Loading...
CL_AGN_250528_CC_AgendaPacket_F_A1.CALL TO ORDER 2.ROLL CALL 3.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4.PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/ANNOUNCEMENTS 5.APPROVE ORDER OF THE AGENDA This is the appropriate time for the Mayor or Councilmembers to approve the agenda as is or reorder. 6.BLUE FOLDER ITEMS (SUPPLEMENTAL) Blue folder (supplemental) items are additional back up materials to administrative reports, changes to the posted agenda packet, and/or public comments received after the printing and distribution of the agenda packet for receive and file. 6.A.FOR BLUE FOLDER DOCUMENTS APPROVED AT THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING RECOMMENDATION: Approved 7.PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS This is the appropriate time for members of the public to make comments regarding items not listed on this agenda. Pursuant to the Brown Act, no action will take place on any items not on the agenda. 7.A.SUPPLEMENTAL PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 AGENDA Regular City Council Meeting CITY COUNCIL Wednesday, May 28, 2025 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 7:00 PM The meeting agenda is available on the City’s website. The City Council meeting will be live-streamed on the City’s website. Both the agenda and the live-streamed video can be found here: https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/agenda/index.php Members of the public may submit written comments in real-time by emailing the City Clerk’s office at cityclerk@cityofrh.net. Your comments will become part of the official meeting record. You must provide your full name, but please do not provide any other personal information that you do not want to be published. Recordings to City Council meetings can be found here: https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/agenda/index.php Next Resolution No. 1390 Next Ordinance No. 387 CL_AGN_250528_CC_Item7A.pdf CL_AGN_250528_CC_Item7A_PublicComment01.pdf 1 8.CONSENT CALENDAR Business items, except those formally noticed for public hearing, or those pulled for discussion are assigned to the Consent Calendar. The Mayor or any Councilmember may request that any Consent Calendar item(s) be removed, discussed, and acted upon separately. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be taken up under the "Excluded Consent Calendar" section below. Those items remaining on the Consent Calendar will be approved in one motion. The Mayor will call on anyone wishing to address the City Council on any Consent Calendar item on the agenda, which has not been pulled by Councilmembers for discussion. 8.A.APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 28, 2025 RECOMMENDATION: Approve. 8.B.APPROVE MOTION TO READ BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS LISTED ON THE AGENDA RECOMMENDATION: Approve. 8.C.APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES OF MAY 12, 2025: CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented. 8.D.PAYMENT OF BILLS RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented. 8.E.REPUBLIC SERVICES RECYCLING TONNAGE AND COMPLAINT REPORTS FOR MARCH 2025 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. 9.EXCLUDED CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS 10.COMMISSION ITEMS 11.PUBLIC HEARINGS 11.A.CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE 386 AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE HEIGHT LIMITS OF SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES, STABLES AND BARNS; AND FINDING THE ACTION TO BE STATUTORILY EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION 21080.17 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE R EC O M M EN D AT I O N: Open the public hearing, receive public testimony, close the public hearing, and by motion: Find that the adoption of the proposed ordinance is statutorily exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under Public Resources Code section 21080.17; and introduce for first reading by title only Ordinance No. 386 regarding the height limits of single-family residential homes, stables and CL_AGN_250528_CC_AffidavitofPosting.pdf CL_MIN_250512_CC_F.pdf CL_AGN_250528_CC_PaymentOfBills_E.pdf VC_REP_250520_Apr_TonnageReport.pdf VC_REP_250520_Apr_C&D_Report.pdf VC_REP_250520_Apr_CallLog_Redacted.pdf VC_REP_250520_Apr_RedTagReport.pdf 2 barns. 12.OLD BUSINESS 13.NEW BUSINESS 13.A.CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 387 DESIGNATING FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES WITHIN THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA BASED ON MAPS PROVIDED BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION AND AMENDING TITLE 15 (BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION) OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE, AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE NOT SUBJECT TO CEQA RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented 13.B.CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED EMPLOYEE SALARY SCHEDULE AND JOB CLASSIFICATION MODIFICATIONS RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented. 14.MATTERS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL 15.MATTERS FROM STAFF 15.A.RECEIVE AND FILE A PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS UPDATE RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. 16.RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION Attachment 01 - 386_HeightLimit_Ordinance_D.pdf Attachment 02 - 2025-04_PC_Resolution_ResidentialHeightLimit_F_E.pdf Attachment 03 - PL_SUB_BH_BuildingHeightsReport_Chart.pdf Attachment 04 - PL_SUB_BH_STAFF REPORT OF HEIGHTS.pdf Attachment 05 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Chapter_17.12_Code_Definitions_Basements.pdf Attachment 06 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.18.060_Stable.pdf Attachment 07 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.18.070_Aviaries.pdf Attachment 08 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Chapter17.28_Section17.28.050_GeneralADUandJADURequirements.pdf Attachment 09 - CL_AGN_241015_PC_Item12A_SR.pdf Attachment 10 - CL_AGN_250318_PC_Item12A_SR.pdf Attachment 11 - CL_AGN_250415_PC_Item10C_SR.pdf Attachment 12 - CL_PBN_250528_CC_HeightLimitOrdinance_Affidavit.pdf Attachment A - PS_FHS_250528_MA_LRA_RollingHills.pdf Attachment B - PS_FHS_250528_MA_LRA__LosAngelesCoSW.pdf Attachment C - PS_FHS_250528_MA_LRA_LegislationFactsheet.pdf Attachment D - PS_FHS_250528_MA_Events&LegislativeTimeline.pdf Attachment E - PS_FHS_250528_MA_FHSZ-InsuranceConsumerAlert.pdf Attachment F - PS_FHS_250528_MA_PublicNotice_FireHazardSeverityZones.pdf Attachment G - 387_ FireHazardSeverityZoneMap_Ordinance.pdf Attachment H - PS_FHS_250528_MA_LACoFD_LRA.pdf Attachment 1 - HR_Revised Salary_Survey_Ad Hoc.pdf Attachment 2 - CL_AGN_250512_CC_Item13C_ClassificationCompensation_StaffReport.pdf Attachment A - CL_AGN_250414_CC_PublicSafetyUpdate.pdf 3 16.A.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(D)(1) THE CITY FINDS, BASED ON ADVICE FROM LEGAL COUNSEL, THAT DISCUSSION IN OPEN SESSION WILL PREJUDICE THE POSITION OF THE CITY IN THE LITIGATION. (3 CASES) A. NAME OF CASE: CONNIE ANDERSEN, ET AL. V. CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY, ET AL. (SEAVIEW CASE) CASE NO.: 24STCV20953 B. NAME OF CASE: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS V. SCE CPUC DOCKET NO. C.24-10-008 C. NAME OF CASE: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS V. SOCALGAS CPUC DOCKET NO. C.24-10-009 RECOMMENDATION: None. 16.B.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - INITIATION OF LITIGATION A CLOSED SESSION WILL BE HELD, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(C) AND (D)(4) REGARDING THE DECISION OF WHETHER TO INITIATE LITIGATION (1 CASE)RECOMMENDATION: NONE RECOMMENDATION: None. 16.C.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - INITIATION OF LITIGATION A CLOSED SESSION WILL BE HELD, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(C) AND (D)(4) REGARDING THE DECISION OF WHETHER TO INITIATE LITIGATION (1 CASE)RECOMMENDATION: NONE RECOMMENDATION: None. 17.RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION 18.ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Monday, June 9, 2025 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, Rolling Hills City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California, 90274. Notice: Public Comment is welcome on any item prior to City Council action on the item. Documents pertaining to an agenda item received after the posting of the agenda are available for review in the City Clerk's office or at the meeting at which the item will be considered. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting due to your disability, please contact the City Clerk at (310) 377-1521 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility and accommodation for your review of this agenda and attendance at this meeting. 4 Agenda Item No.: 6.A Mtg. Date: 05/28/2025 TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM:CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK / EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT:FOR BLUE FOLDER DOCUMENTS APPROVED AT THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:May 28, 2025 BACKGROUND: None. DISCUSSION: None. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Approved. ATTACHMENTS: CL_AGN_250528_CC_Item7A.pdf 5 BLUE FOLDER ITEM (SUPPLEMENTAL) Blue folder (supplemental) items are additional back up materials to administrative reports, changes to the posted agenda packet, and/or public comments received after the printing and distribution of the agenda packet for receive and file. CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 28, 2025 7A. SUPPLEMENTAL PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS FROM: CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK/EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER CL_AGN_250528_CC_Item7A_PublicComment01.pdf 6 Agenda Item No.: 7.A Mtg. Date: 05/28/2025 TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM:CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK / EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT:SUPPLEMENTAL PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS DATE:May 28, 2025 BACKGROUND: None. DISCUSSION: None. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. ATTACHMENTS: CL_AGN_250528_CC_Item7A_PublicComment01.pdf 7 Alfred Visco Statement At Rolling Hills 5/28/25 City Council Meeting At the Rolling Hills City Council meeting of December 10, 2024, California Water Service Company (Cal Water) presented information on a wildfire hardening and reliability project on Appaloosa and Upper Blackwater. Included in said presentation was the comment that it would improve fire flow capacity. Cal Water indicated that said project would be completed in April/May 2025. Cal Water also stated that a Geotechnical Report would be prepared and said report would be given to the City. At the same meeting Cal Water advised that the placing of a portion of their water main lines above ground on Cinchring Road and Quail Ridge Road South had been completed. This generated several comments and questions as follows: 1. A tree had fallen near 3 Quail Ridge Road South which appeared to have a lot of water in the roots and there was a question on whether or not this was due to water from Cal Water infrastructure. Cal Water stated that they would look into it. 2. How does Cal Water know if there is a water main break or a water main leak above and below the above ground water mains? Cal Water stated that they have monitors which check for low pressure which would indicated a water main break and monitors which check for vibrations in the evening which would indicate water main leaks. 3. A simple approach to determine if there were leaks in Cal Water infrastructure was presented ie. determine the amount of water going into the water tank located North of Spur Road and determine the amount of water that was being used by the individual parcels. 4. Is Cal Water planning to remove and replace the old existing underground infrastructure on Cinchring Road? A comment was made by a City Council member that it was his understanding that Cal Water was planning to upgrade all its underground infrastructure and would hope that the land movement areas would be placed in the highest priority. Since that meeting a sink hole occurred on Cinchring Road which was repaired. No indication from anyone on what caused it. At the Rolling Hills City Council meeting of January 13, 2025, I stated the following: “The current wildfires have brought another issue which needs to be addressed. Is Cal Water’s infrastructure including but not limited to tanks, reservoirs, fire hydrates and back up energy sources for its pumps sufficient to fight a major wildfire in Rolling Hills. A letter should be addressed to Cal Water, a public hearing should be immediately held, and representatives of Cal Water should be required to attend to address same.” Since that meeting another issue has been raised i.e. the empty reservoir located at the corner of Palos Verdes Drive North and PalosVerdes Drive South (Palos Verdes Reservoir). So far we have heard only happy talk from Cal Water that their system is ready for a wildfire, that the Palos Verdes Reservoir is not needed, and that in any event they do not own it as it is owned by the Metropolitan Water District of Souther California (MWD). It is my understanding that the Palos Verdes Reservoir is owned by MWD, can store approx. 360 8 million gallons and has been out of service since March 2022. Has Cal Water given the Geotechnical Report to the City? Has Cal Water completed the project? Has the City requested information on how much the project has improved fire flow capacity? I strongly urge the City to require Cal Water to supply complete information concerning how they are monitoring their infrastructure for breaks and leaks including complete reports predating the start of the land movement in 2024 which sets forth said break and leak data. Address the tree issue on Quail Ridge Road South. Supply information concerning the recent sink hole on Cinchring Road. Present a detailed time line for replacing their underground infrastructure on Quail Ridge Road South and Cinchring Road. I again urge that a letter be sent to Cal Water demanding that they supply a detailed report on how their system would be able to respond to a major wildfire in Rolling Hills. I also urge a letter be sent to MWD addressing the issue of the Palos Verdes Reservoir and how it could be placed back in service in order to help respond to a major wildfire in Rolling Hills ie. serving as a source of water for aerial applications and/or increasing the amount of water available to Cal Water’s fire hydrates. 9 Agenda Item No.: 8.A Mtg. Date: 05/28/2025 TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM:CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK / EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT:APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 28, 2025 DATE:May 28, 2025 BACKGROUND: None. DISCUSSION: None. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Approve. ATTACHMENTS: CL_AGN_250528_CC_AffidavitofPosting.pdf 10 Administrative Report 8.A., File # 2798 Meeting Date: 5/28/2025 To: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL From: Christian Horvath, City Clerk TITLE APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 28, 2025 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In compliance with the Brown Act, the following materials have been posted at the locations below. Legislative Body City Council Posting Type Regular Meeting Agenda Posting Location 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 City Hall Window City Website: https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/agenda/index.php https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/city_council/city_council_archive_agendas/index.php Meeting Date & Time MAY 28, 2025 7:00pm Open Session As City Clerk of the City of Rolling Hills, I declare under penalty of perjury, the document noted above was posted at the date displayed below. Christian Horvath, City Clerk Date: May 23, 2025 11 Agenda Item No.: 8.B Mtg. Date: 05/28/2025 TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM:CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK / EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT:APPROVE MOTION TO READ BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS LISTED ON THE AGENDA DATE:May 28, 2025 BACKGROUND: None. DISCUSSION: None. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Approve. ATTACHMENTS: 12 Agenda Item No.: 8.C Mtg. Date: 05/28/2025 TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM:CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK / EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT:APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES OF MAY 12 , 2025: CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING DATE:May 28, 2025 BACKGROUND: None. DISCUSSION: None. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented. ATTACHMENTS: CL_MIN_250512_CC_F.pdf 13 MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 12, 2025 Page 1 Minutes Rolling Hills City Council Monday, May 12, 2025 Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER The City Council of the City of Rolling Hills met in person on the above date at 7:00 p.m. Mayor Pieper presiding. 2. ROLL CALL Councilmembers Present: Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper Councilmembers Absent: None Staff Present: Karina Bañales, City Manager Christian Horvath, City Clerk / Executive Assistant to the City Manager Samantha Crew, Management Analyst Robert Samario, Finance Operations Lead Consultant Nicolas Papajohn, City Attorney 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Councilmember Black 4. PRESENTATIONS / PROCLAMATIONS / ANNOUNCEMENTS – NONE 5. APPROVE ORDER OF THE AGENDA Motion by Councilmember Wilson, seconded by Councilmember Black to approve the order of the agenda. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper NOES: None ABSENT: None 6. BLUE FOLDER ITEMS (SUPPLEMENTAL) Motion by Councilmember Black, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer to receive and file Blue Folder Item 15C. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper NOES: None ABSENT: None 7. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS Public Comment: Ju dith Haenel 8. CONSENT CALENDAR 8.A. APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 12, 2025 14 MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 12, 2025 Page 2 8.B. APPROVE MOTION TO READ BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS LISTED ON THE AGENDA 8.C. APPROVE THE FOLLOWING MINUTES OF APRIL 28, 2025: FINANCE/BUDGET/AUDIT COMMITTEE SPECIAL MEETING AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 8.D. PAYMENT OF BILLS 8.E. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 1389, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPOINTING NICOLAS PAPAJOHN AS CITY ATTORNEY; AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ANY DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT THE APPOINTMENT City Clerk / Executive Assistant to the City Manager Horvath noted a change made to Item 8C City Council minutes after agenda publishing that added a report out from Closed Session. Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer, seconded by Councilmember Wilson to approve the Consent Calendar with the amended City Council minutes. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper NOES: None ABSENT: None 9. EXCLUDED CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS – NONE 10. COMMISSION ITEMS – NONE 11. PUBLIC HEARINGS – NONE 12. OLD BUSINESS – NONE 13. NEW BUSINESS 13.A. FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 PROPOSED BUDGET INCLUDING FINANCE, BUDGET, AND AUDIT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS Presentation by Finance Operations Lead Consultant Samario Motion by Councilmember Wilson, seconded by Councilmember Black to receive and file. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper NOES: None ABSENT: None 13.B. SELECTION OF AN AUDIT FIRM FOR THE THREE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2025 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2027 Presentation by Finance Operations Lead Consultant Samario Motion by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember Wilson contin ue contracting with LSL at the current proposed rates as presented. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote: 15 MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 12, 2025 Page 3 AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper NOES: None ABSENT: None 13.C. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED EMPLOYEE SALARY SCHEDULE AND JOB CLASSIFICATION MODIFICATIONS Presentation by City Manager Bañales Finance Operations Lead Consultant Samario Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer, seconded by Councilmember Wilson to table the item until the next meeting with input from the Personnel Committee. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper NOES: None ABSENT: None 13.D. RECEIVE AND FILE AN UPDATE ON POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL LOCATIONS FOR THE OUTDOOR EMERGENCY SIREN SYSTEM AND RELATED COSTS TO IMPROVE AND ENSURE CITYWIDE COVERAGE Presentation by Management Analyst Crew HQE representatives Charles West, Nancho Lopez Public Comment: Melissa McNabb, Judith Haenel Motion by Councilmember Black, seconded by Councilmember Mirsch to receive and file. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper NOES: None ABSENT: None 14. MATTERS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL 14.A. RECEIVE AND FILE A VERBAL UPDATE FROM THE SOLID WASTE & RECYCLING AD HOC COMMITTEE Presentation by City Manager Bañales Councilmembers Mirsch and Wilson Public Comment: Judith Haenel Motion by Councilmember Black, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer to receive and file. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper NOES: None ABSENT: None 15. MATTERS FROM STAFF 16 MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 12, 2025 Page 4 15.A. RECEIVE AND FILE A VERBAL UPDATE ON THE STATUS OF THE CITY HALL CAMPUS BACKUP GENERATOR Presentation by City Clerk / Executive Assistant to the City Manager Horvath Motion by Councilmember Black, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer to receive and file . Motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper NOES: None ABSENT: None 15.B. DECLARE A VACANCY ON THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION AND DIRECT STAFF TO PUBLICLY NOTICE THE OPENING Presentation by City Clerk / Executive Assistant to the City Manager Horvath Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer, seconded by Councilmember Mirsch to declare a vacancy on the Traffic Commission and direct staff to publicly notice. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper NOES: None ABSENT: None 15.C. LETTER FOR RESIDENTS TO PROVIDE TO INSURANCE PROVIDERS REGARDING FIRE RISK AND MITIGATION Presentation by Management Analyst Crew Public Comment: Judith Haenel Motion by Councilmember Mirsch, seconded by Councilmember Wilson to receive and file. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYES: Mirsch, Wilson, Black, Dieringer, Mayor Pieper NOES: None ABSENT: None 16. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION – 9:37 P.M. 16.A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(D)(1) THE CITY FINDS, BASED ON ADVICE FROM LEGAL COUNSEL, THAT DISCUSSION IN OPEN SESSION WILL PREJUDICE THE POSITION OF THE CITY IN THE LITIGATION. (3 CASES) A. NAME OF CASE: CONNIE ANDERSEN, ET AL. V. CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY, ET AL. (SEAVIEW CASE) CASE NO.: 24STCV20953 B. NAME OF CASE: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS V. SCE CPUC DOCKET NO. C.24-10-008 C. NAME OF CASE: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS V. SOCALGAS CPUC DOCKET NO. C.24-10- 009 16.B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - INITIATION OF LITIGATION GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(D)(1) THE CITY FINDS, BASED ON ADVICE FROM LEGAL COUNSEL, THAT 17 MINUTES – CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, May 12, 2025 Page 5 DISCUSSION IN OPEN SESSION WILL PREJUDICE THE POSITION OF THE CITY IN THE LITIGATION. (1 CASE) RECOMMENDATION: NONE 16.C. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - INITIATION OF LITIGATION A CLOSED SESSION WILL BE HELD, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(C) AND (D)(4) REGARDING THE DECISION OF WHETHER TO INITIATE LITIGATION (1 CASE) RECOMMENDATION: NONE Councilmember Black left the dais and meeting at 10:00 p.m. 17. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION – 10:01 P.M. 18. ADJOURNMENT : 10:01 P.M. The meeting was adjourned at 10:01 p.m. on May 12, 2025. The next regular meeting of the City Council is scheduled to be held on Wednesday, May 28, 2025 beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber at City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California. It will also be available via City’s website link at: https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/agenda/index.php All written comments submitted are included in the record and available for public review on the City website. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________________ Christian Horvath, City Clerk Approved, ____________________________________ Jeff Pieper, Mayor 18 Agenda Item No.: 8.D Mtg. Date: 05/28/2025 TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM:CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK / EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT:PAYMENT OF BILLS DATE:May 28, 2025 BACKGROUND: None. DISCUSSION: None. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented. ATTACHMENTS: CL_AGN_250528_CC_PaymentOfBills_E.pdf 19 20 21 Agenda Item No.: 8.E Mtg. Date: 05/28/2025 TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM:CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK / EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT:REPUBLIC SERVICES RECYCLING TONNAGE AND COMPLAINT REPORTS FOR MARCH 2025 DATE:May 28, 2025 BACKGROUND: On July 1, 2020, the City entered into an Amended and Restated Agreement with Republic Services for the collection, transportation, recycling, composting, and disposal of solid waste, including recyclables, green waste, bulky items, and brush. The Agreement is scheduled to expire on June 30, 2029. As part of this partnership, the city regularly receives and reviews Recycling Tonnage and Complaint Reports from Republic Services. These reports serve several important municipal, regulatory, and community functions. DISCUSSION: The key purposes of the Republic Services Recycling Tonnage and Complaint Reports are to provide the City with oversight and transparency over its waste management and recycling services. These reports allow the City to monitor how much waste and recyclable material is being collected and processed as well as identify any recurring service issues or resident complaints. By regularly reviewing these reports, the City can ensure Republic Services is meeting contractual obligations, quickly addressing service deficiencies, and making informed decisions about public education or operational improvements. The reports also support compliance with state/county mandates for recycling and waste diversion while providing data for planning and reporting to regulatory agencies. Report Types: Recycling Tonnage Report: 22 Documents the total weight of recyclable materials collected. This helps the City measure its progress toward recycling and waste diversion goals and comply with state and county mandates. Complaint Report: Logs resident complaints related to waste and recycling services, such as missed pickups or service issues. This enables the City to track service quality and address recurring problems. Red Tags Report: Records instances where a "red tag" is issued at an address, indicating a violation or issue with waste or recycling practices. For example, in June 2024, red tags were issued for issues such as unleashed dogs at specific addresses. While some red tags in the June 2024 report pertain to code violations unrelated to waste (like animal control), the red tag system is also used to notify residents of improper waste disposal or contamination in recycling bins, prompting corrective action. Missed Pick-Up Report: Details incidents where scheduled waste or recycling pickups were missed, including the address, date, and resolution status. Over the course of presenting the reports, City Council has requested that staff provide additional information explaining the report. As requested, Republic Services has provided the following clarifications to their reports: Non-franchise means any business not covered under the City’s Franchise Agreement with Republic Services – for instance, temporary bins or roll-offs for construction or cleanups, or permanent dumpsters for horse properties. The Commercial Recycling is hauled to various transfer facilities. Those facilities separate and recover(recycle) a portion of that material. They provide Republic recovery rates each month, that is in turn used for the cities Republic serves. The Greenwaste on the Non-Franchise report can show up and change for various reasons from month to month. Aspects like changes to the customer service type, load contamination, and data entry errors can contribute to this. Diversion Requirements: Per the current Agreement, Republic Services shall achieve a minimum annual Diversion rate of thirty percent (30%) for Residential Solid Waste Collection Services, or such other amount as may be set in accordance with the provisions of Section 25 of the Agreement or State law. The annual Diversion rate will be calculated as "the tons of materials Collected by Contractor from the provision of Collection Services that are sold, processed, or shipped to a recycler or re-user and net of any residue amounts, as required by this Agreement, divided by the total tons of materials Collected by Contractor in each Calendar Year." For Rolling Hills to meet the State’s 50% recycling requirement, CalRecycle set the maximum allowable pounds (lbs.) of trash per person per year at 16.7 lbs. The city is currently at 9 lbs. per person, which means that the City of Rolling Hills exceeds the state recycling requirement by 23%. This demonstrates that the City can meet state requirements without the existing 23 diversion requirement. CONCLUSION The Republic Services Recycling Tonnage and Complaint Reports are essential tools for the City of Rolling Hills to monitor recycling performance, ensure regulatory compliance, maintain service quality, and promote transparency and continuous improvement in waste management services. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. ATTACHMENTS: VC_REP_250520_Apr_TonnageReport.pdf VC_REP_250520_Apr_C&D_Report.pdf VC_REP_250520_Apr_CallLog_Redacted.pdf VC_REP_250520_Apr_RedTagReport.pdf 24 Year 2025 Diversion RequirementY Month Commodity Tons Collected Tons Recovered Tons Disposed Diversion % 1 Greenwaste 128.08 128.08 - 100.00% Greenwaste - Free Residential Roll Off Bin 1.63 1.63 - 100.00% Trash 189.31 - 189.31 0.00% Trash - Free Residential Roll Off Bin 10.51 - 10.51 0.00% 1 Total 329.53 129.71 199.82 39.36% 2 Greenwaste 102.30 102.30 - 100.00% Greenwaste - Free Residential Roll Off Bin 8.54 8.54 - 100.00% Recycle 4.35 2.02 2.33 46.46% Trash 181.14 - 181.14 0.00% Trash - Free Residential Roll Off Bin 16.57 - 16.57 0.00% 2 Total 312.90 112.86 200.04 36.07% 3 Greenwaste 110.94 110.94 - 100.00% Recycle 14.41 7.66 6.75 53.17% Trash 199.27 - 199.27 0.00% 3 Total 324.62 118.60 206.02 36.54% 4 Greenwaste 81.53 81.53 - 100.00% Recycle 0.28 0.13 0.15 48.11% Trash 201.63 - 201.63 0.00% Trash - Free Residential Roll Off Bin 19.37 - 19.37 0.00% 4 Total 302.81 81.66 221.15 26.97% Grand Total 1,269.86 442.84 827.02 34.87% CITY OF ROLLING HILLS RESIDENTIAL FRANCHISE 2025 Page 1 of 2 25 Year 2025 Diversion RequirementN Month Commodity Tons Collected Tons Recovered Tons Disposed Diversion % 1 C&D 10.85 8.71 2.14 80.24% Greenwaste 14.33 14.33 - 100.00% Recycle 0.20 0.08 0.12 41.79% Trash 56.68 - 56.68 0.00% 1 Total 82.06 23.12 58.94 28.17% 2 C&D 5.26 4.22 1.04 80.24% Recycle 0.19 0.09 0.10 46.46% Trash 21.78 - 21.78 0.00% 2 Total 27.23 4.31 22.92 15.82% 3 C&D 3.67 2.94 0.73 80.24% Greenwaste 9.52 9.52 - 100.00% Recycle 0.33 0.17 0.16 52.66% Trash 58.05 - 58.05 0.00% 3 Total 71.57 12.64 58.93 17.66% 4 C&D 26.23 23.13 3.10 88.20% Recycle 0.21 0.10 0.11 48.11% Trash 18.30 - 18.30 0.00% 4 Total 44.74 23.23 21.51 51.93% Grand Total 225.59 63.30 162.29 28.06% CITY OF ROLLING HILLS NON-FRANCHISE 2025 Page 2 of 2 26 Republic Services City of Rolling Hills C&D Report Reporting Period April-25 Disposal Site Material Loads Taken Tons Collected CWS C&D 2 15.67 Summary Row Labels Sum of Tons Collected C&D 15.67 Grand Total 15.67 Page 1 of 1 27 Republic Services Call Log Report City:Rolling Hills Year 2025 Month/Quarter 4 Summary of Calls by Type Final Call Final Call Type Sub-Type Total 3.Missed Pick Up Missed Trash - Residential 1 Missed Yard Waste - Residential 1 Missed Bulk Service 1 3.Missed Pick Up Total 3 Grand Total 3 Pg 1 of 2 28 Republic Services Call Log Report Final Call Type Sub-Type Case Number Date/Time Opened Date/Time Closed Created By Request Description Resolution Comments Customer Category Account Number Site Account Name Site Address Phone 3.Missed Pick Up Missed Bulk Service 20250430-214493599 4/30/2025 11:11 AM 5/2/2025 10:36 PM Diana Norman (blank)(blank)RESI 9020003163 1 8 CABALLEROS RD ROLLING HILLS CA 3.Missed Pick Up Missed Trash - Residential 20250430-214496027 4/30/2025 11:27 AM 5/2/2025 10:36 PM Maria Ibarra (blank)(blank)RESI 9020003303 1 CURRENT RESIDENT 17 CHUCKWAGON RD ROLLING HILLS CA 3.Missed Pick Up Missed Yard Waste - Residential 20250430-214496594 4/30/2025 11:31 AM 5/2/2025 10:36 PM Maria Ibarra (blank)(blank)RESI 9020003303 1 CURRENT RESIDENT 17 CHUCKWAGON RD ROLLING HILLS CA Pg 2 of 2 29 Rolling Hills Red Tags – April 2025 Date Address Code Issue COMM 4/1/2025 67 Portugese Bend RD 2 PLACEMENT NO 4/10/2025 3 BUCKBOARD LN 7 CONTAMINATED (REC) NO 4/15/2025 68 EASTFIELD DR 7 CONTAMINATED (REC) NO 4/24/2025 11 UPPER BLACKWATER CYN RD 7 CONTAMINATED (REC) NO 4/29/2025 49 EASTFIELD DR 7 CONTAMINATED (REC) NO 30 Agenda Item No.: 11.A Mtg. Date: 05/28/2025 TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT:CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE 386 AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE HEIGHT LIMITS OF SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES, STABLES AND BARNS; AND FINDING THE ACTION TO BE STATUTORILY EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION 21080.17 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE DATE:May 28, 2025 BACKGROUND: Over the past several months, the Planning Commission has been reviewing the City’s regulations related to building height limitations for residential structures, barns, and stables. The intent of this review was to clarify standards and ensure consistency with the City’s rural character and development goals. On October 15, 2024, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a report on the City's regulations related to building height limitations. At that time, the Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) did not specify numeric height limits for these structures. However, the RHMC did state that “a building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another” (Attachment 3). The staff report from this meeting is included as Attachment 9. At its March 18, 2025 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed staff’s report on existing development patterns and relevant RHMC provisions. Following discussion, the Commission directed staff to prepare a code amendment establishing maximum ridge heights of 18 feet for single-family residences and 20 feet for barns and stables. The staff report from this meeting is included as Attachment 10. On April 15, 2025, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved the draft ordinance (Attachment 1) and voted 4-0 (with Commissioner Kirkpatrick absent) to adopt Resolution No. 2025-04 (Attachment 2), recommending that the City Council adopt an ordinance amending Chapter 17.16 of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code to codify these height limits. The staff report from this meeting is included as Attachment 11. 31 This evening, staff is requesting City Council consideration of Ordinance No. 386 (Attachment 1), which proposes clear regulations regarding maximum allowable structure heights. This ordinance is intended to preserve the scenic beauty, natural landscape, and residential character of the community. As the City continues to grow, the proposed height limits would help ensure that new development remains consistent with the community’s established aesthetic values and overall harmony. DISCUSSION: In recent years, there has been a trend toward increased structure heights and overall massing. At both the October 15, 2024 and March 18, 2025 Planning Commission meetings, staff presented relevant sections of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) addressing height regulations. This allowed the Commissioners to consider these provisions and develop a recommendation for City Council review. To further support the Commission’s efforts, staff conducted research on building heights within the City. The data, compiled from approved plans between 2017 and 2024, includes both residences and stables. Heights ranged from 11 to 25 feet, with some newer structures exceeding 25 feet (Attachment 4). Notably, in 2023 and 2024, there has been a trend toward taller stables, many of which fall within the 20 to 25-foot range. The following sections from the RHMC were reviewed and considered as part of this effort: Basements - RHMC Chapter 17.12 – Definitions Basements are located below ground and are often not visible. Homes may include multiple basement levels. Basement walls—except those within light wells—may not exceed 5 feet in height and must maintain an average height of no more than 2.5 feet at any point immediately adjacent to the exterior of the basement (Attachment 5). Stables & Lofts Stables are considered a valuable asset to each property and contribute significantly to the City’s rural, equestrian character. Based on staff research, the RHMC does not establish a specific height limit for stables. Over the past five years, stables have been trending taller. While the average height of buildings in Rolling Hills is approximately 17 feet, the tallest stable recorded was 25 feet. Many stables also include lofts, as defined in RHMC Section 17.18.060. These lofts, which may resemble second stories, must have a plate height that does not exceed 7 feet. They are intended for hay and equipment storage or use as a tack room and may not contain sleeping quarters (Attachment 6). Aviaries (Bird Homes) Aviaries larger than 200 square feet may not have a roof peak height that exceeds 16 feet (Attachment 7). Storage Areas RHMC Section 17.12.190 defines a storage area as "a space within a building or structure, including attics, used for storing items." Storage areas may be located above or below a story but are not intended to be livable spaces. As such, they cannot include exterior doors, window openings, heating, or air conditioning. The height of a storage area may not exceed 6 feet at any point. Attics may have ceilings that follow the angle of the roofline, which can exceed 6 feet at the peak; however, staff reviews plans to ensure that staircases are not shown leading 32 to attic storage areas (Attachment 5). Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) – RHMC Chapter 17.28.050 For detached ADUs on lots with an existing or proposed single-family or multifamily dwelling, the maximum height is limited to 16 feet. This height is measured from the existing legal grade or the level of the lowest floor—whichever is lower—to the structure’s peak. If the ADU is attached to the primary dwelling, it may not exceed 25 feet in height or the height limitation imposed by the underlying zone, whichever is lower (Attachment 8). Based on the information presented, the Planning Commission discussed building heights for residential structures, barns, and stables. At the conclusion of these discussions, the Commissioners agreed that a maximum residential building height of 18 feet was reasonable. For barns and stables, the Commissioners shared the heights of stables on their own properties and used a practical approach to estimate the necessary height to accommodate stall areas and tack room or loft space. This resulted in a consensus that a 20-foot height was appropriate for barns and stables. Below is language that the City Council is considering this evening: Municipal Ordinance No. 386 The amendment to the Rolling Hills Municipal Zoning Code Chapter 17.16, Sections 17.16.060 & 17.16.080 are as follows: Section 17.16.060 (Lot area and dimensions) of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows: Development Standard Zone District RA-S-1 & RA-S-2 4. Height Limited One story, no greater than 18’ (mezzanines and lofts are not permitted) except for stables and barns which shall be no greater than 20’ Section 17.16.080 (Height limitation) of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows: 17.16.080 - Height limitation. A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below. The maximum height permitted from finished floor to the peak of the structure shall be no greater than eighteen (18) feet except that the maximum height permitted for stables and barns shall be no greater than twenty (20) feet measured from the finished floor to the highest peak of the structure, exclusive of accessory architectural features as determined by the City. The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any structure to finished grade is five feet. The difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than two and one-half feet, with maximum difference of five feet. B. Exceptions: 1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by 33 a solid wall. 2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title. 3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story. Notice of Public Hearing This item was publicly noticed in the Daily Breeze on May 1, 2025 (Attachment 11). Public Comment As of the date of this report, no public comments have been received. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Open the public hearing, receive public testimony, close the public hearing, and by motion: Find that the adoption of the proposed ordinance is statutorily exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under Public Resources Code section 21080.17; and introduce for first reading by title only Ordinance No. 386 regarding the height limits of single-family residential homes, stables and barns. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 01 - 386_HeightLimit_Ordinance_D.pdf Attachment 02 - 2025-04_PC_Resolution_ResidentialHeightLimit_F_E.pdf Attachment 03 - PL_SUB_BH_BuildingHeightsReport_Chart.pdf Attachment 04 - PL_SUB_BH_STAFF REPORT OF HEIGHTS.pdf Attachment 05 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Chapter_17.12_Code_Definitions_Basements.pdf Attachment 06 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.18.060_Stable.pdf Attachment 07 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.18.070_Aviaries.pdf Attachment 08 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Chapter17.28_Section17.28.050_GeneralADUandJADURequirements.pdf Attachment 09 - CL_AGN_241015_PC_Item12A_SR.pdf Attachment 10 - CL_AGN_250318_PC_Item12A_SR.pdf Attachment 11 - CL_AGN_250415_PC_Item10C_SR.pdf Attachment 12 - CL_PBN_250528_CC_HeightLimitOrdinance_Affidavit.pdf 34 ORDINANCE NO. 386 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16 OF TITLE 17 OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND THE RESIDENTIAL HEIGHT LIMIT, AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA. WHEREAS, the City of Rolling Hills, California (“City”) is a municipal corporation, duly organized under the California Constitution and laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the City is a semi-rural hillside community, characterized by predominantly single- story California ranch-style homes, large parcels with open space, and an abundance of equestrian facilities; and WHEREAS, one of the unique features of the City is the uniformity of homes throughout the years, which are typically limited to one story in height; and WHEREAS, in recent years, many homes have been constructed to maximize the building area on the lot, including increased height and a greater amount of grading to prepare many of the steeper properties for a structure; and WHEREAS, these trends have significantly altered the community’s character and affect surrounding properties, creating a high level of concern among residents related to development and design compatibility issues; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to preserve and enhance the community’s character, particularly as it relates to residential building height; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted to the City by Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, the City has the police power to regulate the use of land and property within the City in a manner designed to promote public convenience and general prosperity, as well as public health, safety, and welfare; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the Rolling Hills Municipal Code to impose height limits on residential developments in the City; and WHEREAS, on April 15, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Ordinance, wherein it considered the staff report, supporting documents, public testimony, and all appropriate information submitted with the Ordinance; and WHEREAS, on May 28, 2025, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Ordinance, wherein it considered the staff report and supporting documents, Planning Commission’s recommendation, public testimony, and all appropriate information submitted with the Ordinance; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of the Ordinance have occurred. 35 2 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals above are incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council. Section 2. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is determined to be categorically exempt from CEQA under Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, which applies to projects where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed Ordinance does not involve physical changes to the environment but rather regulates the height of residential developments. Since it does not result in any direct or indirect physical changes to the environment, there is no possibility that it could have a significant environmental impact. Section 3. General Plan. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is consistent with the goals and policies of the Rolling Hills General Plan. The proposed Ordinance is consistent with Housing Element Goal 2 “Maintain and enhance the quality of residential neighborhoods in Rolling Hills,” in support of the following policies: Policy 2.1: Encourage and assist in the maintenance and improvement of existing homes to maintain optimum standards of housing quality and design. Policy 2.3: Require compatible design to minimize the impact of residential redevelopment on existing residences. By imposing a height limit on residential development in the City, this Ordinance will ensure future development is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and environment. Section 4. The Development Standard table in Section 17.16.060 of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows: Development Standard Zone District RA-S-1 RA-S-2 4. Height Limitation One story, no greater than 18’ (mezzanines and lofts are not permitted) except for stables and barns which shall be no greater than 20’ Section 5. Section 17.16.080 of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows: 17.16.080 - Height limitation. A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below. 36 3 The maximum height permitted from finished floor to the highest peak of the structure shall be no greater than eighteen (18) feet except that the maximum height permitted for stables and barns shall be no greater than twenty (20) feet measured from the finished floor to the highest peak of the structure, exclusive of accessory architectural features as determined by the City. The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any structure to finished grade is five feet. The difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than two and one-half feet, with maximum difference of five feet. B. Exceptions: 1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall. 2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title. 3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story. Section 6. The City Council’s actions are made upon review of the Planning Commission’s recommendation, the Staff Report, all oral and written comments, and the documentary evidence presented on the Ordinance.. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance takes effect 30 days following its adoption. Section 8. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid, such invalidity has no effect on the other provisions or application of the Ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this extent, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any portion thereof. Section 10. Custodian of Records: The documents and materials associated with this Resolution that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at Rolling Hills City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California 90274. The Director of Planning and Community Services is the custodian of records for the record of proceedings. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS __th DAY OF ________ 2025. JEFF PIEPER, MAYOR 37 4 ATTEST: ____________________________________ CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Building Heights Report RESOLUTION ADDRESS ROOF HEIGHT STRUCTURE TYPE 2023-15 8 Quail Ridge Road N 25' Stable (Plus 7' Cupola) 2024-09 1 Morgan Lane 24' 8" Stable 2023-02 9 Portuguese Bend Road 21' 5" Stable 2024-03 4 Spur Lane 21' Home 2023-06 20 Upper Blackwater Canyon 21' Home 2018-01 20 Upper Blackwater Canyon 20' Stable 2021-05 15 Upper Blackwater Canyon Road 20' Stable 2017-10 5 Pine Tree Lane 20' Home 2024-14 2 Possum Ridge 19' 6" Stable 2024-05 2 Possum Ridge 18' 9" Home 2019-10 1 Poppy Trail Lane 18' 8 1/4" Home 2023-16 11 Flying Mane 18' 1 1/2" Home 2023-13 19 Portuguese Bend Road 18' Home 2023-04 17 Crest Road East 17' 6" Home 2019-13 8 Middleridge Lane south 17' 4" Home 2022-14 2 Flying Mane Road 16' 9 5/8" Home 2021-02 3 Open Brand Road 16' 8" Home 2018-16 26 Middleridge Lane South 16' 2" Home 2018-03 11 Saddleback Road 16' Stable (Plus 5' Cupola) 2023-11 4 Poppy Trail Lane 15' 5" Home Going to PC 2 Quail Ridge Road South 14' 11 1/2" Home 2022-17 21 Chuckwagon Road 14' 11" Pool House 2024-06 23 Crest Road East 14' 6" Home 2017-10 5 Pine Tree Lane 14' Stable (Plus 5' Cupola) 2025-02 1 Pinto Road 13' 7 3/16" Garage 2024-02 29 Crest Road West 13'6" Stable 2024-05 29 Eastfield Drive 13'3" Home 2023-11 4 Poppy Trail Lane 13' 11" ADU 2023-14 7 Pine Tree Lane 13' 2" House 2017-20 16 Pine Tree Lane 12' 11 1/2" House 2021-09 23 Chuckwagon 12' 3" ADU 2019-10 1 Poppy Trail Lane 12' 1/4' Stable 2023-03 74 Portuguese Bend Road 11' Stable Average 17 High 25 Low 11 45 Building Heights Report RESOLUTION ADDRESS ROOF HEIGHT STRUCTURE TYPE 2023-15 8 Quail Ridge Road N 25' Stable (Plus 7' Cupola) 2024-09 1 Morgan Lane 24' 8" Stable 2023-02 9 Portuguese Bend Road 21' 5" Stable 2024-03 4 Spur Lane 21' Home 2023-06 20 Upper Blackwater Canyon 21' Home 2018-01 20 Upper Blackwater Canyon 20' Stable 2021-05 15 Upper Blackwater Canyon Road 20' Stable 2017-10 5 Pine Tree Lane 20' Home 2024-14 2 Possum Ridge 19' 6" Stable 2024-05 2 Possum Ridge 18' 9" Home 2019-10 1 Poppy Trail Lane 18' 8 1/4" Home 2023-16 11 Flying Mane 18' 1 1/2" Home 2023-13 19 Portuguese Bend Road 18' Home 2023-04 17 Crest Road East 17' 6" Home 2019-13 8 Middleridge Lane south 17' 4" Home 2022-14 2 Flying Mane Road 16' 9 5/8" Home 2021-02 3 Open Brand Road 16' 8" Home 2018-16 26 Middleridge Lane South 16' 2" Home 2018-03 11 Saddleback Road 16' Stable (Plus 5' Cupola) 2023-11 4 Poppy Trail Lane 15' 5" Home Going to PC 2 Quail Ridge Road South 14' 11 1/2" Home 2022-17 21 Chuckwagon Road 14' 11" Pool House 2024-06 23 Crest Road East 14' 6" Home 2017-10 5 Pine Tree Lane 14' Stable (Plus 5' Cupola) 2025-02 1 Pinto Road 13' 7 3/16" Garage 2024-02 29 Crest Road West 13'6" Stable 2024-05 29 Eastfield Drive 13'3" Home 2023-11 4 Poppy Trail Lane 13' 11" ADU 2023-14 7 Pine Tree Lane 13' 2" House 2017-20 16 Pine Tree Lane 12' 11 1/2" House 2021-09 23 Chuckwagon 12' 3" ADU 2019-10 1 Poppy Trail Lane 12' 1/4' Stable 2023-03 74 Portuguese Bend Road 11' Stable Average 17 High 25 Low 11 City of Rolling Hills Building Heights Report 46           Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]  (Supp. No. 28)    Page 1 of 2  DEFINITIONS  17.12.020 "B" words, terms and phrases.  Barn. See "stable."   "Basement" means any floor level below the first story of the primary residence, except  that a floor level in a building having only one floor level shall be classified as a basement unless  such floor level qualifies as a first story as defined herein. Except for walls within light wells,  basement walls across any elevation may not exceed a height of five feet above finished grade  at any point immediately adjacent to the basement exterior, and shall have no greater than an  average of two and one‐half feet exterior height. Basements shall comply with the Los Angeles  County Building Code requirements. Basement well(s) shall be incorporated into the overall  design of the building so that it does not give an appearance of a separate story.   "Building" means any structure having a roof supported by columns or walls and intended  for the shelter, housing or enclosure of any individual, animal, process, equipment, goods or  materials of any kind or nature.  17.12.030 ‐ "C" words, terms and phrases.  Cellar. See "basement."    17.12.120 "L" words, terms and phrases.  "Loft" means an area above a stable utilized for storage of feed and hay, saddles, bridles,  other horse equipment and similar equestrian or agricultural related items, or tack room uses,  but excludes sleeping quarters.     17.12.160 ‐ "P" words, terms and phrases.  "Plate height" means the height of a building measured from the finished floor level to the  top of the wall.    17.12.190 "S" words, terms and phrases.  "Stable" means the same as "barn" and is a building or a portion of a building designed and  constructed to shelter permitted domestic animals and store farm implements, hay, grain,  equestrian and horticultural related items and equipment. Stable may include agricultural  space, loft and tack room space. Stable shall not be a place for human habitation, except for  uses specifically permitted in the tack room; it may not be rented out or be used for human  sleeping or commercial purposes.  47           Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]  (Supp. No. 28)    Page 2 of 2  "Storage area" means space within a building or structure, including attics, used for storing  of items. It includes spaces located below or above a story and may not exceed six feet in height  at any one point. Attics may have a ceiling that follows the shape and the angle of the roofline,  which could be more than six feet high at the peak of the ceiling. Attics and storage areas shall  not have doors to the exterior, window openings, heating or air conditioning.   "Storage room, free standing," shall mean an accessory structure used exclusively for  storage of household, equestrian, garden and similar items.  "Story" means that portion of a building included between the upper surface of any floor  and the ceiling or roof above it. There shall be no story on top of another, except as permitted  in Section 17.16.080(B) of this title.  "Structure" means a combination of materials assembled in a form for use, occupancy or  ornamentation whether installed on, above or below the surface of land or water and requiring  a fixed location or attached to something having a fixed location. Structure shall also include,  but not be limited to, fences, retaining walls, covered porches, entryways, porte cochere,  latticework, trellises, pilasters, fountains, pools, spas, pool/spa equipment, gazebos, garden  walls, decks, and subterranean structures other than basements.  48 Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST] (Supp. No. 29, Update 1) Page 1 of 3 17.18.060 Requirements for stables requiring conditional use permit. All stables over two hundred square feet shall meet the following requirements: A. General requirements and uses: 1. The building occupied by a stable shall be designed for rural and agricultural purpose only. 2. Stable structure shall not be permitted in the front yard, and shall be located no less than twenty-five feet from side property line in the RAS-1 zone, no less than thirty-five feet from side property line in the RAS-2 zone and no less than twenty-five feet from side roadway easement line and from the rear property line. 3. Minimum of sixty percent of the entire structure shall be maintained for agricultural space as defined in Chapter 17.12 of this title, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5). 4. Maximum of forty percent, but not to exceed eight hundred square feet, of the entire structure may be maintained as tack room space as defined in Chapter 17.12 of this title, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5). Tack room may be detached from the main stable structure. 5. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, an existing stable, legally constructed prior to the effective date of the ordinance from which this chapter derives (August 12, 2010), which has a loft area that is maintained as a tack room and the loft area comprises more than forty percent of the size of the first floor may continue to be maintained provided that the area of the loft used as a tack room does not exceed eight hundred square feet, that no other tack room exists on the property and the remaining of the structure and its uses are in compliance with the remaining sections of this chapter. 6. When calculating the size of the stable, the entire footprint including the loft area shall be included, as measured from the exterior of the walls. 7. If there is more than one stable building on a lot, the tack room space shall be calculated as a percentage of the entire square footage of the structures and such tack room space may only be located in one of the structures; notwithstanding the above, it may not exceed eight hundred square feet. 8. Covered porch shall not be included in the size of the stable for the purpose of calculating the agricultural and tack room space of the stable. 9. Stables shall not be used as sleeping quarters for humans. 10. Stables shall be used for the exclusive purpose of keeping permitted domestic animals and related storage and uses, unless otherwise permitted by this chapter. Commercial uses shall not be permitted. B. Exterior appearance of stables and areas immediately adjacent thereto: 1. Whether or not the stable is used for keeping permitted domestic animals, the exterior of the stable structure shall continue to appear as a stable. 2. Areas adjacent to the agricultural space entrance/exit of a stable may have a porous, roughened surface but may not be paved. It shall remain such or may be covered with grass or other low growing ground cover during the time when the agricultural space is not used for keeping of horses or other animals. 3. A porous surface (not paved) may be provided by the access to the tack room space of the stable. 49 Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST] (Supp. No. 29, Update 1) Page 2 of 3 4. The surface area of a corral, pen, paddock, turnout or riding ring shall be covered with dirt or sand surface. It shall remain such or be planted with grass or other low growing ground cover during the time when the stable structure is not used for keeping of horses or other animals. C. Tack Room Space. 1. Tack room shall only be used for activities that impact the senses in a manner similar or less than that of traditional stable activities. Furthermore, all activities that are loud, raucous, annoying, or that produce unusual noises, lighting or other impacts that offend the peace and quiet of persons of ordinary sensibilities and interferes with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property of any neighboring property are prohibited. Such permitted activities shall be deemed to be "passive activities" for the purpose of this chapter. 2. Tack room shall not be used as sleeping quarters for humans. 3. Tack room shall not exceed forty percent of the size of the stable, including the size of the loft, if any, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5) and may not exceed eight hundred square feet. 4. Tack room may contain furniture, excluding beds. 5. Tack room may have finished floors, walls and ceiling. 6. Tack room may have glazed (glass) window openings. 7. Tack room may have standard size doors. 8. Tack room may have amenities such as air conditioning, heating, electrical and phone outlets. 9. Tack room may have a kitchenette and sanitary facility, including shower, sink and toilet. 10. Building and Safety Department review and building permits shall be required for all modifications. 11. All modifications and retrofitting of the tack room space shall be made in such a manner so that it could be convertible to a tack room, at such time as the structure is to be used for keeping of animals. 12. Tack room may be detached from the main stable structure, however it shall meet all the requirements for a tack room as specified in this section. D. Agricultural Space Within the Stable. 1. Agricultural space shall be no less than sixty percent of the size of the stable including the size of the loft, if any, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5). Agricultural space may contain, but not be limited to stalls, wash racks, feed room, hay storage room, grooming area, tools and utilities storage area and other equestrian and agricultural spaces. The agricultural space may be used for storage of vehicles and general household items, but shall have a stable like appearance. 2. Entry doorways to the stalls shall be a minimum of four feet wide and seven and one-half feet high. 3. The exterior doors shall provide the appearance of a stable door. 4. Roll up or overhead doors are prohibited. 5. Ventilation and drainage facilities shall be subject to building code requirements. 6. Safety electrical outlets with covers may be installed, however they shall be located out of horses' reach when the space is used for keeping of horses. 50 Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST] (Supp. No. 29, Update 1) Page 3 of 3 7. Glazed (glass) window openings may be permitted during a time when the stable is not used for keeping of animals, but shall be removable for easy conversion to animal keeping uses. E. Loft Space within a Stable. 1. Loft may be permitted above a stable structure. 2. Loft may be used and counted as part of the agricultural space or as a tack room space, provided it meets the agricultural or tack room space requirements of Section 17.18.060(C) and (D)). 3. Loft may not be used as a tack room, if another tack room exists within the stable structure or elsewhere on the property. 4. Glazed (glass) window openings shall not be allowed in a loft if a loft is used for storage of hay, feed or other agricultural use. Notwithstanding the above, if the loft is used as other storage or working area or as a tack room, then removable glazed openings may be allowed. 5. The plate height for the wall of the loft shall be no greater than seven feet. 6. If a loft is constructed in such a way that access is provided from the exterior, the area immediately adjacent to the exterior of the loft shall not be paved, but may have a porous surface. 7. The area immediately adjacent to the exterior of the loft shall not be used for parking of vehicles, except for vehicles delivering agricultural goods and equipment. (Ord. No. 319, § 22(Exh. A, Pt. A), 7-15-2010; Ord. No. 324, § 9 (Exh. A, Pts. H, I, K), 8-8-2011; Ord. No. 332, §§ 8C, D, 1-14-2013) 51 Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST] (Supp. No. 29, Update 1) Page 1 of 1 17.18.070 Requirements for aviaries requiring conditional use permit. All aviaries over two hundred square feet shall meet the following requirements: 1. Shall not be located on lots of less than 3.5 acres, as measured by excluding roadway easements. 2. The roof shall not exceed a peak height of sixteen feet. 3. Shall not be located on a portion of the lot where the slope is greater than 4:1. 4. Shall not be permitted in the front yard or in the rear yard setback, shall be located no less than twenty-five feet from side property line in the RAS-1 zone, no less than thirty-five feet from the side property line in the RAS-2 zone and no less than twenty-five feet from side roadway easement line. 5. Shall be located a minimum of thirty-five feet from any residential structure including attached garage or a guest house, located on the same lot, and a minimum of one hundred feet from a residential structure, including attached garage or a guest house located on adjoining lots. 6. Shall be used for the exclusive purpose of keeping permitted birds and small animals indigenous to the State of California. Commercial uses shall not be permitted. 7. Shall be counted towards structural, total, building pad coverage or disturbed area of the net lot for purposes of Chapter 17.16. 8. May be permitted in addition to the construction of a stable and shall not be counted towards the size of the stable for purposes of this chapter. (Ord. No. 319, § 22(Exh. A, Pt. A), 7-15-2010; Ord. No. 343, § 8, 6-22-2015) 52 Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:24 [EST] (Supp. No. 29, Update 1) Page 1 of 1 17.28.050 General ADU and JADU requirements. B. Height. 1. Except as otherwise provided by subsections (B)(2) and (B)(3) below, a detached ADU created on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit may not exceed sixteen feet in height. 2. A detached ADU may be up to eighteen feet in height if it is created on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit that is located within one-half mile walking distance of a major transit stop or high quality transit corridor, as those terms are defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, and the ADU may be up to two additional feet in height (for a maximum of twenty feet) if necessary to accommodate a roof pitch on the ADU that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit. 3. A detached ADU created on a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily dwelling that has more than one story above grade may not exceed eighteen feet in height. 4. An ADU that is attached to the primary dwelling may not exceed twenty-five feet in height or the height limitation imposed by the underlying zone that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower. Notwithstanding the foregoing, ADUs subject to this subsection (B)(4) may not exceed two stories. 5. For purposes of this subsection (B), height is measured from existing legal grade or the level of the lowest floor, whichever is lower, to the peak of the structure. 53 Agenda Item No.: 12.A Mtg. Date: 10/15/2024 TO:HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM:JOHN F. SIGNO, AICP, THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT:DISCUSSION ON BUILDING HEIGHT DATE:October 15, 2024 BACKGROUND: Recently, there has been discussion about the City's height limitation allowed. Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) Section 17.16.080 limits a building or structure to no more than one story. The only exceptions are for basements, stables, and storage areas (Attachments 1 and 2). DISCUSSION: Basements Basements are located below ground and often not seen. Homes are allowed to have multiple basement levels. A portion of the basement may daylight provided it does not exceed a height of 5 feet nor an average height of 2-1/2 feet at any point immediately adjacent to the basement exterior. Lofts Many stables in the City have lofts as defined in RHMC Section 17.12.120 (Attachment 2). These lofts often appear to be second stories and can reach a height of 25 feet (Attachment 3). Lofts for a stable are meant to store hay and horse equipment but may also be used as a tack room provided there are no sleeping quarters. Lofts may also be found in some residences and may be legal if they were built prior to the City's incorporation in 1957. Additionally, residences in the Overlay Zoning District (OZD-1) have steeper pitched roofs to meet architectural standards for a colonial building, which is a standard imposed by the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA). Lofts are not allowed in the OZD-1 district, but many have attic spaces converted to a loft or second story because of the high ceiling heights. Storage Areas RHMC Section 17.12.190 defines a storage area as a "space within a building or structure, including attics, used for storing items." A storage area is allowed to be located above or 1 54 below a story, but is not meant to be livable and cannot have doors to the exterior, window openings, heating or air conditioning. A storage area may not exceed six feet in height at any one point. Attics may have a ceiling that follows the shape and the angle of the roofline, which could be more than six feet high at the peak of the ceiling. Staff reviews plans to make sure staircases are not shown leading to a storage area in the attic. Conclusion The Planning Commission should discuss if the height requirement in the Code is adequate. If not, the Commission can make recommendations to improve or amend the height requirement to be considered at a later date. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Discuss and provide direction. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.16.080_Height_limitation..pdf Attachment 2: PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Chapter_17.12_Code_Definitions.pdf Attachment 3: PL_SUB_STA_Stable_Comparison.pdf 2 55           Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:26 [EST]  (Supp. No. 28)    Page 1 of 1  17.16.080 Height limitation.  A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no  story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below.   The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any structure to finished grade is five feet. The  difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than  two and one‐half feet, with maximum difference of five feet.   B. Exceptions:   1. A one‐story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary  residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall.   2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title.   3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story.   (Ord. 312 § 2, 2008: Ord. 295 § 7 (Exh. B (part)), 2004; Ord. 269 § 8, 1997; Ord. 239 § 11(part), 1993).  (Ord. No. 319, §§ 22(Exh. A, Pt. C), 7‐15‐2010; Ord. No. 327, § 6(Exh. A, Pt. 7), 6‐11‐2012)    56           Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]  (Supp. No. 28)    Page 1 of 2  DEFINITIONS  17.12.020 "B" words, terms and phrases.  Barn. See "stable."   "Basement" means any floor level below the first story of the primary residence, except  that a floor level in a building having only one floor level shall be classified as a basement unless  such floor level qualifies as a first story as defined herein. Except for walls within light wells,  basement walls across any elevation may not exceed a height of five feet above finished grade  at any point immediately adjacent to the basement exterior, and shall have no greater than an  average of two and one‐half feet exterior height. Basements shall comply with the Los Angeles  County Building Code requirements. Basement well(s) shall be incorporated into the overall  design of the building so that it does not give an appearance of a separate story.   "Building" means any structure having a roof supported by columns or walls and intended  for the shelter, housing or enclosure of any individual, animal, process, equipment, goods or  materials of any kind or nature.  17.12.030 ‐ "C" words, terms and phrases.  Cellar. See "basement."    17.12.120 "L" words, terms and phrases.  "Loft" means an area above a stable utilized for storage of feed and hay, saddles, bridles,  other horse equipment and similar equestrian or agricultural related items, or tack room uses,  but excludes sleeping quarters.     17.12.160 ‐ "P" words, terms and phrases.  "Plate height" means the height of a building measured from the finished floor level to the  top of the wall.    17.12.190 "S" words, terms and phrases.  "Stable" means the same as "barn" and is a building or a portion of a building designed and  constructed to shelter permitted domestic animals and store farm implements, hay, grain,  equestrian and horticultural related items and equipment. Stable may include agricultural  space, loft and tack room space. Stable shall not be a place for human habitation, except for  uses specifically permitted in the tack room; it may not be rented out or be used for human  sleeping or commercial purposes.  57           Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]  (Supp. No. 28)    Page 2 of 2  "Storage area" means space within a building or structure, including attics, used for storing  of items. It includes spaces located below or above a story and may not exceed six feet in height  at any one point. Attics may have a ceiling that follows the shape and the angle of the roofline,  which could be more than six feet high at the peak of the ceiling. Attics and storage areas shall  not have doors to the exterior, window openings, heating or air conditioning.   "Storage room, free standing," shall mean an accessory structure used exclusively for  storage of household, equestrian, garden and similar items.  "Story" means that portion of a building included between the upper surface of any floor  and the ceiling or roof above it. There shall be no story on top of another, except as permitted  in Section 17.16.080(B) of this title.  "Structure" means a combination of materials assembled in a form for use, occupancy or  ornamentation whether installed on, above or below the surface of land or water and requiring  a fixed location or attached to something having a fixed location. Structure shall also include,  but not be limited to, fences, retaining walls, covered porches, entryways, porte cochere,  latticework, trellises, pilasters, fountains, pools, spas, pool/spa equipment, gazebos, garden  walls, decks, and subterranean structures other than basements.  58 STABLE COMPARISON  Address Size (SF) Height  (Ft.)  Yr.  Approved  Notes  9 PBR 1,334 21.4 2023   74 PBR 960 11 2023   8 Middleridge Ln S 750 13 2022   29 Crest Rd W 900 13.5 2022 Originally approved for 934 SF  8 Quail Ridge Rd N 2,780 25 2021 Plus 7' cupola = 32'  8 Upper Blackwater Cyn Rd 1,875 12 2021 Approx. height  15 Upper Blackwater Cyn Rd. 935 20.8 2021   13 PBR 3,360 24 2019   1 Poppy Trail 452 12.25 2019   20 Upper Blackwater Cyn Rd. 3,575 20 2018   11 Upper Blackwater Cyn Rd. 744 20 2017   7 Middleridge Lane S. 1,361 18.4 2017   6 Meadowlark Ln. 779 20 2017   11 Saddleback 2,340 19.5 2017 To top of cupola  5 Pine Tree Ln. 1,200 14 2017 Plus cupola = ~19'  10 Crest Rd. W 1,188 19.3 2016   77 Crest Rd. E 3,691 18.4 2016   9 Chuckwagon Rd. 2,088 21 2014   3 Meadowlark Ln. 840 19.6 2013   29 Middleridge Ln. S 2,960 23.4 2011   14 Portuguese Bend Rd. 918 18.5 2005 1st floor only  6 Possum Ridge Rd. 1,680 21.5 2003 1st floor only  23 Crest Rd. E 1,225 18.75  Proposed; not built  6 Saddleback Rd. 650 17    2 Meadowlark Ln. 239 18  1st floor only  11 Saddleback Road 2,414 16 2018   2 Possum Ridge  1,890  1994   29 Middleridge Ln. S 3,200 23.6 1996   4 Stormhill Lane 2,064 12.5    1 Pine Tree Lane 2,976 14.5 2015   1 Morgan Lane 4,038 24.9  1st Flr. 2,377 SF; 2nd Flr. 1,721 SF   59 Agenda Item No.: 12.A Mtg. Date: 03/18/2025 TO:HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT:RECEIVE AND FILE INFORMATION ON POTENTIAL DISCUSSION REGARDING BUILDING HEIGHTS DATE:March 18, 2025 BACKGROUND: On October 15, 2024, Planning Commission Chair Chelf requested that former Director of Planning and Community Services, John Signo, present a report on the City’s building height limitations. During the meeting, the Commission directed Director Signo to conduct further research and to facilitate discussion on the matter. The Commission subsequently recommended moving forward with the issue and scheduling it for further consideration. This evening, Staff is seeking recommendations from the Planning Commission regarding height limits for structures, which will be presented to the City Council for consideration. Staff will need to provide public notice in advance of the Council’s review, which will require both a first and second hearing before any changes can be enacted. DISCUSSION: Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) Section 17.16.080 limits a building or structure to no more than one story. The only exceptions are for basements, stables, and storage areas (Attachment 1). This evening, staff will provide an overview of existing height regulations for various structures, including single-story limits and exceptions for basements, stables, storage areas, accessory dwelling units (ADUs), and aviaries. Additionally, the report highlights regulations the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA) set, which further restrict plate heights and roof pitches through architectural review and deed restrictions. The Planning Commission is being asked to review these existing regulations and provide 1 60 direction on potential modifications to height limits for structures within the City. Any recommended changes will require public notice and City Council approval through a two- hearing process before they can be enacted. Basements Basements are located below ground and often not seen. Homes are permitted to have multiple basement levels. Basement walls, except for walls within light wells, may not exceed a height of 5 feet nor an average height of 2-1/2 feet at any point immediately adjacent to the basement exterior (Attachment 2). Stables & Lofts Stables are seen as a valuable asset to each property and a valuable component of the City’s rural, equestrian character. After research, RHMC has not established a limit for stable height, and in the past five years, the stables are trending larger than in the past. The average height of buildings in Rolling Hills is 17 feet high, with the highest stable being 25 feet (32 feet including a 7-foot cupola). (Attachment 3) However, many stables in the City have lofts as defined in RHMC Section 17.18.060. These lofts often appear to be second stories, and the plate height for the wall of the loft may not exceed 7 feet. Lofts for a stable are meant to store hay and horse equipment but may also be used as a tack room, provided there are no sleeping quarters (Attachment 4). Aviaries (Bird Homes) Aviaries over two hundred square feet may not have a roof peak height that exceeds 16 feet (Attachment 5). Storage Areas RHMC Section 17.12.190 defines a storage area as "a space within a building or structure, including attics, used for storing items." A storage area is allowed to be located above or below a story but is not meant to be a livable space and cannot have doors to the exterior, window openings, heating, or air conditioning. A storage area may not exceed 6 feet in height at any one point. Attics may have a ceiling that follows the shape and the angle of the roofline, which could be more than 6 feet high at the peak of the ceiling. Staff review plans to ensure staircases are not shown leading to a storage area in the attic (Attachment 2). ADU Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) Chapter 17.28.050 limits detached ADUs created on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multifamily dwelling unit that may not exceed 16 feet in height. The height is measured from the existing legal grade or the level of the lowest floor (whichever is lower) to the peak of the structure. An ADU that is attached to the primary dwelling may not exceed 25 feet in height or the height limitation imposed by the underlying zone that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower (Attachment 6). The Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA) has building regulations that have 2 61 restrictions on plate heights and roof pitches. The RHCA Architectural Committee reviews each home on a case-by-case basis to ensure the massing of the overall residence is good of its kind. Some property Deed Restrictions/CC&Rs have a maximum height limit of 25’ (Attachment 7). RHCA- Plate Height The standard plate height for structures in the RHCA Building Regulations is 8’6”, measured from the finished floor level to the top of the wall. If a porch is present, the plate height is measured from the finish floor to the top of the beam at the porch. Residences may have taller plate heights, but the heights must meet the following restrictions: a minimum of 50% of the residence must have a plate height of 8’6” or lower, up to 30% of the residence may have a 9’6” plate height and up to 20% of the residence may have a maximum of 10’6” plate height. The plate height limitations were adopted in 2012. RHCA- Roof Pitches The standard roof pitch for all structures in 4:12. The Building Regulations allow a minimum pitch of 3:12 for contemporary designs with hip roofs and a maximum 4½:12 pitch traditional designs. The roof pitch is also considered on a case-by-case basis. CONCLUSION: Staff is seeking the Planning Commission’s recommendations on whether the current height limitations in the RHMC effectively preserve the City’s rural, equestrian character while allowing for reasonable development. The discussion should evaluate whether these regulations strike the right balance between community aesthetics and the functional needs of structures such as stables, storage areas, and accessory dwelling units (ADUs). Additionally, the Commission may wish to address the increasing size of stables, the limitations on lofts and storage areas, and the prescribed height allowances for basements and ADUs that align with the City's long-term vision. If the Commission finds that the current height regulations are insufficient, it may provide direction on potential amendments or improvements. This could include adjusting height limits for specific structures, refining definitions to prevent unintended interpretations, or establishing clearer guidelines for review and enforcement. Any recommended changes will require further public input and City Council approval. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Discuss and provide direction staff to make height limit. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.16.080_Height_limitation.pdf Attachment 2: PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Chapter_17.12_Code_Definitions.pdf Attachment 3: PL_SUB_BH_BuildingHeightsReport_Chart.pdf Attachment 4: PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.18.060_Stable.pdf 3 62 Attachment 5: PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.18.070_Aviaries.pdf Attachment 6: PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Chapter17.28_Section17.28.050_GeneralADUandJADURequirements.pdf Attachment 7: PL_SUB_BH_RHCA_CC&Rs_Building.Heights.pdf 4 63 Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST] (Supp. No. 29, Update 1) Page 1 of 1 17.16.080 Height limitation. A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below. The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any structure to finished grade is five feet. The difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than two and one-half feet, with maximum difference of five feet. B. Exceptions: 1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall. 2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title. 3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story. (Ord. 312 § 2, 2008: Ord. 295 § 7 (Exh. B (part)), 2004; Ord. 269 § 8, 1997; Ord. 239 § 11(part), 1993). (Ord. No. 319, §§ 22(Exh. A, Pt. C), 7-15-2010; Ord. No. 327, § 6(Exh. A, Pt. 7), 6-11-2012) 64           Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]  (Supp. No. 28)    Page 1 of 2  DEFINITIONS  17.12.020 "B" words, terms and phrases.  Barn. See "stable."   "Basement" means any floor level below the first story of the primary residence, except  that a floor level in a building having only one floor level shall be classified as a basement unless  such floor level qualifies as a first story as defined herein. Except for walls within light wells,  basement walls across any elevation may not exceed a height of five feet above finished grade  at any point immediately adjacent to the basement exterior, and shall have no greater than an  average of two and one‐half feet exterior height. Basements shall comply with the Los Angeles  County Building Code requirements. Basement well(s) shall be incorporated into the overall  design of the building so that it does not give an appearance of a separate story.   "Building" means any structure having a roof supported by columns or walls and intended  for the shelter, housing or enclosure of any individual, animal, process, equipment, goods or  materials of any kind or nature.  17.12.030 ‐ "C" words, terms and phrases.  Cellar. See "basement."    17.12.120 "L" words, terms and phrases.  "Loft" means an area above a stable utilized for storage of feed and hay, saddles, bridles,  other horse equipment and similar equestrian or agricultural related items, or tack room uses,  but excludes sleeping quarters.     17.12.160 ‐ "P" words, terms and phrases.  "Plate height" means the height of a building measured from the finished floor level to the  top of the wall.    17.12.190 "S" words, terms and phrases.  "Stable" means the same as "barn" and is a building or a portion of a building designed and  constructed to shelter permitted domestic animals and store farm implements, hay, grain,  equestrian and horticultural related items and equipment. Stable may include agricultural  space, loft and tack room space. Stable shall not be a place for human habitation, except for  uses specifically permitted in the tack room; it may not be rented out or be used for human  sleeping or commercial purposes.  65           Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]  (Supp. No. 28)    Page 2 of 2  "Storage area" means space within a building or structure, including attics, used for storing  of items. It includes spaces located below or above a story and may not exceed six feet in height  at any one point. Attics may have a ceiling that follows the shape and the angle of the roofline,  which could be more than six feet high at the peak of the ceiling. Attics and storage areas shall  not have doors to the exterior, window openings, heating or air conditioning.   "Storage room, free standing," shall mean an accessory structure used exclusively for  storage of household, equestrian, garden and similar items.  "Story" means that portion of a building included between the upper surface of any floor  and the ceiling or roof above it. There shall be no story on top of another, except as permitted  in Section 17.16.080(B) of this title.  "Structure" means a combination of materials assembled in a form for use, occupancy or  ornamentation whether installed on, above or below the surface of land or water and requiring  a fixed location or attached to something having a fixed location. Structure shall also include,  but not be limited to, fences, retaining walls, covered porches, entryways, porte cochere,  latticework, trellises, pilasters, fountains, pools, spas, pool/spa equipment, gazebos, garden  walls, decks, and subterranean structures other than basements.  66 Building Heights Report RESOLUTION ADDRESS ROOF HEIGHT STRUCTURE TYPE 2023-15 8 Quail Ridge Road N 25' Stable (Plus 7' Cupola) 2024-09 1 Morgan Lane 24' 8" Stable 2023-02 9 Portuguese Bend Road 21' 5" Stable 2024-03 4 Spur Lane 21' Home 2023-06 20 Upper Blackwater Canyon 21' Home 2018-01 20 Upper Blackwater Canyon 20' Stable 2021-05 15 Upper Blackwater Canyon Road 20' Stable 2017-10 5 Pine Tree Lane 20' Home 2024-14 2 Possum Ridge 19' 6" Stable 2024-05 2 Possum Ridge 18' 9" Home 2019-10 1 Poppy Trail Lane 18' 8 1/4" Home 2023-16 11 Flying Mane 18' 1 1/2" Home 2023-13 19 Portuguese Bend Road 18' Home 2023-04 17 Crest Road East 17' 6" Home 2019-13 8 Middleridge Lane south 17' 4" Home 2022-14 2 Flying Mane Road 16' 9 5/8" Home 2021-02 3 Open Brand Road 16' 8" Home 2018-16 26 Middleridge Lane South 16' 2" Home 2018-03 11 Saddleback Road 16' Stable (Plus 5' Cupola) 2023-11 4 Poppy Trail Lane 15' 5" Home Going to PC 2 Quail Ridge Road South 14' 11 1/2" Home 2022-17 21 Chuckwagon Road 14' 11" Pool House 2024-06 23 Crest Road East 14' 6" Home 2017-10 5 Pine Tree Lane 14' Stable (Plus 5' Cupola) 2025-02 1 Pinto Road 13' 7 3/16" Garage 2024-02 29 Crest Road West 13'6" Stable 2024-05 29 Eastfield Drive 13'3" Home 2023-11 4 Poppy Trail Lane 13' 11" ADU 2023-14 7 Pine Tree Lane 13' 2" House 2017-20 16 Pine Tree Lane 12' 11 1/2" House 2021-09 23 Chuckwagon 12' 3" ADU 2019-10 1 Poppy Trail Lane 12' 1/4' Stable 2023-03 74 Portuguese Bend Road 11' Stable Average 17 High 25 Low 11 67 Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST] (Supp. No. 29, Update 1) Page 1 of 3 17.18.060 Requirements for stables requiring conditional use permit. All stables over two hundred square feet shall meet the following requirements: A. General requirements and uses: 1. The building occupied by a stable shall be designed for rural and agricultural purpose only. 2. Stable structure shall not be permitted in the front yard, and shall be located no less than twenty-five feet from side property line in the RAS-1 zone, no less than thirty-five feet from side property line in the RAS-2 zone and no less than twenty-five feet from side roadway easement line and from the rear property line. 3. Minimum of sixty percent of the entire structure shall be maintained for agricultural space as defined in Chapter 17.12 of this title, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5). 4. Maximum of forty percent, but not to exceed eight hundred square feet, of the entire structure may be maintained as tack room space as defined in Chapter 17.12 of this title, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5). Tack room may be detached from the main stable structure. 5. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, an existing stable, legally constructed prior to the effective date of the ordinance from which this chapter derives (August 12, 2010), which has a loft area that is maintained as a tack room and the loft area comprises more than forty percent of the size of the first floor may continue to be maintained provided that the area of the loft used as a tack room does not exceed eight hundred square feet, that no other tack room exists on the property and the remaining of the structure and its uses are in compliance with the remaining sections of this chapter. 6. When calculating the size of the stable, the entire footprint including the loft area shall be included, as measured from the exterior of the walls. 7. If there is more than one stable building on a lot, the tack room space shall be calculated as a percentage of the entire square footage of the structures and such tack room space may only be located in one of the structures; notwithstanding the above, it may not exceed eight hundred square feet. 8. Covered porch shall not be included in the size of the stable for the purpose of calculating the agricultural and tack room space of the stable. 9. Stables shall not be used as sleeping quarters for humans. 10. Stables shall be used for the exclusive purpose of keeping permitted domestic animals and related storage and uses, unless otherwise permitted by this chapter. Commercial uses shall not be permitted. B. Exterior appearance of stables and areas immediately adjacent thereto: 1. Whether or not the stable is used for keeping permitted domestic animals, the exterior of the stable structure shall continue to appear as a stable. 2. Areas adjacent to the agricultural space entrance/exit of a stable may have a porous, roughened surface but may not be paved. It shall remain such or may be covered with grass or other low growing ground cover during the time when the agricultural space is not used for keeping of horses or other animals. 3. A porous surface (not paved) may be provided by the access to the tack room space of the stable. 68 Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST] (Supp. No. 29, Update 1) Page 2 of 3 4. The surface area of a corral, pen, paddock, turnout or riding ring shall be covered with dirt or sand surface. It shall remain such or be planted with grass or other low growing ground cover during the time when the stable structure is not used for keeping of horses or other animals. C. Tack Room Space. 1. Tack room shall only be used for activities that impact the senses in a manner similar or less than that of traditional stable activities. Furthermore, all activities that are loud, raucous, annoying, or that produce unusual noises, lighting or other impacts that offend the peace and quiet of persons of ordinary sensibilities and interferes with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property of any neighboring property are prohibited. Such permitted activities shall be deemed to be "passive activities" for the purpose of this chapter. 2. Tack room shall not be used as sleeping quarters for humans. 3. Tack room shall not exceed forty percent of the size of the stable, including the size of the loft, if any, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5) and may not exceed eight hundred square feet. 4. Tack room may contain furniture, excluding beds. 5. Tack room may have finished floors, walls and ceiling. 6. Tack room may have glazed (glass) window openings. 7. Tack room may have standard size doors. 8. Tack room may have amenities such as air conditioning, heating, electrical and phone outlets. 9. Tack room may have a kitchenette and sanitary facility, including shower, sink and toilet. 10. Building and Safety Department review and building permits shall be required for all modifications. 11. All modifications and retrofitting of the tack room space shall be made in such a manner so that it could be convertible to a tack room, at such time as the structure is to be used for keeping of animals. 12. Tack room may be detached from the main stable structure, however it shall meet all the requirements for a tack room as specified in this section. D. Agricultural Space Within the Stable. 1. Agricultural space shall be no less than sixty percent of the size of the stable including the size of the loft, if any, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5). Agricultural space may contain, but not be limited to stalls, wash racks, feed room, hay storage room, grooming area, tools and utilities storage area and other equestrian and agricultural spaces. The agricultural space may be used for storage of vehicles and general household items, but shall have a stable like appearance. 2. Entry doorways to the stalls shall be a minimum of four feet wide and seven and one-half feet high. 3. The exterior doors shall provide the appearance of a stable door. 4. Roll up or overhead doors are prohibited. 5. Ventilation and drainage facilities shall be subject to building code requirements. 6. Safety electrical outlets with covers may be installed, however they shall be located out of horses' reach when the space is used for keeping of horses. 69 Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST] (Supp. No. 29, Update 1) Page 3 of 3 7. Glazed (glass) window openings may be permitted during a time when the stable is not used for keeping of animals, but shall be removable for easy conversion to animal keeping uses. E. Loft Space within a Stable. 1. Loft may be permitted above a stable structure. 2. Loft may be used and counted as part of the agricultural space or as a tack room space, provided it meets the agricultural or tack room space requirements of Section 17.18.060(C) and (D)). 3. Loft may not be used as a tack room, if another tack room exists within the stable structure or elsewhere on the property. 4. Glazed (glass) window openings shall not be allowed in a loft if a loft is used for storage of hay, feed or other agricultural use. Notwithstanding the above, if the loft is used as other storage or working area or as a tack room, then removable glazed openings may be allowed. 5. The plate height for the wall of the loft shall be no greater than seven feet. 6. If a loft is constructed in such a way that access is provided from the exterior, the area immediately adjacent to the exterior of the loft shall not be paved, but may have a porous surface. 7. The area immediately adjacent to the exterior of the loft shall not be used for parking of vehicles, except for vehicles delivering agricultural goods and equipment. (Ord. No. 319, § 22(Exh. A, Pt. A), 7-15-2010; Ord. No. 324, § 9 (Exh. A, Pts. H, I, K), 8-8-2011; Ord. No. 332, §§ 8C, D, 1-14-2013) 70 Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST] (Supp. No. 29, Update 1) Page 1 of 1 17.18.070 Requirements for aviaries requiring conditional use permit. All aviaries over two hundred square feet shall meet the following requirements: 1. Shall not be located on lots of less than 3.5 acres, as measured by excluding roadway easements. 2. The roof shall not exceed a peak height of sixteen feet. 3. Shall not be located on a portion of the lot where the slope is greater than 4:1. 4. Shall not be permitted in the front yard or in the rear yard setback, shall be located no less than twenty-five feet from side property line in the RAS-1 zone, no less than thirty-five feet from the side property line in the RAS-2 zone and no less than twenty-five feet from side roadway easement line. 5. Shall be located a minimum of thirty-five feet from any residential structure including attached garage or a guest house, located on the same lot, and a minimum of one hundred feet from a residential structure, including attached garage or a guest house located on adjoining lots. 6. Shall be used for the exclusive purpose of keeping permitted birds and small animals indigenous to the State of California. Commercial uses shall not be permitted. 7. Shall be counted towards structural, total, building pad coverage or disturbed area of the net lot for purposes of Chapter 17.16. 8. May be permitted in addition to the construction of a stable and shall not be counted towards the size of the stable for purposes of this chapter. (Ord. No. 319, § 22(Exh. A, Pt. A), 7-15-2010; Ord. No. 343, § 8, 6-22-2015) 71 Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:24 [EST] (Supp. No. 29, Update 1) Page 1 of 1 17.28.050 General ADU and JADU requirements. B. Height. 1. Except as otherwise provided by subsections (B)(2) and (B)(3) below, a detached ADU created on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit may not exceed sixteen feet in height. 