City Council with the opportunity to evaluate the options and consider modifications. CONCLUSION If there are questions with regard to this approach, please let me know. AD/ 02-22-08packet memo re fees.doc cc: Nan Huang, Finance Director Page 2 of 3 Attachment Comparative Multipliers Provided By: Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety, Lomita Office The following is a list of contract cities that apply a multiplier grouped by whether or not they have been annually adjusting by the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Cities that update fees annually by the CPI Artesia (except Permit Issuing Fee) - Cerritos Duarte - Industry - Lomita - Rolling Hills - Rolling Hills Estates (new construction) - Rolling Hills Estates (remodels) Westlake Village - Cities that do not update fees by the CPI Carson - Commerce - Irwindale - La Canada Flintridge - Lakewood - La Mirada - Lawndale - Santa Fe Springs - Temple City - Multiplier 2 1 2 1 2 2.5 3 2 2 Multiplier 2 based on 1991 fees Based on a County derivative 1.25 based on 2004 fees Based on a County derivative Based on a County derivative Based on a County derivative 1.5 based on 2004 fees 1 based on 2004 fees 1.5 based on 2002 fees Page 3 of 3 • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 50TH ANNIVERSARY 1957 - 2007 February 11, 2008 Mr. Roy Itani, District Engineer L. A. County Department of Public Works Building and Safety Division 24320 S. Narbonne Avenue Lomita, CA 90717 Dear My It has come to our attention that the City of Rolling Hills multiplier of 2.5 is applied to copies requested by the public. With this letter, it is requestedthat this practice be discontinued. Going forward, the fee for copies should be at the rate established by the County. NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 If you have any questions, please call me at 310.377.1521. Since n Dahlerbruch ity Manager AD/ 02-11-081 tan i-1 tr. d oc cc: Mayor and City Council Mike Jenkins, City Attorney Nan Huang, Finance Director Printed on Recycled Paper • RESOLUTION NO 1034 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING A 25% SURCHARGE ON LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT FEES FOR AN ALTERNATIVE BUILDING AND SAFETY PERMIIIING PROCESS THROUGH A CITY - APPROVED CONSULTANT AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 496 AND RESOLUTION NO. 931. The City Council of the City of Rolling Hills does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1: Resolution No. 496 is amended by adding thereto a new section 2 to read as follows: Section 2. The following surcharge fee is established and shall be collected for each permit: 1. BUILDING PERMIT In addition to the provisions of paragraph 1 (A) of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City -approved consultant. 2. PLUMBING PERMIT In addition to the provisions of paragraph 2 of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City -approved consultant. 3. MECHANICAL PERMIT In addition to the provisions of paragraph 3 of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City -approved consultant. 4. ELECTRICAL PERMIT In addition to the provisions of paragraph 4 of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City -approved consultant. Section 2: Resolution No. 496 is amended by renaming Section 2 as Section 3. Section 3: Resolution No. 931 is amended by adding thereto a new section 2 to read as follows: Section 2. The following surcharge fee is established and shall be collected for each permit: GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW In addition to the provisions of paragraph 5 of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fess shall be charged for the alternative use of the City - approved consultant. Section 4. The surcharge established herein will not exceed the cost to the City of providing the applicable services. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 11th day of February, 2008 James Black Mayor Resolution No. 1034 -1- ATTEST: Marilyn Kern Deputy City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution 1034 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING A 25% SURCHARGE ON LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT FEES FOR AN ALTERNATIVE BUILDING AND SAFETY PERMITTING PROCESS THROUGH A CITY - APPROVED CONSULTANT AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 496 AND RESOLUTION NO. 931. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on February 11, 2008 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Heinsheimer.,Lay, Pernell, Mayor Pro Tem Hill and Mayor Backe NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. DEPUTY CITY CLERK Resolution No. 1034 -2- • RESOLUTION NO 1034 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING A 25% SURCHARGE ON LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT FEES FOR AN ALTERNATIVE BUILDING AND SAFETY PERMITTING PROCESS THROUGH A CITY - APPROVED CONSULTANT AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 496 AND RESOLUTION NO. 931. The City Council of the City of Rolling Hills does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1: Resolution No. 496 is amended by adding thereto a new section 2 to read as follows: Section 2. The following surcharge fee is established and shall be collected for each permit: 1. BUILDING PERMIT In addition to the provisions of paragraph 1 (A) of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City -approved consultant. 2. PLUMBING PERMIT In addition to the provisions of paragraph 2 of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City -approved consultant. 3. MECHANICAL PERMIT In addition to the provisions of paragraph 3 of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City -approved consultant. 4. ELECTRICAL PERMIT In addition to the provisions of paragraph 4 of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fees shall be charged for the alternative use of the City -approved consultant. Section 2: Resolution No. 496 is amended by renaming Section 2 as Section 3. Section 3: Resolution No. 931 is amended by adding thereto a new section 2 to read as follows: Section 2. The following surcharge fee is established and shall be collected for each permit: GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW In addition to the provisions of paragraph 5 of this resolution, a 25% surcharge on Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety fess shall be charged for the alternative use of the City - approved consultant. Section 4. The surcharge established herein will not exceed the cost to the City of providing the applicable services. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 11th day of February, 2008 James Black Mayor Resolution No. 1034 -1- ATTEST: • Marilyn Kern Deputy City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution 1034 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING A 25% SURCHARGE ON LOS ANGELES COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT FEES FOR AN ALTERNATIVE BUILDING AND SAFETY PERMITTING PROCESS THROUGH A CITY - APPROVED CONSULTANT AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 496 AND RESOLUTION NO. 931. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on February 11, 2008 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers He.insheimez,Lay, Pernell, Mayor Pro Tem Hill and Mayor B1:ack3 NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. DEPUTY CITY CLERK Resolution No. 1034 -2- • RESOLUTK;�I�IO. 931 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AMENDING FEES COLLECTED FOR GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 496. The City Council of the City of Rolling Hills does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. Resolution No. 496 is amended by adding thereto a new paragraph 5 to read as follows:: - "5. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW. Not withstanding the provisions of paragraph 1 of this resolution; 0.42% of the valuation of the proposed structure; however, the minimum fee shall be $535.00 and the maximum fee shall be $3588.00." PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14'h day of April, 2003. Frank E. Hill Mayor ATTEST: f'. ti Ai Marilyn Kern Deputy City Clerk The foregoing Resolution No. 931 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AMENDING FEES COLLECTED FOR GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 496. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on April 14, 2003 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Black, Lay, Pernell, Mayor Pxo-Tem Heinsheimer and Mayor Hill. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Marilyn Kern Deputy City Clerk Resolution No. 931 -1- ,;SAFETY; 6269795444; APR -15-O i OIPM;.. /12: 48 FAX 310 377 720 CITY OF ROLLING KILLS PAGE 34 . I" - RESOLUTION Na 931 ` A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY /COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROILING HILLS AMENDING FEES COLLECTED FOR GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PL4N 1 REVIEW SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 496. i The City Council of the City of Rolling Hills does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. Resolution No. 496 is amended by adding thereto a new paragraph 5 to read / as follows:: "5. GgarscHNry4L REPORT. SITE AND Not withstanding the provisions Qf paragraph 1 of this raolution, 0.42% of the valuation of the proposed structure; however, the minimum fee shall be $535.00 and the ma:dmum fee shall be $3588.00." PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14e day of April, 2003. Frank E. Hill Mayor ATTEST:. Marilyn Kern Deputy City Clerk The foregoing Resolution No. 931 entitled: A RESOLUTION OP THE. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY . COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AMENDING FEES COLLECTED FOR GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO.496. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Couneit held on. April 14, 2003 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmerabers Black, Lay, Parnell, Mayor Pro-Tem Heinaheimer and Mayor Hill. NOES: None`. A13.SENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. _ 1( Marilyn Kern Deputy City Clerk Resolution No. 931 -1- GE'-OTECHNICAL AND MATE ALS:ENGINEERING Dlvi � t Guide for Collection of Review Fees for the Review of Building and Grading Plans, Geotechnical Reports and Miscellaneous Applications DAPTS Screens BL & BP Submittal Type Fee Parameter Fee* Building Plan Only - No Reports Geotech Site & Plan Rev $265 Building Plans and Reports Geotech Rpt, Site & Plan Rev 0.42% of valuation (.0042 X valuation) ** ** NOTE: if multiple structures are included within a single plan check number, then the valuation must equal the total valuation of all of the structures under that number. hour(after the third review 4th+) Geotech Rev. of Addenda Rpts $921 DAPTS Screens GP & GR Submittal Type Grading Plans Fee Parameter CubicYards Fee* Geotech Plan Rev 1-1,000 $305 1,001-10,000 $405 ;x10,001-100,000 $570 100,001-500,000 $765. 500,000+ $765 + $50 / 100k yards of additional grading Reports for Grading Plans Geotech Report Rev Geotech Rev. of Addenda'.Rpts ..14,19S 4,7,v • 1-1,000 $915 1,001-10,000 $1,375 10,001-100,000 $1,670 100,001-500,000 $2,290 500,000+ $2,290+ $100 / 100k yards of additional grading $92 / hour (after the third review - 4'h+) DAPTS Screen MP Submittal Type Fee Parameter Miscellaneous Application Geotech Site Rev Misc. Application and Reports Geotech Rpt & Site Rev NOTE: GMED does not approve any project submitted under a Miscellaneous,Apptication. This process is to be used for information purposes only. It is intended to inform the applicant,of the need for geology and/or soils engineering reports prior to GMED'.s recommendation of approval of building and/or grading plans. If GMED's approval is desired, building and/or grading plans must be submitted under a valid building and/or grading plan check number. Fee* $265 $525 (PER REVIEW / SUBMITTAL) 04/15/03 TUE 12:47 FAX 310 377 7288 3., CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 11oo1 ** ** **** r*********** *** TX REPORT *** ********************* TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO 4401 CONNECTION TEL 16269795444 CONNECTION ID ST. TIME 04/15 12:45 USAGE T 01'33 PGS'. 3 RESULT OK City of Rolling Hills INCORPORATED JANUARY 24,1957 NO.2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 E-mail cityofrh@aol.com FAX COVER SHEET DATE: 04/15/03 TIME SENT: 1:25 p.m. TO• Mark Pestrella FROM: Craig R. Nealis Ron Takiguchi City Manager CC: Mike Jenkins Yolanta Schwartz FAX: SUBJECT: REMARKS: OPERATOR: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SHE AND PLAN REVIEW FEES. • At the regular City Council meeting held Monday, April 14, 2003, the City Council unanimously adopted Resolution No. 931 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AMENDING FEES COLLECTED FOR GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 496. We have attached a copy of Resolution No. 931 and Resolution No. 496 for your records. Effectively immediately, you are to collect fees as prescribed in Resolution No. 931 for geotechnical report, site and plan review. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to let me know. Thank you for your City of Rolling Hills INCORPORATED JANUARY 24,1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 E-mail cityofrh@aol.com FAX COVER SHEET DATE: 04/15/03 TIME SENT: 1:25 p.m. TO: Mark Pestrella FROM• Craig R. Nealis Ron Takiguchi City Manager 1 CC: Mike Jenkins Yolanta Schwartz FAX: (0Acol y58- 3 L) - OPERATOR: ..7-y,,t_Jv SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW FEES. REMARKS: At the regular City Council meeting held Monday, April 14, 2003, the City Council unanimously adopted Resolution No. 931 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING FILLS AMENDING FEES COLLECTED FOR GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 496. We have attached a copy of Resolution No. 931 and Resolution No. 496 for your records. Effectively immediately, you are to collect fees as prescribed in Resolution No. 931 for geotechnical report, site and plan review. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to let me know. Thank you for your cooperation and support. TOTAL PAGES (including cover sheet): If you have difficulty receiving any pages, please telephone our switchboard at (310) 377- 1521. REPLY TO: City of Rolling Hills - Fax No. (310) 377-7288 RESOLUTION NO. 931 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AMENDING FEES COLLECTED FOR GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 496. The City Council of the City of Rolling Hills does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. Resolution No. 496 is amended by adding thereto a new paragraph 5 to read as follows:: "5. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW. Not withstanding the provisions of paragraph 1 of this resolution, 0.42% of the valuation of the proposed structure; however, the minimum fee shall be $535.00 and the maximum fee shall be $3588.00." PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of April, 2003. ATTEST: Frank E. Hill Mayor Marilyn Kern Deputy City Clerk The foregoing Resolution No. 931 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AMENDING FEES COLLECTED FOR GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 496. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on April 14, 2003 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Counciimembers Black, Lay, Pernell, Mayor Pxo-Tem Heinsheimer and Mayor Hill. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. Marilyn Kem Deputy City Clerk Resolution No. 931 -1- • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING FEES COLLECTIBLE AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE OF BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL PERMITS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The following fee is established and shall be collected for each permit pursuant to sections 15.04.040; 15.08.030; 15.12.030; 15.16.060 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: 1. A) BUILDING -PERMIT B) PARK AND RECREATION FUND FEE 2. PLUMBING PERMIT 3. MECHANICAL PERMIT 4. ELECTRICAL PERMIT Two and one half times the amount set forth in the Build: Code for each fee, table, and schedule therein. Each new residential dwelling shall pay 2% of the first . $100,000 of construction val- uation, plus .5% of such valuation over $100,000. Two and one half times the amount set forth in the Plumb- ing Code for each fee, table, and schedule therein. Two and one half times the amount set forth in the Mechanical Code for each fee, table, and schedule therein. Two and one half times the amount set forth in the Electrical Code for each fee, table, and schedule therein. Section 2. This resolution shall take effect September 8, 1982. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 23rd day of August, 1982 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk I certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills, California at a regular meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of August, 1982 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Councilmembers Heinsheimer, Leeuwenburgh, Murdock Mayor Pernell None Councilwoman Swanson City Clerk . 0'09/2003 11:26 3106438441 JENKINS & HOGIN LLP PAGE 01 • 1111 JE KI s H GIN, LLIl' A LAW PARTNERSHIP MANHATTAN TOWERS 1230 ROSECRANS AVENUE, SUITE 110 MANHATTAN BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90266 (310)643-8448 • FAX (310), 643-8441 www.LocalGovLaw.com FAX COVER SHEET FAX NUMBER TRANSMI I 1 J.D TO: (310) 377-7288 To: Craig Nealis Of: City of Rolling Hills CC: From: Mike Jenkins Client/Matter: Fee resolution amendment Date: April 9, 2003 TOV NS ':.. .: ar Resolution 1 • COMMENTS: Some minor changes. The information contained in this facsimile is confidential and may be protected by attorney -client communication or work product privileges. The information is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or distribution of this material is prohibited. Please notify us by telephone and return the original by U.S. mail to the address above. Thank you. If there are problems with the transmission of this documents, please call (310) 543.84 0$409!2003 11:26 3106435441 a4io9io3 WiW o8:18 NA3 310 37 ti JENKINS & HOGIN LLP CITY OF ROLLING HILLS >> CITY ATTNY PAGE 02 142004 RESOLUTION NO. 931 A RESOLUTION OF COUNCIL OF FEES E CITY COUNCIL OF THE� OF ROLLING HILLS AMENDING COLLECTED FOR GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 496. The City Council of the City of Rolling Hills does hereby resolve as follows: IJ 4-kele+% a nc, Q raraJr,fts 5 c `r Section 1. Resolution No. 496 is amended by addingA as -ra !lows "5. GEOTECHNICAL Not withstanding aPT 4-4_ 7, rvues,a,J G REPORT, SUE AND ei feesvx outer ,tea ! o r PLAN REVIEW. S eas-ef-the Resek j S .Fl„u !pesc(i41i, lizeartizte 0.42% of the valuation of the proposed structu however, the mintnun fee shall be $535.00 and the maximum fee shall be $3588.00." PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14' day of April, 2003. B. Allen Lay Mayor ATTEST: Marilyn Kern Deputy City Clerk The foregoing Resolution No. 931 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING BILLS AMENDING FEES COLLECTED FOR GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND • PLAN 'REVIEW SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 496. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on April 14, 2003 by the following roll call vote; AYES: NOES: Resolution No. 931 -1- 111 City 0/ IeJ/L4 Jhf/? INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Agenda Item No: 8-C Mtg. Date: 04/14/03 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW FEES. DATE: APRIL 14, 2003 The County of Los Angeles has communicated to the City of Rolling Hills that they have amended the manner in which they collect geotechnical report, site and plan review fees charged to residents requiring geotechnical review for their proposed projects. These fees charged by the County are subject to the fee schedule adopted by the City Council in 1982. Previously, geotechnical fees charged to applicants were determined by applying a complex set of factors including the valuation of the project, estimated time to review the plans, estimated costs of the County engineer's work, the complexity of the geotechnical issues or stabilization proposals and the quality of the initial application and reports. Now, the County applies a fee schedule based solely upon the value of a proposed structure for geotechnical review. This change has resulted in unnecessary charges and a necessity to amend the fee schedule by reducing the City's fees attached to geotechnical review. This amendment will reduce the fees to a level in conformance with the appropriate level of City staff review during the geotechnical plan review process. The new fee establishes a charge of 0.42% of the valuation of a proposed project for each geotechnical application, with a minimum charge of $525 and a maximum charge of $3,588. The County estimates that this fee schedule will establish an appropriate fee charging system and recover all appropriate costs for providing geotechnical review. Without the minimum and maximum fees, low cost projects will not be charged adequately and higher valued projects would be over charged. The County will closely monitor this new fee schedule to determine if any future changes will be recommended. Printed or: Recycled i'.iora As a result of this new fee schedule, we have prepared the attached Resolution No. 931, entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AMENDING FEES COLLECTED FOR GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND AMENDING. RESOLUTION NO. 496. which amends the City's fee schedule for geotechnical review. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that members of the City Council adopt Resolution No. 931 amending the City Fee Resolution for geotechnical permit review by the County. CRN:mlk 04/14/03countyfee.sta -2- RESOLUTION NO. 931 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AMENDING FEES COLLECTED FOR GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 496. The City Council of the City of Rolling Hills does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1. Resolution No. 496 is amended by adding thereto a new paragraph 5 to read as follows:: "5. