Loading...
Traffic Commission Agenda 09-16-1994 (2)• MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 5,1994 CALL TO ORDER An adjourned regular meeting of the Traffic Commission of the City of Rolling Hills was called to order by Chair Hill at 8:30 a.m. on Wednesday, October 5, 1994, in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Henke, Perkins, Wiener and Chair Hill. Commissioners Absent: Virtue. (Excused. ) Others Present: Craig. R. Nealis, City Manager. Ken Johnson, Traffic Engineer. Tom Mericle, Traffic Engineer. Deputy John Nakaji, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Lomita Station. Roger Vink, RHCA Architectural Inspector. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MINUTES OF JULY 15, 1994. City Manager Nealis reported that the draft minutes of July 15, 1994, have been corrected to reflect that the type of material recommended for the stop signs at the gated entrances to the City is "diamond" grade. Commissioner Henke moved approval of the minutes of an adjourned regular meeting of the Traffic Commission held July 15, 1994. Commissioner Perkins second the motion which carried unanimously. CONSENT CALENDAR None. OLD BUSINESS None. NEW BUSINESS CONSIDERATION OF BIDS RECEIVED FOR FY 94-95 REPLACEMENT OF TRAFFIC STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. City Manager Nealis presented the staff report. In response to Commissioner Wiener, City Manager Nealis explained that cleaning of the roadway before striping has been made a component of the Request for Proposal. City Manager Nealis also explained that reflectors are replaced as needed and that he would remind the contractor to dispose of the replaced reflectors properly and not leave them by the side of the road. Commissioner Wiener moved that the Traffic Commission recommend that the City Council award the FY 94-95 Replacement of Traffic Striping and Pavement Markings contract to IPS Services, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $11,962.21. Commissioner Henke seconded the motion which carried unanimously. Minutes Traffic Commission Meeting 10/5/94 -1- • • REPORT REGARDING TRAFFIC ENGINEERS INVESTIGATION OF ENTRANCES TO THE CITY. City Manager Nealis presented the staff report outlining the recommendations of the Traffic Engineer. Traffic Engineer Ken Johnson explained the findings in his report and presented a summary of his recommendations. In response to Chair Hill, Traffic Engineer Johnson explained that the reflective material recommended for the stop signs requires little maintenance. Commissioners discussed the recommendations proposed by the Traffic Engineer and concurred that these improvements would make the three entrances to the City uniform. Discussion ensued regarding the cost for the improvements. City Manager Nealis reported that the City has been using a company for sign work that is reasonable and responsive for this type of work. Commissioner Henke moved that the Traffic Commission recommend that the- City Council implement the recommendations outlined in the Traffic Engineers report. Commissioner Wiener seconded the motion which carried unanimously. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR DOUBLE YELLOW STRIPING ON CREST ROAD. City Manager Nealis presented the staff report. Traffic Engineer Ken Johnson announced that he was leaving. Willdan to accept an appointment with another company and introduced Tom Mericle who will act as the City's Traffic Engineer. City Manager Nealis reported that he had driven Crest Road with Mr. Mericle to familiarize him with this request. Commissioners discussed this request and City Manager Nealis reported that the estimated cost for this work would be $6,700. City Manager Nealis stated that if this request for double yellow striping is approved, this work could be added to the current striping project or done separately. • Mrs. Christa Hawkins, 37 Crest Road West, explained her request for double yellow striping on Crest Road and stated that speeding is a problem on this roadway. Mrs. Hawkins also stated that there are other traffic related problems on Crest Road. Chair Hill reported that the City requests increased traffic enforcement in problem areas of the City and that the Sheriffs Department has been advised of speeding problems on Crest Road and has increased patrols. Traffic Engineer Ken Johnson explained the California Vehicle Code and County requirements for double yellow striping. He stated that double yellow striping is not normally used for lowering speed limits. Traffic Engineer Johnson also stated that there has been no accident history on Crest Road. He further stated that double yellow striping will reduce but not eliminate passing and that it is his recommendation that the roadway remain as it is. Mrs. Hawkins suggested that the City could double the citation fee for speeding citations to discourage this activity. City Manager Nealis stated that he is not aware of any rule that would allow the City to double citation fees and indicated that he would check with Captain Pettus of the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department to ascertain if this is possible. In response to Mrs. Hawkin's concerns, Deputy John Nakaji stated that he would have deputies concentrate on Crest Road and that he would contact Mrs. Hawkins personally to discuss her concerns. Further discussion ensued relative . to this request and Commissioners concurred that more information regarding traffic activity on Crest Road may be beneficial and that this Minutes Traffic Commission Meeting 10/5/94 -2- item 'lSould be continued to the next regular meeting of the Traffic Commission. Commissioners directed staff to provide further information regarding the number of citations issued on Crest Road. Hearing no objection, Chair Hill so ordered. CONSIDERATION OF REVISED DRIVEWAY ACCESS AT 1 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE. City Manager Nealis presented the staff report outlining the applicant's revised plans and provided a brief history of this case to the Traffic Commission. Commissioner Perkins stated that she must abstain from deliberations relative to this request because of the proximity of her residence to 1 Buggy Whip Drive. • Mr. Doug McHattie, South Bay Engineering, reviewed the revised plans with the Traffic Commission and explained that the applicant is requesting re -review of the driveway entrance because the applicant brought to his attention several safety concerns related to ingress and egress to his property. Mr. Mc Hattie explained that he conducted a sight distance study and determined that the new location would enhance sight distance for those entering or leaving Mr. Blazevich's property. He also presented a centerline profile of Buggy Whip Drive. Commission Henke expressed concern that Mr. McHattie was not a Traffic Engineer and that he felt more comfortable in relying on information from the City's Traffic Engineer. • Mr. John Z. Blazevich, 1 Buggy Whip Drive, explained the safety factors which he felt were important to the driveway access to his property. Mr. Blazevich also stated that he had spoken with the City's Traffic Engineer and asked him to take a look at his new proposal. Mr. Nealis explained that a letter from the Traffic Engineer relative to his meeting with Mr. Blazevich is included with the staff report. Traffic Engineer Johnson explained the site distance criteria established by the Traffic Commission and stated that he had not had a chance to review the centerline profile presented by the applicant's representative. Commissioners discussed the new request and items brought to their attention during deliberation. Commissioners concurred that the Traffic Engineer should review the centerline profile before they make a decision relative to this request. Commissioner Wiener moved that consideration of the revised driveway access at 1 Buggy Whip Drive be continued to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Traffic Commission. Commissioner Henke seconded the motion which carried unanimously (Perkins abstained). Hearing no objection, Chair Hill so ordered. OPEN AGENDA - COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None. MATTERS FROM MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION • Commissioner Wiener suggested that the Traffic Commission consider a speed zone survey on Crest Road in conjunction with Mrs. Hawkins request for double yellow striping on Crest Road. Staff was directed to present this recommendation to the City Council. • MATTERS FROM STAFF None. Minutes Traffic Commission Meeting 10/5/94 -3- • ADJOURNMENT • • Hearing no further business before the Traffic Commission, Chair Hill adjourned the meeting 9:57 p.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Traffic Commission to be ' held on Friday, November 18, 1994. Approved, Frank . Hill Chair 4.8of Respectfully submitted, Marilyn L. Kern Deputy City Clerk Minutes Traffic Commission Meeting 10/5/94 -4- z • CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL AND POSTING . STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I am a citizen of the United States. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within proceeding; my business address is 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. On the day of 1994 Iservethewithin a copy of which is annexed hereto and made a part hereof, on the person, or persons, named below by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelop with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Rolling Hills, California addressed as. follows: FAXED MAILED DELIVERED Palos Verdes City Attorney City manager Peninsula News Traffic Commission Also posted in one public place I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the f day of j�,�o� 1994 at Rolling Hills, California. MARILYN L. KERN DEPUTY CITY CLERK AGENDA REGULAR MEETING • • leoffin9. INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 TRAFFIC COMMISSION CITY OF ROLLING HILLS FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 1994 8:30 A.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. MINUTES OF JULY 15, 1994. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR 5. OLD BUSINESS 6. NEW BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION OF BIDS RECEIVED FOR FY 94-95 REPLACEMENT OF TRAFFIC STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. B. REPORT REGARDING TRAFFIC ENGINEERS INVESTIGATION OF ENTRANCES TO THE CITY. C. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR DOUBLE YELLOW STRIPING ON CREST ROAD. CONSIDERATION OF REVISED DRIVEWAY ACCESS AT 1 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE. 7. OPEN AGENDA - COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA . . 8. MATTERS FROM MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION 9. MATTERS FROM STAFF 10. ADJOURNMENT Agenda Traffic Commission Meeting 9/16/94 -1- Printed on Recycled Paper. • Cu, 0/ R0[[t'n, INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 DATE: 9j- /G` _9 y NO 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING MILLS. CALIF 90274 (3101377-1521 FAX (310) 377.7288 FAX COVER SHEET TIME SENT: //,, pa �.", , TO: P 1) r FROM: %�/-P,;_/, TELEPHONE: OPERATOR: OUR FILE NO: YOUR FILE NO: SUBJECT: % f 9 r, L -j- i, Jcc; —9, REMARKS: TOTAL PAGES (including cover sheet): The City of Rolling Hills uses a Savinfax Model 300 telecopier as its primary telecopier. It is compatible with Group 1, 2 and 3 telecopy machines. If you have difficulty receiving any pages, please telephone our switchboard at (310) 377-1521 REPLY TO: City of Rolling Hills - Fax No. (310) 377-7288 • C41 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 U fTE: 9—/4/-9Y TELEPHONE: FAX COVER SHEET iLivi! y(: OUR FILE NO: NO 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS. CALIF 90274 1310) 377.1521 FAX 1310) 377-7288 TIME SENT: / _ "/' FROM: r,7,7:4.(_ OPERATOR: YOUR FILE NO: SUBJECT: 77--e2/Ac., REMARKS: TOTAL PAGES (including cover. sheet): The City of Rolling Hills uses a Savinfax Model 300 telecopier as its primary telecopier. It is compatible with Group 1, 2 and 3 telecopy machines. If you have difficulty receiving any pages, please telephone our switchboard at (310) 377-1521 REPLY TO: City of Rolling Hills - Fax No. (310) 377-7288 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING • • Ci1, ofi2otti.,y Jh/h INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 TRAFFIC COMMISSION CITY OF ROLLING HILLS FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 16,1994 8:30 A.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. MINUTES OF JULY 15, 1994. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR 5. OLD BUSINESS 6. NEW BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION OF BIDS RECEIVED FOR FY 94-95 REPLACEMENT OF TRAFFIC STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. B. REPORT . REGARDING TRAFFIC ENGINEERS INVESTIGATION OF ENTRANCES TO THE CITY. C. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR DOUBLE YELLOW STRIPING ON CREST ROAD. D. CONSIDERATION OF REVISED DRIVEWAY ACCESS AT 1 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE. 7. OPEN AGENDA COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA .. , 8. MATTERS FROM MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION 9. MATTERS FROM STAFF 10. ADJOURNMENT Agenda Traffic Commission Meeting 9/16/94 -1- Printed on Recycled Paper. DRAFT MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA JULY 15, 1994 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Traffic Commission of the City of Rolling Hills was called to order by Chair Hill at 8:43 a.m. on Friday, July 15, 1994, in the . City Council Chambers at City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Commissioners Absent: Others Present: Henke, Perkins, Wiener and Chair Hill. Vice Chair Virtue (excused). Craig R. Nealis, City Manager. Ken Johnson, Traffic Engineer. Deputy Nakaji, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department Lomita Station. INTRODUCTION AND SWEARING IN OF NEW TRAFFIC COMMISSION CHAIR FRANK HILL The City Manager/ City Clerk Craig Nealis delivered the oath of office to Chair Frank Hill and welcomed him to the Traffic Commission. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. MAY9,1994. Commissioner Henke moved approval of the minutes of a Special Meeting of the Traffic Commission of the City of Rolling Hills held May 9, 1994 with an amendment to page three of those minutes indicating that during the field trip to 1 Maverick Lane, the sentence be inserted "the architect and property owners were in attendance." This motion was seconded by Commissioner Perkins which was approved by a 3-0-1 vote (Chair Hill abstained). OLD BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION OF CORRESPONDENCE FROM SOUTH BAY ENGINEERING REGARDING A MODIFICATION TO THE DRIVEWAY OPENING AT 1 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE. Minutes Traffic Commission Meeting 7/15/94 • • DRAFT City Manager Nealis delivered the staff report and provided the Commission with the history of the status of this request. Commissioner Wiener outlined the previous concerns of the Commission to maintain traffic safety and to have driveways in the area offset. Traffic Engineer Ken Johnson indicated that the driveway distance of 105 ft. north of the southerly property line was selected due to sight distance as being optimal to visualize traffic in both directions. Following discussion, Committee Henke questioned the Traffic Engineer on the safety of distances. The Traffic Engineer indicated that 80 to 100 feet was equally as safe as 105 feet. The representative of the applicant, Mr. Dave Chambers of South Bay Engineering was in attendance and indicated that he had nothing to add to the staff report. Following questioning by Chair Hill, Mr. Chambers indicated that Mr. Blazevich is currently in favor of the proposed design in which the driveway begins 5 feet north of the southerly property line. Following a brief discussion, this matter was set for field trip later in the day. NEW BUSINESS A. CONSIDERATION OF STOP SIGN ILLUMINATION AT ENTRANCES TO THE CITY. City Manager Nealis delivered the staff report and Chair Hill commented that he had observed inconsistencies regarding stop signs, gates and illumination of stop signs at the three entrances to the City. Traffic Engineer Ken Johnson indicated that consistency at entrances is a good item and recommended possibly the installation of 3M diamond gray reflective stop signs which may be as effective as illumination. Architectural Inspector Roger Vink indicated that stops signs are the City's responsibility however, supported the Traffic Engineer's idea. Discussion ensued regarding the differences of the gates at the 3 entrances with Roger Vink indicating that the Eastfield gate is set up differently but will be upgraded when it is in a state of permanent disrepair because it is obsolete. Mark Camon, 5 Johns Canyon Road, suggested solar systems to illuminate stop signs. Following discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Wiener which was seconded by Commissioner Perkins to have the Traffic Engineer review stop sign locations, illumination factors at entrances and exits of the City and the necessity, if any, for additional signage in addition to solar capability and use of the control arm gates. The Traffic Engineer indicated that he would complete this analysis and report to the Commissioner at their September meeting. Minutes Traffic Commission Meeting 7/15/94 -2- DRAFT B. CONSIDERATION OF A SPEED LIMIT SIGN IN THE VICINITY OF THE EASTFIELD GATE ENTRY. City Manager Nealis delivered the staff report indicating that there is currently no speed limit sign indicating 25 mile per hour for the entire duration of Eastfield Drive for inbound traffic. Architectural Inspector Roger Vink indicated that he felt that a sign used to be there but. could have been accidentally removed during a trail modification project. Following discussion, staff was directed to investigate the history of whether or not the Traffic Commission had approved a 25 miles per hour sign on Eastfield Drive, and if it was identified that the Commission had taken such action, to simply replace the sign. If no history could be identified, staff was directed to present a recommendation of the Traffic Commission to the City Council to install a 25 mile per hour sign on Eastfield Drive for inbound traffic, with the location to be determined by the Traffic Engineer. Deputy Nakaji of the Sheriff's Department -indicated that a speed limit sign would be beneficial for traffic enforcement. C. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR "SLOW - BLIND DRIVEWAYS" OR "SLOW - LIMITED VISIBILITY" SIGN ON JOHNS CANYON ROAD. City Manager Nealis delivered the staff report indicating that no signs of this nature are currently on Johns Canyon Road and it is generally not the practice of the Traffic Commission to entertain requests for signs of this nature. The Traffic Engineer echoed the comments made by the City Manager. Marc Camon, 6 Johns Canyon Road, entered into discussion with the Traffic Commission indicating that he wanted some sort of signage, a letter sent to home owners about speeding in the area, contractors notified of speeding regulations in the City and requested a discussion about a traffic mirror in the area. City Manager Nealis responded that letters had been sent to all residents on Johns Canyon Road approximately 18 months prior and that such mirrorg are prohibited from erection in the City of Rolling Hills. Patty Clark, 3 Johns Canyon Road, addressed the Commission indicating thatshe supported the comments by Marc Camon and provided photographs from her vehicles perspective entering her driveway which was reviewed by the Commission. Chair Hill indicated that a number of driveways were built in the City prior to Traffic Commission review and oftentimes do not offer optimum sight distance. Commissioner Perkins felt that safety signs for residents are an important matter. Chair Hill indicated that more law enforcement might be needed in the area. Following discussion, staff was directed to initiate additional traffic enforcement in the area and to implement the use of the speed board on Johns Canyon Road. Traffic Engineer Ken Johnson indicated that a driveway needs about three to four seconds of time in which to view a vehicle, approximately 90 feet, for a twenty five mile per hour speed limit to have adequate sight distance. Minutes Traffic Commission Meeting 7/15/94 -3- • • DRAFT Following discussion, it was the consensus of the Commission that staff should present an item to the City Council for consideration of handing out speed limit notices to contractors entering the City and that the Association could assist with handing out these flyers to non-residents. Commissioner Perkins suggested that the people that attend the neighborhood meetings and possibly the Women's Community Club could coordinate a meeting in the Johns Canyon area to discuss speeding issues. The Commission elected to conduct a field trip in this location later in the morning. D. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR STRIPING OF VARIOUS ROADWAYS WITHIN THE CITY. Following a brief discussion and a presentation from the City Manager, the Commission approved the Request for Proposal document and directed staff to communicate this recommendation to the City Council. RECESS Chair Hill recessed the meeting at 10:05 a.m. to 1 Buggy Whip Drive and 3 Johns Canyon Road for the purposes of conducting field inspections at these locations. FIELD TRIP Commissioners reconvened their meeting at 10:20 a.m. at 1 Buggy Whip Drive. Applicant Blazevich and South Bay Engineering representative Dave Chambers were in attendance. Commissioner Perkins did not participate or attend this portion of the meeting due to the proximity of her residence to 1 Buggy Whip Drive. Following measurements on the location and extensive discussion, the Traffic Engineer indicated that approximately three to four seconds of visibility is required for vehicles to safely exit a driveway into traffic lanes in a twenty five mile per hour zone. Mr. Blazevich indicated his desire to have the driveway at the proposed location approximately five feet north of his southerly property line. Chair Hill indicated that maximum safety is achieved with the centerline of the driveway approximately eighty to one hundred feet north of the southerly property line and reinforced the principle that safety is the Traffic Commission's concern. Following discussion, it was determined if the driveway centerline was eighty feet north of the southerly property line, with a twenty six foot wide apron, thirteen feet south of eighty feet is approximately ten feet north of the existing, unauthorized driveway location. Traffic Engineer Ken Johnson indicated that ten feet is too high a degree of accuracy to account for in this case. It was the Traffic Engineer's professional opinion as he observed vehicles providing approximately five seconds for visibility from the existing unauthorized driveway location, that the Traffic Commission could consider the unauthorized driveway location for this residence. Minutes Traffic Commission Meeting 7/15/94 -4- • • DRAFT Following discussion, Commissioner Henke indicated that the proposed location five feet north of the southerly property line was unacceptable. However, it was discussed by Commissioner Henke that with the tree clearance removed, the unauthorized location might be permissible. Commissioner Henke indicated that when the Commission looked at this project the first time, none of the trees had been trimmed. Following discussion and when questioned, Traffic Engineer Ken Johnson agreed that the proposed location of five feet north of the southerly property line was unacceptable. However, the Traffic Engineer indicated that the current location of the unauthorized driveway was acceptable and that having the centerline eighty to one hundred feet north of the southerly property line would be optimal. The Traffic Engineer, in observing traffic in the area, indicated that there was approximately five seconds of sight distance was being provided from the unauthorized location. Based upon the Traffic Engineer's comments and discussion, the Commission made the following recommendation to be presented to the City Council at their regular meeting to be held July 25, 1994. The motion was made by Commissioner Wiener and seconded by Commissioner Henke that the driveway be constructed in the following manner: • That the southerly border of the driveway be located forty three feet north of the south property line. • That the apron be 26 feet wide for at least twenty four feet of distance into the property. • That the duration of the remaining portions of the driveway be twenty feet minimum width between the apron and the structures on the property. • That trees in the area be trimmed to maintain sight distance. • That the property owner be able to utilize the entire driveway following City Council approval while his project is currently pending before the Planning Commission with the understanding that the driveway will be widened to a minimum of twenty feet in width during construction of improvements to the structures on the property. If the structures on the property are not constructed or if the project is denied by the Planning Commission, or approved by the Planning Commission and simply not built, that the improvements to the driveway as recommended by the Traffic Commission must be completed within six months of the date of the action of the Planning Commission. This motion was supported by Chair Hill and Commissioners Henke and Wiener. FIELD TRIP Commissioners arrived at 3 Johns Canyon Road at 11:45 a.m. Following brief discussion, a motion was made to direct staff to prepare a letter to the property owners indicating that the Traffic Commission was not recommending the construction of the "Slow -Blind Driveway" sign or "Low Visibility" sign on Johns Canyon Road and recommended that Minutes Traffic Commission Meeting 7/15/94 -5- • • DRAFT the property owners consider moving their mailboxes. However, Commissioners recommended that the City Council consider their recommendation to cause a twenty five mile per hour sign to be erected at a location deemed suitable by the Traffic Engineer on Johns Canyon Road for inbound traffic. OPEN AGENDA - COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None. MATTERS FROM MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION None. MATTERS FROM STAFF None. ADJOURNMENT Hearing no further business before the Traffic Commission, Chair Hill adjourned the meeting at 12:00 noon to the City Council, Planning Commission and Traffic Commission Joint Study Session to be held on Monday, August 29, 1994 at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. Approved, Frank E. Hill Chair Minutes Traffic Commission Meeting 7/15/94 -6- Respectfully submitted, Craig R. Nealis City Manager TO: FROM: SUBJECT: .fleoffin JUL INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 HONORABLE COMMISSION NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No.: 6-A Mtg. Date: 9/16/94 CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER CONSIDERATION OF BIDS RECEIVED FOR FY 94-95 REPLACEMENT OF TRAFFIC STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1994 BACKGROUND On July 15, 1994, members of the Traffic Commission approved the City of Rolling Hills FY 94-95 Replacement of Traffic Striping and Pavement Markings Request for Proposals and recommended that the City Council request bids for said work. Members of the City Council approved this request on July 25, 1994, and directed staff to solicit bids. Advertisements requesting bids were placed in the Palos Verdes Peninsula News, and the Dodge Green Sheet, as well as posted at City Hall. The Dodge Green Sheet is a publication commonly used by local governments for the advertisement of public works projects. Bids were received until 11:00 a.m. on September 2, 1994, at which time they were publicly opened. Bid packages were requested by six companies. At the time of opening the sealed bids, four qualified bid packages were received as listed below. IPS Services, Inc. $11,962.21 Sterndahl Enterprises, Inc. $14,456.00 Paving Contractors, Inc. $14,595.80 Super Seal & Stripe $19,292.36 -1- Printed on Recycled Paper. We have evaluated the bid packages and they are in order and include the required Bid Bonds of not less than ten percent (10%) of the total amount of each bid. The low bidder, IPS Services, Inc. of San Bernardino, is the same company that provided the FY 93-94 Citywide Replacement of Traffic Striping and Pavement Markings services for the City and their work was completed in a satisfactory manner. In the FY 94-95 City of Rolling Hills Budget, a total of $15,000 is included for this project. Of that amount, $124 has been expended to advertise for this bid process leaving a remaining balance of $14,876 for this project. A Resolution has been prepared and is attached should members of the Traffic Commission desire to approve a bid package and forward it to the City Council for final action. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that members of the Rolling Hills Traffic Commission recommend to the City Council that the FY 94-95 Replacement of Striping and Pavement Markings be awarded to IPS Services, Incorporated of San Bernardino, California. CRN:mlk traffic \ 94stripawa.sta -2- 40 RESOLUTION NO. TC-94-0 A RESOLUTION OF THE ROLLING HILLS TRAFFIC COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THE AWARD OF THE CONTRACT FOR 1994-1995 CITYWIDE REPLACEMENT OF TRAFFIC STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS. WHEREAS, members of the Traffic Commission recommended a FY 94-95 Replacement of Traffic Striping and Pavement Marking Request for Proposals to the City Council; and WHEREAS, members of the City Council approved this Request for Proposals on July 25, 1994; and WHEREAS, the subject Request for Proposals was duly advertised pursuant to state law; and WHEREAS, bids were publicly opened at 11:00 a.m. on Friday, September 2, 1994, and WHEREAS, four qualified bids were received; and WHEREAS, members of the Traffic Commission met on Friday, September 16, 1994 to consider these bids. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by members of the Rolling Hills Traffic Commission as follows: SECTION 1. Members of the Rolling Hills Traffic Commission hereby recommend that the City Council award the FY 94-95 Replacement of Traffic Striping and Pavement Markings Contract to IPS Services Incorporated of San Bernardino in an amount not to eleven thousand, nine hundred sixty-two dollars and twenty-one cents ($11,962.21). PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of September, 1994. FRANK E. HILL CHAIR ATTEST: MARILYN L. KERN DEPUTY CITY CLERK Traffic Commission Resolution No. TC-94-1 The foregoing Resolution No. TC-94-1 entitled: • A RESOLUTION OF THE ROLLING HILLS TRAFFIC COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THE AWARD OF THE CONTRACT FOR FY 94-95 REPLACEMENT OF TRAFFIC STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Traffic Commission on the 16th day of September, 1994 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MARILYN L. KERN DEPUTY CITY CLERK Traffic Commission Resolution No. TC-94-1 t • pl acement lacement of Traffic Striping a ' Pavement Markings Request for Proposal - FY 94-95 PROPOSAL FOR FY 1994-1995 - REPLACEMENT OF TRAFFIC STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKING IN THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS TO THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, as AGENCY: In accordance with the AGENCY'S Notice Inviting Sealed Bids, the undersigned BIDDER hereby proposes to furnish all materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals required for the above stated project as set forth in the Plans, Specifications, and contract`documents therefore, and to perform all work in the manner and time prescribed therein. BIDDER declares that this proposal is based upon careful examination of the work site, Plans, Specifications, Instructions to Bidders, and all other a contract t contract d cuments. If this AGENCY at proposal is accepted for award, BIDDER agrees to enter into the unit and/or lump sum prices set forth in the following Bid Schedule. BIDDER understands that failure to enter into a contract in the manner and time prescribed will result in forfeiture to AGENCY of the guarantee accompanying this proposal. BIDDER understands that a bid is required for the entire work, that the estimated quantities set forth in the Bid Schedule are solely for the purpose of comparing bids, and that final compensation under the contract will be based upon the actual quantities of work satisfactorily completed. THE AGENCY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO INCREASE OR DECREASE THE AMOUNT OF ANY QUANTITY SHOWN AND TO DELETE ANY ITEM FROM THE CONTRACT. It is agreed that the unit and/or lump sum prices bid include all appurtenant expenses, taxes, royalties, and fees. In the case of discrepancies in the amounts bid, unit prices shall govern over extended amount, and words shall govern over figures. If awarded the Contract, the undersigned further agrees that in the event of the BIDDER's default in executing the required contract and filing the necessary bonds and insurance certificates WITHIN TEN DAYS, not including Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays, after the AGENCY has mailed notice of the award of contract to the BIDDER, the proceeds of the security accompanying this bid shall become the property of the AGENCY and this bid and the acceptance hereof may, at the AGENCY's option, be considered null and void. 7/94 7 I pubworks\stripvar.rfp • P Request for Proposal • FY 94-95 Replacement of Traffic Striping p g and avement Markings BID SCHEDULE FOR REPLACEMENT OF TRAFFIC STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS IN THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Item 1. Description Estimated Unit Quantity Unit Price Repaint solid 4" double yellow stripe 26,640 2. Repaint 4" skip yellow 14,735 3. Repaint 4" solid white 82,130 4. Repaint 8" solid white 60 5. Repaint stop/limit line 27 6. Repaint STOP AHEAD 20 7. Repaint Crosswalks (ped) 5 8. Repaint HORSE XING 13 9. Repaint Crosswalk (Horse) 7 10. Repaint ROAD ENDS AHEAD 500 FEET 1 11. Repaint ROAD ENDS 1 12. Two-way Yellow Reflective Markers so (Replace as needed) 750 Each $ a, 35 $ j76a,6° 13. Two -Way Blue Reflective Markers (Replace as needed) 25 Each $ 3." TOTAL AMOUNT BID IN FIGURES TOTAL AMOUNT BID IN WORDS Extended Amount $ Jo $ $ aay $ 58c'1 4° $ .b435 $ 3,4833' $ 1,00 $ Q0.00 $ 50. $ 300.°° $ 57a.°° L.F. L.F. L.F. L.F. $ 350.°o S.F. $.12_1_ $° (00.x° $ 1p0•0 $ a00.°° $ 1►___.a� • • Request for Proposal - FY 94-95 Replacement of 'rabic Striping and Pavement Markings DESIGNATION OF SUBCONTRACTORS BIDDER proposes to subcontract certain portions of the work which are in excess of one- half of one percent of the bid and to procure materials and equipment from suppliers and vendors as follows: NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF SUBCONTRACTORS, SUPPLIERS AND VENDORS NONE PORTION OF WORK MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT 7/94 9 pubworks\stripvar.rfp • Proposal - FY 94-95 Re lacement of T7rattic Striping and Pavement Markings Request for Pr0 p P BIDDER'S REFERENCES The following are the names, addresses and phone numbers for three public agencies for which BIDDER has performed similar work within the past two years: i. goA): n p I n 0,eh, O. ,fix 5�0, / n� /1,}2 Z1, 9080/ Name and address of owner C4646}t) f Name tnd telephone numb of person familiar with project �5w Contract amount , (a/3) -93 7- CO y/ (Ptnh) .75,S/r;N//t1C, ] //-77 Type of work 6/5093 Dat o feted P 2. 4 f OP Th1PL Pa 6�X �� �fin�� J o 9 ,'/ 62- Name and address of owner • N UlegAL 40/0-L) (/) 4-?/ afrie and tele one number of person familiar with project "t/9z too Contract amount 17,DUY, N�� c�/Q/?1/7Q' Type of work ll 4-9y Date completed 3. �i 01 £ v cE /0 5 16006s/tit .9vE, , �'JY ?a 07/ Name and address of owner PQ/9-456' - `7/00 Name aid telephone number of person familiar with project Contract amount Z7el' Zti2 cpv AN -6 �.3/ Type of work 5)-9,3 Date complete The following are the names, addresses, and phone numbers for all brokers and sureties from whom PRINCIPAL intends to procure insurance bonds: L -19 -6C -C -0 --‘ - - `---11aU n CO 541Ve- • 7/94 _j pubworks\stripvar.rfp SURETY COMPANY: MERCHANTS BONDING CO. 2425 E. CAMELBACK RD., STE 800 PHOENIX, A2 85016 PHONE: 800-848-2663 INSURANCE AGENT(BONDING/AUTOMOBILE/EXCESS LIABILITYJWORKER COMP): BEALL INSURANCE CO., INC. PHONE: 909-792-2345 308 WEST STATE STREET FAX: 909-792-0159 REDLANDS, CA 92373 CONTACT:KAREN/DEBBIE INSURANCE(GENERAL LIABILITY): SFINGI & HANNON INSURANCE PHONE: 909-483-5800 CURTIS KEILEY, INC. FAX: 909-483-5804 77-564 COUNTRY CLUB DR., #150 CONTACT: RAEANN PALM DESERT, CA 92211 • 4-9S Re placement of Traffic Striping a�Pavement Markings Request for Proposal - FY 9 p EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMPLIANCE BIDDER certifies that in all previous contracts or subcontracts, all reports which may have been due under the requirements of any satisfactorily filed, ate, thator no such reportsderal l are employment opportunity orders have been satis y outstanding. CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE REOUIREMENT The undersigned certifies that he is aware that this contract cannot be awarded to him unless, at the time of the award, he is the holder of a valid California Contractor's License proper and adequate for the work required by this contract, and that the failure to obtain proper and adequate licensing for an award of the contract shall result in the forfeiture of the bidder's security. BIDDERS' INFORMATION BIDDER certifies that the following information is true and correct: Bidder's Name AR3 c RD / C .