Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
CL_AGN_250617_PC_AgendaPacket_F
1.CALL TO ORDER 2.ROLL CALL 3.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4.APPROVE ORDER OF THE AGENDA This is the appropriate time for the Chair or Commissioners to approve the agenda as is or reorder. 5.BLUE FOLDER ITEMS (SUPPLEMENTAL) Blue folder items are additional back up material to administrative reports and/or public comments received after the printing and distribution of the agenda packet for receive and file. 6.PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS This section is intended to provide members of the public with the opportunity to comment on any subject that does not appear on this agenda for action. Each speaker will be permitted to speak only once. Written requests, if any, will be considered first under this section. 7.CONSENT CALENDAR Business items, except those formally noticed for public hearing, or those pulled for discussion are assigned to the Consent Calendar. The Chair or any Commissioner may request that any Consent Calendar item(s) be removed, discussed, and acted upon separately. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be taken up under the "Excluded Consent Calendar" section below. Those items remaining on the Consent Calendar will be approved in one motion. The Chair will call on anyone wishing to address the Commission on any Consent Calendar item on the agenda, which has not been pulled by Commission for discussion. 7.A.APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 17, 2025 RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 AGENDA Regular Planning Commission Meeting PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, June 17, 2025 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 6:30 PM The meeting agenda is available on the City’s website. The Planning Commission meeting will be live-streamed on the City’s website. Both the agenda and the live-streamed video can be found here: https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/agenda/index.php Members of the public may submit written comments in real-time by emailing the City Clerk’s office at cityclerk@cityofrh.net. Your comments will become part of the official meeting record. You must provide your full name, but please do not provide any other personal information that you do not want to be published. Recordings to Planning Commission meetings can be found here: https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/agenda/index.php CL_AGN_250617_PC_AffidavitofPosting.pdf 1 7.B.APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR THE MAY 20, 2025 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented. 8.EXCLUDED CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS 9.PUBLIC HEARINGS ON ITEMS CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS MEETING 9.A.ZONING CASE NO. 24-043: SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW RESIDENCE, NON-EXEMPT GRADING, STABLE ACCESS, WALLS EXCEEDING A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET AND 2.5 FEET AVERAGE (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR A DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET, STABLE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET; AND VARIANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE FRONT YARD, SITE DISTURBANCE OF MORE THAN 40 PERCENT, AND FILL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 2:1, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR THE LOCATION AT 6 CHUCKWAGON ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (LOT 29-A-EF) (LEE) R E C O M M E N D AT I O N : Open the public hearing, take public testimony, continue the public hearing, discuss the proposed project, and provide direction to staff and applicants. 10.NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 11.OLD BUSINESS 12.NEW BUSINESS 13.SCHEDULE FIELD TRIPS 14.ITEMS FROM STAFF 15.ITEMS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION 16.ADJOURNMENT Next meeting: Tuesday, July 15, 2025 at 6:30p.m. in the City Council Chamber, Rolling CL_MIN_250520_PC_FT_F.pdf CL_MIN_250520_PC_F.pdf Attachment 1: PL_ADR_6 Chuckwagon Rd_ZC24-053_PC Resolution_D.pdf Attachment 2: PL_ADR_6 Chuckwagon Rd_ZC24-053_DevelopmentTable.pdf Attachment 3_250617_6 ChuckwagonRd_ZC 24-043 Homes Near 6 Chuckwagon.pdf Attachment 4_250617_6ChuckwagonRd_ZC24-043-Summary of Discretionary Approvals_.pdf Attachment 5_250617_6 Chuckwagon Rd_ZC24-053_Rigg Letter for 6 Chuckwagon Project June 2025.pdf Attachment 6_CL_AGN_250415_PC_Item10B_MinusPlans.pdf Attachment 7_CL_AGN_250520_PC_Item10B_MinusPlans.pdf Attachment 8: PL_ADR_6ChuckwagonRd_ZC24-043_Arch SitePlan.pdf Attachment 8: PL_ADR_6ChuckwagonRd_ZC24-043_LandscapePlan_F.pdf 2 Hills City Hall, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California, 90274. Notice: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting due to your disability, please contact the City Clerk at (310) 377-1521 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility and accommodation for your review of this agenda and attendance at this meeting. Documents pertaining to an agenda item received after the posting of the agenda are available for review in the City Clerk's office or at the meeting at which the item will be considered. All of the above resolutions and zoning case items have been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines unless otherwise stated. 3 Agenda Item No.: 7.A Mtg. Date: 06/17/2025 TO:HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM:CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK / EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT:APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 17, 2025 DATE:June 17, 2025 BACKGROUND: None. DISCUSSION: None. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented. ATTACHMENTS: CL_AGN_250617_PC_AffidavitofPosting.pdf 4 Administrative Report 7.A., File # 2833 Meeting Date: 6/17/2025 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In compliance with the Brown Act, the following materials have been posted at the locations below. Legislative Body Planning Commission Posting Type Regular Meeting Agenda Posting Location 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 City Hall Window City Website: https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/agenda/index.php https://www.rolling-hills.org/government/city_council/city_council_archive_agendas/index.php Meeting Date & Time JUNE 17, 202 5 6:30pm As City Clerk of the City of Rolling Hills, I declare under penalty of perjury, the document noted above was posted at the date displayed below. Christian Horvath, City Clerk Date: June 13, 2025 5 Agenda Item No.: 7.B Mtg. Date: 06/17/2025 TO:HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM:CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK / EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT:APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR THE MAY 20 , 2025 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS DATE:June 17, 2025 BACKGROUND: None. DISCUSSION: None. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Approve as presented. ATTACHMENTS: CL_MIN_250520_PC_FT_F.pdf CL_MIN_250520_PC_F.pdf 6 MINUTES – PLANNING COMMISSION FIELD TRIP MEETING Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Page 1 Minutes Rolling Hills Planning Commission Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Field Trip Meeting 7:30 a.m. 16 Caballeros Road 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER The Planning Commission of the City of Rolling Hills met at 16 Caballeros Road on the above date, and the meeting was called to order at 7:30 a.m. with Vice Chair Kirkpatrick presiding. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Douglass, Soo, Cardenas, Vice Chair Kirkpatrick Commissioners Absent: Chair Chelf Staff Present: Reina Schaetzl, Willdan Contract Senior Planner Stephanie Grant, Assistant Planner Karina Bañales, City Manager Averie Anderson, Contract Administrative Clerk 3. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA – NONE 4. FIELD TRIPS 4.A. APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION FIELD TRIP MEETING OF MAY 20, 2025 Vie Chair Kirkpatrick approved the affidavit of posting as presented. Without objection, so approved. 4.B. 16 CABALLEROS ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (LOT 6-SK) ZONING CASE NO. 24-154: SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR NON-EXEMPT GRADING AND WALLS TO EXCEED A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET AND 2.5 FEET AVERAGE (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO EXCEED 200 SQUARE FEET FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AND FINDING THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (YOU & WANG) Public Present: Juli Avedissian (14 Caballeros Road) Domingo Ottolia (Architect – 5533 Bayroof) Presentation by Assistant Planner Grant. Commissioners and the public walked the site. No decision was made by the Commission and the item was continued to the evening meeting. At 7:40 a.m. the Commission moved to 6 Chuckwagon Road and reconvened at 7:54 a.m. 7 MINUTES – PLANNING COMMISSION FIELD TRIP MEETING Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Page 2 4.C. 6 CHUCKWAGON ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (LOT 29-A-EF) ZONING CASE NO. 24-043: SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW RESIDENCE, NON- EXEMPT GRADING, STABLE ACCESS, WALLS EXCEEDING A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET AND 2.5 FEET AVERAGE (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR A DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET, STABLE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET; AND VARIANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE FRONT YARD, SITE DISTURBANCE OF MORE THAN 40 PERCENT, AND FILL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 2:1, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LEE) Public Present: Sarah Noel (8 Hackamore Road) Judith Haenel (31 Eastfield Drive) Jeff Browning (Architect - 1570 West 9th Street, San Pedro) Stephanie & Paul Reisz (4 Chuckwagon Road) Allan Rigg (6415 Via Canada, Rancho Palos Verdes) Dan Bolton (Engineer - 25834 Narbonne #210, Lomita) Presentation by Willdan Contract Senior Planner Schaetzl. Commissioners and the public walked the site. No decision was made by the Commission and the item was continued to the evening meeting. 5. ADJOURNMENT: 8:29 A.M. The meeting was adjourned at 8:29 a.m. to the regular meeting of the Planning Commission scheduled to be held on Tuesday, May 20, 2025, beginning at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________________ Christian Horvath, City Clerk Approved, ____________________________________ Brad Chelf, Chair 8 MINUTES – PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Page 1 Minutes Rolling Hills Planning Commission Tuesday, April 15, 2025 Regular Meeting 6:30 p.m. 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER The Planning Commission of the City of Rolling Hills met in person on the above date at 6:30 p.m. Vice Chair Kirkpatrick presiding. 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Cardenas, Soo, Douglass, Vice Chair Kirkpatrick Commissioners Absent: Chair Chelf Staff Present: Karina Bañales, City Manager Reina Schaetzl, Willdan Contract Senior Planner Stephanie Grant, Assistant Planner Christian Horvath, Assistant to the City Manager / City Clerk Ryan Stager, City Attorney 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – City Manager Bañales 4. APPROVE ORDER OF THE AGENDA Motion by Commissioner Cardenas, seconded by Commissioner Soo to approve the order of the agenda. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYES: Cardenas, Soo, Douglass, Vice Chair Kirkpatrick NOES: None ABSENT: Chair Chelf 5. BLUE FOLDER ITEMS (SUPPLEMENTAL) Motion by Commissioner Cardenas, seconded by Commissioner Soo to receive and file Blue Folder Item 10B. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYES: Cardenas, Soo, Douglass, Vice Chair Kirkpatrick NOES: None ABSENT: Chair Chelf 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS – NONE 7. CONSENT CALENDAR 7.A. APPROVE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 20, 2025 7.B. APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR THE APRIL 15, 2025 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Motion by Commissioner Cardenas, seconded by Commissioner Soo to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote: 9 MINUTES – PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Page 2 AYES: Cardenas, Soo, Douglass, Vice Chair Kirkpatrick NOES: None ABSENT: Chair Chelf 8. EXCLUDED CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS – NONE 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON ITEMS CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS – NONE 10. NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 10.A. ZONING CASE NO. 24-154: SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR NON-EXEMPT GRADING AND WALLS TO EXCEED A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET AND 2.5 FEET AVERAGE (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO EXCEED 200 SQUARE FEET FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AND FINDING THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, FOR THE LOCATION AT 16 CABALLEROS ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (YOU & WANG) (LOT 6-SK) Introduction by City Manager Bañales Presentation by Assistant Planner Grant Public Comment: Domingo Ottolia Motion by Commissioner Cardenas, seconded by Commissioner Douglass approving Zoning Case No. 24- 154 ’s Resolution 2025-05 as presented. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYES: Soo, Douglass, Cardenas, Chair Chelf NOES: None ABSENT: Kirkpatrick 10.B. ZONING CASE NO. 24-043: SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW RESIDENCE, NON-EXEMPT GRADING, STABLE ACCESS, WALLS EXCEEDING A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET AND 2.5 FEET AVERAGE (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR A DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET, STABLE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET; AND VARIANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE FRONT YARD, SITE DISTURBANCE OF MORE THAN 40 PERCENT, AND FILL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 2:1, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR THE LOCATION AT 6 CHUCKWAGON ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (LOT 29-A-EF) (LEE) Introduction by City Manager Bañales Presentation by Willdan Contract Senior Planner Schaetzl Public Comment: Paul Reisz, Allan Rigg, Stephanie Reisz, Judith Haenel, Jeff Browning, Dan Bolton, Sarah Noel Motion by Commissioner Cardenas, seconded by Commissioner Douglass to continue the public hearing to the next meeting. Motion carried unanimously with the following vote: AYES: Soo, Douglass, Cardenas, Chair Chelf NOES: None ABSENT: Kirkpatrick 10 MINUTES – PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, May 20, 2025 Page 3 11. OLD BUSINESS – NONE 12. NEW BUSINESS – NONE 13. SCHEDULED FIELD TRIPS Staff noted that there may be a Field Trip per the continuance of Item 10B 14. ITEMS FROM STAFF – NONE 15. ITEMS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION – NONE 16. ADJOURNMENT : 8:06 P.M. The meeting was adjourned at 8:06 p.m. to the Planning Commission meeting on Tuesday, June 17, 2025, beginning at 6:30 p.m. at 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________________ Christian Horvath, City Clerk Approved, ____________________________________ Brad Chelf, Chair 11 Agenda Item No.: 9.A Mtg. Date: 06/17/2025 TO:HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM:REINA SCHAETZL, WILDAN CONSULTANT PRINCIPAL PLANNER THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT:ZONING CASE NO. 24-043: SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW RESIDENCE, NON-EXEMPT GRADING, STABLE ACCESS, WALLS EXCEEDING A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET AND 2.5 FEET AVERAGE (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR A DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET, STABLE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET; AND VARIANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE FRONT YARD, SITE DISTURBANCE OF MORE THAN 40 PERCENT, AND FILL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 2:1, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR THE LOCATION AT 6 CHUCKWAGON ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (LOT 29-A- EF) (LEE) DATE:June 17, 2025 BACKGROUND: This item was continued from the April 15, 2025 and May 20, 2025 Planning Commission (Commission) meetings. To avoid redundancy, the staff reports for those meetings are included as Attachments 6 and 7, respectively. At the April 15 evening meeting, the project was continued due to a public noticing discrepancy identified during the morning field trip. At the May 20 morning field trip and evening meeting, the applicant’s team was present to answer questions, and the public was given the opportunity to provide testimony during the evening session. This staff report outlines items pending further discussion that were raised at both the April 15 and May 20 meetings. These items include: Size of Home/Neighborhood Compatibility 12 The proposed home is 6,939 square-feet with a 2,877 square-foot basement, a 790 square- foot pool, a 1,322 square-foot attached garage, and a 650 square-foot detached solid-covered patio. For more details on the size and components of the home, please refer to the Development Table provided in Attachment 2. At the April 15 morning meeting, the Commission requested a neighborhood comparison chart that reflects the size of homes and garages nearby, as well as the size of any basements, if applicable. Staff presented a Blue Folder item with the chart on May 20, but noted that it was not complete due to time constraints and staffing turnover. Since the meeting, the Staff have completed the chart (see Attachment 3). Twelve of the surveyed properties are near the subject property or directly abut it. Ten of the surveyed properties are recent projects within the City that demonstrate the size of custom homes approved. Part of the neighborhood comparison analysis includes the size of the approved garages. One garage is as large as 1,512 square feet, while many are the typical 2- car garage size of approximately 400 square feet. As discussed further below, the applicant is requesting a six-car garage at 1,322 square feet. Due to the shape of the subject lot, the entire frontage facing Chuckwagon Road is visible from the street, including the proposed six-car garage. Basement: With the addition of a basement, the appearance of the home from the street appears larger. The Commission, a neighboring resident at 4 Chuckwagon, and their representative have expressed concern with the massing of the house (see Attachment 5), including the basement. Privacy: Although the project meets the setback requirements, the proposed home is situated on the highest portion of the lot and potentially affects the privacy of the neighbors to the south at 4 Chuckwagon. The applicant has designed the project with no windows in this area; however, the neighbors and their representative have expressed concerns about potential privacy issues (see Attachment 5). Staff shared the above concerns with the applicant. The Applicant was receptive to the feedback but desired to proceed with the original design. Variances: This Project should be analyzed and weighed against the aforementioned required findings for the various entitlements. To support this review, Staff has prepared a Proposed Discretionary Review Summary Table outlining these key considerations (see Attachment 4). In evaluating the Project, the Commission is guided by the record and evidence presented, and any decision should align with the applicable findings outlined in the Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC), supported by substantial evidence. As such, the discussion below will focus on the three variances requested and the findings necessary to review the Project. This evening, Staff seeks the Commission to open the public hearing, receive public testimony, discuss the project, close the public hearing, and provide directions to staff. 13 DISCUSSION: Project Site Description The subject property is an irregular parcel zoned RAS-1, and the net lot area is 72,510 square feet (1.66 acres). Currently developed with a 3,086-square-foot single-family residence and a 400-square-foot attached garage, the site is proposed for redevelopment, and both existing structures will be demolished. The property contains one primary building pad measuring approximately 19,200 square feet, with an existing 50-foot-wide driveway providing access from Chuckwagon Road, which is proposed to remain (see Attachment 7). Request for Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit and Variances: The application was filed on May 16, 2024 by applicant Jeff Browning, SAA Interiors & Architects, on behalf of the property owner, Ken Lee, requesting Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit and Variances under Zoning Case No. 24-043. The applicant is requesting the following: 6,939 square-foot residence 1,322 square-foot attached 6-car garage 2,877 square-foot basement 650 square-foot detached solid-cover patio (requires Conditional Use Permit as it exceeds more than 200 square feet) 790 square-foot pool with 40 square-foot pool equipment enclosure Site Plan Review for retaining walls exceeding a height of 3 feet and 2.5 average (maximum height of 5-feet), grading, and associated improvements Conditional Use Permit for a future stable greater than 200 square feet (450 SF is proposed) Variances for fill slopes steeper than 2:1, site disturbance of more than 40 percent, and construction in the front yard setback. Variances 2:1 Slope (RHMC Section 15.04.120) A variance is requested because the applicant is requesting fill slopes steeper than 1 unit vertical to 2 horizontal units in order to construct the driveway (see Attachment 7 - Plans). Site Disturbance (RHMC Section 17.16.070) Since the Project requires site disturbance more than the allowable 40% of the net lot area, a variance is being requested to deviate from these provisions to permit a larger buildable area, given, that the gross area of the lot is 100,623 square feet and the net lot area is 72,508 square feet. The lot is already over 70% disturbed (see Attachment 2), and the additional disturbance will require a variance. The applicant is requesting a variance from the Code (RHMC Section 17.16.070) to deviate by 37.9% for grading the disturbance area beyond what is permitted for this project. The disturbed area is 56,500 square feet or 77.9% (40% max permitted, provided that no more than fifty percent of the slopes resulting from the grading are greater (steeper) than 3:1, or three units horizontal (run) to one unit vertical (rise). However, existing land disturbance totals 53,500 square feet and will increase by 3,000 square feet. Since this increase is somewhat significant, the Commission must consider this impact on the 14 natural terrain in granting the variance. Encroachment into Setback Areas (RHMC Sections 17.18.040 and 17.18.060) Additionally, the encroachments into the front yard setbacks with the stable and corral have been placed in a manner intended to maximize usable space while minimizing intrusion. As a result, encroachment into the front yard setback is necessary, which requires a variance. At the May 20 meeting, this variance seemed acceptable since it would place the stable and corral away from neighboring properties. Criteria for Variance RHMC Section 17.38.050 – Required Findings states that in granting a variance, the Commission (and Council on appeal) must make the following findings: 1. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone; 2. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question; 3. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; 4. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; 5. That the variance does not grant special privilege to the applicant; 6. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and 7. That the variance request is consistent with the general plan of the City of Rolling Hills. A fuller discussion of how the Project meets these findings can be found in the draft resolutions (see Attachment 1) prepared for the May 20 and April 15 Planning Commission reports. However, given the issues discussed above and during the field trips and evening meetings, Staff is requesting guidance from the Planning Commission in order to proceed. ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE COMPLIANCE Setbacks The project complies with the remainder of the required setbacks in the RAS-1 Zone per RHMC Section 17.20.080, with the exception of the set-aside areas for the stable and corral. The applicant has requested a variance, as discussed above, for the location of the corral area. Lot Coverage and Building Pad Coverage The Project conforms to the Zoning Code lot coverage requirements. The net lot area of the property is 72,508 square feet (1.66 acres) per RHMC Section 17.16.060(A). The structural net lot coverage is proposed at 10,912 square feet or 15.04% (20% max. permitted), excluding exempt structures, and the total lot coverage proposed, including flatwork, would be 23,952 square feet or 33% (35% max. permitted). Building Pad #1 is a total of 19,200 square-feet. The existing Building Pad #1 Coverage with deductions is 3,486 square feet or 18%, and with 15 an increase of 7,605 square feet or 37.5%, the total proposed Building Pad Coverage with deductions is 11,091 square feet or 55.6%, this exceeds the maximum 30% guideline (RHMC Section 17.16.097) by 25.6%. Environmental Review The Project has been determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which exempts the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including single family residence and accessory structures, including but not limited to garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Open the public hearing, take public testimony, discuss the proposed project, and provide direction to staff and applicants. Continue the public hearing, as necessary. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: PL_ADR_6 Chuckwagon Rd_ZC24-053_PC Resolution_D.pdf Attachment 2: PL_ADR_6 Chuckwagon Rd_ZC24-053_DevelopmentTable.pdf Attachment 3_250617_6 ChuckwagonRd_ZC 24-043 Homes Near 6 Chuckwagon.pdf Attachment 4_250617_6ChuckwagonRd_ZC24-043-Summary of Discretionary Approvals_.pdf Attachment 5_250617_6 Chuckwagon Rd_ZC24-053_Rigg Letter for 6 Chuckwagon Project June 2025.pdf Attachment 6_CL_AGN_250415_PC_Item10B_MinusPlans.pdf Attachment 7_CL_AGN_250520_PC_Item10B_MinusPlans.pdf Attachment 8: PL_ADR_6ChuckwagonRd_ZC24-043_Arch SitePlan.pdf Attachment 8: PL_ADR_6ChuckwagonRd_ZC24-043_LandscapePlan_F.pdf 16 1 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF ZONING CASE NO. 24-043: SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW RESIDENCE, NON-EXEMPT GRADING, STABLE ACCESS, WALLS EXCEEDING A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET AND 2.5 FEET AVERAGE (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR A DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET, STABLE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET; AND VARIANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE FRONT YARD, SITE DISTURBANCE OF MORE THAN 40 PERCENT, AND FILL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 2:1, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LOT 29- A-EF) (LEE) THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. On May 16, 2024, an application was duly filed by Jeff Browning, SAA Interiors & Architects (“Applicant”), on behalf of the property owner, Ken Lee, with respect to real property located at 6 Chuckwagon Road, Rolling Hills (LOT 29-A-EF) requesting: Site Plan Review for construction, non-exempt grading, stable access, walls exceeding a height of 3 feet and 2.5 average (up to maximum height of 5 feet) and other improvements; Conditional Use Permits for a detached accessory structure greater than 200 square feet, stable greater than 200 square feet; and variances for construction in the front yard setback, site disturbance of more than 40 percent and fill slopes steeper than 2:1. Section 2. The lot is irregularly shaped having an expansive curved frontage on Chuckwagon Road. The net lot area is 1.66 acres (72,510 square feet), which excludes roadway easements and ten feet along property lines. Chuckwagon Road has a 60-foot-wide roadway easement. The property is developed presently with a 3,086 square-foot single-level residence built in 1960. Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application at a field trip meeting and regular meeting on April 15, 2025. Neighbors within a 1,000-foot radius were notified of the public hearings and a notice was published in the Daily Breeze on April 4, 2025. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail and the applicant was in attendance at the evening hearing. City Staff noted that the public noticing for the item was not in compliance per Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) Section 15.04.120 and advised that staff revise the notice and the Planning Commission schedule the item for a future meeting. Section 4. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application at a field trip meeting and regular meeting on May 20, 2025. Neighbors within a 1,000-foot radius were notified of the public hearings and a notice was published in the Daily Breeze on May 10, 2025. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail and the applicant was in attendance at the evening hearing. 17 2 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) Section 5. The Project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which exempts the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including accessory structures, including but not limited to garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. Here, the proposed Project includes a new residence, retaining walls, driveway, stable/corral set aside areas, and related improvements. Accordingly, the Project qualifies for the exemption pursuant to Section 15303. Further, no exceptions to the exemption apply; there is no reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. Much of the site has already been graded and developed. Section 6. Site Plan Review. Site Plan Review is required for construction of any new building or structure pursuant to Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) Section 17.46.020(A). The Project is for construction, non-exempt grading, stable access, walls exceeding a height of 3 feet and 2.5 average (up to maximum height of 5 feet) and other improvements. With respect to the Site Plan Review for the development, the Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. The Project complies with and is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and all requirements of the zoning ordinance. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan and Zoning ordinance. The proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low-density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The development is located on the existing building pad, which will reduce the visual impact from neighboring properties. The Project conforms to Zoning Code lot coverage requirements. The net lot area of the lot is 72,510 square feet (1.66 acres) per RHMC Section 17.16.060(A). The structural net lot coverage is proposed at 12,092 square feet or 16.6% (20% max. permitted) excluding exempt structures; and the total lot coverage proposed, including flatwork, would be 23,952 square feet or 33% (35% max. permitted). The disturbed area is 36,890 square feet or 50.9% (40% max permitted provided that no more than fifty percent of the slopes resulting from the grading are greater (steeper) than 3:1, or three units horizontal (run) to one unit vertical (rise). B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. Lot coverage requirements are regarded as maximums, and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted depends upon the existing buildable area of the lot. The topography and the configuration of the lot have been considered, and the project will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, buildings, or structures; the project will be on an existing building pad which enables project elements to be the least intrusive to surrounding properties. Further, the project will be a sufficient distance from nearby residences so views and privacy of surrounding neighbors will not be impacted. The lot has an existing building pad which is disturbed with the remaining area either landscaped or left in a natural state. The new residence will be sited generally within the building footprint of the 18 3 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) previous residential structure. Additionally, the retaining walls are located in a manner that are the least visually intrusive to the property and its neighbors. C. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, and is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to new residences in the vicinity of said lot. The development plan takes into consideration the visibility of the project primarily from Chuckwagon Road. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped or landscaped. D. The project preserves and integrates into the site design, to the greatest extent possible, existing topographic features of the site, including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls). The Project will be located on an existing building pad. Additionally, there will be no significant changes to the overall drainage features on the lot. The project minimizes the need for import/export of soil by balancing cut and fill as much as possible, reducing major alterations to the natural landform. The property will also be landscaped in accordance with the approved landscape plan. E. Grading has been designed to follow natural contours of the site and to minimize the amount of grading required to create the building area. The cut and fill quantities are relatively balanced, reducing the need for excessive soil import/export, which indicates that the design works with the land rather than requiring significant reconfiguration. F. Grading will not modify existing drainage channels nor redirect drainage flow, unless such flow is redirected into an existing drainage course. The grading plan ensures that existing drainage channels remain intact, with modifications only occurring where necessary to direct flow into pre-established drainage courses. G. The project preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees and supplements these elements with drought-tolerant landscaping which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and landscaping provides a buffer or transition area between private and public areas. Surrounding native vegetation and mature trees will not be affected or will be replaced. New vegetation will be installed in accordance with the approved landscape plan. The development will be considerate of the environment and will enhance the rural character of the community. As such, the rural character of the community is maintained and privacy is maintained with neighbors. H. The project is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles. 19 4 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) There are no changes to the existing circulation patterns for pedestrians or vehicles. The driveway will be widened and motor court enlarged to provide better vehicular circulation and more off-street parking. I. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Project is exempt from the CEQA Guidelines pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which exempts the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including single family residence and accessory structures, including but not limited to garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. Here, the Project includes a new stable, corral, recreational game court, and guest house. Accordingly, the Project qualifies for the exemption pursuant to Section 15303. Further, no exceptions to the exemption apply; there is no reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. Much of the site has already been graded and developed. Section 7. Conditional Use Permit Findings. RHMC Section 17.16.040(A)(3,5-7) require a Conditional Use Permit for a detached accessory structure greater than 200 square feet and stable greater than 200 square feet. A stable over 200 square feet is subject to the requirements in Section 17.18.060; and an accessory structure (detached solid covered patio) over 550 square feet is subject to the requirements in Section 17.18.090. The Applicant is proposing a new 650 square foot solid covered free-standing patio and a set aside area for a 450 square-foot stable. Given the foregoing, in accordance with RHMC Section 17.42.050, the Planning Commission makes the following findings: A. That the proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for the proposed uses is consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan because the use is consistent with similar uses in the community, and meets all the applicable code development standards for such use. The Project is compatible with existing land uses as other properties in the same zone have such accessory uses. The Project is consistent with Open Space and Conservation Element Goal 2, which aims for expanded opportunities for outdoor recreation. B. That the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures have been considered, and that the use will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, building or structures. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent structures have been considered, and the Project will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed uses are located on a developed property with sufficient proximity to neighboring buildings and structures. C. That the site for the proposed conditional use is of adequate size and shape to accommodate the uses and buildings proposed. 20 5 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) The proposed conditional uses comply with all applicable development standards in the RAS-1 Zone. The net lot area is 72,510 square feet and is adequate to support the proposed uses. The property is developed and adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed uses and buildings.That the proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development standards of the zone district. The proposed conditional uses comply with all applicable development standards of the RAS-1 Zone, with exception to the variances requested herein. The proposed use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. That the proposed uses are consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities because the Project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. D. That the proposed use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. Granting the proposed conditional use for the project will be consistent with the applicable portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan related to siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. The project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. The proposed project would not constitute a hazardous waste facility. E. That the proposed conditional use observes the spirit and intent of this title. The proposed project allows the Applicant the ability to enjoy rights enjoyed by other residents in the City. The proposed uses are consistent with the residential character of the City. Section 8. Variance Findings. Section 17.38.050 sets forth the required findings for granting Variances for a portion of the proposed project to be constructed in the front and rear yard setbacks for the stable and corral set aside areas. Section 17.16.040(A)(3, 5-7) permits conditional uses subject to certain requirements. The applicant is seeking relief from the Section 17.16.070(B) with regard to the amount of grading disturbance area. With respect to this request for Variances, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone. There are extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property. Unlike most properties in the RAS-1 Zone, the subject property is constrained by mostly unbuildable steep terrain and a limited building pad area. The proposed project would encroach into the required front and rear yard setbacks; however, these areas are already developed and disturbed. The future stable and corral would encroach into the front and rear yard setbacks due to the narrowness 21 6 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) of the site caused by the roadway easement. The stable and corral would be accessed off the main driveway at Chuckwagon Road and then diverted onto the road that leads to this set aside area. B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question. The applicant is requesting a variance from the Code to deviate by 11% for grading disturbance area beyond what is permitted for this project. Since this increase is minimal, its impact is insignificant given the property's constraints. The proposed stable and corral are situated in an area that minimizes further site disturbance. Additionally, the encroachments into the front yard setbacks with the stable and corral have been strategically placed to maximize usable space while minimizing intrusion. As a result, encroachment into both the front and rear yard setbacks is necessary. Therefore, the variance requests are essential to ensure the applicant can enjoy property rights consistent with those of neighboring properties within the same zone. C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Granting a variance for encroachment into the front and rear yard setbacks will not be detrimental to the public welfare and will not be injurious to properties in the vicinity because the encroachments into the front yard setbacks have been strategically placed to maximize usable space while minimizing intrusion. Further, the project will improve the appearance of the property by placing buildings of larger mass away from the residence. Landscaping will be provided to screen structures from Chuckwagon Road. D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed. In granting the variance, the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code will be observed. The City’s Zoning Code ensures that the growth and development of the City is orderly, attractive, and enhances the rural character of the community. The proposed stable and corral add to the attractiveness of the property, are visually harmonious with the community, and are at scale with adjacent residential development. E. That the variance does not grant special privilege to the applicant. The variance does not provide any special privileges to the applicant; the proposed project is similar development that largely maintains the siting of the previous building footprint. The project, together with the variance, will be compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan. F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. 22 7 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) Granting a variance for the project will be consistent with the applicable portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan related to siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. The project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. The proposed project would not constitute a hazardous waste facility. G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills. Approvals granting the variance to allow encroachments into the front and rear yard setbacks will be consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills, which encourages residential uses. Section 9. Based upon the foregoing findings, and the evidence in the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves Zoning Case No. 24-043 subject to the following conditions: A. Approval for the Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permits, and Variances shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval as defined in RHMC Section 17.38.070 of the Zoning Ordinance unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of this section. B. If any condition of this resolution is violated, the entitlement granted by this resolution shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse and upon receipt of written notice from the City, all construction work being performed on the subject property shall immediately cease, other than work determined by the City Manager or his/her designee required to cure the violation. The suspension and stop work order will be lifted once the Applicant cures the violation to the satisfaction of the City Manager or his/her designee. In the event that the Applicant disputes the City Manager or his/her designee’s determination that a violation exists or disputes how the violation must be cured, the Applicant may request a hearing before the City Council. The hearing shall be scheduled at the next regular meeting of the City Council for which the agenda has not yet been posted; the Applicant shall be provided written notice of the hearing. The stop work order shall remain in effect during the pendency of the hearing. The City Council shall make a determination as to whether a violation of this Resolution has occurred. If the Council determines that a violation has not occurred or has been cured by the time of the hearing, the Council will lift the suspension and the stop work order. If the Council determines that a violation has occurred and has not yet been cured, the Council shall provide the Applicant with a deadline to cure the violation; no construction work shall be performed on the property until and unless the violation is cured by the deadline, other than work designated by the Council to accomplish the cure. If the violation is not cured by the deadline, the Council may either extend the deadline at the Applicant’s request or schedule a hearing for the revocation of the entitlements granted by this Resolution pursuant to Chapter 17.58 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC). C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise a variance to such requirement has been approved. 23 8 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file at City Hall and approved by the Planning Commission on May 20, 2025, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. The working drawings submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the approved development plan. All conditions of the Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permits, and Variance approvals shall be incorporated into the building permit working drawings, and where applicable complied with prior to issuance of a grading or building permit from the building department. The conditions of approval of this Resolution shall be printed onto a separate sheet and included in the building plans submitted to the Building Department for review and shall be kept on site at all times. Any proposed modifications and/or changes to the approved project, including resulting from field conditions, shall be discussed with staff so that staff can determine whether the modification is minor or major in nature. Minor modifications are subject to approval by the City Manager or his or her designee. Major modifications are subject to approval by the Planning Commission after a public hearing. Applicant shall not implement modifications or changes to the approved project without the appropriate approval from the City Manager or designee or the Planning Commission, as required. D. Prior to submittal of final working drawings to Building and Safety Department for issuance of building and grading permits, the plans for the project shall be submitted to City staff for verification that the final plans are in compliance with the plans approved by the Planning Commission. E. A licensed professional preparing construction plans for this project for Building Department review shall execute a Certificate affirming that the plans conform in all respects to this Resolution approving this project and all of the conditions set forth herein and the City’s Building Code and Zoning Ordinance. Further, the person obtaining a building and/or grading permit for this project shall execute a Certificate of Construction stating that the project will be constructed according to this Resolution and any plans approved therewith. F. Structural lot coverage of the lot shall not exceed 10,912 square feet or 15.04% of the net lot area (20% maximum). The flatwork coverage is 11,200 square feet or 15.4%. The total lot coverage proposed, including structures and flatwork, shall not exceed 23,952 square feet or 33% (35% maximum). G. The lot is already developed and the total disturbed area will be 36,890 square feet or 50.9% (maximum 50% permitted provided that no more than fifty percent of the slopes resulting from the grading are greater (steeper) than 3:1, or three units horizontal (run) to one unit vertical (rise). Grading for this project shall not exceed 4,464 cubic yards of cut and 3,445 cubic yards of fill for a total of 7,909 cubic yards with 1,019 cubic yard being exempt export. H. The total proposed building pad net coverage for the residential main pad is 13,760 square feet or 19%, which meets the 30% maximum guideline. 24 9 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) I. A driveway access shall be provided per the Fire Department requirements and the driveway shall be roughened and the first 20 feet of the driveway shall not exceed 7% in slope. J. Access to the stable and to the corral shall be decomposed granite or 100% pervious roughened material; it shall not be wider than 12 feet. K. A minimum of five-foot level path and/or walkway, which does not have to be paved, shall be provided around the entire perimeter of all of the proposed structures or as otherwise required by the Fire Department. L. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Low Impact Development requirements for storm water management on site (RHMC Chapter 8.32). M. Hydrology, soils, geology and other reports, as required by the Building and Public Works Departments, and as may be required by the Building Official, shall be prepared. N. Prior to issuance of a final construction approval of the project, all graded slopes shall be landscaped. Prior to issuance of building permit, the landscaping plan shall meet the requirements of the City, shall be submitted to the City in conformance with Fire Department Fuel Modification requirements, and shall be approved by the City’s landscape consultant. O. The project shall be landscaped, and continually maintained in substantial conformance with the landscaping plan on file approved by the City’s landscape consultant. A detailed landscaping plan shall provide that any trees and shrubs used in the landscaping scheme for this project shall be planted in a way that screens the project development from adjacent streets and neighbors, such that shrubs and trees as they mature do not grow into a hedge or impede any neighbors’ views and the plan shall provide that all landscaping be maintained at a height no higher than the roof line of the nearest project structure. In addition, the landscaping plan shall provide for screening of development with vegetation not to exceed 10 feet in height, and that the vegetation used for screening shall be planted in an off-set manner, so as to prevent it, as it grows from forming a solid hedge. The landscaping plan shall utilize to the maximum extent feasible, plants that are native to the area, are water-wise and are consistent with the rural character of the community. Plants listed as high hazardous plants under RHMC Section 8.30.015 are prohibited. P. The applicant shall submit a landscaping performance bond or other financial obligation, to be kept on deposit by the City, in the amount of the planting plus irrigation plus 15%. The bond shall be released no sooner than two years after completion of all plantings, subject to a City staff determination that the plantings required for the project are in substantial conformance with approved plans and are in good condition. A Certificate of Completion shall be submitted by the project designer or contractor prior to final landscape installation inspection. Q. The landscaping shall be subject to the requirements of the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, (RHMC Chapter 13.18). 25 10 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) R. Pursuant to RHMC Chapter 8.30, the property shall at all times be maintained free of dead trees and vegetation. S. The setback lines and roadway easement lines in the vicinity of the construction for this project shall remain staked throughout the construction. A construction fence may be required. T. Perimeter easements, including roadway easements and trails, if any, shall remain free and clear of any improvements to advance equestrian use and emergency preparedness for evacuation within the City. Where Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA) has demonstrated authority over the easement, the City’s Planning Director may grant relief from this condition upon satisfactory proof of permission from RHCA and a legitimate showing that there is no need for the condition to advance equestrian uses and emergency preparedness. U. Minimum of 65% of any construction materials must be recycled or diverted from landfills. The hauler of the materials shall obtain City’s Construction and Demolition permits for waste hauling prior to start of work and provide proper documentation to the City. V. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, storm water pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required. W. During construction, to the extent feasible, all parking shall take place on the project site, on the new driveway and, if necessary, any overflow parking may take place within the unimproved roadway easements along adjacent streets, and shall not obstruct neighboring driveways, visibility at intersections or pedestrian and equestrian passage. During construction, to the maximum extent feasible, employees of the contractor shall car-pool into the City. To the extent feasible, a minimum of 4’ wide path, from the edge of the roadway pavement, for pedestrian and equestrian passage shall be available and be clear of vehicles, construction materials and equipment at all times. X. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and relate traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. Y. Prior to demolition of the existing structures, an investigation shall be conducted for the presence of hazardous chemicals, lead-based paints or products, mercury and asbestos- containing materials (ACMs). If hazardous chemicals, lead-based paints or products, mercury or ACMs are identified, remediation shall be undertaken in compliance with California environmental regulations and policies. AA. The property owner and/or his/her contractor/applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the no-smoking provisions in the Municipal Code. The contractor shall not use tools that could produce a spark, including for clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning 26 11 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) conditions. Weather conditions can be found at: http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/lox/main.php?suite=safety&page=hazard_definitions#FIRE. It is the sole responsibility of the property owner and/or his/her contractor to monitor the red flag warning conditions. AB. Development shall drain in accordance with the approved grading and drainage plan. Drainage dissipaters shall be constructed outside of any easements. The drainage system shall be approved by the Department of Building and Safety. If an above ground swale and/or dissipater is required, it shall be designed in such a manner as not to cross over any equestrian trails or discharge water onto a trail, shall be stained in an earth tone color, and shall be screened from any trail, road and neighbors’ view to the maximum extent practicable, without impairing the function of the drainage system. AC. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices. AD. During construction, an Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 2022 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control storm water pollution. AE. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of storm water drainage facilities and septic tank. AF. The applicant shall pay all of the applicable Building and Safety and Public Works Department fees and Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District fees, if any. AG. Prior to final inspection of the project, “as graded” and “as constructed” plans and certifications shall be provided to the Planning Department and the Building Department to ascertain that the completed project is in compliance with the Planning Commission approved plans. In addition, any modifications made to the project during construction, shall be depicted on the “as built/as graded” plan. AH. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of the Conditional Use Permit and Variance approvals, or the approvals shall not be effective. AI. All conditions of this Resolution, when applicable, must be complied with prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit from the Building and Safety Department. AJ. Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. AK. To the extent permitted by law, Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Rolling Hills, its City Council, its officers, employees and agents (the 27 12 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) “indemnified parties”) from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void any permit or approval for this project authorized by the City, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorney’s fees and costs in defense of the litigation. The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its choice. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this permit. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. AL. The future stable and corral shall comply with all requirements in RHMC Sections 17.18.060 and 17.18.090, unless otherwise approved herein. AM. New landscaping in the RHCA easement is prohibited unless previously approved by RHCA. Landscaping not approved by RHCA in the easement shall be removed from the final landscape plan. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20th DAY OF MAY, 2025. BRAD CHELF, CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 28 13 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025-XX entitled: ZONING CASE NO. 24-043: SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW RESIDENCE, NON-EXEMPT GRADING, STABLE ACCESS, WALLS EXCEEDING A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET AND 2.5 FEET AVERAGE (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR A DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET, STABLE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET; AND VARIANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE FRONT YARD, SITE DISTURBANCE OF MORE THAN 40 PERCENT AND FILL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 2:1, AND FINDING THE SAME EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LOT 29- A-EF) (LEE) was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on May 20, 2025, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK 29 *EXCLUDING: up to 5 (legal) & up to 800 sq. ft. detached structures that are not higher than 12 ft. (no more than 120 sq.ft. per structure per deduction, except for trellis) Development Table Zoning Case No. 24-043 6 Chuckwagon Road SITE PLAN REVIEW, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT & VARIANCE EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL Net Lot Area 72,508 SF 0 SF 72,508 SF Residence 3,086 SF 3,853 SF 6,939 SF Garage 400 SF 922 SF 1,322 SF Swimming Pools/Spa SF 790 SF 790 SF Pool Equipment SF 0 SF SF Guest House 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF Cabana 0 SF 498 SF 498 SF Stable 0 SF 400 SF 400 SF Recreation Court 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF Attached Covered Porches 0 SF 9,500 SF 9,500 SF Entryway/Porte Cochere, Breezeways 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF Attached Trellises 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF Detached Structures: Trellises 0 SF 650 SF 650 SF Service Yard 0 SF 40 SF 40 SF Basement Area Depth of Basement 0 SF 0 FT 2,877 SF 15 FT 2,877 SF 15 FT Primary Driveway 2,600 SF 3,800 SF 6,400 SF Paved Walkways, Patio Areas, Courtyards 1,500 SF -100 SF 1,400 SF Pool Decking 0 SF 2,300 SF 2,300 SF Other Paved Driveways, Road Easements, Parking Pads 4,400 SF -1,100 SF 3,300 SF Grading (balanced onsite) 0 CY 4,464 CY CUT 3,445 CY FILL 1,019 Export (Exempt pool/basement) 7,909 CY TO TAL *Structural Lot Coverage (25% maximum with deductions) 3,486 SF (4.8%) 10,472 SF (14.4%) 10,912 SF (19.5%) Flatwork Lot Coverage (35% maximum) 8,500 SF (11.7%) 2,700 SF (3.7%) 11,200 SF (15.4%) *Total Lot Coverage (Structures and Flatwork) (35% maximum with deductions) 11,986 SF (16.5%) 11,996 SF (16.5%) 23,952 SF (33%) Total Disturbed Area (40% maximum) 53,500 SF (73.8%) 3,000 SF (4.1%) 56,500 SF (77.9%) *Building Pad 1 (19,200 SF) (30% Maximum Guideline) 3,486 STRUCTURE AREA (18%) 7,605 SF STRUCTURE AREA (39.6%) 11,091 SF STRUCTURE AREA (57.7%) 30 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILTY TABLE – ZONING CASE NO. 24-043 JUNE 17, 2025 Homes Near 6 Chuckwagon Road House SF Basement SF Garage SF Net Lot SF Zoning Year Approved 6 CHUCKWAGON 6,939 SF 2,877 SF 1,322 SF 72,508 SF RAS-1 N/A 10 Bowie Road 5,270 SF 6,000 SF 844 SF 70,567 SF RAS-1 2016 (SFR) 1 Chuckwagon Road 3,932 SF N/A 525 SF 44,000 SF RAS-1 2016 (remodel) 3 Chuckwagon Road 5,291 N/A 659 SF 85,412 SF RAS-1 2016 (AA for deck) 4 Chuckwagon Road 2935 N/A 400 SF 57,060 SF RAS-1 2014 (remodel) 23 Chuckwagon Road 2,770 SF N/A 439 SF 29,120 SF RAS-1/OZD 2021 (ADU) 18 Eastfield Drive 5,265 SF 801 SF 1,192 SF 82,328 SF RAS-1 2022 (new residence) 35 Eastfield Drive 4,286 SF N/A 433 SF 44,000 SF RAS-1 2023 (remodel) 40 Eastfield Drive 2,979 SF N/A 750 SF 41,873 SF RAS-1 2023 49 Eastfield Drive 3,261 SF 1,196 SF 948 SF 67,950 SF RAS-1 2019 (Addition) 60 Eastfield Drive 6,200 SF 3,821 SF 1,175 SF 149,846 SF RAS-1 2020 (Pool) 8 Hackamore Road 4,971 SF 480 SF 440 SF 127,200 SF RAS-1 2022 (Addition) 11 Saddleback Road 4,805 SF 1,056 SF 468 SF 94,525 SF RAS-1 2017 Recent Approvals House SF Basement SF Garage SF Net Lot SF Zoning Year Approved 2 Possum Ridge Road 6,230 SF 1,950 SF 890 SF 151,990 SF RAS-2 2024 23 Crest Road East 14,680 SF 7,849 SF 1,000 SF 262,368 SF RAS-2 2024 4 Spur Lane 5,535 SF N/A 497 SF 47,063 SF RAS-1 2024 11 Flying Mane Road 4,795 SF 2,050 SF 420 SF 43,560 SF RAS-1 2023 19 Portuguese Bend Road 6,811 SF N/A 1,512 SF 155,320 SF RAS-2 2023 4 Poppy Trail 7,290 SF 7,290 SF 1,100 SF 277,335 SF RAS-2 2023 8 Middleridge Lane South 6,201 SF 3,000 SF 987 SF 137,810 SF RAS-2 2022 0 Poppy Trail 6,374 SF 934 SF 1,232 SF 117,800 SF RAS-1 2019 20 Upper Blackwater Canyon 9,165 SF 2,250 SF 900 SF 135,735 SF RAS-2 2018 11 Upper Blackwater Canyon 11,052 SF 6,620 SF 1,446 400,752 SF RAS-2 2017 31 1 Attachment #4 Prepared for the Planning Commission Meeting June 17, 2025 (continued from May 20, 2025 Public Hearing) 6 Chuckwagon Road (Zoning Case No. 24-043) PROPOSED DISCRETIONARY REVIEW SUMMARY TABLE ITEM # PROPOSED DESCRIPTION ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE (RHMC) REQUIRES DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL 1. Variance #1: Exceed Disturbed Area The existing disturbed area is 53,500 SF (73.8%) and the project proposes an additional 3,000 SF (4.1%). This will bring the total disturbance to 56,500 SF (77.9%). This exceeds the maximum allowable 40% disturbance by 37.9%. Section 17.16.070 B. The Maximum Disturbed Area. Disturbance shall be limited to forty percent of the net lot area. A Variance is required to exceed the maximum 40% disturbed area. Discretionary 2. Variance #2: Stable and Corral to encroach in front setback and front yard The proposed stable and corral are located in the front yard and front yard setback on the lower level of the lot on the west portion. Section 17.18.040.3.(5)- The corral shall not be permitted in the front yard. 17.18.060.A(2) – The stable structure shall not be permitted in the front yard. Discretionary 3. Variance #3: Fill steep slope The project includes steep fill slope at the driveway, motor court, and main residence. The deepest fill is at 15’ according to the grading plan. The existing fill slope is 1 unit vertical to 1.5 units horizontal. Section 15.04.120 - Amending Section J107.6 Maximum Slope. The slope of fill surfaces shall be no steeper than is safe for the intended use. Discretionary 4. Site Plan Review #1: New construction of a single-family residence with attached garage and basement The project includes the demolition of an existing 3,086 SF single family residence and the construction of a new 6,939 SF single family residence with a 2,877 SF basement (exempt) attached 1,322 SF 6 car garage, and relocated driveway Section 17.46.010.A(2) Site Plan Review (SPR) is required for the construction of a new building or structure. Discretionary 5. Site Plan Review #2: Non-exempt grading The project includes non- exempt grading for total of 6,829 CY. There is 3,445 CY fill for the driveway and retaining walls. There is 3,384 CY cut for the residential building pad. Section 17.46.020.A(1) Site Plan Review (SPR) is required for any grading exempt when exempt pursuant to Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) Discretionary 6. Site Plan Review #3: Walls to exceed 3 feet maximum height The proposed retaining walls will exceed the maximum allowable 3 feet maximum Section 17.16.190(F), requires a SPR for any walls that exceed the maximum 3 feet height and not Discretionary 32 2 ITEM # PROPOSED DESCRIPTION ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE (RHMC) REQUIRES DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL height and do not average 2.5’. (Wall A is max 5’ and 3’ average height, Wall B is max 5’ and 2.4’ average, and Wall C is max height 5’ and 2.4’ average height) average 2.5 feet. 7. Conditional Use Permit #1: Lanai greater than 200 SF 650 SF detached lanai, 10’6” height. The proposed lanai will be located at the top of the west corner of the parcel Section 17.16.030(Q) A Conditional Use Permit is required for cabana, pool house, and similar accessory structures not to exceed two hundred square feet (maximum 800 SF) Discretionary 8. Conditional Use Permit #2: Stable greater than 200 SF The proposed stable is 400 SF. Section 17.18.050.A.(1) Conditional Use Permit is required for a stable greater than 200 square feet. Discretionary Legend: Variance VAR Site Plan Review SPR Conditional Use Permit CUP Discretionary Review DR 33 Rigg Consulting, Inc. May 29, 2025 Rigg Consulting, Inc. 6415 Via Canada Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 City of Rolling Hills Chair and Members of the Planning Commission 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Re: Proposed Home at 6 Chuckwagon Dear Chair and Members of the Planning Commission, Last month I wrote you about the extreme size of the proposed home and resulting privacy and massing impacts to the home at 4 Chuckwagon. Those comments still hold true unless the applicant provides a significantly modified design. During the May meeting, there was virtually no discussion about the size/location of the home and the resulting massing and privacy impacts to the neighbors at 4 Chuckwagon. In fact, there was a comment by a Commissioner that so long as the home was within the setbacks, the home could be built and there was nothing the Commission could do. This was very surprising as the findings for Site Plan Review are very specific and are meant to provide harmony between properties and property owners. The Planning Commission is tasked with requiring these findings when reviewing a project. After the meeting I took another look at the staff report and what it contained about the required findings for Site Plan Review, and the discussion of each finding. In recent past staff reports for large new homes, such as that for 23 Crest Road East, there had been a listing of the findings and an analysis from staff if each finding could be made. However, in the staff report for 6 Chuckwagon, there is only a paragraph indicating that a Site Plan Review is needed without a listing of the required findings or any discussion. I believe this led the Commissioners to believe they were not required to make the required findings. Below I have listed the required findings that cannot be made to approve the home. For each finding I have provided the staff’s recommendations in the report for 23 Crest Road East, and how it differs from the proposed home at 6 Chuckwagon: 34 Rigg Consulting, Inc. A. The Project complies with and is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and all requirements of the zoning ordinance. Findings for 23 Crest Road East – “The proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low-density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The Project maintains the maximum possible distances from adjacent neighbors.” Suggested findings for 6 Chuckwagon - There is not sufficient open space between surrounding structures as the home is very near the home at 4 Chuckwagon. The project imposes virtually the minimal allowable distance to neighboring structures. The design does not reduce the visual impact/mass from this neighboring property. B. The Project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. Lot coverage requirements are regarded as maximums, and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted depends upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Findings for 23 Crest Road East - The topography and the configuration of the lot have been considered, and the Project will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, buildings, or structures; the Project will be built on new building pads which enables Project elements to be the least intrusive to surrounding properties. Further, the Project will be a sufficient distance from nearby residences so views and privacy of surrounding neighbors will not be impacted. Suggested findings for 6 Chuckwagon – The project will adversely affect the property at 4 Chuckwagon. As the proposed home is on the highest portion of the lot and as close as possible to 4 Chuckwagon, it is the most possible intrusive design. The privacy of surrounding neighbors is extremely impacted by the design. C. The Project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. Findings for 23 Crest Road East - The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, and is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to new residences in the vicinity of said lot. The proposed site plan is harmonious with the site conditions of the existing lot and neighboring lots. The integration into the slope following the topography enables the residence to be largely hidden from view from the street and neighboring residences. 