City Council Meeting 03-21-2016 Field TripCITY OF ROLLING HILLS
PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL AND POSTING
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ss
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
I am a citizen of the United States. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within
proceeding; my business address is 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California.
On the day of l8`" of March, 2016, I serve the within
City Council — Adjourned Regular Meeting Agenda 03/21/16
Field Trip to 15 & 18 Portuguese Bend Road (Resolution 2015-03-CTV Appeal)
a copy of which is annexed hereto and made a part hereof, on the person, or persons, named below
by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid; in -
the United States mail at Rolling Hills, California addressed as follows:
E -MAILED MAILED
Interested Parties NONE
and their Attorneys
RH ListSery
DROPBOX DELIVERED
City Attorney City Council Members
City Manager
Also posted at City Hall and at www.Rolling-Hills.org/CityCouncilAgendas
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on the 18'" day of March, 2016 at Rolling Hills, California.
Heidi Luce
City Clerk
0
7
MINUTES OF
AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA
MONDAY, MARCH 21, 2016
CALL TO ORDER
An adjourned regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills was called to order by
Mayor Pieper at 6:00 p.m. at 18 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California.
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Present:
Others Present:
PUBLIC HEARING
Black, Dieringer, Mirsch, Wilson and Mayor Pieper.
Raymond R. Cruz, City Manager.
Yolanta Schwartz, Planning Director.
Wendy Starks, Associate Planner.
Howard Weinberg, Attorney (Nuccion).
Hal Light, Attorney (Hassoldt).
William Hassoldt, applicant (15 Portuguese Bend Rd).
Roger Hawkins, Resident.
Brandon Gill, Arborist.
Luke Midura, Arborist.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF TWO APPEALS OF
COMMITTEE ON TREES AND VIEWS RESOLUTION NO. 2015-03-CTV SETTING
FORTH FINDINGS RELATING TO TRIMMING OF TREES AT 15 PORTUGUESE BEND
ROAD DUE TO VIEW IMPAIRMENT FROM 18 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD.
LOCATION OF TREES:
PROPERTY OWNER:
COMPLAINANTS:
15 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
MR. AND MRS. HASSOLDT
DR. AND MRS. NUCCION
18 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
The City Council and the parties present assembled on the driveway at 18 Portuguese Bend Road. Mr.
Weinberg distributed a larger aerial photo of the trec survey than was previously submitted. Planning
Director Schwartz briefly reviewed the background of the appeals. All present walked onto the patio
above the pool at 18 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California to view the trees and the view.
Mayor Pieper stated that the purpose of the site visit is to: 1) See the view and the viewing area. 2)
Determine if there is a view. 3) Determine if the viewing area is appropriate. 4) If the viewing area is
determined to be appropriate, is it obstructed?
It was confirmed that the aerial photographic evidence provided by Dr. and Mrs. Nuccion was from July
2010.
Mr. Light advised that trees on 15 Portuguese Bend Road have been trimmed in January 2016.
Planning Director Schwartz, Mr. Hassoldt, and Mayor Pieper identified each of the trees subject to this
case, including the ones that are not part of the complaint (#7, Acacia, and #10 of the list provided by
the Nuccions). It was stated that trees #8 and #13 on the new list arc Olive trees that were deemed
mature by CTV and were not recommended for restorative action by the CTV.
In response to an inquiry, Planning Director Schwartz advised that the purchase date for 18 Portuguese
Bend Road is April 2009.
The City Council agreed there is a view from the patio viewing area and that the viewing area is
appropriate. Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer added that there are views of city lights and mountains per
statute.
Minutes — Adjourned Regular
City Council Meeting
03-21-16
Wendy Star
Associate PI ner
A discussion ensued as to whether the trees block the views, if they are mature, and if they are mature,
were they mature in 2009, and if the property owners had a view in 2009.
Councilmember Black observed that it is clear the trees have grown since the photographic evidence and
that the view is obstructed.
Councilmember Mirsch confirmed that the 2 Olive trees are the only ones that were declared mature per
the Committee on Trees and Views and that the l'inc tree that abuts both property lines is not a part of
this complaint.
Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer asked that since the regulations have changed, does the complaint need to go
back to the CTV, and Councilmember Black advised a vote can be taken by the City Council on that
matter during the regular meeting of the City Council on March 28, 2016. Councilmembers directed
staff to obtain an opinion from the City Attorney whether the case can be decided by the City Council or
does it have to go back to the CTV and whether the new regulations and interpretation of Measure B
should be applied to this case or the old ones.
The group proceeded to the pool area, where the Councilmembers stated that some of the pictures were
taken from, and determined that the vantage point from this patio is different.
The City Council and the parties present then proceeded to the property located at 15 Portuguese Bend
Road to view the subject trees.
Mr. Hassoldt and Mayor Pieper identified each of the trees in the complaint. Councilmembers observed
that some of the trees were cut previously as the cut lines were visible, that tree #7, the Acacia has been
cut, that trees #2 and #3, Palm Trees, have been trimmed recently.
Mr. Light advised that in response to Mr. Jenkins, the City Attorney, who advised at a previous meeting
that the owner could trim the trees to ensure the trees' health while this case is being considered, the
owners trimmed and cleaned some of the trees.
Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer inquired if the CTV determined the two trees were mature using the current
definition. Mayor Pieper advised that they did not as the City Council established the definition
recently.
Mayor Pieper confirmed that all Councilmembers have seen the trees and know where each one is.
There being no further questions or comments, the public hearing was continued to Monday, March 28,
2016 beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber at City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling
Hills, California.
OPEN AGENDA - PUBLIC COMMENT
None.
ADJOURNMENT
Hearing no further business before the City Council, Mayor Pieper adjourned the meeting at 6:45 p.m.,
to an adjourned regular meeting of the City Council to be held on Monday, March 28, 2016 beginning at
7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber at City Hall, 2 l'ortuguesc Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California.
Respectfully submitted,
Approved,
Jeff Pieper
Mayor
Minutes — Adjourned Regular
City Council Meeting
03-21-16
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX (310) 377-7288
AGENDA - ADJOURNED CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, MARCH 21, 2016 FIELD TRIP
MEETING TIME/LOCATION:
6:00 P.M.
18 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD & 15 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. PUBLIC HEARING
A. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF TWO APPEALS OF
COMMITTEE ON TREES AND VIEWS RESOLUTION NO. 2015-03-CTV SETTING.
FORTH FINDINGS RELATING TO TRIMMING OF TREES AT 15 PORTUGUESE
BEND ROAD DUE TO VIEW IMPAIRMENT FROM 18 PORTUGUESE BEND
ROAD.
LOCATION OF TREES: 15 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
PROPERTY OWNER: MR. AND MRS. HASSOLDT
COMPLAINANTS: DR. AND MRS. NUCCION
18 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
4. OPEN AGENDA - PUBLIC COMMENT
5. ADJOURNMENT
Public Comment is welcome on any item prior to City Council action on the item.
Documents pertaining to an agenda item received after the posting of the agenda are available for review in the
City Clerk's office or at the meeting at which the item will be considered
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting due to your disability, please contact the Deputy City Clerk at (310) 377-1521 at least 48 hours prior to
the meeting to enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility and accommodation for
your review of this agenda and attendance at this meeting.
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
TO:
FROM:
THRU:
SUBJECT:
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310)377-1521
FAX (310) 377-7288
Agenda Item No. 3-A
Mtg. Date: 03/21/16 FIELD TRIP
HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTORTO
RAYMOND R. CRUZ, CITY MANAGER I�' "
TWO APPEALS
DECISION:
LOCATION OF TREES:
PROPERTY OWNER:
COMPLAINANTS:
OF COMMITTEE ON TREES
AND VIEWS
15 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
MR.AND MRS. HASSOLDT
DR. AND MRS. NUCCION
18 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
DATE PUBLISHED: November 12, 2015
NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES: March 18, 2016
ATTACHMENTS: List of Trees & Aerial Plan submitted 03/16/16
Previous List of Trees & Aerial Plan
Appeal Application Photographs
RECOMMENDATION
1. The City Council, in response to the appeal, is requested to visit both properties;
first, 18 Portuguese Bend Road and observe the trees marked on the tree survey, subject
to the appeal, and the view from the area of the property defined by the complainants
to be their viewing area; and second, 15 Portuguese Bend Road to observe the trees
subject to the appeal. Further, it is recommended that the City Council receive public
testimony and additional information, if any, and adjourn the meeting to the regular
City Council meeting to be held on March 28, 2016 starting at 7:00 PM
PREVIOUS MEETINGS, DOCUMENTATION AND REQUEST:
2. The City Council held a public hearing on November 23, 2015 in the matter of
two appeals of a decision of the Committee and Trees and Views in the above case and
0
scheduled a field trip to subject properties on January 11, 2016. During the course of the
past 2 months both parties requested continuation of the case. The field trip has been
scheduled for March 21, 2016 to be followed by the regular City Council meeting on
March 28, 2016.
