Loading...
511, Addition to SFR of a master su, Correspondence• e Ciiy ofieeeng �ue� CERTIFIED MAIL July 12, 1994 Dr. and Mrs. George A. Murrell 6 Packsaddle Road East Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 SUBJECT: APPEAL PERIOD ZONING CASE NO. 511, 6 Packsaddle Road East (LOT 31-SF) RESOLUTION NO. 94-18 Dear Dr. and Mrs. Murrell: . This letter shall serve as official notification that Zoning Case No. 511 was DENIED by the Planning Commission.and.the enclosed_resolution was approved on July 7, 1994 at an adjourned regular meeting. The Planning Commission's decision was reported to the City Council at their regular meeting on July 11, 1994. The denial will become effective thirty (30) days after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution if no appeals are filed within that time period (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code attached). We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 94-18, specifying the findings of denial set forth by the Planning Commission and the Exhibit A Development Plan to keep for your files. Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. SINCE13 LY, LOLA UNGA PRINCIPAL PLANNER ! PAL PLANNER ENC: RESOLUTION NO.94-18 , EXHIBIT A DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND APPEAL SECTION OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE. cc: Ms. Vicky Barbieri & Associates AIA ®Printed on Recycled Paper • • RESOLUTION NO. 94-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DENYING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSTANTIAL ROOM ADDITIONS AND GARAGE SPACE AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 511. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Dr. and Mrs. George A. Murrell with respect to real property located at 6 Packsaddle Road East, Rolling Hills (Lot 31- SF) requesting Site Plan Review to permit the construction ofsubstantial room additions and garage space at an existing single family residence. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application on April 18, 1994, May 17, 1994, and June 21, 1994, and at a field trip visit on May 7, 1994. Section 4. She_Manning Commission. finds that the_ projegt.qualifies. as a Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 5. Section 17.46.020 requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings or structures, which involve changes to grading or an increase in the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building or structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six month period, may be permitted. Section 6. With respect to the Site Plan Review application to construct 1,381 square feet of residential room additions and 400 square feet of additional garage space, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The granting of the request for Site Plan Review would not be consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan. The construction of a 4,652 square foot residence, 885 square foot garage, and 605 square foot pool on this lot creates maximum structural lot coverage which is not compatible with the General Plan goals of maintaining low profile, low -density residential development patterns in the community. Specifically, building pad coverage (46.2%) is well in excess of the Planning Commission's general guidelines RESOLUTION NO. 94-18 • • PAGE 2 • (30% to 35%) and thus, will cause overdevelopment of the building pad. The pad is smaller and steeper than several neighboring developments. B. The project does not substantially preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building pad coverage. Lot coverage requirements are regarded as maximums, and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted depends upon the existing buildable area of the lot. The project will establish maximum structural coverage on the building pad so that coverage will be 46.2% which the Planning Commission finds to be excessive and not consistent with most of the existing development pattern in the City. C. The proposed development is not harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated in Paragraphs A and B, the proposed project is not consistent nor compatible with the scale and size of the existing building pad on the site. Overdevelopment and infill on the building pad will reduce the existing spaciousness of the residence on the pad. Section 9. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby denies the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 511 for the construction of substantial room additions and garage space at an existing single family residence as shown on the development plan incorporated herein as Exhibit A. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 7TH DAY OF JULY, 1994. ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: ram__ MARILYN FERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 94-18 0 PAGE 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) SS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 94-18 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DENYING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SUBSTANTIAL' ROOM ADDITIONS AND GARAGE SPACE AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 511. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on July 7, 1994 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Frost, Hankins, Raine and Chairman Roberts NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. - .L ) DEPUTY CITY CLERK • u O %Certified ❑ COD '//5C4o ''©,Q 7 y 0 Express Mail ❑Merchandise Return Receipt for 7. Date of Delivery PQcesacee,gidReVil j�"oa�d Est pL 7 i3- C( d on the reverse side? PS Form 3800, June 1985 P 852 865 120 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) Sent to /� mod' v- %17is . Veo %%urrP/I Street nd Now. , A fed Ste and ZIP Code O/ i11.3}AILS Cam . 90�7Y 040 Postage Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt showing to whom and Date Delivered Return Receipt showing to whom, I Date, and Addrrs;of Delivery TOTA(PoStage and es. Po(t nark or Dale ,,—• SENDER: • Complete Items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. • Complete items 3, and 4a & b. • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can return this card to you. • Attach this form to the front of the maitpiece, or on the back if space does not permit. • Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece below the article number. • The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date delivered. 3. Article Addressed to: I also wish to receive the following services (for an extra u fee): •� 1. 