749, SPR detached garage / Convert , Resolutions & Approval Conditions •
f •
This page is part
m DO NOT DISCARD
?�document 0090058070
oon
11111111,11111 Pa es:
Recorded/Filed in Official Records
Recorder's Office, Los Angeles County,
California
FEES: 44.00
TAXES: 0.00
OTHER: 0.00
PAID: 44.00
TITLE(S) : AFFIDAVIT
III I I III I III I I d I I I I III I I III II I loll II I IIYI I I II II I III
LEADSHEET
UI] I III UI F IIII III 1110 II I I Ii U Iliflhll III
1111io euo i III III I I I I o
SEQ:
01
II I II II II IOD 11111 I II tII 1111
- IIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIYIVUIIIIIIIVIIIII�
• L - •
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND 01/15/2009
MAIL TO:
11111111111111111111
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
PLANNING DEPARTMENT *20090058070*
2 PORTUGUESE BEND RD. . -
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310)377-1521
(310)377-7288 FAX
T RECORDER'S USE ONLY
THE REGISTRAR-RECORDER'S OFFICE REQUIRES THAT THE FORM BE NOTARIZED BEFORE RECORDATION.
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )§§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
ZONING CASE NO.749
XX Variances
I(We)the undersigned state: XX Site Plan Review
XX Conditional Use Permit
I am(We are)the owner(s)of the real property described as follows:
1 ACACIA LANE, ROLLING HILLS, (LOT 25-B-RH)CA 90274
This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval
I am (We are)aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
ZONING CASE NO.749 VARIANCES: SITE PLAN REVIEW:: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I e)certif or declar under the ena perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
natter c �f Signature
Name t d or rent :* Name typed or printed
Addre 77
(.5"7(//lf-' �7/ /4,, %._Addr s
City/State CI yf /State
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
State of California
County of Los Angeles) •
` 1� IHAI6)iZ- Na y 0 8[40
On � /°/ before me, `,�
personally appeared u L y/q f r NEB
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within
instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies)and that by
his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed
the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California ��•`
correct.
!..` Commission#r 1756595
WITNESS by hand a icial seal. i Notary Public-.California
:4-.,f Los.Angeles County
Signature of Nota (seal) MUCcrnm.8mire$Jull2,2 1_14
Mit)
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
.: S
,19 G v
•
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Date ignature
Place of Execution
• •
A
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-05.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW
FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW STABLE; A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONVERT THE EXISTING
STABLE INTO.A GARAGE; AND VARIANCES FOR
ENCROACHMENT WITH THE STRUCTURES INTO THE FRONT
AND SIDE YARD SETBACKS AT AN EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 749 AT 1 ACACIA LANE,
LOT 25-B-RH, (LIEB).
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
. HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Lieb with
respect to real property located at 1 Acacia Lane, Rolling Hills (Lot 25-B-RH)
requesting a site plan review for grading of 311 cubic yards of cut and 311 cubic
yards of fill to construct a 1,038 to be located up to 2 feet in the side yard setback
and a wall to be located up to 8 feet into the 10-foot required setback; to convert
the existing 2,250 square foot stable into a garage and to add 1,200 square feet to
the existing 2,250 square foot stable, (to be converted to garage) for a total of
3,450 square foot detached garage for storage of antique cars. 368 square feet of
the new addition would encroach into the front setback. Currently, 690 square
feet of the existing stable encroaches into the front yard setback.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public
hearings to consider the application on January 15, February 19, and March 18,
2008 and field trips on February 19 and March 18, 2008. The applicants were
notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail and were in
attendance. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in
affecting said proposal, and from members of the City staff and the Planning
Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal.
Section 3. The property is developed with a 4,864 square foot
residence, 748 square foot attached garage, 2,250 square foot stable, service yard
and a riding ring.
Section 4. In 2004 the Planning Commission granted the applicants a
request to add 770 sq.ft. to the existing stable and to convert the structure to a
garage, for a total of 3,020 sq.ft. garage that would encroach into the front
setback, and to construct a 778 sq.ft. stable. The property owners did not
construct these improvements and the approval expired.
