Loading...
Traffic Commission Agenda 03-18-1994AGENDA REGULAR MEETING City • 0/ D /EOIfi,Z LLL� INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 TRAFFIC COMMISSION FRIDAY, MARCH 18, 1994 8:30 A.M. NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CITY HALL 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. JANUARY 21, 1994. B. FEBRUARY 25, 1994. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR A. ORDINANCE NO. 246: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS REGARDING THE '11(AFFIC ADVISORY TRAFFIC COMMISSION AND AMENDING THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. 5. OLD BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION OF DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO A PROPOSED NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 1 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE. 6. NEW BUSINESS 7. MA'1"1'ERS FROM MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION 8. MATTERS FROM STAFF 9. ADJOURNMENT Agenda Traffic Commission 02-18-94 -1- Printed on Recycled Paper. /\f Agenda Item No. 3-A DRAFT MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA JANUARY 21, 1994 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Traffic Commission of the City of Rolling Hills was called to order by Chair Leeuwenburgh at 8:35 a.m. on Friday, January 21, 1994, in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. ROLL CALL Present: Absent: Commissioners Virtue, Henke and Chair Leeuwenburgh. Commissioners Wiener and Perkins (excused). INTRODUCTION OF NEW TRAFFIC COMMISSIONERS Chair Leeuwenburgh introduced Dr. Richard Henke and reported that Joan Perkins had plans scheduled prior to being appointed to the Traffic Commission and could not attend the meeting. SELECTION OF VICE CHAIR Hearing no objection, Chair Leeuwenburgh appointed Commissioner V'Etta Virtue as Vice Chair of the Traffic Commission. MINUTES A. MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 19, 1993. Commissioner Henke commented that the minutes of November 19, 1993 should reflect that there were also safety concerns for the mailbox being located at its present location in that drivers often abruptly make U-turns to deposit mail in the mailbox and occasionally leave theirs doors from the driver's side open in vehicle traffic lanes. CONSENT CALENDAR A. CORRESPONDENCE FROM DR. ROBERT W. MOORE REGARDING REQUEST FOR SPEED BUMPS ON MIDDLERIDGE LANE NORTH. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. Minutes Traffic Commission Meeting 01-21-94 -1- • DRAFT B. CORRESPONDENCE FROM JOHN WELBOURN REGARDING RESIGNATION AS A TRAFFIC COMMISSIONER. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. C. CORRESPONDENCE TO RESIDENTS OF BUGGY WHIP DRIVE REGARDING TRAFFIC SAFETY AND INCREASED TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. D. CORRESPONDENCE TO RESIDENTS OF JOHNS CANYON ROAD, CHESTNUT LANE AND MORGAN LANE REGARDING TRAFFIC SAFETY AND INCREASED -I'RAFFIC ENFORCEMENT. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. E. CORRESPONDENCE FROM LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT REGARDING RESULTS OF HOLIDAY SOBRIETY CHECKPOINTS. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. Commissioner Henke moved approval of the recommendations contained in the Consent Calendar. Commissioner Virtue seconded the motion. which carried unanimously. Hearing no objection, Chair Leeuwenburgh so ordered. OLD BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION OF A REPORT REGARDING VEHICLES NOT ADHERING TO THE STOP SIGN AT GATES AS THEY EXIT THE CITY. City Manager Nealis presented the staff report and reported that the recommendations outlined in the memorandum from the Traffic Engineer have been carried out. Commissioners discussed the operation of the gates. Chair Leeuwenburgh reported that all three gates operate differently and perhaps this causes some confusion to the residents and suggested that a lightweight stop sign be placed on the gate arm. Rolling Hills Architectural Inspector Roger Vink stated that a stop sign mounted on the gate arm is not feasible. Mr. Vink also stated that the reflective tape that has been installed on the gate arms allows more visibility to the residents. Hearing no further discussion and no objection, Chair Leeuwenburgh ordered that this report regarding vehicles not adhering to the stop sign at gates as they exist the City be received and filed. B. CONSIDERATION OF RELOCATION OF THE MAILBOX PRESENTLY LOCA'I'BD ON PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD. City Manager Nealis presented the staff report outlining the background on the relocation of the mailbox. He reported that he has discussed this relocation with the Postmaster and that she indicated that the only requirement the post office would have would be that they are notified of the new location. City Manager pointed out to the Commission that a draft flyer has been prepared to announce the relocation of the mailbox to the residents as well as the location of the recycling center and asked that they review it for recommendation to the City Council. Minutes Traffic Commission Meeting 01-21-94 -2- DRAFT Commissioners discussed the flyer and made several changes to the placement of the directional arrows on the flyer. Discussion ensued regarding the convenience of driver side mailbox deposit and the safety factors of the new location of the mailbox. The Commission also discussed the mailbox usage tally prepared by Administrative Intern Steve Aryan. Commissioner Virtue moved that the Traffic Commission recommend that City Council approve the relocation of the mailbox and that the City Council approve the flyer to be mailed by all residents as amended. Commissioner Henke seconded the motion which carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION OF .SIGNAGE ON PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ADJACENT TO RANCHERO ROAD. City Manager Nealis presented the staff report outlining the request for this signage and the costs involved. Chair Leeuwenburgh indicated that she drove this section of roadway on her way to the meeting this morning and suggested that the Commission schedule a field trip to the area this morning. Commissioner Henke reported that the roadway maintenance in this area is difficult and that a warning sign would be of benefit to the residents of the area as well as those visiting in the area. Discussion ensued regarding the roadway striping in this area. City Manager Nealis reported that he will contact the contractor that completed the Citywide Striping project and request that they strip this section of roadway. Hearing no objection, Chair Leeuwenburgh ordered that consideration of this item be continued to the field trip scheduled at the conclusion of Traffic Commission