Loading...
Planning Commission Meeting 03-15-2016CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL AND POSTING STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I am a citizen of the United States. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within proceeding; my business address is 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. On the I I " day of March, 2016, I serve the within Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Regular Meeting - 03/15/2016 a copy of which is annexed hereto and made a part hereof, on the person, or persons, named below by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Rolling Hills, California addressed as follows: Emailed MAILED DROPBOX DELIVERED Assistant City Manager RH ListSery NONE City Attorney Planning Commission Also posted at City Hall and at www.Rolling-Hills.org 1 certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the 1 I`" day of March 2016 at Rolling Hills, California. otetdAth Heidi Luce City Clerk a MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS MARCH 15, 2016 CALL MEETING TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rolling Hills was called to order by Chairman Chelf at 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday, March 15, 2016 in the City Council Chamber, at City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Commissioners Absent: Others Present: Cardenas, Gray, Kirkpatrick and Chairman Chelf. 'Arrived® 6:53 pm Commissioner Smith (excused). Yolanta Schwartz, Planning Director. Raymond Cruz, City Manager. Natalie Karpeles, Assistant City Attorney. Wendy Starks, Associate Planner. Heidi Luce, City Clerk. Tavisha Nicholson, Bolton Engineering. Carole Hoffman, 3 Hillside Lane. Tony Inferrera, Architect. Robert Miller, 46 Eastfield Drive. Andy and Sarah Elkin, 2 Hillside Lane. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Approved as presented. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON MINUTES AND ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES February 16, 2016, Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission Commissioner Cardenas moved that the Planning Commission approve the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on February 16, 2016. Vice Chairman Gray seconded the motion, which carried without objection. February 16, 2016, Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission Vice Chairman Gray moved that the Planning Commission approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on February 16, 2016. Commissioner Cardenas seconded the motion, which carried without objection. RESOLUTIONS RESOLUTION NO. 2016-06. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, SITE PLAN REVIEW AND VARIANCES FOR A NEW CABANA, GRADING, ABOVE GRADE DECK, RETAINING WALLS, POOL AND RELATED STRUCTURES AND FOR ENCROACHMENT WITH A PORTION OF THE RAISED DECK, WALLS, POOL EQUIPMENT AREA AND FIRE PLACE INTO THE REAR YARD SETBACK; TO RETAIN TWO EXISTING SHEDS, PORTION OF TRELLIS AND BARBEQUE IN THE REAR YARD Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting 03-15-16 SETBACK; TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBANCE AND TOTAL COVERAGE OF THE LOT AND TO SET ASIDE AN AREA FOR A FUTURE STABLE AND CORRAL IN THE FRONT YARD AREA OF THE LOT IN ZONING CASE NO. 893 AT 66 EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT 107-EF), (THOMAS). THE PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIROMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). Chairman Chelf introduced the item and asked for staff's comments. Planning Director Schwartz reviewed the applicant's request and stated that at its last meeting, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a Resolution granting approval of the applicant's request. She stated that staff was further asked to check with the Rolling Hills Community Association with regard to the sheds located in the side yard setback and easement and it was found that the RHCA did approve the location of the sheds subject to a condition that they be removed from the easement when the current property owner sells the property. She further stated that the Resolution is presented for consideration with the standard conditions including conditions that the pool be fenced and the pool equipment area be screened. Chairman Chelf called for public comment. Tavisha Nicholson, Bolton Engineering addressed the Planning Commission on behalf of the applicant offering to answer any questions. Vice Chairman Gray expressed his appreciation to the applicant for modifying the request based on the concerns raised by the Planning Commission but expressed further concem regarding the location of the sheds stating that he does not believe that there are extenuating circumstances that justify granting a Variance. He expressed further concern generally regarding the number of Variances being granted. He stated that he will likely support the Resolution even though he has reservations. Chairman Chelf suggested making it a condition of approval that the sheds be removed upon sale of the property. Chairman Chelf commented that the sheds could be moved elsewhere on the property to a location that would not require a Variance but they would be more visible. He stated that he feels the current location is the least offensive place to locate them. Commissioner Cardenas commented that the sheds are only a part of this project because they are existing non -compliant but he believes it is more a Rolling Hills Community Association issue. Following further discussion concerning the sheds, Commissioner Cardenas moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2016-06 granting approval of the applicant's request in Zoning Case No. 893 at 66 Eastfield Drive as amended to include language that the sheds be removed upon sale of the property. Chairman Chclf seconded the motion, which carried without objection. (Commissioners Kirkpatrick and Smith absent) RESOLUTION NO. 2016-05. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW RESIDENCE WITH TWO GARAGES, COVERED PORCHES, A SWIMMING POOL/SPA, KOI POND, KOI POND GAZEBO, VARIOUS HEIGHTS BUT NOT TO EXCEED 5' HIGH RETAINING WALLS AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS ACCESSORY STRUCTURES; AND VARIANCE TO ENCROACH' WITH A PORTION OF THE NEW RESIDENCE AND COVERED PORCHES INTO THE SIDE YARD SETBACK IN ZONING CASE NO. 894 AT 77 CREST ROAD EAST, (LOT 69 - Al -MS), (JANKOVICH). THE PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). Chairman Chelf introduced the item and asked for staffs comments. Planning Director Schwartz reviewed the applicant's request and stated that at its last meeting, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a Resolution granting approval of the applicant's request. She stated that at its last meeting having visited the site and at the request of a neighboring property, the Planning Commission asked that the pool equipment be moved. She noted that the applicant's representative has presented a revised plan to show the pool equipment in an alternate location. She further stated that the Resolution is presented for consideration with the standard conditions also including conditions that the pool be fenced and the pool equipment area be screened. Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting 03-15-16 Chairman Chelf called for public comment. Tavisha Nicholson, Bolton Engineering addressed the Planning Commission to further explain the applicant's request and offering to answer any questions. Commissioner Cardenas commented that he is supportive of the project recognizing that the applicant has addressed the issue regarding the location of the pool equipment. Vice Chairman Gray concurred. Vice Chairman Gray moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2016-05 granting approval of the applicant's request in Zoning Case No. 897 at 77 Crest Road East. Commissioner Cardenas seconded the motion, which carried without objection. (Commissioners Kirkpatrick and Smith absent) RESOLUTION NO. 2016-07. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT OF TWO LOTS AT 11 SADDLEBACK ROAD (APN: 7569-004-022) AND THE VACANT LOT SOUTH THEREOF (APN: 7569-004-023) TO CREATE ONE LOT IN ZONING CASE NO. 896-A, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2015-02, (WARREN). Chairman Chelf introduced the item and asked for staffs comments. Planning Director Schwartz stated that this item and the next item are both related to the project at 11 Saddleback Road where the Planning Commission previously directed staff to prepare a Resolution granting approval of the applicant's request. She stated that the second part of the application for a Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit and Variances is shown next on the agenda as a Public Hearing because the applicant has made revisions to the project. She stated that the first Resolution approving the Lot Line Adjustment merging the two lots is presented with the standard conditions. In response to Chairman Chelf, Planning Director Schwartz confirmed that the applicant would prefer that both items be considered simultaneously. Chairman Chelf then introduced the next item and asked for staffs comments. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON ITEMS CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS MEETING ZONING CASE NO. 896. Request for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a 13,860 square foot dressage arena, 2,415 square foot stable with a 625 square foot loft and 1,685 square foot corral; Site Plan Review for a 4,745 square foot residence, 659 square foot garage and ancillary structures, grading of 23,700 cubic yards cut and fill total, various walls, and swimming pool; and Variances to locate portions of the equestrian facilities in the front yard area of the lot and to exceed the maximum permitted lot disturbance at 11 Saddleback Road (Lots 48-RH 1 and 48- RH-2), (Warren). The project has been determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303 (New construction of single family residence and accessory structures), and Section 15061(6)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the CEQA Guidelines. AND CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL RESOLUTION NO. 2016-08. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, SITE PLAN REVIEW AND VARIANCES FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A DRESSAGE ARENA, STABLE WITH A LOFT AND CORRAL; A NEW RESIDENCE AND GARAGE, VARIOUS RETAINING WALLS, SWIMMING POOL AND RELATED PATIOS AND DECKS; TO LOCATE THE EQUESTRIAN FACILITIES IN THE FRONT YARD AREA OF THE LOT AND TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED LOT DISTURBANCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 896 AT 11 SADDLEBACK ROAD, (WARREN). Planning Director Schwartz reviewed the applicant's revised request stating that since the changes were mostly minor in nature, staff prepared a Resolution based on the Planning Commission's previous direction, granting approval of the revised request for the Planning Commission's consideration. She reviewed the lot configuration of the combined lots as well as the proposed new residence and garage including covered porches, a swimming pool and a stable. She stated that nothing has changed with regard to those structures but what has changed is the location and grading related to the proposed Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting 03-15-16 dressage arena. She noted that the dressage arena has been 13,860 sq. ft. with dimensions 70 ft. by 198 ft. She stated of the setback walls and a swale will be required. She currently proposed at 83% noting that the majority of the noted that the grading also increased to 23,700 cu. yds. - 10, with the remainder of the grading being for over excavation moved out of the setback and is proposed at that by moving the dressage arena back, out further reviewed the disturbance, which is disturbance is in the arca of the arena. She 620 cu. yds. of cut and 10,620 cu. yds. of fill and recompaction. Commissioner Kirkpatrick arrived and took his place at the dais. Planning Director Schwartz further reviewed the location of the access pathway from the stable to the arena noting that it has been moved further away from the pool area. She noted that the applicant also proposes to remove the concrete from the area around the stable and to create an access path off the existing driveway for vehicular and pedestrian access to the arena, which will be constructed of dirt or decomposed granite. Chairman Chelf called for public comment. Tavisha Nicholson, Bolton Engineering addressed the Planning Commission to further explain the revisions that have been made including the proposed arena and the need for the wall. Carole Hoffman, 3 Hillside Lane addressed the Planning Commission to suggest that the access pathway to the arena needs to be such that large vehicles can access the arena for maintenance purposes. Commissioner Kirkpatrick commented that he is supportive of the project given that the concerns raised previously have been addressed. Vice Chairman Gray expressed concern regarding the disturbance required to construct the arena. He reviewed the required finings stating that in his opinion, the project is not harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences given the extensive disturbance and the walls required to support the arena. He further stated that he feels there is too much grading and it changes the natural terrain of the lot; and this particular lot cannot accommodate that size of an arena given the walls necessary to retain it. Chairman Chclf commented that developing that area with a riding ring promotes equestrian use in the community and he is supportive of such uses. He commented that if the lot was left as a separate lot it could be developed with a house and other structures that would have more of an impact than the proposed arena. Commissioner Cardenas commented that he is also concerned about the additional grading but he is supportive of the changes that were made to move the access path away from the pool area and to move the arena further away from the house and accepts that the additional grading is necessary for those changes given that there are no structures being proposed on that portion of the lot. Further discussion ensued concerning the proposed dressage arena. Vice Chairman Gray commented that with 88% disturbance and the amount of dirt being moved and the changing of the terrain doesn't justify the findings. Following further discussion, Commissioner Cardenas moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2016-08 granting approval of the applicant's request in Zoning Case No. 896 at 11 Saddleback Road. Commissioner Kirkpatrick seconded the motion, which carried with Vice Chairman Gray opposed. Commissioner Cardenas moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2016-07 granting approval of the applicant's request for a Lot Line Adjustment in Zoning Case No. 896-A at II Saddleback Road. Commissioner Kirkpatrick seconded the motion, which carried without objection. Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting 03-15-16 ZONING CASE NO. 895. THE APPLICANT REQUESTED CONTINUANCE OF THIS CASE TO THE APRIL 19, 2016 PLANNING COMMISSION FIELD TRIP MEETING. Request for a Site Plan Review to construct a new residence and Variances in Zoning Case No. 895, at 10 Bowie Road, (Lot 4-CRA), Rolling Hills, CA (Pang Jui Yiu). At the request of the applicant, consideration of this item was continued to an adjoumed regular meeting of the Planning Commission scheduled to be held on Tuesday, April 19, 2016 beginning at approximately 8:00 a.m. for the purpose of conducting a site visit to 10 Bowie Road. ZONING CASE NO. 898. Request for a Site Plan Review to construct an 1,743 square foot addition, and Variances to encroach with 85 square feet of the addition 10 feet into the front yard setback, to retain a shed in side setback, and to exceed the maximum permitted disturbed area of the lot at 46 Eastfield, (Lot 97-EF), Rolling Hills, CA (Miller). The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1 exemption Guidelines. Chairman Chelf introduced the item and asked for staffs comments. Planning Director Schwartz reviewed the applicant's request in Zoning Case No. 898 at 46 Eastfield Drive stating that a photograph has been placed on the dais as further explanation regarding the addition. She further reviewed the changes that have been made to the project based on the concems raised by the Planning Commission regarding the roofline at the last meeting noting that the ridgeline is now proposed only I li. higher than the existing residence. She further stated that the applicant has also abandoned the request for the above grade deck resulting in the project having very little grading now. She stated that the current calculations show the house proposed at 3,986 sq. ft. but the applicant has indicated that they would like the house to be 4,000 sq. ft. so they will be adding the additional square footage to accomplish that objective. She further reviewed the other structures on the lot and the set -aside area for the a future stable and corral noting that the flat roof on the guest house will need to be changed to a pitched roof in order to be compliant. She further reviewed the coverages and grading. She noted that that applicant also proposes to retain an existing shed located partially in the setback. Chairman Chelf called for public comment. Anthony Inferrera, Architect addressed the Planning Commission on behalf of the applicant to further explain the applicant's request and the changes that were made. Robert Miller, 46 Eastfield Drive (applicant) addressed the Planning Commission to further explain the history of their property and the reasons for their proposed changes. Hearing no further public comment, Chairman Chelf asked for comments from the Planning Commission. Brief discussion ensued concerning the pitch of roof on the pool house and the ridgeline of the roof on the house. Commissioner Cardenas commented that from his standpoint, the issues expressed previously regarding the addition and the ridgeline of the house have been addressed. Vice Chairman Gray expressed appreciation to the applicant for making the changes and stated that the massing of the addition is better than previously proposed. Commissioner Kirkpatrick concurred. Following brief discussion, Commissioner Cardenas moved that the Planning Commission direct staff to prepare a Resolution granting approval of the applicant's request in Zoning Case No. 898 at 46 Eastfield Drive with the standard findings of fact and conditions of approval. Commissioner Kirkpatrick seconded the motion, which carried without objection. ZONING CASE NO. 897 -REVISED. Request for a Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit and Variances for grading for a new building pad, for walls over 3 feet in height, a pool, trellis, construction of an 800 square foot recreation room and to locate the pool, trellis and recreation room in the front yard area of the lot and to exceed the maximum permitted disturbance on the lot. Also proposed is an 800 square foot addition to the residence and widening of the driveway at Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting 03-15-16 r 2 Hillside Lane, (Lot 60-RH), Rolling Hills, CA. (Elkin). The project has been determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15303. Chairman Chelf introduced the item and asked for staffs comments. Planning Director Schwartz briefly reviewed the applicant's request and stated that at the field trip earlier in the day, the applicant's representative indicated that revised plans will be submitted to address the applicant's concerns regarding the project. Recognizing that the applicants and their representative were present and wishing to address the Planning Commission, Chairman Chelf called for public comments. Tavisha Nicholson addressed the Planning Commission to further explain the modifications that were discussed at the field trip to address the massing location. She asked for input from the Planning Commission with regard to the location of the recreation room and pool — specifically if the location as proposed in the front yard is acceptable. Carole Hoffman, 3 Hillside Lane addressed the Planning Commission stating that she submitted a letter expressing her concerns regarding the project. In response to Commissioner Cardenas regarding the impact of moving or shifting the pool house on the disturbance, Ms. Nicholson stated that there may be some additional disturbance to retain the 3:1 slopes. Commissioner Cardenas commented that he is not opposed to the location of the pool and cabana but he would like to see the grading and disturbance kept to a minimum. He noted that he would be willing to consider additional disturbance to move the cabana out of sight from the neighbor's perspective. He further commented that the stable access issue does need to be addressed but he sees options available to address that issue. Vice Chairman Gray and Commissioner Kirkpatrick concurred. Chairman Chelf commented that he is supportive of moving the structure out of the view and suggested moving it down a step or two. Following brief discussion, consideration of this item was continued to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission scheduled to be held on Tuesday, April 19, 2016 beginning at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber at Rolling Hills City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS None. SCHEDULE OF FIELD TRIPS The Planning Commission scheduled a field trip to the following properties to be conducted on Tuesday, April 19, 2016 beginning at 7:30 a.m. 71 Crest Road E. (new case proposing a trellis in the setback) 10 Bowie Road ITEMS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION Vice Chairman Gray noted for the record that he will be unable to attend the April Planning Commission meeting. ITEMS FROM STAFF Planning Director Schwarz reported that the City Council, at its last meeting, adopted an amended version of the Administrative Regulations Interpreting Measure B and reviewed the adopted provisions. She further reported that the City Council received and filed the Planning Commission Resolutions approving the projects at 17 Middleridge Lane North and 3 Eastfield Drive. Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting 03-15-I6" .. ADJOURNMENT Hearing no further business before the Commission, Chairman Chelf adjourned the meeting at 7:56 p.m. to an adjourned regular meeting of the Planning Commission scheduled to be held on Tuesday, April 19, 2016 beginning at 7:30 a.m. for the purpose of conducting field trips to 71 Crcst Road East and 10 Bowie Road. The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled to be held on Tuesday, April 19, 2016 beginning at 6:30 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, Rolling Hills City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. Respectfully submitted, *JAI bfA146 Heidi Luce City Clerk Approved, Brad C 1 Chaff an Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting 03-15-16 Thursday, March 10, 2016 4:00 PM Subject: March 15th Planning Commission Agenda Packets Available in Dropbox Date: Thursday, March 10, 2016 3:59 PM From: hluce@cityofrh.net <hluce@cityofrh.net> To: Yolanta Schwartz <ys@cityofrh.net>, Wendy Starks <wstarks@cityofrh.net>, "Natalie C. Karpeles" <NKarpeles@localgovlaw.com> Hello! The agendas and staff reports for the March 15th Planning Commission Field Trip and Meeting have been uploaded to Dropbox. You may access the files at the following link: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ilwdubnenw108213/FknK2rMiM6 Have a great weekend! Heidi Heidi Luce, CMC City Clerk/Executive Assistant City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 310-377-1521 Fax: 310-377-7288 www.Rolling-Hills.org This is a transmission from the City of Rolling Hills. The infomration contained in this email pertains to City business and is intended solely for the use of --- -the individual or entity to-whomwihisnddroccud.—lftho roader of this mossugo'ir not onintended mcipiont, or tho'employee or egentresponsible-for' delivering the message to the intended recipient and you have received this message in enor, please advise tho sender by reply email and delete the message. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted by e-mail. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The CITY OF ROLLING HILLS accepts no liability for any damage caused by any vials transmitted by this a -mail. Mr Ra latgice INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 6:30 PM TUESDAY, MARCH 15, 2016 ROLLING HILLS CITY HALL 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON MINUTES AND ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. February 16, 2016, Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission B. February 16, 2016, Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission 6. RESOLUTIONS A. RESOLUTION NO.2016-06. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, SITE PLAN REVIEW AND VARIANCES FOR A NEW CABANA, GRADING, ABOVE GRADE DECK, RETAINING WALLS, POOL AND RELATED STRUCTURES AND FOR ENCROACHMENT WITH A PORTION OF THE RAISED DECK, WALLS, POOL EQUIPMENT AREA AND FIRE PLACE INTO THE REAR YARD SETBACK; TO RETAIN TWO EXISTING SHEDS, PORTION OF TRELLIS AND BARBEQUE IN THE REAR YARD SETBACK; TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBANCE AND TOTAL COVERAGE OF THE LOT AND TO SET ASIDE AN AREA FOR A FUTURE STABLE AND CORRAL IN THE FRONT YARD AREA OF THE LOT IN ZONING CASE NO. 893 AT 66 EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT 107-EF), (THOMAS). THE PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIROMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). -1- B. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-05. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW RESIDENCE WITH TWO GARAGES, COVERED PORCHES, A SWIMMING POOL/SPA, KOI POND, KOI POND GAZEBO, VARIOUS HEIGHTS BUT NOT TO EXCEED 5' HIGH RETAINING WALLS AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS ACCESSORY STRUCTURES; AND VARIANCE TO ENCROACH WITH A PORTION OF THE NEW RESIDENCE AND COVERED PORCHES INTO THE SIDE YARD SETBACK IN ZONING CASE NO. 894 AT 77 CREST ROAD EAST, (LOT 69 - Al -MS), (JANKOVICH). THE PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). C. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-07. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT OF TWO LOTS AT 11 SADDLEBACK ROAD (APN: 7569-004-022) AND THE VACANT LOT SOUTH THEREOF (APN: 7569-004-023) TO CREATE ONE LOT IN ZONING CASE NO. 896-A, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2015-02, (WARREN). 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON ITEMS CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS MEETING A. ZONING CASE NO. 896. Request for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a 13,860 square foot dressage arena, 2,415 square foot stable with a 625 square foot loft and 1,685 square foot corral; Site Plan Review for a 4,745 square foot residence, 659 square foot garage and ancillary structures, grading of 23,700 cubic yards cut and fill total, various walls, and swimming pool; and Variances to locate portions of the equestrian facilities in the front yard area of the lot and to exceed the maximum permitted lot disturbance at 11 Saddleback Road (Lots 48-RH 1 and 48-RH-2), (Warren). The project has been determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303 (New construction of single family residence and accessory structures), and Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the CEQA Guidelines. AND CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL RESOLUTION NO. 2016-08. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, SITE PLAN REVIEW AND VARIANCES FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A DRESSAGE ARENA, STABLE WITH A LOFT AND CORRAL; A NEW RESIDENCE AND GARAGE, VARIOUS RETAINING WALLS, SWIMMING POOL AND RELATED PATIOS AND DECKS; TO LOCATE THE EQUESTRIAN FACILITIES IN THE FRONT YARD AREA OF THE LOT AND TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED LOT DISTURBANCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 896 AT 11 SADDLEBACK ROAD, (WARREN). B. ZONING CASE NO. 895. THE APPLICANT REQUESTED CONTINUANCE OF THIS CASE TO THE APRIL 19, 2016 PLANNING COMMISSION FIELD TRIP MEETING. -2- Request for a Site Plan Review to construct a new residence and Variances in Zoning Case No. 895, at 10 Bowie Road, (Lot 4-CRA), Rolling Hills, CA (Pang Jui Yiu). C. ZONING CASE NO. 898. Request for a Site Plan Review to construct an 1,743 square foot addition, and Variances to encroach with 85 square feet of the addition 10 feet into the front yard setback, to retain a shed in side setback, and to exceed the maximum permitted disturbed area of the lot at 46 Eastfield, (Lot 97-EF), Rolling Hills, CA (Miller). The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1 exemption Guidelines. D. ZONING CASE NO. 897 -REVISED. Request for a Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit and Variances for grading for a new building pad, for walls over 3 feet in height, a pool, trellis, construction of an 800 square foot recreation room and to locate the pool, trellis and recreation room in the front yard area of the lot and to exceed the maximum permitted disturbance on the lot. Also proposed is an 800 square foot addition to the residence and widening of the driveway at 2 Hillside Lane, (Lot 60-RH), Rolling Hills, CA. (Elkin). The project has been determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15303. 8. NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE 9. SCHEDULE OF FIELD TRIPS (April 19, 2016) 71 Crest Road E. 10 Bowie 10. ITEMS FROM STAFF 11. ITEMS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION 12. ADJOURNMENT In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting due to your disability, please contact the City Clerk at (310) 377-1521 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to enable the Cihy to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility and accommodation for your review of this agenda and attendance at this meeting. Documents pertaining to an agenda item received after the posting of the agenda are available for review in the City Clerk's office or at the meeting at which the item will be considered. -3- / A Agenda Item No: 5A Mtg. Date: 03-15-16 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 16, 2016 PRESENT: Chairman Chelf, Commissioners Cardenas, Gray, Kirkpatrick, and Smith Raymond Cruz, City Manager Yolanta Schwartz, Planning Director Wendy Starks, Associate Planner FIELD TRIP Chairman Chelf called the meeting to order at 7:30 a.m. at 46 Eastfield Drive. 10 BOWIE ROAD, ZONING CASE NO. 895. THE APPLICANT REQUESTED CONTINUANCE OF THIS CASE TO THE MARCH 15, 2016 PLANNING COMMISSION FIELD TRIP MEETING. A. ZONING CASE NO. 898. Request for a Site Plan Review to construct an 1,835 square foot addition and a raised deck, and a Variance to encroach with 150 square feet of the addition 10 feet into the front yard setback, to retain a shed in side setback and to exceed the maximum permitted disturbed area of the lot at 46 Eastfield, (Lot 97-EF), Rolling Hills, CA (Miller). The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1 exemption Guidelines. Also present for this field trip was: Anthony Inferrera, Architect Planning Director Schwartz reviewed the applicant's request for Site Plan Review and Variance and pointed out the setback at the front, the western side setback, and the rear setback, and to the existing legal non -conforming shed in the side setback the applicant is proposing to retain. Mr. Inferrera advised that the applicant recently moved it so it is no longer in the easement but it still remains in the setback. Director Schwartz pointed out the graded pad in the rear of the property where the future stable and corral are proposed. The group then walked towards the front of the property where the 1,635 square foot addition is proposed with 80 square feet of it to encroach into the front yard setback. It was noted that the addition would not be visible from the street or any neighbor due to the steep nature of the lot and the landscaping that screens it. Director Schwartz pointed out the flat roof on the existing guest house and advised that a Condition of Approval would be that the applicant ensure the roof on the previously constructed pool shelter/ guest house has been reconfigured and approved by the RHCA Architectural Committee in conjunction with obtaining building permits for the proposed project. Mr. Inferrera advised that the proposed deck was not staked and is being removed from this proposal and Director Schwartz advised that the disturbance will remain as is existing if the deck is no longer proposed. Commissioner Gray inquired about the height of the addition and Director Schwartz answered it is higher than the existing roofline. The architect stated that the span is bigger. Discussion ensued about the height of the addition in the front and whether it needs to be so much higher than the existing house. Commissioner Gray stated that the way the project is staked it may not work when it goes to construction and the applicant may have to revise the ridgeline. The group then proceeded to the rear of the property where the 150 square foot addition is proposed, but was not silhouetted. Commissioner Smith inquired about the roofline as it was not staked and Director Schwartz advised it would likely require an 18 -inch eave. There was concern expressed about whether this addition will accommodate a 4 -foot walkway around the house. Commissioner Cardenas asked whether the utility shed attached to the house, which houses a tankless water heater, will be relocated and where. Director Schwartz advised that it should be shown on the plans. B. ZONING CASE NO. 894. Request for a Site Plan Review to construct a new 6,631 square foot single family residence, 1,308 square foot garage, 1,781 square feet covered porches, 950 square foot swimming pool/spa, covered koi pond, various heights, but not to exceed 5' high retaining walls and other miscellaneous accessory structures; grading for the new development and modification to a previously approved corral area; and request for a Variance to encroach with 325 square feet of the new residence and covered patio into the side yard setback at 77 Crest Road East, (Lot 69 -A1 -MS), Rolling Hills, CA, (Jankovich). The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 exemption Guidelines. Also present for this field trip were: Tavisha Nicholson, Engineer Geoff Sumich, Designer Tom Jankovich, Property Owner Mary -Ann Jankovich, Property Owner Criss Gunderson, Architect and representative of 71 Crest Road East Planning Director Schwartz reviewed the request for Site Plan Review and Variance. Geoff Sumich presented a model of the proposed development for the Commission's review. Commissioner Smith had a question about the 3 large trees and the owners stated that they wish to retain them if possible. Criss Gunderson advised that while he is reporting back to his clients he does not foresee any objections or issues. In response to Commissioner Smith, Director Schwartz stated that a resident below, and one from across the canyon in Rancho Palos Verdes reviewed the plans and voiced no objections or concerns. In response to Chairman Chelf, Director Schwartz stated that the proposed development is not in an easement, but that a portion of the house and porches are in the side setback. Commissioner Smith inquired if the proposed house could be shifted out of the setback. Tavisha Nicholson illustrated how the eastern side setback is very steep and stated that the applicants prefer not to grade on that slope. Commissioner Chelf inquired about the walls and Tavisha Nicholson advised they are less than 3 feet, up to 5 feet, averaging 2.5 feet. Criss Gunderson inquired if there will be fill for the pool and Tavisha confirmed there would be with some cut being exported. Director Schwartz pointed out where the biofiltration unit is proposed. Director Schwartz pointed out the limits of grading on eastern side of the building pad. Criss Gunderson requested that the applicant consider relocating the pool equipment enclosure to the eastern side of the property overlooking the canyon to avoid potential noise to his client below. The group reviewed the previously approved stable area and the proposed modification to the 3' high wall, which is planned to be moved slightly to the north to allow the owners for a larger open area around the stable. Director Schwartz stated that the existing house could not be demolished prior to constructing the stable and the property owners confirmed this would not be an issue as they plan to reside in the existing home for at least a year. There being no further discussion, the public hearing was continued to the evening meeting of the Planning Commission at 6:30 PM. Respectfully Submitted, Yolanta Schwartz Date Planning Director Approved: Brad Chelf, Chairman Date n DRAFT Agenda Item No. 5-B Meeting Date: 03-15-16 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS FEBRUARY 16, 2016 CALL MEETING TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rolling Hills was called to order by Chairman Chelf at 6:32 p.m. on Tuesday, February 16, 2016 in the City Council Chamber, at City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Commissioners Absent: Others Present: Cardenas, Gray, Kirkpatrick, Smith and Chairman Chelf. None. Yolanta Schwartz, Planning Director. Natalie Karpeles, Assistant City Attorney. Heidi Luce, City Clerk. Wendy Starks, Associate Planner. Dave Dennee, 1 Lower Blackwater Canyon Road. Ben Cauthen, Cauthen Design Group. Tavisha Nicholson, Bolton Engineering. Tony Inferrera, Architect. Geoff Sumich, Designer. Andy and Sarah Elkin, 2 Hillside Lane. Scott Martin, Landscape Architect, The (W)orkshop. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA Approved as presented. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON MINUTES AND ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 19, 2016, Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting 02-16-16 DRAFT Commissioner Smith moved that the Planning Commission approve the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on January 19, 2016. Vice Chairman Gray seconded the motion, which carried without objection. January 19, 2016, Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission Commissioner Smith noted a typographical error in the minutes. Vice Chairman Gray moved that the Planning Commission approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on January 19, 2016 as corrected. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion, which carried without objection. RESOLUTIONS RESOLUTION NO. 2016-03. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A REQUEST TO REMOVE RESTRICTIVE DEVELOPMENT CONDITION FROM RESOLUTION NO. 2010-03 IN ZONING CASE NO 776 AT 1 LOWER BLACKWATER CANYON ROAD, (LOT 46-RH) (DENNEE). Commissioner Cardenas recused himself from consideration of this item due to the proximity of his property to the subject property and left the dais. Chairman Chelf introduced the item and asked for staff's comments. Planning Director Schwartz reviewed the applicant's request to remove the restrictive development condition from Resolution 2010-03 in Zoning Case No. 776 at 1 Lower Blackwater Canyon Road. She stated that at its last meeting the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a resolution granting approval of the applicant's request and the Resolution is presented for consideration. Chairman Chelf called for public comment. Hearing none, he asked for comments from the Planning Commission. Vice Chairman Gray moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2016-03 granting approval of the applicant's request to remove the restrictive development condition from Resolution No. 2010-03 in Zoning Case No. 776 at 1 Lower Blackwater Canyon Road. Commissioner Kirkpatrick seconded the motion, which carried without objection. Commissioner Cardenas returned to the dais. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-04. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR A DETACHED GARAGE, GRADING AND RETAINING WALLS; A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A DETACHED GARAGE; AND VARIANCES TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION TO THE RESIDENCE IN THE FRONT SETBACK, A ONE -CAR PARKING PAD LESS THAN 30 FEET FROM THE ROADWAY EASEMENT LINE, FOR GARAGE AND WALL ENCROACHMENT INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK, FOR OUT OF GRADE CONDITION OF THE GARAGE, WALLS THAT DO NOT AVERAGE OUT TO 2.5 - FEET, TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED STRUCTURAL AND TOTAL COVERAGE AND THE DISTURBED AREA OF THE LOT, IN ZONING CASE NO. 892, AT 3 EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT 58-EF), (BENNETT). PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting 02-16-16 DRAFT Chairman Chelf introduced the item and asked for staff's comments. Planning Director Schwartz reviewed the applicant's request in Zoning Case No. 892 at 3 Eastfield Drive. She stated that during the site visit prior to the last meeting, it was noticed that there was an existing out of grade condition near the corner of the garage that will remain with the new garage which was not shown on the original plan nor was it advertised as requiring a variance. She further stated that at its last meeting following discussion regarding the out of grade condition, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a resolution granting approval of the applicant's request as revised to address the Planning Commission's concerns regarding the out of grade condition of the garage. She reviewed the revised plan, which shows only 5 ft. of exposed wall and included the required 4 ft. walkway around the structure. She stated that the Resolution of Approval is presented for consideration. Chairman Chelf called for public comment. Ben Cauthen, Cauthen Design Group addressed the Planning Commission to express concern on behalf of the applicant regarding the fuel modification condition. Hearing no further public comment, Chairman Chelf asked for comments from the Planning Commission. Commissioner Smith expressed concern regarding the project stating that while she understands the constraints on the lot, she still feels the lot is overdeveloped and the location for the future stable and corral is not feasible. Following brief discussion, Vice Chairman Gray moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2016-04 granting approval of the applicant's request in Zoning Case No. 892 at 3 Eastfield Drive. Commissioner Cardenas seconded the motion, which carried with Commissioner Smith abstaining. ZONING CASE NO. 896-A. THE APPLICANT REQUESTED CONTINUANCE OF THIS CASE TO THE MARCH 15, 2016 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Request for a Lot Line Adjustment of two lots at 11 Saddleback Road (Lots 48-RH 1 and 48-RH-2), (Warren). ZONING CASE NO. 896. THE APPLICANT REQUESTED CONTINUANCE OF THIS CASE TO THE MARCH 15, 2016 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. Request for a Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review and Variances at 11 Saddleback Road (Lots 48-RH 1 and 48-RH-2), (Warren). At the request of the applicant, consideration of this item was continued to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission scheduled to be held on Tuesday, March 15, 2016 beginning at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber at Rolling Hills City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-02. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR A SUBSTANTIAL ADDITION, GRADING, SWIMMING POOL, PORCH, AND WALLS AND VARIANCES FOR ENCROACHMENT WITH PORTIONS OF THE ADDITIONS, WALLS Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting 02-16-16 DRAFT AND A LIGHTWELL INTO SETBACKS, TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBED AREA OF THE LOT AND TO EXCEED 2.5' AVERAGE HEIGHT OF WALLS IN ZONING CASE NO. 888 AT 17 MIDDLERIDGE LANE NORTH, (LOT 5 -MR), IN THE OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT-OZD-1, (POST). PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). Chairman Chelf introduced the item and asked for staff's comments. Planning Director Schwartz reviewed the applicant's request in Zoning Case No. 888 at 17 Middleridge Lane North. She stated that at its October meeting after visiting the site and discussing the project the Planning Commission asked the applicant to revise the project to move one of the additions out of the setback as much as possible to meet the line of the existing encroachment so that the wall is not in the easement and to address the issue at the rear of the property where there were proposed three step down walls to the lower pad for the pool. She further stated that at its last meeting the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a resolution granting approval of the applicant's request subject to the modifications to address the Planning Commission's concerns. She further reviewed the applicant's revised request and stated that the Resolution of Approval based on the revised application is presented for consideration. Chairman Chelf called for public comment. Tavisha Nicholson, Bolton Engineering addressed the Planning Commission offering to answer any questions the Planning Commission may have. Hearing no further public comment, Chairman Chelf asked for comments from the Planning Commission. Commissioner Kirkpatrick and Commissioner Cardenas commented that they are appreciative to the applicant for making the suggested revisions and they are okay with the current proposal. Commissioner Cardenas further commented that he feels the project is consistent with the other development on the street. Vice Chairman Gray stated for the record that he listened to the audio recording from the previous meeting and visited the site again. He stated that he is not comfortable with the further encroachment into the front yard setback and he feels there is too much on the building site. Discussion ensued concerning the front yard encroachment and the constraints on that particular street. Planning Director Schwartz provided again the aerial photograph showing the encroachment of the other properties on the street. Vice Chairman Gray expressed further concern regarding the number of variances requested. Commissioner Smith stated that she is concerned about the lot coverage, disturbance and the development over the canyon. She further stated that she does not feel the project is harmonious in scale with the site. Following discussion, Commissioner Kirkpatrick moved that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2016-02 granting approval of the applicant's request in Zoning Case No. 888 at 17 Middleridge Lane North. Commissioner Cardenas seconded the motion, which carried with Commissioner Smith and Vice Chairman Gray opposed. Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting 02-16-16 DRAFT PUBLIC HEARINGS ON ITEMS CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS MEETING ZONING CASE NO. 895. THE APPLICANT REQUESTED CONTINUANCE OF THIS CASE TO THE MARCH 15, 2016 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. Request for a Site Plan Review to construct a new residence and Variances in Zoning Case No. 895, at 10 Bowie Road, (Lot 4-CRA), Rolling Hills, CA (Pang Jui Yiu). At the request of the applicant, consideration of this item was continued to an adjourned regular meeting of the Planning Commission scheduled to be held on Tuesday, March 15, 2016 beginning at approximately 8:00 a.m. for the purpose of conducting a site visit to 10 Bowie Road. ZONING CASE NO. 893. Request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Site Plan Review and Variances for a new 475 square foot cabana, grading, above grade deck, walls, swimming pool and related structures and for encroachment with a portion of the deck, walls, pool equipment area and fire place into the rear yard setback; to retain two existing sheds, trellis and barbeque in the rear yard setback; to exceed the maximum permitted disturbance of the lot; to exceed the maximum permitted total coverage of the lot and to set aside an area for a future stable and corral in the front yard area of the lot in Zoning Case No. 893, at 66 Eastfield Drive, (Lot 107-EF), Rolling Hills, CA, (Thomas). The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 exemption Guidelines. Chairman Chelf introduced the item and asked for staffs comments. Planning Director Schwartz reviewed the applicant's request as revised since the last meeting to address the Planning Commission's concerns. She stated that the applicant is also requesting to retain two existing sheds, which are located in the easement as well as a trellis and barbeque in the rear yard setback. Chairman Chelf called for public comment. Tavisha Nicholson, Bolton Engineering addressed the Planning Commission to further explain the applicant's request. Hearing no further public comment, Chairman Chelf asked for comments from the Planning Commission. Commissioner Cardenas commented that he is not comfortable approving anything in an easement but given that the neighbors have not raised any issues, he would be inclined to approve it. He further stated that otherwise, he is satisfied with changes that the applicant made and feels as though the concerns raised have been addressed. Commissioner Smith commented that she appreciates the modifications that the applicant made and she feels that this is a very difficult lot. Commissioner Kirkpatrick commented that he too appreciates the modifications that the applicant made and feels that the concerns have been mitigated. Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting 02-16-16 c� DRAFT Vice Chairman Gray commented that he is concemed with the project because of the number of variances being requested. He stated that he feels the concems regarding the cabana have been addressed but he objects to the sheds in the easement. Discussion ensued concerning the sheds. Chairman Chelf commented that it was his understanding that the Rolling Hills Community Association approved the location of the sheds with a stipulation that the sheds be removed if the applicant were to move from this property. Further discussion ensued concerning the sheds. Following discussion, Commissioner Smith moved that the Planning Commission direct staff to prepare a Resolution granting approval of the applicant's request in Zoning Case No. 893 at 66 Eastfield Drive with the standard findings of fact and conditions of approval. Commissioner Kirkpatrick seconded the motion, which carried without objection. The Planning Commission directed staff to confirm the Rolling Hills Community Association's action with regard to the sheds. ZONING CASE NO. 898. Request for a Site Plan Review to construct an 1,835 square foot addition and a raised deck, and Variances to encroach with 150 square feet of the addition 10 feet into the front yard setback, to retain a shed and service yard in side setback, for a wall that does not average out to 2.5' in height and to exceed the maximum permitted disturbed area of the lot at 46 Eastfield, (Lot 97-EF), Rolling Hills, CA (Miller). The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1 exemption Guidelines. Chairman Chelf introduced the item and asked for staff's comments. Planning Director Schwartz reviewed the applicant's request for an 1,835 sq. ft addition at 46 Eastfield Drive and stated that the Planning Commission visited the site earlier in they day. She stated that the applicant originally submitted plans to include a raised deck and has since removed that part of the request. She further stated that the encroachment of the addition has been recalculated and it is approximately 80 sq. ft. She further reviewed the applicant's request and the conditions observed in the field. She stated that there will be no grading since the raised deck has been eliminated but the applicant will submit revised numbers. She further stated that the lot coverages on this project are all within the requirements, but the building pad coverage is proposed at 54.8%. She commented that at the field trip, concern was expressed about the height of the structure. Anthony Inferrera, Architect addressed the Planning Commission on behalf of the applicant to address the ridge height issue as well as the other issues raised. Vice Chairman Gray commented that he does not feel the addition is in keeping with the rest of the house. Commissioner Kirkpatrick commented that he is concerned about the massing but he feels that the architectural features are outside the Planning Commission's purview. Commissioner Smith commented that it struck her as a lot of mass and she is concerned that it does not meet the intent of the General Plan to keep things open and rural. Commissioner Cardenas commented that he is concerned about the excessive building pad coverage. Following discussion the applicant was asked to submit a revised plan to address the Planning Commission's concerns regarding the massing, the height and the ridgeline; as well as the other issues raised in the field. Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting 02-16-16 DRAFT ZONING CASE NO. 894. Request for a Site Plan Review to construct a new 6,631 square foot single family residence, 1,308 square foot garage, 1,781 square feet covered porches, 950 square foot swimming pool/spa, covered koi pond, various heights, but not to exceed 5' high retaining walls and other miscellaneous accessory structures; grading for the new development and modification to a previously approved corral area; and request for a Variance to encroach with 325 square feet of the new residence and covered patios into the side yard setback at 77 Crest Road East, (Lot 69 -Al -MS), Rolling Hills, CA, (Jankovich). The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 exemption Guidelines. Chairman Chelf introduced the item and asked for staff's comments. Planning Director Schwartz reviewed the applicant's request and stated that the Planning Commission visited the site earlier today. She stated that the project consists of a new 6,631 sq. ft. residence with two garages, a swimming pool, and covered koi pond. She reviewed the configuration of the lot and setbacks stating that the applicant is requesting a variance to encroach into the side yard setback with 325 sq. ft. of the residence and a portion of the covered patio. She noted that the existing home also encroaches into the side yard setback. She further stated that the Planning Commission previously approved a stable in the front yard area and as part of this application, the applicant proposes to move a portion of the wall that was part of that project further to the East to provide more room around the stable. She stated that during the field trip, the neighbor's architect requested that the pool equipment be moved and the engineer for this project has submitted a revised plan to show the pool equipment being removed from the southern side and moved to the eastern side to address the neighbor's concerns. She further reviewed the drainage plan, which includes a biofiltration unit to collect and dissipate the water from the site based on the stormwater management requirements. She further reviewed the coverages and proposed grading as well as the proposed driveway and turnaround. Chairman Chelf called for public comment. Tavisha Nicholson, Bolton Engineering addressed the Planning Commission to further explain the revisions that were made. Geoff Sumich addressed the Planning Commission offering to answer any questions Hearing no further public comment, Chairman Chelf asked for comments from the Planning Commission. Following brief discussion, Commissioner Cardenas moved that the Planning Commission direct staff to prepare a Resolution granting approval of the applicant's request in Zoning Case No. 894 at 77 Crest Road East with the standard findings of fact and conditions of approval. Commissioner Kirkpatrick seconded the motion, which carried without objection. NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS ZONING CASE NO. 897. Request for a Site Plan Review for grading, retaining walls over 3 feet in height, swimming pool and miscellaneous structures; Conditional Use Permit for a pool Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting 02-16-16 DRAFT house, and Variances to locate the pool and pool house in the front yard of the lot, and to exceed maximum disturbance of the lot in Zoning Case No. 897 at 2 Hillside Lane, (Lot 60-RH), Rolling Hills, CA (Elkin). The project has been determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15303. Chairman Chelf introduced the item and asked for staff's comments. Planning Director Schwartz reviewed the applicant's request in Zoning Case No. 897 at 2 Hillside Lane. She reviewed the configuration of the lot and stated that the applicant proposes an 800 sq. ft. addition to the rear of the residence; a 470 sq. ft. cabana; a 680 sq. ft. swimming pool and 72 sq. ft. spa with a trellis and decking and walls that flank the pool area. She stated that a variance is also being requested to locate the pool and other structures in the front yard area. She stated that there currently exists on the property a two- story stable where the second story is being used as livable area, which will have to be converted back to a stable per the requirements of the Stable Ordinance. She further reviewed the proposed grading, disturbance and structural coverage. She stated that an adjacent property owner has expressed concern regarding the widening of the driveway and staff will be working with the applicant's representative to confirm the location of the property line. Chairman Chelf called for public comment. Andy Elkin, 2 Hillside Lane (property owner) addressed the Planning Commission to introduce himself and his wife Sarah and further explain their request. Scott Martin, Landscape Architect, The (W)orkshop addressed the Planning Commission to further explain the applicant's request. Following staff's presentation and public testimony, the members of the Planning Commission determined that a site visit should be scheduled to provide the members of the Planning Commission with further understanding of the applicant's request in Zoning Case No. 897 at 2 Hillside Lane. The public hearing was continued. SCHEDULE OF FIELD TRIPS The Planning Commission scheduled a field trip to the following properties to be conducted on Tuesday, March 15, 2016 beginning at 7:30 a.m. 2 Hillside Lane 10 Bowie Road ITEMS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION None. ITEMS FROM STAFF Planning Director Schwartz reviewed the status of the View Ordinance amendment, Measure B Interpretation, and the appeal of the CTV resolution, which are currently before the City Council. Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting 02-16-16 DRAFT ADJOURNMENT Hearing no further business before the Commission, Chairman Chelf adjourned the meeting at 8:36 p.m. to an adjourned regular meeting of the Planning Commission scheduled to be held on Tuesday, March 15, 2016 beginning at 7:30 a.m. for the purpose of conducting field trips to 2 Hillside Lane and 10 Bowie Road. The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission is scheduled to be held on Tuesday, March 15, 2016 beginning at 6:30 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, Rolling Hills City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. Respectfully submitted, Heidi Luce City Clerk Approved, Brad Chelf Chairman Minutes Planning Commission Regular Meeting 02-16-16 TO: cat, oveffin, fi/h INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 FROM: APPLICATION NO: SITE LOCATION: ZONING/LOT SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 3777288 Agenda Item No.: 6A Mtg. Date: 3-15-16 HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR ZONING CASE NO. 893 66 EASTFIELD DRIVE (LOT 107-EF) RA -S-1, 1.3 ACRES GROSS TOM AND DEBI THOMAS TAVISHA NICHOLSON, BOLTON ENGINEERING NOVEMBER 5, 2015 AND FEBRUARY 4, 2016 REQUEST AND RECOMMENDATION 1. The applicants Mr. and Mrs. Thomas request 1) Conditional Use Permit to construct a 475 square foot cabana; 2) Site Plan Review for the cabana, for 1,450 square foot pool deck, for higher that 3' retaining walls and grading consisting of 565 cubic yards of dirt, plus additional 180 cubic yards if a stable is constructed in the future; 3) Variances to encroach with a portion (310 sq.ft.) of the raised deck, retaining walls, pool equipment area and fire place into the rear yard setback; to retain two previously constructed sheds, a portion of a trellis and barbeque in the rear yard setback; to exceed the maximum permitted disturbance of the lot; to exceed the maximum permitted total coverage of the lot and to set aside an area for a future stable and corral in the front yard area of the lot. 2. At the February 16, 2016 Planning Commission meeting, by a 5-0 vote the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a Resolution approving the project subject to a revised design that was presented during that meeting that shows the following revisions: The height of the cabana has decreased from 13'10. 5" in height with a proposed out -of -grade condition of 5' to a revised 12'10" in height with the out -of -grade condition now 4' maximum at the northwest corner, with an average of less than 2.5' in height. The roofline has been revised from a shed roof to a gable roof. ZC No. 893 0 Printed on Recycled Paper The pool pad has been "dropped down" by 6" over the entire site, thus reducing the height of retaining walls, and allowing the overall height of the cabana to be reduced. -A planter is proposed beyond the cabana to soften the visual impact of the cabana. The Planning Commission also requested that staff find out whether any conditions were placed on the project by the RHCA in regards to the sheds. The RHCA Board approved a license agreement to allow two sheds to remain partially in the Association easement (and therefore in the side setback) until such time as the property is sold. 3. It is recommended that the Planning Commission review and consider the attached Resolution 2016-06 for adoption, which includes a condition that upon the sale of the property the sheds will be removed. ZC No. 893 RESOLUTION NO. 2016-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, SITE PLAN REVIEW AND VARIANCES FOR A NEW CABANA, GRADING, ABOVE GRADE DECK, RETAINING WALLS, POOL AND RELATED STRUCTURES AND FOR ENCROACHMENT WITH A PORTION OF THE RAISED DECK, WALLS, POOL EQUIPMENT AREA AND FIRE PLACE INTO THE REAR YARD SETBACK; TO RETAIN TWO EXISTING SHEDS, PORTION OF TRELLIS AND BARBEQUE IN THE REAR YARD SETBACK; TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBANCE OF THE LOT AND TOTAL COVERAGE OF THE LOT AND TO SET ASIDE AN AREA FOR A FUTURE STABLE AND CORRAL IN THE FRONT YARD AREA OF THE LOT AT 66 EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT 107-EF), (THOMAS). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Tom and Debi Thomas with respect to real property located at 66 Eastfield, (Lot 107-EF), Rolling Hills, CA requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a 475 square foot cabana; Site Plan Review for the cabana, for 1,450 square foot pool deck, for higher that 3' in height retaining walls and grading consisting of a total of 565 cubic yards of dirt, plus additional 180 cubic yards if a stable is constructed in the future; Variances to encroach with a portion (310 sq.ft.) of the raised deck, retaining walls, pool equipment area and fireplace into the rear yard setback; to retain two previously constructed sheds, a portion of a trellis and barbeque in the rear yard setback; to exceed the maximum permitted disturbance of the lot with 68.3% (maximum allowed is 40%); to exceed the maximum permitted total coverage of the lot with 43.2% (maximum allowed is 35%), and to set aside an area for a future stable and corral in the front yard area of the lot. Also proposed is a 632 square foot swimming pool with 100 square foot spa. Although the pool and spa would not require a discretionary permit and could be approved administratively, the grading for the location requires a Site Plan Review. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application on November 17, 2015, December 15, 2015, and February 16, 2016 at regular Planning Commission meetings, and in the field also on December 15, 2015. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants' representative was in attendance at the public hearings. No neighbors reviewed the plans before the meetings or attended the site visit. The Rolling Hills Community Association received a letter from the adjacent neighbor advising they have no objection to the applicant's Reso. 2016-06 66 Eastfield retaining the sheds in the rear easement and the RHCA Board granted the applicants a license agreement to retain the sheds in the easement until such time as the property sells. Section 3. The subject property, zoned RA -S-1, contains 1.3 acres gross and 44,563 square feet (1.02 acres) of net lot area. The property is developed with a 5,850 square foot residence with 680 square foot garage, 86 square foot entryway, water feature; 766 square foot detached trellis, barbeque, two -100 square foot each sheds and a service yard. The trellis, BBQ and sheds are non -permitted and 251 square foot of the trellis, the BBQ and sheds are located in the rear yard setback. The applicants wish to keep those structures on the property and are a part of this Resolution. Most of the garage and approximately 1,060 square feet of the residence is located in the rear yard setback, and are legal non -conforming. Section 4. The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 exemption Guidelines. Section 5. A Site Plan Review is required subject to Section 17.46.020 of the Zoning Ordinance, in that the proposed cabana, raised deck, and retaining walls are a structural addition. Further, the grading for these new structures require Site Plan Review. With respect to the Site Plan Review application for the cabana, deck, walls, and grading, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development is compliant with all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance except as approved herein a Variance, and is compatible with the General Plan and surrounding uses because the proposed project is consistent with goals and policies that require low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The cabana, pool, walls, and deck construction will be situated to ensure it is not obtrusive to neighbors, will be screened from view, and the pool equipment is located in an area that will not -be intrusive. The elevated out -of -grade condition and "bulk" of the new deck will be mitigated, by landscaping and retaining walls and separated by a 4' walkway. To address Planning Commissioner's concerns, the entire project was "dropped down" and softened with landscaping. B. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot because the required grading has been carefully considered, and the out -of -grade condition is being softened with walls and landscaping. The construction will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed improvements will be constructed on a portion of the lot which is least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with vegetation and is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the proposed project will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors. Reso. 2016-06 66 Eastfield 2 C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. The proposed project is consistent with the scale of homes in the surrounding RA -S-1 similarly zoned neighborhood. The proposed project entails construction of a cabana, pool, raised deck and retaining walls for the purpose of enhancing and facilitating outdoor living on the site, a common residential amenity enjoyed by property owners throughout the City. D. The development plan 'generally follows natural contours of the site to the maximum extent practicable to accomplish groomed and usable areas of the lot, subject to concurrent approval of Variances and a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Section 6 and 7 of this resolution. E. Natural drainage courses will not be affected by the project. Minimal grading is proposed and therefore existing drainage channels are not anticipated to be impacted. The project construction will not be located in a canyon or on existing slopes that exceed 25%. F. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because no change is proposed to the existing driveway, which is in compliance with applicable requirements. Section 6. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance granting relief from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property prevent the ownerfrom making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity or zone. In proposing to encroach with 310 square feet of raised deck, the retaining walls, pool equipment, and fireplace into the rear yard setback, and also to retain 2 sheds, a portion of the trellis and barbecue in the rear yard setback, Variances are required to grant relief from the following Sections of the Zoning Ordinance: 17.12.190 (setback definitions requiring that setbacks be free of structures) and 17.16.150 (Structures and driveways permitted in setbacks where the height of the proposed deck -greater than 12" above grade, and supporting retaining wall greater than 3', and 17.16.070 (maximum allowed lot coverage and disturbance) in which case the proposed total lot coverage and disturbance area would exceed the allowed amounts with an increases from 36.02% to 43.2% where 35% maximum is allowed for total lot coverage, and an increase from 54.5% to 68.3% where 40% maximum total lot coverage is allowed. Variance from Section 17.16.110 relating to the location of the future stable. and corral in the front yard setback is required. With respect to the aforementioned requests for Variances, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional circumstances and conditions on the subject property as follows: Reso. 2016-06 66 Eastfield Regarding requested variance from Zoning Ordinance Sections 17.16.150, and 17.16.070 relating to the encroachment of the structures in the rear yard setback and the height of the deck and projection into the setback for the proposed miscellaneous structures: the current residence is legal non -conforming, with a large portion of the residence including most of the garage being located in the rear yard setback creating a constraint on where outdoor livable area adjacent to the residence can be located. Previously constructed existing structures in the rear yard setback further constrain the lot and as a part of this Resolution, these structures will be legalized. The proposed structures common to residences in Rolling Hills are a pool, outdoor deck, and cabana, and this approval permits the applicants to enjoy the same amenities. Encroachment of the raised deck, existing trellis, and pool equipment into the rear yard setback would enable the property owners to construct a reasonably sized deck designed for outdoor living. The placement of the pool equipment in the rear yard setback keeps it away from all neighbors and allows for better screening. Retaining the two sheds has received approval from the RHCA. Regarding the requested variance from Section 17.16.070 for total lot coverage and disturbance limits, the project does not meet the total lot coverage requirement of 35% and is proposed at 43.2%which is an increase from the existing 36.0% which is legal non -conforming. The proposed structures increases disturbance area to 68.34%, including the future stable and corral which has a slope of 3:1 and the pool pad slopes will be 2:1. The lot coverage and disturbance exceedancc is due to the fact that with the house located in the rear of the lot there is a long and wide existing driveway leading to the residence, an area of which is calculated towards the total lot coverage. To accommodate the large driveway and the house in the rear, the lot was previously graded more than the maximum permitted of 40%; therefore any structural improvements cause those numbers to exceed the maximum permitted. Regarding the Variance from Section 17.16.110, relating to the location of the future stable and corral in the front yard setback, the existing residence is in the rear of the property leaving very few options other than to propose the stable and the corral in the front yard setback. B. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property owners in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied to the property in question by strict application of the code. The property right which otherwise would be enjoyed is the ability to utilize a portion of their rear yard with a sizeable deck, pool, and cabana to accommodate outdoor recreational use, including an cabana and pool, which currently can not be enjoyed due to the existing residence being so far towards the rear of the lot. The proposed location of the entire project - deck, cabana, and pool are the least visually intrusive to the property and its neighbors. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the properties or improvements in such vicinity and Reso. 2016-06 66 Eastfield zone in which the property is located in that the degree of deviation from the allowed amount of encroachment (310 square feet of the raised deck), a portion of the trellis, and the pool equipment is relatively minor. Further, the proposed patio would not be visible from the adjoining street or private properties and therefore is not expected to result in any visual or privacy impacts. D. In granting of the Variance the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance will be observed in that the proposed deck, cabana, and pool construction will be orderly, attractive, legalizes non -conforming uses on the property, and will not affect the rural character of the community. The subject proposed structures are in the rear of the property and will not impact the proposed future stable and corral area and the proposed deck, cabana, and pool will not impact use of the existing structures. E. The Variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The property is located above the adjacent property to rear and there is large open space between any structures on subject property to the adjacent property. F. The Variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los - Angeles Hazardous Waster Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. Section 7. Section 17.16.210(A)(2) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permits approval of a cabana under certain conditions, provided the Planning Commission approves a Conditional Use Permit. With respect to this request for a Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for the cabana would be consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan because the use is consistent with similar uses in the community, meets all the applicable development standards of the Zoning Ordinance and no deviations from the development standards are requested. B. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures have been considered, and the construction of a cabana will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the project is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the structure will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors. C. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain, and surrounding residences because it complies with the low profile residential development pattern of the community, and will be screened from neighbors' view. Reso. 2016-06 66 Eastfield 5 O D. The proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development standards of the zone district because the 475 square foot size of the cabana does not exceed the maximum permitted under the Municipal Code and it does not encroach into any setback areas and is not located in the front. E. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities because the project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. F. The proposed conditional use observes the spirit and intent of Title 17 of the Zoning Code because the proposed project meets all of the development standards of the Zoning Regulations and has a proposed stable, corral and access thereto. The construction of the project and the structure will not be obtrusive to neighbors. Section 8. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review, Variances, and Conditional Use Permit in Zoning Case No. 893 for new cabana, raised deck, pool, pool equipment, fireplace, and walls; to encroach with a portion (310 square feet) of the raised deck, retaining walls, pool equipment area, and fireplace into the rear yard setback; to exceed the maximum permitted total lot coverage and disturbance of the lot; and to retain and legalize two previously constructed sheds, a portion of a trellis, and barbecue in the rear yard setback, subject to the following conditions: A. The Site Plan, Variances, and Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to this approval has not commenced within that time period, as required by Sections 17.38.070(A) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, or the approval granted is otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of those sections. B. It is declared and made a condition of the approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the City has given the applicants written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. Reso. 2016-06 66 Eastfield 6 0 The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file dated February 10, 2016, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. The working drawings submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan approved with this application. A copy of the conditions of this Resolution shall be printed on plans approved when a building permit is issued and a copy of such approved plans, including conditions of approval, shall be available on the building site at all times. The licensed professional preparing construction plans for this project for Building Department review shall execute a Certificate affirming that the plans conform in all respects to this Resolution approving this project and including conformance with all of the conditions set forth therein and the City's Building Code and Zoning Ordinance. Further, the person obtaining a building permit for this project shall execute a Certificate of Construction stating that the project will be constructed according to this Resolution and any plans approved therewith. D. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modifications to the property or this project, which would constitute additional grading, height or any structural development including a trellis or other similar above ground structure shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. E. Grading for this project shall not exceed 320 cubic yards of cut, including 220 cubic yards from excavation of the pool; and 245 cubic yards of fill, for a total of 565 cubic yards of dirt, of which 75 will be exported from the pool excavation and 100 cubic yards, will be for overexcavation and recompaction. 180 cubic yards of dirt will be required for the future stable and corral area, when constructed. The grading will result in 2:1 slopes behind the pool and cabana. Some of the grading for the future stable shows the resulting slopes at 3:1. F. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 8,893 square feet, or 19.96%. Total lot coverage shall not exceed 43.2% or 19,263 square feet. Building Pad coverage on the 21,660 square foot residential pad shall not exceed 8,433 square feet or 39% coverage. Building pad coverage for the future stable will not exceed 450 square feet with 45% coverage. G. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 68.3% (of net lot area), which includes the future stable and corral area. H. The future set -aside area for the stable and corral area of 1,000 square feet, shall be retained on the property at all times. Reso. 2016-06 66 Eastfield 70 I. A minimum of four -foot level path and/or walkway, which does not have to be paved, shall be provided around the entire perimeter of the cabana, pool and decking. J. There shall be no sleeping quarters and temporary occupancy in the cabana. The cabana shall not exceed 475 square feet. All conditions of Section 17.16.210 A. (2) for a cabana shall apply. K. A drainage plan, as required by the Building Department shall be prepared and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of a construction permit. Such plan shall be subject to LA County Code requirements. L. The "as built" miscellaneous structures including 2 sheds, the trellis, fire place and barbecue that are in the rear yard setback shall be made legal and building permit obtained. M. The side and rear setback lines in the vicinity of the construction for this project shall remain staked throughout the construction. N. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, and objectionable odors shall be required. O. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby unimproved roadway easements, but not to obstruct neighboring driveways. During construction, to maximum extend feasible, employees of the contractor shall car-pool into the City. P. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. Q. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) requirements related to solid waste, drainage and storm water management and comply with the City's Low Impact development Ordinance (LID), if applicable. Further the property owners shall be required to conform to the County Health Department requirements for a septic system, should one be required for the cabana. ' Reso. 2016-06 66 Eastfield 8 R. A minimum of 50% of the construction material spoils shall be recycled and diverted. The hauler shall provide the appropriate documentation to the City. S. All graded areas shall be landscaped. In addition, the cabana and swimming pool shall be screened from the neighbors and a landscaping plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. If landscaping of 5,000 square foot area or greater is introduced or redevelop, the landscaping shall be subject to the requirements of the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Any plants introduced for this project shall not grow into a hedge but be off -set and shall not exceed the ridgeline of the cabana. The landscaping plan shall utilize to the maximum extent feasible, plants that are native to the area and are consistent with the rural character of the community. T. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA) Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permit. Perimeter easements and trails, if any, shall remain free and clear of any improvements including, but not be limited to fences -including construction fences, any hardscape, driveways, landscaping, irrigation and drainage devices, except as otherwise approved by the RHCA. U. The contractor shall not use tools that could produce a spark, including for clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning conditions. Weather conditions can be found at: http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/lox/main.php?suite=safety&page=hazard definitions#FIR E. It is the sole responsibility of the property owner and/or his/her contractor to monitor the red flag warning conditions. Should a red flag warning be declared and if work is to be conducted on the property, the contractor shall have readily available fire distinguisher. V. All requirements of the Building and Construction Code, the Zoning Code, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with, including the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance. All utility lines to the cabana shall be undergrounded pursuant to Section 17.27.030. W. Prior to finaling of the project an "as graded" and an "as constructed" plans and certifications shall be provided to the Planning Department and the Building Department to ascertain that the completed project is in compliance with the approved plans. In addition, any modifications made to the project during construction, shall be depicted on the "as built/as graded" plan. X. Until the applicants execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this approval, the approvals shall not be effective. Such affidavit shall be recorded together with the resolution. Reso. 2016-06 66 Eastfield PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15th DAY OF MARCH 2016. BRAD CHELF, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: HEIDI LUCE, CITY CLERK Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Reso. 2016-06 66 Eastfield 10 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2016-06 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, SITE PLAN REVIEW AND VARIANCES FOR A NEW CABANA, GRADING, ABOVE GRADE DECK, RETAINING WALLS, POOL AND RELATED STRUCTURES AND FOR ENCROACHMENT WITH A PORTION OF THE RAISED DECK, WALLS, POOL EQUIPMENT AREA AND FIRE PLACE INTO THE REAR YARD SETBACK; TO RETAIN TWO EXISTING SHEDS, PORTION OF TRELLIS AND BARBEQUE IN THE REAR YARD SETBACK; TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBANCE OF THE LOTAND TOTAL COVERAGE OF THE LOT AND TO SET ASIDE AN AREA FOR A FUTURE STABLE AND CORRAL IN THE FRONT YARD AREA OF THE LOT AT 66 EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT 107-EF), (THOMAS). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on March 15, 2016 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. CITY CLERK Reso. 2016-06 66 Eastfield 11 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 TO: NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No. 6B Mtg. Date: 03-15-16 HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: DATE PUBLISHED: ZONING CASE NO. 894 77 CREST ROAD EAST (LOT 69 -A -1 -MS) RA -S-2, 10.35 ACRES MR. AND MRS. TOM JANKOVICH BOLTON ENGINEERING JANUARY 7, 2016 REQUEST AND RECOMMENDATION 1. The applicants Mr. and Mrs. Jankovich request a Site Plan Review for the construction of a new 6,631 square foot single-family residence, 2 new garage(s) for a total of 1,308 square feet, a new pool (900 square feet) and spa (86 square feet) with a 140 square foot catchment basin, 1,910 square feet of attached covered porches, a 1,070 square foot pond, a 245 square foot koi pond gazebo, new driveway and turnaround access and site retaining walls that exceed 3 feet in height. A variance is requested as 325 square feet of the residence and 3 covered porches are proposed to be located in the side yard setback. Two of the covered porches will encroach between 0' to 7' into the side setback and a third porch, (130 square feet) will encroach in its entirety into the side setback, beyond the residence encroachment. The applicants also request slight modification to the previously approved corral and wall located in the front yard. 2. At the February 16, 2016 Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a Resolution approving the project as presented during the Planning Commission meeting that relocates the pool equipment east of the proposed new residence per the request of an adjacent property owner, and with standard findings of facts and conditions of approval. ZC NO. 894, 77 Crest E. 3. It is recommended that the Planning Commission review and consider the attached Resolution No. 2016-05 for adoption. ZC NO. 894, 77 Crest E. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW RESIDENCE WITH TWO GARAGES, COVERED PORCHES, A SWIMMING POOL/SPA, KOI POND, KOI POND GAZEBO, VARIOUS HEIGHTS BUT NOT TO EXCEED 5' HIGH RETAINING WALLS AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS ACCESSORY STRUCTURES; AND VARIANCE TO ENCROACH WITH A PORTION OF THE NEW RESIDENCE AND COVERED PORCHES INTO THE SIDE YARD SETBACK AT 77 CREST ROAD EAST, (LOT 69 -A1 -MS), (JANKOVICH). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Jankovich with respect to real property located at 77 Crest Road East, Rolling Hills (Lot 69 -A1 -MS) requesting a site plan review for the construction of a new 6,631 square foot single-family residence, 2 new garage(s) for a total of 1,308 square feet, a new pool (900 square feet) and spa (86 square feet) with a 140 square foot catchment basin, 1,910 square feet of attached covered porches, a 1,070 square foot pond, a 245 square foot koi pond gazebo, new driveway and turnaround access and site retaining walls that exceed 3 feet in height. A variance is requested as 325 square feet of the residence and 3 covered patios are proposed to be located in the side yard setback. Two of the covered porches will encroach between 0' to 7' into the side setback and a third porch, (130 square feet) will encroach in its entirety into the side setback, beyond the residence encroachment. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application at their regular meeting on January 19, 2016 and February 16, 2016, and in the field on February 16, 2016. Neighbors within 1,000 -foot radius were notified of the public hearings and a notice was published in the Peninsula News on January 7th, 2016. The applicants and their agents were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail and the applicants and their agents were in attendance at the hearings. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal, and from members of the City staff. Neighbors from Rancho Palos Verdes and a neighbor from 73 Crest Road East previewed the plans prior to the public hearing. The agent for 71 Crest Road East attended the field trip. There were no objections to the project. The Planning Commission have reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. Section 3. The property is zoned RAS-2 and the gross lot area is 10.35 acres. The net lot area is 9.56 acres or 416,381 square feet. The property is currently developed with a 3,275 square foot residence, a 591 square foot garage, and a 96 square foot service yard. A 3,456 square foot stable with a loft was recently approved (Resolution 2015-07). 77 Crest Road East Section 4. The Planning Commission find's that the project qualifies as a Class 3 Exemption, and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 5. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for Site Plan Review and approval before any grading requiring a grading permit or any new building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by 999 square feet or more in any thirty-six (36) month period. With respect to the Site Plan for grading, the new residence, garages, porches, swimming pool/spa, covered koi pond, koi pond gazebo, retaining walls, and other miscellaneous accessory structures, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures and maintaining sufficient setbacks to provide buffers between residential uses. The project is situated on a very large lot and the development would not cause the lot to be overdeveloped. The existing residence encroaches into the western side setback. However, the project encroaches less than the existing residence. The proposed project is situated away from the road so as to reduce the visual impact of the development. The project conforms with Zoning Code lot coverage requirements. The net lot area of the lot is 416,381 square feet. The structural net lot coverage is proposed at 3.6%, which includes all of the structures, with allowance for permitted deductions, (20% max. permitted); and the total lot coverage proposed, including the future 3,456 square foot stable would be 8.1%, (35% max. permitted). The disturbed area of the lot is proposed at 13.9%, which includes disturbance for the approved stable and corral (Resolution 2015-07). B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. The topography and the configuration of the lot, have been considered, and it was determined that the proposed development will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, buildings, or structures, because the proposed project will be constructed largely on an existing building pad, will be the least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with trees and shrubs, is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that it will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners. The lot is over 9 and a half acres in size and no more than 13.9% is proposed to be disturbed, with the remainder of the lot left in it's natural state. C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, and is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to new residences in the vicinity of said lot, located on much smaller lots. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped. The project will be screened from the road and all neighbors. 77 Crest Road East 2 O D. The development plan will introduce additional landscaping, which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and the landscaping will provide a buffer or transition area between private and public areas. E. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the project will capture all resident and visitor parking on -site with 3 guest parking spaces on the circular driveway and in the 2 attached garages. The applicants will continue to utilize the existing driveway approach to the residence. Per the Fire Department requirement, the driveway will be widened to 20 feet and will be moved slightly to the east, outside of the side setback, and will provide access for the Fire Department in case of an emergency. F. The project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 6. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Code permit approval of a variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when, due to exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone, strict application of the Code would deny the property owner substantial property rights enjoyed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone. The applicant seeks a variance from the requirement that side yard setbacks be free of structures as 325 square feet of the residence and 3 covered porches are proposed to be located in the side yard setback. Two of the covered porches will encroach between 0' to 7' into the side setback and a third porch (130 square feet) will encroach in it's entirety into the side setback, beyond the residence encroachment. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone because much of the lot is undevelopable due to the steep eastern and southern slope, and the flag lot shape further constrains the lot. The lot is located south of Crest Road East and south of a shared driveway. The existing residence encroaches into the side yard setback and the requested encroachment is less than the existing. The topography of the lot, specifically the steep slopes, paired with the applicants' desire to minimize grading by utilizing the existing residential pad, create difficulty in remaining outside of the side yard setback. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question because due to the existing graded pad, which encroaches into the setback, and the property's steep slopes, it would be a hardship not to encroach with the proposed residence and covered porches. The existing encroachment cannot be seen or viewed by adjacent residences and there were no concerns voiced by residents either before or during the field visit to the property, or during either of the public hearings. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the 77 Crest Road East 3 property is located because the existing residence encroaches into the side yard setback and the proposed residence encroaches less. The residence would not affect any neighbor's views and therefore would not affect property values, and would be screened from the street. D. The variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. E. The variance request is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed project, together with the variance, will be compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and will uphold the City's goals to protect and promote construction that is rural in nature. The lot is large and supports a stable and corral area. A stable and corral will be constructed to further meet the City's goal to encourage construction of equestrian uses. Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves Zoning Case No. 894 a Site Plan Review for a new residence, new garages, new pool/spa/catchment basin, covered porches, koi pond, koi pond gazebo, new driveway, site retaining walls that exceed 3 feet in height; and Variance to encroach with a portion of the residence and covered porches into the side yard setback subject to the following conditions: A. The Site Plan and Variance approvals shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval as defined in Sections 17.46.070 and 17.38.080, unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of this section. B. It is declared and made a condition of this approval that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in this permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file dated February 16, 2016 except as otherwise provided in these conditions. The working drawings submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the approved development plan. All conditions of the Site Plan Review and Variance approvals shall be incorporated into the building permit working drawings and where applicable complied with prior to issuance of a grading or building permit from the building department. The conditions of approval of this Resolution shall be printed onto building plans submitted to the Building Department for review and shall be kept on site at all times. 77 Crest Road East E. Prior to submittal of final working drawings to the Building and Safety Department for issuance of building permits, the plans for the project shall be submitted to City staff for verification that the final plans are in compliance with the plans approved by the Planning Commission. F. A licensed professional preparing construction plans for this project for Building Department review shall execute a Certificate affirming that the plans conform in all respects to this Resolution approving this project and all of the conditions set forth therein and the City's Building Code and Zoning Ordinance. Further, the person obtaining a building and/or grading permit for this project shall execute a Certificate of Construction stating that the project will be constructed according to this Resolution and any plans approved therewith. G. Structural lot coverage of the lot shall not exceed 14,857 square feet or 3.6% of the net lot area, in conformance with lot coverage limitations (20% maximum). The total lot coverage proposed, including structures and flatwork shall not exceed 33,712 square feet or 8.1%, of the net lot area, in conformance with lot coverage limitations (35% max). H. Grading for this project shall consist of 2,645 cubic yards of cut and 2,395 cubic yards of fill with 250 cubic yards to be exported for the pool and spa. The disturbed area of the lot, including the approved stable and corral shall not exceed 13.9%. I. The residential building pad shall be 39,800 square feet and will have coverage of 35.3%. J. The new residence may encroach 325 square feet, and 3 covered patios may encroach as follows: two of the covered porches will encroach between 0' to 7' into the side setback and a third porch, (130 square feet) will encroach in its entirety into the side setback. No basement or "story" may be constructed under the area of encroachment. K. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Lighting Ordinance of the City of Rolling Hills (RHMC 17.16.190 E), pertaining to lighting on said property, roofing and material requirements of properties in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. L. All utility lines to the residence shall be placed underground, subject to all applicable standards and requirements. M. A drainage plan, as required by the Building Department shall be prepared and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of a construction permit. Such plan shall be subject to LA County Code requirements. N. All graded slopes shall be landscaped. A landscaping plan shall be submitted to the City in conformance with Fire Department Fuel Modification requirements and graded 77 Crest Road East 5 (' slopes. Prior to finaling the project, trees and shrubs shall be planted to screen the project from the neighbors. The landscaping shall not form a hedge like screen but be offset. The height of the trees and shrubs shall not at any time exceed the ridgeline of the roof of the residence. The landscaping plan shall utilize to the maximum extent feasible, plants that are native to the area and are consistent with the rural character of the community. If landscaping of 5,000 square foot area or greater is introduced or redevelop, the landscaping shall be subject to the requirements of the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. O. The west and south side setback lines in the vicinity of the construction for this project shall remain staked throughout the construction. P. The project's biofiltration unit shall be maintained and cleared by the property owner to ensure it functions as intended at all times. Q. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA) Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permit. Perimeter easements and trails, if any, shall remain free and clear of any improvements including, but not be limited to fences -including construction fences, any hardscape, driveways, landscaping, irrigation and drainage devices, except as otherwise approved by the RHCA. R. A minimum of 50% of any construction materials must be recycled or diverted from landfills. The hauler of the materials shall obtain City's Construction and Demolition permit for waste hauling prior to start of work, and provide the appropriate documentation to the City. S. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. T. The contractor shall not use tools that could produce a spark, including for clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning conditions. Weather conditions can be found at: http;//www.wrh.noaa.gov/lox/main.php?suite=safety&page=hazard definitions#FIRE. It is the sole responsibility of the property owner and/or his/her contractor to monitor the red flag warning conditions. Should a red flag warning be declared and if work is to be conducted on the property, the contractor shall have readily available fire distinguisher. U. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby unimproved roadway easements. There shall be no parking along the common driveway with the adjacent properties or blocking of the common driveway. A flagmen shall be used to direct traffic when necessary. 77 Crest Road East 6 ® V. Prior to construction photographs of the common driveway shall be submitted to the Planning Department. Following construction, the common driveway must be restored, at a minimum, to its pre -construction condition. W. Guest parking spaces shall have pervious material and shall be approved by the Planning Department. X. Every effort shall be made to retain the 3 large trees located within the landscaped area in the circular driveway. Y. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) requirements related to solid waste, drainage and storm water management and comply with the City's Low Impact development Ordinance (LID). Further the property owners shall be required to conform to the County Health Department requirements for a septic system. Z. Prior to finaling of the project an "as graded" and an "as constructed" plans and certifications shall be provided to the Planning Department and the Building Department to ascertain that the completed project is in compliance with the approved plans. In addition, any modifications made to the project during construction, shall be depicted on the "as built/as graded" plan. AA. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this permit pursuant to Zoning Ordinance, or the approval shall not be effective. The affidavit shall be recorded together with the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2016. BRAD CHELF, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: HEIDI LUCE, CITY CLERK Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. C 77 Crest Road East 7 (�-1 I STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2016-05 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW RESIDENCE WITH TWO GARAGES, COVERED PORCHES, A SWIMMING POOL/SPA, KOI POND, KOI POND GAZEBO, VARIOUS HEIGHTS BUT NOT TO EXCEED 5' HIGH RETAINING WALLS AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS ACCESSORY STRUCTURES; AND VARIANCE -TO ENCROACH WITH A PORTIONOF THE NEW RESIDENCE AND COVERED PORCHES INTO THE SIDE YARD SETBACK AT 77 CREST ROAD EAST, (LOT 69 -A1 -MS), (JANKOVICH). was approved and adopted at regular meeting of the Planning Commission on March 15, 2016 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices HEIDI LUCE, CITY CLERK 77 Crest Road East City o/KolLin, JvtiLh INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN PLANNING COMMISSION NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FM: (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No.: 6C Mtg. Date: 3/15/16 AND MEMBERS OF THE FROM: YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: ZONING CASE NO. 896-A 11 SADDLEBACK ROAD RA -S-1, 3.25 ACRES GROSS (AFTER LL ADJ) CANDICE WARREN BOLTON ENGINEERING DECEMBER 3, 2015 REQUEST AND RECOMMENDATION 1. The applicant, Candice Warren requests a Lot Line Adjustment (LLA) to merge two lots, containing 1.8 acres and 1.4 acres gross, into one lot which would result in a lot having 3.2 acres gross and 2.258 acres net, as calculated by the City for development purposes. In conjunction with the lot merger, the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a 13,860 square foot dressage arena, 2,415 square foot stable with a 625 square foot loft and 1,685 square foot corral; Site Plan Review for a 4,745 square foot residence plus 659 square foot garage, other accessory structures and 9,300 cubic yards of grading; and Variances to locate the stable in the front yard area of the lot and to exceed the permitted lot disturbance in Zoning Case No. 896. 2. The proposed LLA would eliminate the existing lot line between 11 Saddleback Road and the lot south created in 1977 by Tract Map No. 31906, thereby merging these two lots, both zoned RAS-1. Approval of the Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit and Variance, requested in Zoning Case No. 896 would be subject to approval of the LLA to merge the lots and recordation of the new lot. 3. The Planning Commission at the January 19, 2016 public hearing directed staff to prepare a Resolution of approval. ZC NO. 896-A Lot Line Adj. ® Printed on Recycled Paper r`. The enclosed Resolution No. 2016-07 contains standard findings and facts for the lot line adjustment, which must be recorded separately from the Resolution approving the construction on the merged lot. 4. It is recommended that the Planning Commission review and consider the attached resolution. • ZC NO. 896-A Lot Line Adj. v RESOLUTION NO. 2016-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT OF TWO LOTS AT 11 SADDLEBACK ROAD (APN: 7569-004-022) AND THE VACANT LOT SOUTH THEREOF (APN: 7569-004-023) TO CREATE ONE LOT IN ZONING CASE NO. 896-A, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2015-02, (WARREN). Section 1. An application was duly filed by Ms. Candice Warren with respect to real property located at 11 Saddleback Rod, (APN: 7569-004-022) and the vacant property south thereof (APN: 7569-004-023) requesting to merge the two lots into one lot, which will result in a 3.25 acres gross lot, and is attached hereto as Attachment A and made a part thereof. Concurrently Ms. Warren filed an application in Zoning Case No. 896 for a Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit and a Variance to construct a stable that would be located in the front yard area of the resulting lot, dressage arena a portion of which would be located in the front yard setback, a new single family residence, swimming pool and other accessory structures. Section 2. California Government Code Subsection 66412(d) authorizes lot line adjustments without requiring a tentative map, parcel map or final map if: (A) The lot line adjustment involves two or more existing adjacent parcels, where land is proposed to be taken from one parcel and added to an adjacent parcel; (B) A greater number of parcels than originally existed is not thereby created; (C) The lot line adjustment will create parcels that conform to local zoning and building ordinances; and (D) The lot line adjustment is approved by the City. The City may impose conditions on the Lot Line Adjustment in order to make the lot conform to local zoning and building ordinances, to require the prepayment of real property taxes prior to the approval of the Lot Line Adjustment or to facilitate the relocation of existing infrastructure or easements. Section 3. The lots are located in the RAS-1 zoning district. The resulting lot will be in compliance with the City of Rolling Hills size lot requirements. Section 4. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application to merge the lots on December 15, 2015, January 19, 2016, and at a field trip on January 19, 2016. Two residents testified in favor of the project. Section 5. The Planning Commission finds that the project is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to a Class 5 exemption provided by Section 15305 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Section 6. The Planning Commission has considered the evidence, both written and oral, presented in connection with this application and finds as follows: Reso. 2016-07 1 ZC No. 896-A A. Section 16.16.