35 Rigg Consulting, Inc. Suggested findings for 6 Chuckwagon - The proposal is not consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to new residences in the vicinity of the project. The size contributes to the privacy and mass impacts. The home is sited on the highest point of the lot and as close as possible to the home at 4 Chuckwagon, making the home not hidden at all, and visually obtrusive. G. The Project preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees and supplements these elements with drought-tolerant landscaping which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and landscaping provides a buffer or transition area between private and public areas. Findings for 23 Crest Road East - The rural character of the community is maintained and privacy is maintained with neighbors. Suggested findings for 6 Chuckwagon - The proposal and landscaping do not maintain privacy for the neighbors at 4 Chuckwagon as there is no buffer or transition. Even the RHCA protested the design as the hardscape is into the setback and against their easement, and they recognized there was no room for any landscaping along the 4 Chuckwagon side of the development. I am not sure how this finding can be made as a landscaping plan was not provided. Also at your meeting in May, several Commissioners commented on the lack of any dialogue between the applicant or their representative and the residents next door at 4 Chuckwagon. We had asked staff to contact the applicant so we could work with them. Staff confirmed the applicant would be contacted. Still, even after your concerns with the absence of dialogue with the neighbors, we still have not heard from them. We would again ask for the edge of the driveway, which is 10 feet into the setback, and the home to be moved 60 feet to the west. The setback on the other side of the home would still be larger at 70 feet. We would also ask that the area within the 60-foot area be landscaped with trees to create a visual buffer between our homes. Sincerely, Allan Rigg, PE AICP 36 Agenda Item No.: 10.B Mtg. Date: 04/15/2025 TO:HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM:LISA EDWARDS, PRINCIPAL PLANNER THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT:ZONING CASE NO. 24-043: SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW RESIDENCE, NON-EXEMPT GRADING, STABLE ACCESS, WALLS EXCEEDING A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET AND 2.5 FEET AVERAGE (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR A DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET, STABLE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET; AND VARIANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE FRONT YARD, SITE DISTURBANCE OF MORE THAN 40 PERCENT, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LOT 29-A-EF) (LEE) DATE:April 15, 2025 BACKGROUND: The lot is an irregular rectangular shaped parcel zoned RAS-1 and the net lot area is 72,510 square feet (1.66 acres). The subject property is currently developed with a 3,086-square-foot single-family residence and 400 attached garage. There is one main building pad totaling 19,200 square feet in area and has one access driveway from Chuckwagon Road measuring 50 feet wide. DISCUSSION: Applicant Requests On May 16, 2024, an application was duly filed by Jeff Browning, SAA Interiors & Architects (“Applicant”), on behalf of the property owner, Ken Lee, with respect to real property located at 6 Chuckwagon Road, Rolling Hills (LOT 29-A-EF) requesting: Site Plan Review for construction of a new 6,939 square-foot residence, stable access, walls exceeding a height of 3 feet and 2.5 average (up to maximum height of 5 feet) and other improvements; Conditional Use Permits for a 650 square-foot detached solid-cover patio exceeding more than 200 square feet, future stable greater than 200 square feet (400 SF); and Variances for construction in the front yard setback and site disturbance of more than 40 percent. The Project also includes a 790 square-foot pool with 40 square-foot pool equipment enclosure, a 6837 1,322 square-foot garage, and 2,877 square-foot basement. Site Plan Review The Rolling Hills Municipal Code requires a Site Plan Review for construction of any new building or structure pursuant to RHMC Section 17.46.020.A(2), requires grading pursuant to RHMC Section 17.46.020.3(a), and walls above three feet shall be subject to site plan review pursuant to RHMC Section 17.16.190(F). The Project proposes a one-story, new single-family residence a new six-car attached garage with a basement. The existing main residence is 3,086 square feet and will add 3,853 square feet for a total of 6,939 square feet. A Site Plan Review is also requested for retaining Walls A-D over three feet, not to exceed 5’ high, located along the main driveway, stable access road, and at the rear of the property. Conditional Use Permits The Applicant is proposing a 650-square-foot detached roofed patio structure subject to RHMC Section 17.16.040(A)(3) and requires a Conditional Use Permit because the patio cover exceeds 200 square feet. Additionally, a stable exceeding 200 square feet is being proposed and is subject to the conditions outlined in RHMC Section 17.18.060. Variances Since the Project requires site disturbance more than the allowable 40% of the net lot area, a variance is being requested to deviate from these provisions to permit a larger buildable area given that the gross area of the lot is 100,623 square feet and the net lot area is 72,508 square feet. The encroachments into the front yard setbacks with the stable and corral have been placed in manner intended to maximize usable space while minimizing intrusion. As a result, encroachment into the front yard setback is necessary. Therefore, the variance requests are essential to ensure the applicant can enjoy property rights consistent with those of neighboring properties within the same zone. MUNICIPAL CODE COMPLIANCE Setbacks The project complies with all of the required setbacks in the RAS-1 Zone, with the exception of the set-aside areas for the stable and corral. Lot Coverage and Building Pad Coverage The Project conforms to Zoning Code lot coverage requirements. The net lot area of the property is 72,508 square feet (1.66 acres) per RHMC Section 17.16.060(A). The structural net lot coverage is proposed at 10,912 square feet or 15.04% (20% max. permitted), excluding exempt structures, and the total lot coverage proposed, including flatwork, would be 23,952 square feet or 33% (35% max. permitted). Building Pad #1 is a total of 19,200 square-feet. The existing Building Pad #1 Coverage with deductions is 3,486 square feet or 18%, and with an increase of 7,605 square feet or 37.5%, the total proposed Building Pad Coverage with deductions is 11,091 square feet or 55.6%, this exceeds the maximum 30% guideline by 25.6%. Disturbance The applicant is requesting a variance from the Code to deviate by 37.9% for grading 6938 disturbance area beyond what is permitted for this project. The disturbed area is 56,500 square feet or 77.9% (40% max permitted, provided that no more than fifty percent of the slopes resulting from the grading are greater (steeper) than 3:1, or three units horizontal (run) to one unit vertical (rise)). However, existing land disturbance totals 53,500 square feet and will increase by 3,000 square feet. Since this increase is somewhat significant, Staff asks the Commission to consider this impact on the natural terrain. Neighbor Concerns Staff received a concern from Stephanie & Paul Reisz (residents at 4 Chuckwagon Road). On April 7, 2025, Mrs. Reisz called the City to express her concerns regarding the proposed barn location in the front yard and setback. She was concerned about the proximity of the barn to her bedroom window. . Review by RHCA The Rolling Hills Community Association is pending review of this project. Driveway Pursuant to RHMC Section 17.16.160.A(3), "No driveway shall exceed a maximum grade of twelve percent, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission, and the first twenty feet of a driveway shall have a maximum grade of seven percent." The proposed driveway leading to the main residence is proposed at 19% slope and then tapers to 9.5% after the grade break. Given this, the Planning Commission is asked to render a decision on this matter. Environmental Review The Project has been determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which exempts the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including single family residence and accessory structures, including but not limited to garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Open the public hearing, take public testimony, close the public hearing, discuss the proposed project, and provide direction to staff and applicants. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: PL_ADR_250409_6ChuckwagonRoad_RadiusMap_04.15.25PCMeeting.pdf Attachment 2: PL_ADR_6ChuckwagonRd_ZC24-043_240516_Arch SitePlan.pdf Attachment 3: PL_ADR_250407_6ChuckwagonRoad_Calculations_4.15.25PCMeeting.pdf Attachment 4: PL_ADR_6ChuckwagonRd_ZC24-043_250408_LandscapePlan_F.pdf Attachment 5: 2024-043_PC_Resolution_6 Chuckwagon Rd_ZC24-043_Lee_D.pdf CL_AGN_250415_PC_Item10B_PublicComment01.pdf CL_AGN_250415_PC_Item10B_PublicComment02.pdf CL_AGN_250415_PC_Item10B_PublicComment03.pdf 7039 City of Rolling Hills ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 TITLE VICINITY MAP CASE NO. Zoning Case No. 24-043 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, & Site Plan Review OWNER Lee ADDRESS 6 Chuckwagon Road, Rolling Hills 90274 SITE 1000’ 7140 8641 -2- SPR Rev. July 2019 City of Rolling Hills PLAN SUBMITTAL INFORMATION Complete and submit with each application: 1. "Request for Hearing" application. Seven copies of currently surveyed plan MUST accompany the final application. Plans must be FOLDED to approximately 8 1/2" x 11" with title block visible. Additional plans will be required prior to City Council meeting. 2. Owner's Declaration. 3. Plan submittal using the "Checklist" as guide. Each plan must have a vicinity map, computation of lot coverage, building pad sizes, cut and fill totals, and the percentage of lot disturbance printed on the plot plan and be stamped by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor. 4. Property owner's radius map and property owner's labels. A map is required showing the existing properties, within or partially within a 1,000 foot radius of the exterior boundaries of the property under consideration, including the subject property. Prepare three complete lists of property owners of each parcel with mailing address on mailing labels. Assign a number to each name on the list to correspond with a number of the lot on the map. 5. Certified Property Owners List Affidavit. 6. Filing fee made payable to City of Rolling Hills PLAN SUBMITTAL PROCESS Applications must be submitted to the Planning Department as shown on the "Planning Application Filing Deadline Schedule". Applications shall be deemed complete only after all required information is submitted and the application fees are paid. The Planning staff will meet with the applicant to discuss the proposal. Once an application has been accepted as complete by the City, a hearing will be set before the Planning Commission. Applications are considered at the regular meetings of the Planning Commission, which are held the third Tuesday of each month. Provide sufficient time in your schedule to attend at least four meetings to allow the Planning Commission to study the facts presented and to make a field trip to review the physical conditions. Prior to the field trip a silhouette of the project will have to be erected. The silhouette must be certified. The applicant or a representative must appear at all meetings. The City’s review process takes a minimum of 3-4 months from submittal. City Council reviews the project following Planning Commission action. AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY In reviewing a request, the Planning Commission must consider the following: 1. The Planning Commission shall consider all matters presented to it fairly and impartially, recognizing the rights of the applicant as well as its obligation to enforce all zoning ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills. The site plan review process is intended to assist in the orderly development of property, in conformance with objectives of the General Plan and other ordinances and codes. 8742 8843 -4- SPR Rev. July 2019 City of Rolling Hills CHECKLIST FOR PLAN SUBMITTAL The following information must be included on any plan submitted for checking to the Rolling Hills Planning Commission for: 1. Conditional Use Permit (including grading requirements). 2. Variance (including grading requirements). 3. Site Plan Review (including grading requirements). 4. Subdivisions and Lot Line Adjustments -Provide seven (7) sets of plans (folded) that show the following: (Additional sets will be required before the City Council meeting) - Provide electronic copy of the plans - Provide electronic copy of the application including calculations and all other submittals o Name, address and telephone number of applicant, and name, address and telephone number of architect and civil engineer. o Currently surveyed plot plan showing the entire property. (More than one plan may be submitted). o Plot plans must be stamped by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor. License number and expiration date must be clearly shown. o Architectural elevation plans showing the height of proposed structures from finished grade and basement wells – all sides must be shown. o Vicinity map drawn to scale with requested improvements dimensioned to property line and to structures of all contiguous properties. o North arrow and scale of plans. o Existing contours of the entire lot, in maximum 5’ intervals. o Proposed contours, in maximum 5’ intervals. o Setbacks, easements, fences and horse trails, if any, on the entire lot. o Note distances from the centerline of all existing and proposed streets adjacent to the subject property. o Outline and show square footage of building pads not in setbacks (existing and proposed) in accordance with Municipal Code Title 17. [Buildable area is that portion of a lot NOT IN SETBACKS that constitutes the existing building pad and any contiguous portion of the lot NOT IN SETBACKS that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less]. If there is not an existing building pad, the buildable area shall mean that portion of a lot not in setbacks 8944 -5- SPR Rev. July 2019 City of Rolling Hills which will be created through grading and which will have an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. A lot may have more than one buildable area. o Outline and show distance from building footprint to any projections and architectural features including porches, entryways, porte cocheres, trellises, chimneys, eaves, and bay windows. Show roof chimneys. o Computation of structural and total lot coverage, disturbed area and building pad coverage in accordance with Municipal Code Title 17 (form attached). o All slopes shall not be steeper in slope than two horizontal to one vertical, or exceed a vertical height of thirty feet (30') below or above the natural grade. Shallower slopes are strongly encouraged. All slopes shall be marked with grade. (Municipal Code Title 17). Cut and fill must be balanced on site. Export of dirt is allowed from excavation activities, incl. basements. o Show cut and fill slopes by separate shadings or patterns. Show shaded area square footage, cut and fill totals in cubic yards, and the percentage of lot to be disturbed. (Title 17). o Show all existing and proposed retaining walls and sections through walls, including height and elevations. Show stairs, walkways and height of decks above grade. o Show proposed drainage pattern and design and indicate whether the drainage design is above or below ground. Show drainage devices and method of drainage; ie. show cisterns, biofiltration/bioretention units and similar. o Designate the area(s) for which the Site Plan Review is requested. o Show outline of residence, any additional structures, and any basement areas. Indicate depth of basement. All structures must be physically measured and square footage of each structure must be shown on the drawing. PLEASE NOTE: "Floor area" means the total horizontal area of all floors of a structure, measured in square feet from the exterior surface of the outside walls, including basements, storage areas, and the like, but excluding unenclosed areas. o Show all other existing and proposed structures on the lot, including pool, spa, pool equipment, porches, shelters, entryways, trellises, barbecues, fire places, fire pits, sheds, gazebos, children play houses/forts, trash yard and others. o Show width and length of basement wells and location of stairs. Show windows and doors in basement. o Show an area of not less than 450 square feet for the construction of a stable, 550 square feet for a corral (35’ from any residence and 25’ from rear property line, and not in front yard or side setback), and access road of not more than 25% grade for vehicular access to the stable site on each lot. If grading would be required indicate the quantity. o Show cross sections of slopes before and after grading. Show the variance of the existing slope and proposed slope. Sections should be through the highest cut and fill and through other areas where ground is steep, and as many additional sections as necessary to clearly delineate the proposed change in land contours from the existing terrain. Whenever possible, align the cross sections along the proposed development on the plot plan. 9045 -6- SPR Rev. July 2019 City of Rolling Hills o Soils, geology, hydrology/drainage reports, showing all structures on the property, with their distance from property lines delineated, may be required in applications where the requested project is close to easements, close to other properties, and/or where there is to be significant grading on the property. o Show location of utility pole(s) serving the property and indicate the direction of the utility lines. o Show the slope (in %) and square footage of the driveway and separately of any uncovered parking area or motor court. Calculate the coverage (in %) of the driveway and motor court of the yard area in which they are located. Motor court may not be closer than 30’ to roadway easement. (Yard –Section 17.12.250). o Show any other driveways/roads/easements and paved areas on the property that are existing, currently proposed or planned for the future. o Show trails within the property and adjacent thereto. o If a stable is being constructed, delineate the loft area, if any. Show the size of the stable, the size of porch and separately the size of the loft. Show cupolas or other projections. Show paddock area and corral area. o If known, show the location of septic tank. o If a new driveway approach is proposed it must be reviewed by the Traffic Commission. o Pictures of the entire property. o Submit one copy of the plan delineating in different color markers the following: o Residential Building Pad (not in setbacks) o Additional Building Pads (not in setbacks) o Disturbed Areas o Net Lot boundary o Setback lines o Cut and fill areas for grading (shaded) Public:PLANNING MASTERS:City of Rolling Hills Site Plan Review Application rev. 2019.doc 9146 -7- SPR Rev. July 2019 City of Rolling Hills INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE LOT COVERAGE FORMS TOTAL STRUCTURES AND TOTAL FLATWORK In the TOTAL STRUCTURES column, in addition to those structures listed on the form, include all structures that exist on the lot and those that are proposed, including: cabana, recreation room, hobby shop, guest-house, covered porches, covered entryways, trellis/latticework, gazebo, sheds, pool equipment, service yard, playground equipment, forts, barbecue, fire pits, decks, (for deck-see definition in Section 17.12.040 “D” words, terms and phrases of the Zoning Code), and similar structures. In the TOTAL FLATWORK column include all of the “impervious” surfaces existing and proposed, including all walkways around the residence and accessory uses, walkways from house to other structures, uncovered patios, uncovered parking areas, walkways/decks around the pool, paved access to a stable and all other “impervious” surfaces. When designing a house or addition, check with the Fire Department on the required width of the walkways and driveways. Show any future potential flatwork. NOTE: As required by the Los Angeles County Building Code, when designing a basement with “livable area(s)” you may have to provide for natural light and igress/ingress. Window wells may be acceptable. Check with the County Building and Safety Department for requirements. COMPUTATION OF LOT COVERAGE LOT COVERAGE (TITLE 17) Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures including, but not limited to gazebos, porches, entryways, porte cochere, trellises and similar structures, tennis courts, swimming pools, spa, pool equipment, outdoor bar, barbecue, sheds, shelters, service yards (enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or an area of not less than 450 square feet for the construction of a stable shall not cover more than twenty percent (20%) of the net lot area, provided further that in addition to the above described improvements, the areas included within driveways, paved access to stables, parking spaces, walks, patios, decks and asphalt or concrete paving of any kind excepting roads maintained by the Rolling Hills Community Association, shall not cover more than thirty-five percent (35%) of the net lot area (see Section 17.16.200 “J” for exceptions). For the purposes of this Section "net area" shall exclude: a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot. COMPUTATION OF BUILDABLE AREA AND COVERAGE THEREON A policy of the City is to address coverage of an identified "EXISTING AND/OR PROPOSED BUILDABLE AREA". Coverage thereon is based upon the calculation of the footprint square footage of the residence, garage, stable (barn), other accessory structures proposed and/or developed on said "buildable area," and all projecting structures such as entryways, porte cochere, covered porches and breezeways. (Covered porches that are 10% or less in size of the footprint of the residence or accessory structure and attached trellises are not counted). 9247 -8- SPR Rev. July 2019 City of Rolling Hills For the purpose of this calculation, "buildable area" shall be defined as stated in Section 17.12.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code which declares "buildable area" as the portion of a lot that constitutes the existing or proposed building pad and any other contiguous portion of the lot NOT IN THE SETBACKS THAT HAS AN AVERAGE SLOPE OF TEN PERCENT (10%) OR LESS. If there is no existing building pad, it shall mean that portion of a lot not in the setbacks that will be created through grading and that will have an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. A lot may have more than one “buildable area.” SUMMARY OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES COUNTED/NOT COUNTED TOWARDS LOT COVERAGE: BUILDING PAD COVERAGE: (guideline – 30% maximum pad coverage). All structures, including porte cochere, breezeway and entryway, shall be counted towards building pad coverage, except for the following: ATTACHED STRUCTURES: • Attached covered porch having an area of 10% or less of the size of the structure that it is attached to, (primary or accessory) • Attached trellises (open roof) DETACHED STRUCTURES: (not to exceed a total of 5 such structure on a lot that are legal and conforming, not to exceed 12 feet in height, not to exceed 120 sq.ft. each, (see exceptions below), and not to exceed a combined total of 800 sq.ft.) • Storage sheds; max. 2 on a lot, • Trellis and freestanding covered patio w/solid roof, (may exceed 120 sq.ft.), • Outdoor bar, barbecue, fire place, gazebo, • Roofed playground fort, (may be max. 15 ft.), • fountain, pond and similar structures. These structures may not be located in the front yard area or any setback, except for a fountain, decorative pond or low water feature. STRUCTURAL AND TOTAL LOT COVERAGE AND DISTURBANCE: (Zoning Code requirement: max. - 20% structural coverage; max. - 35% total lot coverage; max. – 40 % lot disturbance). All attached structures, including porches, trellises, porte cochere, breezeway, and entryway shall be counted towards coverage. All detached structures shall be counted towards coverage, except for the following: DETACHED STRUCTURES: (not to exceed a total of 5 such structure on a lot that are legal and conforming, not to exceed 12 feet in height, not to exceed 120 sq.ft. each, (see exceptions below), and not to exceed a combined total of 800 sq.ft.) • Storage sheds; max. 2 on a lot, • Trellis and freestanding covered patio w/solid roof, (may exceed 120 sq.ft.), • Outdoor bar, barbecue, fire place, gazebo, • Roofed playground fort, (may be max. 15 ft.), 9348 -9- SPR Rev. July 2019 City of Rolling Hills • fountain, pond and similar structures. These structures may not be located in the front yard area or any setback, except for a fountain, decorative pond or low water feature. WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS (Chapter 13.18 of the RH Municipal Code) Effective June 13, 2019, in addition to all other City submittal requirements, a Conceptual Landscape Plan is required for all Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit, or Variance applications if the proposed construction project includes any new or altered existing landscaped area(s) of 500 sq.ft. or more. All applicants please note the following: 1. The Conceptual Landscape Plan must provide general summary information including square footage calculations for new landscaped areas and existing landscaped areas to be altered or re-landscaped (see separate worksheet for requirements). 2. The Conceptual Landscape Plan shall be incorporated into the project Site Plan submitted with the planning application. 3. For more information regarding final (detailed) landscape plan requirements See Chapter 13.18 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. Final landscape packet shall be submitted to the City prior to obtaining grading or building permit. A fee and a compliance deposit will be collected at that time. DRIVEWAY(S) AND MOTOR COURT(S) Information regarding driveways, parking pads and motor courts is required for all new developments, garage addition, modification or relocation and for any modification to existing driveway(s) and motor court(s). If no changes are proposed to the existing driveway or motor court, except for reconstruction/repaving, within existing footprint, provide information for the total pervious and impervious surfaces. Pursuant to Sections 17.16.160 and 17.16.150 of the Rolling Hills Zoning Code, only one driveway is allowed (except with a conditional use permit under certain conditions); driveways may not cover more than 20% of the setback area in which they are located and uncovered parking areas/motor courts may not cover more than 10% of the front or side yard setback. Uncovered parking areas shall be located no closer than 30-feet from any roadway easement line. For properties that qualify for reduced setbacks (Sec. 17.17 and 17.24.045) min. of 40% of the front yard area shall be landscaped & only one driveway is allowed. A not to exceed 3-foot high wall may be permitted along a driveway or stairway in any setback. If any of these improvements are in easements, RHCA approval is required prior to City’s review. 9449 -10- SPR Rev. July 2019 City of Rolling Hills NET LOT AREA CALCULATIONS Property Line Easement Line Setback Line 10 ft excluded NET LOT AREA EXCLUDE ROADWAY EASEMENTS PLUS 10 FEET AT PERIMETER OF THE ENTIRE PARCEL ROADWAY EASEMENT Residence 9550 -11- SPR Rev. July 2019 City of Rolling Hills REQUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: ____________________________________________________________ OWNER'S ADDRESS: ____________________________________________________________ TELEPHONE NO: _____________________________ EMAIL: __________________ PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: ____________________________________________________________ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. ___________________________________________________ ASSESSORS BOOK NO. _______ PAGE ______ PARCEL _____ AGENT'S NAME: ____________________________________________________________ AGENT'S ADDRESS: ____________________________________________________________ TELEPHONE NO: ____________________________________________________________ NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ 9651 -12- SPR Rev. July 2019 City of Rolling Hills Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage ___________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Site Plan Review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 9752 -13- SPR Rev. July 2019 City of Rolling Hills D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, landscaping and other on-site parking or storage areas. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 9853 -14- SPR Rev. July 2019 City of Rolling Hills ___________________________________________________________________________________ I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: _______________________ _______________________________________________ Signature For:____________________________________________ Applicant FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 9954 -15- SPR Rev. July 2019 City of Rolling Hills DATE ____________ ZONING CASE NO. ______ ADDRESS ______________________________ ALL MEASUREMENTS TO BE TAKEN FROM THE EXTERIOR FINISHED WALLS OF STRUCTURES. ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND LISTED HERE CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE AREA AND STRUCTURES EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL NET LOT AREA ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. RESIDENCE ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. GARAGE ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. SWIMMING POOL/SPA ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. POOL EQUIPMENT ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. GUEST HOUSE ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. CABANA ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. STABLE (dirt volume to be included in grading quantities) ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES _______sq.ft. _______sq.ft. _______sq.ft. ENTRYWAY/ PORTE COCHERE, BREEZEWAYS ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ATTACHED TRELLISES ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. *DETACHED STRUCTURES: (circle all that applies) SHEDS, TRELLISES, GAZEBO, ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. BARBECUE, OUTDOOR KITCHEN, ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ROOFED PLAY EQUP.- over 15 ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. high and over 120 sq. ft. in area, WATER FEATURES, ETC. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. SERVICE YARD ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. OTHER ________________ ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. BASEMENT AREA ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. (volume to be included in grading quantities) DEPTH OF BASEMENT ________ ________ ________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ TOTAL STRUCTURES ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE ________ % ________ % ________% ___________________________________________________________________________________ TOTAL STRUCTURES EXCLUDING: up to 5 (legal) & up to 800 sq. ft. detached structures that are not higher than 12 ft. (no more ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. than 120 sq.ft. per structure per deduction, except for trellis) % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE ________ % ________ % ________% ___________________________________________________________________________________ 10055 -16- SPR Rev. July 2019 City of Rolling Hills ALL FLATWORK MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL PRIMARY DRIVEWAY(S) ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. PAVED WALKS, PATIO AREAS, COURTYARDS ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. POOL DECKING ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS, ROAD EASEMENTS, PARKING PADS ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq. ft. ____________________________________________________________________________________ TOTAL FLATWORK ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE ________ % ________ % ________ % ____________________________________________________________________________________ TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE ________ % ________ % _________ % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & structural _________ sq.ft _________ sq.ft _________ sq.ft FLATWORK COVERAGE flat work ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. Excl. the allowance of up to 5 – 800 sq. ft. structures from previous page. % TOTAL COVERAGE ________ % ________ % _________ % TOTAL DISTURBED AREA ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. ________ sq.ft. % DISTURBED AREA ________ % ________ % _________ % GRADING QUANTITY ________ cubic yards (include future stable, corral and access way; basement and all other areas to be graded/excavated) ____________________________________________________________________________________ All structures (attached and detached) must be listed. • Free standing legal, conforming accessory structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, fountains, barbecue, outdoor fire place, etc., are not counted towards coverages and disturbed area, unless their combined area exceeds 800 sq. ft., are over 120 sq.ft. in size each (except for trellis) or if there are more than 5 such structures on the property. 