The URL can be used to link to this page

CL_AGN_240917_PC_AgendaPacket_F1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. APPROVE ORDER OF THE AGENDA This is the appropriate time for the Chair or Commissioners to approve the agenda as is or reorder. 5. BLUE FOLDER ITEMS (SUPPLEMENTAL) Blue folder items are additional back up material to administrative reports and/or public comments received after the printing and distribution of the agenda packet for receive and file. 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS This section is intended to provide members of the public with the opportunity to comment on any subject that does not appear on this agenda for action. Each speaker will be permitted to speak only once. Written requests, if any, will be considered first under this section. 7. CONSENT CALENDAR Business items, except those formally noticed for public hearing, or those pulled for discussion are assigned to the Consent Calendar. The Chair or any Commissioner may request that any Consent Calendar item(s) be removed, discussed, and acted upon separately. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be taken up under the "Excluded Consent Calendar" section below. Those items remaining on the Consent Calendar will be approved in one motion. The Chair will call on anyone wishing to address the Commission on any Consent Calendar item on the agenda, which has not been pulled by Commission for discussion. 7.A.APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 17, 2024 RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 AGENDA Regular Planning Commission Meeting PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, September 17, 2024 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 6:30 PM The meeting agenda is available on the City’s website. The Planning Commission meeting will be live-streamed on the City’s website. Both the agenda and the live-streamed video can be found here: https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/agenda/index.php Members of the public may submit written comments in real-time by emailing the City Clerk’s office at cityclerk@cityofrh.net. Your comments will become part of the official meeting record. You must provide your full name, but please do not provide any other personal information that you do not want to be published. Recordings to Planning Commission meetings can be found here: https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/agenda/index.php CL_AGN_240917_PC_AffidavitofPosting.pdf 1 7.B.APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR THE JUNE 18, 2024, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented. 7.C.ZONING CASE NO. 22-20: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A TWO-YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ZONING CASE NO. 22-20 FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 1,583-SQUARE-FOOT ADDITION AND REMODEL TO AN EXISTING RESIDENCE, MAXIMUM FIVE-FOOT-HIGH RETAINING WALL, POOL/SPA IN EXCESS OF 800 SQUARE FEET, GRADING, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; AND VARIANCES TO CONSTRUCT IN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK AND FOR A FIVE-FOOT-HIGH RETAINING WALL TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE FRONT AND SIDE SETBACK AREA FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16 SOUTHFIELD DRIVE, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LOT 33-SF) (BURGOYNE) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2024- 11 granting a two-year extension to commence construction of Zoning Case No. 22-20 (see Attachment 2). If granted, Zoning Case No. 22-20 would expire on May 17, 2026. 8. EXCLUDED CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON ITEMS CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS MEETING 10. NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 10.A.ZONING CASE 24-063: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL FOR A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT SOLAR BATTERIES AND RELATED EQUIPMENT IN THE SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 18 EASTFIELD DRIVE, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO STATE CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15303 (LOT 69-A-EF) (RICH) RECOMMENDATION: Open the public hearing, take public testimony, close the public hearing, and discuss the proposed project. Resolution No. 2024-12 is provided in case the Planning Commission decides to approve the proposed project. CL_MIN_240618_PC_FT_F.pdf CL_MIN_240618_PC_F.pdf Attachment 1: 2022-06_PC_Resolution_16Southfield_ZC 22-20_E.pdf Attachment 2: 2024-11_PC_Resolution_16SouthfieldDr_ZC22- 20_TimeExtension1_Burgoyne_F.pdf Attachment 3: PL_ADR_16SouthfieldDr_ZC24- 047_240909_Plans_2ndSubmittal_Approved.pdf Attachment 1: CL_PBN_240917_PH_RadiusMap_PC_18EastfieldDr_ZC24-063.pdf Attachment 2: PL_ADR_18EastfieldDr_240917_Development_Table.pdf Attachment 3: 2024-12_PC_Resolution_18EastfieldDr_ZC24-063_F.pdf 2 11. OLD BUSINESS 12. NEW BUSINESS 13. SCHEDULE FIELD TRIPS 14. ITEMS FROM STAFF 15. ITEMS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION 16. ADJOURNMENT Next meeting: Tuesday, October 15, 2024 at 6:30 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, Rolling Hills City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California, 90274. Attachment 4: 2022-05_PC_Resolution_18EastfieldDr_ZC 21-16_E.pdf Attachment 5: Previously Approved Resolutions - 18 Eastfield Dr.pdf Attachment 6: PL_ADR_18EastfieldDr_ZC24-005_SolarPanels_240614_Revised_Plans.pdf Notice: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting due to your disability, please contact the City Clerk at (310) 377-1521 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility and accommodation for your review of this agenda and attendance at this meeting. Documents pertaining to an agenda item received after the posting of the agenda are available for review in the City Clerk's office or at the meeting at which the item will be considered. All of the above resolutions and zoning case items have been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines unless otherwise stated. 3 Agenda Item No.: 7.A Mtg. Date: 09/17/2024 TO:HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM:CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK / EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 17, 2024 DATE:September 17, 2024 BACKGROUND: None. DISCUSSION: None. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented. ATTACHMENTS: CL_AGN_240917_PC_AffidavitofPosting.pdf 4 Administrative Report 7.A., File # 2387 Meeting Date: 9/17/2024 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In compliance with the Brown Act, the following materials have been posted at the locations below. Legislative Body Planning Commission Posting Type Regular Meeting Agenda Posting Location 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 City Hall Window City Website: https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/agenda/index.php https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/city_council/city_council_archive_agendas/index.php Meeting Date & Time SEPTEMBER 17, 2024 6:30pm As City Clerk of the City of Rolling Hills, I declare under penalty of perjury, the document noted above was posted at the date displayed below. Christian Horvath, City Clerk Date: September 13, 2024 5 Agenda Item No.: 7.B Mtg. Date: 09/17/2024 TO:HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM:CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK / EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR THE JUNE 18, 2024, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS DATE:September 17, 2024 BACKGROUND: None. DISCUSSION: None. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented. ATTACHMENTS: CL_MIN_240618_PC_FT_F.pdf CL_MIN_240618_PC_F.pdf 6 MINUTES – PLANNING COMMISSION FIELD TRIP MEETING Tuesday, June 18, 202 4 Page 1 Minutes Rolling Hills Planning Commission Tuesday, June 18, 2024 Field Trip Meeting 7:30 a.m. 1-4 Storm Hill Lane 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER The Planning Commission of the City of Rolling Hills met at 1-4 Storm Hill Lane on the above date, and the meeting was called to order at 7:30 a.m. with Vice Chair Kirkpatrick presiding. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Douglass, Cooley, Vice Chair Kirkpatrick Commissioners Absent: Cardenas, Chair Chelf Staff Present: John F. Signo, AICP, Director of Planning & Community Services Stephanie Grant, Assistant Planner Karina Bañales, City Manager Abbie Sedillos, Administrative Clerk/Bookkeeper 3. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA – NONE 4. FIELD TRIPS 4.A. APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION FIELD TRIP MEETING OF JUNE 18, 2024 Unanimous voice vote to accept item. 4.B. ZONING CASE 24-018: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN FOUR PARCELS AT 1-4 STORM HILL LANE, AND DETERMINING THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (APN 7570-024-019, 7570 -024-020, 7570-024- 021, AND 7570-024 -024) (STORM PROPERTIES, INC.) Public Present: Tom Grzywacz (4 Storm Hill Lane) Claudia Grzywacz (4 Storm Hill Lane) Jay Ahluwalia (applicant, Storm Properties, Inc.) Storm Bird (applicant, Storm Properties, Inc.) James Aichele (14 Crest Road West) Nadine Bobit (10 Buggy Whip Drive) Doris Sung (8 Buggy Whip Drive) Chi Chi Tsai (26 Middleridge Lane South) Presentation by Director Signo on the proposed project. Commissioners and the public walked the site. No decision was made by the Commission and the item was continued to the evening meeting. At 7:57 a.m. the Commission moved to 1 Morgan Lane and reconvened at 8:05 a.m. 7 MINUTES – PLANNING COMMISSION FIELD TRIP MEETING Tuesday, June 18, 202 4 Page 2 4.C. ZONING CASE NO. 24-016: SITE PLAN REVIEW TO CONSTRUCT A NEW STABLE, NON- EXEMPT GRADING, RETAINING WALLS TO EXCEED 3 FEET (MAXIMUM 5 FEET HEIGHT), AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONVERT AN EXISTING RECREATIONAL SPORTS COURT INTO AN EQUESTRIAN RIDING ARENA, AND FOR STABLE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET; AND VARIANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A STABLE IN THE FRONT YARD, CORRAL IN THE FRONT AND SIDE YARD SETBACKS, IMPORT OF DIRT, AND TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM 40% DISTURBED AREA FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1 MORGAN LANE AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LOT 170-1-MS) (HU) Public Present: David McLewee (project architect) James Aichele (14 Crest Road West) Gary Hansen (6 Chestnut Lane) Presentation by Assistant Planner Grant on the proposed project. Commissioners and the public walked the site. No decision was made by the Commission and the item was moved to the evening meeting. At 8:23 a.m. the Commission moved to 9 Outrider Road and reconvened at 8:40 a.m. 4.D. ZONING CASE NO. 24-017: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DETACHED PERGOLA THAT EXCEEDS 200 SQUARE FEET; AND VARIANCES FOR A NEW SWIMMING POOL AND PERGOLA TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD, AND POOL EQUIPMENT TO ENCROACH INTO THE SIDE YARD SETBACK LOCATED AT 9 OUTRIDER ROAD AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LOT 92-B-EF) (SONSTEIN) Public Present: Jason Briggs (project architect) Greg Sonstein (property owner) James Aichele (14 Crest Road West) Ben Hong (11 Outrider Road) Presentation by Assistant Planner Grant on the proposed project. Commissioners and the public walked the site. No decision was made by the Commission and the item was moved to the evening meeting. At 8:53 a.m. the Commission moved to 23 Crest Road East and reconvened at 9:05 a.m. Commissione r Douglass left the meeting after the site visit at 9 Outrider Road, and was unable to attend the presentation at 23 Crest Road East. 4.E. ZONING CASE NO. 23-070: SITE PLAN REVIEW TO DEVELOP A VACANT LOT INCLUDING NON-EXEMPT GRADING AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH BASEMENT, RETAINING WALLS EXCEEDING A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), DRIVEWAY WITH PORTIONS THAT EXCEED A WIDTH OF 20 FEET, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A STABLE, CORRAL, DETACHED TRELLIS, AND GUEST HOUSE; AND VARIANCES TO ALLOW THE STABLE, CORRAL, SWIMMING POOL, AND RETAINING WALLS TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD, ALLOW A PORTION OF THE CORRAL TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK, CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALLS EXCEEDING THE MAXIMUM AVERAGE HEIGHT OF TWO-AND-ONE-HALF FEET, CONSTRUCT A BASEMENT WITH A PORTION EXTENDING BEYOND THE BUILDING WALLS OF THE RESIDENCE, CONSTRUCT DECKS/PATIOS MORE 8 MINUTES – PLANNING COMMISSION FIELD TRIP MEETING Tuesday, June 18, 202 4 Page 3 THAN ONE FOOT ABOVE GRADE, AND ALLOW GRADING EXPORT FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 23 CREST ROAD EAST, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LOT 132A-MS) (OGASAWARA) Public Present: David Ramis (project architect) James Aichele (14 Crest Road West) Charlie Raine (2/4 Pinto Road & 64 Portuguese Bend Road) John Mackenbach (56 Portuguese Bend Road) Gary Fournier (30 Crest Road East) Presentation by Director Signo on the proposed project. Commissioners and the public walked the site. No decision was made by the Commission and the item was moved to the evening meeting. 5. ADJOURNMENT : 9:33 A.M. The meeting was adjourned at 9:33 a.m . to the regular meeting of the Planning Commission scheduled to be held on Tuesday, June 18, 2024, beginning at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________________ Christian Horvath, City Clerk Approved, ____________________________________ Brad Chelf, Chair 9 MINUTES – PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, June 18, 202 4 Page 1 Minutes Rolling Hills Planning Commission Tuesday, June 18, 2024 Regular Meeting 6:30 p.m. 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER The Planning Commission of the City of Rolling Hills met in person in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 2 Portuguese Bend Road on the above date at 6:30 p.m. Vice Chair Kirkpatrick presiding. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Cooley, Douglass, Vice Chair Kirkpatrick Commissioners Absent: Cardenas, Chair Chelf Staff Present: John F. Signo, AICP, Director of Planning & Community Services Stephanie Grant, Assistant Planner Scott Shapses, Assistant City Attorney Karina Bañales, City Manager Abbie Sedillos, Administrative Clerk/Bookkeeper 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Director Signo led the Pledge of Allegiance. 4. APPROVE ORDER OF THE AGENDA Vice Chair Kirkpatrick approved the order of the agenda. Without objection, so ordered. 