Loading...
704, Addition to SFR with encroachm, Staff ReportsCuy o/ leo een9 JUL DATE: JULY 25, 2005 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ATTN: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER FROM: YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cltyofrh@aol.com Agenda Item No.: 4A Mtg. Date: 7/25/05 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2005-20. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH WITH AN ADDITION INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 704, AT 7 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST (LOT 27-SF), (STRAUB). BACKGROUND 1. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2005-20, which is attached, on July 19, 2005 at their regular meeting granting approval in Zoning Case No. 704. The vote was 4-0-1. (Commissioner Hanke was absent). 2. The applicants propose to construct a 654 square foot addition to the existing 2,598 square foot residence and 262 square foot addition to the existing 410 square foot garage for a total of 916 square feet of additions. The additions are proposed to be located in the front setback, which require a Variance. When completed, the residence will be 3,252 square feet with a 672 square foot garage. 3. The existing residence encroaches 3 feet into the 50-foot front setback and the existing garage encroaches up to 27 feet into the front setback. The proposed garage addition would follow the line of the existing encroachment of the garage and the residential addition is proposed to encroach up to 19 feet into the front setback. 4. The lot is developed with a 2,598 square foot residence, 410 square foot garage, 646 square foot swimming pool, 17 square feet pool equipment, 159 square foot pool house, 64 square foot covered porch, 168 square foot detached trellis over a patio in the rear yard and over the. pool equipment, and a 56 square foot service yard. The original house was built in 1952. A 588 square foot addition and a swimming pool were constructed in 1957. ZC NO. 704 ®Printed on Recytaed P.uct • • 5. In 1992 the Planning Commission approved a Site Plan and a Variance for subject property to add to and reconstruct the residence for a total of 4,700 square feet residence and garage. The then proposed addition encroached up to 27 feet into the front yard setback. The addition was not built. 6. A 159 square foot pool house exists on the property. There are no building permits for this structure. However, records show that this structure existed when the pool was constructed. At that time neither a Site Plan Review nor Conditional Use Permit were required for a cabana, and therefore, the structure is deemed legal non -conforming. Since this structure was built without building permit, the applicants will be required to either demolish the pool house or obtain a building permit for an "as built" structure in conjunction with the proposed development. The Planning Commission may consider placing a condition to that effect in the Resolution of approval if this project is approved. • 7. No grading is required for this project and no grading is proposed at the time when the stable is constructed. The stable is proposed to be built into the hill. 8. A future 240 square foot stable on two levels, for a total of 480 square feet is proposed to be located below the swimming pool. The loft will be utilized for tack and feed and the bottom level for keeping horses. The Zoning Code requires a set aside or development of a minimum of 450 square foot stable and is silent on the design of the stable. The RH Community Association's regulations prohibit two- story stables, but allow lofts. An 8-foot wide access to the stable is proposed along the south portion of the lot with maximum slope of 13%. 9. The existing driveway approach is proposed to be closed off and relocated in a southerly direction in line with the garage. A neighbor across the street, whose driveway is located opposite the proposed driveway, expressed support for the new location of the Straub's driveway. The Traffic Commission at their May 26, 2005 meeting reviewed and recommended approval of the proposed driveway, with the following conditions: • That the pilaster adjacent to the existing driveway be removed for visibility purposes • That no foliage be planted on either side of the driveway apron to assist with vehicular visibility. 10. The property is located in the RAS-1 zone and is 2.12 acres gross in area. The net lot area is 75,520 square feet. The structural lot coverage is proposed to be 5,314 square feet or 7.0% of the net lot area, which includes all of the structures, (20% permitted). The total lot coverage including structures and flatwork is proposed at 9,033 square feet or 12.0% of the net lot area, (35% permitted). 11. Currently there is one building pad on the property consisting of 6,746 square feet, not in setbacks. The residential building pad coverage is proposed to be 5,074 square feet or 75.2%, which includes a 64 square foot porch. (Currently covered porches are included in the building pad coverage. Recently the Planning ZC NO. 704 I Commission recommended to the City Council an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to allow covered porches having an area of 10% or less of the size of the residence to not to be counted towards the building pad coverage. The City Council introduced the ordinance at their July 11, 2005 meeting. FYI, in this case under this draft language, the covered porch is less than 10% of the size of the residence, and therefore the entire 64 sq.ft. porch would not be included in the building pad coverage. Not including the porch the residential building pad coverage would be 5,010 square feet or 74.2%). Currently, the building pad coverage is 4,118 square feet or 61.0% including the porch. A set aside area for a future stable and corral is currently more than 10% in slope and is permissible for the use as corral and stable, but is not counted as buildable pad. The stable will be built into the hill and no grading is proposed for this area to create a pad of less than 10% slope. 12. The disturbed area of the lot, including the future stable and access is proposed to be 13,583 square feet or 18.0% of the net lot area. Currently the disturbed area is 13.0%. 13. Responding to the criteria to be satisfied for grant of a Variance for the encroachment, the applicants' representative states, "there is no other area on the lot to allow for expansion. Given the topography of the lot and the location of the existing home and pool the only location for additions is in the front setback. 14. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 15. It will be required that all utility lines to the property be placed underground and that the roof material of the entire roof meets City standards. 16. The Rolling Hills Community Association will review the project at a later date. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council receive and file this report or provide other direction to staff. ZC NO. 704 3 • ZONING CASE NO. 704 SITE PLAN REVIEW RA-S-1 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 20 ft. from property Tine Rear: 50 ft. from property line STRUCTURES (Site Plan Review required if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq. ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36-month period). STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE (20% maximum) TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) 1 BUILDING PAD COVERAGE RESIDENTIAL ' STABLE PAD COVERAGE COVERAGE (30% maximum guideline) GRADING Site plan review required if excavation . and/or fill or combination thereof is 1 more than 3 feet in depth and covers more than 2,000 sq. ft., must be balanced on site DISTURBED AREA i (40% maximum; any graded building I pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist.) STABLE (minimum 450 so. ft.) and CORRAL (minimum 550 sq. ft.) STABLE ACCESS ACCESSWAY VIEWS PLANTS AND ANIMALS EXISTING Single family residence, which encroaches into the front setbacks Residence Garage Service Yard Pool Pool eqipm. Porch Pool House Trellis TOTAL 2598 sq.ft. 410 sq.ft 56 sq.ft. 646 sq.ft. 17 sq.ft. 64 sq.ft. 159 sq.ft. 168 sq.ft. 4,118 sq.ft PROPOSED Additions, which would encroach into the front setbacks Residence Garage Stable ServiceYard Pool Pool eqipm. Trellis Pool House Porch TOTAL 3252 sq.ft 672 sq.ft 240 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft 646 sq.ft. 17 sq.ft. 168 sq.ft 159 sq.ft. 64 sq.ft. 5,314 sq.ft 5.4% 7.0% of 75,52) sq.ft. net lot area 11.0% 12.0% of 75,520 sq.ft. net lot area 75.2% of the 6,746 sq.ft. pad 61.0% with porch (not inc. porch-74.2%; porch is less than 10% of the size of the residence) N/A 13.0% N/A N/A N/A Existing from Packsaddle E. N/A N/A ZC NO.704 4 None 18.0% (13,583 sq.ft. - includes future stable) Future 480 sq.ft.(inc.Ioft) Future 550 sq.ft. Along south side of property Modified approach from Packsaddle Rd. E. Planning Commission condition Planning Commission condition VARIANCE REQUIRED FINDINGS A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone; and B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question; and C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; and E. That the variance does not grant special privilege; F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills. NEARBY PROPERTIES For information purposes only ADDRESS 1 Packsaddle E. 2 Packsaddle W. 2 Packsaddle E. 3 Packsaddle E. 6 Packsaddle E. 5 Packsaddle E. 9 Packsaddle E. AVERAGE OWNER Lanman Watts Fuller Cioffi Murrell Rutgers Watson 7 Packsaddle E. Straub RESIDENCE sq.ft. 8,610 5,112 5,088 5,317 4,571 3,685 2,933 5,045 Existing 2,598; Proposed 3,252 LOT AREA sq.ft. (excl. road) 78,408 44,867 48,787 55,756 83,200 121,968 78,408 73,065 88,862 SOURCE: Assessors' Records/Department of Planning Records The above calculations do not include garages. ZC NO. 704 RESOLUTION NO. 2005-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH WITH AN ADDITION INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 704, AT 7 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST (LOT 27-SF), (STRAUB). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Application was duly filed by Dr. and Mrs. Paul Straub with respect to real property located at 7 Packsaddle Road East, Rolling Hills (Lot 27- SF) requesting a Variance to encroach with a 916 square foot residence and garage addition into the front setback at an existing single family residence. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application on May 17, 2005, June 14, 2005, and at a field trip visit on June 14, 2005. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff. The Planning Commission reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants and their representative were in attendance at the hearings. Section 3. A portion of the residence encroaches 3 feet into the front setback and the garage encroaches 27 feet. The proposed garage addition would follow the existing line of encroachment of the garage and the proposed addition would encroach 19 feet into the front setback. Section 4. A 159 square foot cabana exists on the lot, which was constructed many years ago without the benefit of a building permit. The property owners shall arrange for an inspection of this structure and obtain an "as built" building permit. Section 5. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3 Exemption (State of CA Guidelines), and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 6. Section 17.16.120 requires the front setback for every residential parcel in the RA-S-1 Zone to be fifty (50) feet from the roadway easement line. The applicants are requesting to construct a 916 square foot addition, which will continue the encroachment into the front setback. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone. The property has been developed in Reso. No. 2005-20 1 • • this manner in 1952. The lot was graded at that time to create a pad for construction of living area. The topography of the lot together with the fact that the existing residence is located in the front setback creates a difficulty in constructing the addition elsewhere on the property. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The existing residence is 2,598 square feet with a two -car garage. The Variance is necessary because the existing terrain and development on the lot creates a difficulty in placing the addition elsewhere on the property. With the addition of a 916 square feet, the residence would still be smaller than the average homes in the vicinity. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. The proposed addition will be constructed on an existing building pad, will be the least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with mature trees and shrubs, is of sufficient distance from nearby residences and directly across a driveway belonging to the property across the way, so that it will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners. D. In granting of the Variance the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance will be observed in that the proposed addition will be orderly, attractive and shall protect the rural character of the community. The proposed addition will not encroach into the existing or potentially future equestrian uses on the property. A suitable area for a future stable and corral will be set aside. E. The Variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings and the evidence in the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 704 to permit a 916 square foot addition to encroach into the front setback, subject to the following conditions: A. The Variance approvals shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.38.070(A) of the Zoning Ordinance unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of that section. B. If any conditions of approval are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, Reso. No. 2005-20 2 0 • • and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Building Code, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with, unless otherwise set forth in this approval. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated May, 6 2005 except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 5,314 square feet or 7.0% in conformance with structural lot coverage limitations. F. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 9,033 square feet or 12.0% in conformance with total lot coverage limitations. G. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 13,583 square feet or 18.0% in conformance with disturbed area limitations, as approved by this Variance. H. Residential building pad coverage on the 6.746 square foot existing residential building pad shall not exceed 5,074 square feet or 75.2%. I. There shall be no grading for this project. J. Prior to conducting a final inspection of the addition, an inspection of the existing cabana shall be conducted by the Los Angeles County Building and Safety Department. The applicant shall request such an inspection and pay all applicable fees and obtain a building permit. If any deficiencies are found, they shall be corrected prior to securing a final inspection from the Building and Safety Department for the addition. K. In the event that the approvals contained in this Resolution expire and the addition is not built, the City will immediately initiate code enforcement action to assure that the cabana is inspected and has a building permit. L. The existing driveway approach may be relocated to the east and may be located directly opposite the driveway at 6 Packsaddle Road East, subject to the conditions specified by the Traffic Commission: 1. The pilaster adjacent to the existing driveway shall be removed for visibility purposes 2. That no foliage shall be planted on either side of the new driveway apron to assist with vehicular visibility. M. The existing driveway apron shall be closed off and a curb matching the curb in the street shall be constructed. The remainder of the existing driveway and parking areas shall be landscaped in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated May, 6 2005, except as specified by the Traffic Commission. If trees are to be used in the Reso. No. 2005-20 3 /� landscaping scheme for this project, they shall at full maturity not exceed the ridge height of the residence. N. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation that incorporates low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water Efficient Landscaping Requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. O. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices. P. During construction, conformance with local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property is not exposed to landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required. Q. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, storm water pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required. R. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site. S. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. T. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of storm water drainage facilities. U. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste and storm water pollution prevention. V. Prior to granting a final inspection and/or certificate of occupancy, all utility lines to the residence shall be placed underground. W. ' If a construction fence is erected during construction, it shall not be located in any easement or cross over trails. Reso. No. 2005-20 4 n • • X. If an above ground drainage system is utilized, it shall be designed in such a manner as not to cross over any equestrian trails. The drainage system(s) shall not discharge water onto the trail, shall incorporate earth tone colors, including in the design of the dissipater and be screened from any trail and neighbors' views, to the maximum extent practicable, without impairing the function of the drainage system. Y. The property on which the project is located shall contain an area to provide an area meeting all standards for a stable, corral with access thereto. Z. The City's requirements related to outdoor lighting, roofing material and construction and all other requirements shall be complied with. AA. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the project shall be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association. AB. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modification to the property, which would constitute additional structural development or grading, shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. AC. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of the Variance approvals, pursuant to Sections 17.38.060 or the approval shall not be effective. AD. All conditions, when applicable, of the Variance approvals must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 19th DAY OF JULY 2005. / 711 ROGER SOMMER, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: ii ll MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK Reso. No. 2005-20 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2005-20 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH WITH AN ADDITION INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 704, AT 7 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST (LOT 27-SF), (STRAUB). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on July 19, 2005 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners DeRoy, Hankins, Witte and Chairman Sommer. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. Reso. No. 2005-20 DEPUTY CITY CLERK 6 CD i• ! / �'1,� 1 DATE: TO: FROM: • City 0/ Rolliny JUL GA INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityolrh@aol.com JULY 19, 2005 HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: REQUEST ZONING CASE NO. 704 7 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST (LOT 27-SF) RA-S-1, 2.12 ACRES (GROSS) DR. AND MRS. PAUL STRAUB DOUGLAS MCHATTIE, BOLTON ENGINEERING MAY 7, 2005 Request for a Variance to permit construction of a 916 square foot addition, which would encroach into the front setback at an existing single family residence. BACKGROUND 1. At the June 14, 2005 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission directed staff to prepare a Resolution of approval in Zoning Case No. 704, with the standard findings of facts and standard conditions of approval. The vote was 4-0. 2. Staff included conditions requiring an inspection and a building permit for the existing cabana, recommendations from the Traffic Commission for relocation of the driveway approach and that any further development be subject to Planning Commission review and approval, as requested by the Planning Commission. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2005-20 approving this development. @ Printed on lice,,;;l(d l'at rr; r RESOLUTION NO. 2005-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH WITH AN ADDITION INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 704, AT 7 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST (LOT 27-SF), (STRAUB). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Application was duly filed by Dr. and Mrs. Paul Straub with respect to real property located at 7 Packsaddle Road East, Rolling Hills (Lot 27- SF) requesting a Variance to encroach with a 916 square foot residence and garage addition into the front setback at an existing single family residence. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application on May 17, 2005, June 14, 2005, and at a field trip visit on June 14, 2005. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff. The' Planning Commission reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants and their representative were in attendance at the hearings. Section 3. A portion of the residence encroaches 3 feet into the front setback and the garage encroaches 27 feet. The proposed garage addition would follow the existing line of encroachment of the garage and the proposed addition would encroach 19 feet into the front setback. Section 4. A 159 square foot cabana exists on the lot, which was constructed many years ago without the benefit of a building permit. The property owners shall arrange for an inspection of this structure and obtain an "as built" building permit. Section 5. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3 Exemption (State of CA Guidelines), and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 6. Section 17.16.120 requires the front setback for every residential parcel in the RA-S-1 Zone to be' fifty (50) feet from the roadway easement line. The applicants are requesting to construct a 916 square foot addition, which will continue the encroachment into the front setback. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property that do not apply. generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone. The property has been developed in Reso. No. 2005-20 • •. this manner in 1952. The lot was graded at that time to create a pad for construction of living area. The topography of the lot together with the fact that the existing residence is located in the front setback creates a difficulty in constructing the addition elsewhere on the property. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The existing residence is 2,598 square feet with a two -car garage. The Variance is necessary because the existing terrain and development on the lot creates a difficulty in placing the addition elsewhere on the property. With the addition of a 916 square feet, the residence would still be smaller than the average homes in the vicinity. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the publicwelfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. The proposed addition will be constructed on an existing building pad, will be the least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with mature trees and shrubs, is of sufficient distance from nearby residences and directly across a driveway belonging to the property across the way, so that it will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners. D. In granting of the Variance the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance will be observed in that the proposed addition will be orderly, attractive and shall protect the rural character of the community. The proposed addition will not encroach into the existing or potentially future equestrian uses on the property. A suitable area for a future stable and corral will be set aside. E. The Variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings and the evidence in the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 704 to permit a 916 square foot addition to encroach into the front setback, subject to the following conditions: A. The Variance approvals shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.38.070(A) of the Zoning Ordinance unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of that section. B. If any conditions of approval are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, Reso. No. 2005-20 l� • • and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Building Code, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with, unless otherwise set forth in this approval. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated May, 6 2005 except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 5,314 square feet or 7.0% in conformance with structural lot coverage limitations. F. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 9,033 square feet or 12.0% in conformance with total lot coverage limitations. G. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 13,583 square feet or 18.0% in conformance with disturbed area limitations, as approved by this Variance. H. Residential building pad coverage on the 6.746 square foot existing residential building pad shall not exceed 5,074 square feet or 75.2%. I. There shall be no grading for this project. J. Prior to conducting a final inspection of the addition, an inspection of the existing cabana shall be conducted by the Los Angeles County Building and Safety Department. The applicant shall request such an inspection and pay all applicable fees and obtain a building permit. If any deficiencies are found, they shall be corrected prior to securing a final inspection from the Building and Safety Department for the addition. K. In the event that the approvals contained in this Resolution expire and the addition is not built, the City will immediately initiate code enforcement action to assure that the cabana is inspected and has a building permit. L. The existing driveway approach may be relocated to the east and may be located directly opposite the driveway at 6 Packsaddle Road East, subject to the conditions specified by the Traffic Commission: 1. The pilaster adjacent to the existing driveway shall be removed for visibility purposes 2. That no foliage shall be planted on either side of the new driveway apron to assist with vehicular visibility. M. The existing driveway apron shall be closed off and a curb matching the curb in the street shall be constructed. The remainder of the existing driveway and parking areas shall be landscaped in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated May, 6 2005, except as specified by the Traffic Commission. If trees are to be used in the Reso. No. 2005-20 • • landscaping scheme for this project, they shall at full maturity not exceed the ridge height of the residence. N. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation that incorporates low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water Efficient Landscaping Requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. O. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices. P. During construction, conformance with local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property is not exposed to landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required. Q. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, storm water pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required. R. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site. S. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. T. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of storm water drainage facilities. U. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste and storm water pollution prevention. V. Prior to granting a final inspection and/or certificate of occupancy, all utility lines to the residence shall be placed underground. W. If a construction fence is erected during construction, it shall not be located in any easement or cross over trails. Reso. No. 2005-20 u' X. If an above ground drainage system is utilized, it shall be designed in such a manner as not to cross over any equestrian trails. The drainage system(s) shall not discharge water onto the trail, shall incorporate earth tone colors, including in the design of the dissipater and be screened from any trail and neighbors' views, to the maximum extent practicable, without impairing the function of the drainage system. Y. The property on which the project is located shall contain an area to provide an area meeting all standards for a stable, corral with access thereto. Z. The City's requirements related to outdoor lighting, roofing material and construction and all other requirements shall be complied with. AA. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the project shall be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association. AB. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modification to the property, which would constitute additional structural development or grading, shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. AC. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of the Variance approvals, pursuant to Sections 17.38.060 or the approval shall not be effective. AD. All conditions, when applicable, of the Variance approvals must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 19th DAY OF JULY 2005. ROGER SOMMER, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK Reso. No. 2005-20 5 • • STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2005-20 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH WITH AN ADDITION INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 704, AT 7 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST (LOT 27-SF), (STRAUB). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on July 19, 2005 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. Reso. No. 2005-20 DEPUTY CITY CLERK 6 • DATE: TO: FROM: i City off ieJ/L Jh/!f • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com JUNE 14, 2005 HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: REOUEST ZONING CASE NO. 704 7 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST (LOT 27-SF) RA-S-1, 2.12 ACRES (GROSS) DR. AND MRS. PAUL STRAUB DOUGLAS MCHATTIE, BOLTON ENGINEERING MAY 7, 2005 Request for a Variance to permit construction of an addition, which would encroach into the front setback at an existing single family residence. BACKGROUND 1. The Planning Commission visited the subject property earlier today. 2. The applicants propose to construct a 654 square foot addition to the existing 2,598 square foot residence and 262 square foot addition to the existing 410 square foot garage for a total of 916 square feet of additions. The additions are proposed to be located in the front setback, which require a Variance. When completed, the residence will be 3,252 square feet with a 672 square foot garage. 3. The existing residence encroaches 3 feet into the 50-foot front setback and the existing garage encroaches up to 27 feet into the front setback. The proposed garage addition would follow the line of the existing encroachment of the garage and the residential addition is proposed to encroach up to 19 feet into the front setback. 