536, Addition to SFR with encroachm, Staff Reports• •
Roffn D Ci 0/ Jh/ INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX: (310) 377.7288
Agenda Item No.: 4.B.
Mtg. Date: 3/27/96
DATE: MARCH 27,1996
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY
COUNCIL
ATTENTION: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER '
FROM: LOLA M. UNGAR, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 96-7: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A
VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK TO
ENCLOSE A STAIRWAY BETWEEN A RESIDENCE AND AN
ATTACHED GARAGE AND APPROVING A VARIANCE TO
ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A
WALLED SERVICE YARD IN ZONING CASE NO. 536.
Dr. Guy Abraham, 9 Packsaddle Road East (Lot 28-SF)
1. The Planning Commission approved the subject resolution on March 9, 1996.
2. The applicant is requesting a Variance to permit a stairway to be enclosed
between the residence and the attached garage that will encroach up to 8 feet
into the 50 foot front yard setback. The applicant also requests a Variance to
permit a 96 square foot service yard surrounded by a wall that does not exceed
5 feet to encroach up to 17 feet into the 50 foot front yard setback. Almost the
entire existing garage and portions of the existing residence encroach up to 21
feet into the front yard setback. The new stairway enclosure at the northeast
portion of the residence will add 8 square feet to the residence. The service
yard will not add any residenti square footage. The applicants are also
adding 36 square feet and 105 square feet, respectively, to fill in existing
building openings at the east and west central portions of the residence. Total
residential additions will be 224 square feet.
3. The existing 2,677 square foot residence and 521 square foot attached garage
was built in 1960.
®Printed on Rr:y:I..rj
r •
4. The existing residential building pad is 8,084 square feet and coverage on the
pad is 45.5%. The garage and portions of the residence are in the front yard
setback. Proposed additions will fill in existing building openings. Proposed
coverage on the pad will be 49.5%.
5. Structural lot coverage proposed is 5.8% (20% maximum permitted) and total
lot coverage proposed is 10.0% (35% maximum permitted).
6. Access to the property will remain the same from Packsaddle Road East to the
garage at the northeastern portion of the residence.
7. Maximum disturbed area will be 9,920 square feet or 12.9% (40% permitted).
8. Grading for the redesigned front yard driveway area will be minimal and not
require a grading permit. There will be 45 cubic yards of cut soil and 45 cubic
yards of fill soil.
9. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
CRITERIA
Sr MAJOR IMPACTS
RAS-1 Zone Setbacks;
Front: 50 ft. from front easement line
Side: 20 ft. from property line
Rear: 50 ft. from property line
Structures
(Site Plan Review required if size of
structure increases by at least 1,000
sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing
the size of the structure by more than
25% in a 36-month period).
Disturbed Area
(40% maximum; any graded building
pad area, any remedial grading
(temporary disturbance), any graded
slopes and building pad areas, any
nongraded area where impervious
surfaces exist and any planned
landscaped areas)
EXISTING
Residence encroaches up to 21' into
front setback.
Residence
Garage
Swim Pool
Service Yard
Stable &
Corral
TOTAL
N/A
12.9%
PROPOSED
Stairway enclosure area will
encroach up to 8' into front yard
setback and service yard will
encroach up to 17 into front yard
setback.
2,677 sq. ft. Residence
521 sq.ft. Garage
484 sq.ft. Swim Pool
0 sq.ft. Service Yard
0 sq.ft. Future Stable &
Corral 550 sq.ft.
3,682 sq.ft. TOTAL
2,901 sq. ft.
521 sq.ft.
484 sq.ft.
96 sq.ft.
450 sq.ft,
4,452 sq.ft.
