675, Expired - see 749. SPR detache, Application •
o "�G l(�
c r �� £ 1ff
i O /O/"/t ✓v�66a INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1937
NO.2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
MI ROLLING HILLS,CALIF.90274
(310)377-1521
FAX(310)377-7288
REQUEST FOR HEARING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT • ((
PROPERTY OWNER: /o/s/ L
OWNER'S ADDRESS: I A CA C/A GA h)
TELEPHONE NO: < /0) 370 - �j `j D' /
PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: II_5 A /3
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 2 Q L L/'f r7 /-/( t- -S
ASSESSORS BOOK NO.75 7 9 PAGE. /1 PARCEL 2.
AGENT'S NAME: j L 7,)/) c/o C7 //Jl,-
AGENT'S ADDRESS: 7 D 7 3 /G i/G/2 5 pl./i2 R, // )d Z 74
TELEPHONE NO:
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use and under what Section of the Zoning Ordinance
the conditional use is permitted in the zone.
EiAC //Li7 C/I /22 //-167L Ale 0' =////o/37 5/40
7. / 6 . 04- 0 /
®Printed on Recycled Pane,.
Will the proposed use bilmpatible with the uses in the surilding area, and if so, why?
%/ C / 5 /l (.) ) R a clCi9 2-el/L///J
/- % ll-) / S Lci cA 7( 0A)
Will the grant of this Conditional Use Permit be consistent with and in furtherance of the public
health safety and general welfare?
/ 7 /—J 4 O/L- A) 0 /=/='&_
FILING FEE
A filling fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to the CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS.
REQUEST FOR HEARING
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
PROPERTY OWNER: v M L l C l3 •
OWNER'S ADDRESS: 1 AcractrAL t , TZ c0 L t_t 4 C-1 C-1 t LI-3
TELEPHONE NO: (3 i 0 3 7 0 - Ca O 1
PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: C\ ca CA tb
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 2 1;ra a C t-l-t t•.l C-1 1-1 1 I.t.�
ASSESSORS BOOK NO.1 fo 9..PAGE O I PARCEL O 0 ?-
AGENT'S NAME: 130 oc.1 E GGRtt.1C-t
AGENT'S ADDRESS: 0 `7 S l t_V e tz. SPUR. 2 D (2.U-I C Ca q v 2.14
TELEPHONE NO: (3 to) 5 44 - Co 0 l
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROTECT
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project,including what aspects of the project require.a Site P Plan
Review: \ '
E,- C1 G L-t CiJ N�CW S I R.0 G c U QL
plans •
any q .. gNi, a
Describe and delineate on new basement areas square footage: l�
•
SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding.
Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below:
A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it
compares to the sizes,setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses.
714 P c ogCt'7. c Ttz,UC'•i Ug.c C0 P S 4 tS \h)ELt .
vJ t i W ► tJ iW S G i(?-1 f-1 c ' j 1 S S t PI l L AQ 1 tJ
"Z E. V.) t -r(-I t 0 i►-I 173 0("2.. O v t)
B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum'extent feasible, existing natural
topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land II
forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural feature&
a 6-1 - P lA N A L-t_% 0 171,41 t%)c, C L-1 tJ C ',
C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading
and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved., Graded slopes shall be
rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage redirect
drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading
and proposed minimization on lots. •
i SIG R L \ S N d cr.R CA-D t C.-I PO R T l-!C3 t St) S i R v G c.312J
N1 [. .. . A /t..•Q( V4It612. 4h[ O0l•) t `DJfacCl`3 r t t_-t
f-Zr✓ Lca c iAt3Lt=
D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with
landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should
provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native
vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers.
O \�G G-► t_ i/4 T t (PL.N t•1 t• C t Tb 5 E 11s1 t/0
- . No tJ L LAN-1t) S c. Ptt.) C 15 /-1M -Ctc tPAT. ,T.
E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building
coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage
permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of,the lot. Explain how the lot coverage proposed
compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on neighboring lots.
ext51-iNe-- PR..onocbE.D ARE
t otA) tJ t h1CA2 IAG. M4,%A i Ntu M
F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding
residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where
necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the
existing setbacks of neighboring properties.