business. B. CONSIDERATION OF DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO A PROPOSED NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 7 STORM HILL LANE. City Manager Nealis presented the staff report outlining the background on the proposed development of this property. Commissioners discussed this proposal and expressed concerns regarding the width of the driveway to the residence for emergency vehicle access as well as where it meets the hammerhead turn -around and future development of this property. During discussion, Commissioners recommended that the driveway width be at least 24 feet. It was also suggested that the driveway width where it meets the hammerhead be a minimum of 24 feet. Chair Leeuwenburgh expressed concern regarding access of emergency vehicles should the property owners decide to develop the property north of the hammerhead. She suggested that future development of the property north of the hammerhead will require a cul-de-sac turn -around per the Fire Department Code. Commissioners concurred that a field trip to the site would enable them to better understand the configuration of this proposed driveway. Minutes Traffic Commission Meeting 01-21-94 -3- • • DRAFT Hearing no objection, Chair Leeuwenburgh ordered that consideration of the driveway access at 7 Storm Hill Lane be continued to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission and that staff be directed to notify the applicants representative to stake the property indicating the dimension of the driveway and hammerhead turn -around and that amended plans be submitted. C. CONSIDERATION OF DRIVEWAY ACCESS AT 1 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE. City Manager Nealis presented the staff report outlining the applicants request. The Traffic Commission reviewed the plans and concurred that a field trip would be in order. Hearing no objection, Chair Leeuwenburgh ordered that consideration of this item be continued to a field trip scheduled at the end of business discussion this morning. D. CONSIDERATION OF A CURVE WARNING SIGN IN THE VICINITY OF 11 GEORGEFF ROAD. City Manager Nealis presented the staff report outlining the history of this request. Chair Leeuwenburgh provided the Commissioners with a brief history on the placement of this sign and suggested that the Commission visit the site. Hearing no objection, Chair Leeuwenburgh ordered that consideration of this item be continued to the field at the end of business discussion this morning. MAT'T'ERS FROM MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION • Commissioner Virtue suggested that those assisting with parking for parties in the City be required to wear reflective vests to make them more visible, especially during hours of darkness or in the fog. Commissioner Virtue also reported that the curve warning sign of Eastfield Drive is partially obstructed by vegetation. RHCA Architectural Inspector Roger Vink indicated that he would trim the vegetation back so that the sign is visible. • Chair Leeuwenburgh reported that she has received complaints of speeding vehicles on the curve located on Eastfield Drive, uphill from 42 Eastfield Drive. She suggested that the speed display board be placed in this location and that the Sheriff's Department increase patrol of this area. Chair Leeuwenburgh also reported that she has also received complaints of people not adhering to the stop sign at Open Brand and Chuckwagon. Commissioner Virtue also reported on vehicles not stopping at the stop sign at Crest Road and Caballeros. • Deputy Nakaji, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department stated that he would forward this information to the Sheriff's Department for appropriate action. Minutes Traffic Commission Meeting 01-21-94 -4- DRAFT MA'1"1'ERS FROM STAFF A. REPORT REGARDING ROAD KILL RESEARCH. City Manager Nealis indicated that no information has been obtained as no road kills have been reported recently. Hearing no further discussion, Chair Leeuwenburgh recessed the meeting at 9:45 a.m. to the field trip. She stated that the meeting will reconvene in the vicinity of 11 Georgeff Road. FIELD TRIPS CONSIDERATION OF A CURVE WANING SIGN IN THE VICINITY OF 11 GEORGEFF ROAD. Commissioners reconvened at 11 Georgeff Road at 9:55 a.m. Traffic Engineer Ken Johnson indicated that the present location of the sign between 11 and 13 Georgeff Road is appropriate. Following discussion, Commissioners concurred with the Traffic Engineer and directed staff to provide correspondence to Tinka Cramer indicating their findings that the present location is where the sign should be located. Staff was also directed to inform the property owner that the first Eucalyptus tree located south of the 15 mph curve warning sign needs to be cleared to a distance of 15 feet above ground and that the berry bush located adjacent to the sign needs to be trimmed to provide visibility for motorists. Traffic Engineer Ken Johnson indicated that he would forward a memorandum to the City Manager memorializing his opinion determined in the field. CONSIDERATION OF SIGNAGE ON PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ADJACENT TO RANCHERO ROAD. Following convening in the field at this location, the Traffic Engineer recommended a dip sign be installed 100 feet north of Ranchero Road visible to motorists on Portuguese Bend Road. Staff was directed to obtain a memorandum from the Traffic Engineer relative to this recommendation and to submit the recommendation of the Traffic Engineer to the City Attorney for an opinion. If the City Attorney concurs with the Traffic Engineer's recommendation, staff is directed to complete the installation of the signage. CONSIDERATION OF DRIVEWAY ACCESS AT 1 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE. Meeting in the field at this location, Commissioners expressed concern relative to the proposed driveway access as it appears to be in conflict by being directly across the street from a driveway on the other side of the roadway. Traffic Engineer Ken Johnson reviewed the site and recommended that the driveway access at 1 Buggy Whip Drive be located at least 50 feet north of the proposed location. Discussion ensued among Commission members and the Commission concluded that the applicant should resubmit their plans showing the driveway location at least 80 feet north of the current proposed location. Commissioners concurred that the width of the driveway should be a minimum of 20 feet for its entire duration and that the old driveway to the Minutes Traffic Commission Meeting 01-21-94 -5- • • DRAFT existing house shall be removed and returned to a natural state. Following discussion, the Traffic Engineer indicated that either the 50 foot or 80 foot location would be acceptable from a traffic safety