Loading...
763, New Construction of a SFR. Fo, ApplicationAGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: • City (Ileoffinv JJ,PF • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 VARIANCE (310) 377.1521 REOUEST FOR HEARING FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modh' or remove any unauthorized or unlaxful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: 0RS. dAM ES I<AREI.1 SLACK OWNER'S ADDRESS: 2 APPALOOSA. LAME TELEPHONE NO.: PROPERTY ADDRESS: 2 APPALOOSA LAND. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. t'DRTIotJ OF LoT 106 Rol-LI OCT 1-TILLS *TRACT ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. 7569 PAGE 01 0 PARCEL of 1 -rim RAG i sz. , A 4-11 TCGT 2632 'W .237 11-I sr- SUITE: 201, T0RRANCE CA 90505 31d —S39„ 178� Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Variance. DEW:LISH e)cISri kJCr- Sit i&LC -FAMILY( RESIDENCE, C0NSTROCT t lEW - SToRY SI►JC-rLE—1'AMILY KESIDEtJCE oN ))STD- PAD,. MINOR VARiflJcE IS RE©U1Rat) FOR NC ROACF.MEtJT INTO RE CPU IgED GUDE BARD , 1 S PRoPosE D AT `r{-I R EE CORNERS Ai EAST' SIDE OF RESICEiJCE, M A (I MUM -MUcRoAC4- MENT 1 S 4. 4 PT, TOTAL_ AREA 0-F E MCIzD, c-H MEiJT 15 5 4- SO, F; PROPOSED Nl IN IM UM 51De SETF,AGK I S 30, 6 FT, Pr anted on Recyclr:d f'al,ra. Criteria to be satisfied for grant Oariance Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone. NEAREST RES►DEUCE IS I 6,0 I'T AWAY, iF 130ILDHJGT PAO FOR 'ME PRoPoSFn RES ►SCE Is EXIS 1 NCT CRAbINc-r• O ►NCREASE 1-14E PAD 15 NOT ADV ISAt3Le t ui ?O SoILS AND GCtxocTY l SSujS, T�-IE GC7ses STRUcTUfE of.) THE ADJACENT r-Roi'4RI Y IS A TtN N IS GouRT TAT IS 2S FT FROM TfiE PRcFI✓Rr( Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because -fill= l'Ropos FD ENG ROACH IAA ENT' is )lit I N I M AL (.4 , 4 Fr., 5 4- Sa , Ft:) -11-IE SETBACK- Fog TI-)E REST OF rt+lE S?wc7URE -"ti1AT s1cE ASP -AGES WELL OVER F EgvIRED 3S T. SETBACKS o►.I A LC- 011-1E?Z SLOES ,ARE coN sIti><RAsLY GREATER "n+,AN ISEC .0 I RED M'WAWA • FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. Masters/Forms/Variance- Rev.2006 • • REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed Therefore, you may be required to mod f' or rcnnore any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall he .subject to retroactive di.scretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: JDF S JAM E. & KAREiJ SLAGK. 2 APPALOOSA LAI4E , R.N. bt) G 2 APPALOOSA LANE LOT NO. PORTION OF Loy I O, ROLLIt-G- HILLs TRACT - ASSESSORS BOOK NO. 7569 PAGE 010 PARCEL O 1 1-1M RACsz , ARCH1TC.T vc/ 237 TH 5T; tsO ITE 2C>I TORRAIJCCA 9c O5 310--539- 1788 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: IDEMc,L(SH GXISTItJCr RF•61DEI,-10E AND GzARAGt-, CONSTRUCT NEv/ I Sic RY SINGLE-FAMILY ANo GAR, , Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. COI-M7-FNUCToIJ WILL BE LIM11-ED 'TO EXIS1'tN6- BUILDIN6T PAID. exiSTI1JCE- LAt,11::)SCAPINCT AND NIATIVE VECTE-I-761/4T1oIJ WILL $ PRESERVED TO Tf4E GREATEST" roSSi t LE_ C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. COIJSTIZVCTIot S WILL 1E LIMITED -To EXISTINCT 13Ut1—D1NCr PPD, O C-rRAD1 CT IS f RoFOSD. STIN CT bf-P.INAGE Lt— BE MAINTA I/JED. D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. ON Li LANOSCAP1NCT ©N GXI STIIJCT. I3UtLC.1WCr PA WILL gE ALTeRED, ALL NATI\lE VEGETATION WILL REI4Ai1J, EX1STTINCr SCRENIIJCT TREES \X/1LL RCMAIIJ • • E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped stare of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverne permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. f f-oJEGT IS \x/ELL 'x/ITHIN C©\)E•RAGE 6OIDELINes. REbUGTIDIJ IN PAVED AREAS OFFSETS 11JG(EASE )N BuiLDIOCT AREA F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. S'TRUGTo fE AND PAD SIZE ARE SMALL ►IJ RELAT io, TO Loy SIZE„ 1-IE NEAKEGT OFIC-I-GoR Is oVER 1Go FEET ERoM Pf OF SEb RESIo NCE, G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians curd vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. 1✓X1ST/NG- DR►vEWA( WILL !E MAI,JTA►NED, GARAGE SPACE WILL. (3E 1MCI.EAS b FP.0M 2- TO 3, ADDITIcNAL_ PARKING- AKID TVRN►NCT SPACE WILL. BE PF \J1DED JO A. MDToRCouRT- H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. CO1J STIS bail u IS o►JLY PRoposEID AT .EXIsrINC?— F. MINIMAL 1MPAcT CAN 6E EXPECTED DURI NCT DEMDLI SNDK) AIJO COOS) KUGT1c0, 11-IEse IMPACTS \#ILL E3I= MITIGATED f3Y STA1-1oARc MI=AsuREs. • • I hereby certify that the statements furnished. above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other it formation presented are true and corre t to the best of knwkdge and belief. 