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance and Section 17.16.060(A) of the Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance requires that each lot in any subdivision in the RA -S-1 Zone shall have a net area of not less than forty three thousand five hundred and sixty square feet, (1.0 acre). The proposed lot line adjustment will result in one parcel having 3.25 acres gross and 2.258 acres net as calculated by the City for development purposes. Both lots are currently greater than the required one -acre net. The net lot area is measured by taking the entire lot area and deducting (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel of land and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot. B. Section 16.16.020 of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance and Section 17.16.060(B)(3) of the Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance require that in all cases where practicable, the sidelines of lots shall be at approximate right angles or radial to the street upon which such lot fronts. The lots front along Saddleback Road on all but one side and curve with the direction of the road. The Planning Commission finds that the existing condition will remain, including the existing driveway, and therefore not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. Section 16.20.230 of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance requires that easements, the width of which are to be determined by the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA), be dedicated for bridle trail and utility purposes over the strips and portions of land within and abutting upon the property lines and will be recorded concurrently with the Certificate of Compliance for lot line adjustment. D. Chapter 16.48 of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance provides procedures for processing of certificates of compliance, which is a document that acknowledges that subject parcels are considered by the City to be legal lots of record. City records indicate that both parcels were created legally in 1977 by Parcel Map No. 31906. E. Conditions have been attached to this approval which provide that it will not impair or limit the City's application of the Site Plan Review or any other Ordinance or Code to any future development of the lot, including but not be limited to further study of soils, geology, hydrology, grading and other requirements. Section 7. In accordance with the foregoing findings, a Certificate of Compliance for lot line adjustment in Zoning Case No 896-A as indicated on the map stamp dated December 4, 2015, and on file in the Planning Department is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: A. The Lot Line Adjustment approval shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.46.070, unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of this section. Reso. 2016-07 ZC No. 896-A 2 O B. There shall be easements along the adjusted lot line, as required by the Rolling Hills Community Association. The maps and legal descriptions showing the new property easement lines shall be recorded. C. The lot line adjustment approval shall not in any way constitute any representation that the adjusted lot can be developed even if in compliance with current zoning and building ordinance standards. No development shall occur on the property without first complying with all applicable City Building and Zoning requirements and other applicable rules and regulations. D. The lot line adjustment shall not in any respect limit or impair the City's application of the Site Plan Review Ordinance to the lot at such time as an application is made for development. E. The Certificate of Lot Line Adjustment shall not be issued until a legal description complying with the delineation of adjustment, and including the required easements and trails, if any, as specified in Paragraph B of Section 7 are submitted to, and approved by the City. Upon the City's approval of the legal descriptions of the new adjusted lines a Certificate of Compliance shall be issued by the City, shall be recorded by the property owner in the offices of the Los Angeles County Recorder, and evidence of the recordation shall be returned to the City. F. The applicant shall record the deed of the property effectuating the transfer concurrently with the Certificate of Compliance for the Lot Line Adjustment and shall submit proof of such recordation to the City of Rolling Hills. G. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Resolution or the Lot Line Adjustment shall not be effective. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 15th DAY OF MARCH 2016. BRAD CHELF, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: HEIDI LUCE, CITY CLERK Reso. 2016-07 ZC No. 896-A 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2016-07 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT OF TWO LOTS AT 11 SADDLEBACK ROAD (APN: 7569-004-022) AND THE VACANT LOT SOUTH THEREOF (APN: 7569-004-023) TO CREATE ONE LOT IN ZONING CASE NO. 896-A, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2015- 02, (WARREN). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on March 15, 2016 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices CITY CLERK Reso. 2016-07 ZC No. 896-A 4 G City o/ieo&'1, fie& INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 3771521 FAX: (310) 3777288 Agenda Item No.: 7A Mtg. Date: 3-15-16 TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION. PUBLIC HEARING ON A REVISED SITE PLAN, CUP AND VARIANCE AND CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL IN ZONING CASE NO. 896 SITE LOCATION: 11 SADDLEBACK ROAD (LOT 48-1 and 2-RH) ZONING AND SIZE: RA -S-1, 3.25 ACRES GROSS (AFTER LL ADJ) APPLICANT: CANDICE WARREN REPRESENTATIVE: BOLTON ENGINEERING/KEENAN CONSTRUCTION PUBLISHED: DECEMBER 3, 2015 MARCH 3, 2016 REQUEST AND RECOMMENDATION 1. The applicant, Candice Warren, requests a Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permits and Variances to construct a 4,745 square foot residence, 342 square foot basement/wine cellar, 659 square foot attached garage, 370 square feet covered patio, 450 square foot swimming pool, 50 square foot spa, 50 square foot pool equipment area, 2,415 square foot stable with 625 square foot loft, which would be located in the front yard area of the lot (in front of the leading edge of the residence), 135 square foot porch at the stable, 1,685 square foot corral, two trellises 210 square feet each, 60 square foot outdoor kitchen/bbq, 18 square foot fire place, 96 square foot service yard, 950 square foot pool decking, 2,050 square foot patio, a not to exceed 3.5' high seating wall along the pool decking, and 13,860 square foot, (70' by 198'), dressage arena, a portion of which was to be located in the front setback and in front of the leading edge of .the residence. The project included grading of 5,310 cubic yards of cut and 5,310 cubic yards of fill to be balanced on site. With the proposed grading the disturbed area of the lot was proposed to be 83%. In conjunction with the proposed development the applicant requests a Lot Line Adjustment (LLA) to merge two lots, containing 1.8 acres and 1.4 acres gross ZC NO. 896 Printed on Recycled Paper respectively, into one lot, which would result in a lot having 3.2 acres gross and 2.25 acres net in size, as calculated by the City for development purposes, (Zoning Case No. 896-A) 2. Based on the above submittal, at the January 19, 2016 Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a Resolution approving the project subject to the applicant submitting a revised plan showing the removal of the concrete driveway by the stable and replacing it with decomposed granite, and providing an alternate access to the dressage arena from the existing driveway. The applicant requested a continuance of the case after the January 19, 2016 meeting to the March Planning Commission meeting and has recently submitted a revised plan showing the Planning Commission's requested changes to the driveways, and making additional changes to the project as follows: - The dressage arena has been moved approximately 9 feet in a south westerly direction and relocated outside of the front setback, but still partially in front of the leading edge of the house, with not to exceed 5' high retaining wall along the front of the arena and along 100' of the two sides of the arena, ranging in height from a curb to 5'. As the property slopes upwards from the arena to the road, the wall will not be visible from the front of the property. A drainage swale is proposed along the remaining edge of the arena to aid in drainage of the arena. - The horse access path leading from the stable to the arena is proposed to be moved approximately 10' in a northwesterly direction, away from the swimming pool area. - A not to exceed 2.5' high retaining wall along the horse access from the stable to the dressage arena is required to accommodate the grade differential. - A pathway of up to 6' in width is proposed to connect the primary driveway and a horse pathway from Saddleback Road to the arena, and will not be paved. The limit of grading will also be shifted in a westerly and southerly direction to accommodate the new location of the arena and the path from the stable. The disturbance of the lot will increase from previously proposed 75% to 83.0%. Currently the lot is disturbed at 47%. - Grading will increase from 18,600 cubic yards total to 23,700 cubic yards total, including 13,080 cubic yards of overexcavation and compaction for the project. - A horse hitching post near the arena and some garden areas are also proposed to absorb some of the cut dirt from the arena and to create more usable space on the property - With the removal of the hardscape leading to the stable, the total coverage (structures and hardscape) will be reduced from 19.7% (17,700 sf) to 17.3% (17,026 sf). ZC NO. 896 3. Due to the changes to the application, staff re -published the notice of public hearing in the local newspaper and the neighbors within 1,000 -foot radius were also given a notice of the revised project. As of the writing of this report, staff has not received inquiries about the project. • 4. It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the Staff Report and the changes made to the application, continue the public hearing and consider the attached Resolution No. 2016-08 for adoption that incorporates the changes enumerated in item 2. above. ZC NO. 896 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK RESOLUTION NO. 2016-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, SITE PLAN REVIEW AND VARIANCES FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A DRESSAGE ARENA, STABLE WITH A LOFT AND CORRAL; A NEW RESIDENCE AND GARAGE, VARIOUS RETAINING WALLS, SWIMMING POOL AND RELATED PATIOS, TRELLISES AND DECKS; TO LOCATE THE EQUESTRIAN FACILITIES IN THE FRONT YARD AREA OF THE LOT AND TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED LOT DISTURBANCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 896 AT 11 SADDLEBACK ROAD, (WARREN). THE PLANNING COMMISSION DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Ms. Candice Warren, to request a Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permits and Variances to construct a 4,745 square foot residence, 342 square foot basement/wine cellar, 659 square foot attached garage, 370 square feet covered patio, 450 square foot swimming pool, 50 square foot spa, 50 square foot pool equipment area, convert an existing detached garage to a 2,415 square foot stable and add a 625 square foot loft, located in the front yard area of the lot (in front of the leading edge of the residence), 135 square foot porch at the stable, 1,685 square foot corral, two trellises 210 square feet each, 60 square foot outdoor kitchen/bbq, 18 square foot fire place, 96 square foot service yard, 950 square foot pool decking, 2,050 square foot patio, 1,060 square feet of additional paving, a not to exceed 3.5' high seating wall along the pool decking, and 13,860 square foot, (70' by 198'), dressage arena, a portion of which would be located in the front yard area of the lot, with not to exceed 5' high retaining wall along the front portion of the arena and not to exceed 4' high retaining wall along a path leading from the stable to the arena above the pool area. Grading for this project is proposed to be 23,700 cubic yards of dirt total to be balanced on site which includes overexcavation and recompaction. With the proposed grading, the disturbed area of the lot would be 83%. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application at their regular meeting on December 15, 2015 January 19, 2016, and March 15, 2016, and in the field on January 19, 2016. Neighbors within 1,000 - foot radius were notified of the public hearings and a notice was published in the Peninsula News on December 3, 2015 and March 3, 2016. The applicants and their agents were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail and the applicants and their agents were in attendance at the hearings. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal, and from members of the City staff. Three residents visited the site during the noticed field trip on January 19, 2016. Commissioners and these residents expressed concern about the driveway access to the stable being primarily concrete, the access to the dressage arena coming off Reso. 2016-08 11 Saddleback Rd. 1 o of Saddleback Road, and the dressage arena encroaching into the front setback. The applicant's responded with a revised plan to address all of these concerns. The driveway to the stable is now being proposed as all decomposed granite, access to the dressage arena has been relocated to be accessed from the primary driveway, and the dressage arena has been "pushed back" on the lot and is no longer encroaching into the front yard setback. The Planning Commission has reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. Section 3. The property is zoned RAS-1 and with the lot merger will contain 2.25 acres net for development purposes (98,358 square feet). Lot #1 is currently developed with a 3,023 square foot residence with attached 473 square foot garage, 1,165 square foot detached garage, and 130 square foot entryway. The applicant proposes to demolish a portion of the existing detached garage and convert 900 square feet of the garage into a stable, and add to it for a larger stable and add a loft. Lot #2 is vacant. The parcel is located on a curve along Saddleback Road with three sides of the parcel adjacent to the road. Although the gross lot area of the lot (after merger) would be over 3.2 acres; the long roadway easement plus the deductions for development purposes reduces the lot to 2.25 acres net. Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, (CEQA) pursuant to section 15303 (new construction of single family residence and accessory structures), and section 15061(b)(3) (common sense exemption) of the CEQA guidelines. Section 5. Section 17.18.040E of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permits approval of a stable over 200 square feet and riding arena with a Conditional Use Permit provided the uses are not located in the front yard or in any setbacks. Portions of both, the stable and dressage arena are proposed to be located in the front yard area of the lot. With respect to this request for a Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. Conditionally permitted uses are not outright permitted by the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. The Commission must consider applications for conditional use permit and may, with such conditions as are deemed necessary, approve a conditional use which will not jeopardize, adversely affect, endanger or to otherwise constitute a menace to the public health, safety or general welfare or be materially detrimental to the property of other persons located in the vicinity of such use. 13. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for the conversion of the existing garage to a stable and for the dressage arena would be consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan because the uses are consistent with similar uses in the community, and except for their location, meetall the applicable code development standards for a stable and arena, and the area is located in Reso. 2016-08 2 11 Saddleback Rd. an area on the property that is adequately sized to accommodate such uses. The proposed uses are appropriately located in that they will be sufficiently separated from nearby structures used for habitation or containing sleeping quarters. The development would be constructed in furtherance of the General Plan goal of promoting and encouraging equestrian uses. C. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent structures have been considered, and the project will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed stable orientation is not towards neighbors and its general location is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so as to not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors. The proposed stable is to be located next to the corral and a path designated for equestrian uses that runs from the stable/corral to the proposed dressage arena and is separate from the other outdoor living areas on the property. The dressage arena would be located in an area of the lot that is not in proximity to any residents and will not be visible from the road. D. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain, and surrounding residences because the stable and dressage arena complies with the low profile residential development pattern of the community and will not give the property an over -built look, and areas will remain open and unobstructed. The lot is 2.25 acres net in size and is sufficiently large to accommodate the proposed uses. E. The proposed conditional use, other than being proposed in the front yard area, complies with all applicable development standards of the zone district and requires a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Sections 17.18.090 and 17.18.100 of the Zoning Ordinance. F. The proposed conditional uses are consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities because the project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. Section 6. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for Site Plan Review and approval before any grading requiring a grading permit or any new building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by not more than 999 square feet in any thirty-six (36) month period. The grading for the ancillary outdoor structures (swimming pool, trellises, outdoor kitchen, fireplace, decking, and patio) require Site Plan Review, but the actual structures themselves do not. With respect to the Site Plan grading and the proposed structures the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: Reso. 2016-08 3 11 Saddleback Rd. A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures and maintaining sufficient setbacks to provide buffers between residential uses. Although the disturbed area exceeds the maximum permitted amount of 40%, a large portion of it is for the proposed 13,860 square foot dressage arena (which requires a Conditional Use Permit). The dressage arena will be screened from view from Saddleback Road by retaining walls that are depressed and will not be seen from the road. The dressage arena promotes the rural, equestrian aesthetic of Rolling Hills. The existing paved driveway leading to the stable will be removed and replaced with decomposed granite, which also promotes a feeling of open space. None of the structures are in setbacks. The project conforms with Zoning Code lot coverage requirements, except for disturbance. The net lot area of the lot is 96,358 square feet. The structural net lot coverage is proposed at 9.1%, which includes all of the structures, with allowance for permitted deductions, (20% max. permitted); and the total lot coverage proposed, including the stable would be 19.7%, (35% max. permitted). The disturbed area of the lot is proposed to increase from 46.95% which already exceeds the maximum permitted of 40% and is legal nonconforming, to 83% due in large part to the dressage arena. B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. The topography and the configuration of the lot, have been considered, and it was determined that the proposed development will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, buildings, or structures, because the proposed project will be constructed largely on an existing building pad of the currently developed lot, will be the least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with trees and shrubs, is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that it will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners. The lot is 2.25 acres net in size and will feature a dressage arena, and a path for horses. The proposed 4,745 square foot home is only 1,722 square feet larger than the existing home that will be largely retained and remodeled as part of this project. A portion of the existing garage, which will be converted to a stable, is being retained as well. The dressage arena will be developed on the currently vacant lot and will remain open space. C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, and is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to new residences in the vicinity of said lot, located on much smaller lots. Portions of the lot will be left undeveloped. The project will be screened from the road and all neighbors. The residences on neighboring properties average to 4,447 square feet. The proposed residence is 4,745 that bring it in -line with homes nearby. Reso. 2016-08 11 Saddleback Rd. 9 O D. The development plan will introduce additional landscaping, which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and the landscaping will provide a buffer or transition area between private and public areas. E. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the applicants will continue to utilize the existing driveway to the residence and the stable, and the dressage arena will be accessed from the main driveway for heavier vehicles ingress/egress. The stable access will be entirely decomposed granite. There is a new private path proposed leading from the stable and corral behind the residential and pool pad directly to the dressage arena and is all contained on the property. F. The project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to section 15303 (new construction of single family residence and accessory structures), and section 15061(b)(3) (common sense exemption) of the CEQA guidelines. Section 7. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Code permit approval of a variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when, due to exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable 10 other similar properties in the same zone, strict application of the Code would deny the property owner substantial property rights enjoyed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone. The applicant seeks a variance from the requirement 17.18.060A.2. that stables not be located in the front yard, and from 17.16.070B. that disturbance be limited to 40% of the net lot area. The existing garage in the front yard is being converted into a stable. With respect to this request for Variances, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone because Saddleback Road wraps around the property and constrains the lot with large roadway easement. The topography of the lot, specifically the steep slopes on the western portion of the lot further confine where development can be located. The existing garage is located in the front yard and the applicant proposes to utilize the existing structure by converting it into a stable. The disturbance is already legal nonconforming and is proposed to increase to 83% to accommodate the proposed dressage arena. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question because Saddleback Road wraps around the property and the large roadway easement substantially reduces the net lot area for development. The residential building pad and the existing garage pad, to be converted to a stable and corral pad are largely developed already, and there are no other options for locating structures including the stable, but where the existing structures are Reso. 2016-08 5 11 Saddleback Rd. located. The existing garage is not easily seen from the road, and the stable will step down to the corral area and that portion is screened from view and compatible with the slope. There were no concerns voiced by neighbors about where the existing garage/proposed stable is and where the arena will be located. The exceedance of the disturbance is due in large part to the proposed dressage arena. The other structures (pool, attached garage, residence, and ancillary structures) on the residence building pad are located fairly close to one another and make best use of the shape of the lot as it is constrained by Saddleback Road. Any concerns voiced by residents during the field visit to the property were addressed in the revised site plan. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located because the proposed stable is not in any setbacks and is located where the existing garage is. It will not cause any additional line of sight issues on Saddleback due to the rows of existing trees currently in the vicinity. The converted stable will be compatible with desired rural aesthetic of Rolling and therefore would not affect property values. The dressage arena likewise will be screened and will remain as open space, therefore not causing the lot to be overdeveloped. D. The variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. E. The variance request is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed project, together with the variance, will be compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and will uphold the City's goals to protect and promote construction that is rural in nature. Section 8. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves Zoning Case No. 896 a Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permits and Variances to construct a 4,745 square foot residence with 342 square foot basement/wine cellar and 659 square foot attached garage, convert an existing detached garage to a 2,415 square foot stable and add a 625 square foot loft, 13,860 square foot, (70' by 198'), dressage arena, swimming pool and various outdoor amenities, hardscape, retaining walls and to locate the stable and portion of the arena in the front yard area of the lot (in front of the leading edge of the residence. Grading for this project is proposed to be 23,700 cubic yards of dirt total to be balanced on site which includes overexcavation and recompaction. With the proposed grading, the disturbed area of the lot would be 83%.subject to the following conditions: A. The Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Variance approvals shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval as defined in Sections 17.46.070, 17.42.070 and 17.38.080, unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of this section. Reso. 2016-08 6 11 Saddleback Rd. B. It is declared and made a condition of this approval that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in this permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file dated March 9, 2016 except as otherwise provided in these conditions. The working drawings submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the approved development plan. All conditions of the Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, and Variance approvals shall be incorporated into the building permit working drawings, and where applicable complied with prior to issuance of a grading or building permit from the building department. The conditions of approval of this Resolution shall be printed onto building plans submitted to the Building Department for review and shall be kept on site at all times. E. Prior to submittal of final working drawings to the Building and Safety Department for issuance of building permits, the plans for the project shall be submitted to City staff for verification that the final plans are in compliance with the plans approved by the Planning Commission. F. A licensed professional preparing construction plans for this project for Building Department review shall execute a Certificate affirming that the plans conform in all respects to this Resolution approving this project and all of the conditions set forth therein and the City's Building Code and Zoning Ordinance. Further, the person obtaining a building and/or grading permit for this project shall execute a Certificate of Construction stating that the project will be constructed according to this Resolution and any plans approved therewith. G. Structural lot coverage of the lot shall not exceed 8,970 square feet or 9.1% of the net lot area, in conformance with lot coverage limitations (20% maximum). The total lot coverage proposed, including structures and flatwork shall not exceed 19,350 square feet or 19.7%, of the net lot area, in conformance with lot coverage (imitations (35% max). Reso. 2016-08 11 Saddleback Rd. H. Grading for this project shall consist of 5,310 cubic yards of cut and 5,310 cubic yards of fill with 13,080 cubic yards of overexcavation and compaction. The disturbed area of the lot, including the approved stable and corral shall not exceed 83%. I. The residential building pad shall be 17,700 square feet and will have coverage of 34.18%. The stable pad shall be 7,270 square feet and will have coverage of 33.2%. J. The dressage arena may not have lights anywhere within it or around it. Should a mirror be installed in the future at the Arena, and if reflection of the sun off the mirror causes glare on adjoining properties, it shall be the responsibility of the property owner or installer to mitigate this problem in a timely manner. K. The applicant shall provide documented proof that the Southern California Edison Easement has been vacated by SO Cal Edison, or the applicant has permission from them to locate the dressage arena in the easement. L. The applicant shall provide verification from Los Angeles County Land Development Division that the dressage arena can be located in the restricted use area. M. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Lighting Ordinance of the City of Rolling Hills (RHMC 17.16.190 E), pertaining to lighting on said property, roofing and material requirements of properties in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. N. All utility lines to the residence and stable shall be placed underground, subject to all applicable standards and requirements. O. A drainage plan, as required by the Building Department shall be prepared and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of a construction permit. Such plan shall be subject to LA County Code requirements. P. All graded slopes shall be landscaped. A landscaping plan shall be submitted to the City in conformance with Fire Department Fuel Modification requirements and graded slopes. Prior to finaling the project, trees and shrubs shall be planted to screen the project from the neighbors. The landscaping shall not form a hedge like screen but be offset. The height of the trees and shrubs shall not at any time exceed the ridgeline of the roof of the structures. The landscaping plan shall utilize to the maximum extent feasible, plants that are native to the area and are consistent with the rural character of the community. If landscaping of 5,000 square foot area or greater is introduced or redeveloped, the landscaping shall be subject to the requirements of the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Reso. 2016-08 11 Saddleback Rd. 8 is Q. The setback lines and roadway easement line in the vicinity of the construction for this project shall remain staked throughout the construction. R. Perimeter easements, including roadway easements and trails, if any, shall remain free and clear of any improvements including, but not be limited to fences - including construction fences, any hardscape, driveways, landscaping, irrigation and drainage devices, except as otherwise approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association. S. Minimum of 50% of any construction materials must be recycled or diverted from landfills. The hauler of the materials shall obtain City's Construction and Demolition permit for waste hauling prior to start of work and provide proper documentation to the City. T. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. U. The contractor shall not use tools that could produce a spark, including for clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning conditions. Weather conditions can be found at: http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/lox/main.php?suite=safety&page=hazard definitions#FIR E. It is the sole responsibility of the property owner and/or his/her contractor to monitor the red flag warning conditions. Should a red flag warning be declared and if work is to be conducted on the property, the contractor shall have readily available fire distinguisher. V. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby unimproved roadway easements. There shall be no parking along the common driveway with the adjacent properties or blocking of the common driveway. A flagmen shall be used to direct traffic when necessary. W. The existing portion of the concrete driveway leading to the existing garage shall be removed and access to the stable and to the arena shall be decomposed granite or like 100% pervious roughened material. X. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) requirements related to solid waste, drainage and storm water drainage facilities management and to the City's Low Impact development Ordinance (LID). Further the property owners shall be required to conform to the County Health Department requirements for a septic system. Reso. 2016-08 9 11 Saddleback Rd. Y. Prior to finaling of the project an "as graded" and an "as constructed" plans and certifications shall be provided to the Planning Department and the Building Department to ascertain that the completed project is in compliance with the approved plans. In addition, any modifications made to the project during construction, shall be depicted on the "as built/as graded" plan. Z. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this permit pursuant to Zoning Ordinance, or the approval shall not be effective. The affidavit shall be recorded together with the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2016. BRAD CHELF, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: HEIDI LUCE, CITY CLERK Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Reso. 2016-08 10 T 11 Saddleback Rd. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2016-08 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, SITE PLAN REVIEW AND VARIANCES FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A DRESSAGE ARENA, STABLE WITH A LOFT AND CORRAL; A NEW RESIDENCE AND GARAGE, VARIOUS RETAINING WALLS, SWIMMING POOL AND RELATED PATIOS, TRELLISES AND DECKS; TO LOCATE THE EQUESTRIAN FACILITIES IN THE FRONT YARD AREA OF THE LOT AND TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED LOT DISTURBANCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 896 AT 11 SADDLEBACK ROAD, (WARREN). was approved and adopted at regular meeting of the Planning Commission on March 15, 2016 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices HEIDI LUCE, Reso. 2016-08 11 11 Saddleback Rd. INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No. 7C Mtg. Date: 03-15-16 TO: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: DATE PUBLISHED: YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR WENDY STARKS, ASSOCIATE PLANNER ZONING CASE NO. 898 46 EASTFIELD DRIVE (LOT 97-EF) RA -S-1, 1.8 ACRES (EXCL. ROADWAY EASEMENT) MR. AND MRS. ROBERT MILLER TONY INFERRERA, ARCHITECT JANUARY 7, 2016 AND FEBRUARY 4, 2016 REQUEST AND RECOMMENDATION 1. The Planning Commission opened the public hearing in this case on January 19, 2016, viewed the project in the field on February 16, 2016 and continued the hearing to the evening meeting on February 16, 2016. The Planning Commission expressed concerns with the proposed development and recommended that the applicant restudy the ridgeline and massing of the addition at either end of the residence, ensure there is at least a 4' walkway around both additions, remove the previously proposed deck from the plans, and show the service yard on the plans. Several of the Commissioners expressed concerns about the massing of the project and requested clarification on the heights of the proposed additions in relation to the existing residence. 2. The applicants, Mr. and Mrs. Robert Miller, revised their project and request a Site Plan Review and Variances to construct improvements on their property at 46 Eastfield Drive. The Site Plan Review is for the construction of a 1,743 square foot addition to their existing residence for a total of 3,986 square feet (a reduction of 92 square feet from the previous request), and grading of total of 700 cubic yards of dirt, of which 500 c.y. would be for excavation and recompaction (250 c.y. each). ZC NO. 898 46 Eastfield. The variances are requested for a) an 85 square foot portion of the proposed addition that encroaches between 8-10 feet into the front yard setback, b) a request to retain an existing wood shed in a side yard setback, and c) to exceed the maximum permitted disturbed area of the lot. 3. The applicants submitted a revised plan with modifications to the roof line, and elevations that illustrate how the proposed addition at the north end of the residence is compatible with the existing ridgeline, and is proposed to be 12 inches higher than the existing residence. Previously proposed was a difference of 3' between the existing ridgeline and the proposed ridgeline. The south addition will be constructed below the existing eave projection. The northern addition has a minimum 5' walkway clearance, and the southern addition has at least a 6' walkway shown on the plans. The deck has been removed from the plans, and the service yard has been relocated out of the easement and setback and is now adjacent to the existing garage. 4. It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the staff report, take public testimony and provide direction to staff. BACKGROUND 5. The property is zoned RAS-1 and the lot area excluding the roadway easement is 1.8 acres. For development purposes the net lot area of the lot is 65,880 square feet or 1.51 acres. Records indicate that the residence was constructed in 1955. Through the years several additions were made to the residence. Grading for a corral area was approved in 1960 and a stable/tack room was also constructed in 1960. The pool was constructed in 1959 and in 1961 a pool shelter/guest house was constructed. The pool shelter/ guest house was subject to a code enforcement issue in 2007, as a previous owner renovated the structure, and constructed a flat roof with a deck and outdoor barbeque without permits. Following code enforcement action, the owner obtained the required permissions and building permits, but has not corrected the roof configuration. The RHCA Architectural Committee is enforcing the slope of the roof. 6. Currently the lot is developed with a 2,243 square foot residence, 420 square foot garage, 465 square foot swimming pool, 680 square foot guest house, several trellises, sheds, and other amenities. One of the sheds and the service yard are located in side setbacks and require a variance or must be removed. The pool equipment area is located in the side setback as well. Since there are records of permits for the pool from 1959, the equipment area would have been constructed at the same time and is considered legal -nonconforming. MUNICIPAL CODE COMPLIANCE 7. The proposed addition of 1,743 contains an 85 square foot portion that encroaches into the required 50 -foot front yard setback between 8-10 feet for a distance of approximately 23 feet, which requires a variance. ZC No. 898 46 Eastfield Dr. 8. The lot currently is nonconforming for disturbed area (maximum 40% of net lot area permitted). There is a total existing disturbed area of 26,600 square feet (40.4% of the net lot area), which is not proposed to change. The previous plan included a deck that would have increased the disturbance further, but is no longer a part of this project. Grading for this project will entail 100 cubic yards cut, 100 cubic yards fill, plus over - excavation of 250 cubic yards and recompaction of 250 cubic yards, for a total of 700 cubic yards of dirt. The 100 c.y. of cut will be spread on the existing stable pad area. 9. The applicants request to retain a 100 square foot shed in the west side yard setback, which also requires a variance. 10. The residential building pad (outside of setbacks) will not be increased and will remain at 9,950 square feet. The coverage on this pad is proposed at 60.2%, which includes all of the structures on this pad. With the allowed deductions the building pad coverage will be 5,192 square feet or 52.2%. This is an increase from 34.7% from the existing condition. The code provides a guideline of 30% maximum coverage. There is an existing building pad of 2,840 square feet where a pool and guest house is located. The total building pad coverage on this pad remains at 41.55%. No changes are being proposed to this building pad. The future stable and corral are proposed to be set aside on an existing stable building pad, which is 3,375 square feet in area. The coverage on this pad with a future 450 - square foot stable and an existing shed of 185 square feet will be 15.26%. No changes are being proposed to this future building pad. A fourth pad for the deck has been removed from this proposal. 11. The structural lot coverage proposed, with allowed deductions, will be 7,387 square feet or 11.2% net lot coverage. The total lot coverage will be 13,404 square feet or 20.4% net lot coverage. 12. The architect states that 85 square feet of the proposed 1,743 additions will encroach no more than 10 feet into the front setback. He advises that while the lot is larger than those in the direct vicinity of the property, the majority of it is sloped and unbuildable. By utilizing a portion of the existing flat space, be it in the front setback, it allows for no grading and less overall disturbance of the lot. The addition remains within the existing retaining wall and flat area on the site, and the total size of the residence will be in line with other homes in the neighborhood. 13. The Rolling Hills Community Association will review this project at a later date. 14. The project will be required to comply with storm water management requirements and all other Zoning Code requirements, including undergrounding of utility lines. ZC No. 898 46 Eastfield Dr. v 15. When reviewing a development application the Planning Commission must consider whether the proposed project meets the criteria for a Site Plan Review and Variances and must find that the proposed uses are consistent with the General Plan and development standards of the City (except as related to the variances), including provision for open space and maintaining rural environment and that the uses will not adversely affect adjacent properties. 16. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as a Class 1 exemption in that the project is an addition. ZC NO. 898 NEARBY PROPERTIES (For information on y) Address House size in sq.ft. (built/add or remodel) Lot Area sq.ft. (excl. roadway easements) 13 Openbrand 3,700 (1955/1961 216,057 24 Outrider Road 5,551 (1993/1994)* 112,820 48 Eastfield Dr. 2,898 (1956/1966) 78,410 45 Eastfield Dr. 5,820 (1954/1959) 93,650 44 Eastfield Dr. 3,186 (2007)* 35,720 50 Eastfield Dr. 5,325 (1999) 50,530 46 Eastfield Proposed 4,078 77,970 NOTE:The above do not include garages, basements and other accessory structures. SOURCES: Assessors' records * City Records SITE PLAN REVIEW EXISTING PROPOSED RA -S- 1 ZONE SETBACKS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH GARAGE , POOL, GUEST HOUSE, GAZEBO, NEW RESIDENCE WITH BASEMENT, POOL, OUTDOOR KITCHEN, SET -ASIDE STABLE/CORRAL LOCATION Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 20 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from rear easement line STRUCTURES Residence Garage Swimming Pool Pool Equipment Guest House Att/cov porches Entryway Att trellis garage Shed/stable pad Barbecue Kitchen Shed Service yard 2243 sq.ft. 420 sq.ft 465 sq.ft. 35 sq. ft. 680 sq. ft. 300 sq. ft 465 sq. ft. 325 sq. ft. 185 sq. ft. 25 sq. ft. 300 sq. ft. 100 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. Residence Garage Swimming Pool Pool Equipment Guest House Att/cov porches Entryway Att trellis garage Shed/stable pad Barbecue Kitchen Shed Service yard Stable (set -aside) 3986 sq.ft. 420 sq.ft. 465 sq.ft. 35 sq.ft. 680 sq.ft. 300 sq.ft. 465 sq.ft 325 sq.ft. 185 sq.ft. 25 sq.ft. 300 sq.ft. 100 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. 