standpoint. Chair Leeuwenburgh indicated that the 80 foot location offsets the proposed driveway from opposing driveways across the roadway in the safest manner and it provides the best site distance in both directions of vehicular travel on Buggy Whip Drive. Chair Leeuwenburgh also reiterated on recent complaints that have been received relative to speeding on Buggy Whip Drive and the increased Sheriff's patrols that have resulted. The applicant indicated that they would return with plans depicting the Traffic Commission's request. ADJOURNMENT Hearing no objection, this meeting was adjourned at 11:00 a.m. in appreciation of John Welbourn's outstanding service to the Rolling Hills Traffic Commission. The next regularly scheduled meeting of the Traffic Commission will be March 18, 1994. Approved, Ginny Leeuwenburgh Chair Minutes Traffic Commission Meeting 01-21-94 -6- Marilyn L. Kern Deputy City Clerk Agenda Item No. 3-B DRAFT MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA FEBRUARY 25, 1994 CALL TO ORDER A Special Meeting of the Traffic Commission of the City of Rolling Hills was called to order by Chair Leeuwenburgh at 8:45 a.m. on Friday, February 25, 1994, in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. This meeting was a Special Adjourned meeting which was originally scheduled for Friday, February 18, 1994, but was canceled due to inclement weather which would prevent the Traffic Commission from viewing a site location. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Perkins, Wiener, Henke and Chair Leeuwenburgh. Absent: Vice Chair Virtue. Others Present: Craig R. Nealis, City Manager. Ken Johnson, Deputy Traffic Engineer. Deputy Nakaji, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Lomita Station Doug McHattie, South Bay Engineering. CONSENT CALENDAR None. OLD BUSINESS City Manager Nealis delivered the oath of office to all Commissioners who were recently reappointed by City Council Action dated January 10, 1994. NEW BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION OF MODIFICATIONS TO PINE TREE LANE IN ZONING CASE NO. 450, SUBDIVISION NO. 84, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 21486, APPLICANT DR. AND MRS. RAMON CUKINGNAN, 16 PINE TREE LANE (LOT 81-RH). City Manager Nealis delivered a staff report providing Commissioners with the history of this subdivision, other pending subdivisions on Pine Tree Lane, and roadway modifications which are Agenda Traffic Commission 02-25-94 -1- • • . DRAFT required for consideration of any of these subdivision requests. City Manager Nealis explained the County Subdivision Committee review process and indicated that the Planning Commission is currently holding the Resolution of Approval for this case in abeyance until Traffic concerns/conditions have been determined by the Traffic Commission. Commissioner Wiener questioned the 20 foot roadway proposal and expressed concerns whether the Fire Department had been consulted in this matter. Staff explained that the County Fire Department has reviewed this and have concurred with the proposal as it is currently being presented. Deputy Traffic Engineer Ken Johnson indicated that a 20 foot roadway width is minimal distance required for maneuvering fire safety equipment. Doug McHattie of South Bay Engineering, representing the applicant, indicated that the roadway design was worked out with the Fire Department and that the 4 foot decomposed granite would provide a surface that can be utilized by fire safety vehicles. Additionally, Mr. McHattie explained that the 32 foot radius cul-de-sac is meeting the conditions of the Fire Department as well as the 17% grade. Chair Leeuwenburgh questioned the impact of the proposed modifications on Pine Tree Lane to the surrounding areas. South Bay Engineering representative Doug McHattie indicated that the proposed modifications to the entire roadway will only require the removal of one tree. Commissioner Henke questioned the proposal by South Bay Engineering to add asphalt where the roadway would be amended and then to cap the entire roadway with a 2 inch roadway cap. South Bay Engineering expressed that this is the best way to handle this work. City Manager Nealis expressed that the Community Association has the ability to modify any of the roadway materials proposed as it will be a private roadway deeded to the Community Association. Following a brief discussion, the Commission adjourned to the field location to view the proposed cul-de-sac and roadway modifications in conjunction with this case at 9:12 a.m. RECONVENE Commissioners reconvened at 9:20 a.m. in the field at the above referenced site. Following review of the cul-de-sac proposal in the field, Commissioners set forth the following conditions for this project: • That all existing driveways will be approved by the Traffic Engineer following modifications to the roadway to determine if adequate sight distance is present following the roadway modifications at each driveway location. • Any new driveway approaches at the cul-de-sac or on Pine Tree Lane will be submitted to the Traffic Commission upon development of each individual property. • No new driveway approaches were approved by the Traffic Commission during these deliberations. Agenda Traffic Commission 02-25-94 -2- • • DRAFT • Costs of restriping the roadway and replacement of pavement markings following completion of the roadway widening, and replacement of existing roadway traffic signs shall be done to the satisfaction of the City and shall be paid for by the applicant. • The Rolling Hills Community Association shall approve the roadway materials proposed for construction as per the County plan presented to the Traffic Commission. A motion was made by Commissioner Wiener, which was seconded by Commissioner Henke, to approve the conditions as determined in the field. This motion passed by a 4-0-1 vote (Vice Chair Virtue absent). MA1TERS FROM MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION Chair Leeuwenburgh requested if staff had investigated the new driveway approach being constructed at 29 Crest Road West. City Manager Nealis responded that a correspondence has been sent recently to the property owners reminding them of the conditions for sight distance and other conditions of the Traffic Commission, in relation to this case. MATTERS FROM STAFF None. ADJOURNMENT Hearing no further business before the Traffic Commission, Chair Leeuwenburgh adjourned the meeting at 9:55 a.m. to Friday, March 18, 1994, at 8:30 a.m. Approved, Ginny Leeuwenburgh Chair Agenda Traffic Commission 02-25-94 -3- Craig R. Nealis City Manager • City 0/s2PPns�ee INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No.: 4-A Mtg. Date: 3/18/94 TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION FROM: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 246: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS REGARDING THE ADVISORY TRAFFIC COMMISSION AND AMENDING THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE. DATE: MARCH 18, 1994 Attached to this staff report is Ordinance No. 246 adopted by members of the Rolling Hills City Council on February 14, 1994. This Ordinance provides for two year terms on the Traffic Commission. In order to implement the Ordinance, the term for Commissioner Richard Henke and for Commissioner Joan Perkins shall be for a period of one year. After that one year period of time, these appointments will be considered for two year terms. All other remaining terms of the Traffic Commission are for a two year period. It would be in order to receive and file this Ordinance. CRN:mlk traffic\ord246.sta Printed on Recycled Paper. 