5. BLUE FOLDER ITEMS (SUPPLEMENTAL) - NONE 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS - NONE 7. CONSENT CALENDAR 7.A. APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 18, 2024 7.B. APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR THE APRIL 16 , 2024, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS 7.C. ZONING CASE NO. 22-20: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A TWO YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ZONING CASE NO. 22-20 FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 1,583- SQUARE-FOOT ADDITION AND REMODEL TO AN EXISTING RESIDENCE, MAXIMUM FIVE- FOOT -HIGH RETAINING WALL, POOL/SPA IN EXCESS OF 800 SQUARE FEET, GRADING, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; AND VARIANCES TO CONSTRUCT IN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK AND FOR A FIVE-FOOT -HIGH RETAINING WALL TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE FRONT AND SIDE SETBACK AREA FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16 SOUTHFIELD DRIVE, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LOT 33-SF) (BURGOYNE) 10 MINUTES – PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, June 18, 202 4 Page 2 Motion to approve items 7.A and 7.B, as presented by Vice Chair Kirkpatrick, seconded by Commissioner Douglass. Item 7.C was not voted on and would be continued to the next meeting. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYES: Cooley, Douglass, Vice Chair Kirkpatrick NOES: None ABSENT: Cardenas, Chair Chelf 8. EXCLUDED CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS – NONE 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON ITEMS CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS 9.A. ZONING CASE NO. 23-070: SITE PLAN REVIEW TO DEVELOP A VACANT LOT INCLUDING NON-EXEMPT GRADING AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH BASEMENT, RETAINING WALLS EXCEEDING A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), DRIVEWAY WITH PORTIONS THAT EXCEED A WIDTH OF 20 FEET, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A STABLE, CORRAL, DETACHED TRELLIS, AND GUEST HOUSE; AND VARIANCES TO ALLOW THE STABLE, CORRAL, SWIMMING POOL, AND RETAINING WALLS TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD, ALLOW A PORTION OF THE CORRAL TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK, CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALLS EXCEEDING THE MAXIMUM AVERAGE HEIGHT OF TWO-AND-ONE-HALF FEET, CONSTRUCT A BASEMENT WITH A PORTION EXTENDING BEYOND THE BUILDING WALLS OF THE RESIDENCE, CONSTRUCT DECKS/PATIOS MORE THAN ONE FOOT ABOVE GRADE, AND ALLOW GRADING EXPORT FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 23 CREST ROAD EAST, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LOT 132A-MS) (OGASAWARA) Presentation by Planning Director Signo. Public Comment: Frank Escher, David Ramis, Ravi GuneWardena, Dan Bolton, Charlie Raine, Leah Mirsch Motion by Vice Chair Kirkpatrick, seconded by Commissioner Cooley, to adopt Resolution No. 2024-06 with amendments to address stormwater overflow, the height of the mound and what could be planted on it, and the orientation of the passageway from the basement. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYES: Cooley, Douglass, Vice Chair Kirkpatrick NOES: None ABSENT: Cardenas, Chair Chelf 10. NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 10.A. ZONING CASE 24-018: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT BETWEEN FOUR PARCELS AT 1-4 STORM HILL LANE, AND DETERMINING THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (APN 7570-024-019, 7570 -024-020, 7570 -024 - 021, AND 7570-024 -024) (STORM PROPERTIES, INC.) Presentation by Director Signo Public Comment: Jay Ahluwalia 11 MINUTES – PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, June 18, 202 4 Page 3 Motion by Commissioner Douglass, seconded by Commissioner Cooley to adopt Resolution No. 2024-08 as written. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYES: Cooley, Douglass, Vice Chair Kirkpatrick NOES: None ABSENT: Cardenas, Chair Chelf 10.B. ZONING CASE NO. 24-016: SITE PLAN REVIEW TO CONSTRUCT A NEW STABLE, NON- EXEMPT GRADING, RETAINING WALLS TO EXCEED 3 FEET (MAXIMUM 5 FEET HEIGHT), AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONVERT AN EXISTING RECREATIONAL SPORTS COURT INTO AN EQUESTRIAN RIDING ARENA, AND FOR STABLE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET; AND VARIANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A STABLE IN THE FRONT YARD, CORRAL IN THE FRONT AND SIDE YARD SETBACKS, IMPORT OF DIRT, AND TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM 40% DISTURBED AREA FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1 MORGAN LANE AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LOT 170-1-MS) (HU) Presentation by Assistant Planner Grant. Public Comment: David Mclewee Motion by Commissioner Cooley, seconded by Commissioner Douglass to adopt Resolution No. 2024-09 as written. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYES: Cooley, Douglass, Vice Chair Kirkpatrick NOES: None ABSENT: Cardenas, Chair Chelf ABSTAIN: None 10.C. ZONING CASE NO. 24-017: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DETACHED PERGOLA THAT EXCEEDS 200 SQUARE FEET; AND VARIANCES FOR A NEW SWIMMING POOL AND PERGOLA TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD, AND POOL EQUIPMENT TO ENCROACH INTO THE SIDE YARD SETBACK LOCATED AT 9 OUTRIDER ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LOT 92-B-EF) (SONSTEIN) Presentation by Assistant Planner Grant. Public Comment: Greg Sonstein Motion by Commissioner Cooley, seconded by Commissioner Douglass to adopt Resolution No. 2024-10 as written. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYES: Cooley, Douglass, Vice Chair Kirkpatrick NOES: None ABSENT: Cardenas, Chair Chelf 11. OLD BUSINESS – NONE 12. NEW BUSINESS – NONE 13. SCHEDULED FIELD TRIPS – NONE 12 MINUTES – PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, June 18, 202 4 Page 4 14. ITEMS FROM STAFF 14.A. DISCUSS UPCOMING PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS AND POSSIBLY RESCHEDULING OR CANCELING FUTURE MEETINGS Director Signo indicated the regularly scheduled July 16th meeting would be canceled and asked Commissioners to check their calendars for scheduling conflicts for the remainder of 2024. Vice Chair Kirkpatrick suggested rescheduling the August Planning Commission field trip and meeting to August 27, 2024. Assistant City Attorney Shapses indicated the date can be changed with proper notice. 15. ITEMS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION – NONE 16. ADJOURNMENT: 9:33 P.M. The meeting was adjourned at 9:33 p.m. to the Planning Commission meeting on Tuesday, August 20, 2024, beginning at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________________ Christian Horvath, City Clerk Approved, ____________________________________ Brad Chelf, Chair 13 Agenda Item No.: 7.C Mtg. Date: 09/17/2024 TO:HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM:JOHN SIGNO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY SERVICES THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 22-20: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A TWO- YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ZONING CASE NO. 22-20 FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 1,583-SQUARE-FOOT ADDITION AND REMODEL TO AN EXISTING RESIDENCE, MAXIMUM FIVE-FOOT-HIGH RETAINING WALL, POOL/SPA IN EXCESS OF 800 SQUARE FEET, GRADING, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; AND VARIANCES TO CONSTRUCT IN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK AND FOR A FIVE-FOOT-HIGH RETAINING WALL TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE FRONT AND SIDE SETBACK AREA FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16 SOUTHFIELD DRIVE, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LOT 33-SF) (BURGOYNE) DATE:September 17, 2024 BACKGROUND: On May 17, 2022, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-06 by a 4-0 vote (Kirkpatrick absent) approving Zoning Case No. 22-20 for a site plan review for development and variance requests to construct in the front yard setback and for a five-foot-high retaining wall to be constructed in the setback area (see Attachment 1). The project included: New addition of 1,583 square feet for an overall residence of 3,300 square feet Remodel existing 1,717-square-foot house Remodel existing 390-square-foot garage and add 10 square feet for a total of 400 square feet New 975-square-foot attached covered porches New 850-square-foot accessory dwelling unit (ADU) with 200-square-foot attached 14 covered porches New 290-square-foot entryway New 800-square-foot pool with 130-square-foot trough, 48-square-foot pool equipment, and 200-square-foot pond New 200-square-foot spa with 42-square-foot trough New 20-square-foot outdoor kitchen Removal of 125-square-foot pool and raising elevation of remaining pool New 102 square feet of driveway and repaving of existing for a total of 2,500 square feet New 50-square-foot pool equipment New service yard New hardscape of 3,070 square feet and revised pool decking of 1,195 square feet New maximum five-foot-high retaining walls for driveway and stairways (average wall height will be less than 2.5 feet) New drainage curbs and swales around ADU perimeter Future 450-square-foot stable and 550-square-foot corral Zoning, Location, and Lot Description The property located at 16 Southfield Drive is zoned RAS-1 and has a net lot area of 50,938 square feet (1.17 acre). The lot is developed with a 1,717-square -foot single-family residence built in 1954. The residence encroaches 24 feet into the 50-foot front yard setback, which is considered legal nonconforming. There are three building pads: the main building pad includes the existing residence and swimming pool; the second pad includes the proposed accessory dwelling unit (ADU); and the third pad is a set aside area for a future stable and corral. DISCUSSION: An application was duly filed by Dan and Joy Burgoyne ("Applicants"), with respect to real property located at 16 Southfield Drive requesting a two-year time extension to comply with the requirements of Resolution No. 2022-06 and Zoning Case No. 22-20 to commence construction of the approved project. Resolution 2022-06 was approved on May 17, 2022, and the Applicants submitted a time extension request on May 17, 2024. The Applicants are requesting a two-year extension be granted due to additional time needed to complete the review and plan check process with Los Angeles County agencies. This item was scheduled for the June 18, 2024 Planning Commission meeting, however, due to a lack of quorum no action could be taken. Requirements for Extension The Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) provides for the extension of approvals by no more than two years. (See RHMC Sections 17.46.080, 17.42.070, 17.38.070). While no specific findings are required for extensions of conditional use permits (17.42.070) or variances (17.38.070), the Planning Commission must make specific findings for two-year extensions of site plans (17.46.080). To extend a site plan, the Planning Commission must find that the expiration of the site plan would constitute undue hardship on the owner and the extension would not be materially detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the public. Staff has determined that expiration of the site plan would impose undue hardship on the owner 15 because the delays have been due in part to the COVID pandemic and other circumstances beyond their control, like long processing times at LA County. Staff has also determined that there are no changed circumstances on the property or adjacent properties such that extension would be to the material detriment of the public. Thus, Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission adopt these findings and approve the attached resolution to grant these extensions. Modification to the Project - Zoning Case No. 24-047 On May 29, 2024, the applicants submitted a modification under Zoning Case No. 24-047 which downsizes the project (see Attachment 3). The revised plan adds 162 square (SF) feet by enclosing an outdoor patio in the rear of the residence. It also remodels the entire residence, replaces all windows and doors, and adds a new roof. The modification is considered minor and was approved administratively on September 11, 2024. Planning Commission review for a minor modification is not required. The approved plan for the minor modification is included for information purposes only (see Attachment 3). The applicants request a time extension for Zoning Case No. 2022-06 in case they wish to move forward with the site plan review and variance in the future. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2024-11 granting a two-year extension to commence construction of Zoning Case No. 22-20 (see Attachment 2). If granted, Zoning Case No. 22-20 would expire on May 17, 2026. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: 2022-06_PC_Resolution_16Southfield_ZC 22-20_E.pdf Attachment 2: 2024-11_PC_Resolution_16SouthfieldDr_ZC22- 20_TimeExtension1_Burgoyne_F.pdf Attachment 3: PL_ADR_16SouthfieldDr_ZC24- 047_240909_Plans_2ndSubmittal_Approved.pdf 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 2024-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A TWO-YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ZONING CASE NO. 22-20 FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 1,583-SQUARE-FOOT ADDITION AND REMODEL TO AN EXISTING RESIDENCE, MAXIMUM FIVE-FOOT-HIGH RETAINING WALL, POOL/SPA IN EXCESS OF 800 SQUARE FEET, GRADING, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; AND VARIANCES TO CONSTRUCT IN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK AND FOR A FIVE-FOOT-HIGH RETAINING WALL TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE FRONT AND SIDE SETBACK AREA FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16 SOUTHFIELD DRIVE, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LOT 33-SF) (BURGOYNE) THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. On May 17, 2024, an application was duly filed by Dan and Joy Burgoyne ("Applicants"), with respect to real property located at 16 Southfield Drive requesting a two-year time extension to comply with the requirements of Resolution No. 2022-06 to commence construction of the approved project. Section 2. The Commission approved the project adopting Resolution No. 2022-06 at a meeting on May 17, 2022. The Applicants are requesting a two-year extension be granted due to additional time needed to complete the review and plan check process. Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that pursuant to Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) Section 17.46.080 the expiration would constitute an undue hardship upon the property owner; and the continuation of the approval would not be materially detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the public. The expiration would constitute undue hardship on the owner because of unforeseen delays outside of the control of the Applicants. Continuation of the approval will not be materially detrimental to the public because there have been no material changes or conditions on the subject property which would require allowing the approvals to expire. Section 4. Based upon information and evidence submitted, the Planning Commission grants a two-year time extension and does hereby amend Paragraph A of Section 8 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2022-06, dated May 17, 2022, to read as follows: A. The Site Plan Review and Variance approvals shall expire within four years from the effective date of approval of Resolution No. 2022-06. No further extension shall be granted as required by Sections 17.46.080 and 17.38.070 of the RHMC. Section 5. Except as herein amended, the provisions and conditions of Resolution No. 2022-06 shall continue to be in full force and effect. 