4. The lot is developed with a 2,598 square foot residence, 410 square foot garage, 646 square foot swimming pool, 17 square feet pool equipment; 159 square foot pool house, 64 square foot covered porch, 168 square foot detached trellis over a patio in the rear yard and over the pool equipment, and a 56 square foot service yard. The original house was built in 1952. A 588 square foot addition and a swimming pool were constructed in 1957. ZC NO. 704 Pr 6/1 am; ®Pnnierl on Rec.yc:I' d Paton • • • L 5. In 1992 the Planning Commission approved a Site Plan and a Variance for subject property to add to and reconstruct the residence for a total of 4,700 square feet residence and garage. The then proposed addition encroached up to 27 feet into the front yard setback. The addition was not built. 6. A 159 square foot pool house exists on the property. There are no building permits for this structure. However, records show that this structure existed when the pool was constructed. At that time neither a Site Plan Review nor Conditional Use Permit were required for a cabana, and therefore, the structure is deemed legal non -conforming. Since this structure was built without building permit, the applicants will be required to either demolish the pool house or obtain a building permit for an "as built" structure in conjunction with the proposed development. The Planning Commission may consider placing a condition to that effect in the Resolution of approval if this project is approved. 7. No grading is required for this project and no grading is proposed at the time when the stable is constructed. The stable is proposed to be built into the hill. 8. A future 240 square foot stable on two levels, for a total of 480 square feet is proposed to be located below the swimming pool. The loft will be utilized for tack and feed and the bottom level for keeping horses. The Zoning Code requires a set aside or development of a minimum of 450 square foot stable and is silent on the design of the stable. The RH Community Association's regulations prohibit two- story stables, but allow lofts. An 8-foot wide access to the stable is proposed along the south portion of the lot with maximum slope of 13%. 9. The existing driveway approach is proposed to be closed off and moved in a southerly direction in line with the garage. The Zoning Code allows maximum 20-foot wide driveways, unless the Planning Commission approves otherwise. The Traffic Commission at their May 26, 2005 meeting reviewed and recommended approval of the proposed driveway, with the following conditions: • That the pilaster adjacent to the existing driveway be removed for visibility purposes • That no foliage be planted on either side of the driveway apron to assist with vehicular visibility. 10. The property is located in the RAS-1 zone and is 2.12 acres gross in area. The net lot area is 75,520 square feet. The structural lot coverage is proposed to be 5,314 square feet or 7.0% of the net lot area, which includes all of the structures, (20% permitted). The total lot coverage including structures and flatwork is proposed at 9,033 square feet or 12.0% of the net lot area, (35% permitted). 11. Currently there is one building pad on the property consisting of 6,746 square feet, not in setbacks. The residential building pad coverage is proposed to be 5,074 square feet or 75.2%. Not including the 64 s.f. porch the building pad coverage would be 74.2%. Currently, the building pad coverage is 4,118 square feet or 61.0% including the porch. No building pad is proposed for the stable. The area surrounding the future stable is currently more than 10% in slope and is ZC NO. 704 Pr (,/1aim 2 • • permissible for the use as corral, but is not counted as buildable pad. The stable will be built into the hill and no grading is proposed for this area to create a pad of less than 10% slope. 12. The disturbed area of the lot, including the future stable and access is proposed to be 13,583 square feet or 18.0% of the net lot area. Currently the disturbed area is 13.0%. 13. Responding to the criteria to be satisfied for grant of a Variance for the encroachment, the applicants' representative states, "there is no other area on the lot to allow for expansion. Given the topography of the lot and the location of the existing home and pool the only location for additions is in the front setback. 14. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 15. It will be required that all utility lines to the property be placed underground and that the roof material of the entire roof meets City standards. 16. The Rolling Hills Community Association will review the project at a later date. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission open the continued public hearing, take public testimony and provide direction to staff. ZC NO. 704 Pr Al l a/nc C� • • ZONING CASE NO. 704 SITE PLAN REVIEW RA-S-1 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 20 ft. from property line Rear. 50 ft. from property line STRUCTURES (Site Plan Review required if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq. ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36-month period). STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE (20% maximum) TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) BUILDING PAD COVERAGE RESIDENTIAL STABLE PAD COVERAGE COVERAGE (30% maximum guideline) GRADING Site plan review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof is more than 3 feet in depth and covers more than 2,000 sq. ft., must be balanced on site DISTURBED AREA (40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist.) STABLE (minimum 450 sa. ft.) and _CORRAL (minimum 550 sq. ft.) STABLE ACCESS ACCESSWAY VIEWS PLANTS AND ANIMALS EXISTING Single family residence, which encroaches into the front setbacks Residence Garage Service Yard Pool Pool eqipm. Porch Pool House Trellis TOTAL 5.4% 11.0% 61.0% N/A 13.0% N/A N/A N/A 2598 sq.ft. 410 sq.ft 56 sq.ft. 646 sq.ft. 17 sq.ft. 64 sq.ft. 159 sq.ft. 168 sq.ft. 4,118 sq.ft Existing from Packsaddle E. N/A N/A PROPOSED Additions, which would encroach into the front setbacks Residence Garage Stable ServiceYard Pool Pool eqipm. Trellis Pool House Porch TOTAL 3252 sq.ft 672 sq.ft 240 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft 646 sq.ft. 17 sq.ft. 168 sq.ft 159 sq.ft. 64 sq.ft. 5,314 sq.ft 7.0% of 75,52 ) sq.ft. net lot area 12.0% of 75,520 sq.ft. net lot area 75.2% of the 6,746 sq.ft. pad w/o porch 74.2% No stable pad None 18.0% (13,583 sq.ft. - includes future stable) Future 480 sq.ft.