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW. Not withstanding the provisions of paragraph 1 of this resolution, 0.42% of the valuation of the proposed structure; however, the minimum fee shall be $535.00 and the maximum fee shall be $3588.00." PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of April, 2003. B. Allen Lay Mayor ATTEST: Marilyn Kern Deputy City Clerk Resolution No. 931 -1- • • The foregoing Resolution No. 931 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AMENDING FEES COLLECTED FOR GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, SITE AND PLAN REVIEW SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 496. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on April 14, 2003 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Marilyn Kern Deputy City Clerk Resolution No. 931 -2- r-- ;fling ✓ V LLii INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh @ aol.com TO: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER ATTN: LOLA UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: DAN BLANCO, ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN SUBJECT: PLANNING FEES DATE: NOVEMBER 12, 1999 BACKGROUND The following is a survey of South Bay Cities' planning depailwent fee schedules which has been conducted in order to gauge the City of Rolling Hills' relative place in the spectrum of costs for various planning depailiiient services, performed per Lola Ungar's direction. By acquiring the planning depaitanent fee schedules of surrounding South Bay cities and interviewing department personnel, I have created two illustrative matrices, one of which lists the various cities' cost per service item and the other which focuses on Rolling Hills' relative place in the spectrum of costs per service item. CONCLUSIONS Rolling Hills is generally one of the more expensive cities in the South Bay in terms of costs of planning department fees as well as number of procedures for which fees are assessed. For example, Rolling Hills is the only city to assess a fee for either a " `Further stop work order' issuance" or a "Traffic Commission Review." Likewise, Rolling Hills is the most expensive of the only handful of cities who charge for either a "View Impairment Committee Review" or a "Site Plan Review." Rolling Hills also charges the greatest fees for a "Lot Line Adjustment," "Tentative Parcel Map," and "Negative Declaration," and is among the top four in terms of price for a "Conditional Use Permit," "Variance," "Zone Change," "Zoning Amendment," "General Price Amendment," and "Tentative Tract Map." On the other hand, Rolling Hills falls in the middle of the pack when it comes to a "Minor Variance," "Fee for review of illegal or 'as built' structure," "Environmental Impact Report," "Extension of Time" and "Final Parcel or Tract Map," and is actually one of the cheapest cities when it comes to an "Environmental Review." Overall, however, Rolling Hills can be placed in the upper spectrum of South Bay Cities planning depai tinents when it comes to fee schedule prices and quantity of procedures for which fees are assessed. A COMPARISON OF SOUTH BAY CITIES PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEE SCHEDULES Rolling Hills Gardena Hermosa Beach Lawndale Lomita Manhattan Beach P. V. Estates Rancho P. V. Redondo Beach R. H. Estates Torrance Planning Commission Review Unused portions of deposits refunded at end Special cases char- ged hourly on case by case basis Unused portions of deposits refunded . Conditional Use Permit $1,500 $750 $697 $1,200 deposit $300 $2,203 $1,114 $2,400 $900 $600 $1,085 Site Plan Review $1,500 $500 NONE NONE $75 NONE $88.50 $110 $580 $150 NONE Variance $1,250 $750 $1,075 $2,000 deposit $300 $2,735 $1,114 $1,140 $660 $500 $2,798 Variance, Minor $750 $750 $1,075 $2,000 deposit $300 $881 $1,114 $320 $365 $325 $380 Fee for review of illegal or "as built" structures $400 NONE $779 NONE $150 + origin- al appl- ication fee Double the application fee $694 Double the appl- ication fee Double the applicati- on fee $650 Usually only original fee, sometimes $2,397 + original fee Further "Stop work order" issuance $200 NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE Plan Modification 2/3 original applicat- ion fee $375 NONE L. A. County Fees NONE $514 1/2 original application fee 1/2 of original applicat- ion fee $300 NONE $1,085 Zone Change $2,000 $750 $1,396 $2000 deposit $300 $2,206 $109 $4,500 deposit $1,085 $600 $2,661 Zoning Amendment $2,000 $750 $1,396 $2000 deposit $300 $2,206 $109 $4,500 deposit $1,085 $600 $2,661 Rolling Hills Gardena Hermosa Beach Lawndale Lomita Manhattan Beach P. V. Estates Rancho P. V. Redondo Beach R. H. Estates Torrance General Plan Amendment $2,000 $750 $517 $2000 deposit $300 $2,206 $109 $330 $1,085 $600 $2,634 Lot Line Adjustment $1,500 $428 $599 $500 deposit $150 + actual costs $514 $743 $430 $580 County fees + 21% $1,177 Tentative Parcel Map (2-4 parcels) $1,500 + County fees + 20% $750 $1,070 $2,000 deposit $300 + $50/ unit $534 $500 $2,820 $1,085 County fees + 21% $976 Tentative Tract Map (5+ parcels) $1,500+ County fees + 20% $750 $1,070 $2,000 deposit $300+ $50/ unit $534 $500 $9,900 deposit $1,085 County fees + 21% $1,085 Environmental Review $200+ County & State fees $100 $343 $2,000 deposit $1,275 $114 $1,119 $1,230 $720 $250 $814 Appeal Fee 2/3 original applicat- ion fee $200 $384 $800 $100- $150 $425 $300 $700- $940 $100 $300 $160 Negative Declaration $1,300 $100 $343 $1,200 deposit $1,275 $114 ' $1,119 $1,230 $720 $125 $814 Environmental Impact Report City Consult- ant fee + 20% Consulta- nt fee City Consult- ant fee $2,000 deposit Cost + 25% + $25 $1,418 $1,119 Deposit determi- ned by staff Consultant fees Actual cost + 21% $814 + Consultant Fees Extension of Time $200 $200 $261 $80 NONE $214 $224 $100 $185 1/2 original fee $453 Final Parcel or Tract Map County fees + 20% $750 $261 $2,000 deposit NONE $534 County fees $500 $1,085 County's fees + 21% NONE Rolling Hills Gardena Hermosa Beach Lawndale Lomita Manhattan Beach P. V. Estates Rancho P. V. Redondo Beach R. H. Estates Torrance Traffic Commission Review New driveways $300 NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE View Impairment Committee Review Impairment of view $500 NONE NONE $1,200 deposit NONE NONE NONE $185 NONE $150 NONE ROLLING HILLS' RELATIVE POSITION ON THE PRICE SPECTRUM Lowest Fee City Highest Fee City Rolling Hills Fee Number of Cheaper and More Expensive City Fees Per Item Planning Commission Review Conditional Use Permit $300 Lomita $2,400 deposit Rancho P.V. $1,500 Cheaper: 8 More Expensive: 2 Site Plan Review NONE Hermosa Beach/ Lawndale/T orrance/ Manhattan Beach $1,500 Rolling Hills $1,500 Cheaper: 10 Variance $300 Lomita $2,798 Torrance $1,250 Cheaper: 7 More Expensive: 3 Variance, Minor $300 Lomita $2,000 deposit Lawndale $750 Cheaper: 5 More Expensive: 5 Fee for review of illegal or "as built" structures NONE Lawndale/ Gardena $779 Hermosa , Beach $400 Cheaper: 5 More Expensive: 5 Further "Stop work order" issuance NONE Every city but Rolling Hills NONE Every city but Rolling Hills $200 Cheaper: 10 Plan Modification NONE Hermosa Beach/ Lomita/ R.H.Estates $1,085 Torrance $2/3 original application fee Cheaper: Uncertain More Expensive: Uncertain Zone Change $109 P.V. Estates $4,500 deposit Rancho P.V. $2,000 Cheaper: 7 More Expensive: 3 Zoning Amendment $109 P.V. Estates $4,500 deposit Rancho P.V. $2,000 Cheaper: 7 More Expensive: 3 General Plan Amendment $109 P.V. Estates $2,634 Torrance $2,000 Cheaper: 7 More Expensive: 3 Lot Line Adjustment $150+ actual costs Lomita $1,500 Rolling Hills $1,500 Cheaper: 10 Tentative Parcel Map (2-4 parcels) $500 P.V. Estates $1,500 + County Fees+20% Rolling Hills $1,500 + County Fees+20% Cheaper: 10 Tentative Tract Map (5+ parcels) $500 P.V. Estates $9,900 deposit Rancho P.V. $1,500 + County Fees+20% Cheaper: 8 More Expensive: 2 Environmental Review $100 Gardena $2,000 deposit Lawndale $200 + County & State Fees Cheaper: 2 More Expensive: 8 Lowest Fee City Highest Fee City Rolling Hills Fee Number of Cheaper and More Expensive City Fees Per Item Negative Declaration $100 Gardena $1,300 Rolling Hills $1,300 Cheaper: 10 Environmental Impact Report Consultant Fees Several Cities $2,000 deposit Lawndale Consultant Fees + 20% Cheaper: Uncertain More Expensive: Uncertain Extension of Time NONE Lomita $453 Torrance $200 Cheaper: 6 More Expensive: 4 Final Parcel or Tract Map NONE Lomita $1,085 Redondo Beach County Fees + 20% Cheaper: Uncertain More Expensive: Uncertain Traffic Commission Review New driveways NONE Every city but Rolling Hills $300 Rolling Hills $300 Cheaper: 10 View Impairment Committee Review Impairment of view NONE Several cities $1,200 deposit Lawndale $500 Cheaper: 9 More Expensive: 1 TO: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER ATTN: LOLA UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: DAN BLANCO, ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN SUBJECT: PLANNING FEES DATE: NOVEMBER 12, 1999 BACKGROUND The following is a survey of South Bay Cities' planning department fee schedules which has been conducted in order to gauge the City of Rolling Hills' relative place in the spectrum of costs for various planning department services, performed per Lola Ungar's direction. By acquiring the planning department fee schedules of surrounding South Bay cities and interviewing department personnel, I have created two illustrative matrices, one of which lists the various cities' cost per service item and the other which focuses on Rolling Hills' relative place in the spectrum of costs per service item. CONCLUSIONS Rolling Hills is generally one of the more expensive cities in the South Bay in terms of costs of planning department fees as well as number of procedures for which fees are assessed. For example, Rolling Hills is the only city to assess a fee for either a " `Further stop work order' issuance" or a "Traffic Commission Review." Likewise, Rolling Hills is the most expensive of the only handful of cities who charge for either a "View Impairment Committee Review" or a "Site Plan Review." Rolling Hills also charges the greatest fees for a "Lot Line Adjustment," "Tentative Parcel Map," and "Negative Declaration," and is among the top four in terms of price for a "Conditional Use Permit," "Variance," "Zone Change," "Zoning Amendment," "General Price Amendment," and "Tentative Tract Map." On the other hand, Rolling Hills falls in the middle of the pack when it comes to a "Minor Variance," "Fee for review of illegal or 'as built' structure," "Environmental Impact Report," "Extension of Time" and "Final Parcel or Tract Map," and is actually one of the cheapest cities when it comes to an "Environmental Review." Overall, however, Rolling Hills can be placed in the upper spectrum of South Bay Cities planning depaitnnients when it comes to fee schedule prices and quantity of procedures for which fees are assessed. A COMPARISON OF SOUTH BAY CITIES PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEE SCHEDULES Rolling Hills Gardena Hermosa Beach Lawndale Lomita Manhattan Beach P. V. Estates Rancho P. V. Redondo Beach R. H. Estates Torrance Planning Commission Review Unused portions of deposits refunded at end Special cases char- ged hourly on case by case basis Unused portions of deposits refunded Conditional Use Permit $1,500 $750 $697 $1,200 deposit $300 $2,203 $1,114 $2,400 $900 $600 $1,085 Site Plan Review $1,500 $500 NONE NONE $75 NONE $88.50 $110 $580 $150 NONE Variance $1,250 $750 $1,075 $2,000 deposit $300 $2,735 $1,114 $1,140 $660 $500 $2,798 Variance, Minor $750 $750 $1,075 $2,000 deposit $300 $881 $1,114 $320 $365 $325 $380 Fee for review of illegal or "as built" structures $400 NONE $779 NONE $150 + origin- al appl- ication fee Double the application fee $694 Double the appl- ication fee Double the applicati- on fee $650 Usually only original fee, sometimes $2,397 + original fee NONE Further "Stop work order" issuance $200 NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE .. NONE NONE NONE Plan Modification 2/3 original applicat- ion fee $375 NONE L. A. County Fees NONE $514 1/2 original application fee 1/2 of original applicat- ion fee $300 NONE $1,085 Zone Change $2,000 $750 $1,396 $2000 deposit $300 $2,206 $109 $4,500 deposit $1,085 $600 $2,661 Zoning Amendment $2,000 $750 $1,396 $2000 deposit $300 $2,206 $109 $4,500 deposit $1,085 $600 $2,661 Rolling Hills Gardena Hermosa Beach Lawndale Lomita Manhattan Beach P. V. Estates Rancho P. V. Redondo Beach R. H. Estates Torrance General Plan Amendment $2,000 $750 $517 $2000 deposit $300 $2,206 , $109 $330 $1,085 $600 $2,634 Lot Line Adjustment $1,500 $428 $599 $500 deposit $150+ actual costs $514 $743 $430 $580 County fees + 21% $1,177 Tentative Parcel Map (2-4 parcels) $1,500+ County fees + 20% $750 $1,070 $2,000 deposit $300 + $50/ unit $534 $500 $2,820 $1,085 County fees + 21% $976 Tentative Tract Map (5+ parcels) $1,500 + County fees + 20% $750 $1,070 $2,000 deposit $300 + $50/ unit $534 $500 $9,900 deposit $1,085 County fees + 21% $1,085 Environmental Review $200+ County & State fees $100 $343 $2,000 deposit $1,275 $114 $1,119 $1,230 $720 $250 $814 Appeal Fee 2/3 original applicat- ion fee $200 $384 $800 $100- $150 $425 $300 $700- $940. $100 $300 $160 Negative Declaration . $1,300 $100 $343 $1,200 deposit $1,275 " $114 $1,119 $1,230 $720 $125 $814 Environmental Impact Report City Consult- ant fee + 20% Consulta- nt fee City Consult- ant fee $2,000 deposit Cost + 25% + $25 . $1,418 $1,119 Deposit determi- ned by staff Consultant fees Actual cost + 21% $814 + Consultant Fees Extension of Time $200 $200 $261 $80 NONE $214 $224 $100 $185 1/2 original fee $453 Final Parcel or Tract Map County fees + 20% $750 $261 $2,000 deposit NONE $534 County fees $500 $1,085 County's fees + 21% NONE Rolling Hills Gardena Hermosa Beach Lawndale Lomita Manhattan Beach P. V. Estates Rancho P. V. Redondo Beach R. H. Estates Torrance Traffic Commission Review New driveways $300 NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE View Impairment Committee Review Impairment of view $500 NONE NONE $1,200 deposit NONE NONE NONE $185 NONE $150 NONE • ROLLING HILLS' RELATIVE POSITION ON THE PRICE SPECTRUM Lowest Fee City Highest Fee City Rolling Hills Fee Number of Cheaper and More Expensive City Fees Per Item Planning Commission Review Conditional Use Permit $300 Lomita $2,400 deposit Rancho P.V. $1,500 Cheaper: 8 More Expensive: 2 Site Plan Review NONE Hermosa Beach/ Lawndale/T orrance/ Manhattan Beach $1,500 Rolling Hills $1,500 Cheaper: 10 Variance $300 Lomita $2,798 Torrance $1,250 Cheaper: 7 More Expensive: 3 Variance, Minor $300 Lomita $2,000 deposit Lawndale $750 Cheaper: 5 More Expensive: 5 Fee for review of illegal or "as built" structures NONE Lawndale/ Gardena $779 Hermosa Beach $400 Cheaper: 5 More Expensive: 5 Further "Stop work order" issuance NONE Every city but Rolling Hills NONE Every city but Rolling • Hills $200 Cheaper: 10 Plan Modification NONE Hermosa Beach/ Lomita/ R.H.Estates $1,085 Torrance $2/3 original application fee Cheaper: Uncertain More Expensive: Uncertain Zone Change $109 P.V. Estates $4,500 deposit Rancho P.V. $2,000 Cheaper: 7 More Expensive: 3 Zoning Amendment $109 P.V. Estates $4,500 deposit Rancho P.V. $2,000 Cheaper: 7 More Expensive: 3 General Plan Amendment $109 P.V. Estates $2,634 Torrance $2,000 Cheaper: 7 More Expensive: 3 Lot Line Adjustment $150 + actual costs Lomita $1,500 Rolling Hills $1,500 Cheaper: 10 Tentative Parcel Map (2-4 parcels) $500 P.V. Estates $1,500 + County Fees+20% Rolling Hills $1,500 + County Fees+20% Cheaper: 10 - Tentative Tract Map (5+ parcels) $500 P.V. Estates $9,900 deposit Rancho P.V. $1,500 + County Fees+20% Cheaper: 8 More Expensive: 2 Environmental Review $100 Gardena $2,000 deposit Lawndale $200 + County & State Fees Cheaper: 2 More Expensive: 8 Lowest Fee City Highest Fee City Rolling Hills Fee Number of Cheaper and More Expensive City Fees Per Item Negative Declaration $100 Gardena $1,300 Rolling Hills $1,300 Cheaper: 10 Environmental Impact Report Consultant Fees Several Cities $2,000 deposit Lawndale Consultant Fees + 20% Cheaper: Uncertain More Expensive: Uncertain Extension of Time NONE Lomita $453 Torrance $200 Cheaper: 6 More Expensive: 4 Final Parcel or Tract Map NONE Lomita $1,085 Redondo Beach County Fees + 20% Cheaper: Uncertain More Expensive: Uncertain Traffic Commission Review New driveways NONE Every city but Rolling Hills $300 Rolling Hills $300 Cheaper: 10 View Impairment Committee Review Impairment of view NONE Several cities $1,200 deposit Lawndale $500 Cheaper: 9 More Expensive: 1 oiy ihila INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 p FEE SCHEDULE , 0 PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW O Conditional Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Review ❑ Variance ❑ Variance, Minor Minor deviation into required yard setback, not exceeding 5 feet and attached to main residential structure. o Administrative fee on applications for illegal or "as built", grading or structures that require Planning Commission review. ❑ Additional fee charged for each additional "stop work order" that is issued beyond the original stop work order for illegal or "as built" grading or structures that require Planning Commission review. $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,250 $ 750 $ 400 $ 200 ❑ Plan Modification ❑ Zone Change NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com ❑ Zoning Amendment ❑ General Plan Amendment ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Tentative Parcel Map (Subdivision of 2-4 parcelsJl ❑ Tentative Tract Map (Subdivision of 5+ parcels) 2/3 of original application fee $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $1,500 $ 1,500 + County fees plus 20% $ 1,500 + County fees plus 20% Required with all above applications (singular or combined) by State Government Code. 0 Environmental Review $ 200 + County and State fees ❑ Appeal Fee ❑ Negative Declaration ❑ Environmental Impact Report (EIR) ❑ Extension of Time ❑ Final Parcel or Tract Map 2/3 of original application fee $ 1,300 City Consultant fee plus 20% $ 200 County fees plus 20% ❑ TRAFFIC COMMISSION REVIEW New driveways $ 300 ❑ VIEW IMPAIRMENT COMMITTEE REVIEW Impairment of view $ 500 EXAMPLE 1: Request for a Conditional Use Permit ($1,500) and Variance ($1,250) for a mixed use structure that encroaches into a setback also requires an Environmental Review ($200) for a total of $2,950. EXAMPLE 2: Request for Tentative Parcel Map or Tract Map ($1,500) for subdivision, also requires Environmental Review ($200) plus an EIR (City Consultant fee plus 20%) or a Negative Declaration ($1,300). EXAMPLE 3: Anything under the heavy line requires a single fee. * In accordance with Resolution No. 691, dated September 28, 1992 and Resolution No. 854, dated January 25, 1999. 2/17/1999 LMU Printed on Recycled Pape, " EP 2e '9 09:26AM CITY OF GARDENA :.�t��u..•:r.:�a*ri.'.--rt.'::;:•R�'r'�n--�-,`.�'.'�Tj:":.:�' .... ;tr rte•>,u;;-.rr_,— ,..A_ ,,,,. 20 additional copies Plans -10 copies of plans checked below (if no corrections are required after preliminaryI('VIe01 must be submitted); plans must be to scale and collated, stapled and folded to 8 y2' x 11" size ❑ Site Plan 0 Elevations 0 Floor Plan ❑ Landscaping Plan 0 Lighting Plan 0 Security Plan 0 Tentative Tract Map 0 Parcel Map Development Application Environmental Assessment Application Variance Supplement, if applicable Narrative explanation of proposed operations Site photographs (N, S, E, and 'W) Deed of property or copy of lease (copy only) Current Tenant information for multi -tenant developments Colored architectural rendering ( min. 30'i 36'., plus 40 color copies no larger than 11"x I7") Cr.& OF GARDE A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1700 WEST 1624) STREET, GM DENA, CA 90247 TEL: (310) 217-95301 PAX: (310) 217-9698 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS P.1/1 Conditional Use Permit Tentative Tract Map Parcel Map • General Plan Amendment Zone Change Variance Site Plan Review A.de.ositof 3 shall be ,is aldb Cheat tlicant 3J:fr -:Y,^4`:Lf r'Sx}.4+k Yii a ';{ - ,r•._.,::-.c,:4-•„.„..r. ::.4:r �Yi-1 :�'" s?rF `$ :',.. v:>f>gy 1,,, gi:L.,7eltr •liAlIn' Vii:?;..O....,.. . ..,i.. .a.... ....,-:,',A•1...:.;.;::,::': ._...Inn . ......... ..... ........... . .{ ,� v...,:r..v,.,:,.,�:,:.:.�::�-:,��::...-,,v.>. , Actaadthe City of Gardena ry The environmental assessment is performed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Environmental Guidelines. The Environmental Assessment application is intended to provide the EAvironmental Qty Officer with the basic inforxaatioa to determine the appropriate 'environmental documentation for the project.. If it is determined that a project/action will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment, a Negative Declaration•will be prepared• If it is determined that a project ,may/will . have a significant impact on the. eavironment, a mitigated ncgalive declaration will be preps ed, if .the.impacts -clan be: mitigated, , If,the imps s. cannot be .mitigated, an En iro Impact --.111a action of the Negative Deolaratiaa,'Mingatad Ne v' On,.or EIR •sadlor any titil d.required to era_luate.impacts wil be prepay d.at t ie applicarii's . A-cdeposittequal:tv.the estimated cost to Frepaaze'such documents or studied sl»ll'toe made prior to:imtiatim�g wark:; . , Modification of a arevionsly filed application S375.00 Lot Line Adjustment/Lo Mer er $428,0_0 • $750.00 ' emponaty Use Permit $200.00 - Encroachm t Pe 't nvironm tItal A,s , $100.00 Wildlife Impact Exemption $ 25.00 $500.00 Availability of Environmental Documentation (2 separate decks payable to "Los Angeles County Clerk") d � as _ notice f nblic h n ' to defra � the costs o . a fro•.+>:� , . �-, �;,.� •\•e�x�r„:•''�r`.•rji'n[•"{: r`,6;..n S.lk�f, 'i: yS}..✓`�!.,�..y.,,..-t...::�.. �..,.. .._......>sr;>;..<-..,..•:•.:.._.:.:._.:�...........�.__.. r�.y (�,,� ada1 Qty Gizamission meets tbelfut aadthird s: day of the at :0 t. '16?�d ,e- •� P f,'�'•'" `• {nning and �•� �mgj�'1700 RT.esf Gardeaa:`All'C°�an�ssta�: °ce6ng� �e °pw. ba ,�b�� • . J ��� .�.�; rgi i'� £-L'i', dr.Cif: -10 ? d13" . 4:. >..- 1. unless otherwise provided, maykkappca , : 4YX.o.o44b9,9A?Pl -" Any action of the Combs,, ,AM . tip Ckrk �.,.. KELSSID4.9f .. .�� Maps.andTeutativeTract Maps which t be appealed within.tem (10) days of Comm; cinn on_ The cpio al. fee for filing such appeal,sball accompany apps - 09/2A/99 10:37 FAX 13109376235 •HERMOSA BCH CITY Zion TO: • City of iermosa 1r3, each FAX TRANSMI'T'TAL I COMPANY Q sea_et //-e-Zt FAX I C3 NO. OF PAGES. COMMENTS FROM: CITY OF HERHOSA BEACH e°' -"t '' FAX # 937_6235 PHONE I (31a) 3/417-- °2 DATE 0 YGL , 09/20/99 10:37 FAX 13109376235 HERMOSA BCH CITY • l j 002 CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH PLANNING FEES (Effective 911199) ,.-- „v ;' N „ „ ic { l,�o w`,,+:'.� "r'„r,: ,`` ,,' ;r yy77z ; "fir`' 1 , , '�i;f �S� �.i�{' Srin �,f� ,, d-ij1.011g +,Ni+t' 1,..; ''{t' Lr) lu bil i h3f, l$ amrt'�A,,, e f I+ ,I, l r f �c ,w'l'+,�t ,, r l!1 `l,aq;{h,^'PYn-,,i! , � ,4!