The URL can be used to link to this page

Traffic Commission Agenda 10-03-2019aiize fcP.�¢ INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 TRAFFIC COMMISSION CITY OF ROLLING HILLS THURSDAY, OCTOBER 03, 2019 8:30 A.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. MAY 23, 2019 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION. 4. PRESENTATION A. PRESENTATION BY REPRESENTATIVES OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, LOMITA STATION, ON TRAFFIC STATISTICS FOR THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. • 5. OLD BUSINESS NONE. 6. NEW BUSINESS A. CONSIDER THE SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE FY 2019-2020 SIGNAGE AND STRIPING PROJECT AND RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE PROJECT FOR CONSTRUCTION. B. CONSIDER A NEW DRIVEWAY AT 23 CHUCKWAGON ROAD AS A PART OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. C. CONSIDER CHANGING NOVEMBER 28, 2019 TRAFFIC COMMISSION MEETING TO NOVEMBER 21, 2019 DUE TO THE THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY. 7. OPEN AGENDA - COMMENTS FROM PUBLIC ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA NONE. Page 1 of 2 8. MATTERS FROM MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION NONE. 9. MATTERS FROM STAFF NONE. 10. ADJOURNMENT Next meeting scheduled -for Thursday, November 28, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. Documents pertaining to an agenda item received after the posting of the agenda are available for review in the City Clerk's office or at the meeting at which the item will be considered. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting due to your disability, please contact the City Clerk at (310) 377-1521 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility and accommodation for your review of this agenda and attendance at this meeting. Traffic Commission Agenda 10-03-19 Page 2 of 2 DRAFT MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS THURSDAY, MAY 23, 2019 1. CALL TO ORDER TRAFFIC COMMISSION Agenda Item: 3A Mtg. Date: 10/03/2019 A regular meeting of the Traffic Commission of the City of Rolling Hills was called to order by Chair Wilson at 8:30 a.m. on Thursday, May 23, 2019 in the City Council Chamber, at City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Hawkins, Margeta, Virtue and Chair Wilson. Commissioners Absent: Raine Others Present: Elaine Jeng, City Manager. Yolanta Schwartz, Planning Director Vanessa Munoz, Traffic Engineer. Arty Beckler, RHCA Maintenance Supervisor. Deputy Tami Bouse Deputy Johann Schloegl Clint Patterson, 22 Georgeff Road 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES SEPTEMBER 27, 2018 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION. Vice Chairwoman Virtue moved that the Traffic Commission approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Traffic Commission held on September 27, 2018. Commissioner Hawkins seconded the motion, which carried without objection by a voice vote. OCTOBER 18, 2018 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION. Commissioner Margeta moved that the Traffic Commission approve the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting of the Traffic Commission held on October 18, 2018. Commissioner Hawkins seconded the motion, which carried without objection by a voice vote. 4. PRESENTATION NONE. -1- 5. OLD BUSINESS CONSIDERATION OF A REVISED DRIVEWAY AT 8 MIDDLERIDGE LANE SOUTH. Planning Director Schwartz stated that this report is to memorialize the events at the filed trip on October 18, 2018. She reviewed the request and the history of the Traffic Commission consideration of a new driveway at 8 Middleridge Lane South. She stated that the Traffic Commission visited the site to view the proposed and staked driveway on October 18, 2018. During the field trip, the residents opposed to the location of the proposed driveway and members of the Traffic Commission concurred. A different location was suggested, approximately 40' south of the of northerly property line of the property, near where the access to the stable was staked. The Traffic Engineer stated that that location would be acceptable. Planning Director Schwartz stated that at the field trip Commissioner Raine made a motion to recommend approval of the driveway in the location near the northerly 'property line and to place a condition that it be screened from Middleridge Lane. Commissioner Virtue seconded the motion. She stated that this report is to memorialize this action and to restate the motion for the record. The motion was restated by Commissioner Hawkins, since Commissioner Raine was absent, seconded by Commissioner Virtue, and it carried without objection by a voice vote. Planning Director Schwartz stated that the Traffic Commission's recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council when the project is presented to them following Planning Commission decision on the development. 6. NEW BUSINESS A. RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL THE FY 2019-20 SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT WITH. • THE LOS ANGELES SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT. City Manager Elaine Jeng reviewed the supplemental agreement and stated that the current supplemental agreement mimics the one from last year with no changes. She also pointed out that representatives from the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department were present to answer any questions that may come forward. City Manager Elaine apologized to the Commissioners for not having a presentation ready for the meeting. The reason behind it was because the statistics for traffic enforcement were not available. City Manager Elaine Jeng stated staff recommends keeping the agreement. Chairman Wilson asked how it was possible that the City was able to attain the same fee as last year. Deputy Tami Bouse answered the City requested the Fiscal price now but also noted that the Sheriffs fiscal year does not start until July and therefore the new pricing was not available. She did point out that when the new fiscal year starts the City might see an increase of three dollars per hour. Commissioner Hawkins moved that the Traffic Commission recommend to the City Council to accept the supplemental traffic enforcement plan, Commissioner Virtue seconded the motion, which carried without objection by a voice vote. Minutes 05-23-19 Traffic Commission Meeting Minutes -2- B. RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO EVALUATE ALL EQUESTRIAN CROSSINGS IN THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, INSTALL SIGNAGE AND STRIPING IF WARRANTED, AND ADOPT A MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE FOR SIGNED/STRIPED CROSSING. City Manager Elaine Jeng reported to have received a request from the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA) asking for an evaluation of equestrian crossings. According to the RHCA findings, there are a number of crossings that are currently striped. City Manager Elaine Jeng took a look at past practices of how the City addressed these issues. Typically the request for striping was far and few in between but when it did occur, the request would be brought before the Traffic Commission and a decision would be made among the Commissioners. City Manager Elaine Jeng stated she felt this process was not efficient and proceeded to ask the Commissioners to look at the topic more broadly and requested the Traffic Commission to set policy for a schedule of maintenance. Chairman Wilson opened the item to public comment. Clint Patterson, 22 Georgeff Road, stated there are several striped crossings that are so faded you cannot see them. He mentioned a letter he submitted describing other striped crossings along with photos he took. Mr. Paterson also suggested adding signage to crossings because he along with other residents has experienced hazardous drivers. Chairman Wilson inquired whether there is signage at horse crossings. City Manager Elaine Jeng answered yes and proceeded to inform the Commissioner that in the past, individual locations are taken before the Traffic Commission. The commission body would direct staff to evaluate along with the input of the traffic engineer, and then decide based on stripage and signage need, pointing out that there are variations on conditions. Chairman Wilson inquired whether there is a policy of when a sign is needed and/or not needed. City Manager Elaine Jeng answered that is a recommendation of the Traffic Commission depending on the sight condition. Commissioner Hawkins pointed out that according to the municipal ordinance, one must yield the right of way to designate horse crossing, and you must be code compliant with the Department of Transportation Signage in order to designate a horse crossing. He also recognized that the community of Rolling Hills does not like signage and stated that if there is going to be a horse crossing area, proper signage should be posted, to enforce the municipal ordinance. Signage also reminds drivers to slow down. Chairman Wilson inquired if a sign is required for a driver to yield, as oppose to striping only. Vanessa Munoz, Traffic Engineer answered yes because signs are what designate a crossing, otherwise you are not aware of the violation. Chairman Wilson asked if there was an inventory of how many crossings call for signage. Minutes 05-23-19 Traffic Commission Meeting Minutes -3- City Manager Elaine Jeng answered no, what was presented to the Traffic Commission was just a small sample of crossings within the city. There is currently no citywide inventory of equestrian crossings. Chairman Wilson inquired on how the presented list was acquired. Arty Beckler, RHCA Maintenance Supervisor, stated he and RHCA staff put the list together by driving through the city and determining what crossings needed to be roughed, painted, and/or does it need a sign. They also added sites they felt needed a crossing. Commissioner Hawkins stated that when he was assigned to Rolling Hills, he wrote many tickets having to do with drivers and horse crossings. Stressing that without proper signage he could not have been able to do so. Chairman Wilson asked if the horse crossing signs are approved by the State Department of Transportation. Vanessa Munoz Traffic Engineer answered yes, but pointed out they are warning signs and not regulatory. Commissioner Virtue asked if paper warnings are valid. Vanessa Munoz, Traffic Engineer answered no, it is not. She pointed out that even at a stop, what regulates is the sign not the legend. Chairman Wilson inquired about the fees. He asked if the fees include striping, roughing, and signage of all the listed crossings. City Manager Elaine Jeng answered no, and clarified that what was presented to the Traffic Commission is the budget that has been dedicated for next years budget for overall striping and signage for the entire city. She stated she was not sure if the Traffic Commission wanted to take action on this item now or wait and set a policy and take inventory on what crossings in the city need work. If the Traffic Commission decides on the latter, monies needs to be set aside for next fiscal year. City Manager Elaine Jeng expressed it is more efficient to have a company come into the city and do all the striping, roughing and signage all at once as oppose to piece by piece. Chairman Wilson stated that not knowing the fiscal impact this project may have and the Traffic Commission not meeting again soon makes it difficult to take action and therefore wondered what options there were for the Traffic Commission. City Manager Elaine Jeng recommended setting aside a budget and if approved and incorporated into next year's program, then staff can continue to "spend down that bucket". She would then report out at the end of the year, state how much is left and at that point Commissioner Wilson can recommend to Council to allocate additional money. She also recommends conducting a survey of all city's crossings and suggest the Rolling Hills Community Association could do it on the City's behalf. Once that is completed, an estimate of cost per unit can be done and allocating monies can be easily done. She also suggested splitting the project into a two-year program if need be. Minutes 05-23-19 Traffic Commission Meeting Minutes -4- • Clint Patterson, 22 Georgeff Road felt identifying the crossings that need immediate attention should be easy and suggested looking for those that are not near Stop signs. He pointed out a particular one he has come across with no stop sign and no signage located on a relatively blind curve. Chairman Wilson asked what could be done now prior to the City Council considering the budget. City Manger Elaine Jeng recommended using only half of the dedicated budget for this phase of the project. Chairman Wilson asked if the Caballeros Club and/or the Rolling Hills Community Association to prioritize some of the crossings. He does not feel the City Council should dictate which crossings take priority but instead feels the Caballeros Club is more suited for this decision. Chairman Wilson asked for the City Managers recommendation of how to best package the presentation to the City Council. City Manager Elaine Jeng pointed out four streets that the RHCA paved and completed in late -March and stated that they were not striped yet, so she was hoping to get a pricing from Civic Center Striping and lump it together with the work the city will be doing. She also stated she would prioritize whatever crossing comes out of this discussion. The other option is having on -call qualified stripers come out as an as needed basis. Once the Traffic Commission approves the process there will be no need to bring back new trails crossings for approval but rather go through the process outlined earlier. Chairman Wilson asked if the Traffic Commission should recommend a dollar amount to the City Council along with approving a maintenance schedule for signage and striping. City Manager Elaine Jeng answered yes. Chairman Wilson moved that the Traffic Commission recommend to the City Council to evaluate all equestrian crossings in the City of Rolling Hills, install signage and striping if warranted, and adopt a maintenance schedule for signed/striped crossings, and request that the City Council consider a $10,000 budget for the first year, Commissioner Hawkins seconded the motion, which carried without objection by a voice vote. 7. OPEN AGENDA - COMMENTS FROM PUBLIC ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA Clint Patterson, commented he would like to support the efforts to increase the safety for animals. 8. MATTERS FROM MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION A. UPDATE: CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM COMMISSIONER ROGER HAWKINS TO AMEND CHAPTER 10.36 REGARDING RIGHT OF WAY OF HORSEBACK RIDERS AND SAFETY OF ANIMALS. (ORAL) Commissioner Hawkins pointed out some oddities he found in the municipal code he felt are in need of revisions. He stated municipal code 10.36.050, which talks about equestrian crossing, designated signs and what one must do, talks about yielding to horseback riders. He felt the subsection C of the equestrian crossing ordinance should be amended to read "this section does not relieve any horse drawn vehicle, any ridden animal or any live stock from the duty of using due care" because he felt Minutes 05-23-19 Traffic Commission Meeting Minutes -5- that way it imposes a burden on the people that are riding or driving a horse drawn cart. He also stated that Section 21055 of the California Vehicle Code which allows emergency vehicles to ignore traffic laws when making an emergency call and Sections 21056 says 21055 read that yes, you can roll code 3 but you must still pay attention to the people, equestrians, and horse drawn carts. Commissioner Hawkins feels this is inconsistent to one another and section 10.32.170 should be amended to take out "authorize emergency vehicle" language in order to be consistent with the California Vehicle Code. Chairman Wilson asked if adding the section of the California Vehicle Code would be better. Commissioner Hawkins answered that could be another option and stressed that he felt this is something that should be looked at. City Manager Elaine Jeng pointed out that item 8A had more to do with giving the Commissioners an update of past conversations staff has had with Commissioner Hawkins's proposal to change Chapter 10.36 regarding the right of way of horseback riders and safety of animals. She stated that in previous meetings in September the Traffic Commission drafted/revised language that talks about animal crossings. However, in conversations with Commissioner Hawkins it was decided that the changes made by the Commissioners were no longer warranted. Commissioner Hawkins asked if his recommendations could be reviewed during another meeting. City Manager Elaine Jeng suggested agendizing Commissioner Hawkins recommendations. Commissioner Hawkiris motioned that the Traffic Commission reconsider possible amendments to municipal code ordinance' 10.36.050 and 10.32.170, Commissioner Virtue seconded the motion, which carried without objection by a voice vote. B. UPDATE: COMMISSIONER HAWKINS QUESTIONED THE REASON FOR TWO CONFLICITNG SIGNS; ONE SIGN REFERENCED THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE PLACED AT THE SERVICE ROAD LEADING TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY AND ONE SIGN REFERENCED THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE PLACED AT THE CREST ROAD WEST GATE ENTRANCE. (ORAL) City Manager Elaine Jeng gave a summary of the discussions held with Commissioner Hawkins regarding the two conflicting signs. Commissioner Hawkins submitted two photos of the signs found on the service road on the school districts property, at the Crest West Gate. One sign refers to the California Vehicle Code, the other signs refers to the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, so Commissioner Hawkins inquired about which one was the correct one to use. City Manager Elaine Jeng reached out the school district and spoke to Superintendent Terry Kobayashi, who noted that this is a private road and that the California Vehicle Code signage should not be posted and therefore he removed it. City Manager Elaine Jeng confirm that the sign was eliminated and now the Rolling Hills Municipal Code will be the one to reference. 9. MATTERS FROM STAFF NONE. Minutes 05-23-19 Traffic Commission Meeting Minutes -6- ADJOURNMENT Hearing no further business before the Traffic Commission, Chair Wilson adjourned the meeting at 9:55 a.m. to the next meeting of the Traffic Commission scheduled to be held on Thursday, July 25, 2019 beginning at 8:30 a.m. in the Rolling Hills City Council Chamber at City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Rd., Rolling Hills, CA. Respectfully submitted, Yohana Coronel, City Clerk Approved, Patrick Wilson Chair - Minutes 05-23-19 Traffic Commission Meeting Minutes -7- AUGUST 2019 ROLLING HILLS TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT 20RE010231 Agenda I Mtg. Date DATE ` TIME LOCATION VIOLATION SPEED RESIDENT CITES NON ..e r RESIDENT CITES ' .+}` : DEPUTY 8/1/19 2:55pm 38 Crest Rd W Stop 0 1 Despot 8/1/19 3:30pm Eastfield/Chuckwagon Speed 46 1 0 Despot 8/28/19 10:33am Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 43 0 1 Bouse 8/28/19 11:40am Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 43 1 0 Bouse 8/28/19 12:24pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 46 1 0 Bouse 8/29/19 8:01am Speed 44 1 0 Bouse 8/29/19 8:21am Speed 46 1 0 Bouse 8/29/19 9:23am Speed 43 0 1 Bouse 8/29/19 10:09am Speed 43 0 1 Bouse 8/29/19 1:06pm Speed 46 0 1 Bouse 8/29/19 1:40pm Speed 49 0 1 Bouse 8/29/19 2:42pm Speed 45 0 1 Bouse 8/29/19 3:25pm Speed 42 1 0 Bouse 8/29/19 4:17pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 46 1 0 Bouse Total Hours 14 7 7 tern 4A 10/03/19 L$ JULY 2019 ROLLING HILLS TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT "" " . 20RE010051 N 4( DATE r TIME HOURS WORKED " LOCATION VIOLATION SPEED ,i RESIDENTV CITES . ANON -4 RESIDENT CITES T.. .' .