Redesigned front yard driveway area
will require 45 cubic yards of cut
and 45 cubic yards of fill but, will
not require a grading permit
12.9%
{
• •
Structural Lot Coverage
(20% maximum)
Total Lot Coverage
(35% maximum)
3,682 sq.ft. or 4.8% 4,452 sq.ft. or 5.8%
6,933 sq.ft. or 9.0% 7,721 sq.ft. or 10.0%
Residential Building Pad Coverage
(30% recommended) 45.5%
Stable/Corral Building Pad
Coverage
49.5%
N/A 45.0%
Total Building Pad Coverage 45.5% 49.0%
Roadway Access
Existing off Packsaddle East Existing off Packsaddle East
Access to Stable and Corral
[Accessibility and maximum 4:1 N/A N/A
(25%) slope required ONLY for new
residence or additions that require
Site Plan Review].
Preserve Views
Preserve Plants and Animals
Insignificant Impact Insignificant Impact
Insignificant Impact Insignificant Impact
STAIRWAY ENCLOSURE AND SERVICE YARD
VARIANCE REQUIRED FINDINGS ENCLOSURE
A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions applicable to the
property that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same vicuuty and zone; and
B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of substantial property rights
possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and
zone but which is denied the property in question;
and
C. That the granting of such variance will not be
materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity; and
Requests are to fill in existing building openings.
Does not appreciably change the appearance of the
structure on the building pad.
Will not effect properties or improvements in the vicinity.
D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of The spirit and intent of Title 17 (Zoning) will be
this title will be observed; and observed.
E. That the variance does not grant special privilege; Planning Commission will determine.
•
• •
F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of
the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste
Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria
for hazardous waste facilities; and
Consistent with the portions of the County of Los
Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to
siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities.
G. That the variance request is consistent with the The variance request is consistent with the General Plan
General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills. of the City of Rolling Hills.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council receive and file Resolution No. 96-7.
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 96-7
A RESOLUTION OF THE- PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH
INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK TO ENCLOSE A STAIRWAY
BETWEEN A RESIDENCE AND AN ATTACHED GARAGE AND
APPROVING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT
YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A WALLED SERVICE YARD IN
ZONING CASE NO. 536.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY
FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Dr. Guy Abraham with respect to
real property located at 9 Packsaddle Road East (Lot 28-SF) requesting a Variance to
permit a stairway to be enclosed between a residence and an attached garage that will
encroach into the front yard setback and a request for a Variance to permit the
construction of a walled service yard that will encroach into the front yard setback at
an existing residence.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public
hearing to consider the applications on January 16, 1996 and February 20, 1996, and at
a field trip visit on February 3, 1996.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a
Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)) and is therefore
categorically exempt from environmental review under the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of
property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity.
Section 17.16.110 requires a front yard setback of 50 feet from the front easement line
in the RA-S-1 residential zone. The applicant is requesting to construct an 82 square
foot enclosure between a residence and an attached garage that will encroach a
maximum of 8 feet into the fifty foot (50') front yard setback. With respect to this
request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the
other property or class of use in the same zone because the lot is at the end of a cul-
de-sac and the building pad is located close to the street and adjacent residences. The
RESOLUTION NO. 96-7
PAGE 1 OF 4
•
•
existing development pattern on the lot and the sloping rear portion precludes
continued expansion of the residence into the rear of the lot.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because
the development and use of the subject property in a manner consistent with the
shape of the lot and development of other property on this street justifies this
additional small incursion into the front yard setback. There will not be any greater
incursion into the front yard setback than already exists.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity
and zone in which the property is located. Allowing the proposed incursion into
the front yard setback will not allow any greater incursion than already exists. In
addition, development on this portion of the pad will allow a substantial portion of
the more environmentally significant rear and side portions of the lot to remain
undeveloped.
Section 5 . Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 536 to permit the encroachment
of an 82 square foot enclosure of a stairway between a residence and an attached
garage that will encroach a maximum of 8 feet into the fifty foot (50') front yard
setback, as indicated on the development plan submitted with this application and
incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, subject to the conditions specified in
Section 8 of this Resolution.