{N;"I�S'iFr`!!n�,,,5 r ' .,•,.3��r"`a'�F�I '�FT • ",*r4lr • 1' p • e�«` 7l! fit+ �i{iiC ��,d'3{itr^�;IA+ •�7rilPFrir':E,fra 1,'hnTMhuli;,, �Ir,la�. n7 t'��n, ��'. i)tF �l,i nva "�f xi, l {'a �� ���-7.7 4?'•`!! 116; fW !Y , ,� , "'38U"t17'' C'ON'DITI t' ,,,. , , ; ' ', :'1,",,;',":,'",',;::“:','"',.',„ r ' $697, • ,'• ' ,, , ;''$17,;45'' °',r , ,P Ls,,,'CONDOMLNL ,'U?,TO 8;`UNITS,=PER UNIT':;;,,,, , „ COTSD � + TP(,AN„S ,UNITS', ,., ', ., • $1,396, ' O ''.1i�O�tE,' ,r ,.t '. $1,046, , ' ' ' S1,22,0 E ;14c$7 ,34, 9,nclamin 1W„ Mor" 093,:,,, AMENDMENT OR AMORTIZED $372 3505 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - A. 0'S • • • ;389'' • ^,,; • . O ,I,T3ONAL eSEYPE,,,,.,, .,,, • IN:(E• SIQR`A:MENAMC , ;r „ ' 1 ; {iA .,,h„ .., ,V. I'1 v.'3 ,6r_ • ',3 dR :•'Li.. .. p.:t .[' ., „ ,m WALLS •• -�V��� 3864 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - FENCES & n,l „ 4,,,.p ENS? J O TI? ENT1Ati'' ." !, { „�• ,";, r ,'' ,,,, „ ' .m.�'�;, I�',,,,., ; „', +.$ZS' ar:Fisk.&'..fume'f'ee''etemp ion;ivayahle;to,"L: L° a snty„ cfaeck dote p ' '.,•„ 3883 EXTENSION OF TENTATIVE . P I FINAL MAP 1 C.U.P. etc. "r..,.r, lrn'^ .,:f 'r 3811 r GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT I ZONE CHANGE P'IYQN; ,, Vs ... '., ,,.a,.., - ,:' ', ;VW „!„: •„,: namr..S all 4 v,! d) I,OT LINE ADJUSTMENT 3884 { ;:,,;�,'; , ';,, ;:38'8'11. , to it.6. voil T',A1 Y, i 1,",`.;'' �1 ,., ,. ; .,,,.,.:'; :1„,.6" �� „ „ •fl .. 1 ' V ,{1 +V ' 1, u l.,u II le I... 3866 NONCONFORMING REMODEL I id,.,ilp •d, i i 1+.,' 1;�,• .S1.fl�y'r''i„�''• „• ' ie '.,, ' .. , S.,,,,:'. . u, u , . 3885 PERMITTED USE REQUEST 8$g�' `ii:, pLANNTNiG••CQMV,S.W. ;AP„nn.." S'rt) ',DIRE,, , ,.I , ,,L,i„f�', { } r,'l u.d +lids.,.,. ! .,.,N,,: L, lids...,„ ,, ,. 3867 PRECISE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 738Q2,:''I' ISZGN REVIEW'(! E1 ANEistr.8IGNj' `. ,, ,: :' ... ;,, 3215 SIGN REVIEW (TEMPORARY SIGN) n i AAA c. 7 m r: 11 $261 $1,396 $599 ; „• , • ,II I'.• „ ., „d" $779 n378 mi. , $1,331 $35 38,09, • ,,; I,:...:....,,,::' ,,.,, 11 . „ ,., „ 3886 TEXT AMENDME PRIVATE $517 +'^7 ,w„I �, o�„Inn n..",.n, i, �rt r,• i'n, 7� (i+7G �'� �,I,n, 'r, r',;ti r„t•C[,,. w' ,m1'i��7�, ,'yi%:' r, ,j�h�i�; •,,{", ,,,P, n , ,',',t: �'$i',VJ:J.,,,'r,l i, �•t71un;4�,,, 5 „!,"•,.{;,r,.i;',„I�' •r ul7,e, !}r„�bL 3868 300' RADIUS NOTICING (1ST TIME NOTICING) $634 a) Up To 400 Notices b) More Than 400 Notices NOTICE. ;.1,.,, '', ,, , •,a} , ` Up, Td''400:Notices" ' • Iq , $634 + @750/Additional Notice '$374, b :amore Than' 400 Notices;' $374+ 'x)750/Additional Notice' 3838 ZONING MAP / GENERAL PLAN MAP '"' I ,,, !".,N111J,.; . " •`:.,,. 1 ., , N1'. 81,500 Depoosit DEVELOPMENT AGREEME r...,, „ ,,,,. . {s• ,I,„, -I, `• I.,, IL' O L1„COMIVI.I,DECISION' , ,' '„ , '',5529';.,7 eat=°816'-Paster,; S95;1J' gal Pid,236, 30Q'Noticing}," ,(n,Cf{1;Cl� 's'Of�.ce),,,'($1S8=A'p'p T, ;lf;� ZONING ORDINANCES On Disk (In City Clerk's Offcc) S5 3538 �� Rcviscd 8/31/99 f:b95\cd\feepl FROM :CITY OF LPWNDFILE TO • 310 377 7288 1999,09-20 13:63 #643 P.01/01 14717 Burin A enue. Lawndale, California 90250 Phone (310) 970-2100 Fax (31 0) 6444556 Fax To: /444 Cal. Faac 2/0 Phone: ,297- 7,2E6' Re: From: Pages: nate: City of Lawndaie Heart ofthe South Bay -7 CC: ❑ Urgent ❑ For Review 0 Piajase Comment 0 Comments Plo.ase 1-teply 0 Please Rcoyclo FROM :CITY OF LRWNDRLE TO 310 377 7288 1998,08-20 • 13:64 #644 P.01/06 RESOLUTION O. CC A RESOLUT3 N OF 11iI CI'. !La CITY F LAWNDALE, ESTABLISHA G THE "ADMINISTRATIVE FEES CHAPTER 3.'32 O]' THE CIT MUNICIPAL' ODE. 9512-117 'Y COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA, AMOUNT OF °URSUANT TO OF L►WNDALE Services InWstiitutethe yof i with , Inc., to complete comprehensive cost conrocontrol study to ani alyze the current fees beng charged by the City for services and to determine the estim ted costs to the City of providing such services; 'and WHEREAS, on April 20, 1995, he City Council of the City of Lawndale reviewed the .ost Control tudy prepared by Management Services Institute an directed staff to return with recommendations at a future meeting; nd = WHEREAS, the City Council d. sires to recover all or portion of the estimated costs of providing the services identified in the Cost Control Study; and EREAS, Sectiq 3.32.030 of the City of Lawndale Municipal, ode authorizes the City o Lawndale to recover the. estimated reasonable costs' of providin these services and further provides ti1at the City ouncil shal establish such fees by resolution; and EREAS, the "Cast Control. Study" was wade available to the public least ten (1 ) days prior to the date of enactment of this Resolution; and. WHEREAS, notice f a public hearing was published in the Daily Breeze on December 1 and December 6, 1995; and WHEREAS, a publich hearing was and all interested parties were given regarding this matter. held on December 11, 1995, n opportunity to be heard NOW, THEREFORE, CITY COUN TL OF THE CITY OF LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY REOLVE AS FOLL WS: SEhTION 1. Tip t effectiv February 7, 1995 the administrative fees set fo, h in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein, are lereby established pursuant to Section 3.32.030 of the City of Lawndale Munici al Code. RESOLUTION N. CC-95�2-117„ ESTABLISHING1ADMINISTRATIVE FEES -1- FROM :CITY OF LflLJNDRLE TO . 310 377 7288 1999,09-20 13:SS #844 P.02/08 • SECTION 2. The fees establishe supersede all previously es2Eablished fe PASSED, APPROVED ,ND ADOPTED tl 1995. I OR, CITY OF ATTEST: STATE OF CAI4FORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF LAWNDALE ) I, NEIL K. RdTH, City Clerk.of of the City hereby certi y that the foregoing Reso duly ' adopts by the City pouncil of regular meet'ng of said Co.ncil held on 1995, by the following rol call. vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Hofmann, Rh None None None des, Rudolph CITY CLERK, CITY OF LAWNDAE RESOLUTION O. CC -9512-111 ESTABLISHIN ADMINISTRATIi FEES -2- by this Resolution shall for the same service. is 11th day of December, ALE f Lawndale, California, do ution No. CC -9512-117 was e City of.Lawndale at a the 11th day of December, Marthefs, Lagerquist —Y Of 1.AI NDAl.E / ✓l �Y -� Fe& NIT "A" TO RESOLUTION HO. cc-0512-11rP ' /� 336-14111) 4I 6L'O C HSID 9C0s _. __ _____--___ (4 PAA / % /% /~�- %"'"uu vl 15-Nev-95 _-__. _____ __.. _ _ _..___ ...-. _y _____ __ C) � � (-._ z. SECTION ; ----_•_-_---___-______________ ,__ FEE IMRE ----__-__ ________________ s-001 r -------- _.._____. ___ _______ i (including environmental documentation ' Hon-Develmt projects - 11200 deposit. __~_�_��___" _`-__,,_ 1 except for an environmental arapaci fi2500 deposit r DeYelmt Project p- actual--ac•tual--ccrs'ta._ . __. r Add"itianal deposits to be made at 50X S-002 . Special Use Permit/Design Review i report) Zone Change Review & Nap Update 1 (including environmental documentation except for an environmental impact 1 report) FEEAHOUHT of origins] deposit plus processing coats, r ( Upon completion of project unused deposit balance to be refunded. :44 it $2D0 deppue�it. I 1 Additional deposits to be made at Upon completion of project unused I 9-003 i Specific Plan Amendment & Map , 1.. : (-i:n ?:udl n onvi anmettfal ilocumentati an ; -x.000 _depas:W.- • -. i Adtfitianal deposits to by made at except for an environmental impact i report) 1 Upon completion of project unused r r -004 ; General Plan Amendment 1 (including environmental documentation except for an environmental impact I report) OOR ; Variance Review (including environmental documentation ( except for an environmental impact report) )07 ; Planning Text Amendment (Including environmental documentation except for an environmental impact i report) 09 ,n Special Business' Licenses Review and ItrLO futernlnatfnn SOX of original deposit plus processing costs. deposit balance to be refunded. Sex of original deposit plus processing coots. depaait balance to be refunded. 1 $2000 deposit, 1 Additional deposits te be made at 50X of original deposit plus pmceesin .cet i Upon completion_of-prolect=unuaed=depoeit balance to be refunded. 1 $2000 deposit. Additional deposits to be made at 50X of original deposit f Upon completion of project unused deposit balance to berofundedroceesing casts. i $2000 deposit. Additional deposits to be made at SOX of original deposit plus processing caste. Upon completion of project unused deposit balance to be refunded. $450 par review far bueineeses subject to t.MC Section 5.05.050. or determination for uses not included in Zoning Ordinance. 91thQNmb1 d0 A1I9: woad 90/E0'd tib9# 1.Af4!{p>1..IE ' ^A" TO 1EaOLUrlfR U0. iCO-0512-117 FEE KANE 01101/--1 �1 f ; 7enta Iva CA2 ; rentEtive 714 ; "lea Entenr,ian Review - c. yN,D1RROOO 15-gov-9U • Traci Hap pr ... ...1.. .,..: - 1 $2OD17 deposit. • mace at 5'}K of original nil deposit pl'�a __ ___5fnq oasis. Prx 'E Hap ells to Da rsFunded. Tpaci Hap 1 Additional do asii balance to be � Upon completion of project unused deft A Nap i Additional dnalElt. original dapaalt plug proceesin9 casts. Parcel gap Pro" g j Addltttepo d$pualt& to be o3da at !o: of 1 upon cGnpletlon of project ureed do?aslt kLlance to to refunded. -015 1 Home Occupation Ppplioetlon gewgaw i Appeal to City Clog )�D16 i _'ri a AF1Plltll ..... .................... ....... Sac Hf:h application. p5annin9 rap by ueparata aeutryil Resolution far Dusineae ilcsnaing. 1 • iOe1 dapasft plus praaeaein9 ca �$,�y��t of ar�9_ pracaaainB o ate. kdditianal capoglts to "" oal\ kalranGa to Pa ra a� ' °i-tli7 ; Lot Line Adlugtment Bewley d Nap rofaot onset des ; Opal completion of P :iOit dopp3lt. original cep o9ft plus pracaa3ir1 coots. to made at !Sp% al rce to �e refunded. :Upo -' {om l depositor to project unused dopoeit ba Upon completion -of B-021 1 Tonpo"arY Harnsr/fi19► Review t, tt P : an Pr'iva'te Property plus prar.essin9 costs. �ddI deposit. !OK of original deposit p Ohecl: R Npp el deposits to he node of refunded. 5-622 ; cinal Tract Nap p Additional pa .......... unused deposit talancB to � upon oprpla:ion of project .. ......__--_- 91bQNF1U1 AO A1I0: WOHd 88ZL LL£ 0TE OZ -60`666T 90/170 ' d 17179# LA11NOALE r "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. GC -9512-117 C: \INRIRECD3 15 -Nov -95 ID t .ITIDN FEE NAME "1"-__ FEE AMOUNT •1 i3 ; Final Parcel Map Check & Approval Q6.. ..._ --;--Easement _Procsas_ing • • t7 ; Public Improvement Inspection L $20D0 deposit. . Additional deposits to be made at 50% of original deposit plug processing costs. Upon completion of project unused deposit balance to be refunded. 3.2_t3 -R_ de Q t .. . . . - Additional deposits to bo made at 50% of original Upon completion of project unused deposit balance deposit plus processing costs. to be refunded. $250 deposit. Additional deposits to be made at 50% of original deposit plus processing costs. Upon completion of project unused deposit balance to ba refunded. 30 • 31 32 33 34 36 37 62 37 Environmental Impact Report Fence Plan Check/Inspection Building Plan Check Building Inspection/Permit Building Permit Time Extsne'n Review Parking Enforcement Alarm Permit $2000 deposit, Additional deposits to be made at 50% of original deposit plus processing costa. Upon completion of project unused deposit balance to be refunded, $30. Fee structure by separate Council Resolution. Fee structure by soparate Council Resolution, Fee structure by separate Council Resolution. 1. Bail schedule by separate Council Resolution. i 1 1 New Business License Application Review 1 Fee by separate Council Resolution for Business Licensing. Facilities and Show Wagon Rentals Fee by separate Council Resolution for Business Licensing. Fee structure by eoparate Council Resolution. 91baNP1d1 AO AlIO: WOZId 0 88ZL LL£ 01£ 0Z-60`6661 r W N m 90/S0 ' d tb9# LA% DALE "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. CC -8512.117 C:\MsxnEcea 15 -Nov -95 ISx 110N 1 FEE NAME FEE AMOUNT ti ; Moved Business License Appl Review 8 . 1 Business License Renewal Processing 0 ; Returned Check (i18F) Processing '1 1 Document Certification 1 12 1 City Code Update Service - Quarterly 1 13 1 Qarage/Yard Sale Permit. 74 1 Copies or Video/Audio Tapes 1 Fee by separate Council Resolution for Business Licensing. Fee by separate Council Raeoiutlan for Buainaas Licensing. $10. 1 1 Fee charged to be direct cost of duplication as governed by the Public Records Act '-- 0...pBl p yes-J--1,40-per--two=s-tded-page. • 1 125. 1 $3 1 $30 plus postage. 1 75 1 Sale of Hound Reports & Other Publ. • ' 76 1 Agenda/Minute Mailing Service 77 1 Records Research Service 7B 1 Document Printing & Copying BO 1 Fireworks Stand Permit iE2 1 Bicycle Licensing Fee charged to be direct cost of duplication as governed by the Public Records Act. $.20 par page - $.40 par two aided page plus postage & mailing. i Fee charged to be direct coat of duplication me governed by the Public.Recards Act. 1.1.24 per page - $.40 per two sided page plus postage & mailing. • • 1 Fee charged to be direct cost of duplication as governed by the Public Records Act. i $.20 per page - 1.40 par two aided page. , Fee charged to be direct coat of duplication aa,gaverned by the Public Records Act. $.20 per page - $.40 par two sided page or 1.20 per sq. ft. for maps & overeizad dacuwente. 1130 deposit, refunded if permit not granted. 14. 9 1I JaNmU'1 AO A113: woad -I O 8B L LL£ 0T£ 90/90'd 17179# Sep -22-99 09:42 City of Lomita CA 310 3254024 P.01 • • ---r -) : C 15. I [-OS TA :.31 3'71-iZh�s poi? /f‘c L �_so hQ <cryciT- L CITY OF LOMITA SCHEDULE OF PLANNING AND ZONING FEES (AS OF NOVEMBER 1, 1991) APPLICATION Administrative Site Plan Site Plan Review Conditional Use Permit* Zone Variance* Zone Change* Height Variation Permit* Tentative Tract Map* Tentative Parcel Map* Lot Line Adjustment Certificate of Compliance Lot Merger Appeals of Lot Line Adjustment & Lot Merger All other appeals Parkland Acquisition Fee (Required for Tract and Parcel Maps only) Negative Declaration/Categorical Exemption Environmental Impact Report Negative Declaration (Wildlife Impact) Environmental Impact Report (Wildlife Impact) FEE AMOUNT $000. $ 75. $300. $300. $300. $300. $300. $300. $150. $150. $000 $100. $150. plus plus plus plus $50/unit $50/unit actual costs actual costs Calculated by Planning staff for each map $ 25. Cost plus 25% plus $25 $1,275. Cost plus 25% plus $875. *Environmental Report required '99 11:36AM CITY OF MANHATTAN EH P.1/3 J ir,SEP 20 City of Manhattan Bikh 1400 Highland Avenue Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 phone: (310) 545-5621 Fax Numbers : City Hall (310) 545-5234 Personnel � Purchasino (310) 546-9032 FAX CovEa SHEET FAX: FROM: 7?) � DEPT.: PHONE:. !3101 (F.°Z'5-07' eggi DATE: NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): MEMO: If you do not receive all pages, please call the above number and extension. 744 P.2/3 ;SEP 20 '99 11.37AM CITY OF MANHATTAN EH 411 PLANNING AND ZONING FEE SCHEDULE '(Effective April 1, 1999) CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AMENDMENTS Conditional Use Permit Amendment (Residential/Commercial) $ 1102" ** General Plan or Specific Plan Amendment $ 2206 x: Residential Planned Development Permit Amendment $ 1102 * MBMC Code Text Amendment $ 2206 __ Zoning Map Amendment • $ ** Senior Citizen RPD Permit Amendment $ 1102 "_ APPEALS Appeal to City Council of PC Decision Appeal to CC or PC of Administrative Decision Conformance Appeal COASTAL Approval in Concept Coastal Development Permit (Public Hearing) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT . Residential Commercial CONDOMINIUM FEES Conditional Use Permit (2 -Unit Condo's Exempt) Tentative Parcel/ Tract Map (less than 4 units) $ 425 $ 425 $ 425 $ 114 $' 1661 ** $ 2203 $ 2735 $ 2203 $ 534 - x* ** *(Above fees are for initial filing; see subdivision map fees below for additional fees applicable at time of final parcel / tract map filing.) SUBDIVISION APPLICATION (PARCEL / TRACT MAPS) Tentative Parcel / Tract Map (less than 4 Tots / units) Final Parcel Map / final Tract Map Mapping Deposit (paid with Final Map Application) Quimby (Parks and Recreation) Fee (new' lot / unit) Certificate of Compliance Time Extension Applications Lot Line Adjustment Consolidation of Two or More Parcels Revision to Acreage Parcel Map REPORT OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDING . ADDRESS CHANGE $ 534 $ 534 $ 432 $1654 $ 514 $. 214 $ 514 $ .514 " $ 514- 77 166 „ySEP 20 '99 11:37AM CITY OF MANHATTAN EH P.3/3 1 • VARIANCE AND MINOR EXCEPTION Variance $ 2735 ** Minor Exception $ 881 MISCELLANEOUS PLANNING APPLICATIONS Development Agreement • $ 5510 Large Family Day Care Permit $ 491 Neighborhood Overlay District Application $ 3018 Residential Planned Development Permit $ 1661 Specific Plan $ 5510 Senior Citizen Residential Planned Development Permit $ 1661 Temporary Use Permit (per MBMC Section 10.84.110) $ 303 New Unit Fee, $ , 700 Zoning Report (for development potential) $ 92 SIGN PERMIT Permanent Sign (Permit Fee - %2 Building Permit Fee) Temporary Sign Permanent / Temporary Sign Bond - ,Sign Appeal $ .90 $ 57 $ 275 $ 425 ** ** ** ** ENVIRONMENTAL FEES Whether a project qualifies for an Environmental Assessment filing as, "Categorically Exempt - No Initial Study Required”, depends on the nature of the project. Those applications shown without an asterisk are "ministerial projects" per the City's adopted CEQA Guidelines_ To assign a fee, use the following schedule. Any questions concerning the level of environmental review necessary should be directed to the Community Development Department, at (310) 545-5621, Extension 292. * Environmental Assessment (No Initial Study / Categorically Exempt from CEQA $ 114 . Environmental Assessment (initial Study / Not Categorically Exempt from CEQA .$1418 Fish and Game County Clerk Fee (Do Not Date Check) $ 25 ENTERTAINMENT PERMITS :Class I Permit (Initial Fee) Class 1 Permit (Renewal Fee) Class 11 Permit Revised '4/99 $ 300 $ 182 $-182 09/20/99 09:34 FAX 310 378 7820 CITY OF PVE L001 Post -it® Fax Note 7671 Date ll M pa°gesio• To 0 From vjekkal Co.1V f III Co/Dept. Phone # Phone # • Fax# Fax# CITY OF PALOS VERDES ESTATES PLANNING APPLICATION Owner: Address: Telephone # Work # Applicant/Architect: Address: Telephone # Work # Fax # Project Address: Legal Description: Zone: Lot: Block: Tract: Project Description: Please indicate with a check mark which applications are being requested: Neighborhood Compatibility - $892.00 Additional NC Review - $446:00 NC Extension by City Council - $224,00 Coastal Waiver - $76.50 Grading Application - $743.00 NC Extension by Staff- $109,00 Miscellaneous Application - $224.00 Coastal Development - $1.114,00 Coastal Development - $556,50 in conjunction with NC/GA etc. Sports Court - $743,00 • Variance - $1,114.00 Sign Plan Non -complying - $694.00 Lighting Permit - $743.00 Conceptual Project - $191.00 Satellite Dish over 1<$" - $114,50 Other Conditional Use Permit - $1.114,00 Environmental Initial Study - $1,119.00 Sign Plan complying - $82.00 Landscape Plan Review - $519.00 Minor Lot Line Adiustment - $743,00 Site plan or revisions $88.50 To be Completed by Staff Miscellaneous Receipt # Date Applicationfs Received Fees Paid Application #s 340 Palos Verdes Drive West - Palos Verdes Estates CA 90274-1299 (310) 378-0383 • Fax (310) 378-7820 WinwordlLGriRin\Plenningl,lpplie\Cover99.doc 8/99 RANCHO PALOS VERDES DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING. BUILDING, AND CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT FAX (310) 377:=9659 PLANNING & CODE ENFORCEMENT PHONE (310) 377-6003 (310) 541-7702 BUILDING AND SAFETY PHONE FAX COVER SHEET a6 (Incise, al-6, TO: �v i /. ATTN: fio J � f__ y•rFAX NO.: ) - J�� 22 TEL NO.: M VDATE:FROM: i:f l� C1t7v 6 l TOTAL PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE): :, SUBJECT: aele_itiLz`ew DOCUMENT FAXED: ,.%f;7./1( r. eCt..L_ REMARKS: W:\Forms\P1ng\misc\FAXFORM.doc 30940 HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD / RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA 90275-x391 DEPT. NO (310) 377-6008 FAX NO. (310) 377-8659 MAIN CITY HALL N0. (310) 377-0360 FAX NO. (310) 377-9868 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 10 'd 6998LL£O1£ 'ON XU3 308d IIdN WU 90:01 NOW 66-0Z—d3S DEPARTMENT OF PLANNINu, BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENO FEE SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE MAY 31, 19,97 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 1°40.92-68 AND AMENDED BY CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS No. 96-10, N o. 96-86, No. 96-100, AND No. 97-2u Application Type f Fee • ..._ Minor Applications Business License/Home Occupation $12 Certificate of Compliance $1,010 City Tree Review Pe rmit No Fee Coastal Permit Non -appea la ble $470 (Hearing Officer) Appealable $580 Covenant Proce ssing $35 Cove na nt Termination $35 Exotic Animal Permit _ $20 Fences, Walls and Hedges $310 Foliage Analysis $110 Geologic Reviews Assessment Report (single family reside nce and small scale projects) Trust Deposit (initial deposit of $900 f or review by City Geotechnic al Consultant) G eologic Site Visit Trust Deposit (initial deposit of $250 for site visit by City Geotechnical Consultant) Geology Report Review (Tract Dev elopmen t, EJR Geolo gy Report etc) Trust Deposit (initial amount to be determined by Staff) Geologic Investigation Permit $180 plus Security Deposit as determin ed by Staff Grading Minor: 20 to 50 cubic yards or 3' to 5' of cut or fill $195 51 to 999 cubic yards or 51 to 4,999 cubic yards of remedial grading $390 plus Trust Deposit (minimum initial deposit to be determined by Staff) 1,000 to 9,999 cubic yards or 5.000 to 9,999 cubic yards of remedial grading' $520 plus Tnist Deposit (minimum initial deposit to be determined by Staff) 1 Considered a major application Page 1 Resolution N o. 97- 26 EXHIBIT A ZO 'd 6598LL£01£ 'ON XHd 3OOd AdI WU 90:01 NOW 66-OZ-d3S Applicatio n Ty. • Fee Grading (continued) 10,000 to 99,999 cubic yards' $740 plus Trust Deposit (minimum initial deposit to be d etermined by Staff) 100,000 cubic yards or gre ater Ham Radio Antenna Pe rmit2 Landscape Pla n Check and Inspection Large Dornestic Animal Permit Standard Permit 5960 plus Trust Deposit (minimum initial deposit to be d etermined by Staff) Conditiona l Permit Large Family Day Care Lot Line Adjustment Parking Lot Permit 2 to 5 lots 0 or more lots Te mporary 5685 5240 $20 520 5410 $430 plus Trust Deposit for City Engineer Review Trust Deposit (minimum initial deposit to be determined by Staff) Permanent Planning Certification Letter Reversion to Acreage Sign Permit (Staff Review) Temporary' Permanent 5200 $460 5110 5275 plus 515 per lot 565 (one or more) 5110 plus $5 for each additional sign Site Plan Review° Addition / Accessory Struc ture' $65 Ne w Residence Second Unit Antenna - ham radio Antenna - satellite dish Special Construction Permit Special Use Permit Temporary Vendor Permit 5110 5260 (plus a Trust Deposit as determined by Staff for review of any required technical reports .) Use / Interpretation Procedure $290 $460 565 $380 7This perrnit type is required only if the a ntenna Gorr not qualify for the Sit e Plan Review Process. 