Section 5. The property is irregular in shape and it abuts four streets,
Portuguese Bend Road to the east, Palos Verdes Drive North to the north, Acacia
Reso.2008-05 1
Lieb
i
Road to the west and Acacia Lane to the south. The City's tennis courts are to the
east of the property.
Section 6. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as
a Class 4 Exemption (State of CA Guidelines, Section 15304 - Minor Land
Alteration) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review
under the California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 7. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be
submitted for site plan review and approval before any development requiring a
grading permit or any building or structure may be constructed or any
expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made
which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or
structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of
the building by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month
period. With respect to the Site Plan Review application for grading for the
stable, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of facts:
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the
Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structures
comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low-density residential
development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures, and for
equestrian facilities. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback requirements
with the Variance approved in Section 11 of this Resolution. The lot has a net
area of 77,630 square feet, as calculated for development purposes and is level.
With the new stable and addition to the garage, the structural coverage and total
coverage will be well within the maximum permitted. The proposed project is
screened from the road so as to reduce the visual impact of the development.
B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped
state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. The topography and the
configuration of the lot, has been considered, and it was determined that the
proposed development will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to
adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed construction will be
constructed on an existing building pads, will be the least intrusive to
surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped, are of sufficient
distance from nearby residences so that it will not impact the view or privacy of
surrounding neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property
without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners.
Although the proposed stable and wall for access to the stable are in the side
setback, near a roadway easement, there are only three residences that take
access to their homes through Acacia Road, one being the applicants. The
proposed location of the stable is most desirable, because it is going to be located
by the riding ring that will double as a corral.
C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale
and mass with the site, and is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood
when compared to properties in the vicinity. The proposed structures will follow
Reso.2008-05 2
Lieb
//N
• •
the pattern and style of the original residence. The entire lot is flat and therefore
has the appearance of spaciousness.
D. The development plan incorporates existing trees and native
vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. No significant trees or vegetation will
be lost to the new development.
E. The development plan substantially preserved the natural and
undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new
structures will not cause the lot to look overdeveloped. The proposed stable and
garage (currently stable) addition were designed to minimize lot coverage.
Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped.
F. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the
proposed project will not change the existing circulation pattern and will utilize
existing driveways.
G. The project is exempt from the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Section 8. Section 17.16.210(A)(4) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code
permits approval of a detached garage under certain conditions, provided the
Planning Commission approves a Conditional.Use Permit. The applicant is
requesting to convert the existing 2,250 square foot stable to garage, and add
1200 square feet thereto for a total of 3,450 square foot detached garage. A
portion of this addition will be located in the front yard setback. A portion of the
stable (to be converted to garage) is located in the front setback. With respect to
this request for a Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission finds as
follows:
A. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for the conversion of a
stable would be consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning
Ordinance and General Plan because the use is consistent with similar uses in the
community and is a permitted use with a CUP. The area proposed for the garage
is already developed and such use will not change the existing configuration of
structures on the lot, except for further encroachment. With the construction of
the stable in another location of the property, the lot will remain an equestrian
lot.
B. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings,
and structures have been considered, and the conversion of the stable to a garage
will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses,
buildings, or structures because the proposed use will be nestled behind existing
trees and is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the garage will
not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors.
Reso.2008-05 3
Lieb
•
C. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the
natural terrain, and surrounding residences because the detached garage will
comply with the low profile residential development pattern of the community
and the structure already exists. The roof line of the addition will remain the
same as currently exists for the stables.
D. The proposed conditional use complies with all applicable
development standards of the zone district, except for the encroachment, as
approved by this Resolution, because it is a permitted use under the Municipal
Code.
E. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the portions of
the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting
and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities because the project site is not
listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites
List.
F. The proposed conditional use observes the spirit and intent of Title
17 of the Zoning Code because a new stable and corral will be constructed at the
same time as this conversion takes place. The stable will be in a location more
conducive to equestrian uses, next to a riding ring.
