472, Extensive remodel to existing , Applicationr
• •
RipUEST FOR HEARING
FOR ZONE VARIANCE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
The undersigned DR. PAUL M. STRAUB
Name
#7 E. PACKSADDLE ROAD 541-5725
Street Address Telephone Number
0 is/are the owner(s) or is/are in lawful possession of
(2) has permission of the owner
Legal description of property situated at LOT 27, BOOK 59, p. 8-10
Lot Tract
#7 E. PACKSADDLE ROAD
Street Address
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the
project require a Variance.
PROPOSED PROJECT IS AN EXTENSIVE REMODEL OF AN FXTSTTNG RESIDENCE. EXISTING FRONT
SETBACK IS 24'-0". PROPOSED WATERFALL AT NORTHEAST CORNER IS 10'-0" AWAY FROM PROPERTY
LINE. PROPOSED 3'-0" RETAINING WALL AT NORTHEAST CORNER IS 17'-0" AWAY FROM PROPERTY
LINE.
Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance
Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the
'same vicinity and zone.
FRONT SETBACK OF EXISTING RESIDENCE IS 24'-0", THEREFORE, PROPOSED PROJECT IS1SIMPLY
MAINTAINING EXISTING FRONT SETBACK. WATERFALL & RETAINING WALL ARE LANDSCAPING
FEATURES, NOT MAJOR STRUCTURES, AND ARE AT LEAST 10'-0" AWAY FROM PROPERTY LINE.
Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to
the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where prr--•= ty..is. 1c2ated because.
THERE IS A LARGE (42") PINE TREE IN THE FRO YARD THAT SEVFRFT.Y LIMITS VISIBILITY OF
RESIDENCE FROM STREET. THE RESIDENCE TO THE SOUTH IS ONLY SETBACK APPROXIMATELY •
20', THEREFORE, PROPOSED PROJECT ShiBACK WILL NOT SEEM TO BE OUT OF CHARAC1ER FOR
THIS STREET.
FILING FEE
A filing fee 0111111111.1111Lmust accompany the application. Hake check payable to:
aINde'S DECLARATION
_, (fie), declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is trus and correct.
Executed at #7 E. PACKSADDLE RD., ROLLING HILLS , California,
this FIRST
day of NO ER
s /7 1zs-• ei"%/ J
#7 E. PACKSADDLE ROAD .
Address
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in
California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant
should acknowledge before a Wot_ry public of the State where the signature is
(fixed, or before another officer of that State authorised by its laws to take .
acknowledgments, that he �(it) owns the property described herein, and that the
information in the accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its)
knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
FORMS ISSUED TO: - - _
NAME PILED
•
ORGANIZATION
•JOE J11.oDRES$
, .. ....
DATE.
DECISION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
•
PEE $
••Y
ii:1.&J4 . NO.'
•
, 19
The action of the Planning Commission will be final unless within twenty (20) days
following the notice to the applicant of the decision, an appeal in writing is filed
with the City Clerk by:
A. The applicant:
B. Any person who protested, either orally or in writing, as a matter of record
prior to the final vote of the planning Comiaissioe•on the natter and who, in
addition, received or vas entitled to receive the written notice specified
in subdivision 2 of subsection A of Section 17.40.0601 or
C. The City Council, upon the affirmative. vote of three members of the Council.
In order to obtain a building permit, it will be neeessary for the applicant to sign
a copy of the findings that they understand and accept the conditons of approval.
COMPUTATION C! LO? COVERAGE
CITY or ROLLING RILLS
Lar COVERAGE (Ordinance No. 188)
Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts, swimming pools,
service yards (enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or an area of not less than 200 square
feet for the construction of a stable (with vehicle access thereto) shall not corer
more than twenty (200 percent of the net lot area; provided further that in addition
to the above described improvements, the areas included within driveways, parking
space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt or concrete paving of any kind excepting
roads maintained by the Rolling Bills Community Association, shall not cover more
than thirty-five (35%) percent of the net lot area.
For the purposes of this Section 'net a: a' shall exclude all perimeter easements
a maximum of ten feet and that portion of the lot or parcel of land which is used
or roadway purposes, and shall also exclude any private drive or driveway which pro-
vides ingress and egress to any other lot or parcel of land, and access strip portion
of any flag lot.
aar'.DING AREA CALCUTATIONS
WET LOT AREA - 77,892 sq. ft.-
_
ssr�.,.,i -4,700 eq. ft.
GARAGE - 650 sq. h.
sirmaNG POOL 680 -sq. ft.