3A $50 refundable Security Deposit shall be collected for any Temporary Sign in the Public Riaht .of-way . `1The fee for any staff level Site Plan Review that reouires a site visit shall be 5110.00 regardless of the type of proposal. P age 2 Resolution No. 97- 26 EXHIBIT A £0 'd 6998LL£Oi£ 'ON XU. 308d AdN WU LO:OI NOW 66-OZ-d3S Application TO • 0 Fee Major Applications Affordable Housing Feasibility Analysis Trust Deposit (minimum initial deposit to be determined by Staff) Coastal Permit Nonappealable $720' (Planning Commission) Appealable $1,1505 Coastal Specific Initiation Request $330 Plan Amendment Application Trust Deposit (minimum initial deposit of $4,500) Code Initiation Request $330 Amendment Application Trust Deposit (minimum initial deposit to be determined by Staff) Conditional Use Revision to Existing CUP $600 Permit New CUP for pre-existing use $600 New CUP $2,400 Residential Planned Development $2,400 (a Trust Deposit may also be required based on the complexity of the proposal) Density Bonus Request Trust Deposit (minimum initial deposit of $2,000) Encroachment Standard $700 Permit Tract Entrance Observation Structures Trust Deposit (minimum initial deposit of $1,000) Environmental Assessment Initial Study / Negative Declaration $1,230 Environmental Impact Report Trust Deposit (minimum initial deposit to be determined by Staff) Extreme Slope Permit 5410 General Pien Amendment Initiation Request $330 Application Trust Deposit (minimum initial deposit to be determined by Staff) Height Variation Permit Staff Review $1,000 Planning Commission Review $ 9,260 Landslide Moratorium Exclusion Trust Deposit (minimum initial deposit to be determined by Staff) Landslide Moratorium Exception Permit Staff Review $110 City Council $r30 $if the Coastal Permit is filed in conjunction with (Oct' applications for concurrent processing, the fee shall be one ha (112) of the stated fee. 170 'd 6S98LL£OI£ 'ON XU3 Page 3 Resolution No. 97- 26 EXHIBIT A 308d Add WU LO:OI NOW 66-OZ-d3S Minor Exception Permit rarJ(JI I MUWVI1 l iliC $320 Miscellaneous Hearing $260 Parcel Map Tentative or Vesting Tentative $2,020 plus Trust Deposit for City Engine; ,review Final 3500 plus Trust Deposit for City Engineer Review Sign Permit (Planning Commission) Temporary 5370 Permanent $540 plus 520 for each ad'• :iona! sign Specific Plan Application Trust Deposit (minimum initial deposit to be determined by Staff) Amendment Trust Deposit (minimum initial deposit of $4,500) Tract Map Tentative or Vesting Tentative Trust Deposit (minimurn initial deposit of 39,900) Final Trust Deposit (minimum initial deposit to be. determined by Staff) plus Trust Deposit for City Engineer Review Variance $1,140 View Restoration Permit $105 initial base plus Trust Deposit (minimum initial deposit to be determined by Staff) Zone Change Trust Deposit (minimum initial deposit of $4,550) Revisions and Amendments Half of the permit fee for applications with a flat fee, or a Trust. Deposit (as determined by Staff) for those applications which required, or would have required a Trust Deposit originally Minor Application Appeals (except Coastal Permits) 3700 per appellant Major Application Appeals Penalty Fee (After the Fact Applications) Time Extensions 3940 per appellant Double the application fee $100 or the amount of the original application fee if less than $100 Address File - Public Review (5 complimentary copies included) 310 Stamping Extra Plans Revised: 04101/97 N.1 GR O U R LP LAN N t N GIFO RM S1P EE. S C H $25 per set beyond those required for plan check Page 4 Resolution No. 97- 26 EXHIBIT A 50 d 6598LL601S 'ON XV3 308d AdN WV L0:01. NON 66-Oz-d3S SEP 23 '99 01:58PM CITY OF REDONDO ECH P.1 • New fees e f eet&v_e_1 Resolution; 8027 Planning Fees ariancc: , a) All land uses except single family homes b) Single-family homes Zoning Map Amendment Planning Commission Review $660.00 • $365.00 $1085.00 $580.00 a) Fee waived when in conjunction with an application for a Conditional Use Permit for a condominium; b) Fee waived for signs in conjunction with application for a Conditional Use Permit; c) Fee waived when in conjunction with an application for a Building Moving Permit. Planned Development Review a. In conjunction with establishment of PLD overlay zone $1440.00 (Fees waived for Zoning Map Amendment and Planning Commission Review); b. Addition/substantial alteration to an existing development $580.00 (Fees waived for Planning Commission Review). Condit on 1 Use Permit a) All uses except condominiums $900.00 b) Condominiums $1155.00* '(plus $580,00 per unit, plus a supplemental fee of $1810.00 for condominium conversion) • Administrative Design Review no fee Modification $300.00 Temporary Use Permit no fee Building Moving Permit $ 1440.00 • Tract Map $1085.00 Parcel Map $1085.00 Environmental Assessment 5720.00 Extensions of Discretionary Approvals $185.00 (No additional fee is charge for extensions of multiple approvals in conjunction with the same project) Appeals 5100.00 SEP 23 '99 a1:58PM CITY OF REDONDO.ECH • P.2 a) No additional fee is charged for appeals of multiple applications in Conjunction with the same project; b) Fee refunded if appeal is upheld. Coastal Development Permit a) Non -advertised b) Advertised Development Agreement Lot Line Adjustment $40.00 $100.00 51440:00 $580.00 Zoning Ordinance (1996) $15.00 General Plan $25.00 General Plan Appendix ...,..$8.00 Harbor/Civic Center Specific Plan $8.00 Land Use Elements (contains map) $6.00 General Plan Map $2.00 09/22/99 15:58 FAX 310 377 4468 CITY OF R.H.E. (1dj001 City of Rolling Hills Estates Fees & Charges Fiscal Year 1999 - 2000 Post -it" Fax Note 7671 Date 9,,v_gei pages & To �h {f J From A _ ? . D . •P.�f L. CoJDepL Co. Phone # Phone # /E2Fax . Fax# :1 09/22/99 15:59 FAX 310 377 4468 • CITY OF R.H.E. U002 DEPARTMENT/FEE CATEGORY il. FINANCE Business License Application Business License — Horse Trainers Certain Businesses Permit Fee Dance Permit Entertainment Permit Fire/Going Out of Business Sale Fortune Telling Permit Solicitor's Permit (Commercial) Solicitor's Permit (Non -Commercial) TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 11. GENERAL GOVERNMENT _ Annual Budget 3 Annual Financial Report 3 Calendar 3 Fees and Charges Book 3 Maps — also see Planning 4 Microfiche copies 4 Photocopies 4 Per Video Tape Duplication 4 Per Audio Tape Duplication 4 Parking Permits 4 _ Resident Handbook 4 Returned Check 4 ID. MISCELLANEOUS CODE ENFORCEMENT Alarm Fines 4 False Alarms 4 Noise Variance 4 Sound Amplification 4 P1. PLANNING Actions Requiring City Council Approval 5 Application to approve action 5 Conditional Use Permit 5 Continuance/Extensions 5 — Demolition - Rehab Processing Fees 5 Environmental Assessment - Initial Studies 5 Environmental Impact Report 5 Family Day Care 5 Grading Permit 6 Maps 6 _ Minor Deviation 6 Minor Land Subdivision - Filing of Tentative Map 6 Minor Land Subdivision - Appeal 6 1 09/22/99 15:59 FAX 310 377 4468 CITY OF R.H.E. Cj003 • TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) DEPARTMENT/FEE CATEGORY PAGE N. PLANNING (CONTINUED) Multiple Application 6 Negative Declaration — Appeal 6 Neighborhood Compatibility Study Reports 6 Neighborhood Compatibility 6 New Construction 6 On -Site Inspection 6 Over the Counter Approval 6 Precise Plan of Design 7 Residential Building Records 7 Residential Development Standards 7 Searchlight Permit 7 Signs Permit 7 Signs - Temporary in right-of-way 7 Special Use Permit 7 Subdivision - DevelopmentNesting Tentative Map 7 Temporary Use Permit 7 Traffic Impact Analysis Surcharge 7 Variance 7 View Preservation Site Inspection 7 Zone Change 7 V. RECREATION Ernie Howlett Equestrian Facilities 8 Single Event Trainer Business License 8 Horseshows 8 Park Permit 9 Ernie Howlett- Kitchen Rental 9 Stable Board 9 Special Recreation Events 9 Cross Country Run Tracy Austin Tennis Tournament Swimming 10 Tennis 10 Non -Resident Recreation Class Surcharge 11 Nature Center Group Tours 11 APPENDIX Precise Plan of Design (PPD) Class Descriptions 12 Cost Recovery Basis of fees 12 Park Land Dedication 12 Business License 0 12 AB 939 Fees 12 Franchise Fees 12 2 09/22/99 16:00 FAX 310 377 4468 CITY OF R.H.E. i7j004 • • L FINANCE Code Reference Account Code Description Approved Fee 5.08.010 01-3140 Business License Application New License $ 20.00 Renewal $ 10.00 5.08.100 01-3140 Business License -Horse Trainers Per Day $ 25.00 Per Year $300.00 5.12.090 01-3140 Certain Businesses Application Fee $ 50.00 Renewal $ 15.00 5.24.020 01-3140 Dance Permit $ 50.00 528.030 01-3140 Entertainment Permit $100.00 5.28.110 Appeal Revocation $100.00 520.040 01-3140 Flre/Going Out of Business Sale $250.00 & $10/day Max. 30 days 5.32.060 01-3140 Fortune Telling Permit Application Fee $100.00 Business License $ 50.00 5.48.080 014140 Solicitor's Permit (Commercial) Fee Per Day • $ 50.00 Fee Per Quarter $200.00 Fee Per Year $500.00 Solicitor's Permit (Non -Commercial) No fee 11. GENERAL GOVERNMENT 01-3730 Annual Budget $ 10.00 01-3730 Annual Financial Report $ 10.00 01-3730 Calendar $ 2.00 01-3730 Fees and Charges Book $ 3.50 3 09/22/99 16:00 FAX 310 377 4468 CITY OF R.H.E. a005 • • 11. GENERAL GOVERNMENT (continued) Reference Account Code Description Approved Fee 01-3730 Maps: Peninsula Realtors No Charge Trails/Bike Paths $ 0.25 95-3730 PVPHA Trail Map $ 10.00 01-3730 Microfiche copies $ 1.00/page Parking Permits $ 25.00/permit Non-refundable Per Video Tape Duplication $25.00 Per Audio Tape Duplication $15.00 Photocopies $ 0.25/page Resident Handbook No Charge Returned Check $ 10.00 III. MISCELLANEOUS CODE ENFORCEMENT 8.08.150 01-3520 Alarm Fines Alarm Permit Install Alarm w/o permit Failure to take corrective action: lst Offense 2nd Offense 3rd & Subsequent No charge $100.00 $ 50.00 $100.00 $200.00 Operating audible alarm without 10 minute auto reset $100.00 Operating a direct dial service $250.00 8.08.150 01-3520 False Alarm Fines For each false alarm $ 50.00 Penalty - after lst notice $ 15.00 8.32.230 01-3510 Noise Variance Application Fee $ 50.00 8.32.220 01-3510 Sound Amplification $ 50.00 4 09/22/99 16:00 FAX 310 377 4468 CITY OF R.H.E. a006 IV. PLANNING Reference Account Code Description 01-3410 Actions Requiring City Council Approval (Encroachment Permit, etc.) 01-3410 01-3410 Application for approval validating an action taken without having first formally sought City approval. Conditional Use Penult Single Request Appeal Continuance of Matters before City Council or Planning Commission First request Second request Each subsequent 01.3410 Extension of permit time 8.12.280 01-3410 Demolition/Rehab Processing Fees Preparation of job specs City Council Approval Compliance Inspection Billing Assessment Filing Fee Rehearing by Planning Commission on substandard declaration 01-3410 Environmental Assessment 01-3410 Environmental Impact 01-3410 Landscaping Fees 01-3410 Family Day Care Application Appeal 5 Approved Fee $325.00 Double -fee $600.00 $300.00 No fee 50% of original fee 50% + 10% for each request 50% of original fee Actual cost $ 80.00 Actual cost $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $250.00 or Actual cost + $205 whichever is greater Subcontractor Actual cost + 21% Administrative overhead Subcontractor Actual cost + 21% Administrative overhead $325.00 $175.00 09/22/99 16:01 FAX 310 377 4468 CITY OF R.H.E. Ij007 • IV. PLANNING (Continued) Reference Account Code Description 01-3410 Grading Permit 1-10 cubic yards 11 cubic yards and up 01-3410 Maps Blueprints of City Maps (Zoning Map, etc.) Approved Fee Admin. approval $325.00 $ 10.00 01-3410 Minor Deviation $325.00 Appeal to City Council $175.00 16.16.030(b) 01-3410 Minor Land Subdivision Filing Tentative Map LA County fees + 21% 16.16.130 Appeal $300.00 — 01-3410 Multiple Application Fees Filed Cost of the most For the Same Project (applicable to expensive + half the CUP, SUP, Variance, MD and grading only) cost of all other apps. 01-3410 Negative Declaration Appeal 5125.00 01-3410 Neighborhood Compatibility Study Reports $10%py 01-3410 Neighborhood Compatibility Second Story Addition $500.00 Appeal $250.00 All Others $325.00 Appeat $175.00 3.20.030 01-3170 New Construction $500/unit 01-3410 On -Site Inspection $150.00 01-3410 Over the Counter Approval $100.00 6 09/22/99 16:01 FAX 310 377 4468 CITY OF R.H.E. U008 • • IV. PLANNING (continued) Reference Account Code Description 01-3410 5.52.040 01-3410 01-3730 5.56.030 01-3730 01-3230 01-3730 Precise Plan of Design (See Appendix A for description of PPD Classes) Fee Appeal Class (1) $200.00 $100.00 Class (2) $300.00 $150.00 Class (3) $500.00 $250.00 Class (4) $600.00+ $300.00 + $0.15 per sq. ft. in excess 10,000 sq. ft. Class (5) $1,050.00+ $525.00 + $0.01 per sq. ft. in excess 50,000 sq. ft Residential Building Records with Site Inspection Residential Development Standards Searchlight Permit Sign Permit Signs - Temporary (in right-of-way) Special Use Permit Appeal 16.04.050 01-3410 Subdivision 5.64.030 01-3410 Temporary Use Permit Traffic Impact Analysis Surcharge 01-3410 Variance Appeal 01-3410 View Preservation Site Inspection 01-3410 Zone Change Single request Appeal Each additional request 7 Approved Fee $100.00 $150.00 $ 5.00 $100.00/day $100.00 No fee for non-profit $325.00 $175.00 LA County fees + development/vesting consultant fees + 21% $100.00 Direct Costs + 21% $500.00 $250.00 $150.00 $600.00 $300.00 50% of basic fee 09/22/99 16:02 FAX 310 377 4468 CITY OF R.H.E. Ij009 • V. RECREATION Reference Account Code Description 50-3454 Ernie Howlett Park Equestrian Facilities Rental Approved Fee Activity Event Charge/Day A English, Western, or combination $500/day B Driving shows using all three rings $350.00 C Dressage show using all three rings $350.00 D Dressage show using dressage ring and a warm-up ring $250.00 E Clinic or demonstrations that charge participants or spectators using two or more rings $150.00 F Clinic or demonstrations that charge participants or spectators and use dressage arena only $50.00 maximum or $5.00 per rider G Clinics and other uses that are free to public and participants No charge Activity Refundable Event Charge A & B Clean-up and restoration due when event is scheduled $200.00 C, D & E Clean-up and restoration due when event is scheduled $100.00 A only Damage deposit for use of City jumps $200.00 01-3140 Single -Event Trainer Business License for event held in conjunction with rental of Emie Howlett Equestrian Facilities 50-3454 Jump/Judges Stand Rental City Jump Judge's Stand at Dressage $100.00 $200.00 day $ 65.00/day 50-3454 Stall Rental Box Stall $ 15.00/day Paddock $ 10.00/day Combo $ 20.00/day Renter is responsible for own feeding, cleaning, and shavings 50-3454 Horseshows Rated Warm-up $ 5.00/ride Regular $ 15.00/ride Medal $ 20.00/class Unrested Warmup $ 5.00/ride Regular $ 8.00/ride Medal $10.00/class 8 09/22/99 16:02 FAX 310 377 4468 CITY OF R.H.E. 01010 • • V. RECREATION (continued) Reference Account Code Description Ord610 50-3454 (continued) Dressage Regular Classes AHSA Qualifying If combined with regular AHSA drug fee AHSA nonmember CDS nonmember 01-3620 Park Permit Refundable Deposit Rental Kitchen Facilities Ernie Howlett Park (Non-refundable) 50-3450 Rolling Hills Estates Equestrian Center Stable Board (Resident) Box Stall Pipe Corral w/shavings Pipe Corral 50-3453 50-3450 95-3440,401 95.3440,400 Non-resident boarder Surcharge Trailer Parking Special Recreation Events Cross Country Run Pre -registration with shirt Race Day registration w/shirt Tracy Austin Tournament Tennis Member Nonmember 9 Approved Fee $ 35.00 $ 35.00 $ 50.00 $ 3.00 $ 15.00 $ 5.00 $ 50.00 $ 25.00 $290/month $250/month $235/month $ 20/month $ 25/month $ 17.00 $ 20.00 $ 25.00 $ 30.00 09/22/99 16:02 FAX 310 377 4468 CITY OF R.H.E. • • d�. o11 V. RECREATION (continued) Reference Account Code Description Approved Fee 01-3420 Swimming Memberships (Residents) (No refunds after first day of program) Individual $ 80.00 Family (1-2 children) $140.00 Family (3-4 children) $160.00 Family (5-6 children) $180.00 Additional Lessons $ 40.00/child 51-3461 Non-residents Add $ 5.00 to above fees Nonmember Daily Swim Fee $ 2.00 Tennis Center Fees Memberships (Individual) New member resident New member non-resident Individual Renewal Before May 31, 1998 (resident) Before May 31, 1998 (non-resident) After May 31, 1998 (resident) After May 31, 1998 (non-resident) Family Renewal Before May 31, 1998 (resident) Before. May 31, 1998 (non-resident) After May 31, 1998 (resident) After May 31, 1998 (non-resident) 51-3460 Daily Court Fees $ 25.00 $ 30.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 25.00 $ 30.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 60.00 $ 70.00 Members: Weekdays 8 am to dose $ 4.50 Weekends/Holidays $ 5.50 Seniors & Youth $ 2.00 (18 & under, 62 & over) Non -Members: Weekdays 8 am to close $ 5.50 Weekends/Holidays $ 6.50 Seniors & Youth $ 3.25 Tournaments Court fees as determined above plus surcharge per court 10 $ 2.00 09/22/99 16:03 FAX 310 377 4468 CITY OF R.H.E. 11012 V. RECREATION (continued) Reference Account Code Description Approved Fee 51-3460 Tennis Balls $ 3.50 01-3730 Non -Resident Recreation Class surcharge 10% of class fee Nature Center 01-3730 Group Tours $2/Tour Adults $1/Children 11 09/22/99 16:03 FAX 310 377 4468 CITY OF R.H.E. • • 1j 013 — APPENDIX Precise Plan of Design (PPD) CLASSES: Class 1 • Alterations to exterior of structures. • Additions to existing buildings in commercial districts not exceeding 400 sq. ft. floor area. • Construction of new structure not exceeding 400 sq. ft. floor area. • Alterations to existing vehicle parking and/or landscaping area. Class 2 • Additions to existing structure exceeding 400 sq. ft and/or development of new building in an existing developed commercial center providing that such additions do not exceed 2,000 sq. ft. of total floor area. Class 3 • Additions to existing and/or new buildings to be developed commercial centers exceeding 2,000 sq. ft. of floor space, but less than 10,000 sq. ft. of floor area. • Development of a previously undeveloped commercial site not exceeding 10,000 sq. ft. of floor area. Class 4 • All commercial development exceeding 10,000 sq. ft. of floor area and not exceeding 50,000 sq. ft. Class 5 • All commercial development exceeding 50,000 sq. ft. of floor area. The following items provide additional information related to Fees and Charges: The City charges various fees on a cost recovery basis only. Park Land Dedication Fee: Refer to Municipal Code Sections 16.08 Business Licenses: Refer to Municipal Code Sections 5.04-5.64 AB 939 Fees: There is a 10% charge on all businesses located in the City, excluding home occupations and a $1 charge per resident per month for solid waste analysis and reduction. This fee is reviewed annually. Franchise fees: The City has exclusive franchise agreements based on a fixed percentage of gross receipts with the following companies: Southern California Edison, Southern Califomia Gas, and California Water Service Company are all based on 2% of gross receipts arising from the use, operation or possession of the franchise and no less than 1% of the gross receipts derived from the sale of electricity, gas, and water, respectively; Cox Communications Palos Verdes, Inc. provides franchise fees for cable based on 5% of gross receipts; and Browning -Ferris Industries franchise fees for residential solid waste are based on 10% of gross receipts. The City also has non-exclusive franchise agreements for commercial haulers of solid waste in the City based on 10% of gross receipts which is the same rate charged on the exclusive residential refuse franchise. 12 09/20/99 MON 12:25 FAX 310 618 5829 or Torrance Planning Ha City of Torrance, Planning Department 3031 Torrance Blvd., Torrance, CA 90503 (310) 618-5990 Fax: (310) 618-5829 Development Application G 4�erasKt�P" 11001 1‘93-11 CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR CORRECT FEES IF FILING MORE THAN ONE APPLICATION ON THE SAME PROPERTY. THE FOLLOWING MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH THE ATTACHED APPLICATION: (NOTE: ALL DRAWINGS MUST BE TO SCALE). CONTACT PLANNING DEPARTMENT REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FEES/PLANS (PLANS MUST BE FOLDED). CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP)/DEVELOPMENT PERMIT MVP) Filing Fee $1,085 Notification Fee $174 Engineering Map $10 PRECISE PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT (PP) Filing Fee $1,302 Notification Fee $174 Engineering Map $10 PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW (PCR) Filing Fee $1,085 Notification Fee $174 Engineering Map $10 Plans: 23 copies including Plot Plan, Elevations and Floor Plans (Plans need to be stapled, collated and folded 8" x 11" size) - approximately 9" x 12" Plans: 23 copies including Plot Plan, Elevations and Floor Plans (Plans need to be stapled, collated and folded 8" x 11" size) Plans: 23 copies including Plot Plan, Elevations and Floor Plans (Plans need to be stapled, collated and folded 8" x 11" size) ZONE CHANGES (ZC) Filing Fee $2,661 + time and materials in excess of fee Notification Fee $316 WAIVER (W) Filing Fee $814 Responses to criteria with adjacent Property Owners List VARIANCE (V) Filing Fee $2,798 Notification Fee $316 Responses to criteria Plans: 16 copies including Plot Plan, Elevations and Floor Plans (Plans need to be stapled, collated and folded 8" x 11" size) Plans: 40 copies including Plot Plan, Elevations and Floor Plans (Plans need to be stapled, collated and folded 8" x 11" size) DIVISION OF LOT (D) Filing Fee $976 Parcel Map: Show existing improvements; 23 copies Notification Fee $174 Engineering Map $27 per lot Title Declaration (seperate sheet) TENTATIVE TRACT (TT) Filing Fee $1,085 Tract Map: Show existing improvements; 23 copies Notification Fee $174 Engineering Map $27 per lot Title Declaration (separate sheet) VALIDATION PERMIT (VP) Filing Fee $2,397 Notification Fee $174 Responses to criteria and Owner Statement GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (GPA) Filing Fee $2,634 Notification Fee $316 Plans: 23 copies including Plot Plan, Elevations and Floor Plans (Plans need to be stapled, collated and folded 8" x 11" size) Location Map Letter of Request FENCE HEIGHT EXCEPTIONS Filing Fee $196 Fence Height Waiver: r__—_---- s..._a„�........,t ...7:..,.....4 T1,...r,crFcs (iiAmcrc T.ict Plans: Five copies including Plot Plan, Elevation and fence section showing height (Plans need to be stapled, collated and folded 8" x 11" size) 09/20/99 MON 12:25 FAX 310 618 5829 • Torrance Planning a a 002 ®' P al��set— r F City of Torrance, Planning Department cc :Rat 'E u 3031 Torrance Blvd., Torrance, CA 90503 (310) 618-5990 Schedule of Fees ,BIOENT1Pv .t i�PF'•tni_��ni�F.