PLEASE REFER TO THE DOCUMENTS AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PROVIDED TO YOU FOR THE NOVEMBER 23, 2015 MEETING.
3. At the November meeting, the City Council requested that an accurate tree
survey of the view obstructing trees on 15 Portuguese Bend Road be prepared and
submitted by the property owners of 18 Portuguese Bend Road and that the trees be
labeled in the field. At the meeting the owners of 15 Portuguese Bend Road agreed to
provide access to their property for the purpose of conducting the tree survey.
The owners of 18 Portuguese Bend Rd. submitted tree aerial and a list of obstructing
trees, which is enclosed. Since the methodology and depiction of the trees on the
current survey differ from the survey of trees submitted by the Nuccions to the CTV in
their initial application, enclosed is also the aerial photo and the list previously
submitted. The new list contains a column that relates each NEW tree number to the old
numbering system.
Also enclosed with this report are pictures submitted by the initial complainants for the
request for a hearing to the Committee on Trees and Views.
4. Before the City Council are two appeals of a decision of the Committee on Trees
and Views ("Committee") adopted on October 7, 2015.
The appeals were filed by the property owners of 15 Portuguese Bend Road on whose
property the trees are located and by the complainants at 18 Portuguese Bend Road.
Section 17.54.060(B -C) of the Municipal Code provides the City Council with the
authority to uphold, overturn or otherwise modify the Committee's original action; or
remand the application back to the Committee for further review and direction.
5. Appeals
A. The appeal by Mr. and Mrs. Hassoldt (tree owners) has been filed on the basis:
• The Nuccions have not established, by clear and convincing evidence or at all,
the existence of a protected view over Number 15 (15 Portuguese Bend Road);
• Each of the trees subject to the complaint are exempt because they were mature
on April 22, 2009 (when the Nuccions acquired the property)
• Other various bases for the appeal.
i. The Hassoldts were not properly noticed of the view complaint case filed
by the Nuccions
ii. The View Ordinance fails to provide procedure to require service of view
complaint
iii. Upholding the CTV resolution would be in excess of the jurisdiction of the
City
iv. The remediation actions will provide an unobstructed view and not "view
corridors" to the Nuccions
v. No view existed when the Nuccions acquired the property and therefore
the decision of the CTV is unlawful
vi. The Nuccions have failed to establish by "clear and convincing evidence"
that they had a view when they purchased the property and that the trees
were not mature when they acquired the property.
The details of the statement of Appeal are enclosed as Attachment C to the report
provided to you for the 11-23-15 City Council meeting.
B. The appeal by Dr. and Mrs. Nuccion (complainants) has been filed on the basis
that:
• The Committee erred in its decision that the two Olive trees subject to the
complaint were mature when the Nuccions purchased the property, and are
therefore not eligible for remediation; and
• The Committee abused its discretion by rejecting one arborist report that
concluded that the Olive trees were not mature and accepting another arborist
report that concluded that the Olive trees were mature; and that the decision of
the Committee to render those trees mature is not supported by substantial
evidence.
The details of the statement of Appeal are enclosed as an Attachment D to the report
provided to you for the 11-23-15 City Council meeting.
6. Pursuant to Section 17.54.060 of the Zoning Ordinance, the appeal hearing shall
be limited to the issues raised by the appellants identified above and conducted as a de
novo hearing, meaning that a new hearing shall be held and new evidence may be
considered; however, the scope of the City Council's review shall be limited to those
issues identified in the two appeals. The City Council shall consider all information in
the Committee's record, as well as additional information presented at the appeal
hearings, before taking action.
