746, Construct a SFR with basement,, Resolutions & Approval Conditions• c9
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
MAIL TO
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
(310) 377-7288 FAX
stir
+ RECORDER'S USE ONLY
THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER'S OFFICE REQUIRES THAT THE FORM BE NOTARIZED BEFORE RECORDATION.
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
ZONING CASE NO.74�
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCES
XX
XX
I (We) the undersigned state:
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows:
3 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST, ROLLING HILLS, (LOT 25-SF) CA 90274
This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
ZONING CASE NO. 746 SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCES
xx
XX
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
SignatureXuAN4 tit/
Name typed or printed
i/t A 4_1�AYf�
AddresRI V 6,S/S. cA ( a°1 /h1"'/
City/State
Signatures must be acknowledged bya notary public.
State of Califomia )
County of Los Angeles) /° ' , 1 . ` I ,
On t - 0 t- 100g before me, R . (.Q - Iv Nl,mf U ju -
1 I
-1
personal!a pe t`.{ 1-&l 6- 1— 1 jk/ A-• 1V»A iv r /i
seLsnnal v (or proved to me on the basis of sat sfactory evidence) to be the person(s). whose name( .ie/aj
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that,hsielshet executed the same in-hisA9eNtheir authorized
capacity ies and that by hisflher it ignature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the Atx Tojt �eVAoAw ci�tt.
person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I)' R. COWAN
Witness by hind and official seal. u) COMM. #1697830
e NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA
!t,,.
loertlfy under PENALTY OF PERJURY �c . cL�,CAJ(/i�I _ m 0,-.,t:► : ► ELES COUNTY
'►"
ander the laws of the State of California, Signature of No�ry My Comm. Expires Nov. 3, 2010
�.,,,.;„,.
hat the foregoing naragranh It true d� eorreat- ,. WWWWW
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
Signature
/ 1/1//`iit
Name -type • orpriq� s2(44,A�`/
ss . fP.)- 7�G
C' y/State
� • )(H((F A-3
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-01
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR
GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
TO REPLACE AN EXISTING RESIDENCE AND REQUEST FOR VARIANCES
TO ENCROACH INTO THE SIDE YARD SETBACKS WITH BASEMENT LIGHT
WELLS, TO PERMIT EXPORT OF SOIL AND TO SET ASIDE AN AREA FOR A
FUTURE STABLE AND CORRAL IN THE FRONT YARD IN ZONING CASE
NO. 746, AT 3 PACKSADDLE ROAD WEST, (LOT 25-SF), (LIN).
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Lin with
respect to real property located at 3 Packsaddle Road West (Lot 25-SF), Rolling
Hills, CA requesting a Site Plan Review and Variances to permit grading and
construction of a new 6,230 square foot single family residence and 781 square
foot garage, 559 square foot swimming pool, 20 square foot pool equipment
area, 96 square foot service yard, 900 square feet of covered porches, 800 square
feet of detached trellises and a barbecue area and 4,940 square foot basement;
minor Variance to encroach with two of the basement light wells 4-feet into side
yard setbacks, a Variance to set aside an area for a future stable and corral in the
front yard area and a Variance to export 450 cubic yards of the 1,787 cubic yards
of dirt, which will be generated from excavation for the basement.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public
hearings to consider the application on October 16, 2007, at a field trip and at a
regular Planning Commission meeting on November 20, 2007, December 18,
2007, and at a second field trip visit on December 18, 2007. The applicants were
notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard
and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from
members of the City staff, and the Planning Commission having reviewed,
analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants' representative was in
attendance at the hearings.
Section 3. The applicants propose to demolish the existing residence
and close off the existing second driveway.
Section 4. Originally, the applicants submitted a request for a CUP for
a garden room and a Variance to locate it in the front yard. At the public
hearings, the Planning Commission and neighbors expressed concerns about the
use and location of the garden room, location of the stable, the expansion of the
building pad and height of the raised pad. Several neighbors submitted letters
conveying their objections.