2. A detached ADU may be up to eighteen feet in height if it is created on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit that is located within one-half mile walking distance of a major transit stop or high quality transit corridor, as those terms are defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, and the ADU may be up to two additional feet in height (for a maximum of twenty feet) if necessary to accommodate a roof pitch on the ADU that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit. 3. A detached ADU created on a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily dwelling that has more than one story above grade may not exceed eighteen feet in height. 4. An ADU that is attached to the primary dwelling may not exceed twenty-five feet in height or the height limitation imposed by the underlying zone that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower. Notwithstanding the foregoing, ADUs subject to this subsection (B)(4) may not exceed two stories. 5. For purposes of this subsection (B), height is measured from existing legal grade or the level of the lowest floor, whichever is lower, to the peak of the structure. 72 PLATE HEIGHTS DISCUSSION Current Regulations: To help maintain the low rambling nature of ranch architecture, plate heights are limited and strictly enforced. While the recommended plate height for a residence is 8’6”, taller plates are allowed on a case-by-case basis if harmonious with the design and massing of the overall residence. i. Plate heights are measured from the finished floor level to the top of the wall. If a porch is present, the plate height is measured from the finish floor to the top of the beam. (See Appendix L “Illustrations of Plate Height”) ii. The following percentages are the allowable limits for plate heights above 8’6”: (Percentages of plate height are calculated by the linear footage of the perimeter.) 1) Minimum of 50% of the residence must have plate heights of 8’6” or lower, 2) Up to 30% of the residence may have a plate height up to 9’6, ** 3) Only 20% of the residence may have a plate height up to 10’6. ** ** Maximum plate heights may be limited and are considered on a case-by-case basis to assure the massing of the overall residence is good of its kind. Attached is the current Appendix for plate heights as well additional examples for discussion. 73 APPENDIX L ILLUSTRATIONS OF PLATE HEIGHT 74 PLATE HEIGHT AT PORCH If a porch is present, the plate height is measured from the finish floor of the residence to the top of the beam of the porch 75 PLATE HEIGHT @ STANDARD EAVE The plate height is measured from the finish floor of the residence to the top plate, where the eave rafter meets the top of the wall. 76 PLATE HEIGHT @ SOFFITED EAVE The plate height is measured from the finish floor of the residence to where the soffited eave meets the exterior wall. 77 Agenda Item No.: 10.C Mtg. Date: 04/15/2025 TO:HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM:LISA EDWARDS, PRINCIPAL PLANNER THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT:CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE HEIGHT LIMITS OF SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES, STABLES AND BARNS; AND FINDING THE ACTION TO BE STATUTORILY EXEMPT FROM CEQA UNDER SECTION 21080.17 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE DATE:April 15, 2025 BACKGROUND: On October 15, 2024, Planning Commission Chair Chelf requested that former Director of Planning and Community Services, John Signo, present a report on the City’s regulations pertaining to building height limitations within the Rolling Hills Municipal Zoning Code. The Commission tasked Director Signo to conduct further research and to facilitate discussion on the matter. At its March 18, 2025 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed Staff’s report and made a motion to direct Staff to draft a proposed municipal code ordinance amendment that includes a maximum ridge height for homes to 18 feet and a maximum ridge height for barns and stables, not including the cupola or other accessories, to 20 feet (5 -0 vote). At this time, Staff is requesting a recommendation from the Commission to the City Council regarding proposed height limits for structures that are incorporated in the draft resolution and ordinance attached hereto. Once the Commission provides its recommendation, the City Council will conduct a first and second reading of the proposal. DISCUSSION: The City is considering the introduction of a new ordinance (Ordinance No. 386) aimed at addressing building heights within the community (Attachment 1). This proposed ordinance seeks to establish clear regulations regarding the maximum allowable height for structures, with the goal of preserving the scenic beauty, natural landscape, and residential character. As the City experiences growth and development, this measure would help ensure that new constructions align with the community’s aesthetic values while maintaining harmony with its surroundings. Public feedback and further discussions will play a crucial role in shaping the final version of this ordinance. 1 78 Commissioner Discussion During the last Planning Commission meeting, a discussion addressing the heights of residences and stables were both analyzed in order to establish maximum heights in the Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC). Historically, the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA) had been the authority on structural heights for main homes, stables, and barns. Although the Code mentions that the maximum height for any residence is one -story, it does not specify an exact height dimension. Similarly, the allowance of a loft within a barn (maximum 7-foot plate height for wall of loft) is mentioned, but no overall height is specified. Although the Commission unanimously agreed that the residential height of 18 feet was reasonable, the focus of the discussion was primarily with regard to heights of barns and stables. Commissioners then shared stable heights on their own properties and used a logical calculation that would accommodate the stall areas, tack room/loft area, which landed at a 20- foot height. Municipal Ordinance No. 386 The amendment to the Rolling Hills Municipal Zoning Code Chapter 17.16, Sections 17.16.060 & 17.16.080 are as follows: Section 17.16.060 (Lot area and dimensions) of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows: Development Standard Zone District RA-S-1 & RA-S-2 4. Height Limited One story, no greater than 18’ (mezzanines and lofts are not permitted) except for stables and barns which shall be no greater than 20’ Section 17.16.080 (Height limitation) of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows: 17.16.080 - Height limitation. A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below. The maximum height permitted from finished floor to the peak of the structure shall be no greater than eighteen (18) feet except that the maximum height permitted for stables and barns shall be no greater than twenty (20) feet measured from the floor to the highest peak of the structure, exclusive of accessory architectural features as determined by the City. The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any structure to finished grade is five feet. The difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than two and one-half feet, with maximum difference of five feet. B. Exceptions: 1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this 2 79 section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall. 2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title. 3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story. The following is a review of the Code Sections that address height: Basements Basements are located below ground and often not seen. Homes are permitted to have multiple basement levels. Basement walls, except for walls within light wells, may not exceed a height of 5 feet nor an average height of 2-1/2 feet at any point immediately adjacent to the basement exterior (Attachment 3). Stables & Lofts Stables are seen as a valuable asset to each property and a valuable component of the City’s rural, equestrian character. After research, RHMC has not established a limit for stable height, and in the past five years, the stables are trending larger than in the past. The average height of buildings in Rolling Hills is 17 feet high, with the highest stable being 25 feet (32 feet including a 7-foot cupola) However, many stables in the City have lofts as defined in RHMC Section 17.18.060. These lofts often appear to be second stories, and the plate height for the wall of the loft may not exceed 7 feet. Lofts for a stable are meant to store hay and horse equipment but may also be used as a tack room, provided there are no sleeping quarters (Attachment 4). Aviaries (Bird Homes) Aviaries over two hundred square feet may not have a roof peak height that exceeds 16 feet (Attachment 5). Storage Areas RHMC Section 17.12.190 defines a storage area as "a space within a building or structure, including attics, used for storing items." A storage area is allowed to be located above or below a story but is not meant to be a livable space and cannot have doors to the exterior, window openings, heating, or air conditioning. A storage area may not exceed 6 feet in height at any one point. Attics may have a ceiling that follows the shape and the angle of the roofline, which could be more than 6 feet high at the peak of the ceiling. Staff review plans to ensure staircases are not shown leading to a storage area in the attic (Attachment 6). ADU RHMC Chapter 17.28.050 limits detached ADUs created on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multifamily dwelling unit that may not exceed 16 feet in height. The height is measured from the existing legal grade or the level of the lowest floor (whichever is lower) to the peak of the structure. An ADU that is attached to the primary dwelling may not exceed 25 feet in height or the height limitation imposed by the underlying zone that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower (Attachment 7). Building Heights Report This report was compiled using building heights approved between 2017 and 2024 (see Attachment 8). The data was analyzed to assess the range of heights for both residences and stables, which varied from 11 to 25 feet. Notably, there has been a recent trend (2023–2024) 3 80 of increasing stable heights, with many falling within the 20 to 25-foot range. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RHCA – ADU The RHCA has building regulations that have restrictions on plate heights and roof pitches. The RHCA Architectural Committee reviews each home on a case-by- case basis to ensure the massing of the overall residence is good of its kind. Some property Deed Restrictions/CC&Rs have a maximum height limit of 25’ (Attachment 7). RHCA- Plate Height The standard plate height for structures in the RHCA Building Regulations is 8’6”, measured from the finished floor level to the top of the wall. If a porch is present, the plate height is measured from the finish floor to the top of the beam at the porch. Residences may have taller plate heights, but the heights must meet the following restrictions: a minimum of 50% of the residence must have a plate height of 8’6” or lower, up to 30% of the residence may have a 9’6” plate height and up to 20% of the residence may have a maximum of 10’6” plate height. The plate height limitations were adopted in 2012 (Attachment 9). RHCA- Roof Pitches The standard roof pitch for all structures in 4:12. The Building Regulations allow a minimum pitch of 3:12 for contemporary designs with hip roofs and a maximum 4½:12 pitch traditional designs. The roof pitch is also considered on a case-by-case basis. Public Comment No public responses have been received as of the date of this report. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Open the public hearing, receive public testimony, close the public hearing, and by motion: Find that the adoption of the proposed ordinance is statutorily exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under Public Resources Code section 21080.17. Adopt a resolution (Attachment 1) recommending that the City Council adopt the proposed ordinance that is attached thereto as Exhibit “A.” ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 01 - 2025-04_PC_Resolution_ResidentialHeightLimit.pdf Attachment 02 - 386_HeightLimit_Ordinance_D.pdf Attachment 03 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Chapter_17.12_Code_Definitions.pdf Attachment 04 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.18.060_Stable.pdf Attachment 05 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.18.070_Aviaries.pdf Attachment 06 - PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Section_17.12.190_Storage.pdf Attachment 07 - 4 81 PL_SUB_BH_RHMC_Chapter17.28_Section17.28.050_GeneralADUandJADURequirements.pdf Attachment 08 - PL_SUB_BH_BuildingHeightsReport_Chart.pdf Attachment 09 - PL_SUB_BH_RHCA_CC_Rs_Building.Heights.pdf CL_PBN_250326_PH_PC_BuildingHeight_Affidavit.pdf 5 82 65277.00001\43665712.1 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16 OF TITLE 17 OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND THE RESIDENTIAL HEIGHT LIMIT, AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA. WHEREAS, the City of Rolling Hills, California (“City”) is a municipal corporation, duly organized under the California Constitution and laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the City is a semi-rural hillside community, characterized by predominantly single-story California ranch-style homes, large parcels with open space, and an abundance of equestrian facilities; and WHEREAS, one of the unique features of the City is the uniformity of homes throughout the years, which are limited to one story in height, with few exceptions; and WHEREAS, in recent years, many homes have been constructed to maximize the building area on the lot, including increased height and a greater amount of grading to prepare many of the steeper properties for a structure; and WHEREAS, these trends have significantly altered the community’s character and affect surrounding properties, creating a high level of concern among residents related to development and design compatibility issues; and WHEREAS, on October 15, 2024, the Planning Commission requested a report on the City’s residential building height regulations to facilitate discussion on the matter; and WHEREAS, at the March 18, 2025, Planning Commission meeting, City staff presented their report for discussion, whereby the Planning Commission, pursuant to Section 17.50.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code (“RHMC”), directed City staff to draft an ordinance updating the RHMC to impose a height limit on residential buildings; and WHEREAS, on March 26, 2025, the City gave public notice of the public hearing for Ordinance No. 386 by publishing the required notice in a newspaper of general circulation and posting the notice at City Hall; and WHEREAS, on April 15, 2025, the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public hearing and considered the staff report, recommendations by staff, and public testimony concerning Ordinance No. 386. 83 65277.00001\43665712.1 Page 2 of 4 THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the Recitals above are true and correct and incorporated herein. SECTION 2. CEQA. The Planning Commission finds that the Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), pursuant to the following sections of the State CEQA Guidelines: Section 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment), Section 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378(a) because it does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, and Section 15061(b)(3) (the activity is covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment). Specifically, the Ordinance does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment because it involves imposing a maximum building height on residential development and does not propose nor authorize any action that would have the potential to cause a physical change in the environment, directly or indirectly. Therefore, the Ordinance is not subject to CEQA. SECTION 3. General Plan. Based on the entire record before the Planning Commission, including all written and oral evidence presented, the Planning Commission hereby that this Ordinance is consistent with the goals and policies of the Rolling Hills General Plan. The proposed Ordinance is consistent with Housing Element Goal 2 “Maintain and enhance the quality of residential neighborhoods in Rolling Hills,” in support of the following policies: Policy 2.1: Encourage and assist in the maintenance and improvement of existing homes to maintain optimum standards of housing quality and design. Policy 2.3: Require compatible design to minimize the impact of residential redevelopment on existing residences. By imposing a height limit on residential development in the City, this Ordinance will ensure future development is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and environment. SECTION 4. Recommendation. Based on the foregoing recitals and findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt the proposed Ordinance, attached as Exhibit “A” hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 5. Certification. The Planning Commission Chair shall sign and the Secretary shall attest to the adoption of this Resolution. 84 65277.00001\43665712.1 Page 3 of 4 SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Resolution takes effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 2025. __________________________ BRAD CHELF, CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: _________________________________ CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK 85 65277.00001\43665712.1 Page 4 of 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025-04 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS 17.16 AND 17.17 OF TITLE 17 OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND THE RESIDENTIAL HEIGHT LIMIT, AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on April 15, 2025, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: And in compliance with the law of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. _______________________________ CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK 86 ORDINANCE NO. 386 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AMENDING CHAPTER 17.16 OF TITLE 17 OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND THE RESIDENTIAL HEIGHT LIMIT, AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM CEQA. WHEREAS, the City of Rolling Hills, California (“City”) is a municipal corporation, duly organized under the California Constitution and laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the City is a semi-rural hillside community, characterized by predominantly single- story California ranch-style homes, large parcels with open space, and an abundance of equestrian facilities; and WHEREAS, one of the unique features of the City is the uniformity of homes throughout the years, which are typically limited to one story in height; and WHEREAS, in recent years, many homes have been constructed to maximize the building area on the lot, including increased height and a greater amount of grading to prepare many of the steeper properties for a structure; and WHEREAS, these trends have significantly altered the community’s character and affect surrounding properties, creating a high level of concern among residents related to development and design compatibility issues; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to preserve and enhance the community’s character, particularly as it relates to residential building height; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted to the City by Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, the City has the police power to regulate the use of land and property within the City in a manner designed to promote public convenience and general prosperity, as well as public health, safety, and welfare; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the Rolling Hills Municipal Code to impose height limits on residential developments in the City; and WHEREAS, on April 15, 2025, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Ordinance, wherein it considered the staff report, supporting documents, public testimony, and all appropriate information submitted with the Ordinance; and WHEREAS, on _____, 2025, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Ordinance, wherein it considered the staff report and supporting documents, Planning Commission’s recommendation, public testimony, and all appropriate information submitted with the Ordinance; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of the Ordinance have occurred. 87 2 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The recitals above are incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council. Section 2. CEQA. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is determined to be categorically exempt from CEQA under Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, which applies to projects where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed Ordinance does not involve physical changes to the environment but rather regulates the height of residential developments. Since it does not result in any direct or indirect physical changes to the environment, there is no possibility that it could have a significant environmental impact. Section 3. General Plan. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is consistent with the goals and policies of the Rolling Hills General Plan. The proposed Ordinance is consistent with Housing Element Goal 2 “Maintain and enhance the quality of residential neighborhoods in Rolling Hills,” in support of the following policies: Policy 2.1: Encourage and assist in the maintenance and improvement of existing homes to maintain optimum standards of housing quality and design. Policy 2.3: Require compatible design to minimize the impact of residential redevelopment on existing residences. By imposing a height limit on residential development in the City, this Ordinance will ensure future development is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and environment. Section 4. The Development Standard table in Section 17.16.060 of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows: Development Standard Zone District RA-S-1 RA-S-2 4. Height Limitation One story, no greater than 18’ (mezzanines and lofts are not permitted) except for stables and barns which shall be no greater than 20’ Section 5. Section 17.16.080 of Title 17 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended, with additions in underline and deletions in strikethrough, as follows: 17.16.080 - Height limitation. A. General Limitation. A building or structure shall have no more than one story, meaning that there shall be no story on top of another, except as specified in subsection (B) below. 88 3 The maximum height permitted from floor to the highest peak of the structure shall be no greater than eighteen (18) feet except that the maximum height permitted for stables and barns shall be no greater than twenty (20) feet measured from the floor to the highest peak of the structure, exclusive of accessory architectural features as determined by the City. The maximum height permitted from finished floor of any structure to finished grade is five feet. The difference between the finished grade and the finished floor level across any elevation shall average no more than two and one-half feet, with maximum difference of five feet. B. Exceptions: 1. A one-story primary residence is permitted over a basement. For the purpose of this section primary residence includes a garage attached to the main residence by a solid wall. 2. Stables may have a loft, subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.18 of this title. 3. A storage area, as defined in Section 17.12.190 "S" may be located above or below a story. Section 6. The City Council’s actions are made upon review of the Planning Commission’s recommendation, the Staff Report, all oral and written comments, and the documentary evidence presented on the Ordinance.. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance takes effect 30 days following its adoption. Section 8. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid, such invalidity has no effect on the other provisions or application of the Ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this extent, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. The City Council declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any portion thereof. Section 10. Custodian of Records: The documents and materials associated with this Resolution that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at Rolling Hills City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California 90274. The Director of Planning and Community Services is the custodian of records for the record of proceedings. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS __th DAY OF ________ 2025. JEFF PIEPER, MAYOR 89 4 ATTEST: ____________________________________ CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 90           Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]  (Supp. No. 28)    Page 1 of 2  DEFINITIONS  17.12.020 "B" words, terms and phrases.  Barn. See "stable."   "Basement" means any floor level below the first story of the primary residence, except  that a floor level in a building having only one floor level shall be classified as a basement unless  such floor level qualifies as a first story as defined herein. Except for walls within light wells,  basement walls across any elevation may not exceed a height of five feet above finished grade  at any point immediately adjacent to the basement exterior, and shall have no greater than an  average of two and one‐half feet exterior height. Basements shall comply with the Los Angeles  County Building Code requirements. Basement well(s) shall be incorporated into the overall  design of the building so that it does not give an appearance of a separate story.   "Building" means any structure having a roof supported by columns or walls and intended  for the shelter, housing or enclosure of any individual, animal, process, equipment, goods or  materials of any kind or nature.  17.12.030 ‐ "C" words, terms and phrases.  Cellar. See "basement."    17.12.120 "L" words, terms and phrases.  "Loft" means an area above a stable utilized for storage of feed and hay, saddles, bridles,  other horse equipment and similar equestrian or agricultural related items, or tack room uses,  but excludes sleeping quarters.     17.12.160 ‐ "P" words, terms and phrases.  "Plate height" means the height of a building measured from the finished floor level to the  top of the wall.    17.12.190 "S" words, terms and phrases.  "Stable" means the same as "barn" and is a building or a portion of a building designed and  constructed to shelter permitted domestic animals and store farm implements, hay, grain,  equestrian and horticultural related items and equipment. Stable may include agricultural  space, loft and tack room space. Stable shall not be a place for human habitation, except for  uses specifically permitted in the tack room; it may not be rented out or be used for human  sleeping or commercial purposes.  91           Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST]  (Supp. No. 28)    Page 2 of 2  "Storage area" means space within a building or structure, including attics, used for storing  of items. It includes spaces located below or above a story and may not exceed six feet in height  at any one point. Attics may have a ceiling that follows the shape and the angle of the roofline,  which could be more than six feet high at the peak of the ceiling. Attics and storage areas shall  not have doors to the exterior, window openings, heating or air conditioning.   "Storage room, free standing," shall mean an accessory structure used exclusively for  storage of household, equestrian, garden and similar items.  "Story" means that portion of a building included between the upper surface of any floor  and the ceiling or roof above it. There shall be no story on top of another, except as permitted  in Section 17.16.080(B) of this title.  "Structure" means a combination of materials assembled in a form for use, occupancy or  ornamentation whether installed on, above or below the surface of land or water and requiring  a fixed location or attached to something having a fixed location. Structure shall also include,  but not be limited to, fences, retaining walls, covered porches, entryways, porte cochere,  latticework, trellises, pilasters, fountains, pools, spas, pool/spa equipment, gazebos, garden  walls, decks, and subterranean structures other than basements.  92 Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST] (Supp. No. 29, Update 1) Page 1 of 3 17.18.060 Requirements for stables requiring conditional use permit. All stables over two hundred square feet shall meet the following requirements: A. General requirements and uses: 1. The building occupied by a stable shall be designed for rural and agricultural purpose only. 2. Stable structure shall not be permitted in the front yard, and shall be located no less than twenty-five feet from side property line in the RAS-1 zone, no less than thirty-five feet from side property line in the RAS-2 zone and no less than twenty-five feet from side roadway easement line and from the rear property line. 3. Minimum of sixty percent of the entire structure shall be maintained for agricultural space as defined in Chapter 17.12 of this title, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5). 4. Maximum of forty percent, but not to exceed eight hundred square feet, of the entire structure may be maintained as tack room space as defined in Chapter 17.12 of this title, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5). Tack room may be detached from the main stable structure. 5. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, an existing stable, legally constructed prior to the effective date of the ordinance from which this chapter derives (August 12, 2010), which has a loft area that is maintained as a tack room and the loft area comprises more than forty percent of the size of the first floor may continue to be maintained provided that the area of the loft used as a tack room does not exceed eight hundred square feet, that no other tack room exists on the property and the remaining of the structure and its uses are in compliance with the remaining sections of this chapter. 6. When calculating the size of the stable, the entire footprint including the loft area shall be included, as measured from the exterior of the walls. 7. If there is more than one stable building on a lot, the tack room space shall be calculated as a percentage of the entire square footage of the structures and such tack room space may only be located in one of the structures; notwithstanding the above, it may not exceed eight hundred square feet. 8. Covered porch shall not be included in the size of the stable for the purpose of calculating the agricultural and tack room space of the stable. 9. Stables shall not be used as sleeping quarters for humans. 10. Stables shall be used for the exclusive purpose of keeping permitted domestic animals and related storage and uses, unless otherwise permitted by this chapter. Commercial uses shall not be permitted. B. Exterior appearance of stables and areas immediately adjacent thereto: 1. Whether or not the stable is used for keeping permitted domestic animals, the exterior of the stable structure shall continue to appear as a stable. 2. Areas adjacent to the agricultural space entrance/exit of a stable may have a porous, roughened surface but may not be paved. It shall remain such or may be covered with grass or other low growing ground cover during the time when the agricultural space is not used for keeping of horses or other animals. 3. A porous surface (not paved) may be provided by the access to the tack room space of the stable. 93 Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST] (Supp. No. 29, Update 1) Page 2 of 3 4. The surface area of a corral, pen, paddock, turnout or riding ring shall be covered with dirt or sand surface. It shall remain such or be planted with grass or other low growing ground cover during the time when the stable structure is not used for keeping of horses or other animals. C. Tack Room Space. 1. Tack room shall only be used for activities that impact the senses in a manner similar or less than that of traditional stable activities. Furthermore, all activities that are loud, raucous, annoying, or that produce unusual noises, lighting or other impacts that offend the peace and quiet of persons of ordinary sensibilities and interferes with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property of any neighboring property are prohibited. Such permitted activities shall be deemed to be "passive activities" for the purpose of this chapter. 2. Tack room shall not be used as sleeping quarters for humans. 3. Tack room shall not exceed forty percent of the size of the stable, including the size of the loft, if any, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5) and may not exceed eight hundred square feet. 4. Tack room may contain furniture, excluding beds. 5. Tack room may have finished floors, walls and ceiling. 6. Tack room may have glazed (glass) window openings. 7. Tack room may have standard size doors. 8. Tack room may have amenities such as air conditioning, heating, electrical and phone outlets. 9. Tack room may have a kitchenette and sanitary facility, including shower, sink and toilet. 10. Building and Safety Department review and building permits shall be required for all modifications. 11. All modifications and retrofitting of the tack room space shall be made in such a manner so that it could be convertible to a tack room, at such time as the structure is to be used for keeping of animals. 12. Tack room may be detached from the main stable structure, however it shall meet all the requirements for a tack room as specified in this section. D. Agricultural Space Within the Stable. 1. Agricultural space shall be no less than sixty percent of the size of the stable including the size of the loft, if any, except as specified in Section 17.18.060(A)(5). Agricultural space may contain, but not be limited to stalls, wash racks, feed room, hay storage room, grooming area, tools and utilities storage area and other equestrian and agricultural spaces. The agricultural space may be used for storage of vehicles and general household items, but shall have a stable like appearance. 2. Entry doorways to the stalls shall be a minimum of four feet wide and seven and one-half feet high. 3. The exterior doors shall provide the appearance of a stable door. 4. Roll up or overhead doors are prohibited. 5. Ventilation and drainage facilities shall be subject to building code requirements. 6. Safety electrical outlets with covers may be installed, however they shall be located out of horses' reach when the space is used for keeping of horses. 94 Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST] (Supp. No. 29, Update 1) Page 3 of 3 7. Glazed (glass) window openings may be permitted during a time when the stable is not used for keeping of animals, but shall be removable for easy conversion to animal keeping uses. E. Loft Space within a Stable. 1. Loft may be permitted above a stable structure. 2. Loft may be used and counted as part of the agricultural space or as a tack room space, provided it meets the agricultural or tack room space requirements of Section 17.18.060(C) and (D)). 3. Loft may not be used as a tack room, if another tack room exists within the stable structure or elsewhere on the property. 4. Glazed (glass) window openings shall not be allowed in a loft if a loft is used for storage of hay, feed or other agricultural use. Notwithstanding the above, if the loft is used as other storage or working area or as a tack room, then removable glazed openings may be allowed. 5. The plate height for the wall of the loft shall be no greater than seven feet. 6. If a loft is constructed in such a way that access is provided from the exterior, the area immediately adjacent to the exterior of the loft shall not be paved, but may have a porous surface. 7. The area immediately adjacent to the exterior of the loft shall not be used for parking of vehicles, except for vehicles delivering agricultural goods and equipment. (Ord. No. 319, § 22(Exh. A, Pt. A), 7-15-2010; Ord. No. 324, § 9 (Exh. A, Pts. H, I, K), 8-8-2011; Ord. No. 332, §§ 8C, D, 1-14-2013) 95 Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:23 [EST] (Supp. No. 29, Update 1) Page 1 of 1 17.18.070 Requirements for aviaries requiring conditional use permit. All aviaries over two hundred square feet shall meet the following requirements: 1. Shall not be located on lots of less than 3.5 acres, as measured by excluding roadway easements. 2. The roof shall not exceed a peak height of sixteen feet. 3. Shall not be located on a portion of the lot where the slope is greater than 4:1. 4. Shall not be permitted in the front yard or in the rear yard setback, shall be located no less than twenty-five feet from side property line in the RAS-1 zone, no less than thirty-five feet from the side property line in the RAS-2 zone and no less than twenty-five feet from side roadway easement line. 5. Shall be located a minimum of thirty-five feet from any residential structure including attached garage or a guest house, located on the same lot, and a minimum of one hundred feet from a residential structure, including attached garage or a guest house located on adjoining lots. 6. Shall be used for the exclusive purpose of keeping permitted birds and small animals indigenous to the State of California. Commercial uses shall not be permitted. 7. Shall be counted towards structural, total, building pad coverage or disturbed area of the net lot for purposes of Chapter 17.16. 8. May be permitted in addition to the construction of a stable and shall not be counted towards the size of the stable for purposes of this chapter. (Ord. No. 319, § 22(Exh. A, Pt. A), 7-15-2010; Ord. No. 343, § 8, 6-22-2015) 96    Created: 2024‐05‐03 17:45:25 [EST] (Supp. No. 28)  Page 1 of 2  DEFINITIONS  17.12.190 "S" words, terms and phrases.  "Stable" means the same as "barn" and is a building or a portion of a building designed  and constructed to shelter permitted domestic animals and store farm implements, hay, grain,  equestrian and horticultural related items and equipment. Stable may include agricultural  space, loft and tack room space. Stable shall not be a place for human habitation, except for  uses specifically permitted in the tack room; it may not be rented out or be used for human  sleeping or commercial purposes.  "Storage area" means space within a building or structure, including attics, used for storing of items. It includes spaces located below or above a story and may not exceed six feet in height at any one point. Attics may have a ceiling that follows the shape and the angle of the roofline, which could be more than six feet high at the peak of the ceiling. Attics and storage areas shall not have doors to the exterior, window openings, heating or air conditioning. "Storage room, free standing," shall mean an accessory structure used exclusively for storage of household, equestrian, garden and similar items. "Story" means that portion of a building included between the upper surface of any floor and the ceiling or roof above it. There shall be no story on top of another, except as permitted in Section 17.16.080(B) of this title. "Structure" means a combination of materials assembled in a form for use, occupancy or ornamentation whether installed on, above or below the surface of land or water and requiring a fixed location or attached to something having a fixed location. Structure shall also include, but not be limited to, fences, retaining walls, covered porches, entryways, porte cochere, latticework, trellises, pilasters, fountains, pools, spas, pool/spa equipment, gazebos, garden walls, decks, and subterranean structures other than basements. 97 Created: 2025-02-10 14:50:24 [EST] (Supp. No. 29, Update 1) Page 1 of 1 17.28.050 General ADU and JADU requirements. B. Height. 1. Except as otherwise provided by subsections (B)(2) and (B)(3) below, a detached ADU created on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit may not exceed sixteen feet in height. 2. A detached ADU may be up to eighteen feet in height if it is created on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit that is located within one-half mile walking distance of a major transit stop or high quality transit corridor, as those terms are defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code, and the ADU may be up to two additional feet in height (for a maximum of twenty feet) if necessary to accommodate a roof pitch on the ADU that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit. 3. A detached ADU created on a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily dwelling that has more than one story above grade may not exceed eighteen feet in height. 4. An ADU that is attached to the primary dwelling may not exceed twenty-five feet in height or the height limitation imposed by the underlying zone that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower. Notwithstanding the foregoing, ADUs subject to this subsection (B)(4) may not exceed two stories. 5. For purposes of this subsection (B), height is measured from existing legal grade or the level of the lowest floor, whichever is lower, to the peak of the structure. 98 PLATE HEIGHTS DISCUSSION Current Regulations: To help maintain the low rambling nature of ranch architecture, plate heights are limited and strictly enforced. While the recommended plate height for a residence is 8’6”, taller plates are allowed on a case-by-case basis if harmonious with the design and massing of the overall residence. i. Plate heights are measured from the finished floor level to the top of the wall. If a porch is present, the plate height is measured from the finish floor to the top of the beam. (See Appendix L “Illustrations of Plate Height”) ii. The following percentages are the allowable limits for plate heights above 8’6”: (Percentages of plate height are calculated by the linear footage of the perimeter.) 1) Minimum of 50% of the residence must have plate heights of 8’6” or lower, 2) Up to 30% of the residence may have a plate height up to 9’6, ** 3) Only 20% of the residence may have a plate height up to 10’6. ** ** Maximum plate heights may be limited and are considered on a case-by-case basis to assure the massing of the overall residence is good of its kind. Attached is the current Appendix for plate heights as well additional examples for discussion. 99 APPENDIX L ILLUSTRATIONS OF PLATE HEIGHT 100 PLATE HEIGHT AT PORCH If a porch is present, the plate height is measured from the finish floor of the residence to the top of the beam of the porch 101 PLATE HEIGHT @ STANDARD EAVE The plate height is measured from the finish floor of the residence to the top plate, where the eave rafter meets the top of the wall. 102 PLATE HEIGHT @ SOFFITED EAVE The plate height is measured from the finish floor of the residence to where the soffited eave meets the exterior wall. 103 CL_PBN_250326_PH_PC_BuildingHeight_F - Page 1 of 1 2615 Pacific Coast Highway #329 Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (310) 543-6635 pfernandez@scng.com City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, California 90274 Account Number:5007827 Ad Order Number:0011726463 Customer's Reference/PO Number: Publication:Daily Breeze Publication Dates:03/26/2025 Total Amount:$918.32 Payment Amount:$0.00 Amount Due:$918.32 Notice ID:8mxWdV8ywb9uXnnqwaWl Invoice Text:NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD BY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN – Ordinance 386 is a City initiated Zoning Code Amendment to amend various sections of Title 17 (Zoning Code) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. Hearing Date: April 15, 2025 Hearing Time: 6:30p.m. Hearing Location: Rolling Hills Council Chambers 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Project Location: Citywide Project Description: Ordinance 386 is a City-initiated Zoning Code Amendment to amend Title 17 (Zoning Code) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. The Zoning Code Amendment revises the height limit of single-family residential homes. Ordinance 386 includes revisions to Zoning Code Chapter 17.16 (Residential Agriculture-Suburban (RA-S) Zone) and Chapter 17.17 (Overlay Zoning District-1 (OZD-1)). The Planning Commission’s action serves as a recommendation to the City Council. Environmental Documentation: Ordinance 386 is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to the following sections of the State CEQA Guidelines: Section 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment), Section 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378(a) because it does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment), and Section 15061(b)(3) (the activity is covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment). Specifically, the Ordinance does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable 104 CL_PBN_250326_PH_PC_BuildingHeight_F - Page 1 of 1 Daily Breeze 2615 Pacific Coast Highway #329 Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (310) 543-6635 0011726463 City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, California 90274 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Los Angeles I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of Daily Breeze, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Torrance*, County of Los Angeles, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of County of Los Angeles, State of California, under the date of June 15, 1945, Decree No. Pomo C-606. The notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to wit: 03/26/2025 I certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Hermosa Beach, California On this 26th day of March, 2025. ______________________________ Signature *Daily Breeze circulation includes the following cities: Carson, Compton, Culver City, El Segundo, Gardena, Harbor City, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach, Inglewood, Lawndale, Lomita, Los Angeles, Long Beach, Manhattan Beach, Palos Verdes Peninsula, Palos Verdes, Rancho Palos Verdes, Rancho Palos Verdes Estates, Redondo Beach, San Pedro, Santa Monica, Torrance and Wilmington 105 CL_PBN_250528_CC_HeightLimitOrdinance - Page 1 of 1 2615 Pacific Coast Highway #329 Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (310) 543-6635 pfernandez@scng.com City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, California 90274 Account Number:5007827 Ad Order Number:0011733082 Customer's Reference/PO Number: Publication:Daily Breeze Publication Dates:05/01/2025 Total Amount:$618.92 Payment Amount:$0.00 Amount Due:$618.92 Notice ID:aDJo7EbSRrk9RxdwVD4m Invoice Text:NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD BY CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN–Ordinance 386 is a City initiated Zoning Code Amendment to amend sections of Title 17 (Zoning Code) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. Hearing Date: May 28, 2025 Hearing Time: 7:00 p.m. Hearing Location: Rolling Hills Council Chambers, 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Project Location: Citywide Project Description: Ordinance 386 is a City-initiated Zoning Code Amendment to amend Title 17 (Zoning Code) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. The Zoning Code Amendment revises the height limit of single-family residential homes. Ordinance 386 includes revisions to Zoning Code Chapter 17.16 (Residential Agriculture-Suburban (RA-S) Zone). On April 15, 2025, the Planning Commission voted to recommend Ordinance 386 to the City Council for approval. Environmental Documentation: Ordinance 386 is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to the following sections of the State CEQA Guidelines: Section 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment), Section 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378(a) because it does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment), and Section 15061(b)(3) (the activity is covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment). Specifically, the Ordinance does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the 106 CL_PBN_250528_CC_HeightLimitOrdinance - Page 1 of 1 Daily Breeze 2615 Pacific Coast Highway #329 Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (310) 543-6635 0011733082 City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, California 90274 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Los Angeles I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of Daily Breeze, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Torrance*, County of Los Angeles, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of County of Los Angeles, State of California, under the date of June 15, 1945, Decree No. Pomo C-606. The notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to wit: 05/01/2025 I certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Hermosa Beach, California On this 1st day of May, 2025. ______________________________ Signature *Daily Breeze circulation includes the following cities: Carson, Compton, Culver City, El Segundo, Gardena, Harbor City, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach, Inglewood, Lawndale, Lomita, Los Angeles, Long Beach, Manhattan Beach, Palos Verdes Peninsula, Palos Verdes, Rancho Palos Verdes, Rancho Palos Verdes Estates, Redondo Beach, San Pedro, Santa Monica, Torrance and Wilmington 107 Agenda Item No.: 13.A Mtg. Date: 05/28/2025 TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM:SAMANTHA CREW, MANAGEMENT ANALYST THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT:CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 387 DESIGNATING FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES WITHIN THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA BASED ON MAPS PROVIDED BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION AND AMENDING TITLE 15 (BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION) OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE, AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE NOT SUBJECT TO CEQA DATE:May 28, 2025 BACKGROUND: Pursuant to California state law, the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) is required to identify and map areas across the state that are at risk of wildfires, designated as “Fire Hazard Severity Zones” (FHSZ). On March 24, 2025, the Director of CAL FIRE released an updated FHSZ map for the City of Rolling Hills (Attachment A and County Map Attachment B). The revised maps incorporate the latest climate data, fire history, topography, and wildfire behavior modeling to classify areas as Moderate, High, or Very High fire hazard zones. Legislation: Assembly Bills (AB) and Senate Bills (SB) Wildfire events and evolving legislation have shaped California’s approach to fire hazard planning over the past four decades. In 1980, the Panorama Fire in San Bernardino burned 28,800 acres, destroyed 325 structures, and caused four fatalities. Two years later, Public Resources Code Section 4201 mandated that CAL FIRE develop FHSZ, leading to the creation of the first FHSZ maps in 1985. In 1991, the devastating Tunnel Fire in Oakland Hills burned 1,600 acres, destroyed 2,900 structures, and claimed 25 lives. This tragedy prompted the passage of the “Bates Bill” (AB 337, Government Code Section 51175), which directed CAL FIRE to identify Very High FHSZs within Local Responsibility Areas (LRAs) and make recommendations to local jurisdictions, which are then required to take appropriate action (Attachment C - LRA Legislation & FAQ). In 2007, CAL FIRE finalized its statewide FHSZ model to include Very High zones in LRAs. The Tubbs Fire in 2017 and the Camp Fire in 2018, two of the most destructive wildfires in state history, further underscored the need for proactive planning. In response, AB 642 and SB 63 were enacted to require CAL FIRE to 108 identify not just Very High, but also Moderate and High FHSZs in LRAs. Building on this, AB 211 (2022) requires local agencies to formally adopt these designations by ordinance, ensuring consistent implementation of wildfire resilience measures statewide. 