Section 6. Section 17.16.110 requires a front yard of 50 feet from the front
easement line in the RA-S-1 residential zone. The applicants are requesting to
construct a 96 square foot service yard bordered by a 6 foot wall that will encroach a
maximum of seventeen feet (17') into the fifty foot (50') front yard setback. With
respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the
other property or class of use in the same zone because the lot is long and narrow
and the building pad is located close to the street and adjacent residences. The
existing development pattern on the lot and the sloping rear portion precludes
continued expansion of the residence into the rear of the lot.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because
the development and use of the subject property in a manner consistent with the
shape of the lot and development of other property on this street justifies this
RESOLUTION NO. 96-7
PAGE 2 OF 4
additional small incursion into the front yard setback. There will not be any greater
incursion into the front yard setback than already exists.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity
and zone in which the property is located. Allowing the proposed incursions into
the front yard setback will not allow any greater incursion than already exists. In
addition, development on this portion of the pad will allow a substantial portion of
the more environmentally significant rear and side portions of the lot to remain
undeveloped.
Section 7, Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 536 to permit the encroachment
of a 96 square foot service yard bordered by a 6 foot wall that will encroach a
maximum of seventeen feet (17') into the fifty foot (50') front yard setback, as
indicated on the development plan submitted with this application and
incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, subject to the conditions specified in
Section 8 of this Resolution.
Section 8. The Variance to the front yard setback approved in Section 5 and
the Variance to the front yard setback approved in Section 7 are subject to the
following conditions:
A. The Variance approvals shall expire within one year from the effective
date of approval as defined in Section 17.38.070.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Variance approvals, that if
any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the
privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been
given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of
thirty (30) days.
C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be
complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the site plan on file dated December 14, 1995 and marked Exhibit A, except as
otherwise provided in these conditions.
E. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of
any building or grading permit.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-7
PAGE3 OF4
•
•
F. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions
of these Variance approvals, or the approvals shall not be effective.
G. All conditions of these Variance approvals must be complied with
prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los
Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON DAY OF MARCH, 1996.
ALLAN ROBE , CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
MARILYN IRN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
§§
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 96-7 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE
FRONT YARD SETBACK TO ENCLOSE A STAIRWAY BETWEEN A
RESIDENCE AND AN ATTACHED GARAGE AND APPROVING A
VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK TO
CONSTRUCT A WALLED SERVICE YARD IN ZONING CASE NO. 536.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on March 9,1996
by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Raine, Witte and Chairman Roberts.
NOES: None .
ABSENT: None .
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Sommer.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
DEPUTY CITY LERK
RESOLUTION NO. 96-7
PAGE4 OF4
•
Cuy 0/ Jh/'h
HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 20,1996
TO:
FROM:
•
8(3
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX (310) 377-7288
HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
LOLA M. UNGAR, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
APPLICATION NO.
SITE LOCATION:
ZONING AND SIZE:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PUBLISHED:
REOUEST
ZONING CASE NO. 536
9 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST (LOT 28-SF)
RAS-1, 1.89 ACRES
DR. GUY ABRAHAM
MR. CRISS GUNDERSON, ARCHITECT
JANUARY 6, 1996
Request for a Variance to permit a stairway to be enclosed between a residence and
an attached garage that will encroach into the front yard setback and a request for a
Variance to permit the construction of a walled service yard that will encroach into
the front yard setback.
BACKGROUND
1. The Planning Commission viewed a silhouette staking of the proposed
construction on February 3, 1996.
2 The applicant is requesting a Variance to permit a stairway to be enclosed
between the residence and the attached garage that will encroach up to 8 feet
into the 50 foot front yard setback. The applicant also requests a Variance to
permit a 96 square foot service yard surrounded by a wall that does not exceed
5 feet to encroach up to 17 feet into the 50 foot front yard setback. Almost the
entire existing garage and portions of the existing residence encroach up to 21
feet into the front yard setback. The new stairway enclosure at the northeast
portion of the residence will add 82 square feet to the residence. The service
yard will not add any residential square footage. The applicants are also
adding 36 square feet and 105 square feet, respectively, to fill in existing
building openings at the east and west central portions of the residence. Total
residential additions will be 224 square feet.
