Loading...
Traffic Commission Agenda 01-21-1994CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL AND POSTING STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I am a citizen of the United States. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within proceeding; my business address is 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. Onthe J day of ,1994 Iservethewithin a copy of which is annexed hereto and made a part hereof, on the person, or persons, named below by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelop with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Rolling Hills, California addressed as. follows: FAXED • Palos Verdes Peninsula News MAILED DELIVERED City Attorney City manager Traffic Commission Also posted in one public place I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the /gam day of ,1994 at Rolling Hills, California. MARILYN L. KERN DEPUTY CITY CLERK AGENDA REGULAR MEETING • (1y 0/ R0f/ _WA INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 TRAFFIC COMMISSION FRIDAY, JANUARY 21, 1994 8:30 A.M. NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CITY HALL 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. INTRODUCTION OF NEW TRAFFIC COMMISSIONERS 4. MINUTES A. MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 19, 1993. S. SELECTION OF VICE CHAIR 6. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CORRESPONDENCE FROM DR. ROBERT W. MOORE REGARDING REQUEST FOR SPEED BUMPS ON MIDDLERIDGE LANE NORTH. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. B. CORRESPONDENCE FROM JOHN WELBOURN REGARDING RESIGNATION AS A TRAFFIC COMMISSIONER. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. C. CORRESPONDENCE TO RESIDENTS OF BUGGY WHIP DRIVE REGARDING TRAFFIC SAFETY AND INCREASED TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. D. CORRESPONDENCE TO RESIDENTS OF JOHNS CANYON ROAD, CHESTNUT LANE AND MORGAN LANE REGARDING TRAFFIC SAFETY AND INCREASED TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. Agenda Traffic Commission 01-21-94 -1- Printed on Recycled Paper. E. CORRESPONDENCE FROM LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT REGARDING RESULTS OF HOLIDAY SOBRIETY CHECKPOINTS. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. 7. OLD BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION OF A REPORT REGARDING VEHICLES NOT ADHERING TO THE STOP SIGN AT GATES AS THEY EXIT THE CITY. B. CONSIDERATION OF RELOCATION OF THE MAILBOX PRESENTLY LOCATED ON PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD. 8. NEW BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION OF SIGNAGE. ON PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ADJACENT TO RANCHERO ROAD. B. CONSIDERATION OF DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO A PROPOSED NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 7 STORM HILL LANE. C. CONSIDERATION OF DRIVEWAY ACCESS AT 1 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE. D. CONSIDERATION OF A CURVE WANING SIGN IN THE VICINITY OF 11 GEORGEFF ROAD. 10. MATTERS FROM MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION 11. MA'1'1':RS FROM STAFF A. REPORT REGARDING ROAD KILL RESEARCH. 10. ADJOURNMENT Agenda Traffic Commission 01-21-94 -2- • • Cuy o`RoPliny INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 FAX COVER SHEET l »TF: /—/ g 9y TO• (2) ," -& s TELEPHONE: NO 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS. CALIF 90274 13101377-1521 FAX 1310) 377.7288 TIME SENT: tQ; �—p Ky., FROM: OPERATOR: ���, OUR FILE NO: YOUR FILE NO: SUBJECT:.19A REMARKS: - TOTAL PAGES (including cover sheet): The City of Rolling Hills uses a Savinfax Model 300 telecopier as its primary telecopier. It is compatible with Group 1, 2 and 3 telecopy machines. If you have difficulty receiving any pages, please telephone our switchboard at (310) 377-1521 REPLY TO: City of Rolling Hills - Fax No. (310) 377-7288 P•,^!ed on Recycled Paper • • (MA" _AIL INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 FAX COVER SHEET DATE: J- jg -9 y TO: . A -`e -y-7 1 o% r7 s c-, TELEPHONE: OUR FILE NO: SUBJECT: REMARKS: NO 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS. CALIF 90274 1310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377.7288 TIME SENT: o O s FROM: rs YY...;b OPERATOR: 7y e YOUR FILE NO: /-.7/^9y TOTAL PAGES (including cover sheet): The City of Rolling Hills uses a Savinfax Model 300 telecopier as its primary telecopier. It is compatible with Group 1, 2 and 3 telecopy machines. If you have difficulty receiving any pages, please telephone our switchboard at (310) 377-1521 REPLY TO: City of Rolling Hills Fax No. (310) 377-7288 R., -led on ReMled Paper AGENDA REGULAR MEETING • City 0/ leolliny JUL INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 TRAFFIC COMMISSION FRIDAY, JANUARY 21, 1994 8:30 A.M. NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CITY HALL 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. INTRODUCTION OF NEW TRAFFIC COMMISSIONERS 4. MINUTES A. MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 19, 1993. 5. SELECTION OF VICE CHAIR 6. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CORRESPONDENCE FROM DR. ROBERT W. MOORE REGARDING REQUEST FOR SPEED BUMPS ON MIDDLERIDGE LANE NORTH. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. B. CORRESPONDENCE FROM JOHN WELBOURN REGARDING RESIGNATION AS A TRAFFIC COMMISSIONER. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. C. CORRESPONDENCE TO RESIDENTS OF BUGGY WHIP DRIVE REGARDING TRAFFIC SAFETY AND INCREASED TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. D. CORRESPONDENCE TO RESIDENTS OF JOHNS CANYON ROAD, CHESTNUT LANE AND MORGAN LANE REGARDING TRAFFIC SAFETY AND INCREASED TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and. file. Agenda Traffic Commission 01-21-94 -1- Printed on Recycled Paper. • • E. CORRESPONDENCE FROM LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT REGARDING RESULTS OF HOLIDAY SOBRIETY CHECKPOINTS. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. 7. . OLD BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION OF A REPORT REGARDING VEHICLES NOT ADHERING TO THE STOP SIGN AT GATES AS THEY EXIT THE CITY. B. CONSIDERATION OF RELOCATION OF THE MAILBOX PRESENTLY LOCATED ON PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD. 8. NEW BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION OF SIGNAGE ON PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ADJACENT TO RANCHERO ROAD. B. CONSIDERATION OF DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO A PROPOSED NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 7 STORM HILL LANE. C. CONSIDERATION OF DRIVEWAY ACCESS AT 1 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE. D. CONSIDERATION OF A CURVE WANING SIGN IN THE VICINITY OF 11 GEORGEFF ROAD. 10. MATTERS FROM MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION 11. MATTERS FROM STAFF A. REPORT REGARDING ROAD KILL RESEARCH. 10. ADJOURNMENT Agenda Traffic Commission 01-21-94 -2- Agenda Item No.: 4-A DRAFT MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 19, 1993 A regular meeting of the Traffic Commission of the City of Rolling Hills was called to order by Chair Leeuwenburgh at 8:45 a.m. on Friday, November 19, 1993, in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Virtue, Wiener, Acting Commissioner Henke and Chair Leeuwenburgh. Absent: Commissioner Welbourn. Others Present: Craig R. Nealis, City Manager. Ken Johnson, Traffic Engineer. Roger Vink, RHCA Architectural Inspector. Deputy Nakaji, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Lomita Station. MINUTES A. MINUTES OF JULY 16, 1993. Commissioner Virtue commented that on page 2 of the July 16 minutes, that the bottom paragraph under New Business, Item A "Consideration of Request for Proposals for FY 93-94 Citywide Street Striping Program" needs to be amended to indicate that "Commissioner Welbourn seconded the motion which carried unanimously." Hearing no other objections and following a motion by Commissioner Virtue which was seconded by Chair Leeuwenburgh, the minutes of the July 16, 1993 were approved as amended. B. MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 17, 1993. Commissioner Wiener moved approval of the minutes of September 17, 1993. Acting Commission Henke seconded the motion which carried unanimously (Virtue abstained). CONSENT CALENDAR A. RELOCATION OF THE MAILBOX ADJACENT TO CITY HALL PROPERTY. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. City Manager Nealis presented the staff report providing the Commissioners with the history of the Agenda Traffic Commission 11/19/93 -1- • • DRAFT establishment of the mailbox at its current location and indicated that Commissioner Stringfellow had commented that the Keesals seemed to be objecting to the location of the mailbox close to their driveway. Chair Leeuwenburgh commented that Rolling Hills residents have become accustomed to having the mailbox along Portuguese Bend Road. Discussion ensued over various locations of the mailbox. Commissioner Virtue suggested the location of Saddleback and Portuguese Bend Roads. Chair Leeuwenburgh indicated that modifications of the mailbox further up the Hill may require the removal of some trees. Architectural Inspector Roger Vink indicated that the main concern of the Keesals is that tennis players are parking on the easement rather than using City Hall parking lot. City Manager Nealis suggested that he contact the Tennis Club and be directed to work with the City Traffic Engineer to come up with various alternative locations for the mailbox and report back to the Commission at their January meeting. Hearing no objection, this was so ordered by Chair Leeuwenburgh. OLD BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FROM THE WILDLIFE PRESERVATION COMMITTEE REGARDING "CRI'T'TER CROSSING" SIGNS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS WITHIN THE CITY. (This item was taken out of order.) Wildlife preservation Committee Member Don Gales addressed the Commission quoting from a 1988 letter from then Mayor Gordana Swanson on the purpose of the Wildlife Preservation Committee's mission to preserve and restore wildlife in the community. Mr. Gales indicated that he felt that the Traffic Commissioner's appraisal of the "Critter Crossing" signs request was more appropriate for a regular City and not the country living atmosphere in Rolling Hills. Mr. Gales reiterated the Wildlife Preservation Committee's request for two or three signs indicating "Critter Crossing" where road kill occurs. Locations already identified are near the LaCaze property on Portuguese Bend Road and the vicinity of Saddleback and Portuguese Bend Road and on Crest Road near the fire station. Chair Leeuwenburgh requested information from Don Gales relative to the numbers and types of animals subject to road kill. Mr. Gales indicated that the Wildlife Preservation Committee is researching this. City Manager Nealis indicated that he will research this with the Humane Society. Mr. Gales indicated that their request was for standard roadway signs with a possible silhouette of quail or other animals crossing a roadway urging vehicularcaution. Chair Leeuwenburgh indicated to Mr. Gales the number of requests the Traffic Commission has relative to children at play signs, watch for horses signs, or other signs relative to activity inthe community. She indicated that we do not wish to confuse people by erecting signs relative to the preservation of wildlife when the Commission has denied requests for signs relative to these other activities. Chair Leeuwenburgh indicated that she was supportive of the Wildlife Preservation Committee's efforts but that the City is charged with health and safety responsibilities. It was further addressed that the community is somewhat resistant to additional signage. Agenda Traffic Commission 11/19/93 -2- • • DRAFT City Manger Nealis commented that if signs were erected that caused a vehicle to swerve away from, for example, quail, and that swerving resulted in an accident, that the City may be in a position of having erected a sign that led to an accident. Traffic Engineer Ken Johnson supported the comments made by the City Manager and reiterated the Commissions need to address vehicular safety matters in this regard. Acting Commissioner Henke requested that the City produce articles for the newsletter alerting motorists to watch out for animals as well as other uses on Rolling Hills roadways that may be in conflict with vehicles. Commissioner Virtue suggested that the Wildlife Preservation Committee prepare a report with possible flyers of information to be presented at the RHCA annual meeting. City Manager Nealis was directed to obtain statistics from the Humane Society relative to this matter and pass them along to the Wildlife Preservation Committee and the Traffic Commission at their next meeting as an informational matter. Traffic Engineer Ken Johnson indicated that a proliferation of warning signs at each gate entrance warning of animals, children, horses, etc would tend to dilute the effect in terms of notifying motorists. Following discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Wiener, which was seconded by Commissioner Virtue, to deny the request of the Rolling Hills Wildlife Preservation Committee for "Critter Crossing" signs at various locations in the City. Staff was directed to return with a report from the Humane Society relative to the number of road kills occurring in the community CONSENT CALENDAR �. B. CORRESPONDENCE FROM CAPTAIN HERB PETTUS REGARDING PENINSULA REGIONAL ACTIVITY REPORT, JULY - SEPTEMBER, 1993 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. City Manager Nealis presented the report indicating that there have been no injury accidents thus far in 1993. Chair Leeuwenburgh requested input from Deputy Nakaji relative to the Sheriff's Department activities during the recent fires. Deputy Nakaji described the 12 hours shifts employed by the Sheriff's Department indicating that the Palos Verdes Peninsula is a designated fire zone and that there was excessive manpower deployed locally for fire prevention patrols. He further indicated that a deputy actually put out a fire on the Peninsula during the time the Laguna Hills fire was burning and that Sheriff's Department personnel responded with fire personnel at the fire at Del Cerro Park. Deputy Nakaji also indicated that motorcycle patrols were instituted on the trails on the Peninsula. Agenda Traffic Commission 11/19/93 DRAFT NEW BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY ROLLING HILLS RESIDENT ROBERT W. MOORE RELATING TO SPEED BUMPS ON MIDDLERIDGE LANE NORTH. City Manager Nealis indicated that Dr. Moore has verbally withdrawn his request from consideration and that the City Manager had contacted the residents on the roadway indicating the action by Dr. Moore. City Manager Nealis further indicated that he has requested this withdrawal in writing from Dr. Moore. City Manager Nealis further indicated that the speed board had been used on Middleridge Lane North at least 16 times since February 6, 1993 although some of these times were on Middleridge Lane South. City Manager Nealis also reported his conversation with Deputy Lopez indicating that during a 6 hour period during hours of darkness, when a Sheriff's patrol vehicle was not visible on the roadway, the fastest radar clocked vehicle on the location was 18 mph and additionally, that no citations had been issued with any enforcement efforts in the area. City Manager Nealis also commented that he will be forwarding a copy of a letter from another concerned resident in the area to the City Attorney for possible recommendation in that it appears that a neighborhood dispute is erupting over this matter. Chair Leeuwenburgh indicated that the City has gone above and beyond its duty to try and address the concerns expressed by the Moores in this regard. City Manger Nealis indicated that he would include the letter from Dr. Moore withdrawing his request for speed bumps on the next agenda for the Traffic Commission for information purposes. B. REVIEW SIGNAGE IN CITY HALL PARKING LOT. City Manger Nealis displayed the signs indicating one way traffic only and recycling center which are proposed to be erected in the City Hall parking areas. City Traffic Engineer Ken Johnson voiced approval of the signs and indicated that the signs should be installed at least 3-1/2 to 4 feet high so they are easily viewed by. motorists. Acting Commissioner Henke suggested that arrows be painted on the roadway indicating one way driving only: Traffic Engineer Johnson agreed with this suggestion and the City Manager indicated that he would take care of this matter. Hearing no objection, Chair Leeuwenburgh approved the signage as presented by staff. MA'T'ERS FROM MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION • Chair Leeuwenburgh requested that RHCA Inspector Roger Vink investigate the overgrowth of bushes on Eastfield Drive in the vicinity of Hackamore Lane as you approach the stop sign in a downhill fashion. Roger Vink indicated that he would investigate this situation. • Chair Leeuwenburgh indicated that the "Stop Ahead" sign on Eastfield as you approach Agenda Traffic Commission 11/19/93 -4- • • DRAFT Crest Road is in an aged condition and needs to be replaced. RHCA Architectural Inspector Roger Vink indicated he would investigate this matter. • Chair Leeuwenburgh indicated that some stop signs in the City have lost their reflectivity and may have gone beyond their five year life span in terms of reflectivity. Roger Vink indicated that he would research this matter. • Chair Leeuwenburgh indicated that Commissioner Welbourn will be resigning from the Traffic Commissioner due to health concerns. • Chair Leeuwenburgh requested staff to provide a letter to the Caballeros reminding them to be on the look out for smokers on the trails. • Commissioner Wiener suggested that a reminder be placed in the Newsletter that the Municipal Code requires joggers to run in single file on Rolling Hills Roadways. Direction was also provided to Sheriff's Department personnel in attendance to vigorously enforce this provision in the Municipal Code. City Manager indicated that he would discuss this matter with Captain Herb Pettus. MAI MRS FROM STAFF • City Manager Nealis indicated that the Commission appointments will expire in January, 1994 and indicated he would provide notices of the vacancies to Commissioners when they are published so Commissioners can provide letters expressing their interest to continue serving on the Commission should they so desire. ADJOURNMENT Hearing no further business before the Traffic Commission, Chair Leeuwenburgh; adjourned the meeting at 10:20 a.m. to Friday, January 21, 1994 at 8:30 a.m. Approved, GINNY LEEUWENBURGH CHAIR Agenda Traffic "Commission 11/19/93 -5- CRAIG R. NEALIS CITY MANAGER cry /E'o/Any J/d/ • Agenda Item No.: 6-B INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 November 19, 1993 Honorable Ginny Leeuwenburgh Chair City of Rolling Hills Traffic Commission 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Dear Chair Leeuwenburgh: Due to recent health complications, I am forced to resign as a member of the Rolling Hills Traffic Commission effective immediately. I have enjoyed my participation on this important Commission and I am certain that under your guidance the Commission will continue to be an important component of the safety of the City of Rolling Hills. Thank you for all of your support. Sincerely, C`_i` John Welbourn JW:mlk corres.mk\jwcom.res tr Printed on Recycled Paper. 