450 sq.ft. (Site Plan Review required for new residence and if size of structure increases by more than 999 s.f. in a 36 -month period). TOTAL 5,639 sq. ft. TOTAL 7,832 sq.ft. STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE 7.9% w/allowed deductions 7,387 sq.ft. w/ allowed ZC No. 898 46 Eastfield Dr. (20% maximum) deductions or 11.2% of 65,880 sq. ft. net lot area TOTAL LOT COVERAGE 17.2% with exclusions/allowances 13,404 sq.ft or 20.4% of 65,880 sq ft. net lot w/allowances (35% maximum) . BUILDING PADS (30% guideline) 34.7% 41.55% 2.3% 52.2% of 9,950 sq.ft. residential pad 41.55% of 2,840 15.3% sq.ft. of 3,375 sq. ft. Residence Pool Stable (min. 450 sq. ft. stable) GRADING N/A 100 c.y. cut for house, 250 c.y. overexcavation & 250c.y. compaction for house, 100 c.y. fill for stable pad SUM = 700 c.y. Site Plan Review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof that is more than 3 feet in depth and covers more than 2,000 sq.ft.) must be balanced on site (except basement) DISTURBED AREA 40.4% 40.4% 26,600 sq.ft. of net lot area (40% max; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist.) STABLE (min. 450 SQ.FT. N/A 450 sq. ft. future proposed 550 sq. ft. future corral & 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL) STABLE ACCESS N/A Off main private driveway ROADWAY ACCESS Existing driveway approach Existing driveway approach VIEWS N/A Planning Commission review PLANTS AND ANIMALS N/A Planning Commission review SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA 17.46.010 Purpose. The site plan review process is established to provide discretionary review of certain development projects in the City for the purposes of ensuring that the proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan; incorporates environmentally and aesthetically sensitive grading practices; preserves existing mature vegetation; is compatible and consistent with the scale, massing and development pattern in the immediate project vicinity; and otherwise preserves and protects the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Rolling Hills. 17.46.050 Required findings. A. The Commission shall be required to make findings in acting to approve, conditionally approve, or deny a site plan review application. B. No project which requires site plan review approval shall be approved by the Commission, or by the City Council on appeal, unless the following findings can be made: 1. The project complies with and is consistent with the goals and policies of the general plan and all requirements of the zoning ordinance; 2. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizin • building coverage. Lot coverage requirements are ZC No. 898 46 Eastfield Dr. regarded as maximums, and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted depends upon the existing buildable area of the lot; 3. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences; 4. The project preserves and integrates into the site design, to the greatest extent possible, existing topographic features of the site, including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls); 5. Grading has been designed to follow natural contours of the site and to minimize the amount of grading required to create the building area; 6. Grading will not modify existing drainage channels nor redirect drainage flow, unless such flow is redirected into an existing drainage course; 7. The project preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees and supplements these elements with drought -tolerant landscaping which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and landscaping provides a buffer or transition area between private and public areas; 8. The project is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenient and safe movement of pedestrians and vehicles; and 9. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. CRITERIA FOR VARIANCES 17.38.050 Required findings. In granting a variance, the Commission (and Council on appeal) must make the following findings: A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone; B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial , property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question; C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; E. That the variance does not grant special privilege to the applicant; F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and G. That the variance request is consistent with the general plan of the City of Rolling Hills. ZC No. 898 46 Eastfield Dr. a/Ram `die¢ INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 TO: FROM: APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No.:7D Mtg. Date: 3-15-16 HONORABLE CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR WENDY STARKS, ASSOCIATE PLANNER ZONING CASE NO. 897 2 HILLSIDE LANE (LOT 60-RH) RA -S-1, 1.97 ACRES (EXCL. ROAD EASEMENT) MS. SARAH ELKIN THE (W)ORKSHOP & BOLTON ENGINEERING CORP. FEBRUARY 4, 2016 MARCH 3, 2016 REQUEST AND RECOMMENDATION 1. The Planning Commission held a public hearing in this case on February 16, 2016, and viewed the project in the field earlier in the day on March 15, 2016. 2. The applicant, Ms. Elkin, requests a Site Plan Review for the construction of 'retaining walls that will have a maximum height of 5 feet and an average height of no more than 2.5 feet in height, 1,450 cubic yards of grading for a new building pad where the applicant proposes a 680 square foot pool, and a 72 square foot spa along with a 800 square foot recreation room, 227 square foot attached trellis, and 1,610 square feet of pool decking. 250 cubic yards of dirt will be exported from the pool and steps leading to the pool. A Conditional Use Permit is requested for the 800 square foot recreation room, and Variances are requested to locate all of the accessory structures, including various walls in the front yard area of the lot, (pursuant to City's Zoning Ordinance, no structures are permitted in front of the leading edge of the residence) and to exceed the maximum permitted disturbance of the lot, from the existing 52.33% to 56.13%. At the previous ZC NO. 897 2 Hillside Lane meeting the applicants proposed a 470 square foot pool house, but wish to enlarge it to an 800 square foot structure. Also proposed is an 800 square foot addition to the existing 2,450 square foot single-family residence, 525 square feet of new paved walkways leading from the house to the pool pad, 195 square feet of concrete will be removed in the corral area and adjacent to the stable, and new concrete added around the pool. These improvements could be approved administratively and do not require Planning Commission action. The driveway will be widened to 20 feet from an existing 16 feet and will result in an additional 1,325 square feet of paved driveway. The Traffic Commission will review the driveway apron at their March 24, 2016 meeting. 3. It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the staff report, take public testimony and provide direction to staff. BACKGROUND 4. The property is zoned RAS-1 and the gross lot area is 1.97 acres. The net lot area is 1.45 acres or 63,160 square feet. The existing property was developed primarily towards the rear of the lot with most of the garage, and all of a small shed, and a two-story tack house in the rear setback. 5. The property is currently developed with a 2,450 square foot residence, a 535 square foot garage, a 52 square foot shed, a 96 square foot service yard, and a previously permitted 751 square foot two story stable/tack house, of which the second story has been converted to a guest house (375 square foot stable on the first story, and a 376 square foot guest house on the second story). A nonconforming 25 square foot wood stove has been demolished. The applicant proposes to convert the guesthouse portion to a stable tack room/storage use. As part of this application process the Planning Commission will visit the stable/guest house structure to verify that it can be converted to a stable use and place such a condition on the development. 6. Records indicate that the residence was constructed in the late 1930's, early 1940's. A permit for a tool house/tack house was approved in 1941, and a permit for a workshop was approved in 1944. In 1969 a variance was approved to build a tennis court in the front yard, which was not constructed. MUNICIPAL CODE COMPLIANCE 7. The project's disturbed area is currently 52.33% and above the allowed 40%. The proposed disturbed area will increase due to the disturbance for the pool pad for a total of 56.13% disturbance. The applicant's agent advises that the slopes for this pad will be 3:1 for at least 50% of the grading and the project is allowed 50% disturbance (Section 17.16.070B.A.2). The increase to 56.13% will require a variance. The cut for the pool pad ZC NO. 897 2 Hillside Lane will be 750 cubic yards; the fill will be 500 cubic yards, with 250 cubic yards to be exported. 8. The structural coverage on the lot will be 6,737 square feet or 10.67% and the total coverage (structures and hardscape) will be 19,416 square feet or 30.74%, both in compliance with the code. 9. The 800 square foot addition to the existing 2,450 square foot residence will result in a 3,250 square foot house. The adjacent homes are 5,168 square feet (to the north), 4,473 square feet (to the south), and 5,534 square feet (to the east) and the proposed house will be compatible in size. The residential addition will be at least 35 feet from the stable to comply with the Municipal Code (17.18.040.5c). The residential building pad will increase by 800 square feet and with the addition the coverage on this pad will be 4,532 square feet or 28.9%; and with the allowed deductions, 4,131square feet or 26%. 10. The 680 square foot pool, 72 square foot spa, 800 square foot recreation room, 50 square feet of pool equipment, 227 square foot attached trellis, and 1,610 square foot decking are proposed to be located in the front yard of the residence, not in a setback. As the proposed pool/spa and structures are located in the front yard, a variance is needed but otherwise all are compliant with the Municipal Code. The recreation room is proposed to be 15'.8" high. The pool pad improvements are located 144 feet away from Saddleback Road and 80 feet from Hillside Lane roadway easements. The new pool building pad will be 4,100 square feet and will have coverage of 1,482 (with deductions) or 36.15%. 11. The existing 16' driveway is proposed to be widened to 20' to comply with Fire Department requirements. 18 -inch maximum curb walls are proposed along the perimeter of the driveway leading to the 32' radius Fire Department Turn -around area. The Traffic Commission will review the driveway apron on March 24, 2016. 12. Proposed is approximately 9-10 foot difference in elevation between the residential building pad and the proposed accessory structures on the second pad. Stairs and various walls will connect the building pads. A 3 -foot high maximum wall screens the pool and deck area from the front yard area to the north. A 5 -foot maximum wall screens the recreation room and attached trellis from the front yard area to the north and wraps around this structure to the east, and includes the pool equipment area. A 4 -foot high retaining wall is proposed along the south side of the pool building pad. 13. The 751 square foot two-story existing structure in the southeast portion of the site, and in the rear and side yard setbacks has a stable on the first floor and a guest house on the second floor and will be converted entirely into a two-story stable as a condition of approval. Pursuant to Section 17.18.060(D) the first story of the stable must conform with ZC NO. 897 2 Hillside Lane the requirements of an agricultural space including entry doors and access to the stable. Pursuant to Section 17.18.060(C), the tack room space cannot be used for sleeping. The applicant has set aside a 1,150 square feet corral outside of the setbacks. A condition of approval will be to remove the concrete from the proposed corral area and replace it with decomposed granite. The stable access is concrete. However, 275 square feet of concrete will be removed and replaced with a 3 foot wide strip of decomposed granite running the length of the access to the stable, and a 6' wide DG path with wrap around the corral area to meet up with the stable to comply with Municipal Code 17.18.030.A. The existing stable pad (not in setback) is 660 square feet and has coverage of 64.85%. 14. A 52 square foot shed in the southeast portion of the site is in the side setback and a condition of approval will be for the applicant to relocate the shed outside of the setback or remove it. 15. A wood stove was built into the retaining wall between the residence and the stable, adjacent to the proposed corral area. A condition of approval will be to fully remove what remains of the stove. 16. In response to justification for the project, the applicant's agents advise that the proposed residential addition will be on a previously constructed pad where little to no grading will be required. The pool pad will be located largely on a previously disturbed area as well but will require some grading. Not to exceed 5 foot high retaining walls and 3:1 slopes for the new building pad will minimize the development impact on the property. The remaining 50% of the grading will have 2:1 slopes to blend with existing contours. The agents also advise the property was previously developed mostly at the rear of the lot, with the garage and stable being in the rear setback. The existing house pad is proposed to be developed on the southeast side and due to the 35' clearance required from stables, the only other area for a pool is in the front yard. The pool and associated pool pad improvements are proposed to be out of all setbacks and as far away fro Saddleback Road as possible. 17. Rolling Hills Community Association will review this project at a later date. 18. When reviewing a development application the Planning Commission must consider whether the proposed project meets the criteria for a Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance and must find that the proposed uses are consistent with the General Plan and development standards of the City, including provision for open space and maintaining a rural environment and that the uses will not adversely affect adjacent properties. 19. Fuel modification review and approval from the Fire Department is also required. ZC NO. 897 2 Hillside Lane 20. This project will be required to comply with all zoning requirements, including undergrounding of utility lines and Health Department requirements for a septic system. 21. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Class 3. ZC 897 NEARBY PROPERTIES For information onl Address House size in sq.ft. (built/add or remodel) Lot Area sq.ft. (excl. roadway easements) 4 Hillside Lane 4,473 ((1999)* 92,350 49 Saddleback Road 5,534 (1998) 75,790 48 Saddleback Road 5,168 (1972/1976) 38,770 46 Saddleback Road 7,832 (2013)* 105,420 3 Hillside Lane 2,634 (1938/1950) 98,710 93 Saddleback Road 4,441 (1949) 255,262 20 Portuguese Bend Road 4,193 (1939/1947) 192,100 2 Hillside Lane Proposed 3,250 85,760 NOTE: The above do not include garages, basements and other accessory structures. SOURCES: Assessors' records * City Records ZONING CASE NO. 897 SITE PLAN REVIEW/CUP/VR EXISTING PROPOSED RA -S- 1 ZONE SETBACKS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, GARAGE, GUEST HOUSE/STABLE, SHED ADDITION, SWIMMING POOL/SPA, RECREATION ROOM, LEGALIZE STABLE Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 20 ft from side property line Rear: 50 ft. from rear property line CUP required for pool house in the Residence Garage Swimming Pool Spa Recreation Rm Pool equip. Stable/Guest h. Shed Service yard Attch porches Entryway Attached trellis 2450 sq.ft. 535 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft 376 sq.ft. 52 sq.ft 96 sq.ft. 198 sq.ft. 250 sq.ft. 203 sq.ft. Residence Garage Swimming Pool Spa Recreation Rm Pool equip. Stable Shed Service yard Attch porches Entryway Attached Trellis 3250 sq.ft. 535 sq.ft. 680 sq.ft. 72 sq.ft. 800 sq.ft. 50 sq.ft 376 sq.ft. 52 sq.ft 96 sq.ft. 198 sq.ft. 250 sq.ft. 430 sq.ft front yard; SPR required for grading, pool, spa, pool house, new decking„ and retaining walls. Variance is required for locating the structures in the front yard (pool, spa, pool equipment, and pool house), and for exceeding disturbed area. TOTAL 4,160 sq.ft. TOTAL 6,789 q.ft GRADING N/A 750 c.y. cut & 500 c.y. fill Site Plan Review required if ZC NO. 897 2 Hillside Lane excavation and/or fill or combination thereof that is more than 3 feet in depth and covers more than 2,000 sq. ft.) 250 c.y. to be exported STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE 6.5% 10.7% of 63,160 s.f. net lot area (6,737 s.f. excl/allowances) (20% maximum) TOTAL LOT COVERAGE 21.62 % 30.7% of 63,160 s.f. net lot area (19,416 s.f. excl/allowances) (35% maximum) BUILDING PAD COVERAGE (30% 22.02% of 15,129 sq.ft. pad n/a 64.85% of 660 sq.ft. pad 26.3% of 15,900 sq.ft. pad 36.2% of 4,100 sq.ft. pad 64.85% of 660 sq.ft. pad maximum -guideline) Residential Pool pad Stable pad DISTURBED AREA 52.33% or 33,052 sq. ft. (63,160 sq. ft. net lot area) 56.1% or 35,452 sq.ft. (63,160 sq. ft. net lot area) (40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist) STABLE (min. 450 SQ.FT. 375 sq.ft. existing 0 sq ft. corral 751 sq.ft. proposed 2 -story 550 s.f. corral & 550 SQ.Fr. CORRAL) STABLE ACCESS Existing Existing ROADWAY ACCESS Existing driveway approach Existing driveway approach with widened driveway to 20' from 16' VIEWS N/A Planning Commission review PLANTS AND ANIMALS N/A Planning Commission review SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA 17.46.010 Purpose. The site plan review process is established to provide discretionary review of certain development projects in the City for the purposes of ensuring that the proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan; incorporates environmentally and aesthetically sensitive grading practices; preserves existing mature vegetation; is compatible and consistent with the scale, massing and development pattern in the immediate project vicinity; and otherwise preserves and protects the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Rolling Hills. 17.46.050 Required findings. A. The Commission shall be required to make findings in acting to approve, conditionally approve, or deny a site plan review application. B. No project which requires site plan review approval shall be approved by the Commission, or by the City Council on appeal, unless the following findings can be made: 1. The project complies with and is consistent with the goals and policies of the general plan and all requirements of the zoning ordinance; 2. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. Lot coverage requirements are regarded as ZC NO. 897 2 Hillside Lane maximums, and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted depends upon the existing buildable area of the lot; 3. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences; 4. The project preserves and integrates into the site design, to the greatest extent possible, existing topographic features of the site, including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls); 5. Grading has been designed to follow natural contours of the site and to minimize the amount of grading required to create the building area; 6. Grading will not modify existing drainage channels nor redirect drainage flow, unless such flow is redirected into an existing drainage course; 7. The project preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees and supplements these elements with drought -tolerant landscaping which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and landscaping provides a buffer or transition area between private and public areas; 8. The project is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenient and safe movement of pedestrians and vehicles; and 9. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: 17.42.050 Basis for approval or denial of conditional use permit. The Commission (and Council on appeal), in acting to approve a conditional use permit application, may impose conditions as are reasonably necessary to ensure the project is consistent with the General Plan, compatible with surrounding land use, and meets the provisions and intent of this title. In making such a determination, the hearing body shall find that the proposed use is in general accord with the following principles and standards: A. That the proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan; B. That the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures have been considered, and that the use will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, building or structures; C. That the site for the proposed conditional use is of adequate size and shape to accommodate the use and buildings proposed; D. That the proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development standards of the zone district; E. That the proposed use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; F. That the proposed conditional use observes the spirit and intent of this title. SOURCE: City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance CRITERIA FOR VARIANCES 17.38.050 Required findings. In granting a variance, the Commission (and Council on appeal) must make the following findings: ZC NO. 897 2 Hillside Lane A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone; B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question; C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; E. That the variance does not grant special privilege to the applicant; F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and G. That the variance request is consistent with the general plan of the City of Rolling Hills.. ZC NO. 897 2 Hillside Lane