7. The City Council, in response to the appeal, is requested to consider the record
on this case, receive public testimony and additional information, if any, and provide
direction to staff. Staff consulted with the California Fair Political Practices Commission
(FPPC) regarding whether the location of Mayor Pieper's home within 500 feet of 15
Portuguese Bend Road creates a conflict requiring recusal. The FPPC determined that
no conflict exists and Mayor Pieper may participate in the proceedings.
BRIEF BACKGROUND (A detailed report was provided to the City Council for the
11/23/15 meeting)
8. On April 24, 2014, Dr. and Mrs. Nuccion, the owners of 18 Portuguese Bend Road
("Complainants"), filed a View Impairment Complaint ("Complaint") against trees
located on property owned by Mr. and Mrs. Hassoldt at 15 Portuguese Bend Road. The
Complaint was referred to a mediator and after that mediation failed to achieve an
agreement, on December 22, 2014, with clarified request letter and other information, on
February 4, 2015 the Complainants applied to the City for resolution of the complaint
before the Committee on Trees and Views.
9. In the application, the complainants requested that their view be restored to the
cut lines that existed when they purchased the property, which (they stated) are clearly
visible on the trees. They stated that to the best of their ability they are providing
pictures of their view and how it is obstructed (at time of application submittal). The
complainants purchased the property in April 2009 and proof of purchase was
submitted to the City.
The applicants stated that the trees block the view of the City lights to the north of
Rolling Hills. They stated that in the past they had a clear view from Santa Monica to
Mt. Baldy and that their primary viewing areas are the rooms on the north side of the
residence and the patio immediately adjacent thereto.
10. Between March 2015 and October 2015 the Committee held several public
hearings including a field trip on April 21, 2015 to both properties.
11. Following the public hearings and the field visit, the Committee found that:
a. a view as defined in the Municipal Code existed from 18 Portuguese Bend
Road when the Complainants acquired the property,
b. the view from the Complainants' property is significantly impaired
because 11 trees located at 15 Portuguese Bend Road impair the view of the City lights
from the Designated Viewing Areas, and
c. restorative action is necessary to abate the view impairment by creating
view corridors and views through trees.
12. At its April 21, 2015 meeting, the Committee directed staff to bring a Resolution
addressing 11 trees at 15 Portuguese Bend Road. Those trees were to be laced, trimmed
and lowered to the previous cuts. Mr. and Mrs. Hassoldt attorney submitted a letter
challenging the resolution on the following points: 1) that the Committee should have
been provided with additional evidence regarding the tree including an independent
arborists' report and a civil engineer's report and 2) that the Committee did not
consider or discuss the maturity of the trees. The Assistant City Attorney advised the
Committee that they should make a finding regarding maturity.
0
At the meeting staff reiterated that the Ordinance as amended by Measure B, does not
differentiate with regard to the type of restorative action when it exempts mature trees
and does not provide guidance as to the determination of maturity when trees have
been trimmed in the past.
The Committee decided that an independent arborist should be consulted to determine
the maturity of the trees. Staff was directed to procure an independent Arborist to
conduct a study of the subject trees and return with findings.
13. After several postponements of the meetings and challenges by the parties, the
City selected David De La Torre as the independent arborist. Both parties presented to
the Committee Arborist Reports prepared by their selected arborist. The findings in
those reports were conflicting; and both the applicants and the owners of the trees
urged the Committee to consider their arborist's report.
14. At the September 22, 2015 Committee meeting, Mr. De La Torre presented his
findings where he concluded that of the 11 trees at issue, only two (Tree #4A and #7,
both Olive Trees) were not mature in 2009, and the remainder were mature and would
therefore be ineligible for remediation under Measure B. However, he also found that
many of the trees that he deemed mature show signs of "TOPPING" trim method
prohibiting the tree's "NATURAL" height potential and he recommended trimming of
those trees.