(-AS >1 G-t c s V 171-4 i i '
I`l o -: c N t . 2 c (-54) C.c1 r-/c rn i3
Rc, t� cs
G._.... . .Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience'and safety of circulation for pedestrians
and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the'driveway location, design,trip data,
landscaping and other on-site parking or storage areas.
to LA.t a c-t t tilTi- t-e.= R c c-, r>t( -0 c t:I A 6-►G�
H. _ Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental.Quality Act?
Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures.
I i knitl._t,: 1.4isgC (\ D Gr ts. Gi
•
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits,presents the data and
information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and,that
the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
Date: - fc3 - 0 3 gG �` r
Signature
For: f , Z.
Applicant
•
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I(We)declare under penalty of perjury that the fimgoing is true and correct.
Executed at 12E1)oAY77o L""/act , California,
this 3 '-a' day of_ Dc T .2 d L _ 20 "7
•
By:
By:
0 /<'/A)ei 5 G7/)LL' r/L:.
'Address
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If
this application is signed outside of California, the applicant.should acknowledge before a Notary
Public of the State where the signature is fixed„ or before another officer of that State authorized
by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that
the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and
belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
APPLICANT:%7 L/L=! _ DATE FILED
REPRESENTATIVE: Ratio A/./--/,4 i i�L; FEEE:,
COMPANY NAME:12 o t-n.) En)h/A/CE11,N h RECEIPT N'O:
COMPANY ADDRESS: B'Y
7 O 7 f GV G,P .SPi /2/i — ZONING CASE NO:
/-�,�/• ea , 9 a z 7 4 _ 'TFNI'ATIVE HEARING DATE:
COMPANY PHONE NO. (Yip) -6,61/0
•
PROJECT ADDRESS: / A c r4 c i 6i2.
• •
OWNER'S ACEMBIEDGLEMENI
•
•
Property development in Rolling Hill's is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA").
The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent
and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the,City and the RHCA to develop
property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA.does not mean or imply or
ensure approval by the other.
The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals&L.
I. (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its
. admonition is completely understood.
Executed at e)A/v 0 /,3��{c �f ,California
this .3 4L-d
day of O d o r , 20 0 3
By:_
By: — --
/f-00 ..e/ C7S `7ALL AVG
Address
,City
. ..00 I.., it.. 0 0
•
p wrl eau O1 ROLi66/E iw,3 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
I a
171 s
NO.2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
IN A
ROLLING HILLS,CALIF.90274
(310)377.1521 1
FAX:(310)377.7288
E-mail:cityofrh@aol.com
•
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
(To Be Completed By Applicant)
•
Date Filed Zoning Case No.
GENERAL INFORMATION(
1. Applicant(s) -TU M L.I L/3 Tel. (3/0) 3 7 0 .. S.S 0 /
Address /A G c 1 ( L t...) 9..o t.._L A to G-, 1 1 «t.5
2. Legal Owner(s) 4) 5 4 13 o'./(1 Tel. ( )
Address
3. Project Address I A G A C 1 , , Lt.)
Assessor's Book No. 7ci eo q - 0. r 4'5" - C)O 2 Lot No. 7.
4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required
by city, regional,state and federal agencies:
..... .Q Q. LI. C. .A.. 41 L..o 6 /Lo c, 1:71 s--5 1i 4.0 S CA— r- 11 L
5. Existing zoning district Q4 ej - !
6. Proposed project/use of site S TA C3 LE 4 C to Cz,n, t rA C-.L (-I o 0-.IL--
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
7. Site size 2. 0 4 (a c 12.E S
' 8. Net lot area P 41c)6 0 Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of
the lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement
plus the area within ten (10)feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement;
(b)the ten (10)foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c)any private drive or
driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag
lot."
•
9. Total square footage of structures 8 4, Ca v
10. Number of floors of construction 0 ta L
11. Basement square footage 3 0 0
March 20,'2000
Environmental Information Form
-1
. elPr!Merl on Reayclad P:.ipc! - -
•• •
12.--. . Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 1 (0) 3 7 2
13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? N A
14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? t•.l Aa
• 15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? VVC;, 4
16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? N o
17. Driveway Access and Parking:
a Is a new driveway accessway proposed? N.0 (Requires Traffic Commission Review).
b. Number of driveway(s) Existing? 0 C L Proposed? O
(Second driveway requires approved Conditional Use.Permit from Planning Commission).
c. Width of driveway(s) Existing? 1 ` Proposed? --�
(Maximum of 20 foot width unless approved by the Planning Commission).
d. Does first 20 feet of driveway have a maximum grade of 7%?