10156 -17- SPR Rev. July 2019 City of Rolling Hills DATE_________ Z.C. NO. _______ ADDRESS_______________________ CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BUILDABLE PAD AREA EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL AND STRUCTURES BUILDING PAD ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. RESIDENCE ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. GARAGE ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. POOL/SPA ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. POOL EQUIPMENT ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. CABANA/REC.RM ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. GUEST HOUSE ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. STABLE ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. SPORTS COURT ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. SERVICE YARD ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary residence ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. Accessory structures ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. PORCHES THAT EXCEED 10% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE/ BREEZEWAY ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ATTACHED TRELLISES ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. (from previous pages) ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. (from previous pages after excluding allowed deductions) OTHER ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE ________% ________% ________% TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. Excluding attached trellises, excluding. allowed deductions, and including the area of covered porches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence/accessory structures. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE ________% ________% _________% 10257 -18- SPR Rev. July 2019 City of Rolling Hills DATE_________ Z.C. NO. _______ ADDRESS_______________________ CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 2 BUILDABLE PAD AREA EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL AND STRUCTURES BUILDING PAD ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. RESIDENCE ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. GARAGE ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. POOL/SPA ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. POOL EQUIPMENT ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. CABANA/REC.RM ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. GUEST HOUSE ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. STABLE ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. SPORTS COURT ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. SERVICE YARD ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary residence ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. Accessory structures ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. PORCHES THAT EXCEED 10% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE/ BREEZEWAY ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ATTACHED TRELLISES ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES (from previous pages) ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES (from previous pages after excluding ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. allowed deductions) OTHER ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE ________% ________% _________% TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. ________sq.ft. Excluding attached trellises, excluding allowed deductions, and including the area of covered porches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence/accessory structures. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE ________% ________% _________% 10358 1,104.00 ft 1,088.50 ft 1,101.50 ft 1,106.30 ft 1,104.60 ft 1,102.0 ft 1,101.50 ft 1,104.30 ft 1,104.00 ft Garage 1,089.00 ft North of (P) Residence 4,464 7.0 ft At House Lanai 1,437 88 436 448 3.6 ft 4.0 ft 5.1 ft 30 Lanai 480 5.4 ft 1,775 10.2 ft 185 7.9 ft 7.8 ft 0 0 N/A N/A 0 N/A 975 3,445 967 113 975 4.0 ft 12.0 ft 3.0 ft Outter Edge of Pad Northside of Residence Pad At Driveway Northside of Residence Pad N/A N/A N/A At Lanai; West of Residence Bottom of Driveway Rear of Residence At Residence At Residence 10459 -20- SPR Rev. July 2019 City of Rolling Hills DATE______________ZONING CASE NO._____________ADDRESS_____________________ CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS THE FOLLOWING PROPOSED ELEMENTS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED WITH PLANNING APPLICATION. A complete landscaping packet, if applicable, subject to Chapter 13.18 of the RHMC shall by submitted prior to obtaining permits. PLANTING AREA 1. NEW AREA(S) TO BE LANDSCAPED _____________sq. ft 2. EXISTING LANDSCAPING TO BE ALTERED (RE- LANDSCAPED) _____________ sq. ft 3. TOTAL LANDSCAPING: NEW AND ALTERED AREAS _____________sq. ft. _________________________________________________________________________________ OTHER LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS 4. CHECK OFF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS THAT MAY BE PROPOSED, AND SHOW LOCATIONS ON PROJECT SITE PLAN: WATER FEATURE: o GARDEN WALL (less than 3-Ft tall) o SITTING WALL / BENCH o WALKWAY OR PATIO o TRELLIS, CANOPY OR SIMILAR STRUCTURE o 10560 -21- SPR Rev. July 2019 City of Rolling Hills DATE______________ZONING CASE NO._____________ADDRESS_____________________ CALCULATION OF DRIVEWAY(S) AND MOTOR COURT(S) COVERAGE; IMPERVIOUS/PERVIOUS SURFACES AND INCLUDING FIRE DEPARTMENT TURN AROUND, IF REQUIRED EXISTING TOTAL PROPOSED TOTAL DRIVEWAY(S) __________s.f. _________s.f TOTAL MOTOR COURT(S) _________s.f. _________s.f & PARKING PAD(S) AREA OF FRONT SETBACK _________s.f. AREA OF SIDE SETBACK _________s.f. AREA OF DRIVEWAY(S) _________s.f. _________s.f IN SIDE SETBACK % OF SIDE SETBACK ________% ________% COVERED BY DRIVEWAY(S) AREA OF MOTOR COURT(S) ________s.f. _________s.f & PARKING PADS IN SIDE SETBACK % OF SIDE SETBACK ________% _________% COVERED BY MOTOR COURT(S) & PARKING PAD(S) AREA OF DRIVEWAY(S) _________s.f. ________s.f. IN FRONT SETBACK % OF FRONT SETBACK ________% ________% COVERED BY DRIVEWAY(S) AREA OF MOTOR COURT(S) _________s.f. _________s.f & PARKING PADS IN FRONT SETBACK % OF FRONT SETBACK ________% ________% COVERED BY MOTOR COURT(S) & PARKING PAD(S) IMPERVIOUS SURFACE __________s.f. _________s.f. PERVIOUS SURFACE __________s.f. __________s.f. 10661 10762 10863 -24- SPR Rev. July 2019 City of Rolling Hills CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ZONING CASE CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I, ___________________________________________________, declare under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as: ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ Executed at _______________, California, this _____________day of ______________, 20 ____. ____________________________________ Signature Public:PLANNING MASTERS:City of Rolling Hills Site Plan Review Application rev. 2019.doc 10964 -25- SPR Rev. July 2019 City of Rolling Hills GUIDE TO DEVELOPER TECHNICAL INFORMATION FOR PROJECTS IN ROLLING HILLS (MS4 PERMIT) THIS GUIDE PERTAINS TO DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT STANDARDS PER THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUNICIPAL NPDES PERMIT (MS4 PERMIT), INCLUDING LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS (CHAPTER 8.32 OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE). Chapter 8.32 Storm Water Management and Pollution Control Ordinance of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code prescribe the requirements of the Municipal NPDES Permit authorized by the Federal Clean Water Act. The new regulations have replaced the previously required Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP), but are more restrictive and apply to ALL projects, regardless of size. All projects must implement an effective combination of erosion and sediment control BMPs from the Municipal NPDES Permit to prevent erosion and sediment loss, and the discharge of construction wastes. However, some projects are subject also to the Low Impact Development, (LID), requirements. LID means building or landscape features designed to retain or filter storm water runoff. Developer Technical Information for Projects subject to the requirements of the Storm Water Management Ordinance and LID criteria is posted on the City’s Website at: www.Rolling-Hills.org/index.aspx?nid=95 www.Rolling-Hills.org/DocumentCenter/View/768 www.Rolling-Hills.org/DocumentCenter/View/769 - (P. 2 of Appendix B - Rainfall depth information) Chapter 8.32 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code is provided as Attachment A to the Technical Information document above. The development community must adhere to these regulations, keep track and provide all the necessary information and documents to the City and/or City’s Building Officials in a timely manner. LID designs, if applicable, must be shown on all plans submitted to the City and be implemented in an approved manner. ALL Development and Redevelopment Projects are subject to the Municipal NPDES Permit, but some are also subject to the LID regulations. In summary, the following single-family residential and accessory structures construction is subject to the new LID regulations, (see Section 8.32.090 and 8.32.095 of Chapter 8.32): 1. Construction of new single family residential homes, equal to one acre or greater of disturbed area and adding more than ten thousand square feet of impervious area (including the house); 2. Single family hillside residential developments or redevelopments; 11065 -26- SPR Rev. July 2019 City of Rolling Hills 3. Redevelopment projects which include: (a) Land-disturbing activities which create, add, or replace ten thousand square feet or more of impervious surface area; and (b) Where Redevelopment results in an alteration to more than fifty percent of impervious surfaces of a previously existing development; (c) Where Redevelopment results in an alteration to less than fifty percent of impervious surfaces of a previously existing development, and the existing development was not subject to post-development storm water quality control requirements, only the alteration must be mitigated, and not the entire development. 4. Roadway construction with ten thousand square feet or more of impervious surface area; 5. Any New Development or Redevelopment project located in or directly adjacent to or discharging directly into a Significant Ecological Area, where the development will: (a) Discharge storm water that is likely to impact a sensitive biological species or habitat; and (b) Create two thousand five hundred square feet or more of impervious surface area. The County of Los Angeles Low Impact Development (LID) Standards Manual along with the County’s Stormwater BMP Design and Maintenance Manual should serve as the primary design manual for developers. The attached flow chart contains the general steps for developers to walk through to determine which, if any, section of the Developer Technical Information manual is relevant to their project. In addition, the Developer Planning Checklist form is to be submitted with all applications to the Planning Department. 11166 -27- SPR Rev. July 2019 City of Rolling Hills 11267 -28- SPR Rev. July 2019 City of Rolling Hills General Project Information Project Address Parcel ID Zoning/Use Code Project Developer Project Owner Owner Phone Owner address Owner email Site acreage Project acreage/disturbed area (may be less than site acreage for redevelopment projects) Existing hydrologically connected1 impervious area (ft2) Planned impervious surface area for the project (ft2) (includes building footprint as well as impervious driveways, patios, sport courts, etc.) Planned hydrologically connected1 impervious surface area for the project (ft2) Planned pervious surface area for the project (ft2) State WDID No. (if subject to Construction General Permit) Runoff Calculations for Project Site 85th percentile, 24-hour storm (inches) Project design storm (inches ) (Greater of 85th percentile, 24-hour storm and 0.75) Storm Water Quality Design volume (ft3) Percent of design storm to be retained on site Biofiltration BMPs being used ? (Yes/No) Biofiltration BMP Treatment Volume (1.5 times the SWQDv not reliably retained on site) If offsite mitigation measures will be used, the following information must be provided Design volume for water quality mitigation treatment BMPs (ft3) If flow-through water quality treatment BMPs are approved, provide the 1-year, 1-hour storm intensity (inches per hour) Percent of design storm volume to be infiltrated at off-site mitigation site Percent of design storm to be treated with biofiltration at off-site retrofit Name/address of off-site mitigation or retrofit sites GIS coordinates for off-site mitigation project BMP Specifications Permanent Structural BMP ID [provide additional columns for BMPs as necessary] BMP A BMP B (if necessary) Structural BMP Type and Description BMP Location on Site (Coordinates) BMP Location Description (or attach map) BMP Design Capture Volume (ft3) *Attach BMP design plans/specs 11368 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX ZONING CASE NO. 24-043: SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW RESIDENCE, NON-EXEMPT GRADING, STABLE ACCESS, WALLS EXCEEDING A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET AND 2.5 FEET AVERAGE (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR A DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET, STABLE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET; AND VARIANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE FRONT YARD, SITE DISTURBANCE OF MORE THAN 40 PERCENT, AND FINDING THE SAME EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LOT 29- A-EF) (LEE) THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. On May 16, 2024, an application was duly filed by Jeff Browning, SAA Interiors & Architects (“Applicant”), on behalf of the property owner, Ken Lee, with respect to real property located at 6 Chuckwagon Road, Rolling Hills (LOT 29-A-EF) requesting: Site Plan Review for construction, non-exempt grading, stable access, walls exceeding a height of 3 feet and 2.5 average (up to maximum height of 5 feet) and other improvements; Conditional Use Permits for a detached accessory structure greater than 200 square feet, stable greater than 200 square feet; and variances for construction in the front yard setback and site disturbance of more than 40 percent. Section 2. The lot is irregularly shaped having an expansive curved frontage on Chuckwagon Road. The net lot area is 1.66 acres (72,510 square feet), which excludes roadway easements and ten feet along property lines. Chuckwagon Road has a 60-foot-wide roadway easement. The property is developed presently with a 3,086 square-foot single-level residence built in 1960. Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application at a field trip meeting and regular meeting on April 15, 2025. Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application. Neighbors within a 1,000-foot radius were notified of the public hearings and a notice was published in the Daily Breeze on April 4, 2025. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail and the applicants were in attendance at the hearings. Section 4. The Project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which exempts the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including accessory structures, including but not limited to garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. Here, the proposed Project includes a new residence, retaining walls, driveway, stable/corral set aside areas, and related improvements. Accordingly, the Project qualifies for the exemption pursuant to Section 15303. Further, no exceptions to the exemption apply; there is no reasonable possibility that the activity will have a 11969 2 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. Much of the site has already been graded and developed. Section 5. Site Plan Review. Site Plan Review is required for construction of any new building or structure pursuant to Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) Section 17.46.020(A). The Project is for construction, non-exempt grading, stable access, walls exceeding a height of 3 feet and 2.5 average (up to maximum height of 5 feet) and other improvements. With respect to the Site Plan Review for the development, the Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. The Project complies with and is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and all requirements of the zoning ordinance. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan and Zoning ordinance. The proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low-density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The development is located on the existing building pad, which will reduce the visual impact from neighboring properties. The Project conforms to Zoning Code lot coverage requirements. The net lot area of the lot is 72,510 square feet (1.66 acres) per RHMC Section 17.16.060(A). The structural net lot coverage is proposed at 12,092 square feet or 16.6% (20% max. permitted) excluding exempt structures; and the total lot coverage proposed, including flatwork, would be 23,952 square feet or 33% (35% max. permitted). The disturbed area is 36,890 square feet or 50.9% (40% max permitted provided that no more than fifty percent of the slopes resulting from the grading are greater (steeper) than 3:1, or three units horizontal (run) to one unit vertical (rise). B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. Lot coverage requirements are regarded as maximums, and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted depends upon the existing buildable area of the lot. The topography and the configuration of the lot have been considered, and the project will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, buildings, or structures; the project will be on an existing building pad which enables project elements to be the least intrusive to surrounding properties. Further, the project will be a sufficient distance from nearby residences so views and privacy of surrounding neighbors will not be impacted. The lot has an existing building pad which is disturbed with the remaining area either landscaped or left in a natural state. The new residence will be sited generally within the building footprint of the previous residential structure. Additionally, the retaining walls are located in a manner that are the least visually intrusive to the property and its neighbors. C. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, and is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to new residences in 12070 3 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) the vicinity of said lot. The development plan takes into consideration the visibility of the project primarily from Chuckwagon Road. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped or landscaped. D. The project preserves and integrates into the site design, to the greatest extent possible, existing topographic features of the site, including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls). The Project will be located on an existing building pad. Additionally, there will be no significant changes to the overall drainage features on the lot. The project minimizes the need for import/export of soil by balancing cut and fill as much as possible, reducing major alterations to the natural landform. The property will also be landscaped in accordance with the approved landscape plan. E. Grading has been designed to follow natural contours of the site and to minimize the amount of grading required to create the building area. The cut and fill quantities are relatively balanced, reducing the need for excessive soil import/export, which indicates that the design works with the land rather than requiring significant reconfiguration. F. Grading will not modify existing drainage channels nor redirect drainage flow, unless such flow is redirected into an existing drainage course. The grading plan ensures that existing drainage channels remain intact, with modifications only occurring where necessary to direct flow into pre-established drainage courses. G. The project preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees and supplements these elements with drought-tolerant landscaping which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and landscaping provides a buffer or transition area between private and public areas. Surrounding native vegetation and mature trees will not be affected or will be replaced. New vegetation will be installed in accordance with the approved landscape plan. The development will be considerate of the environment and will enhance the rural character of the community. As such, the rural character of the community is maintained and privacy is maintained with neighbors. H. The project is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles. There are no changes to the existing circulation patterns for pedestrians or vehicles. The driveway will be widened and motor court enlarged to provide better vehicular circulation and more off-street parking. I. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 12171 4 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) The Project is exempt from the CEQA Guidelines pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which exempts the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including single family residence and accessory structures, including but not limited to garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. Here, the Project includes a new stable, corral, recreational game court, and guest house. Accordingly, the Project qualifies for the exemption pursuant to Section 15303. Further, no exceptions to the exemption apply; there is no reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. Much of the site has already been graded and developed. Section 6. Conditional Use Permit Findings. RHMC Section 17.16.040(A)(3,5-7) require a Conditional Use Permit for a detached accessory structure greater than 200 square feet and stable greater than 200 square feet. A stable over 200 square feet is subject to the requirements in Section 17.18.060; and an accessory structure (detached solid covered patio) over 200 square feet is subject to the requirements in Section 17.18.090. The Applicant is proposing a new 650 square foot solid covered free-standing patio and a set aside area for a 400 square-foot stable. Given the foregoing, in accordance with RHMC Section 17.42.050, the Planning Commission makes the following findings: A. That the proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for the proposed uses is consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan because the use is consistent with similar uses in the community, and meets all the applicable code development standards for such use. The Project is compatible with existing land uses as other properties in the same zone have such accessory uses. The Project is consistent with Open Space and Conservation Element Goal 2, which aims for expanded opportunities for outdoor recreation. B. That the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures have been considered, and that the use will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, building or structures. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent structures have been considered, and the Project will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed uses are located on a developed property with sufficient proximity to neighboring buildings and structures. C. That the site for the proposed conditional use is of adequate size and shape to accommodate the uses and buildings proposed. The proposed conditional uses comply with all applicable development standards in the RAS-1 Zone. The net lot area is 72,510 square feet and is adequate to support the proposed uses. The property is developed and adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed uses and buildings. 12272 5 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) D. That the proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development standards of the zone district. The proposed conditional uses comply with all applicable development standards of the RAS-1 Zone, with exception to the variances requested herein. The proposed use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. That the proposed uses are consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities because the Project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. E. That the proposed use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. Granting the proposed conditional use for the project will be consistent with the applicable portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan related to siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. The project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. The proposed project would not constitute a hazardous waste facility. F. That the proposed conditional use observes the spirit and intent of this title. The proposed project allows the Applicant the ability to enjoy rights enjoyed by other residents in the City. The proposed uses are consistent with the residential character of the City. Section 7. Variance Findings. Section 17.38.050 sets forth the required findings for granting Variances for a portion of the proposed project to be constructed in the front and rear yard setbacks for the stable and corral set aside areas. Section 17.16.040(A)(3, 5-7) permits conditional uses subject to certain requirements. The applicant is seeking relief from the Section 17.16.070(B) with regard to the amount of grading disturbance area. With respect to this request for Variances, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone. There are extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property. Unlike most properties in the RAS-1 Zone, the subject property is constrained by mostly unbuildable steep terrain and a limited building pad area. The proposed project would encroach into the required front and rear yard setbacks; however, these areas are already developed and disturbed. The future stable and corral would encroach into the front and rear yard setbacks due to the narrowness of the site caused by the roadway easement. The stable and corral would be accessed of the main driveway at Chuckwagon Road an then diverted onto the road that leads to this set aside area. 12373 6 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question. The applicant is requesting a variance from the Code to deviate by 11% for grading disturbance area beyond what is permitted for this project. Since this increase is minimal, its impact is insignificant given the property's constraints. The proposed stable and corral are situated in an area that minimizes further site disturbance. Additionally, the encroachments into the front yard setbacks with the stable and corral have been strategically placed to maximize usable space while minimizing intrusion. As a result, encroachment into both the front and rear yard setbacks is necessary. Therefore, the variance requests are essential to ensure the applicant can enjoy property rights consistent with those of neighboring properties within the same zone. C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Granting a variance for encroachment into the front and rear yard setbacks will not be detrimental to the public welfare and will not be injurious to properties in the vicinity because the encroachments into the front yard setbacks have been strategically placed to maximize usable space while minimizing intrusion. Further, the project will improve the appearance of the property by placing buildings of larger mass away from the residence. Landscaping will be provided to screen structures from Chuckwagon Road. D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed. The granting of the variance will allow for a development that is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the proposed project is visually harmonious with adjacent properties and in scale with adjacent residential development. E. That the variance does not grant special privilege to the applicant. The variance does not provide any special privileges to the applicant; the proposed project is a like-for-like development that largely maintains the siting and size of the previous building footprint. The project, together with the variance, will be compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan. F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. Granting a variance for the project will be consistent with the applicable portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan related to siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. The project site is not listed on the current State of California 12474 7 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. The proposed project would not constitute a hazardous waste facility. G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills. Approvals granting the variance to allow encroachments into the front and rear yard setbacks will be consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills, which encourages residential uses. Section 8. Based upon the foregoing findings, and the evidence in the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves Zoning Case No. 24-043 subject to the following conditions: A. Approval for the Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permits, and Variances shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval as defined in RHMC Section 17.38.070 of the Zoning Ordinance unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of this section. B. If any condition of this resolution is violated, the entitlement granted by this resolution shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse and upon receipt of written notice from the City, all construction work being performed on the subject property shall immediately cease, other than work determined by the City Manager or his/her designee required to cure the violation. The suspension and stop work order will be lifted once the Applicant cures the violation to the satisfaction of the City Manager or his/her designee. In the event that the Applicant disputes the City Manager or his/her designee’s determination that a violation exists or disputes how the violation must be cured, the Applicant may request a hearing before the City Council. The hearing shall be scheduled at the next regular meeting of the City Council for which the agenda has not yet been posted; the Applicant shall be provided written notice of the hearing. The stop work order shall remain in effect during the pendency of the hearing. The City Council shall make a determination as to whether a violation of this Resolution has occurred. If the Council determines that a violation has not occurred or has been cured by the time of the hearing, the Council will lift the suspension and the stop work order. If the Council determines that a violation has occurred and has not yet been cured, the Council shall provide the Applicant with a deadline to cure the violation; no construction work shall be performed on the property until and unless the violation is cured by the deadline, other than work designated by the Council to accomplish the cure. If the violation is not cured by the deadline, the Council may either extend the deadline at the Applicant’s request or schedule a hearing for the revocation of the entitlements granted by this Resolution pursuant to Chapter 17.58 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC). C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise a variance to such requirement has been approved. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file at City Hall and approved by the Planning Commission on April 15, 2025, except as 12575 8 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) otherwise provided in these conditions. The working drawings submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the approved development plan. All conditions of the Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permits, and Variance approvals shall be incorporated into the building permit working drawings, and where applicable complied with prior to issuance of a grading or building permit from the building department. The conditions of approval of this Resolution shall be printed onto a separate sheet and included in the building plans submitted to the Building Department for review and shall be kept on site at all times. Any proposed modifications and/or changes to the approved project, including resulting from field conditions, shall be discussed with staff so that staff can determine whether the modification is minor or major in nature. Minor modifications are subject to approval by the City Manager or his or her designee. Major modifications are subject to approval by the Planning Commissioner after a public hearing. Applicant shall not implement modifications or changes to the approved project without the appropriate approval from the City Manager or designee or the Planning Commission, as required. E. Prior to submittal of final working drawings to Building and Safety Department for issuance of building and grading permits, the plans for the project shall be submitted to City staff for verification that the final plans are in compliance with the plans approved by the Planning Commission. F. A licensed professional preparing construction plans for this project for Building Department review shall execute a Certificate affirming that the plans conform in all respects to this Resolution approving this project and all of the conditions set forth herein and the City’s Building Code and Zoning Ordinance. Further, the person obtaining a building and/or grading permit for this project shall execute a Certificate of Construction stating that the project will be constructed according to this Resolution and any plans approved therewith. G. Structural lot coverage of the lot shall not exceed 21,737 square feet or 14.3% of the net lot area (20% maximum). The flatwork coverage is 12,092 square feet or 16.6%. The total lot coverage proposed, including structures and flatwork, shall not exceed 23,952 square feet or 33% (35% maximum). H. The lot is already developed and the total disturbed area will be 36,890 square feet or 50.9% (maximum 50% permitted provided that no more than fifty percent of the slopes resulting from the grading are greater (steeper) than 3:1, or three units horizontal (run) to one unit vertical (rise). Grading for this project shall not exceed 4,464 cubic yards of cut and 3,445 cubic yards of fill for a total of 7,909 cubic yards with 1,019 cubic yard being exempt export. I. The total proposed building pad net coverage for the residential main pad is 13,760 square feet or 19%, which meets the 30% maximum guideline. 