SOMME 450 sq. ft.
. 1E21HI4. COURT -0- K. ft.
CABANA 159 sq. .ft:
TOTAL SQUARE FEET 6,639
% o t.AW MAY NOT EXCEED 20% OF NET LOT AREA) 8.5.' . • • •
DRIVEWAY 1,280' •q. ft•
PAVED ITALICS AND PATIO AREA • • 408 sq. ft.
POOL DECKING 1,480 eq. ft.
TOTAL SQUARE FEET 3,168
.4.1 • t
•
TOTAL COVERAGE (MAY NOT 35. OF WET LOT AREA) _12 , 6'
s• •
CITY a tOt.L/11G MILLS
MI= Chit
CLRTIfItD PROPERTY 010/1 PS' LIST
At?ICAVIT •
STATE or CALITORNIA)ss.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELZS)
I, ` 4/1" /�/% sue'/ L� , declare under. penalty of
perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to
r'A= all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessaent roll
• • of the County within the area described and.for a distance otone thousand,. (1,000)
teat fro. the exterior_boundaries of property legally described ass
BOOK 59-,.PAGES 8-10, LOT 27
`• !••
♦•
.ti
• O••••�+ •••
•• . ? • ••
Executed at • Pal. (4__Q'C-P/I E , California, thti
7 9 * day of —Cr?:••.. .
. . • ..• • •• •
e
•
stgnature
.0 Conditional Os* permit
IZI Variance
[� tone Change
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by
ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills ("City") and by private deed
restrictions enforced by the Rolling Hills Community Association
("RHCA") .
The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA
are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and
approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in
Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not
mean or imply or ensure approval by the other.
The suggested sequence for property development is to obtain
City approvals first.
I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement
has been fully read and its admonition is.completely understood.
Executed at E , California
this FIRST day of NOVEMBER , 1991 .
By:
By:
#7 E. PACKSADDLE RD., ROLLING HILLS
Address
City
PROPERTY OWNER:
OWNERS ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO:
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
REOUEST FOR HEARING
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DR. PAUL M. STRAUB
##7 E. PACKSADDLE ROAD
541-5725
#67 E. • PACKSADDLE ROAD
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO 27:
ASSESSORS BOOK NO 59 PAGE$-1Q PARCEL
SOUDi BAY ENG. CORP. (DOUG McHATTIE)
AGENT' 8 ADDRESS: 304 TEJON PLACE. PALOS VERDES ESTATES 90274
TELEPHONE NO: (213) 375-2556 ;
**********************************************************************
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
AGENT'S NAME:
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what
aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review:
REMODEL OF EXISTING RESIDENCE. CHANGES IN HOUSE ELEVATIONS, CHANGES IN
FOOTPRINT OF STRUCTURE, CHANGES IN DRIVEWAY.
SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make
an affirmative finding., Describe in detail the project's conformance
with the criteria below:
A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning
Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the
sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses.
YES. ALL NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ARE SINGLE FAMILY RANCH STYLE HOMES.
SETBACKS ARE UNCHANGED FROM EXISTING HOUSE SETBACKS. IN TERMS OF SQUARE
FOOTAGE, THIS PROJECT IS APPROXIMATELY THE SAME AS SEVERAL NEIGHBORING HOUSES.
Site Plan Review
Application -9-
• •
B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design,
to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic
features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature
trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and
knolls) ? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing
natural features.
THIS SITE WAS PREVIOUSLY GRADED TO PROVIDE A LEVEL PAD FOR EXISTING RESIDENCE.
PROPOSED RESIDENCE REMODEL IS CONFINED TO EXISTING PAD. NO MAJOR GRADING IS
TO BE PERFORMED.
C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the
site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of
existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved.
Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with
existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage
redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course.
Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed
minimization on lots.
ON THIS SITE.
THERE TS TO BE NO NEW MAJOR GRADING ASSOCIALED WITH THIS REMODEL.
D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding
native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is
compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community?
Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between
private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native
vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers.
ADDITIONAL PLANTING WILL ENHANCE THE AREA. EXISTING, MATURE PINE TREES
.ARE TO REMAIN, AS WILL SEVERAL OTHER MATURE TREES. THERE ARE TO BE SEVERAL
NEW PLANTERS AROUND THE RESIDENCE.
Site Plan Review
Application -10-
E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and
undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot
coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual
amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing
buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage proposed
compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on
neighboring lots.