0 Addressee's Address 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery •tu Consult postmaster for fee. 4a. Article Number air• Y `%ir5- Get,r 4e MU Yre._I / C� / Q E 4v. aervtce i ype o /' ❑ Registered ❑ Insured • m Cc a c y 0 w 0 cc 5. Signature (Addressee) 1 8. Addressee's Address (Onty if requested . ro tt7 l— and fee is paid) nature (Agent) A 5- Form 3811, December ttErS1 * U.S.G.P.O.: 1992-307-530 DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT • City ofielinv June 24, 1994 Dr. and Mrs. George A. Murrell 6 Packsaddle Road East Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX (310) 377.7288 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 511, a request for Site Plan Review to permit the construction of substantial room additions and garage space at an existing single family residence at 6 Packsaddle Road East (Lot 31-SF). Dear Dr. and Mrs. Murrell: This letter shall serve as official notification that Zoning Case No. 511 was DENIED by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on June 21, 1994. The final Resolution of DENIAL will be forwarded to you after it is signed by the Planning Commission Chairman and City Clerk. The Planning Commission's decision will be reported to the City Council at their regular meeting on July 11, 1994. You should also be aware that the decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed within thirty (301 days after adoption of the Planning Commission's Resolution (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, AI LOLA M. UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLANNER cc: Ms. Vicky Barbieri & Associates AIA ca Printed on Recycled Paper. GEORGE A. MURRELL, D.D.S. May 2, 1994 • • GEORGE A. MURRELL, D.D.S., INC. 1101 SEPULVEDA BLVD.. SUITE 200 MANHATFAN BEACH, CALIFORNIA 90266 (310) 545.0061 Ms. Lola M. Ungar, Principal Planner Planning Commission 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 JOHN A. MURRELL. D.D.S. p5t7,41M MAY 0 2 1994 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Dear Ms. Ungar: Anne-Merelie and I were looking forward to seeing the members of the Planning Commission on our site visit. Unfortunately, we regret we cannot be present on Saturday, May 7, 1994, because we must attend an Academy of Prosthodontics annual scientific meeting in Florida at that time. These meetings are planned several years in advance; our airline tickets had to be purchased and hotel reservations made several months ago. In lieu of our being there, we have arranged for our architect, Ms. Vicki Barbieri, to be present to explain the project and answer any questions you may have. I hope this will be satisfactory to the Planning Commission, and again, I apologize for this unavoidable conflict in schedules. Sincerely, George A. Murrell • • CL1f1O /eof/tni INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 April 26, 1994 Dr. & Mrs. George A. Murrell 6 Packsaddle Road East Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 511. 6 Packsaddle Road East (Lot 31-SF) Dear Dr. & Mrs. Murrell: We have arranged for the Planning Commission to conduct a field inspection of your property to view a silhouette of the proposed project on Saturday. May 7. 1994. The Planning Commission will meet at 7:30 A.M. at 9 Open Brand Road and then proceed to the other scheduled project sites. Do not expect the Commission at 7:30 A.M., but be assured that the field trip will take place before 9:30 A.M. The site must be prepared with a full-size silhouette of the proposed proiect showing the roof ridge and bearing walls. We have enclosed Silhouette Construction Guidelines. The owner and/or representative should be present to answer any questions regarding the proposal. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, 244f4-1--- LOLA M. UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLANNER LMU.mjs Fieldtr.mur Attachment: Silhouette Construction Guidelines cc: Ms. Vicky Barbieri & Associates AIA ®Printed on Recycled Paper. • • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX (213) 377-7288 SILHOUETTE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES 1. When required by the Planning Commission or City Council, a silhouette of proposed construction should be erected for the week preceding the designated Planning Commission or City Council meeting. The Silhouette shall not remain erected for a period longer than one week unless directed by the Planning Commission or City Council. 2. Silhouettes should be constructed with 2" x 4" lumber. Printed boards are not acceptable. 3. Bracing should be provided where possible. 4. Wire, twine or other suitable material should be used to delineate roof ridges and eaves. 5. Small pieces of cloth or flags should be attached to the wire or twine to aid in the visualization of the proposed construction. 6. The application may be delayed if inaccurate or incomplete silhouettes are constructed. 7. If you have any futher questions contact the Planning Department Staff at (213) 377-1521. iiV V••. 411 • • ::00 SECTION 1 41 1 1 PLAN 41 • • City ofieotting NOTIFICATION LETTER March 30, 1994 Dr. and Mrs. George A. Murrell 6 Packsaddle Road East Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX (310) 377.7288 SUBJECT: Zoning Case No. 511, Request for Site Plan Review to permit the construction of substantial room additions and garage space at an existing single family residence at 6 Packsaddle Road East (Lot 31-SF). Dear Dr. and Mrs. Murrell: Your application for Zoning Case No. 511 has been set for public hearing consideration by the Planning Commission at their meeting on Monday, April 18, 1994. (For this meeting only the Commission will meet on a Monday. The usual Planning Commission meeting date is the third Tuesday of the month). The meeting will begin at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers,. Rolling Hills City Hall Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You or your designated representative must attend to present your project and to answer questions. The staff report for this project will be available at the City Hall after 3:00 PM on Friday, April 15, 1994. Please arrange to pick up the staff report to preview it prior to the hearing. Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, (144' if. r-- LOLA M. UNGA PRINCIPAL PLA NER cc: Ms. Vicky Barbieri & Associates AIA ca Printed on Recycled Paper, • C1iy o/ eo een9 _Afro STATUS OF APPLICATION March 21, 1994 Dr. and Mrs. George A. Murrell 6 Packsaddle Road East Rolling Hills, CA 90274 a INCORPORATED JANUARY 24 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX (310) 377.7288 SUBJECT: Zoning Case No. 511, Request for Site Plan Review to permit the construction of substantial room additions and garage space at an existing single family residence at 6 Packsaddle Road East (Lot 31-SF). Dear Dr. and Mrs. Murrell: Pursuant to state law the City's staff has completed a preliminary review of the application noted above and finds that the information submitted is: X Not complete. The application has been held in abeyance because certain information is missing, you failed to comply with certain requirements, or both. The information needed to complete the application is listed below, and must be supplied before the application can be deemed complete. For further information, please call (310) 377-1521. Additional Information/Requirements: 1. Please provide Property owner's radius map and property owner's labels. A map is required showing the existing properties, within or partially within a 1,000 foot radius of the exterior boundaries of the property under consideration, including the subject property. Prepare three complete lists of property owners of each parcel with mailing address on labels. Assign a number to each name on the list to correspond with the map numbers. Please provide this information by April 4, 1994. Feel free to call me if you have any questions at (310) 377-1521. Sincerely, LOLA UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLANNER cc: Ms. Vicky Barbieri & Associates AIA ®Printed on Recycled Paper.