Section 9. Section 17.16.110 requires that the front yard setback be fifty
(50) feet from the roadway easement line. The applicants request to add 1200
square feet to the proposed garage, of which 368 square feet would encroach into
the front yard setback. Approximately 690 square feet of the existing structure
already encroaches into the front yard setback. With respect to this request for a
Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and
conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply
generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone because the lot is
irregular in shape, abuts four different streets and is already developed with a
structure in this location. The location of the garage is desired so as to preserve
nearly all of the existing open space of the rear of the property unaffected, which
contains a riding ring.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and
zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance will permit
the development of the property in a manner similar to development patterns on
surrounding properties. The location of the building pad and the development
pattern of the remaining structures on site, especially the driveways dictate that
the proposed garage be located in the front and replace the existing structure. By
placing the proposed addition to the garage (currently stable), least amount of
area of the lot will be disturbed and does not require a new building.
C. The granting of the Variance will not be materially detrimental to
Reso.2008-05 4
Lieb
i
the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity
and zone in which the property is located because the proposed development
will not be visible to neighbors and will permit the owners to enjoy their
property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property
owners.
Section 10. Section 17.16.110 requires that the side yard setback on a
corner lot be 10 feet from the roadway easement. The applicants request to
construct a 1,038 square foot stable with porches that would encroach between
one to two feet into the side yard setback for the length of the structure. In
addition, a wall not to exceed 5 feet, ranging from a 6-inch curb to 5 feet, is
planned to be located up to 8 feet in the side setback. The wall is necessary to
provide access to the rear of the stable. With respect to this request for a Variance
to encroach with the stable and the wall into the side yard setback, the Planning
Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and,
conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply
generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone because the lot is
irregular in shape, abuts four different streets and is already developed with a
riding ring in the vicinity of the proposed location of the stable. The location of
the stable is desired so as to preserve nearly all of the existing open space of the
rear of the property unaffected, which contains a riding ring and to cluster
equestrian uses together in the rear of the primary residence.The wall is
necessary to provide access to the rear of the stable and to accommodate the
difference in elevation between the primary residence and the pad for the stable.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and
zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance will permit
the development of the property in a manner similar to development patterns on.
surrounding properties. There are several stables in the vicinity that encroach
into setbacks. The location of the building pad and the development pattern of
the remaining structures on site, especially the primary residence and the riding
ring, dictate that the proposed stable be located near the side yard. The location
of the stable is desired so as to cluster equestrian uses together in the rear of the
primary residence. The wall is necessary to provide access to the rear of the
stable and to accommodate the difference in elevation between the primary
residence and the pad for the stable. Although the proposed stable and wall for
access to the stable are in the side setback, near a roadway easement, there are
only three residences that take access to their homes through Acacia Road, one
being the applicants. The proposed location of the stable is most desirable,
because it is going to be located by the riding ring.
C. The granting of the Variance will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in
such vicinity and zone in which the property is located because the proposed
development will not be visible
Reso.2008-05 5
Lieb
to neighbors and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without
deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners. Acacia
Road is a very seldom-traveled road. Only two homes take access from that road.
The two homeowners supported the proposed stable and wall location.
Section 11. Based upon the foregoing findings and the evidence in the
record, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review,
Conditional Use Permit and Variances applications in Zoning Case No. 749 for
the proposed structures, subject to the following,conditions:
A. The Site Plan Review, Variance, and Conditional Use Permit
approvals shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval as
defined in Sections 17.38.070(A), 17.42.070(A), and 17.46.080(A) of the Zoning
Ordinance unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of those
sections.
B. If any conditions of approval are violated, this approval shall be
suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse; provided that the
applicants have been given written notice to cease such violation, the
opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held,
and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty
(30) days from the date of the City's determination.
C. All requirements of the Building Code, the Zoning Ordinance; and
of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with,
unless otherwise set forth in this approval.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial
conformance with the site plan, dated March 12, 2008, except as otherwise
provided in these conditions.
E. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 11,383 square feet or 14.7%,
in conformance with structural lot coverage limitations.
F. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed
16,075 square feet or 20.7%, in conformance with lot coverage limitations.
G. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 29,267 square feet or
37.7%, including the proposed grading for the stable, in conformance with
disturbed area limitations.
H. Building pad coverage on the 52,812 square foot building pad shall
not exceed 10,934 square feet or 20.7 %, not including porches consisting of 10%
of the size of the stable and primary residence.
I. The detached garage shall not exceed 3,450 square feet of floor area,
Reso.2008-05 6
Lieb
and no more than 363 square feet of the addition may encroach into the front
yard setback.
J. The garage shall not be used as habitable space, and may not have
a kitchen.
K. The roof extension for the addition shall be at the same height as the
current roofline of the stable at its lowest point (front and rear, not at the ridge
height).
L. Grading for the project shall not exceed 311 cubic yards of cut soil
and 311 cubic yards of fill soil. Grading shall be balanced on site and shall
preserve the existing landscaping to the greatest extent possible.
M. The stable shall be one storyand shall not e eed 14 feet
proposed
in height to the highest ridgeline. Access to the stable shall be provide om the
existing driveway on Acacia Road and shall not exceed 25% slope.
N. All graded areas shall be landscaped.Landscaping shall incorporate
and preserve, to the maximum extent feasible, the existing trees and shrubs and
provide for natural landscape screening surrounding the proposed stable.
O. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the
maximum extent feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system,
utilizes automatic controllers,incorporates an irrigation design using
"hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and
utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray.
P. The rear area of the garage shall be landscaped, and not be
developed with impervious surface. In addition, the shrubs currently screening
the stable from Portuguese Bend Road shall remain and the garage shall be
screened at all times.
Q. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize
the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by
construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management
District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices.
R. During construction, conformance with the air quality management
district requirements, storm water pollution prevention practices, county and
local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not
exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides,
mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required.
S. During construction, the Erosion Control Plan containing the
elements set forth in the 2008 County of Los Angeles Uniform.Building Code
Reso.2008-05 7
Lieb
•
shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to
control storm water pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles.
T. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the
project site.
U. During construction, the property owners shall be required to
schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day
between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when
construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere
with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
V. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional
Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for
the installation and maintenance of septic tank facilities.
W. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional
Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best
Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste and storm water pollution
prevention.
X. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of
any grading or building permits.
Y. Perimeter easements shall remain free and clear of any
improvements including, but not be limited to, fences-including construction
fences, grading (both cut and fill), landscaping, irrigation and drainage devices,
play equipment, parked vehicles, building materials, debris and equipment,
except that the Rolling Hills Community Association may approve certain
encroachments. Portions of the three-rail fences are located in the RHCA
roadway easements and shall be either removed and placed on the easement line
or approved in their current location by the RHCA.
Z. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of
Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the development plan
described in Condition D.
AA. Prior to granting a final inspection utility lines to the garage and
the stable shall be placed underground.
AB. The City's and the Community Association's requirements related
to outdoor lighting, roofing material and construction and all other requirements
shall be complied with.
AC. 50% of the demolition and construction materials must be
recycled/diverted. Prior to granting a final inspection, verification to be
• submitted to staff regarding how much material was recycled/diverted and
Reso.2008-05 8
Lieb
410 0
where it was taken.
AD. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all
conditions of the Variance, Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review
approvals, pursuant to Section 17.38.060, or the approval shall not be effective.
AE. All conditions, when applicable, of the Variance, Conditional Use
Permit and Site Plan Review approvals must be complied with prior to the
issuance of a grading or building permit from the County of Los Angeles.
AF. Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a
result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time
limits set forth in section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code
of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15th DAY OF APRIL 2008.