ZONING CASE NO. 536
PAGE 1 OF 4
n
rs
Printed on Recycled Paper.
3. The existing 2,677 square foot residence and 521 square foot attached garage
was built in 1960.
4. The existing residential building pad is 8,084 square feet and coverage on the
. pad is 45.5%. The garage and portions of the residence are in the front yard
setback. Proposed additions will fill in existing building openings. Proposed
coverage on the pad will be 49.5%.
5. • Structural lot coverage proposed is 5.8% (20% maximum permitted) and total
lot coverage proposed is 10.0% (35% maximum permitted).
6. Access to the property will remain the same from Packsaddle Road East to the
garage at the northeastern portion of the residence.
7. Maximum disturbed area will be 9,920 square feet or 12.9% (40% permitted).
8. Grading for the redesigned front yard driveway area will be minimal and not
require a grading permit. There will be 45 cubic yards of cut soil and 45 cubic
yards of fill soil.
9. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed plans and
take public testimony.
ZONING CASE NO. 536
PAGE 2 OF 4
CRITERIA
& MAJOR IMPACTS
RAS-1 Zone Setbacks;
Front: 50 ft. from front easement line
Side: 20 ft. from property line
Rear: 50 ft. from property line
Structures
(Site Plan Review required if size of
structure increases by at least 1,000
sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing
the size of the structure by more than
25% in a 36-month period).
Grading
EXISTING
Residence encroaches up to 21' into
front setback.
Residence
Garage
Swim Pool
Service Yard
Stable &
Corral
TOTAL
N/A
Disturbed Area
(40% maximum; any graded building
pad area, any remedial grading
(temporary disturbance), any graded 12.9%
slopes and building pad areas, any
nongraded area where impervious
surfaces exist and any planned
landscaped areas)
Structural Lot Coverage
(20% maximum)
Total Lot Coverage
(35% maximum)
3,682 sq.ft. or 4.8%
6,933 sq.ft. or 9.0%
Residential Building Pad Coverage
(30% recommended) 45.5%
Stable/Corral Building Pad
Coverage
Total Building Pad Coverage
Roadway Access
N/A
45.5%
2,677 sq. ft.
521 sq.ft.
484 sq.ft.
0 sq.ft.
0 sq.ft.
PROPOSED
Stairway enclosure area will
encroach up to 8' into front yard
setback and service yard will
encroach up to 17 into front yard
setback.
Residence
Garage
Swim Pool
Service Yard
Future Stable &
Corral
2,901 sq. ft.
521 sq.ft.
484 sq.ft.
96 sq.ft.
450 sq.ft.
3,682 sq.ft. TOTAL 4,452 sq.ft.
Existing off Packsaddle East
Access to Stable and Corral
[Accessibility and maximum 4:1 N/A
(25%) slope required ONLY for new
residence or additions that require
Site Plan Review].
Redesigned front yard driveway area
will require 45 cubic yards of cut
and 45 cubic yards of fill but, will
not require a grading permit
12.9%
4,452 sq.ft. or 5.8%
7,721 sq.ft. or 10.0%
49.5%
45.0%
49.0%
Existing off Packsaddle East
N/A
ZONING CASE NO. 536
PAGE 3 OF 4
Preserve Views Insignificant Impact
Insignificant Impact
Preserve Plants and Animals Insignificant Impact Insignificant Impact
STAIRWAY ENCLOSURE AND SERVICE YARD
VARIANCE REQUIRED FINDINGS ENCLOSURE
A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions applicable to the
property that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same vicuuty and zone; and
Requests are to fill in existing building openings.