Section 5. As a result of the concerns expressed by the neighbors and
the Planning Commission, the applicants revised their project. The applicants
eliminated the proposal for the garden room in the front yard area relocated the
Reso. 2008-01 1
3 Packsaddle E.
• LI
set aside area for a future stable and corral from the rear to the front, requested to
export 450 c.y. of soil from the basement, to fill the rear of the lot to enlarge the
building pad by no more than 4 feet and to fill the front yard by no more than 1
foot -on the average for better drainage. The applicants also proposed to move the
residence further to the east (47 feet from the north eastern corner of the existing
house, whereas previously it was proposed to be moved 36 feet); they redesigned
the pool and enlarged the porches in the front.
Section 6. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as
a Class 3 Exemption (The State of CA Guidelines, Section 15303) and is therefore
categorically exempt from environmental review under the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Section 7. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be
submitted for Site Plan Review and approval before any grading requiring a
grading permit or any building or structure may be constructed or any
expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made
which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or
structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of
the building by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month
period. With respect to the Site Plan Review application requesting construction
of a new residence, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of
fact:
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan,
the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structures
comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential
development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The
project conforms to Zoning Code lot coverage requirements. The net lot area of
the lot is 45,981 square feet, (1.4 acres). The proposed residence (6,230 sq.ft.),
garage (781 sq.ft.), covered porches/ entryway (900 sq.ft.), service yard (96 sq.ft.),
swimming pool (559 sq.ft.), detached trellises and barbecue area (800 sq.ft.), the
future stable and 4,940 square foot basement which constitutes 20.0% (excluding
the permitted exceptions) of the net lot which is within the maximum 20%
structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including all
structures, paved areas and driveway will be 15,814 square feet, which
constitutes 35.0% of the net lot which is within the 35% maximum overall net lot
coverage requirement. The proposed project is screened from the road so as to
reduce the visual impact of the development. The disturbed area of the lot
currently exceeds the maximum permitted and the lot will be re -disturbed, rather
than graded for the first time.
B. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and
undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new
structure will not cause the lot to look overdeveloped. Significant portions of the
lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space on the property. The
existing shrubs and trees on the southern portion on the parcel will remain and
will screen the house from the neighbor, and additional screening will be added
Reso. 2008-01 2
3 Packsaddle E.
•
as a condition of this approval. The nature, condition, and development of
adjacent uses, buildings, and structures, the topography of the lot and neighbors'
concerns have been considered, and the construction of the new house will not
adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the adjacent uses, buildings, or
structures because the proposed structure will be constructed on a portion of the
lot which is least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and
landscaped with trees and shrubs, is a sufficient distance from nearby residences
so that the proposed structures will not impact the view or privacy of
surrounding neighbors, and will substantially utilize the existing building pad
for the new construction.
C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale
and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As
indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum set forth in the Zoning
Code will not be exceeded. A residence directly north to subject site is over 20%
larger than the proposed residence and is located on a smaller lot.
D. The development plan incorporates existing trees and is screened
from other properties and the road by existing mature vegetation, which will be
preserved.
E. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to
minimize grading and retain the natural drainage courses. Grading for this
project will involve 1,787 cubic yards of cut from the basement. 1,337 cubic yards
will be balanced on site and 450 will be exported. Since all of the soil will be
generated from the excavation of the basement, the existing building pad will be
minimally disturbed.
F. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the
existing driveway will remain.
G. The project conforms to the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act and is exempt.
Section 8. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of
property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity.
Section 17.16.110 requires that the front yard setback be fifty (50) feet from the
roadway easement line, and be unobstructed from the ground upwards. In order
to set aside a 1000 square foot area for a future stable and corral in the front yard,
the applicants are seeking a Variance. With respect to this request for a Variance,
the Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and
conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other
Reso. 2008-01 3
3 Packsaddle E.
• l�
property or class of use in the same zone. The existing residence has been
developed towards the rear of the lot to garner the extraordinary views from
the rear of the lot. The proposed residence will be located in a similar position.