1 ,0)A, q. '/:- : .,
ROGER SOMMER, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Reso.2008-05 9
Lieb
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS)
I certify that the foregoing Resolution 2008-05 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW
FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW STABLE; A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONVERT THE EXISTING
STABLE INTO A GARAGE; AND VARIANCES FOR
ENCROACHMENT WITH THE STRUCTURES INTO THE FRONT
AND SIDE YARD SETBACKS AT AN EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 749 AT 1 ACACIA LANE,
LOT 25-B-RH, (LIEB).
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission on April 15, 2008 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Smith, Witte, Vice Chairman Henke and
Chairman Sommer.
NOES: None. .
ABSENT:. None.
ABSTAIN: Commissioner DeRoy.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Reso.2008-05 10
Lieb
S � I
•
This Is a true and certified co
of
if it bears the seal,imprinted n purple ink r
the record
of the Registrar-RecdrdeP/Coun Clerk
'��
C1
t
JAN 15 2009 _' ri-trr
C ACTING U w�� ,' ill+`'
IERX
�OSAr ' REGISTRAR-RECORDERICp �"-, 2,
41� } ter`
LES COUNTY,CALIFORNIA ,� ; .. : _� '�v
G��al�
�ANGELGS'
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-14
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A TIME EXTENSION TO
COMMENCE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SECOND PHASE OF A
PROJECT APPROVED BY PLANNING. COMMISSION BY
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-05 FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR
GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW STABLE; A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONVERT THE EXISTING
STABLE INTO A GARAGE; AND VARIANCES FOR
ENCROACHMENT WITH THE STRUCTURES INTO THE FRONT
AND SIDE YARD SETBACKS AT AN EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 749 AT 1 ACACIA LANE, LOT
25-B-RH, (LIEB). PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE
EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Tom Lieb with
respect to real property located at 1 Acacia Lane, Rolling Hills (Lot 25-B-RH)
requesting a two-year time extension for previously approved Conditional Use
Permit, Variances and Site Plan Review for grading of 311 cubic yards of cut and 311
cubic yards of fill to construct a 1,038 square foot stable to be located up to 2 feet in the
side yard setback and a wall to be located up to 8 feet into the 10—foot required
setback; to convert the existing 2,250 square foot stable into a garage and to add 1,200
square feet to the existing 2,250 square foot stable, (to be converted to garage) for a
total of 3,450 square foot detached garage for storage of antique cars. 368 square feet
of the new addition would encroach into the front setback. Currently, 690 square feet
of the existing structure encroaches into the front yard setback.
Section 2. The applicants have constructed the new stable and the wall for
the stable and moved their animals into the new stable. In their request they state that
the second phase of the project is to convert the old stable into a garage and to
construct the addition.
Section 3. The Commission considered this item at a meeting on July 20,
2010 at which time information was presented indicating that additional time is
needed to commence processing of the second phase of the project.
Section 4. Based upon information and evidence submitted, the Planning
Commission does hereby amend Paragraph A, of Section 11 of Resolution No. 2008-05
to read as follows:
A. The Site Plan Review, Variances and Conditional Use Permit approvals
shall expire within four years from the effective date of approval as defined in
Sections 17.38.070(A), 17.42.070(A) and 17.46.080(A) of the Zoning Ordinance.
• •
No further extension to commence the second phase of the project shall be
granted.
Section 5. Except as herein amended, the provisions and conditions of
Resolution No. 2008-05 shall continue to be in full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20th DAY OF JULY 2010.
ORE DEROY, CHAI ON
ATTEST:
H %�% C DEPU CITY CLERK
• S
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2010-14 entitled:
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A TIME EXTENSION TO
COMMENCE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SECOND PHASE OF A
PROJECT APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION BY
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-05 FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR
GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW STABLE; A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONVERT THE EXISTING
STABLE INTO A GARAGE; AND VARIANCES FOR
ENCROACHMENT WITH THE STRUCTURES INTO THE FRONT
AND SIDE YARD SETBACKS AT AN EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 749 AT 1 ACACIA LANE, LOT.
25-B-RH, (LIEB). PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE
EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
on July 20, 2010 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Chelf, Henke, Pieper, Vice Chairperson Smith and
Chairperson DeRoy.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Admini rative 0 ices