-5 /IT Business Address 72 0. 80y /ni58c Telephone 90 9-'9L% mac% 0 � State Contractor's License No. and Class 4,2i cQP A18 Original Date Issued -19 g off. Expiration Date 4 - -962 The following are the names, titles, addresses, and phone numbers of all individuals, firm members, partners, joint venturers, and/ocorporate � officers2having S g a principal interest in this proposal: )nc TP3 5�f2 V/CE5 • CeO • _G_a. / 0cis ' cr.J , eikr- d. E- g w Zf Y6 3 V.P. P 7/94 cqN E ayy.3 pubworks\stripvar.rfp Request for Proposal 94-95 Replacement of Traffic Striping Pavement Markings The date of any voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy judgements against any principal having an interest in this proposal are as follows: All current and prior DBA's, alias, and/or fictitious business names for any principal having an interest in this proposal are as follows: N/A I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above representations are true and correct. Executed this 02 9-0 day of ,19_1, at `m PJ) /pro , California. 9_4p : VP Signature and Title of Biddeti or Authorized Representative (SEAL) 7/94 -12- pubworks\stripvar.rfp 08-08-1994 1: 49ir1 FROM IPS SER!J I CES TO 7920159 P.13_: • Request for Proposal - FY 94-95 Replacement of Tram Striping 11111'avement Ong+ BID BOND FOR FY 1994-1995 REPLACEMENT OF TRAFFIC STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS IN THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that Bidder IPS SERVICES, INC. as PRINCIPAL, andMERCHANTS BONDING CO, as SURETY, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Rolling Hills, as AGENCY, in the penal sum of which is ten percent of the total amount bid by PRINCIPAL to AGENCY for the above stated project, for the payment of which sum, PRINCIPAL and SURETY agree to be bound, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITIONS OF THIS OBLIGATION ARE SUCH that, whereas PRINCIPAL is about to submit a bid to AGENCY for the above stated project, if said bid is rejected, or is said bid is accepted and a contract is awarded and entered into by PRINCIPAL in the manner and time specified, and provides the required payment and performance bonds and insurance coverages to AGENCY, this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise it shall remain is full force and effect in favor of AGENCY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have set their names, titles, hands, and seals this 15TH day of AUGUST 19 94 . PRINCIPAL: BY: ` f§ s nvlcES INC, P n PQA 1D4a2 San Bernardino, CA 92423-0458 SURETY: MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY ICHARD ALLEN BEALL _ ATT(1RNF.Y TN._ Af'T — Subscribed and sworn to this 15TH day of AUGUST NOTARY PUBLIC {SEAL) 7/94 t.a Akek I.e DMA L ALEi01C COMM i 1027 Wavy Catania SAN p — COUNTY Illy Comm. Endres M 17.1998 19 94_• pubworks\siripvar.rfp TOTAL P.03 i Merchants Bonding Con p y (Mutual) POWER OF ATTORNEY • Know All Men By These Presents, that the MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (Mutual), a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State "of Iowa, and having its principal office in the City of Des Moines, County of Polk, State of Iowa, hath made, constituted and appointed, and does by these presents make, constitute and appoint »>RICHARD ALLEN BEBLL«< »X« »x« of RE L •and State of • CA its true and lawful Attorney -in -Fact. with full power and. authority hereby con%rred in its name, place and stead, to sign, execute, acknowledge and deliver in its behalf as surety: »>FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS($500,000.00)«< and to bind the MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (Mutual) thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bond or undertaking was signed by the duly authorized officers of the MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (Mutual), and all the acts of said Attorney. pursuant to the authority herein given, are hereby ratified and confirmed.. This Power -of -Attorney is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the following By -Laws adopted by the Board of Directors of the MERCHANTS BONDING. COMPANY (Mutual). ARTICLE 2, SECTION 6A. — The Chairman of the Board or President or any Vice President or Secretary shall have power and authority 'to appoint Attorneys -id -Fact, and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company, and attach the seal of the Company thereto, bonds and undertakings. recognizances, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof. . ARTICLE 2. SECTION 60. — The signature of any authorized officer and the Seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any Power of Attorney or Certification thereof authorizing the execution and delivery of any pond, undertaking, recognizance. or other suretyship obligations of the Company. and such signature and seal when so used shall have the same Iorce and effect as though manually fixed. In Witness Whereof, MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (Mutual) has caused these presents to be signed by its Vice President and Executive Vice President, and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed. this 26th day of February A.D.. 19 91 Attest: MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (Mutual) • -.. .O\NG•�oto•• • �fl;:ORPO -.q2• • • 1933 3• "°yONcu1,ve V,co Prosrol' STATE OF- IOWA COUNTY OF POLK ss.,. . •sy�.,,...••`-\o.• On this 26th day of February . 19 91 , before me appeared M.J. Long and Rodney Bliss III, to me personally known. who being by me auiy sworn did say that they are Vice President and Executive Vice President respectively of the MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (Mutual). the corporation described in the foregoing instrument. and that the Seal affixed to.the said instrument is the Corporate Seal of the said Corporation and that the said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of . said Corporation by authority of its Board of Directors. , By •502 /91 BEALL FINANCIAL & INS SERV INC an • In Testimony Whereof; 1 have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal, at the City of Des Moines. Iowa the day and year first • above written. a• •°F'G BRU1'p°�°• • 3.: • IOWA • • • •• • p � •P •STATE OF IOWA • .4 AL •' COUNTY OF POLK ss °° . •• ° ..... ° • • 1, M.J. Long. Vice President of the MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (Mutual). do hereby certify i t.th above and foregoing is a true anti correct copy of the POWER OF ATTORNEY executed by said ME61Eki Tqe1JVDING • COMPANY (Mutual). which is still in force and effect. . • O. P0q9-A...4 4 . q • In Witness Whereof. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the Company. al ° �•. v0 y •- • this • day of . . 19. ° c":2, „ � rr, .� • CONTINUOUS This power of attorney expires ____ 2)45;;...14 Notary Potthc. P, 'I6 County. Iowa ' hf y Canons^,nn Einues 8-4-92 • (DATE) State of 67/96/ FDeK//9 County of .;5/9/I/ 8ffEi fiezyPVC? A before me, Nor�- �� 17�cC6//� �� (NAME/TITLE OF OFFICER•i.e.'JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC') personally appeared (-�tEVC C R/E6E' INAME(S) OF SIGNERISU personally known to me -OR- 0 APRIL HERGENREDER 0 Comm. No. 1001685 p a NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA tfi nt :_ . SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYCt t+ My Comm. Ezp. August 19, 1997 , (SEAL) proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrumentthe person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. (S NATU'f OF NOTARY) ATTENTION NOTARY The information requested below and in the column to the right is OPTIONAL. Recording of this document is not required by law and is also optional. It could, however, prevent fraudulent attachment of this certificate to any unauthorized document. THIS CERTIFICATE MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Trtle or Type of Document b(l) Bond Number of Pages 1 Date of Document 51—/5— 7 (� Signer(s) Other Than Named Above Ric hodzo I"7 1 I e N v€»LL WOLCOTTS FORM 83240 Rev. 3-94 (price class B -2A) 1994 WOLCOTTS FORMS, INC. ALL PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT WITH SIGNER CAPACITY/REPRESENTATIONMNO FINGERPRINTS RIGHT THUMBPRINT (Optional) TOP OF THUMB HERE CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER(S) OINDIVIDUALIS) CORPORATE Vide S,l yr OFFICER(S) (TITLES) ❑PARTNER(S) OLIMITED OGENERAL OATTORNEY IN FACT OTRUSTEE(S) OGUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: •NI o Per`A'o(sll:a tfptityPea} • ' P. O. co'- , C-. - �' " a(i�C((inrt:.:�3, �r.�4-23-CY5° RIGHT THUMBPRINT (Optional) TOP OF THUMB HERE CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNERIS) OINDIVIDUAL(S) DCORPORATE OFFICER(S) !TITLES) ❑PARTNER(S) ❑LIMITED ❑GENERAL OATTORNEY IN FACT OTRUSTEE(S) ❑GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (Name of Person(s) or Entitylies) 7 11P, 6,1111. 8 • 4.95 Re placement of Traffic Striping an Pavement Markings Request for Proposal - FY 9 p NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT FOR FY 1994-1995 REPLACEMENT OF TRAFFIC STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS IN THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) SS. STEVE /?i E G E%2. , being first duly sworn, deposes and says that he or she is V/C C OR es ii FNT of /AS 1/00 the party making the foregoing bid, that the bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly, colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the bid are true; and, further, that the bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid. Subscribed and sworn to before me on (Notary Seal) Signature ✓ u = C _-,`• date) 7/94 , � -14- pubworks\stripvar.rfp • State of eciNtvAntet, County of fkrnn [Q On 8/3i A9y personally appeared before me, 4A2/'- HEREN'bEk, Nor9/2- 7ai3L/C, (NAME/TITLE OF OFFICER•i.e.'JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC') ZfE YE O • 8/ C= 6ER_ (NAMES) OF SIGNER(S)I personally known to me -OR- 0 O ; .. COMM: h0. 