-_-5_,--:4, : DEPTY, 7/22/19 3:25pm 3:00-5:00pm Portuguese Bend/Saddleback Stop 0 1 Bouse 7/22/19 4:19pm Portuguese Bend/Saddleback Stop 0 1 Bouse 7/23/19 2:15pm 2:00-4:00pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 45 1 0 Bouse 7/23/19 3:49pm Portuguese Bend/Saddleback Stop 0 1 Bouse 7/24/19 1:15pm 1:00-3:00pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 46 0 1 Bouse 7/24/19 2:40pm Speed 53 0 1 Bouse 7/29/19 1:28pm 1:00-3:00pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 49 0 1 Bouse 7/29/19 2:49pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 48 1 0 Bouse 7/30/19 1:40pm 1:00-5:00pm Crest Rd W/Buggy Whip Speed 46 1 0 Despot 7/30/19 2:30pm Crest Rd W/Buggy Whip Speed 45 0 1 Despot 7/30/19 3:01pm " Eastfield/Chuckwagon Stop 0 1 Despot 7/30/19 4:16pm II Eastfield/Chuckwagon Stop 0 1 Despot 7/31/19 12:43pm 12:00-4:00pm Eastfield/Outrider Stop 0 1 Despot 7/31/19 1:27pm Eastfield/Outrider Stop 0 1 Despot 7/31/19 2:48pm " Eastfield/Outrider Stop 1 0 Despot 7/31/19 3:46pm " Johns Canyon/Crest Rd W Unsafe entry hwy 0 1 Despot 7/31/19 2:35pm 2:00-5:00pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 43 0 1 Bouse 7/31/19 3:44pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 48 1 0 Bouse 7/31/19 4:11pm Portuguese Bend/Saddleback Stop 0 1 Bouse Total Hours 19 5 14 Inventory List 9/26/19 JUNE 2019 ROLLING HILLS TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT 19RE011537 : I 1 DATE TIME HOURS WORKED LOCATION VIOLATION SPEED RESIDENT CITES NON - RESIDENT i CITES f •DEPUTY 6/12/19 2:55pm 12:00-6:00pm Eastfield/Outrider Stop 0 1 Despot 6/12/19 3:10pm Eastfield/Chuckwagon Stop 0 1 Despot 6/12/19 3:33pm Eastfield/Chuckwagon Stop 0 1 Despot 6/12/19 4:31pm Crest Rd W/Buggy Whip Speed 52 0 1 Despot 6/13/19 11:21 am 11:00-3:00pm 26 Portuguese Bend Rd 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 43 0 1 Bouse 6/13/19 12:33pm Speed 47 0 1 Bouse 6/13/19 1:51pm 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 52 0 1 Bouse 6/13/19 2:24pm 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 43 0 1 Bouse 6/14/19 9:46am 9:00-1:00pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 44 1 0 Bouse 6/14/19 10:58am 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 43 0 1 Bouse 6/14/19 11:24am 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 45 0 1 Bouse 6/14/19 12:55pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 45 0 1 Bouse 6/19/19 8:30am 7:00-3:00pm 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 44 1 0 Bouse 6/19/19 9:41am 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 46 1 0 Bouse 6/19/19 11:31am 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 43 1 0 Bouse 6/19/19 11:46am 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 42 1 0 Bouse 6/19/19 12:34pm 26 Portuguese Bend Rd (SB) Speed 48 1 0 Bouse 6/19/19 1:03pm II 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 42 1 0 Bouse 6/19/19 1:56pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 46 0 1 Bouse 6/19/19 2:34pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 44 0 1 Bouse 6/20/19 3:04PM 3:00-6:OOPM Eastfield/Outrider Stop 0 1 Despot 6/20/19 4:41 pm Eastfield/Outrider Stop 1 0 Despot 6/20/19 5:05pm II Eastfield/Outrider Stop 0 1 Despot 6/24/19 4:23pm 3:00-5:00pm 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 43 0 1 Bouse 6/26/19 11:14am 11:00-1:00pm 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 44 1 0 Bouse V/1b/1 DATE TIME HOURS WORKED LOCATION VIOLATION SPEED RESIDENT CITES NON - RESIDENT CITES DEPUTY 6/26/19 12:09pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 52 1 0 Bouse 6/27/19 11:16am 11:00-2:00 Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 42 0 1 Bouse 6/27/19 11:26am Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 45 1 0 Bouse 6/27/19 1:44pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 44 1 0 Bouse 6/27/19 2:09pm 26 Portuguese Bend Rd (Juvi) Speed 43 0 1 Bouse 6/28/19 8:51am 8:00-2:OOpm 26 Portuguese Bend Rd S/B Speed 43 1 0 Bouse 6/28/19 9:32am 20 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 44 0 1 Bouse 6/28/19 11:01am 20 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 44 0 . 1 Bouse 6/28/19 12:13pm 20 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 46 0 1 Bouse 6/28/19 12:37pm 20 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 42 0 1 Bouse Total Hours 38 13 22 Inventory List 9/26/19 MAY 2019 ROLLING HILLS TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT !t, 19RE011367 DATE TIME HOURS WORKED LOCATION VIOLATION SPEED RESIDENT CITES NON- RESIDENT CITES DEPUTY 5/10/19 7:50am 7:30-9:30am 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 49 1 0 Bouse 5/10/19 8:25am 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 46 1 0 Bouse 5/13/19 3:23pm 2:00-9:00pm Eastfield/Outrider Stop 1 0 Despot 5/13/19 3:50pm Eastfield/Outrider Stop 1 0 Despot 5/13/19 4:32pm Eastfield/Outrider Eastfield/Outrider Eastfield/Outrider Eastfield/Outrider Stop 0 1 Despot 5/13/19 5:02pm II Stop 0 1 Despot 5/13/19 6:17pm Stop 0 1 Despot 5/13/19 6:46pm Stop 0 1 Despot 5/13/19 7:31pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 45 1 0 Despot 5/15/19 9:32am 9:00-12:00 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 46 1 0 Bouse 5/15/19 10:37am 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 43 0 1 Bouse 5/15/19 11:20am 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 44 0 1 Bouse 5/21/19 10:46am 10:30-12:30pm Eastfield/Chuckwagon Stop 1 0 Despot 5/21/19 12:34pm Eastfield/Outrider Stop 0 1 Despot 5/21/19 2:39pm 2:30-5:30pm Eastfield/Chuckwagon Stop 0 1 Despot 5/21/19 3:08pm 28 Crest Rd W Speed (juvi) 44 0 1 Despot 5/21/19 5:23pm II 48 Crest Rd W Speed 48 0 1 Despot 5/23/19 9:00AM 9:00-3:OOPM 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 46 1 0 Bouse 5/23/19 10:08am 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 45 1 0 Bouse 5/23/19 10:59am 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 47 1 0 Bouse 5/23/19 12:28pm 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 46 1 0 Bouse 5/23/19 1:24pm II 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 51 0 1 Bouse 5/23/19 2:15pm 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 42 0 1 Bouse 5/28/19 9:32am 9:00-1:00pm 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 44 0 1 Bouse 5/28/19 10:41am 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 43 1 0 Bouse Inventory List 9/26/19 Y DATE __ b TIME• HOURS WORKED LOCATION VIOLATION SPEED RESIDENT. CITES RESIDENT ry,r CITES . DEPUTY 3-2 s. -; 5/28/19 12:02pm II 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 45 1 0 Bouse 5/28/19 12:26pm .. 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 45 1 0 Bouse 5/28/19 2:23pm 2:00-7:00 38 Crest Rd W Speed 45 1 0 Despot 5/28/19 3:17pm Crest Rd W/Buggy Whip Speed 44 1 0 Despot 5/28/19 4:07pm It Crest Rd W/Buggy Whip Speed 45 0 1 Despot 5/28/19 5:45pm II Eastfield/Outrider Stop 0 1 Despot Total Hours 32 16 15 Inventory List 9/26/19 *Traffic Enforcement Index: Haz. Cites + DUI Arrests / Fatal + Injury Collisions (20:1) City of Rolling Hills 2019 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Average Total Collisions 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0.38 Injury Collisions 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0.25 Enforcement Index * 0 0 0 25 0 33 0 0 7.25 Hazardous Cites 13 22 12 25 45 33 32 24 25.75 Non -Hazardous Cites 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.38 Parking Cites 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 DUI Arrests 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 DUI Collisons 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Fatal Collisions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 *Traffic Enforcement Index: Haz. Cites + DUI Arrests / Fatal + Injury Collisions (20:1) -w •;x y�[:."'�(�`{;..�.""'�=+' "�'�""�- "' •>,a'�A ;n, .r"x^'^�`x •T�ti'"�' {-,ar".1"��'. .+ �, -,.•t �„t ,�. 5.� r,^,y. ifi�."4 ,'..�'. '1%. �y�µ47 Tc^r? �f .: :rv+` :r'�: .'.x. iii: �sSri ris 't �'�-.c. ,,;L - R Y i�',w• -4^ xy'?�if .w. �' ��.c 1 wfi�•Ic• e^ „�.t rtr ."Te,: x';yGtr � � r � � ��iro R'� � 3•„T +�„�. t \ � � r:*'r .V�y �, 9 � �,•r; ".J �` is �^��'� ✓ � 7 � iAUGUST' 2019aROLLING�HILLS TRAFLFIC'ENFORCEMENT :: x ''P� io 1 q t� 1e, ur - n7;. aa' r :� '7C � Ci fi' •; tl M1r�. rA!r. J.:4E �. fi t t-k«r, j 44 tsi1'1,4.k 'q'it* ';4 �� .4 M• h ' 7 20RE010231� rL 4 } __ .- -: s.1 ss n •++i:._ ... : Y' �... �K .;-s. i- 'r I_•4.: ..3.... -:3� x n:lia•.. veF,l� �J•• .`�'.a .. r��. y Agenda Item 4A Mtg. Date: 10/03/19 57,,,,r_ "L."-, • " , DATE x ,•�j,' ;,.�-.•,�ri�;:s::,.��.,• r� +V 2.., °F�'+�t ,b '3. .� .=?'',......;:;6.,'' ,'• uTIMEI ^c. e4 ti. 'Tfir x :i• •�1 .,}�7, r i,•- �, ` 4... � . F ;b •.•r .�s; V14-1‘ "� Thy p} I' i2 'k.. i7 -t-; -- t �; 'F n i Y." .;''!. ,y Y•cl' s •. �, 7C �3,.,,+•.eY•,, az�r�E -.,,v '—T '4e,�' , ,,,11.•,:i7,LOCATION P.� a -.4., , : c ,", , y •, '#,,,5' ,,..;r +.:,�:�.5 �;;z.�:,'�'r:-,�.rtt`�,.?.1• ?s,A 'z3.r k4,: ,,., •rr �y17 i ' r e _r t 4,4:,',.lblY� .'r.. aY '. '" . ..... .-Y .1;"_ '. �'. .r1l..w.r _....`�'._s'v's1-�{'i".n_k .. •r r�, '.?��?fi"' •1 �.r::� �.:c tiaT�;; E r tY. .MWi- , ,, .�e,� x �',� .+ , VIOLATION =* ,:a:..� v. ��,,-..,�ti t u-�L7Sw ^,p,a Krt �S! (..... x�. ?��Sf1��%�•`�'x� it r..1 � :t r ; � .• - 1 •�� .w:ee �� 4SPEED �'.• .� i1;�s �•i w+ a f..'xi• s::' , _:..�s ' x>.�s. !RESIDENT' ;4-:a -txs: ay CITES j i'd7? ii. n �"h :,� .x-�i wY;� IG�- N9147'1:7' RESID_ENT.V r _ ,<.. I P 1 :�� ITES-..} a.n , ,•;: z.. .,< .� � �'�,.�..,s� )"'DEP,time, ,a• .�,,,, x xRt. Y . �!a•" : �� ....�r-`.:,' r..:.. 8/1/19 2:55pm 38 Crest Rd W Stop 0 1 Despot 8/1/19 3:30pm Eastfield/Chuckwagon Speed 46 1 0 Despot 8/28/19 10:33am Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 43 0 1 Bouse 8/28/19 11:40am Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 43 1 0 Bouse 8/28/19 12:24pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon ' Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 46 1 0 Bouse 8/29/19 8:01 am Speed 44 •1 0 Bouse 8/29/19 8:21am Speed 46 1 0 Bouse 8/29/19 9:23am Speed 43 0 1 Bouse 8/29/19 10:09am Speed 43 0 1 Bouse 8/29/19 1:06pm Speed 46 0 1 Bouse 8/29/19 1:40pm Speed 49 0 1 Bouse V 8/29/19 2:42pm Speed 45 0 1 Bouse 8/29/19 3:25pm Speed 42 1 0 Bouse 8/29/19 4:17pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 46 1 0 Bouse Total Hours 14 7 7 #: i•} y,, 4w' t {� Via,-'. y." t1.:I; e *S,7''. -y -f 14,,.,0414,- t � wry— , z t' i i.'..ui"v JULYY2019'ROLLING° HILLS.,TRAFF.IC+ENFORCEME4. NT; . ; �.;:(4F441,-. �,; , ; �* x� w f' - ••• s"�,• .a :-. ; ; 20F2E010051 =' Gt.,'�n_ .. ......T:Yh..i _, 1..�.' _ [ • ci .. t` � 'z.r.ie +�4 1 t.Y.^fit ty nrse ^vn''f: ..ti wa. ,..--e- �-+�T.g3','F"'i,2;.w,f'%..YrM 5 '' DATE' ::-. ;�a' .7 � c � E ,r.s.., "'�.'�'`-� �* _. � T4' ��`,'l;f~ ,�' 04TIME,:,'t r- _ '; v k. i, b't 4r� i . zy A -rd �. - ''"°r .e..f%r . �e. ;. HOURS=.,,e`�,£� WORKED' "'! �. ,. . , ., � v ::�n uw'i �,, h,c; �x' , _ �y ,a� , l''t;,4 in _.. + .,•3r •\* :- Y4,4441:,. ;x-. . .,?vs +�r r. ;z,; r is �A, t. ,."i--t' , LO�C�ATION. ".��t* . y F! �� `s`„ q4,--:?( a,d :' 6::?.. .-6 F+� it , �.4:ta'�� _ k�: � ..��ila::. n_, v � .lina"r �c. .. i tY '+.h:r�""r'�G* r•1r.?; i,..-. oiTq .A,,-, ! 3. �_�VIOL'ATION�I•� , is a�yv '.ss�<�.�z.,,. �"�+.'� 17� _ ,; . �vrt� �..,.v�, "Lt:. :;:,'.l:,: a,�SPEED'; , n .t�. �.f,..:"6' .;z`•.: n,rit„xtrN++im+ .a RESIDENT' " �k�;ax�-v-�� ,tyy,C,'RESIDENT�'�yx�'DEPUTjYr,-�.-', ,CITES ��.u.n# �s??�..�i`i. .'." g.NON ^5'7'"t^t,gi. . - did' �. CITES, .y.u. »�.. r; -...;-. F 'y'°... f. P r , �" ... �' 1-".�_.:'.c;a-. 7/22/19 3:25pm 3:00-5:00pm Portuguese Bend/Saddleback Stop 0 1 Bouse 7/22/19 4:19pm Portuguese Bend/Saddleback Stop 0 1 Bouse 7/23/19 2:15pm 2:00-4:00pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 45 1 0 Bouse 7/23/19 3:49pm Portuguese Bend/Saddleback Stop 0 1 Bouse 7/24/19 1:15pm 1:00-3:00pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 46 0 1 Bouse 7/24/19 2:40pm Speed 53 0 1 Bouse 7/29/19 1:28pm 1:00-3:00pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 49 0 1 Bouse 7/29/19 2:49pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon . Speed 48 1 0 Bouse 7/30/19 1:40pm 1:00-5:00pm Crest Rd W/Buqgy Whip Speed 46 1 0 Despot 7/30/19 2:30pm Crest Rd W/Buggy Whp Speed 45 0 1 Despot 7/30/19 3:01pm II Eastfield/Chuckwagon Stop 0 1 Despot N V 7/30/19 4:16pm " Eastfield/Chuckwagon Stop 0 1 Despot 7/31/19 12:43pm 12:00-4:00pm Eastfield/Outrider Stop 0 1 Despot 7/31/19 1:27pm Eastfield/Outrider Stop 0 1 Despot 7/31/19 2:48pm " Eastfield/Outrider • Stop 1 0 Despot 7/31/19 3:46pm Johns Canyon/Crest Rd W Unsafe entry hwy 0 1 Despot 7/31/19 2:35pm 2:00-5:oopm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 43 0 1 Bouse 7/31/19 3:44pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 48 1 0 Bouse 7/31/19 4:11pm Portuguese Bend/Saddleback Stop 0 1 Bouse Total Hours 19 5 14 Inventory List 9/26/19 `-'`: .0.441,;. � z _K!�� r .aid F ;.t?; :!"l a' � � , ` +`2-"6 JUNE`2019.ROLLING`HILLS7RAFFICzENFORCEMrENTI- { i {I i,',-; wa r„ c� .3y zK+. ,.wr�'�� s• e ry'l`� r r4G.. ors L rrxtY ^4y`+x'� �r t <Y 1 .1' a.. .. .,* •-u r-, a• ,z..w �.•.« ;ir« r.. _','__ ". . .,.._.?:ecai r:- a�kr r. �+• , :. ros.•V �,, . ....�+ �.. • c.s�'. ta. .^S v«rr+ ,.:.a'r:7_' p F.; ..' f.0 .!F' 'i-, ' r;;�-� ��t= � DATE x�� i` �{{. ,,,qq . w^L". •.1!>".."L", r . .. .11.Y-Y-: ',.;..� 7yTIME t 4 g4.; ��-�Fa�.�'�. y _ . ��i� ri^ •af< -' : k .HOURS �:«t,� t WORKED 9�'ei{ i<<.-,.Y9%' u `. :l J. ,: ��+. -'''' �,.ra a ,cc': � ++ �nv� .w� `.x �..� � � j;., .+iq a. yx: <x '" .,;7...'14:4r7'.,. " Yt 't* a; ',�'#' � al .-4 .1 LOCATIN, { - �; � ; a , ..' .� rr r 44.W ] .. i-' �i? �sN�- � �T,;.- T .,,w2 �' �.. .i�:'^�+rb. " at :•3 ,� ; .r 1 .�, j'}p S17i. :_;�". ! xIY Ay t r< i�.�� Y r:ivr VIOLATION ,t - r. < <T �., jt � 1�. 1l�<.M� �:�:'�.�•..�,��.a<._ �_ iRi" -,[. ,, �r :SPEED'N> `1 i i� t_t;�� =;�'_.;'�_ Y aRr SI. i^x:..i 4. ;RESIDENT, Wy 7,-� . K • y CITES..:S 1 !s ,, .�c�a��::rix,.,+. �.).NON ".ir Y'., .. _ �a,i„ 0RESIDENT"' -� :1 .. CITES.. ty'�.'a� f �, 0:4:44,4.;,44f. ,'"4 -DEPUTY. �r.!..� >< s / . M"*� t -Y . .,�^� 6/12/19 2:55pm 12:00-6:00pm Eastfield/Outrider Stop 0 1 Despot 6/12/19 3:10pm Eastfield/Chuckwagon Stop 0 1 Despot 6/12/19 3:33pm " Eastfield/Chuckwagon Stop 0 1 Despot 6/12/19 4:31pm " Crest Rd W/Buggy Whip Speed 52 0 1 Despot 6/13/19 11:21 am 11:00-3:00pm 26 Portuguese Bend Rd 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 43 0 1 Bouse 6/13/19 12:33pm Speed 47 0 1 Bouse 6/13/19 1:51pm " 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 52 0 1 Bouse 6/13/19 2:24pm 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 43 0 1 Bouse 6/14/19 9:46am 9:00-1:00pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 44 1 0 Bouse 6/14/19 10:58am 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 43 0 1 Bouse 6/14/19 11:24am " 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 45 0 1 Bouse V 6/14/19 12:55pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 45 0 1 Bouse 6/19/19 8:30am 7:00-3:00pm 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 44 - 1 0 Bouse 6/19/19 9:41am 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 46 1 0 Bouse 6/19/19 11:31am " 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 43 1 0 Bouse 6/19/19 11:46am " 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 42 1 0 Bouse 6/19/19 12:34pm " 26 Portuguese Bend Rd (SB) Speed 48 1 0 Bouse 6/19/19 1:03pm " 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 42 1 0 Bouse 6/19/19 1:56pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 46 0 1 Bouse 6/19/19 2:34pm 0 Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 44 0 1 Bouse 6/20/19 3:04PM 3:00-6:OOPM Eastfield/Outrider Stop 0 1 Despot 6/20/19 4:41pm Eastfield/Outrider Stop 1 0 Despot 6/20/19 5:05pm " Eastfield/Outrider Stop 0 1 Despot 6/24/19 4:23pm 3:00-5:00pm 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 43 0 1 Bouse 6/26/19 invcntnnr 11:14am I let 11:00-1:00pm 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 44 1 0 Bouse -h DATE a .. 'TIME k.• u HOURS .- WORKED ,' LOCATION ;^ w : 2 4 VIOLATION 3 1 , `• :,,SPEED,'' ' � ' - �� RESIDENT:` { . ., .CITES.: '.NON 4., RESIDENT; _ CITES ti . ".DEPUTY - 6/26/19 12:09pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 52 1 0 Bouse 6/27/19 11:16am 11:00-2:00 Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 42 0 1 Bouse 6/27/19 11:26am Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 45 1 0 Bouse 6/27/19 1:44pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 44 1 0 Bouse 6/27/19 2:09pm " 26 Portuguese Bend Rd (Juvi) Speed 43 0 1 Bouse 6/28/19 8:51am 8:00-2:00pm 26 Portuguese Bend Rd S/B Speed 43 1 0 Bouse 6/28/19 9:32am 20 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 44 0 1 Bouse 6/28/19 11:01 am 20 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 44 0 1 Bouse 6/28/19 12:13pm " 20 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 46 0 1 Bouse 6/28/19 12:37pm 20 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 42 0 1 Bouse Total Hours 38 13 22 V nventory us 9/26/19 MAY 2019 ROLLING HILLS TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT 19RE011367 DATE TIME HOURS WORKED LOCATION VIOLATION SPEED RESIDENT CITES NON - RESIDENT` CITES DEPUTY' 5/10/19 7:50am 7:30-9:30am 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 49 1 0 Bouse 5/10/19 8:25am 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 46 1 0 Bouse 5/13/19 3:23pm 2:00-9:00pm Eastfield/Outrider Stop 1 0 Despot 5/13/19 3:50pm Eastfield/Outrider Stop 1 0 Despot 5/13/19 4:32pm " Eastfield/Outrider Eastfield/Outrider Eastfield/Outrider Eastfield/Outrider Stop 0 1 Despot 5/13/19 5:02pm Stop 0 1 Despot 5/13/19 6:17pm II Stop 0 1 Despot 5/13/19 6:46pm " Stop 0 1 Despot 5/13/19 7:31pm Crest Rd W/Johns Canyon Speed 45 1 0 Despot 5/15/19 9:32am 9:00-12:00 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 46 1 0 Bouse 5/15/19 10:37am 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 43 0 1 Bouse UI V 5/15/19 11:20am 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 44 0 1 Bouse 5/21/19 10:46am 10:30-12:30pm Eastfield/Chuckwaqon Stop 1 0 Despot 5/21/19 12:34pm Eastfield/Outrider Stop 0 1 Despot 5/21/19 2:39pm 2:30-5:30pm Eastfield/Chuckwagon Stop 0 1 Despot 5/21/19 3:08pm 28 Crest Rd W Speed (juvi) 44 0 1 Despot 5/21/19 5:23pm " 48 Crest Rd W Speed 48 ' 0 1 Despot 5/23/19 9:00AM 9:00-3:OOPM 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 46 1 0 Bouse 5/23/19 10:08am 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 45 1 0 Bouse 5/23/19 10:59am 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 47 1 0 Bouse 5/23/19 12:28pm " 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 46 1 0 Bouse 5/23/19 1:24pm 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 51 0 1 Bouse 5/23/19 2:15pm " 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 42 0 1 Bouse 5/28/19 9:32am 9:00-1:00pm 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 44 0 1 Bouse 5/28/19 10:41am 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 43 1 0 Bouse ventory Is 9/26/19 ' DATE' • TIME HOURS WORKED LOCATION. _ ' VIOLATION SPEED t. RESIDENT , CITES , N N RESIDENT- CITES •- DEPUTY . 5/28/19 12:02pm 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 45 1 0 Bouse 5/28/19 12:26pm 26 Portuguese Bend Rd Speed 45 1 0 Bouse 5/28/19 2:23pm 2:00-7:00 38 Crest Rd W Speed 45 1 0 Despot 5/28/19 3:17pm Crest Rd W/Bugqy Whip Speed 44 1 0 Despot 5/28/19 4:07pm Crest Rd W/Buggy Whip Speed 45 0 1 Despot 5/28/19 5:45pm Eastfield/Outrider Stop 0 1 Despot Total Hours 32 16 15 0) v .• L--_-.. _.._ Inventory List 9/26/19 *Traffic Enforcement Index: Haz. Cites + DUI Arrests / Fatal + Injury Collisions (20:1) City of Rolling Hills 2019 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Average Total Collisions 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0.38 Injury Collisions 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0.25 Enforcement Index * 0 0 0 25 0 33 0 0 7.25 Hazardous Cites 13 22 12 25 45 33 32 24 25.75 Non -Hazardous Cites 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.38 Parking Cites 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 DUI Arrests 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 DUI Collisons 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Fatal Collisions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0.00 *Traffic Enforcement Index: Haz. Cites + DUI Arrests / Fatal + Injury Collisions (20:1) ge't Rd/4i, get6 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No: 6A Mtg. Date: 10/03/2019 TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION FROM: ELAINE JENG, P.E., CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDER THE SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE FY 2019-2020 SIGNAGE AND STRIPING PROJECT AND RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE PROJECT FOR CONSTRUCTION. DATE: OCTOBER 3, 2019 ATTACHMENT: 1. SIGNAGE AND STRIPING BID SCHEDULE FOR WILLIAMSBURG LANE, UPPER BLACKWATER CANYON ROAD, MIDDLERIDGE LANE NORTH, AND MIDDLERIDGE LANE SOUTH. 