10/t O� Date: Signature For: Applicant FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS • • OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. .� �A L(v z-r� w• -, Executed at (` Adaralifornia, this ~7� day of By: By: Address , 20 Q City NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: ORS. JAMES S- KAREN 13L-ACK REPRESENTATIVE: TIM RAC1S2 COMPANY NAME: TIM RAcIS3 Ap,c4i ITT COMPANY ADDRESS: 2tG32 'V( 2S7 TH ST Su ITS Zc 1 TaRRAtC1= C aosoS COMPANY PHONE NO. ( 310 ' G 3`1-178E PROJECT ADDRESS: 2 APPALOOSA DATE FILED FEE: RECEIPT NO: BY: ZONING CASE NO TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: • • OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HELLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. OS Executed at 2� L7 Z ! !ice NI �Ln 111-6 �, Cali omia this day of , 20 a . By: Qt41.11 J [ By: Address City DATE Z.C. NO. ADDRESS GRADING AND EXCAVATION INFORMATION Grading Quantities: CUT/EXCAVATION For house/addition For other structures (i.e. walls) List For driveway(s) For yard areas For basement excavation For pool/spa excavation Overexcavation TOTAL CUT TOTAL EXPORT FILL For house/addition For other structures (i.e.walls) List For driveway(s) For yard areas For basements For basement wells For pool/spa Cubic Yds. Max. Depth Max. Depth Location Recompaction TOTAL FILL TOTAL GRADING (Sum of total cut and total fill) NO GPADI N CT PROf'OS E D Existing pad elevations Finished floor Finished grade Proposed pad elevations Finished floor Finished grade Basement -finished floor Basement -finished well wall PAD/FLOOR ELEVATIONS Residential pad 94> 939 940 9 39 N /A N/lk Other pad • • OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Z��Z w 2?7 Z� cL�- ` 1 m-r-yvi.�..� California, � this —Zi day of , 20 06 By: A27-7 2\-19M---- By: Address W�p City NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: DRS cJAl4FS & KAREN SLACK REPRESENTATIVE: TIM RAC 1 SZ . ARC-I-1 tTECT- COMPANY NAME: COMPANY ADDRESS: 26232 W Z37 T+f ST SO1TE So ToRRAN cA ODSo'S COMPANY PHONE NO. (310 ) G39 - 1788 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2 APPALOOSA 1-1\1. DATE FILED FEE: RECEIPT NO: BY: ZONING CASE NO TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS 2 AP PALoo SA L N . ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN AREA AND STRUCTURES NET LOT AREA RESIDENCE GARAGE SWIMMING POOL/SPA POOL EQUIPMENT GUEST HOUSE CABANA STABLE (dirt volume to be included in grading quantities) RECREATION COURT ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES ENTRYWAY/ PORTE COCHERE, BREEZEWAYS ATTACHED TRELLISES *DETACHED STRUCTURES: (circle all that applies) SHEDS, TRELLISES, GAZEBO, BARBECUE, OUTDOOR KITCHEN, ROOFED PLAY EQUP.- over 15 ft. high and over 120 sq. ft. in area, WATER FEATURES, ETC. SERVICE YARD OTHER BASEMENT AREA CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE EXISTING 179,Ooo sq.ft. 4-, I I O sq.ft. 479 sq.ft. I, 18 5 sq.ft. D sq.ft. O sq.ft. o sq.ft. It SD 0sq.ft. sq.ft. 1h sq.ft. sq.ft. 700 sq.ft. 45 sq.ft. 1 44 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. (volume to be included in grading quantities) DEPTH OF BASEMENT TOTAL STRUCTURES STRUCTURAL COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURES EXCLUDING UP TO 5 & UP TO goo 6raiksq. ft. detached structures that are not higher than 10 ft. % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE 43,973 sq.ft. 5,o % sq.ft. 4, (o PROPOSED TOTAL sq.ft. 179,000 sq.ft. 4, 2-71 sq.ft. 8,38 I sq.ft. 190 sq.ft. 669 sq.ft. t7 sq.ft. 1, I $S sq.ft. O sq.ft. 5Osq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. O sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. O sq.ft. 1,718 sq.ft. O sq.ft. 5 5 2 sq.ft. O sq.ft. (144- ) sq.ft. sq.ft. • sq.ft. C7 sq.ft. o sq.ft. • sq.ft. (o, c �7 sq.ft. 3,7 % ,, �7 sq.ft. 3,7 % ',Goo sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 1, 74-4- sq.ft. sq.ft. I,229 2 sq.ft. 643 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. O sq.ft. SG sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. a sq.ft. 15, 670o sq.ft. 8,7 % 14, 813 sq.ft. /L( 2.."3 % °!Jv ALL FLATWORK MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN PRIMARY DRIVEWAY(S) PAVED WALKS, PATIO AREAS, COURTYARDS POOL DECKING OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS, ROAD EASEMENTS, PARKING PADS CoMMoIJ hR,\) vAY BARK) DRIVEvc/J�Y TOTAL FLATWORK % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE % TOTAL COVERAGE q,(9 5 5 sq.ft. (+, 8o 2 i sq.ft. �a3 sq.ft. Z. 145 sq.ft. 10, o 5osq.ft. 2(0� 221 OI B sq.ft. I2, 3 % '3Or " I sq.ft. 17,3 % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE { 7 g 7 sq.ft. Excl. the allowance of up to 5 —g00 sq. ft. structures