100ifIg 41 CC < �A', NOTARYRUdlle 9AkifORNIA 0 '' yf SAN 9ERNARINQ UQUNi`F - My Comm, Cate, Wile )9, 199} (SEAL) proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. antiZWFO PP /1Jt0,� NOTARY) ATTENTION NOTARY The information requested below and in the column to the right is OPTIONAL: Recording of this document is not required by law and is also optional. It could, however, prevent fraudulent attachment of this certificate to any unauthorized document. NON ,/ THIS CERTIFICATE The or Type of Document / V dN CO / �/ S/ O,Y MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE DOCUMENT Number of Pages Date of Document DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above WOLCOTTS FORM 63240 Rev. 3.94 (price eleas 8-2A) 1994 WOLCOTTS FORMS, INC. ALL PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT WITH SIGNER CAPACITY/REPRESENTATION/TWO FINGERPRINTS RIGHT THUMBPRINT (Optional) TOP OF THUMB HERE CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER(S) ❑INDIVIDUAL(S) • CORPORATE V/ Cep2Es/ frI : OFFICER(S) (TITLES) ❑PARTNER(S) ❑LIMITED ❑GENERAL ❑ATTORNEY IN FACT OTRUSTEE(S) ❑GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑OTHER: , SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (Name of Person(s) or Entity(ies) IPS SERVICES INC. P. 0. r..,. 10458 an Bc;n:rc;.; o, CA 92423-045 RIGHT THUMBPRINT (Optional) TOP OF THUMB HERE CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNERS) ❑INDIVIDUAL(S) ❑CORPORATE OFFICER(S) (TITLES) ❑PARTNER(S) ❑LIMITED ❑GENERAL ❑ATTORNEY IN FACT ❑TRUSTEE(S) ❑GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR ❑OTHER: SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: (Name of Person(s) or Entity(ies) 7 8 Request for Proposal - FY 94-95 Replacement of Traffic Striping and Pavement Markings PROPOSAL FOR FY 1994-1995 REPLACEMENT OF TRAFFIC STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS IN THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA Bids To Be Received On September 2, 1994, at 11:00 a.m. at the City of Rolling Hills Administration Facility. Completion Time 15 Consecutive Working Days Unless otherwise agreed upon on specific locations due to upcoming resurfacing work. Forfeiture Due to Delay - $250.00 Per Calendar Day Number of Sheets in Proposal: 10 Number of Sheets of Plans: 5 CONTRACTOR Name IPaaEROiCFS, I!'�C• . Street Address j 19 9 O Pry L p VE City M QS n,c, State (tA Zip Code q a 359 Telephone Number 909(- 794-i Q/ leoftin • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No.: 6-B Mtg. Date: 9/16/94 TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION FROM: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: REPORT REGARDING TRAFFIC ENGINEERS INVESTIGATION OF ENTRANCES TO THE CITY. DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1994. BACKGROUND At the regular Traffic Commission Meeting held Friday, July 15, 1994, Traffic Commissioners directed the Traffic Engineer to evaluate the vehicle circulation of inbound and outbound traffic at the three gated entrances to the City. A memorandum regarding this research from the Traffic Engineer is attached to this staff report. RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations from the Traffic Engineer include replacement of all stop signs with diamond gray reflective sheeting signs, remove flood lights on stop signs, move the stop sign atthe visitors/residents merge for Portuguese Bend Road entrance five feet closer to the stop bar, add a stop sign for the resident entrance at the Eastfield Drive and add reflective tape to all gate arms. A representative of Willdan Associates is in attendance this morning to address any questions Commissioners may have. From a staff perspective, these recommendations certainly seem consistent with the traffic safety standards applied by the Traffic Commission in the City of Rolling Hills. Should members of the Rolling Hills Traffic Commission concur with the recommendations of the Traffic Engineer, it would be in order to recommend that the City Council implement the recommendations in the attached report. CRN:mlk entrances.sta Printed on Recycled Paper. • • August 29, 1994 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES ❑ E\GINEEIRS & P A\\ERS Professional Consulting Services Since 1964 AUG 31 1994 CITY Of tOLL1NC HILLS Mr. Craig Nealis City Manager City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Roiling Hills, CA 90274 Subject: Investigation of Entrances to Rolling Hills Dear Mr. Nealis: have completed my survey of the three entrances to Rolling Hills. the survey had three purposes: 1) to look at stop sign lighting, 2) to identify any potential safety issues; and 3) to identify any inconsistencies in traffic controls. Enclosed are sketches of each entrance with the traffic controls at each location. I found the gates to be generally free from serious safety problems or features that would lead to driver confusion; although, I found some minor inconsistencies that can be easily remedied. Portuguese Bend Road Entrance - This entrance has two entrance lanes and one exit lane as shown on Figure 1. The entrance has three stop signs and four painted stop legends. The visitor entrance at the guardhouse does not have a stop sign; however, my observation of the visitor entrance operation did not indicate any problems caused by the lack of a stop sign at this location. The stop sign located at the merge point of the visitor and resident entrances is about 10' in front of the painted stop bar. A visitor who stops at the painted stop legend cannot see clearly past the guardhouse to see if a resident is approaching the gate; however, a visitor stopped at the sign will extend partially into the through lane. The driver is legally required to stop at the stop sign rather than the stop bar. It would be appropriate to relocate the stop sign about 5' closer to the stop bar. At the new location, a driver stopped at the sign can see residents approaching and the visitor vehicle does not extend into the through lane. All stop signs at this entrance are 30" in size, which is the standard, recommended size for a residential type of street. For speeds over 40 mph, 36" stop signs are used; however, I believe the large sign would be overkill for Rolling Hills. All the stop signs are engineer grade reflective sheeting, which is the standard for reflectivity. I recommend that all signs be replaced with diamond grade reflective 12900 CROSSROADS PARKWAY SOUTH • SUITE 200 • IND - ", CALIFORNIA 91746-3499 • (310) 908-6200 • FAX (310) 695-2120 August 29, 1994 Page 2 sheeting, which is extremely reflective and very visible at night. The small spotlights should be removed because they are not all weather devices, they are susceptible to being jarred out of place, they may detract from the sign itself, and the placement of diamond grade reflective sheeting will provide the necessary visibility. The gates at this location have strips of reflective tape located on each gate arm. The tape makes the gate arm very visible and should be used on all gate arms. Eastfield Drive Entrance - This entrance has one stop sign and three stop bars. The stop locations are sited appropriately and the sign and paint are in good condition. The sign and legend at the visitor/resident merge are located to provide very good sight distance to drivers in both lanes. Unlike the other two entrances, the resident entrance does have a stop bar but does not have a stop sign. For consistency, a stop sign should be placed at the guardhouse for this location. The exit lane has no stop sign or stop bar. The times I visited this entrance, the exit gate has been in a continuously raised position, and the lack of a stop control did not appear a problem. If the practice of leaving the gate raised is changed in the future, a stop sign should be placed in front of the gate for consistency. It is also recommended that diamond grade reflective sheeting stop signs be installed at this entrance. The sign on Eastfield Drive at Palos Verdes Drive East should also be changed to diamond grade reflective sheeting signs. Crest Road Entrance - The Crest Road Entrance has a standard arrangement of stop signs and legends, with the visitor entrance absent a stop sign at the guardhouse. All stop signs and legends are located appropriately; i.e., within 5' of each other, and the visitor/resident merge has excellent drive sight distance. I have no recommended changes other than replacement of the stop signs with diamond grade reflective sheeting signs. Recommendations - I recommend the following: 1. Replace all stop signs with diamond grade reflective sheeting signs. 2. Remove flood lights on the signs. 3. Move the stop sign at the visitor/resident merge for Portuguese Bend Road entrance 5' closer to the stop bar. August 29, 1994 Page 3 4. Add a stop sign for the resident entrance at East -field Drive. 