12676 9 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) J. A driveway access shall be provided per the Fire Department requirements and the driveway shall be roughened and the first 20 feet of the driveway shall not exceed 7% in slope. K. Access to the stable and to the corral shall be decomposed granite or 100% pervious roughened material; it shall not be wider than 12 feet. L. A minimum of five-foot level path and/or walkway, which does not have to be paved, shall be provided around the entire perimeter of all of the proposed structures or as otherwise required by the Fire Department. M. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Low Impact Development requirements for storm water management on site (RHMC Chapter 8.32). N. Hydrology, soils, geology and other reports, as required by the Building and Public Works Departments, and as may be required by the Building Official, shall be prepared. O. Prior to issuance of a final construction approval of the project, all graded slopes shall be landscaped. Prior to issuance of building permit, the landscaping plan shall meet the requirements of the City, shall be submitted to the City in conformance with Fire Department Fuel Modification requirements, and shall be approved by the City’s landscape consultant. P. The project shall be landscaped, and continually maintained in substantial conformance with the landscaping plan on file approved by the City’s landscape consultant. A detailed landscaping plan shall provide that any trees and shrubs used in the landscaping scheme for this project shall be planted in a way that screens the project development from adjacent streets and neighbors, such that shrubs and trees as they mature do not grow into a hedge or impede any neighbors’ views and the plan shall provide that all landscaping be maintained at a height no higher than the roof line of the nearest project structure. In addition, the landscaping plan shall provide for screening of development with vegetation not to exceed 10 feet in height, and that the vegetation used for screening shall be planted in an off-set manner, so as to prevent it, as it grows from forming a solid hedge. The landscaping plan shall utilize to the maximum extent feasible, plants that are native to the area, are water-wise and are consistent with the rural character of the community. Plants listed as high hazardous plants under RHMC Section 8.30.015 are prohibited. Q. The applicant shall submit a landscaping performance bond or other financial obligation, to be kept on deposit by the City, in the amount of the planting plus irrigation plus 15%. The bond shall be released no sooner than two years after completion of all plantings, subject to a City staff determination that the plantings required for the project are in substantial conformance with approved plans and are in good condition. A Certificate of Completion shall be submitted by the project designer or contractor prior to final landscape installation inspection. R. The landscaping shall be subject to the requirements of the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, (Chapter 13.18 of the RHMC). 12777 10 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) S. Pursuant to Chapter 8.30 of the RHMC, the property shall at all times be maintained free of dead trees and vegetation. T. The setback lines and roadway easement lines in the vicinity of the construction for this project shall remain staked throughout the construction. A construction fence may be required. U. Perimeter easements, including roadway easements and trails, if any, shall remain free and clear of any improvements to advance equestrian use and emergency preparedness for evacuation within the City. Where RHCA has demonstrated authority over the easement, the City’s Planning Director may grant relief from this condition upon satisfactory proof of permission from RHCA and a legitimate showing that there is no need for the condition to advance equestrian uses and emergency preparedness. V. Minimum of 65% of any construction materials must be recycled or diverted from landfills. The hauler of the materials shall obtain City’s Construction and Demolition permits for waste hauling prior to start of work and provide proper documentation to the City. W. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, storm water pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required. X. During construction, to the extent feasible, all parking shall take place on the project site, on the new driveway and, if necessary, any overflow parking may take place within the unimproved roadway easements along adjacent streets, and shall not obstruct neighboring driveways, visibility at intersections or pedestrian and equestrian passage. During construction, to the maximum extent feasible, employees of the contractor shall car-pool into the City. To the extent feasible, a minimum of 4’ wide path, from the edge of the roadway pavement, for pedestrian and equestrian passage shall be available and be clear of vehicles, construction materials and equipment at all times. Y. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and relate traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. Z. Prior to demolition of the existing structures, an investigation shall be conducted for the presence of hazardous chemicals, lead-based paints or products, mercury and asbestos- containing materials (ACMs). If hazardous chemicals, lead-based paints or products, mercury or ACMs are identified, remediation shall be undertaken in compliance with California environmental regulations and policies. AA. The property owner and/or his/her contractor/applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the no-smokin g provisions in the Municipal Code. The contractor shall not use tools that could produce a spark, including for clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning 12878 11 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) conditions. Weather conditions can be found at: http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/lox/main.php?suite=safety&page=hazard_definitions#FIRE. It is the sole responsibility of the property owner and/or his/her contractor to monitor the red flag warning conditions. AB. Development shall drain in accordance with the approved grading and drainage plan. Drainage dissipaters shall be constructed outside of any easements. The drainage system shall be approved by the Department of Building and Safety. If an above ground swale and/or dissipater is required, it shall be designed in such a manner as not to cross over any equestrian trails or discharge water onto a trail, shall be stained in an earth tone color, and shall be screened from any trail, road and neighbors’ view to the maximum extent practicable, without impairing the function of the drainage system. AC. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices. AD. During construction, an Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 2022 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control storm water pollution. AE. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of storm water drainage facilities and septic tank. AF. The applicant shall pay all of the applicable Building and Safety and Public Works Department fees and Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District fees, if any. AG. Prior to final inspection of the project, “as graded” and “as constructed” plans and certifications shall be provided to the Planning Department and the Building Department to ascertain that the completed project is in compliance with the Planning Commission approved plans. In addition, any modifications made to the project during construction, shall be depicted on the “as built/as graded” plan. AH. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of the Variance approval, or the approval shall not be effective. AI. All conditions of this Resolution, when applicable, must be complied with prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit from the Building and Safety Department. AJ. Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. AK. To the extent permitted by law, Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Rolling Hills, its City Council, its officers, employees and agents (the 12979 12 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) “indemnified parties”) from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void any permit or approval for this project authorized by the City, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorney’s fees and costs in defense of the litigation. The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its choice. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this permit. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. AM. The future stable and corral shall comply with all requirements in Sections 17.18.060 and 17.18.090, unless otherwise approved herein. AN. New landscaping in the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA) easement is prohibited unless previously approved by RHCA. Landscaping not approved by RHCA in the easement shall be removed from the final landscape plan. 13080 13 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15th DAY OF APRIL, 2025. BRAD CHELF, CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: ____________________________________ CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 13181 14 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025-XX entitled: ZONING CASE NO. 24-043: SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW RESIDENCE, NON-EXEMPT GRADING, STABLE ACCESS, WALLS EXCEEDING A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET AND 2.5 FEET AVERAGE (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR A DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET, STABLE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET; AND VARIANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE FRONT YARD, SITE DISTURBANCE OF MORE THAN 40 PERCENT, AND FINDING THE SAME EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LOT 29- A-EF) (LEE) was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on December 17, 2024, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. __________________________________ CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK 13282 April 14, 2025 Paul and Stephanie Reisz 4 Chuckwagon Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 City of Rolling Hills Chair and Members of the Planning Commission 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Dear Chair and Members of the Planning Commission, Thank you for your review of the proposed new home next door to us at 6 Chuckwagon. We appreciate your time protecting the values of Rolling Hills by mandating that projects minimize impacts to neighbors when possible. We bought our home four years ago because of the environment and privacy offered by the Rolling Hills community. Our purchase also was partially due to the large separation between our home and the existing home on the property. The silhouette clearly shows how unreasonably close the new home will be to ours. As this proposal is for a new home at 6 Chuckwagon, we do not understand why it cannot be placed closer to the middle of the lot and help preserve our privacy. As proposed, nearly the entire structure is on the east half of the lot. We realize that there is a slope on the western portion of the lot, but the design currently provides for 75 feet of flat area west of the home. Rather than shove the home almost against the side setback, and the driveway/parking area into the setback, the home could be shifted into this flat area. Exhibit #1 shows they would still have significant outdoor areas by shifting the home to the west by 35 feet. The proximity of the proposed driveway and parking area to our home creates concerns related to the noise from the cars and the lights from them shining into our master bedroom. As mentioned, the driveway and parking areas are in the side 13383 setback, and on ground 19 feet above the floor of our home. Noise and lights from the cars will impact our privacy as shown on Exhibit #2. If the house is moved away from our property, we would support the driveway and parking area if they were similarly moved. We are fully in support of the location of the stable and corral on the west side of the 6 Chuckwagon property. We are confused as the staff report references a proposed stable and the required Conditional Use Permit, but only a conceptual location is shown on Sheet 3 of the Bolton Engineering drawings. We are in support of this location for the stable and corral, but would want the city’s review to be of detailed plans that would allow for a solid approval. Our concern is that a lack of details could result in a flawed approval that could somehow result in the stable and corral being moved to our side of the lot. We want to be absolutely certain that never happens. Finally, we are concerned that vegetation planted to the north of the home could grow up into our ocean views. We would ask for a condition of approval to be added that limits the vegetation to a reasonable height, maybe 16 feet in height. Thank you very much for your time, Paul and Stephanie Reisz 13484 Exhibit #1 13585 Exhibit #2 13686 13787 From: Amy Josefek <amy@josefekassoc.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 11:46 AM To: Planning <Planning@cityofrh.net> Subject: Re: 6 Chuckwagon Road, Zoning Case No. 24-043 EXTERNAL EMAIL - This email was sent by a person from outside your organization. Exercise caution when clicking links, opening attachments or taking further action, before validating its authenticity. Hello Planning Commissioners, I write to you in response to plans I've seen for 6 Chuckwagon Road. While I'm one property away from that one, I must confess some concern for the plan there... Seeing how very close to the property line is the placement shown for a new garage. But I guess that's a far less problematic option than having a stable erected in that same location. I'd been told that a stable will be a part of this redevelopment plan; I don't see it specified on the drawings and just would want to make sure that, if it were built, it would be placed on the other end of the property, adjacent to the Lower Willow Springs Trail. A stable adjacent to 4 Chuckwagon would have an outsized, unfortunate effect on the neighbors next door (and quite likely, on my property, as well); there's no way to avoid the unmistakable smell from a stable. In this case, it would be terribly close, not only to bedroom windows, but to the backyard (pool) area, as well. Fwiw, I love living in this community where it's a normal event to look out and see/ hear a beautiful horse with rider, walking along the street. Thank you for the consideration of all neighbors in our community. Amy Josefek 2 Chuckwagon Road 13888 Agenda Item No.: 10.B Mtg. Date: 05/20/2025 TO:HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM:REINA SCHAETZL, WILDAN CONSULTANT PRINCIPAL PLANNER THRU:KARINA BAÑALES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 24-043: SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW RESIDENCE, NON-EXEMPT GRADING, STABLE ACCESS, WALLS EXCEEDING A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET AND 2.5 FEET AVERAGE (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR A DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET, STABLE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET; AND VARIANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE FRONT YARD, SITE DISTURBANCE OF MORE THAN 40 PERCENT, AND FILL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 2:1, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR THE LOCATION AT 6 CHUCKWAGON ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (LOT 29-A- EF) (LEE) DATE:May 20, 2025 BACKGROUND: Planning Commission Morning Field Trip The project was originally scheduled for presentation to the Planning Commission on April 15, 2025. All Commissioners were present at the evening meeting, with the exception of Vice Chair Gregg Kirkpatrick, who had an excused absence. Attendees of the morning field trip included: James Aichele (14 Crest Road West) Judith Haenel (31 Eastfield Drive) Stephanie Reisz (4 Chuckwagon Road) Allan Rigg (6415 Via Canada, Rancho Palos Verdes) Kathryn Bishop (Rolling Hills Community Association) Leah Mirsch (4 Cinchring Road) James Donelson (1 Chuckwagon Road) 4889 No members of the project team were present at the field trip. During the visit, the Commission and members of the public walked the subject property and asked questions of staff. Upon inspection, staff observed that the property included a slope that appeared steeper than 2:1. Planning Commission Evening Meeting At the evening meeting, City Manager Bañales announced that, based on the steep terrain observed during the morning field visit and a subsequent review of the project plans, the public noticing for the item did not comply with Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) Section 15.04.120. As a result, the item was pulled from the agenda and will be re-noticed for a future meeting. Victor Lockett (Job Captain, SAA Interiors & Architects), representing the project, was in attendance at the evening meeting. DISCUSSION: The lot is an irregular rectangular shaped parcel zoned RAS-1 and the net lot area is 72,510 square feet (1.66 acres). The subject property is currently developed with a 3,086 square-foot single-family residence and 400 square-foot attached garage. There is one main building pad totaling 19,200 square feet in area and has one access driveway from Chuckwagon Road measuring 50 feet wide (see Attachment 3). Applicant Requests. On May 16, 2024, an application was duly filed by Jeff Browning, SAA Interiors & Architects (“Applicant”), on behalf of the property owner, Ken Lee, with respect to real property located at 6 Chuckwagon Road, Rolling Hills (LOT 29-A-EF) requesting: Site Plan Review for construction of a new 6,939 square-foot residence, stable access, walls exceeding a height of 3 feet and 2.5 average (up to maximum height of 5 feet) and other improvements; Conditional Use Permits for a 650 square-foot detached solid-cover patio exceeding more than 200 square feet, future stable greater than 200 square feet (400 SF); and Variances for construction in the front yard setback, site disturbance of more than 40 percent and fill slopes steeper than 2:1. The Project also includes a 790 square-foot pool with 40 square-foot pool equipment enclosure, a 1,322 square-foot attached garage, and 2,877 square-foot basement. On May 6, 2025, staff conveyed the issues discussed at the April 15, 2025 field trip with the Applicant, including the large size of the house and garage. Additionally, staff informed the Applicant that the steep slope of the lot was not properly noticed for the public hearing. Staff also shared the comments from the neighbors with the Applicant, which included the configuration and location of the driveway. The Applicant was receptive to the feedback but desired to proceed with their original application. Subsequently, staff prepared a revised notice for the May 20, 2025 Planning Commission meeting. Site Plan Review The Rolling Hills Municipal Code requires a Site Plan Review for construction of any new building or structure pursuant to RHMC Section 17.46.020.A(2), requires grading pursuant to RHMC Section 17.46.020.3(a), and walls above three feet shall be subject to site plan review pursuant to RHMC Section 17.16.190(F). The Project proposes a one-story, new single-family residence a new six-car attached garage with a basement. The existing main residence is 4990 3,086 square feet and will add 3,853 square feet for a total of 6,939 square feet. A Site Plan Review is also requested for retaining Walls A-D over three feet, not to exceed 5’ high, located along the main driveway, stable access road, and at the rear of the property. Conditional Use Permit The Applicant is proposing a 650-square-foot detached roofed patio structure subject to RHMC Section 17.16.040(A)(3) and requires a Conditional Use Permit because the patio cover exceeds 200 square feet. Additionally, a stable exceeding 200 square feet is being proposed and is subject to the conditions outlined in RHMC Section 17.18.060. Variances Since the Project requires site disturbance more than the allowable 40% of the net lot area, a variance is being requested to deviate from these provisions to permit a larger buildable area given that the gross area of the lot is 100,623 square feet and the net lot area is 72,508 square feet. Additionally, the encroachments into the front yard setbacks with the stable and corral have been placed in manner intended to maximize usable space while minimizing intrusion. As a result, encroachment into the front yard setback is necessary, which requires a variance. Finally, a variance is needed because the applicant is requesting fill slopes steeper than 1 unit vertical to 2 horizontal units in order to construct the garage. Therefore, the three variance requests are essential to ensure the applicant can enjoy property rights consistent with those of neighboring properties within the same zone. MUNICIPAL CODE COMPLIANCE Setbacks The project complies with the remainder of the required setbacks in the RAS-1 Zone, with the exception of the set-aside areas for the stable and corral. The applicant has requested a variance, as discussed above for the location of the corral area. Disturbance The applicant is requesting a variance from the Code to deviate by 37.9% for grading disturbance area beyond what is permitted for this project. The disturbed area is 56,500 square feet or 77.9% (40% max permitted, provided that no more than fifty percent of the slopes resulting from the grading are greater (steeper) than 3:1, or three units horizontal (run) to one unit vertical (rise). However, existing land disturbance totals 53,500 square feet and will increase by 3,000 square feet. Since this increase is somewhat significant, Staff asks the Commission to consider this impact on the natural terrain and as discussed in the section above regarding variances. Lot Coverage and Building Pad Coverage The Project conforms to Zoning Code lot coverage requirements. The net lot area of the property is 72,508 square feet (1.66 acres) per RHMC Section 17.16.060(A). The structural net lot coverage is proposed at 10,912 square feet or 15.04% (20% max. permitted), excluding exempt structures, and the total lot coverage proposed, including flatwork, would be 23,952 square feet or 33% (35% max. permitted). Building Pad #1 is a total of 19,200 square-feet. The existing Building Pad #1 Coverage with deductions is 3,486 square feet or 18%, and with an increase of 7,605 square feet or 37.5%, the total proposed Building Pad Coverage with 5091 deductions is 11,091 square feet or 55.6%, this exceeds the maximum 30% guideline (RHMC Section 17.16.097) by 25.6%. Neighbor Concerns In response to the first public hearing notice mailed for the April 15, 2025 Planning Commission meeting, staff received comments from Stephanie & Paul Reisz, the residents at 4 Chuckwagon Road. On April 7, 2025, Mrs. Reisz called the City to express her concerns regarding the proposed barn location in the front yard and setback. She was concerned about the proximity of the barn to her bedroom window. Paul and Stephanie Reisz subsequently submitted a letter expressing their concerns (see Attachment 7). Additionally, the City received an email on April 15, 2025 from Amy Josefek regarding the placement of the stable (see Attachment 8). On April 22, 2025, staff received comments from Allan Rigg regarding the project (see Attachment 9). In response to the revised second public hearing notice for the May 20, 2025 Planning Commission meeting, Allan Rigg has resubmitted the same letter. Paul and Stephanie Reisz resubmitted their concerns via email as well (see Attachment 7). Review by RHCA The Rolling Hills Community Association had concerns about the effect of the project on the adjacent RHCA easements (see Attachment 10). Environmental Review The Project has been determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which exempts the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including single family residence and accessory structures, including but not limited to garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. Attachment 6 is a draft resolution of approval. If the Planning Commission is inclined to approve the project, staff recommends adoption of Resolution 2024-05 or provide alternative direction to staff. FISCAL IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: Open the public hearing, take public testimony, close the public hearing, discuss the proposed project, and provide direction to staff and applicants. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: PL_ADR_250409_6ChuckwagonRoad_RadiusMap_05.20.25PCMeeting.pdf Attachment 2: PL_ADR_6ChuckwagonRd_ZC24-043_Arch SitePlan.pdf Attachment 3_PL_ADR_6ChuckwagonRd_ZC24-043_VicinityMap_Google.pdf Attachment 4: PL_ADR_6 Chuckwagon Rd_ZC24-053_DevelopmentTable.pdf Attachment 5: PL_ADR_6ChuckwagonRd_ZC24-043_LandscapePlan_F.pdf Attachment 6: PL_ADR_6 Chuckwagon Rd_ZC24-053_PC Resolution_D.pdf Attachment 7: PL_ADR_6ChuckwagonRd_ZC24-043_4 Chuckwagon Letter.pdf Attachment 8: PL_ADR_6ChuckwagonRd_ZC24-043_2 Chuckwagon Letter.pdf Attachment 9: PL_ADR_6ChuckwagonRd_ZC24-043_Allan Rigg Letter.pdf 5192 Attachment 10: PL_ADR_6ChuckwagonRd_ZC24-043_RHCA Letter.pdf Attachment 11: CL_PBN_250520_PH_PC_16Caballeros_6Chuckwagon_Affidavit.pdf PL_ADR_6ChuckwagonRd_ZC04-043_House_BasementSF.pdf 5293 City of Rolling Hills ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 TITLE VICINITY MAP CASE NO. Zoning Case No. 24-043 Conditional Use Permit, Variance, & Site Plan Review OWNER Lee ADDRESS 6 Chuckwagon Road, Rolling Hills 90274 SITE 1000’ 5394 *EXCLUDING: up to 5 (legal) & up to 800 sq. ft. detached structures that are not higher than 12 ft. (no more than 120 sq.ft. per structure per deduction, except for trellis) Development Table Zoning Case No. 24-043 6 Chuckwagon Road SITE PLAN REVIEW, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT & VARIANCE EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL Net Lot Area 72,508 SF 0 SF 72,508 SF Residence 3,086 SF 3,853 SF 6,939 SF Garage 400 SF 922 SF 1,322 SF Swimming Pools/Spa SF 790 SF 790 SF Pool Equipment SF 0 SF SF Guest House 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF Cabana 0 SF 498 SF 498 SF Stable 0 SF 400 SF 400 SF Recreation Court 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF Attached Covered Porches 0 SF 9,500 SF 9,500 SF Entryway/Porte Cochere, Breezeways 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF Attached Trellises 0 SF 0 SF 0 SF Detached Structures: Trellises 0 SF 650 SF 650 SF Service Yard 0 SF 40 SF 40 SF Basement Area Depth of Basement 0 SF 0 FT 2,877 SF 15 FT 2,877 SF 15 FT Primary Driveway 2,600 SF 3,800 SF 6,400 SF Paved Walkways, Patio Areas, Courtyards 1,500 SF -100 SF 1,400 SF Pool Decking 0 SF 2,300 SF 2,300 SF Other Paved Driveways, Road Easements, Parking Pads 4,400 SF -1,100 SF 3,300 SF Grading (balanced onsite) 0 CY 4,464 CY CUT 3,445 CY FILL 1,019 Export (Exempt pool/basement) 7,909 CY TO TAL *Structural Lot Coverage (25% maximum with deductions) 3,486 SF (4.8%) 10,472 SF (14.4%) 10,912 SF (19.5%) Flatwork Lot Coverage (35% maximum) 8,500 SF (11.7%) 2,700 SF (3.7%) 11,200 SF (15.4%) *Total Lot Coverage (Structures and Flatwork) (35% maximum with deductions) 11,986 SF (16.5%) 11,996 SF (16.5%) 23,952 SF (33%) Total Disturbed Area (40% maximum) 53,500 SF (73.8%) 3,000 SF (4.1%) 56,500 SF (77.9%) *Building Pad 1 (19,200 SF) (30% Maximum Guideline) 3,486 STRUCTURE AREA (18%) 7,605 SF STRUCTURE AREA (39.6%) 11,091 SF STRUCTURE AREA (57.7%) 6995 1 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF ZONING CASE NO. 24-043: SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW RESIDENCE, NON-EXEMPT GRADING, STABLE ACCESS, WALLS EXCEEDING A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET AND 2.5 FEET AVERAGE (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR A DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET, STABLE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET; AND VARIANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE FRONT YARD, SITE DISTURBANCE OF MORE THAN 40 PERCENT, AND FILL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 2:1, AND FINDING THE PROJECT CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LOT 29- A-EF) (LEE) THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. On May 16, 2024, an application was duly filed by Jeff Browning, SAA Interiors & Architects (“Applicant”), on behalf of the property owner, Ken Lee, with respect to real property located at 6 Chuckwagon Road, Rolling Hills (LOT 29-A-EF) requesting: Site Plan Review for construction, non-exempt grading, stable access, walls exceeding a height of 3 feet and 2.5 average (up to maximum height of 5 feet) and other improvements; Conditional Use Permits for a detached accessory structure greater than 200 square feet, stable greater than 200 square feet; and variances for construction in the front yard setback, site disturbance of more than 40 percent and fill slopes steeper than 2:1. Section 2. The lot is irregularly shaped having an expansive curved frontage on Chuckwagon Road. The net lot area is 1.66 acres (72,510 square feet), which excludes roadway easements and ten feet along property lines. Chuckwagon Road has a 60-foot-wide roadway easement. The property is developed presently with a 3,086 square-foot single-level residence built in 1960. Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application at a field trip meeting and regular meeting on April 15, 2025. Neighbors within a 1,000-foot radius were notified of the public hearings and a notice was published in the Daily Breeze on April 4, 2025. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail and the applicant was in attendance at the evening hearing. City Staff noted that the public noticing for the item was not in compliance per Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) Section 15.04.120 and advised that staff revise the notice and the Planning Commission schedule the item for a future meeting. Section 4. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application at a field trip meeting and regular meeting on May 20, 2025. Neighbors within a 1,000-foot radius were notified of the public hearings and a notice was published in the Daily Breeze on May 10, 2025. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail and the applicant was in attendance at the evening hearing. 7596 2 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) Section 5. The Project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which exempts the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including accessory structures, including but not limited to garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. Here, the proposed Project includes a new residence, retaining walls, driveway, stable/corral set aside areas, and related improvements. Accordingly, the Project qualifies for the exemption pursuant to Section 15303. Further, no exceptions to the exemption apply; there is no reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. Much of the site has already been graded and developed. Section 6. Site Plan Review. Site Plan Review is required for construction of any new building or structure pursuant to Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC) Section 17.46.020(A). The Project is for construction, non-exempt grading, stable access, walls exceeding a height of 3 feet and 2.5 average (up to maximum height of 5 feet) and other improvements. With respect to the Site Plan Review for the development, the Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. The Project complies with and is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and all requirements of the zoning ordinance. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan and Zoning ordinance. The proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low-density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The development is located on the existing building pad, which will reduce the visual impact from neighboring properties. The Project conforms to Zoning Code lot coverage requirements. The net lot area of the lot is 72,510 square feet (1.66 acres) per RHMC Section 17.16.060(A). The structural net lot coverage is proposed at 12,092 square feet or 16.6% (20% max. permitted) excluding exempt structures; and the total lot coverage proposed, including flatwork, would be 23,952 square feet or 33% (35% max. permitted). The disturbed area is 36,890 square feet or 50.9% (40% max permitted provided that no more than fifty percent of the slopes resulting from the grading are greater (steeper) than 3:1, or three units horizontal (run) to one unit vertical (rise). B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. Lot coverage requirements are regarded as maximums, and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted depends upon the existing buildable area of the lot. The topography and the configuration of the lot have been considered, and the project will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to adjacent uses, buildings, or structures; the project will be on an existing building pad which enables project elements to be the least intrusive to surrounding properties. Further, the project will be a sufficient distance from nearby residences so views and privacy of surrounding neighbors will not be impacted. The lot has an existing building pad which is disturbed with the remaining area either landscaped or left in a natural state. The new residence will be sited generally within the building footprint of the 7697 3 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) previous residential structure. Additionally, the retaining walls are located in a manner that are the least visually intrusive to the property and its neighbors. C. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, and is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to new residences in the vicinity of said lot. The development plan takes into consideration the visibility of the project primarily from Chuckwagon Road. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped or landscaped. D. The project preserves and integrates into the site design, to the greatest extent possible, existing topographic features of the site, including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls). The Project will be located on an existing building pad. Additionally, there will be no significant changes to the overall drainage features on the lot. The project minimizes the need for import/export of soil by balancing cut and fill as much as possible, reducing major alterations to the natural landform. The property will also be landscaped in accordance with the approved landscape plan. E. Grading has been designed to follow natural contours of the site and to minimize the amount of grading required to create the building area. The cut and fill quantities are relatively balanced, reducing the need for excessive soil import/export, which indicates that the design works with the land rather than requiring significant reconfiguration. F. Grading will not modify existing drainage channels nor redirect drainage flow, unless such flow is redirected into an existing drainage course. The grading plan ensures that existing drainage channels remain intact, with modifications only occurring where necessary to direct flow into pre-established drainage courses. G. The project preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees and supplements these elements with drought-tolerant landscaping which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and landscaping provides a buffer or transition area between private and public areas. Surrounding native vegetation and mature trees will not be affected or will be replaced. New vegetation will be installed in accordance with the approved landscape plan. The development will be considerate of the environment and will enhance the rural character of the community. As such, the rural character of the community is maintained and privacy is maintained with neighbors. H. The project is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles. 7798 4 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) There are no changes to the existing circulation patterns for pedestrians or vehicles. The driveway will be widened and motor court enlarged to provide better vehicular circulation and more off-street parking. I. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Project is exempt from the CEQA Guidelines pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which exempts the construction and location of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures, including single family residence and accessory structures, including but not limited to garages, carports, patios, swimming pools and fences. Here, the Project includes a new stable, corral, recreational game court, and guest house. Accordingly, the Project qualifies for the exemption pursuant to Section 15303. Further, no exceptions to the exemption apply; there is no reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. Much of the site has already been graded and developed. Section 7. Conditional Use Permit Findings. RHMC Section 17.16.040(A)(3,5-7) require a Conditional Use Permit for a detached accessory structure greater than 200 square feet and stable greater than 200 square feet. A stable over 200 square feet is subject to the requirements in Section 17.18.060; and an accessory structure (detached solid covered patio) over 550 square feet is subject to the requirements in Section 17.18.090. The Applicant is proposing a new 650 square foot solid covered free-standing patio and a set aside area for a 450 square-foot stable. Given the foregoing, in accordance with RHMC Section 17.42.050, the Planning Commission makes the following findings: A. That the proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for the proposed uses is consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan because the use is consistent with similar uses in the community, and meets all the applicable code development standards for such use. The Project is compatible with existing land uses as other properties in the same zone have such accessory uses. The Project is consistent with Open Space and Conservation Element Goal 2, which aims for expanded opportunities for outdoor recreation. B. That the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures have been considered, and that the use will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, building or structures. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent structures have been considered, and the Project will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed uses are located on a developed property with sufficient proximity to neighboring buildings and structures. C. That the site for the proposed conditional use is of adequate size and shape to accommodate the uses and buildings proposed. 7899 5 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) The proposed conditional uses comply with all applicable development standards in the RAS-1 Zone. The net lot area is 72,510 square feet and is adequate to support the proposed uses. The property is developed and adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed uses and buildings.That the proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development standards of the zone district. The proposed conditional uses comply with all applicable development standards of the RAS-1 Zone, with exception to the variances requested herein. The proposed use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. That the proposed uses are consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities because the Project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. D. That the proposed use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. Granting the proposed conditional use for the project will be consistent with the applicable portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan related to siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. The project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. The proposed project would not constitute a hazardous waste facility. E. That the proposed conditional use observes the spirit and intent of this title. The proposed project allows the Applicant the ability to enjoy rights enjoyed by other residents in the City. The proposed uses are consistent with the residential character of the City. Section 8. Variance Findings. Section 17.38.050 sets forth the required findings for granting Variances for a portion of the proposed project to be constructed in the front and rear yard setbacks for the stable and corral set aside areas. Section 17.16.040(A)(3, 5-7) permits conditional uses subject to certain requirements. The applicant is seeking relief from the Section 17.16.070(B) with regard to the amount of grading disturbance area. With respect to this request for Variances, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone. There are extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property. Unlike most properties in the RAS-1 Zone, the subject property is constrained by mostly unbuildable steep terrain and a limited building pad area. The proposed project would encroach into the required front and rear yard setbacks; however, these areas are already developed and disturbed. The future stable and corral would encroach into the front and rear yard setbacks due to the narrowness 79100 6 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) of the site caused by the roadway easement. The stable and corral would be accessed off the main driveway at Chuckwagon Road and then diverted onto the road that leads to this set aside area. B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question. The applicant is requesting a variance from the Code to deviate by 11% for grading disturbance area beyond what is permitted for this project. Since this increase is minimal, its impact is insignificant given the property's constraints. The proposed stable and corral are situated in an area that minimizes further site disturbance. Additionally, the encroachments into the front yard setbacks with the stable and corral have been strategically placed to maximize usable space while minimizing intrusion. As a result, encroachment into both the front and rear yard setbacks is necessary. Therefore, the variance requests are essential to ensure the applicant can enjoy property rights consistent with those of neighboring properties within the same zone. C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Granting a variance for encroachment into the front and rear yard setbacks will not be detrimental to the public welfare and will not be injurious to properties in the vicinity because the encroachments into the front yard setbacks have been strategically placed to maximize usable space while minimizing intrusion. Further, the project will improve the appearance of the property by placing buildings of larger mass away from the residence. Landscaping will be provided to screen structures from Chuckwagon Road. D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed. In granting the variance, the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code will be observed. The City’s Zoning Code ensures that the growth and development of the City is orderly, attractive, and enhances the rural character of the community. The proposed stable and corral add to the attractiveness of the property, are visually harmonious with the community, and are at scale with adjacent residential development. E. That the variance does not grant special privilege to the applicant. The variance does not provide any special privileges to the applicant; the proposed project is similar development that largely maintains the siting of the previous building footprint. The project, together with the variance, will be compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan. F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. 80101 7 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) Granting a variance for the project will be consistent with the applicable portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan related to siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. The project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. The proposed project would not constitute a hazardous waste facility. G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills. Approvals granting the variance to allow encroachments into the front and rear yard setbacks will be consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills, which encourages residential uses. Section 9. Based upon the foregoing findings, and the evidence in the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves Zoning Case No. 24-043 subject to the following conditions: A. Approval for the Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permits, and Variances shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval as defined in RHMC Section 17.38.070 of the Zoning Ordinance unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of this section. B. If any condition of this resolution is violated, the entitlement granted by this resolution shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse and upon receipt of written notice from the City, all construction work being performed on the subject property shall immediately cease, other than work determined by the City Manager or his/her designee required to cure the violation. The suspension and stop work order will be lifted once the Applicant cures the violation to the satisfaction of the City Manager or his/her designee. In the event that the Applicant disputes the City Manager or his/her designee’s determination that a violation exists or disputes how the violation must be cured, the Applicant may request a hearing before the City Council. The hearing shall be scheduled at the next regular meeting of the City Council for which the agenda has not yet been posted; the Applicant shall be provided written notice of the hearing. The stop work order shall remain in effect during the pendency of the hearing. The City Council shall make a determination as to whether a violation of this Resolution has occurred. If the Council determines that a violation has not occurred or has been cured by the time of the hearing, the Council will lift the suspension and the stop work order. If the Council determines that a violation has occurred and has not yet been cured, the Council shall provide the Applicant with a deadline to cure the violation; no construction work shall be performed on the property until and unless the violation is cured by the deadline, other than work designated by the Council to accomplish the cure. If the violation is not cured by the deadline, the Council may either extend the deadline at the Applicant’s request or schedule a hearing for the revocation of the entitlements granted by this Resolution pursuant to Chapter 17.58 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code (RHMC). C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise a variance to such requirement has been approved. 81102 8 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file at City Hall and approved by the Planning Commission on May 20, 2025, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. The working drawings submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the approved development plan. All conditions of the Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permits, and Variance approvals shall be incorporated into the building permit working drawings, and where applicable complied with prior to issuance of a grading or building permit from the building department. The conditions of approval of this Resolution shall be printed onto a separate sheet and included in the building plans submitted to the Building Department for review and shall be kept on site at all times. Any proposed modifications and/or changes to the approved project, including resulting from field conditions, shall be discussed with staff so that staff can determine whether the modification is minor or major in nature. Minor modifications are subject to approval by the City Manager or his or her designee. Major modifications are subject to approval by the Planning Commission after a public hearing. Applicant shall not implement modifications or changes to the approved project without the appropriate approval from the City Manager or designee or the Planning Commission, as required. D. Prior to submittal of final working drawings to Building and Safety Department for issuance of building and grading permits, the plans for the project shall be submitted to City staff for verification that the final plans are in compliance with the plans approved by the Planning Commission. E. A licensed professional preparing construction plans for this project for Building Department review shall execute a Certificate affirming that the plans conform in all respects to this Resolution approving this project and all of the conditions set forth herein and the City’s Building Code and Zoning Ordinance. Further, the person obtaining a building and/or grading permit for this project shall execute a Certificate of Construction stating that the project will be constructed according to this Resolution and any plans approved therewith. F. Structural lot coverage of the lot shall not exceed 10,912 square feet or 15.04% of the net lot area (20% maximum). The flatwork coverage is 11,200 square feet or 15.4%. The total lot coverage proposed, including structures and flatwork, shall not exceed 23,952 square feet or 33% (35% maximum). G. The lot is already developed and the total disturbed area will be 36,890 square feet or 50.9% (maximum 50% permitted provided that no more than fifty percent of the slopes resulting from the grading are greater (steeper) than 3:1, or three units horizontal (run) to one unit vertical (rise). Grading for this project shall not exceed 4,464 cubic yards of cut and 3,445 cubic yards of fill for a total of 7,909 cubic yards with 1,019 cubic yard being exempt export. H. The total proposed building pad net coverage for the residential main pad is 13,760 square feet or 19%, which meets the 30% maximum guideline. 82103 9 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) I. A driveway access shall be provided per the Fire Department requirements and the driveway shall be roughened and the first 20 feet of the driveway shall not exceed 7% in slope. J. Access to the stable and to the corral shall be decomposed granite or 100% pervious roughened material; it shall not be wider than 12 feet. K. A minimum of five-foot level path and/or walkway, which does not have to be paved, shall be provided around the entire perimeter of all of the proposed structures or as otherwise required by the Fire Department. L. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Low Impact Development requirements for storm water management on site (RHMC Chapter 8.32). M. Hydrology, soils, geology and other reports, as required by the Building and Public Works Departments, and as may be required by the Building Official, shall be prepared. N. Prior to issuance of a final construction approval of the project, all graded slopes shall be landscaped. Prior to issuance of building permit, the landscaping plan shall meet the requirements of the City, shall be submitted to the City in conformance with Fire Department Fuel Modification requirements, and shall be approved by the City’s landscape consultant. O. The project shall be landscaped, and continually maintained in substantial conformance with the landscaping plan on file approved by the City’s landscape consultant. A detailed landscaping plan shall provide that any trees and shrubs used in the landscaping scheme for this project shall be planted in a way that screens the project development from adjacent streets and neighbors, such that shrubs and trees as they mature do not grow into a hedge or impede any neighbors’ views and the plan shall provide that all landscaping be maintained at a height no higher than the roof line of the nearest project structure. In addition, the landscaping plan shall provide for screening of development with vegetation not to exceed 10 feet in height, and that the vegetation used for screening shall be planted in an off-set manner, so as to prevent it, as it grows from forming a solid hedge. The landscaping plan shall utilize to the maximum extent feasible, plants that are native to the area, are water-wise and are consistent with the rural character of the community. Plants listed as high hazardous plants under RHMC Section 8.30.015 are prohibited. P. The applicant shall submit a landscaping performance bond or other financial obligation, to be kept on deposit by the City, in the amount of the planting plus irrigation plus 15%. The bond shall be released no sooner than two years after completion of all plantings, subject to a City staff determination that the plantings required for the project are in substantial conformance with approved plans and are in good condition. A Certificate of Completion shall be submitted by the project designer or contractor prior to final landscape installation inspection. Q. The landscaping shall be subject to the requirements of the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, (RHMC Chapter 13.18). 83104 10 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) R. Pursuant to RHMC Chapter 8.30, the property shall at all times be maintained free of dead trees and vegetation. S. The setback lines and roadway easement lines in the vicinity of the construction for this project shall remain staked throughout the construction. A construction fence may be required. T. Perimeter easements, including roadway easements and trails, if any, shall remain free and clear of any improvements to advance equestrian use and emergency preparedness for evacuation within the City. Where Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA) has demonstrated authority over the easement, the City’s Planning Director may grant relief from this condition upon satisfactory proof of permission from RHCA and a legitimate showing that there is no need for the condition to advance equestrian uses and emergency preparedness. U. Minimum of 65% of any construction materials must be recycled or diverted from landfills. The hauler of the materials shall obtain City’s Construction and Demolition permits for waste hauling prior to start of work and provide proper documentation to the City. V. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, storm water pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required. W. During construction, to the extent feasible, all parking shall take place on the project site, on the new driveway and, if necessary, any overflow parking may take place within the unimproved roadway easements along adjacent streets, and shall not obstruct neighboring driveways, visibility at intersections or pedestrian and equestrian passage. During construction, to the maximum extent feasible, employees of the contractor shall car-pool into the City. To the extent feasible, a minimum of 4’ wide path, from the edge of the roadway pavement, for pedestrian and equestrian passage shall be available and be clear of vehicles, construction materials and equipment at all times. X. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and relate traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. Y. Prior to demolition of the existing structures, an investigation shall be conducted for the presence of hazardous chemicals, lead-based paints or products, mercury and asbestos- containing materials (ACMs). If hazardous chemicals, lead-based paints or products, mercury or ACMs are identified, remediation shall be undertaken in compliance with California environmental regulations and policies. AA. The property owner and/or his/her contractor/applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the no-smoking provisions in the Municipal Code. The contractor shall not use tools that could produce a spark, including for clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning 84105 11 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) conditions. Weather conditions can be found at: http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/lox/main.php?suite=safety&page=hazard_definitions#FIRE. It is the sole responsibility of the property owner and/or his/her contractor to monitor the red flag warning conditions. AB. Development shall drain in accordance with the approved grading and drainage plan. Drainage dissipaters shall be constructed outside of any easements. The drainage system shall be approved by the Department of Building and Safety. If an above ground swale and/or dissipater is required, it shall be designed in such a manner as not to cross over any equestrian trails or discharge water onto a trail, shall be stained in an earth tone color, and shall be screened from any trail, road and neighbors’ view to the maximum extent practicable, without impairing the function of the drainage system. AC. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices. AD. During construction, an Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 2022 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control storm water pollution. AE. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of storm water drainage facilities and septic tank. AF. The applicant shall pay all of the applicable Building and Safety and Public Works Department fees and Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District fees, if any. AG. Prior to final inspection of the project, “as graded” and “as constructed” plans and certifications shall be provided to the Planning Department and the Building Department to ascertain that the completed project is in compliance with the Planning Commission approved plans. In addition, any modifications made to the project during construction, shall be depicted on the “as built/as graded” plan. AH. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of the Conditional Use Permit and Variance approvals, or the approvals shall not be effective. AI. All conditions of this Resolution, when applicable, must be complied with prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit from the Building and Safety Department. AJ. Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. AK. To the extent permitted by law, Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Rolling Hills, its City Council, its officers, employees and agents (the 85106 12 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) “indemnified parties”) from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void any permit or approval for this project authorized by the City, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorney’s fees and costs in defense of the litigation. The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its choice. The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney's fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this permit. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this condition. AL. The future stable and corral shall comply with all requirements in RHMC Sections 17.18.060 and 17.18.090, unless otherwise approved herein. AM. New landscaping in the RHCA easement is prohibited unless previously approved by RHCA. Landscaping not approved by RHCA in the easement shall be removed from the final landscape plan. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20th DAY OF MAY, 2025. BRAD CHELF, CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 86107 13 Resolution No. 2025-XX (ZC 24-043) 6 Chuckwagon Rd (Lee) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025-XX entitled: ZONING CASE NO. 24-043: SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW RESIDENCE, NON-EXEMPT GRADING, STABLE ACCESS, WALLS EXCEEDING A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET AND 2.5 FEET AVERAGE (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR A DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET, STABLE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET; AND VARIANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE FRONT YARD, SITE DISTURBANCE OF MORE THAN 40 PERCENT AND FILL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 2:1, AND FINDING THE SAME EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LOT 29- A-EF) (LEE) was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on May 20, 2025, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. CHRISTIAN HORVATH, CITY CLERK 87108 April 14, 2025 Paul and Stephanie Reisz 4 Chuckwagon Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 City of Rolling Hills Chair and Members of the Planning Commission 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Dear Chair and Members of the Planning Commission, Thank you for your review of the proposed new home next door to us at 6 Chuckwagon. We appreciate your time protecting the values of Rolling Hills by mandating that projects minimize impacts to neighbors when possible. We bought our home four years ago because of the environment and privacy offered by the Rolling Hills community. Our purchase also was partially due to the large separation between our home and the existing home on the property. The silhouette clearly shows how unreasonably close the new home will be to ours. As this proposal is for a new home at 6 Chuckwagon, we do not understand why it cannot be placed closer to the middle of the lot and help preserve our privacy. As proposed, nearly the entire structure is on the east half of the lot. We realize that there is a slope on the western portion of the lot, but the design currently provides for 75 feet of flat area west of the home. Rather than shove the home almost against the side setback, and the driveway/parking area into the setback, the home could be shifted into this flat area. Exhibit #1 shows they would still have significant outdoor areas by shifting the home to the west by 35 feet. The proximity of the proposed driveway and parking area to our home creates concerns related to the noise from the cars and the lights from them shining into our master bedroom. As mentioned, the driveway and parking areas are in the side 88109 setback, and on ground 19 feet above the floor of our home. Noise and lights from the cars will impact our privacy as shown on Exhibit #2. If the house is moved away from our property, we would support the driveway and parking area if they were similarly moved. We are fully in support of the location of the stable and corral on the west side of the 6 Chuckwagon property. We are confused as the staff report references a proposed stable and the required Conditional Use Permit, but only a conceptual location is shown on Sheet 3 of the Bolton Engineering drawings. We are in support of this location for the stable and corral, but would want the city’s review to be of detailed plans that would allow for a solid approval. Our concern is that a lack of details could result in a flawed approval that could somehow result in the stable and corral being moved to our side of the lot. We want to be absolutely certain that never happens. Finally, we are concerned that vegetation planted to the north of the home could grow up into our ocean views. We would ask for a condition of approval to be added that limits the vegetation to a reasonable height, maybe 16 feet in height. Thank you very much for your time, Paul and Stephanie Reisz 89110 Exhibit #1 90111 Exhibit #2 91112 From: Amy Josefek <amy@josefekassoc.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2025 11:46 AM To: Planning <Planning@cityofrh.net> Subject: Re: 6 Chuckwagon Road, Zoning Case No. 24-043 EXTERNAL EMAIL - This email was sent by a person from outside your organization. Exercise caution when clicking links, opening attachments or taking further action, before validating its authenticity. Hello Planning Commissioners, I write to you in response to plans I've seen for 6 Chuckwagon Road. While I'm one property away from that one, I must confess some concern for the plan there... Seeing how very close to the property line is the placement shown for a new garage. But I guess that's a far less problematic option than having a stable erected in that same location. I'd been told that a stable will be a part of this redevelopment plan; I don't see it specified on the drawings and just would want to make sure that, if it were built, it would be placed on the other end of the property, adjacent to the Lower Willow Springs Trail. A stable adjacent to 4 Chuckwagon would have an outsized, unfortunate effect on the neighbors next door (and quite likely, on my property, as well); there's no way to avoid the unmistakable smell from a stable. In this case, it would be terribly close, not only to bedroom windows, but to the backyard (pool) area, as well. Fwiw, I love living in this community where it's a normal event to look out and see/ hear a beautiful horse with rider, walking along the street. Thank you for the consideration of all neighbors in our community. Amy Josefek 2 Chuckwagon Road 92113 Rigg Consulting, Inc. April 22, 2025 Rigg Consulting, Inc. 6415 Via Canada Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275 City of Rolling Hills Chair and Members of the Planning Commission 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Re: Proposed Home at 6 Chuckwagon Dear Chair and Members of the Planning Commission, The delay in the review of the proposed home at 6 Chuckwagon was a welcome pause for the neighbors to fully understand the project and to understand the impacts. We look forward to your review in May. The issues with the project all stem from its enormous size. A tool used in PVE and RPV to understand if a proposed home is “… harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences” is a comparison of the livable area of the proposal with other nearby homes. In PVE the analysis includes homes within 300 feet, and in RPV it is the closest 20 homes. I have used the PVE method to create a chart shown as Exhibit #1 in this letter. The data for the nearby homes is from the Los Angeles County Assessor. The proposed size of the home, without the basement, at 6,939 square feet. This is more than double the average size of the homes within 300 feet at 3,460 square feet. Please note the average size of the lots within 300 feet is nearly identical to the size of the lot at 6 Chuckwagon. The next largest home is 5,571 square feet, but is on a lot nearly 50% larger. These comparisons could be tainted by the fact that the County Assessor counts basements for the other homes as livable areas of a home. If the livable area of the proposed home at 9,816 square feet is compared to the average livable area within 300 feet, it is 284% larger. The chart also includes a calculation of the Floor Area Ratio (FAR), which is the livable area of the home divided by the lot size, which gives a measure of the intensity of the development of the lot. The home at 5 Chuckwagon has an FAR of 5.1%, which matches the average of the homes within 300 feet of 5.1%. However, the proposed home has a FAR of 9.6% when not counting the basement, and 13.5% when counting the basement. 