602, A 380 sq. ft addition to SFR w, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsAp •
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A
MODIFICATION TO PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-04, APPROVING AN EXTENSION
TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VARIANCE TO PERMIT
ENCROACHMENTS INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD
SETBACK TO ENLARGE A KITCHEN, GRANTING A
VARIANCE TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENTS INTO THE
SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A
FAMILY ROOM ADDITION, AND GRANTING A
VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM TOTAL LOT
COVERAGE AT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN
ZONING CASE NO. 602.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A request has been filed by Mr. Joseph Cioffi and Mrs. Kathy
Halliday, with respect to real property Ideated at 3 Packsaddle Road East, (Lot
25-SF) Rolling Hills, requesting a one year time extension for a previously
approved Variance to encroach into the side yard set back with a kitchen and
family room addition, and a Variance to exceed the maximum allowed lot
coverage in Zoning Case No. 602 that was approved by the Planning
Commission by Resolution No. 2000-04 on March 21, 2001
Section 2. The Commission considered this item at a meeting on
February 20, 2001, at which time information was presented indicating that the
extension of time is necessary because the applicant's family obligations and
illness in the past year made it necessary for the project to be delayed.
Section 3. Based on information and evidence submitted, the Planning
Commission does hereby amend Paragraph A, Section 10 of Resolution No. 2000-
04, dated March 21, 2000, to read as follows:
"This Variance approvals shall expire within two years from the effective
date of approval as defined in Section 17.38.070(A) of the Zoning Code."
Section 4. Except as herein amended, the remaining provisions of
Resolution No. 2000-04 shall continue to be in full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS EBRUARY 2001.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
AI 1 EST:
. 4217,-y-- )
MATILI411-1-vgYN KE , DEPUTY CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
§§
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2001-04 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO PLANNING
COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2000-04, APPROVING AN EXTENSION TO
A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VARIANCE TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENTS
INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO ENLARGE A KITCHEN,
GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENTS INTO THE
SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A FAMILY ROOM
ADDITION, AND GRANTING A VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM
TOTAL LOT COVERAGE AT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING
CASE NO. 602.
was approved and adopted at a regular. meeting of the Planning Commission on
February 20, 2001 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte and
Chairman Roberts
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Mar 13 02 10:05a
'
•
310 540 4364
p• 3
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
Sidney F. Croft
3858 Carson Street
Suite 127
Torrance, CA 90503
01-1610188
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE
LICENSE AGREEMENT
nus AGREEMENT.made.and executed a of this 1/th of February, 2000, by
and between ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES, a
non-profit California corporation, sometimes hereinafter referred to as
"LICENSOR" or "ASSOCIATION", and JOSEPH V. CIOFFI and KATHY JOAN HALLIDAY,
sometimes hereinafter referred to as "LXCENSEE".
W ITNESSET H:
RECITAL S:
,LICENSEE is the owner of the hereinafter described parcel of land
situated in.the City of Rolling Hills, County of Los Angeles, State of
California, commonly known by street and number as 3 Packsaddle Road East,
and more particularly described in Exhibit A.
The above -described real property is under the control and jurisdiction
of the ASSOCIATION and is subject to the terms and conditions of that
certain document entitled "Agreement and Declaration No. 150-AR of
Establishment of Basic Protective Restrictions, Covenants; ConditiOns,
Reservations, Liens, Charges and Certain LocalRestrictions", recorded May
17, 1951, in Book 36229, page 238, Official Records of Los Angeles County,
California. said Agreement is sometimes hereinafter referred to in this
document as "Declaration .No. 150-AR".
11
Declaration No. 150-AR reserved to the subdivider (predecessor in
interest to LICENSEE) certain casements on, over, under, across and along
all strips of land shown as streets, roads and easements on any subdivision
map or record of survey referred to in Subportion (1) of Subsection (a) of
Section 1 of Article III of the Declaration of Restrictions, which
reservation includes an easement which extends along the Southerly. boundary
of the real property described in Recital I above. Said easement was
reserved for roads, streets, bridle trails,, parkways, park areas, poles,
wires and conduits for the transmission of electricity for lighting,
hearing, power, telephone and other public utility purposes and the
1
Mar 13 02 10:05a
310 540 4364 p.4
01-1610188
necessary attachments:in connection therewith; public and private sewers,
storm water drains, land drains and pipes, water systems, water, heating and
gas mains, pipes and other methods of conducting and performing any.public
or quasi -public service or function beneath*the surface of the ground.