12-6-93 Rolling Hills Traffic Commission Dear Commission Members: Ag nda Item No : 6-A -DEC O r8 C. `( iQE,ROLLING Nil, I would like to thank the commission members for their willingness to consider my request for speed bumps on Middleridge Ln. N. My request was withdrawn due to several homeowners on the street not being in favor of this as a means of slowing down excessive traffic speed. I do however strongly disagree with the findings of Willdan Associates and their proposal to the city in their letter dated 11- 17-93. They have 2 recommendations: 1. Selected speed enforcement -presently the Sheriff' Dept. patrol the entire city for a total of 6 hours per week. This is hardly sufficient to enforce a problem that occurs due to a few individuals. 2.Discuss the problem with offending motorist- this solution which I already tried simply brought about a letter from one motorist' lawyer to me stating that I was harassing his client and that I should cease or face a law suit. Another motorist' response was F--- You! And another motorist simply gave me the finger. I do not believe asking someone to slow down will make any difference at all. It would appear Willdan Associates is not dealing with reality in this case. I do feel there is a need for greater efforts to reduce speed on our street. I would like the city to put in place "Children at play" signage as soon as possible. Perhaps increased awareness will help reduce the chance of tragedy and the liability that exists for the city. Thank you for your consideration. Robert W. Moore • city • op2 PP.>,$ Agenda Item No.: 6-C • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 •JOOY MURDOCK Mayor GINNY LEEUWENBURGH Mayor Pro Tem THOMAS F. HEINSHEIMER Councilmember GODFREY PERNELL Councilmember GORDANA SWANSON Councilmember January 6, 1994 Mr. & Mrs. Joseph Abdo 0 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Abdo: NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX; (310) 377.7288 SENT TO THE ATTACHED LIST One of the goals of the City of Rolling Hills and the Rolling Hills Traffic Commission is to ensure traffic safety on Rolling Hills roadways. Based upon complaints in the area, we will be initiating increased Sheriffs Department traffic patrols and radar deployment as well as the use of the speed display board on Buggy Whip Drive over the next few weeks. It is hoped that a safer living and driving environment will be realized by increasing the awareness of the 25 mile per hour speed limit on Buggy Whip Drive. Should you wish to discuss this further, please do not hesitate to call. We appreciate your cooperation and your willingness to obey local speed laws. Sincerely, 9JZ4r Craig R. Nealis City Manager CRN:mlk corres.cm\buggywhip.l tr merge a:buggywhi.mer cc: Traffic Commission Capt. Herb Pettus ®Pr r'E.y.jr QBC,c. "7 Cyt Mr. & Mrs. Joseph Abdo 0 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. Janura& Ms. Anderson 4 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. See Myun Kim 8 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Dr. & Mrs. Bernard Weiss 11 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. Thomas J. Cipolla 14 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Dr. Gary Chang 17 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. Robert Jonas 20 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. Darryl L. Snider 25 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Dr. & Mrs. Lawrence Amberg 1 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling I -fills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. Charles Perkins 5 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. William Crowley 9 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. A. Bryon Elliott 12 Buggy Whip . Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. Donald Mehlig 15 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Dr. & Mrs. Loren Stern 18 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. H. J. Meany 21 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling. Hills, CA 90274 Dr. & Mrs. George Stefanik 27 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Dr. & Mrs. Robert Schmit 2 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. Emanuel Reznick 7 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. Ty Bobit 10 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Dr. & Mrs. Irwin Glasner 13 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. Charles E. Rutherford 16 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. Frank Gargas 19 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Dr. & Mrs. Melvin Snyder 23 Buggy Whip Drive Rolling Hills, CA 90274 • • Oty Wk." Agenda Item No.: 6-E INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 JODY.MURDOCK Mayor GINNY LEEUWENBURGH Mayor Pro Tem THOMAS F. HEINSHEIMER Councilmember GODFREY PERNELL Councilmember GORDANA SWANSON Councilmember January 13, 1994 Mr. & Mrs. James Dodson 7 Morgan Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Dodson: NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 SENT TO THE ATTACHED LIST One of the goals of the City of Rolling Hills and the Rolling Hills Traffic Commission is to ensure traffic safety on Rolling Hills roadways. Based upon complaints in the area, we will be initiating increased Sheriff's Department traffic patrols and radar deployment as well as the use of the speed display board in your area over the next few weeks. It is hoped that a safer living and driving environment will be realized by increasing the awareness of the 25 mile per hour speed limit on Johns Canyon Road, Chestnut Lane and Morgan Lane. Should you wish to discuss this further, please do not hesitate to call. We appreciate your cooperation and your willingness to obey local speed laws. Sincerely, Craig R. Nealis City Manager CRN:mlk corres.cm\jonchemo.ltr merge a:jcanyon.mer cc: Traffic Commission Capt. Herb Pettus Printed on Recycled Paper Mr(&'Mrs. Sam Shariat 1 Chestnut Lane Rolling Hilts, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. Gary R. Hansen 6 Chestnut Lane Rolling. Hilts, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. Carl J. Ghormley 2 Johns Canyon Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. Marc Kamen 5 Johns Canyon Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Dr. & Mrs. David N. Stone 9 Johns Canyon Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. Paul Hennessey 12 Johns Canyon Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. William R. Hoover 1 Morgan Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. Ivano Stamegna 4 Morgan Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. James Dodson 7 Morgan Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. Howard Lester 2 Chestnut Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Dr. Richard Spellberg 5 Chestnut Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Ms. Patricia M. Clark 3 Johns Canyon Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 - Dr. & Mrs. Thomas Heinsheimer 7 Johns Canyon Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Dr. & Mrs. Joseph S. Carey 10 Johns Canyon Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. John R. Royan 13 Johns Canyon Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. Michael Gray 2 Morgan Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. Lee Perlman 5 Morgan Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. James Bird 4 Storm Hill Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 • Mr. & Mrs. Mark V. Sauer 4 Chestnut Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. Craig Hofman 1 Johns Canyon Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. Darryl E. Dalcin 4 Johns Canyon Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. Robert J. Cole 8 Johns Canyon Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. William R. Peters 11 Johns Canyon Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. Stephen W. Shultz 14 Johns Canyon Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. Gerry R. Ginsberg 3 Morgan Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Mr. & Mrs. Orrin L. Pollock 6 Morgan Lane Rolling Hilts, CA 90274 Agenda Item .o.: 6-E Triuntg of Eno ii.ngetro sheriff'a Department eel-cpuartrru 4700 /lamina +Buukrbarir i1 untrrr Park, CIalifurnin g1754- 2163 SHERMAN BLOCK, SHERIFF January 12, 1994 Craig Nealis City Manager City of Rolling Hills #2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, California 90274 Dear Mr. Nealis: JAN 1 4 1994 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS The Lomita Sheriff's Station concluded the holiday Sobriety Checkpoints scheduled on December 22,23,29 and 30th, 1993. A total of 947 vehicles passed through the checkpoints in the City of Rolling Hills Estates. All of the drivers were screened while still in their vehicles. Thirty-six of the drivers were required to perform a series of Field Sobriety Tests. Two of the drivers were arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol/drugs as a result of the checkpoints. Three citations were issued for seatbelt violations at the checkpoints. The operation experienced no major problems and ran smoothly at all times. The traffic flowed very well, with vehicles only experiencing minor delays as a result of our operations. Their were no alcohol/drugs related collisions reported in your city or the City of Rolling Hills Estates during the holiday weekends. If you have any questions, please contact the Lomita Traffic Office, Sergeant Thomas or Deputy Nakaji at (310) 539-1661, extensions 249 and 248 respectively. SINCERELY, SHERMAN BLOCK, SHERIFF Herbert H. Pettus, Captain Commander, Lomita Station �raol fion o� (Service • 0/ R0/i J/d/ INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No.: 7-A Mtg. Date:. 