Loading...
Planning Commission Adjourned Regular Meeting 11-15-2016MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION November 15, 2016 FIELD TRIP PRESENT: Chairman Chelf, Commissioners Cardenas, Gray, Kirkpatrick and Seaburn Raymond Cruz, City Manager Julia Stewart, Assistant Planner Yolanta Schwartz, Planning Director Leah Mirsch, Resident Mr. and Mrs. Liu, property owners Rene Espina, Landscape Architect Helen Frylcman, property owner Tavisha Nicholson, Bolton Engineering A. ZONING CASE NO. 912, Request for a Site Plan Review to construct a 228 square foot, 8 -foot tall covered seating area that is 2.5 -feet maximum above grade and a 2.5' high wall on a property with a restricted development condition imposed through a prior project. The subject property is at 3 Chuckwagon Road (Lot 40-EF) Rolling Hills, CA, (Liu). The project has been determined to be categorically exempt (Class 3) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15303. Planning Director Schwartz reviewed the applicant's proposal for a new trellis, a portion of which would be up to 2.5' out of grade and two 2.5' each terraced retaining walls, as well as two on grade stairways leading from the house pad to the trellis area. She stated that 18 cubic yards of dirt will be graded and the walls will be screened with vegetation. Further, the development standards meet the code requirements and no variances are being requested. Everyone present viewed the project from the deck of the house. Rene Espina stated that the slopes between the home and the trellis and in front of the trellis would be landscaped. In response to Chairman Chelf, Ms. Schwartz stated that neighbors within 1,000 -foot radius were notified of the hearings and that no comments were received. Following a brief discussion, Chairman Chelf called for questions from the Commissioners. Hearing none, Commissioner Kirkpatrick moved that staff prepare a Resolution of approval for Planning Commission consideration at the next meeting. Commissioner Cardenas seconded the motion. There being no further discussion, the public hearing was continued to the evening meeting of the Planning Commission beginning at 6:30 PM. 1 B. ZONING CASE NO. 913, Request for Variances and Site Plan Review to construct a 72 square foot, maximum 8 -foot tall chicken coop within the "front yard" of the subject property, to exceed the previously approved lot disturbance to 66.1%, and to relocate a pool equipment area necessitating an up to 5' tall enclosure wall on a property with a restricted development condition imposed through a prior project. The subject property is at 10 Crest Road W. (Lot 2 -CH) Rolling Hills, CA, (Frykman). The project has been determined to be categorically exempt (Class 3) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15303. Planning Director Schwartz reviewed the applicant's proposal including the request for a variance to exceed the previously approved lot disturbance and pointed out the previously approved area for the stable and corral in the front yard. Everyone present walked to the proposed chicken coop, which the applicant stated she started to construct after it was approved by the RHCA. She stated that she did not realize that City's approval was required. In response to Commissioner Kirkpatrick, Ms. Schwartz stated that the two short walls constructed on each side of the chicken coop do not require discretionary approval. All present then walked over to the area of the proposed pool equipment. Discussion ensued regarding the height of the walls, location of the pool equipment area in the hillside, proximity to the easement and inability to screen it with vegetation as well as the configuration of the opening to the pool equipment enclosure. The Commissioners made several suggestions and the applicant's engineer stated that she would study the suggestions and respond and/or bring new plan for the evening meeting. There being no further discussion, the public hearing was continued to the evening meeting of the Planning Commission beginning at 6:30 PM. spgctfu ly Sybmitted, Yo ta Schwartz Planning Director Approved: ia./104(0 Date 2 11/15/16 PC Meeting Notification List Z.C. NAME email: Address City 912 - 3 Chuckwagon Road Mr. & Mrs. Stephen Liu Rene Espino 913 -10 Crest Road West Mr. & Mrs. Karl Frykman 10 Crest Road West `Tavisha Nicholson ticholson@boltonengineering.com rene@CompassLClnc.com 3 Chuckwagon Road Public:Planning Commission: 2016 PC Agenda Packets PDF:11/15/16:Notification List.xlsx CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL AND POSTING STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I am a citizen of the United States. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within proceeding; my business address is 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. On the 10'" day of November 2016,1 serve the within Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Regular Meeting -11/15/2016 E -MAILED MAILED DropBox DELIVERED Interested Asst. City Attorney City Manager RH Web site listSery Parties Planning Commissioners Interested parties Also posted at City Hall at www.Rolling-Hills.org and PDF's in DropBox. I declare under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the 10'" day of November, 2016 at Rolling Hills, California. Ewa Nikodem Administrative Assistant INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 7:30 AM TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2016 MEET AT 3 CHUCKWAGON' 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA 4. FIELD TRIPS A. ZONING CASE NO. 912, Request for a Site Plan Review to construct a 228 square foot, 8 -foot tall covered seating area that is 2.5 -feet maximum above grade and a 2.5' high wall on a property with a restricted development condition imposed through a prior project. The subject property is at 3 Chuckwagon Road (Lot 40-EF) Rolling Hills, CA, (Liu). The project has been determined to be categorically exempt (Class 3) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15303. B. ZONING CASE NO. 913, Request for Variances and Site Plan Review to construct a 72 square foot, maximum 8 -foot tall chicken coop within the "front yard" of the subject property, to exceed the previously approved lot disturbance to 66.1%, and to relocate a pool equipment area necessitating an up to 5' tall enclosure wall on a property with a restricted development condition imposed through a prior project. The subject property is at 10 Crest Road W. (Lot 2 -CH) Rolling Hills, CA, (Frykman). The project has been determined to be categorically exempt (Class 3) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15303. 5. ADJOURNMENT Documents pertaining to an agenda item received after the posting of the agenda are available for review in the City Clerk's office or at the meeting at which the item will be considered. -1- ter, al Rea, qd41 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No.: 4A -FT Mtg. Date: 11-15-16 TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING/ LOT SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: ZONING CASE NO. 912 3 CHUCKWAGON RD. (LOT 40-EF) RA -S-1 / 2.3 ACRES (GROSS) MR. AND MRS. STEPHEN LIU COMPASS LANDSCAPING INC. NOVEMBER 3, 2016 REQUEST AND RECOMMENDATION 1. Mr. and Mrs. Stephen Liu, owners of 3 Chuckwagon Road request a Site Plan Review for construction of a 228 square foot covered patio/deck that is to be 2.5 -feet maximum above grade. The structure is proposed to be located on a slope to the rear of the home and will be accessed from an existing pathway that is between upper and lower slopes. Minimal grading of 18 cubic yards will be required to construct the patio and two terraced 2.5 -foot tall retaining walls, with planter in between, to screen the out of grade condition of the patio. The applicant proposes to also build two on grade stairways, off decks at the back of the residence that will provide access down to the new deck as well. New irrigation and plants will be installed on the slope between the house and patio. 2. It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the staff report, view the project in the field, open the public hearing, accept public testimony and continue the meeting to the evening meeting. ZC NO. 912 3 Chuckwagon Rd. BACKGROUND 3. In 2013 the Planning Commission adopted Resolution 2013-07, approving a Site Plan Review for a new above grade deck and swimming pool and repair of an existing deck at approximately the same level as the residence. Resolution No. 2013-07 contains a "restricted development condition" that requires that any future structural development be subject to Planning Commission review and approval. Other improvements that were part of the 2013 project include a small addition, remodeling, and miscellaneous porches. 4. The property owners submitted the subject Site Plan Review application seeking approval to construct a 228 square foot seating patio at the base of a slope to the rear of the existing residence, a part of which is 2.5' out of grade. The floor of the seating area will be formed with softset flagstone with an open redwood trellis overhead. The entire structure will be no more than 8'2" tall, measured from the adjacent walkway. Below the seating area floor will be additional 2'6" tall retaining wall that will create a terraced planter with shrubs that would serve as a barrier protection for anyone standing on the patio. No other revisions to the most recent approval for this project (Resolution 2013-07) are proposed. 5. Residents within a 1,000 -foot radius of the property have been notified of this public hearing. 6. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as a "Class 3" exemption, qualifying as a small structure that is accessory to the existing residence. MUNICIPAL CODE COMPLIANCE 7. The seating patio will be located 74 feet from the rear property line, well outside the rear and side setbacks of 50 and 20 -feet, respectively. 8. The property is zoned RAS-1. The gross lot area is 2.3 acres or 100,188 sq.ft. The net lot area for development purposes is 85,412 square feet, (1.96 acres). The lot is irregular, long and narrow, somewhat triangular in shape with very long frontage (500 - ft) on Chuckwagon Road. The residential pad is approximately midway between the front and rear property lines at the lot's greatest depth. A future stable and corral pad has been approved to the west of the residence. A small third pad will be created to accommodate the proposed patio to the rear and below the residence. 9. As a result of the entitlements granted by Reso. 2013-07 the site is currently approved for: 5,291 square foot residence, 659 square foot attached garage, 472 square foot pool, 30 square foot pool equipment enclosure, 450 square foot (future) stable, 600 square feet porches, 314 square feet porte cochere, 476 square feet attached trellis, 2,753 square feet raised decks and a 150 square foot service yard. In addition the 2013 approvals permitted a set aside for a future stable and corral. The applicant is in the process of constructing the 2013 approved items. 