5. Add reflective tape to all gate arms. Sincerely, WILLDAN AS :+o CIATES Ken Johnson Supervising Engineer Enclosures KJR:Iss 55432/1002/066 0664\I\I54 PALOS VERDES DRIVE N 14.5' EDGE OF PAVEMENT ACCESS CONTROL GATE o CITY HALL ENTRANCE M ACCESS CONTROL GATE /STOP SIGN 10 20 30 SCALE (FT) CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ENTRANCE PALOS VERDES DRIVE E w a IL 12.5' IS 28' GUARD HOUSE N $ 10' ACCESS CONTROL GATE POST 10.5' 0 ISLAND POST STOP SIGN 8.5' EASTFIELD DRIVE 12' 11' 9.5' a STOP SIGN ACCESS CONTROL GATE 10 20 30 SCALE (FT) CITY OF ROLLING HILLS EASTFIELD DRIVE ENTRANCE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ACCESS CONTROL GATE STOP SIGN a CREST ROAD ENTRANCE 10 20 30 SCALE (FT) City • • 0/ JUL INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No.: 6-C Mtg. Date: 9/16/94 TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION FROM: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR DOUBLE YELLOW STRIPING ON CREST ROAD. DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1994 Attached to this staff report is background material relative to the above referenced request. Attachments include an August 9, 1994 correspondence from Rolling Hills resident Christa Hawkins relating to non -visitor entrance policies to the City of Rolling Hills. This responsibility in under the purview of the Community Association. Members of the Community Association have announced stricter enforcement policies at all three gates in their September 7, 1994 Newsletter. Additionally, Ms. Hawkins is recommending increased traffic enforcement and double yellow striping on Rolling Hills roadways. In follow-up correspondence, Ms. Hawkins indicates that Crest Road would be the street to target for implementation of her striping proposal. Crest Road is currently centerlined with skip yellow. Double yellow striping of this roadway would cost approximately $6, 800, including reflector replacement. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that members of the Traffic Commission consider the request by Christa Hawkins. CRN:mlk doubleyellow.sta Printed on Recycled Paper. • August 9, 1994 Traffic Commission City of Rolling Hills No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, California 90274 Dear Commission Members: 0, AUG 1 0 1994 CITY of ROWNg JACES In the July 25, 1994 Newsletter, certain Traffic Commission Items were mentioned generally regulating to striping of various roadways, posting speed limit signs at various locations, and distributing speed limit warning notices to visitors and contractors entering the City. On the assumption that the Traffic Commission is taking an affirmatively tough stand on both warning of speed limits and enforcing traffic regulations within the City, my husband and I applaud your efforts. In other gated communities we have been in, gaining access is far more difficult than Rolling Hills and, once in those communities, traffic laws are STRICTLY enforced. Moreover, speed limits tend to be lower than in Rolling Hills. Result: safe and sane driving practices for the residents of these other communities. When I have described our City practices to residents we know in other communities, they express amazement at our lax policies. It's nice to occasionally see some effort being made at improving the safety of our city streets which our family feels involves (1) reduced speed limits, e.g., 25 m.p.h. on Crest Road, (2) adequate posting of speed limit signs, (3) signage cautioning motorists to drive slowly and quietly around equestrians and, most importantly (4) strict enforcement of our traffic laws and ordinances. We do not believe that well -intended letters asking residents and their guests, who drive 60-70 m.p.h. along Crest Road, to slow down has any impact on people who are disrespectful of traffic laws. What does work? Traffic tickets which reminds people with fines and increased insurance premiums that ignoring public safety carries with it a price tag. Even if these people don't care whether they maime or kill a person or animal, they may be moved to lighten up on the gas pedal if they have been fined once or twice or if they find their license to drive in jeopardy. After all, people such as these can buy their "peace of mind" by obeying the same law that responsible citizens obey. Traffic Commission City of Rolling Hills August 9, 1994 Page 2 In this City, I feel that the speed limit on any travelled street should be no higher than 25 m.p.h. Since I live just a few hundred feet inside the Crenshaw gate and having been passed to my left (as I am attempting to make a left turn into my driveway by persons impatient with my minding the speed limits), I feel that double/double striping the streets in ways which make it unlawful to pass drivers travelling in the same direction is striping which is long overdue. cc: City Council • • City 0/ INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 THOMAS F. HEINSHEIMER Mayor GODFREY PERNELL Mayor Pro Tem FRANK E. HILL Councilmember B. ALLEN LAY Councilmember JODY MURDOCK Councilmember Ms. Christa Hawkins 37 Crest Road West Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Dear Ms. Hawkins: August 12, 1994 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 Thank you for your letter dated August 9, 1994 to the Rolling Hills Traffic Commission. It appears from reading your correspondence that you are supporting the continued issuance of traffic citations and requesting that the Traffic Commission consider double striping Rolling Hills roadways. From your correspondence, it seems that you are requesting the double yellow striping on all streets in the City or possibly just on Crest Road. If you could please provide some clarification on this, it would be appreciated. Your correspondence will be forwarded to the Traffic Commission for their consideration at their regular meeting scheduled to held on Friday, September 16, 1994 at 8:30 a.m. in the Rolling Hills City Council Chambers, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. Other items in your letter can also be discussed at that Traffic Commission meeting. Your attendance is encouraged. Thank you again for your correspondence. We look forward to seeing you on September 16, 1994. Sincerely, ed Craig R. Nealis City Manager CRN:mlk corres.cm\hawkinsc.ltr cc: City Council Traffic Commission Printed on Recycled Paper. ii3103776718 H.AAIKINS P01 • August 17, 1994 ONLY _�31Q1 .377-7288 City of Rolling Hills No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road Roiling Hills, California 90274 Attention: Craig R. Nealis, City Manager Dear Mr. Nealis; Thank you for your letter of August 12. Respecting the double striping on City streets, 1 are requesting such striping on those City streets where such striping is likely to promote safety. In that regard, the main "thoroughfares," e.g., Crest Road, Portuguese Bend Road and Eastfield seem to be likely candidates for such striping. Based on my personal (and regrettably repeated) experience and based on my talks With my husband (who has training and experience in such matters, crest Road would be the street i would target first for such strjaaaing. The winding characteristics of Portuguese Bend Road and Eastfield tend to discourage overtaking drivers from passing to the left cars in front of them; however, the extended visibility on crest Road emboldens impatient drivers to make frequently high speed passing maneuvers around those drivers operating their cars at the posted speed limit.. While my family lives on the north side of Crest Road just a few hundred yards inside the Crenshaw Gate, both my husband and I have been passed to the left (at speeds tar in excess of the legal limit) just as we were attempting to make a left turn into our driveway. Our left turn signals don't seem to be a discouragement to such reckless drivers, nor does common sense. My husband and I have regularly experienced similar high speed passing episodes elsewhere on crest, all by drivers who seem impatient with the fact that We both do our best to obey the city's posted speed limits. My husband, who formerly used to enforce traffic laws, has estimated the speed of some of these passing motorists to be in the neighborhood of 60 miles per hour. If residents are experiencing similar problems on other streets within the city, those streets ought to be double striped as well. However, I think for now that double striping on Crest Road would be an excellent start to promoting safe driving practices in the City. Please excuse the fact that some of our families' letters are routed to both the city and the Community Association. The fact is that the jurisdiction as between the city and Community FAX 3103776718 H.1►\I 1NS PU3 • City of Rolling Hills Craig R. Naafis, City Manager August 17, 1994 Page 2 Association is not always clear, particularly in those areas where safety is at issue. We think it critical that both the City and the Community Association collaborate on doing everything they collectively can do to promote health and safety within the city. , Christa Hawkins 37 Crest Road West Rolling Hills, California 90274 cc: City Council Traffic Commission Community Association TO: • • City WIZ INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No.: 6-D Mtg. Date: 9/16/94 HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION FROM: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF REVISED DRIVEWAY ACCESS AT 1 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE (BLAZEVICH). DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1994 At the regular Traffic Commission Meeting held March 18, 1994, Commissioners made the following determination relative to the above referenced driveway: • That