93114 Rigg Consulting, Inc. The comparison of the livable area and FAR without the basement shows the home is nearly double when compared to the neighborhood. This is not harmonious with the neighborhood in strict numerical terms, but as mentioned earlier, in the impacts that the size creates. It should be further noted that the lot is very challenging due to the topography and that a smaller home as compared to the average, such as the existing home at 2,877 square feet, is warranted. The size of the home is additionally enlarged by the six-car garage, which is an additional 1,300 square feet and a 1,200 square foot master bedroom. The extreme size of the proposal causes severe impacts to the residents of 4 Chuckwagon. The walls and driveway are within the side setback and tower over their home and outside living areas (Exhibits #2 and #3). The proposal even moves the new home’s west edge toward the east 28 feet as shown in Exhibit #4. The movement of this massive home to the east shows no regard for the adjacent residents and put them into a fish bowl. Often a Planning Commission will continue a project that is close to approval for the applicant to make minor changes. It would seem that the extreme size of and extreme impacts caused by this proposal cannot be solved by minor adjustments and possibly an entire new concept is needed. As such, a denial of the project could be warranted. However, the neighbors at 4 Chuckwagon and I have tried to determine how to avoid a denial and reduce the impacts to them. It would seem that if the home were placed more towards the center of the lot as shown on Exhibit #5, the impacts would be acceptable. We would ask for the edge of the driveway, which is 10 feet into the setback, and the home to be moved 60 feet to the west. The setback on the other side of the home would still be larger at 70 feet. We would also ask that the area within the 60-foot area be landscaped with trees to create a visual buffer between our homes. The reduction of the six-car garage to a standard two-car garage could account for 35 feet of the movement of the home. We would also want to compliment their design of the location of the corral and stable. It is far away from the home at 4 Chuckwagon and will not cause significant noise or smell to them. Please make sure to keep this location. Sincerely, Allan Rigg, PE AICP 94115 Rigg Consulting, Inc. Exhibit #1 95116 Rigg Consulting, Inc. Exhibit #2 96117 Rigg Consulting, Inc. Exhibit #3 97118 Rigg Consulting, Inc. Exhibit #4 98119 Rigg Consulting, Inc. Exhibit #5 99120 100121 CL_PBN_250520_PH_PC_16Caballeros_6Chuckwagon - Page 1 of 1 2615 Pacific Coast Highway #329 Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (310) 543-6635 pfernandez@scng.com City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, California 90274 Account Number:5007827 Ad Order Number:0011734959 Customer's Reference/PO Number: Publication:Daily Breeze Publication Dates:05/10/2025 Total Amount:$783.56 Payment Amount:$0.00 Amount Due:$783.56 Notice ID:qP6Z07IBcCSBMNmYOQJq Invoice Text:NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND FIELD TRIP PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rolling Hills will conduct public hearing field trip visits starting at 7:30 AM on Tuesday, May 20, 2025, at the following properties for the purpose of receiving public input on the projects described below: 1st field trip 7:30 AM 16 CABALLEROS ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (LOT 6-SK) ZONING CASE NO. 24-154: SITE PLAN REVIEW REQUESTS FOR NON-EXEMPT GRADING AND WALLS TO EXCEED A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET AND 2.5 FEET AVERAGE (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST TO EXCEED 200 SQUARE FEET FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AND FINDING THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (WANG & YOU) 2nd FIELD TRIP AT 7:50 AM 6 CHUCKWAGON ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (LOT 29-A-EF) ZONING CASE NO. 24-043: SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW RESIDENCE, NON-EXEMPT GRADING, STABLE ACCESS, WALLS EXCEEDING A HEIGHT OF 3 FEET AND 2.5 FEET AVERAGE (UP TO A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5 FEET), AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS; CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR A DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET, STABLE GREATER THAN 200 SQUARE FEET; AND VARIANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE FRONT YARD, SITE DISTURBANCE OF MORE THAN 40 PERCENT, AND FILL SLOPES STEEPER THAN 2:1, AND FINDING THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (LEE) Both projects have been 101122 CL_PBN_250520_PH_PC_16Caballeros_6Chuckwagon - Page 1 of 1 Daily Breeze 2615 Pacific Coast Highway #329 Hermosa Beach, California 90254 (310) 543-6635 0011734959 City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, California 90274 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Los Angeles I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not party to or interested in the above- entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of Daily Breeze, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Torrance*, County of Los Angeles, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of County of Los Angeles, State of California, under the date of June 15, 1945, Decree No. Pomo C-606. The notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to wit: 05/10/2025 I certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Hermosa Beach, California On this 10th day of May, 2025. ______________________________ Signature *Daily Breeze circulation includes the following cities: Carson, Compton, Culver City, El Segundo, Gardena, Harbor City, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach, Inglewood, Lawndale, Lomita, Los Angeles, Long Beach, Manhattan Beach, Palos Verdes Peninsula, Palos Verdes, Rancho Palos Verdes, Rancho Palos Verdes Estates, Redondo Beach, San Pedro, Santa Monica, Torrance and Wilmington 102123 Homes Close to 6 Chuckwagon Road House SF Basement SF 10 Bowie Road 5,270 SF 6,000 SF 23 Chuckwagon Road 2,770 SF 60 Eastfield Drive 6,200 SF 3,821 SF 49 Eastfield Drive 3,261 SF 1,196 SF 40 Eastfield Drive 2,979 SF 18 Eastfield Drive 5,265 SF N/A 11 Saddleback Rd 4,805 SF 1056 SF 8 Hackamore Rd 4,971 SF 480 SF Recent Approvals House SF Basement SF Year Approved 2 Possum Ridge Rd 6,230 SF 1,950 SF 2024 23 Crest Road East 14,680 SF 7,849 SF 2024 4 Spur Lane 5,535 SF 2024 11 Flying Mane Rd 5,292 SF 2,050 SF 2023 19 Portuguese Bend Rd 6,811 SF 2023 4 Poppy Trail 7,290 SF 7,290 SF 2023 8 Middleridge South 6,201 SF 3,000 SF 2022 0 Poppy Trail 6,374 SF 934 SF 2019 20 Upper Blackwater Cyn 9,975 SF 7,750 SF 2018 11 Upper Blackwater Cyn 11,052 SF 6,620 SF 2017 103124 1104.5TW1101.5BW1104.5TW1101.5BW1104.5TW1101.5BW1102.0TW1101.5BW1087.0TW 1085BW 1095TW 1090BW 1098TW 1095BW 1095TW 1090BW 1088TW 1087BW 1098TW 1095BW 1100TW 1099BW 1101TW 1097BW 1101TW 1096BW 1101TW 1099BW1075TW1072BW1070TW1065BW1065TW1063BW1066TW 1065BW 1101TW 1100BW 1100TW 1097BW 1097TW 1092.5BW 1092TW 1086.5BW1075TW1070BW 1070TW1065BW1065TW1063BW1103.5TW 1101.5BW1101.5TW 1101.5BW 1102.5TW 1101.5BW 1103.5TW 1101.5BW 1104.5TW1101.5BW10' E A S E M E N T 50' REAR Y A R D SETB A C K 10 ' R H C A E A S E M E N T 20 ' SI D E Y A R D SE T B A C K 50' FRON T Y A R D SETBA C K 30'ROAD EASEM E N T30'ROADEASEMENT30'ROADEASEMENT50'FRONT YARDSETBACKL=436.26', R=320.00 ' Δ=78° 06' 45" AS P HASPH PI P EPIPESPIPEDIRT DIRT CON CCONCDEC K10601070103010401050102011001090108010 9 0 110010 7 0 1060 1050 1150 1140 1130 1120 111 0 1 1 5 0 1 1 4 0 11 6 0 1 1 3 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 11101 0 9 0 10 7 0 10 8 010201040105010301060 11 7 0 10 8 010701 0 8 0 1 0 9 0 1 1 0 0 1060105010401030CHUC K W A G O N R O A D C H U C K W A G O N R O A D CHUCKW A G O N R O A D (P)SEEPAGEPIT(P) SEPTICTANKA ABB CB1070TW 1065BW 10 7 5 T W 10 7 2 B W 10 8 7 T W 10 8 5 B W 1095T W 1090B W 1098T W 1095B W 1101TW 1100BW1090T W 1088B W 1095T W 1092B W 1100TW 1098B W1066T W 1065B W1065TW1063BW 1098F G 1105RIM 1101 FG 1105RIM 1104FG 1105FS 1101.50 T W 1098B W 5.1 MATCH LI NE OU T L I N E O F B A S E M E N T DETACHED PATIO COVER 650 SF 31' - 6 " 3 1 ' - 6 " 13' - 4 " 1 3 ' - 4 " 4'- 0 " 4 ' - 0 " 43' - 4 " 4 3 ' - 4 " 81' - 1 " 8 1 ' - 1 " 62' - 7 " 6 2 ' - 7 " 21' - 0 " 2 1 ' - 0 " 3'-0"3'-0" 29'-7"29'-7" 12'-9"12'-9" 21'-1"21'-1" 10'-0"10'-0" 7'-2"7'-2" 21' - 0 " 2 1 ' - 0 " 34' - 9 " 3 4 ' - 9 " 27' - 1 0 " 2 7 ' - 1 0 " 20' - 3 " 2 0 ' - 3 " 40' - 6 " 4 0 ' - 6 " 20' - 4 " 2 0 ' - 4 " 29' - 3 " 2 9 ' - 3 " 14' - 1 " 1 4 ' - 1 " 4'- 0 " 4 ' - 0 " OUTLINE OF (E) RESIDENCE 1120.26'1120.26' 1115.30'1115.30' 1116.66'1116.66' 1116.06'1116.06' 1117.34'1117.34' 1118.50'1118.50' 21 1 ' - 1 1 " 2 1 1 ' - 1 1 " • • • • SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 6,957 SF RESIDENCE 2,877 BASEMENT 1,318 SF ATTACHED GARAGE 950 SF COVERED PORCH NORTHTOP OF STRUCTURE 5'-4"5'-4" 20'-0"20'-0" 4'-9"4'-9" 1116.01'1116.01' DATE: DRAWN: REVIEWED: PROJECT NO: SCALE: OWNERSHIP AND USE OF DOCUMENTS ALL DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND COPIES THEREOF FURNISHED BY SAA INTERIORS ARE AND SHALL REMAIN IT'S PROPERTY. THEY ARE TO BE USED ONLY WITH RESPECT TO THIS PROJECT. FEDERAL LAW PROHIBITS THE REPRODUCTION, DISPLAY, SALE, OR OTHER DISPOSITION OF THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHLEMMER ALGAZE ASSOCIATES. COPYRIGHT © 2015 SHLEMMER ALGAZE ASSOCIATES ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SHEET TITLE: SHEET NO: SEAL AND STAMP: CONSULTANTS: PROJECT: CULVER CITY - IRVINE - LOS ANGELES - SAN FRANCISCO - NEW JERSEY - NEW YORK 6083 Bristol Parkway Culver City, CA 90230 18600 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92612 515 South Flower Street, Suite 1200 Los Angeles, CA 90071 T 310.553.3252 T 949.724.8958 T 213.929.1400 DRAWINGS ISSUE 485C US Route 1 South, Suite 105 Iselin, NJ 08830 T 848.200.1200 711 3rd Ave., 6th Floor New York, NY 10017 T 917.512.6688 www.saaia.com T 415.390.6793 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION IF DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS DEVELOPED AND PROVIDED BY SAA INTERIORS + ARCHITECTURE AT THE TIME OF AND RELATING TO COVID-19 CONTAIN RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (CDC) AND THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO), SUCH RECOMMENDATIONS ARE ONLY VALID AS OF THE DATE THE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS ARE PRODUCED. THE CDC AND/OR WHO MAY UPDATE OR MODIFY THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS AT ANY TIME PER THEIR DISCRETION. IN USING RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THESE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS, THE RECIPIENT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT WAS BASED ON THEIR OWN DECISION AND TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY. THE INTENDED RECIPIENT INDEMNIFIES AND DEFENDS SAA FOR ANY USE OF THESE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS BY OTHERS. SAA’S SERVICES ARE INTENDED TO ONLY BE OF ASSISTANCE AND GUIDANCE FOR OUR CLIENT’S STRATEGIES AND DO NOT CONSTITUTE AS REQUIREMENTS OR ANY FORM OF HEALTH, ILLNESS OR DISEASE ADVICE. SAA MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES REGARDING THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS. ANY RECOMMENDATIONS OR USE OF ANY CDC OR WHO INFORMATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ENDORSEMENT BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OR THE CDC AND WHO NOR ITS AFFILIATES. 575 Market Street, #502 San Francisco, CA 94105 1" = 20'-0" A-1.0 11-29-2023 VML JB 632690 COVER SHEET, INDEX, MAP, BUILDING DATA, ETC. NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 6 CHUCKWAGON ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90275 LEE RESIDENCE ARCHITECT: SAA INTERIOR + ARCHITECTURE 6083 BRISTOL PARKWAY CULVER CITY, CA 90230 PHONE: 310-553-3252 CONTACT: JEFF BROWNING EMAIL: jbrowning@saaia.com VICINITY MAP CLIENT: KEN LEE 6 CHUCKWAGON ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90275 NORTHCONTACT LIST SHEET INDEX A-1.0 COVER SHEET, INDEX, MAP, BUILDING DATA, ETC. A-1.1 FLOOR PLAN A-1.2 FLOOR PLAN - WEST WING A-1.3 FLOOR PLAN - EAST WING A-1.4 BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN A-1.5 ROOF PLAN A-2.0 ELEVATIONS A-2.1 ELEVATIONS A-2.2 ELEVATIONS A-2.3 DETACHED COVERED PATIO A-3.0 SECTIONS A-4.0 DOOR, HARDWARE SCHEDULE AND DOOR DETAILS SCOPE OF WORK: NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE APN 7567003011 ZONING RAS-1 OCCUPANCY R-3/U-1 CONSTRUCTION TYPE V-B NR (NON-SPRINKLERED) LOT AREA 100,623.6 SF (2.31 AC) PROJECT INFORMATION GENERAL BUILDING INFO GARAGE - ATTACHED GROUND FLOOR LIVING AREA BASEMENT AREA TOTAL LIVING AREA TOTAL DECKS AND BALCONIES TOTAL STRUCTURESTOTAL STRUCTURES POOL / SPA LOT COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSED 400 SF 1,318 SF 3,086 SF 6,957 SF -2,877 SF 3,486 SF 11,152 SF -950 + 650 = 1,600 SF 12,752 SF12,752 SF 790 SF 13,542 SF (13.5 %) LEE RESIDENCE SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"SITE PLAN 1 DATE DESCRIPTION DELTA ARCHITECTURE CIVIL ENGINEERING C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 OVERALL SITE PLAN EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS SITE PLAN PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN SITE SECTIONS DETAILS CUT AND FILL MAP CIVIL ENGINEER: BOLTON ENGINEERING CORPORATION 25834 NARBONNE AVENUE LOMITA, CA 90717 PHONE: 310-325-5580 CONTACT: DAN BOLTON EMAIL: dbolton@boltonengineering.com 125 DN DN 3 2.1 2 1 D D G G F H J J 5.1 3.1 4.1 C C B B A A 4 5 6 7 A-2.01 A-2.2 1 A-2.02 A-2.1 1 BEDROOM 1BEDROOM 1 MASTER SUITEMASTER SUITE AV MASTER BATHMASTER BATH CLOSETCLOSET CLOSET LIVING ROOMLIVING ROOM DETACHED PATIO COVER POOLPOOL JACUZZIJACUZZI YARD AREAYARD AREA DINING ENTRY ENTRY 27'-1"27'-1" GARAGEGARAGE MOTOR COURTMOTOR COURT COURTYARDCOURTYARD 1'-0"1'-0"22'-3"22'-3"1'-0"1'-0"19'-0"19'-0"17'-8"17'-8"11'-8"11'-8"LIGHT WELL 1104.01'1104.01' KITCHENKITCHEN OFFICEOFFICE BUTLER'S PANTRYBUTLER'S PANTRY DN TO BASEMENT BEDROOM 2BEDROOM 2 CLOSETCLOSET NOR T H BEDROOM 3BEDROOM 3 BEDROOM 4BEDROOM 4REF13'-6"13'-6"13'-11"13'-11"LAUNDRYLAUNDRY D D W W 1103.84'1103.84' 1103.93'1103.93' OU T L I N E O F ( E ) R E S I D E N C E OU T L I N E O F ( E ) R E S I D E N C E A-2.3 1 MATCH LINE55'-9"55'-9"42'-10 1/2"42'-10 1/2"55'-1 1/2"55'-1 1/2"10'-10 1/2"10'-10 1/2"29'-3"29'-3"14'-1"14'-1"4'-0"4'-0"26'-0"26'-0"16'-3"16'-3"17'-8"17'-8"21'-0"21'-0"34'-9"34'-9"27'-10"27'-10"20'-2 1/2"20'-2 1/2"40'-6"40'-6"20'-4"20'-4"29'-3"29'-3"14'-1"14'-1" WEST WING 9'-7 1/2"9'-7 1/2"10'-4"10'-4"9'-7 1/2"9'-7 1/2"12'-8 1/2"12'-8 1/2"A-2.33 A-2.3 4 3'-8"3'-8"A-1.2 1 A-1.3 1 EAST WING DATE: DRAWN: REVIEWED: PROJECT NO: SCALE: OWNERSHIP AND USE OF DOCUMENTS ALL DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND COPIES THEREOF FURNISHED BY SAA INTERIORS ARE AND SHALL REMAIN IT'S PROPERTY. THEY ARE TO BE USED ONLY WITH RESPECT TO THIS PROJECT. FEDERAL LAW PROHIBITS THE REPRODUCTION, DISPLAY, SALE, OR OTHER DISPOSITION OF THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHLEMMER ALGAZE ASSOCIATES. COPYRIGHT © 2015 SHLEMMER ALGAZE ASSOCIATES ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SHEET TITLE: SHEET NO: SEAL AND STAMP: CONSULTANTS: PROJECT: CULVER CITY - IRVINE - LOS ANGELES - SAN FRANCISCO - NEW JERSEY - NEW YORK 6083 Bristol Parkway Culver City, CA 90230 18600 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92612 515 South Flower Street, Suite 1200 Los Angeles, CA 90071 T 310.553.3252 T 949.724.8958 T 213.929.1400 DRAWINGS ISSUE 485C US Route 1 South, Suite 105 Iselin, NJ 08830 T 848.200.1200 711 3rd Ave., 6th Floor New York, NY 10017 T 917.512.6688 www.saaia.com T 415.390.6793 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION IF DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS DEVELOPED AND PROVIDED BY SAA INTERIORS + ARCHITECTURE AT THE TIME OF AND RELATING TO COVID-19 CONTAIN RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (CDC) AND THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO), SUCH RECOMMENDATIONS ARE ONLY VALID AS OF THE DATE THE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS ARE PRODUCED. THE CDC AND/OR WHO MAY UPDATE OR MODIFY THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS AT ANY TIME PER THEIR DISCRETION. IN USING RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THESE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS, THE RECIPIENT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT WAS BASED ON THEIR OWN DECISION AND TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY. THE INTENDED RECIPIENT INDEMNIFIES AND DEFENDS SAA FOR ANY USE OF THESE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS BY OTHERS. SAA’S SERVICES ARE INTENDED TO ONLY BE OF ASSISTANCE AND GUIDANCE FOR OUR CLIENT’S STRATEGIES AND DO NOT CONSTITUTE AS REQUIREMENTS OR ANY FORM OF HEALTH, ILLNESS OR DISEASE ADVICE. SAA MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES REGARDING THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS. ANY RECOMMENDATIONS OR USE OF ANY CDC OR WHO INFORMATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ENDORSEMENT BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OR THE CDC AND WHO NOR ITS AFFILIATES. 575 Market Street, #502 San Francisco, CA 94105 1/8" = 1'-0" A-1.1 11-29-2023 VML JB 632690 FLOOR PLAN NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 6 CHUCKWAGON ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90275 LEE RESIDENCE SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"COMPOUND FLOOR PLAN 1 DATE DESCRIPTION DELTA 126 UP UP E E 3 3 D FC HOME THEATERHOME THEATER UP TO GROUND FLOOR LIGHT & EGRESS WELL WINE CELLARWINE CELLAR AV CONCESSIONS FP NOR T H10'-1"10'-1"18'-10"18'-10"2'-5"2'-5"20'-0"20'-0"1'-3"1'-3"28'-6"28'-6"1'-6"1'-6" 1092.01'1092.01' 5.2 OUTLINE OF FIRST FLOOR 53'-10 1/2"53'-10 1/2"20'-4"20'-4"40'-6"40'-6" 11'-1"11'-1"5'-10"5'-10"5'-0"5'-0"10'-9"10'-9"19'-4"19'-4"23'-10"23'-10"10'-5"10'-5"18'-5 1/2"18'-5 1/2"32'-7"32'-7"29'-8"29'-8"20'-4 1/2"20'-4 1/2"6'-0"6'-0"2'-5"2'-5" DATE: DRAWN: REVIEWED: PROJECT NO: SCALE: OWNERSHIP AND USE OF DOCUMENTS ALL DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND COPIES THEREOF FURNISHED BY SAA INTERIORS ARE AND SHALL REMAIN IT'S PROPERTY. THEY ARE TO BE USED ONLY WITH RESPECT TO THIS PROJECT. FEDERAL LAW PROHIBITS THE REPRODUCTION, DISPLAY, SALE, OR OTHER DISPOSITION OF THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHLEMMER ALGAZE ASSOCIATES. COPYRIGHT © 2015 SHLEMMER ALGAZE ASSOCIATES ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SHEET TITLE: SHEET NO: SEAL AND STAMP: CONSULTANTS: PROJECT: CULVER CITY - IRVINE - LOS ANGELES - SAN FRANCISCO - NEW JERSEY - NEW YORK 6083 Bristol Parkway Culver City, CA 90230 18600 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92612 515 South Flower Street, Suite 1200 Los Angeles, CA 90071 T 310.553.3252 T 949.724.8958 T 213.929.1400 DRAWINGS ISSUE 485C US Route 1 South, Suite 105 Iselin, NJ 08830 T 848.200.1200 711 3rd Ave., 6th Floor New York, NY 10017 T 917.512.6688 www.saaia.com T 415.390.6793 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION IF DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS DEVELOPED AND PROVIDED BY SAA INTERIORS + ARCHITECTURE AT THE TIME OF AND RELATING TO COVID-19 CONTAIN RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (CDC) AND THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO), SUCH RECOMMENDATIONS ARE ONLY VALID AS OF THE DATE THE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS ARE PRODUCED. THE CDC AND/OR WHO MAY UPDATE OR MODIFY THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS AT ANY TIME PER THEIR DISCRETION. IN USING RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THESE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS, THE RECIPIENT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT WAS BASED ON THEIR OWN DECISION AND TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY. THE INTENDED RECIPIENT INDEMNIFIES AND DEFENDS SAA FOR ANY USE OF THESE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS BY OTHERS. SAA’S SERVICES ARE INTENDED TO ONLY BE OF ASSISTANCE AND GUIDANCE FOR OUR CLIENT’S STRATEGIES AND DO NOT CONSTITUTE AS REQUIREMENTS OR ANY FORM OF HEALTH, ILLNESS OR DISEASE ADVICE. SAA MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES REGARDING THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS. ANY RECOMMENDATIONS OR USE OF ANY CDC OR WHO INFORMATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ENDORSEMENT BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OR THE CDC AND WHO NOR ITS AFFILIATES. 575 Market Street, #502 San Francisco, CA 94105 1/4" = 1'-0" A-1.4 11-29-2023 VML JB 632690 BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 6 CHUCKWAGON ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90275 LEE RESIDENCE SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN 1 DATE DESCRIPTION DELTA 127 FINISH FLOOR0" 8'-6" PLATE8' - 6" BASEMENT LEVEL FF-11' - 0" 10'-6" PLATE10' - 6" 3 2.1 15.13.14.14 1104.01'1104.01' 1116.59'1116.59' 1120.26'1120.26'20'-0"20'-0"11'-0"11'-0"FINISH FLOOR0" 8'-6" PLATE8' - 6" BASEMENT LEVEL FF-11' - 0" 10'-6" PLATE10' - 6" 3214 5 6 7 1104.01'1104.01' 5.2 1093.01'1093.01' DATE: DRAWN: REVIEWED: PROJECT NO: SCALE: OWNERSHIP AND USE OF DOCUMENTS ALL DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND COPIES THEREOF FURNISHED BY SAA INTERIORS ARE AND SHALL REMAIN IT'S PROPERTY. THEY ARE TO BE USED ONLY WITH RESPECT TO THIS PROJECT. FEDERAL LAW PROHIBITS THE REPRODUCTION, DISPLAY, SALE, OR OTHER DISPOSITION OF THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHLEMMER ALGAZE ASSOCIATES. COPYRIGHT © 2015 SHLEMMER ALGAZE ASSOCIATES ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SHEET TITLE: SHEET NO: SEAL AND STAMP: CONSULTANTS: PROJECT: CULVER CITY - IRVINE - LOS ANGELES - SAN FRANCISCO - NEW JERSEY - NEW YORK 6083 Bristol Parkway Culver City, CA 90230 18600 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92612 515 South Flower Street, Suite 1200 Los Angeles, CA 90071 T 310.553.3252 T 949.724.8958 T 213.929.1400 DRAWINGS ISSUE 485C US Route 1 South, Suite 105 Iselin, NJ 08830 T 848.200.1200 711 3rd Ave., 6th Floor New York, NY 10017 T 917.512.6688 www.saaia.com T 415.390.6793 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION IF DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS DEVELOPED AND PROVIDED BY SAA INTERIORS + ARCHITECTURE AT THE TIME OF AND RELATING TO COVID-19 CONTAIN RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (CDC) AND THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO), SUCH RECOMMENDATIONS ARE ONLY VALID AS OF THE DATE THE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS ARE PRODUCED. THE CDC AND/OR WHO MAY UPDATE OR MODIFY THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS AT ANY TIME PER THEIR DISCRETION. IN USING RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THESE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS, THE RECIPIENT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT WAS BASED ON THEIR OWN DECISION AND TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY. THE INTENDED RECIPIENT INDEMNIFIES AND DEFENDS SAA FOR ANY USE OF THESE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS BY OTHERS. SAA’S SERVICES ARE INTENDED TO ONLY BE OF ASSISTANCE AND GUIDANCE FOR OUR CLIENT’S STRATEGIES AND DO NOT CONSTITUTE AS REQUIREMENTS OR ANY FORM OF HEALTH, ILLNESS OR DISEASE ADVICE. SAA MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES REGARDING THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS. ANY RECOMMENDATIONS OR USE OF ANY CDC OR WHO INFORMATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ENDORSEMENT BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OR THE CDC AND WHO NOR ITS AFFILIATES. 575 Market Street, #502 San Francisco, CA 94105 1/4" = 1'-0" A-2.0 11-29-2023 VML JB 632690 ELEVATIONS NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 6 CHUCKWAGON ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90275 LEE RESIDENCE SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"EAST ELEVATION 1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"WEST ELEVATION 2 DATE DESCRIPTION DELTA 128 FINISH FLOOR0" 8'-6" PLATE8' - 6" BASEMENT LEVEL FF-11' - 0" 10'-6" PLATE10' - 6" ED C B A MATCH LINE6'-8"6'-8"1093.01'1093.01' FINISH FLOOR0" 8'-6" PLATE8' - 6" 10'-6" PLATE10' - 6" E DGFHJ C B A TO ADJACENT GRADETO ADJACENT GRADE16'-9" TOP OF STRUCTURE 16'-9" TOP OF STRUCTURE 20'-0"20'-0"OUTLINE OF BASEMENT FINISH FLOOR0" 8'-6" PLATE8' - 6" 10'-6" PLATE10' - 6" EGFHJ MATCH LINEDATE: DRAWN: REVIEWED: PROJECT NO: SCALE: OWNERSHIP AND USE OF DOCUMENTS ALL DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND COPIES THEREOF FURNISHED BY SAA INTERIORS ARE AND SHALL REMAIN IT'S PROPERTY. THEY ARE TO BE USED ONLY WITH RESPECT TO THIS PROJECT. FEDERAL LAW PROHIBITS THE REPRODUCTION, DISPLAY, SALE, OR OTHER DISPOSITION OF THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHLEMMER ALGAZE ASSOCIATES. COPYRIGHT © 2015 SHLEMMER ALGAZE ASSOCIATES ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SHEET TITLE: SHEET NO: SEAL AND STAMP: CONSULTANTS: PROJECT: CULVER CITY - IRVINE - LOS ANGELES - SAN FRANCISCO - NEW JERSEY - NEW YORK 6083 Bristol Parkway Culver City, CA 90230 18600 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92612 515 South Flower Street, Suite 1200 Los Angeles, CA 90071 T 310.553.3252 T 949.724.8958 T 213.929.1400 DRAWINGS ISSUE 485C US Route 1 South, Suite 105 Iselin, NJ 08830 T 848.200.1200 711 3rd Ave., 6th Floor New York, NY 10017 T 917.512.6688 www.saaia.com T 415.390.6793 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION IF DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS DEVELOPED AND PROVIDED BY SAA INTERIORS + ARCHITECTURE AT THE TIME OF AND RELATING TO COVID-19 CONTAIN RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (CDC) AND THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO), SUCH RECOMMENDATIONS ARE ONLY VALID AS OF THE DATE THE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS ARE PRODUCED. THE CDC AND/OR WHO MAY UPDATE OR MODIFY THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS AT ANY TIME PER THEIR DISCRETION. IN USING RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THESE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS, THE RECIPIENT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT WAS BASED ON THEIR OWN DECISION AND TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY. THE INTENDED RECIPIENT INDEMNIFIES AND DEFENDS SAA FOR ANY USE OF THESE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS BY OTHERS. SAA’S SERVICES ARE INTENDED TO ONLY BE OF ASSISTANCE AND GUIDANCE FOR OUR CLIENT’S STRATEGIES AND DO NOT CONSTITUTE AS REQUIREMENTS OR ANY FORM OF HEALTH, ILLNESS OR DISEASE ADVICE. SAA MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES REGARDING THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS. ANY RECOMMENDATIONS OR USE OF ANY CDC OR WHO INFORMATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ENDORSEMENT BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OR THE CDC AND WHO NOR ITS AFFILIATES. 575 Market Street, #502 San Francisco, CA 94105 As indicated A-2.1 11-29-2023 VML JB 632690 ELEVATIONS NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 6 CHUCKWAGON ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90275 LEE RESIDENCE SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"NORTH ELEVATION - WEST WING 3 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"NORTH ELEVATION 1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"NORTH ELEVATION - EAST WING 2 DATE DESCRIPTION DELTA 129 EDCBA FINISH FLOOR0" 8'-6" PLATE8' - 6" BASEMENT LEVEL FF-11' - 0" 10'-6" PLATE10' - 6" ED GF H JCBA FINISH FLOOR0" 8'-6" PLATE8' - 6" 10'-6" PLATE10' - 6" EGF H J DATE: DRAWN: REVIEWED: PROJECT NO: SCALE: OWNERSHIP AND USE OF DOCUMENTS ALL DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND COPIES THEREOF FURNISHED BY SAA INTERIORS ARE AND SHALL REMAIN IT'S PROPERTY. THEY ARE TO BE USED ONLY WITH RESPECT TO THIS PROJECT. FEDERAL LAW PROHIBITS THE REPRODUCTION, DISPLAY, SALE, OR OTHER DISPOSITION OF THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHLEMMER ALGAZE ASSOCIATES. COPYRIGHT © 2015 SHLEMMER ALGAZE ASSOCIATES ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SHEET TITLE: SHEET NO: SEAL AND STAMP: CONSULTANTS: PROJECT: CULVER CITY - IRVINE - LOS ANGELES - SAN FRANCISCO - NEW JERSEY - NEW YORK 6083 Bristol Parkway Culver City, CA 90230 18600 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92612 515 South Flower Street, Suite 1200 Los Angeles, CA 90071 T 310.553.3252 T 949.724.8958 T 213.929.1400 DRAWINGS ISSUE 485C US Route 1 South, Suite 105 Iselin, NJ 08830 T 848.200.1200 711 3rd Ave., 6th Floor New York, NY 10017 T 917.512.6688 www.saaia.com T 415.390.6793 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION IF DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS DEVELOPED AND PROVIDED BY SAA INTERIORS + ARCHITECTURE AT THE TIME OF AND RELATING TO COVID-19 CONTAIN RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (CDC) AND THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO), SUCH RECOMMENDATIONS ARE ONLY VALID AS OF THE DATE THE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS ARE PRODUCED. THE CDC AND/OR WHO MAY UPDATE OR MODIFY THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS AT ANY TIME PER THEIR DISCRETION. IN USING RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THESE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS, THE RECIPIENT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT WAS BASED ON THEIR OWN DECISION AND TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY. THE INTENDED RECIPIENT INDEMNIFIES AND DEFENDS SAA FOR ANY USE OF THESE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS BY OTHERS. SAA’S SERVICES ARE INTENDED TO ONLY BE OF ASSISTANCE AND GUIDANCE FOR OUR CLIENT’S STRATEGIES AND DO NOT CONSTITUTE AS REQUIREMENTS OR ANY FORM OF HEALTH, ILLNESS OR DISEASE ADVICE. SAA MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES REGARDING THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS. ANY RECOMMENDATIONS OR USE OF ANY CDC OR WHO INFORMATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ENDORSEMENT BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OR THE CDC AND WHO NOR ITS AFFILIATES. 575 Market Street, #502 San Francisco, CA 94105 As indicated A-2.2 11-29-2023 VML JB 632690 ELEVATIONS NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 6 CHUCKWAGON ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90275 LEE RESIDENCE SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"SOUTH ELEVATION - WEST WING 3 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"SOUTH ELEVATION 1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"SOUTH ELEVATION - EAST WING 2 DATE DESCRIPTION DELTA 130 1104.5TW1101.5BW1104.5TW1101.5BW1104.5TW1101.5BW1102.0TW1101.5BW1087.0 T W 1085B W 1095TW1090BW1098TW 1095BW 1095TW1090BW1088TW1087BW 1098TW1095BW 1100TW1099BW 1101TW 1097B W 1101TW 1096B W 1101TW 1099B W 1075TW1072BW 1070TW1065BW 1065TW1063BW 1066TW1065BW 1064TW1060BW1092TW1089BW 1101TW 1100B W 1100TW 1097B W1097TW 1092.5 B W 1092TW 1086.5 B W 1075TW1070BW 1070TW1065BW 1065TW1063BW 1103.5 T W 1101.5 B W 1101.5 T W 1101.5 B W 1102.5 T W 1101.5 B W 1103.5 T W 1101.5 B W 1104.5TW1101.5BW10' EASEMENT50'REAR YARDSETBACK10' RHCA EASEMENT 20' SIDE YARD SETBACK50'FRONT YARDSETBACK30'ROADEASEMENT30'ROADEASEMENT30'ROADEASEMENT50'FRONT YARDSETBACKL=436.26', R=320.00'Δ=78° 06' 45"ASPH ASPHN55°37'16"W210.84'N53°45'40"E167.69'N25°56'30"E190.23'S80°13'20"E165.59'N35°29'1 0 " W 30.00'N54°30'39"E43.21'N42°20'37"E72.50'N14°59'00"E70.00'N41°34'38"E200.00'S57°32'05"E 170.00'S41°34'38"W211.43'S49°43'35"E 459.55' S47°22'25"E171.51'N09°42'28"E163.21'N08°55'26"W138.19'N54°30'39"E43.21'N14°59'00"E195.88'N41°34'38"E200.00'S57°32'05"E 170.00'3 0 ' E A S E M E N T 30' EAS E M E N T 25' EA S E M E N T 50' RE A R Y A R D SETBA C K 10' RHCA EASEMENT 10' RHCA EASEMENT 10' RHCA EASEMENT 10' RHCAEASEMENT 50' REARYARDSETBACK50' REARYARDSETBACK50' F R O N T Y A R D SE T B A C K 50' FRONTYARDSETBACK30'30'20' SIDEYARD SETBACK 20' SIDEYARD SETBACK S42°37'40"W30.00'RD. E A S E M E N T RD. EASEMENTPIPE PIPE S PIPEDIRTDIRTCONC CONCDECKASPHASPH ASPH PAVER CON C CONC STE P ASPH SWALE SWALEDIRT DIRT WOOD GATEDOO R S I L L EL 1 1 0 6 . 3 ⅊⅊⅊⅊⅊⅊⅊⅊⅊⅊⅊ #6 CHUCKWAGON L A N E PORTION OF LOTS 2 8 A N D 2 9 RECORD OF SURE Y , M B 5 8 , 6 - 1 0 HOUSE HIGHEST R I D G E E L 1 1 2 1 . 7 1 #4 CHUCKWAGON LANEPORTION OF LOT 38 AND 39 RECORD OF SURVEY, MB 58, 6-10 #8 HAC K A M O R E R O A D PORTION O F L O T 2 8 A N D 2 9 RECORD O F S U R V E Y , M B 5 8 , 6-1060'30'30'6 0 ' 3 0 ' 3 0 '60'30'30'C O N C CONCC O N C P A T I O CONC PATIO CONCPLANTERCSCS D O O R S I L L EL 1 1 0 6 . 1GMEM GATEGATECPDIRT DIRT GARAGE F F EL 1104 . 3 HEDGE ASPH CATCH B A SI NASPHASPH DENSE TREESDENSE TREESDENSE TREES18" TREE36" TREE10" TREETREESTREESTREES15" TREE30" TREE18" TREE10" TREE6" TREE 36" TREE STUMP 36" TREESTUMPFLOWLINE1060107010301040105010201100109010801090 1100 107010601050 115011401130 1120 1110 1150 1140 1160 1130 1100 1120 1110 1090 10701080 102010401050103010601170 108010701080 1090 1100 10601050104010301064.91063.41061.51101.41104.81103.91103.71102.31104.11082.71081.81083.71084.51084.51059.61019.01081.41083.41083.51083.01083.31104.7 1105.71102.91101.81113.71112.61144.41137.71138.41104.21084.91087.01086.51085.41016.61015.81019.01113.71180.41180.41112.51112.91113.01019.11016.31017.01161.61017.41011.81113.01113.21159.61180.51161.61161.41180.41180.41179.41106.21103.31103.61103.41103.31103.61083.61081.41083.71081.71083.01082.31083.31058.51056.81060.51062.31059.41059.41068.91078.91094.61096.8 1104.2 1103.8 1104.7 1104.41105.81106.11104.61104.11105.71104.61106.31105.81104.71105.11106.11106.11105.01104.31104.11102.91104.21102.91102.61104.11104.211 0 4 . 4 POWER POLECLEAN OUTMANHOLE15" DRAIN 15" DRAINFIRE HYDRANTPOWER POLECATV HHPOWER POLE3 RAIL FENCE STEPS18' BLO CK WALL W/ CLF WALL W/ CLF WATER VALVE 18" BLOCK WALL W/ CLF WF WOOD PLANTERPLANTERC L F CHUCKWAGON ROADCHUCKWAGON ROAD CHUCKWAGON ROAD(P)SEEPAGEPIT(P) SEPTICTANKA AB BCB15.06.40.0-7.5-15.01070TW1065BW1075TW1072BW 1087TW1085BW 1095TW1090BW1098TW1095BW1101TW1100BW1090TW1088BW1095TW1092BW1100TW1098BW1064TW1060BW1066TW1065BW1065TW1063BW1098FG1105RIM1101FG1105RIM1104FG1105FS1101.50TW1098BW1104.5TW1101.5BW1104.5TW1101.5BW1104.5TW1101.5BW1102.0TW1101.5BW1087.0 T W 1085B W 1095TW1090BW1098TW 1095B W 1095TW 1090B W 1088TW 1087B W 1098TW 1095B W 1100TW 1099B W 1101TW 1097B W 1101TW 1096B W 1101TW 1099B W 1075TW1072BW 1070TW1065BW 1065TW1063BW 1066TW1065BW 1064TW1060BW 1092TW 1089B W 1101TW 1100B W 1100TW 1097B W1097TW 1092.5 B W 1092TW 1086.5 B W 1075TW1070BW 1070TW1065BW 1065TW1063BW 1103.5 T W 1101.5 B W 1101.5 T W 1101.5 B W 1102.5 T W 1101.5 B W 1103.5 T W 1101.5 B W 1104.5TW1101.5BW10' EASEMENT50'REAR YARDSETBACK10' RHCA EASEMENT 20' SIDE YARD SETBACK50'FRONT YARDSETBACK30'ROADEASEMENT30'ROADEASEMENT30'ROADEASEMENT50'FRONT YARDSETBACKL=436.26', R =320.00'Δ=78 ° 0 6' 45" ASPH ASPHN55°37'16"W210.84'N53°45'40"E167.69'N25°56'30"E190.23'S80°13'20"E165.59'N35°29'1 0 " W 30.00'N54°30'39"E43.21'N42°20'37"E72.50'N14°59'00"E70.00'N41°34'38"E200.00'S57°32'05"E 170.00'S41°34'38"W211.43'S49°43'35"E 459.55' S47°22'25"E171.51'N09°42'28"E163.21'N 0 8 ° 5 5 ' 2 6 " W 13 8 . 1 9 'N54°30'39"E43.21'N14°59'00"E195.88'N41°34'38"E200.00'S57°32'05"E 170.00'3 0 ' E A S E M E N T 30' EAS E M E N T 25' EA S E M E N T 50' RE A R Y A R D SETBA C K 10' RHCA EASEMENT 10' RHCA EASEMENT 10' RHCA EASEMENT 10' RHCA EASEMENT 50' REARYARDSETBACK50' REARYARDSETBACK50' F R O N T Y A R D SE T B A C K 50' FRONTYARDSETBACK30'30'20' SIDEYARD SETBACK 20' SIDEYARD SETBACK S42°37'40"W30.00'RD. E A S E M E N T RD. EASEMENTPIPE PIPE S PIPEDIRTDIRTCONC CONCDECKASPHASP H ASPH PAVER CON C CONC STE P ASPH SWALE SWALEDIRT DIRT WOOD GATEDOO R S I L L EL 1 1 0 6 . 3 ⅊⅊⅊⅊⅊⅊⅊⅊⅊⅊⅊ #6 CHUCKWAGON L A N E PORTION OF LOTS 2 8 A N D 2 9 RECORD OF SURE Y , M B 5 8 , 6 - 1 0 HOUSE HIGHEST R I D G E E L 1 1 2 1 . 7 1 #4 CHUCKWAGON LANE PORTION OF LOT 38 AND 39 RECORD OF SURVEY, MB 58, 6-10 #8 HAC K A M O R E R O A D PORTION O F L O T 2 8 A N D 2 9 RECORD O F S U R V E Y , M B 5 8 , 6-1060'30'30'6 0 ' 3 0 ' 3 0 '60'30'30'C O N C CONCC O N C P A T I O CONC PATIO CONCPLANTERCSCS D O O R S I L L EL 1 1 0 6 . 1GMEM GATEGATECPDIRT DIRT GARAGE F F EL 1104 . 3 HEDGE ASPH CATCH B A SI NASPHASPH DENSE TREESDENSE TREESDENSE TREES18" TREE36" TREE10" TREETREESTREESTREES15" TREE30" TREE18" TREE10" TREE6" TREE 36" TREE STUMP 36" TREESTUMPFLOWLINE1060107010301040105010201100109010801090 1100 107010601050 115011401130 1120 1110 1150 1140 1160 1130 1100 1120 1110 1090 10701080 102010401050103010601170 10801070 1080 1090 1100 10601050104010301064.91063.41061.51101.41104.81103.91103.71102.31104.11082.71081.81083.71084.51084.51059.61019.01081.41083.41083.51083.01083.31104.7 1105.71102.91101.81113.71112.61144.41137.71138.41104.21084.91087.01086.51085.41016.61015.81019.01113.71180.41180.41112.51112.91113.01019.11016.31017.01161.61017.41011.81113.01113.21159.61180.51161.61161.41180.41180.41179.41106.21103.31103.61103.41103.31103.61083.61081.41083.71081.71083.01082.31083.31058.51056.81060.51062.31059.41059.41068.9 1078.91094.61096.8 1104.2 1103.8 1104.7 1104.41105.81106.11104.61104.11105.71104.61106.31105.81104.71105.11106.11106.11105.01104.31104.11102.91104.21102.91102.61104.11104.211 0 4 . 