There is not an adequate area in the rear to construct a future stable and corral
without impairing the view. The lot was graded at that time to create a pad for
construction in a manner that the structure was placed towards the rear of the
property. The topography of the lot together with the fact that the existing pad
and residence are located in the rear create difficulty in setting aside the area for
a future stable and corral elsewhere on the property.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and
zone, but which is denied to the property in question because due to the existing
grade, narrow lot configuration it would be a hardship to located the stable in
the rear yard. In addition, the extraordinary view from the rear yard would be
blocked from the house. The expansive open space in the front yard comfortably
supports future stable. The narrow nature of the property places a hardship on
locating the stable in the side or rear areas. Further, due to the narrow
configuration of the lot, the neighbors expressed desire to not to place an area
for a future stable in the rear, as it would negatively affect their views and
privacy.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental
to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located because a stable, if ever built in
the front yard, would not be seen by any neighbors, would not affect their views
and therefore property value and would be screened from the street.
D. In granting of the Variance the spirit and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance will be observed in that the proposed construction will be orderly,
attractive and shall protect the rural character of the community. As it is required
by the Zoning Ordinance to set aside an area for a stable and corral, in this case
the front yard set aside area is suitable area for a future stable and corral.
E. The Variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City
of Rolling Hills because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan
requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient
open space between surrounding structures and a set aside area for a future
stable and corral.
Section 9. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of
property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity.
Section 17.16.120 requires that the side yard setback be twenty (20) feet from the
side property line, and be unobstructed from the ground upwards. The
applicants seek a minor variance to encroach four feet into the north and south
Reso. 2008-01 4
3 Packsaddle E.
• �1
side yard setback with the basement light wells. With respect to this request the
Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and
conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other
property or dass of use in the same zone. The existing residence has been
developed with substantial encroachment into the side setbacks; up to 10 feet
along 104 feet of the length of the residence on the south side and 25 feet along
the north side. The proposed residence will eliminate this encroachment, and the
two wells would encroach 4-feet for no more than 22-feet along the length of the
structure (stairwell) on the north side and 14 feet along the south side. The
subject property is extremely narrow in comparison to its length and to the
neighboring properties. The building department requires the light wells and
stairs. The encroachment of the proposed light wells is substantially less in width
and mass than the existing encroachment of the residence. It should be noted that
these existing encroachments of the residence were expanded to current
condition, when the Planning Commission granted a variance in 2000. The
encroachments are in the side and will not affect the surrounding properties. The
proposed light wells are four feet in width, rather than the maximum permitted
by the RHCA of 8 feet.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and
zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary
because the existing terrain and development on the lot creates a difficulty in
placing the new construction elsewhere on the property. The subject property is
extremely narrow in comparison to its length and to the neighboring properties.
The building department requires the light wells and stairs. The encroachment of
the proposed light wells is substantially less in width and mass than the existing
encroachment of the residence. In addition, he neighbor to the south, who
objected to the original encroachment of up to 10 feet, did not object to the
proposed insignificant encroachment.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental
to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located. The proposed construction
will be constructed on an existing building pad, will be the least intrusive to
surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with trees and shrubs,
is of sufficient distance from nearby residences and is less intrusive than the
existing development, so that it will not impact the view or privacy of
surrounding neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property
without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners.
Section 10. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of
Reso. 2008-01 5
3 Packsaddle E.
• s
property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. A
Variance to Section 15.04.150 is required because it states that no import or
export of soil is allowed in the City. The applicants request a Variance because
they propose to export 450 cubic yards of soil from excavation of the basement.