A LARGE PORTION OF THIS LOT IS UNGRADED AND IN ITS ORIGINAL, NATURAL, UNDEVELOPED
STATE. OVER 80% OF THIS LOT IS A CANYON, LEFT IN ITS NATURAL STATE.
F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the
site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks
shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall
be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness.
Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing
setbacks of neighboring properties.
PROPOSED PROJECT IS NEITHER LARGER OR SMALLER THAN OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE AREA.
SETBACKS HAVE NOT CHANGED FROM ORIGINAL RESIDENCE.
G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles?
Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway
location, design, trip data, landscaping and other on -site parking
or storage areas.
PROJECT IS SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE. THEREFORE. THERE WILL BE MINIMAL IMPACT
ON THE NUMBER OF VEHICLES AND TRIPS IN THE AREA. PROJECT IS AT THE END OF A
CUL-DE-SAC ACCESSIBLE ONLY BY A PRIVATE DRIVE.
Site Plan Review
Application
-11-
H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project
impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed
mitigation measures.
YES
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached
exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan
review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the
facts, statements and other information presept are true and correct
to the best of my knowledge and belief. X''''Date: 11-J cil ���,h/,
Signature '
For: PAUL M. STRAUB
Applicant
Site Plan Review
Application -12-
• •
COMPUTATION OF LOT COVERAGE,
LOT COVERAGE (TITLE 17)
Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts,
swimming pools, service yards (enclosed or unenclosed) , stables, or
an area of not less than 1,000 square feet for the construction of
a stable and corral (with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover
more than twenty (20%) of the net lot area, provided further that
in addition to the above described improvements, the areas included
within driveways, parking space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt
or concrete paving of any kind excepting roads maintained by the
Rolling Hills Community Association, shall not cover more than
thirty-five (35%) percent of the net lot area.
For the purposes of this Section "net area" shall exclude all
perimeter easements for a maximum of ten feet (10') and that
portion of the lot or parcel of land which is used for roadway
purposes, and shall also exclude any private drive or driveway
which provides ingress and egress to any other lot or parcel of
land, and access strip portion of any flag lot.
BUILDING AREAS
NET LOT AREA
RESIDENCE
GARAGE
SWIMMING POOL
STABLE
TENNIS COURT
SERVICE YARD
OTHER
(CABANA)
EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
77, 892 sq.ft. 77, 892 sq.ft. 77, 892 sq.ft.
2,119 sq. ft. 2.581 sq. ft.• 4.700 sq. ft.
400 sq.ft. 250 sq. ft. 650 sq.ft.
680 sq.ft. - sq.ft. 680 sq.ft.
-0- sq.ft. 450 sq.ft. 450 sq.ft.
-0- sq.ft. -0- sq.ft. -0- sq.ft.
-0- sq.ft. -0- sq. ft. -0- sq.ft.
159 sq.ft. -0- sq.ft. 159 sq.ft.
TOTAL SQUARE FEET 3,358 sq.ft. 3,281 sq.ft. 6,639 sq.ft.
% STRUCTURE COVERAGE 4.3 %
Site Plan Review
Application -6-
4.2 % 8.5 %
• •
DRIVEWAY 1.143 sq. ft. 137:sq. ft. 1,280 sq. ft.
PAVED WALKS AND
PATIO AREA
POOL DECKING
190 sq. ft. 28 8 sq. ft. 408 sq. ft.
1 .970 sq. ft. (490) sq. ft. 1,480 sq. ft.
TOTAL FLATWORR 3,233 sq.ft. ( 65) sq.ft. 3,168 sq.ft.
% TOTAL FLATWORR
COVERAGE 4.2 % (0.t) % 4.1; %
TOTAL COVERAGE 8.5 %
Site Plan Review
Application -7-
4.1 % 12.6 %
COMPUTATION OF BUILDABLE AREA AND COVERAGE THEREOF,
A policy of the City is to address coverage of an identified "EXISTING
BUILDABLE AREA". Coverage thereof is based upon the calculation of the
"footprint" square footage of the residence, garage, stable (barn), and
other accessory structures proposed and/or developed on said "buildable
area".
For purposes of this calculation, "buildable area" shall be defined as
stated in Section 17.08.135 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code which
declares existing "buildable area" as the portion of a lot that
constitutes the existing building pad and any other contiguous portion
of the lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten
percent (10%) or less. If there is no existing building pad, it shall
mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average
slope of ten percent (10%) or less.
BUILDABLE AREA CALCULATIONS
TOTAL BUILDABLE PAD AREA 13,200 sq.ft.