2. CAA SIGNAGE AND STRIPING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR HORSE CROSSINGS. 3. SIGNAGE AND STRIPING BID SCHEDULE FOR CREST ROAD EAST. 4. CAA RECOMMENDATION FOR AN ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL AT WILLIAMSBURG LANE AND UPPER BLACKWATER CANYON ROAD. BACKGROUND Roads in Rolling Hills are under the control of the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA). Property owners gave the RHCA control over the roadways through easements. The City is responsible for the safety element including signing and striping -1- of roadways. In March 2019, RHCA repaved four streets: Williamsburg Lane, Lower Blackwater Canyon Road, Middleridge Lane North and Middleridge Lane South. In anticipation of the pavement work, the City conducted an inventory of the signage and striping for the four streets. The inventory was taken to the City Council for approval. In January 2019, the City Council directed staff to remove the replacement of signs as a part of the project and instructed staff to advertise for construction bids to implement the striping. In February and March 2019, City Hall experienced loss of staff and the striping of the four streets was delayed. In July 2019, the City hired a Project Manager Alan Palermo Consulting to assist with capital improvement projects including the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Signing and Striping Project. The Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Signing and Striping Project will include the proposed signing and striping of horse crossings, the signing and striping of Crest Road East, and the signage and striping of the proposed all -way stop control at Williamsburg Lane and Lower Blackwater Canyon Road. The signing and striping of the four streets are proposed to be added to the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Signing and Striping Project. DISCUSSION Alan Palermo Consulting reviewed the bid -schedule for the four streets and is recommending adjustments to the signage. The revised bid schedule for the four streets is included as Attachment 1 to this report. In May 2019, the Traffic Commission recommended to the City Council to have staff conduct an inventory of horse crossings for the City and establish a maintenance schedule. In September 2019, Charles Abbot & Associates (CAA) conducted an inventory and provided recommendations for signing and striping horse crossings within the City. CAA's recommendation for the horse crossing is included as Attachment 2 to this report. In late August 2019, RHCA Manager informed City staff that they are planning to repave Crest Road East on October 2019. City staff worked with CAA to inventory the signage and striping and completed a bid schedule for Crest Road East between Portuguese Bend Road and the eastern limits. CAA's inventory and bid schedule is included as Attachment 3 to this report. In mid -September 2019, a resident on Williamsburg Lane requested City staff to review the intersection of Williamsburg Lane and Lower Blackwater Canyon Road. The resident noted the inability to see the on -coming traffic along Upper Blackwater Canyon Road from Williamsburg Lane. CAA reviewed the intersection and recommended to install an ALL -WAY stop control at the subject intersection. CAA's recommendation is included as Attachment 4 to this report. -2- FISCAL IMPACT In the FY 19/20, approximately $40,000 is programmed for signing and striping. Based on staff's estimates, there is sufficient funds for the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Signing and Striping Project. NOTIFICATION The Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA), President of Caballeros, and residents along Williamsburg Lane have been advised that the Traffic Commission will consider the scope of the FY 19-20 Signing and Striping Project. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Traffic Commission make a recommendation to the City Council to approve the scope of work for the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Signage and Striping Project. -3- Ite '6r'r{ A' Attachment 1 Attachment C BID SCHEDULE ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 Remove Existing Sign 2 EA $ $ 2 Install RI -1 Sign 1 EA $ $ 3 Repost Existing Sign 5 EA $ $ 4 Install R28 (CA) Sign with " Arrow 2 EA $ $ 5 Install W14-1 Sign 2 EA $ $ 6 Install W5-1 Sign 0 EA $ $ 7 Install Type 2 Object Marker 1 EA $ $ 8 Install OMl-3 Object Marker 0 EA $ $ 9 Install W3-1 Sign 0 EA $ $ 10 Install 0M4-3 Object Marker 1 EA $ $ 11 Install Wl-1 Sign 0 EA $ $ 12 Install W13 -1P (15) Sign 0 EA $ $ 13 Install 8" edgeline per Caltrans Standard Plan A20B, Detail 27B 14,050 LF $ $ 14 Install Two -Direction No Passing Zone per Caltrans Standard Plan A20A, Detail 22 465 LF $ $ 15 Install Skip Yellow Centerline per Caltrans Standard Plan A20A, Detail 2 2,800 LF $ $ 16 Install Ladder Crosswalk per Caltrans Standard Plan A24F 1 EA $ $ 17 Install White Limit Line per Caltrans Standard Plan A24E 3 EA $ $ 18 Install "STOP" Pavement Marking per Caltrans Standard Plan A24D 3 EA $ $ 19 Install "STOP AHEAD" Pavement Marking per Caltrans Standard Plan A24D 1 EA $ $ 20 Install Blue Raised Reflective Pavement Marker 13 EA $ $ TOTAL BASE BID (In Figures) $ TOTAL BASE BID (In Words) NOTES: 1. All amounts and totals given in the Bid Schedule will be subject to verification by the Contractor. In case of variation between the unit cost and amount shown by bidder, the unit cost will be considered to be his/her bid. 2. Quantities shown in the above Bid Schedule are estimated quantities for bidding purposes only. Actual quantities shall be determined from field measurements. Item 6A Attachment 2 CAA PROFESSIONAL BUILDING Z SAFETY/ENGINEERINGjINFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT September 24, 2019 Elaine Jeng, P.E. City Manager City of Rolling Hills No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 EQUESTRIAN CROSSING EVALUATION CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Dear Ms. Jeng: As requested, we have performed an evaluation of 29 existing and proposed equestrian crossing locations within the City of Rolling Hills. The crossing locations, as indicated in Attachment A, were provided by City representatives. Maps identifying the 12 proposed locations and 17 existing locations are illustrated in Attachment B. The included recommendations for modifications are intended to comply with requirements and guidelines in the California Vehicle Code (CVC), Caltrans Standard Plans and the current edition of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). The recommendations are based on an understanding that the City prefers to limit the number of traffic control signs to an appropriate degree for the semi -rural nature of the community. The general approach to determining equestrian crossing recommendations includes the following: • Crossing locations will be identified by the use of standard crosswalk markings, consisting of two transverse white stripes, 12 inches each in width, spaced at 10 feet on -center. • Crossings that are controlled by stop signs will have no additional advance signage or pavement markings to identify the crossing, other than the crosswalk lines. This includes those few crossings that, due to geometrics and equestrian path locations, are situated slightly in advance of the stop sign. • Advance pavement markings ("HORSE XING") will be used in advance of all crossings that are not controlled by stop signs. The pavement markings will generally be placed with the top of the "XING" marking located 100 feet in advance of the crosswalk. Pavement word marking size and spacing should be installed per current Caltrans Standard Plan A24D (adjust for "HORSE" marking). 1 CA4 PROFESSIONAL BUILDING SAFETY/ENGINEERING/INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT • For crossings where visibility is limited to less than the stopping sight distance for the roadway speed limit (200 feet for 30 mph, 150 feet for 25 mph), equestrian symbol signs (W11-7) and "AHEAD" plaques (W16 -9P) will be used. Advance signs are recommended instead of signs at the crossing to reduce the potential for conflict between the signs and the horses and their riders. Recommendations for the 29 proposed and existing equestrian crossing locations are illustrated in Attachment C. Also included is Location 30, on Poppy Trail, which is an existing crossing that was not included in the City -provided list. Please feel free to contact me at (562) 252-2511 or jackrvdell caaprofessionals.com if you have any questions regarding these recommendations. It has been a pleasure to provide you with this traffic engineering service. Sincerely, Charles Abbott Associates J zk Ry I, P.E., T.E. enior Traffic Engineer JR: Equestrian Crossing Evaluation Report - 9-24-19 Attach. 2 Attachment A NO. ADDRESS/ INTERSECTION New Crossing Existing Crossing GOOD NEEDS TO BE ROUGHED NEEDS TO BE PAINTED Priority (2019) NOTES /COMMENTS / QUESf1ONS PRIORITY 1 Entrance to Buggy Whip Dr (Crest Rd. West) X ✓ ✓ Yes Confirm Crossing location is in Buggy Whip Dr 2 #5 Johns Canyon X ✓ ✓ Yes ' There are 4 Bridle Trails in the Vicinity of 05 Johns Canyon. Confirm location for this crossing Crest Road West at //5 (Entrance to Glory Trail) X ✓ ✓ Yes Confirming location is just west of 85 Crest Road West Crossing in Crest Road West 4 Entrance to Quail Ridge South (Portuguese Bend Road) X ✓ 1,, Yes Confirm Crossing location is in Quail Ridge South 5 Portuguese Bend/ Crest Rd. West crosswalks on all streets X 6, 4, Yes _ May be in area that will receive pavement improvement in 2019 Confirming 4 Crossings being requested 6 Entrance to Georgeff Rd. (Crest Rd. East) X 4,, 6/ Yes Maybe in area that will receive pavement improvement in 2019 Confirm Crossing location is in Georoff Rd 7 Caballeros Rd/ Purple Canyon to Willow Springs X ✓ 4, Yes Verify Location for Crossing - Just south of 86 Caballeros Rd? 8 Upper Blackwater Road/ Appaloosa Rd. X ✓ Yes Appaloosa Lane (not Road)? There is an existing horse crossing approximately 160 feet to the north of Upper Blackwater Road/Appaloosa Lane 'intersection. Confirming the request for another crossing. 9 Entrance to Pine Tree Lane @ Ponguese Bend Rd. street entrance X ✓ ✓ Yes Confirm Crossing location is in Pine Tree Lane 10 Middleridge Lane (at entrance to Sis trail) X X ✓ Yes Need location confirmed (Middleridge Road at Lower Si's Trail?) at the bend in road? There is an existing crossing at this location? 11 Entrance to Williamsburg Lane/ Middleridge Lane X ✓ ✓ Yes Confirm Crossing location is in Williamsburg Lane 12 Saddleback/ Parnelli Trail at #26 X ✓ ✓ Yes Need location confirmed, is this for the trail crossing just south of 26 Saddleback Road? 13 Georgeff Road / Fulds Furlong Crossing (Existing) X 4, 4, Yes 14 Entrance to Caballeros Rd. (Crest Rd. East) (Existing) ?? ?? ✓ Yes May be in area that will receive pavement improvement in 2019 New Crossing in Caballeros Rd or Roughing existing Crossing across Crest Road East? Eastfield Trail #49 (Existing) X g,, Yes this is crossing just west of 49 Eastfield Drive? C15 16 Chuckwagon/ Upper Lower Willow (Existing) X ✓ Yes Existing Crossing 17 #20 Eastfield (Existine) X ✓ Yes Existing crossing just west of 20 Eastfield Drive 18 Appaloosa Road (Existing) ?? ✓ 4, Yes Appaloosa Lane (not Road)? Where on Appaloosa Lane?, Confirm at Upper Si's Trail? 19 Association Entrance (existing) X ✓ No Confirming existing crossing at Gatehouse? 20 Acacia/ Portuguese Bend Road (existing) ✓ Yes Confirming Acacia Lane (Acacia Road does not cross PB Road), Crossing just south of Gatehouse, North of Acacia Lane 21 Middleridge Lane/ Blackwater Trail (existing) X 1., ✓ Yes Shouldn't this be Lower Blackwater Canyon Road / Blackwater Trail? 22 Middleridge Lane South & North (existing) ✓ Yes is this the crossing on Middleridge Lane South or !is the intent for this crossing to cross Middleridge 'Lane North? 23 Davidson Trail/ Saddleback (existing) ✓ Yes Verify Location for Crossing - I could not find it 'Crossing Saddleback Road, connecting Davidson Tra to Saddleback Trail? 24 Saddleback/ Poppy Trail (existine) X ✓ No 25 Poppy Trail (existing) (fine) X ✓ No 26 Portuguese Bend Above Poppy Trail (existing) X ✓ No 27 Portuguese Bend/ Pheasant Trail X ✓ No 28 Wagon Lane/ Portuguese Bend Road (Fine) X ✓ No 29 Upper Blackwater/ Sagebrush Lane (Fine) X ✓ No V Promenade on 0. The Peninsula Soloedo 9 Elementary School "15'1aa L Ootvre. RQ Peninsula Center Lib•ery Q Co T' i . y at cr -r-, ":,) 4444 Vista Del Bnstol Farms is Norte Reserve Rolling HMIs T Ro itigecrest ¶termedlote School Gaa,,� , ,a ti �'9 r St John Fisher Church 9 sa' Fuiorum Reserve end afi a pi A n� 4r+ Y., •Wr 7• Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Authority 9 rti pPalos Verdes Y NaturePreserve '••1.. Del Cerio Park Dal Cerro Reserve 1/41 Portuguese Canyon LEGEND: Y Existing Crossing Proposed New Crossing lgua Magna Canyon Storm Hill Park 3 1 Rencho De Mgr High School 1c s 1 1 w4...y D000legroy Q E►amentary School Attachment B Equestrian Crossings Sheet 1 of 2 Palos Verdes 9 Pcraeree Homes . .3 Martingale T•�ilhead Park t �° Messes Gap 040e. 9 Sisters of Charity 9 t of Rolkng Hills f 11%,.. 9 MVP Car Title loans r Its ti 44e28 pk 13 SaffosRest 9 d 1 1 1 16 9 Rollin( Hills Eaetfield G. 17 MW esteLibrary 9 !Lily* al Water Reservoir 12 9 essible Air uCt Cleaning 9 Mireleste Intermediate School Southern California Edison Electrieal.. 9 Sea To Me clothing Palos Ve•Ccs )-11113 n Chadwick School 9 :ides tx40aut 14.41 WO* ei slot y I, imam i«rat Oa 44 fMU 08115"1 Palos Verdes Penmstuta - Transit Mrthordy 9 ►.yam � Rollihg HO'S Country O y Sthool A '1 *IP Aqua M*IQna Canyon Fa Storm Hdl Park South Coast Botanic Gard 28 44, St Luke so Presbyter an Church 19 I Plot. Attachment B $ t• Equestrian Crossings Sheet 2 of 2 9 EmSty-asoota ;AuD »,-..- Rdlhcl4 Hills. Lett,. League Datp+egray Element$ry-$Chool 26 F.— , r George F Canycr Censer and f S t viroks�r H Palos Verdes n Paradise Homes Martingale Trailhead Park Sisters of Charity of Rolling Hills It n Rolling N ).. Eastftefa Loc 1 Retain existing "STOP" pavement marking Attachment C Recommendation Sketches Remove existing stop limit line Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing edgelines Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 60 ft long. 2. Place back edge of crosswalk approximately 2 ft from Crest Rd W edgeline extension. Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in southbound lane, approximately 100 ft n/o crosswalk Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing west edgeline and driveway pavers Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in northbound lane, approximately 150 ft s/o crosswalk #5 Johns Canyon Rd asaoN \\ JNIX Rancho Elastico Trail Install W11-7 sign and W16 -9P plaque for northbound traffic, approximately 150 ft s/o crosswalk Loc 2 Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 18 ft long. 2. Place crosswalk at the extension of Rancho Elastico Trail, s/o the driveway for #5 Johns Canyon Rd. Loc 3 #5 Crest Rd W * 4� Crest Rd W Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in eastbound lane, approximately 100 ft w/o crosswalk 0 Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 22 ft long. 2. Place crosswalk at the extension of Glory Trail, e/o the driveway for #5 Crest Rd W. Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 40 ft long. 2. Place back edge of crosswalk approximately 2 ft from Crest Rd W edgeline extension. Crest /ill w Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing east edgeline and fire station driveway 1 co a r, •r. Attachment C Recommendation Sketches • Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in westbound lane, approximately 100 ft e/o crosswalk Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing edgelines u 4 Remove existing stop limit line t Relocate "STOP" pavement marking to 8 ft in advance of front crosswalk line Loc 4 Loc 5 Match crosswalk line at edgeline/existing limit line Match crosswalk lines as shown C,e sf 6 f Install "STOP" pavement markings 8 ft in advance of front crosswalk lines (typ). Portuguese Bend Rd Notes: 1. Crosswalk approximate lengths are as indicated below: North Leg — 71 ft; East Leg — 41 ft; South Leg — 48 ft; West Leg — 46 ft. 2. Angle crosswalks as shown. 3. Remove existing "STOP" markings, limit lines and conflicting gore striping (north approach). Attachment C Recommendation Sketches Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on - center, between existing edgelines or intersecting crosswalk lines (typical) Match crosswalk line at edgeline/existing limit line Match crosswalk lines as shown Loc 6 Remove existing stop limit line N Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 49 ft long. 2. Place front edge of crosswalk at the existing stop limit line. 0 day • Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft. on -center, between existing edgelines Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in northbound lane, approximately 100 ft s/o crosswalk r - .ti I q_ Attachment C t Recommendation Sketches 0,0 l O/ rer ,o V. Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 27 ft long. 2. Angle crosswalk between Caballeros Trail on the east and Purple Canyon Trail on the west. The west end of the crosswalk should be placed between the fire hydrant and the storm drain inlet. Retain existing "STOP" pavement marking Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing edgelines Loc 7 Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in southbound lane, approximately 100 ft n/o crosswalk Loc 8 -s \005 ‘).1 L� /% • Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing edgelines Install "STOP" pavement marking 8 ft in advance of front crosswalk line. Trim vegetation on the northwest corner of the intersection to provide adequate equestrian clearance. t om7 Relocate stop sign approximately 4 ft southerly. -13 CD m t Cr U a) U co m a) Attachment C Recommendation Sketches Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 45 ft long. 2. Place back edge of crosswalk approximately 2 ft from Upper Blackwater Canyon Rd edgeline. Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 25 ft long. 2. Angle crosswalk between Blackwater Canyon Trail on the east and the existing stop sign location on the west. The crosswalk will be located in advance of the "STOP" pavement marking. Loc 9 Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing edgelines - Blackwater Canyon Trail Portuguese Bend Rd Loc 10 s 44 Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in eastbound lane, approximately 150 ft w/o crosswalk. Install "STOP" pavement marking 8 ft in advance of front crosswalk line. ,r. l 9MX Attachment C Recommendation Sketches Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 19 ft long. 2. Place crosswalk at the extension of Si's Trail. 1 Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing edges of rolled curb Trim vegetation on inside of the curve, approximately 200 ft e/o crosswalk, that restricts visibility of the crosswalk for westbound traffic. Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in westbound lane, approximately 150 ft e/o crosswalk. Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on - center, between existing edges of rolled curb o; i Loc 11 Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 50 ft long. 2. Place back edge of crosswalk approximately 2 ft from Middleridge Ln edge of pavement. Loc 12 Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing edgelines Sala/e back r"d// Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in northbound lane, approximately 100 ft s/o crosswalk. Remove or relocate existing "SLOW CURVE" pavement marking Loc 13 ere t Refresh existing "HORSE XING" pavement markings and crosswalk Attachment C Recommendation Sketches Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in southbound lane, approximately 100 ft n/o crosswalk. #26 Saddleback Rd Sec/a/back r0/./ Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 25 ft long. 2. Angle crosswalk between the east and west extensions of Saddleback Trail, south of the driveway to 26 Saddleback Rd. Loc 14 Crest Rd Loc 15 Refresh existing "HORSE XING" pavement markings and crosswalk Attachment C Recommendation Sketches Refresh existing crosswalk #49 Eastfield Dr I F Loc 16 DAtif Loc 17 • Note: 1. As an alternative to removing the existing equestrian crossing signs at the crosswalk, retain the W11-7 signs and replace the "EQUESTRIAN XING" signs with a downward diagonal arrow plaque (W16 -7P). Refresh existing "HORSE XING" pavement markings and crosswalk EQUESTRIAN XING EQUESTRIAN XING Attachment C Recommendation Sketches .r #3 Chuckwagon Rd Chuckwagon Rd Refresh existing "HORSE XING" pavement markings and crosswalk Install new equestrian symbol (W11-7) and "AHEAD" (W 16-9P) signs for westbound traffic, approximately 150 ft in advance of the crosswalk .7 AHEAD Remove existing equestrian symbol (W11-7) and "EQUESTRIAN XING" signs #20 Eastfield Dr Loc 18 Relocate existing equestrian symbol (W11-7) sign for westbound traffic to approximately 400 ft in advance of the new crosswalk location. Replace the existing "EQUESTRIAN XING" sign with an "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) sign. #3 Appaloosa Ln Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing edgelines. Refresh existing "HORSE XING" pavement markings Loc 19 Refresh existing crosswalk EOUESTRIAN XING Attachment C Recommendation Sketches -0' AHEAD Remove existing equestrian symbol (W11-7) and "EQUESTRIAN XING" signs approximately 35 ft south of trail Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 35 ft long. 2. Angle crosswalk between Upper Si's Trail on the east and the north end of the AC curb on the west. City Hall Loc 20 Relocate existing equestrian symbol (W11-7) sign for southbound traffic to approximately 100 ft in advance of the crosswalk location. Replace the existing "EQUESTRIAN XING" sign with an "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) sign. Loc 21 ) 1 AHEAD AHEAD .I Reinstall 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing edgelines Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in eastbound lane, approximately 150 ft w/o crosswalk. r / T, .1 Replace the existing "EQUESTRIAN XING" sign with an "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) sign for eastbound traffic, approximately 180 ft w/o crosswalk 1. , I et? 42- o o �Y• AHEAD Attachment C Recommendation Sketches J Refresh existing "HORSE XING" pavement markings and crosswalk Install new equestrian symbol (W11- 7) and "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) signs for northbound traffic, approximately 100 ft in advance of the crosswalk. EQUESTRIAN XING r i y `• _ I Remove existing equestrian symbol (W11-7) and "EQUESTRIAN XING" signs approximately 100 ft e/o reinstalled crosswalk • Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in westbound lane, approximately 100 ft n/o crosswalk I I 'J" Note: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 30 ft long. Loc 22 Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 30 ft long. 2. Place back edge of crosswalk approximately 2 ft from Middleridge Rd edge of pavement. Loc 23 Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in eastbound lane, approximately 235 ft w/o new crosswalk location. AHEAD Replace the existing "EQUESTRIAN XING" sign with an "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) sign for eastbound traffic, approximately 235 ft w/o new crosswalk location. H 0 v Attachment C Recommendation Sketches Reinstall 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing edgelines Install new equestrian symbol (W11-7) and "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) signs for westbound traffic, approximately 150 ft in advance of the new crosswalk location. Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing edgelines. Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 50 ft long. 2. Angle crosswalk between Davidson Trail on the south and Saddleback Trail on the north. Saddleback Rd #86 Saddleback Rd N07\6/‘/` AHEAD a Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in westbound lane, approximately 150 ft e/o new crosswalk location. Loc 24 -riNG s F Poppy Trail cr Attachment C Recommendation Sketches .o. a) a 1-3 3seloy co, Refresh existing "HORSE XING" pavement markings and crosswalk ' Loc 25 I AHEAD Refresh existing "HORSE XING" pavement markings and crosswalk cOis Replace the existing "EQUESTRIAN XING" sign with an "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) sign for southbound traffic, approximately 150 ft n/o the crosswalk. AHEAD Replace the existing "EQUESTRIAN XING" sign with an "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) sign for northbound traffic, approximately 150 ft sio the crosswalk. Loc 26 Install new equestrian symbol (W11-7) and "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) signs for southbound traffic, approximately 200 ft in advance of the crosswalk. Refresh existing "HORSE XING" pavement markings and crosswalk Portuguese Bend Rd o 73 - Loc 27 8e�0 QoxJg)ee AHEAD Pheasant Ln Attachment C Recommendation Sketches 4)64'04, A0 Refresh existing "HORSE XING" pavement markings and crosswalk Loc 28 Refresh existing "HORSE XING" pavement markings and crosswalk Ce -o C a) 3S2l0H CO G) N a) rn ONIX 0 XING HORSE Attachment C Recommendation Sketches Wagon Ln Loc 29 AHEAD Sd9ebrosh <n Replace the existing "EQUESTRIAN XING" sign with an "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) sign for southbound traffic, approximately 190 ft n/o the crosswalk. Refresh existing "HORSE XING" pavement markings and crosswalk Replace the existing "EQUESTRIAN XING" sign with an "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) sign for northbound traffic, approximately 210 ft s/o the crosswalk. • Loc 30 Replace the existing "EQUESTRIAN XING" sign with an "AHEAD" (W16 - 9P) sign for southbound traffic, approximately 150 ft n/o the crosswalk. #4 Poppy Trail W11-7 AHEAD AHEAD Attachment C Recommendation Sketches Replace the existing "EQUESTRIAN XING" sign with an "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) sign for southbound traffic, approximately 180 ft n/o the crosswalk. i Refresh existing "HORSE XING" pavement markings and crosswalk Note: 1. This existing crossing location was not included in the list provided by the City. EQUESTRIAN XING AHEAD L W16 -9P W16 -7P Prepared by: witm66A! Attachment 3 C44 PROFESSIONAL BUILDING & SAFE fYiENGINEERINGINER:ASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT September 24, 2019 Elaine Jeng, P.E. City Manager City of Rolling Hills No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 TRAFFIC SIGNING, STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKING EVALUATION CREST ROAD EAST Dear Ms. Jeng: Thank you for this opportunity to perform this traffic signing, striping and pavement marking evaluation on Crest Road East within the City of Rolling Hills. The included recommendations for modifications are intended to comply with requirements and guidelines in the California Vehicle Code (CVC), Caltrans Standard Plans and the current edition of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). The recommendations are based on an understanding of the City's semi -rural nature and a desire to limit new traffic controls to an appropriate degree for the community. Also included in the evaluation is a review of the horizontal alignment on Crest Road East to determine the need for warning signs and advisory speed plaques. INVENTORY A field inventory of Crest Road East was conducted on September 19, 2019. The existing signage is indicated in Attachment A and the existing pavement markings are indicated in Attachment B. A separate evaluation of equestrian crossings is also being conducted and will be issued independent of this report. However, there are two existing equestrian crossings on Crest Road East (at Georgeff Road and at Caballeros Road) and the traffic controls associated with these crossings are included in this evaluation as well as the separate equestrian crossing report. HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT WARNING SIGNS Crest Road East has several horizontal curves between Portuguese Bend Road and its easterly terminus (Attachment C). The CA MUTCD specifies in Sections 2C.06 through 2C.15 the application of the warning signs as well the use of advisory speed plaques to alert motorists of the horizontal alignment change. Advisory speeds are determined through a ball -bank indicator analysis. In determining the need for curve or turn warning signs, consideration should be given to driver expectancy based on the driving environment. If the curve can be driven at a legal speed without discomfort, there is 1 PROPRiSiONAL 131,:!:.DM1 & SAFE rYIEDli.!NEERP Cffi:'R%fTi CFUit_ M.ANAc ME;4r normally no need for a sign. A curve warning sign should be considered in advance of any curve that produces a reading of 10 degrees on a Ball Bank Indicator at speeds lower than the approach speed. If a curve warning sign is needed, it should be supplemented with an advisory speed message. The method for conducting a ball -bank indicator evaluation, which was conducted on September 14, 2019, is contained in CA MUTCD Section 2C.08. For the 30 mph speed limit on Crest Road East, a ball -bank indicator reading of 14 or more would suggest that a warning sign and advisory speed plaque are appropriate. The results are as follows: Ball -Bank Reading Warning Sign Curve # (Average — Both Directions) Required 1 7 NO 2 6 NO 3 6 NO 4 9 NO RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations will provide compliance with current CA MUTCD standards. They also incorporate the details contained in the most current Caltrans Standard Plans, issued in 2018. For items not included in the following recommendations, the existing traffic controls should be reinstalled/retained. All installations should be consistent with installation requirements of the CA MUTCD and Caltrans Standard Plans. Based on the field investigation and ball -bank indicator evaluation, the following recommendations are provided: 1. Do not install horizontal alignment warning signs or advisory speed plaques on Crest Road East. 2. Consider raising the height of traffic control signs to provide the CA MUTCD guidance of a 7 -foot clearance between the bottom of the sign and the surrounding ground surface. 3. Replace all existing 4" wide white edgeline and 4" yellow centerline striping with 6" stripes to comply with current Caltrans Standard Plans. 4. Replace all existing stop signs (R1-1) with new, retroreflective 30" x 30" signs. 2 J PROFRSSiONAL Bln1.01NO & SAFE rYiENG INEERINGIINFRASTRUCTURF MANAGEMENT 5. Install new All -Way Plaques (R1 -3P) below each of the stop signs (R1-1) at the intersections of Portuguese Bend Road and Crest Road East, and at Crest Road East and Eastfield Drive: 6. Replace the existing "CLOSED TO THROUGH TRAFFIC" warning sign on the south side of Crest Road East, approximately 36 feet east of Eastfield Drive with an R11-4 regulatory sign. BID SCHEDULE A roadway resurfacing bid schedule of the signing, striping and markings on Crest Road East is included as Attachment C. The bid schedule includes existing traffic controls to be reinstalled/retained and the recommendations included above. All traffic controls should be installed per requirements of the current CA MUTCD and Caltrans Standard Plans. Please feel free to contact me at (562) 252-2511 or jackrvdell c(caaprofessionals.com if you have any questions regarding these recommendations. It has been a pleasure to provide you with this traffic engineering service. Sincerely, Charles Abbott Associates Ry I, P.E., T.E. enior Traffic Engineer JR: Crest Rd East Signing and Striping Inventory Report - 9-24-19 Attach. 3 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Sign Inventory Attachment A SIGN ID Main Street Location Cross Street Approximate location MUTCD Sign Code Sign Notes Sign Height Sign Width Sign Orientation Sign Condition 1 Crest Road East N/S Portuguese Bend Road E/L RI -1 30" 30" Facing Westbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 4 1/2 ft above ground 2 Crest Road West S/S Portuguese Bend Road W/L R1-1 30" 30" Facing Eastbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 4 1/2 ft above ground 3 Portuguese Bend Road W/S Crest Road West N/L R1-1 30" 30" Facing Southbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 4 1/2 ft above ground 4 Portuguese Bend Road E/S Crest Road East S/L R1-1 30" 30" Facing Northbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 4 1/2 ft above ground 5 Georgeff Road W/S Crest Road East N/L R1-1 30" 30" Facing Southbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 4 1/2 ft above ground 6 Crest Road East S/S Georgeff Road 150' E/0 R2-1 30 MPH 30" 24" Facing Eastbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 4 1/2 ft above ground 7 Crest Road East S/S Caballeros Road 300' W/O W3-1 30" 30" Facing Eastbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 3 ft above ground 8 Crest Road East 5/5 Caballeros Road W/L R1-1 24" 24" Facing Eastbound Traffic Replace with 30" x 30" sign. Sign mounted 3 ft above ground 9 Caballeros Road W/S Crest Road East N/L R1-1 24" 24" Facing Southbound Traffic Replace with 30" x 30" sign. Sign mounted 3 ft above ground 10 Crest Road East N/S Southfield Drive E/L R1-1 24" 24" Facing Westbound Traffic Replace with 30" x 30"sign. Sign mounted 3 ft above ground 11 Southfield Drive E/S Crest Road East S/L R1-1 24" 24" Facing Northbound Traffic Replace with 30" x 30" sign. Sign mounted 3 ft above ground 12 Crest Road East N/S Southfield Drive 330' E/0 W3-1 30" 30" Facing Westbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 4 ft above ground 13 Crest Road East S/S Southfield Drive 465' E/0 R2-1 30 MPH 30" 24" Facing Eastbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 4 1/2 ft above ground 14 Crest Road East N/S Eastfield Drive 260' W/O R2-1 30 MPH 30" 24" Facing Westbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 4 1/2 ft above ground 15 Crest Road East S/S Eastfield Drive 225' W/O W3-1 30" 30" Facing Eastbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 4 1/2 ft above ground 16 Crest Road East S/S Eastfield Drive W/L R1-1 24" 24" Facing Eastbound Traffic Replace with 30" x 30" sign. Sign mounted 3 ft above ground Attach A - Sign Inventory Page 1 of 4 9/24/2019 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Sign Inventory Attachment A SIGN ID Main Street Location Cross Street Approximate Location MUTCD Sign Code Sign Notes Sign Height Sign Width Sign Orientation Sign Condition 17 Eastfield Drive W/S Crest Road East N/L R1.1 24" 24" Facing Southbound Traffic Replace with 30" x 30" sign. Sign mounted 3 ft above ground 18 Crest Road East N/S Eastfield Drive E/L R1-1 24" 24" Facing Westbound Traffic Replace with 30" x 30" sign. Sign mounted 3 ft above ground 19 Crest Road East S/S Eastfield Drive 36'.E/O "CLOSED TO THROUGH TRAFFIC" Non -Standard Sign 24" 24" Facing Eastbound Traffic Existing sign is a warning sign. Replace with R11-4 regulatory sign. 20 Crest Road East S/S Eastfield Drive 140' E/0 W31A (CA) 30" 30" Facing Eastbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 4 1/2 ft above ground 21 Crest Road East N/5 Eastfield Drive 445' E/O R26 (CA) "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" 18" 12" Facing South Acceptable - Sign mounted on fence 22 Crest Road East N/S Eastfield Drive 500' E/0 R26 (CA) "NO STOPPING FIRE LANE" 18" 12" Facing North Acceptable - Sign mounted on utility pole 23 Crest Road East S/S Eastfield Drive 550' E/O R26 (CA) "NO STOPPING FIRE LANE" 18" 12" Facing South Acceptable - Sign mounted on fence 24 Crest Road East Head -On Eastfield Drive 580' E/0 W31 (CA) 30" 30" Facing Eastbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted on fence 25 Crest Road East Head -On - North of W31 (CA) Eastfield Drive 580' E/O 0M4-3 24" 24" Facing Eastbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted on fence 26 Crest Road East Head -On - South of W31 (CA) Eastfield Drive 580' E/O 0M4-3 24" 24" Facing Eastbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted on fence Attach A - Sign Inventory Page 2 of 4 9/24/2019 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Pavement Marking Inventory Attachment B MARKING ID Main Street Location Cross Street Approximate Location Caltrans Standard Plan Marking Notes Marking Width Marking Length Marking Material 1 Crest Road East Westbound Approach Portuguese Bend Road E/L A24E White Limit Line 12" 15 ft Thermoplastic 2 Crest Road East Westbound Approach Portuguese Bend Road E/L A24D "STOP" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 3 Crest Road East Centerline Portuguese Bend Road E/L A20A 22 etail on Two-DirecZone No Passing 4" 315 ft Paint 4 Crest Road East North Edge of Pavement Portuguese Bend Road E/L A20 Z;Betail Edgeline 4" 320 ft Paint 5 Crest Road East South Edge of Pavement Portuguese Bend Road E/L A20 Z;Betail Edgeline 4" 2,950 ft Paint 6 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Georgeff Road 110' W/O A24D/E "HORSE XING" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 7 Crest Road East Westbound Lane Georgeff Road 45' W/O A24D "STOP AHEAD" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 8 Crest Road East ON Georgeff Road W/L A24F - Basic White Crosswalk - 10 ft Wide 12" 35 ft Thermoplastic 9 Crest Road East Centerline Georgeff Road E/L A20A z Detail 2 Two -Dire Zoon ne No Passing 4" 160 ft Paint 10 Crest Road East Westbound Lane Georgeff Road 160' W/O A24D/E "HORSE XING" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 11 Crest Road East North Edge of Pavement Georgeff Road E/L A20B;Betail Edgeline 4" 2,500 ft Paint 12 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Georgeff Road 290' E/O A20A - Type D (Blue) Blue raised reflective pavement marker N/A N/A N/A 13 Crest Road East Centerline Georgeff Road 160' E/O A20A - Detail 2 Skip Yellow Centerline 4" 2,200 ft Paint 14 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Georgeff Road 970' E/O A20A - Type D (Blue) Blue raised reflective pavement marker N/A N/A N/A 15 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Caballeros Road 970' W/O A20A - Type D (Blue) Blue raised reflective pavement marker N/A N/A N/A 16 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Caballeros Road 420' W/O A20A - Type D (Blue) Blue raised reflective pavement marker N/A N/A N/A 17 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Caballeros Road 300' W/O A24D "STOP AHEAD" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 18 Crest Road East Centerline Caballeros Road W/L A20A z Detail 2 Two -Dire on Zone No Passing 4" 150 ft Paint 19 Crest Road East Eastbound Approach Caballeros Road W/L A24D "STOP" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 20 Crest Road East ON Caballeros Road W/L A24F - Basic White Crosswalk - 10 ft Wide 12" 45 ft Thermoplastic 21 Crest Road East North Edge of Pavement Caballeros Road E/L A20B;Betail Edgeline 4" 2,400 ft Paint 22 Crest Road East Westbound Approach Southfield Drive E/L A24E White Limit Line 12" 12 ft Thermoplastic 23 Crest Road East Westbound Approach Southfield Drive E/L A240 "STOP" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 24 Crest Road East Centerline Southfield Drive E/L A20A 22 etail on Two-DireZone No Passing 4" 160 ft Paint 25 Crest Road East South Edge of Pavement Southfield Drive E/L A206;Betail Edgeline 4" 2,800 ft Paint 26 Crest Road East Centerline Southfield Drive 160' E/O A20A - Detail 2 Skip Yellow Centerline 4" 1,900 ft Paint 27 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Southfield Drive 350' E/O A24D "STOP AHEAD" N/A N/A Thermoplastic Pavement Marking Inventory Page 3 of 4 9/24/2019 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Pavement Marking Inventory Attachment B MARKING ID Main Street Location Cross Street Approximate Location Caltrans Standard Plan Marking Notes Marking Width Marking Length Marking Material 28 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Southfield Drive 495' E/O A20A - Type D (Blue) Blue raised reflective pavement marker N/A N/A N/A 29 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Southfield Drive 1,100' E/O A20A - Type D (Blue) Blue raised reflective pavement marker N/A N/A N/A 30 Crest Road East Centerline Eastfield Drive W/L A20A 22 etail Two -Dire Zone No