With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as
follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and
conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply
generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone. The Variance for
the export of soil is necessary because in order to balance the soil on the
property, the property would have to be substantially raised. The entire property
has been previously graded and is level, with very few undulating features. The
applicants originally proposed balanced cut and fill, which would result in
raising the rear of the lot up to 7 feet, which both the Planning Commission and
the neighbors objected to. In order to minimize the amount of soil to be exported,
and still provide for a larger building pad area for outdoor uses, the rear of the
lot would be raised at a maximum by 4 feet. In order to correct current
inadequate drainage in the front of the lot, the applicants propose to add a slight
slant to the front yard and fill it between 6" to one foot. With these corrections to
the lot the amount of soil to be exported is substantially less than originally
proposed.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and
zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary
because of the unusually flat topography of the lot, which makes it difficult to
balance the soil on the lot without substantially elevating the lot.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental
to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located. The project as conditioned by
this Resolution will be adequately screened to prevent adverse visual impact to
surrounding properties. The export of soil will not in any way affect the
properties in the vicinity. The proposed development will improve drainage
through the use of approved drainage plan, and will permit the owners to enjoy
their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding
property owners.
Section 11. Based upon the foregoing findings in Sections 8, 9 and 10,
the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application and
Variances in Zoning Case No. 746 for excavation and for construction of a new
residence, garage, accessory structures and encroachment of the residence into
the side setback and export of soil, as shown on the Development Plan dated
January 8, 2008, and marked Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions:
A. The Site Plan Review and Variances approvals shall expire within
two years from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to this
approval has not commenced within that time period, as required by Sections
Reso. 2008-01 6
3 Packsaddle E.
• •
9
•
17.46.080(A) and 17.38.070(A) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, or the
approval granted is otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of those
sections.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the approval, that if any
conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the
privileges granted hereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been
given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has
been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails
to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the
City's determination.
C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must
be complied with unless otherwise set forth in this approval, or shown otherwise
on an approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial
conformance with the revised site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated
January 8, 2008.
E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of
Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development
plan approved with this application. In addition, prior to submittal of final plans
to the Building Department for issuance of building permits, the plans for the
project shall be submitted to staff for verification that the final plans are in
compliance with the plans approved by the Planning Commission.
F. Grading shall not exceed 1,787 cubic yards of excavation from the
basement, and 450 cubic yards may be exported. Any additional grading
quantities, including from the excavation of footings, basement, drainage devices
and any other activity on site, required by the Los Angeles County Building
Department or due to conditions in the field, shall be reviewed and approved by
the Planning Commission.
G. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 9,036 square feet or 20.0%.
H. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed
15,814 square feet or 35.0% in conformance with lot coverage limitations.
I. The lot has been previously disturbed at 100%..
J. Residential building pad coverage on the 28,631 square foot
residential building pad shall not exceed 29.4% (not including portion of the
covered porches and 800 sq.ft. of ancillary uses).
K. One light well and one set of stairs may encroach no more than 4
feet into the north and south side yard setbacks.
Reso. 2008-01 7
3 Packsaddle E.
• �o
L. The basement shall not exceed 4,940 square feet and all
requirements for the basements shall be met pursuant to City of Rolling Hills
Zoning Code, the Los Angeles County Building Code and the RHCA
architectural guidelines.
M. Prior to issuance of an excavation or building permits, two sets of
landscaping plans shall be submitted to staff for review. The property shall be
landscaped and screened from adjacent properties. Shrubs shall be planted in an
offset manner as not to create a hedge, but a see through screen. Shrubs shall be
provided along the west and north easement lines to screen the project but not to
obstruct views, of neighboring properties. The shrubs, at maturity, shall be no
less than 9' in height and no more than 10' high and shall be maintained at this
height at all times. The existing or like landscaping along the south easement line
shall be maintained. The applicants are encouraged to obtain input from adjacent
property owners as to the type and location of proposed shrubs for screening.
Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation that incorporates low
gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an
irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate
conditions, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and
overspray.
N. Any walls required for this project shall not exceed 30 inches in
height, shall not be in setbacks and shall be screened with landscaping to
maximum extend practicable.
O. The property owners shall be required to conform with the City of
Rolling Hills and RHCA roofing material standards.
P. The property owners shall be required to conform with the City of
Rolling Hills Outdoor Lighting Standards and undergrounding of utility lines
standards.