4 POWER POLECLEAN OUTMANHOLE15" DRAIN 15" DRAINFIRE HYDRANTPOWER POLECATV HHPOWER POLE3 RAIL F E N C E STEPS18' BLO CK WALL W/ CLF WALL W/ CLF WATER VALVE 18" BLOCK WALL W/ CLF WF WOOD PLANTERPLANTERC L F CHUCKWAGON ROADCHUCKWAGON ROAD CHUCKWAGON ROAD(P)SEEPAGEPIT(P) SEPTICTANKA AB BCB15.06.40.0-7.5 -15.01070TW1065BW1075TW1072BW 1087TW 1085BW 1095TW1090BW1098TW1095BW1101TW1100BW1090TW1088BW1095TW1092BW1100TW1098BW1064TW1060BW1066TW1065BW1065TW1063BW1098FG1105RIM1101FG1105RIM1104FG1105FS1101.50TW1098BWA-2.3 3 A-2.3 4 6" STEP EQEQEQEQ20'-0"20'-0"1'-0"1'-0"18'-0"18'-0"1'-0"1'-0"2'-0"2'-0"12'-9 1/2"12'-9 1/2"2'-0"2'-0" 1116.01'1116.01'3" / 12"3" / 12"2'-6"2'-6"2'-3"2'-3" FINISH FLOOR0" 8'-6" PLATE8' - 6" FINISH FLOOR0" 8'-6" PLATE8' - 6" DATE: DRAWN: REVIEWED: PROJECT NO: SCALE: OWNERSHIP AND USE OF DOCUMENTS ALL DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND COPIES THEREOF FURNISHED BY SAA INTERIORS ARE AND SHALL REMAIN IT'S PROPERTY. THEY ARE TO BE USED ONLY WITH RESPECT TO THIS PROJECT. FEDERAL LAW PROHIBITS THE REPRODUCTION, DISPLAY, SALE, OR OTHER DISPOSITION OF THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF SHLEMMER ALGAZE ASSOCIATES. COPYRIGHT © 2015 SHLEMMER ALGAZE ASSOCIATES ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SHEET TITLE: SHEET NO: SEAL AND STAMP: CONSULTANTS: PROJECT: CULVER CITY - IRVINE - LOS ANGELES - SAN FRANCISCO - NEW JERSEY - NEW YORK 6083 Bristol Parkway Culver City, CA 90230 18600 MacArthur Blvd., Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92612 515 South Flower Street, Suite 1200 Los Angeles, CA 90071 T 310.553.3252 T 949.724.8958 T 213.929.1400 DRAWINGS ISSUE 485C US Route 1 South, Suite 105 Iselin, NJ 08830 T 848.200.1200 711 3rd Ave., 6th Floor New York, NY 10017 T 917.512.6688 www.saaia.com T 415.390.6793 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION IF DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS DEVELOPED AND PROVIDED BY SAA INTERIORS + ARCHITECTURE AT THE TIME OF AND RELATING TO COVID-19 CONTAIN RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (CDC) AND THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO), SUCH RECOMMENDATIONS ARE ONLY VALID AS OF THE DATE THE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS ARE PRODUCED. THE CDC AND/OR WHO MAY UPDATE OR MODIFY THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS AT ANY TIME PER THEIR DISCRETION. IN USING RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THESE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS, THE RECIPIENT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT WAS BASED ON THEIR OWN DECISION AND TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY. THE INTENDED RECIPIENT INDEMNIFIES AND DEFENDS SAA FOR ANY USE OF THESE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS BY OTHERS. SAA’S SERVICES ARE INTENDED TO ONLY BE OF ASSISTANCE AND GUIDANCE FOR OUR CLIENT’S STRATEGIES AND DO NOT CONSTITUTE AS REQUIREMENTS OR ANY FORM OF HEALTH, ILLNESS OR DISEASE ADVICE. SAA MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES REGARDING THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE DRAWINGS AND MATERIALS. ANY RECOMMENDATIONS OR USE OF ANY CDC OR WHO INFORMATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ENDORSEMENT BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OR THE CDC AND WHO NOR ITS AFFILIATES. 575 Market Street, #502 San Francisco, CA 94105 1/4" = 1'-0" A-2.3 11-29-2023 VML JB 632690 DETACHED COVERED PATIO NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 6 CHUCKWAGON ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90275 LEE RESIDENCE SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"DETACHED PATIO PLAN 1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"DETACHED PATIO ROOF PLAN 2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"SIDE ELEVATION 3 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"FRONT ELEVATION 4 DATE DESCRIPTION DELTA 131 CHUC K W A G O N R O A D C H U C K W A G O N R O A D CHUCKW A G O N R O A D D N D N UP UP Bolton Engineering Corp.Civil Engineering and Surveying25834 Narbonne Avenue Suite 210Lomita, Ca. 90717Ph: 310-325-5580 Fax: 310-325-55811 LOT COMPUTATIONS EARTHWORK ESTIMATE LOT INFORMATION 30 30 60 30 6 CHUCKWAGON ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 SCALE: 1" = 30' INDEX OF SHEETS OVERALL SITE PLAN TYPICAL SECTION CHUCK W A G O N ROAD SCALE: 1" = 250' VICINITY MAP PROJECT SITE 132 CHUC K W A G O N R O A D C H U C K W A G O N R O A D CHUCKW A G O N R O A D Bolton Engineering Corp.Civil Engineering and Surveying25834 Narbonne Avenue Suite 210Lomita, Ca. 90717Ph: 310-325-5580 Fax: 310-325-55812SCALE: 1" = 20' EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CHUCK W A G O N ROAD C H U C K W A G O N R O A D 133 CHUC K W A G O N R O A D C H U C K W A G O N R O A D CHUCKW A G O N R O A D LEGEND Bolton Engineering Corp.Civil Engineering and Surveying25834 Narbonne Avenue Suite 210Lomita, Ca. 90717Ph: 310-325-5580 Fax: 310-325-55813SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 20' 134 CHUC K W A G O N R O A D C H U C K W A G O N R O A D CHUCKW A G O N R O A D D N D N UP UP LEGEND-GRADING PLAN Bolton Engineering Corp.Civil Engineering and Surveying25834 Narbonne Avenue Suite 210Lomita, Ca. 90717Ph: 310-325-5580 Fax: 310-325-55814SCALE: 1" = 20' PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN CHUCK WAGON ROAD 135 Bolton Engineering Corp.Civil Engineering and Surveying25834 Narbonne Avenue Suite 210Lomita, Ca. 90717Ph: 310-325-5580 Fax: 310-325-55815 SCALE: 1" = 20' DRIVEWAY PROFILE SCALE: 1" = 20' SECTION A-A SCALE: 1" = 20' SECTION B-B SCALE: 1" = 20' SECTION C-C 136 FTBSV CONFIGURATION (OPTIONS: BASIN "-B", GREEN INFR. INLET "-I", PIPE INLET "-P", SLOTTED THROAT INLET "-T") MEDIA BAY SIZE VAULT SIZE (L x W) LONG SIDE INLET DESIGNATION SHORT SIDE INLET DESIGNATION AVAILABILITY OUTLET PIPE DIA MIN. NO. OF INLET PIPES (-P ONLY) 4 x 4 4 x 4 FTBSV0404 FTBSV0404 ALL 4" SDR 35 1 6 x 4 6 x 4 FTBSV0604 FTBSV0406 N/A CA 4" SDR 35 1 6.5 x 4 6.5 x 4 FTBSV06504 FTBSV04065 CA ONLY 4" SDR 35 1 7.83 x 4.5 7.83 x 4.5 FTBSV078045 FTBSV045078 DE,MD,NJ,PA,VA.WV ONLY 4" SDR 35 1 8 x 4 8 x 4 FTBSV0804 FTBSV0408 N/A DE,MD,NJ,PA,VA,WV 4" SDR 35 1 6 x 6 6 x 6 FTBSV0606 FTBSV0606 ALL 4" SDR 35 1 8 x 6 8 x 6 FTBSV0806 FTBSV0608 ALL 4" SDR 35 1 10 x 6 10 x 6 FTBSV1006 FTBSV0610 ALL 6" SDR 35 2 12 x 6 12 x 6 FTBSV1206 FTBSV0612 ALL 6" SDR 35 2 13 x 7 13 x 7 FTBSV1307 FTBSV0713 ALL 6" SDR 35 2 14 x 8 14 x 8 FTBSV1408†N/A ALL 6" SDR 35 3 16 x 8 16 x 8 FTBSV1608†N/A N/A OR,WA 6" SDR 35 3 15 x 9 15 x 9 FTBSV1509†N/A OR,WA ONLY 6" SDR 35 3 18 x 8 18 x 8 FTBSV1808†N/A CALL CONTECH 6" SDR 35 3 20 x 8 20 x 8 FTBSV2008†N/A CALL CONTECH 6" SDR 35 4 22 x 8 22 x 8 FTBSV2208†N/A CALL CONTECH 6" SDR 35 4 †UTILIZES (2) CURB OPENINGS WITH MIN 1' SPACING N/A = NOT AVAILABLE SDR 35 OUTLET COUPLING CAST INTO PRECAST VAULT WALL (OUTLET PIPE LOCATION MAY VARY)***CURB AND GUTTER (NOT BY CONTECH) SEE FILTERRA BIOSCAPE VAULT CURB INLET DETAIL SHEET 18" GI INLET (CAST-IN) ENERGY DISSIPATION ROCKS PLANT PROVIDED BY CONTECH SECTION A-A GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE INLET - TOP FLUSH WITH TOP OF CURB, NOT INTENDED FOR SIDEWALK APPLICATIONS PLAN VIEW SHORT SIDE INLET 4' CURB INLET (MAX) REFER TO OTHER DETAILS FOR ALTERNATE INLETS INLET SHAPING (NOT BY CONTECH) CURB (NOT BY CONTECH) UNDERDRAIN FLOWKIT TYPE A2-8 (Modified)MOW CURB TYPE A1-6 (Modified)Bolton Engineering Corp.Civil Engineering and Surveying25834 Narbonne Avenue Suite 210Lomita, Ca. 90717Ph: 310-325-5580 Fax: 310-325-55816 137 CHUC K W A G O N R O A D C H U C K W A G O N R O A D CHUCKW A G O N R O A D D N D N BE D R O O M 1 MA S T E R S U I T E AV MA S T E R B A T H CL O S E T CL O S E T LIVI N G R O O M DE T A C H E D PA T I O C O V E R PO O L JAC U Z Z I YA R D A R E A DIN I N G EN T R Y GA R A G E M O T O R C O U R T CO U R T Y A R D 11 0 4 . 0 1 ' KIT C H E N OF F I C E BU T L E R ' S P A N T R Y DN T O BAS E M E N T BE D R O O M 2 CL O S E T BE D R O O M 3 BE D R O O M 4REFLA U N D R Y D D W W 110 3 . 8 4 ' 11 0 3 . 9 3 'OUTLINE OF (E) RES IDENCE MATCH LINEWE S T W I N G UP UP HO M E T H E A T E R UP T O GR O U N D FLO O R LI G H T Θ E G R E S S W E L L WI N E C E L L A R AV CON C E S S I O N S FP 109 2 . 0 1 ' OU T L I N E O F F I R S T F L O O R 20 60 00 60 20 CRORU DHSWK AUHD RI )LOOAUHD RI CXWLEGEND-CUT FILL EXHIBIT Bolton Engineering Corp.Civil Engineering and Surveying25834 Narbonne Avenue Suite 210Lomita, Ca. 90717Ph: 310-325-5580 Fax: 310-325-55813CUT/FILL COLOR MAP SCALE: 1" = 20' CHUCK WAGON ROAD 138 THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE ARE THE PROPERTY OF GREGORY W GEORGE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, AND SHALL NOT BE COPIED IN PART OR IN WHOLE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION GREGORY W GEORGE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PREFERENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE AND ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF GREGORY W GEORGE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, AND/OR THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK L-102.1/Users/gregorygeorge/Library/CloudStorage/Dropbox/#StudioGWG Projects/Lee Residence - 6 Chuckwagon/6 Chuckwagon_01.plnStudio GWG LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECTURE PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLANNING for mail: 318 Avenue I, #154 Redondo Beach, California 90277 310.686.5202 studioGWG@gmail.com LA6230 C27-581236, BStudioGWG@gmail.com info@studioGWG.com Illustrative Landscape Plan 4/8/25Lee Residence6 Chuckwagon Road Rolling Hills, CA 90275ASPHASPHASPH10601070103010401050102011001090108010901070 1060 1050 1150 1 1 4 0 1130 1120 1110 1 1 4 0 11301 1 0 0 1 12 0 111010 90 1070 1080 A S P H 10201040105010301060PI PEPI PESPIPEDIRT CONCDECK DIRTASPH C H U C K W A G O N R O A D 108010701080109011001060105010401030L=436.26', R=320.00' Δ=78° 06' 45" D N D N UP U P (P)SEEPAGEPIT(P) SEPTICTANK1070TW 1065BW 1075TW1072BW 1087TW1085BW 1095T W 1090B W 1098T W 1095B W 1101T W 1100B W1090TW1088BW109 5T W 1092B W 1100T W 1098B W1064TW1060BW1066TW1065BW1065TW1063BW1098FG1105RIM1101 F G 1105R IM 1104F G 1105F S 1101.50T W 1098B W POOLEQ. EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN RHUS / TOYON / CHINESE ELMS CERCIDIUM 'DESERT MUSEUM' PACHYCEREUS SPECIES ALOE ARBORESCENS EUPHORBIA COTINIFOLIA ECHIUM CANDICANS RHUS INTEGRIFOLIA MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM STATUE BASE W/ SHORT WALL LANAI PHORMIUM TENAX SPECIES VARIOUS SIZES BARN CORRAL GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS ALOE VERA DYMONDIA N SCALE: 1" = 20' 1 Illustrative Landscape Plan L-102.1 0 10'20'40' 139 THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE ARE THE PROPERTY OF GREGORY W GEORGE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, AND SHALL NOT BE COPIED IN PART OR IN WHOLE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION GREGORY W GEORGE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PREFERENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE AND ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF GREGORY W GEORGE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, AND/OR THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK L-102.2/Users/gregorygeorge/Library/CloudStorage/Dropbox/#StudioGWG Projects/Lee Residence - 6 Chuckwagon/6 Chuckwagon_01.plnStudio GWG LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECTURE PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLANNING for mail: 318 Avenue I, #154 Redondo Beach, California 90277 310.686.5202 studioGWG@gmail.com LA6230 C27-581236, BStudioGWG@gmail.com info@studioGWG.com Planting Notes and Details 4/8/25Lee Residence6 Chuckwagon Road Rolling Hills, CA 90275BOTANICAL COMMON WATERCODEQTYSIZE NOTES TREE ALOE SPP.ALOE LowALO SPP 12 5 GAL NOTES EUPHORBIA COTINIFOLIA CARIBBEAN COPPER PLANT ModerateEUP COT 10 24 BOX NOTES PARKINSONIA 'DESERT MUSEUM'DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDE Very LowPAR DM 21 24 BOX NOTES GROUND COVER ECHINOCACTUS SPP.BARREL CACTUS Very LowECH SPP 92 5 GAL NOTES ECHIUM CANDICANS PRIDE OF MADEIRA LowECH CAN 36 5 GAL NOTES PACHYCEREUS MARGINATUS MEXICAN FENCE POST CACTUS Very LowPAC MAR 36 15 GAL NOTES RHUS INTEGRIFOLIA LEMONADE BERRY Very LowRHU INT TBD 5 GAL NOTES SHRUB DYMONDIA MARGARETAE DYMONDIA LowDYM MAR TBD FLATS NOTES MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM MYOPORUM Very LowMYO PAR TBD FLATS NOTES PERENNIAL PHORMIUM TENAX NEW ZEALAND FLAX LowPHO TEN 423 5 GAL NOTES PLANTING LEGEND MWELO Calcs – Residential Ken Lee Landscape 6 Chuckwagon Long Beach Hydrozones Zone number 1 Plant factor Moderate .4 Irrigation type Drip Area in square feet (number only) 40845 Zone Plant Factor Irr.Irr. Eff. ETAF (PF/IE)Area ETAF x Area ETWU Delete 1 .4 Drip 0.81 0.49 40845 s.f.20,014 496,473 TOTALS 40,845 s.f.496,473 gal/yr TOTAL SPECIAL LANDSCAPE AREA 0 s.f. MAWA: 552,947 gal/yr PASS!ETWU: 496,473 gal/yr Long Beach Annual ETo = 39.7 in. Project Name and City Project name Ken Lee Landscape 6 Chuckwagon Choose city (for ETo data) Long Beach Provided by WaterWonk. Contact us: talktome@WaterWonk.us Copyright © 2010 - 2023 WaterWonk. All rights reserved. GENERAL PLANTING NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A QUALIFIED SUPERVISOR ON THE SITE AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION THROUGH COMPLETION OF PICK-UP WORK. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES LISTED FOR CONVENIENCE OF CONTRACTOR. ACTUAL NUMBER OF SYMBOLS SHALL HAVE PRIORITY OVER QUANTITY DESIGNATED. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH AND PAY FOR ALL CONTAINER GROWN TREES, SHRUBS AND VINES, INCLUDING SEEDED AND SODDED TURF, HYDROMULCHES AND FLATTED GROUNDCOVERS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE AND PAY FOR: PLANTING OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS; THE SPECIFIED GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS; THE STAKING AND GUYING OF TREES AND THE CONTINUOUS PROTECTION OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS UPON THEIR ARRIVAL AT THE SITE. 4. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / DESIGNER AND/OR OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 5. ALL BOXED TREES SHALL BE SELECTED AND SPOTTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / DESIGNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONCRETE CONTRACTOR AND GENERAL CONTRACTOR. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO ASSUME ALL LIABILITY FOR ACCURATE PLACEMENT OF TREES. 6. ALL VINE RUNNERS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THE NURSERY STAKES REMOVED AND VINE RUNNERS SHALL BE ESPALIERED TO THE ADJACENT WALL OR FENCE. 7. ALL SOIL PREPARATION SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER THE SOIL AGRONOMY REPORT TO BE PROVIDED AND PAID FOR BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR. THE REPORT SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY FORWARDED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / DESIGNER UPON COMPLETION. 8. THE SOIL AMENDMENTS SPECIFIED ARE FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR A SOILS AGRONOMY REPORT FROM AN APPROVED SOILS LABORATORY AND/OR ANY ADDITIONAL SPECIFICATION PROVIDED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / DESIGNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIALS. (WALLACE LABS, EL SEGUNDO). 9. FOR AREA TO BE LANDSCAPED, THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS SHALL BE UNIFORMLY BROADCAST AND THOROUGHLY INCORPORATED BY MEANS OF A ROTOTILLER OR EQUAL. AMOUNT PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET 2 CU. YDS. STABILIZED ORGANIC AMENDMENT DERIVED FROM PEAT MOSS, STEER MANURE, OR A COMBINATION WITH REDWOOD SHAVINGS. (SEE SOILS REPORT) 15 LBS. AGRICULTURAL GYPSUM 15 LBS. SOIL SULFUR 15 LBS. 15-15-15 FERTILIZER 10. THE PLANTING PITS FOR BOXED TREES SHALL BE EXCAVATED TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOTBALL AND NO DEEPER THAN THE ROOTBALL. THE BACKFILL MIX FOR USE AROUND THE ROOTBALL OF ALL TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING FORMULA: 6 PARTS ON-SITE SOIL 4 PARTS BY VOLUME ORGANIC AMENDMENT PER ABOVE SOIL PREPARATION 1 LB./CU.YD. OF MIX 12-12-12 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER 2 LBS./CU. YD. OF MIX IRON SULFATE 15 LBS./CU. YD. OF MIX AGRICULTURAL GYPSUM 11. THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER INSTALLATION ALL LANDSCAPE SHALL BE FERTILIZED WITH BEST FERTILIZER COMPANY 16-6-8 OR APPROVED EQUAL, APPLIED AT THE RATE OF SIX POUNDS (6 LBS.) PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET. FERTILIZER APPLICATION SHALL BE CONTINUED THEREAFTER AT MONTHLY INTERVALS. 12. FOR ALL STAKED TREES, SEE DETAIL 1 13. FOR ALL BOX TREES, SEE DETAIL 14. FERTILIZER TABLETS SHALL BE AGRIFORM, 21 GRAM TABLETS (20-10-5) IN QUANTITIES AS FOLLOWS: 1 GALLON SHRUBS 1 5 GALLON SHRUBS AND TREES 3 15 GALLON SHRUBS 4 BOXED TREES 1 PER 4" OF BOX SIZE PLACE TABLETS AT HALF THE DEPTH OF THE ROOTBALL. 15. ALL SHRUB AREAS SHALL BE COVERED WITH MINIMUM 3" SHREDDED BARK MULCH. CITY OF ROLLING HILLS LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. NO LANDSCAPING SHALL BE ALLOWED IN THE RHCA EASEMENT 2. TREES SPECIFIED SHALL NOT GROW HIGHER THAN THE HEIGHT OF THE ROOF RIDGE 3. TREES SHALL BE PLANTED IN LOCATIONS THAT DO NOT HINDER VIEWS FROM ADJACENT LOTS 4. TREES ARE REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED TO A HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED THE ROOF RIDGE AND SO THAT VIEWS FROM ADJACENT LOTS ARE NOT OBSTRUCTED 5. HEDGES ARE NOT ALLOWED 6. ALL PLANTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE GENERAL LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TAKEN FROM CURB FACE, BUILDING FACE OR EDGE OF PAVING, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLAN. THE DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN FOR APPROXIMATE LINE AND ALL RADII AND CURVES ARE TO HAVE CONTINUOUS AND SMOOTH TRANSITIONS WITHOUT ABRUPT CHANGES OR BENDS. 2. ALL FORMS AND ALIGNMENT OF PAVING SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / DESIGNER PRIOR TO POURING (GIVE A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS NOTICE). 3. FOR SITE GRADING SEE ENGINEERING PLANS OR REFERENCE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR ONSITE DETERMINATION. WATER SHALL GRAVITY DRAIN TO STREET BY SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DRAIN SYSTEM. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE HELD LIABLE FOR ALL DAMAGES INCURRED. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION, QUANTITY AND INSTALL SLEEVES FOR IRRIGATION, LIGHTING, DRAINS AND UTILITY CONDUITS PRIOR TO CONCRETE. 6. ALL CONSTRUCTION AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. 7. THESE NOTES SHALL BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PLANS AND ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / DESIGNER. 8. CONTRACTOR MUST CHECK ALL DIMENSIONS, FRAMING CONDITIONS AND SITE CONDITIONS BEFORE STARTING WORK. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / DESIGNER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR POSSIBLE DEFICIENCIES. 9. CONDITIONS NOT SPECIFICALLY SHOWN SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED SIMILAR TO THE DETAILS FOR THE RESPECTIVE MATERIALS. 10. THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS REPRESENT THE FINISHED STRUCTURE. ALL BRACING, TEMPORARY SUPPORTS, SHORING, ETC. IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. OBSERVATION VISITS TO THE JOB SITE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DO NOT INCLUDE INSPECTION OF CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND SAFETY CONDITIONS AT THE WORKSITE. THESE VISITS SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS CONTINUOUS AND DETAILED INSPECTIONS. 11. DESIGN, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND PRODUCTS OTHER THAN THOSE DESCRIBED BELOW OR INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS MAY BE CONSIDERED FOR USE, PROVIDED PRIOR APPROVAL IS OBTAINED FROM THE OWNER, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / DESIGNER AND THE APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODE AUTHORITY. GENERAL HARDSCAPE / GRADING NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY GRADES AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / DESIGNER PRIOR TO START OF GRADING WORK. 2. ALL DRAIN LINES TO DRAIN AT 1% MINIMUM WITH SMOOTH CONTINUOUS FALL. 3. ALL TOP SURFACES OF STEP TREADS TO SLOPE AT 1% FOR DRAINAGE. 4. ALL PLANTED AREAS TO SLOPE TO CATCH BASINS AT 1-1/2% MINIMUM SLOPE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. ALL EXISTING GRADES SHOWN PER SURVEY. 6. ALL PROPOSED PAVING SURFACES SHALL MEET EXISTING PAVING SURFACES WITH SMOOTH AND CONTINUOUS TRANSITION AND FLUSH ALONG ENTIRE EDGE. 7. CONCRETE WALKS TO HAVE A MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE OF 2% AND SHALL MEET ALL LOCAL AND COUNTY REQUIREMENTS. 8. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS, EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, STREET IMPROVEMENTS, AND FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS WITH THE ENGINEER. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY UPON ANY DISCREPANCIES. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PROPOSED DRAINAGE INVERTS 10. DAYLIGHT DRAIN LINE THROUGH FACE OF EXISTING CURB 1" ABOVE FLOW LINE. EXACT INVERT TO BE VERIFIED IN FIELD. 11. ALL FINISH GRADES IN PLANTED AREAS SHALL BE 1-1/2" BELOW ADJACENT PAVING SURFACE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 12. ALL FLASH WALLS SHALL FOLLOW FINISH GRADE. 13. FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PER ENGINEERING PLANS. GENERAL LIGHTING NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL STUB OUT ELECTRICAL CONDUIT TO SPECIMEN TREES AFTER TREE PLANTING. ALL FIXTURES SHALL BE MOUNTED AFTER INSTALLATION OF SPECIMEN TREES. EXACT LOCATION OF FIXTURE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO TREE LOCATION. 2. LIGHTS MAY NEED TO BE LOCATED ON DIFFERENT CIRCUITS ACCORDING TO USE AREAS AND TYPE OF LIGHT. 3. ALL LIGHTING FIXTURES AND ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE HELD LIABLE FOR ALL DAMAGES INCURRED. 5. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT UNIFORM BUILDING CODES, PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND STATE HEALTH AND SAFETY REQUIREMENTS. 6. THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS REPRESENT THE FINISHED STRUCTURE. ALL BRACING, TEMPORARY SUPPORTS, SHORING, ETC. IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. OBSERVATION VISITS TO THE JOB SITE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / DESIGNER DO NOT INCLUDE INSPECTION OF CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND FOR SAFETY CONDITIONS AT THE WORKSITE. THESE VISITS SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS CONTINUOUS AND DETAILED INSPECTIONS. 7. ALL ELECTRICAL FIXTURES ARE SHOWN SCHEMATICALLY FOR LOCATIONS AND QUANTITIES REQUIRED. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 8. ALL CIRCUITS TO BE CONTROLLED BY DIMMER/ SWITCH ZONES TO BE DETERMINED 9. SPECIFY TRANSFORMERS @ 300 WATTS -MAX WATTAGE PER CIRCUIT TO BE 220 WATTS FOR ROOM FOR EXPANSION. 9. ALL WIRES TO BE HOME RUN TO A DIRECT BURIAL BOX PER CIRCUIT. 10. NO SPLICES IN THE MIDDLE OF A RUN. 11. ALL RUNS TO LIGHT GROUPS SHALL BE PLACED IN CONDUIT. 12. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL LINE VOLTAGE FOR ELECTRICAL 13. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SWITCH AND POWER TO LANDSCAPE POST @ TRANSFORMER FOR EXTERNAL LOW VOLTAGE LANDSCAPE LIGHTING 14. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE POWER TO FIREPLACE AND BBQ I HAVE COMPLIED WITH THE CRITERIA OF THE ORDINANCE AND APPLIED THEM FOR THE EFFICIENT USE OF WATER IN THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN PLANS. SIGNATURE: DATE: APRIL 7TH, 2025 140 THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE ARE THE PROPERTY OF GREGORY W GEORGE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, AND SHALL NOT BE COPIED IN PART OR IN WHOLE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION GREGORY W GEORGE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PREFERENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE AND ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF GREGORY W GEORGE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, AND/OR THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK L-102.3/Users/gregorygeorge/Library/CloudStorage/Dropbox/#StudioGWG Projects/Lee Residence - 6 Chuckwagon/6 Chuckwagon_01.plnStudio GWG LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECTURE PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLANNING for mail: 318 Avenue I, #154 Redondo Beach, California 90277 310.686.5202 studioGWG@gmail.com LA6230 C27-581236, BStudioGWG@gmail.com info@studioGWG.com Planting and Lighting Plan 4/8/25Lee Residence6 Chuckwagon Road Rolling Hills, CA 90275ASPHASPHASPH1060107010301040105011001090108010901070 1060 1050 1150 1 1 4 0 1130 1120 1110 1 1 4 0 11301 1 0 0 1 12 0 111010 90 1070 1080 PI PEPI PESPIPEDIRT CONCDECK DIRTASPH C H U C K W A G O N R O A D 108010701080109011001060105010401030L=436.26', R=320.00' Δ=78° 06' 45" D N D N UP U P (P)SEEPAGEPIT(P) SEPTICTANK1070TW 1065BW 1075TW1072BW 1087TW1085BW 1095T W 1090B W 1098T W 1095B W 1101T W 1100B W1090TW1088BW109 5T W 1092B W 1100T W 1098B W1064TW1060BW1066TW1065BW1065TW1063BW1098FG1105RIM1101 F G 1105R IM 1104F G 1105F S 1101.50T W 1098B W LANDSCAPE LIGHTING LEGEND PATH LIGHTS X QTY: X X X QTY: X X X QTY: 2 X UPLIGHTS X QTY: X X DOWNLIGHTS X QTY: X X RECESSED LIGHT QTY: X X WALL SCONCE X QTY: X X X QTY: X X POOL LIGHT X QTY: X X BARN CORRAL BOTANICAL COMMON WATERCODEQTYSIZE NOTES TREE ALOE SPP.ALOE LowALO SPP 12 5 GAL NOTES EUPHORBIA COTINIFOLIA CARIBBEAN COPPER PLANT ModerateEUP COT 10 24 BOX NOTES PARKINSONIA 'DESERT MUSEUM'DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDE Very LowPAR DM 21 24 BOX NOTES GROUND COVER ECHINOCACTUS SPP.BARREL CACTUS Very LowECH SPP 92 5 GAL NOTES ECHIUM CANDICANS PRIDE OF MADEIRA LowECH CAN 36 5 GAL NOTES PACHYCEREUS MARGINATUS MEXICAN FENCE POST CACTUS Very LowPAC MAR 36 15 GAL NOTES RHUS INTEGRIFOLIA LEMONADE BERRY Very LowRHU INT TBD 5 GAL NOTES SHRUB DYMONDIA MARGARETAE DYMONDIA LowDYM MAR TBD FLATS NOTES MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM MYOPORUM Very LowMYO PAR TBD FLATS NOTES PERENNIAL PHORMIUM TENAX NEW ZEALAND FLAX LowPHO TEN 423 5 GAL NOTES PLANTING LEGEND N SCALE: 1" = 20' 1 Planting and Lighting Plan L-102.3 0 10'20'40' 141 THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE ARE THE PROPERTY OF GREGORY W GEORGE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, AND SHALL NOT BE COPIED IN PART OR IN WHOLE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION GREGORY W GEORGE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PREFERENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE AND ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF GREGORY W GEORGE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, AND/OR THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK L-102.4/Users/gregorygeorge/Library/CloudStorage/Dropbox/#StudioGWG Projects/Lee Residence - 6 Chuckwagon/6 Chuckwagon_01.plnStudio GWG LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECTURE PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLANNING for mail: 318 Avenue I, #154 Redondo Beach, California 90277 310.686.5202 studioGWG@gmail.com LA6230 C27-581236, BStudioGWG@gmail.com info@studioGWG.com Irrigation Plan 4/8/25Lee Residence6 Chuckwagon Road Rolling Hills, CA 90275ASPHASPHASPH1060107010301040105011001090108010901070 1060 1050 1150 1 1 4 0 1130 1120 1110 1 1 4 0 11301 1 0 0 1 12 0 111010 90 1070 1080 PI PEPI PESPIPEDIRT CONCDECK DIRTASPH C H U C K W A G O N R O A D 108010701080109011001060105010401030L=436.26', R=320.00' Δ=78° 06' 45" D N D N UP U P (P)SEEPAGEPIT(P) SEPTICTANK1070TW 1065BW 1075TW1072BW 1087TW1085BW 1095T W 1090B W 1098T W 1095B W 1101T W 1100B W1090TW1088BW109 5T W 1092B W 1100T W 1098B W1064TW1060BW1066TW1065BW1065TW1063BW1098FG1105RIM1101 F G 1105R IM 1104F G 1105F S 1101.50T W 1098B W BARN CORRAL ASPHASPHASPH1060107010301040105011001090108010901070 1060 1050 1150 1 1 4 0 1130 1120 1110 1 1 4 0 11301 1 0 0 1 12 0 111010 90 1070 1080 PI PEPI PESPIPEDIRT CONCDECK DIRTASPH C H U C K W A G O N R O A D 108010701080109011001060105010401030L=436.26', R=320.00' Δ=78° 06' 45" D N D N UP U P (P)SEEPAGEPIT(P) SEPTICTANK1070TW 1065BW 1075TW1072BW 1087TW1085BW 1095T W 1090B W 1098T W 1095B W 1101T W 1100B W1090TW1088BW109 5T W 1092B W 1100T W 1098B W1064TW1060BW1066TW1065BW1065TW1063BW1098FG1105RIM1101 F G 1105R IM 1104F G 1105F S 1101.50T W 1098B W 20'-0" MAXIMUM 50'-0" MAXIMUM 30'30' 18" TYP 1" PVC SCHEDULE 40 LOOP WHERE POSSIBLE TO EVEN OUT WATER FLOW NETAFIM 0.6 GALLON PER HOUR EMITTER TUBING 12-18" OC 1" PVC SCHEDULE 40 LOOP WHERE POSSIBLE TO EVEN OUT WATER FLOW NETAFIM 0.6 GALLON PER HOUR EMITTER TUBING 12-18" OC POC WATER METER ASSUMED LOCATION 2" CWS VERIFY TO WATER PURVEYOR TREE BOX NETAFIM 0.6 GALLON PER HOUR EMITTER TUBING 12-18" OC TEE 4W 4W IRRIGATION LEGEND & SPECIFICATIONS SYMBOLS 1-1/2" SCH 40 PVC LOOPED MAINLINE BACK FLOW ASSEMBLY PROVIDE 1 1/2" BRASS RISERS PRECEDED BY NIBCO T-113 GATE VALVE SIZED 1-1/2" 1-1/2" FEBCO 825YA W/ BRASS ISOLATION VALVES PROVIDE SECURITY ENCLOSURE WITH CONCRETE BASE INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS GUIDELINES Hunter PCZ-101-40 1" VALVE 1" HQ44AW QUICK COUPLING VALVE W/ LOCKING VALVE COVER BOX HUNTER ICC2 CONTROLLER W/ RAIN SENSOR MINIMUM 12 STATIONS - VERIFY W/ OWNER PROVIDE 110v POWER SUPPLY - HARDWIRE LOCATE FOR EASE OF ACCESS - VERIFY LOCATION W/ OWNER PROVIDE: HUNTER FLOW-CLIK, FLOW SENSOR; HUNTER RAIN-CLIK, RAIN SENSOR; HUNTER SOLAR SYNC - ET SENSOR AND MODULE PROVIDE TRIPLE LINES OF DRIP TUBING OF EMITTERS AROUND TREE DRIPLINE POINT OF CONNECTION VERIFY TO BUILDING PLANS C 01 (VALVE #) NETAFIM TUBING .6 GALLON PER HOUR EMITTER TYPICAL DRIP IRRIGATION INSTALLATION DIAGRAMS VALVE VALVE CONSULT AND VERIFY DISTANCES FROM NETAFIM CATALOGUE 01 02 03 14 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 13 12 ZONE 01 2,900 SF ZONE 02 2,800 SF ZONE 03 2,500 SF ZONE 04 3,000 SF ZONE 05 3,400 SF ZONE 06 2,800 SF ZONE 07 1,900 SF ZONE 08 2,200 SF ZONE 09 2,500 SF ZONE 10 2,700 SF ZONE 11 2,600 SF ZONE 12 1,500 SF ZONE 13 1,300 SF ZONE 14 1,600 SF ZONE 15 1,100 SF ZONE 16 900 SF ZONE 17 700 SF ZONE 18 FOR POTS ZONE 19 FOR POTS 15 16 17 18 19 ZONES 1-14, 1-1/4" ZONES 15-17, 1" ZONES 18,19, 1" 1-1/2" PVC MAINLINE 85 PSI - ASSUMED PROVIDING 35 GPM 35X60 = 2100 GPH 2,100/.6 = 3,500 SF MAX EMITTER PER STATION VALVE TOTAL 36,400 SF N SCALE: 1" = 20' 1 Irrigation Plan L-102.4 0 10'20'40' 142 THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE ARE THE PROPERTY OF GREGORY W GEORGE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, AND SHALL NOT BE COPIED IN PART OR IN WHOLE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION GREGORY W GEORGE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PREFERENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE AND ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF GREGORY W GEORGE, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, AND/OR THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK L-102.5/Users/gregorygeorge/Library/CloudStorage/Dropbox/#StudioGWG Projects/Lee Residence - 6 Chuckwagon/6 Chuckwagon_01.plnStudio GWG LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECTURE PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLANNING for mail: 318 Avenue I, #154 Redondo Beach, California 90277 310.686.5202 studioGWG@gmail.com LA6230 C27-581236, BStudioGWG@gmail.com info@studioGWG.com Irrigation Notes & Details 4/8/25Lee Residence6 Chuckwagon Road Rolling Hills, CA 90275SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 3 DRIP TUBING SCHEMATIC L-102.5 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 2 IRRIGATION CONTROLLER L-102.5 SCALE: 1' = 1'-0" 1 IN-GROUND VALVE INSTALLATION L-102.5 GENERAL IRRIGATION NOTES 1. ALL MAIN LINE PIPING AND CONTROL WIRES UNDER PAVING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SEPARATE SLEEVES. MAIN LINE SLEEVE SIZE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TWICE (2X) THE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE TO BE SLEEVED. CONTROL WIRE SLEEVES SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE FOR THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF WIRES UNDER PAVING. 2. ALL LATERAL LINE PIPING UNDER PAVING SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40 PIPE AND SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO PAVING. 3. PIPE SIZES SHALL CONFORM TO THOSE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF SMALLER PIPE SIZES SHALL BE PERMITTED, BUT SUBSTITUTIONS OF LARGER SIZES MAY BE APPROVED. ALL DAMAGED AND REJECTED PIPE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AT THE TIME OF SAID REJECTION. 4. INSTALL ALL BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES AND ALL PIPING BETWEEN THE POINT OF CONNECTION AND THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS PER LOCAL CODES. 5. FINAL LOCATION OF THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AND AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER SHALL BE APPROVED BY OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. 6. 120 VAC ELECTRICAL POWER SOURCE AT CONTROLLER LOCATION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE FINAL CONNECTION FROM THE ELECTRICAL SOURCE TO THE CONTROLLER. 7. ALL SPRINKLER HEADS SHALL BE SET PERPENDICULAR TO FINISH GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 8. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL FLUSH AND ADJUST ALL SPRINKLER HEADS AND VALVES FOR OPTIMUM COVERAGE WITH MINIMAL OVERSPRAY ONTO WALKS, STREETS, WALLS, ETC. 9. THIS DESIGN IS DIAGRAMMATIC. ALL PIPING, VALVES, ETC., SHOWN WITHIN PAVED AREAS IS FOR DESIGN CLARIFICATION ONLY AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN PLANTING AREAS WHEREVER POSSIBLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE ALL VALVES IN SHRUB AREAS. 10. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH ALL GRADE DIFFERENCES, LOCATION OF WALLS, RETAINING WALLS, STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ALL ITEMS DAMAGED BY HIS WORK. HE SHALL COORDINATE HIS WORK WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS FOR THE LOCATION AND INSTALLATION OF PIPE SLEEVES AND LATERALS THROUGH WALLS, AND UNDER PAVING, ETC. 11. THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM DESIGN IS BASED ON A MINIMUM OPERATING PRESSURE OF _____ PSI AND A MAXIMUM FLOW DEMAND OF _____ GPM. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY WATER PRESSURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REPORT ANY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE WATER PRESSURE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND THE ACTUAL PRESSURE READING AT THE IRRIGATION POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. 12. DO NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS IN THE FIELD THAT UNKNOWN OBSTRUCTIONS, GRADE DIFFERENCES OR DIFFERENCES IN THE AREA DIMENSIONS EXIST THAT MIGHT NOT HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED IN THE ENGINEERING. SUCH OBSTRUCTIONS OR DIFFERENCES SHOULD BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. IN THE EVENT THIS NOTIFICATION IS NOT PERFORMED, THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY REVISIONS NECESSARY. 13. ALL SPRINKLER EQUIPMENT NOT OTHERWISE DETAILED OR SPECIFIED SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 14. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILED INFORMATION. 15. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / DESIGNER 24 HOURS PRIOR TO REFILLING TRENCHES WITH MAINLINES FOR PRESSURE TEST. 16. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / DESIGNER 24 HOURS PRIOR TO PLANTING TO VERIFY COMPLETED SYSTEM AND ACCURATE AND APPROPRIATE COVERAGE OF IRRIGATION OVER PLANTING AREAS. 143