1991 - AB 337 Known as the "Bates Bill," was enacted in response to the 1991 Oakland Hills Fire. It requires CAL FIRE to identify Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ) within LRAs. Once identified, CAL FIRE must provide recommendations to local jurisdictions, which is then required to take appropriate action. The bill is codified in Government Code Section 51175 and aims to strengthen local planning and mitigation efforts in high-risk wildfire areas. 2021 - AB 642 Enhances wildfire resilience by requiring CAL FIRE to map Moderate and High FHSZ in LRAs, expand use of prescribed and cultural burns, and establish a Cultural Burning Liaison. It also calls for updated fire-safe building standards and tribal burn boss training programs. 2021 - SB 63 Strengthens wildfire prevention by expanding hazard mapping to include Moderate and High zones, requiring defensible space beyond property lines, and authorizing local partners to conduct home hardening assessments. It also prioritizes funding for roadside vegetation management and public education. 2022 - AB 211 Requires local agencies to adopt CAL FIRE’s Moderate and High FHSZ designations within 120 days and extends CEQA exemptions for wildfire resilience projects. Also allocates funding for drought and ecosystem recovery efforts. The release of the updated FHSZ map for the City of Rolling Hills marks a critical step in aligning with California’s evolving wildfire mitigation framework. Grounded in decades of legislation, scientific advancement, and lessons from past wildfire events (Attachment D), this map serves as a key planning tool to support fire resilience at the local level. As the City considers adoption of the updated map, it reflects not only a legal obligation but a broader commitment to protecting lives, property, and natural resources from the growing threat of wildfire. Los Angeles County Fire Presentation and Action Items This evening, the City Council will receive a presentation from Assistant Fire Chief Brian Kane of the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACoFD) on the updated 2025 Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps. Following the presentation, staff will request that the City Council: Open the public hearing; Take public testimony; Deliberate on matters concerning the adoption of the updated Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps; and Introduce, for first reading, Ordinance No. 387. DISCUSSION: California’s Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) maps are essential planning tools used to identify areas with varying levels of wildfire hazard. Developed by CAL FIRE, these maps provide a long-term, science-based assessment of how likely an area is to experience wildfire and how intense that fire could be under extreme conditions. While often confused with risk 109 maps, FHSZ maps serve a different purpose: they evaluate hazard, the likelihood, and expected behavior of wildfire, rather than risk, which considers the vulnerability of specific structures and the presence of mitigation measures. Understanding this distinction is critical for land-use planning, building code development, and public safety efforts. The following explains the methodology, purpose, and limitations of FHSZ mapping, as well as recent updates aimed at improving accuracy across both State and Local Responsibility Areas. Methodology, Purpose, and Limitations FHSZ maps are created using a science-based and field-tested model that evaluates the hazard of an area burning, not the risk of fire damage. “Hazard” refers to the physical conditions that influence wildfire likelihood and behavior over a 30- to 50-year period, such as terrain, natural vegetation, fire history, typical weather patterns, flame length, and ember generation. The model incorporates two key components: (1) the probability of an area burning and (2) the expected fire behavior under extreme fuel and weather conditions. These maps function similarly to flood zone maps, identifying areas based on the probability of wildfire occurrence rather than predicting specific outcomes or property loss. Importantly, hazard maps do not account for recent wildfire activity, defensible space, ignition- resistant construction, or fuel reduction efforts. These are instead considered under the concept of risk. “Risk” reflects the potential damage a fire could cause under current conditions, incorporating mitigation measures such as fuel reduction, defensible space, and fire-resistant building features. Insurance companies rely on risk models, not hazard models, because they factor in short-term, site-specific variables that affect a structure’s susceptibility to damage. Unlike hazard models, risk models can change frequently based on evolving conditions. Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara recently stated, "The CAL FIRE hazard maps are not used for insurance rates or underwriting decisions, but they will empower communities with more accurate information about the very real hazards we face." (Attachment E). Outside of wildland areas, hazard models also evaluate potential threats to buildings by considering urban vegetation, terrain, weather, proximity to wildlands, and nearby fire behavior. However, they do not directly predict structure loss, as detailed ignition vulnerability data (e.g., roof type or vent openings) is not included. One critical component of the model is ember spread, since embers are a major cause of wildfire ignition. Embers can travel long distances in high winds and ignite structures by entering attics, vents, or landing on decks and roofs. State Responsibility Areas (SRAs) and Local Responsibility Areas (LRAs) FHSZ maps are currently being updated to incorporate the latest fire science, localized climate data, and improved wildfire behavior modeling. These updates aim to provide a more accurate reflection of current wildfire hazard conditions throughout California, both in State Responsibility Areas (SRAs) and Local Responsibility Areas (LRAs). SRAs are lands where the state holds financial responsibility for wildland fire protection. In contrast, LRAs include incorporated cities, urban regions, agricultural lands, and other areas where fire protection is managed by local agencies. CAL FIRE applies an adapted version of the SRA hazard model to LRAs, taking into account both ember exposure from adjacent wildlands and flammable vegetation within the urban environment. 110 Under California Government Code Sections 51177-51179, local agencies receiving FHSZ maps for LRAs from the Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM) are required to follow a three-step process: (1) within 30 days, make the maps available for public review and comment (Attachment F - Public Notice); (2) within 120 days, adopt the maps by local ordinance (Attachment G - Ordinance); and (3) within 30 days of adoption, submit the ordinance and related documents to the Board of Forestry and Fire Protection. Local agencies may only increase, not decrease, the hazard designations provided by OSFM. As wildfire threats continue to evolve with changing climate conditions and expanding development in fire-prone areas, the importance of accurate, science-based hazard mapping cannot be overstated. California’s updated FHSZ maps provide a critical foundation for informed decision-making in land use, building regulations, and emergency preparedness. By distinguishing between long-term hazard and short-term risk, these maps support more targeted mitigation strategies and better coordination among state and local agencies. Ultimately, the updated FHSZ maps serve as a proactive tool to help communities understand their wildfire exposure, strengthen their resilience, and reduce the potential impacts of future wildfires. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION It is important to note that currently, Section 15.04.040, Subsection 4 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) defines a 'fire zone' as follows: "Fire zone" means the fire zone adopted by an ordinance creating and establishing fire zones or where no such fire zones have been adopted by the City of Rolling Hills, shall mean very high fire hazard severity zone (VHFHSZ). The current language in the Municipal Code assumes that, in the absence of a formally adopted fire zone map or ordinance, the entire City is classified as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) by default. However, this assumption may not be accurate, as Cal Fire’s 2025 FHSZ maps indicate that not all areas of the City fall within a Very High FHSZ. Therefore, should the City Council desire to approve the first reading this evening, staff will place Ordinance No. 387 on the June 9, 2025 City Council meeting for second reading and adoption, thus updating the definition found in Section 15.04.040, Subsection 4 of the RHMC. CONCLUSION For the City of Rolling Hills, where wildfire risk is a persistent concern due to the community’s rural character and natural landscape, the updated FHSZ maps are a vital tool in advancing local wildfire preparedness. These maps not only reflect the most current science and modeling but also help the City make informed decisions about land use, development standards, and resource allocation. The adoption and use of these updated maps reaffirm the City’s commitment to public safety, community resilience, and responsible stewardship of its unique environment. FISCAL IMPACT: No direct fiscal impact. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: Open the public hearing; 111 Take public testimony; Deliberate on matters concerning the adoption of the updated Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps; and Introduce for first reading, Ordinance No. 387 ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A - PS_FHS_250528_MA_LRA_RollingHills.pdf Attachment B - PS_FHS_250528_MA_LRA__LosAngelesCoSW.pdf Attachment C - PS_FHS_250528_MA_LRA_LegislationFactsheet.pdf Attachment D - PS_FHS_250528_MA_Events&LegislativeTimeline.pdf Attachment E - PS_FHS_250528_MA_FHSZ-InsuranceConsumerAlert.pdf Attachment F - PS_FHS_250528_MA_PublicNotice_FireHazardSeverityZones.pdf Attachment G - 387_ FireHazardSeverityZoneMap_Ordinance.pdf Attachment H - PS_FHS_250528_MA_LACoFD_LRA.pdf 112 City and County boundaries as of 10/22/24 (CA Board of Equalization) CAL FIRE State Responsibility Areas (SRA25_1) CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZSRA23_3, FHSZLRA_25_1) Data Sources: Daniel Berlant, State Fire Marshal, CA Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Joe Tyler, Director/Fire Chief, CA Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Wade Crowfoot, Secretary for Natural Resources, CA Natural Resources Agency Gavin Newsom, Governor, State of CaliforniaThe State of California and the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy of data or maps. Neither the State nor the Department shall be liable under any circumstances for any direct, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to any claim by any user or third party on account of, or arising from, the use of data or maps. and other relevant factors including areas where winds have been identified by the Office of the State Fire Marshal as a major cause of wildfire spread. statewide criteria and based on the severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in those areas. Moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones shall be based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, Government Code section 51178 requires the State Fire Marshal to identify areas in the state as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones based on consistent Unzoned LRA Incorporated City Projection: NAD 83 California Teale Albers Scale: 1:20,000 at 11" x 17" 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6Km 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1MiFire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) in Local Responsibility Area (LRA), as Identified by the State Fire Marshal Rolling Hills PortugueseBendRdSaddl ebackRdEast f i el dD r SouthfieldDrBuggyWhipDrCrest RdWJohnsCanyonRd GeorgeffRdLowerBlackwaterCanyonRdCrest R d E ChuckwagonRdCabal l erosRdPineTreeLnUNINCORPORATED LOS ANGELES CO. RANCHO PALOS VERDES RANCHO PALOS VERDES RANCHO PALOS VERDES ROLLING HILLS ESTATES ROLLING HILLS ESTATES TORRANCE March 24, 2025 As Identified by the State Fire MarshalLocal Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zones CITY OF ROLLING HILLS – LOS ANGELES COUNTY Very High High Moderate 113 City and County boundaries as of 10/22/24 (CA Board of Equalization) CAL FIRE State Responsibility Areas (SRA25_1) CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZSRA23_3, FHSZLRA_25_1) Data Sources: Daniel Berlant, State Fire Marshal, CA Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Joe Tyler, Director/Fire Chief, CA Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Wade Crowfoot, Secretary for Natural Resources, CA Natural Resources Agency Gavin Newsom, Governor, State of CaliforniaThe State of California and the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy of data or maps. Neither the State nor the Department shall be liable under any circumstances for any direct, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to any claim by any user or third party on account of, or arising from, the use of data or maps. Waterbody Federal Responsibility Area (FRA)Unzoned LRA Incorporated City Projection: NAD 83 California Teale Albers Scale: 1:277,000 at 11" x 17" 0 5 10 15 20Km 0 5 10Mi Fire Hazard Severity Zones in State Responsibility Area (SRA), Effective April 1, 2024 Very High High Moderate Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) in Local Responsibility Area (LRA), as Identified by the State Fire Marshal and other relevant factors including areas where winds have been identified by the Office of the State Fire Marshal as a major cause of wildfire spread. statewide criteria and based on the severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in those areas. Moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones shall be based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, Government Code section 51178 requires the State Fire Marshal to identify areas in the state as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones based on consistent Los Angeles County 105 5 10 405 110 210 101 101 23 110 2 47 187 1 90 27 118 91 134 213 1 42 1 170 107 AGOURA HILLS BEVERLY HILLS BURBANK CALABASAS CARSONCULVER CITYEL SEGUNDO GARDENAGLENDALE HAWTHORNE INGLEWOOD LOMITALOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES MALIBU RANCHO PALOS VERDESREDONDO BEACHROLL INGHIL LS SANTA MONICA TORRANCE WESTLAKEVILLAGEV E N T U R A C O . March 24, 2025 As Identified by the State Fire MarshalLocal Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zones SOUTHWESTERN LOS ANGELES COUNTY – UNINCORPORATED LRA Avalon Santa Catalina Island San Clemente Island No Unincorporated LRA on Santa Catalina or San Clemente islands Very High High Moderate 114 115 116 117 FHSZ Frequently Asked Questions What do Fire Hazard Severity Zones measure? The Fire Hazard Severity Zone map reflects “hazard,” not “risk”. The map is like flood zone maps, where lands are described in terms of the probability level of a par琀椀cular area being inundated by floodwaters, and not specifically prescrip琀椀ve of impacts. “Hazard” is based on the physical condi琀椀ons that create a likelihood and expected fire behavior over a 30 to 50-year period without considering mi琀椀ga琀椀on measures such as home hardening, recent wildfire, or fuel reduc琀椀on efforts. “Risk” is the poten琀椀al damage a fire can do to the area under exis琀椀ng condi琀椀ons, accoun琀椀ng for any modifica琀椀ons such as fuel reduc琀椀on projects, defensible space, and igni琀椀on resistant building construc琀椀on. What is a Fire Hazard Severity Zone or FHSZ? Public Resource Code 4202; The State Fire Marshal shall classify lands within State Responsibility Areas into Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Each zone shall embrace rela琀椀vely homogeneous lands and shall be based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, and other relevant factors present, including areas where winds have been iden琀椀fied by the department as a major cause of wildfire spread. Government Code 51178; The State Fire Marshal shall iden琀椀fy areas in the state as Moderate, High, and Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones based on consistent statewide criteria and based on the severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in those areas. Moderate, High, and Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones shall be based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, and other relevant factors including areas where winds have been iden琀椀fied by the Office of the State Fire Marshal as a major cause of wildfire spread. Will the new Fire Hazard Severity Zones affect my ability to get or maintain insurance? Insurance companies use risk models, which differ from hazard models, because they consider the suscep琀椀bility of a structure to damage from fire and other short-term factors that are not included in hazard modeling. It is unlikely that insurance risk models would u琀椀lize CAL FIRE Fire Hazard Severity Zones as a factor, but much of the same data that is used in the Fire Hazard Severity Zone model are likely included in the insurance companies’ risk models. However, insurance risk models incorporate many addi琀椀onal factors and that change more frequently than those that CAL FIRE includes in its hazard mapping, which is built to remain steady for the next 10+ years. General 118 FHSZ Frequently Asked Questions When were the maps last updated? In 2007, CAL FIRE updated the FHSZs for the en琀椀re State Responsibility Area (SRA). Between 2008- 2011 the department worked with local governments to make recommenda琀椀ons of the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones within Local Responsibility Area (LRA). Why are fire hazard severity maps being updated? The hazard maps are being updated to more accurately reflect the zones in California that are suscep琀椀ble to wildfire. The hazard mapping process will incorporate new science in local climate data and improved fire assessment modeling in determining hazard ra琀椀ngs. Where do Fire Hazard Severity Zones apply? Fire Hazard Severity Zones are found in areas where the state has financial responsibility for wildfire protec琀椀on and preven琀椀on, called the State Responsibility Area. More than 31 million acres are in this area. Under Senate Bill 63 (Stern, 2021) Government Code 51178 was amended to also iden琀椀fy the Moderate and High Fire Hazard Severity Zones with the Very High in Local Responsibility Area (LRA). What are the uses of Fire Hazard Severity Zones? The zones are used for several purposes including to designate areas where California’s defensible space standards and wildland urban interface building codes are required. They can be a factor in real estate disclosure, and local governments may consider them in their general plan. What are the key elements of the Fire Hazard Severity Zone model? The fire hazard severity model for wildland fire has two key elements: probability of an area burning and expected fire behavior under extreme fuel and weather condi琀椀ons. The zones reflect areas that have similar burn probabili琀椀es and fire behavior characteris琀椀cs. The factors considered in determining fire hazard within wildland areas are fire history, flame length, terrain, local weather, and poten琀椀al fuel over a 50-year period. Outside of wildlands, the model considers factors that might lead to buildings being threatened, including terrain, weather, urban vegeta琀椀on cover, blowing embers, proximity to wildland, fire history, and fire hazard in nearby wildlands. FHSZs are not a structure loss model, as key informa琀椀on regarding structure igni琀椀on (such as roof type, etc.) is not included. General 119 FHSZ Frequently Asked Questions How do the Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps differ from California Public U琀椀li琀椀es Commission (CPUC) High Fire Threat District Maps? The California Public U琀椀li琀椀es Commission (CPUC) sponsored map, known as "CPUC High Fire Threat District Map” (HFTD), includes similar factors as those in the FHSZ maps, however the CPUC HFTD Map is designed specifically for iden琀椀fying areas where there is an increased risk for u琀椀lity associated wildfires. As such, the CPUC map includes fire hazards associated with historical powerline-caused wildfires, current fuel condi琀椀ons, and scores areas based on where fires start, as opposed to where poten琀椀al fires may cause impacts. Why is my property in a different zone than the adjacent area, which looks similar? In wildland areas, zone edges are a result of the way zones are delineated. Specifically, zones represent areas of similar slope and fuel poten琀椀al. Zone boundaries divide zones based on geographic and vegeta琀椀on features that align with fire hazard poten琀椀al; although, at a local scale, it may appear that the immediate area is similar on both sides of the edge. The class value within a zone is based on the average hazard score across the whole zone, so areas that are in the same zone but not immediately adjacent to a local area can have an influence on the final zone classifica琀椀on. Classifica琀椀on outside of wildland areas is based on the fire hazard of the adjacent wildland and the probability of flames and embers threatening buildings. How are Fire Hazard Severity Zones determined? CAL FIRE used the best available science and data to develop, and field test a model that served as the basis of zone assignments. The model evaluated the probability of the area burning and poten琀椀al fire behavior in the area. Many factors were included such as fire history, vegeta琀椀on, flame length, blowing embers, proximity to wildland, terrain, and weather. What new data will be included in the new model, and how does this differ from the previous model? A 2 km grid of climate data covering the years 2003-2018 is being used in the update. The previous model used stock weather inputs across the state to calculate wildland fire intensity scores. The updated model will adjust fire intensity scores based on the most extreme fire weather at a given loca琀椀on, considering temperature, humidity, and wind speed. In addi琀椀on, ember transport is being modeled based on local distribu琀椀ons of observed wind speed and direc琀椀on values instead of using a generic buffer distance for urban areas adjacent to wildlands. General 120 FHSZ Frequently Asked Questions How can I search the Fire Hazard Severity Zone of a property? You can search by address to find your current designa琀椀on on the web at: osfm.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ Why does the model place an emphasis on the spread of embers? Embers spread wildfire because they can travel long distances in the wind and ignite vegeta琀椀on, roofs, a琀�cs (by ge琀�ng into vents), and decks. Why do waterbodies have a Fire Hazard Severity Zone Classifica琀椀on? All areas in State Responsibility Area, including water bodies, require a Fire Hazard Severity Zone designa琀椀on. The 2007 FHSZ maps zoned all water as Moderate by default. In the 2023 FHSZ model we added a buffer of FHSZ from the surrounding wildland into water bodies to account for poten琀椀al threat of embers to buildings on docks and house boats, as well as varia琀椀on in reservoir height that occurs with drought. How does CAL FIRE assist Local Governments in Fire Hazard Severity Zones? CAL FIRE’s Land Use Planning Program is a specialized unit that provides support to local governments by providing fire safety exper琀椀se on the State’s wildland urban interface building codes, wildfire safety codes, as well as helping in the development of the safety elements in general plans. General 121 FHSZ Frequently Asked Questions What is State Responsibility Area or SRA? SRA is a legal term defining the area where the state has financial responsibility for wildland fire protec琀椀on and preven琀椀on. Incorporated ci琀椀es and federal ownership are not included. Within the SRA, CAL FIRE is responsible for fire preven琀椀on and suppression. There are more than 31 million acres in SRA, with an es琀椀mated 1.7 million people and 800,000 exis琀椀ng homes. How is State Responsibility Area determined? The Board of Forestry and Fire Protec琀椀on (Board) classifies land as State Responsibility Area. The legal defini琀椀on of SRA is found in the Public Resources Code Sec琀椀on 4125. The Board has developed detailed procedures to classify lands as State Responsibility Area. Lands are removed from SRA when they become incorporated by a city, change in ownership to the federal government, become more densely populated, or are converted to intensive agriculture that minimizes the risk of wildfire. While some lands are removed from SRA automa琀椀cally, the Board typically reviews changes every five years. What Fire Hazard Severity Zones are in State Responsibility Area? All of the State Responsibility Area is in a Fire Hazard Severity Zone. Lands are either ranked as Moderate, High or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones. What are the wildland urban interface (WUI) building codes in State Responsibility Area? The WUI building codes (California Building Code (CBC) Chapter 7A) reduce the risk of embers fanned by wind-blown wildfires from igni琀椀ng buildings. The codes for roofing, siding, decking, windows, and vents apply throughout all State Responsibility Area regardless of the fire hazard severity ranking. Ember-resistant building materials can be found at: h琀琀ps://osfm.fire.ca.gov/divisions/fire-engineering-and-inves琀椀ga琀椀ons/building-materials-lis琀椀ng/ State Responsibility Area 122 FHSZ Frequently Asked Questions What is the difference between the various Fire Hazard Severity Zones? Classifica琀椀on of a wildland zone as Moderate, High or Very High Fire Hazard is based on the average hazard across the area included in the zone, which have a minimum size of 200 acres. In wildlands, hazard is a func琀椀on of modeled flame length under the worst condi琀椀ons and annual burn probability. Both these factors generally increase with increasing hazard level, but there may be instances where one value is Very High and the other is low, pushing the overall hazard into a more intermediate ranking. On average, both modeled flame length and burn probability increase by roughly 40-60% between hazard classes. Is the GIS data for Fire Hazard Severity Zones available for download? The data inputs used to develop the Fire Hazard Severity Zones are iden琀椀fied in the Ini琀椀al Statement of Reasons (ISOR) Title 19 Development (ca.gov). CAL FIRE has developed an addi琀椀onal data package which consists of sequen琀椀al modeling steps, including any data inputs that were not already publicly available and referenced in the ISOR. The data package encompasses 34 spa琀椀al datasets and 8 tables, provided in raster, polygon, and table format. These datasets are forma琀琀ed for Esri ArcGIS so昀琀ware, except for four tables provided in Excel. Ten of the datasets are updated versions used to produce an edited SRA FHSZ map following the public comment period that ended April 4, 2023. Upon formal adop琀椀on of the FHSZ map, the final SRA FHSZ geospa琀椀al data file will become available. The data package is available on the FHSZ website Fire Hazard Severity Zones (ca.gov) under the science and methods banner. State Responsibility Area 123 FHSZ Frequently Asked Questions What is Local Responsibility Area or LRA? Local Responsibility Areas (LRA) are incorporated ci琀椀es, urban regions, agriculture lands, and por琀椀ons of the desert where the local government is responsible for wildfire protec琀椀on. This is typically provided by city fire departments, fire protec琀椀on districts, coun琀椀es, and by CAL FIRE under contract. When did Fire Hazard Severity Zones begin in Local Responsibility Area? Assembly Bill 337 (Bates, 1992) prompted by the devasta琀椀ng Oakland Hills Fire of 1991, calls for CAL FIRE to evaluate fire hazard severity in Local Responsibility Area and to make a recommenda琀椀on to the local jurisdic琀椀on where Very High FHSZ exist. Government Code 51175 then provides direc琀椀on for the local jurisdic琀椀on to take appropriate ac琀椀on. How are Fire Hazard Severity Zones determined in Local Responsibility Areas? CAL FIRE uses an extension of the State Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zone model as the basis for evalua琀椀ng fire hazard in Local Responsibility Area. The Local Responsibility Area hazard ra琀椀ng reflects flame and ember intrusion from adjacent wildlands and from flammable vegeta琀椀on in the urban area. What are the requirements for landowners in Fire Hazard Severity Zones in Local Responsibility Areas? California’s WUI building codes (CBC Chapter 7A) apply to the design and construc琀椀on of new buildings located in High and Very High FHSZs in Local Responsibility Areas. Local ordinances may require igni琀椀on resistant construc琀椀on for remodel projects. Check with your local building department to determine which igni琀椀on resistant building codes apply to your project. In addi琀椀on, Government Code Sec琀椀on 51182 calls for defensible space clearance and other wildland fire safety prac琀椀ces for buildings. Owners are also required to make a natural hazard disclosure as part of a real estate transfer. For informa琀椀on regarding home hardening and defensible space clearance, visit www.readyforwildfire.org. Does the designa琀椀on of Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in the Local Responsibility Area trigger the 100-foot clearance requirement? Yes, per Government Code 51182 unless a local government has passed a more stringent requirement, the 100-foot defensible space clearance applies. For informa琀椀on regarding home hardening and defensible space clearance, visit www.readyforwildfire.org. Local Responsibility Area 124 FHSZ Frequently Asked Questions Why is my property in a different zone than the adjacent area, which looks similar? In non-wildland areas, zone edges occur based on distance to the wildland edge. Because hazard in these areas is largely determined by incoming embers from adjacent wildland, urban areas that are similar in vegeta琀椀on type and housing density may have a change in FHSZ class as the distance to the wildland edge increases. Areas immediately adjacent to wildland receive the same FHSZ score as that wildland where fire originates, and the model then produces lower scores as the distance to wildland edge increases. What is the process for developing Fire Hazard Severity Zones in the Local Responsibility Area? CAL FIRE uses the same modeling data that is used to map the State Responsibility Area. The map, along with a model ordinance, are then sent to the governing body for adop琀椀on. How are the new Fire Hazard Severity Zones impac琀椀ng development? Many of the changes expanding Fire Hazard Severity Zones in Local Responsibility Areas have been supported by the building industry. CAL FIRE works closely with the building industry when se琀�ng various building codes and defensible space requirements, so we are working together to not affect development itself but to make sure development matches the hazards of that area. When will the Local Responsibility Area Map be released? The Local Responsibility Area map process will happen a昀琀er the State Responsibility Area process has been completed, which is es琀椀mated to occur in winter of 2025. Why haven’t Moderate and High Fire Hazard Severity Zone classes been classified before in the Local Responsibility Area? New legisla琀椀on, Senate Bill 63 (Stern, 2021), now requires the adop琀椀on of all three Fire Hazard Severity Zone classes in the Local Responsibility Area. Previously only Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones were required for adop琀椀on in Local Responsibility Areas. Local Responsibility Area 125 LRA Legislation Factsheet Assembly Bill No.337 An act to add Chapter 6.8 (commencing with Section 51175) to Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5 of the Government Code, and to amend Section 13108.5 of the Health and Safety Code, relating to fire protection. [Enrolled, January 28, 1991] AB 337, Bates. Very high fire hazard severity zones. (1) Under existing law, the State Board of Forestry is required to classify all lands within the state, in accordance with prescribed criteria, for the purpose of determining areas in which the financial responsibility of preventing and suppressing fires is primarily the responsibility of the state. This bill would declare that the prevention of fires is not a municipal affair but is instead, a matter of statewide concern, and would make a finding and declaration of the Legislature that its provisions apply to all local agencies, including, but not limited to, charter cities, charter counties, and charter cities and counties. The bill would prohibit that finding from limiting the authority of a local agency, as defined, from imposing more restrictive fire and panic safety requirements, as otherwise authorized by law. The bill would state that it is not the intent of the Legislature to limit or restrict the authority of a local agency to impose more restrictive fire and panic safety requirements, as otherwise authorized by law. This bill would require the Director of Forestry and Fire Protection to identify areas in the state as very high fire hazard severity zones within all counties pursuant to a prescribed schedule. The bill would require local agencies, as defined, to designate, by ordinance, very high fire hazard severity zones in their jurisdiction after receiving recommendations from the director, except as prescribed. The bill would authorize local agencies to include or exclude areas following certain findings and would require changes made by local agencies to be final and not rebuttable by the director. By requiring local agencies to designate very high fire hazard severity zones within their jurisdictions, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the State Fire Marshal to prepare and adopt a model ordinance that provides for the establishment of any high fire hazard security zones. 126 LRA Legislation Factsheet Assembly Bill No.337 (Continued) (2) Under existing law, any person who owns, leases, controls, operates, or maintains any building or structure in, upon, or adjoining any mountainous area or forest-covered lands, brush-covered lands, or grass-covered lands, or any land that is covered with flammable material, is required to undertake specified fire protection measures, including the maintenance of specified firebreaks. The bill would enact requirements of this nature for any person who owns, leases, controls, operates, or maintains, any occupied dwelling or occupied structure in, upon, or adjoining any mountainous area, forest-covered land, brush-covered land, grass-covered land, or land covered with flammable material, which area or land is within a very high fire hazard severity zone, as described in (1). The bill would authorize local agencies to exempt certain structures and would exempt certain land or water areas. The bill would make violation of these requirements an infraction or misdemeanor, as specified, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime, and would specify related matters. This bill would require local agencies to notify owners of property of violation and would authorize local agencies to correct the conditions and make a lien upon the property, as prescribed. By creating these requirements, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would permit a violation of these requirements to be considered a public nuisance, as specified. (3) Existing law requires the State Fire Marshal to adopt, amend, and repeal regulations for roof coverings and openings into the attic areas of buildings in those fire hazard severity zones in state responsibility lands as designated by the director. Existing law requires the director to classify lands within state responsibility areas into fire hazard severity zones. This bill would instead require the State Fire Marshal to propose, and would require the State Building Standards Commission to adopt, amend, and repeal those regulations. The bill would also require the State Fire Marshal to propose, and would require the State Building Standards Commission to adopt, amend, and repeal, those regulations for buildings in very high fire hazard severity zones in state responsibility lands, designated by the director, and in very high fire hazard severity zones as described in (1). The bill would require roofs on all new buildings and certain existing buildings in both of those zones to be at least a class B roof that complies with Standard 32-7 of the Uniform Building Code, as adopted in the California Building Standards Code. The bill would impose requirements on installers and roofing materials and make other related changes. The bill would exempt historic buildings, as defined, from these provisions. 127 LRA Legislation Factsheet Senate Bill No.63 CHAPTER 382 An act to amend Sections 51177, 51178, 51178.5, 51182, and 51189 of the Government Code, to amend Section 13108.5 of the Health and Safety Code, and to amend Sections 4124.5 and 4291 of, and to add and repeal Sections 4123.8, 4291.5, and 4291.6 of, the Public Resources Code, relating to fire prevention. [Approved by Governor September 28, 2021. Filed with Secretary of State September 28, 2021.] SB 63, Stern. Fire prevention: vegetation management: public education: grants: defensible space: fire hazard severity zones. (1) Existing law requires the Director of Forestry and Fire Protection to identify areas of the state as very high fire hazard severity zones based on specified criteria. Existing law requires a local agency, within 30 days after receiving a transmittal from the director that identifies very high fire hazard severity zones, to make the information available for public review, as provided. This bill, among other things, would also require the director to identify areas of the state as moderate and high fire hazard severity zones. The bill would modify the factors the director is required to use to identify areas into fire hazard severity zones, as provided. The bill would require a local agency to make this information available for public review and comment, as provided. By expanding the responsibility of a local agency, the bill would impose a state- mandated local program. This bill would also make conforming changes. (2) Existing law requires a person who owns, leases, controls, operates, or maintains an occupied dwelling or structure in, upon, or adjoining a mountainous area, forest-covered land, brush- covered land, grass-covered land, or land that is covered with flammable material that is within a very high fire hazard severity zone, as designated by a local agency, or a building or structure in, upon, or adjoining those areas or lands within a state responsibility area, to maintain a defensible space of 100 feet from each side and from the front and rear of the structure, as specified. Existing law authorizes a greater distance than specified above on the specified land in a very high fire hazard severity zone. Existing law specifies that clearance beyond the property line may only be required if state law, local ordinance, rule, or regulation includes certain findings and specifies that clearance on adjacent property shall only be conducted following written consent by the adjacent landowner. 128 LRA Legislation Factsheet Amended by Senate Bill No.63 Government Code 51178 The State Fire Marshal shall identify areas in the state as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones based on consistent statewide criteria and based on the severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in those areas. Moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones shall be based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, and other relevant factors including areas where winds have been identified by the Office of the State Fire Marshal as a major cause of wildfire spread. (Amended by Stats. 2021, Ch. 382, Sec. 2.5. (SB 63) Effective January 1, 2022.) Government Code 51178.5 Within 30 days after receiving a transmittal from the State Fire Marshal that identifies fire hazard severity zones pursuant to Section 51178, a local agency shall make the information available for public review and comment. The information shall be presented in a format that is understandable and accessible to the general public, including, but not limited to, maps. (Amended by Stats. 2021, Ch. 382, Sec. 3.5. (SB 63) Effective January 1, 2022.) 129 LRA Legislation Factsheet Assembly Bill No. 211 CHAPTER 574 An act to amend Sections 11891, 11893, 12581, 12996, 12998, 12999.4, and 12999.5 of, and to add Sections 12999.6 and 13001 to, the Food and Agricultural Code, to amend Section 51179 of the Government Code, to amend Sections 44274.10, 44274.11, 44274.12, 44274.13, and 44274.14 of the Health and Safety Code, to amend Sections 3113, 4799.05, 14503.5.1, 14538, 14549.2, 14581, 42052, and 42060 of, to add Sections 14537.5, 14548, 14555, and 21166.3 to, to add Part 5 (commencing with Section 75250) to Division 44 of, and to repeal Section 75250.1 of, the Public Resources Code, to amend Section 43152.6 of, and to amend and repeal Section 43152.10 of, the Revenue and Taxation Code, to amend Section 13198 of the Water Code, to amend the Budget Act of 2021 (Chapters 21, 69, and 240 of the Statutes of 2021) by amending Item 8570-002-0001 of Section 2.00 of that act, and to amend the Budget Act of 2021 (Chapter 44 of the Statutes of 2022) by amending Items 3540-101-0001 of Section 2.00 of that act, relating to public resources, and making an appropriation therefor, to take effect immediately, bill related to the budget. [Approved by Governor September 27, 2022. Filed with Secretary of State September 27, 2022.] AB 211, Committee on Budget. Public resources trailer bill. (2) Existing law requires the State Fire Marshal to identify areas of the state as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones based on specified criteria. Existing law requires a local agency to designate, by ordinance, very high fire hazard severity zones in its jurisdiction within 120 days of receiving recommendations from the State Fire Marshal. Existing law authorizes a local agency, at its discretion, to include areas within the jurisdiction of the local agency, not identified as very high fire hazard severity zones by the State Fire Marshal, as very high fire hazard severity zones following a finding supported by substantial evidence, as provided. This bill would additionally require a local agency to designate, by ordinance, moderate and high fire hazard severity zones within 120 days of receiving recommendations from the State Fire Marshal. By expanding the responsibility of a local agency, the bill would impose a state- mandated local program. The bill would additionally authorize a local agency, at its discretion, to include areas within the jurisdiction of the local agency, not identified as moderate and high fire hazard severity zones by the State Fire Marshal, as moderate and high fire hazard severity zones, respectively. The bill would prohibit the local agency from decreasing the level of fire hazard severity zone as identified by the State Fire Marshal for any area within the jurisdiction of the local agency, as provided. 130 LRA Legislation Factsheet Amended by Assembly Bill No. 211 Government Code 51179 (a) A local agency shall designate, by ordinance, moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones in its jurisdiction within 120 days of receiving recommendations from the State Fire Marshal pursuant to Section 51178. (b) (1) A local agency may, at its discretion, include areas within the jurisdiction of the local agency, not identified as very high fire hazard severity zones by the State Fire Marshal, as very high fire hazard severity zones following a finding supported by substantial evidence in the record that the requirements of Section 51182 are necessary for effective fire protection within the area. (2) A local agency may, at its discretion, include areas within the jurisdiction of the local agency, not identified as moderate and high fire hazard severity zones by the State Fire Marshal, as moderate and high fire hazard severity zones, respectively. (3) A local agency shall not decrease the level of fire hazard severity zone as identified by the State Fire Marshal for any area within the jurisdiction of the local agency, and, in exercising its discretion pursuant to paragraph (2), may only increase the level of fire hazard severity zone as identified by the State Fire Marshal for any area within the jurisdiction of the local agency. (c) The local agency shall transmit a copy of an ordinance adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) to the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection within 30 days of adoption. (d) Changes made by a local agency to the recommendations made by the State Fire Marshal shall be final and shall not be rebuttable by the State Fire Marshal. (e) The State Fire Marshal shall prepare and adopt a model ordinance that provides for the establishment of very high fire hazard severity zones. (f) Any ordinance adopted by a local agency pursuant to this section that substantially conforms to the model ordinance of the State Fire Marshal shall be presumed to be in compliance with the requirements of this section. (g) A local agency shall post a notice at the office of the county recorder, county assessor, and county planning agency identifying the location of the map provided by the State Fire Marshal pursuant to Section 51178. If the agency amends the map, pursuant to subdivision (b) or (c) of this section, the notice shall instead identify the location of the amended map. (Amended by Stats. 2022, Ch. 574, Sec. 10. (AB 211) Effective September 27, 2022.) 131 LRA Legislation Factsheet Increasing Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) Area and Designation Government Code section 51179 requires a local agency to designate, by ordinance, moderate, high, and very high FHSZ within 120 days of receiving the identified FHSZ’s from the State Fire Marshal pursuant to Section 51178. The law does not allow for a local jurisdiction to request changes or provide comments to the State Fire Marshal on the FHSZ designations. However, a local agency may choose to increase the designation of a FHSZ from the FHSZ identified by the State Fire Marshal, or designate areas as having a FHSZ that were not designated in a FHSZ by the State Fire Marshal. This may occur because FHSZ zone edges in the maps and data from the State Fire Marshal are not aligned with parcel boundaries or roads that some may consider for lines of convenance when adopting ordinances. A local agency is not allowed to reduce the designation of a FHSZ classification from the State Fire Marshal (i.e. a local agency cannot make an area designated as High by the State Fire Marshal, Moderate in its adopted ordinance). However, a local jurisdiction can increase the designation from the one identified by the State Fire Marshal. If a local agency decides to increase the designation of a FHSZ, it may do so if it does the following: 1. If increasing the designation to Very High, a local agency must make a finding supported by substantial evidence in the record that the requirements of Government Code section 51182 are necessary for effective fire protection. 