4101DINANCE NO. 246 • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS REGARDING THE ADVISORY TRAFFIC COMMISSION AND AMENDING THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 10.08.010 of Chapter 10.08 of Title 10 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: "10.08.010 Establishment --Membership. There is established an advisory Traffic Commission, the members of which shall serve without compensation at the pleasure of the City Council for staggered terms of two years. The Commission shall consist of one member of the Council and four residents of the City, one of whom shall be a member of the Board of Directors of the Rolling Hills Community Association. The Chairperson of such Commission shall be the City Councilmember. A Vice -Chairperson shall be elected by the Commission." Section 2. In order to implement the staggering of terms as provided for in Section 10.08.010, the term of one resident of the City and the resident who is a member of the Board of Directors of the Rolling Hills Community Association appointed in January, 1994 shall be for a period of one year; thereafter, the term of those two positions shall be two years. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOYIED THIS 14th day of February, 1994. JO RD K -A4C4) MAYOR Al I EST: CRAIG R. NEALIS CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )SS The foregoing Ordinance No. 246 entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS REGARDING THE ADVISORY TRAFFIC COMMISSION AND AMENDING THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on February 14, 1994, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Councilmembers Swanson,.Pernell, Heinsheimer, Mayor Pro Tem Leeuwenburgh and Mayor Murdock. None. None. None. MARILYN l .KERN DEPUTY CITY CLERK Ordinance No. 246 • • city o/ !2 /iL g Jh/'/? INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No.: 5-A Mtg. Date: 3/18/94 TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION FROM: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO A PROPOSED NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 1 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE. DATE: MARCH 18, 1994 At the regular Traffic Commission meeting held on Friday, January 21, 1994, Commissioners considered the proposed driveway access at 1 Buggy Whip Drive. At that meeting, Traffic Commissioners instructed the applicant's representative to resubmit their plans showing the driveway location at least 80 feet north of the current proposed location on Buggy Whip Drive. Commissioners concurred that the width of the driveway should be a minimum of 20 feet for its entire duration and that the existing driveway to the existing house shall be removed and returned to a natural state. A copy of the staff report that was presented to the Traffic Commission is attached to this staff report. The attached plans depict the driveway approximately 50 feet north of the original proposed location. The applicant's representative is prepared to address the Traffic Commission regarding this driveway location. It would be in order for members of the Rolling Hills Traffic Commission to consider a field trip this morning to view this item as it is currently proposed. CRN:mlk traffic\ lbuggywhip.sta Printed on Recycled Paper. • • City ofieoffing -WA INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No.: 8-C Mtg. Date: 1/21/94 TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION FROM: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF DRIVEWAY ACCESS AT 1 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE DATE: JANUARY 21, 1994 Attached to this staff report are plans and staff. materials that were presented to the Planning Commission relative to this property. As you will notice in the attached documents, a lot line adjustment was approved at the subject property. With the new lot line configuration, the property owners are proposing to rebuild their residential structure and have a replacement driveway access for the new residential structure. This item is currently being considered by the members of the Rolling Hills Planning Commission. It would be in order to review the plans and other related materials and provide direction to staff relative to this project. CRN:mlk traffic\ lbug.sta • • HEARING DATE: TO: FROM: City o`Po/tiny JUL INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 JANUARY 18, 1994 PLANNING COMMISSION LOLA UNGAR, PRINCIPAL PLANNER NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS. CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING & SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: ZONING CASE NO. 505 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE & 13 CREST ROAD WEST (LOT 176 -A -MS & A PORTION OF LOT 176 -MS) RAS-2, 7.43 ACRES MR. JOHN Z. BLAZEVICH MR. DOUGLAS MCHATTIE, SOUTH BAY ENGINEERING DECEMBER 25, 1993 REQUEST The applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit for the construction and relocation of a tennis court to replace an existing tennis court and requests Site Plan Review for the construction of a proposed new single family residence to replace an existing single family residence. BACKGROUND In reviewing the applicants' request under Title 16, Subdivisions and Title 17, Zoning, staff would identify the following issues for evaluation: 1. The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for the construction and relocation of a 7,060 square foot tennis court to replace an existing 7,246 square foot tennis court. The applicant also requests Site Plan Review to construct a 15,950 square foot residence and 900 square foot garage to replace an existing 5,544 square foot residence and 1,152 square foot garage. The new residence, garage and pool will occupy the areas currently occupied by the existing residence, garage, pool and tennis court. The new tennis court will be located at the southern portion of the lot. 2. Retaining walls will be required at the southern portion of the residence along the perimeter of the driveway and turnaround area for 209 feet. There is also a 320 foot long 4 -foot high (maximum height permitted) retaining wall proposed that will surround the new tennis court. 