29 2 Resolution No. 2024-11 16 Southfield Drive PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024. ______________________________ BRAD CHELF, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: _____________________________ CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK 30 3 Resolution No. 2024-11 16 Southfield Drive STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2024-11 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A TWO-YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ZONING CASE NO. 22-20 FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 1,583-SQUARE-FOOT ADDITION AND REMODEL TO AN EXISTING RESIDENCE, MAXIMUM FIVE-FOOT-HIGH RETAINING WALL, POOL/SPA IN EXCESS OF 800 SQUARE FEET, GRADING, AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; AND VARIANCES TO CONSTRUCT IN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK AND FOR A FIVE-FOOT-HIGH RETAINING WALL TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE FRONT AND SIDE SETBACK AREA FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16 SOUTHFIELD DRIVE, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LOT 33-SF) (BURGOYNE) was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on September 17, 2024, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices ________________________________ CHRISTIAN HORVATH CITY CLERK 31 9/9/24 Approved for 162 SF addition and interior remodel (no change to existing footprint). Zoning Case No. 24-047 32 33 34 35 36 Agenda Item No.: 10.A Mtg. Date: 09/17/2024 TO:HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM:JOHN SIGNO, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY SERVICES THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: ZONING CASE 24-063: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL FOR A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT SOLAR BATTERIES AND RELATED EQUIPMENT IN THE SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 18 EASTFIELD DRIVE, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO STATE CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15303 (LOT 69-A-EF) (RICH) DATE:September 17, 2024 BACKGROUND: Zoning, Location, Lot Description, and History The property located at 18 Eastfield Drive is zoned RAS-1 and has a net lot area of 68,826 square feet (1.58 acre). On December 17, 1996, the Planning Commission approved a Site Plan Review request for a new single-family residence and other improvements to replace an existing residence on the subject property. On July 21, 1998, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit to construct a cabana and modification to the 1996 Site Plan Review approval for additional grading. On June 14, 2005, the Planning Commission approved a Site Plan Review for grading and construction of a stable and corral, a Conditional Use Permit to convert an existing stable into a recreation room, and a variance to exceed the maximum permitted disturbed area on the lot. On May 17, 2022, the Planning Commission granted approval for a Site Plan Review for grading and construction of a new retaining wall; Conditional Use Permit for a recreational game court; and Variance to exceed the maximum permitted lot disturbance in Zoning Case No. 21-16. The lot is developed with a 5,265-square-foot single-family residence and a 1,284-square-foot garage. There are three existing building pads on site with approximately 50 feet difference in elevation. The highest point is located closest to the roadway easement on the western 37 portion of the property; the lowest portion is located in the eastern portion of the lot near the existing stable and corral. The existing residence and garage are located on the Pad 1, which is 26,083 square feet and located closest to the roadway easement; Pad 2 is 12,342 square feet in the middle of the property and contains a swimming pool, pool house, and garden. Pad 3, in the rear portion of the property, is 7,439 square feet and includes a stable, corral, and recreational game court. DISCUSSION: Applicant Request The applicant is requesting a variance to encroach into the required side yard setback in order to construct a project that includes solar batteries and equipment. The project will be located 10 feet from the property line. There will be four batteries, each nine inches wide, three feet high, and two feet long. Distance from the residence to the batteries will be at least 15 feet, which provides adequate access around the residence. The pad area will be approximately 13 feet long by three feet wide, or 39 square feet. The batteries will connect to new roof-mounted solar panels. Roof-mounted solar panels are approved administratively and not subject to discretionary review. The residence will also be re-roofed which is also approved administratively and not subject to Planning Commission review. Variance to Encroach into the Side Yard Setback Certain findings listed in Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) Section 17.38.050 are required in order to approve a variance. Findings are included in the attached resolution and listed below. MUNICIPAL CODE COMPLIANCE Area of Disturbance The location of the solar batteries is landscaped and has already been disturbed. There will be no further site disturbance. Lot Coverage The proposed concrete pad will be 39 square feet. Environmental Review The proposed project has been determined to not have a significant effect on the environment and is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) of the CEQA Guidelines, which exempts accessory structures including new solar panels and equipment. 38 Public Participation Neighbors within a 1,000-foot radius were notified of the public hearings and a notice was published in the Daily Breeze on September 6, 2024. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE 17.38.050 Required Variance findings . In granting a variance, the Commission (and Council on appeal) must make the following findings: 1. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone; 2. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question; 3. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; 4. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; 5. That the variance does not grant special privilege to the applicant; 6. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and 7. That the variance request is consistent with the general plan of the City of Rolling Hills. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Open the public hearing, take public testimony, close the public hearing, and discuss the proposed project. Resolution No. 2024-12 is provided in case the Planning Commission decides to approve the proposed project. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: CL_PBN_240917_PH_RadiusMap_PC_18EastfieldDr_ZC24-063.pdf Attachment 2: PL_ADR_18EastfieldDr_240917_Development_Table.pdf Attachment 3: 2024-12_PC_Resolution_18EastfieldDr_ZC24-063_F.pdf Attachment 4: 2022-05_PC_Resolution_18EastfieldDr_ZC 21-16_E.pdf Attachment 5: Previously Approved Resolutions - 18 Eastfield Dr.pdf Attachment 6: PL_ADR_18EastfieldDr_ZC24-005_SolarPanels_240614_Revised_Plans.pdf 39 City of Rolling Hills 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 TITLE VICINITY MAP CASE NO. Zoning Case No. 24-063 Variance OWNER Rich ADDRESS 18 Eastfield, Rolling Hills 90274 SITE 40 DEVELOPMENT TABLE – ZONING CASE NO. 24-063 (18 EASTFIELD DRIVE) Request: Variance to Encroach Into Side Yard Setback PAD 1 PAD 2 PAD 3 TOTAL RAS-1 Zone Setbacks Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 20 ft. from side property line Rear: 50 ft. from rear easement line Single family residence, garage (SF) Swimming Pool, Pool House (SF) New Stable and corral (SF) Pad/Net Lot Area Existing: 26,083 Proposed: 0 Total: 26,083 Existing: 7,317 Proposed: 5,025 Total: 12,342 Existing: 6,213 Proposed: 1,226 Total: 7,439 68,826 Residence 5,265 5,265 Garage 1,284 1,284 Swimming Pool/Spa 722 722 Pool Equipment 233 233 Proposed Solar Batteries & Equip. 39 39 Stable (min. 450 SF) 479 479 Corral (existing; min. 550 SF) (1,006) (1,006) Recreation Court 1,697 1,697 Attached Covered Porched 377 353 730 Potting Shed 140 140 Aviary 76 76 Chicken Coop 83 83 Water Features, Etc. 294 294 Other 1,374 1,374 Total Structure Area 8,339 1,548 2,529 12,416 Structural Coverage (20% maximum) 18% Grading (balanced on site) None for this project -- Total Flatwork 8,708 Total Structural and Flatwork 21,124 Total Lot Coverage (35% maximum) 30.7% Building Pad Coverage (Policy: 30% maximum) 32.0% 12.5% 29.9% Disturbed Area (40% maximum; up to 60% with slopes less than 3:1) No Change No Change No Change 34,355 49.9% 41 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2024-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A VARIANCE REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT SOLAR BATTERIES AND EQUIPMENT IN THE SIDE YARD SETBACK IN ZONING CASE NO. 24-063 FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 18 EASTFIELD DRIVE, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO STATE CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15303 (LOT 69-A-EF) (RICH) THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Joseph and Christine Rich with respect to real property located at 18 Eastfield Drive, Rolling Hills (Lot 69-A-EF) requesting a variance to construct solar batteries and equipment approximately 10 feet from the property line within the 20-foot side yard setback. Section 2. On December 17, 1996, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 96-21 approving a Site Plan Review in Zoning Case No. 546 for the construction of a new single-family residence, and other improvements to replace an existing single-family residence. On July 21, 1998, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 98-14 approving a Conditional Use Permit for a cabana and modifications to a Site Plan Review application to permit the construction of the cabana with increased grading in Zoning Case No. 579. On June 14, 2005, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2005-18 approving a Site Plan Review for grading and construction of a stable and corral to be reviewed by the Planning Commission; a Conditional Use Permit to convert an existing stable into a recreation room; and a Variance to exceed the maximum permitted disturbed area of the lot in Zoning Case No. 703 of 40% to 48.4%. On May 17, 2022, the Planning Commission granted approval for a Site Plan Review for grading and construction of a new retaining wall; Conditional Use Permit for a recreational game court; and Variance to exceed the maximum permitted lot disturbance in Zoning Case No. 21-16. Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application at its special field trip meeting and its regular meeting on September 17, 2024. Neighbors within 1,000-foot radius were notified of the public hearings and a notice was published in the Daily Breeze on September 6, 2024. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail and were in attendance at the hearings. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal. Section 4. The property is zoned RAS-1 and the net lot area excluding the roadway easement is 68,826 square feet (1.58 acre). The lot is developed with a 5,265-square-foot single-family residence and a 1,284-square-foot garage. There are three existing building pads on site with approximately 50 feet difference in elevation. The existing residence and garage are located on the Pad 1 (25,546 square feet), which is the highest point and closest to the roadway easement on the western portion of the property; Pad 2 is 12,017 square feet in the 42 2 middle of the property and contains a courtyard area, swimming pool, and pool house. Pad 3 in on the eastern and rear portion of the lot, is the lowest part on the property, and is 893 square feet; it is developed with a stable, corral, and recreational game court. Section 5. The Planning Commission finds that the Project is categorically exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Section 15303 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (“State CEQA Guidelines”), Class 3 "New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures." Class 3 exempts the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including single family residence and accessory structures, including but not limited to garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. Here, the Project involves the construction of solar batteries and equipment on a developed lot within a residential zone. Accordingly, the Project qualifies for the exemption pursuant to Section 15303. Further, no exceptions to the exemptions in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply. Specifically, the Project: a. Is not located in a particularly sensitive environment. The Project is located in an urbanized area and is not environmentally sensitive. b. There is no possibility of a cumulative impact of the same type of project in the same place over time. The Project entails the construction of solar batteries and equipment. Once built, the likelihood of a successive project on this site is low and probability of a cumulative impact is low. c. Is not marked by unusual circumstances. There is nothing unusual about the construction of solar batteries and equipment in a residential area. In addition, the Project will implement best management practices (BMPs) to prevent erosion and construction pollutants from contacting stormwater. d. Would not damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. e. Is not located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. f. Would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The Planning Commission directs staff to prepare, execute, and file a Notice of Exemption with the Los Angeles County Clerk and the State Clearinghouse within five (5) working days of the Project’s approval and the adoption of this Resolution. Section 6. Variance. Section 17.38.050 sets forth the required findings for granting a variance to encroach approximately 10 feet from the property line into the required 20-foot side yard setback identified in Section 17.16.120(A). With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone. There are extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property. The lot consists of an unusual lot configuration in that it is deep and slopes downward toward the rear. The site is 43 3 developed with a residence and related improvements and the side yard is the best place to construct the batteries and equipment. B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question. Granting the requested variance to encroach into the required side yard setback is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone in that the site is already developed and the project will be consistent with other properties that have similar ground-mounted equipment. C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Granting a variance to encroach into the required side yard will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity in that the project will be screened and adequately set back from neighboring structures. Further, the project will be consistent with other development in the area in that other residences are equipped with solar batteries. D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed. Granting the requested variance will meet the spirit and intent of this title in that the project will be used for residential purposes and located on a residential lot. E. That the variance does not grant special privilege to the applicant. The project results in a common amenity enjoyed by many properties throughout the City and the proposed location is the best location since it is screened, not visible from the street, and located in close proximity to the existing electrical panel. The project, together with the variance, will be compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan. F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. Granting a variance for the project will be consistent with the applicable portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan related to siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. The project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills. 44 4 Granting the variance to encroach into the required side yard setback will be consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills, which allows and encourages residential uses. Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings, and the evidence in the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves Zoning Case No. 24-063 subject to the following conditions: A. The Variance approval shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval as defined in RHMC Section 17.38.070 of the Zoning Ordinance unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of these sections. B. If any condition of this resolution is violated, the entitlement granted by this resolution shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse and upon receipt of written notice from the City, all construction work being performed on the subject property shall immediately cease, other than work determined by the City Manager or his/her designee required to cure the violation. The suspension and stop work order will be lifted once the Applicant cures the violation to the satisfaction of the City Manager or his/her designee. In the event that the Applicant disputes the City Manager or his/her designee’s determination that a violation exists or disputes how the violation must be cured, the Applicant may request a hearing before the City Council. The hearing shall be scheduled at the next regular meeting of the City Council for which the agenda has not yet been posted; the Applicant shall be provided written notice of the hearing. The stop work order shall remain in effect during the pendency of the hearing. The City Council shall make a determination as to whether a violation of this Resolution has occurred. If the Council determines that a violation has not occurred or has been cured by the time of the hearing, the Council will lift the suspension and the stop work order. If the Council determines that a violation has occurred and has not yet been cured, the Council shall provide the Applicant with a deadline to cure the violation; no construction work shall be performed on the property until and unless the violation is cured by the deadline, other than work designated by the Council to accomplish the cure. If the violation is not cured by the deadline, the Council may either extend the deadline at the Applicant’s request or schedule a hearing for the revocation of the entitlements granted by this Resolution pursuant to Chapter 17.58 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC). C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise a variance to such requirement has been approved. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file at City Hall and approved by the Planning Commission except as otherwise provided in these conditions. The working drawings submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the approved development plan. All conditions of the Variance approval shall be incorporated into the building permit working drawings, and where applicable complied with prior to issuance of a grading or building permit from the building department. 45 5 The conditions of approval of this Resolution shall be printed onto a separate sheet and included in the building plans submitted to the Building Department for review and shall be kept on site at all times. Any proposed modifications and/or changes to the approved project, including resulting from field conditions, shall be discussed with staff so that staff can determine whether the modification is minor or major in nature. Minor modifications are subject to approval by the City Manager or his or her designee. Major modifications are subject to approval by the Planning Commissioner after a public hearing. Applicant shall not implement modifications or changes to the approved project without the appropriate approval from the City Manager or designee or the Planning Commission, as required. E. Prior to submittal of final working drawings to Building and Safety Department for issuance of building and grading permits, the plans for the project shall be submitted to City staff for verification that the final plans are in compliance with the plans approved by the Planning Commission. F. A licensed professional preparing construction plans for this project for Building Department review shall execute a Certificate affirming that the plans conform in all respects to this Resolution approving this project and all of the conditions set forth herein and the City’s Building Code and Zoning Ordinance. Further, the person obtaining a building and/or grading permit for this project shall execute a Certificate of Construction stating that the project will be constructed according to this Resolution and any plans approved therewith. G. Structural lot coverage of the lot shall not exceed 12,377 square feet or 18% of the net lot area, in conformance with lot coverage limitations (20% maximum). The total lot coverage proposed, including structures and flatwork, shall not exceed 20,835 square feet or 30.3% of the net lot area in conformance with lot coverage limitations (35% maximum). H. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 49.9%, or 34,355 square feet surface area. Grading, other than preparation for the foundation, is not proposed. L. The solar batteries and equipment shall be screened from neighboring properties with vegetation or fencing and maintained in good condition at all times. Conduit and wiring shall be underground or concealed in a manner approved by the Planning Director. M. A minimum of five-foot level path and/or walkway, which does not have to be paved, shall be provided around the entire perimeter of all of structures, or as otherwise required by the Fire Department. N. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Low Impact Development requirements for storm water management on site (RHMC Chapter 8.32). 46 6 O. Hydrology, soils, geology and other reports, as required by the Building and Public Works Departments, and as may be required by the Building Official, shall be prepared. P. Prior to issuance of building permit, any new landscaping shall be shown on a landscaping plan and shall meet the requirements of the City. The landscape plan shall be submitted to the City in conformance with Fire Department Fuel Modification requirements, and shall be approved by the City. Q. The project shall be landscaped, and continually maintained in substantial conformance with the landscaping plan on file. A detailed landscaping plan shall provide that any trees and shrubs used in the landscaping scheme for this project shall be planted in a way that screens the project development from adjacent streets and neighbors, such that shrubs and trees as they mature do not grow into a hedge or impede any neighbors’ views and the plan shall provide that all landscaping be maintained at a height no higher than the roof line of the nearest project structure. In addition, the landscaping plan shall provide for screening of the project with vegetation not to exceed 10 feet in height, and that the vegetation used for screening shall be planted in an off-set manner, so as to prevent it, as it grows from forming a solid hedge. The landscaping plan shall utilize to the maximum extent feasible, plants that are native to the area, are water-wise and are consistent with the rural character of the community. Plants listed as high hazardous plants under RHMC Section 8.30.015 are prohibited. R. The landscaping shall be subject to the requirements of the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, (Chapter 13.18 of the RHMC). Pursuant to Chapter 8.30 of the RHMC, the property shall at all times be maintained free of dead trees and vegetation. S. The setback lines and roadway easement lines in the vicinity of the construction for this project shall remain staked throughout the construction. A construction fence may be required. T. Perimeter easements, including roadway easements and trails, if any, shall remain free and clear of any improvements to advance equestrian use and emergency preparedness for evacuation within the City. Where RHCA has demonstrated authority over the easement, the City’s Planning Director may grant relief from this condition upon satisfactory proof of permission from RHCA and a legitimate showing that there is no need for the condition to advance equestrian uses and emergency preparedness. U. Minimum of 65% of any construction materials must be recycled or diverted from landfills. The hauler of the materials shall obtain City’s Construction and Demolition permits for waste hauling prior to start of work and provide proper documentation to the City. V. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, storm water pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required. 47 7 W. During construction, to the extent feasible, all parking shall take place on the project site, on the driveway and, if necessary, any overflow parking may take place within the unimproved roadway easements along adjacent streets, and shall not obstruct neighboring driveways, visibility at intersections or pedestrian and equestrian passage. During construction, to the maximum extent feasible, employees of the contractor shall car-pool into the City. To the extent feasible, a minimum of 4’ wide path, from the edge of the roadway pavement, for pedestrian and equestrian passage shall be available and be clear of vehicles, construction materials and equipment at all times. X. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and relate traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. Y. Prior to demolition of the existing structures, an investigation shall be conducted for the presence of hazardous chemicals, lead-based paints or products, mercury and asbestos-containing materials (ACMs). If hazardous chemicals, lead-based paints or products, mercury or ACMs are identified, remediation shall be undertaken in compliance with California environmental regulations and policies. Z. The property owner and/or his/her contractor/applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the no-smoking provisions in the Municipal Code. The contractor shall not use tools that could produce a spark, including for clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning conditions. Weather conditions can be found at: http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/lox/main.php?suite=safety&page=hazard_definitions#FIRE. It is the sole responsibility of the property owner and/or his/her contractor to monitor the red flag warning conditions. AA. The project shall drain in accordance with the City’s drainage requirements. Drainage dissipaters shall be constructed outside of any easements. The drainage system shall be approved by the Department of Building and Safety. If an above ground swale and/or dissipater is required, it shall be designed in such a manner as not to cross over any equestrian trails or discharge water onto a trail, shall be stained in an earth tone color, and shall be screened from any trail, road and neighbors’ view to the maximum extent practicable, without impairing the function of the drainage system. AB. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices. AC. During construction, an Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 2016 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control storm water pollution. 48 8 AD. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of storm water drainage facilities and septic tank. AE. The applicant shall pay all of the applicable Building and Safety and Public Works Department fees and Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District fees, if any. AF. Prior to final inspection of the project, “as graded” and “as constructed” plans and certifications shall be provided to the Planning Department and the Building Department to ascertain that the completed project is in compliance with the Planning Commission approved plans. In addition, any modifications made to the project during construction, shall be depicted on the “as built/as graded” plan. AG. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of the Site Plan Review approval, or the approval shall not be effective. AH. All conditions of this Resolution, when applicable, must be complied with prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit from the Building and Safety Department AI. Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024. BRAD CHELF, CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ____________________________________ CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 49 9 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2024-12 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A VARIANCE REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT SOLAR BATTERIES AND EQUIPMENT IN THE SIDE YARD SETBACK IN ZONING CASE NO. 24-063 FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 18 EASTFIELD DRIVE, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO STATE CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15303 (LOT 69-A-EF) (RICH) was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on September 17, 2024, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. __________________________________ CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 RESOLUTION NO. 2005-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A STABLE AND CORRAL; GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONVERT AN EXISTING STABLE INTO A RECREATION ROOM; GRANTING A VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBED AREA OF THE LOT AND A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR DEVELOPMENT ON A PROPERTY THAT REQUIRES PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW DUE TO EXISTING STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTION AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 703, AT 18 EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT 69- A-EF), (RICH). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application has been filed by Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Rich, with respect to real property located at 18 Eastfield Drive, (Lot 69-A-EF), Rolling Hills, requesting a Site Plan Review for grading and construction of a 450 square foot stable with 360 square foot covered porch and a corral, Conditional Use Permit to convert an existing 320 square foot stable into a recreation room, a Variance to exceed the maximum permitted disturbed area of the lot and a Site Plan Review for the proposed development on a property that requires Planning Commission review, due to existing structural development restriction approved in 1996 and in 1998. An addition of 446 square feet to the existing basement and modification to the entryway are also proposed. Section 2. In 1996, the Planning Commission approved a Site Plan Review request for a new single family residence and other improvements to replace an existing residence on subject property. On July 21, 1998, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit to construct a cabana and modification to the 1996 Site Plan Review approval for additional grading. Both, the 1996 and 1998 Resolutions of Approval contain a condition that any further development on the property is subject to Planning Commission review and approval. Section 3 The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the request in Zoning Case No. 703 on April 19, 2005, May 17, 2005 and at a field trip on May 17, 2005. The applicants were notified of the hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in said proposal. The Planning Commission heard a report from the City staff and reviewed, analyzed and studied the proposal. The applicants and the applicants' representative were in attendance at the hearings. 06 1316073 64 Section 4. The City staff received a letter from a neighbor objecting to the proposed location of the stable. The Planning Commission reviewed and analyzed the letter and scheduled a visit to view the proposed project from the objecting neighbor's property. Prior to the field trip, the neighbor submitted a letter recanting her objection and requesting that the field trip to view the project from her property be cancelled. Section 5. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3 Exemption (The State of CA Guidelines, Section 15303) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section b Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any development requiring a grading permit or any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month period. With respect to the Site Plan Review application for grading for the stable and corral and the restriction placed in 1996 and 1998 on any future development on subject property the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, and surrounding uses because the proposed stable complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures, and equestrian uses. The project conforms to Zoning Code setbacks and the grading will be minimal. B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot. The proposed stable will be constructed on an existing building pad and minimal grading is required. The project is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the stable will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners. C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site. Although the disturbed net lot area exceeds the maximum permitted, the proposed project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to properties in the vicinity. The grading for the stable and corral will increase the disturbed lot area by 8.5%, which is minimal. D. The development plan incorporates existing vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot and the stable will not cause the lot to look overdeveloped. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space. 06 1316073 65 E. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will not change the existing circulation pattern and will utilize an existing driveway. No new stable access from Outrider Road or Eastifeld Drive is proposed. F. The proposed project is to construct a stable and corral area of sufficient size that meets all standards for vehicular access thereto in conformance with site plan review requirements. G. The project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 7. Sections 17. 38.010 through 17. 38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. A Variance to Section 17.16.070 (B) is required because it states that the lot disturbance shall be limited to 40% of the net lot area. With respect to this request for a Variance for lot disturbance of 48.4%, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone. The Variance for the total disturbance is necessary because the configuration, and topography of the lot create a difficulty in meeting this Code requirement. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because of the existing conditions of the lot. The existing 320 square foot stable is located in proximity to the cabana and swimming pool and is not utilized for a stable. The proposed stable will be located away from the living area" of the lot and will retain an equestrian flavor. The stable will only minimally affect the disturbance of the lot. 328 cubic yards of grading is required for this construction, which includes excavation for a basement. One of the goals of the General Plan is to encourage construction of equestrian uses, which this Variance would accommodate. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. All development will occur within required setbacks, and will be adequately screened to prevent adverse visual impact to surrounding properties. 16 1316073 66 Section 8. Section 17.16.210(A)(2) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permits approval of a recreation room under certain conditions, provided the Planning Commission approves a Conditional Use Permit. The applicant is requesting to convert the existing 320 square foot stable into a recreation room. With respect to this request for a Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for the recreation room would be consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan and will be desirable for the public convenience and welfare because the use is consistent with similar uses in the community, and the area proposed for the recreation room would be located in an area on the property where such use will not change the existing configuration of structures on the lot. B. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures have been considered, and the conversion will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed recreation room will be located in a cluster with other structures and will promote pad integration. The proposed recreation room is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that it will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors. C. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain, and surrounding residences because the recreation room will comply with the low profile residential development pattern of the community. D. The proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development standards of the zone district because the 320 square foot size of the recreation room is less than the maximum permitted under the Municipal Code. E. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities because the project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. 1 F. The proposed conditional use observes the spirit and intent of Title 17 of the Zoning Code because an adequate area is set -aside for the construction of a stable structure, adjacent corral and access. Section 9. Based upon the foregoing findings and the evidence in the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves a Site Plan Review for grading and construction of a 450 square foot stable, a Variance request to exceed the maximum permitted disturbance of the lot and a Conditional Use Permit to convert an existing 320 square foot stable into a recreation room, and a Site Plan Review for the total proposed development due to the restriction placed on the previously approved applications for subject property, in accordance with the Q7361316 67 development plan dated March 28, 2005 and marked Exhibit A in Zoning Case No. 703 subject to the following conditions: A. The Site Plan, Variance and Conditional Use Permit approvals shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval if work has not commenced as defined in Sections 17.38.070, 17.42.070 and 17.46.080 of the Zoning Ordinance, unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of these sections. B. It is declared and made a condition of the approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the City has given the applicants written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. This shall include, but not be limited to, the requirements of the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance, Undergrounding of Utilities Ordinance, Roof Covering Ordinance and others. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated March 28, 2005, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 9,254 square feet or 14.8% in conformance with lot coverage limitations. F. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 20,352 square feet or 32.6% in conformance with lot coverage limitations. G. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 30,236 square feet or 48.4% in conformance with the Variance approval. H. Building pad coverage on the stable pad shall not exceed 25.6%; including the covered patio. Building pad coverage on the residential building pad shall not exceed 31.5% including covered porches and 28.8% not including covered porches. I. Grading for the stable and excavation for the basement shall not exceed 328 cubic yards of cut and 328 cubic yards of fill and shall be balanced on site. J. The stable and recreation room shall be screened from adjacent properties. Landscaping shall be designed using mature trees and shrubs so as not to obstruct views from neighboring properties, but to screen these structures 06 1316073 68 on the lot. If trees are to be incorporated into the landscaping scheme, at maturity they shall be no higher than the ridge height of the stable and the recreation room on the lot. K. The stable and corral shall be located a minimum of twenty-five feet from the rear property line and twenty feet from the side property line. L. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum extent feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water efficient landscaping requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. M. No kitchen or other cooking facilities shall be permitted in the recreation room. No sleeping quarters shall be permitted in the recreation room. N. The stable shall be used exclusively for keeping permitted domestic animals. Commercial uses are not permitted. O. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices. P. During construction, conformance with the Air Quality Management District requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices shall be required so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence. Q. During and after construction, all soil preparation, drainage, and landscape sprinklers shall protect the building pad from erosion and direct surface water in an approved manner. R. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby roadway easements. S. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. T. If any walls are to be incorporated into the design of this project, they shall not be located in any setback nor shall they exceed 3-feet in height. 06 1316073 69 U. The drainage plan system shall be approved by the Planning Department and the County Drainage Engineer and shall assure that any water from any site irrigation systems and all drainage from the site shall be conveyed in an approved manner and shall remain on the property and not cross over any easements. V. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities. W. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste. X. The project shall be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any permits. Y. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the development plan described in Condition D. Z. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modifications to the property, which would constitute additional structural development or grading, shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. AA. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit and Variance approvals, pursuant to Sections 17.38.060, 17.42.060 and 17.46.065 of the Zoning Ordinance, or the approval shall not be effective. AB. All conditions of this Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit and Variance approval, which apply, must be complied with prior to .the issuance of a building permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14th DAY OF JUNE 2005. ROG R SbMMER, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: T. MARILYN L. KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK 06 1316073 70 t STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2005-18 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A STABLE AND CORRAL; GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONVERT AN EXISTING STABLE INTO A RECREATION ROOM; GRANTING A VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBED AREA OF THE LOT AND A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR DEVELOPMENT ON A PROPERTY THAT REQUIRES PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW DUE TO EXISTING STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTION AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 703, AT 18 EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT 69- A-EF), (RICH). was approved and adopted at an adjourned regular meeting of the Planning Commission on June 14, 2005 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioner DeRoy, Hankins, Witte and Chairman Sommer. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. DEPUTY CITY CLERK 06 1316073 71 RESOLUTION NO. 98-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A CABANA AND APPROVING A REQUEST FOR MODIFICATIONS TO AN APPROVED SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CABANA THAT REQUIRES INCREASED GRADING AT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN ZONING CASE NO. 579. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Russell Cole Shoemaker with respect to real property located at 18 Eastfield Drive (Lot 69-A-EF), Rolling Hills requesting a Conditional Use Permit to permit the construction of a cabana and request for Site Plan Review modification to permit the construction of a cabana that requires increased grading at a single family residential development. Section 2. On December 17, 1996, the Planning Commission approved a request for Site Plan Review application by Resolution No. 96-21 in Zoning Case No. 546 for the construction of a new single family residence, and other improvements to replace an existing single family residence. Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the applications on May 19, 1998 and June 16, 1998, and at a field trip visit on June 9, 1998. Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15303(e) . and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 5. Section 17.16.210(A)(2) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permits approval of a Cabana or detached recreation room with a Conditional Use Permit under certain conditions. The applicant is requesting to construct a 220 square foot cabana. With respect to this request for a Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for the cabana would be consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan and will be desirable for the public convenience and welfare because the use is consistent with similar uses in the community, and the area proposed ,for the cabana would be located in an area on the property where such use will not change the existing configuration of structures on the lot. RESOLUTION NO. 98-14 PAGE 1 98 1701309 f b;:tA- 72 B. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures have been considered, and the construction of cabana will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed cabana structure will be 90 feet from the residential structure and is a sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the cabana will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors. C. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain, and surrounding residences because the cabana will comply with the low profile residential development pattern of the community and is located on a 1.74 acre parcel of property that is adequate in size, shape and topography to accommodate such use. D. The proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development standards of the zone district because the 220 square foot size of the cabana is less than the 800 square foot maximum permitted for similar accessory buildings and the cabana does not encroach into any setback areas. E. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities because the project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. F. The proposed conditional use observes the spirit and intent of Title 17 of the Zoning Code because the cabana will be adjacent to the pool. Section 6. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a cabana in accordance with the Development Plan attached hereto in Zoning Case No. 579 subject to the conditions contained in Section 9. Section 7. Section 17.46.010 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building or structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six month period. In addition, a condition of Resolution No. 96-21 required that any modifications to the project which would constitute additional structural development requires the filing of a new application for Site Plan Review approval by the Planning Commission. The applicant is requesting to modify the approved Site Plan by constructing a cabana that requires increased grading. The applicant's latest proposal submitted on April 6, 1998, includes additional grading of 85 cubic yards of cut soil and 85 cubic yards of fill soil for a total of 565 cubic yards of cut soil and 565 cubic yards of fill soil. With respect to this request, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: RESOLUTION NO. 98-14 PAGE 2 98 1701309 73 A. The development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed grading together with the other improvements on the property complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project as modified conforms to Zoning Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The lot has* a net square foot area of 62,471 square feet. The residence (5,079 sq.ft.), attached garage (1,192 sq.ft.), swimming pool 624 sq. ft.), existing stable (320 sq.ft.), service yard (96 sq.ft.); and cabana (220 sq.ft.) will have 7,531 square feet which constitutes 12.1% of the lot which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 18,571 square feet which equals 29.7% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requirement. The proposed project is on a relatively large lot with the proposed structures located away from the road so as to reduce the visual impact of the development and is similar and compatible with several neighboring developments. The building pad is 26,786 square feet and structural coverage on the building pad is 28.1%. B. The proposed development preserves, and integrates into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls) because a minimum amount of grading is proposed and will only be done to provide approved drainage that will flow away from the proposed residence and existing neighboring residences. C. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to minimize grading and the natural drainage courses will continue to the canyons at the east side (rear) of this lot. D. The development plan incorporates existing large trees and native vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. Specifically, the development plan preserves several mature trees and shrubs. E. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structures will _not cause the structural and total lot._coverage to be exceeded. The residential and total lot coverage will not exceed the Planning Commission's established guideline. Further, the proposed project is designed to minimize grading. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain scenic vistas across the northerly portions of the property. F. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum will not be exceeded and the proposed project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to this RESOLUTION NO. 98-14 PAGE 3 98 1701309 74 irregular -shaped lot. Grading shall be permitted only to restore the natural slope of the property. G. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will utilize the same driveway to Eastfield Drive for access. H. The project conforms with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental review. Section 8. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves a modification to an approved Site Plan Review application to allow the proposed increased grading on the site for a cabana. The modifications are shown on the Development Plan and marked Exhibit A in Zoning Case No. 579. These approved modifications are subject to the conditions contained in Section 9 of this Resolution. Section 9. The Conditional Use Permit for a cabana approved in Section 6 and the modification to permit the increased grading for the cabana from the amount previously approved in the Site Plan Review application, that is approved in Section 8, as indicated on the Development Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A in Zoning Case No. 579, are subject, to the following list of conditions. These conditions include applicable conditions of approval previously imposed on the Site Plan Review application by Resolution No. 96-21 on December 17, 1996. To the extent these conditions duplicate prior conditions imposed on this project, the conditions set forth herein shall be considered as continuations of those prior requirements: A. The Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review approvals shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval as defined in Sections 17.42.070(A) and 17.46.080(A). B. It is declared and made a condition of the Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review approvals, that if any conditions thereof are violated, these approvals shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder _shall lapse;. provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of thirty (30) days. C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. RESOLUTION NO. 98-14 PAGE4 98 1701309 75 D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked, Exhibit A, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. The cabana shall not exceed 220 square feet. F. No sleeping quarters or kitchen or other cooking facilities shall be provided within the cabana or detached recreation room. G. No vehicular access or paved parking area shall be developed within 50 feet of the cabana. H. The basement door of the residence shall be solid (without windows) and shall be subject to City staff approval. I. Renting of the cabana is prohibited. J. Any retaining walls incorporated into the project shall not exceed 5 feet in height, averaging no more than 2-1/2 feet. K. Residential building pad coverage shall not exceed 28.1%. L. Maximum disturbed area shall not exceed 39.9% of the net lot area. M. Grading shall not exceed 565 cubic yards of cut soil and 565 cubic yards of fill soil. N. Landscaping shall incorporate and preserve, to the maximum extent feasible, the existing mature trees and shrubs and the natural landscape screening surrounding the proposed building pad. O. Two copies of a landscape plan must be submitted for review by the Planning Department and include native drought -resistant vegetation that will not disrupt the impact of the views of neighboring properties prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit. The landscaping plan submitted must comply with the purpose and intent of -the -Site Plan Review Ordinance, shall incorporate existing mature trees and native vegetation, and shall utilize to the maximum extent feasible, plants that are native to the area and/or consistent with the rural character of the community. A bond in the amount of the cost estimate of the implementation of the landscaping plan plus 15% shall be required to be posted prior to issuance of a grading and building permit and shall be retained with. the City for not less than two years after landscape installation. The retained bond will be released by the City Manager after the City Manager determines that the landscaping was installed RESOLUTION NO. 98-14 PAGE 5 98 1701309 76 pursuant to the landscaping plan as approved, and that such landscaping is properly established and in good condition. P. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes must conform to the City of Rolling Hills standard of 2 to 1 slope ratio. Q. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit. R. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review, pursuant to Section 17.42.060, or the approval shall not be effective. S. Notwithstanding Section 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modifications to the project which would constitute additional development shall require the filing of a new application for Site Plan Review approval by the Planning Commission. T. All conditions of these Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review approvals must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 21ST D OF JU ATTEST: DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 98-14 PAGE 6 ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN 98 1'701309 77 INDEXVICINITY MAP JURISDICTION NOTES REV BY DATE COMMENTS REV A BB 2/21/2024 Property Plan Added. REV B BB 4/8/2024 Property Plan Updated. REV C BB 5/29/2024 Swap PW2/+ for PW3 REV D BB 6/11/2024 Powerwall count decrease. FSM Added. **** LICENSE GENERAL NOTES · · ” ABBREVIATIONS SCOPE OF WORK ELECTRICAL NOTES D D D 78 (E) DRIVEWAY Unlocked Gated0 50'100' Scale:1" = 50'-0' PROPERTY PLAN D 79 (E) DRIVEWAY T1 SV SV SV SV SV SVUnlocked GatedFront Of House 3 6 " F SB 36" FS B 18" FSB 12" WSB 12" WSB12" WSB 36" FSB18" FSB 12" WSB12" WS B 12" WSB12" WS B 12" W S B 18" FSB 1 2 " W S B 18" FS B 12" WS B 18" FSB3 6 " F SB 12" WS B 12" WSB12" WS B 12" WSB18" FSB3 6 " F S B 12" WSB18" FSB 1 2 " W SB 12" WS B 12" WSB 12" WS B 18" FSB 36" FSB12" WS B18" FSB 18" FSB 12" WSBPitch4/12MP2 Pitch4/12MP3 Pitch4/12MP4Pitch4/12MP5 Pitch4/12MP7Pitch4/12MP8Scale:1/16" = 1' SITE PLAN 01'32'16' #SSTAMPCA #ESTAMPCA LEGEND MP3 18° (4:12) 196 18° (4:12) 196 Comp Shingle 1 Story MP2 18° (4:12) 196 18° (4:12) 196 Comp Shingle 1 Story MP4 18° (4:12) 106 18° (4:12) 106 Comp Shingle 1 Story MP5 18° (4:12) 196 18° (4:12) 196 Comp Shingle 1 Story MP5 18° (4:12) 196 18° (4:12) 196 Comp Shingle 1 Story MP5 18° (4:12) 196 18° (4:12) 196 Comp Shingle 1 Story D 80 (E) DRIVEWAY SV SV 36" FSB 12" WS B 36" FSB18" FSB 12" WSB12" WS B 12" WSB12" WS B 12" W S B 18" FSB 18" FSB3 6 " F SB 12" W S B 18" FSB 1 2 " W SB 12" WSB 18" FSBPitch4/12MP2 Pitch4/12MP3 Pitch4/12MP4Scale: 3/32" = 1' SITE PLAN 0 1'10'21' #SSTAMPCA #ESTAMPCA LEGEND MP3 18° (4:12) 196 18° (4:12) 196 Comp Shingle 1 Story MP2 18° (4:12) 196 18° (4:12) 196 Comp Shingle 1 Story MP4 18° (4:12) 106 18° (4:12) 106 Comp Shingle 1 Story MP5 18° (4:12) 196 18° (4:12) 196 Comp Shingle 1 Story MP5 18° (4:12) 196 18° (4:12) 196 Comp Shingle 1 Story MP5 18° (4:12) 196 18° (4:12) 196 Comp Shingle 1 Story 81 SV SV SV SV 36" FS B 12" WS B 12" W S B 18" FSB 1 2 " W S B 18" FSB3 6 " F SB 12" WSB 12" WSB12" WS B 12" WSB18" FSB 3 6 " F S B 12" WSB18" FSB 1 2 " W SB 12" WS B 12" WS B 12" WSB 18" FSB 36" FSB18" FSB 18" FSB 12" WSBPitch4/12MP3 Pitch4/12MP4Pitch4/12MP5 Pitch4/12MP7Pitch4/12MP8Scale: 3/32" = 1' SITE PLAN 0 1'10'21' #SSTAMPCA #ESTAMPCA LEGEND MP3 18° (4:12) 196 18° (4:12) 196 Comp Shingle 1 Story MP2 18° (4:12) 196 18° (4:12) 196 Comp Shingle 1 Story MP4 18° (4:12) 106 18° (4:12) 106 Comp Shingle 1 Story MP5 18° (4:12) 196 18° (4:12) 196 Comp Shingle 1 Story MP5 18° (4:12) 196 18° (4:12) 196 Comp Shingle 1 Story MP5 18° (4:12) 196 18° (4:12) 196 Comp Shingle 1 Story 82 T1 SV SVUnlocked Gated3 6 " F SB 18" FSB 12" WS B 12" WSB1 2 " W S B 18" FS B 12" WS B 18" FSB12" WSB12" WS B 12" WSB18" FSB 3 6 " F S B 12" WS B18" FSB 18" FSB 12" WSBPitch4/12MP4Pitch4/12MP5 Pitch4/12MP8Scale: 3/32" = 1' SITE PLAN 0 1'10'21' MP3 18° (4:12) 196 18° (4:12) 196 Comp Shingle 1 Story MP2 18° (4:12) 196 18° (4:12) 196 Comp Shingle 1 Story MP4 18° (4:12) 106 18° (4:12) 106 Comp Shingle 1 Story MP5 18° (4:12) 196 18° (4:12) 196 Comp Shingle 1 Story #SSTAMPCA #ESTAMPCA LEGEND MP5 18° (4:12) 196 18° (4:12) 196 Comp Shingle 1 Story MP5 18° (4:12) 196 18° (4:12) 196 Comp Shingle 1 Story D 83 NTS TYPICAL PV SIDE VIEWSV Scale: 1 1/2" = 1' STANDOFFS1 Scale: 3/4"=1'-0" TRENCH DETAILT1 #SSTAMPCA 84 #SSTAMPCA 85 B 7 C 4 D 4 E 2 1 S1A S1B1 3 1 S2 3 1 S3 F G 6 H6 5 J 12V · · · I ” – A #ESTAMPCA D 86 B 7 C 4 D 4 E 2 1 S1A S1B1 3 1 S2 3 1 S3 F G 6 H6 5 J 12V · · · I ” – #ESTAMPCAD 87 SCALE: 1/4"= 1' SOUTH WALL EXTERIOR FLOOR PLANA NORTH WALL EXTERIOR EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONE1 FREESTAND MOUNT EXTERIOR EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONE2 D 88 #ESTAMPCA · · · · · · · · · D 89 90 SOLAR PV SYSTEM EQUIPPED WITH RAPID SHUTDOWN CAUTION: MULTIPLE SOURCES OF POWER - Address: 18 Eastfield Dr OPERATING VOLTAGE = 240V JB-90213442-00 CAUTION: MULTIPLE SOURCES OF POWER - Address: 18 Eastfield Dr OPERATING VOLTAGE = 240V JB-90213442-00 91 NEC_2020-690_31_D_2 Per Code: 690.31.D.2 Label Location: (C)(IC)(CB) NEC_2020-690_53 Per Code: 690.53 Label Location: (DC) (INV) NEC_2020-690_13_B Per Code: 690.13.B Label Location: (AC) (POI)(DC) (INV) NEC_2020-690_54 Per Code: 690.54 Label Location: (AC) (POI) NEC_2020-690_13_B-3 Per Code: 690.13.B Label Location: (DC)(CB) NEC_2020-705_12_B_3_2 Per Code: 705.12.B.3.2 Label Location: (POI) NEC_2020-705_12_B_3_3 Per Code: 705.12.B.3.3 NEC_2020-705_12_C Per Code: 705.12.C Label Location: (POI) NEC_2020-690_54-690_13_B Per Code: 690.54; 690.13.B Label Location: (POI) UL_1741_Power_Control_System Per Code: UL 1741 Power Control System Label Location: (INV)(LC) NEC_2020-690_56_C_2 Per Code: 690.56.C.2 Label Location: RSD Switch NEC_2020-690_56_C Per Code: 690.56.C Label Location: (MSP) (POI): Point of Interconnection (M): Utility Meter (LC): Load Center (INV): Inverter With Integrated DC Disconnect (IC): Interior Run Conduit (DC): DC Disconnect (D): Distribution Panel (CB): Combiner Box (C): Conduit (AC): AC Disconnect NEC 2020 - Default Label Set 547.22 48 48 240240 92 NEC_2020-408_4 Per Code: 408.4 Label Location: (BLC) NEC_2020-220 Per Code: 220 Label Location: (BLC) NEC_2020-312_8_A_3 Per Code: 312.8.A.3 Label Location: (MSP) NEC_2020-705_12_C-1 Per Code: 705.12.C Label Location: (MSP) NEC_2020-706_15_C-2 Per Code: 706.15.c Label Location: (AC) NEC_2020-705_12_B_3_2 Per Code: 705.12.B.3.2 Label Location: (POI) NEC_2020-705_12_B_3_3 Per Code: 705.12.B.3.3 NEC_2020-705_12_C-2 Per Code: 705.12.C Label Location: (MSP) UL_1741_Power_Control_System Per Code: UL 1741 Power Control System Label Location: (INV)(LC) IRC_2021-R_328_11 Per Code: R328.11 Label Location: (MSP) NEC_2020-706_15_C Per Code: 706.15.C Label Location: (MSP) (MSP): Main Service Panel (BLC): Backup Load Center (AC): AC Disconnect NEC 2020 - Default Label Set 240 92 93 !"