�N '�X`:'f7•�r .a-, af!%j.-r�-_y Y}-'i..; _ �i�:_ .., .. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) $ 1,085 $ 543 $ 174 $ 10 Division of Lot (DIV) $ 976 $ 488 $ 174 . $ 27'per lot Environmental Assessment (EAS) $ 814 — $ 174 — General Plan Amendment (GPA) $ 2,634 $ 1,317 $ 316 — Modification of CUP, PRE, PCR, DVP $ 1,085 $ 543 $ 174 — Planning Commission Review (PCR) $ 1,085 $ 543 $ 174 $ 10 Precise Plan of Development (PRE) $ 1,302 $ 651 $ 174 $ 10 Tentative Tract (TTM) $ 1,085 $ 543 $ 174 $ 27 per lot Validation Permit (VAL) $ 2,397 — $ 174 — Variance (VAR) $ 2,798 $ 1,399 $ 316 — Waiver (WAV) $ 814 $ 407 — — Zone Change (ZON) $ 2,661 $ 1,331 $ 316 — Development Permit (DVP) $ 1,085 $ 543 $ 174 — ___ f-40 'i- 'C �}{:t YL 1 ' M3R . _ W. 4! :: .•n �3�R� ��Ts•= rs _ y�rf , 5..:iF,.y�x ? �C�.�,'�.,�. } .. . -, :! } .. . z _ •Vus. €h., i,,- is=,.,,;«_ -oaf _z — # 13 ��i €:� "1 � _ - =8' 'iI�..M:': v.I:Lo_-.-F.Y=.:�. 3a .:Y' _�::,:-a'_c.: __3•N1:: 7;:C:_ ,:t..,.x. � t . ` . � N �.3. - .±r,.=Ys., - :_:` :r�.., >' -k. a7 •a._ _,#_r;_::i�:j!G'r:, ;-'iC;j:s.�.:�..;.i .. .1 - .:� . aY _. , p�ya :3 : L'}A:.y. 3.._�,',_ -..< :..-�,.r__. #��xt'' '}:?. 1.. 3�� __ �: �'G����*i ri.x.1. ,r:=t' -- ...,�..:._ _- -'- i'K Carnival $ 163 Fence Height Exception $ 196 Large Family Day Care Permit $ 153 Minor Hillside Exemption $ 192 Minor Modification of CUP, PRE, PCR, DVP $ 380 Non-residential Trailer $ 169 Parking Lot Sales/ Exceptions $ 204 Satellite Dish $ 182 Temporary Tent $ 188 Time Extension $ 453 Title Company Information Requests $ 98 Minor Conditional Use Permit $ 380 Minor Development Permit $ 380 APPEALS: All appeals of Planning Director Action, Planning Commission Decisions, and Environmental Review Board Decisions must be filed within 15 days of the decision with the City Clerk at a cost of $160.00. Qf Ailing _Ails INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com MEMORANDUM TO: PEGGY MINOR, RHCA MANAGER FROM: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 845: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING AN ADDITIONAL PROCESSING FEE FOR PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATIONS INVOLVING ILLEGAL OR "AS BUILT" PROJECTS, AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 691 REGARDING FEES. DATE: JANUARY 26, 1999 Members of the Rolling Hills City Council adopted the attached Resolution at the City Council meeting held Monday, January 25th This new administrative fee will apply to illegal or "as built" structures or grading that requires discretionaryreview by the Planning Commission. These fees will be charged in addition to those required for Planning Commission review and is effective immediately. If you would like to discuss this further, please do not hesitate to let me know. Thank you for your cooperation. CRN:mlk 01/26/99nccafeereso. mem cc: City Council Planning Director Lola Ungar Panted on Recycled Paper • • RESOLUTION NO. 854 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING AN ADDITIONAL PROCESSING FEE FOR PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATIONS INVOLVING ILLEGAL OR "AS BUILT" PROJECTS, AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 691 REGARDING FEES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 1 of Resolution No. 691 is hereby amended to add a new paragraph Q to read as follows: "Q. An additional $400 processing fee shall be established and charged on Planning and Zoning applications involving illegal or "as built" structures or grading that require Planning Commission review. In addition, a $200 fee shall be charged for each additional "stop work order" that is issued if more than one "stop work order" is required. These processing fees are for processing discretionary cases for Planning and Zoning illegal or "as built" projects that have been constructed without benefit of discretionary hearings and shall be paid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Section 17.30.030 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code." Section 2. Except as herein amended, the provisions of Resolution No. 691 shall remain in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1999. FRANK E. HILL, MAYOR ATTEST: MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 854 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING AN ADDITIONAL PROCESSING FEE FOR PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATIONS INVOLVING ILLEGAL OR "AS BUILT" PROJECTS, AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 691 REGARDING FEES. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on January 25, 1999 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Councilmembers Lay, Murdock, Pernell, Mayor Pro Tem Heinsheimer and Mayor Hill None. None. None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. DEPUTY C CLERK Resolution No. 854 -1- DATE: TO: ATTN: FROM: SUBJECT: • City ofieoffing -WA INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Agenda Item No.: 6.B. Mtg. Date: 1/25/99 JANUARY 25, 1999 HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING AND CHARGING ADMINISTRATIVE FEES FOR ILLEGAL OR "AS BUILT" STRUCTURES OR GRADING THAT REQUIRES DISCRETIONARY REVIEW BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 854: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING AN ADDITIONAL PROCESSING FEE FOR PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATIONS INVOLVING ILLEGAL OR "AS BUILT" PROJECTS, AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 691 REGARDING FEES. BACKGROUND On January 11, 1999, the City Council requested that a public hearing be held regarding the establishment and charge of administrative fees for illegal or "as built" structures or grading that requires discretionary review by the Planning Commission. Draft Resolution No. 854 that establishes the stated fees is attached. Following a request by the City Council on June 27, 1998, the Planning Commission looked at methods to discourage illegal construction, also known as "as built" projects. This review was precipitated by the presentation to the City Council of three Planning Commission resolutions approving modifications to projects that involved grading and construction without permits and without Planning Commission approval. On October 20, 1998, as a result of their review, the Commission recommended to the City Council that an additional $400 administrative fee be charged on applications for illegal or "as built" structures or grading that require Commission review and that $200 be charged for each additional "stop work order" that is issued if more than one "stop work order" is required. The Commission also recommended that the suggestions of Building and Safety representatives listed on the following page and numbered 1-6 should be observed. FEES FOR ILLEGAL OR "AS BUILT" PROJECTS O PAGE 1 Printed on Recycled Paper. Beginning on August 18, 1998, the Planning Commission reviewed information regarding Building officials' suggestions, nearby cities' practices, a report from Assistant City Attorney Kevin Ennis regarding the level of penalties that could be assessed and an estimate of the monetary value of the additional staff time required for enforcement and review of "as built" projects. During the fall of 1997, at least four construction projects took place without benefit of City and County permits. They were brought to the attention of the City by neighbors, the Community Association, the County building inspector, and City employees. Eventually, each of the property owners made application for Planning Commission review. At this time, the Commission has approved all of the four cases and the property owners are required to modify their projects and obtain all necessary County permits. Staff calculated the monetary value/administrative fee for the additional staff time required for enforcement and review of "as built" projects that require a Variance, Conditional Use Permit or Site Plan Review application. Staff involved in the administration process are the City Manager, Planning Director, Building Inspector, and Clerk Typist/Receptionist. The average cost of administration of "as built" projects is $400. (This equates to roughly two hours of time each for the City Manager, Planning Director, and Building Inspector and one-half hour of time for the Clerk Typist/Receptionist). Staff discussed the situation with County Department of Building and Safety representatives District Engineer Ms. Lata Thakar and District Engineering Associate Mr. Rafael Bernal. The following methods were suggested to discourage illegal construction or "as built" projects: 1. Education: Continue to print small articles in the bi-monthly City news bulletin about the need to obtain the permission of the City and the Community Association for the construction of any structure and the possible penalties. 2. Issue a "Stop Work Order" promptly when illegal work is discovered and require the property owner to seek approval from the Planning Commission. 3. Meet with and send a letter to the property owner regarding the need to stop work and the City's requirements when illegal work is discovered. 4. Utilize the sheriff to clear the job site in extreme cases, as determined by the City Manager, should illegal work be continued. 5. Charge a noncompliance Investigation Fee For Work Without Permit as described in Section 107.13 of the Uniform Building Code for each required permit (i.e., grading, building, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical), which results in the payment of double the permit fees for completion/modification/demolition of "as built" projects. 6. Refer the case to the District Attorney for prosecution as a misdemeanor in accordance with Section 1.08.10 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. FEES FOR ILLEGAL OR "AS BUILT" PROJECTS PAGE 2 so • NEARBY Cl'1IES • In the City of Rancho Palos Verdes, illegal projects are given a "Stop Work Order" and all permit fees are subject to two (2) times the original permit fees. • In the City of Palos Verdes Estates, illegal projects are under the jurisdiction of a Code Enforcement Officer to achieve compliance. And, on a case -by -case basis all permit fees are subject to ten (10) times the original permit fees. • The City of Rolling Hills Estates publishes an article about once a year in their city newsletter about the planning process. The building inspector is notified to issue a "Stop Work Order" for illegal projects and all permit fees are subject to two (2) times the original permit fees. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council review the methods suggested to discourage "as built" projects and adopt Resolution No. 854. Should the Council adopt Resolution No. 854, it is recommended that staff prepare a special mailer to be sent to all Rolling Hills property owners, local developers, contractors and realtors and heavily publicize this new administrative fee in the City newsletter. FEES FOR ILLEGAL OR "AS BUILT" PROJECTS 2 PAGE 3 V DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 854 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING AN ADDITIONAL PROCESSING FEE FOR PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATIONS INVOLVING ILLEGAL OR "AS BUILT" PROJECTS, AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 691 REGARDING FEES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 1 of Resolution No. 691 is hereby amended to add a new paragraph Q to read as follows: "Q. An additional $400 processing fee shall be established and charged on Planning and Zoning applications involving illegal or "as built" structures or grading that require Planning Commission review. In addition, a $200 fee shall be charged for each additional "stop work order" that is issued if more than one "stop work order" is required. These processing fees are for processing discretionary cases for Planning and Zoning illegal or "as built" projects that have been constructed without benefit of discretionary hearings and shall be paid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Section 17.30.030 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code." Section 2. Except as herein amended, the provisions of Resolution No. 691 shall remain in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1999. FRANK E. HILL, MAYOR AT"I'EST: MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) §§ I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 854 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING AN ADDITIONAL PROCESSING FEE FOR PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATIONS INVOLVING ILLEGAL OR "AS BUILT" PROJECTS, AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 691 REGARDING FEES. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on January 25, 1999 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 854 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING AN ADDITIONAL PROCESSING FEE FOR PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATIONS INVOLVING ILLEGAL OR "AS BUILT" PROJECTS, • AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 691 REGARDING FEES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 1 of Resolution No. 691 is hereby amended to add a new paragraph Q to read as follows: "Q. An additional $400 processing fee shall be established and charged on Planning and Zoning applications involving illegal or "as built" structures or grading that require Planning Commission review. In addition, a $200 fee shall be charged for each additional "stop work order" that is issued if more than one "stop work order" is required. These processing fees are for processing discretionary cases for Planning and Zoning illegal or "as built" projects that have been constructed without benefit of discretionary hearings and shall be paid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Section 17.30.030 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code." Section 2. Except as herein amended, the provisions of Resolution No. 691 shall remain in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1999. ATTEST: MARILYN <ERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS §§ FRANK E. HILL, MAYOR I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 854 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING AN ADDITIONAL PROCESSING FEE FOR PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATIONS INVOLVING ILLEGAL OR "AS BUILT" PROJECTS, AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 691 REGARDING FEES. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on January 25, 1999 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: None. Councilmembers Lay, Murdock, Pernell, Mayor Pro Tem Heinsheimer and Mayor Hill None. None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. t - Y.„ � YC 2 I ez,, `,� DEPUTY C CLERK Resolution No. 854 -1- CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL AND POSTING STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I am a citizen of the United States. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within proceeding; my business address is 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. On the 11 `4 day of „�� , , 1999 serve the within a copy of which is annexed hereto and made a part hereof, on the person, or persons, named below by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Rolling Hills, California addressed as follows: FAXED MAILED DELIVERED Palos Verdes City Attorney City Manager Peninsula News City Council Also posted at City Hall. I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the California. ffTh day of , , 1999 at Rolling Hills, MARILYN L. KERN DEPUTY CITY CLERK ie0ii ihird INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FEES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, January 25, 1999, at 7:30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers located at No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California 90274, a public hearing will be held on the proposed adoption of a resolution establishing and charging administrative fees for illegal or "as built" structures or grading that requires discretionary review by the Planning Commission. At said time and place all persons who desire to be heard with respect to the proposed resolution may appear before the City Council and be heard thereon. Dated: January 14, 1999 Marilyn L. en Deputy City Clerk Printed on Recycled Paper. •City ofieo //in _Afro M INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FEES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, January 25, 1999, at 7:30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers located at No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California 90274, a public hearing will be held on the proposed adoption of a resolution establishing and charging administrative fees for illegal or "as built" structures or grading that requires discretionary review by the Planning Commission. At said time and place all persons who desire to be heard with respect to the proposed resolution may appear before the City Council and be heard thereon. Dated: January 14, 1999 Marilyn L. I'(en Deputy City Clerk Printed on Recycled Paper. 01/11/99 MON 11:39 FAX 310 377 7288 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 41110 *******:I:h::&********** 4110 *** TX REPORT **:x *::*..:* ; ***:*:k:***:::;* TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO 3736 CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID PVP NEWS ST. TIME 01/11 11:38 USAGE T 00'43 PGS. 2 . RESULT OK 3774522 Rolla, AIL INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 FAX COVER SHEET DATE« - 1'", - TO: )0Ul� IV s FAX: NO..2.POt1TUGUESE HEW) ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF.. 80274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (31Q) 377.7285 Email: citroirhQaoLcom TIME SENT: f j + 'ava 4 4 if4 . • - FROM: Clean - it, 4. 0 OPERATOR: ]i i -- - REMARKS: - - 7744.-.4...„01‘4.104.-Lis54 LY,/917 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above -entitled matter. I am the principle clerk of the printer of the PalosVerdes Peninsula News a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published semi-weekly in the City of Rancho Palos Verdes County of Los Angeles, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, under the date of October 15 19 63 Case Number C 824957 ; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to---.vit: _.f0t.NVtg2y all in the year 19 ! q. I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Rancho Palos Verdes California this 1 day of ., 19 34 • Signature SIP This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp B. El r " 9 JAN 1 5 999 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Pv Proof of Publication of PVPN# P.V.P. News No. 5619 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CALIFORNIA i •. • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FEES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Monday, Janu- ary 25, 1999, at 7:30 p.m., in the City Council Cham- bers located at No. 2' Portuguese bend Road, Rolling Hills; California 90274, a public hearing will be held on _the proposed adoption of a resolution establishing and charging administrative fees for illegal or "as built" structures or grading that requires discretionary review ,by the Planning Commission. At said time and place all person who desire to be heard with respect to the proposed resolution may ap- pear before the City Council and be heard thereon. •Dated: January 14, 1999 Signed: Marilyn L. Ken Deputy City Clerk '-Published in. the Palos Verdes Peninsula News on January 14, 1999. • ANEW 411.1166 JL 1996 FEE STUDY TO:. HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ATTN: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER FROM: CRAIG MOONEYHAM, ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN RE: CITY COST RELATIONS TO PEE SCHEDULE DATE: JULY 29, 1996 BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the appropriateness of Rolling Hills' fees for services. The primary research involved ascertaining the costs of labor and material associated with each particular fee. All employees were surveyed in regards to time involved with performing each specific task. Labor costs were determined by establishing the cost per hour for each employee, including base salary and support costs. Support costs represent the City's contribution to employee insurance, PERS, FICA, Medicare, Work. Comp., State U.I. and auto allowance. This figure was then multiplied by employee hours contributed to the task. Research was also conducted regarding a Dog Attack Appeal where no fee exists. FINDINGS: The findings of this study indicate that the labor and material expense to the City of Rolling Hills is equal to or in excess of the fees currently charged. The survey also showed costs to administer a Dog Attack Appeal Fee at $708.09. All work used in determining the aforementioned claims and figures is included. CRN:cam fees t City opeolling INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 FEE SCHEDULE* PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW O Conditional Use Permit ❑ Site Plan Review ❑ Variance $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,250 O Variance, Minor $ 750 Minor deviation into required yard setback, not exceeding 5' and attached to main residential structure Plan Modification 2/3 of original application fee NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377.7288 ❑ Zone Change ❑ Zoning Amendment ❑ General Plan Amendment ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Tentative Parcel Map (Subdivision of 2 - 4 parcels) ❑ Tentative Tract Map (Subdivision of 5 + parcels) $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 and county fees plus 20% $ 1,500 and county fees plus 20% Required with a above applications (singular or combined) by state government code. 0 - Environmental Review $ 200 plus county & state fees ❑ Appeal Fee ❑ Negative Declaration ❑ Environmental Impact Report (EIR) ❑ Extension of Time ❑ Final Parcel or Tract Map 2/3 of original application fee $ 1,275 City consultant fee plus 20% $ 200 County fees plus 20% O TRAFFIC COMMISSION REVIEW New driveways or other related items ❑ VIEW IMPAIRMENT COMMII'1"EE REVIEW Impairment of view $ 300 $ 500 EXAMPLE 1: EXAMPLE 2: EXAMPLE 3: Request for a Conditional Use Permit (S1,500) and Variance (S1,250) for a mixed use structure that encroaches into a setback also requires an Environmental Review ($200) for a total of S2,950. Request for Tentative Parcel and Tract Map (S1,500) for subdivision, require an Environmental Review ($200) plus a Negative Declaration (S1,275) for a total of $2,975. Anything under the double line requires a single fee. ' In accordance with RESOLUTION NO. 691, DATED SEPTEMBER ?R 100" RESOLUTIN NO. 691 OF THE COUNCIL A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS SETTING FEES FOR PLANNING, ZONING, SUBDIVISIONS, VIEW IMPAIRMENT, TRAFFIC COMMISSION REVIEW, AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, AND RESCINDING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 614. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing discretionary cases for Planning and Zoning, and Subdivisions and shall be paid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Sections 17.40.040 and 16.12.060 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: A. Conditional Use Permit B. Site Plan Review C. Variance D. Variance, Minor 1. Minor deviation into required yard setback, not exceeding 5' and attached to main residential structure. E. Plan Modification F. Appeal Fee G. Zone Change H. Zoning Amendment I. General Plan Amendment J. Environmental Review K. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) L. Extension of Time M. Lot line Adjustment N. Tentative Parcel Map O. Tentative Tract Map P. Final Parcel or Tract Map $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,250 $ 750 2/3 of original application fee 2/3 of original application fee $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $200 plus county & state fees City consultant fee plus 20% $ 200 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 and county fees plus 20% $ 1,500 and county fees plus 20% County fees plus 20% Section 2. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing View Impairment and Traffic Commission cases: A. View Impairment B. Traffic Commission Review 1. New driveways or other traffic related items. $ 500 $ 300 Section 3. The foll Administration processing: fees are established and charged for General' ' A. General Plan B. Zoning Code C. Budget D. Meeting Tapes (Audio) E. Zoning Map F. Xeroxed Copies, each page G. False Alarms - 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th $ 30 $ 25 $ 30 $ 25 $ 3 $ .25 $ 50 $ 100 150 200 250 Section 4. The fees set forth in Sections 1, 2, and 3 above do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing such services. Section 5. Resolution No. 614, May 29, 1990, is hereby rescinded. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOYIhD THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1992. Al ILST: DEPUTY CITY CLERK The foregoing Resolution No. 691 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS SETTING FEES FOR PLANNING, ZONING, SUBDIVISIONS, VIEW IMPAIRMENT, TRAFFIC COMMISSION REVIEW, AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, AND RESCINDING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 614. was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on September 28, 1992 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Leeuwenburgh, Heinsheimer, Pernell, Mayor Pro Tem Murdock NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Mayor Swanson DEPUTY G 11Y CLERK SUMMATION CHART TASKS EMPLOYEE LABOR (HRS) LABOR COSTS MATERIAL COSTS CUMULATIVE COST OF TASK CURRENT FEE 1) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 40.05 $1,582.90 $168,33 $1,751.23 $1,500,00 2) SITE PLAN REVIEW 39,3 $1,567.46 $168.33 $1,735.79 $1,500.00 3) VARIANCE 34.8 $1,343.62 $168.33 $1,511.95 $1,250,00 4) MINOR VARIANCE 32.8 $1,247.52 $28.33 $1,275.85 $750.00 5) PLAN MODIFICATION 29.1 $1,128.45 $28.33 $1,156.78 2/3 ORIGINAL FEE 6) ZONE CHANGE/AMENDMENT 52.8 $2,064.32 $168.33 $2,232.65 $2,000.00 7) LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 46.3 $1,777.75 $28.33 $1,806.08 $1,500.00 8) SUBDIVISION/PARCEL TRACT MAP 75.3 $2,913.70 $168.33 $3,082.03 - $1,500.00 9) FINAL PARCEL OR TRACT MAP 15.75 $652.45 $0.32 $652.77 $1,500.00 10) APPEAL FEE 9.55 $418.40 $0.64 $419.04 COUNTY FEE PLUS 20% 11) NEGATIVE DECLARATION 8.75 $366.56 $0.32 $366.88 2/3 ORIGINAL FEE 12) EXTENSION OF TIME 7.55 $332.98 $0.64 $333.62 $0.00 13) ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - 6.5 $245.38 $38.46 $283.84 $200.00 14) TRAFFIC COMMISSION REVIEW 6 - $350.10 $23.50 $373.60 $300.00 15) VIEW IMPAIRMENT COMMITTEE REVIEW 11 $641.85 $1,647.74 $2,289.59 $500.00 STAFF LABOR NAME TITLE BASE SALARY SUPPORT COST TOTAL ANNUAL COST HOURLY COST CRAIG NEALIS CITY MANAGER $75,762.00 $38,012.31 $113,774.31 $58.35 LOLA UNGAR PRINCIPLE PLANNER $53,004.24 $20,612.78 $73,617.02 $37.75 NAN HUANG SENIOR ACCOUNTANT $45,815,52 $19,425.33 $32,620.42* $33.46 $43,049.95 $22.08 MARILYN KERN DEPUTY CITY CLERK $31,122.00 $11,927.00 $34,937.22 $17.92 ' MELINDA SCHOEN CLERK TYPIST $21,294.00 $13,643.22 CRAIG MOONEYHAM ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN $5,928.00 $636.07 $6,654.07 $6.73 GINNY WILSON BOOK KEEPER $7,280.00 $774.70 $4,027.35* $11.06 * COST SPLIT WITH RHCA • S Conditional Use Permit Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 8 58.35 $468.80 Lola Ungar 26.8 37.75 $1,011.70 Marilyn Kern 2 22.08 $44.16 Melinda Schoen 3.25 17.92 $58.24 $1,582.90 Site Plan Review Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 8 58.35 $466.80 Lola Ungar 26.8 37.75 $1,011.70 Marilyn Kern 2 22.08 $44.16 Melinda Schoen 2.5 17.92 $44.80 $1,567.46 Variance Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 5 58.35 $291.75 Lola Ungar 25.8 37.75 $973.95 Marilyn Kern 1.5 22.08 $33.12 Melinda Schoen 2.5 17.92 $44.80 $1,343.62 Page 1 • • MINOR VARIANCE Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 4 $58.35 $233.40 Lola Ungar 24.8 $37.75 $936.20 Marilyn Kern 1.5 $22.08 $33.12 Melinda Schoen 2.5 $17.92 $44.80 $1,247.52 PLAN MODIFICATION Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 5 $58.35 $291.75 Lola Ungar 20.1 $37.75 $758.78 Marilyn Kern 1.5 $22.08 $33.12 Melinda Schoen 2.5 $17.92 $44.80 $1,128.45 ZONE CHANGE/AMENDMENT Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 7 $58.35 $408.45 Lola Ungar 41.8 $37.75 $1,577.95 Marilyn Kern 1.5 $22.08 $33.12 Melinda Schoen 2.5 $17.92 $44.80 $2,064.32 • LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 5 $58.35 $291.75 Lola Ungar 37.3 $37.75 $1,408.08 Marilyn Kern 1.5 $22.08 $33.12 Melinda Schoen 2.5 $17.92 $44.80 $1,777.75 SUBDIVISION/PARCEL-TRACT MAP Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 7 $58.35 $408.45 Lola Ungar 64.3 $37.75 $2,427.33 Marilyn Kern 1.5 $22.08 $33.12 Melinda Schoen 2.5 $17.92 $44.80 $2,913.70 FINAL PARCEL -TRACT MAP Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 3 $58.35 $175.05 Lola Ungar 12.5 $37.75 $471.88 Marilyn Kern 0.25 $22.08 $5.52 Melinda Schoen 0 $17.92 $0.00 $652.45 S S APPEAL FEE Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 3 $58.35 $175.05 Lola Ungar 6.3 $37.75 $237.83 Marilyn Kern 0.25 $22.08 $5.52 Melinda Schoen 0 $17.92 $0.00 $418.40 NEGATIVE DECLARATION Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 2 $58.35 $116.70 Lola Ungar 6.5 $37.75 245.38 Marilyn Kern 0 $22.08 $0.00 Melinda Schoen 0.25 $17.92 $4.48 $366.56 EXTENSION OF TIME Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 3 $58.35 $175.05 Lola Ungar 3.8 $37.75 $143.45 Marilyn Kern 0.25 $22.08 $5.52 Melinda Schoen 0.5 $17.92 $8.96 $332.98 • DOG ATTACK APPEAL Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 11 58.35 $641.85 Lola Ungar 0 37.75 . $0.00 Marilyn Kern 3 22.08 $66.24 Melinda Schoen 0 17.92 $0.00 $708.09 TRAFFIC COMMISSION REVIEW Craig Nealis 6 $58.35 $350.10 Lola Ungar 0 $37.75 $0.00 Marilyn Kern 0 $22.08 $0.00 Melinda Schoen 0 $17.92 $0.00 $350.10 VIEW IMPAIRMENT REVIEW Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 11 $58.35 $641.85 Lola Ungar 0 $37.75 $0.00 Marilyn Kern 0 $22.08 $0.00 Melinda Schoen 0 $17.92 $0.00 $641.85 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Employee Hours Cost Totals Craig Nealis 0 $58.35 $0.00 Lola Ungar 6.5 $37.75 $245.38 Marilyn Kern 0 $22.08 $0.00 Melinda Schoen 0 $17.92 $0.00 $245.38 1 LANNING TASKS VS. TIME CITY MANAGER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Ma v require Negative Declaration • TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review 1.0 Public Hearing Notice Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates 1.0 Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 2.0 City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant .5 Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Traffic Commission review (driveway) 1.5 Traffic Engineer review (driveway) 1.0 Meeting with Planner .5 Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 7.0 SITE PLAN REVIEW (May require Negative Declaration) TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review 1.0 Public Hearing Notice Notice to residents Status & field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates 1.0 Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 2.0 City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant .5 Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period Landscape plan to consultant Traffic Commission review (driveway) 1.5 Traffic Engineer review (driveway) 1.0 Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner .5 Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 8.0 VARIANCE TASK MP AVERAGE TW/HOURS Environmental review Application review 1.0 Public Hearing Notice Notice to residents Status & field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates 1.0 Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 2.0 City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/ plan & appeal period Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner .5 Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 5.0 MINOR VARIANCE TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review 1.0 Public Hearing Notice Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates 1.0 Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 1.0 City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner .5 Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 4.0 • PLAN MODIFICATION TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review 1.0 Public Hearing Notice Notice to residents Status & field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates 1.0 Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 2.0 City Council report . Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period . Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner .5 Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 5.0 ZONE CHANGE, ZONING AMENDMENT, AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT Also require Negative Declaration TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review 1.0 Public Hearing Notice Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates 1.0 Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 2.0 City Council reports Phone calls application Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan Meeting with Planner .5 Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 5.0 *OT LINE ADJUSTMENT TASK AVERAGE TIME/ HOURS Environmental review Application review 1.0 Public Hearing Notice Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates 1.0 Applicant meetings . Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 2.0 City Council reports Phone calls application Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan Certificate of Compliance Form + Meets and Bounds Review County Fees Meeting with Planner .5 Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 5.0 SUBDIVISION/ 1'hNTATIVE PARCEL OR TRACT MAP TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Regional Planning review meeting Environmental review Application review 1.0 Public Hearing Notice Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates 1.0 Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 2.0 City Council reports Phone calls application Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan County Fees Meeting with Planner .5 Staff Meeting .5 Traffic Commission review (driveway) 1.0 Traffic Engineer review (driveway) 1.0 TOTAL 7.0 FOAL PARCEL OR TRACT MAP TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Review of Final Map 1.0 Staff report Final Map to City Council 1.0 Final Map Recordation letter County Fees Meeting with Planner .5 Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 3.0 APPEAL FEE TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Notification letter to applicant Staff report • S 1.0 City Council meeting 1.0 Results of case letter to applicant Phone calls Meeting with Planner .5 Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 3.0 NEGATIVE DECLARATION TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Complete CEQA forms 1.0 Notices to Govm't. Agencies/County Letter to applicant Notice of Determination to County Meeting with Planner .5 Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 2.0 EXTENSION OF TIME TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Notification letter to applicant Staff report 1.0 Planning Commission meeting 1.0 Results of case letter to applicant Phone calls Meeting with Planner .5 Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 3.0 •ANNING TASKS VS. TIME PRINCIPAL PLANNER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (May require Negative Declaration • • TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review .5 Application review 3.0 Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents .5 Status and field trip letters to applicant 1.0 Staff report preparation/updates 6.0 Applicant meetings 1.0 Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 2.0 City Council report 1.0 Phone calls application & landscaping 1.5 Results of case letter to applicant .5 Resolution preparation 6.0 Certified letter w/plan & appeal period - .8 Landscape plan t� consultant .5 Landscape plan bond .5 Traffic Commission review (driveway) Traffic Engineer review (driveway) Follow -Up Meeting with Applicant 1.0 Follow -Up Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 26.8 SITE PLAN REVIEW (May require Negative Declaration TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review .5 Application review 3.0 Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents .5 Status & field trip letters to applicant 1.0 Staff report preparation/updates 6.0 Applicant meetings 1.0 Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 2.0 City Council report 1.0 Phone calls application & landscaping 1.5 Results of case letter to applicant .5 Resolution preparation 6.0 • Certified letter w/plan & appeal period .8 Landscape plan to consultant .5 Traffic Commission review (driveway) Traffic Engineer review (driveway) Landscape plan bond .5 Follow -Up Meeting with Applicant 1.0 Follow -Up Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 26.8 VARIANCE New TASK w AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review .5 Application review 3.0 Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents .5 Status & field trip letters to applicant 1.0 Staff report preparation/updates 6.0 Applicant meetings 1.0 Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 2.0 City Council report 1.0 Phone calls application & landscaping 1.5 Results of case letter to applicant .5 Resolution preparation 5.0 Certified letter w/plan & appeal period .8 Landscape plan to consultant .5 Landscape plan bond .5 Follow -Up Meeting with Applicant 1.0 Follow -Up Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 25.8 MINOR VARIANCE TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review .5 A 2.0 Application review • Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents .5 Status and field trip letters to applicant 1.0 Staff report preparation/updates 6.0 Applicant meetings 1.0 P 2.0 Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) • City Council report 1.0 Phone calls application & landscaping 1.5 Results of case letter to applicant .5 Resolution preparation 5.0 Certified letter w/plan & appeal period .8 Landscape plan to consultant .5 Landscape plan bond .5 Follow -Up Meeting with Applicant 1.0 Follow -Up Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 24.8 PLAN MODIFICATION TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review .5 Application review 1.0 Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents .5 Status & field trip letters to applicant 1.0 Staff report preparation/ updates 2.5 Applicant meetings 1.0 Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 1.0 City Council report .8 Phone calls application & landscaping 1.5 Results of case letter to applicant .5 Resolution preparation 6.0 Certified letter w/plan & appeal period .8 Landscape plan to consultant .5 Landscape plan bond .5 Follow -Up Meeting with Applicant 1.0 Follow -Up Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 20.1 ZONE CHANGE, ZONING AMENDMENT, AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT Also require Negative Declaration TASK AVERAGE TIME/ HOURS Environmental review .5 Application review 2.0 Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents .5 Status and field trip letters to applicant 1.0 Staff report preparation/updates 12.0 Applicant meetings 3.0 Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 3.0 City Council reports 3.0 Phone calls application 1.5 Results of case letterto applicant .5 Resolution preparation 12.0 Certified letter w/plan .8 Follow -Up Meeting with Applicant 1.0 Follow -Up Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 41.8 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review .5 Application review 8.0 , Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents .5 Status and field trip letters to applicant 1.0 Staff report preparation/updates 8.0 Applicant meetings 2.0 Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 3.0 City Council reports 1.0 Phone calls application 1.0 Results of case letter to applicant .5 Resolution preparation 6.0 Certified letter w/plan .8 Certificate of Compliance Form + Meets and Bounds Review 3.0 County Fees Unknown Follow -Up Meeting with Applicant 1.0 Follow -Up Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 37.3 SUBDIVISION/TENTATIVE PARCEL OR TRACT MAP TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Regional Planning review meeting 3.0 Environmental review .5 Application review 8.0 Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents .5 Status and field trip letters to applicant 1.0 Staff report preparation/updates 12.0 Applicant meetings 3.0 Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) 3.0 City Council reports 3.0 Phone calls application 1.5 Results of case letter to applicant .5 Resolution preparation 24.0 Certified letter w/plan .8 County Fees Unknown Follow -Up Meeting with Applicant 2.0 Follow -Up Staff Meeting 1.0 Traffic Commission review (driveway) Traffic Engineer review (driveway) TOTAL 64.3 FINAL PARCEL OR TRACT MAP TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Review of Final Map 8.0 Staff report Final Map to City Council 2.0 Final Map Recordation letter .5 County Fees Unknown Meeting with Applicant .5 Staff Meeting .5 Follow -Up Meeting with Applicant .5 Follow -Up Staff Meeting .5 TOTAL 12.5 APPEAL FEE TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Notification letter to applicant .5 Staff report 2.0 City Council meeting .3 Results of case letter to applicant .5 Phone calls .5 Meeting with Applicant .5 Staff Meeting .5 Follow -Up Meeting with Applicant • F .5 Follow -Up Staff Meeting 1.0 TOTAL 6.3 NEGATIVE DECLARATION TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review .5 Complete CEQA forms 3.0 Notices to Gov't. Agencies/County 2.0 Letter to applicant .5 Notice of Determination to County .5 Meeting with Applicant Staff Meeting TOTAL 6.5 EXTENSION OF TIME • TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Notification letter to applicant .5 Staff report 2.0 Planning Commission meeting .3 Results of case letter to applicant .5 Phone calls .5 Meeting with Applicant Staff Meeting TOTAL 3.8 " ANNING TASKS VS. TIME lip DEPUTY CITY CLERK CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (May require Negative Declaration) • TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .25 Notice to residents .25 Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) .50 City Council report .50 Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Traffic Commission review (driveway) .50 Traffic Engineer review (driveway) Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL 2.0 SI11; PLAN REVIEW (May require Negative Declaration) TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .25 Notice to residents .25 Status & field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) .50 City Council report .50 Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period Landscape plan to consultant Traffic Commission review (driveway) .50 Traffic Engineer review (driveway) Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL 2.0 VARIANCE TASK W AVERAGE TI /HOURS , Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .25 Notice to residents .25 Status & field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) .50 City Council report .50 Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL 1.5 MINOR VARIANCE TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review • Public Hearing Notice .25 Notice to residents .25 Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings .50 Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) .50 City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period • Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL 1.5 • PLAN MODIFICATION 1 TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .25 Notice to residents .25 Status &-field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) .50 City Council report .50 Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting. TOTAL 1.5 ZONE CHANGE, ZONING AMENDMENT, AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (Also require Negative Declaration TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .25 Notice to residents - .25 Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) .50 City Council reports .50 Phone calls application Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan Meeting with Planner - Staff Meeting TOTAL 1.5 *LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .25 Notice to residents .25 Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall &Field Trip) .50 City Council reports .50 Phone calls application Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan Certificate of Compliance