(Maximum of 7%for first 20 feet of driveway required).
Existing? YGS Proposed?
e. Grade of driveway(s)? Existing? 13 Proposed?
(Maximum of 12%unless approved by the Planning Commission).
f. Has site plan been reviewed by Los Angles County Fire.Protection Engineer to meet
current driveway access requirements? t•1 c)
Explain
g. Does driveway cover more than a maximum 20% of the area.of the yard in which it is
located?
Explain
h. Does uncovered parking area cover more than a maximum 10% of the area of the yard in
which it is located? ty 0
Explain
i. Does vehicular accessway to Stable and corral-have,.a maximum slope of 25% or
less? yEs Stable and corral average vehicular access slope 8 °% •
j. Does property have an above ground garage with a minimum capacity of
2 cars? f e'w With guest house a minimum of 3 cars?
18. Grading quantities shall be balanced.Amount cut 2. rc' 4 Amount fill 2 is 4. ter
(Include any basement cut in grading quantities).
19. Area of disturbance. 40%of net lot area maximum;any remedial grading •(temporary•disturbance),
any graded slopes'and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces
will remain or are proposed to be added.
Square feet f 2 4-10 . Percentage of Net Lot Area ) °to •
20. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet 46 fo 4-
March 20,2000
Environmental Information Form
1-2
•
• •
21, If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented,
square footage of sales area;estimated employment per shift and loading facilities.
• 22. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift,and loading facilities.
N. A .
23. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy,
loading facilities,and community benefits to be derived from the project.
v.n
24. Attach plans.
25. Proposed scheduling. A `j A
26. If the project involves a site plan review, variance,conditional use or rezoning application, state
this and indicate clearly why the application is required.
TQc Hct7 GC1'ca,a.N Ac1 e= 1-In`t S C Gt C2-fort,IG
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTINC1
27. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil
stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing
structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots
or polaroid photos will be accepted.
•
March 20,2000
• Environmental Information Form
1-3
• •
28. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural,
historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity
of land use (one-family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height,
frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid
photos will be accepted.
29. Is the proposed project consistent with:
Yes No N/A
City of Rolling Hills General Plan ✓
Applicable Specific Plan -- _
City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance --
South Coast Air Quality Management Plan
Congestion Management Plan V
Regional Comprehensive Plan ; M
30. Have anyof the following studies
tudies been submitted? '
Geology Report Historical Report
Hydrology Report Archaeological Report
_Soils Report Paleontological Study
Traffic Study Line of Sight Exhibits
Noise Study Visual Analysis
Biological Study Slope Map
Native Vegetation Fiscal Impact Analysis
Preservation Plan
_Solid Waste Generation Report Air Quality Report
Public Services/ ^Hazardous Materials/
Infrastructure Report Waste
March 20,2000
Environmental Information Form
1-4
•
•I . . •
i
::
r_
Potenua#y . 1 t. ss Than
S tic t sn�> grn�cant
mpack l • Irnp
Issues: •
j; AESTHETICS—Would the project:
a) •:Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 0 0 • 0 .1
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but . 0 0 0 POI
not limited to,trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway? .. . . .
c).Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ❑ ❑ • ❑ Er
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which CI ❑ CII
• would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
• !L AGRICULTURE RESOURCES:
,
In determining whether impacts to agricultural ❑ ❑ 0 la/
resources are significant environmental effects, lead
agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land . ,
Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997)
prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an
optional model to use in assessing impacts on
agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,or ❑ ❑ • El ri •
Farmland of Statewide Importance.(Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
• California Resources Agency,to non-agricultural use? /
b) Conflict With existing zoning for agricultural use, or a •' ' ❑ 0 0 [3
Williamson Act contract?
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment 0 0 0 El/which, due to their location or nature, could.result in
conversion of Farmland,to non-agricultural use?
jil. AIR QUALITY—Where available,the significance
criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district may be
relied upon to make the following determinations.
Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the 0 0 0 th
• applicable air quality plan?
• •• March 20,2000
Environmental Information Form
1-6
Pot ntiaJP I s'than #-ass thalk
��uficat�l tiQnift 1fVid# Sigrufirattt
• larlldgat>an
Impact Impa�t t
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute 0 0 0
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of . .. 0 CI. . ❑. El"
any criteria pollutant for which the project region is
non-attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard (including releasing
emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant • • 0 • 0 ❑ 123/
• concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ❑ Cl ❑ ad'
number of people?
•
• j(. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES--Would the project::
a) Have a substantial adverse effect,either directly or '' ❑ ❑ ❑ (
:through habitat modifications, on any species
• 'idented as a candidate,sensitive, or'special status •
species in local or regional plans, policies, or
• regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) • Have substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat 0 0 ❑ f9'
or other sensitive natural community identified in local
or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish •
and Wildlife Service?
c) -Have a substantial adverse effect.on federally 0 • ❑ 0 15
• protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act(including, but not limited to, marsh,
• vernal pool, coastal, etc.)through direct removal, ,
filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
•
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native 0 0 ❑ 121/
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or.migratory wildlife
corridors,or impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites? . .... . —/
• e) Conflict with any.policies or.ordinances protecting . .. ❑ • 0 • ElEt
• biological resources,such as a tree preservation
policy or ordinance?.. . . .
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat CI El ❑
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan?
•
March 20,2000
Environmental Information Form
1-7
Potenilally l than
•
Ipnantvith
L.CULTURAL RESOURCES—Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance 0 ❑ D 0'
of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the
State CEQA Guidelines?
• b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the 0 0 ❑ L9r
significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to
§15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines?
•
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological •• 0 ❑ ❑
• resource or site or unique geologic feature?
• d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ❑ 0 ❑ COY
outside of formal cemeteries?
yy GEOLOGY AND SOILS-Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial . • • • •
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault,as delineated ❑ .❑ 0 Q"
on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the
area or based on other substantial evidence of a
• known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
• Special Publication 42. •
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? 0 0 D 0
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ❑ 0 0 Ca'
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides? 0 0 ❑ l
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? . CID 0
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, D 0 ❑ D�
or that would become unstable as a result of the
project,and potentially result in on-or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction
or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- O O ❑ L�
1 B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating
substantial risks to life and property? •
• e) :.Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the 0 ❑ O
use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal
• systems where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water? •
•
March 20,2000
Environmental Information Form
1-8 .
s=<t�ss'1<h�tF
•
•
slmp •
a ` t Ior1I pat amp
ill.)jpZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Would the project:
a) •Create a significant hazard to the public or the 0 0 0
environment through the routine transport, use,or •
• disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ 0 0 i •
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset „
and accident conditions involving.the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ❑ ❑ • ❑ C
acutely hazardous materials,substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of 0 ❑ • 0 III
hazardous materials sites'compiled pursuant to ;
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, ;
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e For a ro ect located within an airport 1 land use"plan ❑ ❑ • ❑
or,where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles
IIofa public
s p b is airport orpublic use airport,rP P
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area/
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, CI ❑ 0 p/
would the project result in a safety hazard for people •
residing orworking in the project area? /
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ❑ CICICH
adopted emergency response plan or emergency .
evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of 0 ❑ • ❑
loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including
where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or
where residences are intermixed with wild
lands?ds.
•
•
•
March 20,2000
Environmental Information Form
1-9
•
...:.... ...... :...
Patentiafly l ass'Oran•
Stg*ant p 5ignicant NO
Impa� I auat Impact ttnpaac�
yut JIYDRQLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
--Would the project: .
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge . ❑ 0 0 �
requirements?
• b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or ❑ • 0 • ❑ L�
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge
such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer
volume or a lowering of the local groundwater able
level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby .
wells would drop to a level which would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for which permits
have been granted?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ❑ 0 ❑ 'Er
• site or areas including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner which would
• result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site?