Passing on 4" 250 ft Paint 31 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Eastfield Drive 210' E/O A24D "STOP AHEAD" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 32 Crest Road East Eastbound Approach Eastfield Drive W/L A24E White Limit Line 12" 12 ft Thermoplastic 33 Crest Road East Eastbound Approach Eastfield Drive W/L A24D "STOP" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 34 Crest Road East Westbound Approach Eastfield Drive E/L A24E White Limit Line 12" 35 ft Thermoplastic 35 Crest Road East Westbound Approach Eastfield Drive E/L A24D "STOP" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 36 Crest Road East North Edge of Pavement Eastfield Drive E/L A20 Z;Betail Edgeline 4" 400 ft Paint 37 Crest Road East Centerline Eastfield Drive E/L A20A z Detail 2 Two -Dire on Zone No Passing 4" 160 ft Paint 38 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Eastfield Drive 80' E/O A24D/E "ROAD ENDS 500 FEET" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 39 Crest Road East Centerline Eastfield Drive 160' E/O A20A - Detail 2 Skip Yellow Centerline 4" 230 ft Paint 40 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Eastfield Drive 360' E/O A24D/E "ROAD ENDS" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 41 Crest Road East North Edge of Pavement Eastfield Drive 430' E/O A20A 2 Detail on Two-Dire1 Zone No Passing 4" 160 ft Paint Pavement Marking Inventory Page 4 of 4 9/24/2019 Attachment C BID SCHEDULE ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 Remove Existing Sign 13 EA 2 Install Rl-1 Sign 12 EA 3 Install R1 -3P Sign 12 EA 4 Install R11-4 Sign 1 EA 5 6 7 8 Install 8" edgeline per Caltrans Standard Plan A20B, Detail 27B Install Two -Direction No Passing Zone per Caltrans Standard Plan A20A, Detail 22 Install Two -Direction No Passing Zone per Caltrans Standard Plan A20A, Detail 21 Install Skip Yellow Centerline per Caltrans Standard Plan A20A, Detail 2 Install Basic Crosswalk per Caltrans Standard Plan A24F 11,370 1,195 160 4,330 LF LF LF LF 9 2 EA 10 Install White Limit Line per Caltrans Standard Plan A24E 4 EA 11 Install "STOP" Pavement Marking per Caltrans Standard Plan A24D 5 EA 12 Install "HORSE XING" Pavement Marking per Caltrans Standard Plan A24D/E 2 EA 13 Install "STOP AHEAD" Pavement Marking per Caltrans Standard Plan A24D 4 EA 14 Install "ROAD ENDS 500 FEET" Pavement Marking per Caltrans Standard Plan A24D/E 1 EA 15 Install "ROAD ENDS" Pavement Marking per Caltrans Standard Plan A24D/E 1 EA 16 Install Blue Raised Reflective Pavement Marker 6 EA TOTAL BASE BID (In Figures) TOTAL BASE BID (In Words) NOTES: 1. All amounts and totals given in the Bid Schedule will be subject to verification by the Contractor. In case of variation between the unit cost and amount shown by bidder, the unit cost will be considered to be his/her bid. 2. Quantities shown in the above Bid Schedule are estimated quantities for bidding purposes only. Actual quantities shall be determined from field measurements. Itenis-A" Attachment 4 PROFESSIC'NAL BUILDING & SAFETYiENGINEERINiiINFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT September 25, 2019 Elaine Jeng, P.E. City Manager. City of Rolling Hills No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road • Rolling Hills, CA 90274 MIDDLERIDGE ROAD AND WILLIAMSBURG LANE/LOWER BLACKWATER CANYON ROAD ALL -WAY STOP CONTROLS Dear Ms. Jeng: RECOMMENDATIONS 1•. Consider the installation of all -way stop controls at Middleridge Lane and Williamsburg Lane/Lower Blackwater Canyon Road. • BACKGROUND As requested I reviewed the intersection, of Lane/Lower Blackwater Canyon Road with respect to the need for all -way stop controls and offer the following comments. Due to the proximity of Williamsburg Lane and Lower Blackwater Canyon Road, this area is being evaluated as a single intersection. DISCUSSION Middleridge Road in the subject vicinity is classified as a local roadway in the current functional classification map (California Roadway System Map 13V52) and runs east -west. It has one lane in each direction and has no posted speed limit in the subject vicinity. Thevertical alignment is rolling with multiple horizontal curves between points west of Williamsburg Lane and east of Lower Blackwater Canyon Road.` Midd.leridge Road and Williamsburg CHARLES ABBO7TT ASSOCIATES, INC. 27401 Los ALTOS •:SUITE 220 • MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 TOLL FREE: (866) 530-4980 • PHONE: (949) 367-2850 • FAX: (949) 367-2852 WW W. C AA PROFESSION ALS. CO41 •PROFESSIONAL BUILLNNO &SAFErY/ENGINEERINe;1NFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT Williamsburg Lane and Lower Blackwater Canyon Road are both local roadways that run north -south with one lane in each direction. Williamsburg Lane is a cul-de-sac that terminate on the south at Middleridge Road and has stop control. Lower Blackwater Canyon Road is stop controlled at Middleridge Road, and then continues easterly. Williamsburg Lane and Lower Blackwater Canyon Road are approximately 70 feet apart, with Williamsburg Lane on the west and Lower Blackwater Canyon Road on the east. 'There is rural residential development on all roadways in the area. A field review was conducted on September 19, 2019. Traffic volumes on allroadways were observed to be extremely light. A review of the available SWITRS data at this intersection revealed no reported collisions since 2014 that could be correctable with the installation of all -way stop. controls. For the assumed legal speed limit of 25 mph on Middleridge Road, the minimum stopping sight distance per Table 201.1 of the California Highway Design, Manual is 150 feet. Field CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES, INC. 27401 Los ALros •SUITE 220 • MISSION VIEIO, CA 92691 TOLL FREE: (866) 530-4980 • PHONE: (949) 367-2850 • FAX: (949) 367-2852 W W W. CAA PROFESSION A LS. COM C41 PROFESSIONAL BUILDING & SAFETY/ENO!NEERIN.I!INERASTRUCTURE MANAOEMENT measurements revealed that visibility for Williamsburg Lane looking west and Lower Blackwater Canyon Road looking east exceeds the minimum stopping sight distance. However, visibility for Williamsburg Lane looking east was measured at approximately 125 feet and visibility for Lower Blackwater Canyon Road looking west was measured at approximately 110 feet. The visibility restrictions are due to geographic features that are not easily mitigated. The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) provides guidance for the installation of all -way stop controls. It suggests that all -way stop controls may be considered when: • Warrant A - Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi -way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. • Warrant B - There is a crash problem, as indicated by 5 or more reported crashes in a 12 -month period that are susceptible to correction by all -way stop installation. Such crashes include right- and left -turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. • Warrant C - Where the vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor -street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour. When the 85th -percentile approach speed of the major - street traffic exceeds 40 mph, as it does at this intersection, the minimum vehicular volume warrants may be reduced to 70 percent of the above values. • Warrant D - Where none of the above Warrants are satisfied, but Warrants B and C are satisfied 80 percent. For this warrant, the 70 percent reduction for Warrant D cannot be applied. The CA MUTCD also provides other criteria that may be considered, including: • The need to control left -turn conflicts; • The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes; CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES, INC. 27401 Los ALTOS •SUITE 220 • MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 TOLL FREE: (866) 530-4980 • PHONE: (949)367-2850 • FAX: (949) 367-2852 WWW.CAA PROFESSION ALS. C OM PROPT SS!C.NAL. BUILDING & SAFELY/ENOINEI RIN(1INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT • Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and, • An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where all -way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection. Warrant A would clearly not be satisfied as a traffic signal is not appropriate for this location. The lack of reported crashes do not satisfy Warrant B. As indicated previously, the traffic volumes for Middleridge Road, Williamsburg Lane and Lower Blackwater Canyon Road are far below the minimum thresholds in Warrant C. The reported crashes and traffic volumes also do not satisfy Warrant D. With regards to the additional criteria allowed for consideration in the CA MUTCD, the following criterion appears applicable to justify all -way stop controls at this intersection. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop — Visibility for motorists on the north approach of Williamsburg Lane viewing traffic approaching from the east, and visibility on the south approach of Lower Blackwater Canyon Road viewing traffic approaching from the west is limited due to the roadway curvature and vertical alignment. The minimum stopping sight distance of 150 feet for 25 mph cannot be provided and can create conflict for motorists attempting to enter Middleridge Road. CONCLUSION Due to the restricted visibility for motorists on the north and south approaches viewing approaching traffic on Middleridge Road and application of the additional criteria regarding visibility issues, the installation of all -way stop controls could be justified. JR: Middleridge Rd and Williamsburg Ln- Lower Blackwater Canyon Rd All -Way Stop Control Analysis - 9-25-19 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES, INC. 27401 Los ALTOS •SUITE 220 • MISSION VIEIO, CA 92691 TOLL FREE (866) 530-4980 • PRONE: (949)367-2850 • FAX: (949) 367-2852 W W W.CA.A PROFESSION .A L.S.COM %of ESSlpy �PCK RYD; e4 l No. 42874 E,q,, 3-31-20 CIVIL/�Q . Rallief ge.e4 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No: 6A Mtg. Date: 10/03/2019 TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION FROM: ELAINE JENG, P.E., CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDER THE SCOPE OF WORK FOR THE FY 2019-2020 SIGNAGE AND STRIPING PROJECT AND RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE PROJECT FOR CONSTRUCTION. DATE: OCTOBER 3, 2019 ATTACHMENT: 1. SIGNAGE AND STRIPING BID SCHEDULE FOR WILLIAMSBURG LANE, UPPER BLACKWATER CANYON ROAD, MIDDLERIDGE LANE NORTH, AND MIDDLERIDGE LANE SOUTH. 2. CAA SIGNAGE AND STRIPING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR HORSE CROSSINGS. 3. SIGNAGE AND STRIPING BID SCHEDULE FOR CREST ROAD EAST. 4. CAA RECOMMENDATION FOR AN ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL AT WILLIAMSBURG LANE AND UPPER BLACKWATER CANYON ROAD. BACKGROUND Roads in Rolling Hills are under the control of the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA). Property owners gave the RHCA control over the roadways through easements. The City is responsible for the safety element including signing and striping -1- 1/37 of roadways. In March 2019, RHCA repaved four streets: Williamsburg Lane, Lower Blackwater Canyon Road, Middleridge Lane North and Middleridge Lane South. In anticipation of the pavement work, the City conducted an inventory of the signage and striping for the four streets. The inventory was taken to the City Council for approval. In January 2019, the City Council directed staff to remove the replacement of signs as a part of the project and instructed staff to advertise for construction bids to implement the striping. In February and March 2019, City Hall experienced loss of staff and the striping of the four streets was delayed. In July 2019, the City hired a Project Manager Alan Palermo Consulting to assist with capital improvement projects including the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Signing and Striping Project. The Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Signing and Striping Project will include the proposed signing and striping of horse crossings, the signing and striping of Crest Road East, and the signage and striping of the proposed all -way stop control at Williamsburg Lane and Lower Blackwater Canyon Road. The signing and striping of the four streets are proposed to be added to the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Signing and Striping Project. DISCUSSION Alan Palermo Consulting reviewed the bid -schedule for the four streets and is recommending adjustments to the signage. The revised bid schedule for the four streets is included as Attachment 1 to this report. In May 2019, the Traffic Commission recommended to the City Council to have staff conduct an inventory of horse crossings for the City and establish a maintenance schedule. In September 2019, Charles Abbot & Associates (CAA) conducted an inventory and provided recommendations for signing and striping horse crossings within the City. CAA's recommendation for the horse crossing is included as Attachment 2 to this report. In late August 2019, RHCA Manager informed City staff that they are planning to repave Crest Road East on October 2019. City staff worked with CAA to inventory the signage and striping and completed a bid schedule for Crest Road East between Portuguese Bend Road and the eastern limits. CAA's inventory and bid schedule is included as Attachment 3 to this report. In mid -September 2019, a resident on Williamsburg Lane requested City staff to review the intersection of Williamsburg Lane and Lower Blackwater Canyon Road. The resident noted the inability to see the on -coming traffic along Upper Blackwater Canyon Road from Williamsburg Lane. CAA reviewed the intersection and recommended to install an ALL -WAY stop control at the subject intersection. CAA's recommendation is included as Attachment 4 to this report. -2- 2/37 FISCAL IMPACT In the FY 19/20, approximately $40,000 is programmed for signing and striping. Based on staff's estimates, there is sufficient funds for the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Signing and Striping Project. NOTIFICATION The Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA), President of Caballeros, and residents along Williamsburg Lane have been advised that the Traffic Commission will consider the scope of the FY 19-20 Signing and Striping Project. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Traffic Commission make a recommendation to the City Council to approve the scope of work for the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Signage and Striping Project. -3- 3/37 1acn. v'+ Attachment 1 Attachment C BID SCHEDULE ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT ] 1 Remove Existing Sign 2 EA $ $ 2 Install RI -1 Sign 1 EA $ $ 3 Repost Existing Sign 5 EA $ $ 4 Install R28 (CA) Sign with Arrow 2 EA $ $ 5 Install W 14-1 Sign 2 EA $ $ 6 Install W5-1 Sign 0 EA $ $ 7 Install Type 2 Object Marker 1 EA $ $ 8 Install OMI-3 Object Marker 0 EA $ $ 9 Install W3-1 Sign 0 EA $ $ 10 Install 0M4-3 Object Marker 1 EA $ $ 11 Install W1-1 Sign 0 EA $ $ 12 Install W13 -1P (15) Sign 0 EA $ $ 13 Install 8" edgeline per Caltrans Standard Plan A20B, Detail 27B 14,050 LF $ $ 14 Install Two -Direction No Passing Zone per Caltrans Standard Plan A20A, Detail 22 465 LF $ $ 15 Install Skip Yellow Centerline per Caltrans Standard Plan A20A, Detail 2 2,800 LF $ $ 16 Install Ladder Crosswalk per Caltrans Standard Plan A24F 1 EA $ $ 17 Install White Limit Line per Caltrans Standard Plan A24E 3 EA $ $ 18 Install "STOP" Pavement Marking per Caltrans Standard Plan A24D 3 EA $ $ 19 Install "STOP AHEAD" Pavement Marking per Caltrans Standard Plan A24D 1 EA $ $ 20 Install Blue Raised Reflective Pavement Marker 13 EA $ $ TOTAL BASE BID (In Figures) $ TOTAL BASE BID (In Words) NOTES: 1. All amounts and totals given in the Bid Schedule will be subject to verification by the Contractor. In case of variation between the unit cost and amount shown by bidder, the unit cost will be considered to be his/her bid. 2. Quantities shown in the above Bid Schedule are estimated quantities for bidding purposes only. Actual quantities shall be determined from field measurements. 4/37 Attachment 2 CAA PROFIJS.$1ONAL BUILDING iSAEETY%ENUINEI?RINGiI;;FRASTRUCTURE MANAGESII T September 24, 2019 Elaine Jeng, P.E. City Manager City of Rolling Hills No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 EQUESTRIAN CROSSING EVALUATION CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Dear Ms. Jeng: As requested, we have performed an evaluation of 29 existing and proposed equestrian crossing locations within the City of Rolling Hills. The crossing locations, as indicated in Attachment A, were provided by City representatives. Maps identifying the 12 proposed locations and 17 existing locations are illustrated in Attachment B. The included recommendations for modifications are intended to comply with requirements and guidelines in the California Vehicle Code (CVC), Caltrans Standard Plans and the current edition of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). The recommendations are based on an understanding that the City prefers to limit the number of traffic control signs to an appropriate degree for the semi -rural nature of the community. The general approach to determining equestrian crossing recommendations includes the following: • Crossing locations will be identified by the use of standard crosswalk markings, consisting of two transverse white stripes, 12 inches each in width, spaced at 10 feet on -center. • Crossings that are controlled by stop signs will have no additional advance signage or pavement markings to identify the crossing, other than the crosswalk lines. This includes those few crossings that, due to geometrics and equestrian path locations, are situated slightly in advance of the stop sign. • Advance pavement markings ("HORSE XING") will be used in advance of all crossings that are not controlled by stop signs. The pavement markings will generally be placed with the top of the "XING" marking located 100 feet in advance of the crosswalk. Pavement word marking size and spacing should be installed per current Caltrans Standard Plan A24D (adjust for "HORSE" marking). 1 5/37 CAA PROFESSIONAL BUILDING & SAFETY%ENGINEERING'INFRASTRUCT& RE MANAGEMENT • For crossings where visibility is limited to less than the stopping sight distance for the roadway speed limit (200 feet for 30 mph, 150 feet for 25 mph), equestrian symbol signs (W11-7) and "AHEAD" plaques (W16 -9P) will be used. Advance signs are recommended instead of signs at the crossing to reduce the potential for conflict between the signs and the horses and their riders. Recommendations for the 29 proposed and existing equestrian crossing locations are illustrated in Attachment C. Also included is Location 30, on Poppy Trail, which is an existing crossing that was not included in the City -provided list. Please feel free to contact me at (562) 252-2511 or jackrvdell(c�caaprofessionals.com if you have any questions regarding these recommendations. It has been a pleasure to provide you with this traffic engineering service. Sincerely, Charles Abbott Associates J k Ryd' 1l, P.E., T.E. enior Traffic Engineer JR: Equestrian Crossing Evaluation Report - 9-24-19 Attach. 2 6/37 Attachment A NO. ADDRESS! INTERSECTION New Crossing Existing Crossing GOOD NEEDS TO BE ROUGHED NEEDS TO BE PAINTED Priority (2019) NOTES /COMA1EN7'S/QUESTIONS PRIORITY 1 Entrance to Buggy Whip Dr (Crest Rd. West) X V V Yes Confirm Crossing location is in Buggy Whip Dr 2 /15 Johns Canyon X V V Yes There are 4 Bridle Trails in the Vicinity of #5 Johns Canyon. Confirm location for this crossing 3 Crest Road West at #5 (Entrance to Glory Trail) X V ✓ Yes Confirming location is just west of #5 Crest Road West Crossing in Crest Road West 4 Entrance to Quail Ridge South (Portuguese Bend Road) X V V Yes Confirm Crossing location is in Quail Ridge South 5 Portuguese Bend/ Crest Rd. West crosswalks on all streets X V V Yes May be in area that will receive pavement improvement in 2019 Confirming 4 Crossings being requested 6 Entrance to Georgeff Rd. (Crest Rd. East) X V V Yes Maybe in area that will receive pavement improvement in 2019 Confirm Crossing location is in Georoff Rd 7 Caballeros Rd/ Purple Canyon to Willow Springs X V V Yes Verify Location for Crossing - lust south of #6 Caballeros Rd? 8 Upper Blackwater Road/ Appaloosa Rd. X V Yes Appaloosa Lane (not Road)? There is an existing horse crossing approximately 160 feet to the north of Upper Blackwater Road/Appaloosa lane intersection. Confirming the request for another crossing. _ 9 Entrance to Pine Tree Lane @ Ponguese Bend Rd. street entrance X 6/ ✓ Yes Confirm Crossing location is in Pine Tree Lane 10 Middleridge Lane (at entrance to Sis trail) X X V Yes Need location confirmed (Middleridge Road at Lower Si's Trail?) at the bend in road? There is an existing crossing at this location? 