ASSOCIATION -has acquired'all subdivider's.right, title,and interest in and
f":1Cf'Mf:s.ntfl rr.izerl,N7d by the subdivider and, by the provisions of
saia ucciaration No. 160-AR, has jurisdiction and control over said
easements so reserved..
XII
.LICENSEE desires to make use of a portion of said easement for the
purpose of planting and maintaining shrubs, trees and an irrigation line
over approximately 3 feet into the easement owned by the ASSOCIATION; and
the ASSOCIATION -finds that the proposed use by the Licensees of the portion
of said easement, on a non-exclusive basis, will enable LICENSEE to make
better.use of his property.
IV
Plants depicting the location of the shrubs and trees to be planted
have been preparcd by Criss.Gunderson, AIA and.submitted to RHCA (the
"Gunderson Plans") and arc attached hereto as Exhibit B.
IT IS NOW, THEREFORE, AGREED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, as follows:
A. ASSOCIATION grants LICENSEE.the right and privilege to plant and
maintain.shrubs, trees and an irrigation line over approximately 3 feet into
the.easement owned by .the ASSOCIATION.
B. Except as provided for herein, this Agreement is subject to the
condition that LICENSEE shall not, during thc term hereof, make a use of the
area above -described, .in such a way as to conflict With Any of the Rules and
Regulations of the ASSOCIATION, its Bylaws, laws, or Declaration No. 150-AR
as the same are now constituted or as they may hereinafter be amended or
modified or changed.
C. This Agreement shall cease and terminate without notice to either
party upon conveyance or transfer by LICENSEE cf their right of
possession of the legal or equitable title in and to all or any part Of the
real property described in Recital I hereof, provided, however, that said
Agreement herein granted to LICENSEE may be renewed and continuedby the
transferee of this Agreement with the written consent and agreement of the
ASSOCIATION.
D. If ASSOCIATION has reasonable need for the use of the easement the
ASSOCIATION expressly reserves the right to terminate said Agreement by
giving the LICENSEE (or his transferee) one hundred eighty (180) days'
written notice of its intended use of the easement and its intention to so
terminate the.Agreement and -thereafter all rights of LICENSEE (or his
transferee) to use the real property which is tile subject of this License,
described in paragraph A, shall immediately terminate and end.
2
Mar. 13 02 10:05a
310 540 4364 p.5
01-1610188 lt
E. LICENSEE agrees to install shrubs and trees in accordance with the
Gunderson Plans. If LICENSEE fails to follow the Gunderson Plans, LICENSOR
shall have the right to terminate this license on 30 day's noticc to
LICENSEE.
F. LICENSEE agrec8 to trim the shrubs and trees upon the written
requires the written request of LICENSOR. If LICENSEE fails to trim the
shrubs and trees, LICENSOR shall have the right to go upon the property.and
trim the shrubs and trees and the cost of the trimming incurred .by the
ASSOCIATION shall immediately become a lien upon the real property described
in 12i.::'nnf, in favor of ASSOCIATION, to secure to it the payment of
sums of money expended by ------:
'-'11,-ture as provided for. herein.
G. In the event the Agreement.
.
n Abnve; Lirv.msm4: nornns urson thr writt=
,acInt of LICENSOR to remove any ite= -za
= .r.nri if F4uch ite= are not so removed upon demand of
1-1-16- ASSOCIATION, then ASSOCIATION -
re, 7.7(77=7.! his ri-Ansferee;;
said'property and remove the 8ame and the cost of th:.:
--Tn 1-,enme a lien npon th:1' roo,1 Pro7:!.o--y
described in .Recital I hereot, in tawyf :11-
by the ASSOCIATION ;II [...onliwci
7he removal of said obstruction or stru-ct---
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have affixcd their signatures as
of the day and year first above written.
ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES,
a non-profi."- lifornia corporation
By -rywa
DonIlio6n; President
0
By n'st a
Bernard Howroy •
3
310 540 4364 P•6
Mar 13 02 10:05a
•
State of California
County of Los Angeles
•
141
5
01.1610188
0r:A/7,7000 before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Don
Moen andBernard Howroyd, personally known to me, or proved to me on the
basis of satisfactory evidence, to be the persons whose names are subscribed
to the within instrument and acknowledged to mc that they executed the same
in their authorized capacities, and that by theil-
Pn!-ity upon behalf of which the persons
,Icted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
DOUGLOSIGMCWIV
Noteryr.—
LOA Mar0610000V
MY Comm.
State of California
County of Los Angeles
On ?7bozX c'e" before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Jo=ph
HFOliday, ppr5onally known to mn, Or provnd to mn
the basis of satisfactory evidence, !L-c. br.
w4t-hin iyir4FT.Itmt,111- apd. ackpowlecleed t7171
executed the same in their authorizcd
signature on the -.instrument the persons, or thc entity upon behalf of which
the.persons acted, executed the 'instrumen!....
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
/ • ()
A4
bignat.w;tr ef Notary/
V
4
BRUNO J. SARTINL JR.
Common 0 1170990 r
Noto-y %Vic - ColifomA0 X
•
• As t ...3,133.1,1. •11V
(Seal)
310 540 4364 p.7
Mar 13 02 10:05a
. . •
EXHIBIT -A"
-0
01 1610188
Those portions of*Lot H of the 1!tanCho Los Palos Verdes, allotted to
Jotham Bixby by decree of partition in the action "Bixby et al., vs.
Bent, et al., Case No. 2373, in the Ditrict Court of the 17th
Judicial District of said State of California, in the City
esc r"a nneeles. State cr
clicc4eu L" c,
County, described as f0.1.1:
Parcel 1:
Beoinning at the most westerly corner of the land Ahown as Parcel No.
filed in Record of Surveys Book 59 Pages 8
cf the ,..^"nt„
-- ---
fi.O' 00". East 432.41 feet:
------- 7-7'erly and has a radius of 200.00 feet, a distance
R Actmrs.
- Easterly and has a radius of 400.00
a distance of 103.53 ff!-7. "'
_
A.-_,Irnoa 47' 00" WcS: czt.0.1. Lw=%. cA.ANA
I •
%,' 00- wesc lzu.tm LUCL 4t, t.sAc
Parcel 2:
fnr road nurposen over those strips of land described in
- --=3 Trt E. Douglas and wife,
recorded in Book 22419 Page 401, Official Records of said County.
Parcel 3:
Ragpments for road purposes over those scrips of land shown as
- ne—:ord of Surveys Book
8 Lo 10, in cZ tcuc.uzzy
L 7.7
r,flc
County.
Emeepting therefrom those porti.ons thereof lying within the
described Parcel 1.
7t2:ts thereof included within the
!%nes of Parcels 28, 29, 30, , 56, 57 and CR All in said Record
Survey.
(S)
-0
--CI
Ile.xierVa;. a•-i64 M.-44.0e. r...14,
r —
etrIN. •
• 4
"NAM
ga••••44/4.
_
9
1.0 rr 4.4:81 ,sa-en.•<.
•
gr:0 Jica4errnani
TO Be ne.L.04,7 evw..t
Pr j
0:Lc
Ato.e.C.s •
004.1 s.A..als
•••••••
I 7
!
, •
,
4-25 tr- rieskse:
rk--4,sc. molar e 0. c,
r-tfets-s:i G 5"-cl
ift.xteractial4 Dept.'VE.4
Ff...N.0E A 5Ace...Ae.t.rr L.Nal
tat\k`it:Failt`te,
•••
• • N.
o:p10,00,40,30 "?.
a"Cloarry,4
; .
/ lune reu.. •
•
61.449111,14,
vI•oTow... -cekaz7"
I
•
1"14
g-FiSTrz.11 "tivia47- Iforr
.c,Anorr ge acv
•Wee. 0.0 T-.:2 QC?