1/21/94 TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION FROM: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A REPORT REGARDING VEHICLES NOT ADHERING TO THE STOP SIGN AT GATES AS THEY EXIT THE CITY. DATE: JANUARY 21, 1994 BACKGROUND In November, 1993, Traffic Commissioners requested that the Deputy Traffic Engineer investigate methods to increase the adherence to the stop signs for vehicles exiting the City at the three gates. A report is attached to this staff report which was presented to the Traffic Commission in January, 1993 relative to this subject. At that time, Traffic Commissioners held this matter until such time as the hardscape improvements were complete. This item is presented today for discussion purposes and possible actions relative to the Traffic Engineer's recommendations or other methods which Commissioners may feel are appropriate to increase the adherence to the local traffic safety laws. CRN:mlk traffic\gatestop.sta Printed on Recycled Paper. • • C4, `l2 llins INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION FROM: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING VEHICLES NOT ADHERING TO THE STOP SIGNS AT GATES AS THEY EXIT THE CITY. DATE: JANUARY 15, 1993 Attached to this memorandum is a report prepared by Deputy Traffic Engineer Mike Evans. This report has been preparedin response to a request from the Traffic Commission at the meeting held -on November 20, 1992.' It is recommended that the Commission discuss the alternatives outlined in the Deputy Traffic Engineer's report. CRN:mlk traffic\exit.sta Printed on Recycled Paper. MEMORAHQUM To: Craig Nealis City Manager From: Mike Evans Deputy Traffic Engineer Date: January 11, 1993 Subject: CITY EXIT GATES BACKGROUND Rolling Hills is a guard gated community with three entry/exit gates. The exit gates consist of a single automated raising/lowering bar type gate. In addition, at each exit gate, "STOP" signs, and "STOP" legends are posted requiring vehicles to come to a complete stop before proceeding out of the gate. The exit gates have normally been kept in an upright position in response to property owner requests. The Rolling Hills Traffic Commission has recently received reports from property owners that vehicles have been disregarding the "STOP signs and legends. And since the gates are raised, vehicles have been observed traveling through the exit gate area at excessive speeds. RECQMMEN©AT1QN In order to preserve the safety of traffic in the vicinity of the exit gates, the :automatic gates should remain in the closed or down position: "STOP" signs and legends should be clearly visible and maintained. if not already posted; a sign informiri the exiting motorist that "the exit gate closes after :each vehicle" should be^posted. `If the gate mechanism can_ handle the addition weight, a lightweight "STOP" sign could be mounted in the center of the gate Itself: --7 The exit gate "STOP" regulations should be strictly enforced. Without enforcement disregard of all traffic control devices may become prevalent. Residents/property owners may be notified of the Intent to resume full use of the exit gates and that the "STOP" regulations will be enforced by the Sheriff's Department. ME:Ik 55432/1002/066 trans3\m\m1 • ihfro INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No.: 7-B Mtg. Date: 1/21/94 TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION FROM: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RELOCATION OF MAILBOX ADJACENT TO CITY HALL PROPERTY. DATE: JANUARY 21, 1994 BACKGROUND Following completion of the hardscape design, the mailbox was relocated to its current location at Portuguese Bend Road to accommodate Rolling Hills residents desiring to drop off mail as they exit the City. For years, the mailbox had been located closer to the City Hall driveway entrance however, the placement of the mailbox at its original location following the hardscape re -design seemed to be prompting traffic concerns/conflicts between motorists stopping to utilize the mailbox and those attempting to exit the City in the morning. Staff has researched the placement of the mailbox at an alternative location. Attached to this memorandum is a report from the Traffic Engineer describing a proposed location on the City Hall property that would enable motorists to drop off their mail from the driver's side of their vehicle. Additionally, an information sheet is attached to this staff report which is recommended for approval and submittal to the City Council for formal action relative to the information dissemination for this relocated mailbox and the new landscape design. It would be in order for members of the Rolling Hills Traffic Commission to take action on this matter and forward a recommendation to the City .Council for consideration. CRN:mlk traffic\mailbox.sta Printed on Recycled Paper. • WILLDAN ASSOCIATES ❑ ENGINEERS& PLANNERS Professional Consulting Services Since 1964 January 10, 1994 Mr. Craig Nealis City of Rolling Hills No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road City of Rolling Hills, CA 90276 Subject: Location of Public Postal Box Dear Mr. Nealis: ,ID ggiaTI JAN 12 1994 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS fit..._ I have reviewed potential locations for the post office mail drop box in your City Hall/Homeowners Association complex. Although it is possible to place the box at several locations, I believe that a location near the end of the one-way road is most appropriate. The box should be placed on the driver's side (south side) of the one-way road. At this location, the box will be removed from the heavily used entrance to the complex; it will be accessible to drivers without exiting their automobile; and it will not interfere with other activities at City Hall. Sincerely, WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 7eie4.444- Ken Johnson Supervising Engineer KJ:sv 55432/1002/066 trans4\I\I1 12900 CROSSROADS PARKWAY SOUTH • SUITE 200 • INDUSTRY, CALIFORNIA 91746-3499 • (310) 908-6200 • FAX (310) 695-2120 Li`MI "NI - I PORIUGU SE BEND ROAD 02 LAITY ASSOC r DRAFT RECYCLING CENTER MAILBOX NEW MAIL BOX AND RECYCLING DROP-OFF CENTER Following completion of the City of Rolling Hills/Rolling Hills Community Association Hardscape Project, the US Mail Collection Drop-off Bcx and the Recycling Center are now in their permanent locations. Please notice the new locations for the Mailbox and the Recycling Drop-off Center. The Mailbox is conveniently located on the northerly portion of the City Hall between the City and Community. Association buildings. This new location enables drivers to drop-off their mail from the driver's side of their vehicle without exiting their car. The new location for the Recycling Drop-off Center is located directly north of City Hall adjacent to the circular turnaround driveway. This Center is designed to provide a convenient place for Rolling Hills residents to voluntarily participate in the recycling of cans, bottles and paper products. For more information regarding thesepublic services, please contact Rolling Hills City Hall at 377-1521. • City Rolling ichiL INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No.: 8-A Mtg. Date: 1/21/94 TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION FROM: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF SIGNAGE ON PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ADJACENT TO RANCHERO ROAD DATE: JANUARY 21, 1994 Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Inspector Roger Vink has suggested that the Traffic Commission consider placement of a "Caution -Severe Dip" sign on Portuguese Bend Road as motorists approach Ranchero Road heading into the Flying Triangle area. Costs for acquisition and placement of a sign of this nature will cost $242.90. Currently, there is $1,480 in remaining funds in the $2,000 road sign budget for FY 93-94. Should members of the Traffic Commission concur with the recommendation, it would be in order direct staff to take appropriate action. CRN:mlk traffic\dipsign.sta Printed on Recycled Paper. • CALL BACK RETURNED ID CALL WANTS TO El SEE YOU WILL CALL 1-1 AGAIN L� WAS IN 0 URGENT • city O� IEO/fi,,. INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No.: 8-B Mtg. Date: 1/21/94 TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION FROM: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO A PROPOSED NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 7 STORM HILL LANE DATE: JANUARY 21, 1994 Included with this staff report are plans and the staff report that was presented to the City Council relative to the above referenced property. Although