• d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the • ❑ 0 ❑ !E
• site or areas including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner which would • •
result in flooding on-or off-site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ❑ • 0 ❑ l3"
• the capacity of existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? O ❑ O [�
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as 0 0 0 I9�
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
.
• h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures 0 • CI • CI
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
•
i) Expose people or structures to'a significant risk of loss, ❑ 0 OEr
injury-or death involving flooding, including flooding as •.• •
a result of the failure of a levee or dam? •
•
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ 0 0 lit
•
•
•
March 20,2000
Environmental Information Form
1-10
.
P t ally . aid W h less'han
•
mpact x Impact Impc t
!IL J,qND USE AND PLANNING--.Would the project:
•
a) Physically divide an established community? . 0 ❑ ❑
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ❑ •0 ❑ El/
•regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the • • '
.project (including but not limited.to the general plan,
specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or 0 ❑ ❑ Gil
• natural community conservation plan? •
L MINERAL RESOURCES--Would the project:
•
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral 0 ❑ 0 El<
resource that would be of value to the region and the .
residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important ❑ Cl ❑ CW"
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan,specific plan or other land use plan?
XI. NOISE-Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ❑ ❑ 0 IY
excess•of standards established in the local general • •
plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of
other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive 0 Cl ❑ ef •
groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise 0 0 ' 0 lEr
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing • .
without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient ❑ ❑ ❑
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels
existing without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ❑ Cl 0
wher
e e such a plan has not been ado ted withi two
p
n
miles of a public airport or public use airport,would
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels. /
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would 0 ❑ Elal
the project expose.people'residing or working in the
'project area to excessive noise levels?
March 20,2000
Environmental Intormatlon Form
1-1 1
•
•
• •
PotsntiaH n;t n UVlq�
ri0nt SzgnfioantImpact imp�to
Impact r# +otart�on:
xll
. POPULATION AND HQUSING-Would the project:
• a) Induce substantial population growth in an area,either 0 0 ❑ F�
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
• businesses) or indirectly (for example, through •
extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
•
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, D ❑ 0 [51/
necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
• c)` Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ❑ D ❑ [il/
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
•
•
XIIL PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical •
impacts associated.with the provision.of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need for
new or physically altered governmental facilities, the
• construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
• acceptable service ratios,response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
Are protection? 0 0' . ❑' • p/
Police protection? ❑ 0 0 • IZ(
Schools? ❑ El 0
Parks? ❑ ❑ 0 al
Other public facilities? 0 0 ❑
•
)CIV. RECREATION
• a).Would the project increase the,use of existing ,. D O ❑ L9
neighborhood and regional parks or other
• recreational facilities such.that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be
• accelerated? /
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or 0 0 ❑
require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities which might have an adverse physical effect
on the environment?
March 20,2000
Environmental Information Form
1-12
I.�ssThan ,
Patierdiauy Jii�nnt�V l es'thar�
•
•
•
•
•
Iklia�tfan
Impact' liripf�ct Impat�
TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC—Would the
project: /
•a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in 0 0 ❑ 13
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity•of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in
• either the number of vehicle trips,the volume to ,•
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
intersections?_ ...: •
•b) Exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of El • • 0 0 IS /
service standard established by the county
congestion management agency for designated
roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either ❑ 0 0 I
• an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that'
results in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature 0 ❑ 0
(e.g.,sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? • 0 • ❑ 0
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ 0 ❑ Ef
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans,or programs ❑ . 0 ❑ p
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., but
.turnouts, bicycle racks)?
Jtem XVI, UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS —
Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Cl 0 ❑ a'
applicable Regional Water Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ❑ 0 ❑ Ef
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of •
existing facilities,the construction of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
c) •Require or result in the construction of new stormwater ❑ ❑ ❑ I:1
• • drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,
the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects? •
d)`Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ❑ 0 0 . qr
• project from existing entitlements and resources, or
are new or expanded entitlements needed?
•
.. • March 20,2000
• Environmental Information Form
1-13
i •
Less Than •
Potentially ncant wati Lees Than
i Mitl on Significant No
Impact Incorporation Impact impact
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment CI 0 0 1
provider which serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project's
projected demand in addition to the provider's
existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity ❑ 0 0 (3
to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal
needs?
g) Comply with federal, state,and local statutes and 0 0 0 iV
regulations related to solid waste?