11 Entrance to Williamsburg Lane/ Middleridge Lane X V V I I Yes Confirm Crossing location is in Williamsburg Lane 12 Saddleback/ Parnelli Trail at #26 X V V I Yes Need location confirmed, is this for the trail crossing just south of 26 Saddleback Road? 13 Georgeff Road / Fulds Furlong Crossing (Existing) X V 6, 1 Yes 14 Entrance to Caballeros Rd. (Crest Rd. East) (Existing) v? e? improvement V Yes I May be in area that will receive pavement in 2019 New Crossing in Caballeros Rd or Roughing existing Crossing across Crest Road East? 15 Eastfield Trail #49 (Existing) X V Yes Confirming this is crossing just west of 49 Eastfield Drive? 16 Chuckwagon/ Upper Lower Willow (Existing) X ✓ Yes Existing Crossing 17 #20 Eastfield (Existing) X V I Yes Existing crossing just west of 20 Eastfield Drive 18 Appaloosa Road (Existing) ?? V V Yes I _ 'Appaloosa Lane (not Road)? Where on Appaloosa Lane?, Confirm at Upper Si's Trail? 19 Association Entrance (existing) X V No Confirming existing crossing at Gatehouse? 20 Acacia/ Portuguese Bend Road (existing) ✓ Yes I Confirming Acacia Lane (Acacia Road does not cross PB Road), Crossing just south of Gatehouse, North of Acacia Lane 21 Middleridge Lane/ Blackwater Trail (existing) X V V Yes Shouldn't this be Lower Blackwater Canyon Road / Blackwater Trail? 22 Middleridge Lane South & North (existing) V Yes Is this the crossing an Middleridge Lane South or is the intent for this crossing to cross Middleridge Lane North? 23 Davidson Trail/ Saddleback (existing) _ V Yes Verify Location for Crossing - I could not find it Crossing Saddleback Road, connecting Davidson TcaiLto ddXeba#Bkir#jj? 24 Saddleback/ Poppy Trail (existing) X V No 25 Poppy Trail (existing) (fine) X V No 26 Portuguese Bend Above Poppy Trail (existing) X V No 27 Portuguese Bend/ Pheasant Trail X V No 28 Wagon Lane/ Portuguese Bend Road (Fine) X V No 29 Upper Blackwater/ Sagebrush Lane (Fine) X ✓ No 7/37 Agk1 �:Qna Calynn Viso t5e1 c Reserve. ,orum Reserve at a e rest • d ., C - Del Cerro Reserve r'oRugueae Canyon LEGEND: Y Existing Crossing Proposed New Crossing si s Ga tAk Attachment B Equestrian Crossings Sheet 1 of 2 'a o V rile laiK Nor IU3Y' - 0 r Attachment B Equestrian Crossings Sheet 2 of 2 to2Mii !&b Loc 1 Retain existing "STOP" pavement marking Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 60 ft long. 2. Place back edge of crosswalk approximately 2 ft from Crest Rd W edgeline extension. Attachment C Recommendation Sketches Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in southbound lane, approximately 100 ft n/o crosswalk • Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing west edgeline and driveway pavers f Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in northbound lane, approximately 150 ft s/o crosswalk XWG HORsE AHEAD) Remove existing stop limit line Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing edgelines Loc 2 #5 Johns Canyqn Rd Rancho Elastic° • Install W11-7 sign and W16 -9P plaque for northbound traffic, approximately 150 ft s/o crosswalk Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 18 ft long. 2. Place crosswalk at the extension of Rancho Elastico Trail, s/o the driveway for #5 Johns Canyon Rd. 10/37 Loc 3 • • Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in eastbound lane, approximately 100 ft w/o crosswalk Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 22 ft long. 2. Place crosswalk at the extension of Glory Trail, e/o the driveway for #5 Crest Rd W. Attachment C Recommendation Sketches j i Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in westbound lane, approximately 100 ft e/o crosswalk Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing edgelines igo Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 40 ft long. 2. Place back edge of crosswalk approximately 2 ft from Crest Rd W edgeline extension. Crest Ra Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing east edgeline and fire station driveway a) 0 Remove existing stop limit line Relocate "STOP" pavement marking to 8 ft in advance of front crosswalk line Loc 4 11/37 Match crosswalk line at edgeline/existing limit line Match crosswalk lines as shown Install "STOP" pavemen markings 8 ft in advance front crosswalk lines (typ). 4 t of Notes: 1. Crosswalk approximate lengths are as indicated below: North Leg — 71 ft; East Leg — 41 ft; South Leg — 48 ft; West Leg — 46 ft. 2 Angle crosswalks as shown. 3 Remove existing "STOP" markings, limit lines and conflicting gore striping (north approach). 44, a i4 Attachment C Recommendation Sketches Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on - center, between existing edgelines or intersecting crosswalk lines (typical) Match crosswalk lines at edgeline Match crosswalk line at edgeline/existing limit line lines as shown 12/37 r. a (.7 o gia Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 49 ft long. 2. Place front edge of crosswalk at the existing stop limit line. C, • -4 Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing edgelines 44 VA Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in northbound lane, approximately 100 ft s/o crosswalk Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 27 ft long. 2. Angle crosswalk between Caballeros Trail on the east and Purple Canyon Trail on the west. The west end of the crosswalk should be placed between the fire hydrant and the storm drain inlet. rY'-.i .,5:;x+4 46 Y• .1 t} 'r 4 '1 K- rb" Wel 1 -ti „71e C7% or Attachment C Recommendation Sketches Retain existing "STOP" pavement marking Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing edgelines A \. ,.Fi.{}t Loc7 Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in southbound lane, approximately 100 ft n/o crosswalk `ts.5;c—S.,; • 13/37 Loc 8 to i. j• (5.66‘.. a , , r- s. ..=�..r,.r• 1. • Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing edgelines ii4d3:i+ Install "STOP" pavement marking 8 ft in advance of front crosswalk line. t r_ aU- - PP it %, 't"•r AIrst l T ,• i • • Trim vegetation on the northwest corner of the intersection to provide adequate equestrian clearance. 1.. Relocate stop sign approximately 4 ft southerly. 0 Attachment C Recommendation Sketches • o y *i Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 45 ft long. 2. Place back edge of crosswalk approximately 2 ft from Upper Blackwater Canyon Rd edgeline. i c Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 25 ft long. 2. Angle crosswalk between Blackwater Canyon Trail on the east and the existing stop sign location on the west. The crosswalk will be located in advance of the "STOP" pavement marking. t t,r Loc 9 Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing edgelines fi rtr.- -a,- jortugues Bend Rd r 14/37 Loc 10 I } r•f • • V , Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in eastbound lane, approximately 150 ft w/o crosswalk. 4 • • , 1 t Install "STOP" pavement marking 8 ft in advance of front crosswalk line. �• T• -J • AV" `+ •7, * 1► - ' 7 C , ,(17 �` fS Attachment C Recommendation Sketches Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 19 ft long. 2. Place crosswalk at the extension of Si's Trail. -1 y - 3 TO`. ' _ Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing edges of rolled curb i Trim vegetation on inside of the curve, approximately 200 ft e/o crosswalk, that restricts visibility of the crosswalk for westbound traffic. Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in westbound lane, approximately 150 ft e/o crosswalk. • -1"'f • 4) +' ,N.,5' '▪ 'r� 1/ ▪ • ' 3 ., ), r„,t r-., `' ! rte- ' 7 J E r1 . - r r n. t, •`- • Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on - center, between existing edges of rolled curb 0 - Loc 11 rf • Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 50 ft long. 2. Place back edge of crosswalk approximately 2 ft from Middleridge Ln edge of pavement. 15/37 Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in northbound lane, approximately 100 ft s/o crosswalk. Remove or relocate existing "SLOW CURVE" pavement marking Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in southbound lane, approximately 100 ft n/o crosswalk. Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 25 ft long. 2. Angle crosswalk between the east and west extensions of Saddleback Trail, south of the driveway to 26 Saddleback Rd. . , . "314,Tfl 3'+'•:'..a7-'i :Sw "X Loc 16 .y� Attachment C Recommendation Sketches ; "T ' #3 Chuckwagon Rd Chug agora Refresh existing "HORSE XING" pavement markings and crosswalk Loc 17 ! Note: 1. As an alternative to removing the existing equestrian crossing signs at the crosswalk, retain the W11-7 signs and replace the "EQUESTRIAN XING" signs with a downward diagonal arrow plaque (W 16-7P). Refresh existing "HORSE XING" pavement markings and crosswalk EQUESTRIAN XING EQUESTRIAN XING Install new equestrian symbol (W11-7) and "AHEAD" (W 16-9P) signs for westbound traffic, approximately 150 ft in advance of the crosswalk AHEAD Remove existing equestrian symbol (W11-7) and "EQUESTRIAN XING" signs #20 E4stfield pr 18/37 Relocate existing equestrian symbol (W11-7) sign for westbound traffic to approximately 400 ft in advance of the new crosswalk location. Replace the existing "EQUESTRIAN XING" sign with an "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) sign. Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing edgelines. Refresh existing "HORSE XING" pavement markings Refresh existing crosswalk .1 %, 0.1( EQUESTRIAN XING ' S5, City Hall Attachment C Recommendation Sketches AHEAD Remove existing equestrian symbol (W11-7) and "EQUESTRIAN XING" signs approximately 35 ft south of trail Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 35 ft long. 2. Angle crosswalk between Upper Si's Trail on the east and the north end of the AC curb on the west. )'d 19/37 Relocate existing equestrian symbol (W11-7) sign for southbound traffic to approximately 100 ft in advance of the crosswalk location. Replace the existing "EQUESTRIAN XING" sign with an "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) sign. Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in eastbound lane, approximately 150 ft w/o crosswalk. Replace the existing "EQUESTRIAN XING" sign with an "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) sign for eastbound traffic, approximately 180 ft w/o crosswalk Install new equestrian symbo (W11- 7) and "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) signs for northbound traffic, approximately 100 ft in advance of the crosswalk. Remove existing equestrian symbol (W11-7) and "EQUESTRIAN XING" signs approximately 100 ft e/o reinstalled crosswalk Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in westbound lane, approximately 100 ft n/o crosswalk Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 30 ft long. 2. Place back edge of crosswalk approximately 2 ft from Middleridge Rd edge of pavement. Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in eastbound lane, approximately 235 ft w/o new crosswalk location. AHEAD Replace the existing "EQUESTRIAN XING" sign with an "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) sign for eastbound traffic, approximately 235 ft w/o new crosswalk location. 4'. Attachment C Recommendation Sketches Reinstall 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing edgelines Install new equestrian symbol (W11-7) and "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) signs for westbound traffic, approximately 150 ft in advance of the new crosswalk location. Install 12" crosswalk lines, spaced at 10 ft on -center, between existing edgelines. Notes: 1. Crosswalk is approximately 50 ft long. 2. Angle crosswalk between Davidson Trail on the south and Saddleback Trail on the north. • S4iidikb_acktil Y' AHEAD 54 Install "HORSE XING" pavement marking in westbound lane, approximately 150 ft e/o new crosswalk location. ,.�. 4 #86 '; Saddleb ck Rd, 21/37 • Loc 24 Loc 25 4 a • Refresh existing "HORSE XING" pavement markings and crosswalk tVON 417. v1 Replace the existing "EQUESTRIAN XING" sign with an "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) sign for r :z. " southbound traffic, approximately 150 ft n/o ti' •, 1 :X/ the crosswalk. F's .�.,. Attachment C Recommendation Sketches �. _ •- +, . s'} ••••• ',l 4 Refresh existing "H XING" pavement markings and crosswalk "HORSE + •t<<• f ;• i„�; ]:ice} Q` #t r�, �� G �„ c s1 4r4 F• < • ` 5 a• •i S ,a C. rr 7 ,r.- ' , `1 �,\+ �` �. ' :713 , as . `"~s.. ,L rS: �. ;-•- }'f., .._ rr r rL + qs -' w' /tit iil .0, . , ,i,., • 0. o AHEAD �U A, t • •. l„ NORSE � "5 i• . `r a� ,�r.. Replace the existing "EQUESTRIAN XING" sign with an "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) sign for northbound traffic, approximately 150 ft s/o the crosswalk. r. e r `1 t' : -." ,";r1i f'f� Sri 1. ,a AHEAD . - -• bra+ .. 22/37 Loc 26 Install new equestrian symbol (W11-7) and "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) signs for southbound traffic, approximately 200 ft in advance of the crosswalk. Refresh existing "HORSE XING" pavement markings and crosswalk -Portuguese Bend'Rd r • F. •, If Ir , , , • -•r rs � r I • 3 �j 'yo T }• r -2 - I N� >. .-•-• Attachment C Recommendation Sketches AHEAD • , I- \e fr. \ f~ R L' r 1• - C CLf t/) doy ) AO A� •y' 6 • Refresh existing "HORSE XING" pavement markings and crosswalk 23/37 411111111111 Refresh existing "HORSE XING" pavement markings and crosswalk n[!, ( :: 4. 4 h • AHEAD L. HORSE ,3J AHEAD Attachment C Recommendation Sketches 031, Replace the existing "EQUESTRIAN XING" sign with an "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) sign for southbound traffic, approximately 190 ft n/o the crosswalk. I'J o aL fJ y Refresh existing "HORSE XING" pavement markings and crosswalk Replace the existing "EQUESTRIAN XING" sign with an "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) sign for northbound traffic, approximately 210 ft s/o the crosswalk. i1 24/37 Loc 30 Replace the existing "EQUESTRIAN XING" sign with an "AHEAD" (W16 - 9P) sign for southbound traffic, approximately 150 ft n/o the crosswalk. W11-7 AHEAD AHEAD Attachment C Recommendation Sketches Replace the existing "EQUESTRIAN XING" sign with an "AHEAD" (W16 -9P) sign for southbound traffic, approximately 180 ft n/o the crosswalk. • Refresh existing "HORSE XING" pavement markings and crosswalk • Note: 1. This existing crossing location was not included in the list provided by the City. EQUESTRIAN XING J AHEAD W16 -9P r W16 -7P 25/37 ltd ., 1.1/1 Attachment 3 PROFESSIONAL BUILDING & SAFE fY: ENiINFERINC:IINF'RASTRUCTURE MA`7ACiiMENT September 24, 2019 Elaine Jeng, P.E. City Manager City of Rolling Hills No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 TRAFFIC SIGNING, STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKING EVALUATION CREST ROAD EAST Dear Ms. Jeng: Thank you for this opportunity to perform this traffic signing, striping and pavement marking evaluation on Crest Road East within the City of Rolling Hills. The included recommendations for modifications are intended to comply with requirements and guidelines in the California Vehicle Code (CVC), Caltrans Standard Plans and the current edition of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD). The recommendations are based on an understanding of the City's semi -rural nature and a desire to limit new traffic controls to an appropriate degree for the community. Also included in the evaluation is a review of the horizontal alignment on Crest Road East to determine the need for warning signs and advisory speed plaques. INVENTORY A field inventory of Crest Road East was conducted on September 19, 2019. The existing signage is indicated in Attachment A and the existing pavement markings are indicated in Attachment B. A separate evaluation of equestrian crossings is also being conducted and will be issued independent of this report. However, there are two existing equestrian crossings on Crest Road East (at Georgeff Road and at Caballeros Road) and the traffic controls associated with these crossings are included in this evaluation as well as the separate equestrian crossing report. HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT WARNING SIGNS Crest Road East has several horizontal curves between Portuguese Bend Road and its easterly terminus (Attachment C). The CA MUTCD specifies in Sections 2C.06 through 2C.15 the application of the warning signs as well the use of advisory speed plaques to alert motorists of the horizontal alignment change. Advisory speeds are determined through a ball -bank indicator analysis. In determining the need for curve or turn warning signs, consideration should be given to driver expectancy based on the driving environment. If the curve can be driven at a legal speed without discomfort, there is 1 26/37 PROFESSIONAL BUILDING & SAFErY!EN ; EFEi RING/FNFRASTRUCTU F MAN.AOT MCNI normally no need for a sign. A curve warning sign should be considered in advance of any curve that produces a reading of 10 degrees on a Ball Bank Indicator at speeds lower than the approach speed. If a curve warning sign is needed, it should be supplemented with an advisory speed message. The method for conducting a ball -bank indicator evaluation, which was conducted on September 14, 2019, is contained in CA MUTCD Section 2C.08. For the 30 mph speed limit on Crest Road East, a ball -bank indicator reading of 14 or more would suggest that a warning sign and advisory speed plaque are appropriate. The results are as follows: Ball -Bank Reading Warning Sign Curve # (Average — Both Directions) Required 1 7 NO 2 6 NO 3 6 NO 4 9 NO RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations will provide compliance with current CA MUTCD standards. They also incorporate the details contained in the most current Caltrans Standard Plans, issued in 2018. For items not included in the following recommendations, the existinq traffic controls should be reinstalled/retained. All installations should be consistent with installation requirements of the CA MUTCD and Caltrans Standard Plans. Based on the field investigation and ball -bank indicator evaluation, the following recommendations are provided: 1. Do not install horizontal alignment warning signs or advisory speed plaques on Crest Road East. 2. Consider raising the height of traffic control signs to provide the CA MUTCD guidance of a 7 -foot clearance between the bottom of the sign and the surrounding ground surface. 3. Replace all existing 4" wide white edgeline and 4" yellow centerline striping with 6" stripes to comply with current Caltrans Standard Plans. 4. Replace all existing stop signs (R1-1) with new, retroreflective 30" x 30" signs. 2 27/37 C4,4 1111111.111.11111111111111111111 PROFESSIONAL B 0 I. DI NS & SAFETY/ENGINEERING/INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT 5. Install new All -Way Plaques (R1 -3P) below each of the stop signs (R1-1) at the intersections of Portuguese Bend Road and Crest Road East, and at Crest Road East and Eastfield Drive. 6. Replace the existing "CLOSED TO THROUGH TRAFFIC" warning sign on the south side of Crest Road East, approximately 36 feet east of Eastfield Drive with an R11-4 regulatory sign. BID SCHEDULE A roadway resurfacing bid schedule of the signing, striping and markings on Crest Road East is included as Attachment C. The bid schedule includes existing traffic controls to be reinstalled/retained and the recommendations included above. All traffic controls should be installed per requirements of the current CA MUTCD and Caltrans Standard Plans. Please feel free to contact me at (562) 252-2511 or jackrvdella,caaprofessionals.com if you have any questions regarding these recommendations. It has been a pleasure to provide you with this traffic engineering service. Sincerely, Charles Abbott Associates Ry I, P.E., T.E. enior Traffic Engineer JR: Crest Rd East Signing and Striping Inventory Report - 9-24-19 Attach. 