2. If increasing the designation to Moderate or High, a local agency may do this at its discretion. If a local agency decides to include areas in its FHSZ adopted ordinance not identified as being in a FHSZ by the State Fire Marshal, it may include those areas if it does the following: 1. If including areas not identified as being in a FHSZ and designating it as Very High, a local agency must make a finding supported by substantial evidence in the record that the requirements of Government Code section 51182 are necessary for effective fire protection. 2. If including areas not identified as being in a FHSZ and designating it as Moderate or High, a local agency may do this at its discretion. 132 LRA Legislation Factsheet 133 134 1980 - Panorama Fire Burned 28,800 acres, 325 structures lost, 4 fatalities (San Bernardino). 1982 - PRC 4201 Required CAL FIRE to create Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ). 1985 - FHSZ Maps First statewide FHSZ maps created for fire planning. 1991 - Tunnel Fire Burned 1,600 acres, 2,900 structures lost, 25 fatalities (Oakland Hills). 1992 - AB 337 (Bates Bill) CAL FIRE to identify Very High FHSZ in Local Responsibility Areas (LRAs) and recommend actions. 2007 - FHSZ Model Finalized Updated hazard model applied to LRAs statewide. 2017 - Tubbs Fire Burned 36,810 acres, 5,643 structures lost, 22 fatalities (Santa Rosa). 2018 - Camp Fire Burned 153,336 acres, 18,804 structures lost, 85 fatalities (Paradise). 2021 - AB 642 Expanded mapping to include Moderate and High FHSZ, added cultural burns, liaison, and training. 2021 - SB 63 Extended hazard mapping, defensible space, and community assessment programs. 2022 - AB 211 Mandates local adoption of Moderate and High FHSZ; supports CEQA exemptions and funding. California Wildfire Events & Legislative TimelineCalifornia Wildfire Events & Legislative Timeline 135 LQVXUDQFHFDJRY ɕ-927-4357 CAL FIRE hazard maps do not affect insurance rates or availability Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara issued a fact sheet explaining that CAL FIRE hazard maps do not affect insurance rates or availability. A Spanish- language fact sheet is also available. For many years, insurance companies have been using wildfire risk models for determining where they will write and renew policies, and how much premium to charge a policyholder -- not the Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps. CAL FIRE’s maps are required by law and their purpose is to drive local planning decisions, not insurance decisions. Commissioner’s POV: “Let me be clear: The CAL FIRE hazard maps are not used for insurance rates or underwriting decisions. But they will empower communities with more accurate information about the very real hazards we face. The reality is we all need to do more to protect our homes and communities from wildfires. When communities know and understand their risks, they can plan and prepare.” Background: The Department of Insurance is implementing a Sustainable Insurance Strategy aimed at supporting safer communities. Based on feedback gathered from thousands of town halls and meetings with homeowners, businesses, and individual consumers, Commissioner Lara implemented an aggressive approach to modernize insurance regulations to address insurance accessibility challenges for consumers. Commissioner Lara’s new Safer from Wildfires regulation clarifies what actions you should take to reduce wildfire risks and receive an insurance discount. Insurance companies use computerized wildfire catastrophe models to determine which homes to write based on the risk of loss. Building on the Safer from Wildfires initiative — the nation’s first wildfire safety discount program — the strategy requires catastrophe models to account for mitigation efforts by homeowners, businesses, and communities, something not possible even a few months ago under outdated regulations. Learn More: The Department of Insurance fact sheet is posted at CAL FIRE’s Fire Hazard Severity Zone web page where you can learn more about enhancing your property’s fire safety and view current versions of maps. 136 LQVXUDQFHFDJRY ɕ-927-4357 Exciting News! ฺุู The California Department of Insurance (CDI) is proud to introduce the Community Outreach and Education Partnership Initiative. This dynamic program is designed to raise consumer awareness about CDI's vital services and expand understanding of key insurance topics and fraud prevention. Become a valued partner and unlock exclusive access to: • Comprehensive consumer education materials • Specialized training sessions • Powerful social media tools Become a Partner Today: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/VHGZQHT 137 65277.00001\43666489.1 Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) California state law requires the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) to identify and map fire hazard areas statewide, referred to as “Fire Hazard Severity Zones.” On March 24, 2025, CAL FIRE released an updated version of the map from the director of CAL FIRE for an updated Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) map in the City of Rolling Hills. These maps use the latest climate data, fire history, topography, and wildfire modeling to classify areas as Very High, High, or Moderate Fi re Hazard Zones. The City of Rolling Hills, in partnership with the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACoFD), is currently reviewing the updated maps. While local governments, including the City of Rolling Hills, do not determine the contents of the FHSZ maps, they are required by state law to make the updated maps available for public review and comment, and to adopt these designations within 120 days. Although cities may not reduce a fire hazard severity designation, discretion is provided to cities to increase a designation where appropriate based on community input and local risk assessments. • Public Review & Comment: The City has 30 days from the release date to share the draft map for public review and comment. • Ordinance Adoption: The City must adopt a finalized map and ordinance within 120 days of receiving the map. • Submission to Cal Fire: After adoption, the City has 30 days to submit the ordinance to CAL FIRE. Please Submit Public Comment To: cityclerk@cityofrh.net What are Fire Hazard Severity Zones? The Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) maps are developed using a science-based and field-tested model that assigns a hazard score based on the factors that influence fire likelihood and fire behavior. Many factors are considered, such as fire history, exist ing and potential fuel (natural vegetation), predicted flame length, blowing embers, terrain, and typical fire weather for the area. There are three levels of hazard in the Local Responsibility Areas: Moderate, High, and Very High. The map below shows the updated fire hazard severity zones in Rolling Hills. Residents can utilize the interactive map by entering their address and view their designated fire hazard severity zone. CLICK TO COMPARE OLD & NEW FHSZ IN LRA CLICK TO FIND YOUR FHSZ & LOCAL CONTACTS How do the updated maps impact my property? 138 65277.00001\43666489.1 Properties located within the Fire Hazard Severity Zones are required to comply with the following items to reduce the chance of building loss or damage from a wildfire: • Providing defensible space clearance around buildings. See Los Angeles County Fire Department’s Guide to Defensible Space. • New buildings are to be constructed using fire-resistive features, such as those identified in Chapter 7A of the California Building Code. • Property owners must disclose that the property is located within a FHSZ to prospective buyers. • The City of Rolling Hills, in partnership with the LACoFD, is further reviewing how the updated maps affect building codes and development standards. Frequently Asked Questions Several frequently asked questions are answered below, and a comprehensive FAQ sheet from CAL FIRE can be accessed here. How are fire hazard severity zones determined? CAL FIRE uses the best available science and data to develop and field-test a model that serves as the basis of zone assignments. The model evaluated the probability of the area burning and potential fire behavior in the area. Many factors were included, such as fire history, vegetation, flame length, blowing embers, proximity to wildland, terrain, and weather. What do fire hazard severity zones measure? The Fire Hazard Severity Zone map evaluates “hazard,” not “risk.” The map is like flood zone maps, where lands are described in terms of the probability level of a particular area being inundated by floodwaters and not specifically prescriptive of impacts. “Hazard” is based on the physical conditions that create a likelihood and expected fire behavior over a 30 to 50-year period without considering mitigation measures such as home hardening, recent wildfire, or fuel reduction efforts. “Risk” is the potentia l damage a fire can do to the area under existing conditions, accounting for any modifications such as fuel reduction projects, defensible space, and ignition-resistant building construction. What are the key elements of the fire hazard severity zone model? The fire hazard severity model for wildland fire has two key elements: the probability of an area burning and expected fire behavior under extreme fuel and weather conditions. The zones reflect areas that have similar burn probabilities and fire behavior characteristics. The factors considered in determining fire hazard within wildland areas are fire history, flame length, terrain, local weather, and potential fuel over a 50 -year period. Outside of wildlands, the model considers factors that might lead to buildings 139 65277.00001\43666489.1 being threatened, including terrain, weather, urban vegetation cover, blowing embers, proximity to wildlands, fire history, and fire hazards in nearby wildlands. FHSZs are not a structure loss model, as key information regarding structure ignition (such as roof type, etc.) is not included. Why are the fire hazard severity maps being updated? The hazard maps are being updated to more accurately reflect the zones in California that are susceptible to wildfire. The hazard mapping process will incorporate new science in local climate data and improved fire assessment modeling in determining hazard ratings. Can the City change the fire hazard severity zone map? No. The City can only increase the level of fire hazard severity as identified by CAL FIRE for any area within the jurisdiction. Fire hazard severity cannot be decreased by the City. How will the updated Cal Fire Maps affect insurance availability and affordability? According to the California Department of Insurance, CAL FIRE maps are intended to drive local planning decisions, not insurance decisions. Under the California Department of Insurance's new regulation finalized in October 2022, insurance companies must provide discounts for wildfire safety actions such as community mitigation and home - hardening, which CAL FIRE’s maps do not assess. In addition, insurance companies are already using risk analysis tools and models that go beyond CAL FIRE’s proposed maps in determining what properties they will underwrite. Additional information from the California Department of Insurance can be accessed here. Other Resources • CAL FIRE • Los Angeles County Fire Department • California Department of Insurance • Rolling Hills Printable Fire Map 140 ORDINANCE NO. 387 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DESIGNATING FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES WITHIN THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA BASED ON MAPS PROVIDED BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION AND AMENDING TITLE 15 (BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION) OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE, AND FINDING THE ORDINANCE NOT SUBJECT TO CEQA WHEREAS, Government Code Section 51178 requires the State Fire Marshal to identify areas in the state as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones (“FHSZs”) based on consistent statewide criteria and severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in those areas; and WHEREAS, on March 24, 2025, the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection published a new Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map for the City of Rolling Hills (“City”); and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to designate by ordinance the FHSZs in its jurisdiction recommended by the State Fire Marshal pursuant to Government Code Section 51178; and WHEREAS, based on the entire record before the City Council and all written and oral evidence presented, the City Council finds the proposed Ordinance complies with the California Environmental Quality Act for the reasons set forth in this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, any and all other legal prerequisites relating to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The City Council hereby finds that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as substantive findings of this Ordinance. SECTION 2. CEQA. The City Council finds that the proposed actions are not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15060(c)(3).) Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines provides that organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment do not qualify as a project subject to CEQA. Here, the proposed actions constitute an organization or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment because it involves the designation of FHSZs in the Local Responsibility Areas as recommended by the Office of the State Fire Marshal and amendments to the City’s Municipal Code regarding the same. 141 Accordingly, the proposed actions are not a project subject to CEQA. Even if the proposed actions do qualify as a project subject to CEQA, they would be exempt from CEQA because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed actions in question may have a significant effect on the environment for the same reasons referenced above. (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15061(b)(3).) SECTION 3. Designation of Fire Hazard Severity Zones. The City Council hereby designates the Fire Hazard Severity Zones as recommended by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Government Code Section 51178. The map, approved by the City, is attached hereto as Attachment “A” entitled “City of Rolling Hills Fire Hazard Severity Zones” dated March 24, 2025, and hereby incorporated by reference. The official map is also located electronically on the following website: https://calfire.app.box.com/file/1810971784473. SECTION 4. Amendment. The definition of “fire zone” set forth in Section 15.04.040 (Definitions.) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Section 4, all other remaining provisions of Section 15.04.040 shall remain unchanged and continue in full force and effect: 15.04.040 - Definitions. "Fire zone" means the applicable fire hazard severity zone as designated by the City of Rolling Hills by ordinance. SECTION 5. Amendment. Section 15.20.025 (Very high fire hazard severity zone (VHFHSZ).) of Title 15 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 15.20.025 - Fire Hazard Severity Zones. The Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zones map for the City of Rolling Hills dated March 24, 2025, as identified by the State Fire Marshal, is hereby adopted by the City of Rolling Hills and incorporated herein for all purposes. This map is available for inspection in the City Clerk's office at the Rolling Hills City Hall. SECTION 6. Submittal to State and Posting. The City Clerk shall submit a copy of this Ordinance to the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection within thirty (30) days of adoption and take any necessary and proper actions to post all notices required under Government Code Section 51179. SECTION 7. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance for any reason is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, 142 subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 8. Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at City Hall for the City of Rolling Hills, located at Rolling Hills City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California 90274. The City Clerk is the custodian of the record of proceedings. SECTION 9. Effective Date. This Ordinance takes effect thirty (30) days following its adoption. SECTION 10. City Clerk’s Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be posted at the duly designated posting places within the City and published once within fifteen (15) days after passage and adoption as required by law; or, in the alternative, the City Clerk may cause to be published a summary of this Ordinance and post a certified copy of the text of this Ordinance in the Office of the City Clerk five (5) days prior to the date of adoption of this Ordinance, and, within fifteen (15) days after adoption, the City Clerk shall cause to be published the aforementioned summary and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, together with the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS __th DAY OF ________ 2025. JEFF PIEPER, MAYOR ATTEST: ____________________________________ CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK 143 1 144 2 LRA FHSZ MAPS 2025 What's Happening: Cal Fire has updated the Local Responsibility Area (LRA) Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) Map The State Fire Marshal will be releasing the Updated Recommended LRA FHSZ maps starting February 10, 2025, in four phases. 145 3 2007-2011 FHSZ MAP 146 4 2025 PROPOSED FHSZ MAP 147 5 FHSZ ROLLOUT PLAN Maps have been shifted to be released in phases, starting on 2/10/25 Roll out of FHSZ Map for Los Angeles County: 3/24/25 148 6 BACKGROUND The recommended LRA FHSZ maps will be expanded to include the High and Moderate FHSZs that were not previously mapped in 2010 The State Responsibility Area (SRA) FHSZ was completed in 2024 149 7 •A 2 km grid of climate data covering the years 2003-2018 is being used in the update •Updated model will adjust fire intensity scores based on the most extreme fire weather at a given location •Ember transport is being modeled based on local distribution of observed wind speed and direction values instead of using a generic buffer distance for urban areas adjacent to wildlands BACKGROUND 150 8 BACKGROUND •Local Cities can add to or increase the FHSZ. •Any additions to the Very High FHSZ requires substantial evidence of record to make the change. •The local agency cannot remove or decrease the FHSZs as recommended by the SFM per State Law. 151 WHY ARE THE FHS MAPS BEING UPDATE The hazard maps are being updated to more accurately reflect the zones in California that are susceptible to wildfire. The hazard mapping process will incorporate new science in local climate data and improved fire assessment modeling in determining hazard ratings. 152 10 WHAT DO THE FHS MAPS MEASURE Fire Hazard Severity Zone map evaluates “hazard,” not “risk”. “Hazard” is based on the physical conditions that create a likelihood and expected fire behavior over a 30 to 50-year period without considering mitigation measures such as home hardening, recent wildfire, or fuel reduction efforts. “Risk” is the potential damage a fire can do to the area under existing conditions, accounting for any modifications such as fuel reduction projects, defensible space, and ignition resistant building construction. 153 11 HOW ARE FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES DETERMINED? CAL FIRE uses the best available science and data to develop, and field test a model that served as the basis of zone assignments. The model evaluated the probability of the area burning and potential fire behavior in the area. Many factors were included such as fire history, vegetation, flame length, blowing embers, proximity to wildland, terrain, and weather. 154 12 WHAT NEW DATA WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE NEW MODEL, AND HOW DOES THIS DIFFER FROM THE PREVIOUSMODEL? 155 13 A 2 km grid of climate data covering the years 2003-2018 is being used in the update. The previous model used stock weather inputs across the state to calculate wildland fire intensity scores. The updated model will adjust fire intensity scores based on the most extreme fire weather at a given location, considering temperature, humidity, and wind speed. In addition, ember transport is being modeled based on local distributions of observed wind speed and direction values instead of using a generic buffer distance for urban areas adjacent to wildlands. 156 14 WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE VARIOUS FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES? 157 15 Classification of a wildland zone as Moderate, High or Very High fire hazard is based on the average hazard across the area included in the zone, which have a minimum size of 200 acres. In wildlands, hazard is a function of modeled flame length under the worst conditions and annual burn probability. Both these factors generally increase with increasing hazard level, but there may be instances where one value is Very High and the other is low, pushing the overall hazard into a more intermediate ranking. On average, both modeled flame length and burn probability increase by roughly 40-60% between hazard classes. Classification outside of wildland areas is based on the fire hazard of the adjacent wildland and the probability of flames and embers threatening buildings. 158 16 WHY DOES THE MODEL PLACE AN EMPHASIS ON THE SPREAD OF EMBERS? Embers spread wildfire because they can travel long distances in the wind and ignite vegetation, roofs, attics (by getting into vents), and decks. 159 17 IS MY PROPERTY IN VHFS ZONE You can search by address to find your current designation on the web at: osfm.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ 160 18 What are the key elements of the Fire Hazard Severity Zone model? 161 19 Two key elements: probability of an area burning and expected fire behavior under extreme fuel and weather conditions. The zones reflect areas that have similar burn probabilities and fire behavior characteristics. The factors considered in determining fire hazard within wildland areas are fire history, flame length, terrain, local weather, and potential fuel over a 50-year period. Outside of wildlands, the model considers factors that might lead to buildings being threatened, including terrain, weather, urban vegetation cover, blowing embers, proximity to wildland, fire history, and fire hazard in nearby wildlands. 162 20 WHY IS MY PROPERTY IN A DIFFERENT ZONE THAN THE ADJACENT AREA, WHICH LOOKS SIMILAR? 163 21 In non-wildland areas, zone edges occur based on distance to the wildland edge. Because hazard in these areas is largely determined by incoming embers from adjacent wildland, urban areas that are similar in vegetation type and housing density may have a change in FHSZ class as the distance to the wildland edge increases. Areas immediately adjacent to wildland receive the same FHSZ score as that wildland where fire originates, and the model then produces lower scores as the distance to wildland edge increases. 164 22 In wildland areas, zone edges are a result of the way zones are delineated. Specifically, zones represent areas of similar slope and fuel potential. Zone boundaries divide zones based on geographic and vegetation features that align with fire hazard potential; Although, at a local scale, it may appear that the immediate area is similar on both sides of the edge. The class value within a zone is based on the average hazard score across the whole zone. Areas that are in the same zone but not immediately adjacent to a local area can have an influence on the final zone classification. 165 23 LEGISLATIVE PROCESS •The State Legislature has passed a law for Cities and Counties to implement •City must ratify (though we can too) •AB 211-Requires local agency to “designate by ordinance” the Zones 166 24 LEGISLATIVE PROCESS •Cal Fire strongly recommends cities to ratify as 51 State Statues tied to FHSZ (building, insurance, real estate, CEQA, etc.) •Can affect City’s General and Safety plan 167 25 TIMELINE The recommended LRA FHSZ maps must be made available for public review and comment within 30 days of receipt from the State Fire Marshal. The recommended LRA FHSZ maps must be adopted by Ordinance within 120 days of receipt from the SFM. Two concurrent events: 168 26 TIMELINE •March 24, 2025: SFM releases recommended LRA FHSZ Maps. •March/April 2025: Cities review with guidance from Fire Department for any recommended changes (Additions or increase FHSZ) Not allowed to remove or decrease FHSZ.April 2025: Maps with any recommended changes posted by cities for public review and comment. It must be within 30 days of release of Maps by SFM. •May 2025: Prepare final maps with any recommended changes. •June 2025: Adoption of maps by cities. It must be within 120 days of the release of maps by SFM. •July 22, 2025: Send approved maps and ordinance to BOF within 30 days of adoption and before this date. •Effective Date of new maps: 30 days after adoption unless specified by SFM.169 27 MORE INFORMATION From Cal Fire Compare New and Old LRA FHSZ 170 28 THANK YOU From County of Los Angeles Fire Department ASSISTANT CHIEF BRIAN KANE 171 Agenda Item No.: 13.B Mtg. Date: 05/28/2025 TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT:CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED EMPLOYEE SALARY SCHEDULE AND JOB CLASSIFICATION MODIFICATIONS DATE:May 28, 2025 BACKGROUND: On May 12, 2025, the City Council considered a staff report regarding proposed employee salary schedule and job classification modifications for the City of Rolling Hills (Attachment 2). At that meeting, staff explained that, given the City's small workforce and limited budget, a customized approach was necessary to ensure the classification and compensation study reflected the unique needs and structure of the organization. Unlike larger agencies, Rolling Hills requires a tailored framework that supports its high service standards, small-town character, and commitment to fiscal responsibility. As is best practice, most agencies conduct comprehensive studies every five to seven years to promote fair compensation, legal compliance, and the recruitment and retention of qualified personnel. However, it is unknown when a study of this nature was last completed and presented to the City Council for consideration. In this instance, the City Manager conducted the study in-house, reviewing each classification and comparing job duties and salary ranges to comparable city positions per the City Council adopted 2022 update of the Employee Handbook and Personnel Policy Manual (Attachment 2 sub-attachment A). This approach allowed the City to balance best practices with practical experiences, ensuring the recommendations are both relevant and sustainable for Rolling Hills. The Council subsequently directed the City Manager (staff) to coordinate with the Personnel Ad Hoc Committee (Ad Hoc Committee), comprised of Mayor Pieper and Mayor Pro Tem Dieringer, to further review options for lowering the top end of the salary ranges for benchmarked agencies. The Council also requested a review of the Council-approved comparison cities list to determine whether cities should be added, or existing ones be removed from the salary survey for greater relevancy and accuracy. 172 This evening, staff are asking the City Council to consider new recommendations as discussed with the Ad Hoc Committee that will strengthen the City’s ability to provide high-quality, responsive services to residents: 1. Adoption of the updated City salary schedule and classifications 2. Approval to replace the Planning Director classification with Planning Manager, eliminate the Administrative Clerk/Bookkeeper position, and bring code enforcement in-house under the new consolidated classification of Code Compliance Officer/Planning Technician. 3. Direction to begin recruitment for the revised and consolidated positions. DISCUSSION: The Ad Hoc Committee and staff met to discuss the composition of the survey cities used for benchmarking, the methodology for salary adjustments, and to address any anomalies in the data. As a result, a revised Salary Survey using Comparable Cities was created (Attachment 1). Below are highlights of those discussions and the approach. Survey City Selection and Adjustments During the meeting, it was discussed that the City of Carson and Hermosa Beach are significantly larger agencies compared to the City of Rolling Hills. Their inclusion in the salary survey could skew the results, leading to salary benchmarks that do not accurately reflect the operational scale and service level of Rolling Hills. To address this, both cities were removed from the survey. The City of Bradbury and the City of Avalon were added as replacements to maintain a robust and comparable dataset. These cities are more similar in size and scope of services to Rolling Hills, ensuring that the salary comparisons are relevant and appropriate. Staff will return at a future meeting with updates made to the list of survey cities for the adoption of the Employee Handbook and Personnel Policy Manual by City Council. Methodology: 10% Reduction from Median The primary goal was to ensure that both the bottom and top steps of each salary classification were fiscally responsible and reflective of the services provided. At the May 12 City Council meeting, staff presented a salary schedule that reduced the median of the salary survey by 5% while maintaining the top end of the salary as indicated in the median of the salary survey which at that time also included the Cities of Carson and Hermosa Beach. The Ad Hoc Committee and staff agreed to apply a 10% reduction to both the bottom and top steps of the median salary for all surveyed cities in each classification. This approach balances the need to remain competitive in the labor market while safeguarding the City's financial health. Anomalies and Special Consideration Two notable exceptions were identified: Code Enforcement Compliance/Planning Technician: The salary range for this 173 classification remained at its original range of Code Enforcement Officer, as the current compensation accurately reflects the duties and responsibilities assigned. The only change is the title, as it will now be “Code Compliance Officer/Planning Technician. No adjustment was deemed necessary (Attachment 1). Code Compliance Officer/Planning Technician Bottom Top $4,551 $6,085 Planning Manager: Not all surveyed cities had a Planning Manager classification. In such cases, the Senior Planner salary was used, provided the duties and responsibilities were sufficiently similar. This ensured that the benchmark data remained relevant and the salary range for the Planning Manager was appropriately aligned with comparable roles in other cities. A 10% reduction was applied only to the bottom of the range, while the top of the range was maintained at the market median. This adjustment allows for greater flexibility in recruiting and retaining staff while ensuring continued fiscal responsibility. It is important to note that this position will replace the Planning Director position. Staff will evaluate the position and return to the City Council should a need arise to make any adjustments. Agency Planning Manager Senior Planner Bottom Top Bottom Top Avalon $7,161 $9,237 Bradbury El Segundo $11,237 $14,293 $7,995 $9,718 Hidden Hills La Habra Heights Lawndale $8,286 $10,072 $8,286 $10,072 Lomita Palos Verdes Estates $7,711 $9,672 Rancho Palos Verdes $8,846 $11,500 $8,846 $11,500 Rolling Hills Estates $7,707 $11,147 $7,707 $11,147 Signal Hill $10,318 $13,169 $7,743 $9,883 Average $8,752 $11,299 $8,115 $10,464 Median $8,286 $11,147 $7,995 $10,072 10% reduction on bottom only $7,457 $11,147 Rows shaded in grey indicate that the Planning Manager classification was missing and has been replaced with the Senior Planner classification. 174 Title Change for City Clerk/Executive Assistant to the City Manager The classification of City Clerk/Executive Assistant to the City Manager is recommended to be changed to City Clerk/Assistant to the City Manager, removing the “Executive” designation. This updated classification aligns with the scope of the role, which includes capital improvement project management, support of City Manager initiatives, as directed by the City Council, and greater oversight of the City’s budget. There is no fiscal impact for this change. Adding Missing Salaries to Classification Staff received and reviewed additional salary ranges that were not captured in the initial presentation (Attachment 1). The following were added: City of La Habra Heights: Administrative Assistant City of Lawndale Assistant City Clerk Community Development Director Assistant Planner Code Enforcement Officer Conclusion As directed, staff and the Ad Hoc Committee met to discuss adjustments that allow the City of Rolling Hills to balance fiscal responsibility and competitiveness in employee compensation. The process presented this evening ensures that salaries are aligned with the City's size, service level, and financial resources while still attracting and retaining qualified staff to serve the community effectively. As shared at the May 12 City Council meeting, the classification and compensation review presented is a targeted response to Rolling Hills’ operational needs and current staffing challenges. The recommendations are grounded in a salary survey of comparable peer cities and a careful review of internal roles, ensuring the City remains competitive and fiscally responsible. The proposed changes - updating the salary schedule, restructuring the Planning Department, and consolidating code enforcement and administrative support - are designed to streamline operations, improve recruitment, and enhance service delivery. Based on the information presented, staff seeks City Council approval for: 1. Adoption of the updated City salary schedule and classifications 2. Approval to replace the Planning Director classification with Planning Manager, eliminate the Administrative Clerk/Bookkeeper position, and bring code enforcement in-house under the new consolidated classification of Code Compliance Officer/Planning Technician. 3. Direction to begin recruitment for the revised and consolidated positions. FISCAL IMPACT: 175 Salary Schedule As discussed at the May 12 City Council meeting, no fiscal impact is anticipated for FY 2025– 26 when adopting the proposed salary schedule since all current employees already earn above the proposed classifications' minimums. However, over time, there will be a long-term fiscal impact as employees advance within their salary ranges based on merit, not tied to any cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) outlined in the City’s Employee Handbook (Attachment 2, sub attachment A). Code Compliance Officer/Planning Technician As explained at the May 12 City Council meeting, merging the two positions would not result in a fiscal impact for FY 2025–26. The current budget allocates $62,880 for contracted code enforcement services and $25,332 for the Bookkeeper position, totaling $88,202, which is sufficient to cover the cost of the consolidated role at the proposed salary level. Planning Manager At the May 12 City Council meeting, staff presented a Planning Manager salary range of $7,325 to $14,293 and noted that it would have no short-term fiscal impact. The previous Planning Director position, which is currently vacant, was paid and is still budgeted at $12,784 per month (Attachment 2). This evening, staff is presenting a revised salary range of $7,457 to $11,147 for the Planning Manager position. Even as the individual progresses within the range over time based on merit, their compensation would remain below the previous Planning Director salary, ensuring continued fiscal responsibility. RECOMMENDATION: Staff seeks City Council approval of the following: Adoption of the updated City salary schedule and classifications Approval to replace the Planning Director classification with Planning Manager, eliminate the Administrative Clerk/Bookkeeper position, and bring code enforcement in-house under the new consolidated classification of Code Compliance Officer/Planning Technician. Direction to begin recruitment for the revised and consolidated positions. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - HR_Revised Salary_Survey_Ad Hoc.pdf Attachment 2 - CL_AGN_250512_CC_Item13C_ClassificationCompensation_StaffReport.pdf 176 Attachment 1 Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Avalon $ 18,375 $ 10,631 $ 13,713 $ 5,878 $ 7,582 - - $ 4,834 $ 6,235 $ 6,025 $ 7,771 $ 5,325 $ 6,869 - - $ 7,161 $ 9,237 - - Bradbury $ 12,500 - - $ 6,250 $ 7,917 - - - - $ 5,417 $ 7,917 - - - - - -- - El Segundo $ 24,336 $ 13,581 $ 18,750 $ 6,583 $ 8,373 - - $ 6,877 $ 8,359 $ 7,176 $ 9,128 $ 5,988 $ 7,278 - - $ 11,237 $ 14,293 $ 7,995 $ 9,718 Hidden Hills $ 17,917 - - $ 5,833 $ 8,711 - - - - $ 2,885 $ 4,038 - - - - - - - - La Habra Heights $ 12,471 - - - - $ 3,555 $ 4,764 - - - - - - - - - - Lawndale $ 21,239 $ 12,966 $ 15,761 $ 9,716 $ 11,810 $5,140 $6,247 $5,791 $7,039 $ 6,657 $ 8,092 $ 5,768 $ 7,005 - - $ 8,286 $ 10,072 $ 8,286 $ 10,072 Lomita $ 20,000 $ 12,688 $ 15,422 $ 8,547 $ 10,389 $ 4,013 $ 4,878 $ 5,346 $ 6,499 $ 6,200 $ 7,536 $ 5,397 $ 6,560 - - - - - - Palos Verdes Estates $ 20,833 $ 10,735 $ 16,050 $ 8,895 $ 11,148 $ 4,579 $ 5,845 $ 5,989 $ 7,280 $ 6,345 $ 8,502 - - - - $ 7,711 $ 9,672 - - Rancho Palos Verdes $ 21,250 $ 14,437 $ 18,768 $ 11,825 $ 15,373 $ 5,517 $ 7,173 $ 6,459 $ 8,426 $ 7,043 $ 9,156 $ 6,481 $ 8,424 - - $ 8,846 $ 11,500 $ 8,846 $ 11,500 Rolling Hills Estates $ 18,847 $ 12,276 $ 18,418 $ 8,546 $ 12,473 $ 4,469 $ 6,554 $ 6,012 $ 7,624 $ 7,202 $ 9,252 $ 4,971 $ 7,512 - - $ 7,707 $ 11,147 $ 7,707 $ 11,147 Signal Hill $ 22,917 $ 14,131 $ 18,542 $ 8,397 $ 10,716 $ 4,655 $ 5,941 $ 5,841 $ 7,457 $ 6,721 $ 8,578 $ 5,587 $ 7,130 - - $ 10,318 $ 13,169 $ 7,743 $ 9,883 Average $ 19,153 $ 12,681 $ 16,928 $ 8,047 $ 10,449 $ 4,561 $ 5,915 $ 5,894 $ 7,365 $ 6,167 $ 7,997 $ 5,645 $ 7,254 - - $ 8,752 $ 11,299 $ 8,115 $ 10,464 Median $ 20,000 $ 12,827 $ 17,234 $ 8,471 $ 10,553 $ 4,579 $ 5,941 $ 5,915 $ 7,368 $ 6,501 $ 8,297 $ 5,587 $ 7,130 - - $ 8,286 $ 11,147 $ 7,995 $ 10,072 10 Percent reduction $ 18,000 $ 11,544 $ 15,511 $ 7,624 $ 9,497 $ 4,121 $ 5,347 $ 5,324 $ 6,632 $ 5,851 $ 7,467 $ 5,028 $ 6,417 - - $ 7,457 $ 11,147 - - Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Rolling Hills - - - $ 7,624 $ 9,497 $ 4,121 $ 5,347 $ 4,551 $ 6,085 $ 5,851 $ 7,467 $ 5,028 $ 6,417 - - $ 7,457 $ 11,147 - - Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Rolling Hills $ 16,172 $ 12,351 $ 12,785 $ 6,488 $ 8,519 $ 4,373 $ 5,795 $ 4,551 $ 6,085 $ 6,449 $ 8,341 $4,551 $6,085 $25.63 $32.70 - - - - Bookkeeper/ Administrative Clerk Planning Manager Senior PlannerAgency City Manager Planning and Community Services Director City Clerk/Executive Assistant to the City Manager Administrative Assistant Code Enforcement Officer Management Analyst Administrative Assistant Code Compliance Officer/Planning Technician Management Analyst Assistant Planner Assistant Planner Bookkeeper/ Administrative Clerk Planning Manager Senior PlannerAgency City Manager Planning and Community Services Director City Clerk/Assistant to the City Manager Revised Salary Survey of Comparable Cities Management Analyst Assistant Planner Bookkeeper/ Administrative Clerk Planning Manager Senior Planner City of Rolling Hills Recommended Salary Schedule Current City of Rolling Hills Salary Ranges Agency City Manager Planning and Community Services Director City Clerk/Executive Assistant to the City Manager Administrative Assistant Code Enforcement Officer May 28, 2025 City Council Meeting 177 Agenda Item No.: 13.C Mtg. Date: 05/12/2025 TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT:CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED EMPLOYEE SALARY SCHEDULE AND JOB CLASSIFICATION MODIFICATIONS DATE:May 12, 2025 BACKGROUND: In 2022, the City Council adopted the City of Rolling Hills Employee Handbook and Personnel Policy Manual (Attachment A), establishing policies for employee compensation, classification, and best practices in workforce management. The Handbook outlines a structured approach to setting and amending salary ranges, conducting regular compensation surveys to ensure market competitiveness, and authorizing classification studies to keep job descriptions and pay aligned with actual duties and responsibilities. Given the City’s small staff and limited budget, conducting a classification and compensation study required a thoughtful, tailored approach to ensure the results truly fit the organization's unique needs. Unlike larger agencies, the City does not have a one-size-fits-all structure, so care was taken to review each position carefully. As is best practice, most agencies conduct comprehensive studies every five to seven years to promote fair compensation, legal compliance, and the recruitment and retention of qualified personnel. Based on research performed, it is unknown when a study of this nature was last completed and presented to the City Council for consideration. In this instance, the City Manager conducted the study in-house, reviewing each classification and comparing job duties and salary ranges to comparable city positions. This approach allowed the City to balance best practices with practical experiences, ensuring the recommendations are both relevant and sustainable for Rolling Hills. This evening, staff are asking the City Council to consider a few recommendations that will strengthen the City’s ability to provide high-quality, responsive services to residents: Adoption of the updated City salary schedule and classifications; Approval to replace the Planning Director classification with Planning Manager, eliminate the Administrative Clerk/Bookkeeper position, and bring code enforcement in-house 1178 under the new consolidated classification of Code Compliance Officer/Planning Technician; and Direction to begin recruitment for the revised and consolidated positions. DISCUSSION: As part of the City’s ongoing commitment to strengthening internal operations and aligning services with community needs, staff recommend several key adjustments following the recent classification and compensation study. These recommendations are designed to ensure that the City remains an employer of choice, attracting and retaining highly qualified staff who are dedicated to delivering exceptional service to our residents. The following discussion outlines the rationale for these recommendations, including a summary of the proposed salary schedule, an overview of the updated classification structure, and the operational benefits of filling these vacancies. Council approval will allow staff to move forward with these actions, strengthening City operations and enhancing the services provided to Rolling Hills residents. Current Rolling Hills Salary Schedule: Below is the current salary schedule for City of Rolling Hills classifications. As outlined in the Employee Handbook, this schedule is available on the City’s website under the Finance Department webpage. The schedule is updated annually to reflect any cost-of-living adjustments that take effect on July 1 during the budget adoption process. Full-Time Classification Monthly Minimum Monthly Maximum City Manager $16,172 Planning & Community Services Director $12,351 $12,785 Management Analyst $6,449 $8,341 City Clerk/Executive Assistant to the City Manager $6,488 $8,519 Senior Planner $6,442 $8,333 Assistant Planner $4,551 $6,085 Code Enforcement Officer $4,551 $6,085 Administrative Assistant $4,373 $5,795 Part-Time Classification Hourly Minimum Hourly Maximum Bookkeeper/Administrative Clerk $26 $33 Salary Survey of City Council Approved Cities To remain competitive with comparable agencies, staff has developed an updated 2179 compensation schedule based on an analysis of City Council approved cities (Attachment A, page 14): Carson, El Segundo, Hermosa Beach, Hidden Hills, La Habra Heights, Lawndale, Lomita, Palos Verdes Estates, Rancho Palos Verdes, Rolling Hills Estates, and Signal Hill. This analysis ensures that salary ranges are both fair and market-driven, helping recruit and retain the talent necessary to serve the community effectively (Attachment B). Proposed Salary Schedule for Current City Budgeted Positions Proposed Salary Schedule The proposed salary structure addresses the unique challenges faced by the City of Rolling Hills, particularly in filling specialized roles like Planning (Attachment D). First, the recommendation focuses on those classifications that are currently filled or expected to be filled soon, ensuring the proposed salary schedule is both timely and relevant. By utilizing the median salary, representing the middle of the market rather than the highest end, our approach balances fiscal responsibility with the need to offer competitive compensation. This thoughtful methodology positions the City as an employer of choice, supporting staff’s commitment to excellent public service and organizational stability. Secondly, Staff adopted a non-traditional approach to salary benchmarking that goes beyond the standard public sector methodology. Recognizing that Rolling Hills is not a one-size-fits-all organization, and that today’s competitive market makes recruitment especially difficult, staff intentionally set the minimum salary range 5% below the lowest comparable agency. This deliberate adjustment is designed to cast a wider net, encouraging applications from candidates who may not fit the traditional mold but bring valuable transferable skills, knowledge, and potential to grow within the City. By broadening the candidate pool in this way, Rolling Hills positions itself to attract diverse talent and address vacancies more effectively, while still maintaining a competitive and responsible compensation structure. This thoughtful, flexible strategy reflects the City’s commitment to innovation and adaptability in meeting its workforce needs. Additionally, the classification of City Clerk/Executive Assistant to the City Manager is recommended to be changed to City Clerk/Assistant to the City Manager, removing the “Executive” designation. This updated classification aligns with the scope of the role, which includes capital improvement project management, support of City Manager initiatives as directed by the City Council, and greater oversight of the City’s budget. Lastly, staff recognize that this may be the first-time staff are presenting a salary study before the City Council. Being mindful of that, Staff will ensure that any future changes in classifications or salaries are brought back to the Council for review and approval, ensuring transparency and alignment with the Employee Handbook and Personnel Policy Manual (Attachment A, pages 12-14). Fiscal Impact: There is no fiscal impact for fiscal year 2025-26 because all existing employees are currently above the low end of the proposed salary ranges. Long term, the increase in the top end of the salary range will result in $142,380 in additional 3180 costs as employees will have the opportunity to move up to a higher threshold in their salary ranges through merit-based salary increases, separate from any cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) provided by the City’s Handbook for employees. Recommendation: Staff seeks City Council approval of the recommended salary schedule reflecting current positions and salaries. Planning Department Enhancements Staff recommend restructuring to address current vacancies and strengthen succession planning within the Planning Department, emphasizing internal organizational growth and advancement opportunities. Creating a Planning Manager Classification Rather than recruiting immediately for a Planning Director, staff propose filling the vacancy with a Planning Manager position. This approach aligns with hiring trends and responds to recruitment challenges. It also broadens the candidate pool to include talented planners eager to advance their careers. Importantly, this structure creates a clear pathway for professional development: after two years of successful performance evaluations, the Planning Manager would be eligible for a re-classification change to Planning Director. This supports succession planning and ensures the department’s leadership is well-prepared to navigate the City’s complex regulatory environment and long-range planning initiatives. Staff has attached a draft list of duties (Attachment D). Code Enforcement Rolling Hills has seen its code enforcement approach evolve over the years, from part-time, in-house oversight to contracting with outside firms. As the community continues to grow and residents express a strong interest in timely code compliance, such as addressing dead vegetation, unpermitted construction, and other concerns, an opportunity exists to enhance the City’s approach and better serve the community's needs. The contracted Code Enforcement Officer works 12 hours per week, two 6-hour shifts on Tuesday and Thursday. Part-Time Administrative Clerk/Bookkeeper The Administrative Clerk/Bookkeeper position became vacant in March 2025. The previous incumbent was responsible for arranging and attending morning and evening Planning Commission meetings. They prepared minutes, processed applications or Over the Counter Applications, Administrative Reviews, and Discretionary review applications. They also processed Construction & Demolition (C&D) Hauling Permits and assisted the Finance Department with processing payments and making deposits – to name a few. The part-time Administrative Clerk/Bookkeeper position is also budgeted for 19 hours per week. By consolidating these roles into a single, in-house Code Compliance Officer/Planning Technician, the city can provide a more consistent and responsive level of service to the community. Code Compliance Officer/Planning Technician Based on the City’s services and needs, staff recommend consolidating the roles of 4181 Administrative Clerk/Bookkeeper and contract Code Enforcement Officer into a single, in- house Code Compliance Officer/Planning Technician. Bringing code enforcement in-house is more than just a staffing adjustment - it offers consistent enforcement and a deeper understanding of the community’s unique needs. Beyond addressing violations, this role will also educate and engage residents, fostering a collaborative approach to maintaining Rolling Hills’ high quality of life. Staff has attached a draft list of duties (Attachment D). This consolidation streamlines operations and enhances efficiency, giving residents a point of contact for code compliance, public inquiries, inspections, and permit processing. Fiscal Impact: The creation of a Planning Manager with a salary range of $7,325 to $14,293 has no short- term fiscal impact. The current Planning Director position, currently vacant, was paid and is budgeted at $12,784 per month. This is at the higher end of the proposed salary range; thus, unless the Planning Manager is brought in higher than this level, there will be no fiscal impact. Long-term, assuming the Planning Director ’s salary was capped at $12,784 per month, then there would be a fiscal impact when the Planning Manager moves into the higher end of the salary range over several years. With regards to the merger of Code Enforcement and Administrative Assistant/Bookkeeper roles and responsibilities, there is no short-term fiscal impact. At the low-end of the salary range ($5,078), the full estimated cost of the new position is $85,582. However, the current budget includes $62,880 for contracted code enforcement services and $25,332 for the existing Bookkeeper position, which totals $88,202 and is enough to cover the costs at that salary level. Over time, however, as the employee filling the new position moves up through the salary range, there would be some fiscal impact, although nominal, based on the assumption that the $62,880 budgeted for contracted code enforcement services would not otherwise increase each year as well. Recommendation: Staff requests City Council approval to replace the Planning Director classification with a new Planning Manager classification, eliminate the Administrative Clerk/Bookkeeper position, and bring code enforcement functions in-house under the new classification of Code Compliance Officer/Planning Technician. Staff also seeks direction to begin the recruitment process for these revised and consolidated positions. CONCLUSION The classification and compensation review presented is a targeted response to Rolling Hills’ operational needs and current staffing challenges. The recommendations are grounded in a salary survey of peer cities and a careful review of internal roles, ensuring the City remains competitive and fiscally responsible. The proposed changes - updating the salary schedule, restructuring the Planning Department, and consolidating code enforcement and administrative support - are designed to streamline operations, improve recruitment, and enhance service delivery. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact in FY 2025–26, as current employees are above the proposed salary minimums. Long-term, merit-based increases could result in up to $142,380 in additional costs. The new Planning Manager position has no short-term impact and only potential long- 5182 term costs if the employee exceeds the previous Planning Director ’s salary. The merged Code Enforcement/Bookkeeper role is budget-neutral at entry level, with minimal long-term impact as the employee progresses through the salary range. RECOMMENDATION: Staff seeks City Council approval of the following: Adoption of the updated City salary schedule and classifications Approval to replace the Planning Director classification with Planning Manager, eliminate the Administrative Clerk/Bookkeeper position, and bring code enforcement in-house under the new consolidated classification of Code Compliance Officer/Planning Technician. Direction to begin recruitment for the revised and consolidated positions. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A - HR_EHB_220425_Final.pdf Attachment B - HR_Salary Survey_20250512.pdf Attachment C - HR_Proposed Salary Schedule_20250512.pdf Attachment D - HR_Draft Job Duties for Planning Manager and Code Compliance Officer_Planning Technician.pdf 6183 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK AND PERSONNEL POLICY MANUAL Update: April 25. 2022 7184 2 INTRODUCTION Welcome to the City of Rolling Hills! We trust you will find working for the City professionally challenging, an excellent career opportunity, a positive experience and an environment that strives to provide a work / life balance. The City prides itself on excellent customer service, the highest level of professionalism, being responsive and communicative, maintaining a small-town, rural atmosphere, and sustaining the privacy of the community. City staff are committed to public service, excellence and efficiency in the provision of services, the ICMA Code of Ethics, and the principles of democracy and professional management afforded by the Council-Manager form of government. As a member of the City team, we look forward to your positive contributions in these areas. This handbook has been developed to provide new staff persons with important introductory information regarding the City’s personnel benefits and policies on matters relevant to all employees. On subjects not included in this handbook, please ask the City Manager or the Human Resources Director. Updates to the policies herein will be provided in separate announcements throughout your career with the City. CITY ORGANIZATION The City of Rolling Hills is a “contract city” that operates under the Council-Manager form of government. As a contract city, Rolling Hills contracts with the Los Angeles County Sheriff Department (Lomita Station) and Building & Safety Department (Lomita Office) for police and building permit services, respectively. Fire protection, water, electricity, natural gas, and road maintenance are also the responsibility of other non-City agencies. Under the Council-Manager form of government, the City is governed by five Council members who are elected at-large in municipal elections held every two years. City Council terms are staggered so that in one election, three members will be elected and in the next election, two members will be elected. The City Council hires a City Manager who is responsible for day-to-day operations of the City, implementing City Council policy and all aspects of staff supervision.1 The City Council also hires a City Attorney for legal counsel. Rolling Hills is a “general law” city and, as such, its authority is established under the California State Constitution. The City has an adopted Municipal Code that contains the ordinances of the City. UNIQUE FEATURES OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Rolling Hills is a private, gated community under the rules and regulations of two separate and unrelated agencies, the City of Rolling Hills and the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA). The RHCA has authority and responsibility for road maintenance, access into the City, architectural review, and all easements and trails. Under the auspices of the RHCA, the roads in the City are not public. They are private property 1 The provisions of this Employee Handbook and Personnel Policy Manual apply to the position of City Manager; provided, however, that to the extent any provision in the contract for the City Manager conflicts with this Employee Handbook, the provision in the contract for City Manager shall prevail. 8185 3 maintained by the RHCA. The City of Rolling Hills, in contrast, is responsible for land use regulation, building permits, environmental issues, traffic safety (e.g., roadway striping and signage), law enforcement through a contract with the Sheriff’s Department, emergency preparedness, municipal elections, and other typical city functions. Approximately 75% of the City’s revenues derive from property taxes with the remaining 25% basically from building permits. Rolling Hills is also a residential community with no business or industrial activities. The community consists of only one-story, ranch-style, single-family homes. Properties are typically one or two acres. Each lot is required to have a barn and corral or area designated for a barn and corral. There are a total of twenty-three miles of equestrian and hiking trails. Some trails are connected to trails in the Palos Verdes Peninsula Land Conservancy or other peninsula-wide trails. There is also no leash law; dogs are free to roam throughout the community. These characteristics are intended to maintain the integrity and identity of Rolling Hills as a rural community. As a City team member, it is important to understand the distinction between the City and RHCA in order to provide residents and the public with the best customer service. IN ROLLING HILLS, SERVICE IS THE BUSINESS! Local government is a service-oriented and public profession. City employees directly connect with the public in many different ways. In Rolling Hills, it is an expectation that members of the City team maintain a pleasant, friendly, and cooperative demeanor to each other and in all capacities when working and communicating with the public. Care should be taken to act in a professional and respectful, courteous manner at all times, for example, on the telephone, in written communications (emails and letters), and during encounters in public settings (at meetings, the public counter, and events). City staff must keep in mind that they are ambassadors of the City and represent the organization. With service as our business, it is the responsibility of City staff to be responsive and helpful to residents and assist the public. In that capacity, City staff also has the responsibility to exercise sound judgment and appropriate discretion to circumstances and situations. 9186 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Title Page I Purpose and Application ................................................................. 5 II Definition of Terms .......................................................................... 6 III General Provisions........................................................................ 10 IV Classification ................................................................................. 12 V Compensation ............................................................................... 14 VI Benefits ......................................................................................... 18 VII Hours of W ork ............................................................................... 22 VIII Applications and Applicants .......................................................... 23 IX Examinations ................................................................................ 26 X Employment Eligibility Lists .......................................................... 28 XI Method of Filling Vacancies .......................................................... 29 XII Probationary Period ...................................................................... 30 XIII Attendance and Leaves ................................................................ 31 XIV Holidays ........................................................................................ 39 XV Changes in Employment Status.................................................... 41 XVI Separation from Employment ....................................................... 42 XVII Reports and Records .................................................................... 44 XVIII Grievance Procedures .................................................................. 46 XIX Discipline....................................................................................... 48 XX Performance Evaluations and Annual W ork Plans ....................... 51 XXI Vehicle Use ................................................................................... 53 XXII Professional Development ............................................................ 54 XXIII Employee Standards of Conduct .................................................. 55 10187 5 CHAPTER I PURPOSE AND APPLICATION Section 1. Purpose: The purpose of the City of Rolling Hills Employee Handbook and Personnel Policy Manual is to establish lawful procedures for dealing with personnel matters. The personnel provisions set forth herein constitute the personnel rules and regulations for the City of Rolling Hills. Employees are expected to read this Handbook carefully, and to know and understand its contents. The City reserves the right to make changes to this Handbook at any time without prior notice. Employees’ at-will employment can only be changed by the City Council and by written agreement signed by the employee and the City Manager. Except as otherwise provided in this Handbook, no one has the authority to make any promise or commitment contrary to what is in this Handbook. Employees are responsible for knowing about and understanding those changes once they have been disseminated. The City also reserves the right to interpret the provisions of this Handbook. This Handbook replaces all earlier Handbooks and supersedes all prior inconsistent policies, practices, and procedures. Section 2. Application: These rules apply to all employees of the City of Rolling Hills unless a specific rule or procedure indicates otherwise. Section 3. No Contract Created: These rules do not create any contract of employment, express or implied, or any right in the nature for a contract. Section 4. Handbook Acknowledgement: Employees should sign the acknowledgement form at the end of this Handbook and return it to the City Manager or Designee. This will provide the City with a record that each employee has received this Handbook. 11188 6 CHAPTER II DEFINITION OF TERMS DEFINITION OF TERMS Unless the context indicates otherwise the following terms, whenever used in this document, shall be defined as follows: Advancement: A salary increase within the limits of the pay range established for the position. At-Will: All employment at the City is “at-will.” This means that both employees and the City have the right to terminate employment at any time, with or without advance notice, and with or without cause. Employees also may be demoted or disciplined and the terms of their employment may be altered at any time, with or without cause, at the discretion of the City. Only the City Council has the authority to alter this arrangement, to enter into an agreement for employment for a specified period of time, or to make any agreement contrary to this at-will status. Any such agreement must be in writing, must be signed by the employee and the City Manager, and must express a clear and unambiguous intent to alter the at-will nature of the employment relationship. Nothing contained in this Handbook or any other documents provided to employees is intended to be, nor should it be, construed as a guarantee that employment (or any benefit) will be continued for a specific time period. For example, any salary figures provided to an employee in annual or monthly terms are stated for the sake of convenience. They are not intended to create an employment contract for one or more months or years. Employees should ask the City Manager if they have any questions about their status as an employee at-will. City Manager’s Designee: The person assigned to the Human Resources function (Human Resources Director). Demotion: The movement of an employee from one class to another class having a lower maximum rate of pay. A demotion may be voluntary or involuntary. Domestic Partner: A domestic partnership is legally established in California when all of the following requirements are met: both persons file a Declaration of Domestic Partnership with the Secretary of State; both persons have a common residence; neither person is married to someone else or is a member of another domestic partnership with someone else that has not been terminated, dissolved, or adjudged a nullity; two persons are not related by blood in a way that would prevent them from being married to each other in another state; both persons are at least 18 years of age; 12189 7 either of the following: (a) both persons are members of the same sex; or (b) one or both of the persons are over the age of 62, and meet certain eligibility criteria pursuant to the Social Security Act; and both persons are capable of consenting to the domestic partnership. Eligible: When used as a noun, means a person whose name is considered for appointment to a position. Employment Eligibility List: A list of one or more names of persons who are being considered for a position vacancy generated from candidate resumes, the results of an examination, or some other method of identifying eligible persons. Examinations: (a) Open-competitive examination: An examination for a particular position which is open to all persons meeting the qualifications for the class. (b) Promotional examination: An examination for a particular position, admission to the examination being limited to employees identified by the City Manager or Designee. (c) Continuous examination: An open competitive examination which is administered periodically and as a result of which names are placed on an employment list, in order of final scores, for a period of not more than one (1) year. Exempt: An employee not entitled to overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Job Classifications: For the purposes of the City’s personnel rules and regulations, each position title shall correspond to the City’s list of classifications and salary range. (a) Full-time Exempt: Various executive, administrative, and professional positions exempt from overtime requirements. (b) Full-time Non-Exempt: Positions subject to overtime requirements and working 37.5 hours per week. (c) Hourly Benefited: Positions known as regular part-time working twelve (12) months per year and an average of twenty (20) or more hours per week on a year-round basis. Benefits are provided to regular part-time employees on a pro-rated basis. 13190 8 (d) Hourly Non-benefited: At-will positions also known as either seasonal part-time or part-time. These employees are sometimes referred to as “Temporary”. (e) Seasonal Part-time: A position utilized up to 37.5 hours per week on a seasonal or partial year basis, but not more than 1,000 hours per fiscal year. If an employee identified as seasonal part time works more than 1,000 hours in a fiscal year he or she does not acquire regular employee status. (f) Part-time: A position with an average of 19.5 hours or less per week and no more than 1,000 hours per fiscal year. If an employee identified as part time works more than 1,000 hours in a fiscal year he or she does not acquire regular employee status. Layoff: The involuntary separation of a regular status employee or reduction to a position in a lower classification because the position is no longer needed. Personnel Ordinance: City of Rolling Hills Municipal Code, Title 2, as amended from time to time. Probationary Period: A working test period during which an employee is required to demonstrate his or her fitness for the duties to which he or she is appointed by actual performance of the duties of the position. The probationary period or initial period of employment is considered a part of the examination process and shall be utilized for closely observing the employee’s work to determine the employee’s fitness for the position. Promotion: The movement of an employee from one position to another position having a higher maximum rate of pay and different job duties from the previous position. Provisional Appointment: A temporary appointment of a person who possesses the minimum qualifications established for a particular class, and who has been appointed to a position in the absence of available eligible personnel. This is sometimes referred to as an “Interim Appointment”. Reclassification: The change of a position from one position to another as a result of the gradual accretion or reduction of duties and/or responsibilities over time. Regular Employee: A full-time employee who has successfully completed his or her probationary period and has been retained as an employee. Regular Part-Time Employee: An employee who has successfully completed his or her probationary period. 14191 9 Rejection: The separation of an employee from employment during the probationary period or examination process. Reinstatement: The re-employment, without examination, of a former regular employee. Temporary Employee: An employee who has been appointed to a full-time or part-time position of limited duration. Transfer: A change of an employee from one position to another position in having the same maximum salary limits, involving the performance of similar duties and responsibilities, and requiring the same qualifications. Y Rate: When an employee is moved to a different position with a lower salary range, the employee will retain his/her current salary until the salary of the new position has a maximum salary rate that is equal to or higher than the current salary. 15192 10 CHAPTER III GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 1. Equal Employment Opportunity: It is the City’s policy to provide equal employment opportunity for all applicants and employees. The City does not unlawfully discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, religious creed (including religious dress and religious grooming practices), sex (including pregnancy, perceived pregnancy, childbirth, breastfeeding, or related medical conditions), gender, gender identity (including transgender identity), gender expression (including transgender expression), because an individual has transitioned (to live as the gender with which they identify), is transitioning, or is perceived to be transitioning), sex stereotyping, national origin, ancestry, citizenship, age (40 years and over), mental disability and physical disability (including HIV and AIDS), legally protected medical condition or information (including genetic information), protected medical leaves (requesting or approved for leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act or the California Family Rights Act), military and/or veteran status, service, or obligation, reserve status, national guard status, marital status, domestic partner status, sexual orientation, status as a victim of domestic violence, sexual assault or stalking, enrollment in a public assistance program, engaging in protected communications regarding employee wages or otherwise exercising rights protected under the California Fair Pay Act, requesting a reasonable accommodation on the basis of disability or bona fide religious belief or practice, or any other basis protected by local, state, or federal laws. Consistent with the law, the City also makes reasonable accommodations for disabled applicants and employees; for pregnant employees who request an accommodation [with the advice of their health care providers] for pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions; for employees who are victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking; and for applicants and employees based on their religious beliefs and practices. The City prohibits sexual harassment and the harassment of any individual on any of the other protected bases listed above. The City also prohibits retaliation against a person who reports or assists in reporting suspected violations of this policy, cooperates in investigations or proceedings arising from a violation of this policy, or engages in other activities protected under this policy. This policy applies to all areas of employment including recruitment, hiring, training, promotion, compensation, benefits, transfer, disciplinary action, and social and recreational programs. It is the responsibility of every manager and employee to conscientiously follow this policy. Any employee having any questions regarding this policy should discuss them with the City Manager’s Designee. 16193 11 Section 2. Political Activity Prohibited: City employees shall not engage in political activities in violation of Government Code Section 3201 et seq. No one employed by the City may engage in political activities on City premises, while engaged in official duties, using City equipment, or wearing an official City uniform. Section 3. Outside Employment: No employee may hold outside employment that is incompatible with his/her City employment. Each regular employee who holds any other position in addition to City employment shall submit a written request to the City Manager prior to accepting such employment. Section 4. Employee Duties: Employees are required to carry out the primary duties and responsibilities of their employment. Section 5. Violation of Rules: Violation of the provisions of these rules shall be grounds for disciplinary action. Section 6. Amendment and Revision of Rules: Amendments and revisions to these rules must be recommended by the City Manager and approved by the City Council. Section 7. Employee Standards of Conduct and ICMA Code of Ethics: Employees are requested to be mindful of the ICMA Code of Ethics and uphold the intent of the tenets and guidelines of the Code. Employees are required to adhere to the Employee Standards of Conduct (Chapter XXIII). Section 8. Federal Taxes: Completion of appropriate IRS forms will be required of all personnel at the time of employment. The number of exemptions claimed will determine the amount of federal tax deductions. Section 9. Social Security: All employees, full and part time, will be required to have a Social Security number and/or meet other legal requirements including proof of citizenship or permanent residency status at the time of employment. Social Security deductions will be made according to established schedule provided by government agencies. 17194 12 CHAPTER IV CLASSIFICATION Section 1. Classification Plan: The City of Rolling Hills has an established list of classifications as follows: Full-time Exempt City Manager Planning and Community Services Director City Clerk/Executive Assistant to the City Manager Senior Management Analyst Senior Planner Full-time Non-Exempt Administrative Assistant, City Clerk Department Code Enforcement Officer/Assistant Planner Hourly Non-Benefited Finance Director Human Resources Director Account Manager Part-time Planning Technician, Planning Department Each position in the City service is defined by specifications, including title, definition of the position, supervision received and exercised, a description of the duties and responsibilities of positions in each class, and the training, experience, and other qualifications to be required of applicants for positions in each class. Section 2. Adoption, Amendment, and Revision of Plan: The list of classifications may be amended from time to time by resolution of the City Council. Section 3. New Positions: When a new position is created, an employment eligibility list will be established before an appointment is made, unless the position is filled by a promotional appointment. Section 4. Classification Studies: Classification studies shall be conducted from time to time to determine if the duties and responsibilities of a position have substantively changed, have become inequitably aligned in relation to other classifications within the City service, and/or are otherwise incorrectly designated. The City Manager or Designee shall conduct the classification study and as a result, a position may be reclassified to a more appropriate classification, whether new or already authorized, at a higher or lower maximum salary level. 18195 13 After conducting a classification study of the position(s), the City Manager will recommend classification changes, if any, to the City Council for approval. Section 5. Qualifying Examination: A reclassification with a title change that results in a salary increase above the old classification may require of the incumbent a qualifying examination to determine whether or not the incumbent possesses the minimum qualifications for the new class. The method for the qualifying examination shall be determined by the City Manager or Designee. It may be an interview, demonstration of skills and abilities, or a written examination. An incumbent proposed for a reclassification who does not pass the qualifying examination shall retain his or her original title until such time as he or she does pass the qualifying examination. An employee whose position is being reclassified upward and who has demonstrated competency for the position, need not take a qualifying examination. Section 6. Y-Rate: When a reclassification results in a lower maximum rate of pay for the incumbent, the incumbent shall be “Y-Rated” at the salary level he/she has earned up to that time. 19196 14 CHAPTER V COMPENSATION Section 1. Compensation Plan: The City has established salary ranges covering all positions in the City service, showing the minimum and maximum rates of pay. The salary ranges can be found on the City’s website under the Finance Department. Section 2. Amendment of Plan: The compensation plan may be amended from time to time by action of the City Council. Section 3. Comprehensive Compensation Survey: A Comprehensive Compensation Survey will be conducted as needed, to assure that the City’s jobs are paid equitably against the labor market. The Survey will include each position and include labor market comparisons to: Carson El Segundo Hermosa Beach Hidden Hills La Habra Heights Lawndale Lomita Palos Verdes Estates Rancho Palos Verdes Rolling Hills Estates Signal Hill Section 4. Salary upon Initial Hire: The City Manager shall have the discretion to place the employee at a salary level within the salary range of the position into which the employee is hired. Section 5. Merit Advancement: The City Manager has the authority and discretion to adjust all regular and part-time employee salaries within their range at any time. The City Manager shall justify a salary change within the range with documentation and based on the performance and skill-level of the employee. Section 6. Evaluation: Each employee will be formally evaluated annually on the anniversary of his or her employment in regards to the employee’s performance of his or her work responsibilities. In the evaluation, the City Manager will consider and evaluate the employee’s salary for a potential merit advancement. If the evaluation is untimely and in the evaluation, the employee is deemed meritorious of a salary adjustment within the salary range, the employee will receive the increase retroactively. Performance evaluations and Annual Work Plans will be tracked by the City Manager or his or her Designee. 20197 15 Section 7. Probationary Period: At the end of the probation period and annually thereafter on the anniversary date of hire, each employee will be evaluated by the City Manager with regard to work performance. An adjustment to the base salary within the salary range will be considered. Adjustments to the base salary are subject to the determination and approval of the City Manager; adjustments to the base salary upon completion of the probation period are not automatic. Section 8. Effective Date of Increase: Salary increases shall be effective the first day of the pay period following the approved effective date. Section 9. Salary on Promotion: An employee promoted to a position having a greater maximum salary will be placed at a salary that results in not less than a three and one-half percent (3.5%) increase above the employee’s current regular salary. The City Manager may establish the salary at a higher level within the range. Section 10. Salary on Demotion: An employee who is demoted will be placed within the salary range for the position into which demoted. The salary will be set at a level that is lower and closest to the salary the employee was receiving before the demotion. Section 11. Salary on Reclassification: An employee whose position title is changed but will be performing similar duties will receive the salary set forth below. (a) If the new position title maintains the same salary range, the salary will not change. (b) If the new position title has a higher salary range, at the discretion of the City Manager, the salary adjustment will be determined in the same manner as a promotion. (c) If the new position title has a lower salary range, the employee will be Y-rated. Section 12. Pay Periods: Employees shall be compensated by paycheck or electronic transfers every two weeks. Checks or electronic transfers in payment for compensation will be made available by the City to employees. Section 13. Bilingual Pay: The City does not provide a bilingual premium pay differential in addition to regular pay for employees who are requested by the City to use bilingual skills during their scheduled work hours on a recurring basis. Section 14. Overtime: (a) As a matter of general policy, the City does not permit employees to work overtime and will provide adequate staff to handle normal 21198 16 operations. However, non-exempt employees may be required to work overtime at the discretion of the City Manager. (b) Overtime for non-exempt employees is defined as hours assigned to be worked and actually worked in excess of thirty-seven and one- half (37.5) hours in the designated work week. (c) Non-exempt employees working overtime when not expressly authorized to do so shall be subject to discipline. (d) Overtime assigned and worked by non-exempt employees shall be compensated at time and one-half their regular rate of pay. The employee may request, and the City Manager shall have the unrestricted discretion to approve or not approve, compensation in the form of accrued compensatory time at time and one-half pay, except an employee may not accrue more than thirty-seven and one- half (37.5) hours compensatory time at any time. (e) If a non-exempt employee is required to work on an observed holiday beyond the regular thirty-seven and one-half (37.5) hour work week, he or she shall be entitled to pay at the rate of two (2) times the regular rate of pay. (f) Employees who are exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) are compensated on a salary basis and are not eligible for overtime. Section 15. Acting Pay: An employee who is provisionally appointed to an acting or interim position that is in a higher salary range than that of the position title in which the employee is normally assigned shall receive acting compensation. (a) Acting pay shall be provided only for appointments with duration greater than twenty-one (21) consecutive calendar days and shall be retroactive to the effective date of the acting appointment and continue until completion of appointment. (b) Such acting appointments shall be made in writing by the City Manager. (c) Compensation shall be at the entrance of the salary range of the acting position or a minimum of three and one-half percent (3.5%) higher than the employee receives, whichever is greater. Section 16. Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA): Annually, employees will receive a COLA in their salary or hourly rate based on the month of March, Los Angeles/Orange County/Riverside Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all items. The COLA will be applied to employee salaries or hourly rates 22199 17 automatically not to exceed 3.5% on July 1 of every year based on the March CPI. On July 1 of every year, position salary ranges will also adjust automatically. The salary range will adjust based on the month of March, Los Angeles/Orange County/Riverside CPI for all items not to exceed 3.5%. Section 17. Exceptional Performance Recognition: The City’s program for recognizing an employee’s exceptional performance is described in Chapter XX. 23200 18 CHAPTER VI BENEFITS Section 1. Retirement Plan: (a) The City is a member of the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS). Eligible Regular employees of the City hired prior to December 31, 2012 are enrolled in the 2%@60 retirement program. Under PERS Regulations, employees hired on or after January 1, 2013 and who are considered “Classic” employees will be enrolled in the 2%@60 retirement program. Eligible Regular employees of the City hired on or after January 1, 2013 are enrolled in the 2%@62 and 2.5%@67 retirement program consistent with State Assembly Bills 340 and 197 enacted September 12, 2012 and City Resolution No. 1136. All conditions of PERS apply to all eligible Regular employees of the City of Rolling Hills. (b) The pensionable compensation used to calculate the defined benefits paid to employees hired after December 31, 2012 will not exceed the maximum amount specified in the federal retirement system (United States Code Title 42 § 430(b), as may be amended from time to time); as adjusted annually based on changes to the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers. (c) Regular employees hired after December 31, 2012 pay 100% of the employee portion of the retirement program or 50% of the “normal cost,” defined as that portion of the present value of projected benefits under the defined benefit plan that are attributable to the current year of service (also known as the “Member Contribution Rate as a percentage of payroll”), whichever is higher. Exercising its authority to implement the provisions of section 414(h)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), all employee’s payments for the retirement program are tax deferred. For employees hired after December 31, 2012, the City is prohibited from making contributions greater than the amount specified in the federal retirement system. (d) The final compensation is the average full time monthly pay rate for the highest 36 consecutive months. If the service is coordinated with Social Security, the final compensation will be reduced according to State law. “Compensation” is defined as the normal monthly rate of pay or base pay for the employee for services rendered on a full-time basis during normal working hours, pursuant to the City’s pay schedule. It does not include pay for unused sick leave or time off or overtime pay. 24201 19 (e) Employees are permitted to replenish their PERS out of their own funds, if they have chosen to remove those funds from PERS following termination of previous employment. (f) All employees, full and part time, are required to participate in the Social Security System. (g) Newly retired former employees, or employees of another PERS member, are required to sit out for at least 180 days before returning to work for the City to avoid forfeiture of their retired status. Such employees also cannot serve more than 960 hours in a calendar year. This subsection shall not apply to employees hired to fill a critically needed position, where the appointment has been approved by City Council in a public meeting. (h) Any public official or employee who is convicted of a felony related to performance of his or her official duties, related to seeking an elected office or appointment, in connection with obtaining benefits, or committed against a child who the official or employee has contact with as part of his or her official duties, forfeits all pension benefits earned or accrued after the date of the conviction. Section 2. Health and Life Insurance: (a) The City maintains Workers’ Compensation Insurance for work- related injuries. Group term life insurance, long-term disability insurance, health insurance, prescription drug, dental insurance, and vision insurance is also provided for all Regular Exempt and Non- Exempt full-time employees who have successfully completed their twelve month probationary period. (b) The City of Rolling Hills provides 100% of the single-party premium for health, dental, and vision insurance, inclusive of prescription drug coverages within the health plans, of each Regular employee who has successfully completed their probationary period. The City will pay 80% of the premium for the eligible dependents of Regular employees up to a maximum monthly family premium of $1,642.21 based on the 2015 rate for the Anthem Traditional HMO plan. The City will contribute up to a maximum monthly premium of $202 for dental insurance based on the 2015 rate for Met Life DPPO plan and up to a maximum monthly premium of $30 for vision insurance based on the 2015 rate for VSP plan 2 following successful completion of the Regular employee’s probationary period. 2 Resolution 1249 sets the City’s monthly contribution to insurance premiums for the eligible dependents of regular employees for calendar year 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023 as follows: (1) health insurance up to a maximum of $1,658.42; (2) dental insurance up to a maximum of $204.02; (3) vision insurance up to a 25202 20 Information describing coverage is available from the Finance Department. (c) Through the implementation of an IRS compliant Section 125 plan, the City will provide Regular employees with the ability to withhold pre-tax income from his/her salary to pay his/her portion of insurance premiums. Section 3. Credit Union: (a) Applications are available to all employees for membership in the F & A Federal Credit Union. Automatic payroll deductions may be arranged. Section 4. Deferred Compensation and Employment Longevity Plan: (a) The City of Rolling Hills offers an employee funded deferred compensation program. Applications are available in the Finance Department. (b) According to the following schedule, effective July 1, 2009, the City of Rolling Hills will match employee contributions up to the IRS limit. Years of service City match to employee’s contribution (up to __% of salary) 0 - 1.99 0% 2 – 2.99 1% 3 – 5.99 2% 6 – 8.99 3% 9 – 11.99 4% 12 – 14.99 5% 15+ 6% Section 5. Other benefits: (a) The City provides single-party health coverage for its Regular employee retirees through PERS. Heath plan options and terms of the program are governed through the City’s contract with PERS. Regular employees hired after December 31, 2012 will be qualified to receive single-party retiree health coverage from the City providing 1) the Regular employee retires from the City of Rolling Hills and 2) maximum of $30.30. The maximum contribution for each policy will be increased by 2% for calendar year 2024 and beyond. 26203 21 the Regular employee has been in the employment of the City of Rolling Hills for a minimum of 5 consecutive, uninterrupted years. (b) A surviving beneficiary of a current or former employee hired before January 1, 2013 will receive benefits through PERS, as appropriate to individual circumstances. The terms of these benefits are specified in the City’s contract with PERS. 27204 22 CHAPTER VII HOURS OF WORK Full-time employees are assigned to the 9/75 flex plan under which they will work seventy- five (75) hours in a nine (9) day period. Section 1. The 9/75 Plan: Full-time employees work 37.5 hours over a 5-day workweek exclusive of meal periods as follows: Alternating Week 1 Alternating Week 2 Mon - Wed: 7:30am to 5:00pm Mon - Wed: 7:30am to 5:00pm Thursday: 7:30am to 5:00pm Thursday: 7:30am to 3:30pm Friday: 7:30am to 5:00pm Friday: off Section 2. Alternate Work Schedule: Full-time employees may be assigned to work days or hours other than those set forth in Section 1. Section 3. Work Week Defined: The work period or work week will begin at 12:01 p.m. on Friday and end the following Friday at 12:00 noon for all full-time employees working under the 9/75 work schedule if the employee is scheduled to be off every other Friday. Section 4. Work Week Schedule Change: The City may change the work week when public necessity or convenience so requires. Section 5. Request to Change Schedule: Employees for whom personal necessity requires a different schedule than above, may make a request for the alternate schedule to the City Manager. Alternate schedules must begin no earlier than 7:00 a.m. and end no later than 6:00 p.m. and will not include a shorter meal period than below. Section 6. Meal Period: Because City employees are public employees the sections of the California Labor Code regarding mandatory meal and rest periods are not applicable. Meal periods are non-paid and nonworking time and shall be one hour for all full-time employees. Every effort will be made to schedule such meal period during the middle of the shift. 28205 23 CHAPTER VIII APPLICATIONS AND APPLICANTS Section 1. Announcement: All recruitments for positions shall be publicized by means as the City deems advisable. The announcements shall specify the title and pay of the position, duties and responsibilities of the work to be performed, minimum requirements established, the manner of making application, and other pertinent information. Section 2. Application: Applications shall be made as prescribed on the announcement. Application forms shall require information covering training, experience, and other pertinent information. All applications must be signed by the person applying. Section 3. Disqualification: The City Manager or Designee may reject any application which indicates on its face that the applicant does not possess the minimum qualifications required for the position or for any material cause which, in the judgment of the City Manager or Designee would render the applicant unsuitable for the position. Falsification of any information presented on the employment application shall be grounds for rejection/disqualification from the recruitment and/or termination from employment, if applicant is appointed to the position. Section 4. Prohibition Against Nepotism: It is the policy of the City to seek the best possible candidates through appropriate search procedures. The City seeks to eliminate or limit even the appearance of impropriety where possible. As such, the City has adopted the following policy regarding application and/or hiring of employee relatives. For purpose of this policy, “relative” shall mean a spouse, domestic partner, parent, parent-in-law, step-parent, legal guardian, sibling, step-sibling, sibling-in-law, child, step-child, child-in-law, legal ward, grandchild, or grandparent. Each applicant is required to disclose the identity of any relative who is a current employee. An applicant’s failure to disclose a relative who is a current employee may result in the rejection of the applicant or future disciplinary action against the applicant after employment, up to and including termination. Relatives of current employees shall not be hired into positions in which one relative may supervise, directly or indirectly, any other relative. One or more of the following roles, undertaken on a regular, acting, overtime, or other basis shall constitute direct or indirect supervision: 1. Occupying a position in an employee’s direct line of supervision; 29206 24 2. Functional supervision, such as a lead worker, crew leader, or shift supervisor; or 3. Participating in personnel actions including, but not limited to, appointment, transfer, promotion, demotion, layoff, suspension, termination, assignments, approval of merit increases, evaluations, and grievance adjustments. Relatives of current employees shall not be hired into positions in which one relative may work in a capacity which would allow a current employee to evaluate or control the terms, conditions, and/or performance circumstances of employment of a relative. Relatives of current employees shall not be hired into any position in which the employment of such relative has the potential for adversely impacting the supervision, safety, security, or morale of other employees. The City shall review each applicant who is a relative of a current employee to determine whether hiring the applicant would result in any of the prohibited situations. If the City Manager or Designee finds that any of those situations exists, then the applicant may be rejected, or may be considered for employment in a position that does not present the above situations. Current employees shall not participate, directly or indirectly, in the recruitment or selection process for a position for which a relative is an applicant. Current employees having hiring powers or authority to recommend hires shall not, either directly or indirectly, seek to influence or assist in the hiring of any relative to any position within the City. Current employees shall not participate or interfere in, or otherwise attempt to influence, any personnel actions affecting his or her relative including, but not limited to, transfer, promotion, demotion, layoff, suspension, termination, assignments, approval of merit increases, evaluations, and grievance adjustments. Change In Status. Current employees must report a change of status to the City Manager or Designee in advance of the effective date where feasible, but in no event later than a reasonable time after the effective date of the change of status. For purposes of this policy, “a change of status” is the change in the legal status or personnel status of one or more current employees. 1. Changes in legal status include but are not limited to marriage, divorce, separation, or any such change through which a current employee becomes a relative or ceases to be a relative of another current employee. 