RESIDENCE 4,700 sq.ft.
GARAGE 650 sq. ft.
STABLE (BARN) -0- sq.ft.
POOL 680 sq.ft.
OTHER (CABANA) 159 sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON BUILDING PAD
BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
Site Plan Review
Application -8-
6.189 sq. ft.
46.8
h
•
CHECKLIST FOR PLAN SUBMITTAL,
The following information must be included on any plan submitted
for checking to the Rolling Hills Planning Commission for:
A. Conditional Use Permit (including grading requirements).
B. Variance (including grading requirements).
C. Site Plan Review (including 'grading requirements).
Show the following:
✓1. Name, address and telephone no. of applicant, and name
address and telephone no. of architect and civil
engineer.
Vicinity map drawn to scale.
Requested improvements should be dimensioned to property
line and residences of all contiguous properties.
North arrow and scale of plans.
Existing contours of the entire lot.
‹. Show setbacks, easements, horse trails on entire lot.
.v6< Squarefootage of building pads in accordance with
Municipal Code Title 17 (form attached).
Computation of lot coverage in accordance with Municipal
Code Title 17 (form attached).
All slopes shall not be steeper in slope than two
horizontal to one vertical, or exceed a vertical height
of thirty feet (30'). All slopes shall be marked with
grade. (Municipal Code Title 15).
vr. All cut and fill slopes must be shaded. (Title 15).
Show all retaining walls and sections through walls,
height and elevations. Show height for all buildings.
vll. Show proposed drainage pattern of graded areas.
vi2. The defined area(s) for which the Variance, Conditional
Use Permit or site plan reviewis requested.
Site Plan Review
Application -4-
Show outline of
All structures
footage of each
note must be
measurements.
residence and any additional structures.
must be physically measured and square
structure must be shown on drawing. A
on the drawing certifying to those
. Show a graded area of not less than 450 square feet for
the construction of a stable, 550 square feet for a
corral, and a graded road of not more than 25% grade for
vehicular access to the stable site. (Title 17).
�5. Sections should be shown through highest slope and
through other areas where ground is steep, and as many
additional sections as necessary to clearly delineate
land contours with existing ground.
. A current survey and grading plan, with related soils,
geology, hydrology/drainage reports, showing all
structures on the property, with their distance from
property lines delineated, will be required in
applications where the requested change is close to
easements, close to other properties, and/or where there
is to be significant grading on the property.
✓17. Note distances from the center line of all existing and
proposed streets adjacent to the subject property.
•
8. Show the existing buildable area which is that portion of
a lot that constitutes the existing building pad and any
contiguous portion of the lot within the area defined by
the required minimum setbacks that has an average slope
of ten percent (10%) or less. If there is not an
existing building pad, the buildable area shall mean that
portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an
average slope of ten percent (10%) or less.
Site Plan Review
Application -5-
OWNER'B DECLARATION
I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
correct.
Executed at ROLLING HILLS
this FIRST day of NOVEMBER , 1991
,California,
1
##7 E. PACKSADDLE RD.
ROLLING HILLS, CA
(address)
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is
signed in California. If this application. is signed outside of
California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of
the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of
that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it)
owns the property described herein, and that the information
accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge
and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
APPLICANT: DR. PAUL M. STRAUB DATE FILED �9/
REPRESENTATIVE: DOUG McHATTIE FEE: YZ, Z .S7)
COMPANY NAME: SOUTH BAY ENG. CORP. RECEIPT NO: 1V 7S
COMPANY ADDRESS: 304 TEJON PLACE BY: AU1-1(14
P.V.E. ZONING CASE NO: U`�7Z
COMPANY PHONE NO. 011 ) 379-7.SS6 TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: 12/7! 9/
PROJECT . ADDRESS: 007 F. PACKSADDLE
Site Plan Review
Application
—13—
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of
the City of Rolling Hills ("City") and by private deed restrictions
enforced by the Rolling Hills Community Association ("RHCA").
The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are
completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and
approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in
Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean
or imply or ensure approval by the other.
The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City
approvals first.
I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has
been fully read and its admonition is completely understood.
Executed at
this FIRST
#7 E. PACKSADDLE RD:,
day of
By:
By:
Site Plan Review
Application -14-
ROLLING HILLS , California
NOVEMBER , 1991.