!#$ %&#'(# ")&* &+, (&&)'+, - . / )&(&&) '+, % , )0& ! "# $" % &&' $ &&( $ &&)*$ &)1&& 2&) ( + ,&-./* 0 1' 23 3 03&&4('./-5 4 0 0 5(6 7 8 4!*$$ "# 8 4!* 8 4!* 7 %!* + ,&- + 9,/* 5":"16$;<= 4 0 $*& $*&& > # $*&<$' 0 % > # $*&<&' 0 > # $*&<<' 0 0 ? > # $*&; 4 @A'B # $*&-3 %8 C 4 $*&6 %8 C 4 $*&/5 > # $*< ( "35" %8 C 4 $*; > # *;:*$:&*&$" $<&6&;"&*&$'//*"1 $:& $*- %8 C 4 $*65 C 4 %8 C 4 $*/5 5 > % $*D 9 5 > % $*=5 $*=&C # % 5 > % $*=<5 C 4 5 > % $*=; 5 > % $*$* " C 4 4 $*$$ 5 > % 0 C 4 $*$&" %5 > % 0 C 4 $*$< 4 # 84 E @53B 4 &)1&&4 6+ 3C4 @"2****$/B:F @"**$*<DB " 8 8 :3C4 C %: 4 :F @ G$**$&/</$&$&H()F*<**$;IB % <D 7 &&- ! * 7 * @5B 56/ @1"(B % 7 1 C J 1 ! 1 + % J A 11&)1!7&8)*9 4:/6.;<$ %&="!#"! 53*;/$6**-K L" % 8" % L:: :+A"1(5+1:(!(M51 A5+1 :53*;/$6**-K&*&*M*$ 4:/6. <$ %& 53*;/$6**&K % L:: :+A"1(5+1:(!(M51 A5+1 :53*;/$6**&K&*&*M*= *;:*$:&*&$" 5 27 L::CCC N*<:&*&$%" 5 27 " $<&6&;"&*&$'//*"1 &:& 94 The intended purpose of this document is to show that the PV system will never exceed 600VDC when designed to the max string length. To show this, we have provided voltage calculations using the electrical characteristics of various modules we will be installing. The relevant equations are below and will be used for all individual module calculations. VCorString = (Voc + (Tlow о 25˚C)Tvoc) כ 14 where Tvoc = CT,vocVoc where Tlow = 2˚C Tesla 425W Module (T425S) CT,voc соϬ͘Ϯϲ %/˚C Voc = 48.65 V VCor = [48.65 + (2˚ - 25˚C) * (оϬ͘ϮϲйΎϰϴ͘ϲϱͿ΁Ύϭϭ VCorString = 567.15 V (max string length is 11 modules for non-fixed voltage inverter) Tesla 420W Module (T420S) CT,voc соϬ͘Ϯϲйͬ˚C Voc = 48.50 V VCor = [48.50 + (2˚ - 25˚C) * (оϬ͘ϮϲйΎϰϴ͘ϱ0Ϳ΁Ύϭϭ VCorString = 565.40 V (max string length is 11 modules for non-fixed voltage inverter) Tesla 400W Module (T400H) CT,voc соϬ͘Ϯ7 %/˚C Voc = 45.30 V VCor = [45.30 + (2˚ - 25˚C) * (оϬ͘Ϯ7% * 45.30Ϳ΁Ύϭ2 VCorString = 577.36 V (max string length is 12 modules for non-fixed voltage inverter) Tesla 395W Module (T395H) CT,voc соϬ͘Ϯ7 %/˚C Voc = 45.27 V VCor = [45.27 + (2˚ - 25˚C) * (оϬ͘Ϯ7% * 45.27Ϳ΁Ύϭ2 VCorString = 576.98 V (max string length is 12 modules for non-fixed voltage inverter) SolarCity Standard 265W Module (SC265) CT,voc соϬ͘ϯϲйͬ˚C Voc = 38.3 V VCor = [38.3 + (2˚ - 25˚C) * (оϬ͘ϯϲйΎϯϴ͘ϯͿ΁Ύϭϰ VCorString = 580.60 V (max string length is 14 modules for non-fixed voltage inverter) SolarCity 325W Module (SC325) CT,voc соϬ͘Ϯϯϱйͬ˚C Voc = 69.60 V VCor = [69.60 + (2˚ - 25˚C) * (оϬ͘ϮϯϱйΎϲϵ͘ϲ0Ϳ΁Ύϴ VCorString = 586.90 V (max string length is 8 modules for non-fixed voltage inverter) SolarCity 315W Module (SC315B2) CT,voc соϬ͘25 %/˚C Voc = 70.20 V VCor = [70.20 + (2˚ - 25˚C) * (оϬ͘ϮϱйΎ70.20Ϳ΁Ύϴ VCorString = 593.89 V (max string length is 8 modules for non-fixed voltage inverter) Hanwha 345W Module (Q.PEAK DUO BLK-G6+/SC) CT,voc соϬ͘ϮϳйͬΣ Voc = 40.92 V VCor = [40.92 + (2˚ оϮϱ˚C) * (оϬ͘ϮϳйΎϰϬ͘ϵϮͿ΁Ύϭϯ VCorString = 564.99 V (max string length is 13 modules for non-fixed voltage inverter) Hanwha 340W Module (Q.PEAK DUO BLK-G6+/SC) CT,voc соϬ͘ϮϳйͬΣ Voc = 40.66 V VCor = [40.66 + (2˚ оϮϱ˚C) * (оϬ͘ϮϳйΎϰϬ͘ϲϲͿ΁Ύϭϯ VCorString = 561.40 V (max string length is 13 modules for non-fixed voltage inverter Hanwha 320W Module (Q.PEAK DUO BLK-G5/SC) CT,voc соϬ͘ϮϴйͬΣ Voc = 40.56 V VCor = [40.56 + (2˚ оϮϱ˚C) * (оϬ͘ϮϴйΎϰϬ͘ϱϲͿ΁Ύϭϯ VCorString = 561.24 V (max string length is 13 modules for non-fixed voltage inverter) Hanwha 315W Module (Q.PEAK DUO BLK-G5/SC) CT,voc соϬ͘ϮϴйͬΣ Voc = 40.29 V VCor = [40.29 + (2˚ оϮϱ˚C) * (оϬ͘ϮϴйΎϰϬ͘ϮϵͿ΁Ύϭϯ VCorString = 557.50 V (max string length is 13 modules for non-fixed voltage inverter) Hanwha 300W Module (Q.PEAK-G4.1/SC) CT,voc соϬ͘ϮϴйͬΣ Voc = 39.76 V VCor = [39.76 + (2˚ оϮϱ˚C) * ;оϬ͘ϮϴйΎϯϵ͘ϳϲͿ΁Ύϭϰ VCorString = 592.49 V (max string length is 14 modules for non-fixed voltage inverter) 95 ͘ 96 FLASHING INSERT ZS COMP DATASHEET 2 Listed to UL 2703 and UL 2582 for Wind Driven Rain Part #850-1628 SPECIFICATIONS Designed for pitched roofs. Installs in portrait and landscape orientations. Engineered for spans up to 72” and cantilevers up to 24”. ZS Comp has a UL 1703 Class “A” Fire Rating when installed using modules from any manufacturer certified as “Type 1” or “Type 2”. Attachment method UL listed to UL 2582 for Wind Driven Rain. ZS Comp supports 50 psf (2400 Pa) front and up to 72 psf (3450 Pa) rear side design load rating for Portrait module orientation per UL 2703. ZS Comp supports 50 psf (2400 Pa) front side and up to 72 psf (3450 Pa) rear side design load rating for Landscape module orientation. Engineered for compliance with ASCE 7-05, 7-10, and 7-16 wind load requirements. Zep wire management products listed to UL 1565 for wire positioning devices. ZS Comp grounding products are listed to UL 2703 and UL 467. ZS Comp bonding products are listed to UL 2703. DESCRIPTION PV mounting solution for composition shingle roofs. Works with all Zep Compatible Modules. Auto bonding UL-listed hardware creates structural and electrical bond. ROOFING SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONS MOUNTING BLOCK CAPTURED WASHER LAG Listed to UL 2703 Part #850-1633 Part #850-1631-002 and #850-1631-004 ZS COMP DATASHEET 3 GROUND ZEP LEVELING FOOT DC WIRE CLIP HOME RUN CLIP Listed to UL 1565 Part #850-1510 ARRAY SKIRT END CAP Listed to UL 2703 Part #850-1511 Listed to UL 2703 Part #850-1613 Listed to UL 2703 Part #850-1608 Listed to UL 2703 Part #850-1606 Listed to UL 2703 Part #850-1586 (Left) Part #850-1588 (Right) INTERLOCKSKIRT GRIP Listed to UL 2703 Part #850-1397 Listed to UL 1565 Part #850-1509 Listed to UL 2703 Part #850-1281 HYBRID INTERLOCK 97 TESLA.COM/ENERGY Photovoltaic Combiner Box Tesla 4J Combiner Box Tesla uses custom photovoltaic combiner boxes to combine solar module strings on the roof. The two combiner boxes defined here are purpose-built photovoltaic combiner box assemblies, with one designed for rail-based systems and one designed for systems without rails. NOTE: Tesla 4J combiner box with bracket / cord grip has the same dimensions as Tesla 4J combiner box, but has the added bracket/cord grip as shown above. End View End View Top View with Cover Top View with Cover PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS Part Number Tesla 4J Array System Voltage 600 Vdc Single Input String Current Rating 42 A Single Input String Current Rating 42 A Dual Input String Current Rating 28.5 A Output Current Rating (with jumpers)57 A Maximum Number of Single Inputs 4 Maximum Number of Combined Inputs 2 NA 2022-05-24 COMPLIANCE INFORMATION Certifications UL 1741, UL 508, CSA 22.2 No. 94 ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS Maximum Operating Temperature 50°C Enclosure Type NEMA 3, 3R, 4, 4X, 12, 13 Ingress Rating IP66 MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS Dimensions 185.93 x 228.6 x 126.8 mm (7.32 x 9.32 x 4.99 in) Tesla 4J Combiner Box with Bracket / Cord Grip 7.32 in (185.93 mm)9.32 in (228.6 mm)1.38 in (35.1 mm) 3.61 in (91.7 mm) 98 1TESR-DS-0451-22 PV HAZARD CONTROL EQUIPMENT AND COMPONENTS Function Manufacturer Model No.Firmware Versions and Checksums Certification Standard PVRSE Mid Circuit Interrupter (MCI)Tesla MCI-1, MCI-2 N/A UL 1741 PVRSE Inverter, Powerwall+, or Powerwall 3 Tesla 7.6 kW: 1538000 1 3.8 kW: 1534000 1 7.6 kW: 1850000 1 11.5 kW: 1707000 1 V4, CEA4F802 V4, FF7BE4E1 V4, CEA4F802 V1, 0x3282A1 UL 1741, 1998 PVRSS/PVRSE PV Module Tesla SR60T1, SR72T1, SR72T2, SR72T3R N/A UL 61730 PVHCS Initiator (PV Inverter) Dedicated PV system AC circuit breaker or AC disconnect switch, labeled per NEC 690.12 requirements.N/A PVHCS Initiator (Powerwall+, Powerwall 3) Emergency stop device (NISD)- Listed "Emergency Stop Button" or "Emergency Stop Device" or "Emergency Stop Unit". UL 508 or UL 60947 Parts 1, 5-1 and 5-5 PVHCS Initiator (Powerwall 3) On/Off Enable switch located on Powerwall 3, when labeled as Rapid Shutdown initiator per NEC 690.12 requirements UL 1741 1 Applies to variations of this part number with suffix of two numbers and one letter. Note: PVHCS installation requirements may reduce the effective equipment and component ratings below the individual equipment and component PVRSE ratings in order to achieve PVHCS shock hazard reduction requirements. PVHCS INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS Max System Voltage 600 Vඌඋ PVHCS Maximum Circuit Voltage (Array Internal Voltage After Actuation)165 Vඌඋ (cold weather open circuit) Max Series-Connected Panels Between MCIs: 10 OTHER INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS 1. An MCI must be connected to one end of each series string or mounting plane sub-array string. 2. Verification that MCIs are installed with 10 or fewer modules between MCIs shall be documented for inspection, by voltage measurement logs and/or as-built string layout diagrams. 3. For PV Inverter: The PVHCS initiator (AC breaker or switch) shall be sized and installed in accordance with NEC requirements. The specific part shall be identified on the as-built system drawings. 4. For Powerwall+ or Powerwall 3: The PVHCS emergency stop initiator shall have the following minimum ratings: Outdoor (Type 3R or higher), 12V, 1A, and shall be installed in accordance with NEC requirements. The specific part shall be identified on the as-built system drawings. Refer to the Powerwall installation manual for further details. PV HAZARD CONTROL SYSTEM | BIPV UL 3741 REPORT DATE 01-27-23 PV RAPID SHUTDOWN ARRAY WARNING: To reduce the risk of injury, read all instructions. 1TEPV-DS-0023-22 3. Verification that the MCIs are installed in accordance with 1) and 2) shall be documented for inspection, by voltage measurement logs and/or as- built string layout diagrams. 4. For PV Inverter: The PVHCS initiator (AC breaker or switch) shall be sized and installed in accordance with NEC requirements. The specific part shall be identified on the as-built system drawings. 5. For Powerwall+ and Powerwall 3: The PVHCS emergency stop initiator shall have the following minimum ratings: Outdoor (Type 3R or higher), 12V, 1A, and shall be installed in accordance with NEC requirements. The specific part shall be identified on the as-built system drawings. Refer to the Powerwall installation manual for further details. PV HAZARD CONTROL EQUIPMENT AND COMPONENTS Function Manufacturer Model No. Firmware Versions and Checksums Certification Standard Inverter, Powerwall+, or Powerwall 3 Tesla 7.6 kW: 15380001 3.8 kW: 15340001 7.6 kW: 18500001 11.5 kW: 17070001 V4, CEA4F802 V4, FF7BE4E1 V4, CEA4F802 V1, 0x3282A1 UL 1741, UL 1998, PVRSS/PVRSE Mid Circuit Interrupter (MCI) Tesla MCI-1, MCI-2 N/A UL 1741 PVRSE PV Modules The PVHC PV modules must be listed by a NRTL to UL 1703 and/or UL 61730-1 and UL 61730-2 (excluding Class 0 and Class I). PV Mounting System The PV mounting system must comply with one of the following: • Listed by NRTL to UL 2703 and rated for use with the specific PV modules noted above. •The non-certified combinations of mounting and PV modules shall be evaluated for loading, mounting and grounding per the NEC and other applicable installation codes. PV Connectors The following PV connectors may be used to connect to the Tesla MCIs: • Staubli type PV-KST4/6II-UR or type PV-KST4-EVO2 (male), • Staubli type PV-KBT4/6II-UR or PV-KBT4-EVO2 (female), • Staubli Branch Socket PV-AZB4 and Branch Plug PV-AZS4, • Connectors evaluated by an NRTL for intermatability with the connectors above. PVHCS Initiator (PV Inverter) Dedicated PV system AC circuit breaker or AC disconnect switch, labeled per NEC 690.12 requirements.N/A PVHCS Initiator (Powerwall+, Powerwall 3) Emergency stop device (NISD)- Listed "Emergency Stop Button" or "Emergency Stop Device" or "Emergency Stop Unit". UL 508 or UL 60947 Parts 1, 5-1 and 5-5. PVHCS Initiator (Powerwall 3) On/Off Enable switch located on Powerwall 3, when labeled as Rapid Shutdown initiator per NEC 690.12 requirements UL 1741 1 Applies to variations of this part number with suffix of two numbers and one letter. Note: PVHCS installation requirements may reduce the effective equipment and component ratings below the individual equipment and component PVRSE ratings in order to achieve PVHCS shock hazard reduction requirements. PVHCS INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS Max System Voltage 9ඌඋ PVHCS Maximum Circuit Voltage (Array Internal Voltage After Actuation)9ඌඋFROGZHDWKHURSHQFLUFXLW OTHER INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS 1. An MCI must be connected to one end of each series string or mounting plane sub-array string. 2. MCIs shall be installed between series connected module combinations such that the PVHC Maximum Circuit Voltage after actuation is no greater than 165V under any circumstances. The installation location coldest anticipated operating ambient temperature shall be used to calculate the PV maximum voltage in accordance with NEC 690.7. PV HAZARD CONTROL SYSTEM | GENERIC PV ARRAY UL 3741 REPORT DATE 01-27-23 PV RAPID SHUTDOWN ARRAY WARNING: To reduce the risk of injury, read all instructions. Tesla Inverter Based PVHCS, Consisting of Tesla Inverters, Tesla MCI and other listed components to create the system 99 Tesla Solar Shutdown Device 1 Datasheet Electrical Specifications Nominal Input DC Current Rating (IMP)12 A Maximum Input Short Circuit Current (ISC)19 A Maximum System Voltage (PVHCS)600 V DC Solar Shutdown Device 1 Technical Specifications Environmental Specifications Ambient Temperature -40°C to 50°C (-40°F to 122°F) Storage Temperature –30°C to 70°C (–22°F to 158°F) Enclosure Rating NEMA 4X / IP65 Compliance Information Certifications UL 1741 PVRSE, UL 3741, PVRSA (Photovoltaic Rapid Shutdown Array) RSD Initiation Method PV System AC Breaker or Switch Compatible Equipment See Compatibility Table below Mechanical Specifications Model Number MCI-1 Electrical Connections MC4 Connector Housing Plastic Dimensions 125 mm x 150 mm x 22 mm (5 in x 6 in x 1 in) Weight 350 g (0.77 lb) Mounting Options ZEP Home Run Clip M4 Screw (#10) M8 Bolt (5/16") Nail / Wood screw RSD Module Performance Maximum Number of Devices per String 5 Control Power Line Excitation Passive State Normally Open Maximum Power Consumption 7 W Warranty 25 years — The Solar Shutdown Device is a Mid-Circuit Interrupter (MCI) and is part of the PV system rapid shutdown (RSD) function in accordance with Article 690 of the applicable NEC. When paired with Powerwall+ or Tesla Solar Inverter, solar array shutdown is initiated by any loss of AC power. 