2. Changes in personnel status include but are not limited to promotion, demotion, transfer, re-assignment, resignation, retirement, or termination of a current employee who is a relative of another current employee. 30207 25 Within thirty (30) days from receipt of notice, the City shall undertake a case- by-case consideration and individualized assessment of the particular work situation to determine whether the change of status has the potential for creating an adverse impact on supervision, safety, security, or morale. The City Manager or Designee shall make a good faith effort to regulate, transfer, condition, or assign duties in such a way as to minimize problems of supervision, safety, security, or morale. Notwithstanding this, the City retains the right to exercise its discretion to refuse to implement a change in personnel status due to its potential for creating an adverse impact on supervision, safety, security, or morale. The City shall reasonably monitor and regulate both relatives’ conduct and performance for a period of one (1) year from the date of the determination. If the City determines that a change of status has caused potential for creating an adverse impact on supervision, safety, security, or morale, the City shall re-visit the prior determination. Depending on the nature and severity of the situation, the City may transfer one of the relatives to a similar position that would not be in violation of this policy. The transfer will be granted provided the relative qualifies and there is an opening to be filled. There can be no guarantee that the new position will be within the same classification or at the same salary level. If the situation cannot be resolved by transfer or by good faith efforts to regulate, transfer, condition, or assign duties in such a reasonable way that would not be in violation of this policy, one of the relatives must separate from City employment. Pre-Existing Relationships. Where situations exist prior to the effective date of this policy that may be in conflict with these rules, reasonable efforts shall be made to address the situation so as to minimize potential problems of supervision, safety, security, or morale and to avoid future conflict. 31208 26 CHAPTER IX EXAMINATIONS Section 1. Types of Examinations: The selection techniques used in the examination process shall measure the knowledge and abilities of the applicants to execute the duties and responsibilities of the position to which they seek to be appointed. Examinations shall consist of selection techniques which will test fairly the qualifications of candidates. The City Manager or Designee may select the appropriate examination(s) to be utilized in the selection process. Section 2. Promotional Examinations: All candidates for promotion must meet the minimum qualifications identified by the City Manager or Designee. The City Manager or Designee will determine whether the examination is open competitive or a promotional appointment. Section 3. Continuous Examinations: Open-competitive examinations may be administered periodically for a single position as the needs of the service require. Names shall be placed on employment lists, in order of final scores, for a period of not more than one (1) year, unless extended by the City Manager or Designee. Section 4. Conduct of Examinations: The City Manager or Designee will determine the manner and methods and by whom examinations shall be prepared and administered. Section 5. Reasonable Accommodation in Testing: Should an otherwise qualified applicant who is disabled request a reasonable accommodation for any part of the testing process the City may modify the process to reduce or eliminate the testing barrier. Section 6. Background Investigations: Following a conditional offer of employment, each prospective employee shall submit to a criminal background check. The City does not consider, distribute, or disseminate information about any of the following while conducting a criminal background check in connection with a job application: an arrest not followed by a conviction, except when the applicant is out on bail or his/her own recognizance pending trial; a referral to or participation in a pre-trial or post-trial diversion program; and a conviction that has been sealed, dismissed, expunged, or statutorily eradicated pursuant to law. If the City’s criminal background check reveals an applicant’s prior conviction, the City shall conduct an individualized assessment to determine whether the conviction has a direct and adverse relationship with the specific job duties that may justify denying employment. The following 32209 27 factors shall be considered as part of the individualized assessment: the nature and gravity of the offense or conduct; the time that has passed since the offense or conduct and completion of the of the sentence; and the nature of the job held or sought. If the results of the City’s individualized assessment justify denying employment the applicant shall be provided with notice and an opportunity to respond within five business days. Written notice of the preliminary decision to deny employment shall be provided to the applicant. The written notice shall contain the identity of the disqualifying conviction, a copy of the conviction history report, an explanation of the applicant’s right to respond to the notice before a final decision is made, notice of the deadline to respond within five business days, and an explanation informing the applicant that the response can include evidence challenging the accuracy of the conviction history report and/or evidence of rehabilitation or mitigating circumstances. If the City makes a final decision not to hire the applicant based on the conviction history after considering the applicant’s response the City shall provide a final determination notice that includes notice of the final denial, any existing procedure the City has for the applicant to challenge the final decision, and the applicant’s right to file a complaint with the Department of Fair Employment and Housing. Section 7. Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986: In compliance with the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, all new employees must verify identity and entitlement to work in the United States by providing required documentation. Section 8. Notification of Selection Process Results: Each person competing in an employment selection process shall be given notice of the results from the examination. 33210 28 CHAPTER X EMPLOYMENT ELIGIBILITY LISTS Section 1. Employment Eligibility Lists: As soon as possible after the completion of a continuous examination, the City Manager or Designee will prepare and keep available an employment eligibility list consisting of the names of applicants who qualified in the examination, arranged alphabetically. Section 2. Removal of Applicants from Lists: The name of any person appearing on an employment eligibility list shall be removed by the City Manager or Designee if the person eligible requests in writing that his or her name be removed, fails to respond to a notice mailed to his or her last known address, or has been certified for appointment and has not been appointed. Section 3. Use of Employment Eligibility Lists: A vacant position may be filled by the appointment of a person whose name is on an employment eligibility list for the position. 34211 29 CHAPTER XI METHOD OF FILLING VACANCIES Section 1. Types of Appointment: All vacancies shall be filled by re-employment, transfer, voluntary demotion, promotion, or from eligible applicants by a process deemed appropriate by the City Manager or Designee. Section 2. Appointment: After interview(s) and an examination if deemed necessary for the selection of a candidate, the City Manager or Designee shall thereupon notify the person of the conditional offer of appointment, subject to passing a required medical examination and all background investigations. Section 3. Temporary Assignments: Employees may be temporarily assigned higher or lower duties without a change in pay. Such action shall not be deemed as a transfer, demotion, promotion, or reclassification. In all cases where periodic or regular variations in assignments occur because of seasonal needs, the temporary change of duties or a change of the work schedule shall be considered as incidental to the position. Section 4. Extended Assignment to Vacant Higher Position: Employees assigned to perform duties in a vacant higher level regular position in excess of twenty- one (21) consecutive calendar days as authorized by the City Council shall be entitled to a salary rate increase to the higher level for the time actually worked in the assignment. (See CHAPTER V, Section 15, Acting Pay.) The duration of such assignment to a vacant higher position shall not exceed one (1) year. It is the responsibility of the City Manager to adjust the salary rate increase. 35212 30 CHAPTER XII PROBATIONARY PERIOD Section 1. Probationary Period: Upon initial and promotional appointment to a position, an employee must serve a probationary period of 1 year of actual and continuous service. Periods of time on paid or unpaid leave excluding five (5) days or less automatically extends the probationary period by the number of days the employee is on leave. The City Council may, by resolution, establish a longer probation period for a specified classification prior to the time of an appointment. Continuous service with the City in a temporary position may be calculated into the probationary period upon hiring the individual into a regular position at the discretion of the City Manager. Completion of the probationary period does not entitle an employee to continued employment for any length of time. Completion of the probationary period does not alter the at-will nature of the employment. Section 2. Purpose of Probationary Period: During the probationary period, the City Manager shall review, examine, and monitor the conduct, capacity, efficiency, skill, responsibility, integrity, and effectiveness of an employee to determine whether the employee is fully qualified for employment in the position to which the employee has been appointed. Section 3. Extension of Probationary Period: The probationary period may be extended by the City Manager for a period up to six (6) months by written notice to the employee prior to the expiration of the original probationary period. Section 4. Reduction of Probationary Period: The probationary period may be shortened by the City Manager. Section 5. Rejection During Probation: At any time during the probationary period an employee may be rejected from employment without cause and without right of appeal. Section 6. Rejection During Probation From a Promotional Position: A promoted employee who has attained regular status in another position of City employment who does not successfully complete the probationary period in the promoted position may be returned to the former position without right to review or appeal unless terminated for cause. Section 7. Use of Leave During Probation: Accrued sick leave may be used any time by the probationary employee during the probationary period. Vacation leave hours are accrued during the probationary period, but shall be available for use upon completion of 1 year of service unless otherwise approved by the City Manager. 36213 31 CHAPTER XIII ATTENDANCE AND LEAVES Section 1. Attendance: Full-time employees shall be in attendance at their work in accordance with the rules regarding hours of work, holidays, and leave. Absence of any employee without leave may result in disciplinary action, including discharge. Section 2. Vacation Leave: Vacation is a right, earned as a condition of employment, to a leave of absence with pay for the recreation and well-being of the employee. If an employee has exhausted sick leave, vacation may be used for sick leave upon request of the employee and with approval of the City Manager. (a) Employees shall accrue, on a pro-rata basis, vacation leave for completed pay periods. Such vacation allowance shall be available for use on the first day following the pay period in which it is earned; however, vacation allowance shall be available for use after one year by a probationary employee. (b) All Full-time employees accrue vacation as follows: Years of Service Completed Vacation Days Accrual 0 – 3 5/6 day per month 3 1 day per month 5 1 1/4 days per month 10 1 2/3 days per month (c) Maximum Accrual: Employees shall be permitted to accumulate a maximum of 40 days of vacation leave or the maximum amount accumulated in a two-year period of employment, whichever is less. Employees who have accumulated the maximum amount of vacation leave shall accrue no further vacation leave until they use sufficient leave to fall below the maximum that may be accumulated. (d) Waiver of Maximum Accrual: A waiver must be requested by the employee and approved by the City Manager, for a period not to exceed thirteen (13) pay periods per fiscal year. If, at the end of the waiver period the maximum accrual amount is exceeded, vacation accrual for the affected employee will stop. No further vacation time will be accrued until the employee’s vacation leave balance is below the maximum accrual amount. In the event that the failure to utilize vacation past the thirteen pay period waiver is due to the City’s inability to allow an employee to take vacation (as opposed to an employee’s delay and/or failure to request vacation time off), the 37214 32 employee may, with City Manager authorization, continue to accrue vacation. (e) Vacation Leave Cash Out Option: In December of each year, if an employee has over two weeks of accrued vacation after using accrued vacation leave for one week (37.5 hours) of vacation during the calendar year, he or she may “cash out” up to two weeks of the accrued vacation (75 hours) at his or her base rate of pay. (f) The minimum charge against accumulated vacation leave shall be fifteen (15) minutes or multiples thereof. Vacation leave shall be compensated at the employee’s base rate of pay. (g) The time during a calendar year at which an employee may take his or her vacation shall be determined by the City Manager with due regard for the wishes of the employee and particular regard for the needs of the City. (h) All vacation leave requests shall be made with as much advance notice as possible, and prior approval must be given by the City Manager. When circumstances warrant and advance notice is impractical, the City Manager may approve the use of vacation leave for emergency absences. If an employee does not request time off in advance and simply does not show up for work, the City Manager may deny the use of vacation time or any leave accruals, and said employee may be subject to disciplinary action. (i) When a fixed holiday falls within a vacation period, the holiday time shall not be charged against an employee’s earned vacation benefits. (j) Employees who terminate or retire shall be paid for all accrued vacation leave earned at their base rate of pay at the time of their separation of employment. (k) Employees on Unpaid Leave: Employees on Unpaid Leave do not accrue Vacation Leave. (l) Employees not Eligible for Vacation: All part-time employees including temporary, emergency, and seasonal part time, do not accrue Vacation Leave. Section 3. Paid Sick Leave: Employees who are hired to work at least thirty days are eligible for California Paid Sick Leave. Paid Sick Leave may be taken for below prescribed purposes: 38215 33 1. The diagnosis, care, or treatment of an existing health condition of, or preventive care for, an employee or an employee’s family member; or 2. To attend legal proceedings, or to obtain medical treatment, counseling, or other victims’ services for domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking. A “family member” for these purposes is defined as a child (a biological, adopted, or foster child, stepchild, legal ward, or a child to whom the employee stands in loco parentis), a parent (a biological, adoptive, or foster parent, stepparent, or legal guardian of an employee or the employee’s spouse or registered domestic partner, or a person who stood in loco parentis when the employee was a minor child), a spouse or registered domestic partner, a grandparent, grandchild, and sibling. Additionally, Paid Sick Leave may be used for an employee who is a victim of domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking. Accrual: Employees shall accrue one day of sick leave (7.5 hours) with full pay for each month of service. Sick leave shall be available for use the first day following the payroll period in which it is earned. If the employee does not take the full amount of sick leave allowed in any year, the amount not taken shall be accumulated from year to year, to a maximum of 30 days. Separation of Employment: Upon separation of employment (voluntary termination, involuntary termination, retirement, etc.) employees are not entitled to be compensated for unused Paid Sick Leave. However, previously unused paid sick days must be reinstated if an employee separates from employment and then is rehired within one year. To the extent possible, employees must provide reasonable advance notice of their need for Paid Sick Leave under this policy. If the need is not foreseeable, the employee must provide notice as soon as practicable. Paid Sick Leave under this policy will not constitute a break in service for the purpose of City benefits or seniority. Minimum Use: The minimum charge against accumulated sick leave shall be fifteen (15) minutes or multiples thereof. Approved sick leave with pay shall be compensated at the employee’s base rate of pay. Notification: Employees should notify the City Manager prior to, or within 45 minutes after the time set for the beginning of his/her regular duties if using paid sick leave. The City Manager may request a certificate issued by a licensed physician or other satisfactory proof of illness if the sick leave extends more than 3 consecutive days. Violations: Violation of sick leave privileges may result in disciplinary action when in the opinion of the City Manager, the employee has been excessively absent or has abused such privileges. Employees who do not 39216 34 call in within 45 minutes of the start of their assignment may be denied use of sick leave. Employees on Unpaid Leave: Employees on unpaid leave do not accrue Paid Sick Leave. Employees may donate accrued paid sick time up to two (2) days per calendar year to other employees in need of additional paid time off to seek medical treatment for themselves. Donation of paid sick time to another employee will only be permitted after that recipient employee has exhausted all other available accrued leave. The donation of paid sick time is strictly voluntary. Section 4. Occupational Injury or Illness Leave: Whenever a person is compelled to be absent from employment with the City on account of injury or illness arising out of or in the course of that employee’s employment as determined by the Workers’ Compensation Act, the employee may elect to apply pro-rated accrued sick leave, if any, to such absence to receive compensation of an amount of the difference between the compensation received under the Workers’ Compensation Act and that of the employee’s regular pay, not to exceed the amount of the employee’s earned sick leave. An employee, in such instance, may also elect to use any earned vacation time in like manner after sick leave is exhausted. An employee, in such instance, may also elect to use any earned Floating Holiday hours in like manner after sick leave and earned vacation time is exhausted. Employees shall receive full salary in lieu of Workers’ Compensation benefits and paid sick leave for the first twenty-four (24) hours following an occupational injury or illness, if authorized absence is by order of an accepted physician under the Workers’ Compensation sections of the California Labor Code. Section 5. Bereavement Leave: When circumstances are such and the City Manager determines that conditions warrant, full-time employees may be granted up to three (3) days of paid bereavement leave per occurrence following completion of one year of employment in the event of the death of a spouse, domestic partner, child, brother, sister, parent, parents-in-laws, or grandparent. Section 6. Jury Duty and Witness Leave: If a regular full-time employee is required to serve as a juror, such employee shall receive regular pay less amounts received while actually performing jury service for a period of service not to exceed 10 days of jury service. The City will not pay mileage or other additional expenses incurred by jury duty. Employees will be required to provide a Jury Duty Certification form to their supervisor, to be attached to their time sheet for that time period. 40217 35 Employees shall be granted leave with pay when subpoenaed to testify as a witness other than as a party or an expert. Employees absent from work due to jury duty or witness leave must notify the City Manager of the status of their leave daily. Section 7. California CFRA Leave: The California Family Rights Act (CFRA) provides eligible employees the opportunity to take unpaid, job-protected leave for certain specified reasons. The maximum amount of leave is twelve (12) weeks within a 12- month period. All employees who have worked at least twelve (12) months in the preceding seven (7) years and have worked at least 1,250 hours within the twelve (12) months preceding the date the leave commences are eligible for CFRA leave. (a) Reasons for leave: CFRA leave may be used for the following reasons: (1) To care for or bond with a newborn child. (2) To care for or bond with a child placed with the employee and/or the employee’s registered domestic partner for adoption or foster care. (3) To care for an immediate family member (spouse, parent, registered domestic partner, child or registered domestic partner’s child, sibling, grandparent, or grandchild) with a serious health condition. (4) For the employee’s serious health condition that makes the employee unable to perform his or her job (except pregnancy, which is covered under PDL and does not run concurrently with CFRA). (5) For a qualifying military exigency related to the covered active duty or call to covered active duty of a spouse, domestic partner, child, or parent in the United States armed forces. Eligible employees may take CFRA leave in a single block of time, intermittently, or by reducing the normal work schedule when medically necessary for the serious health condition of the employee or immediate family member. Employees may choose to use accrued paid sick leave or vacation time with some or all of the CFRA leave. 41218 36 When seeking leave under this policy, employees must provide the City Manager or Designee with the following: (1) Thirty (30) days’ notice of the need to take CFRA leave (if foreseeable), or notice as soon as practicable in the case of unforeseeable leave; (2) Medical certification supporting the need for leave within fifteen (15) calendar days of the company’s request for the certification. Failure to do so may result in the delay of the commencement of leave or denial of a leave request; (3) Periodic reports as deemed appropriate during the leave regarding the employee’s status and intent to return to work; and (4) A return-to-work release before returning to work if the leave was due to the employee’s serious health condition. The City will maintain health insurance coverage for employees and /or their families when CFRA leave is taken on the same terms as if the employee had continued to work. In some instances, the City may recover premiums paid to maintain health coverage or other benefits for employees and/or their families. Section 8. California Paid Family Leave: The City participates in a private voluntary disability insurance program that it offers to its employees as a legal alternative to the mandatory State Disability Insurance (SDI). Employees may inquire into this program with the City Manager or Human Resources Director. Section 9. Pregnancy Disability Leave: A full-time employee is eligible for up to four (4) months of unpaid leave for an actual disability caused by the employee’s pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical condition. (a) During the pregnancy disability leave time, paid leave may be charged to accrued benefit time such as vacation and floating holiday, at the employee’s request. In addition, accrued sick leave may be used at the employee’s request, in accordance with Section 3. (b) Health insurance benefits shall continue for the duration of the pregnancy disability leave under the same conditions as if the employee had continued employment. If the employee fails to return to work after the period of leave to which the employee is entitled has expired, the City is entitled to recover the premiums paid on behalf of the employee for maintaining coverage. (c) The City Manager may require the employee to file a physician’s certificate or personal affidavit and to provide reasonable notice of the date the leave will begin and the estimated duration of the leave. (d) Employees disabled by pregnancy may also take intermittent leave or be provided reasonable accommodation to continue work. 42219 37 (e) Employees returning from Pregnancy Disability Leave generally are entitled to be reinstated in the same position, subject to certain conditions, and consistent with applicable law. Section 10. Lactation Accommodation Policy: The City provides accommodations to lactating employees who need to express breast milk during work hours in accordance with applicable law. The City will provide the employee with the use of a room or other location (not a bathroom) to express breast milk that is in close proximity to the employee’s work area, shielded from view, and free from intrusion. Such space will meet the requirements of the California Labor Code including a surface to place a breast pump and personal items, a place to sit, access to electricity, a sink with running water, and a refrigerator for storing breast milk. Employees who are nursing have a right to request a lactation accommodation. Such requests may be made verbally or in writing, and should indicate the need for an accommodation in order to express breast milk at work, and should be directed to the City Manager or Designee. The City will promptly respond to such requests and indicate the approval or denial of the break request. The City reserves the right to deny an employee’s request for a lactation break if the additional break time will seriously disrupt City operations. The requested break time should, if possible, be taken concurrently with other scheduled break periods. The City prohibits any form of discrimination or retaliation against an employee for exercising or attempting to exercise any rights provided by this policy. Any such conduct or other violations of this policy should be reported to the City Manager or Designee. Employees have the right to file a complaint with the California Labor Commissioner for violation of a lactation accommodation right described in this policy. Section 11. Election Leave: If a full-time employee does not have sufficient time outside of working hours to vote at a statewide election, the voter may, without loss of pay, take off enough working time, which when added to the voting time available outside of working hours will enable the voter to vote. Regular part-time employees are eligible for election leave based upon hours scheduled to work. No more than two (2) hours of the time taken off for voting shall be without loss of pay. The time off for voting shall be only at the beginning or end of the regular work shift, whichever allows for the greatest free time for voting and the least time off from the regular working shift, unless otherwise mutually agreed upon. The employee shall give the City Manager at least two working days’ notice that time off for voting is desired. 43220 38 Section 12. Leave of Absence Without Pay: The City Manager may grant a regular employee a leave of absence without pay for a period not to exceed one (1) month. No such leave shall be granted except upon written request of the employee, setting forth the reason for the request. Approval will be in writing. Upon expiration of a regularly approved leave or within a reasonable period of time after notice to return to duty, the employee shall be reinstated in the position held at the time leave was granted. Failure on the part of an employee on leave to report promptly at its expiration, or within a reasonable time after notice to return to duty, shall be cause for discharge. Such leave of absence shall not be counted as a break in service for purposes of satisfying the continuous employment requirement for vacation allowance. An employee on leave of absence without pay does not accrue sick leave, vacation time, or receive benefits while on leave. Such employee does not lose or forfeit any sick leave or unpaid vacation time that had been accumulated prior to the time being granted. Section 13. Military Leave: Military leave shall be granted to City employees in accordance with the provisions of current federal and state law. Section 14. Administrative Leave: At the discretion of the City Manager and in special circumstances, Regular employees may be provided administrative leave without loss in pay or the deduction of other leave accrued. Section 15. Disability Accommodation: It is the City’s policy to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), as well as applicable state and local laws relating to disability issues. The City will not discriminate against any employee with respect to any terms, privileges, or conditions of employment because of his or her physical or mental disability. The City will also reasonably accommodate all employees and applicants with disabilities who are otherwise qualified to safely perform the essential duties of the job unless any such accommodations would impose an undue hardship in the City’s operations. If an employee needs a reasonable accommodation to perform the essential job duties of his or her position, the employee should make the request to the City Manager or Designee. The City believes in an interactive process with the employee to identify and consider possible accommodations that would enable the employee to perform his or her position’s essential job duties. Reasonable accommodation is available to all disabled employees, where his or her disability affects the performance of job functions and when such accommodations would not impose undue hardship. All employment decisions are based on the merits of the situation in accordance with defined criteria, not the disability of the individual. 44221 39 CHAPTER XIV HOLIDAYS Section 1. Holidays Observed: The City observes the following paid holidays: 1. New Year’s Day (January 1) 2. Martin Luther King Jr. Day (observed the third Monday in January) 3. President’s Day (observed the third Monday in February) 4. Memorial Day (observed the last Monday in May) 5. Independence Day (July 4) 6. Labor Day (observed the first Monday in September) 7. Veteran’s Day (November 11) 8. Every day appointed by the President or Governor for a public fast, thanksgiving, or holiday including Thanksgiving Day 9. Friday following Thanksgiving Day 10. Christmas Eve (December 24) 11. Christmas Day (December 25) Holidays which fall on Saturday shall be observed the preceding Friday and holidays which fall on Sunday shall be observed on the following Monday. Paid holidays are only for the observed days. If an observed holiday falls on an eight and one-half (8.5) hour work day under the 9/75 work schedule, those employees on the 9/75 schedule shall receive eight and one-half (8.5) hours of holiday pay. If an observed holiday falls on a seven (7) hour workday under the 9/75 work schedule, those employees on the 9/75 schedule shall receive seven (7) hours of holiday pay. If the holiday falls on a regular day off for that employee, that employee will take the preceding day off. 45222 40 Section 2. Floating Holiday: (a) Each full-time employee is allowed eight and one-half (8.5) hours per calendar year, January through December with the approval of the City Manager. (b) Floating holiday hours are not cumulative and must be used during the above period or said employee will lose the allocated hours. (c) Each employee must submit a request in advance. (d) An employee is eligible to use floating holiday hours as they are allocated. (e) Floating holiday hours may be used in lieu of sick leave only if all other benefit time has been exhausted. Section 3. Eligibility for Holidays: All employees are eligible for holiday pay except the following: (a) Seasonal and part-time employees. (b) Temporary employees. 46223 41 CHAPTER XV CHANGES IN EMPLOYMENT STATUS Section 1. Transfer: An employee may be transferred by the City Manager at any time from one position to another position. Transfer shall not be used to effectuate a promotion, demotion, advancement, or reduction, each of which may be accomplished only as provided in these rules. No person shall be transferred to a position for which he/she does not possess the minimum qualifications. Section 2. Promotion: When practicable and consistent with the best interests of the City, vacancies may be filled by promotion. All candidates for promotion must meet the minimum qualifications identified by the City Manager or Designee. If, in the opinion of the City Manager or Designee, a vacancy in the position could be filled better by an open, competitive recruitment instead of a promotional appointment, he/she shall arrange for an open competitive examination. Section 3. Demotion: The City Manager may demote an employee whose ability to perform his/her required duties falls below standard. No employee shall be demoted to a position for which he/she does not possess the minimum qualifications. Section 4. Suspension: The City Manager may suspend an employee at any time for cause. Section 5. Reclassification: The City Manager may reclassify a position from one position to another if there has been a gradual accretion or reduction of duties and/or responsibilities over time. 47224 42 CHAPTER XVI SEPARATION FROM EMPLOYMENT Section 1. Job Abandonment: An employee is deemed to have resigned if the employee is absent for three (3) consecutive workdays without prior authorization and without notification during the period of absence. On the second working day of unauthorized absence, the City Manager shall send an overnight letter to the employee’s last known address informing the employee that if the employee fails to report to work within one (1) workday, or receive authorization for such absence, the employee will be deemed to have resigned and extending to the employee an informal pre-disciplinary conference. Employees separated from employment for job abandonment will be reinstated with such charge removed from the employee’s record upon presentation of justification for absence such as severe accident, severe illness, false arrest, or mental or physical impairment which prevented notification. Employees have no right to appeal if deemed to have resigned as a result of job abandonment. Section 2. Discharge: An at-will employee may be discharged at any time with or without cause or notice. Section 3. Lay-off: The City Manager may lay off an employee because of change in duties or organization or shortage of work or funds. (a) Notification: Employees to be laid off shall be given, whenever possible, at least ten (10) calendar days prior notice. (b) Order of Layoff: Employees shall be laid off in the inverse order of their seniority and with regard to their responsibilities. Seniority shall be determined based upon date of hire in the position. A lay off out of the inverse order of seniority may be made if, in the City’s judgment, retention of special job skills is required. (c) Re-employment Rights for Laid-off Employees: Regular employees, who have received a satisfactory or better evaluation for the twelve (12) months prior to lay off, have completed their probationary period, and who have been laid off shall be automatically placed on a re- employment list for one year for the classification from which they were laid off. Section 4. Resignation: An employee wishing to leave City service in good standing shall file with the supervising official at least ten (10) working days before leaving the service, a written resignation stating the effective date and reasons for leaving. Failure to give such notice shall mean the employee did not terminate in good standing, unless the City Manager has waived the two-week notice requirement. Failure to comply with this Chapter shall be entered on the service record of the employee and be cause for denying 48225 43 future employment by the City. A resignation becomes final when accepted by the City Manager and only at the City Manager’s discretion can be withdrawn. Section 5. Reinstatement: A regular employee who has resigned, or has otherwise been separated while in good standing, may be considered for reinstatement by the City Manager, to a position in the former employee’s same or comparable position for a period of two (2) years after resignation or separation provided such a position is vacant and available. The employee shall be reinstated to the salary range and step held at the time of resignation or separation and shall receive a new anniversary date which shall be the first date of employment upon reinstatement. The employee will serve a new probationary period. 49226 44 CHAPTER XVII REPORTS AND RECORDS Section 1. General: The City maintains a personnel file on each employee. An employee’s personnel file shall contain only material that is necessary and relevant to the administration of the City’s personnel program. Personnel files are the property of the City, and access to the information they contain is restricted. Section 2. Notifying City of Changes in Personal Information: Each employee is responsible to promptly notify the City Manager or Designee of any changes in relevant personal information, including: • Mailing address • Telephone number • Persons to contact in emergency • Number and names of dependents Section 3. Location of Personnel Files: The personnel files will be kept secure and confidential by the City Manager or Designee. Section 4. Medical Information: (a) Separate Confidential Files. All medical information about an employee or applicant is kept separately and is treated as confidential, in accordance with federal and state law. (b) Information in Medical Files. The City will not obtain medical information about an employee or applicant except in compliance with the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act. To enable the City to obtain certain medical information, the employee or applicant may need to sign an authorization for release of employee medical information. (c) Access to Medical Information. Access to employee or applicant medical information shall be strictly limited to only those with a legitimate need to have such information for City business reasons. In the case of an employee with a disability, managers and supervisors may be informed regarding necessary restrictions on the work or duties of the employee and necessary accommodations. Section 5. References and Release of Information in Personnel Files: (a) Public Information: Upon request, the City will release to the public information about its employees as required by the Public Records Act. The City will not disclose personnel information that it considers would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 50227 45 (b) Reference Checks: All requests from outside the City for reference checks or verification of employment concerning any current or former employee must be referred to the City Manager or Designee. Information will be released only if the employee signs an authorization for release of employment information, except that without such authorization, the following limited information will be provided: dates of employment and job title. Section 6. Employee Access to Personnel File: An employee may inspect his or her own personnel file at reasonable times and at reasonable intervals. An employee who wishes to review his or her file should contact the City Manager or Designee to arrange an appointment. The review must be done in the presence of the City Manager or Designee. Section 7. Destruction of Records: Personnel files, payroll records, and records relating to personnel recruitment, including correspondence, applications, examinations, and reports will be destroyed according to the City’s Records Retention Schedule. 51228 46 CHAPTER XVIII GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES Section 1. Definition: (a) Grievance: A “grievance” is a written allegation by an employee, submitted as herein specified, claiming violation(s) of the specific express terms of the Employee Handbook and Personnel Policy Manual, or expressing concern relating to an aspect of employment, and for which there is no other specific method of review provided by City law. (b) Grievant: A grievant is an employee or group of employees adversely affected by an act or omission of the City. (c) Day: A day is any day the agency is open to the public, that is any day except Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays recognized by the City. Section 2. Procedure: Step A: Informal Discussion: The grievant shall discuss the controversy with the City Manager on an informal basis in an effort to resolve the situation. The issue will be considered resolved if not presented to the City Manager within ten (10) working days following the day the event occurred upon which the controversy is based. The City Manager shall respond within five (5) working days following the meeting with the grievant. Failure of the City Manager to respond within such time limit shall entitle the grievant to process the controversy to the next step. Step B: First Level of Review: If the controversy is not settled at Step A, the grievant may submit the grievance in writing to the City Manager within five (5) working days of the receipt of the grievance response at Step A. Failure of the grievant to deliver the written grievance shall constitute a waiver of the grievance. The City Manager shall meet with the grievant and a written decision and statement of facts and issues shall be rendered to the grievant within ten (10) working days from the date of the written grievance. Failure of the City Manager to respond within such time limit shall entitle the grievant to process his/her grievance at the next level of review. If the City Manager is the subject of the grievance the grievance shall be submitted to the Personnel Committee instead of the City Manager. 52229 47 Step C: Second Level Review: If the grievance is not settled at Step B, the grievant may place the grievance in writing to and present it to the Rolling Hills City Council within five (5) working days of receipt of the Step B grievance response. Failure of the grievant to deliver such written notice shall constitute a waiver of the grievance. The City Council shall hear the grievance at a regular meeting, and a written decision and statement of facts and issues shall be rendered to the grievant. The decision of the City Council shall be final and binding. Section 3. Reprisals: Employees shall be insured freedom from reprisal for using the grievance procedure. 53230 48 CHAPTER XIX DISCIPLINE Nothing in this Section is intended to alter the at-will status of employment with the City. Consistent with the City’s Employment At Will policy, you and the City each have the right to terminate the employment relationship at any time with or without cause and with or without prior notice. As well, the City reserves the right to terminate any employment relationship, to demote, and to otherwise discipline an employee without resort to the below disciplinary procedures. Section 1. Types of Disciplinary Action: (a) Oral Warning: A formal discussion with an employee, by the City Manager, about performance or conduct problems, the need for the employee to improve, and what specific improvement is expected. The City Manager shall make a written record of the warning. (b) Written Reprimand: A formal written notice to the employee regarding performance or conduct problems, the need for the employee to improve, and what specific improvement is expected. The written reprimand goes in the employee’s personnel file. (c) Suspension: Removal of an employee from duty without pay for a specified period. (d) Reduction in Pay: A reduction in pay from the employee’s current salary to a lower salary. (e) Demotion: A reduction in position title and salary. (f) Dismissal or Discharge: Separation from employment of an employee for cause. Section 2. Grounds for Disciplinary Action Involving Regular Employees: Grounds for discipline include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) Fraud in securing employment or making a false statement on an application for employment. (b) Incompetency; i.e., the inability to comply with the minimum standard of an employee’s position for a significant period of time. (c) Inefficiency or inexcusable neglect of duty, i.e., failure to perform duties required of an employee within his/her position. (d) Willful disobedience or insubordination, a willful failure to submit to duly appointed and acting supervision or to conform to duly 54231 49 established orders or directions of persons in a supervisory position, or insulting or demeaning any fellow employee. (e) Dishonesty. (f) Possession, distribution, sale, use, or being under the influence of alcohol or illegal drugs or narcotics while on duty or while operating a vehicle in the course of City business or potentially dangerous equipment leased or owned by the City. (g) Excessive absenteeism. (h) Inexcusable absence without leave. (i) Abuse of sick leave, i.e., taking sick leave without a doctor’s certificate when one is required, or misuse of sick leave. (j) The conviction of either a misdemeanor or a felony related to the position held will constitute grounds for dismissal of any employee. The record of conviction will be conclusive evidence of the fact that the conviction occurred. The City Manager may inquire into the circumstances surrounding the commission of the crime in order to support the degree of discipline. A plea or verdict of guilty, or a conviction showing a plea of nolo contendere, is deemed to be a conviction within the meaning of this Section. (k) Discourteous treatment of the public or other employees. (l) Improper or unauthorized use of City property. (m) Refusal to subscribe to any oath or affirmation which is required by law in connection with agency employment. (n) Any willful act or conduct undertaken in bad faith, either during or outside of duty hours, which is of such a nature that it causes discredit to the City. (o) Inattention to duty or negligence in the care and handling of City property. (p) Violation of the rules and regulations of the City. (q) Outside employment not specifically authorized. (r) Acceptance from any source of a reward, gift, or other form of remuneration in addition to regular compensation to an employee for the performance of his or her official duties. 55232 50 (s) The refusal of any officer or employee of the City to testify under oath before any Grand Jury having jurisdiction over any then pending cause of inquiry in which the investigation of government bribery or misconduct in agency office is involved shall constitute of itself sufficient ground for the immediate discharge of such officer or employee. (t) Willful violation of any of the provisions of an ordinance, resolution, rule, regulation, or policy prescribed by the City. (u) Improper political activity. Example: Campaigning for or espousing the election or non-election of any candidate in national, state, county, or municipal elections while on duty and/or during working hours or in City uniform on or off duty; or the dissemination of political material of any kind while on duty and/or during working hours or in uniform. (v) Working overtime without authorization. (w) Possession of weapons on agency property unless authorized. (x) Making false or malicious statements concerning any employee, the City, or the City’s policies or practices. 56233 51 CHAPTER XX PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS AND ANNUAL WORK PLANS Section 1. General: Performance evaluation is the process of evaluating and recording the performance of each employee. The performance evaluation is best used: (a) To maintain a high level of efficiency or assist in raising efficiency by commending the employee. (b) To indicate to the employee those points in which he/she shows weak performance, and suggest the proper means of raising his/her working performance to the standard level. (c) To inform the employee of good performance. (d) To encourage better working relationships and mutual understanding by letting the employee know where he/she stands with relation to the City Manager’s evaluation of his/her work. (e) To establish an annual work plan consisting of goals and tasks to be accomplished. Section 2. Responsibility for Evaluation: The City Manager is responsible for proper preparation of the performance evaluation for each employee. The City Manager should carefully review the complete position description, and the goals and objectives for the employee, if any, before beginning each evaluation, to remind himself/herself of what should be expected from the employee. Section 3. Discussion with Employee: The performance evaluation must be discussed with the employee. During the interview, as well as in the performance evaluation documentation, special attention should be given to discussing specific ways in which the employee can improve his/her performance. An opportunity should also be afforded to the employee to comment and bring up any questions he or she may have. Section 4. Schedule: Performance evaluations for probationary employees are to be presented at the end of the first six (6) months, and after the first twelve (12) months, to correspond to the completion of the one year probationary period. After the probationary evaluation, an evaluation should be done on an annual basis on the employee’s anniversary date. Section 5. Appeal Procedure: It is the intent of the City to offer fair and equitable appeals procedures for employees’ performance evaluations. Below are the official guidelines. 