from previous page. % TOTAL COVERAGE 30,2o �- TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 'B4,000 sq.ft. 47 % % DISTURBED AREA C3-G(6)sq.ft. tJ sq.ft. l,4-67 sq.ft. .S % `- `I' sq.ft. 1,6 t1 3,$ 53 sq.ft. 54.5 sq.ft. 2,1 +G sq.ft. 10, coSsq. ft. 26S 1G,8SB sq.ft. 3Z,4&B sq.ft. 18,1 % 6 4 3) sq.ft. 3I,$IS '9 % I./ , % 0 sq.ft. $4-,000 sq.ft. 0 GRADING QUANTITY (include future stable, corral and access way; basement and all other areas to be graded) No CrR ,r2l IJ Cr ',Re) FPS I: ¢7 O cubic yards All structures (attached and detached) must be listed. * Free standing accessory structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, fountains, barbecue, outdoor fire place, etc., are not counted towards coverages and disturbed area, unless their combined area exceedsep00 sq. ft., or if there are more than 5 such structures on the property. • • DATE Z . C . NO . ADDRESS 2. APPALOOSA L fJ . CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BUILDABLE PAD AREA EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL AND STRUCTURES BUILDING PAD &O►5b0sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 60/GOQq.ft. RESIDENCE 4, I10 sq ft �%,2%1 sq.ft. �,3�1 sq.fr. GARAGE 47 i sq.ft. sq. ft. 69 sq.ft. POOL/SPA tr �� sq.ft. O sq.fr. 1 ' 1 S sq.ft. POOL EQUIPMENT 9°sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 9 0sgSt. CABANA/REC.RM 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. GUEST HOUSE 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. ° sq.ft. STABLE //EOO sq.fr. O sq.ft. / OO sq.ft. SPORTS COURT 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. 0sq.ft. SERVICE YARD 96 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. :46' sq.fr.ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary residence2o sq.fr. Is7/Bsq.ft. 1l`1s'q.ft. Accessory structures 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. ° sq.ft. AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED 0 sq.ft. SO Gcq.fr. ' 9OC%'sq.fr. PORCHES THAT EXCEED ro% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE/ BREEZEWAY 0 sq.ft. ATTACHED TRELLISES 700sq.ft. ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES 7 57 sq.ft. (from I" page) ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES 0 sq.ft. (from 1't page not including allowed deductions) OTHER sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 S )7 3sq ft % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 14', % TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD Ni. 1 -7 ,+ o sq ft. Not incl. attached trellises, Not incl. allowed deductions, and incl. the area of covered porches that exceed 10% of the 'size of the residence/acts. structures. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE l2.3 % 0 sq.ft. 592sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 0 gq.ft. !� 2 9 2,q.ft. 6¢3 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. / Si 6O0sq.ft. 25,$% J 2,759sq.fr. 12F-27 e,g % 21.I s �- o�-- Nov. 25. 2008 5:14PM �C C HOMES No.5699 P. 2 2 APPALOOSA LANE ROLLING HILLS, CA 7569-010-011 • BUILDING AREAS-31 ROOFED AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED RESIDENCE 4,110 sq.ft. 8,318 sq.ft. GARAGE 479 sq.ft. 669 sq.ft. ENTRY PORCH 26 sq.ft. 64 sq.ft. COVERED PORCH 0 sq.ft. 1,719 sq.ft. TOTAL ROOFED AREA ATTACHED TRELLIS PATIO 1 PATIO 2 4,615 sq.ft. 10,770 sq.ft. 360 sq.ft. 250 sq.ft. 1,038 sq.ft. 232 sq.ft. TOTAL ATTACHED TRELLIS 610 sq.ft. 1,270 sq.ft LOT AREAS GROSS LOT AREA TOTAL GROSS AREA NET LOT AREA TOTAL NET AREA DRIVEWAY EASEMENT NET LOT AREA TOTAL NET LOT AREA PAD AREA PAD 1 2J-ect° vrittivy\4_ dAdwv6 184.1 109-148/4, 218,030 sq.ft. 187,475 sq.ft. f 8.475 saLIL 179,000 sq.ft 179,450 sq.ft 60,500 sq.ft. Nov. 25. 2008 5:14PM 4 C HOMES No. 5699 4?--5- 0 . . BUILDING PAD COVERAGE / PAD NO. 1 BUILDING PAD AREA V— V 61 AND STRUCTURES ° BUILDING PAD 60,500 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 60,500 sq.ft. 2 CO RESIDENCE 4,110 sq.ft. 4,208 sq.ft. 8,318 sq.ft. W Z GARAGE 479 sq.ft. 190 sq.ft. 669 sq.ft. ,"r LLI SWIMING POOUSPA 1,185 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 1,185 sq.ft. ( f/ POOL EQUIPMENT 90 sq.ft. 0 sq.fL 90 sq.ft. U GUEST HOUSE 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 1 05 CABANA 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.fL 0 sq.ft. 0 w STABLE 1,500 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 1,500 sq.ft. U RECREATION COURT 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 d SERVICE YARD 96 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. (Z —) ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES 0 (fu Primary residence 26 sq.ft. 1,757 sq.ft. 1ce ,783 sq.ft. ft Q Accessory structures 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES THAT EXCEED 10% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE 0 sq.ft. 951 sq.ft. 951 sq.ft. ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. . ATTACHED TRELLISES 700 sq.ft. 570 sq.ft. 1,270 sq.ft. . DETACHED STRUCTURES 787 sq.ft. ( 144 sq.ft.) 643 sq.ft. Not Incl. allowed deductions. . OTHER 0 sq.ft. . 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 8,973 sq.ft. 6,581 sq.ft. 15,554 sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 14.8 % 10.9 % 25.7 % TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 Not Incl. attached trellises ( 700 sq.fL) ( 570 sq.ft.) ( 1,270 sq.ft.) Not Incl. allowed deductions ( 787 sq.ft.) 144 sq.ft. ( 643 sq.ft.) Inca. porches exceeding 10% of floor area of residence. ( 26 sq.ft.) ( 915 sq.ft.) ( 951 sq.ft.) 7,460 sq.ft. 5,230 sq.ft. 12,690 sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 12.3 % 8.6 % 21,0 % 1- 0 a. 2 APPALOOSA LANE CHECKED 13! T.R. Nov,25. 2008 5:14PM : C C HOMES • -, 0 CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE. No. 5699 P. 13( REBO II© STRUCTURES EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL GROSS LOT AREA 218,000 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 218,000 sq.ft. NET LOT AREA 179,000 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 179,000 sq.ft. STUCTURAL COVERAGE RESIDENCE 4,110 sq.ft. 4,208 sq.ft. 8,318 sq.ft. GARAGE 479 sq.ft, 190 sq.ft. 669 sq.ft. SWIMING POOLISPA 1,185 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 1,185 sq.ft. POOL EQUIPMENT 90 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 90 sq.ft. GUEST HOUSE 0 sq,ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. CABANA 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. STABLE 1,500 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 1,500 sq.ft. RECREATION COURT 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES 26 sq.ft. 1,757 sq.ft. 1,783 sq.ft. ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. ATTACHED TRELLISES 700 sq.ft. 570 sq.ft. 1,270 sq.ft. DETACHED STRUCTURES Trellis 643 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. (. 3 sq.ft. Gazebo 144 sq.ft, ( 144 sq.ft.) 0 sq.ft. Barbecue • 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. SERVICE YARD 96 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 95 sq.ft. OTHER :, 0 sq.% 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. BASEMENT AREA 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURES EXCLUDING UP TO 5 & UP TO 800 sq.ft. detached structure that 8,973 sq.ft. 6,581 sq.ft. 15,554 sq.ft. 5.0% 3.7% 8.7% �yglt are not higher than 10 ft. (643 sq.ft.) 8,186 sq.ft. 6,627 sq.ft. 14,813 sq.ft. % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE 4.6 % 3.7 % 8.3 % S^14PM �C C HOMES - No.S699 Nov.25. 2008 5:14PM �C C HOMES No.5699 FLATWORK COVERAGE PRIMARY DRIVEWAYS 8,655 sq.ft. ( 4,450 sq.ft.) 4,205 sq.ft. PAVED WALKS, PATIO AREAS al Pool steps 418 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 418 sq.ft. Paved walks & stoops 113 sq.ft. 14 sq.ft. 127 sq.ft. Ca Rear patios 372 sq.ft. ( 372 sq.ft.) 0 sq.ft. POOL DECKING 2,145 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 2,145 sq,ft. OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS 0 Common driveway 10,050 sq.ft. 130 sq.ft. 10,180 sq.ft. Barn driveway 265 sq.ft. 163 sq.ft, 428 sq.ft. TOTAL FtATWORK 22,018 sq.ft. ( 4,515 sq.ft.) 17,503 sq.ft. % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE 12.3 % ( 2.5 %) 9.8 % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE % TOTAL COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE Excluding allowance for up to 5 structures up to 800 sq.ft. ( 787 sq.ft.) 144 sq.ft. ( 643 sq.ft.) 30,204 sq.ft. 2,210 sq. 32,414 sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE 16.9 % 1.2 A 18.1 % DISTURBED AREAS 84,000 sq.ft. q.ft. 84,000 sq.ft. % DISTURBED AREA 47.0 % /0.0 % 47.0 % GRADING QUANTITY 0 c.y. (No grading proposed) 30,991 sq.ft. 2,066 s • ' . 33,057 sq.ft. 17.3% 1.2_'• 18.5% ■ 0 VIM Date Filed GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Applicant(s) DRS JAMES � KAREN SACK Tel. (27(o)— la & ri 2. Legal Owner(s) � Tel. 2 # -"C) (0t 5 Address ( c�� � � ^ w 3. Project Address SAM1= PORTION of LOT (OG, Assessor's Book No. 7569 - 010 - OI 1 Lot No. ROLLS I-IIIC.S 'TACT 4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS. CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityolrh@aol.com Address 2 APPALOOSA LANE 5. Existing zoning district R A - S - 2 . 6. Proposed project/use of site Si0.c.TL.