XVII. STORM WATER QUALITY IMPAC/S—Would
the project:
•a) During construction result In potential impact on storm 0 0 0 p/
water runoff?
b) Post-construction result in potential impact on storm i0 0 0 II
water runoff?
c) Result in potential for discharge of storm water from areas 0 0 0 le
from material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling„
vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing),
waste handling,hazardous materials handling or
storage,delivery areas or loading docks, or other outdoi
work areas?
d) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to impair 0 0 0 El/
the beneficial uses of the receiving waters or areas that
provide water quality benefit? /'
e) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to cause 0 0 0 I
significant harm on the biological integrity of the
waterways and water?
f)Result in potential for significant changes in the flow 0 0 0 l
velocity or volume of storm water runoff that can cause
environmental harm?
g) Result in potential for significant increases in erosion of CI 0 0 1
the project site or surrounding areas?
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
-14
S
•
!'Sin•
ss significantgnificant n No
Impact I don Impact I1111)84I
XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the [] p 0
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community,reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually CI C p a/
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable"means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects and the
effects of probable future projects.)
c) Does the project have environmental effects which p0
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings,either directly or indirectly?
IMMO"�.._�o-_.-----�--- ..ram.
•
February 2002
Environmental Information Form
1-15
0
•
NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to
Section 65962.5 of the Government Code,then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below.
I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the.Government Code and hereby
certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are nat contained on
these lists.
Date 9- 8- O 3 .moo /1// `.�!'!'.
12r1/4-e-i-e
For '%, L-l L
Applicant
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits
present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the
facts,statements,and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
I ,2 77/
Date `�— o - !.� 3 c
Signature
For / G ,L27
Applicant
March 20,2000
Environmental Information Form
1-16
• •
CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS'LIST
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
I, JANE KOBZEFF declare under penalty of perjury, that the attached list contains
the names and addresses of all persons who are shown on the latest available assessment roll of the
County of Los Angeles as owners of the subject property and as owners of the property within a
distance of 1000 feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as
follows:
Property address: 1 Acacia Lane, Rolling Hills
APN#: 7569-015-002
•
Legal description: Portion of Lot 25, Rolling Hills Tract
Date: October 28, 2003
1
Signed: ,(
Subscribe nd sworn to before me this 28th day of October, 2003
•
g-/,416.1--
Notary Public FRANCENE D.URLMANA
.61
NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA rn
t: • COMMISSION#1324574 c
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
My Comm.Exp.October 9,2005
C:\DATA\WORD\MAPPING\MASTERS\CertOwnersList.doc
V . 0 I
‘ .c°\'
DATE I ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS / A c A+ c/is GA)
. APPLICANT 7 L../L a •
CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE
BUILDING AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
NET LOT AREA 7 Z 630 sq.ft. sq.ft. 77, 630 sq.ft.
BUILDING PAD(S) 5 2. 8 as sq.ft. sq.ft. 52, 8/2 sq.ft.
RESIDENCE i4vo y .:. .0 sq.ft. sq.ft. 4el,4 sq.ft.
GARAGE 748 sq.ft. sq.ft. 748 sq.ft.
SWIMMING POOL/SPA sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
STABLE 2 Z 6 0 sq.ft. 768 sq.ft. 7 c 6 sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT 145
( - ) sq.ft. sq.ft. • sq.ft. 17 t7 4
SERVICE YARD 94 sq.ft. . sq.ft. 9 6 sq.ft.
OTHER cAo.QIACie Iou'st sq.ft. 'BOZO sq.ft. 3 020 sq.ft.
NEW BASEMENT AREA sq.ft.
(Volume to be included in grading quantities.) .
TOTAL STRUCTURES 47/sq t, sq.ft. 9494 sq.ft.
% STRUCTURAL . `0, 3 % % 1Z . 2- %
COVERAGE
%TOTAL PAD l C: I cto
COVERAGE 1 CY• % % 143. 0 %
DRIVEWAY 3 Z 14 sq.ft.. I"7 7 6 sq.ft. 4c)C) U sq.ft.
PAVED WALKS AND
PATIO AREAS 1 0 78 sq.ft. . . sq.ft. 1078 sq.ft.