Form + Meets and Bounds Review County Fees Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL 1.5 SUBDIVISION/TENTATIVE PARCEL OR TRACT MAP TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Regional Planning review meeting Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .25 Notice to residents .25 Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) .50 City Council reports .50 Phone calls application Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan County Fees Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting Traffic Commission review (driveway) .25 Traffic Engineer review (driveway) TOTAL 1.75 fbAL PARCEL OR TRACT MAP • TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Review of Final Map Staff report Final Map to City Council .25 Final Map Recordation letter County Fees Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL .25 APPEAL FEE TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Notification letter to applicant Staff report City Council meeting .25 Results of case letter to applicant Phone calls Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL .25 NEGATIVE DECLARATION TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Complete CEQA forms Notices to Govm't. Agencies/County Letter to applicant Notice of Determination to County Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL EXTENSION OF TIME TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Notification letter to applicant Staff report Planning Commission meeting .25 Results of case letter to applicant Phone calls Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL .25 .LANNING TASKS VS. TIME CLERK/ TYPIST CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (May require Negative Declaration) TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents 1.5 Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) .5 City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation .25 Certified letter w/plan & appeal period .5 Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Traffic Commission review (driveway) Traffic Engineer review (driveway) Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL 3.25 SITE PLAN REVIEW Ma v require Negative Declaration TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents 1.5 Status & field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period .5 Landscape plan to consultant Traffic Commission review (driveway) Traffic Engineer review (driveway) Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL 2.5 VARIANCE TASK AVERAGE TI E/HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents 1.5 Status & field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/ plan & appeal -period .5 Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL 2.5 MINOR VARIANCE TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents 1.5 Status .and field trip letter's to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City_ Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period .5 Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting , TOTAL 2.5 410 PLAN MODIFICATION TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents 1.5 Status & field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period .5 Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL 2.5 ZONE CHANGE, ZONING AMENDMENT, AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT Also rectuire Negative Declaration TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents 1.5 Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council reports Phone calls application Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan .5 Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL 2.5 • LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents 1.5 Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council reports Phone calls application Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan .5 Certificate of Compliance Form + Meets and Bounds Review County Fees Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL 2.5 SUBDIVISION/TENTATIVE PARCEL OR TRACT MAP TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Regional Planning review meeting Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice .5 Notice to residents 1.5 Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/ updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council reports Phone calls application Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan .5 County Fees Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting Traffic Commission review (driveway) Traffic Engineer review (driveway) TOTAL 2.5 •AL PARCEL OR TRACT MAP • • TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Review of Final Map Staff report Final Map to City Council Final Map Recordation letter County Fees Meeting with Planner • Staff Meeting TOTAL 0 APPEAL FEE TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Notification Letter to applicant Staff report City Council meeting Results of case letter to applicant Phone calls Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL 0 NEGATIVE DECLARATION TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Environmental review Complete CEQA forms Notices to Govm't. Agencies/County Letter to applicant .25 Notice of Determination to County Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL .25 EXTENSION OF TIME TASK AVERAGE TIME/HOURS Notification letter to applicant .25 Staff report Planning Commission meeting Results of case letter to applicant .25 Phone calls Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL .50 INNING TASKS vs. MATERIAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (May require Negative Declaration) TASK . MATERIAL COSTS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice $23.50 Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant $0.96 Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal_period $2.20 + $1.67 POSTAGE Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Traffic Commission review (driveway) Public Hearing Notice in Newspaper $140.00 Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL $168.33 SITE PLAN REVIEW (May require Negative Declaration) TASK MATERIAL COSTS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice $23.50 Notice to residents Status & field trip letters to applicant $0.96 Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period $2.20 + $1.67 POSTAGE Landscape plan to consultant Traffic Commission review (driveway) Public Hearing Notice in Newspaper $140.00 Landscape plan bond Meeting with. Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL $168.33 VARIANCE TASK MATERIAL COSTS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice $23.50 Notice to residents Status & field trip letters to applicant $0.96 Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period $2.20 + $1.67 POSTAGE Public Hearing Notice in Newspaper $140.00 Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL $168.33 MINOR VARIANCE TASK MATERIAL COSTS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice $23.50 Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant $0.96 Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period $2.20 + $1.67 POSTAGE Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL $28.33 • PLAN MODIFICATION TASK MATERIAL COSTS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice $23.50 Notice to residents Status & field trip letters to applicant $0.96 Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period $2.20 + $1.67 POSTAGE Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL $28.33 ZONE CHANGE, ZONING AMENDMENT, AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (Also require Negative Declaration TASK MATERIAL COSTS Environmental review Application review ,• Public Hearing Notice $23.50 Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant $0.96 Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council reports Public Hearing Notice in Newspaper $140.00 Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan $2.20 + $1.67 POSTAGE Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL $168.33 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT TASK MATERIAL COSTS Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice $23.50 Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant $0.96 Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council reports Phone calls application Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan $2.20 + $1.67 POSTAGE Certificate of Compliance Form + Meets and Bounds Review County Fees Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL $28.33 SUBDIVISION/TENTATIVE PARCEL OR TRACT MAP TASK MATERIAL COSTS Regional Planning review meeting Environmental review Application review Public Hearing Notice $23.50 Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant $0.96 Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council reports Public Hearing Notice in Newspaper $140.00 Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan $2.20 + $1.67 POSTAGE County Fees Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting Traffic Commission review (driveway) Traffic Engineer review (driveway) TOTAL $168.33 FINAL PARCEL OR TRACT MAP • TASK MATERIAL COSTS Review of Final Map . Staff report Final Map to City Council Final Map Recordation letter $0.32 County Fees Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL $0.32 APPEAL FEE TASK MATERIAL COSTS Notification letter to applicant $0.32 Staff report City Council meeting Results of case letter to applicant $0.32 Phone calls Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL $0.64 NEGATIVE DECLARATION [We have been charging $1,275 ($1,250 Fish & Game fee + $25 County Clerk filing fee) but, have been advised by the County Clerk that this is no longer necessary. All cases have been waived by Fish & Game and we returned the $1,250 fee to the applicant after 6 months. The County Clerk kept the $25)]. TASK MATERIAL COSTS Environmental review Complete CEQA forms Notices to Govm't. Agencies/County Letter to applicant Notice of Determination to County Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL $0.00 EXTENSION OF TIME TASK MATERIAL COSTS Notification letter to applicant $0.32 Staff report Planning Commission meeting Results of case letter to applicant $0.32 Phone calls , Meeting with Planner Staff Meeting TOTAL $0.64 •AFFIC COMMISSION REVIEW • TASK MATERIAL COSTS Environmental review Application review • Public Hearing Notice • Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period' Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Traffic Commission review (driveway) Traffic Engineer review (driveway) Staff Meeting Follow -Up Staff Meeting TOTAL $0.00 VIEW IMPAIRMENT COMMITTEE REVIEW TASK MATERIAL COSTS Environmental Review Application review Public Hearing Notice Notice to residents $23.50 Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Applicant meetings Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Resolution preparation Certified letter w/plan & appeal period $7.74 Landscape plan to consultant Public Hearing Notice in Newspaper $140.00 Mediation Expenses $1500.00 Traffic Engineer review (driveway) Staff Meeting Follow -Up Staff Meeting TOTAL $1,671.24 •NNING TASKS vs. MATERIAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW TASK MATERIAL COSTS Fee to County Clerk $25.00 Application review Public Hearing Notice Notice to residents Status and field trip letters to applicant Staff report preparation/updates Letters to Applicants $0.96 Public meetings (City Hall & Field Trip) City Council report Phone calls application & landscaping Results of case letter to applicant Negative Declaration $12.50 Certified letter w/plan & appeal period Landscape plan to consultant Landscape plan bond Traffic Commission review (driveway) Traffic Engineer review (driveway) Staff Meeting Follow -Up Staff Meeting • TOTAL $38.46 H ® N E E 0 TO ' DATE TIME AM PM FRO ®n� i11' atl /ivl ti 1'hJI'ry E CODE %/ NO.3-77 ` fo L/3 EXT. Uos / O M S E Pa�i N i---m,o7_ J kar-cl .. , !e 11 f-a.../u Gee -1: s� aCl SIGNED PHONED BACK El I CALLRNED SEEYOU El AGAIN ALL ❑ WAS IN URGENT CITY,OF ROLLING HILLS FEE SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 30, 1992* Nj,21.INNING* ZONING & SUBDIVISIONS A. Conditional Use Permit B. Site Plan Review C. Variance D. Variance, Minor City O/ /20//iflf Jh/ INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 195.7 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 y W IMPAIRMENT }1LN0 TRAFFIC COMMISSION CAM $ 1,500 A. View Impairment $ 500 $ 1,'500 B. Traffic Commission Review $ 1,250 1. New driveways or other traffic related items. Q NERAL ADMINISTRATION PROCESSING 1. Minor deviation into required yard setback, not exceeding 5' and attached A. General Plan $ 30 to main residential structure. $ 750 B. Zoning Code $ 25 E. Plan Modification 2/3 of original application fee C. Budget $ 30 F. Appeal Fee 2/3 of original application fee D. Meeting Tapes (Audio) $ 25 G. Zone Change $ 2,000 $ 3 E. Zoning Map H. Zoning Amendment $ 2,000 $ .25 F. Xeroxed Copies, each page I. General Plan Amendment $ 2,000 $ 50 G. False Alarms 1st J. Environmental Review $200 plus county & state fees 2nd 100 3rd 150 K. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) 4th 200 City consultant fee plus 20% 5th 250 L. Extension of Time $ 200 * In accordance with RESOLUTION NO. 691, DATED SEPTEMBER 28, 199V • M. Lot line Adjustment $ 1,500 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS SETTING FEES FOR PLANNING, ZONING, N. Tentative Parcel Map $ 1,500 and county fees SUBDIVISIONS, VIEW IMPAIRMENT, TRAFFIC COMMISSION plus 20% REVIEW, AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, AND RESCINDING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 614. 0. Tentative Tract Map $ 1,500 and'county fees plus 20% P. Final Parcel or Tract Map County fees plus 20% $ 300 City 0/ leoffin INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 AGENDA ITEM MEETING DATE 9/28/92 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ATTENTION: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER FROM: LOLA M. UNGAR, PRINCIPAL PLANNER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 691: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS SETTING FEES FOR PLANNING, ZONING, SUBDIVISIONS, VIEW IMPAIRMENT, TRAFFIC COMMISSION REVIEW, AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, AND RESCINDING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 614. 7-A NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 BACKGROUND Staff has determined that some of the current fees do not reflect costs to the City. These fees have far exceeded expenses, i.e. plan modification, environmental review, environmental impact report, and subdivision fees. The majority of City fees are, however, recommended to remain the same (see Proposed Fee Changes attached). The last time that fees were changed was May 29, 1990, Resolution No. 614 (attached). At that time, some fees were not defined or included, such as, minor Site Development Review, minor Variance, and General Administration fees. Since then, other cities, county, and state requirements now require fees and administrative oversight by the City and Planning Department, (i.e. As of January, 1991, a Negative Declaration requires a fee of $1,250 to the Dept. of Fish & Game, plus $25 to record with the County Recorder). Along with these fees, administrative time and energy has been devoted by the City Manager, Planner, Senior Accountant; Bookkeeper, Deputy City Clerk, Clerk Typist and consultation with the. City Attorney, most of the time for subdivisions and tennis courts. For these reasons, the City of Rolling Hills needed to reevaluate fees. Staff conducted a survey of nearby cities that offer similar services and their fees. We have included the cities of Rancho Palos Verdes, Palos Verdes Estates, Rolling Hills Estates, Torrance, Carson and Hawthorne (attached). Printed on Recycled Paper. _ RESOLUTION NO. 691 PAGE 2 DISCUSSION These are the proposed fees to be changed: Plan Modification: Modifying an existing plan that goes beyond the intent of the original approval requires the same procedures as other discretionary cases. The present resolution states that the fee "varies" with no guidelines. Staff proposes a minimum 2/3 of original fee. Variance (Minor): The current schedule does not define a minor Variance. Staff proposes to redefine a minor variance as "Minor deviation into required yard setback not exceeding 5' and attached to main residential structure." Site Development Review (Minor): There is no record of what this applies to. We propose to omit this designation. Multiple applications: Other cities do not charge less for multiple applications. Therefore, staff proposes eliminating the reduced rate. Environmental review: Environmental review varies in each case and needs to be addressed even though most discretionary cases in Rolling Hills are exempt because they are single family dwellings. But, special development, including recreation courts and subdivisions should pay some administrative fee because they require an intricate procedure of noticing and formal documentation. Therefore, staff proposes that $200 be charged for all environmental review in addition to any county and state fees required. Environmental Impact Report: Because the negotiation and choice of consultant and intricate procedure of noticing and formal documentation involved with the report is so lengthy and time consuming, involving all members of the City staff, we propose that 20% should be added to the consultant's fee. Subdivision fees: At present, we charge $1,500 each for these cases. Currently, there are five subdivision cases being processed and all members of the staff have spent numerous hours in the past one and a half years involved with pushing the cases forward, meeting with applicants, meeting with the County Subdivision Committee, forwarding bills, and updating the status of these cases. Therefore, staff proposes an additional 20% be added to all county fees charged to the City in these cases. RESOLUTION NO. 691 PAGE 3 Traffic Commission Review: Requests for Site Plan Review or new driveways need the expertise of a Deputy Traffic Engineer and the Traffic Commission. Typical driveway review cases cost the City $300 for the engineer, we propose to charge that fee at the time the application for discretionary review is made. General Administration Fees: Many requests are made of City staff for copies of documents and tapes which take some time and use of resources to produce. So, to defray the administrative costs in staff's use of time, energy and resources, we have also included comparable rates for these documents. We have also changed the alarm fees to reflect the additional expense of multiple false alarms. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 691. RESOLUTION NO. 691 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS SETTING FEES FOR PLANNING, ZONING, SUBDIVISIONS, VIEW IMPAIRMENT, TRAFFIC COMMISSION REVIEW, AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, AND RESCINDING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 614. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing discretionary cases for Planning and Zoning, and Subdivisions and shall be paid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Sections 17.40.040 and 16.12.060 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: A. Conditional Use Permit B. Site Plan Review C. Variance D. Variance, Minor 1. Minor deviation into required yard setback, not exceeding 5' and attached to main residential structure. $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,250 $ 750 E. Plan Modification 2/3 of original application fee F. Appeal Fee 2/3 of original application fee G. Zone Change $ 2,000 H. Zoning Amendment $ 2,000 I. General Plan Amendment $ 2,000 J. Environmental Review $200 plus county & state fees K. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) City consultant fee plus 200 L. Extension of Time M. Lot line Adjustment N. Tentative Parcel Map $ 200 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 and county fees plus 20 0 0. Tentative Tract Map $ 1,500 and county fees plus 20% RESOLUTION NO. 691 PAGE 2 P. Final Parcel or Tract Map County fees plus 20% Section 2. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing View Impairment and Traffic Commission cases: A. View Impairment $ 500 B. Traffic Commission Review 1. New driveways or other traffic related items. $ 300 Section 3. General Administration processing: A. General Plan $ 30 B. Zoning Code $ 25 C. Budget $ 30 D. Meeting Tapes (Audio) $ 25 E. Zoning Map $ 3 F. Xeroxed Copies, each page $ .25 The following fees are established and charged for G. False Alarms - 1st $ 50 2nd 100 3rd 150 4th 200 5th 250 Section 4. The fees set forth in Sections 1, 2, and 3 above do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing such services. Section 5. Resolution No. 614, May 29; 1990, is hereby rescinded. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1992. MAYOR • • RESOLUTION NO. 691 PAGE 3 ATTEST: CITY CLERK The foregoing Resolution No. 691 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS SETTING FEES FOR PLANNING, ZONING, SUBDIVISIONS, VIEW IMPAIRMENT, TRAFFIC COMMISSION REVIEW, AND GENERAL ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, AND RESCINDING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 614. was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on September 28, 1992 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: CITY CLERK CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PROPOSED FEE CHANGES CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW SITE DEV. REVIEW (MINOR) VARIANCE VARIANCE (MINOR) ZONE CHANGE ZONING AMENDMENT APPEAL FEE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ENVIR.IMPACT REPORT (EIR) APPL.PAYS APPL.PAYS CITY CONSULTANT FEE CITY CONSULTANT FEE + 20% EXTENSIONS OF TIME LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ANTENNA APPROVAL TEMPORARY USE PERMIT 0 $ 200 1,500 SAME 2,000 SAME 0 SAME 0 SAME EXISTING PROPOSED $ 1,500 SAME 1,500 SAME 750 OMIT 1,250 SAME 750 SAME 2,000 SAME 2,000 SAME 2/3 ORIG. FEE SAME VIEW IMPAIRMENT PLAN MODIFICATION FEE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FINAL PARCEL MAP FINAL TRACT MAP TRAFFIC COMMISSION REVIEW GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FEES GENERAL PLAN COPY VARIES $200 + COUNTY ZONING CODE COPY & STATE FEES BUDGET COPY MEETING TAPES (AUDIO) ZONING MAP XEROXED COPIES FALSE ALARMS - 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH 5TH EXISTING $ `500 VARIES $ 1,500 1,500 0 0 300 PROPOSED SAME 2/3 OF O=BI . FEE $1,500 + 20%/COUNTY FEES $1,500 + 20$/COUNTY FEES 20%/COUNTY FEES 20%/COUNTY FEES 30 SAME 10 25 (NEW CODE) 0 30 25 SAME 3 SAME .25 SAME 50 N SAME 100 150 200 250 9/14/92 LMU 411 RESOLUTION NO. 614 i i k co W A RESOLUT/ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS SETTING FEES FOR PLANNING, ZONING, AND SUBDIVISION SERVICES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing variances, site development reviews, zone changes, conditional use permits and appeals, and shall be paid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Section 17.40.040 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: 1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $1,500.00 2. ,SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW $1,500.00 3. $ITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW - (MINOR) $ 750.00 4. VARIANCE $1,250.00 5. VARIANCE - (MINOR) 750.00 6. ZONE CHANGI $2,000.00 7. ' CODE AMENDMENT - (NON -CITY INITIATED) $2,000.00 8. COMBINATION CASES Varies For multiple applications: The application fee shall be the sum of the largest fee plus fifty percent (50%) of the basic fee of each additional application request. 