B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation Does not appreciably change the appearance of the
and enjoyment of substantial property rights structure on the building pad.
possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and
zone but which is denied the property in question;
and
C. That the granting of such variance will not be
materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity; and
Will not effect properties or improvements in the vicinity.
D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of The spirit and intent of Title 17 (Zoning) will be
this title will be observed; and observed.
E. That the variance does not grant special privilege; Planning Commission will determine.
F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of
the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste
Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria
for hazardous waste facilities; and
Consistent with the portions of the County of Los
Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relatiiT to
siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities.
G. That the variance request is consistent with the The variance request is consistent with the General Plan
General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills. of the City of Rolling Hills.
ZONING CASE NO. 536
PAGE 4 OF 4
•City ol Rolling
HEARING DATE: FEBRUARY 3,1996
TO:
FROM:
•
3
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
LOLA M. UNGAR, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
APPLICATION NO.
SITE LOCATION:
ZONING AND SIZE:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PUBLISHED:
REOUEST
ZONING CASE NO. 536 •
9 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST (LOT 28-SF)
RAS-1, 1.89 ACRES
DR. GUY ABRAHAM
MR. CRISS GUNDERSON, ARCHITECT
JANUARY 6, 1996
Request for a Variance to permit a stairway to be enclosed between a residence and
an attached garage that will encroach into the front yard setback and a request for a
Variance to permit the construction of a walled service yard that will encroach into
the front yard setback.
BACKGROUND
In reviewing the applicant's request under Title 17, Zoning, staff would identify the
following issues for evaluation:
1. The applicant is requesting a Variance to permit a stairway to be enclosed
between the residence and the attached garage that will encroach up to 8 feet
into the 50 foot front yard setback. The applicant also requests a Variance to
permit a 96 square foot service yard surrounded by a 6 foot wall to encroach
up to 17 feet into the 50 foot front yard setback. Almost the entire existing
garage and portions of the existing residence encroach up to 21 feet into the
front yard setback. The new stairway enclosure at the northeast portion of the
residence will add 82 square feet to the residence. The service yard will not
add any residential square footage. The applicants are also adding 36 square
feet and 106 square feet, respectively, to fill in existing recessed openings at the
east and west central portions of the residence. Total residential additions
will be 224 square feet.
2. The existing 2,677 square foot residence and 521 square foot attached garage
was built in 1960.
ZONING CASE NO. 536
PAGE 1
Printed on Recycled Paper.
• •
3. The existing residential building pad is 8,084 square feet and coverage on the
pad is 45.5%. The garage and portions of the residence are in the front yard
setback. Proposed additions will fill in existing building openings within
existing . Proposed coverage on the pad will be 49.5%.
4. Structural lot coverage proposed is 5.8% (20% maximum permitted) and total
lot coverage proposed is 10.0% (35% maximum permitted).
5. Access to the property will be from Packsaddle Road East to the garage at the
northeastern portion of the residence.
6. Maximum disturbed area will be 9,920 square feet or 12.9% (40% permitted).
7. There will be grading in the front yard that will be minimal and not require a
grading permit. There will be 45 cubic yards of cut soil and 45 cubic yards of
fill soil.
8. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed plans and
take public testimony.
CRITERIA
& MAJOR IMPACTS
RAS-1 Zone Setbacks:
Front: 50 ft. from front easement line
Side: 20 ft. from property line
Rear: 50 ft. from property line
Structures
(Site Plan Review required if size of
structure increases by at least 1,000
sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing
the size of the structure by more than
25% in a 36-month period).
Grading
(Site Plan Review and grading permit
required if excavation and/or fill or
combination thereof that is more than
3 feet in depth and covers more than
2,000 sq.ft.) must be balanced on site.
EXISTING
Residence encroaches up to 21' into
front setback.
Residence
Garage
Swim Pool
Service Yard
Stable &
Corral
TOTAL
N/A
2,677 sq. ft.
521 sq.ft.
484 sq.ft.
0 sq.ft.
0 sq.ft.