3 28/37 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Sign Inventory Attachment A SIGN ID Main Street Location Cross Street Approximate Location MUTCD Sign Code Sign Notes Slgn Height Sign Width Sign Orientation Slgn Condition 1 Crest Road East N/S Portuguese Bend Road E/1 R1-1 30" 30" Facing Westbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 4 1/2 ft above ground 2 Crest Road West S/S Portuguese Bend Road W/L R1-1 30" 30" Facing Eastbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 4 1/2 ft above ground 3 Portuguese Bend Road W/S Crest Road West N/L R1.1 30" 30" Facing Southbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 4 1/2 ft above ground 4 Portuguese Bend Road E/S Crest Road East 5/L R1-1 30" 30" Facing Northbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 4 1/2 ft above ground 5 Georgeff Road W/S Crest Road East N/L R1-1 30" 30" Facing Southbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 4 1/2 ft above ground 6 Crest Road East S/S Georgeff Road 150' E/0 R2-1 30 MPH 30" 24" Facing Eastbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 4 1/2 ft above ground 7 Crest Road East 5/5 Caballeros Road 300' W/O W3-1 30" 30" Facing Eastbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 3 ft above ground 8 Crest Road East S/S Caballeros Road W/L R1-1 24" 24" Facing Eastbound Traffic Replace with 30" x 30" sign. Sign mounted 3 ft above ground 9 Caballeros Road W/S Crest Road East N/L R1-1 24" 24" Facing Southbound Traffic Replace with 30" x 30" sign. Sign mounted 3 ft above ground 10 Crest Road East N/S Southfield Drive E/1 R1-1 24" 24" Facing Westbound Traffic Replace with 30" x 30" sign. Sign mounted 3 ft above ground 11 Southfield Drive E/S Crest Road East S/L R1-1 24" 24" Facing Northbound Traffic Replace with 30" x 30" sign. Sign mounted 3 ft above ground 12 Crest Road East N/S Southfield Drive 330' E/O W3-1 30" 30" Facing Westbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 4 ft above ground 13 Crest Road East 5/5 Southfield Drive 465' E/0 R2-1 30 MPH 30" 24" Facing Eastbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 4 1/2 ft above ground 14 Crest Road East N/S Eastfield Drive 260' W/O R2-1 30 MPH 30" 24" Facing Westbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 4 1/2 ft above ground 15 Crest Road East S/S Eastfield Drive 225' W/O W3-1 30" 30" Facing Eastbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 4 1/2 ft above ground 16 Crest Road East S/S Eastfield Drive W/L R1-1 24" 24" Facing Eastbound Traffic Replace with 30" x 30" sign. Sign mounted 3 ft above ground Attach A - Sign Inventory Page 1 of 4 9/24/2019 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Sign Inventory Attachment A SIGN ID Main Street Location Cross Street Approximate Location MUTCD Sign Code Sign Notes Sign Height Sign Width Sign Orientation Sign Condition 17 Eastfield Drive W/S / Crest Road East N L / R1-1 24" 24" Facing Southbound Traffic Replace with 30" x 30" sign. Sign mounted 3 ft above ground 18 Crest Road East N/S Eastfield Drive E/L R1-1 24" 24" Facing Westbound Traffic Replace with 30" x 30" sign. Sign mounted 3 ft above ground 19 Crest Road East 5/5 Eastfield Drive 36' E/0 "CLOSED TO THROUGH TRAFFIC" Non -Standard Sign 24" 24" Facing Eastbound Traffic Existing sign is a warning sign. Replace with 811-4 regulatory sign. 20 Crest Road East 5/5 Eastfield Drive 140' E/0 W31A (CA) 30" 30" Facing Eastbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted 4 1/2 ft above ground 21 Crest Road East N/S Eastfield Drive 445' E/0 R26 (CA) "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" 18" 12" Facing South Acceptable - Sign mounted on fence 22 Crest Road East N/S Eastfield Drive 500' E/0 R26 (CA) "NO STOPPING FIRE LANE" 18" 12" Facing North Acceptable - Sign mounted on utility pole 23 Crest Road East S/S Eastfield Drive 550' E/0 R26 (CA) "NO STOPPING FIRE LANE" 18" 12" Facing South Acceptable - Sign mounted on fence 24 Crest Road East Head -On Eastfield Drive 580' E/O W31 (CA) 30" 30" Facing Eastbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted on fence 25 Crest Road East Head -On - North of W31 (CA) Eastfield Drive 580' E/0 0M4-3 24" 24" Facing Eastbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted on fence 26 Crest Road East Head -On - South of W31 (CA) Eastfield Drive 580' E/0 0M4-3 24" 24" Facing Eastbound Traffic Acceptable - Sign mounted on fence Attach A - Sign Inventory Page 2 of 4 9/24/2019 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Pavement Marking Inventory Attachment B MARKING ID Main Street Location Cross Street Approximate Location Caltrans Standard Plan Marking Notes Marking Width Marking Length Marking Material 1 Crest Road East Westbound Approach Portuguese Bend Road E/L A24E White Limit Line 12" 15 ft Thermoplastic 2 Crest Road East Westbound Approach Portuguese Bend Road E/L A24D "STOP" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 3 Crest Road East Centerline Portuguese Bend Road E/L A20A 22 etail Two -Dire Zone No Passing on 4" 315 ft Paint 4 Crest Road East North Edge of Pavement Portuguese Bend Road E/L A20B;eetail Edgeline 4" 320 ft Paint 5 Crest Road East South Edge of Pavement Portuguese Bend Road E/L A2OB - Detail 278 Edgeline 4" 2,950 ft Paint 6 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Georgeff Road 110' W/O A24D/E "HORSE XING" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 7 Crest Road East Westbound Lane Georgeff Road 45' W/O A24D "STOP AHEAD" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 8 Crest Road East ON Georgeff Road W/L A24F - Basic White Crosswalk - 10 ft Wide 12" 35 ft Thermoplastic 9 Crest Road East Centerline Georgeff Road g E/L A20A - Detail 22 Two -Direction No Passing Zone 4" 160 ft Paint 10 Crest Road East Westbound Lane Georgeff Road 160' W/O A24D/E "HORSE XING" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 11 Crest Road East North Edge of Pavement Georgeff Road E/L A20B - Detail 276 Edgeline 4" 2,500 ft Paint 12 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Georgeff Road 290' E/O A20A - Type D (Blue) Blue Blue raised reflective pavement marker N/A N/A N/A 13 Crest Road East Centerline Georgeff Road 160' E/O A20A - Detail 2 Skip Yellow Centerline 4" 2,200 ft Paint 14 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Georgeff Road 970' E/O A20A - Type D (Blue) Blue raised reflective pavement marker N/A N/A N/A 15 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Caballeros Road 970' W/O A20A - Type D (Blue) Blue raised reflective pavement marker N/A N/A N/A 16 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Caballeros Road 420' W/O A20A - Type D (Blue) Blue raised reflective pavement marker N/A N/A N/A 17 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Caballeros Road 300' W/O A24D "STOP AHEAD" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 18 Crest Road East Centerline Caballeros Road W/L A20A - Detail 22 Two -Direction No Passing Zone 4" 150 ft Paint 19 Crest Road East Eastbound Approach Caballeros Road W/L A24D "STOP" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 20 Crest Road East ON Caballeros Road W/L A24F - Basic White Crosswalk - 10 ft Wide 12" 45 ft Thermoplastic 21 Crest Road East North Edge of Pavement Caballeros Road E/L A208;Betail Edgeline 4" 2,400 ft Paint 22 Crest Road East Westbound Approach Southfield Drive E/L A24E White Limit Line 12" 12 ft Thermoplastic 23 Crest Road East Westbound Approach Southfield Drive E/L A24D "STOP" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 24 Crest Road East Centerline Southfield Drive E/L / A20A - Detail 22 Two -Direction No Passing Zone 4" 160 ft Paint 25 Crest Road East South Edge of Pavement Southfield Drive E/L A206;Betail Edgeline 4" 2,800 ft Paint 26 Crest Road East Centerline Southfield Drive 160' E/O A20A - Detail 2 Skip Yellow Centerline 4" 1,900 ft Paint 27 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Southfield Drive 350' E/O A24D "STOP AHEAD" N/A N/A Thermoplastic Pavement Marking Inventory Page 3 of 4 9/24/2019 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Pavement Marking Inventory Attachment B MARKING ID Main Street Location Cross Street Approximate Location Caltrans Standard Plan Marking Notes Marking Width Marking Length Marking Material 28 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Southfield Drive 495' E/O A20A - Type D (Blue) Blue raised reflective pavement marker N/A N/A N/A 29 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Southfield Drive 1,100' E/O A20A - Type D (Blue) Blue raised reflective pavement marker N/A N/A N/A 30 Crest Road East Centerline Eastfield Drive W/L A20A - Detail 22 Two -Direction No Passing Zone 4" 250 ft Paint 31 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Eastfield Drive 210' E/O A24D "STOP AHEAD" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 32 Crest Road East Eastbound Approach Eastfield Drive W/L A24E White Limit Line 12" 12 ft Thermoplastic 33 Crest Road East Eastbound Approach Eastfield Drive W/L A24D "STOP" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 34 Crest Road East Westbound Approach Eastfield Drive E/L A24E White Limit Line 12" 35 ft Thermoplastic 35 Crest Road East Westbound Approach Eastfield Drive E/L A24D "STOP" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 36 Crest Road East North Edge of Pavement Eastfield Drive E/L A20 z;Betail Edgeline 4" 400 ft Paint 37 Crest Road East Centerline Eastfield Drive E/L A20A Z Detail 2 Two -Dire ne No Passing Zoon 4" 160 ft Paint 38 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Eastfield Drive 80' E/O A24D/E "ROAD ENDS 500 FEET" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 39 Crest Road East Centerline Eastfield Drive 160' E/O A20A - Detail 2 Skip Yellow Centerline 4" 230 ft Paint 40 Crest Road East Eastbound Lane Eastfield Drive 360' E/O A24D/E "ROAD ENDS" N/A N/A Thermoplastic 41 Crest Road East North Edge of Pavement Eastfield Drive 430' E/O A20A - Detail 21 Two -Direction No Passing Zone 4" 160 ft Paint Pavement Marking Inventory Page 4 of 4 9/24/2019 Attachment C BID SCHEDULE ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 Remove Existing Sign 13 EA $ $ 2 Install R1-1 Sign 12 EA $ $ 3 Install R1 -3P Sign 12 EA $ $ 4 Install R11-4 Sign 1 EA $ $ 5 Install 8" edgeline per Caltrans Standard Plan A20B, Detail 27B 11370 . ' LF $ • $ 6 Install Two -Direction No Passing Zone per Caltrans Standard Plan A20A, Detail 22 . 1,195 LF $ $ 7 Install Two -Direction No Passing Zone per Caltrans Standard Plan A20A, Detail 21 160 LF $ $ 8 ' Install Skip Yellow Centerline per Caltrans Standard Plan A20A, Detail 2 4,330 LF $ $ 9 Install Basic Crosswalk per Caltrans Standard Plan A24F 2 EA $ $ • 10 Install White Limit Line per Caltrans Standard Plan A24E 4 EA $ $ 11 Install "STOP" Pavement Marking per Caltrans Standard Plan A24D 5 EA $ $ 12 Install "HORSE XING" Pavement Marking per Caltrans Standard Plan A24D/E 2 EA $ $ 13 Install "STOP AHEAD" Pavement Marking per Caltrans Standard Plan A24D 4 EA $ $ 14 Install "ROAD ENDS 500 FEET" Pavement Marking per Caltrans Standard Plan A24D/E 1 EA $ $ ' 15 Install "ROAD ENDS" Pavement Marking per Caltrans Standard Plan A24D/E 1 EA $ $ 16 Install Blue Raised Reflective Pavement Marker 6 EA $ $ TOTAL BASE BID (In Figures) $ TOTAL BASE BID (In Words) NOTES: 1. All amounts and totals given in the Bid Schedule will be subject to verification by the Contractor. In case of variation between the unit cost and amount shown by bidder, the unit cost will be considered to be his/her bid. 2. Quantities shown in the above Bid Schedule are estimated quantities for bidding purposes only. Actual quantities shall be determined from field measurements. 33/37 Item GA Attachment 4 .PROI'ESSIONAL B0!LRIN° & SAFF.rY?E; !NF.ERi:;C!INFRAsr ucTURE MANACEMI NT September 25, 2019 Elaine Jeng, P.E. City Manager City of Rolling Hills No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 MIDDLERIDGE ROAD AND WILLIAMSBURG LANE/LOWER BLACKWATER CANYON ROAD ALL -WAY STOP CONTROLS Dear Ms. Jeng: RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Consider the installation of all -way stop controls at Middleridge Lane and Williamsburg Lane/Lower Blackwater Canyon Road. BACKGROUND As requested I reviewed the intersection Lane/Lower Blackwater Canyon Road with respect to the need for all -way stop controls and offer the following comments. Due to the proximity of Williamsburg Lane and Lower Blackwater Canyon Road, this area is being evaluated as a single intersection. DISCUSSION Middleridge Road in the subject vicinity is classified as a local roadway in the current functional classification map (California Roadway System Map 13V52) and runs east -west. It has one lane in each direction and has no posted speed limit in the subject vicinity. The vertical alignment is rolling with multiple horizontal curves between points west of Williamsburg Lane and east of Lower Blackwater Canyon Road. of Middleridge Road and Williamsburg • CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES, INC. 27401 Los ALTOS •SUITE 220 • MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 TOLL FREE: (866) 530-4980 • PHONE: (949) 367-2850 • FAX: (949) 367-2852 WNW CAA PROFESSION ALS. C OM 34/37 PROPR_S:C:74.AL .BUILD!!,,. & $.d!'f;i 2N,II N!: _. is WC RN; R AfiT RUC?.Y4@. \I:\faAv..o9ii iJ 1' Williamsburg Lane and Lower Blackwater Canyon Road are both local roadways that run north -south with one lane in each direction. Williamsburg Lane is a cul-de-sac that terminate on the south at Middleridge Road and has stop control. Lower Blackwater , Canyon Road is stop controlled at Middleridge Road, and then continues easterly. hi Looking `West .:17'1,77- k; t , r l Williamsburg Lane and Lower Blackwater Canyon Road are approximately 70 feet apart, with Williamsburg Lane on the west and Lower Blackwater Canyon Road on the east. There is rural residential development on all roadways in the area. A field review was conducted on September 19, 2019. Traffic volumes on all roadways were observed to be extremely light. A review of the available SWITRS data at this intersection revealed no reported collisions since 2014 that could be correctable with the installation of all -way stop controls. For the assumed legal speed limit of 25 mph on Middleridge Road, the minimum stopping sight distance per Table 201.1 of the California Highway Design. Manual is 150 feet. Field 4.!;200t5ii CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES, INC. 27401 Los, ALTOS *SUITE 220 • MISSION VIEIO, CA 92691 TOLL FREE: (866) 530-4980 • PHONE: (949) 367-2850 • FAX: (949) 367-2852 W'W W.CA.A PROFESSION ALS. COM 35/37- - - PROFR33ICI4A!. dU?L:'.iaO C .rLi; YiF.':•.:E:i::L:ILINC:iI`!i'iil.STRUCTL'R' MANAGISMEL4r measurements revealed that visibility for Williamsburg Lane looking west and Lower Blackwater Canyon Road looking east exceeds the minimum stopping sight distance. However, visibility for Williamsburg Lane looking east was measured at approximately 125 feet and visibility for Lower Blackwater Canyon Road looking west was measured at approximately 110 feet. The visibility restrictions are due to geographic features that are not easily mitigated. The California. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) provides guidance for the installation of all -way stop controls. It suggests that all -way stop controls may be considered when: • Warrant A - Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi -way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. • Warrant B - There is a crash problem, as indicated by 5 or more reported crashes in a 12 -month period that are susceptible to correction by all -way stop installation. Such crashes include right- and left -turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. • Warrant C - Where the vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor -street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour. When the 85th -percentile approach speed of the major - street traffic exceeds 40 mph, as it does at this intersection, the minimum vehicular volume warrants may be reduced to 70 percent of the above values. • Warrant D - Where none of the above Warrants are satisfied, but Warrants B and C are satisfied 80 percent. For this warrant, the 70 percent reduction for Warrant D cannot be applied. The CA MUTCD also provides other criteria that may be considered, including: • The need to control left -turn conflicts; • The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes; .0311111111111111 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES, INC. 27401 LOS ALTOS •SUITE 220 • MISSION VIEIO, CA92691 TOLL FREE: (866) 530-4980 • PHONE: (949) 367-2850 • FAX: (949) 367-2852 W W W. C4A PROFESSION AlS.COM 36/37 PSKlrt; pP:!.l. .BUIL I.)I1:f f.• SA PS J'Yi 6?:i.I:iSLi:iN(/ fPi ADTRL'Ci UR_ S7.'dt,{unb411:ir • Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and, • An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where all -way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection. Warrant A would clearly not be satisfied as a traffic signal is not appropriate for this location. The lack of reported crashes do not satisfy Warrant B. As indicated previously, the traffic volumes for Middleridge Road, Williamsburg Lane and Lower Blackwater Canyon Road are far below the minimum thresholds in Warrant C. The reported crashes and traffic volumes also do not satisfy Warrant D. With regards to the additional criteria allowed for consideration in the CA MUTCD, the following criterion appears applicable to justify all -way stop controls at this intersection. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop — Visibility for motorists on the north approach of Williamsburg Lane viewing traffic approaching from the east, and visibility on the south approach of Lower Blackwater Canyon Road viewing traffic approaching from the west is limited due to the roadway curvature and vertical alignment. The minimum stopping sight distance of 150 feet for 25 mph cannot be provided and can create conflict for motorists attempting to enter Middleridge Road. CONCLUSION Due to the restricted visibility for motorists on the north and south approaches viewing approaching traffic on Middleridge Road and application of the additional criteria regarding visibility issues, the installation of all -way stop controls could be justified. JR: Middleridge Rd and Williamsburg Ln- Lower Blackwater Canyon Rd All -Way Stop Control Analysis - 9-25-19 • CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES, INC. 27401 LOS ALTOS •SUITE 220 • MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691 TOLL FREE: (866) 530-4980 • PHONE: (949) 307-2850 • FAX: (949) 367-2852 W W W.0 AA PROFESSION ALS. C OM 37/37 ,grf Rallaif gal INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No: 6B Mtg. Date: 09/26/19 TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION FROM: YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR THRU: ELAINE JENG, P.E., CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDER A NEW DRIVEWAY AT 23 CHUCKWAGON ROAD AS A PART OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 2019 ATTACHMENTS: 1. LETTER OF REQUEST 2. MEMORANDUM FROM TRAFFIC ENGINEER RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the members of the Traffic Commission review and consider the applicant's request for a relocated driveway and driveway apron at 23 Chuckwagon Road. The Traffic Commission may wish to conduct a field visit during the meeting to review the site. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The property owners at 23 Chuckwagon propose to relocate an existing apron and driveway to a location where it can better serve the garage and reduce hardscape along the front of the property. The proposed driveway would have an 18' wide apron and 13-14' wide driveway. Attached is the applicant's request and description of the project. Due to the required grading, slope and a wall greater than 36" in height, following Traffic Commission recommendation as to the location and sight distance, the Planning Commission will consider the request at a future date.. However, the applicants would like to get input from the Traffic Engineer and the Traffic Commission, if this driveway could be constructed from traffic engineering standpoint and requirements. 