3. The existing house and attached garage were built in 1977 4. Grading for the project site will require 9,700 cubic yards of cut soil and 9,700 cubic yards of fill soil. ZONING CASE NO. 505 PAGE 2 5. The disturbed area of the lot will be 113,553 square feet or. 38.9% (40% maximum permitted) of the lot area. 6. The structural lot coverage proposed is 25,581 square feet or 8.7% (20% permitted) and the total lot coverage proposed is 42,417 square feet or 14.5% (35% permitted). 7. The building pad coverage on the 71,329 square foot residential building pad is 26% and the coverage of the tennis court pad is 100%. The total building pad coverage is 32%. 8. Access to the new residence will be changed to an entrance further south on Buggy Whip Drive, 30 feet from the southerly property line. The new (and partially existing) 11 foot wide roadway will have an accessway of 15 feet. The accessway is 9 feet less than the 24 feet the Traffic Commission has recently recommended for driveway entrances. 9. Other residences on properties adjacent to the proposed project are: ADDRESS RESIDENCE(SQ.FT) ACRES 0 Buggy Whip Drive (Abdo) 7 Buggy Whip Drive (Reznick) 9 Buggy Whip Drive (Crowley) 25 Crest West (Chandran) 13 Crest West (Kouri) 11 Crest West (Bemis) 9 Crest West (Pak) 4 North Quail Ridge (Shroeder) 1 Buggy Whip Drive (Proposed) 4,523 3,614 3,135 4,320 6,311 3,534 9,159 2,440 15,950 1.99 1.53 2.00 1.89 2.80 2.00 3.78 5.09 7.43 10. After reviewing the Initial Study for the project, Staff has determined that this project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Accordingly, a Negative Declaration has been prepared. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed plans and take public testimony. •City opeollin • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS. CALIF 90274 1310)377-1521 FAX: (3101377.7288 NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 505 Application has been filed with the City of Rolling Hills for approval of the project known as Lot1176CMSeandcu0rretolo be located at Lot 176 -A -MS and a ortion of Whi Drive Rollin Hills CA and be implemented by Mr. John Z. Blazevich. The request is briefly described as: on A req uest uest for a Conditional Use Permit fo existing heconstucti court and relocation of a tennis court to replace of a and a request. for Site Plan Review for the to replace an existing single proposed new single family residence s ngle family residence. in the Pursuant to the authority and criteria and the contained Guidelines iof forthe Environmental Quality Act (CEQ ) yzed the project Cit of Rollin Hills the Lead Agency ty have a has anasignificant impactaon determined that the project will the Lead Agency prepared the environment. Based on this finding, this NEGATIVE DECLARATION. FINDINGS OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT: CONDITION(S) (IF ON THE ATTACHEDE DETERMINED INITIAL STUDY, AND THAT THE PROJECT WILL NOT HAVE APPLICABLE), IT H A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. n of A perio d of at least 21 days from the date of pub ica io enable the notice of this NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be P public review of the project specifications, the Initialof the StudyTInd udy and this document prior to the final A copy of the project DECLARATION by the Lead Agency. specifications is on file it eRooffiCesles of TCA 90274.of Rollin s Hills 2 Portu uese Bend Road Date: December 22 1993 By: Lola Ungar Principal Planner • • • City O /2//i, h// INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 (To Be Completed By Applicant Date Filed r EN RAL INFO_ MAMAIlQi 1. Applicant S O t) i t►1 et Address 2. Legal Owner Address P • 0. 0 )e 3. Project Address Parcel No. 7 5 _-- 1 k Lot No. Po R. t'1 6 a C 7 4A Assessor's Book, Page , 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project,including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: NO. 2 PORTUGUESE RENO ROAD ROLLING HILLS. CALIF 40274 (3101377-152i FAX. (W013774285 Zoning Case No. .SUS 5. Existing zoning district Q 6. Proposed project/use of site: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7. Site size 8. Net lot area y 9. Total square footage of structures 32.3 123 10. Number of floors of construction Tel. 217.1:115.12 5512 Tel. 8 3 2- S v O o 11. Basement square footage CD �+ 12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls?? t� A 14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? ip () A 15. Wilt the entire building structure requ roof? new, 16. � Amount cut 4)? O O Amount fill � ? � �—• 17. Will cut and fill be balanced• Square feet \' . Gf • percentage of lot _____121.13.--. 18. Area of disturbance. J—.-- 19. If residential, include the unit, size. Square feet Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? ro ect, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square 20. If commercial, indicate the type of p � footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities. 21. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. n. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. • 23. Attach plans. 4 24. Proposed scheduling. 25. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. c. t Callo applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach Are the following items app additional sheets as necessary). 2S 26. X. r. 28. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes or hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. • 29. 30. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes, or odors in vicinity. 31. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing draining patterns. 32. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. 33. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. 35. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.). Substantially increased fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 37. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. 34. 36. nt`T*dENTAL s . t t trrsi hy, soil Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including �lscde 8 '�opremStion on Desaib�ypc��g stability, plants and �'n''� and any cultural, hs of the site. Sna hots or structures on the and the use of the structures. Attach photograp ps polaroid photos will be x cfp L_s?_L t P L. L. -T rties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, 39. Describe the surrounding Pro Pe historical sity of land oeascenicil, est ho Indicate use,the �ettc.) and of land cale of development (height, rontage,tsent--back, rear use (one -family, guest house, yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. Cl .1 1_. re • • (Please explain all 'yes' and 'maybe' answers on separate sheets.) • 40. Lull. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g, Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 41. Ait. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 42. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either,marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, dunnage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface ff? e. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X .NAtiBI EQ X MAYbc f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? — h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i, Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? j. Significant changes in the temperature, flow, or chemical content of surface thermal springs? 43. Plant Lim. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including tress, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 44. Aram 1 L' . Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? • Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 45. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 46. t ight and Clare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 47. 1 and Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? K. X. • 48. Nirnral Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 49. u Eck of Uossi. WdI the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including. but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemical or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? 50. Po uo� lation. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of in . Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 52. Irao«-►nation! irculation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles? 53. Atli Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 1 MAYBE lig 1 x • 54. Emu. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase he developmein demand nt of on new sources of energy? ting sources of energy, or require P 55. iii . Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a, power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? H►�man Ncalih• Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard excluding mental health? b. Exposure of people to potential health. hazards? 57. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Reacatis n. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 59. f» rural R{Soursta. a Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? -d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 56. 58. X titAYBE NQ 60. d - -lim of G. .fits ce. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short- term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may affect two or more separate resources where the impact is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effect on human beings, either directly or indirectly? • • NOTE: in the event that the project site and any alternatives arc not listed on liscompiled edlopursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify provided w. I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5m2.s app Govation ernment dean contained od ereby n these certify(i that the development project and any alternatives proposed riN Date Signature For i_I Applicant CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date DEG. For J Q wa.1 LA -La.) l c t -k Applicant forms\environm.app JVv+n v�T tviv+NEE �� �rnrvn�+n+Vh ENVIRONMENTAL TAL IMPACTS 40. b. The grading necessary for the completion of the project will require compaction of fill soils. c. In order to complete the project it will entail slight modifications to the overall topography of the lot. • e o` Ip lling • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF 90274 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION AND CHECKLIST FORM 13101377.1521 (INITIAL STUDY) FAX: (31 0) 377-7299 DATE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPERTY ADDRESS: ZONING AND AREA: CASE NO.: SUBJECT: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PRELIMINARY DRAFT DECEMBER 22, 1993 MR. JOHN Z. BLAZEVICH MR. DOUGLAS MCHATTIE, SOUTH BAY ENGINEERING 1 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE (LOT 176 -A -MS AND A PORTION OF LOT 176 -MS) RAS-2,7.43 ACRES, IRREGULAR SHAPED LOT ZONING CASE NO. 505 REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND RELOCATION OF A TENNIS COURT TO REPLACE AN EXISTING TENNIS COURT AND A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PROPOSED NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. 33. Grading will be necessary for a portion of the site where recompaction will be required for fill soils existing on the property. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 38. The project site is a large 7.43 acre parcel consisting of undulating hillsides and knolls covered by grasses, and mature shrubs and trees, with some areas being heavily wooded. Currently, there is a large one-story single family residence with attached garage, a pool, tennis court and guest house on the lot. Landscaped lawns, shrubs and trees surround the existing residence, with native plants, grasses, shrubs, and trees beyond the residential area. Native birds and animals frequent the area such as sparrows, crows, raccoons, possum, skunks, gophers and an occasional fox. 39. The site is located within a one unit per 2 -acre zone designation and is surrounded by similar development of the one- story ranch style w th birds and animals agricultural bfrequent uildings.thesareacribed in Paragraph 38, native findings ontained Tne fothe elEnvironmental ls is a Informa description o)a Che Checklist Form whichprecededin the • • INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 505 PAGE 2 this page. A detailed discussion of all potential environmental impacts checked "Yes" or "Maybe" is provided, along with appropriate mitigation measures. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Item 40. Earth. a -d. Although approval of the project will not result in unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic ubstructures, it should be noted that portions of the City exhibit unstable earth conditions, including active landslides and soil creep. The Land Use Element of the General Plan establishes a Landslide Hazard Overlay to carefully regulate development in unstable areas. This property is not within a mapped active landslide area. Grading, excessive irrigation, and/or increased septic tank discharge in unstable areas may trigger additional slope failure. Because the City is located in seismically active southern California, additional development will be exposed to potential groundshaking in the event of an earthquake. The Palos Verdes fault, considered potentially active, is located approximately one mile northeast of the City. Although approval of the subdivision of land will not result in disruptions, displacements, compaction, or overcrowding of the soil, during future construction these will occur in g order to prepare a.26,000 square foot building pad for the b e. A smaller building site currently exists. Any displacement and recompaction of the soil will be required to conform with local ordinances and engineering practices requiring balanced cut and fill and should not cause a significant environmental impact. e -g. Also, during future construction, there will be removal of natural vegetative cover, potentially causing an increase in soil erosion by wind action or storm runoff. This reduction of vegetative cover and the increased runoff associated with development may cause a slight increase in the soil deposition, siltation, or erosion in or near the ocean. As additional development is limited to one (1) single-family dwelling unit, related erosion impacts will be less than significant. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the City a preliminary grading plan showing proposed drainage facilities, driveways, building pad(s), stable, corral, and blue line streams, for the lot at least 30 days prior to the Planning Commission hearing on the subdivision application. INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 505 PAGE 3 Item 41. Air a -c. The proposed project will not increase pdwelliment ng,unitl of a sin increase the size of development single-family While increased development will generate slight increases in vehicle ction and, le d tr construction, n, the resultantng and after uimpact on air quality will odors during const be less than significant. Item 42. Water a. Future development of the single residential unit on a two acre minimum parcel will not alter fresh or marine water currents. b. The proposed subdivision may alter drainage patterns, increase surface runoff and water imperviousabsorption surfacethe materialsplacement and of structures, the introduction irrigation systems. However, due to the nominal increase in development proposed and permitted by the General Plan, the impacts are not expected to be substantial. c. No major floodplains exist in the City. The GeneralFlood waters Plan does notnpermit erally flow through the canyon areas. changes in the course or flow of canyons, and so g development in the Y floodwaters waters is not anticipated. d. No water bodies are located in the project area. Future development in the project area is not expected to result in change in the amount of any water bodies located in the vicinity. e. The applicants propose a Sept t tank erc othe watershed, project. As septic tank leach field effluen p olate into some discharge into surface waters downstream may occur. The impact generated f msignificant. replacement of 1 dwelling unit, than however, will be less i. No major floodplains exist in the City, and development is not permitted in the canyon areas most likely to be affected by flooding. No open bodies of water occur within the City, thus no such hazard exists. The project is located high enough and far enough away from the ocean that tsunami hazards do not exist. j. Because the applicants propose a septic tank system, some discharge into surface waters downstream may occur. Item 43. Plant Life a -d. Any additional development which within will e be City rewill re a esthe e amount of native vegetation instances, by non-native specter, But, due to the limited growth INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 505 PAGE 4 proposed, this impact will be less than significant. In addition, the General Plan and Zoning Code set forth policies which encourage the retention and use of native drought tolerant vegetation in landscaping. No known rare and endangered species of plants exist in the City. Item 44. Animal Life a. As further development occurs in Rolling Hills, the natural habitat of the area will be slightly reduced. But, the impact of the current proposal is expected to be less than significant. b. Large lot, estate density development proposed for this project provides the opportunity to retain substantial amounts of existing habitat. The only animal listed by the Federal Government is the Palos Verdes Blue, a butterfly which was last seen in theRolling Hills area in May, 1986. Several other animals do occur, however, that are considered as candidates for protection by either the Federal Government or the State Government. The Tiger Beetle, while not considered to be endangered or threatened, does maintain a sensitivity to humans, exists to an extent that maybe cause for concern. Recently, the California gnatcatcher was added to the list of endangered species- and, in a recent census, one pair of gnatcatchers were located at the southern tip of the City adjacent to the City of Rancho Palless significant. Palos Vrdes. The impact of the proposed future development will be Item 46. .Light and Glare Residential building materials are carefully regulated Buildings the e Zoning Ordinance and the Community limited to one story in height. Light and glare impacts are therefore expected to be less than significant. Item 52. Transportation/Circulation a. Buggy Whip Drive is a short, winding private road that will not require widening. The incremental increase of one larger dwelling unit will not generate more than an estimated 10 daily vehicle trips. This is considered less than significant. Item 59. Cultural Resources a. While prior tilling and dry farming practices may have. disrupted potential remains, grading prior to construction may uncover a cultural resource. INITIAL REVIEW ZONING CASE NO. 505 PAGE 5 Mitigation Measures 2. In the event that subsurface material of an archaeological,paleontological or other cultural resource is encountered during project grading or development, all grading and construction shall cease in the immediate area, and the find shall be left untouched until a qualified professional archaeologist or paleontologist, whichever is appropriate, is contacted and called in to evaluate the find and makes recommendations as to disposition, mitigation or salvage. The developer shall incur the cost of such professional investigation. The developer shall comply with the mitigation measures recommended and approved by the City for the disposition, mitigation or salvage of such material. On the basis of this initial evaluation: (check one) I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation ded to the project. de 1bAdon an attached sheet NEGATIVE DECLARATION will bee prepaeen red. to the I find the project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.' Date December 22, 1993 LOLA M. UNGAR For the City of Rolling Hills (Lead Agency) CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL AND POSTING STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I am a citizen of the United States. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within proceeding; my business address is 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. On the day of i a % ,1994 I serve the within -9y a copy of which is annexed hereto and made a part hereof, on the person, or persons, named below by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelop with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Rolling Hills, California addressed as. follows: FAXED MAILED DELIVERED. Palos Verdes City Attorney City manager Peninsula News Traffic Commission Also posted in one public place 6 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the %S day of • ; ,,,I) , 1994 at Rolling Hills, California. MARILYN L. KERN DEPUTY CITY CLERK coy o/a rrn, qtr INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 FAX COVER SHEET DATE: 3 / - 9>/ TO: ef t/, s TELEPHONE: NO 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLUhG MILS. CALIF 90274 13101377.1521 FAX. (310) 377.7268 TIME SENT: q'/Z) FROM: Craif OPERATOR OUR FILE Nth YOUR FILE NO: SUBJECT: REMARKS: - TOTAL PAGES (including cover sheet): The City of Rolling Hills uses a Savinfax Model 300 telecopier as Its primary telecopier. It is compatible with Group 1, 2 and 3 telecopy machines. If you haye difficulty receiving any pages, please telephone our switchboard at (310) 377-1521 . REPLY TO: City of Rolling Hills - Fax No. (310) 377-7288 C1i 0/ Rolling INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1937 FAX COVER SHEET DATE: TIME SENT: TO: —,- J Obi «-, FROM: TELEPHONE: OPERATOR=_ _l��, OUR FILE NO: YOUR FILE NO: NO 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS. CALIF 90274 13101377.1521 FAX (310) 377.7288 SUBJECT: k,)_2 REMARKS: • TOTAL PAGES (including cover sheet): The City of Rolling Hills uses a Savinfax Model 300 telecopler as its primary telecopier. It is compatible with Group 1, 2 and 3 telecopy machines. If you have difficulty receiving any pages, please telephone our switchboard at (310) 377.1521 . REPLY TO: City of Rolling Hills - Fax No. (310) 377-7288 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING 0/ /Oftfl9. LS INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 TRAFFIC COMMISSION FRIDAY, MARCH 18, 1994 8:30 A.M. NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS CITY HALL 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. JANUARY 21, 1994. B. FEBRUARY 25, 1994. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR A. ORDINANCE NO. 246: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS REGARDING THE TRAFFIC ADVISORY TRAFFIC COMMISSION AND' AMENDING THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. 5. OLD BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION OF DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO A PROPOSED NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 1 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE. 6. NEW BUSINESS 7. MATTERS FROM MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION 8. MATTERS FROM STAFF 9. ADJOURNMENT Agenda Traffic Commission 02-18-94 -1- Printed on Recycled Paper. • •H • " s ,+, )11' + Ij 1; • 1. j' 4 " .411 ' , II , ', 7 ! e_ I ILL\TNIS 7,246 sq.ft. SERVICE YARD 96 sq.ft. 7,060 sq.ft. 7,060 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. ,111, • I 1111 , 1,11, ,I 11 • • 1,1•11, ; I • I r Lu II•• • • I I s4. • ;Ts . "14 4144 „ , • , , A 0 r e 1 "„ •, '••• ,.,' / / / .i/ r1 X / / -1/ - :2 ,1 , i / —// 7-7r- /+1 / / / 11 / / // /, i , ,,.'•,i .; , 11 IFi 4r/ ' I / /i 7 ,1 ,// i I : f ' , „/'/ , , /: I ,i . /; „`\ \ " \ 1. \ j 14 \ 14 \ !v, t , 40304.4. i3f \ 14 k, 4, 5 I = / / / ,/ / / • A C • / '11\ \ \ \ „ \\4 \14 \ 14 \ \ 7 \ \s 1414 414 \ \ ‘ 1\ \ \ 1\ \ \ \ s"\ \ ;r7\ 14 , 14 \\ \ 14 ,„ 14 14 „ \ 2\ \ \\, \ s\ 414 / / • e • „e ; ; 7 A ! 7 , • 1 1 '1 se / f / ; 7 I • '14144 e e 2 r ; 14 14 •, "rs / / / / / / .+1 / / / / / . /14 / • ' / r " / " / e - I' I ,. I „;/ // / / i '.. ' r ,- ' A1 .3- ., .7; / A A ; + .- ,7 1 / , . Al 1 • 1 1 i 1 1 7' f / I : •• .:! /i i , r i ' I i i i t 7 14 i I ' ' i i e 1 ! ; ; ri t „ s ; i •' ; I i 1 1 '8 • 7: • I I ic i i 1 I i ; i 11 }i 14:87 ' i; 'i tI ... 1 i sr • 1 c if i 1 1 .. ' ) I t „ i s 8 7 : ' , 7 ; e14 S c 1 i 1 ' f s s ;' 1 1,.. , 1 ; -,s, 1 •' 1.1 ', ; : s ; I ", l"., "rs, s 1 '''s ; s ! s 1 s - „ , s ' ?, 1 - s , s , s s 1 , , ., , , , 's. 11,, I; '' s t s S " 1. 1 '; \ s 1 1; \ •••• 1 s, ' ' s 1 • • s • s s • c • s s ; s s, 1, t \ \ ; s ' s s'" 141 • + \ \ 's14 '+‘ \ \ \ 1 ; --„ \ ,, „ \ \ '" ks. "s s „ ''S !!" \ ''', 'S, S • ; t, t 14 ‘ i At 1 ,.e. k., c, \ 7, , ', k ", 3, \ \ „ , 14 \ ''i 1 ! ' : A \ k ; !A \ i, 14 14!, \ ,,, l \„„ \ c , 7 '\ "',A ,,I, 7\., se,14 \ \ ', '''' \ 1 17 1 \ s C., ' t I i ; \ ' \ 't ''t ! 1 A 't 1 1 , 7 ; 1 .21 I ': !IA! 37 17 i • 14 14 ' '14- 3 1414 ij - , -is •-• 7 i '", I 1 3 7 7 ! .3 1 ; 1 1 i 1; !, 1 1 ! A i 7 7 - S . ,--"; 1, 1 I ; 1 f•--4\ '''s ! I ?---f " I ; 1 ; / 1 A' 7 ) / / / / / / / / / I // / / 1 3 I' . / ..,,,,, ..,., .1. . ../.. .d" ,-; ee,,,, „.„7!!' +,'' +3' - -"4- ,7! + - • '7 k \14 \ s = "s s 's 1, \ . \ s, 1 1 1 S s --,?-- 1 1A ; •i ' I- •- , 'A A \ 14 1 1 „1, 1 1 s )s•-• s 1 1 \ \ \ 11 14 I 41 i 1 .e3, + ! ! i 1 7 1 k, ‘, ''s s i 1144 J '', 7 ; 4 S -; ‘ 1 1,, , s I 1 1 I s 1. --1i '1 1 s, .. 1 's J ''1 4 si 1 1, --1,7 i 1 1 i K1 1 14 1 1 c14 ', i l' 1 1 f t 11 1 ? i 1 I i ; j i • • stt 7 • " / •-` • 7/1 ; 1 f ; "e ":„1" , , s s • s • • - • es , 3'1 • , • „ "1, k A 1414, " "kr ' • 3 , A \ \ 1\ 7 3 s141414 1; \14 \ k !A '; \k s \ !. '1! s s 14 14 1 14'; 1 ‘14 14 st 14 ; ; 4,14 1414 s, s = , s 1414 II 14 1 s 41414 / 14 4114 41 ; 14 s es Ie „ 14 I 1 s ‚14- , 14 -14 es" ee "-ce ,„ 14 14 14 c-"/ -71""17-1422 -14 -14 •3 = s'‘ 14 -14 14 '14- \ e \ \ '''' s (1 , • . . . , , A ' \ 1 14 14, 14 ',71 ) 14 c; k \ ' 14 OTHER GUEST HOUSE 1,480 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE % TOTAL PAD COVERAGE 16,213 sq.ft. 5.6 25,581 sq.ft. 8.7 070 32 25,581 sq.ft. 8.7 % 32 DRIVEWAY PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREAS POOL DECKING 4,912 sq.ft. 948 sq.ft. 1,192 sq.ft. 12,810 sq.ft. 12,81.0 sq.ft. 2,310 sq.ft. 2,310 sq.ft. 1,716 sq.ft. 1,716 sq.ft. TOTAL FLATWORK % TOTAL FLAT-WRK COVERAGE • 7,052 sq.ft. 16,836 sq.ft. 2.4 % 5.8 % 16,836 sq.ft. 5.8 • TOTAL S I RUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE 23,265 sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE 7.8 % 49,417 sq.ft. 14.5 % 49,417 sq.ft. 14.5 % .yce.e., , - 4 !"-`c \ ' 011[114 MONO 35 14 c,, 14 7-7 --r 7 ay r/cL9700 cy. .74 e • 11 1//c/N/ 7Y MA P 2001 ..113.114 I. ,41t. Th uJ CO 00Z date /2-7-.93 scale id-. zo ' drawn C.,/ checked sheet IL I t •s ; , s,:s , 14 1 - 1 tp III, s 111.'1 11 LI 1, I Li: 41 of sheets job no. 93172-5-