- FAMl L`f iZ�S1DI= NCC PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7. Site size 2 IS, OOO SQ. t� _ • • GEC O//eO// JJ,FP ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To Be Completed By Applicant) Zoning Case No. ,lG a 8. Net lot area 119, 00 d . "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lo�nes of the lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot." 9. Total square footage of structures � r�OC: 10. Number of floors of construction 1 11. Basement square footage O I-1 February 2002 Environmental Information Form ® Pnrtted on Recycled I':c;iet • • 12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? 14. WiII any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? 15. WiII the entire building structure require a new roof? 32,4S8 COM PLETE DEM G o f XISi Its Cr RESiDEtJGt, S 16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with Tess than 200 square feet added? 17. Driveway Access and Parking: a. Is a new driveway accessway proposed? ND (Requires Traffic Commission Review). b. Number of driveway(s) Existing? I Proposed? 1 (Second driveway requires approved Conditional Use Permit from Planning Commission). c. Width of driveway(s) Existing? 17 r Proposed? 17 1 (Maximum of 20 foot width unless approved by the Planning Commission). d. Does first 20 feet of driveway have a maximum grade of 7%? (Maximum of 7% for first 20 feet of driveway required). Existing? 1- /o Proposed? i` ` 4 e. Grade of driveway(s)? Existing? 4°iv Proposed? 4°,/a (Maximum of 12% unless approved by the Planning Commission). f. Has site plan been reviewed by Los Angles County Fire Protection Engineer to meet current driveway access requirements? NO Explain g- Does driveway cover more than a maximum 20% of the area of the yard in which it is located? ND Explain h. Does uncovered parking area cover more than a maximum 10% of the area of the yard in which it is located? NU Explain i. Does vehicular accessway to stable and corral have a maximum slope of 25% or less? `(ES Stable and corral average vehicular access slope 5 °�o . j. Does property have an above ground garage with a minimum capacity of 2 cars? `(YES With guest house a minimum of 3 cars? ND 18. Grading quantities shall be balanced. Amount cut O . Amount fill 031 (Include any basement cut in grading quantities). Np 6TRt.c.p1 t.SCr PpipPOS..D 19. Area of disturbance. 40% of net lot area maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces will remain or are proposed to be added. Square feet 84.000 . Percentage of Net Lot Area 47 / . 20. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet 0081 February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-2 • • • 21. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities. NA 22. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. NA 23. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. NA 24. Attach plans. 25. Proposed scheduling. AS 5000 AS FOSS! QLE 26. tf the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. SITE PLAN R/I LVv REL MREb 1OK NEW RES1 D . VARIAMC1 1ZE4X.JIRMID i-OR 1=NcRCSAM1-m T : INT? SID1 'f ARD SET13AciK _ ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 27. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. SITE 15 A G-BAL D PAD ON A RISe IN A L'IG-E FAYINE, 5ofL CDN 51ST5 of AN loAcTria ,AOcia.t,1T LANDSLIt[,,s ¶1"r4 Lg E.( COASJLTINCT SAND 12-\/*10)e/1!7 '13'W THE cc,i-N ;Y AN !=`XI S1 /Na ONE- ST0R1 Aesi DENc WILL ire- DEMOL-ISNEO,. IMSTMKT Pry c SPA Will- REMAIN, 1 ETACHEf7 13APJ AND OTHER SiBuciui . f,ND, M osT REMAIN. February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-3 • • 28. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. ADJACEfJ1 PPNOP PTIE5' ARE Na\MOtJE STof,Y SlN&LE PAM)LY RSI13E1,3CES, NEAREST RESG ►JcE IS )Eo ter'. AWAY, Tf-IEPE ARE IJD 4-IISTZDRIG 5-1-Rucrup,s a.1 SITE, NATIVE VE CTETATI Ot•J AND Ate I MALS WILL NOT 13E DI STURg>=D, f ROPOSEb RESI1 E JCE. 15 \X/ELL gEt_mxi ADJACEfJT PROP RTI-,ES 'W.D SHDXLD NOT I'FFEGT AfY( VIEWS, 29. Is the proposed project consistent with: City of Rolling Hills General Plan Applicable Specific Plan City of Ralllrrg Hills Zoning Ordinance South Coast Air Quality Management Plan Congestion Management Plan Regional Comprehensive Plan 30. Have any of the following studies been submitted? t-Geology Report _ Hydrology Report ✓Soils Report _ Traffic Study _ Noise Study _ Biological Study Native Vegetation Preservation Plan _ Solid Waste Generation Report _ Public Services/ Infrastructure Report 1-4 Yes No Historical Report _ Archaeological Report _ Paleontological Study _ Line of Sight Exhibits _ Visual Analysis _ Slope Map Fiscal Impact Analysis _ Air Quality Report _ Hazardous Materials/ Waste WA February 2002 Environmental Information Form • • EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. tf there are one or more 'Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," above may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation Measures: For effects -that are "Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9. The explanation of each issue should identify: a. the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. February 2002 Environmental Information Form . 