9, Decrease side yard setback fro, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsBEFORE THE PLANNING C0YLMISSION OF . THE CITY OF
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In. the. Matter.: of the Application
of
GEORGE A. MURRELL,
Lot 31, Southfield (R. & S. 59-8,.10)
ROLLING HILLS,
.FINDINGS AND FORMAL "REPORT
9
10
11
12
13:
14
15,
16
17'
18
19 The Commission finds that the applicant
' The'application. of George A. Murrell, Lot 31,
Southfield,
for a side _yard variance, came on for hearing- on. the 16th day of
May, 1961, at the hour of 8:00.P.M., at .the City Hall of the City
of Rolling Hills, California, andthe applicant having submitted
evidence in support of his application, and the Planning _Commission
being advised
now makes its Findings and"Formal Report as required,
by the Ordinances of the City of.Rolling :Hills, :.California.
.
20. George. A. Murrell, is the owner of that certain real property
21 described as Lot:.31, Southfield, located in the .City of Rolling
22. Hills i .,.California and that notice of the public. hearing in
23,
connection with said application
24
8.06 and;8.07 of Ordinance No. 33
25''
26 California.
27
28
29,
30
Ih.
'Thai .no person appeared at said public' hearing in.
was given as required by. Sections
of the City of Rolling Hills,
opposition to the application for a variance and that no evidence
was received by the Commission in opposition thereto.
4
The Commission .further .finds that the residence of ;
applicant is located ten (10) feet from the side line of said Lot
instead of twenty (20) feet as required by said Zoning Ordinance,
5
and further finds that by reason of the terrain of said Lot 31,
6
7; the varianceshould be granted to applicant in order to preserve
8 substantial' property rights possessed by other property in the
9 same vicinity and zone, and that the granting of such variance.
10
.. 11
,"injurious to property or 'improvements in such vicinity and zone
12
in which applicant's property, is. located, -and that there, are
13
exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions by
14
15 reason. of physical location and terrain of said Lot 31, .which do
16 not apply generally to
17,
18
19.
From the foregoing'. it . is, concluded' that a variance
will not be materially detrimentalto the public welfare or
20'
should be granted by the•Planning Commission of the City ,of
21'
22
Rolling Hills:to. George A. :Murrell of Lot 31 of Southfield_ in
23 accordance :,With the Plot Plan marked Exhibit 1 on file in these."
24 proceedings, and it is, therefore, so ordered:"
zone.
other property in
the
same vicinity. and.
Dated:'' May 25, 1961.
Mary Louisa Pours..
Secretary,.PlanningCommission