1 The applicants propose to demolish the existing garage and construct a new garage and make other improvements to the property, which were approved administratively. To assist the Traffic Commission in its review of this request, the applicant was asked to stake the driveway. The City's Traffic Engineer has reviewed the plans for the proposed driveway and provided her opinion. She will visit the property prior to the meeting on September 266, 2019 and provide an oral report to the Traffic Commission at the meeting. The Traffic Commission could also visit the site. NOTIFICATION The applicant's representative, the Rolling Hills Community Association; and the residents/property owners of adjacent properties have been forwarded a copy of the agenda to advise them that the Traffic Commission will be reviewing this request. CONCLUSION The Traffic Commission's recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for a decision on whether or not to approve the proposed driveway apron, once the construction of the driveway is reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. 2 Attachment 1 OTTOLIA & BARNES Architecture 5533 Bayridge Road, Rancho Palos Verdes, California 90275, T: (310) 375-0107, E: dco@OBAstudio.com September 12, 2019 City of Rolling Hills Traffic Commission 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, California 90274 Re. New driveway and approach to property located at 23 Chuchwagon Road Dear Traffic Commission Members, On behalf of Sandra and Mario Ramirez, I would like to submit a new driveway to their recently purchased home for your consideration. Our project consists of removing the existing driveway and retaining walls, which run from the middle of the lot in a westerly direction, and replacing it with a new driveway. ■ The proposed driveway will be at a downslope from Chuckwagon Road, and run parallel to, and be 8'- 2" away from, the Westerly property line. The proposed apron is 18 feet wide and will taper to a 13 foot wide driveway. The driveway will be 55'-7" long. It's initial approach will be 8 feet long at 8% slope, it will then blend to 17.75% slope for a distance of approximately 39'-7", and terminate at an 8% slope for the final 8' of driveway length. At its sides, the driveway will have two retaining walls which will follow the natural slope and vary in height. Using the front easement line as a benchmark, the height of the retaining wall at the front easements line would be approximately 9" above the existing grade, and approximately 36" above the existing natural grade at 10' away from the front easement line. Where the proposed driveway meets the existing driveway, at point approximately 13' away from the front easement line, there is a height of approximately 60" which will be reduced, after removing the existing driveway and continuing the slope of the existing grade to approximately 48". We are anticipating a fill of 63 cubic yards. Thank you for your time and consideration, please feel free to contact me if you have any comments or need any further information. Respectfully submitted, omingo Ottolia Architect CA License C27790 Attachment Item -emir Attachment 2 WI LLDAN I Engineering TO: Elaine Jeng PE, City Manager FROM: Vanessa Munoz, PE, TE, City Traffic Engineer DATE: September 20, 2019 SUBJECT: 23 Churckwagon Road Driveways This memorandum is in response to the request by the City to review and provide input on the residential driveway being proposed by the residents at 23 Chuckwagon Road. The proposed driveway will replace the existing residential driveway located approximately in the middle of the lot. The proposed driveway is located 8-2" away from the westerly property line. The driveway apron is 18 -feet wide with a 13 -foot driveway aisle. The proposed driveway will have two retaining walls, one on each side of the driveway aisle which will follow the natural slope of the terrain and the walls will be of varying height. He height of the retaining walls at the front easements line would be 9" above the existing grade and approximately 36" above the existing natural grade at 10 -feet away from the front easement line. Based on the review of the driveway layout plan and engineering judgement, the proposed driveway width and apron are acceptable, however a field review of the proposed driveway location will be performed prior to the traffic commission meeting and a final verbal recommendation will be made at the traffic commission with regards to the proposed location and sight distance requirements. gee& INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No: 6B Mtg. Date: 09/26/19 TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION FROM: YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR THRU: ELAINE JENG, P.E., CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDER A NEW DRIVEWAY AT 23 CHUCKWAGON ROAD AS A PART OF A DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 2019 ATTACHMENTS: 1. LETTER OF REQUEST 2. MEMORANDUM FROM TRAFFIC ENGINEER RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the members of the Traffic Commission review and consider the applicant's request for a relocated driveway and driveway apron at 23 Chuckwagon Road. The Traffic Commission may wish to conduct a field visit during the meeting to review the site. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The property owners at 23 Chuckwagon propose to relocate an existing apron and driveway to a location where it can better serve the garage and reduce hardscape along the front of the property. The proposed driveway would have an 18' wide apron and 13-14' wide driveway. Attached is the applicant's request and description of the project. Due to the required grading, slope and a wall greater than 36" in height, following Traffic Commission recommendation as to the location and sight distance, the Planning Commission will consider the request at a future date. However, the applicants would like to get input from the Traffic Engineer and the Traffic Commission, if this driveway could be constructed from traffic engineering standpoint and requirements. -1- 1/6 The applicants propose to demolish the existing garage and construct a new garage and make other improvements to the property, which were approved administratively. To assist the Traffic Commission in its, review of this request, the applicant was asked to stake the driveway. The City's Traffic Engineer has reviewed the plans for the proposed driveway and provided her opinion. She will visit the property prior to the meeting on September 26th, 2019 and provide an oral report to the Traffic Commission at the meeting. The Traffic Commission could also visit the site. NOTIFICATION The applicant's representative, the Rolling Hills Community Association; and the residents/property owners of adjacent properties have been forwarded a copy of the agenda to advise them that the Traffic Commission will be reviewing this request. CONCLUSION The Traffic Commission's recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for a decision on whether or not to approve the proposed driveway apron, once the construction of the driveway is reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. -2- 2/6 Attachment 1 OTTOLIA & BARNES Architecture 5533 Bayridge Road, Rancho Palos Verdes, California 90275, T: (310) 375-0107, E: dco@OBAstudio.com September 12, 2019 City of Rolling Hills Traffic Commission 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, California 90274 Re. New driveway and approach to property located at 23 Chuchwagon Road Dear Traffic Commission Members, On behalf of Sandra and Mario Ramirez, I would like to submit a new driveway to their recently purchased home for your consideration. Our project consists of removing the existing driveway and retaining walls, which run from the middle of the lot in a westerly direction, and replacing it with a new driveway. ■ The proposed driveway will be at a downslope from Chuckwagon Road, and run parallel to, and be 8'- 2" away from; the Westerly property line. The proposed apron is 18 feet wide and will taper to a 13 foot wide driveway. The driveway will be 55'-7" long. It's initial approach will be 8 feet long at 8% slope, it will then blend to 17.75% slope for a distance of approximately 39'-7", and terminate at an 8% slope for the final 8' of driveway length. At its sides, the driveway will have two retaining walls which will follow the natural slope and vary in height. Using the front easement line as a benchmark, the height of the retaining wall at the front easements line would be approximately 9" above the existing grade, and approximately 36" above the existing natural grade at 10' away from the front easement line. Where the proposed driveway meets the existing driveway, at point approximately 13' away from the front easement line, there is a height of approximately 60" which will be reduced, after removing the existing driveway and continuing the slope of the existing grade to approximately 48". We are anticipating a fill of 63 cubic yards. Thank you for your time and consideration, please feel free to contact me if you have any comments or need any further information. Respectfully submitted, Domingo Ottolia Architect CA License C27790 Attachment 3/6 Attachment 2 '. ,""LLDAN Engineering TO: Elaine Jeng PE, City Manager FROM: Vanessa Munoz, PE, TE, City Traffic Engineer DATE: September 20, 2019 SUBJECT: 23 Churckwagon Road Driveways This memorandum is in response to the request by the City to review and provide input on the residential driveway being proposed by the residents at 23 Chuckwagon Road. The proposed driveway will replace the existing residential driveway located approximately in the middle of the lot. The proposed driveway is located 8-2" away from the westerly property line. The driveway apron is 18 -feet wide with a 13 -foot driveway aisle. The proposed driveway will have two retaining walls, one on each side of the driveway aisle which will follow the natural slope of the terrain and the walls will be of varying height. He height of the retaining walls at the front easements line would be 9" above the existing grade and approximately 36" above the existing natural grade at 10 -feet away from the front easement line. Based on the review of the driveway layout plan and engineering judgement, the proposed driveway width and apron are acceptable, however a field review of the proposed driveway location will be performed prior to the traffic commission meeting and a final verbal recommendation will be made at the traffic commission with regards to the proposed location and sight distance requirements. 4/6 Item tiB Photo 2 !tern 6B Photo 1 TO: FROM: THROUG: SUBJECT: DATE: ge4 a/Rat/4/9 qeied INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No.: 6C Mtg. Date: 10/03/2019 HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION YOHANA CORONEL, MBA ELAINE JENG, P.E., CITY MANAGER RECOMMEND TO THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION TO RESCHEDULE THE NOVEMBER 28, 2019 TRAFFIC COMMISSION MEETING TO NOVEMBER 21, 2019, DUE TO THE THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY. OCTOBER 03, 2019 RECOMMENDATION The Traffic Commission is scheduled to meet on November 28, 2019. This year, November 28 falls on the Thanksgiving holiday. Staff recommends that the Traffic Commission reschedule the November 28, 2019 Traffic Commission Meeting to November 21, 2019, the Thursday prior to November 28, 2019. -1- PROPOSED 80• WIDE CONC. h r Ji 'i-4;42 "":".9 o 1 SITE PLAN \\ FRONT EASEMENT LINE MOVE RE EXISTING DRIVEWAY 1 i // P 8,,00 PRIVRWAYISI AND MOTOR COURTIS) ADDRESS 23 C(nuokwegon Rd. DATE 08(06119 The Information below is to be submitted (or all new developments, garage addition, modificationm or rebeation and for any modification to existing driveway(s) and motor counts). If no changes to existing conditions are proposed, mark this form N/A. Pursuant to Section 17.16.150 of the Rolling Hilh Zoning Code, driveways may not cover mote than 20% of ' the setback area in which they are located and uncovered parking areas/motor cons may not cover more than 10% of the front or side yard setback. Uncovered parking areas shall be located no closer then 3Dfeel from any roadway easement line. A rat to exctcd 3•foot high wall may be permitted along a driveway or stairway in any setback. If any of these improvements are In vsemenn, RHCA approval ',required prior to CIty's review. CALCULATION OF ORIVEWAY(51 AND MOTOR COURTISI COVERAGE INCLUDING FIRE DEPARTMENT TURN AROUND, IF REOUIRED DRIVEWAYS, PARKING PADS & MOTOR COURTS EXISTING TOTAL PROPOSED TOTAL DRIVEWAY(S) 3,007s.f. 1,296 sJ, TOTAL MOTOR COURT(5)0 PARKING PAD(S) 1,3080.1. 643s.L AREA OF FRONT SETBACK 3,724 s.f. AREA OF SIDE SETBACK 3,719o1. AREA OF OR IVF.WAY(5) IN 51OF, SETBACK 1,5565! 981 0( % OF SIDE SETBACK COVERED BYDRIVEWAY(5) 42% 26 % AREA OF MOTOR COURT(S) & PARKING PADS IN SIDE SETBACK 419 s.(. 247 s.f. %OF SIDE SETBACK COVERED BY MOTOR COURT(5) & PARKING PAD(S) 11 % 7 % AREA OF DRI VEWAY(s) IN FRONT SETBACK 1.012 s.f. 390 s.f. % OF FRONT SETBACK COVERED BY DRIVEWAY(S) 27% 10 % AREA OF MOTOR COURT(S) & PARKING PADS IN FRONT SETBACK N/As.(. N/Ash. S OF FRONT SETBACK COVERED DY MOTOR COURT(5) & PARKING PAD(S) N/A % N/A Y 39'•701 //1- /1 I I II I y IJ jllLI-t7- 1n\ I \\\\ I -� ``l kz LI OF ROOF ABOVE a:)� \ II EXISTING PI TER `\\I'` '. (J WALL TO BE RE OVED 1 G� J/ \ 1 .I X S 0 25'-0" ROAD EASMENT 0 EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO REMAIN FRONT EASEMENT LINE / POSTS ® ENTR✓PORCH CONC. ALMWAY 0 188 FT. O COVERED PORN 81 SQ. FT. /JMPERVIOUS / 30'-0" / MINIMUM FRO / ARO / 10'-0° / NET AREA / EXCLUSION YARD -f LINE OF ROO .1 I. .I ABOVE (TYP.) -1-) 3a 11 EXISTING FRONT 6 Y 1 DATE 0&OBl1g 7 C. NO. _ ADDRESS 23 CHUCKWAGON RD, DRAPING AND EXCAVATION INFORMATION GradinoOaantithg Cubic Yds Max,Denth Max, Depth Lmotl,n CUT/EXCAVATION N/A For house/addition Pot other .wauws (Le. wall.) NIA seed_ Foryd�nse,.ay(s) or basement excavation For pool/spa exeovallon O Rxcasalinn NIA TOTAL CUT 10.8 TOTAL EXPORT E165 For house/addition For other sWOum Iis.w•allsj Ust For driveway(s) For yard divas For basements For basement wells Forpeel/spa Reevmpactkm TOTAL FILL N/A N/A N/A 46 46 2,5' 1.4 nom Tans raotmty RN we BN westen edge of me proposed driveway & dhply south 01 also% MM..% 0(a l aToai he used for remand 110 4.5 IT Tromham.oroonnv Pp° .1WpIM a directly na mtne pnpeaed ...y. ay, 6 directly noM o1 easWp odvevay, TOTAL GRADING (Sum of total cut and total fill/ 58.8 Fxialnu pod clevalbn. FminOed floor Finished grade - Feetk d end elevations - Fln/need flour Finished grade 8°sn`meMl-Mishd thaw ' Bamment-ML hd well wall' PAD/FLOOR FIJ: VATION\ Residential pad N/A -10 Other pad PROPERTY L • Z NEW PARKING PAD r'•_, .c a 843 80. FT. NEN• rtIR1V! , Witg�iA 1ERY QUA ~~•"••�� 1,288 8O. FT.171 y a=te• ~�•- un na: 2 03- 8 ADURIsss: 23 CHUCKWAGON RD. ALL MEASUREMENTS TO BE TAKEN FROM TIIE EXTERIOR FINISHED SURFACE OF STRUCTURES AND OUTSIDE BEAMS ON TRELLISES; ALL STRUCTURES ON THE LOT MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND LISTED HERE CALCULATIONOV LOT GOVRRAGE ARRA AND STRULy1RES RXISTINO PROIOSEA NTT LI)F ARIA RESIDENCE 2,770 aq,n 0 sqn. GARAGE 439 rq.n. 0 NA. SWIMMI.gv ISXRISPA 0 s1on, 0 ,ion, RXR. I:UUIPMI:NT 0 Nn. 0 Nn, OI/I/IT HOUSE 0 rq.n. 0 NA. CABANA 0 Nn. 0 yin. STANEJK 450 sqn 0 sin. RIi('RIATION UOIIRT 0 q,fl. _o_.4.5. ATTnetutII COIL/RI/D PORCHES 331 su.0. 0 to. ENTRYWAY/tGRTE(TXTIERIL BREEZEWAYS 0 sqn. 0 sin. AITACHE'STRIB.IJSISLsy.n. 0 eq,n. *DETACHED STRU(-1URIS: (chic ail that yspli>) SIIIIIAROS,'RUIJJSgS,CIA7JIBO0sgn, _____G_ mil. MROIECUIL ODIUM KITCHEN _O___.1.0. _0- sin. ROOh/nbseD PLAY EQUI•. owl IS _E_Nn,�-016, high wedmm 120 N. ( Inarm. WAl1ili EEATl1RF5. tTIW Min. _�,_ si.0. SERVICE YARD �N.n. 0.q S. OOIER _ 08gn. 0 stn. ItASEMIi\•I'AREA 0sq.n. (Alta. °/dill IS/Plll (R BASI/I E:R ' _ NA - T9745, 23,288 yt,n, 2,770 yn. 439 eq B. 0 sqn, 0 sq.R, 0 NA. 0 NA. __9so NA. 0 sq,R, at 50. R,• 2m 50. FL 331 ;n oy;n. o sqn, D65N.R. TOTAI.S'IRGCIl1RE5 4.065yi,n. 0 yin. R SIRII(Tl1RAI. COVINA(il/ 17,4 00 _ L 17,4 % TOTAL S'IRI7l9URES I:XCLI r111NG UP 10 S & EP TO FOO w.11.6milied groourv, that WA arc ma Miller than 1211. _Nn, 9 S'IRUCIIIRAI. (UVERAGIi 9, EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO REMAIN SERVICE YARD 76. 6O. FT. PROPOSED 48" WIDE CONC. STEPS (147 SO. FT.) COVERED PORCH 270 SO. FT. LINE OF PROPOSED ROOF ABOVE (TYP.) PATIO 380 SO. FT. )MPERVIOUg LINE OF PROPOSED ROOF ABOVE (TYP.) � 1�'�ei� 55•e� di= yV LINE OF ROOF ABOVE (TYP.) aad .0 .\ 1 1 1 1 l \5 f I \ FUTURE STABLE 450 SQ. FT. Nn. rq.n, _rA+ REMOVE EXISTING DRIVEWAY REMOVE EXISTING WALL •�•` i/ ti0 417 A / /.. FUTURE CORRAL 556SO. FT. ALL FLATWORM MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND LISTED HERE note: existing primary driveway is permeable (pavers set In sand) I'RINARY DRIVEWAY(S) Nn, 0 PANE) WALKS. PATIO AREAS. COURTYARDS _191 NA. (003. DIiCKINO 0 sqn. OI1 SiR PAVED DRIVEWAYS. ROAD IASE:N EN1S. PAR KING PAIN _128 yin. o rq,n. 345 wn. 154 n, 0 eq,n, 0 rq.n o yn. 1 428 NA. TOTAL IIATWVORK 'A l T1ill. I•IA'IW(IRK I (l1Yl/RAliT +_237 Nn. 345 rqn• 1.582.0. 5,3 %, 1.5 % 6,8 % TUFA!. Anti(TIIRA!. & Ii A1WRK COVI/SAGI/ %lO'G\'(II. CTVI/RA(It/ 5_002 xqn. 22.7 % 345 ,sqn. 5.045 yin. 1,5 % 242 % aaxUOEa3050. Fr. I 7'GTAI-S'1RIil'I'1/NAI-& '4,852 l-ATWIORK COVERAGE. aglt. stn.., Wr,'b up as-®0sale n. n % TOTAI. COVERAGE 20.8 rA 345 NA. 5.187 nq,R. 1_5 % 22.3 g, 'IIIT/Ile SOFT'. DF RiNVIOU5 SIIRFAI lS tOlhx than lan lsa ping: 1.515 rqn I c. O.G.. paern. Yin sand. grins Onel (3107 at oat adman • 1,218 at prvgpaa) TOTAL DIST/RRII)AREA NA 4.J13 N,f1,4.3re y)n Lim u St, R. UIS1TRBIiIS AREA 165 % •10.2 rA All structures (attached and detached) must Re listed. • Miscellaneous conforming free standing accessary structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, fountains, barbecue, °ordoor fire place, etc. ore not counted towards coverages unless greater than 170 s.1., (except for trellises), their combined area exceeds SBOsq. (t., or If them are mom than 5 such structures on the property. -`/•NF •••••••v7j' S6. / / -. • EXISTING CONC. %s / SLAB TO BE REMAIN •-J / ' 1,428 SO. FT.. ' JtQPERVIOUs. .. . iS 2P o,u.60 R las h•tie �/ F • �00 / Pod DATE :12n03_L8AO05 _23_C11U KWAGON,9D CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO_1 BUILDABLE PAD AREA AilD_SERl1CTURES IIUIIJIINCI PAD REIDExC.R GARAGE WWII/VA P(X)1.EUUIPxtl_\'1' G11ANA/RRC Rx1 GC•IST IIOUSIE STABLE vkfl. SPORTS COURT SERVIIT/ YARD 75 vpfl. ATI'AI:I lED COVERED PORCH FSA91 0 arms, mldmrn ei5. . Ii. AcseswpstnAllim vl,t, .•.ter ARM OP ATTACIII:DIX)VRµnD 91 ukh Luta. IS)RCI IES T IA'I' EXCEED nr,%01, Tl 1E SIZED), RESIDE.NGE/AIX5. 6'IRCCIVRE ENTRY W AY/POµl'E CORN IEREr ItRI/I/ZI/WAI 0 e}h. _12..N. fr. Al rAI.III:D Tµr:IJ.151S .,I,R, 0 qR. AI.1. DhlACIIEII SIRUCI'UREs wA nRS. _.yh (from kA mrvrsp page) EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAI. 0 _,g _y♦n NO DETACHED STRCUTURES ON AID r AI.i.Dl/TACIII/I STRLCTIRI] N� .1A .•.8, �qR Win, Mm lot amelge pax Mom de'4 (moil OI•IIER IOTA].STR UCTERILS ON PAD NO, 1 3,815 .Fn. A• IR:II.IIING PADCOVI/RAGE TOTAL vlRUCll,RIPi ON PAD NO.1 3,345Not IneL attached , h. 00 Notinet.kwnI&Ar ws, aM IneL the area nTwon dp,mhn that men, 109 ofthe doe ache mitlenteincmwrm'tara0 R. IlUII.IIIS61'AU COVERAGE 34-L_Ta _9_18 / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 0 / EXISNO RETAINING WALL TO REMAIN RECEI� sEP' 19 2( City of Rollin By OTTOLIA & BARNES Architecture • OomLgo 00toba. AM 027790 Dorothy BeneeOtatla. MA 028714 CAM 6weSn Awl Romeo Pb v...Calms =TS r:Ots( »corm F:Ofom.al Eamp0esamoms AnaMeo s 51.00500 a algal real or slpnmre is aaccdva sear as WWI version el ma downmm ea algk,5ay aubaah.4 be AKnlbn. erchnen U no, rerlWble rW eny subsequent nodiocatlon, oorugyl, or veaWa wriaed use of such downtrod. To rily see validity W applleablliy d oN seal W signature. =tad Natant No. SubmissbrmR(ovislmr Date A N CD ccl C2 71M (tea•C 0 O cz 240 CCO 6 ±- (") . Mco 1 f}i3ntca imings. epeamNon, mess deaipns and enanpcmams nerm:n od money an and shall rondo nyol IM 5,00,50 end no pros 9:401:47.a be cools diaoeaed a anon OF mma0bn with any W her woo e otmr then aN spodlk pn/ecl w Moto irlw . w, n pmaa eM w ° xu oo t W mn MM.. Visual cont. wee Nese droh&ps olradr cvdonce W acupfanoa of raukuw. date: project number. sheet title: Site Plan sheet number, 09.12-19 1816 SCALE: 3132° r 1'-O . tTILITIE8 TO BE BELOW GROUND A1.1