(inc.loft) Future 550 sq.ft. Along south side of property Modified approach from Packsaddle Rd. E. Planning Commission condition Planning Commission condition ZC NO. 704 PC A/1d/n; • • VARIANCE REQUIRED FINDINGS A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone; and B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question; and C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; and E. That the variance does not grant special privilege; F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills. NEARBY PROPERTIES For information purposes only ADDRESS 1 Packsaddle E. 2 Packsaddle W. 2 Packsaddle E. 3 Packsaddle E. 6 Packsaddle E. 5 Packsaddle E. 9 Packsaddle E. AVERAGE OWNER Lanman Watts Fuller Cioffi Murrell Rutgers Watson 7 Packsaddle E. Straub RESIDENCE sq.ft. 8,610 5,112 5,088 5,317 4,571 3,685 2,933 5,045 Existing 2,598; Proposed 3,252 LOT AREA sq.ft. (excl. road) 78,408 44,867 48,787 55,756 83,200 121,968 78,408 73,065 88,862 SOURCE: Assessors' Records/Department of Planning Records The above calculations do not include garages. ZC NO.704 Pr F/la/fK 50 • • City ol RO/fi �✓ee INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com MEMORANDUM TO: YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: CRAIG NEALIS, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: DRIVEWAY APPROACH REALIGNMENT AT 7 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST (STRAUB). DATE: MAY 26, 2005 Attached please find correspondence that was sent to the applicants' representative regarding the Traffic Commission recommendation in this matter. Your incorporation of these conditions into any potential resolution of approval will be appreciated. Please let me know if you have any further questions. CRN:mlk 05-26-05schwartz-mem.doc ®Prtrited or, Recycled Paper. fi • la. L11 / Of- Rotting ill& INCORPORATED JANIJARY 24, 1957 T v t_ NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310)377-1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 E-mail: cityotrh@aol.com GODFREY PERNELL, D.D.S. Mayor B. ALLEN LAY Mayor Pro Tem DR. JAMES BLACK Councilmember THOMAS F. HEINSHEIMER Councilmember FRANK E. HILL Councilmember May 26, 2005 Mr. Roger North Robinson North Architects 2360 Plaza Del Amo, Suite 200 Torrance, CA 90501 Dear Mr. North: • At the regular meeting of the Rolling Hills Traffic Commission held Thursday, May 26, 2005, Commissioners considered the enclosed staff report. As a result of their deliberation in the field, Commissioners recommended that the driveway realignment proposed at 7 Packsaddle Road East be approved subject to the following conditions: • that the pilaster adjacent to the existing driveway be removed for visibility purposes. • that no foliage be planted on either side of the driveway apron to assist with vehicular visibility. This recommendation of the Traffic Commission will be presented to the Planning Commission during the review of the land use application on this property. Should you wish to discuss this further, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you for your cooperation and support. Sincerely, 64, at Craig R. Nealis City Manager CRN:mlk 05-26-05north-lt r.doc cc: Dr. & Mrs. Paul Straub Doug McHattie Yolanta Schwartz, Planning Director Dr. & Mrs. George Murrell ® Pr!,4U:1,.r1 l':u,.n 1 • • City olnlertS n•/e Ira: C VC Ii r _, ,u. ry 24, Icf: NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityolrh@aol.com Agenda Item No: 6-D Mtg. Date: 5/26/05 TO: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSION FROM: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A DRIVEWAY APPROACH REALIGNMENT AT 7 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST (STRAUB). DATE: MAY 26, 2005 BACKGROUND Currently, the property owners at 7 Packsaddle Road East, Mr. and Mrs. Paul Straub, are pursuing a land use application before the Planning Commission that involves a residential addition and reconfiguration of the driveway access as indicated on the attached site plan. The applicants are requesting to close off the existing driveway approach and construct a new 31-foot wide driveway approach south of the existing driveway. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that members of the Traffic Commission review this proposal and provide appropriate direction to staff. CRN:mlk 05-26-05s1raand riacma y-sta.doc s i _ . •., • \, 1\,\ X-• 1y .• `.- N.• .111 I 7�' I '• 10 F • ( A WI 4b•,4 •L ' • •Y• IrI 'tlI.•' of DATE: TO: FROM: • City oi Jh//' • R- INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityotrh@aol.com MAY 17, 2005 HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: REOUEST ZONING CASE NO. 704 7 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST (LOT 27-SF) RA-S-1, 2.12 ACRES (GROSS) DR. AND MRS. PAUL STRAUB DOUGLAS MCHATTIE, BOLTON ENGINEERING MAY 7, 2005 Request for a Variance to permit construction of an addition, which would encroach into the front setback at an existing single family residence. BACKGROUND 1. The applicants propose to construct a 654 square foot addition to the existing 2,598 square foot residence and 262 square foot addition to the existing 410 square foot garage for a total of 916 square feet of additions. The additions are proposed to be located in the front setback, which require a Variance. When completed, the residence will be 3,252 square feet with a 672 square foot garage. 2. The existing residence encroaches 3 feet into the 50-foot front setback and the existing garage encroaches up to 27 feet into the front setback. The proposed garage addition would follow the line of the existing encroachment of the garage and the residential addition is proposed to encroach up to 19 feet into the front setback. 4. The lot is developed with a 2,598 square foot residence, 410 square foot garage, 646 square foot swimming pool, 17 square feet pool equipment, 159 square foot pool house, 64 square foot covered porch, 168 square foot detached trellis over a patio in the rear yard and over the pool equipment, and a 56 square foot service yard. The original house was built in 1952. A 588 square foot addition and a swimming pool were constructed in 1957. ZC NO. 704 yr s/17mc ®1'nntral on Hucyck.,(1 ',gnn • • 5. In 1992 the Planning Commission approved a Site Plan and a Variance for subject property to add to and reconstruct the residence for a total of 4,700 square feet residence and garage. The then proposed addition encroached up to 27 feet into the front yard setback. The addition was not built. 