PROPOSED
Stairway enclosure area will
encroach up to 8' into front yard
setback and service yard will
encroach up to 17' into front yard
setback.
Residence
Garage
Swim Pool
Service Yard
Future Stable &
Corral
2,901 sq. ft.
521 sq.ft.
484 sq.ft.
96 sq.ft.
450 sq.ft.
3,682 sq.ft. TOTAL 4,452 sq.ft.
45 cubic yards of cut
45 cubic yards of fill
but, will not require a grading
permit.
ZONING CASE NO. 536
PAGE 2
Disturbed Area
(40% maximum; any graded building
pad area, any remedial grading
(temporary disturbance), any graded 12.9% 12.9%
slopes and building pad areas, any
nongraded area where impervious
surfaces exist and any planned
landscaped areas)
Structural Lot Coverage
(20% maximum)
Total Lot Coverage
(35% maximum)
Residential Building Pad Coverage
(30% or less recommended)
Stable/Corral Building Pad
Coverage
3,682 sq.ft. or 4.8% 4,452 sq.ft. or 5.8%
6,933 sq.ft. or 9.0% 7,721 sq.ft. or 10.0%
45.5% 49.5%
N/A 45.0%
Total Building Pad Coverage 45.5% 49.0%
Roadway Access
Existing off Packsaddle East Existing off Packsaddle East
Access to Stable and Corral
[Accessibility and maximum 4:1 N/A N/A
(25%) slope required ONLY for new
residence or additions that require
Site Plan Review].
Preserve Views
Preserve Plants and Animals
Insignificant Impact Insignificant Impact
Insignificant Impact Insignificant Impact
ZONING CASE NO. 536
PAGE 3
• •
VARIANCE REQUIRED FINDINGS
A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions applicable to the
property that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same vicmity and zone; and
B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of substantial property rights
possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and
zone but which is denied the property in question;
and
C. That the granting of such variance will not be
materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity; and
D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of
this title will be observed; and
E. That the variance does not grant special privilege;
F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of
the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste
Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria
for hazardous waste facilities; and
G. That the variance request is consistent with the
General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills.
ZONING CASE NO. 536
PAGE 4
•
City 0/
HEARING DATE: JANUARY 16, 1996
TO:
FROM:
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
LOLA M. UNGAR, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
APPLICATION NO.
SITE LOCATION:
ZONING AND SIZE:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PUBLISHED:
REOUEST
ZONING CASE NO. 536
9 PACKSADDLE ROAD EAST (LOT 28-SF)
RAS-1, 1.89 ACRES
DR. GUY ABRAHAM
MR. CRISS GUNDERSON, ARCHITECT
JANUARY 6, 1996
Request for a Variance to permit a stairway to be enclosed between a residence and
an attached garage that will encroach into the front yard setback and a request for a
Variance to permit the construction of a walled service yard that will encroach into
the front yard setback.
BACKGROUND
In reviewing the applicant's request under Title 17, Zoning, staff would identify the
following issues for evaluation:
1. The applicant is requesting a Variance to permit a stairway to be enclosed
between the residence and the attached garage that will encroach up to 8 feet
into the 50 foot front yard setback. The applicant also requests a Variance to
permit a 96 square foot service yard surrounded by a 6 foot wall to encroach
up to 17 feet into the 50 foot front yard setback. Almost the entire existing
garage and portions of the existing residence encroach up to 21 feet into the
front yard setback. The new stairway enclosure at the northeast portion of the
residence will add 82 square feet to the residence. The service yard will not
add any residential square footage. The applicants are also adding 36 square
feet and 105 square feet, respectively, to fill in existing recessed openings at the
east and west central portions of the residence. Total residential additions
will be 224 square feet.
2. The existing 2,677 square foot residence and 521 square foot attached garage
was built in 1960.
ZONING CASE NO. 536
PAGE 1
Printed on Recycled Paper.
t.