the driveway shall be 20 feet in width at entrance with a 26 foot wide apron; • That the southerly border of the driveway entrance be at least 105 north of the southerly property line at 1 Buggy Whip Drive; • That the trees adjacent to the driveway be trimmed to provide adequate sight distance; and • That the plans for the project be amended to reflect the recommendations of the Traffic Commission. At the regular meeting of the Traffic Commission held Friday, July 15, 1994, Commissioners considered a request for a modification of the previous conditions of approval recommended to the City Council by Traffic Commission action on March 18, 1994. At that meeting, the Commission essentially recommended to the City Council that the applicant be permitted to maintain the driveway at the temporary driveway location fenced -off on the property. Specifics of this recommended approval included: • That the southerly border of the driveway be located 43 feet north of the southerly property line; • That the driveway apron be 26 feet in width for at least 24 feet inward from the street; -1- Printed on Recycled Paper. • That the remaining portion of the driveway for its entire duration be a minimum of 20 feet in width; • That all tree trimming in the area be maintained to accommodate sight distance; • That these improvements be completed in conjunction with construction of proposed development on the site; • That the applicant be permitted, following City Council approval, to utilize the driveway in its current configuration during this construction phase; • That if this project is not built or is denied by the Planning Commission, that in either case, the modifications to the driveway as recommended by the Commission be implemented by the property owner within 6 months of the date of approval/denial from the Planning Commission. Based upon a request by the applicant, the Commissioners recommended these conditions of approval for a modification to the original driveway request to the City Council, separate from the Planning Commission application, at the July 25th meeting of the City Council. At that meeting, City Councilmembers declined to take action on the recommendations of the Traffic Commission indicating that their inaction was not a denial of the modification request, but may tie the hands of the Planning Commission in considering any modifications that they deem necessary relative to the driveway approach in conjunction with the entire residential development. CURRENT PROPOSAL The current proposal identifies the driveway 15 feet north of the southerly property line. Additionally, it identifies the entire width of the driveway at 16 feet. These two issues appear to be the modification that the applicant is seeking and is presented to he Traffic Commission for consideration of recommendation to the City Council this morning. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that members of the Traffic Commission review the request of the applicant and adjourn to a field inspection, if deemed necessary by the Commission. Any recommendation of the Commission will be forwarded to the Planning Commission and incorporated into any Resolution, as appropriate, on this case. Background material has been compiled and is attached to this staff report for Traffic Commission consideration. CRN:mlk lbuggywhip.sta -2- August 12, 1994 • • WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 0 E\GI\EERS& PJ\\\EIRS Professional Consulting Services Since 1964 AUG 2 2 1994 CITY OF R©LL1f 1j. ry. Mr. Craig Nealis City Manager City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Way Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Subject: Driveway at 1 Buggy Whip Lane Dear Mr. Nealis: I saw Mr. Blazevich and his engineer at the above address on August 5, 1994, when I passed his property during my investigation of the Rolling Hills entrance gates. We had a short discussion of his driveway approach. Mr. Blazevich indicated that he was interested in pursuing a driveway opening that was different than the location recommended by the Traffic Commission. His desired location, approximately 20 to 25' closer to Crest Road than the Traffic Commission recommended location, was marked by plastic ribbon. Mr. Blazevich also showed me a plan of the profile of Buggy Whip Lane which illustrated the elevation of the road every 50'. The plan showed that the crest, or highest point, of the vertical curve in Buggy Whip Lane was about 50' south of the current driveway opening. Mr. Blazevich stated that his proposed driveway opening was better for driver sight distance than the Traffic Committee approved location, and the plan showed that he was correct. I did not study the plan and did not come to a conclusion about the relative merits of the two driveway approach locations. I did indicate to Mr. Blazevich that the determination of safe drive sight distance was not an exact science, and therefore, it may be difficult to predict the relative safety within 20'. Adequate driver sight distance depends on vehicle speed and driver reaction time. I also stated that driver sight distance criteria in Rolling Hills was somewhat more restrictive than other areas of Southern California due to the unique nature of the community with many retired drivers. Mr. Blazevich requested that I attend the next Planning Commission meeting to discuss the driveway issue. I stated that I could not attend without the direction of the City Manner, and that my function was to respond to questions and issues from the Traffic Commission, not the Planning Commission. I told him that I would 12900 CROSSROADS PARKWAY SOUTH • SUITE 200 • INDUSTRY, CALIFORNIA 91746-3499• (310) 908-6200 • FAX (310) 695-2120 August 12, 1994 Page 2 discuss the situation with you that same day. I did not find that the driveway location proposed by Mr. Blazevich was better than previously discussed locations for driver sight distance. I await your direction of the driveway issue. Very truly yours, WILLDAi l ASSOC TES nneth (Joh n C nsultiri Traffic Engineer KJ:mk 55432/1002/066 0664\I\I50 Ciiy 0/ Polk" Jiitto • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 Agenda Item No.: 6-A Mtg. Date: 7/15/94 TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION FROM: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CORRESPONDENCE FROM SOUTH BAY ENGINEERING REGARDING A MODIFICATION TO THE DRIVEWAY OPENING A 1 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE. DATE: JULY 15, 1994 At the regular meeting of the Rolling Hills Traffic Commission held, Friday, March 18, 1994, Commissioners approved the driveway at 1 Buggy Whip Drive with the following conditions: • That the driveway shall be 20 feet wide at the entrance with a 26 foot wide apron. • That the southerly border of the driveway entrance be at least 105 feet north of the southerly property line at 1 Buggy Whip Drive. • That the trees adjacent to the driveway be trimmed to provide adequate site distance. • That plans for the project be amended and stamped to reflect the recommendation of the Traffic Commission. Since that time, representatives of the Rolling Hills. Planning Commission denied the application for construction of the new single family residence at that location. Essentially, the application for the driveway ceased when the Planning Commission denied construction of the residence since the City Council did not overturn the Planning Commission decision. However, on June 6, 1994, an appeal for this case was filed by the applicant. In the course of that appeal, they are requesting modification to the driveway as previously approved by the Traffic Commission. This appeal has been remanded back to the Planning Commission and will be considered on July 19, 1994. Plans for the driveway show the driveway constructed approximately 5 feet north of the southerly property line. ®2- .;r, Pr. . , i.f -�[ • • It would be in order for members of the Rolling Hills Traffic Commission to consider any testimony this morning and to conduct a field inspection of this driveway request. CRN:mlk traffic\71594bw.sta 2 DA 6/13/94 ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS 1 Buggywh i. APPLICANT ,7, . Blazes ' 'ALC�T1QN OF LOT CO RAG EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL NET LOT AREA 291,758 sq.ft, 291,758 sq.ft. 2_91, 75.8 sq.ft. BUILDING PA_D(S) sq.ft. 82,960 sq.ft. 82,960 sq.ft. RESIDENCE 5,544 sq.ft. 11,900 sq.ft. 11,900 sq.ft. GARAGE 1,152 sq.ft. 900 sq.ft. 900 sq.ft. SWIMMING POOL/SPA 695 sq.ft. 1,125 sq.ft. 1,125 sq.ft. STABLE ni/a sq.ft. 450"wsq.ft. 450 . sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( TEMS ) 7,246 sq.ft. 7,060 sq.ft. 7 , 060..-sq:ft. SERVICE YARD 96. OTHER GUM HOUSE 1,480 sq:ft. sq.ft.. 96 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES 16,213 sq.ft. 21,531 sq.ft. 21,531 sq.ft. % S I . UM -ORAL 5,6 c 7.4 % 7.4 % COVERAGE % TOTAL PAD COVERAGE /c 25,9 is 25.9 % DRIVEWAY 4,912 sq.ft. PAVED WALKS AYD PATIO AREAS 943 sq.ft. POOL DECKING 1,192 sq.ft. 12,810 sq.ft. 128,n sq.ft. 2,310 sq.ft. 2,310 sq.ft. 1,716 sq.ft. 1,716 sq.ft. TOTAL FLATtiVORK cc TOTAL FL ATWORK COVERAGE 7,052 sq.ft. 2.4 sic 16,836 sq.ft. 16,836 sq.ft. 5.8 ci"c 5.8 _% TOTAL STRUM.: fURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE 23,265 sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE 7.8 c 38,367sq.ft. 13.1 16 38,367 sq.ft. 13.1 ;c DISTURBANCE OF N' A� = 34,1'% _ - . 7 1 / (2O /00 ci' /e/ 7 /TY MAP /1/=200` arm .c¢w .vm Oss 4'11 grEl SEP 1 31994 szz r- , 1 t;ttY OF ROLLING HiLtAt