FT, •Fike-r
C.13
R3
• •
•
U iiiXI
•
t,9Ct, DVS OIC
EV/i.eirX 4
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING BILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT
ENCROACHMENTS INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO
ENLARGE A KITCHEN, GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT
ENCROACHMENTS INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO
CONSTRUCT A FAMILY ROOM ADDMON, AND GRANTING A
VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM TOTAL LOT COVERAGE
AT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 602.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF ME CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Mr. Joseph. Cioffi and Mrs. Kathy
Halliday with respect to real property located at 3 Packsaddle.Road East. (Lot 25-SF),
Rolling Hills, requesting .,a Variance to permit encroachment.; into, ;the. south side
yard setback to, enlarge a Icitchn, requesting a Variance to permit encroachment into
the south side yard setback to construct a family, roOnr.additiON'.'and requesting a •
Variance to exceed the maximum total lot coverage at a singlbifamily residence. • •
Section 2.: . The • •Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public
,hearing to Consider the applications on November ..• 1.6::.1.999,,,,:•beceniber 21, 1999;
January 18, 2000,, and February. 15, 2000, and at a fielcUttip,7vigit: dru,Deceinber 4, 1999.
The applicants:were ,notified of the public hearing- in iwriting:ty.first class mail, and
through the City's newsletter. Evidence was heard and ,presented from all persons
interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the
Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The
applicants were in attendance at the hearing. During the • hearing process, the ,
proposed new decking at the rear of the house was reduced by 191 square feet. Other
concerns expressed by the Commission and nearby property owners were the fence -
blocked easement at the southwest corner of the property, and landscape screening
and fencing at the south side of the residence.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a
Class 1 Exemption (State CA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)) and is therefore
categorically exempt from environmental review under • the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of
property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity.
Section 17.16.120 requires the side yard setback for every residential parcel in the RA-
5-1 zone to be twenty (20) feet. The applicant is requesting to encroach up to a
maximum 6 feet into the 20 foot side yard setback to enclose a breezeway that will
enlarge a kitchen by 234 square feet. With respect to this request for a Variance, the
Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of
use in the same zone because of the irregular shape of the lot. The existing legal
nonconforming residence was built with the residence encroaching up to 6 feet into
the south side yard setback and up to 7 feet into the north side yard setback. This
addition will not encroach beyond existing encroachments and is limited in area so
as to leave nearly all of the existing open space near the front and rear of the
residence unaffected.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preserv. ation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the. same vicinity and 'zone,
but which is denied to!the.property in question. The City'sktbaCk requirement Was •
increased after the hOrne.:**-already•constructed and. the encroachment permit the
•• use 'of the lot IO:th&exterif .allowed for other.propertieSinitheMdittitylThe •Variance
• will permit-.thef.'deVelopment.of the property -in a manneisiinilarqd development .
• • patterns on surrOundingproperties. .• • - • • - i. • c • • • • . • -
• • • •
•C. • The granting of the. Variance wouldnotbe!inateriallyij-d'etrimentat-to
the public. welfare Or .injurious • to .the property orimprovernentiiirch vicinity • •
• • and *zone ..the'property. is located. Development' orii..•.tfie-.pad !*ill • 'alio*. a
.. substantial. portion of the lot to remain undeveloped.— „.
Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the :Variance for •Zoning Case .No. 602. to' permit the enlargement .of • ••
kitchen that will encroach a maximum. of .(6) feet into the .Side yardsetback,: as
indicated on the development plan submitted with this application and
incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, dated February 9, 2000, subject to the
conditions specified in Section 10 of this Resolution.
Section 6. Section 17.16.120 requires the side yard setback for every
residential parcel in the RA-S-1 Zone to be twenty (20) feet. The, applicant is
requesting to encroach up to a maximum 6 feet into the 20 foot side yard setback to
construct a 160 square foot family room addition. With respect to this request for a
Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of
use in the same zone because of the irregular shape of the lot. The existing legal
nonconforming residence was built with the residence encroaching up to 6 feet into
the south side yard setback and up to 7 feet into the north side yard setback. This
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-04
PAGE 2 OF 8
addition will not encroach beyond existing encroachments and is limited in area so
as to leave nearly all of the existing open space near the front and rear of the
residence unaffected.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
but which is denied to the property in question. The City's setback requirement was
increased after the home was already constructed and the encroachments permit the
use of the lot to the extent allowed for other properties in the vicinity. The Variance
will permit the development of the property in a manner similar to development
patterns on surrounding properties.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be Materially detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity
and zone in which the property is located. Development on the pad will allow a
. substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped.