15. The City's arborist used an acceptable methodology in the field of arboriculture
to determine whether a tree is mature or not. The applicants and free owners' arborists
disputed City arborist's conclusion, but none showed how they came to their
conclusion that the trees in question were either mature or not mature (mature -
Hassoldts arborist; not mature-Nuccions arborists). In their report they relied on their
experience, literature and knowledge of the field to make their case. One of the arborists
provided a definition of maturity as when a tree reaches its highest potential height, but
did not substantiate what that is in the case of the trees in question. [See Arborists
reports in Attachment E-2, CTV Staff Reports dated 7/7/15, 7/21/15 and 9/22/15 of
your Agenda Item 5B of the Appeal packet -(binder) dated 11/23/15].
16. Notwithstanding Mr. De La Torre's findings, and considering the other reports,
the Committee reviewed historical photographs in ROLLING HILLS The Early Years, by
A.E. Hanson (1978), and determined that the photographs of the general area of the
property at 15 Portuguese Bend Road shows that only two (tree #9 and #9A on the old
list and #8 and #13 on the new list) of the obstructing trees, both Olive trees, existed at
the time of the photograph and therefore were mature when the Complainants acquired
their property in 2009, and are therefore ineligible for remediation under Measure B.
The Committee found the remaining nine trees not to be mature and ordered restorative
action as follows:
TYPE OF
TREE &
TREE #
LOCATION
ACTION
MAINTENANCE
1
Eucalyptus
NO ACTION
NO ACTION
2
Eucalyptus- along
Roadway easement -front
Lace, shape & crown
reduce to no higher than
the current height of
Palm Trees
Every two years
3
Washington Fan Palm -
along N/E side of
property
Remove the dead fronds
Every two years
3 -A
Washington Fan Palm -
along N/E side of
property
Remove the dead fronds
Every two years
4
Eucalyptus & various
volunteers- S/W corner
of lot
Lower the canopy and
trim to old cuts for city
view
Every two years
4-A
Olive & various
volunteers- S/W corner
of lot
Lower the canopy and
trim to old cuts for city
view
Every two years
5
tus- by garage
Eucalyptus- g g
Reduce crown to the
height of top of pole
Every two years
6
California Pepper- along
front
Shape & reduce canopy
to old cuts
Every two years
6-A
California Pepper -along
front
Shape & reduce canopy
to old cuts
Every two years
7
Olive Tree- along front;
S/E corner
Shape, reduce crown
and balance to 2009
view
Every two years
8
Acacia
NO ACTION
NO ACTION
9
Olive Tree- lawn area
NO ACTION
NO ACTION
9-A
Olive Tree- lawn area
NO ACTION
NO ACTION
TOTAL 9 Trees Subject to Initial Restorative Action
The initial action is to be completed at the cost of the owners of 18 Portuguese Bend
Road, the initial complainants in this case; and the two-year maintenance is to be
implemented by the owners of the trees.
Hassoldt Property Tree Survey Mao Key
ISA Certified Arborists: Brandon Gill (WE -6574A) / Luke Midura (MN -4572A)
Legal Description: M.B. 201-29-35
Rolling Hills Lot No. 78
Tree # Species Common Name Old List #s
1 Eucalyptus camaldulensis Eucalyptus (Red Gum) 2
2 Washingtonie robusta Fan Palm
3 Washingtonia robusta Fan Palm
4 Schinus molls
3
3A
California Pepper 6
'Olive i 7
'California Pepper I' 6A
Acacia 8
5 Olea europaea
6 Schinus molle
7 Acacia spp.
8 Olea europaea
9 Olea europaea
10
11
12
'Olive I 9A
Olive 4A
Schinus molls 1California Pepper not on old list
Eucalyptus nidis !Gum) i 4
Eucalyptus camaldulensis :Eucalyptus (Red Gum) 5
13 Olea europaea
Olive
9
No # Eucalyptus camaldulensis Eucalyptus (Red Gum) 1 - removed
RECt%.V
MAR 14 VAS
City of Houury ""`
By
9 Tree 1 - Eucalyptus camddul...
9 Tree 2- Washinglonio robust.
q Tree 3- washingtada robust.
Tree 4- Schism male
9 Tree 6.Olea europ.e.
q Tree 6 -Scrims male
9 Tree 7 -Acacia app.
9 Tree 6- Olee eumpses
9 Tree 9- Olea europ.0
Tree 10-Schinua molle
• Tree 11 - Eucalyptus r dis
9 Tree 12 - Eucalyptus calmed..
9 Tree 13 Oleo axop.es
Agenda Item No: 3-A
Field Trip Mtg. Date: 03/21/16
Revised Page #9
COMMITTEE ON TREES AND VIEWS ORDER FOR RESTORATIVE ACTION
—OCTOBER 2015.