650 mm 150 mm 125 mm 250 mm M4 Screw M8 Bolt Nail / Wood Screw 22 mm UL 3741 PV Hazard Control (and PVRSA) Compatibility Tesla Solar Roof and Tesla/Zep ZS Arrays using the following modules are certified to UL 3741 and UL 1741 PVRSA when installed with Powerwall+ or Tesla Solar Inverter and Solar Shutdown Devices. See Powerwall+ / Tesla Solar Inverter Rapid Shutdown: Module Selection Based on PV Hazard Control System Listing for guidance on installing other modules. Brand Model Required Solar Shutdown Devices Tesla Solar Roof V3 1 Solar Shutdown Device per 10 modules Tesla Tesla TxxxS (where xxx = 405 to 450 W, increments of 5) Tesla TxxxH (where xxx = 395 to 415 W, increments of 5) 1 Solar Shutdown Device per 3 modules 1 Hanwha Q.PEAK DUO BLK-G5 or Q.PEAK DUO BLK-G6+1 Solar Shutdown Device per 3 modules 1 Exception: Tesla solar modules installed in locations where the max Voc for three modules at low design temperatures exceeds 165 V shall be limited to two modules between Solar Shutdown Devices. January 31, 2023 100 Q.PEAK DUO BLK ML-G10+ / TS Q.PEAK DUO BLK ML-G10+ SERIES MODEL 385-405Wp | 132Cells 20.5% Maximum Module Efficiency TOP BRAND PV MODULES USA 2022PV MODULERELIABILITY SCORECARD 2022TOPPERFORME R 1 See data sheet on rear for further information. ² APT test conditions according to IEC / TS 62804-1:2015, method A (−1500 V, 96 h) The ideal solution for: Rooftop arrays on residential buildings Qcells is the first solar module manufacturer to pass the most comprehensive quality programme in the industry: The new “Quality Controlled PV” of the independent certification institute TÜV Rheinland. The most thorough testing programme in the industry Innovative all-weather technology Optimal yields, whatever the weather with excellent low-light and temperature behaviour. Inclusive 25-year product warranty and 25-year linear performance warranty1. A reliable investment Long-term yield security with Anti LeTID Technology, Anti PID Technology2 and Hot-Spot Protect. Enduring high performance Q.ANTUM DUO Z Technology with zero gap cell layout boosts module efficiency up to 20.5 %. Breaking the 20% efficiency barrier Zep compatibleTM frame design High-tech black Zep CompatibleTM frame, for improved aesthetics, easy installation and increased safety. Rooftop arrays on commercial/industrial buildings Format 74.4 in × 41.2 in × 1.57 in (including frame) (1890 mm × 1046 mm × 40 mm) Weight 51.8 lbs (23.5 kg) Front Cover 0.13 in (3.2 mm) thermally pre-stressed glass with anti-reflection technology Back Cover Composite film Frame Black anodised aluminium Cell 6 × 22 monocrystalline Q.ANTUM solar half cells Junction box 2.09-3.98 in × 1.26-2.36 in × 0.59-0.71 in (53-101 mm × 32-60 mm × 15-18 mm), IP67, with bypass diodes Cable 4 mm² Solar cable; (+) ≥ 52.2 in (1325 mm), (−) ≥ 52.2 in (1325 mm) Connector Stäubli MC4; IP68 Mechanical Specification 45.3" (1150 mm) 4 × Fastening points (DETAIL A) Frame 8.66" (220 mm) 41.2" (1046 mm) 39.1" (992 mm) 1.57" (40 mm) 8 × Drainage opening 0.14" × 3.1" (3.6 mm × 8 mm) 6 × Grounding points ø 0.16" (4 mm) DETAIL A 0,472" (12 mm) 0.354" (9 mm)1.063" (27 mm) 14.6“ (370 mm) 4 × Drainage opening 74.4" (1890 mm) ≥52.2" (1325 mm) ≥52.2"(1325 mm) Qcells pursues minimizing paper output in consideration of the global environment. Note: Installation instructions must be followed. Contact our technical service for further information on approved installation of this product. Hanwha Q CELLS America Inc. 400 Spectrum Center Drive, Suite 1400, Irvine, CA 92618, USA | TEL +1 949 748 59 96 | EMAIL hqc-inquiry@qcells.com | WEB www.qcells.com Q..PPEEAKK DDUO BLLKKK MMMMLLL--GG11100++ SSEERRIEESS Specifications subject to technical changes© Qcells Q.PEAK_DUO_BLK_ML-G10+_TS_DA_385-405_2022-07_Rev01_NAProperties for System Design Maximum System Voltage VSYS [V]1000 (IEC) / 1000 (UL)PV module classification Class II Maximum Series Fuse Rating [A DC]20 Fire Rating based on ANSI/UL 61730 TYPE 2 Max. Design Load, Push/Pull3 [lbs / ft2] 85 (4080 Pa) / 85 (4080 Pa) Permitted Module Temperature on Continuous Duty −40 °F up to +185 °F (−40 °C up to +85 °C)Max. Test Load, Push/Pull3 [lbs / ft2] 128 (6120 Pa) / 128 (6120 Pa) 3 See Installation Manual UL 61730, CE-compliant, Quality Controlled PV - TÜV Rheinland; IEC 61215:2016, IEC 61730:2016, U.S. Patent No. 9,893,215 (solar cells) Qualifications and Certificates 200 400 600 800 1000 90 100 80 110 10 2515 20005 86 98 95 80 100 85 Electrical Characteristics TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENTS Temperature Coefficient of ISC α [% / K] +0.04 Temperature Coefficient of VOC β [% / K] −0.27 Temperature Coefficient of PMPP γ [% / K] −0.34 Nominal Module Operating Temperature NMOT [°F] 109 ± 5.4 (43 ± 3 °C) POWER CLASS 385 390 395 400 405 MINIMUM PERFORMANCE AT STANDARD TEST CONDITIONS, STC1 (POWER TOLERANCE +5 W / −0 W)MinimumPower at MPP1 PMPP [W]385 390 395 400 405 Short Circuit Current1 ISC [A]11.04 11.07 11.10 11.14 11.17 Open Circuit Voltage1 VOC [V]45.19 45.23 45.27 45.3 45.34 Current at MPP IMPP [A]10.59 10.65 10.71 10.77 10.83 Voltage at MPP VMPP [V]36.36 36.62 36.88 37.13 37.39 Efficiency1 η [%]≥19.5 ≥19.7 ≥20.0 ≥20.2 ≥20.5 MINIMUM PERFORMANCE AT NORMAL OPERATING CONDITIONS, NMOT2 MinimumPower at MPP PMPP [W]288.8 292.6 296.3 300.1 303.8 Short Circuit Current ISC [A]8.90 8.92 8.95 8.97 9.00 Open Circuit Voltage VOC [V]42.62 42.65 42.69 42.72 42.76 Current at MPP IMPP [A]8.35 8.41 8.46 8.51 8.57 Voltage at MPP VMPP [V]34.59 34.81 35.03 35.25 35.46 1Measurement tolerances PMPP ± 3 %; ISC; VOC ± 5 % at STC: 1000 W/m2, 25 ± 2 °C, AM 1.5 according to IEC 60904-3 • ²800 W/m2, NMOT, spectrum AM 1.5 RELATIVE EFFCIENCY [%]Qcells PERFORMANCE WARRANTY PERFORMANCE AT LOW IRRADIANCE At least 98 % of nominal power during first year. Thereafter max. 0.5 % degradation per year. At least 93.5 % of nominal power up to 10 years. At least 86 % of nominal power up to 25 years. All data within measurement tolerances. Full warranties in accordance with the warranty terms of the Qcells sales organisation of your respective country. Typical module performance under low irradiance conditions in comparison to STC conditions (25 °C, 1000 W/m2). YEARS IRRADIANCE [W/m²] Qcells Industry standard of p-mono* *Standard terms of guarantee for the 5 PV companies with the highest production capacity in 2021 (February 2021)RELATIVE EFFCIENCYCOMPARED TO NOMINAL POWER [%]Certified UL 61730 101 DC- DC+ 1 GD • • • • • DC1 102 February 2007 8-20 For more information visit: www.eaton.com CA08101001E Switching Devices 8 Safety Switches Product Selection 120/240 Vac General-Duty, Fusible, Single Throw Specifications ■30 – 600 amperes. ■Suitable for service entrance appli- cations unless otherwise noted. ■Horsepower rated. ■Bolt-on hub provision. Provided for general-duty switches in a NEMA 3R enclosure. See Page 8-7 for selection. ■UL listed File No. E5239. Meets UL 98 for enclosed switches and NEMA Std. KS-1. ■200 – 600 ampere switches incorporate K-Series design. DP221NGB DG321NRB Table 8-40. 120/240 Vac General-Duty, Fusible, Single Throw Maximum hp ratings apply only when dual element time delay fuses are used. These switches do not have an interlock which prevents door from being opened when switch is in the ON position. Use 3-wire catalog numbers below. Solid neutral bars are not included. Order separately from Table 8-1 on Page 8-5. WARNING! Switch is not approved for service entrance unless a neutral kit is installed. Grounded B phase rating, UL listed. Note: All general-duty safety switches are individually packaged. Note: Accessories are limited in scope on general-duty safety switches. See Page 8-5 for availability. In addition, clear line shields are available as an accessory on 200 – 600 ampere general-duty switches. Catalog Numbers: 200 A = 70-7759-11, 400 A = 70-8063-8, 600 A = 70-8064-8. System Ampere Rating Fuse Type Provision Maximum Horsepower Ratings NEMA 1 Enclosure Indoor NEMA 3R Enclosure RainproofSingle-Phase ac 3-Phase ac dc 120 Volt 240 Volt 240 Volt 250 Volt Catalog Number Price U.S. $ Catalog Number Price U.S. $ Fusible — Plug Type 2-Wire (One Blade, One Fuse, S/N) — 120 Vac 30 Plug (Type S, T or W) 1/2 – 2 — — —DP111NGB — 3-Wire (Two Blades, Two Fuses, S/N) — 120/240 Vac 30 Plug (Type S, T or W) 1/2 – 2 1-1/2 – 3 — —DP221NGB Use cartridge-type fuse catalog number DG221NRB Fusible — Cartridge Type 2-Pole 2-Wire (Two Blades, Two Fuses) — 240 Vac 30 60 100 200 400 600 — — — — H H — — — — — — 1-1/2 – 3 3 – 10 7-1/2 – 15 15 — — 3 – 7-1/2 7-1/2 – 15 15 – 30 25 – 60 50 – 125 75 – 200 — — — — — — DG225FGK DG226FGK DG225FRK DG226FRK 3-Wire (Two Blades, Two Fuses, S/N) — 120/240 Vac 30 60 100 200 400 600 H H H H H H — — — — — — 1-1/2 – 3 3 – 10 7-1/2 – 15 15 — — 3 – 7-1/2 7-1/2 – 15 15 – 30 25 – 60 50 – 125 75 – 200 — — — — 50 — DG221NGB DG222NGB DG223NGB DG224NGK DG225NGK DG226NGK DG221NRB DG222NRB DG223NRB DG224NRK DG225NRK DG226NRKS/NS/NS/NDiscount Symbol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22CD 103 2023Gateway 3 Datasheet Gateway 3 1Only Eaton CSR or BWH main breakers are 25 kA rated Performance Specifications Model Number 1841000-01-y Nominal Grid Voltage 120/240 V AC Grid Configuration Split phase Grid Frequency 60 Hz Continuous Current Rating 200 A Maximum Supply Short Circuit Current 22 kA with Square D or Eaton main breaker 25 kA with Eaton main breaker1 IEC Protective Class Class I Overvoltage Category Category IV Mechanical Specifications Dimensions 660 x 411 x 149 mm (26 x 16 x 6 in) Weight 16.4 kg (36 lb) Mounting options Wall mount Environmental Specifications Operating Temperature –20°C to 50°C (–4°F to 122°F) Operating Humidity (RH)Up to 100%, condensing Maximum Elevation 3000 m (9843 ft) Environment Indoor and outdoor rated Enclosure Type NEMA 3R Compliance Information Certifications UL 67, UL 869A, UL 916, UL 1741 PCS, CSA 22.2 107.1, CSA 22.2 29 Emmissions FCC Part 15, ICES 003 — Tesla Gateway 3 controls connection to the grid in a Powerwall system, automatically detecting outages and providing seamless transition to backup power. It provides energy monitoring that is used by Powerwall for solar self-consumption, time-based control, and backup operation. 411 mm 660 mm 149 mm AC Meter Revenue accurate (+/- 0.5%) Communication CAN User Interface Tesla App Backup Transition Automatic disconnect for seamless backup Overcurrent Protection Device 100–200 A Service entrance rated Eaton CSR, BWH, or BW, or Square D QOM breakers Internal Panelboard 200 A 8-space/16 circuit breakers Eaton BR, Siemens QP, or Square D HOM breakers rated to 10–125A Warranty 10 years 104 Powerwall 3 Power Everything 2024 — Powerwall 3 is a fully integrated solar and battery system, designed to accelerate the transition to sustainable energy. Customers can receive whole home backup, cost savings, and energy independence by producing and consuming their own energy while participating in grid services. Once installed, customers can manage their system using the Tesla App to customize system behavior to meet their energy goals. Powerwall 3 achieves this by supporting up to 20 kW DC of solar and providing 11.5 kW AC of continuous power per unit. It has the ability to start heavy loads up to 185 A LRA, meaning a single unit can support the power needs of most homes. Powerwall 3 ´æ¡æ´¬Í¡«ÓâÌææßâÓóî´ÓÍŻ«æîÍ¡«ď´¡Íî´ÍæîÆÆî´ÓÍæŻ¡æĊæĊæî¡Ì¡ĄßÍæ´ÓÍŻÍæ´ÌßÆ¡ÓÍÍ¡î´ÓÍîÓÍĊ¡Æ¡îâ´Æ service. 22024Powerwall 3 Datasheet Solar Technical ]ß¡´ďî´ÓÍæ Maximum Solar STC Input 20 kW u´î±æîÍtÓÆî¬¡600 V DC Vt.ÍßóîtÓÆî¬¡YÍ¬¡60 — 550 V DC VtCVVdtÓÆî¬¡YÍ¬¡60 — 480 V DC CVVdæ 6 Maximum Current per MPPT (Imp)13 A 5 Maximum Short Circuit Current per MPPT (Iæ)15 A 5 VÓÿ¡âÿÆÆĚd¡±Í´Æ]ß¡´«´î´ÓÍæ 1 Typical solar shifting use case. 2 Values provided for 25°C (77°F), at beginning of life. 3.3 kW charge/discharge power. 3 d¡æî¡óæ´Í¬ÿ¡´¬±î¡¡«ď´¡ÍĊÌ¡î±ÓÓÆÓ¬ĊŮ 4 d±¡óæîÓÌ¡â´æ¡Ąß¡î¡îÓßâÓþ´¡´Íî¡âÍ¡îÓÍÍ¡î´þ´îĊ«ÓâVÓÿ¡âÿÆÆĚż¡ÆÆóÆâæ±ÓóÆÍÓî¡óæ¡æî±¡ßâ´ÌâĊÌÓ¡Ó« connectivity. Cellular connectivity subject to network operator service coverage and signal strength. 5 u±¡â¡î±¡´Íßóîóââ¡Íî¡Ą¡¡æî±¡CVVdâî´Í¬ŻÀóÌß¡âÍ¡óæ¡îÓÓÌ´Í¡îÿÓCVVdæ´ÍîÓæ´Í¬Æ¡´ÍßóîîÓ intake DC current up to 26 A ICV / 30 A ISC. Battery Technical ]ß¡´ďî´ÓÍæ Nominal Battery Energy 13.5 kWh AC 2 CĄ´ÌóÌÓÍî´ÍóÓóæ´æ±â¬¡VÓÿ¡â 11.5 kWAC CĄ´ÌóÌÓÍî´ÍóÓóæ±â¬¡VÓÿ¡â 5 kW AC JóîßóîVÓÿ¡â%îÓâYî´Í¬ėƃĘŽ&â´Ó¡ÓÍď¬óâÆ¡ž CĄ´ÌóÌÓÍî´ÍóÓóæóââ¡Íî 48 A Maximum Output Fault Current 10 kA =Ó]îâîß´Æ´îĊŽĘæž 185 A LRA VÓÿ¡â]Æ´Æ´îĊ Up to 4 Powerwall 3 units supported ]Ċæî¡Ìd¡±Í´Æ ]ß¡´ďî´ÓÍæ CÓ¡ÆDóÌ¡â ĘĞėĞėėėƃĄĄƃĊ DÓÌ´ÍÆ&â´tÓÆî¬¡Ž.ÍßóîǡJóîßóîž 120/240 VAC &â´dĊß¡Split phase Frequency 60 Hz Jþ¡âóââ¡ÍîVâÓî¡î´ÓÍ¡þ´¡60 A ]ÓÆâîÓîî¡âĊîÓ+ÓÌ¡Ź&â´«ď´¡ÍĊ 89% 1,2 ]ÓÆâîÓ+ÓÌ¡Ź&â´«ď´¡ÍĊ 97.5% 3 ]óßßÓâî¡.æÆÍ´Í¬¡þ´¡æ Gateway 3, Backup Switch, Backup Gateway 2 Connectivity Wi-Fi (2.4 and 5 GHz), Dual-port switched Ethernet, Cellular (LTE/4G 4) +âÿâ¡.Íî¡â«¡âĊÓÍîîâ¡ÆĊŻYß´]±óîÓÿÍŽY]ž¡âî´ď¡æÿ´î± and 2-pin connector, RS-485 for meters AC Metering Revenue Grade (+/- 0.5%) VâÓî¡î´ÓÍæ Integrated arc fault circuit interrupter (AFCI), Isolation CÓÍ´îÓâ.Íî¡ââóßî¡âŽ.C.žŻVtYß´]±óîÓÿÍŽY]žóæ´Í¬ d¡æÆC´ƃ´âó´î.Íî¡ââóßî¡âæ óæîÓÌ¡â.Íî¡â«¡d¡æÆCÓ´Æ¡ßß Warranty 10 years 105 32024Powerwall 3 Datasheet Mechanical ]ß¡´ďî´ÓÍæ ´Ì¡Íæ´ÓÍæ ĘėĠĠĄĝėĠĄĘĠĚÌÌŽěĚŮęĜĄęěĄĞŮĝ´Íž Weight 130 kg (287 lb) CÓóÍî´Í¬Jßî´ÓÍæ Floor or wall mount VÓÿ¡âÿÆÆĚd¡±Í´Æ]ß¡´«´î´ÓÍæ Environmental ]ß¡´ďî´ÓÍæ Operating Temperature –20°C to 50°C (–4°F to 122°F) 6 Jß¡âî´Í¬+óÌ´´îĊŽY+ž Up to 100%, condensing Storage Temperature –20°C to 30°C (–4°F to 86°F), up to 95% RH, non- condensing, State of Energy (SOE): 25% initial Maximum Elevation 3000 m (9843 ft) Environment Indoor and outdoor rated ÍÆÓæóâ¡Yî´Í¬DCĚY .Í¬â¡ææYî´Í¬IP67 (Battery & Power Electronics) IP45 (Wiring Compartment) VÓÆÆóî´ÓÍYî´Í¬PD3 Jß¡âî´Í¬DÓ´æ¡ǠĘÌ < 50 db(A) typical ƸĝęŽžÌĄ´ÌóÌ Compliance Information ¡âî´ďî´ÓÍæ UL 1642, UL 1699B, UL 1741, UL 1741 SA, UL 1741 SB, UL 1741 PCS, UL 3741, UL 1973, UL 1998, UL 9540, IEEE 1547- 2018, IEEE 1547.1, UN 38.3 &â´ÓÍÍ¡î´ÓÍ United States Ì´ææ´ÓÍæ FCC Part 15 Class B Environmental RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU ]¡´æÌ´AC156, IEEE 693-2005 (high) %´â¡d¡æî´Í¬C¡¡îæî±¡óÍ´îÆ¡þ¡Æß¡â«ÓâÌÍ¡â´î¡â´ of UL 9540A 6 Performance may be de-rated at operating temperatures above 40°C (104°F). 609 mm 193 mm 1099 mm 82024Powerwall 3 Datasheet VÓÿ¡âÿÆÆĚĄÌßÆ¡]Ċæî¡ÌÓÍ«´¬óâî´ÓÍæ Powerwall 3 with Backup Switch Whole Home Backup Powerwall 3 with Gateway 3 Whole Home Backup Powerwall 3 with Backup Gateway 2 Partial Home Backup 106