1-5 Potentially Significant Impact Issues: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact I. AESTHETICS — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Cl 0 0 IIV b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but 0 0 0 IIV not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or 0 0 0 quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which 0 ❑ 0 would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural 0 0 0 0 resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or 0 0 0 Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ❑ 0 ❑ E Williamson Act contract? - c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? III. AIR QUALITY— Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? 1-6 ❑ ❑ 0 r ❑ ❑ ❑ February 2002 Environmental Information Form • • Potentially SiLess gnniificcannt With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute 0 0 0 lid substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of 0 0 0 E any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant 0 0 0 th'''' concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial 0 0 0 l number of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES,— Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or 0 0 0 through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat 0 0 0 or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally 0 ❑ 0 protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native 0 0 0 resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any policies or ordinances protecting 0 0 0 biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat 0 0 0 f Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-7 • • • Potentially Significanntw th Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact V . CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ❑ ❑ 0 lia-/° of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the 0 0 0 I11.' significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological 0 0 0 l resource or site or unique geologic feature? • d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred 0 0 0 outside of formal cemeteries? VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated 0 0 0 riVi on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? 0 0 ❑ iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including 0 ❑ 0 ❑'''' liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ❑ 0 b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? 0 0 0 I c). Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, 0 0 0 E'er or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? 1' d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 0 0 0 l 1 B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life and property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the 0 0 0 I use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? • February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-8 • • Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS — Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 0 0 0 ®r environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 0 0 ❑ f environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or 0 0 0 acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ❑ 0 0 hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan ❑ 0 0 CV or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area/ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ❑ 0 ❑ would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an 0 0 0 adopted_emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of 0 0 0 loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-9 • • Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY — Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge 0 0 0 f requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or ❑ 0 0 interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater able level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the 0 ❑ 0 site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the 0 ❑ 0 EHr site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed 0 0 0 ra the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? 