10. The structural coverage for the project including the proposed seating patio will be 13.37% (20% max. permitted), and 19.6% for combined structural/flatwork (35% max. permitted). The disturbed area shall increase by .44% over the 2013 approved project to 33,692 square feet, or 39.44% (40% max. permitted). 11. With the project the site would have three separate pads: the residential pad, a future stable pad and the proposed seating patio pad. There will be no changes to the residential pad, which will remain approved for 60.8% coverage. The patio pad will be approximately 300 square feet with coverage estimated at 76%, (30% guideline). 12. The south side of the covered patio will be located in a relatively flat area adjacent to an existing pathway; whereas the north side will be out of grade. The project will not negatively impact existing drainage patterns or facilities. 13. When reviewing a site plan review application the Planning Commission should consider whether the proposed project is consistent with the criteria for Site Plan Review 14. The Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Committee will review the project at a later date. ZONING CASE NO. 912 REVIEW CRITERIA EXISTING/PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROPOSED RA -S-1 Zone Setbacks: Residence with accessory structures New covered patio/out off grade Front. 50 ft. from front easement Side: 20 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line Site Plan Review required if size of structure increases by up to 999 sq.ft. in a 36 -month period, decks, grading and certain accessory structures Residence 5291 sq.ft. Garage 659 sq.ft. Swim Pool /spa 472 sq.ft. Stable -Future 450 sq.ft. Service Yard 150 sq.ft. Pool eqp. 30 sq.ft. Att. porch 600 sq.ft. Att. Trellis 0 sq.ft. Porte cochere 314 sq.ft. Raised decks 2753 sq.ft. TOTAL 11,195 sq.ft. Residence 5291 sq.ft. Garage 659 sq.ft. Swim Pool /spa 472 sq.ft. Stable -Future 450 sq.ft. Service Yard 150 sq.ft. Pool eqp. 30 sq.ft. Att. porch 600 sq.ft. Att. Trellis 0 sq.ft. Porte cochere 314 sq.ft. Raised decks 2753 sq.ft. New deck 228 sq.ft. TOTAL 11,423 sq.ft. Structural Lot Coverage (20% maximum) 13.1 % of 85,412 s.f. net lot area. 13.4% of 85,412 s.f. net lot area. Total Lot Coverage (35% maximum) 19.6% (16,737 sq.ft.) 19.9% (16,965 sq.ft.) Building Pad Coverage (30% maximum -guideline) Stable New deck 60.8% on 16,013 sq.ft. pad 45% -Future 60.8% on 16,013 sq.ft. pad 45% -Future 76% of 300 sq.ft. pad Grading 272 c.y. cut/excavation and 272 c.y. fill. Area for stable, if 18 cubic yards constructed, would require apprx. 275 c.y. cut and 275 c.y. fill Disturbed Area (40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist. Roadway Access Access to Stable 39.0 %, with future stable corral and access Existing from Chuckwagon From drwy off of Chuckwagon Road Planning Commission review Planning Commission review Preserve Views Preserve Plants and Animals 39.44%, with future stable corral and access Existing from Chuckwagon From drwy off of Chuckwagon Road Planning Commission review Planning Commission review SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA 17.46.010 Purpose. The site plan review process is established to provide discretionary review of certain development projects in the City for the purposcs of ensuring that the proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan; incorporates environmentally and aesthetically sensitive grading practices; preserves existing mature vegetation; is compatible and consistent with the scale, massing and development pattern in the immediate project vicinity; and otherwise preserves and protects the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Rolling Hills. 17.46.050 Required findings. A. The Commission shall be required to make findings in acting to approve, conditionally approve, or deny a site plan review application. B. No project which requires site plan review approval shall be approved by the Commission, or by the City Council on appeal, unless the following findings can be made: I. The project complies with and is consistent with the goals and policies of the general plan and all requirements of the zoning ordinance; 2. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. Lot coverage requirements are regarded as maximums, and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted depends upon the existing buildable area of the lot; 3. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences; 4. The project preserves and integrates into the site design, to the greatest extent possible, existing topographic features of the site, including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls); 5. Grading has been designed to follow natural contours of the site and to minimize the amount of grading required to create the building area; 6. Grading will not modify existing drainage channels nor redirect drainage flow, unless such flow is redirected into an existing drainage course; 7. The project preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees and supplements these elements with drought -tolerant landscaping which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and landscaping provides a buffer or transition area between private and public areas; 8. The project is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenient and safe movement of pedestrians and vehicles; and 9. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 TO: FROM: NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No.: 4B -FT Mtg. Date: 11-15-16 HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING/ LOT SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: ZONING CASE NO. 913 10 CREST RD. E. (LOT 2 -CH) RA -S-1 / 2.3 ACRES (GROSS) MR. AND MRS. KARL FRYICMAN BOLTON ENGINEERING NOVEMBER 3, 2016 REQUEST AND RECOMMENDATION 1. Mr. and Mrs. Karl Frykman of 10 Crest Road East request Variances to construct a 72 square foot chicken coop and to exceed disturbance on the lot. The applicants also propose to relocate and slightly enlarge a pool equipment enclosure with a 5' wall, requiring a Site Plan Review. The chicken coop is proposed to be within the "front yard" of the lot and with the new structures the lot disturbance will increase by 625 square feet and by 1.53% beyond the amount granted in a prior Variance request. Also proposed are two short walls (not exceed 2' in height) in the area of the chicken coop to accomplish a flat area. It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the staff report, view the project in the field, open the public hearing, accept public testimony and continue the meeting to the evening meeting. BACKGROUND 2. Resolution No. 2014-21 contains a "restricted development condition" that requires that any future structural addition, except small minor amenities, be subject to Planning Commission review. Although minor in nature, the proposed development does not qualify to be exempt from the restricted development condition, per RHMC ZC NO. 913 10 Crest Rd. W. 17.46.040.C.1 on the basis that it triggers a variance and the pool equipment wall is over 3 feet in height. The previously approved pool equipment structure is proposed to be enlarged by 10 square feet (100 square feet total) and moved slightly, from adjacent to the home to the west property line. The enclosure walls will be set into a slope and will be 5' high at the highest point. 3. In 2014 (Zoning Case 860) the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2014- 21, approving a Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit and Variances to allow construction of a stable within the front yard, corral in the front setback, swimming pool and wall in the rear setback, and related grading at the subject property. One of the approved Variances permitted the applicant to increase the amount of disturbed area beyond the maximum 40% allowed to 64.6% due to project related grading. 4. The property owners submitted the subject application for two new Variances and SPR related to construction of a 72 square foot chicken coop and relocation of the pool equipment area. It is proposed that the coop be built within the "front yard" of the property, between the front roadway easement and front building wall of the residence, which triggers the first Variance. As a result of the coop and pool equipment construction, the disturbed area will be increased by 1.53%, to 66.1%, which triggers the second Variance. No other revisions to the effective approval for this project (Resolution 2014-21) are proposed. 5. The proposed project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as a "Class 3" exemption, qualifying as a small structure that is accessory to the existing residence. MUNICIPAL CODE COMPLIANCE 6. The property is zoned RAS-1. The gross lot area is 2.3 acres or 100,188 sq.ft. The net lot area for development purposes is 40,914 square feet, (.93 acres). The topography slopes gently up from Crest Rd. The existing home is at the rear of the lot, partially within the rear setback. 7. As a result of the entitlements granted by Reso. 2014-21, the site is currently approved for: 4,385 square foot residence, 750 square foot attached garage, 1,104 square foot pool (within the rear setback), 90 square foot pool equipment 735 square foot stable (within front yard), 234 square feet of porches, 227 square feet detached trellis, 195 square feet of attached trellis, 32 square feet of barbeque, a 192 square foot deck and a 90 square foot service yard. In addition, the 2014 approvals permitted a 2,700 square foot corral, within the front yard. 8. The structural coverage for the project including the proposed coop and pool equipment structure will be 18.7%, (20% max. permitted) with allowed deductions and 32.85% for combined structural/flatwork (35% max. permitted), excluding deductions. The disturbed area shall increase by 1.53% over the 2014 approved Variance, 27,046 square feet, or 66.1% (40% max. permitted). 9. The residential building pad for the property contains 11,050 square feet. With the proposed pool equipment structure, the total residential pad coverage will be 58.1%. With the proposed coop, the stable pad (1,371 square feet) will have 70.57% coverage. The proposed pool equipment enclosure is in compliance with all criteria required of a "minor amenity" pursuant to the zoning code and therefore, subject to Commission concurrence, is exempt from the restricted development condition applicable to this site. 10. When reviewing this application, the Planning Commission should consider whether the application meets the criteria for granting variances and site plan review. The applicant's representative has stated that approval of the requested variances is justified due to the location of the home towards the rear of the lot, which results in an unusually deep "front yard". 