6. A 159 square foot pool house exists on the property. There are no building permits for this structure. However, records show that this structure existed when the pool was constructed. At that time neither a Site Plan Review nor Conditional Use Permit were required for a cabana, and therefore, the structure is deemed legal non -conforming. Since this structure was built without building permit, the applicants will be required to either demolish the pool house or obtain a building permit for an "as built" structure in conjunction with the proposed development. The Planning Commission may consider placing a condition to that effect in the Resolution of approval if this project is approved. 7. No grading is required for this project and no grading will be required at the time when the stable is constructed. The stable will be tucked into the hill. 8. A future 240 square foot stable on two levels, for a total of 480 square feet is proposed to be located below the swimming pool. The loft will be utilized for tack and feed and the bottom level for keeping horses. The Zoning Code requires a set aside or development of a minimum of 450 square foot stable and is silent on the design of the stable. The RH Community Association's regulations prohibit two- story stables, but allow lofts. An 8-foot wide access to the stable is proposed along the south portion of the lot with maximum slope of 13%. 9. The existing driveway approach is proposed to be closed off and moved in a southerly direction in line with the garage. The Zoning Code allows maximum 20-foot wide driveways, unless the Planning Commission approves otherwise. The Traffic Commission will review the proposed driveway at their May 26, 2005 meeting. 10. The property is located in the RAS-1 zone and is 2.12 acres gross in area. The net lot area is 75,520 square feet. The structural lot coverage is proposed to be 5,314 square feet or 7.0% of the net lot area, which includes all of the structures, (20% permitted). The total lot coverage including structures and flatwork is proposed at 9,033 square feet or 12.0% of the net lot area, (35% permitted). 11. Currently there is one building pad on the property consisting of 6,746 square feet, not in setbacks. The residential building pad coverage is proposed to be 5,074 square feet or 75.2%. Not including the 64 s.f. porch the building pad coverage would be 74.2%. Currently, the building pad coverage is 4,118 square feet or 61.0% including the porch. No building pad is proposed for the stable. The area surrounding the future stable is currently more than 10% in slope and is permissible for the use as corral, but is not counted as buildable pad. The stable will be tucked into the hill and no grading is proposed for this area to create a pad of less than 10% slope. ZC NO. 704 Pr VI7/fK 2 • 12. The disturbed area of the lot, including the future stable and access is proposed to be 13,583 square feet or 18.0% of the net lot area. Currently the disturbed area is 13.0%. 13. Responding to the criteria to be satisfied for grant of a Variance for the encroachment, the applicants' representative states, "there is no other area on the lot to allow for expansion. Given the topography of the lot and the location of the existing home and pool the only location for additions is in the front setback. 14. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 15. It will be required that all utility lines to the property be placed underground and that the roof material of the entire roof meets City standards. 16. The Rolling Hills Community Association will review the project at a later date. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the staff report, open the public hearing, take public testimony and provide direction to staff. ZC NO. 704 Pr S/17/fK 3 ZONING CASE NO. 704 SITE PLAN REVIEW RA-S-1 ZONE SETBACKS Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 20 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line STRUCTURES (Site Plan Review required if size of structure Increases by at least 1,000 sq. ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36-month period). STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE (20% maximum) TOTAL LOT COVERAGE (35% maximum) BUILDING PAD COVERAGE RESIDENTIAL STABLE PAD COVERAGE COVERAGE (30% maximum guideline) GRADING Site plan review required if excavation and/or fill or combination thereof is more than 3 feet in depth and covers more than 2,000 sq. ft., must be balanced on site DISTURBED AREA (40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist.) STABLE (minimum 450 sq. ft.) and CORRAL (minimum 550 sq. ft.) STABLE ACCESS ACCESSWAY VIEWS PLANTS AND ANIMALS EXISTING Single family residence, which encroaches into the front setbacks Residence Garage Service Yard Pool Pool eqipm. Porch Pool House Trellis TOTAL 5.4% 11.0% 61.0% N/A 13.0% N/A N/A N/A 2598 sq.ft. 410 sq.ft 56 sq.ft. 646 sq.ft. 17 Sq.ft. 64 sq.ft. 159 sq.ft. 168 sq.ft. 4,118 sq.ft Existing from Packsaddle E. N/A PROPOSED Additions, which would encroach into the front setbacks Residence Garage Stable ServiceYard Pool Pool eqipm. Trellis Pool House Porch TOTAL 3252 sq.ft 672 sq.ft 240 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft 646 sq.ft. 17 sq.ft. 168 sq.ft 159 sq.ft. 64 sq.ft. 5,314 sq.ft 7.0%% of 75,520 sq.ft. net lot area 12.0% of 75,520 sq.ft. net lot area 75.2% of the 6,746 sq.ft. pad w/o porch 74.2% No stable pad None 18.0% (13,583 sq.ft. -includes future stable) Future 480 sq.ft.(inc.Ioft) Future 550 sq.ft. Along south side of property Modified approach from Packsaddle Rd. E. Planning Commission condition N/A Planning Commission condition ZC NO. 704 nr cn 1rng 4 • • VARIANCE REQUIRED FINDINGS A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone; and B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question; and C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; and E. That the variance does not grant special privilege; F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and G. That the variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills. NEARBY PROPERTIES For information purposes only ADDRESS 1 Packsaddle E. 2 Packsaddle W. 2 Packsaddle E. 3 Packsaddle E. 6 Packsaddle E. 5 Packsaddle E. 9 Packsaddle E. AVERAGE OWNER Lanman Watts Fuller Cioffi Murrell Rutgers Watson 7 Packsaddle E. Straub RESIDENCE sq.ft. 8,610 5,112 5,088 5,317 4,571 3,685 2,933 5,045 Existing 2,598; Proposed 3,252 LOT AREA sq.ft. (excl. road) 78,408 44,867 48,787 55,756 83,200 121,968 78,408 73,065 88,862 SOURCE: Assessors' Records/Department of Planning Records The above calculations do not include garages. ZC NO. 704 Pr VI7/n5 5