0 0 0 f� g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as 0 0 0 mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood _ Insurance Rate maporother flood hazard delineation .. map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures 0 0 0 which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, 0 0 0 l3' injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 0 0 0 February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-10 • • • Potentially Signefiss maWith Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING —Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? 0 0 0 LEV b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or 0 0 0 ❑/ regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or 0 0 0 L natural community conservation plan? X. MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral 0 0 0 resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the Toss of availability of a locally -important 0 0 0 fD.#1' mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Xl. NOISE— Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in 0 0 0 18� excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive 0 0 0 I groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise 0 0 0 levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient 0 0 0 f!3 noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, 0 0 0 111., where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would 0 0 0 131 the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? February 2002 Environmental Information Form • • Th• Potentially Signifycant With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING- Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ❑ 0 0 directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, 0 0 0 lit necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating 0 0 ❑ I71'. the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XII1. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? 0 0 0 ®' Police protection? 0 0 0 41.•"- Schools? ❑ 0 0 (Y' Parks? 0 0 0 fEr' - Other public facilities? 0 0 0 . XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing 0 ❑ 0 fia--' neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? _ b) Does the project include recreational facilities or 0 0 0 f require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-12 • • Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC—Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in 0 0 0 relation to the existing traffic Toad and capacity of the street system (Le., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections? b) Exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of 0 0 0 t service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either 0 0 0 an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature 0 0 0 L (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? / e) Result in inadequate emergency access? 0 0 0 p' f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 0 0 0 11) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs 0 0 0 q.' supporting alternative transportation (e.g., but turnouts, bicycle racks)? XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the 0 0 0 per. applicable Regional Water Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or 0 0 0 ta/ wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm 0 0 0 Gle. water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the 0 0 0 project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-13 e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? XVII. STORM WATER QUALITY IMPACTS —Would the project: a) During construction result in potential impact on storm water runoff? b) Post -construction result in potential impact on storm • water runoff? c) Result in potential for discharge of storm water from areas from material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas or loading docks, or other outdo( work areas? d) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to impair the beneficial uses of the receiving waters or areas that provide water quality benefit? e) Result. in.potentiaL.for_ discharge of_storm water to cause significant harm on the biological integrity of the waterways and water? f) Result in potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of storm water runoff that can cause environmental harm? g) Result in potential for significant increases in erosion of the project site or surrounding areas? Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation El Less Than Signficant Impact 0 No Impact ❑ 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ o ED' ❑ ❑ o ❑ ❑ t, o ❑ ❑ o ❑ o CY o ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ 0 0 February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-14 • • Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ❑ 0 ❑ quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually 0 0 0 E limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects.) ,/ c) Does the project have environmental effects which ❑ 0 0 I� will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? February 2002 Environmental Information Form 1-15 • • NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the lists prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed statement indicating whether the project and any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list, and shall specify any list. HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is required to submit a signed statement which contains the following information: 1. Name of applicant: PAS JAMES Z le-AIetJ 13LACK 2. Address: 2 APPA Loosf'• LAf.IE, 3. Phone Number: L>) 5s-(44- (61 6+3 4. Address of Site (street name and ntfv mber if a at�bTe, and ZIP code): APPALOOSA LANE. R,I-L CA. 5. Local Agency (city/county): BOLLINICT I ilLL5 6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: 7 569 - 010 - oil 7. ._Specify__.any list pursuant_. to. Section.. 6.5962.5.. of_ the Government Code: STATE 0 F CALIFORNIA HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (available at City Halll. 8. Regulatory identification number: 9. Date of List: JULY 1992 Date b iab For Signatur Applicant 1-16 February 2002 Environmental Information Form • • NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below. have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on these lists. Date 1;b 1 t For Signatur Applicant (7%--cc7 CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date 1 o/ iIo? t For Signature Applicant 1-17 February 2002 Environmental Information Form • • CERTIFED PROPERTY OWNERS' LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I, JANE KWF declare under penalty of perjury, that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons who are shown on the latest available assessment roll of the County of Los Angeles as owners of the subject property and as owners of the property within a distance of 1000 feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as follows: Property address: 2 Appaloosa Lane, City of Rolling Hills APN #: 7569-010-011 Les?al description: Portion of Lot 106. Rolling Hills Tract Date: September 22, 2008 Signed: KILIL „AL/ �U� Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this 22nd day of SPntembpr 20 08 , by Jane Knh?Pff , proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who appeared before me. Signature (0Lei (Seal) FRANCENE O. URALMAN NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA in COMMISSION # 1725171 c LOS ANGELES COU2011 My Comm. Exp. February • • CERTIFED PROPERTY OWNERS' LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I, JANE KCBMEEF declare under penalty of perjury, that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons who are shown on the latest available assessment roll of the County of Los Angeles as owners of the subject property and as owners of the property within a distance of 1000 feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as follows: Property address: 2 Appaloosa Lane, City of Rolling Hills APN #: 7569-010-011 Legal description: Portion of Lot 106. Rolling Hills Tract Date: September 22, 2008 Signed: U (J Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this 22nd day of SP,ptPm1Pr 20 08 , by Jane Kob7Pff , proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who appeared before me. Signature /(pc, c ` J (Seal) FRA� E D. URALMAN NOTARY PUBLIC • CALIFORNIA in LOS ANGELES COUNTY My Comm. Exp. February 12, 2011 t September 22, 2008 SOUR & ASSOCIATES LLC. Business and Real Estate Development Services 1001 Sixth Street, Suite 110, Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 e-mail address: srourllc@esrour.com 310/372-8433 ■ Fax 310/372-8894 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION for Property address: 2 Appaloosa Lane, Rolling Hills Legal: Portion of Lot 106, Rolling Hills Tract APN: 7569-010-011 PREPARED FOR: JAMES BLACK 2 Appaloosa Lane Rolling Hills Ca 90274 ATTACHMENTS: By OCT - 2 2008 CITY OF ROLUfjG HILLS Notarized affidavit dated September 22, 2008 Map depicting properties within affected area and keyed to owners list List of property owners and mailing addresses within 1000' of subject property prepared in format required by the City Triplicate sets of mailing labels to affected owners File copy for City, Architect & Client P.IWORD\MAPPMGVNASTERS\PRJCV-RH DOC