• •
3. The existing residential building pad is 8,084 square feet and coverage on the
pad is 45.5%. The garage and portions of the residence are in the front yard
setback. Proposed additions will fill in existing building openings within
existing . Proposed coverage on the pad will be 49.5%.
4. Structural lot coverage proposed is 5.8% (20% maximum permitted) and total
lot coverage proposed is 10.0% (35% maximum permitted).
5. Access to the property will be from Packsaddle Road East to the garage at the
northeastern portion of the residence.
6. Maximum disturbed area will be 9,920 square feet or 12.9% (40% permitted).
7. There will be grading in the front yard that will be minimal'and not require a
grading permit. There will be 45 cubic yards of cut soil and 45 cubic yards of
fill soil.
8. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed plans and
take public testimony.
CRITERIA
& MAJOR IMPACTS EXISTING PROPOSED
RAS-1 Zone Setbacks:
Front: 50 ft. from front easement
line
Side: 20 ft. from property line
Rear: 50 ft. from property line
Structures
(Site Plan Review required if
size of structure increases by at
least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the
effect of increasing the size of
the structure by more than 25%
in a 36-month period).
Residence encroaches up to 21'
into front setback.
Residence
Garage
Swim Pool
Service Yard
Stable &
Corral
TOTAL
2,677 sq. ft.
521 sq.ft.
484 sq.ft.
0 sq.ft.
0 sq.ft.
Stairway enclosure area will
encroach up to 8' into front yard
setback and service yard will
encroach up to 17' into front yard
setback.
Residence
Garage
Swim Pool
Service Yard
Future Stable &
Corral
2,901 sq. ft.
521 sq.ft.
484 sq.ft.
96 sq.ft.
450 sq.ft.
3,682 sq.ft. TOTAL 4,452 sq.ft.
ZONING CASE NO. 536
PAGE 2
Grading N/A
(Site Plan Review and grading
permit required if excavation
and/or fill or combination
thereof that is more than 3 feet
in depth and covers more than
2,000 sq.ft.) must be balanced on
site.
Disturbed Area
(40% maximum; any graded
building pad area, any remedial
grading (temporary
disturbance), any graded slopes
and building pad areas, any
nongraded area where
impervious surfaces exist and
any planned landscaped areas)
Structural Lot Coverage
(20% maximum)
Total Lot Coverage
(35% maximum)
Residential Building Pad
Coverage
(30 to 35% recommended)
Stable/Corral Building Pad
Coverage
Total Building Pad Coverage
Roadway Access
12.9%
3,682 sq.ft. or 4.8%
6,933 sq.ft. or 9.0%
45.5%
N/A
45.5%
Existing off Packsaddle East
Access to Stable and Corral
[Accessibility and maximum 4:1 N/A
(25%) slope required ONLY for
new residence or additions that
require Site Plan Review].
45 cubic yards of cut
45 cubic yards of fill
but, will not require a grading
permit.
12.9%
4,452 sq.ft. or 5.8%
7,721 sq.ft. or 10.0%
49.5%
45.0%
49.0%
Existing off Packsaddle East
N/A
ZONING CASE NO. 536
PAGE 3
• •
Preserve Views Insignificant Impact Insignificant Impact
Preserve Plants and Animals Insignificant Impact Insignificant Impact
VARIANCE REQUIRED FINDINGS
A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions applicable to the
property that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same vicinity and zone; and
B. That such variance is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of substantial
property rights possessed by other properties
in the same vicinity and zone but which is
denied the property in question; and
C. That the granting of such variance will not be
materially detrimental to the public welfare
or injurious to properties or improvements in
the vicinity; and
D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and
intent of this title will be observed; and
E. That the variance does not grant special
privilege;
F. That the variance is consistent with the
portions of the County of Los Angeles
Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating
to siting and siting criteria for hazardous
waste facilities; and
G. That the variance request is consistent with
the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills.
ZONING CASE NO. 536
PAGE 4