Section 7. . Based upon_ .the foregoing findings, .the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Variance for Zoning:Case No. 602 to permit -the-. contruction-of
a family room addition that will encroach .a maximum of six (6),.feetinto:.:-the- side
..yard•setback, as indicated. on, the development .plan submitted with .this_:application •..
.and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A; dated February 9, ;2000,,subject.to
:the conditions specified in Section •10, of this Resolution. • . •
: ; . .. .. .
Section 8: • A Variance to Section 17.16.070..(A)(2). is requirecUbe4t0e it tates
' - dial ,COVeiage' by structures and all other* imPerVious' 'surfaces, 'known -:astotal' lot
coverage, shall not be more than 35 percent of the net lot area. The applicant is
•requesting a •Variance because total lot coverage .will be 38.5°/0 of the net • lot area.
With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as
. follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of
use in the same 'zone. The Variance for the total lot coverage is necessary because
the lot is unusually long and narrow and the residence is deeply set on the lot
resulting in a long driveway that elevates coverage areas. The lot size and
configuration, together with the existing development on the lot creates a difficulty
in meeting this Code requirement.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment • of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because of
the unusual size and configuration of the lot together with the City's development
standards result in more severe restrictions on the development of the subject
property than occurring on other lots in the vicinity.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-04
PAGE 3 OF 8
C. The granting of the Variance would not beanaterially detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity
and zone in which the property is located. All development will occur within
required setbacks and will be adequately screened to prevent adverse visual impact
to surrounding properties. Development on the site will be 38.5% which will allow
a substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped.
Section 9. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 602 to permit total lot coverage of
38.5%, as indicated on the development plan submitted with this application and
incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, dated February 9, 2000, subject to the
conditions specified in Section 10 of this Resolution.
Section 10. The Variances to the side yard setback approved in Sections 5
and 7 and the Variance to exceed the total lot coverage approved in Section 9 are
subject to the following conditions:
A.. The Variance"approvals shall expire within one year from'the, 'effective
date of approval as defined in .Section 17.38.070(A) unless • otherwise extended
•to the requireanthitSj,orfiiat ,•• • ,•.'41.::P'r`3.-?,1.•ii
. • „
• B. It is declared andanade conditicin .of the .Variantei app`toVars; "that if
,any .conditions thereof ' areTh.rialated, this approval shall be -.§tispende'd7.'and ;,the
ptivileges granted thereunder-shalllapse; providedthat the • ,applicanfvfitieen
given written notice to'rease such violation, the opportunity for. a hearirig-thas:,been
provided, and if reqti6ted; has been held; and 'thereafter the apPlicant failsqo tOrreet • -
the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date. of the City's
determination.
C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be
complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated February 9, 2000, except as
otherwise provided in these conditions.
E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of
Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan
approved with this application.
F. The structural lot coverage shall not exceed 15.3% and the total lot
coverage shall not exceed 38.5%.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-04
PAGE 4 OF 8
G. The residential building pad coverage shall not exceed 27.6%, the stable
'pad coverage shall not exceed 30.0%, and total building pad coverage shall not
exceed 27.7%.
H. Maximum disturbed area shall not exceed 38.9°/0 of the net lot area.
1. Grading shall not be permitted for the project.
J. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum
extent feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes
automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones,"
considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to
reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section
17.27.020 (Water efficient landscaping requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal
Code.
K. . . Two copies of a preliminary landscape plan must be submitted for •
, review ,by. .the: Planning Department. and :include . native drought-resistant.•7:.
vegetation, thatwill not disrupt the impact, of.the views of neighboring properties •
wi�itb the issuance of anv buikling • nr iactiriLgermit. The .landscaping • fplan -
• submitted Must comply with the „,purpoie intent of the , Site Plan' • Review:.:i,-;• ; •
'::Ordinance, 'shall incorporate existing matureJrees and native vegetation; :and *shall f.'3-]•!•:•-•!,.!,‘ • •
• . utilize ,.to the. ,Maximum extent feasible; plantsthat are .native to the area •and/or;-,.;.,, •
:•congistent with the -rural character of the conitnunity...•
f
..A • • bond • in the amount of the. .Cost. estfinate of the implementatiOn of
landscaping plan plus 15% shall be required .to be posted prior to issuance :of a
drainage and building permit and shall be retained with the. City for not less than
two years after landscape installation. The retained bond will be released by the City
Manager after the City Manager determines that the landscaping was installed
pursuant to the landscaping plan as approved, and that such landscaping is properly
established and in good condition.