57234 52 (a) Employee and City Manager meet to review and discuss the employee’s performance evaluation. (b) The employee may respond in writing to the contents of the evaluation. The employee must submit this response to the City Manager within ten (10) working days immediately following receipt of the evaluation. The decision shall be rendered in writing within fifteen (15) working days by the City Manager, and the decision of the City Manager shall be final. Section 6. Exceptional Performance Recognition: Based on fiscal year finances and Council approval, the City Manager is provided a pool of funds to recognize an employee’s exceptional performance. Annually, the City will endeavor to budget a 5% increase in salaries. The amount of funds potentially available in the bonus pool is the difference between the CPI adjustment provided to staff in July (see Chapter V) and 5%. An employee can be given exceptional performance recognition of no more than the difference between the CPI and 5% as a one-time check, gift card, or item (the recognition, in other words, does not become part of the employees’ salary) for exceptional performance during the prior fiscal year. The recognition will require the City Manager to document and justify the action. 58235 53 CHAPTER XXI VEHICLE USE Section 1. Use of Private Vehicles: Private automobiles are not to be used for the City business except as authorized. The City Manager may authorize such use at the reimbursement rate equal to that set forth by the Internal Revenue Service. Payments shall be based upon the most direct route to and from the destination and garage and parking expenses shall be paid in addition to the current rate, upon submission of paid receipts within the fiscal year of the trips. To receive mileage reimbursement, the employee must acknowledge and be in compliance with the City’s Vehicle Use Policy. Section 2. Auto Allowance: Select employees will receive a monthly car allowance. This stipend will be in lieu of any mileage reimbursement and is intended to cover all actual expenses incurred. If additional garage, parking, and other related auto expenses are incurred above the monthly allowance, they are reimbursable. 59236 54 CHAPTER XXII PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Section 1. Training: The City Manager and employees of the City are eligible to request specialized training in the form of symposiums, special courses, forums, professional association meetings, professional development courses, etc., at the City’s expense. The City retains the sole authority to approve or deny requests for specialized training. 60237 55 CHAPTER XXIII EMPLOYEE STANDARDS OF CONDUCT Section 1. Code of Ethics: (a) Each officer, official, and employee has an obligation to the residents, to the people’s elected representatives, and to fellow employees to meet the highest ethical and professional standards and to enhance the public’s respect and trust for the City government and its operations. (b) Employees of the City have responsibilities unique from their counterparts in the private industry. Employment with the City carries an obligation of personal integrity and conduct that serves to establish public respect, confidence, and trust. (c) Employees represent the City of Rolling Hills and the quality of City service is judged through their performance and conduct. The residents of Rolling Hills have the right to expect that City employees will provide services in an efficient, thorough, and courteous manner. (d) The City, as a condition of employment, expects to receive from the employee: (1) Initiative and a conscientious effort to perform productive work. (2) Cooperative, positive, responsive, and courteous relations with fellow employees, supervisors, subordinates, and the public. (3) A continuous effort to strive for greater knowledge and skill on the job in order to maintain performance at a high level. (4) Compliance with all policies, regulations, rules of conduct, and ordinances established by the City. (5) Responsible work habits demonstrated by: a. Dependability, promptness, reliable attendance, and performing required duties competently, b. Keeping informed of developments and matters affecting job performance, c. Being flexible and adaptable to change, 61238 56 d. Accepting constructive suggestions and criticism. (6) Neat and clean grooming and attire appropriate to the job assignment. a. Work days Appropriate dress shall be professional and business casual, representative of an office environment and appropriate for meetings and interaction with the public. b. Other As appropriate for the position, the employee is required to have shoes and clothing for meetings in the field, visits to construction sites, and walking on trails. (7) Support in principle of the ICMA (International City/County Management Association) Code of Ethics and related tenants. No employee will accept a fee, compensation, gift, payment of expenses, or any other thing of monetary value in any circumstances in which acceptance may result in or create the appearance of any one or more of the following: 1. Use of public office and/or employment for personal or private gain. 2. Preferential treatment of any person. 3. Loss of complete independence or impartiality. 4. Making a City decision outside of official channels. 5. Reduction of public confidence in the integrity of City government and/or its employees. 6. Impeding government efficiency or economy. Section 2. Policy Against Harassment, Discrimination, and Retaliation The City strictly prohibits and has “zero tolerance” for discrimination and harassment in any phase of the employment, including but not limited to recruitment, testing, hiring, upgrading, promotion/demotion, transfer, layoff, termination, rates of pay, benefits, and selection for training. This includes sexual harassment (which includes harassment based on sex, pregnancy, perceived pregnancy, childbirth, breastfeeding, or related medical 62239 57 conditions), as well as harassment, discrimination, and retaliation based on such factors as race, color, religion, religious creed (including religious dress and religious grooming practices), sex, national origin, ancestry, citizenship, age (40 years and older), mental disability and physical disability (including HIV and AIDS), legally-protected medical condition or information (including genetic information), protected medical leaves (requesting or approved for leave under the California Family Rights Act), military and/or veteran status, service, or obligation, reserve status, national guard status, marital status, domestic partner status, gender, gender identity (including transgender identity), gender expression (including transgender expression), because an individual has transitioned (to live as the gender with which they identify), is transitioning, or is perceived to be transitioning), sex stereotyping, sexual orientation, status as a victim of domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking, enrollment in a public assistance program, engaging in protected communications regarding employee wages or otherwise exercising rights protected under the California Fair Pay Act, requesting a reasonable accommodation on the basis of disability or bona fide religious belief or practice, or any other basis protected by federal, state, or local laws. Discrimination and Harassment Defined. Discrimination and harassment may consist of offensive verbal, physical, or visual conduct when such conduct is based on or related to an individual’s sex or membership in one of the above-described protected classifications, and: (1) Submission to the offensive conduct is an explicit or implicit term or condition of employment; (2) Submission to or rejection of the offensive conduct forms the basis for an employment decision affecting the employee; or (3) The offensive conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual’s work performance or creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment. Examples of Sexual Harassment. For the purpose of clarification, examples of what may constitute prohibited sexual harassment include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Making unsolicited sexual advances or written, verbal, physical, or visual contact with sexual overtones. (Written examples: suggestive or obscene letters, notes, invitations. Verbal examples: derogatory comments, slurs, jokes, epithets. Physical examples: touching, assault, blocking or impeding access, leering gestures, display of sexually suggestive objects or pictures, cartoons, or posters.) 2. Continuing to express sexual interest after being informed that the interest is unwelcome. (Reciprocal attraction is not considered sexual harassment.) 63240 58 3. Making reprisals, threats of reprisal, or implied threats of reprisal following a negative response. (For example, implying or actually withholding support for an appointment, promotion, or change of assignment; suggesting a poor performance report will be prepared; or suggesting probation will be failed.) 4. Engaging in implicit or explicit coercive sexual behavior which is used to control, influence, or affect the career, salary, or work environment of another employee. 5. Offering favors or employment benefits, such as promotions, favorable performance evaluations, favorable assigned duties or shifts, recommendations, reclassifications, etc., in exchange for sexual favors. (Similar conduct when applied to other protected classes such as race, color, creed, national origin, age, disability, medical condition, religion, sexual orientation, or marital status may constitute harassment and violation of this Policy. For example, racial jokes or degrading comments about age or ethnic background can constitute harassment under this policy). Accordingly, in order to avoid the risk of discipline, such acts should be avoided in all circumstances. Internal Complaint Procedure. Any applicant or employee who believes that he or she has been the victim of sexual or other prohibited discrimination or harassment by co-workers, supervisors, clients or customers, visitors, vendors, corporate officers, or others must immediately notify the City Manager or Designee of the alleged conduct. If the employee believes that, for any reason, the City Manager is the source of the conduct or is biased, the employee may submit the complaint to the Personnel Committee. Internal Investigation and Resolution. Following receipt of a discrimination or harassment grievance, the City shall begin an immediate and thorough investigation to determine if sexual or other discrimination/harassment has occurred. The investigation shall be conducted in an impartial manner and all information shall be maintained confidential to the extent possible. After full consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances involving the inquiry, a timely decision will be made by the City and appropriate disciplinary or other action will be taken, up to and including termination of employment. Prohibition Against Retaliation. Retaliation against anyone for opposing conduct prohibited by the City’s anti-discrimination/harassment policies or for filing a complaint with or otherwise participating in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing conducted by the City, or any authorized governmental agency, is strictly prohibited and may subject the offending person to, among other things, disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment. 64241 59 External Reporting. In addition to the City’s internal complaint procedure, an employee may file a complaint with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) or the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Section 3. Injury and Illness Policy The City of Rolling Hills has an adopted Injury and Illness Policy for the purpose of preventing injury and illness at work. The policy applies to all employees. Section 4. Information Technology Policy The City of Rolling Hills has an adopted Information Technology Policy for the purpose of defining inappropriate use of the electronic information, technological equipment (e.g., computers), and technological systems (e.g., email). The policy applies to all employees. Section 5. Smoking Policy The City of Rolling Hills is a smoke-free City. Employees are not permitted to smoke within the City limits. Section 6. Drug and Alcohol Use Policy The City strictly prohibits its employees from using alcohol or drugs in connection with their employment, as it constitutes a threat to the safe and efficient performance of an employee’s duties. At no time shall any employee be under the influence of any controlled drug or alcohol while on the job, including but not limited to marijuana (with, or without, prescription). Please note that, while Proposition 64 (2016) legalized use of recreational marijuana in California, the City still will find a positive test for marijuana as a valid basis for discipline, up to and including termination of employment. (Employees who are taking lawful medications pursuant to a physician’s prescription, except in the case of medical marijuana, who has also certified that they may efficiently perform their duties without jeopardizing the health or safety of others will not be considered to have violated this policy for taking such prescription medicine). Prohibitions. The following conduct is prohibited and may result in discipline, up to and including termination: 1. Using or possessing alcohol or other controlled substances while on duty. 2. Reporting for duty or remaining on duty when the employee used any controlled substances, except if the use is pursuant to the instructions of a physician who has advised the employee that the substance does not 65242 60 adversely affect the employee’s ability to safely operate a vehicle or otherwise perform the employee’s job. 3. Reporting for duty or remaining on duty if the employee tests as having a blood alcohol concentration of 0.02 or greater. 4. Reporting for duty or remaining on duty if the employee tests positive for controlled substances (including, but not limited to, marijuana, whether prescribed or not). 5. Refusing to submit to any alcohol or controlled substances test required by this Policy. An employee who refuses to submit to a required drug/alcohol test will be treated in the same manner as an employee who tested 0.02 or greater on a blood alcohol test or tested positively on a controlled substances test. A “refusal to submit” to an alcohol or controlled substances test required by this policy includes, but is not limited to: • A refusal to provide a urine sample for a drug test; • An inability to provide a urine sample without a valid medical explanation; • A refusal to complete and sign the breath alcohol testing form, or otherwise to cooperate with the testing process in a way that prevents the completion of the test; • An inability to provide breath or to provide an adequate amount of breath without a valid medical explanation; • Tampering with or attempting to adulterate the urine specimen or collection procedure; • Not reporting to the collection site in the time allotted by the supervisor or manager who directs the employee to be tested; • Leaving the scene of an accident without a valid authorization. Reasonable Suspicion Testing. All employees may be required to submit to an alcohol or drug test if a supervisor has reasonable suspicion to believe the employee is under the influence of alcohol or controlled substances. Reasonable suspicion alcohol and drug testing will generally be administered within two hours of the observation. If not, the supervisor should provide written documentation as to why the test was not promptly conducted. Consequences of Failing an Alcohol or Drug Test. A positive result from a drug or alcohol test may result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination, even for a first offense. The City also reserves the right to 66243 61 discipline or terminate an employee convicted of an offense which involves the use, distribution, or possession of illegal drugs. If an employee is not terminated, the employee: 1. Must be removed from performing any job function and immediately placed in an unpaid status. 2. Must submit to an examination by a substance abuse professional. Upon a determination by the substance abuse professional, the employee may be required to undergo treatment for his or her alcohol or drug abuse. The City is not required to pay for this treatment. 3. Shall not be returned to his or her former position until the employee submits to a return to duty controlled substance and/or blood alcohol test (depending on which test the employee failed) which indicates and alcohol concentration level of less than 0.02 or a negative result on a controlled substance test. 4. Will be required to submit to unannounced follow up testing and, possibly other conditions if he or she has been returned to his or her position. Compliance With State and Federal Law. At all times, the City will comply with current applicable state and federal law concerning drug and alcohol testing. Issues or inconsistencies that are not addressed in this policy will be determined by referring to state or federal law and regulations governing drug and alcohol testing. The City reserves the right to make changes to this policy at any time, for the purpose of complying with state and/or federal law or regulation as it exists now or as it may be amended. 67244 62 EMPLOYEE HANDBOOK ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I acknowledge receipt of the City of Rolling Hills Employee Handbook and warrant and represent that I have read and understand the document. I had an opportunity to ask questions and receive clarification from the City regarding conditions of employment, policies, and rules contained in this Handbook. I agree to observe and abide by the conditions of employment, policies, and rules contained in this Handbook. I understand and agree that my relationship with the City is ‘‘at-will,’’ which means that my employment is for no definite period and may be terminated by me or by the City at any time and for any reason with or without cause or advance notice. I understand that the City retains the right to make decisions involving employment as needed in order to conduct its work in a manner that is beneficial to the employees and the City. I understand and agree that nothing in the Handbook creates or is intended to create a promise or representation of continued employment and that employment at the City is employment “at-will”; employment may be terminated at the will of either the City or myself with or without cause. I understand and agree that the terms of my at-will employment may not be modified or superseded except by the City Council and by written agreement signed by me and the City Manager, that no other employee or representative of the City has the authority to enter into any such agreement, and that any agreement to employ me for any specified period of time or that is otherwise inconsistent with the terms of this Acknowledgment will be unenforceable unless in writing, approved by the City Council and signed by me and the City Manager. My signature below certifies that I understand that the foregoing agreement on “at-will” status is the sole and entire agreement between the City and me concerning my employment and the circumstances under which my employment may be terminated. I also understand that if I violate the rules, policies, and procedures set forth herein that I may be subject to discipline, up to and including termination of my employment. This Handbook supersedes all prior agreements, understandings, and representations concerning my employment. I understand that if I have questions regarding the Handbook that I can discuss them with the City Manager’s Designee. Name Date 68245 Attachment B City Council Meeting May 12, 2025 Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Carson $ 28,600 $ 15,432 $ 19,696 $ 7,976 $ 10,179 $5,515 $7,040 $6,184 $7,893 $ 12,441 $ 15,879 $7,410 $9,457 $6,289 $8,026 - - El Segundo $ 24,336 $ 13,581 $ 18,750 $ 6,583 $ 8,373 $6,877 $8,359 $ 11,237 $ 14,293 $7,176 $9,128 $5,988 $7,278 - - Hermosa Beach $ 22,765 $ 14,942 $ 17,297 $ 10,736 $ 12,429 $5,954 $7,237 $6,240 $7,585 $ 12,209 $ 14,840 $7,123 $8,658 $6,045 $7,349 - - Hidden Hills $ 17,917 $ 5,833 $ 8,711 $2,885 $4,038 - - La Habra Heights $ 12,471 - - Lawndale $ 21,239 $ 12,966 $ 15,761 $6,657 $8,092 $5,768 $7,005 - - Lomita $ 20,000 $ 12,688 $ 15,422 $ 8,547 $ 10,389 $4,013 $4,878 $5,346 $6,499 $6,200 $7,536 $5,397 $6,560 - - Palos Verdes Estates $ 20,833 $ 10,735 $ 16,050 $ 8,895 $ 11,148 $4,579 $5,845 $5,989 $7,280 $ 7,711 $ 9,672 $6,345 $8,502 - - Rancho Palos Verdes $ 21,250 $ 14,437 $ 18,768 $ 11,825 $ 15,373 $5,517 $7,173 $6,459 $8,426 $7,043 $9,156 $6,481 $8,424 - - Rolling Hills Estates $ 18,847 $ 12,276 $ 18,418 $ 8,546 $ 12,473 $4,469 $6,554 $6,012 $7,624 $7,202 $9,252 $4,971 $7,512 - - Signal Hill $ 22,917 $ 14,131 $ 18,542 $ 8,397 $ 10,716 $4,655 $5,941 $5,841 $7,457 $ 10,318 $ 13,169 $6,721 $8,578 $5,587 $7,130 - - Average $ 21,016 $ 13,465 $ 17,634 $ 8,593 $ 11,088 $4,957 $6,381 $6,119 $7,640 $ 10,783 $ 13,571 $6,476 $8,240 $5,816 $7,411 - - Median $ 21,239 $ 13,581 $ 18,418 $ 8,546 $ 10,716 $4,655 $6,554 $6,098 $7,605 $ 11,237 $ 14,293 $6,882 $8,618 $5,878 $7,314 - - Bookkeeper/ Administrative Clerk Management Analyst Assistant PlannerPlanning ManagerAdministrative Assistant Code Enforcement Officer City Clerk/Executive Assistant to the City ManagerAgencyCity Manager Planning and Community Services Director Salary Survey of City Council Approved Cities For each relevant classification, staff gathered each agency's monthly low and high salary ranges and calculated the average and median for a comprehensive market perspective. 69246 Attachment C City Council Meeting May 12, 2025 Proposed Salary Schedule for Current City Budgeted Positions 70247 City of Rolling Hills Planning Manager & Code Compliance Officer/Planning Technician Draft List of Duties Attachment D City Council Meeting May 12, 2025 Management reserves the right to add, modify, change, or rescind the work assignments of different positions and to make reasonable accommodations so that qualified employees can perform the essential functions of the job. Planning Manager duties: • Read and interpret development plans, subdivision layouts, site plans, and other technical drawings. • Oversee the preparation, submittal, and review of planning documents, site development plans, subdivision maps, and related applications for compliance with the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and applicable codes. • Author, update, and revise the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Building Code, and other legislative policies. • Conduct research and analysis for planning projects; develop maps, charts, graphs, and reports interpreting phases of planning studies and cases. • Prepare comprehensive reports, recommendations, staff analyses, and resolutions on planning, zoning, and development matters. • Conduct environmental impact assessments and prepare required reports and declarations. • Coordinate and collaborate with residents, applicants, consultants, and public agencies on the submittal, review, permitting, and inspection of development applications. • Respond to development code enforcement cases; conduct investigations, compliance actions, and assist in complaint resolution. • Respond to public inquiries at the counter, by telephone, and in writing regarding the municipal code, zoning code, permitted uses, current development projects, and code enforcement matters. • Serve as primary staff support to the Planning Commission and its subcommittees; prepare agendas and reports; attend and participate in Planning Commission, City Council, and other board and committee meetings. • Prepare and compose correspondence, staff reports, resolutions, meeting packets, and other documents in support of the City Council, City Manager, Commissions, and Committees. • Implement and administer programs such as the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). • Participate in the preparation, analysis, and administration of the department budget. • Develop, direct, and coordinate the implementation of departmental goals, objectives, policies, procedures, and work standards; establish service and staffing levels within City policies and budget. • Participate in professional group meetings and stay abreast of trends, innovations, and legislative changes in planning and zoning. • Provide critical thinking and professional recommendations in all aspects of staff work and decision-making processes. 71248 City of Rolling Hills Planning Manager & Code Compliance Officer/Planning Technician Draft List of Duties Attachment D City Council Meeting May 12, 2025 • Work collaboratively across disciplines and with regional, state, and federal public agencies. • Conduct field studies, investigations, and enforcement activities related to code compliance as needed. • Work irregular hours, including evenings, weekends, and holidays, as necessary; be available for call-back with a reasonable response time during emergencies, disasters, and critical incidents. • Perform related duties as assigned. Code Compliance Officer/Planning Technician duties • Analyze research and data to determine applicable ordinances, codes, regulations, and statutes. • Read and interpret maps, plot plans, codes, ordinances, and regulations. • Apply knowledge of zoning, building, and related codes; quickly learn and implement new regulations as needed. • Conduct field investigations of potential code violations, including site visits, walking/hiking trails, evidence gathering, and identifying relevant issues. • Receive, review, and properly investigate complaints regarding zoning, noise, nuisances, and other code compliance issues. • Oversee and enforce conditions of approval for permits, variances, Construction & Demolition Permits, Temporary Use Permits, Conditional Use Permits, and related applications. • Perform final field inspections to ensure compliance with codes and permit conditions. • Respond to public inquiries in person, by phone, email, and at the counter regarding municipal and zoning codes, code enforcement, permitted uses, and development projects. • Exercise independent judgment and sound decision-making in enforcement matters. • Review and process planning and zoning applications, permits, variances, and related documents for accuracy and compliance. • Perform plan checks for zoning code compliance; review and approve designated permit applications, assess fees, and establish permit conditions. • Assist with planning projects and activities, including research, data compilation, inspections, and preparation of special reports. • Prepare staff reports and resolutions; present applications at Planning Commission or City Council meetings as needed. • Assist with the preparation of various agenda packets and associated materials. • Attend committee and staff meetings (including morning or evening Planning Commission meetings); prepare meeting minutes and distribute materials. • Manage, organize, and process online applications, payments, and approvals in the permitting software system. 72249 Agenda Item No.: 15.A Mtg. Date: 05/28/2025 TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM:SAMANTHA CREW, MANAGEMENT ANALYST THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: RECEIVE AND FILE A PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS UPDATE DATE:May 28, 2025 BACKGROUND: The City of Rolling Hills is committed to fostering a safe and resilient community through proactive public safety initiatives. Staff routinely update the City Council on key efforts, including ongoing programs and responses to emerging challenges. These initiatives involve close coordination with regional partners, utility providers, and emergency services to support the safety and well-being of all residents. This report provides an overview of recent developments and outlines the current actions being taken to further strengthen public safety in the city. This evening, staff will present an update on activities that have occurred since the last Public Safety Report delivered in early April (Attachment A). DISCUSSION: This monthly Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Report provides current updates and outlines future goals, supporting the City’s commitment to ongoing disaster response and preparedness. The report serves as a tool to strategically allocate resources, improve operations, and enhance community resilience. Strong partnerships with first response agencies and continued collaboration with neighboring Palos Verdes Peninsula cities further strengthen these efforts and help ensure a coordinated public safety approach. Re-Energization - Southern California Gas (SoCalGas) SoCal Gas will provide staff with a timeline for gas restoration within the next two weeks, following the completion of the Rolling Hills service model. Preliminary plans include the installation of above-ground piping and swing joints in the Flying Triangle area, as well as along Cinchring Road and Quailridge Road South. Additional safety enhancements will include excess flow valves, pressure monitoring devices, and manual shut-off valves at critical 250 locations. In the meantime, SoCal Gas continues to survey residents to assess interest in gas restoration. The company also plans to host an informational webinar to educate residents on the restoration process and next steps. Re-Energization – Southern California Edison (SCE) As power restoration efforts progress, SCE, in collaboration with LA County Building and Safety, Wildan, and the Fire Department, continues to conduct safety and compliance inspections to ensure properties meet all necessary requirements before re-energization. To maintain alignment and efficiency, the City convenes weekly coordination meetings with all involved agencies, fostering clear communication and timely decision-making. Currently, six homes remain in various stages of the permitting and approval process. City staff are actively facilitating progress on each case, working to address a range of needs, from completing essential repairs and scheduling inspections to resolving planning and permitting requirements with Building & Safety and SCE. Ongoing communication with property owners ensures issues are addressed as they arise and that each home continues to move steadily toward restoration. Through close coordination with contractors, SCE, emergency services, and residents, the City remains committed to advancing the restoration process and supporting those still awaiting service. Peninsula Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP) As part of the ongoing coordination for the Peninsula Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan, staff continue to participate in bi-weekly meetings with the consultant team from Black & Veatch. This week’s meeting centered on identifying and discussing hazards unique to the Peninsula region and advancing several key components of the planning effort. GIS work is a central focus, with continued refinement of the hazard selection process that began earlier this month, and initial discussions around potential earthquake scenarios for analysis. Public outreach efforts are progressing, including webpage development, social media strategies, and creating a public survey to gather community input. These efforts reflect productive progress among all participating jurisdictions as the planning process moves forward. Brush Clearance The Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACoFD) has scheduled its 2025 Annual Defensible Space (Brush Clearance) Inspections starting June 1. These inspections are part of LACoFD's efforts to reduce wildfire risks by ensuring properties comply with defensible space requirements. Property owners will receive either a Compliance Letter or an Official Inspection Report detailing any necessary corrections. If violations are found, owners are given at least 30 days to make the required corrections. Failure to comply may result in administrative fines and abatement enforcement fees. LACoFD cannot currently enforce the 0-5 ft ember-resistant zone (Zone 0) because it has not yet been formally adopted into state or local regulations. Although AB 3074 mandates the creation of Zone 0 standards, those regulations are still under development by CAL FIRE and the State Fire Marshal. Until finalized and adopted by local jurisdictions like LA County, LACoFD’s enforcement authority remains limited to Zones 1 (0-30 ft) and 2 (30-100 ft). However, the Assistant Chief Kane has indicated that this year the department is phasing in Zone 0 through an educational approach, encouraging residents to keep the 0-5 ft area around their homes lean and green. 251 Siren System At the last City Council meeting, HQE presented three proposed locations for additional siren poles to address coverage gaps identified during the citywide siren testing. These sites were selected based on several factors, including resident feedback from the post-test survey, sound propagation modeling, and input from the April meeting with the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA). The goal is to improve system coverage and ensure audible alerts reach all Rolling Hills residents. To support the expansion, HQE submitted a proposal offering to cover 100% of the labor, Other Direct Costs (ODCs), and the Cellular Communications Data Package, representing a significant contribution toward project implementation. However, HQE is requesting that the City fund the cost of equipment and materials, which will be provided at cost with no markup. While the City had previously understood there would be no additional costs associated with the system expansion, staff continue to coordinate closely with HQE to refine the plan. As directed by the Council, staff are now working with RHCA and HQE to define a general siting radius for each proposed location, as well as to identify a secondary list of alternate sites with their respective radii that could fulfill the same coverage needs. Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps On March 24, 2025, the Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM) released updated Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) maps for Local Responsibility Areas (LRAs), including the City of Rolling Hills. In accordance with state requirements, the City was required to make these maps available for public review and comment within 30 days of their release. To meet this obligation, the City posted the maps on its website and issued a public notice to ensure accessibility and transparency. Following the conclusion of the public comment period, the City is required to formally adopt the updated FHSZ designations through a local ordinance within 120 days. This adoption process ensures compliance with Government Code Section 51179 and supports the City’s efforts to align local hazard mitigation planning with the State’s fire risk classifications. City staff will bring this item to the City Council for consideration at the May 28, 2025, meeting and will request formal adoption of the updated FHSZ maps as issued by the State Fire Marshal. Peninsula Public Safety Committee (PPSC) and the Regional Contract Law Committee (RCLC) At the May 8, 2025, Peninsula Public Safety Committee (PPSC) meeting, members received updates on the School Resource Officer (SRO) program, along with emergency response data presented by the Los Angeles County Fire Department and McCormick Ambulance for each Peninsula city. LACoFD also reviewed the newly released Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) maps, highlighting both historical context and recent developments. During the Regional Law Enforcement Coordinating Committee (RCLC) meeting, the Lomita Sheriff’s Station provided quarterly crime and traffic updates, noting an increase in residential burglaries in Rancho Palos Verdes and shoplifting incidents at Peninsula Center. The discussion also covered traffic safety efforts and crime prevention education. Both meetings reinforced the importance of interagency coordination, strategic safety planning, and ongoing community engagement across the Peninsula. 252 Recent Events: Equine First Aid Essentials Event at Ernie Howlett Park On May 3, 2025, the four Peninsula cities, Palos Verdes Estates, Rancho Palos Verdes, Rolling Hills, and Rolling Hills Estates, hosted the inaugural Equine First Aid Essentials event at Ernie Howlett Park. Attendees received hands-on instruction from local veterinarians on topics including emergency bandaging, essential first aid kit items, and common equine medical conditions. The Los Angeles County Department of Animal Care and Control’s Equine Response Team shared valuable insights on emergency preparedness, while the Sheriff’s Mounted Posse demonstrated mounted street safety. Informational booths featured resources from the four cities, LA County Fire, Animal Care and Control, and local equestrian organizations and businesses. The cities extend sincere thanks to all who participated and look forward to hosting a similar event next spring. Block Captain Canyon Management Video “Popcorn & Movie” Event The Canyon Management Video “Popcorn & Movie” event, held on May 21, 2025, at Rolling Hills City Hall, was a success, bringing residents together for an engaging conversation on wildfire preparedness. Hosted by the Rolling Hills Block Captains, the event featured a screening of educational videos created specifically for Rolling Hills residents. These high- quality videos offer essential guidance on managing canyon areas and reducing fire fuel hazards. The full series, including the home hardening videos, is available on the City website and serves as a valuable resource for residents working to protect their homes and community from wildfire threats. Upcoming Events: Community Forum on Wildfire Prevention On Thursday, May 29, 2025, from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m., the Office of Los Angeles County Supervisor Janice Hahn, in partnership with the Los Angeles County Fire Department and the Peninsula cities, will host a Community Forum on Wildfire Prevention. The event will take place at the South Coast Botanic Garden, located at 26300 Crenshaw Boulevard. Residents are encouraged to attend to learn about the latest defensible space regulations, home hardening strategies, water reliability, and overall wildfire preparedness. To RSVP, please contact fourthdistrict@bos.lacounty.gov or call (310) 519-6021. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A - CL_AGN_250414_CC_PublicSafetyUpdate.pdf 253 Agenda Item No.: 15.A Mtg. Date: 04/14/2025 TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM:SAMANTHA CREW, MANAGEMENT ANALYST THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: RECEIVE AND FILE A PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS UPDATE DATE:April 14, 2025 BACKGROUND: Since September 2024, staff have provided the City Council with regular monthly updates outlining key developments and emerging challenges. Over the past six months, Staff has presented that the City has filed formal complaints with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) against Southern California Gas Company (SoCal Gas) and Southern California Edison (SCE). Concurrently, staff have participated in ongoing meetings with utility providers, emergency services coordinators, and local and regional partners to advocate for timely resolutions. By October 2024, 12 properties were identified as eligible for re-energization, contingent upon required permits and inspections. Discussions with SCE continued into January 2025 to explore broader solutions for all remaining affected properties. This evening, staff will present an update on developments that have occurred since the last Public Safety Report delivered in early March (Attachment A). DISCUSSION: The information below outlines the City’s ongoing efforts in disaster response and preparedness. Through this comprehensive Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Report, the City is able to strategically allocate resources, identify areas for operational improvement, and continue strengthening the community’s resilience to local hazards. The City also benefits from close collaboration with its neighboring Palos Verdes Peninsula cities and maintains active engagement with first response agencies to ensure coordinated and effective public safety efforts. This monthly report provides both current updates and a forward-looking perspective on future goals. 254 Re-Energization - SoCal Gas Rolling Hills saw natural gas service shut off for 36 customers after the utility company claimed land movement concerns in the area. SoCal Gas installed two isolation valves to enhance public safety by enabling targeted control of gas flow to streets affected by land movement. Additionally, 26 new survey points were installed throughout the community to improve the monitoring of land movement rates. In early February, City staff and Councilmember Leah Mirsch met with SoCal Gas to discuss ongoing assessments and restoration plans. The utility company reported progress on their stress/strain model and noted that pipe samples had been collected to evaluate durability and elasticity. A final design and implementation plan is expected by the second quarter of 2025. Currently the design is 95% complete. If land movement remains minimal, restoration work could begin shortly thereafter. Preliminary plans include adding above-ground piping and swing joints in the Flying Triangle area, Cinchring Road, and Quailridge Road South. Additional safety measures include excess flow valves, pressure monitoring devices, and manual shut-off valves at key locations. SoCalGas intends to distribute a survey to residents whose gas service was disconnected in September, inquiring whether they are interested in having service restored. City staff are coordinating with SoCal Gas to schedule a community event where residents can learn more about the restoration process. The meeting will provide an overview of what to expect during the gas service restoration process, including the steps required to safely turn service back on, billing information, and available options for restoring service versus opting out. Once the date and agenda for the town hall are finalized, they will be made available to the community. Re-Energization - SCE As power restoration continues, SCE, alongside LA County Building and Safety, Willdan, and the Fire Department, remains active in inspecting properties for safety and compliance. To support this effort, the City holds weekly coordination meetings with these agencies. At the time this report was written, a total of 37 properties have been re-energized to date. Six customers have opted not to restore power, and eight properties remain without service. City staff continue to coordinate with contractors, SCE, the Fire Department and property owners to facilitate the restoration process for the remaining properties. Siren System At the last City Council meeting, staff presented an update on the Emergency Outdoor Siren Notification System and introduced the Alert and Warning Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The Council adopted the SOP as a living document and directed staff to continue working with the Ad Hoc Committee to refine the document. This SOP will serve as the operational framework for activating and maintaining the City's emergency alert systems, including sirens, the SAFE network, and other communication tools. The City Council also considered funding options for the distribution of SAFE Network Units, which are part of the City's broader emergency communication enhancements made possible through a Community SAFE Grant. After discussion, the Council selected Option B, placing the responsibility for purchasing SAFE Units on residents. This approach minimizes administrative burden and clarifies ownership, allowing homeowners to manage their own devices. Staff was informed late in the morning on Friday, April 4, that HQE would be conducting minor sound testing in areas identified as having limited or no sound. The testing involved the use of 255 small speakers mounted on a truck and was confined to specific locations. It was not intended to be loud or disruptive. All testing activities were completed within approximately four hours. City staff participated in a SiSA system training with HQE, the siren system vendor, on April 8. This training represented a key milestone toward the City assuming full operational control of the emergency siren system. Looking ahead, an Alert and Warning Standard Operating Procedure Manual, providing detailed, step-by-step guidance for City staff, emergency personnel, and mutual aid partners will be forthcoming. More staff training will be required prior to its finalization to ensure effective implementation. Emergency Generator S&K submitted plans for the Dual Fuel Emergency Generator Backup project to Los Angeles County Building and Safety in February, and staff has requested an expedited review. Plans were also submitted to the City of Rolling Hills Estates and have received initial approvals; however, the plan check review by Willdan is still pending. Staff will follow up with contacts at Willdan to help move the process forward. In addition, S&K is working closely with the Los Angeles County Fire Department, which is expediting its review, with a meeting scheduled next week to review the plans in detail. Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps The Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM) released the updated Local Responsibility Area (LRA) Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) Maps on March 24, 2025. In compliance with state requirements, the City is responsible for making the maps available for public review and comment within 30 days of their release. Following the conclusion of the public notice and comment period, the City will be required to formally adopt the designation through a local ordinance within 120 days. Staff will bring this item back to the City Council after the public review period and will request that the Council formally adopt the designation in accordance with state law. Assemblymember Muratsuchi’s PVP Wildfire Town Hall: Lessons from the LA Wildfires Assemblymember Al Muratsuchi, in collaboration with the Cities of Rancho Palos Verdes, Palos Verdes Estates, Rolling Hills Estates, and Rolling Hills, is hosting a Wildfire Preparedness Town Hall and Expo on Saturday, April 26, from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. at Fred Hesse, Jr. Community Park, located at 29301 Hawthorne Blvd., Rancho Palos Verdes. The event will focus on lessons learned from the January wildfires and provide important information on how to prepare for future wildfire risks. Key presenters include the California Department of Insurance, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, Los Angeles County Fire Department, and the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District. The expo will also feature informational booths from the Palos Verdes Peninsula cities. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A - CL_AGN_CC_250310_CC_15A_Matters_Staff_PublicSafety.pdf 256 Agenda Item No.: 16.A Mtg. Date: 05/28/2025 TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM:CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK / EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(D)(1) THE CITY FINDS, BASED ON ADVICE FROM LEGAL COUNSEL, THAT DISCUSSION IN OPEN SESSION WILL PREJUDICE THE POSITION OF THE CITY IN THE LITIGATION. (3 CASES) A. NAME OF CASE: CONNIE ANDERSEN, ET AL. V. CALIFORNIA WATER COMPANY, ET AL. (SEAVIEW CASE) CASE NO.: 24STCV20953 B. NAME OF CASE: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS V. SCE CPUC DOCKET NO. C.24-10-008 C. NAME OF CASE: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS V. SOCALGAS CPUC DOCKET NO. C.24-10-009 DATE:May 28, 2025 BACKGROUND: None. DISCUSSION: None. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: None. ATTACHMENTS: 257 Agenda Item No.: 16.B Mtg. Date: 05/28/2025 TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM:CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK / EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT:CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - INITIATION OF LITIGATION A CLOSED SESSION WILL BE HELD, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(C) AND (D)(4) REGARDING THE DECISION OF WHETHER TO INITIATE LITIGATION (1 CASE) RECOMMENDATION: NONE DATE:May 28, 2025 BACKGROUND: None. DISCUSSION: None. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: None. ATTACHMENTS: 258 Agenda Item No.: 16.C Mtg. Date: 05/28/2025 TO:HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM:CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK / EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT:CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - INITIATION OF LITIGATION A CLOSED SESSION WILL BE HELD, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(C) AND (D)(4) REGARDING THE DECISION OF WHETHER TO INITIATE LITIGATION (1 CASE) RECOMMENDATION: NONE DATE:May 28, 2025 BACKGROUND: None. DISCUSSION: None. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: None. ATTACHMENTS: 259