TYPE OF
TREE
AND
TREE #
LOCATION
ACTION
MAINTENANCE
1
Eucalyptus
NO ACTION
NO ACTION
2
Eucalyptus- along Roadway
easement -front
Lace, shape & crown reduce
to no higher than the current
height of Palm Trees
Every two years
3
Washington Fan Palm-
along N/E side of property
Remove the dead fronds
Every two years
3 A
Washington Fan Palm-
along N/E side of property
Remove the dead fronds
Every two years
4
Eucalyptus & various
volunteers- S/W corner of
lot
Lower the canopy and trim
to old cuts for city view
Every two years
4 A
Olive & various volunteers-
S/W corner of lot
Lower the canon and trim
to old cuts for city view
Every two years
5
Eucalyptus- by garage
Reduce crown to the height
of top of pole
Every two years
6
California Pepper- along
front
Shape & reduce canopy to
old cuts
Every two years
6-A
California Pepper -along
front
Shape & reduce canopy to
old cuts
Every two years
Olive Tree- along front; S/E
corner7
Shape, reduce crown and
balance to 2009 view
Every two years
8
Acacia
NO ACTION
NO ACTION
9
Olive Tree- lawn area
NO ACTION
NO ACTION
9-A
Olive Tree- lawn area
NO ACTION
NO ACTION
TOTAL 9 Trees Subject to Initial Restorative Action
e 4
is
i
, t
4
1
kt
Bit
Save home Save image X Close
lett",
vt
PECEt VELA
DEC 2 2 2201.
6/8
Save home Save image X Close
C
7/8
mV� L_a ta:Lbp V.7
FEB 0 4 2015
City of Rolling HilI
3y
3/19
liV a t 'J d
FEB 04 2O5
City of Rolling Hilts
By
r
poll!
4/19
5) ,.f.•• �a y
FEB 0 4 rtesa
City of Roiling Hills
By
m ®5,„
FEB 0 4 203
City of Rolling Hills
Easy
6/19
dl
Matt..
'aI4,0,:
FEB P4 W3
City of Holing Hills
•
7119
er
Bye ity tat Rcs:r.g H.d
8/19
f CJ U £115
G.iJ
0@
0
cs.
M4r
3 ,) 21E
City of Rolling Hi!
•
/
pt
FEB �v
City of Roh:ng
Sy
1
rf
— o h.cAd I h CJMoitsi
poc.lak. -
15 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD -Trees
TYPE OF
TREE
AND
TREE #
LOCATION
ACTION
MAINTENANCE
1
Eucalyptus
NO ACTION
NO ACTION
2
Eucalyptus- along Roadway
easement -front
' Lace, shape & crown reduce to
no higher than the current height
of Palm Trees
Every two years
3
Washington Fan Palm-
along N/E side of property .
Remove the dead fronds
.
Every two years
3-A
Washington Fan Palm
along N/E side of property
Remove the dead fronds
Every two years
4
Eucalyptus & various
volunteers- S/W corner of
lot
Lower the canopy and trim to old
cuts for city view
Every two years
4-A
Olive & various volunteers-
S/W comer of lot
Lower the canopy and trim to old
cuts for city view
Every two years
5
Eucalyptus- by garage
Reduce crown to the height of top
of pole
Every two years
6
California Pepper- along
front
Shape & reduce canopy to old
cuts
Eve two years
Every
6-A
California Pepper -along
front
Shape & reduce canopy to old
cuts
Eve years
Every two
Olive Tree- along front; S/E
comer7
Shape, reduce crown and balance
to 2009 view
Everytwo years
8
Acacia
NO ACTION
NO ACTION
9
Olive Tree- lawn area
Lace, shape, reduce crown and
balance to 2009 view
Every two years
9-A
Olive Tree- lawn area
Lace, shape, reduce crown and
balance to 2009 view
Every two years
TOTAL 11 Trees Subject to Initial Restorative Action
The locations of the above listed trees are shown on the aerial photograph attached hereto