11. Very minor new grading is proposed -10 cubic yards. The coop will be located on a relatively flat area near the future stable, requiring minor new disturbance and the pool equipment structure, to be located near the residence adjacent to the side setback will also require minor additional grading 12. The Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Committee will review the project at a later date. CRITERIA FOR VARIANCES 17.38.050 Required findings. In granting a variance, the Commission (and Council on appeal) must make the following findings: A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone; B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question; C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; E. That the variance does not grant special privilege to the applicant; F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and G. That the variance request is consistent with the general plan of the City of Rolling Hills. SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA 17.46.010 Purpose. The site plan review process is established to provide discretionary review of certain development projects in the City for the purposes of ensuring that the proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan; incorporates environmentally and aesthetically sensitive grading practices; preserves existing mature vegetation; is compatible and consistent with the scale, massing and development pattern in the immediate project vicinity; and otherwise preserves and protects the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Rolling Hills. 17.46.050 Required findings. A. The Commission shall be required to make findings in acting to approve; conditionally approve, or deny a site plan review application. B. No project which requires site plan review approval shall be approved by the Commission, or by the City Council on appeal, unless the following findings can be made: 1. The project complies with and is consistent with the goals and policies of the general plan and all requirements of the zoning ordinance; 2. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. Lot coverage requirements are regarded as maximums, and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted depends upon the existing buildable area of the lot; 3. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences; 4. The project preserves and integrates into the site design, to the greatest extent possible, existing topographic features of the site, including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls); 5. Grading has been designed to follow natural contours of the site and to minimize the amount of grading required to create the building area; 6. Grading will not modify existing drainage channels nor redirect drainage flow, unless such flow is redirected into an existing drainage course; 7. The project preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees and supplements these elements with drought -tolerant landscaping which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and landscaping provides a buffer or transition area between private and public areas; 8. The project is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenient and safe movement of pedestrians and vehicles; and 9. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. SOURCE: City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance ZONING CASE NO. 913 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PROPOSED RA -S-1 ZONE SETBACKS RESIDENCE , STABLE SWIMMING POOL, CORRAL CHICKEN COOP & POOL EQUIPMENT Front 50 ft. front easement line Side: 20 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line Site Plan Review required for new structures, grading, pool greater than 800 sq.ft. CUP for stable and corral. Variances for lot disturbance, setback and yard area encroachment & existing trellis. Residence Garage Stable Service Pool/spa Pool eqpm. Porches Trellis attch. Trellis det. Bbq 4385 sq.ft 750 sq.ft 735 sq.ft. 90 sq.ft 1104 sq.ft. 90 sq.ft. 234 sq.ft 227 sq.ft. 195 sq.ft 32 sq.ft. Residence Garage Stable Service Pool/spa Pool eqpm. Porches Trellis det. Trellis attch. Bbq Chicken coop 4385 sq.ft 750 sq.ft 735 sq.ft. 90 sq.ft 1104 sq.ft. 100 sq.ft. 234 sq.ft 227 sq.ft. 195 sq.ft 32 sq.ft. 72 sq.ft. TOTAL 7,842 sq.ft TOTAL 7,924 sq.ft. STRUCTURAL LOT 7,684 sq. ft. or 18.5% of 40,914 sq.ft. net lot area (excl. allowed deductions) 7,665 sq. ft. or 18.73% of 40,914 sq.ft. net lot area (excl. allowed deductions) COVERAGE (20% maximum) TOTAL LOT COVERAGE 13,359 sq. ft. or 32.65% of 40,914 sq.ft. net lot area (excl. deduct.) 13,441 sq. ft. or 32.85% of 40,914 sq.ft. net lot area (excl. deduct.) (35% maximum) BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 11,050 sq.ft. pad, 58.1% including pool 1,371 sq.ft.pad, 65.3% (w/ deductions) 11,050 sq.ft. pad, 58.2% including pool 1,371 sq.ft.pad, 70.5% (w/ deductions) RESIDENTIAL (30% maximum guideline) STABLE GRADING 785 cubic yards total; 345 c.y. stable; 440 c.y. including excavation and re- compaction 250 c.y. export from the pool 10 cubic yards Site plan review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof is more than 3 feet in depth and covers more than 2,000 sq. ft. balanced on site DISTURBED AREA 26,421 sq.ft. or 64.6% of 40,914 sq.ft net lot area 27,046 sq.ft. or 66.1% of 40,914 sq.ft. net lot area (40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist.) STABLE (minimum 450 sq. ft.) 1,188 sq.ft. 2 -story stable; 2,700 sq.ft. corral 1,188 sq.ft. 2 -story stable; 2,700 sq.ft. corral CORRAL (minimum 550 sq. ft.) STABLE ACCESS From existing drwy From existing drwy ACCESSWAY Existing from Crest W. Existing from Crest W. VIEWS N/A N/A PLANTS AND ANIMALS N/A N/A