9. FILING OF AN APPEAL For filing an appeal of a decision of the Planning Commission: The appellant shall pay a fee equal to two-thirds of the amount of the original categorical application fee, to which the appeal relates, and, is the decision of the Planning Commission, from which the appellant appeals. 10. ALL FEES RELATIVE TO ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Varies Environmental review fees shall be separate, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), be based on vendor cost and be in addition to those established herein SECTION 2. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing subdivisions and appeals, and shall be paid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Section 16.12.060 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: 1. SUBDIVISION MAP $1,500.00 2. POST TENTATIVE AND FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP Varies APPROVAL Fees related to the processing of a tentative subdivision map and a final subdivision map, after City Council approval, shall be separate and in addition to those established herein. Varies • • 3. TILING OF AN APPE1►y For filing an appeal of a decision of the Planning Commission: The appellant shall pay a fee equal to two-thirds of the amount of the original categorical application fee, to which the appeal relates, and, is the decision of the Planning Commission, from which the appellant appeals. $ECTIQN 3. The fees set forth in Sections 1 and 2 above do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing such services. Varies SECTION 4. Resolution Number 598 is hereby rescinded. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 29th day of 1922. l ATTEST: City Clerk The foregoing Resolution No. 614 entitled:. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS SETTING FEES FOR PLANNING, ZONING, AND SUBDIVISION SERVICES was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on May 29, 1990 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Leeuwenburgh, Murdock, Pernell, Mayor Heinsheimer NOES: None ABSENT: Councilwoman Swanson • FEE SCHEDULE SURVEY - AUGUST, 1992 ROILING HILLS RANCHO PV PV ESTATES RH ESTATES TORRANCE CARSON HAWTHORNE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1,500.00 1,000 - 2,400.00 750.00 600.00 1;112.00 1,500.00 1,645.00+ SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 1,500.00 110.00 600.00 325 - 500.00 . none none none SITE DEV. REVIEW (MINOR) 150.00 65.00 0 none none none 0 VARIANCE 1,250.00 1,140.00 150.00 500.00 1,112.00 150.00 1,64.5.00+ VARIANCE (MINOR) 150.00 1,140.00 750.00 500.00 1,112.00 750,00 1,645.00+ ZONE CHANGE 2,000.00 4,450.00 0 600.00 1,243.00 2,500.00 2,407.00+ ZONING AMENDMENT 2,000.00 165.00 0 0 972.00 1,000.00 2,363.00+ APPEAL FEE 2/3 orig. fee 1,000 - 1,050.00 0 150 - 300.00 80.00 1/2 filing 3/4 orig. fee fee ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW varies 1,230.00 0 205.00+ 901.00 150.00 450.00 ENVIR. IMPACT REPORT (EIR) app. pays City determined app. pays City cost + 20% app. pays City LA Co + 10% conslt + 202 conslt. fee by Staff conslt. fee conslt. fee EXTENSIONS OF TIME 0 100.00 0 50% of orig. 109.00 150.00 orig. app. fee fee LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1,500.00 430.00 1 25.00 0 1,063.00 300.00 1,645.00 trust dep. GRADING PERMIT LA Co. X 2.5% 195 - 960.00 500.00 75-390.00 146 = 5,274.00 LA Co X 2% 80 - 2,664.00+ ENCROACHMENT see variance 100.00 125.00 0 1,172.00 150.00 1,645.00+ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2,000.00 165.00 0 600.00 972.00 2,500.00 2,363.00+ ANTENNA APPROVAL 0 110 - 250.00 75.00 150.00 109.00 none 0 TEMPORARY USE PERMIT 0 none 0 25.00 . none none 0 VIEW IMPAIRMENT 500.00 2,200 - 3,600.00 0 25.00 inspec. prior to constr none none only MODIFICATION FEE varies 145.00 . 0 0 380.00-1,172.00 250.00 or 0 or orig. fee ' org. fee TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 1,500.00 2,280 + up to 20% pending LA Co. + 212 1,112.00 2,000.00 1,645.00+ adain fee I tr. dep development TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 1,500.00 9,900 1 up to 20% pending LA Co. + 21% 1,172.00 2,000.00 1,645.00+ adain fee + tr. dep development FINAL PARCEL MAP 0 500 + up to 202 pending LA Co. + 21% 0 0 0 adain fee + tr. dep development FINAL TRACT MAP 0 1,025 + up to 20% pending LA Co. 3 21% 0 0 0 adain fee + tr. dep development GEOL. ASSESMENT app. pays 0 app. pays LA Co. LA Co. GEOL. INVESTIGATION App. pays 75.00 app. pays PERMIT LA Co. LA Co. GEOL. REPORT REVIEW App. pays 750.00 app. Pays LA Co. LA Co. GENERAL ADMIN. FEES GENERAL PLAN COPIES 30.00 47,00 20.00 70.00 ZONING CODE COPIES 10.00 20.00 2.00 1st pg. d 25.00 .25 each addit. BUDGET COPIES 0 25.00 35.00 10.00 MEETING TAPES(AUDIO) 25.00 tape your 25.00 loaner copy own ZONING MAPS 3.00 2.00 3-5.00 . .50 XEROXED COPIES .25 3.00 1st pg. t 25.00 .25 .25 each addit. FALSE ALARMS - 1ST 50.00 50.00 25.00 50.00 2ND 100.00 • 100.00 3RD 150.00 150.00 4TH 200.00 SIN 250.00 a 4r - FEE SCHEDULE'SURVEY - AUGUST, 1992 ROILING HILLS RANCHO PV PV ESTATES RH ESTATES TORRANCE CARSON HAWTHORNE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1,500.00 1,000 - 2,400.00 150.00 600.00 1;112.00 1,500.00 1.645.00+ SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 1,500.00 110.00 600.00 325 500.00 none none none SITE DEV. REVIEW (MINOR) 150.00 65.00 0 none none none 0 VARIANCE 1,250.00 1,140.00 150.00 500.00 1,112.00 150.00 1,645.00+ VARIANCE (MINOR) 150.00 \ 1,140.00 150.00 500.00 1,112.00 150.00 1,645.00+ 1 ZONE CHANGE 2,000.00. 4,450.00 0 600.00 1,243.00 2,500.00 2,401.00+ ZONING AMENDMENT 2,000.00 165.00 0 0 912.00 1,000.00 2,363.00+ APPEAL FEE 2/3 orig. fee 1,000 - 1,050.00 0 150 - 300.00 80.00 1/2 filing 3/4 orig. fee fee ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW varies 1,230.00 0 = 205.00+ 901.00 150.00 450.00 ENVIR. IMPACT REPORT (E1R) app. pays City determined app. pays City cost + 202 app. pays City LA Co + 101 conslt + 201 conslt. fee by Staff conslt. fee conslt. fee EXTENSIONS OF TIME 0 100.00 0 501 of orig. 109.00 150.00 orig. app. fee fee LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1,500.00 430.00 4 25.00 0 1,063.00 300.00 1,645.00 trust dep. GRADING PERMIT LA Co. X 2.51 195 - 960.00 500.00 15-390.00 146 - 5,214.00 LA Co X 21 80 - 2,664.00+ ENCROACHMENT see variance 100.00 125.00 0 1,172.00 150.00 1,645.00+ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2,000.00 165.00 0 600.00 912.00 2,500.00 2,363.00+ ANTENNA APPROVAL 0 110 - 250.00 15.00 150.00 109.00 none 0 TEMPORARY USE PERMIT 0 none 0 25.00 none none 0 VIEW IMPAIRMENT 500.00 2,200 - 3,600.00. 0 25.00 inspec. prior to constr. lone none only MODIFICATION FEE varies 145.00 0 0 380.00-1,112.00 250.00 or 0 or orig. fee org. fee TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 1,500.00 2,280 + up to 201 pending LA Co. + 211 1,112.00 2,000.00 1,645.00+ admin fee + tr. dep development TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 1,500.00 9,900 + up to 201 pending LA Co. + 211 1,112.00 adnin fee + tr. dep development FINAL PARCEL MAP 0 S00 + up to 201 pending LA Co. + 211 0 admen fee + tr. dep development FINAL TRACT MAP 0 1,025 + up to 201 pending LA Co. + 211 0 adain fee + tr. dep developeent GEOL. ASSESMENT app, pays 0 LA Co. GEOL. INVESTIGATION App. pays 15.00 PERMIT LA Co. GEOL. REPORT REVIEW App. pays 150.00 LA Co. app. pays LA Co. app. pays LA Co. app. Pays LA Co. GENERAL ADMIN. FEES ' GENERAL PLAN COPIES 30.00 47.00 20.00 10.00 ZONING CODE COPIES 10.00 20.00 2.00 1st pg. t 25.00 .25 each addit. BUDGET COPIES 0 25.00 35.00 10.00 MEETING TAPES(AUOI0) 25,00 tape your 25.00 loaner copy own ZONING MAPS 3.00 • 1.00 3-5.00 .50 XEROXED COPIES .25 3.00 1st pg. l 25.00 .25 .25 each addit. FALSE ALARMS - 1ST 50.00 50.00 25.00 50.00 ' 2ND 100.00 100.00 3RD 150.00 150.00 4TH 200.00 5TH • 250,00 2,000.00 1,645.00' 0 Ciiy 0/ INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FEES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on the 28th day of September, 1992, at 7:30 P.M., in the City Council Chambers located at No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California 90274, a public hearing will be held on the proposed adoption of a resolution establishing or increasing certain development and administrative fees. At said time and place all persons who desire to be heard with respect to the proposed resolution may appear before the City Council and be heard thereon. Dated: September 17, 1992. Deputy City Clerk .wvv, ea,nted on Recycled Pa: er. • cry `/2llinq Jhff Agenda Item No. 2A Mtg. Date: 8:/14/92 ell INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 MEETING DATE: AUGUST 14, 1992 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX: (213) 377-7288 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ATTENTION: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER FROM: LOLA M. UNGAR, PRINCIPAL PLANNER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CITY FEE CHANGES BACKGROUND Staff has determined that certain current fees do not reflect costs to the City. Some fees have far exceeded expenses, i.e. plan modification, environmental review, environmental impact report, view impairment, and subdivision fees. The last time that fees were changed was May 29, 1990, Resolution No. 614 (attached). At that time, some fees were not defined or included, such as, minor Site Development Review, minor Variance, and General Administration fees. Since then, other cities, county, and state requirements now require fees and administrative oversight by the City and Planning Department, (i.e. As of January, 1991, a Negative Declaration requires a fee of $1,250 to the Dept. of Fish & Game, plus $25 to record with the County Recorder), in addition to the administrative time and energy devoted by the City Manager, Planner, Bookkeeper, Deputy City Clerk, Clerk Typist and consultation with the City Attorney (used mostly for subdivisions and tennis court cases). For these reasons, the City of Rolling Hills needs to reevaluate fees. Staff conducted a survey of nearby cities that offer similar services and their fees. We have included the cities of Rancho Palos Verdes, Palos Verdes Estates, Rolling Hills Estates, Torrance, Carson and Hawthorne (attached). It should also be noted that the City of Rancho Palos Verdes recently had a cost control system prepared by a consultant (Management Services Institute, Inc. of Anaheim, CA) which was completed in March, 1992. While their conclusions were more intensive than necessary for our needs, they suggest that the cost of services be adjusted to the level of benefits. And, that community development services, which mainly benefit the developer or property owner, are specialized services which should be supported by developers and not by general taxes. They say that were no development to take place, most of the costs could be eliminated, or at least, significantly reduced. FEES PAGE 2 The results of the survey show that many of our fees are comparable to other cities, except for the City of Palos Verdes Estates which charges a utility tax and parcel taxes. Note the 20% add-on fee and trust deposit requirements for the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. These fees are a direct result of their cost control system. DISCUSSION Plan Modification: Modifying an existing plan that goes beyond the intent of the original approval requires the same procedures as other discretionary cases. The present resolution states that the fee "varies" with no guidelines. Staff proposes a minimum 2/3 of original fee. Variance (Minor): The current schedule does not define a minor Variance. The previous resolution No. 598 defined it as "Minor deviation into required yard setback not exceeding 10' and attached to main residential structure" but was rescinded. Because the entire process is the same and requires the same noticing, reports, etc., other cities do not have a discount and charge the same fee. Staff proposes to omit this fee and charge for all Variances equally. Site Development Review (Minor): There is no record of what this applies to. We propose to omit this designation as well. Multiple applications: Other cities do not charge less for multiple applications. Therefore, staff proposes eliminating the reduced rate. Environmental review: Environmental review varies in each case and needs to be addressed even though most discretionary cases in Rolling Hills are exempt because they are single family dwellings. But, special development, including recreation courts and subdivisions should pay some administrative fee because they require an intricate procedure of noticing and formal documentation. Therefore, staff proposes that $200 be charged for all environmental review in addition to any county and state fees required. Environmental Impact Report: Because the negotiation and choice of consultant and intricate procedure of noticing and formal documentation involved with the report is so lengthy and time consuming, involving all members of the City staff, we propose that 20% should be added to the consultant's fee. View Impairment: At present, we charge $500 for these cases and then, pay $1,500 for the mediator...Therefore, staff proposes a minimum fee of $2,000 to cover additional staff time. FEES PAGE 3 Subdivision fees: At present, we charge $1,500 each for these cases. Currently, there are five subdivision cases being processed and all members of the staff have spent numerous hours in the past 'one and a half years involved with pushing the cases forward, meeting with applicants, meeting with the County Subdivision Committee, 'forwarding bills, and updating the status of these cases. Therefore, staff proposes an additional 20% be added to all county fees charged to us in these cases. General Administration Fees: Many requests are made of City staff for copies of documents and tapes which take some time and use of resources to produce. So, to defray the administrative costs in staff's use of time, energy and resources, we have also included comparable rates for these documents. ALTERNATIVES 1. Status quo 2. Approve some fee changes 3. Approve all fee changes RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached proposed fee structure. A. 1 V RESOLUTION NO. 614 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS SETTING FEES FOR PLANNING, ZONING, AND SUBDIVISION SERVICES co icr m a THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing variances, site development reviews, zone changes, conditional use permits and appeals, and shall bepaid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Section 17.40.040 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: 1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 3. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW - (MINOR) 4. VARIANCE 5. VARIANCE - (MINOR) 6. ;ONE CHANGE 7. CODE AMENDMENT - (NON -CITY. INITIATED) 8. COMBINATION CASES For multiple applications: The application fee shall be the sus of the largest fee plus fifty percent (50%) of the basic fee of each additional application request. $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $ 750.00 $1,250.00 750.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Varies 9. FILING OF AN APPEAL Varies For filing an appeal of a decision of the Planning Commission: The appellant shall pay a fee equal to two-thirds of the amount of the original categorical application fee, to which the appeal relates, and, is the decision of the Planning Commission, from which the appellant appeals. • 10. ALL FEES RELATIVE TO ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Varies Environmental review fees shall be separate, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), be based on vendor cost and be in addition to those established herein SECTION 2. The following fees are established and charged for applications for processing subdivisions and appeals, and shall be paid by the applicant prior to submission for public hearing, pursuant to Section 16.12.060 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code: 1. SUBDIVISION MAP $1,500.00 2. POST TENTATIVE AND FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP APPROVAL Fees related to the processing of a tentative subdivision map and a final subdivision map, after City Council approval, shall be separate and in addition to those established herein. Varies • •s 3. ILING OF AN APPEAL r Varies For filing an appeal of a decision of the Planning Commission: The appellant shall pay a fee equal to two-thirds of the amount of the original categorical application fee, to which the appeal relates, and, is the decision of the Planning Commission, from which the appellant appeals. SECTION 3. The fees set forth in Sections 1 and 2 above do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing such services. 1922. ATTEST: SECTION 4. Resolution Number 598 is hereby rescinded. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this - : day of City Clerk The foregoing Resolution No. 614 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS SETTING FEES FOR PLANNING, ZONING, AND SUBDIVISION SERVICES was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on May 29, 1990 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Leeuwenburgh, Murdock, Pernell, Mayor Heinsheimer NOES: None ABSENT: Councilwoman Swanson FEE SCHEDULE SURVEY - AUGUST, 1992 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1,500.00 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 1,500.00 SITE OEV. REVIEW (MINOR) 750.00 VARIANCE 1,250.00 VARIANCE (MINOR) 750.00 ZONE CHANGE 2,000.00 ZONING AMENDMENT 2,000.00 ROILING HILLS RANCHO PV PV ESTATES RH ESTATES TORRANCE CARSON HAWTHORNE 1,000 - 2,400.00 150.00 600.00 1;172.00 1,500.00 1,645.00+ 110.00 600.00 325 - 500.00 none none none 65.00 0 none none none 0 1,140.00 - 150.00 500.00 1,172.00 750.00 1,645.00+ 1,140.00 750.00 500.00 1,172.00 750.00 1,645.00+ 4,450.00 0 600.00 1,243.00 2,500.00 2,407.00+ 165.00 0 0 972.00 1,000.00 2,363.00+ APPEAL FEE 2/3 orig. fee 1,000 - 1,050.00 0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW varies . 1,230.00 0 ENVIR. IMPACT REPORT (EIR) app. pays City determined conslt. fee by Staff EXTENSIONS OF TIME 0 100.00 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT GRADING PERMIT ENCROACHMENT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ANTENNA APPROVAL TEMPORARY USE PERMIT VIEW IMPAIRMENT MODIFICATION FEE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FINAL PARCEL MAP FINAL TRACT MAP GEOL. ASSESMENT GEOL. INVESTIGATION PERMIT GEOL. REPORT REVIEW 1,500.00 430.00 + trust dep. LA Co. X 2.5% 195 - 960.00 see variance 700.00 2,000.00 0 0 500.00 varies 1,500.00 1.500.00 0 0 app. pays LA Co. App. pays LA Co. App. pays LA Co. GENERAL ADMIN. FEES GENERAL PLAN COPIES ZONING CODE COPIES BUDGET COPIES MEETING TAPES(AUDIO) ZONING MAPS XEROXED COPIES FALSE ALARMS - 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH 5TH 30.00 10.00 0 25.00 3.00 .25 50.00 165.00 110 - 250.00 none 150 - 300.00 80.00 205.00+ 901.00 app. pays City cost + 20% conslt. fee 0 50% of orig. fee 25.00 0 500.00 app. pays City conslt. fee 109.00 1,063.00 1/2 filing 3/4 orig. fee fee 150.00 450.00 LA Co + 10% 150.00 300.00 conslt + 20% orig. app. fee 1,645.00 75-390.00 146 - 5,274.00 LA Co X 2% 80 - 2,664.00+ 125.00 0 1,172.00 750.00 1,645.00+ 0 600.00 972.00 2,500.00 2,363.00+ 75.00 150.00 109.00 none 0 0 25.00 none none 0 2,26-J-3,600.00 0 145.00 2,280 + up to 20% admin fee + tr. dep 9,900 + up to 20% admin fee + tr. dep 500 + up to 20% admin fee + tr. dep 1,025 + up to 20% admin fee + tr. dep 47.00 20.00 25.00 tape your Own 2.00 3.00 1st pg. & .25 each addit. 50.00 100.00 150.00 0 pending development pending development pending development pending development 0 75.00 750.00 20.00 25.00 inspec. prior to constr. none only 0 380.00-1,172.00 LA Co. + 21% 1,172.00 LA Co. + 21% 1,112.00 LA Co. +21% 0 LA Co. + 21% 0 app. pays LA Co. app. pays LA Co. app. pays LA Co. 70.00 2.00 1st pg. d 25.00 .25 each addit. 35.00 10.00 25.00 3-5.00 25.00 25.00 loaner copy .50 .25 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 none 250.00 or 0 or orig. fee org. fee 2,000.00 2,000.00 1,645.00+ 1,645.00+ 0 0 0 CITY OF ROLLING HILTS PROPOSED FEE CHANGES EXISTING ,.PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1,500.00 SAME SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 1,500.00 SAME SITE DEV. REVIEW (MINOR) 750.00 OMIT VARIANCE 1,250.00 SANE; VARIANCE (MINOR) 750.00 CST NNE CHANGE 2,000.00 SAME ZONING AMENDMENT 2,000.00 ; SAME APPEAL FEE 2/3 orig. fee ; SAME ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW varies $200+county & state fees ENVIR. IMPACT REPORT (EIR) app• pays City. appl.pays City conslt. fee ' consult.fee+200 EXTENSIONS OF TIME 0 $200 LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 1,500.00 SAME GRADING PERMIT LA Co. X 2.51 ; SAME ENCROACHMENT see variance GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2,000.00 SAME I ANTENNA APPROVAL 0 i SAME TEMPORARY USE PERMIT 0 VIEW IMPAIRMENT 500.00 MODIFICATION FEE varies TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP 1,500.00 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 1,500.00 FINAL PARCEL MAP 0 FINAL TRACT MAP 0 GEOL. ASSESMENT 6E01. INVESTIGATION PERMIT GEOL. REPORT REVIEW app. Pays LA Co. App. pays SAME LA Co. APP. Pays SAME LA Co. SAME $2,000 2/3 orig.fee $1,500+20%/County fees $1;500+20%/County fees 20%/County fees 20%/County fees GENERAL ADMIN. FEES GENERAL PLAN COPIES 30.00 ZONING CODE COPIES 10.00 BUDGET COPIES 0 MEETING TAPES(AUDIO) 25.00 ZONING MAPS XEROXED COPIES .25 3.00 SAME SAME $25 (New code) $30 SAME SAME SAME FALSE ALARMS - 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH STY 50.00 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250