L. Landscaping shall incorporate and preserve, to the maximum extent
feasible, the existing mature trees and shrubs and the natural landscape screening
surrounding the proposed building pad.
M. Landscaping shall be designed using mature trees and shrubs so as not
to obstruct views of neighboring properties but, to obscure the • residence at the
southern portion of the lot.
N. Landscaping shall be planted at the south side of the residence 7 feet
north of the southern property line. The landscaping shall include a hedge of Texas
Privet, Escallonia Fradesii, or like landscape materials, that shall be maintained to a
height of 8 feet. The hedge plantings shall be interspersed with 8 trees which at their
mature height shall not exceed the ridge height of the residence.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-04
PAGE 5 OF 8
O. The portion of the existing lawn area at the rear of the residence which
is 10 feet from the southern property line shall be removed.
P. The irrigation line that is on the southern property line shall be
removed and relocated to be 10 feet from the southern property line at the rear of
the residence and 7 feet from the southern property line from the rear of the
residence to the front of the residence.
Q. The existing 3-rail fence located 10 feet from the southern property line
shall be continued in a westerly direction from a point that is located 34 feet east of
the residential garage to the rear of the residence for 145 feet and that is 7 feet from
the southern property line.
R. The existing 3-rail fence 10 feet north of the southwestern corner of the
lot shall1 be removed.
S?". During construction, confotinaiie.ith the. air quality manageinent,...».
district rquirements, stormwater polltitiOn'i;ieythition• practices, county'and local
Cifaiiians.:',andengineering practiCes'''S6' ti.14.13dOple'or property are not exposed to
,"iiii‘te'Velifcle trips, noise, dust, and'iSbj'eCildn'able.odors shall be required: -';
•?, • • .,.• . • • .,•
tlie,Er§SlOr},Cointr0 Pln-Ontaining the el,enients,..),,„
et fOri,h ut ISection 7010 of the 1996:Count? 'offl!oi*ngeles' Uniform Buildihg'C'o'ile
shallVii;e.lioll'CiWed to 'minimize erosion and to protect siopes and channels
stofmwaier pollution as required by the County Of Los Angeles.
U. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the
project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place .within nearby
roadway easements..
V. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule
and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the
hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and.
mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet
residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
W . The drainage plan system shall be modified and approved by the
Planning Department and City Engineer, to include any water from any site
irrigation systems and that all drainage from the site shall be conveyed in an
approved manner to the rear or west of the lot.
X. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee *prior to the issuance of
any drainage or building permit.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-04
PAGE 6 OF 8
• Y. The working •drawings submitted to the County Department of
Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the development plan
described in Condition D.
Z. Within one month of the completion of the construction, the
landscaping, irrigation, and fencing shall be installed.
AA. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code, any modifications to the project which would constitute grading or
additional structural development shall require the filing of a new application for
Site Plan Review for approval by the Planning Commission.
AB. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all
conditions of these Variance approvals, pursuant to Section 17.38.060, or the
approval shall not be effective,
AC. All conditions of these Variance approvals must be complied with
prior to the issuance of a building.permit. from the County. of Los Angeles. • , •
•
PASSED, APPROVED AND' ADOPTED THIS 21ST D OF 000:;`
ALT,AN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
', •
_ k •
MARILYN KRN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-04
PAGE 7 OF 8
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2000-04 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HELLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT
ENCROACHMENTS INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO
ENLARGE A KITCHEN, GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT
ENCROACHMENTS INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO
CONSTRUCT A FAMILY ROOM ADDMON, AND GRANTING A
VARIANCE TO EXC:EEL) THE MAXIMUM TOTAL LOT COVERAGE
AT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 602.
was approved and adopted at an adjourned regular meeting of the Planning
.Commission on March 21, 2000 by the followingToll call Vote:
— 'Commissioners Hankins
AYES Chaiivan Roberts.
None'.
ABSENT: None .
ABSTAIN:.•
Witte and
• and in compliance with the laws of California 'was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
f
l7.1111dkE7.,ERK
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-04
PAGE 8 OF 8