Address
City
• •
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
ZONING CASE
CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST,
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
SS
I, PAUL M. STRAUB , declare
under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and
addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear
on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area
described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the
exterior boundaries of property legally described as:
BOOK 59, PAGES 8-10, LOT 27
Executed at #7 E. PACKSADDLE RD., ROLLING HILLS , California,
this FIRST day of NOVEMBER , 19 91 •
SIGNATURE
Conditional Use Permit
Variance
Site Plan Review
Zone Change
Site Plan Review
Application -15-
• •
Date Filed
City O/ /O//inii/ INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
(To Be Completed By Applicant)
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS. CALIF. 90274
(213) 377.1521
FAX (213) 377.7288
Zoning Case No.
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Applicant, address and telephone no. 541-5725
SOUTH BAY ENGINEERING CORP., 304 TEJON PL., P.V.E., 375-2556 (D. McHATTIE)
2. Legal Owner, address and telephone no. (if different from
above) DR. PAUL M. STR.AUB, #7 E:':PACKSADDLE, R.H.
3. Address of project #7 E. PACKSADDLE.
Assessor's Book, Page, Parcel No. BOOK 59, PAGE 8-10, -.
Lot No. 27
4. List and describe any other related permits and other public
approvals required for this project,including those required
by city, regional, state and federal agencies:
BUILDING PERMIT'
5. Existing zoning district RAS-1
6. Proposed use of site (project for which this form is filed):
PRIVATE RESIDENCE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
7. Site size. 2.12 ACRES
8. Net lot area. 77,892 SQ. FT.
9. Total square footage of structures. 5,959SQ. FT.
10. Basement square footage. 900 SQ. FT.
• •
11. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage. 9807 SQ. FT.
12. Will any exterior walla be removed or relocated? Which walls?
SOUTH WALL, PART OF EAST WALL, AND PART OF WEST WALL. (SEE PLANS)
13. Will an interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls?
SOUTHEAST WING AND EAST WING. (SEE PLANS)
14. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? NO
15. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 25%
added? NO
.16. Will cut and fill be balanced? N.A. Amount cut -0-
Amount fill -0-
17. Attach plans.
18. Proposed scheduling. A.S.A.P.
19. If residential, include the unit size, approximate sale price
and household size expected. 4700 SQ. FT., $1.5M, SINGLE FAMILY
20. If commercial, .indicate the type estimated employment per
shift and loading facilities. NOT COMMERCIAL
21. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated
employment per shifts, estimated occupancy, loading
facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the
project. NOT INSTITUTIONAL
22. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or
rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the
application is required. VARIANCE REQUIRED FOR FRONT SETBACK,
WATERFALL BASE WITHIN 20' EASEMENT, 3' 0" RET. WALL INDO' EASEMENT.
Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects?
Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as
necessary).
Yes No
X 23. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands,
beaches, lakes or hills, or substantial alteration
of ground contours.
X 24. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing
residential areas or public lands or roads.
25. Change in pattern, scale or character of general
area of project.
X 26. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
X 27. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes, or odors in
vicinity.
X 28. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water
quality or quantity, or alteration of existing
draining patterns.
X 29. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration
levels in the vicinity.
X 30. Site on .filled land or on slope of 10 percent or
more.
X 31. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials,
such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives.
X 32. Substantial change in demand for municipal services
(police, fire, water, sewage, etc.).
X 33. Substantially increased fossil fuel consumption
(electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.).
X 34. Relationship to a larger project or series of
projects.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
35. Describe the project site at it exists before the project,
including information on topography, soil stability, plants
and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects.
Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of
the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots
or polaroid photos will be accepted.
PROJECT IS A REMODEL OF EXISTING RESIDENCE. EXISTING RESIDLNCE HAS A Y-SHAPED
FOOTPRINT. REMODELED RESIDENCE WILL HAVE AN ESSENTIALLY SQUARE FOOTPRINT WITH
A SMALLER. RECTANGULAR WING ADJOINING. THE EXTERIOR WALLS OF THE WING ARE
EXISTING AND WILL REMAIN.
36. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on
plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic
aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential,
commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest
house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height,
frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of
the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted.
SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ARE USED FOR sugar .F-FAMTTv RESIDENCES AND ARE OF THE
SAME MAGNITUDE IN TERMS OF SQUARE FOOTAGE. ALL ARE 1ANCTT STYLE HOMES.
THAT HAVE SIMILAR PLANTS AND ANIMALS AS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in
the attached exhibits present the data and information required
for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and
that the facts, statements, and information presented are true
and rrect to the best of my knowledge and belief.
/-144/iter/
Signature of Legal Owr er - Date
F (� gitt
Sign ture ofApplicant
9/