POOL DECKING sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ' -
OTHER PAVED sq.ft. . sq.ft. sq. ft.
DRIVEWAYS, EASEMENTS y).' ...Nr
TOTAL FLATWORK 4292 sq.ft. sq.ft. 6 0 68 sq.ft.
%TOTAL FLATWORK 4./j\
COVERAGE Ci•c) % % 7. 8 %
TOTAL STRUCTURAL& t2l 2'
FLATWORK COVERAGE hl -Q.Z4 sq.ft. sq.ft. . I5,664 sq.ft.
TOTAL COVERAGE t5,' 44. 3, % % ZO, I % A
R..
NET- LOT 7J/5 i 11R13,9NCL /8. 6 /
DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS
APPLICANT
CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
PAD NQ. 1
BUILDABLE PAD AREA AS 2,8 I Z sq.ft.
RESIDENCE 4 t 4 sq.ft.
GARAGE 7 4-8 sq.ft.
STABLE(BARN) 7 6 S sq.ft.
POOL ....... .. sq.ft. •
(CA t2ttt AE Nov&L) 30 2.0 sq.ft.
OTHER SQVc. 12.4 4:3'Co sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 9 4 9 6 sq.ft.
%BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 18 0 %
pAD NO. 2
BUILDABLE PAD AREA sq.ft.
RESIDENCE sq.ft.
GARAGE sq.ft. •
STABLE(BARN) sq.ft.
POOL sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
( ) sq.ft.
OTHER sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 sq.ft.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE %
DATE ZONIN'ASE NO. ADDRESS 4
' APPLICANT
CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE
BUILDING AREAS 'EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
NET LOT AREA 64 9 6 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. 8 4;c360, sq.ft.
BUILDING PAD(S) 67 O2 4 sq.ft. sq.ft. '5 Z v 24 sq.ft. y
RESIDENCE 48 64-sq.ft. sq.ft. 4864. sq.ft.
GARAGE 748 sq.ft. sq.ft. 74 $ sq.ft.
SWIMMING POOL/SPA `— sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
STABLE 870 sq.ft. 6.76 sq.ft. 676 sq.ft. 7.-'' ')
RECREATION COURT
( _ L ' ) sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
SERVICE YARD )6 sq.ft. sq.ft. ) Co sq.ft.
OTHER CARRIAGE EIOd SC. sq.ft. 29 18 sq.ft. 2918 sq.ft.
NEW BASEMENT AREA sq.ft.
(Volume to be included in grading quantities.)
TOTAL STRUCTURES 66 78 sq.ft. sq.ft. e Z O 2 sq.ft. •
%STRUCTURAL 1. 7 % % 10. 9 %
COVERAGE
%TOTAL PAD .
COVERAGE 1 l•. 5 % % (6. 1, %
DRIVEWAY 43 1 5 sq.ft. 1 ?7 Z2 sq.ft. ' e O 9:2 sq.ft.
PAVED WALKS AND
PATIO AREAS 'O`7 8 sq.ft. sq.ft. 1078 sq.ft.
POOL DECKING sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
TOTAL FLATWORK G 3 93 sq.ft. sq.ft. '7 17 0 sq.ft.
%TOTAL FLATWORK
COVERAGE 6.4 % % 8. 4. %
TOTAL STRUCTURAL&FLATWORK
COVERAGE 11191 l sq.ft. sq.ft. 16,37Z sq.ft.
%TOTAL COVERAGE 14. 1 % % I q, 3 %
•
'DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS
APPLICANT
CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
PAD NO. 1
BUILDABLE PAD AREA ' 51, 0 Z 4- sq.ft.
RESIDENCE 4 '4 sq.ft.
GARAGE •7 4 sq.ft.
STABLE(BARN) (o sq.ft.
POOL sq.ft.
(CA212.0 ACC la dU SE) Z l 8 sq.ft.
OTHER 9 (o sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 2 D 2 sq.ft.
%BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 16 • %
PAD NO. 2
BUILDABLE PAD AREA sq.ft.
RESIDENCE sq.ft.
GARAGE sq.ft. •
STABLE(BARN) sq.ft.
POOL sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
( sq.ft.
OTHER sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO.2 sq.ft.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE %
1