Q. A minimum of four -foot level path and/or walkway, which does
not have to be paved, shall be provided around the entire perimeter of the
residence, garage and basement.
R. The property on which the project is located contains a set aside
area for a future stable and corral in the front yard. However, the Planning
Commission shall review any proposed development in the future for a stable
and corral. The Variance granted in this application for front yard set aside
area for equestrian uses does not guarantee future approval in that location.
S. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling
Hills Municipal Code, any modification to this project and to the property,
which would constitute additional structural development, grading or
additional excavation of dirt, shall require the filing of a new application for
approval by the Planning Commission.
Reso. 2008-01 8
3 Packsaddle E.
•
T. During and after construction, all soil preparation, drainage, and
landscape sprinklers shall protect the building pad from erosion and direct
surface water in an approved manner.
U. The side and rear property lines and the side and rear easement
lines shall be delineated during the entire duration of the construction and no
grading or construction shall take place in the easement, unless approved by the
RHCA.
V. During and after construction perimeter easements and trails shall
remain free and clear of encroachments including, but not be limited to, site
development, fences -including construction fences, grading, landscaping,
irrigation, drainage devices, play equipment, parked vehicles, building materials,
debris and other equipment, unless otherwise approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association.
W. No drainage device may be located in such a manner as to
contribute to erosion or in any way affect an easement, trail or adjacent
properties. The energy dissipaters shall be designed in such a manner as to not
cross over any equestrian trails or easements. The drainage system(s) shall not
discharge water onto a trail, shall incorporate earth tone colors, including in the
design of the dissipater and shall be screened from any trail and neighbors views
to the maximum extent practicable, without impairing the function of the
drainage system.
X. During construction, conformance with the air quality management
district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, County and
local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not
exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, and objectionable odors shall be
required.
Y. During construction, an Erosion Control Plan containing the
elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 2007 County of Los Angeles Building
Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to
control stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles.
Z. During construction, the property owners shall be required to
schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day
between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when
construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere
with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
AA. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional
Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for
the installation and maintenance of a septic tank.
AB. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional
Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for
Reso. 2008-01 9
3 Packsaddle E.
the installation and post construction maintenance of stormwater drainage
facilities.
AC. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional
Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best
Management Practices (BMPs) related to solid waste.
AD. Prior to the submittal of a final building plan to the County of Los
Angeles for plan check, a detailed drainage plan that conforms to the
development plan as approved by the Planning Commission shall be submitted
to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for review and approval.
AE. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of
any grading or building permit.
AF. The applicant shall pay all of the applicable Los Angeles County
Building and Safety and Public Works Department fees, including Parks and
Recreation fees and school fees for new residence.
AG. Until the applicants execute and record an Affidavit of Acceptance
of all conditions of this Site Plan Review and Variances approvals, as required by
the Municipal Code, the approvals shall not be effective.
AH. All conditions of the Site Plan and Variances approvals, that apply,
shall be complied with prior to the issuance of grading or building permit from
the County of Los Angeles.
AI. Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a
result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time
limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code
of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6
Reso. 2008-01 10
3 Packsaddle E.
\3
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15th DAY OF JANUARY 2008.
ROQER SOMMER, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
MtUtk,k-1,, -1A/rt}
MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Reso. 2008-01 11
3 Packsaddle E.
\i
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2008-01 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE
PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A
NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING
RESIDENCE AND REQUEST FOR VARIANCES TO ENCROACH
INTO THE SIDE YARD SETBACKS WITH BASEMENT LIGHT
WELLS, TO PERMIT EXPORT OF SOIL AND TO SET ASIDE AN
AREA FOR A FUTURE STABLE AND CORRAL IN THE FRONT
YARD IN ZONING CASE NO. 746, AT 3 PACKSADDLE ROAD
WEST, (LOT 25-SF), (LIN).
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
January 15, 2008 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners DeRoy, Henke, Witte and
Chairman Sommer.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Smith.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
..,U\
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Reso. 2008-01 12
3 Packsaddle E.