this residence will be utilizing an existing private driveway access which also provides vehicular to an adjoining property, it is appropriate for members of the Traffic Commission to review this proposal as it is presented. This item was approved by the Planning Commission with the requirement that the Traffic Commission review the driveway access. Members of the Rolling Hills City Council are currently taking this case under jurisdiction to review the structures proposed on the lot The City Council will consider their appeal following establishment of a field trip at the Monday, January 24, 1994 City Council meeting. This items is being presented to the Traffic Commission today so that any issues relative to the driveway can be considered. CRN:mlk traffic \ stormhill.sta Printed on Recycled Paper. TO: ATTENTION: FROM: SUBJECT: eity o,/ iei4 Jh/f INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 AGENDA ITEM 5-A MEETING DATE 1/10/94 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER LOLA M. UNGAR, PRINCIPAL PLANNER ZONING CASE NO. 498 Mr. and Mrs. Domenique Claessens, 7 Storm Hill Lane (Lot 169 -B -MS) RESOLUTION NO. 93-36: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 498. APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING & SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: BACKGROUND ZONING CASE NO. 498 7 STORM HILL LANE (LOT 169 -B -MS) RAS-2, 63 ACRES MR. AND MRS. DOMINIQUE CLAESSENS MR. DOUGLAS MCHATTIE, SOUTH BAY ENGINEERING 1. The applicants request Site Plan Review for the construction of a new 12,480 square foot residence, a 2,200 square foot attached garage, a 1,365 square foot pool, a 2,100 square foot stable, and a 96 square foot service yard at the southern portion of this 63 acre lot. 2. The Planning Commission approved the subject resolution on December 21, 1993. Special conditions required for this project include: the recordation of a restrictive deed in favor of the City of Rolling Hills requiring any future subdivision of the 63+ acre property to provide for a lot of at least 15 acres in size for this development project, the recordation of a road easement over a portion of the property owned by Mr. and Mrs. James Bird at 4 Storm Hill Lane (Lot 169 -A -MS) and a portion of the Claessens' property, any modifications to the project which would constitute additional structural development will require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission, the driveway access must be reviewed and approved by the Traffic Commission, and the vegetation selected to minimize the buildings on the pad must utilize to the maximum extent feasible trees of a determinate height that will minimize future obstruction of views from properties on Buggy Whip Drive. Printed on Recycled Paper. ZONING CASE NO. 498 PAGE 2 3. At the request of the Planning Commission, staff conducted a study of residences in the vicinity of the proposed project which showed an average residence size of 4,195 square feet. The Commission found that even if the existing lot is further subdivided, the southern portion of the lot will have 15 acres and a structural lot coverage of 2.6%, the lot coverage maximum will not be exceeded and the proposed project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to this very large lot. 4. The length of the house from west to east is 189 feet, and from north to south is 213 feet at the west wing and 83 feet at the east wing. 5. The plans show a residential pad that will be below the brow of the hill facing north, surrounded by varying slopes that do not exceed 2:1 slopes. The building pad proposed is 57,920 square feet and structures on the building pad cover 31.4% of the pad. 6. Access to the property will be from a new road off Storm Hill Lane that transverses the Bird property at 4 Storm Hill Lane. Plans show a hammerhead turnaround area where the driveway access meets Storm Hill Lane to accommodate safety vehicles. 7. A 4 foot wide bridle trail of decomposed granite is proposed adjacent to the 20 foot wide roadway along Storm Hill Lane to access the stable at the southern portion of the building pad. 8. Grading for the project site will require 17;300 cubic yards of cut soil and 17,300 cubic yards of fill soil. 9. The structural lot coverage proposed is 18,241 square feet or 0.67% and the total lot coverage proposed is 37,255 square feet or 1.37%. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council receive and file Resolution No. 93-36. RESOLUTION NO. 93-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 498. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Domenique Claessens with respect to real property located at 7 Storm Hill Lane, Rolling Hills (Lot 169 -B -MS) requesting Site Plan Review approval for a new single family residence, with attached garage, a pool, a barn and a hobby shop; and requesting Conditional Use Permits for the construction of a tennis court, a guest house and a cabana. During the hearing process, plans were revised to reduce the request to the construction of a new single family residence with attached garage, a pool, and a stable. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the applications on May 18, 1993, June 15, 1993, July 20, 1993, August 17, 1993, September 21, 1993, October 26, 1993, and November 16, 1993, and at field trip visits on June 3, 1993 and October 23, 1993. Section 3. An Initial Review and Negative Declaration were prepared for the project but, as revised, the project is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to a Class 3 exemption provided by Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Section 4. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month period. Section 5. With respect to the Site Plan Review application, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 2,716,253 square feet (62.4 acres). The proposed residence (12,480 sq.ft.), garage (2,200 sq.ft.), swimming pool (1,365 sq.ft.), and stable (1,010 sq.ft.) will have 17,151 square feet which constitutes 0.63% of the lot which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The tot lot coverage including paved areas RESOLUTION NO. 93-36 PAGE 2 and driveway will be 36,165 square feet which equals 1.33% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requirement. The proposed project is on a relatively large lot with most of the proposed structures located away from the road so as to reduce the visual impact of the development. The large acreage of the property allows the accommodation of a larger house. B. The proposed development preserves and integrates into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls) because a minimum amount of grading is proposed and will only be done to provide approved drainage that will flow away from the proposed residence and existing neighboring residences. C. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to minimize grading and the natural drainage courses will continue to the canyons at the east and west side of this very large lot. D. The development plan incorporates existing large trees and native vegetation to the maximum extent feasible and, with the conditions attached to this approval, supplements it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community. E. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structures will not cause the structural and total lot coverage to be exceeded. Further, the proposed project will have a buildable pad coverage of 29.6%. Should the existing lot be further subdivided, the southern portion of the lot will have 15 acres and a structural lot coverage of 2.6% as in Section 7, Condition E. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain trail access near the eastern and western property lines and scenic vistas across the northerly portions of the property. F. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum will not be exceeded and the proposed project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to this very large lot. Grading shall be permitted only to restore the natural slope of the property. Theratio of the proposed structure to lot coverage is much smaller than the ratio found on several properties in the vicinity. G. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project wil_utilize Storm Hill Lane for access. RESOLUTION NO. 93-36 PAGE 3 Also, the proposed driveway will be at the end of a private driveway that serves one other residence which will therefore create little interference with traffic. H. The project conforms with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental review. Section 6. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 498 for a proposed residential development as indicated on the development plan incorporated herein as Exhibit A and subject to the conditions contained in Section 7. Section 7. The Site Plan Review for residential development approved in Section 6 is subject to the following conditions: A. The Site Plan Review approval shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.46.080.A. B. It is declared and made a condition of the Site Plan Review approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, the Permit shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of thirty (30) days. C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise approved by Variance. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. If there is any future subdivision of this 63+ acre lot, the southern portion containing this development shall retain at least fifteen (15) acres of this existing lot with a structural lot coverage of 2.6%. The applicant shall execute and cause to be recorded a restrictive deed in favor of the City of Rolling Hills which requires any future subdivision of the property to provide for a lot of at least 15 acres in size for this development project. The form and content of the restrictive deed shall be approved by the City prior to recordation. No grading or building permit shall be issued for this project until this restrictive deed is recorded. F. The applicant shall prepare and cause to be recorded a road easement over a portion of the property owned by Mr. and Mrs. James Bird at 4 Storm Hill Lane (Lot 169 -A -MS) and a portion of Mr. and Mrs. Dominique Claessens' property (Lot 169 -B -MS). Prior to recordation of RESOLUTION NO. 93-36 PAGE 4 these deeds, the location, description and configuration of the easement shall be approved by the City and the Rolling Hills Community Association. No grading or building permit shall be issued for this project until the road easement deeds are recorded. G. Notwithstanding Section 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modifications to the project which would constitute additional structural development shall require the filing of a new application for approval. by the Planning Commission. H. All retaining walls incorporated into the project shall not be greater than 5 feet in height at any one point. I. The driveway access must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Traffic Commission prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit. J. To minimize the visibility of buildings on the pad, the structures, driveway, graded slopes and retaining walls shall be screened and shielded from view with native drought -resistant vegetation and other vegetation that is compatible with the surrounding vegetation of the community. The vegetation selected shall utilize to the maximum extent feasible trees of a determinate height that will minimize future obstruction of views from properties on Buggy Whip Drive. K. The landscape plan must be submitted for review by the Planning Commission, as well as the Planning Department, and include native drought -resistant vegetation that will not disrupt the impact of the views of neighboring properties prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit. The landscaping plan submitted must comply with the purpose and intent of the Site Plan Review Ordinance, shall incorporate existing mature trees and native vegetation, and shall utilize to the maximum extent feasible, plants that are native to the area and/or consistent with the rural character of the community. A bond in the amount of the cost estimate of the implementation of the landscaping plan plus 15% shall be required to be posted prior to issuance of a grading and building permit and shall be retained with the City for not less than two years after landscape installation. The retained bond will be released by the City Manager after the City Manager determines that the landscaping was installed pursuant to the landscaping plan as approved, and that such landscaping is properly established and in good condition. L. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the Planning RESOLUTION NO. 93-36 PAGE 5 Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review.- Cut and fill slopes must conform to the City of Rolling Hills standard of 2 to 1 slope ratio. M. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit. N. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review and must conform to the development plan approved with this application. 0. The building pad coverage shall not exceed 29.6%. P. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Variance and Site Plan Review, or the approval shall not be effective. Q. All conditions of this Site Plan Review approval must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED T ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: MARILYN KEAN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) ss DECEMBER, 1993. I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 93-36 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 498. RESOLUTION NO. 93-36 PAGE 6 was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on December 21, 1993 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Hankins, Commissioner Frost None None Lay, Raine and Chairman. Roberts and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices DEPUTY CITY CLERK • • City ofieoffinv JUL INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No.: 8-C Mtg. Date: 1/21/94 TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION FROM: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF DRIVEWAY ACCESS AT 1 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE DATE: JANUARY 21, 1994 Attached to this staff report are plans and staff materials that were presented to the Planning Commission relative to this property. As you will notice in the attached documents, a lot line adjustment was approved at the subject property. With the new lot line configuration, the property owners are proposing to rebuild their residential structure and have a replacement driveway access for the new residential structure. This item is currently being considered by the members of the Rolling Hills Planning Commission. It would be in order to review the plans and other related materials and provide direction to staff relative to this project. CRN:mlk traffic\ lbug.sta Printed on Recycled Paper. • • HEARING DATE: TO: FROM: c� a/RO/IL4 JUL INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 JANUARY 18, 1994 PLANNING COMMISSION LOLA UNGAR, PRINCIPAL PLANNER NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING & SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: REQUEST ZONING CASE NO. 505 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE & 13 CREST ROAD WEST (LOT 176 -A -MS & A PORTION OF LOT 176 -MS) RAS-2, 7.43 ACRES MR. JOHN Z. BLAZEVICH MR. DOUGLAS MCHATTIE, SOUTH BAY ENGINEERING DECEMBER 25, 1993 The applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit for the construction and relocation of a tennis court to replace an existing tennis court and requests Site Plan Review for the construction of a proposed new single family residence to replace an existing single family residence. BACKGROUND In reviewing the applicants' request under Title 16, Subdivisions and Title 17, Zoning, staff would identify the following issues for evaluation: 1. The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for the construction and relocation of a 7,060 square foot tennis court to replace an existing 7,246 square foot tennis court. The applicant also requests Site Plan Review to construct a 15,950 square foot residence and 900 square foot garage to replace an existing 5,544 square foot residence and 1,152 square foot garage. The new residence, garage and pool will occupy the areas currently occupied by the existing residence, garage, pool and tennis court. The new tennis court will be located at the southern portion of the lot. 2. Retaining walls will be required at the southern portion of the residence along the perimeter of the driveway and turnaround area for 209 feet. There is also a 320 foot long 4 -foot high (maximum height permitted) retaining wall proposed that will surround the new tennis court. 3. The existing house and attached garage were built in 1977. 4. Grading for the project site will require 9,700 cubic yards of cut soil and 9,700 cubic yards of fill soil. ii Panted on Recycled Paper. ZONING CASE NO. 505 PAGE 2 5. The disturbed area of the lot will be 113,553 square feet or 38.9% (40% maximum permitted) of the lot area. 6. The structural lot coverage proposed is 25,581 square feet or 8.7% (20% permitted) and the total lot coverage proposed is 42,417 square feet or 14.5% (35% permitted). 7. The building pad coverage on the 71,329 square foot residential building pad is 26% and the coverage of the tennis court pad is 100%. The total building padcoverage is 32%. 8. Access to the new residence will be changed to an entrance further south on Buggy Whip Drive., 30 feet from the southerly property line. The new (and partially existing) 11 foot wide roadway will have an accessway of 15 feet. The accessway is 9 feet less than the 24 feet the Traffic Commission has recently recommended for driveway entrances. 9. Other residences on properties adjacent to the proposed project are: ADDRESS 0 Buggy Whip Drive (Abdo) 7 Buggy Whip Drive (Reznick) 9 Buggy Whip Drive (Crowley) 25 Crest West (Chandran) 13 Crest West (Kouri) 11 Crest West (Bemis) 9 Crest West (Pak) 4 North Quail Ridge (Shroeder) 1 Buggy Whip Drive (Proposed) RESIDENCE(SO.FT) ACRES 4,523 3,614 3,135 4,320 6,311 3,534 9,159 2,440 15,950 1.99 1.53 2.00 1.89 2.80 2.00 3.78 5.09 7.43 10. After reviewing the Initial Study for the project, Staff has determined that this project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Accordingly, a Negative Declaration has been prepared. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed plans and take public testimony. • City /a«nS.ue� INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS. CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 505 Application has been filed with an Zoning Case No.e City of R5051ng to bellls ocated approval of the project known as Z at Lot 176 -A -MS and a portion of Lot 176 -MS and currently, 1 BuggY Whip Drive, Rolling Hills, CA andto be implemented by Mr. John Z. Blazevich. The request is briefly described as: A request for a Conditional Use Permit for the construction and relocation of a tennis court to replace an existing tennis court and a ed newrequest of a construction single family residence to replace an existing g single proropos family residence. Pursuant to the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines of the City of Rolling Hills, the Lead Agency has analyzed the project and determined that the project will not have a significant impact on the environment. Based on this finding, the Lead Agency prepared this NEGATIVE DECLARATION. FINDINGS OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT: BASED ON THE ATTACHED INITIAL CONDITION(S) HAVE APPLICABLE), IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE PROJECT WILL A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. A period of at least 21 days from the date of publication of the notice of this NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be provided to enable public review of the project specifications, the Initial Study and this document prior to the final adoption of the NEGATIVE DECLARATION by the Lead Agency. A copy of the project specifications is on file in the offices of The City of Rolling Hills, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274. Date: December 22, 1993 By: Lola Ungar %i Principal Planner ®P. Pez-e • city obRJfi, JJ'fL • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1937 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To Be Completed By Applicant) Date Filed (2 ' Z 2,-13 GENERAL INFORMATION NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS. CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX (310) 377.7288 Zoning Case No. .SU� 1. Applicant SiOt)T1a FS etItaEEC tAC-t Tel. 375- 25512 Address 3 0 di- TC .10 ►� P L. 'P . C. C, ' 4 O 2 "7 '1-- 2. Legal Owner J O N ca Z. rbL A Z G) t r Tel. B 3 2 -'bud d Address P•o• M0)4 t(,0620 'AA PeD20 45-• O / 33 3. Project Address % 50 el r, `4 v 41 n 0 Assessor's Book, Page, Parcel No. -75‘0- 2c - 1 k Lot No. Po 2. 1'i �at 7 b A 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project,including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: C-1czar is CI cuI 1_...n 1t\ C-,, 5. Existing zoning district . Q A S — 6. Proposed project/use of site: '5 t A C L F A n'1 I L. LZ tc S I D C. NaCC... PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7. Site size 7.43 A. 32-3,7/-5 S •-1. 8. Net lot area ,, . `I 0 Ac.,. I/ I ' -1E8 S . 4 . 9. Total square footage of structures °lc , 9 5 C) 10. Number of floors of construction O N ( 11. Basement square footage 1 (p 12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage �' Z, t 1 5 13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? ID N , 14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? ('.) A 15. Will the entire building structure requjtea new roof? 1) t. A 16. 17. Will cut and fill be balanced'. Amount cut 4) .7 0 O Amount fill ? 00 Percentage of lot 3 18. Area of disturbance. Square feet 13 5i S 3 j . 9 19. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet 15 t ()co 20. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? 1) 14 /a► 21. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 22. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 23. Attach plans. 24. Proposed scheduling. _R G t rZ C 0_1\3 4r= TO t) G T t o OGG. 1094 25. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. C %.—re 9LAty (Zs:0tCV.) 12.ND v3 Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NQ 26. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes or hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours. 2‹. 27. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. 2- 28. 29. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 30. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes, or odors in vicinity. 31. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing draining patterns. 32. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. 33. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more. 34. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. >C 35. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.). 36. Substantially increased fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). X 37. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 38. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. f \ n _` 7Ct5 r1T,\' S rrrC-iLe P.ArtILT [AO ��, POOL— t(rt4i4V5 d C?t=r.)7LQ S( -t) Prr4C-7 39. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. t t C1t.E FA (VI I L ldor,m,mg) o 'Cu) D Pl.it)5 fir0r--5 ()Ng STOO 43 t1 S tr-11- DeVr- oPNt PJ?. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Please explain all 'yes' and -maybe answers on separate sheets.) YU MAYBE ILIQ 40. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c.' Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 41. AjL. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? G Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 42. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? • • f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water -related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? j. Significant changes in the temperature, flow, or chemical content of surface thermal springs? 43. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including tress, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 44. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals9 c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals' d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 45. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 46. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 47. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? -5- 48. Natural Resource. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 49. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemical or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? 50. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 51. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 52. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles? 53. Public Servicel. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? f MAYBE .NQ 54. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 55. Utilitie4. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 56. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard excluding mental health? • b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 57. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 58. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 59. Cultural Resources. a. .Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? -d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? -7- X 46 .�C MAYBE liQ 60. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short- term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may affect two or more separate resources where the impact is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effect on human beings, either directly or indirectly? .Z NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section 659623 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below. I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on these lists. Date )s2<, 2 9/ Signature For `-, L/1 C Applicant CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. For J p t.t to forms\environm.app Applicant -10- r"4 i.� A Z. J 1 T G t-1 JVvIn ..+AY CivLi1NEE 1/4,vrtrvnAIIV1v ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 40. b. The grading necessary for the completion compaction of fill soils. c. In order to complete the project it will to the overall topography of the lot. of the project will require entail slight modifications • • Cuy o` l2 fF...9 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION AND CHECKLIST FORM (310)377-1521 (INITIAL STUDY) FAx: (310) 377.7288 DATE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPERTY ADDRESS: ZONING AND AREA: CASE NO.: SUBJECT: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PRELIMINARY DRAFT DECEMBER 22, 1993 MR. JOHN Z. BLAZEVICH MR. DOUGLAS MCHATTIE, SOUTH BAY ENGINEERING 1 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE (LOT 176 -A -MS AND A PORTION OF LOT 176 -MS) RAS-2, 7.43 ACRES, IRREGULAR SHAPED LOT ZONING CASE NO. 505 REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND RELOCATION OF A TENNIS COURT TO REPLACE AN EXISTING TENNIS COURT AND A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PROPOSED NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. 33. Grading will be necessary for a portion of the site where recompaction will be required for fill soils existing on the property. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 38. The project site is a large 7.43 acre parcel consisting of undulating hillsides and knolls covered by grasses, and mature shrubs and trees, with some areas being heavily wooded. Currently, there is a large one-story single family residence with attached garage, a pool, tennis court and guest house on the lot. Landscaped lawns, shrubs and trees surround the existing residence, with native plants, grasses, shrubs, and trees beyond the residential area. Native birds and animals frequent the area such as sparrows, crows, raccoons, possum, skunks, gophers and an occasional fox. 39. The site is located within a one unit per 2 -acre zone designation and is surrounded by similar development of the one- story ranch style with agricultural outbuildings. As described in Paragraph 38, native birds and animals frequent the area. The following analysis is a description of the findings contained in the Environmental Informatio._ and Checklist Form which preceded INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 505 PAGE 2 this page. A detailed discussion of all potential environmental impacts checked "Yes" or "Maybe" is provided, along with appropriate mitigation measures. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Item 40. Earth. a -d. Although approval of the project will not result in unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic ubstructures, it should be noted that portions of the City exhibit unstable earth conditions, includingactive landslides and soil creep. The Land Use Element of the General Plan establishes a Landslide Hazard Overlay to carefully regulate development in unstable areas. This property is not within a mapped active landslide area. Grading, excessive irrigation, and/or increased septic tank discharge in unstable areas may trigger additional slope failure. Because the City is located in seismically active southern California, additional development will be exposed to potential groundshaking in the event of an earthquake. The Palos Verdes fault, considered potentially active, is located approximately one mile northeast of the City. Although approval of the subdivision of land will not result in disruptions, displacements, compaction, or overcrowding of the soil, during future construction these will occur in order to prepare a 26,000 square foot building pad for the building site. A smaller building site currently exists. Any displacement and recompaction of the soil will be required to conform with local ordinances and engineering practices requiring balanced cut and fill and should not cause a significant environmental impact. e -g. Also, during future construction, there will be removal of natural vegetative cover, potentially causing an increase in soil erosion by wind action or storm runoff. This reduction of vegetative cover and the increased runoff associated with development may cause a slight increase in the soil deposition, siltation, or erosion in or near the ocean. As additional development is limited to one (1) single-family dwelling unit, related erosion impacts will be less than significant. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the City a preliminary grading plan showing proposed drainage facilities, driveways, building pad(s), stable, corral, and blue line streams, for the lot at least 30 days prior to the Planning Commission hearing on the subdivision application. INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 505 PAGE 3 Item 41..Air a -c. The proposed project will not increase development but, will increase the size of development of a single-family dwelling unit. While increased development will generate slight increases in vehicle trips during and after construction and, objectionable odors during construction, the resultant impact on air quality will be less than significant. Item 42. Water a. Future development of the single residential unit on a two acre minimum parcel will not alter fresh or marine water currents. b. The proposed subdivision may alter drainage patterns, increase surface runoff and reduce water absorption by the placement of structures, the introduction of impervious surface materials and irrigation systems. However, due to the nominal increase in development proposed and permitted by the General Plan, the impacts are not expected to be substantial. c. No major floodplains exist in the City. Flood waters generally flow through the canyon areas. The General Plan does not permit development in the canyons, and so changes in the course or flow of floodwaters is not anticipated. d. No water bodies are located in the project area. Future development in the project area is not expected to result in change in the amount of any water bodies located in the vicinity. e. The applicants propose a septic tank system for the project. As septic tank leach field effluent percolate into the watershed, some discharge into surface waters downstream may occur. The impact generated from a replacement of 1 dwelling unit, however, will be less than significant. i. No major floodplains exist in the City, and development is not permitted in the canyon areas most likely to be affected by flooding. No open bodies of water occur within the City, thus no such hazard exists. The project is located high enough and far enough away from the ocean that tsunami hazards do not exist. j. Because the applicants propose a septic tank system, some discharge into surface waters downstream may occur. Item 43. Plant Life a -d. Any additional development within the City will reduce the amount of native vegetation which will be replaced, in some instances, by non-native speci But, due to the limited growth INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 505 PAGE 4 proposed, this impact will be less than significant. In addition, the General Plan and Zoning Code set forth policies which encourage the retention and use of native drought tolerant vegetation in landscaping. No known rare and endangered species of plants exist in the City. Item 44. Animal Life a. As further development occurs in Rolling Hills, the natural habitat of the area will be slightly reduced. But, the impact of the current proposal is expected to be less than significant. b. Large lot, estate density development proposed for this project provides the opportunity to retain substantial amounts of existing habitat. The only animal listed by the Federal Government is the Palos Verdes Blue, a butterfly which was last seen in the Rolling Hills area in May, 1986. Several other animals do occur, however, that are considered as candidates for protection by either the Federal Government or the State Government. The Tiger Beetle, while not considered to be endangered or threatened, does maintain a sensitivity to humans, exists to an extent that may be cause for concern. Recently, the California gnatcatcher was added to the list of endangered species and, in a recent census, one pair of gnatcatchers were located at the southern tip of the City adjacent to the City of Rancho Palos Verdes. The impact of the proposed future development will be less than. significant. Item 46. Light and Glare Residential building materials are carefully regulated by the .Zoning Ordinance and the Community Association. Buildings are limited to one story in height. Light and glare impacts are therefore expected to be less than significant. Item 52. Transportation/Circulation a. Buggy Whip Drive is a short, winding private road that will not require widening. The incremental increase of one larger dwelling unit will not generate more than an estimated 10 daily vehicle trips. This is considered less than significant. Item 59. Cultural Resources a. While prior tilling and dry farming practices may have disrupted potential remains, grading prior to construction may uncover a cultural resource. INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 505 PAGE 5 Mitigation Measures 2 In the event that subsurface material of an archaeological,paleontological or other cultural resource is encountered during project grading or development, all grading and construction shall cease in the immediate area, and the find shall be left untouched until a qualified professional archaeologist or paleontologist, whichever is appropriate, is contacted and called in to evaluate the find and makes recommendations as to disposition, mitigation or salvage. The developer shall incur the cost of such professional investigation. The developer shall comply with the mitigation measures recommended and approved by the City for the disposition, mitigation or salvage of such material. X On the basis of this initial evaluation: (check one) I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect onthe environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find the project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date December 22, 1993 LOLA M. UNGAR For the City of Rolling Hills (Lead Agency) City 0/ /E"O//ifl INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No.: 8-D Mtg. Date: 1/21/94 TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AM) MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION FROM: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A CURVE WARNING SIGN IN THE VICINITY OF 11 GEORGEFF ROAD DATE: JANUARY 21, 1994 Correspondence is attached to this staff report from Tinka Cramer who resides at 11 Georgeff Road. According to the property owner, the curve warning sign was originally placed south of her property to warn motorists of the upcoming curve at Georgeff and El Concho Roads. The sign was knocked down and was replaced at its present location. The property owner at 11 Georgeff is objecting to the present location and is requesting Traffic Commission review for possible relocation of the sign. It would be in order for members of the Rolling Hills Traffic Commission to consider this staff report and provide direction for staff. CRN:mlk traffic\curve.sta Printed on Recycled Paper. '39`+ Mrs. Catherine R. Cramer No. 11 Georgeff Road (diFff tl ft'' Rolling Hills, California 90274 Rte g —4-- (B119914 At 1( o- 4- !S o ibRA ^tom .Q - 'LL) t ( LEO N 1. . -�. .-kexaZdzk Qt /4) Cer% YCQ-4bestA. � C (� 4"-L95:S. 11)€? C7 c.) -c— 41-V-.4- I i ,LR$L,,5A cL--tt-;,Q4L4.1 QL- L -CtZy� wit co.D_ , , . u6t,„,„ caQ;as.,, f, ,,,,oza5„ • tom' t GrIS'K'e=c---F Po-rKb . Rt.